Gallery bridge switching scheduling method and system based on flight information

Abstract

The invention provides a corridor bridge switching scheduling method and system based on flight information, and belongs to the technical field of optimization scheduling, and the method specifically comprises the steps: calculating the corridor bridge usage duration of a related flight of the corridor bridge type switching frequency of an alternative scheduling scheme, and the deviation condition of the interval duration of the type switching process; determining deviation switching times in the gallery bridge type switching times, determining an optimal scheduling scheme in the alternative schemes according to deviation conditions of deviation switching times corresponding to each gallery bridge in the alternative scheduling schemes, and determining change conditions of historical passenger carrying data of associated flights in different gallery bridge type switching times of the optimal scheduling scheme. The optimal scheme in the optimal scheduling schemes is determined by combining the interval duration of different gallery bridge type switching times in the type switching process, and automatic switching processing of access control devices of different gallery bridges is performed by using the optimal scheme, so that the reliability of gallery bridge type switching control is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of optimized scheduling, and in particular relates to a flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling method and system. Background Art

[0002] The domestic / international convertible jet bridge can realize the universal management of domestic and international flights. During use, the flight support personnel can swipe open the corresponding access control according to the current flight and convert the jet bridge to the currently required support type.

[0003] However, with the increase in the number of flights, this traditional management method that mainly relies on manual labor has exposed some problems: First, there is a lack of an effective "fool-proof and error-correcting" judgment mechanism. The current judgment of whether the conversion is correct or not relies solely on manual labor, which is prone to port incidents such as "it should be an international bridge, but it is actually a domestic bridge." Second, the efficiency of bridge conversion is not high. On-site personnel need to repeatedly check the flight information before they can implement the conversion of the bridge type. Once an error occurs, they need to rework it.

[0004] Existing technical solutions, such as the invention patent CN202311619772.9 "Method, device, equipment and storage medium for allocating parking spaces at airports", realize the optimized scheduling and allocation of parking spaces. However, the domestic and international attributes of different parking spaces in the above technical solution are fixed, so the above technical problems do not exist and are not solved.

[0005] In response to the above technical problems, the present application specifically provides a method and system for jet bridge transfer scheduling based on flight information. Summary of the invention

[0006] To achieve the purpose of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions: In a first aspect, the present application provides a bridge transfer scheduling method based on flight information, specifically comprising: S1 determines available scheduling schemes for the jet bridges using the time of different types of flights, and determines alternative scheduling schemes in the available scheduling schemes based on type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling schemes and the interval duration of different type conversion processes; S2: Determine the deviation switching number in the number of bridge type switching according to the deviation of the bridge use time of the flight associated with the number of bridge type switching of the alternative scheduling scheme and the interval time of the type conversion process; S3, determining a preferred scheduling scheme among the alternative scheduling schemes according to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling schemes; S4 determines the changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights in the preferred scheduling scheme at different times of jet bridge type switching, and determines the optimal scheme in the preferred scheduling scheme in combination with the interval length of the different jet bridge type switching times during the type conversion process, and uses the optimal scheme to automatically switch the access control devices of different jet bridges.

[0007] The beneficial effects of the present invention are: The alternative scheduling schemes in the available scheduling schemes are determined based on the type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling schemes and the interval durations of different type conversion processes, thereby firstly realizing the screening of available scheduling schemes with fewer jet bridge type switching times and longer interval durations during the jet bridge type switching times, avoiding the occurrence of technical problems such as low reliability of jet bridge switching control due to a large number of switching times or a short interval duration, and ensuring that the jet bridges can meet the passenger disembarkation needs of different flights.

[0008] The optimal plan in the preferred scheduling scheme is determined based on the changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights in the different times of jet bridge type switching and the interval lengths of the different times of jet bridge type switching during the type conversion process. This avoids the technical problem that the preferred scheduling scheme cannot meet the flight's passenger disembarkation needs due to frequent changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights in the jet bridge type switching process. It ensures that the fluctuations in the historical passenger data of the associated flights with different times of jet bridge type switching in the optimal plan are within the preset range, thereby improving the reliability of the jet bridge's scheduling processing.

[0009] A further technical solution is that the types of flights include international flights and domestic flights.

[0010] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the available scheduling scheme of the corridor bridge is: With the constraint that different flights have corresponding jet bridges, the available jet bridges for different flights are determined based on the types and distribution periods of different flights and the distribution data of jet bridges; The available allocated bridges of different flights are combined to generate an available scheduling plan for the bridges.

