Product full life cycle carbon cost accounting method and system and electronic equipment
By employing a full lifecycle carbon cost accounting method, the problem of fragmented data across the entire lifecycle of corporate carbon emission management and cost accounting is solved, enabling the quantification and optimization of the full lifecycle carbon footprint and supporting the sustainable development of enterprises in a carbon-neutral context.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202511392606.9
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-09-26
- Publication Date
- 2026-01-13
AI Technical Summary
In existing technologies, enterprises face problems such as fragmented data throughout the entire lifecycle, lack of financial conversion of carbon costs, and simplistic decision-making models in carbon emission management and cost accounting, resulting in incomplete carbon footprint tracking and insufficient economic benefit assessment of emission reduction plans.
This paper provides a method for calculating carbon costs throughout the entire product lifecycle. By obtaining carbon emissions and cost factors at different stages of the lifecycle, and combining carbon quotas, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs, the paper calculates and optimizes the carbon emission costs throughout the entire lifecycle, and uses linear programming or genetic algorithms for decision optimization.
It enables complete tracking and quantification of carbon footprint throughout its entire lifecycle, supporting enterprises' sustainable development in a carbon-neutral context, reducing carbon costs, and meeting ESG compliance requirements.
Smart Images

Figure CN121329449A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of carbon cost accounting technology, and more specifically, to a method, system, and electronic device for carbon cost accounting throughout the product lifecycle. Background Technology
[0002] Driven by the "dual carbon" goals, enterprises face the dual challenges of carbon emission management and cost accounting: 1. Deficiencies in traditional cost accounting: Existing financial systems only account for explicit production costs (raw materials, labor, equipment), failing to include implicit environmental costs (such as carbon quota purchase fees and the potential impact of carbon tariffs), leading to product pricing deviating from true social costs (e.g., a car manufacturer failed to account for carbon emissions in its supply chain, resulting in 12% of its actual carbon costs going unrecognized). 2. Fragmented carbon footprint tracking: Most enterprises can only account for carbon emissions in the production process (e.g., factory energy consumption), lacking full-chain coverage of upstream raw material mining (e.g., carbon emissions from steel smelting) and downstream logistics recycling (e.g., product waste disposal), resulting in "gaps" in carbon data. 3. Insufficient ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) decision support: The economic benefit assessment of emission reduction schemes (e.g., switching to low-carbon packaging, investing in photovoltaic equipment) relies on qualitative analysis, lacking quantitative tools (e.g., the difference in the marginal contribution of different emission reduction schemes to products cannot be accurately measured).
[0003] Among related technologies, carbon footprint accounting faces the following technical bottlenecks: 1. Fragmented data across the entire lifecycle: Data from the procurement end (supplier carbon performance) and the recycling end (reverse logistics carbon emissions) are not integrated, and the accounting boundary is limited to within the enterprise; 2. Lack of financial conversion of carbon costs: The mapping relationship between carbon quotas, carbon taxes and product costs has not been established (e.g., the specific impact of the EU carbon border tax on the cost of exported products cannot be quantified); 3. Simplified decision-making model: Only carbon footprint reports are provided, without linking financial indicators (such as marginal contribution and net profit), which cannot support the economic comparison of emission reduction schemes.
[0004] Therefore, a method for calculating the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire life cycle is needed. Summary of the Invention
[0005] This invention proposes a method, system, and electronic device for calculating the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire life cycle, in order to solve the problem of how to calculate the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire life cycle under a carbon neutrality background.
[0006] To address the aforementioned problems, according to one aspect of the present invention, a method for calculating the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire life cycle is provided, the method comprising:
[0007] The carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle are obtained based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle.
[0008] Determine the carbon cost factors at different stages of the life cycle;
[0009] The carbon emission cost for each stage of the life cycle is determined based on the carbon emissions at each stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor.
[0010] The total cost of carbon emissions is determined by summing the carbon emission costs at each stage of the life cycle.
[0011] Preferably, the different life cycle stages include: procurement, production, logistics, use, and recycling.