[0011] A further technical solution is that the type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges between international types and domestic types.

[0012] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme in the available scheduling scheme is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme; Based on the intervals of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determine the type conversion times whose intervals are shorter than a preset interval; Based on the number of corridor bridges having type conversion times with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration, it is determined whether the available scheduling solution is an alternative scheduling solution.

[0013] A further technical solution is that when the number of corridors with type conversion times with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of corridors, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme.

[0014] A further technical solution is that changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights are determined based on deviations in the historical passenger volumes of the associated flights on different dates.

[0015] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is: Determine the historical passenger volume of the associated flights on different dates based on the changes in the historical passenger volume data of the associated flights in different times of bridge type switching, and determine the passenger volume fluctuation flights among the associated flights based on the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger volume on different dates does not meet the requirements; The number of bridge type switching times when the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuation flight is used as the fluctuation switching times, and the interval time of the fluctuation switching times during the type conversion process is used to determine the number of fluctuation switching times within a preset time interval; The optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is determined according to the number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

[0016] A further technical solution is that the optimal solution is a preferred scheduling solution with the minimum number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

[0017] A further technical solution is to use the optimal solution to automatically switch access control devices of different corridors, specifically including: Based on the optimal solution, determine the corresponding jet bridges for different flights; Automatic switching processing of the access control device of the jet bridge corresponding to the flight is performed according to the type of the flight.

[0018] In a second aspect, the present application provides a flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling system, which adopts the above-mentioned flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling method, specifically including: Alternative solution screening module, deviation switching analysis module, preferred solution determination module, access control device control module; The alternative scheme screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling schemes among the available scheduling schemes; The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times in the corridor bridge type switching times; The preferred solution determination module is responsible for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions; The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal solution among the preferred scheduling solutions, and using the optimal solution to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors.

[0019] Other features and advantages will be described in the following description. The objects and other advantages of the present invention are realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the description and drawings.

[0020] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings; Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a jet bridge transfer scheduling method based on flight information; Figure 2 is a flow chart of a method for determining an alternative scheduling solution among available scheduling solutions; Figure 3 is a flow chart of a method for determining the number of deviation switching times; Figure 4 is a flow chart of a method for determining a preferred scheduling solution among alternative solutions; Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining an optimal solution among preferred scheduling solutions; Figure 6 It is a framework diagram of a jet bridge transfer scheduling system based on flight information. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0022] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0023] The purpose of the present invention is to realize the scheduling processing of domestic / international convertible bridges, fully consider the number of type switching of different domestic / international convertible bridges in the scheduling processing, realize the screening of the optimal plan with less type switching number and lower passenger number fluctuation of associated flights with type switching number, and use the optimal plan to realize automatic switching processing of access control devices of different bridges.

[0024] With the constraint that different flights have corresponding jet bridges, the available jet bridges for different flights are determined according to the types and distribution periods of different flights and combined with the distribution data of jet bridges. The available jet bridges for different flights are combined to generate an available scheduling plan for the jet bridges.

[0025] The alternative scheduling scheme is an available scheduling scheme in which the number of corridor bridge type switching times is within a preset switching number range and the interval durations of different type conversion processes are all greater than a preset duration threshold.

[0026] Based on the jet bridge usage duration of flights associated with the jet bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling scheme on different dates, determine the date when the jet bridge usage duration is greater than the interval duration, and use it as the duration deviation date. When the proportion of the duration deviation dates is less than 0.2, it is determined that the jet bridge type switching times do not belong to the deviation switching times.

[0027] The preferred scheduling scheme is the alternative scheme in which the proportion of the number of corridor bridges with deviation switching times is less than 0.1.

[0028] The historical passenger capacity of the associated flights on different dates is determined based on the changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights in different times of jet bridge type switching. The associated flights whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger capacity on different dates does not meet the requirements are regarded as passenger-carrying fluctuation flights. The jet bridge type switching times of the associated flights as passenger-carrying fluctuation flights are regarded as the fluctuation switching times. The interval duration of the fluctuation switching times during the type conversion process is used to determine the fluctuation switching times within a preset time interval. The optimal scheduling plan with the smallest fluctuation switching times within the preset time interval is regarded as the optimal plan.