[0012] Preferably, obtaining the carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle based on carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle includes:
[0013] In the procurement process, the carbon emissions from procurement are determined based on the formula: "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement quantity × Unit carbon emission factor".
[0014] In the production process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Production carbon emissions = equipment energy consumption × electricity carbon emission factor + waste disposal volume × waste carbon emission factor".
[0015] In the logistics process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Logistics carbon emissions = Acquisition weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor".
[0016] During the usage phase, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Usage carbon emissions = Driving mileage × Unit power consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor".
[0017] In the recycling process, the amount of carbon emissions recovered is determined based on the formula: "Recovered carbon emissions = Waste disposal amount × Disposal emission factor - Recycled material amount × Material production emission reduction factor".
[0018] Preferably, determining the carbon cost factor for different life cycle stages includes:
[0019] Carbon cost factors for different lifecycle stages are determined based on carbon allowance costs, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs.
[0020] Preferably, the carbon emission cost for each life cycle stage is determined based on the carbon emissions at each stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor, including:
[0021] For any lifecycle stage i, based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The method for determining carbon emission costs is as follows:
[0022] Among them, H iThe carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
[0023] Preferably, the method further includes:
[0024] The carbon emission costs and total carbon emission costs for each stage of the life cycle are presented according to different dimensions.
[0025] Preferably, the method further includes:
[0026] Determine the carbon cost objective function and business constraints, and use linear programming or genetic algorithms for optimization to optimize all stages of the product lifecycle;
[0027] The carbon cost objective function is to minimize the total cost of carbon emissions; the business constraints include production scale constraints, supply chain cycle constraints, and carbon emission reduction constraints.
[0028] According to another aspect of the present invention, a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system is provided, the system comprising:
[0029] The carbon emission calculation unit is used to obtain the carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle.
[0030] The carbon cost factor determination unit is used to determine the carbon cost factor at different stages of the life cycle.
[0031] The carbon emission cost determination unit is used to determine the carbon emission cost of each life cycle stage based on the carbon emission amount and the corresponding carbon cost factor at each stage of the life cycle.
[0032] The total cost determination unit is used to determine the total carbon emission cost based on the sum of the carbon emission costs at each stage of the life cycle.
[0033] Preferably, the different life cycle stages include: procurement, production, logistics, use, and recycling.
[0034] Preferably, the carbon emission calculation unit obtains the carbon emissions of the product at different stages of its life cycle based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle, including:
[0035] In the procurement process, the carbon emissions from procurement are determined based on the formula: "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement quantity × Unit carbon emission factor".
[0036] In the production process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Production carbon emissions = equipment energy consumption × electricity carbon emission factor + waste disposal volume × waste carbon emission factor".
[0037] In the logistics process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Logistics carbon emissions = Acquisition weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor".
[0038] During the usage phase, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Usage carbon emissions = Driving mileage × Unit power consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor".
[0039] In the recycling process, the amount of carbon emissions recovered is determined based on the formula: "Recovered carbon emissions = Waste disposal amount × Disposal emission factor - Recycled material amount × Material production emission reduction factor".
[0040] Preferably, the carbon cost factor determination unit determines the carbon cost factors for different life cycle stages, including:
[0041] Carbon cost factors for different lifecycle stages are determined based on carbon allowance costs, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs.
[0042] Preferably, the carbon emission cost determination unit determines the carbon emission cost for each life cycle stage based on the carbon emission amount and the corresponding carbon cost factor for each life cycle stage, including:
[0043] For any lifecycle stage i, based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The method for determining carbon emission costs is as follows:
[0044] Among them, H i The carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
[0045] Preferably, the system further includes:
[0046] The visualization unit is used to display the carbon emission costs and total carbon emission costs for each stage of the life cycle according to different dimensions.
[0047] Preferably, the system further includes:
[0048] The optimization unit is used to determine the carbon cost objective function and business constraints, and to optimize the entire product life cycle using linear programming or genetic algorithms.
[0049] The carbon cost objective function is to minimize the total cost of carbon emissions; the business constraints include production scale constraints, supply chain cycle constraints, and carbon emission reduction constraints.
[0050] Based on another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the steps of a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting method.
[0051] According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides an electronic device, comprising:
[0052] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium; and
[0053] One or more processors for executing a program in the computer-readable storage medium.
[0054] This invention provides a method, system, storage medium, and electronic device for calculating the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire lifecycle. The method includes: obtaining the carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its lifecycle based on carbon emission factors at each stage; determining the carbon cost factors for different stages of the lifecycle; determining the carbon cost for each stage of the lifecycle based on the carbon emissions and corresponding carbon cost factors; and determining the total carbon cost based on the sum of the carbon cost costs for each stage of the lifecycle. This invention enables the tracking of a product's carbon footprint throughout its entire lifecycle, providing core technological support for enterprises' sustainable development in a carbon-neutral context, and possesses significant technological innovation and industry application value. Attached Figure Description
[0055] Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be more fully understood by referring to the following figures:
[0056] Figure 1 A flowchart of a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting method 100 provided according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
[0057] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the structure of a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system 200 provided according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
[0058] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device 300 provided in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation
[0059] Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are merely some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments described herein.
[0060] It should be noted that, unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement, numerical expressions, and values of the components and steps described in these embodiments do not limit the scope of the invention.
[0061] Those skilled in the art will understand that the terms "first," "second," etc., in the embodiments of the present invention are only used to distinguish different steps, devices, or modules, and do not represent any specific technical meaning, nor do they indicate a necessary logical order between them.
[0062] It should also be understood that in the embodiments of the present invention, "multiple" can refer to two or more, and "at least one" can refer to one, two or more.
[0063] It should also be understood that any component, data or structure mentioned in the embodiments of the present invention can generally be understood as one or more unless explicitly defined or given contrary instructions in the context.
[0064] Furthermore, the term "and / or" in this invention is merely a description of the relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A existing alone, A and B existing simultaneously, or B existing alone. Additionally, the character " / " in this invention generally indicates that the preceding and following related objects have an "or" relationship.
[0065] It should also be understood that the description of the various embodiments in this invention emphasizes the differences between the various embodiments, and the similarities or similarities can be referred to each other. For the sake of brevity, they will not be described in detail.
[0066] At the same time, it should be understood that, for ease of description, the dimensions of the various parts shown in the accompanying drawings are not drawn according to actual scale.
[0067] The following description of at least one exemplary embodiment is merely illustrative and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its application or use.
[0068] Techniques, methods, and equipment known to those skilled in the art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, they should be considered part of the specification.
[0069] It should be noted that similar labels and letters in the following figures indicate similar items; therefore, once an item is defined in one figure, it does not need to be discussed further in subsequent figures.
[0070] The embodiments of this invention can be applied to electronic devices such as terminal devices, computer systems, and servers, and can operate together with a wide range of other general-purpose or special-purpose computing system environments or configurations. Well-known examples of terminal devices, computing systems, environments, and / or configurations suitable for use with electronic devices such as terminal devices, computer systems, and servers include, but are not limited to: personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, handheld or laptop devices, microprocessor-based systems, set-top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments including any of the above systems, etc.
[0071] Electronic devices such as terminal devices, computer systems, and servers can be described in the general context of computer system executable instructions (such as program modules) executed by a computer system. Typically, program modules can include routines, programs, object programs, components, logic, data structures, etc., which perform specific tasks or implement specific abstract data types. Computer systems / servers can be implemented in distributed cloud computing environments, where tasks are executed by remote processing devices linked through communication networks. In distributed cloud computing environments, program modules can reside on local or remote computing system storage media, including storage devices.
[0072] Exemplary methods
[0073] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting method 100 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The method of this embodiment can track the carbon footprint of a product throughout its entire lifecycle, providing core technological support for enterprises' sustainable development in a carbon-neutral context, and possesses significant technological innovation and industry application value. This embodiment can be applied to electronic devices, such as... Figure 1 As shown, it includes the following steps:
[0074] In step 101, the carbon emissions of the product at different stages of its life cycle are obtained based on the carbon emission factors of the product at different stages of its life cycle.