[0029] Example 1 Figure 1 As shown, the present application provides a bridge transfer scheduling method based on flight information, which specifically includes: S1 determines available scheduling schemes for the jet bridges using the time of different types of flights, and determines alternative scheduling schemes in the available scheduling schemes based on type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling schemes and the interval duration of different type conversion processes; Furthermore, the types of flights include international flights and domestic flights.

[0030] Specifically, the method for determining the available scheduling scheme of the corridor bridge is: With the constraint that different flights have corresponding jet bridges, the available jet bridges for different flights are determined based on the types and distribution periods of different flights and the distribution data of jet bridges; The available allocated bridges of different flights are combined to generate an available scheduling plan for the bridges.

[0031] Optionally, the type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges between international and domestic types.

[0032] It should be noted that if Figure 2 As shown, the method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme in the available scheduling scheme is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme; Based on the intervals of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determine the type conversion times whose intervals are shorter than a preset interval; Based on the number of corridor bridges having type conversion times with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration, it is determined whether the available scheduling solution is an alternative scheduling solution.

[0033] Further, when the number of corridors with a type conversion number whose interval duration is less than a preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of corridors, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme.

[0034] In another embodiment, the method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme in the available scheduling scheme is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme; Based on the intervals of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determine the type conversion times whose intervals are shorter than a preset interval; Based on the number of type conversions whose interval duration is less than a preset interval duration, it is determined whether the available scheduling scheme is an alternative scheduling scheme.

[0035] It should be noted that, when the number of type conversions whose interval duration is less than the preset interval duration does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme.

[0036] S2: Determine the deviation switching number in the number of bridge type switching according to the deviation of the bridge use time of the flight associated with the number of bridge type switching of the alternative scheduling scheme and the interval time of the type conversion process; Furthermore, the associated flight of the type conversion number is the closest flight before the conversion period corresponding to the type conversion number.

[0037] It should be noted that if Figure 3 As shown, the method for determining the number of deviation switching times is: Based on the jet bridge usage durations of the associated flights with the jet bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling solution on different dates, determine the date when the jet bridge usage duration is greater than the interval duration, and use it as the duration deviation date; Determine the deviation between the jet bridge usage time and the interval time on different dates based on the jet bridge usage time of the associated flights with the jet bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling scheme, and use the average value of the deviation between the jet bridge usage time and the interval time on different dates as the average value of the time deviation; The switching duration deviation coefficient of the number of corridor bridge type switching times is determined according to the duration deviation average value and the duration deviation date, and the switching duration deviation coefficient is used to determine whether the number of corridor bridge type switching times is a deviation switching number.

[0038] It should be noted that the switching duration deviation coefficient of the number of times the corridor type is switched is determined according to the duration deviation average value and the duration deviation date, specifically including: Determine a duration deviation coefficient based on a preset deviation coefficient corresponding to the duration deviation average value; The switching duration deviation coefficient of the number of times the corridor type is switched is determined by multiplying the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates by the duration deviation coefficient.

[0039] Specifically, determining whether the number of corridor bridge type switching times is a deviation switching number by using the switching time deviation coefficient specifically includes: When the switching duration deviation coefficient is greater than a preset deviation coefficient threshold, the number of corridor bridge type switching times is determined to be the deviation switching number.

[0040] Optionally, the method for determining the number of deviation switching times is: Based on the jet bridge usage durations of the associated flights with the jet bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling solution on different dates, determine the date when the jet bridge usage duration is greater than the interval duration, and use it as the duration deviation date; Whether the number of corridor bridge type switching times is the deviation switching number is determined according to the date quantity ratio of the duration deviation date and the deviation between the corridor bridge use time and the interval time on the duration deviation date.

[0041] It can be understood that whether the number of corridor bridge type switching times is the number of deviation switching times is determined according to the proportion of the number of dates of the duration deviation date and the deviation between the corridor bridge use time and the interval time of the duration deviation date, specifically including: When the proportion of the number of dates of the duration deviation date is greater than the proportion of the number of preset deviation dates, the number of corridor bridge type switching times is determined to be the number of deviation switching times; When the proportion of the duration deviation dates is not greater than the proportion of the preset deviation dates: When the date quantity ratio of the duration deviation date is within the preset date quantity ratio interval and the deviation between the corridor bridge usage time and the interval time on the duration deviation date is greater than the preset time deviation, the corridor bridge type switching number is determined to be the deviation switching number.