[0075] Preferably, the different life cycle stages include: procurement, production, logistics, use, and recycling.
[0076] Preferably, obtaining the carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle based on carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle includes:
[0077] In the procurement process, the carbon emissions from procurement are determined based on the formula: "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement quantity × Unit carbon emission factor".
[0078] In the production link, the production carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Production carbon emissions = Equipment energy consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor + Scrap treatment volume × Scrap carbon emission factor".
[0079] In the logistics link, the logistics carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Logistics carbon emissions = Obtained weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor".
[0080] In the usage link, the usage carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Usage carbon emissions = Driving mileage × Unit power consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor".
[0081] In the recycling link, the recycling carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Recycling carbon emissions = Scrap disposal volume × Treatment emission factor - Recycled material volume × Material production emission reduction factor".
[0082] In the embodiments of the present invention, data is collected from five dimensions of procurement, production, logistics, usage, and recycling and the carbon emissions are calculated.
[0083] Specifically, in the procurement link, it is connected to the supplier system, blockchain nodes are deployed, and the supplier raw material carbon emission data is obtained through blockchain technology, and the procurement carbon emissions are calculated. Among them, the procurement carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement volume × Unit carbon emission factor". For example, steel smelting carbon emissions = Procurement volume (tons) × Unit carbon emission factor (such as 2.3 tons CO2e / ton of steel). In addition, it can also require the supplier to upload data in an associated manner according to "Product - Raw material - Carbon emission" to generate a "carbon traceability file" in association with the procurement order.
[0084] Specifically, in the production link, edge computing gateways are deployed on equipment such as injection molding machines and lathes, the energy consumption data and scrap treatment carbon emission factors are collected on a second-by-second basis, and the production carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Production carbon emissions = Equipment energy consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor + Scrap treatment volume × Scrap carbon emission factor". For example, if the electricity carbon emission factor is 0.8 kgCO2e / kWh, the scrap carbon emission factor is 0.5 kgCO2e / kg, the injection molding machine consumes 50 kWh of electricity in 1 hour, and the scrap is 30 kg, then the production carbon emissions can be determined as 50×0.8 + 30×0.5 = 55 kgCO2e.
[0085] Specifically, in the logistics link, it is connected to the transportation management system TMS, the carbon intensity factor is calculated according to the transportation mode (sea / air / land transportation) (such as 0.15 tons CO2e of emissions per ton of goods per kilometer for sea transportation), and then the logistics carbon emissions are determined based on the formula "Logistics carbon emissions = Obtained weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor". For example, for 10 tons of goods transported by sea for 1000 kilometers, the logistics carbon emissions = 10×1000×0.15 = 1500 kgCO2e.
[0086] Specifically, during the usage phase, energy consumption is collected through product network data (such as the carbon emissions corresponding to the electric vehicle's driving range) or user surveys. The carbon emissions are then determined based on the formula: "Usage carbon emissions = Driving distance × Unit energy consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor". For example, taking an electric vehicle as an example, with a unit energy consumption of 0.15 kWh / km and an electricity carbon emission factor of 0.8 kg CO2e / kWh, driving 1000 km would result in usage carbon emissions of 1000 × 0.15 × 0.8 = 120 kg CO2e.
[0087] Specifically, in the recycling stage, recycling IoT tags (such as RFID UHF tags) are deployed to record the disposal process (dismantling and recycling stages). The amount of carbon emissions recovered is determined based on the formula: "Recovered carbon emissions = Disposal volume × Disposal emission factor - Recycled material volume × Material production emission reduction factor". For example, if the disposal emission factor is 0.3 kg CO2e / kg and the material production emission reduction factor is 2.0 kg CO2e / kg, and 100 kg of lithium batteries are recycled and 50 kg are reused, then the recovered carbon emissions = 100 × 0.3 - 50 × 2.0 = -70 kg CO2e (the negative sign indicates emission reduction).
[0088] In embodiments of the present invention, a product carbon footprint database can also be constructed based on the LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) standard, and five-dimensional data can be integrated by SKU (such as a certain type of cable) to generate a "full life cycle carbon emission inventory".
[0089] In step 102, the carbon cost factors for different life cycle stages are determined.
[0090] Preferably, determining the carbon cost factor for different life cycle stages includes:
[0091] Carbon cost factors for different lifecycle stages are determined based on carbon allowance costs, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs.
[0092] In embodiments of this invention, carbon allowance costs (e.g., a local carbon trading market price of 80 yuan / ton CO2e), carbon taxes (e.g., the EU carbon tax of 100 euros / ton CO2e, equivalent to 780 yuan / ton), and carbon removal costs (e.g., CCUS technology costs of 200 yuan / ton CO2e) are integrated to form a dynamically updated cost factor library (synchronized with carbon market data monthly). Different cost factors can be configured for different stages; for example, the production stage can be prioritized with carbon taxes as a carbon cost factor, while the logistics stage can be prioritized with carbon allowances as a carbon cost factor.
[0093] In step 103, the carbon emission cost of each life cycle stage is determined based on the carbon emission amount of each life cycle stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor.
[0094] Preferably, the carbon emission cost for each life cycle stage is determined based on the carbon emissions at each stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor, including:
[0095] For any lifecycle stage i, based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The method for determining carbon emission costs is as follows:
[0096] Among them, H i The carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
[0097] In step 104, the total carbon emission cost is determined based on the sum of the carbon emission costs of each life cycle stage.
[0098] In embodiments of the present invention, the carbon emission cost of each stage is obtained by multiplying the carbon emission amount of each stage by the corresponding carbon cost factor and dividing by 1000, i.e., based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The carbon emission cost is determined in a way that allows H to be used as an indicator; among which, H i The carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
[0099] Taking the procurement process as an example, the carbon emission cost of procurement = carbon emission amount procured (kgCO2e) ÷ 1000 × carbon quota price (yuan / tonCO2e). For example, if the carbon emission amount procured is 230 kgCO2e, then the carbon emission cost of procurement = 230 ÷ 1000 × 80 = 18.4 yuan.
[0100] In embodiments of the present invention, the sum of the carbon emission costs of each stage is the total carbon emission cost.
[0101] Preferably, the method further includes:
[0102] The carbon emission costs and total carbon emission costs for each stage of the life cycle are presented according to different dimensions.
[0103] In embodiments of this invention, a BI dashboard (such as Power BI or Tableau) is developed to display carbon cost distribution across multiple dimensions: "product-process-cost type," supporting drill-down analysis (e.g., drilling down from "total carbon cost" to "carbon cost of a specific SKU's production process"). Visualized indicators include: a carbon cost percentage pie chart (the proportion of carbon cost at each stage to the total carbon cost); a carbon cost trend line chart (monthly / quarterly carbon cost changes, compared to changes in business volume); and a carbon cost heatmap (displaying carbon cost density by SKU / product line, identifying high-carbon products).
[0104] Preferably, the method further includes:
[0105] Determine the carbon cost objective function and business constraints, and use linear programming or genetic algorithms for optimization to optimize all stages of the product lifecycle;
[0106] The carbon cost objective function is to minimize the total cost of carbon emissions; the business constraints include production scale constraints, supply chain cycle constraints, and carbon emission reduction constraints.
[0107] In embodiments of the present invention, carbon cost optimization decisions can also be made. Specifically, based on linear programming (LP) or genetic algorithm (GA), the inputs are "carbon cost target (e.g., a 10% reduction)" and "business constraints (e.g., production scale, supply chain cycle)", and the outputs are optimization solutions (e.g., replacing low-carbon suppliers, adjusting transportation methods, improving production processes).
[0108] The decision-making model includes the following: the objective function is MinΣ(carbon cost at each stage), and the constraints are: 1. Production scale constraint: output ≥ market demand (e.g., 1000 units / month); 2. Supply chain cycle constraint: for example, procurement-production-logistics cycle ≤ 30 days; 3. Carbon emission reduction constraint: for example, total carbon emissions ≤ baseline value × (1-10%).
[0109] In embodiments of the present invention, data can be re-collected and carbon costs calculated quarterly based on the optimization scheme output by the decision model (such as replacing supplier A with low-carbon supplier B) to verify the optimization effect (such as a 15% reduction in carbon procurement costs after replacement), forming a closed loop of "optimization-verification-re-optimization".
[0110] The advantages of this invention are:
[0111] 1. Full lifecycle coverage: Accounting for the entire chain from procurement to recycling, adapting to the carbon neutrality "full life cycle emission reduction" requirements, and ensuring that no carbon costs are overlooked.
[0112] 2. Deep integration of business and finance: Convert carbon emissions into financially quantifiable costs (such as carbon tax and carbon quotas) to solve the pain point of "difficulty in financializing environmental costs" under the carbon neutrality goal.
[0113] 3. Dynamic optimization: Through decision-making models and closed-loop management, carbon costs are continuously reduced, helping enterprises achieve the dual goals of "cost reduction + emission reduction" in the context of carbon neutrality, and meeting ESG compliance requirements.
[0114] Exemplary device
[0115] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the structure of a product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system 200 provided according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 As shown, the product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system 200 of this embodiment includes: a carbon emission calculation unit 201, a carbon cost factor determination unit 202, a carbon emission cost determination unit 203, and a total cost determination unit 204.
[0116] Preferably, the carbon emission calculation unit 201 is used to obtain the carbon emission of the product at different stages of its life cycle based on the carbon emission factors of the product at different stages of its life cycle.
[0117] Preferably, the different life cycle stages include: procurement, production, logistics, use, and recycling.
[0118] Preferably, the carbon emission calculation unit 201 obtains the carbon emissions of the product at different stages of its life cycle based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle, including:
[0119] In the procurement process, the carbon emissions from procurement are determined based on the formula: "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement quantity × Unit carbon emission factor".
[0120] In the production process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Production carbon emissions = equipment energy consumption × electricity carbon emission factor + waste disposal volume × waste carbon emission factor".
[0121] In the logistics process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Logistics carbon emissions = Acquisition weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor".
[0122] During the usage phase, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Usage carbon emissions = Driving mileage × Unit power consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor".
[0123] In the recycling process, the amount of carbon emissions recovered is determined based on the formula: "Recovered carbon emissions = Waste disposal amount × Disposal emission factor - Recycled material amount × Material production emission reduction factor".
[0124] Preferably, the carbon cost factor determination unit 202 is used to determine the carbon cost factor for different life cycle stages.
[0125] Preferably, the carbon cost factor determination unit 202 determines the carbon cost factors for different life cycle stages, including:
[0126] Carbon cost factors for different lifecycle stages are determined based on carbon allowance costs, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs.
[0127] Preferably, the carbon emission cost determination unit 203 is used to determine the carbon emission cost of each life cycle stage based on the carbon emission amount of each life cycle stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor.
[0128] Preferably, the carbon emission cost determination unit 203 determines the carbon emission cost of each life cycle stage based on the carbon emission amount of each life cycle stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor, including:
[0129] For any lifecycle stage i, based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The method for determining carbon emission costs is as follows:
[0130] Among them, H i The carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
[0131] Preferably, the total cost determination unit 204 is used to determine the total carbon emission cost based on the sum of the carbon emission costs of each life cycle stage.
[0132] Preferably, the system further includes:
[0133] The visualization unit is used to display the carbon emission costs and total carbon emission costs for each stage of the life cycle according to different dimensions.
[0134] Preferably, the system further includes:
[0135] The optimization unit is used to determine the carbon cost objective function and business constraints, and to optimize the entire product life cycle using linear programming or genetic algorithms.
[0136] The carbon cost objective function is to minimize the total cost of carbon emissions; the business constraints include production scale constraints, supply chain cycle constraints, and carbon emission reduction constraints.
[0137] The product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system 200 of this invention corresponds to the product lifecycle carbon cost accounting method 100 of another embodiment of this invention, and will not be described again here.
[0138] Exemplary electronic devices
[0139] Figure 3 This is the structure of an electronic device provided in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The electronic device may be either or both of a first device and a second device, or a standalone device independent of them, which may communicate with the first device and the second device to receive acquired input signals from them. Figure 3 A block diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure is shown. Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device 300 includes one or more processors 301 and memory 302.
[0140] The processor 301 may be a central processing unit (CPU) or other form of processing unit with data processing capabilities and / or instruction execution capabilities, and may control other components in the electronic device to perform desired functions.
[0141] The memory 302 may include one or more computer program products, which may include various forms of computer-readable storage media, such as volatile memory and / or non-volatile memory. The volatile memory may include, for example, random access memory (RAM) and / or cache memory. The non-volatile memory may include, for example, read-only memory (ROM), hard disk, flash memory, etc. One or more computer program instructions may be stored on the computer-readable storage medium, and the processor 301 may execute the program instructions to implement the methods of the software programs of the various embodiments of this disclosure described above, and / or other desired functions. In one example, the electronic device may further include an input device 303 and an output device 304, these components being interconnected via a bus system and / or other forms of connection mechanisms (not shown).
[0142] In addition, the input device 303 may also include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, etc.
[0143] The output device 304 can output various information to the outside. The output device 304 may include, for example, a display, a speaker, a printer, and a communication network and its connected remote output devices, etc.
[0144] Of course, for the sake of simplicity, Figure 3 Only some of the components of the electronic device relevant to this disclosure are shown, omitting components such as buses, input / output interfaces, etc. In addition, the electronic device may include any other suitable components depending on the specific application.
[0145] Exemplary computer program products and computer-readable storage media
[0146] In addition to the methods and apparatus described above, embodiments of this disclosure may also be computer program products comprising computer program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps of the methods according to various embodiments of this disclosure as described in the "Exemplary Methods" section above.
[0147] The computer program product can be written in any combination of one or more programming languages to perform the operations of the embodiments of this disclosure. The programming languages include object-oriented programming languages such as Java and C++, as well as conventional procedural programming languages such as C or similar languages. The program code can be executed entirely on a user's computing device, partially on a user's computing device, as a standalone software package, partially on a user's computing device and partially on a remote computing device, or entirely on a remote computing device or server.
[0148] Furthermore, embodiments of this disclosure may also be computer-readable storage media having computer program instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps in the methods according to various embodiments of this disclosure described in the "Exemplary Methods" section above.
[0149] The computer-readable storage medium may be any combination of one or more readable media. A readable medium may be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. A readable storage medium may, for example, include, but is not limited to, electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatuses, or devices, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of readable storage media (a non-exhaustive list) include: electrical connections having one or more wires, portable disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fibers, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination thereof.
[0150] The basic principles of this disclosure have been described above with reference to specific embodiments. However, it should be noted that the advantages, benefits, and effects mentioned in this disclosure are merely examples and not limitations, and should not be considered as essential features of each embodiment of this disclosure. Furthermore, the specific details disclosed above are for illustrative and facilitative purposes only, and are not limitations. These details do not limit the scope of this disclosure to the necessity of employing the aforementioned specific details for implementation.
[0151] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, with each embodiment focusing on its differences from other embodiments. Similar or identical parts between embodiments can be referred to interchangeably. For system embodiments, since they largely correspond to method embodiments, the description is relatively simple; relevant parts can be referred to the descriptions in the method embodiments.
[0152] The block diagrams of devices, apparatuses, devices, and systems disclosed herein are merely illustrative examples and are not intended to require or imply that they must be connected, arranged, or configured in the manner shown in the block diagrams. As those skilled in the art will recognize, these devices, apparatuses, devices, and systems can be connected, arranged, and configured in any manner. Words such as “comprising,” “including,” “having,” etc., are open-ended terms meaning “including but not limited to,” and are used interchangeably with them. The terms “or” and “and” as used herein refer to the terms “and / or,” and are used interchangeably with them unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “such as” as used herein refers to the phrase “such as but not limited to,” and is used interchangeably with it.
[0153] The methods and apparatus of this disclosure may be implemented in many ways. For example, they may be implemented by software, hardware, firmware, or any combination of software, hardware, and firmware. The above-described order of steps for the methods is for illustrative purposes only, and the steps of the methods of this disclosure are not limited to the order specifically described above unless otherwise specifically stated. Furthermore, in some embodiments, this disclosure may also be implemented as a program recorded on a recording medium, the program including machine-readable instructions for implementing the methods according to this disclosure. Thus, this disclosure also covers recording media storing programs for performing the methods according to this disclosure.
[0154] It should also be noted that in the apparatus, devices, and methods of this disclosure, the components or steps are decomposable and / or recombinable. Such decomposition and / or recombination should be considered equivalent to the present disclosure. The above description of the disclosed aspects is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use this disclosure. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein can be applied to other aspects without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Therefore, this disclosure is not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein, but rather to be carried out within the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
[0155] The above description has been given for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, this description is not intended to limit the embodiments of this disclosure to the forms disclosed herein. Although numerous exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those skilled in the art will recognize certain variations, modifications, alterations, additions, and sub-combinations therein.
Claims
1. A method for calculating the carbon cost of a product throughout its entire life cycle, characterized in that, The method includes: The carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle are obtained based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle. Determine the carbon cost factors at different stages of the life cycle; The carbon emission cost for each stage of the life cycle is determined based on the carbon emissions at each stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor. The total cost of carbon emissions is determined by summing the carbon emission costs at each stage of the life cycle.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Different lifecycle stages include: procurement, production, logistics, use, and recycling.
3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle are obtained based on the carbon emission factors at each stage of the product's life cycle, including: In the procurement process, the carbon emissions from procurement are determined based on the formula: "Procurement carbon emissions = Procurement quantity × Unit carbon emission factor". In the production process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Production carbon emissions = Equipment energy consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor + Waste disposal volume × Waste carbon emission factor". In the logistics process, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Logistics carbon emissions = Acquisition weight × Transportation distance × Carbon intensity factor". During the usage phase, the carbon emissions are determined based on the formula: "Usage carbon emissions = Driving mileage × Unit power consumption × Electricity carbon emission factor". In the recycling process, the amount of carbon emissions recovered is determined based on the formula: "Recovered carbon emissions = Waste disposal volume × Disposal emission factor - Recycled material volume × Material production emission reduction factor".
4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Determine the carbon cost factors for different stages of the life cycle, including: Carbon cost factors for different lifecycle stages are determined based on carbon allowance costs, carbon taxes, and carbon removal costs.
5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The carbon emission cost for each stage of the life cycle is determined based on the carbon emissions at each stage and the corresponding carbon cost factor, including: For any lifecycle stage i, based on "H i =T i ÷1000×S i The method for determining carbon emission costs is as follows: Among them, H i The carbon emission cost of any life cycle stage i; T i S represents the carbon emissions at any stage i in the life cycle; i Let i be the carbon cost factor corresponding to any life cycle stage i.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: The carbon emission costs and total carbon emission costs for each stage of the life cycle are presented according to different dimensions.
7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the carbon cost objective function and business constraints, and use linear programming or genetic algorithms for optimization to optimize all stages of the product lifecycle; The carbon cost objective function is to minimize the total cost of carbon emissions; the business constraints include production scale constraints, supply chain cycle constraints, and carbon emission reduction constraints.
8. A product lifecycle carbon cost accounting system, characterized in that, The system includes: The carbon emission calculation unit is used to obtain the carbon emissions of a product at different stages of its life cycle based on the carbon emission factors at different stages of the product's life cycle. The carbon cost factor determination unit is used to determine the carbon cost factor at different stages of the life cycle. The carbon emission cost determination unit is used to determine the carbon emission cost of each life cycle stage based on the carbon emission amount and the corresponding carbon cost factor at each stage of the life cycle. The total cost determination unit is used to determine the total carbon emission cost based on the sum of the carbon emission costs at each stage of the life cycle.
9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the method as described in any one of claims 1-7.
10. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: The computer-readable storage medium as described in claim 9; as well as One or more processors for executing a program in the computer-readable storage medium.