[0042] S3, determining a preferred scheduling scheme among the alternative scheduling schemes according to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling schemes; Specifically, Figure 4 As shown, the method for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions is: According to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling scheme, a corridor bridge with a deviation switching time is determined and used as a deviation switching corridor bridge; Determine the deviation switching weight values ​​of different deviation switching bridges according to the product of the deviation switching times of different deviation switching bridges and the preset proportional factor; According to the sum of the deviation switching weight values ​​of the deviation switching corridor bridge, a deviation weight sum is determined, and the deviation weight sum is used to determine whether the alternative plan is a preferred scheduling plan.

[0043] Further, using the deviation weight and determining whether the alternative solution is a preferred scheduling solution specifically includes: When the deviation weight sum of the alternative solutions is greater than a preset deviation weight threshold, it is determined that the alternative solution does not belong to the preferred scheduling solution.

[0044] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions is: According to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling scheme, a corridor bridge with a deviation switching time is determined and used as a deviation switching corridor bridge; Determining the total number of deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling schemes according to the number of deviation switching times of different deviation switching corridor bridges; Whether the alternative scheduling scheme is a preferred scheduling scheme is determined according to the sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling schemes.

[0045] Specifically, when the total number of deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling scheme does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the alternative scheme does not belong to the preferred scheduling scheme.

[0046] Optionally, the method for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions is: When it is determined that there is no corridor with a deviation switching number according to the deviation of the deviation switching number corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling scheme, it is determined that the alternative scheme belongs to the preferred scheduling scheme; When there is no bridge with deviation switching times: The number of corridor bridges with deviation switching times is obtained, and when the number of corridor bridges with deviation switching times does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the alternative solution does not belong to the preferred scheduling solution; When the number of bridges with deviation switching times meets the requirement: The corridors with the deviation switching times are used as deviation switching corridors, and the total number of deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling schemes is determined according to the deviation switching times of different deviation switching corridors. When the total number of deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling schemes does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the alternative schemes do not belong to the preferred scheduling schemes; When the total number of deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling schemes meets the requirements: Obtaining the number of deviation switching of different deviation switching bridges, and when there is a deviation switching bridge whose number of deviation switching does not meet the requirement, determining that the alternative solution does not belong to the preferred scheduling solution; When there is no deviation switching bridge whose deviation switching times do not meet the requirements: When it is determined that there is no deviation switching bridge whose deviation switching number is within a preset deviation switching number interval based on the deviation switching number of the deviation switching bridge, it is determined that the alternative solution belongs to the preferred debugging solution; When there is a deviation switching bridge whose deviation switching times are within the preset deviation switching times range: Obtaining the number of deviation switching bridges whose deviation switching times are within a preset deviation switching times interval, and when the number of deviation switching bridges whose deviation switching times are within the preset deviation switching times interval does not meet the requirement, determining that the alternative solution does not belong to the preferred debugging solution; When the number of deviation switching bridges within the preset deviation switching number range meets the requirement: The number of deviation switching bridges is obtained, and the type switching deviation coefficient of the alternative scheme is determined in combination with the switching deviation times of different deviation switching bridges, and the type switching deviation coefficient is used to determine whether the alternative scheme belongs to the preferred debugging scheme.

[0047] S4 determines the changes in the historical passenger data of the associated flights in the preferred scheduling scheme at different times of jet bridge type switching, and determines the optimal scheme in the preferred scheduling scheme in combination with the interval length of the different jet bridge type switching times during the type conversion process, and uses the optimal scheme to automatically switch the access control devices of different jet bridges.

[0048] Further, when the type switching deviation coefficient is greater than a preset switching deviation coefficient threshold, it is determined that the alternative solution belongs to the preferred debugging solution.

[0049] It can be understood that the change in the historical passenger data of the associated flight is determined according to the deviation of the historical passenger data of the associated flight on different dates.

[0050] Specifically, Figure 5 As shown, the method for determining the optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is: Determine the historical passenger volume of the associated flights on different dates based on the changes in the historical passenger volume data of the associated flights in different times of bridge type switching, and determine the passenger volume fluctuation flights among the associated flights based on the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger volume on different dates does not meet the requirements; The number of bridge type switching times when the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuation flight is used as the fluctuation switching times, and the interval time of the fluctuation switching times during the type conversion process is used to determine the number of fluctuation switching times within a preset time interval; The optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is determined according to the number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

[0051] Furthermore, the optimal solution is a preferred scheduling solution with the smallest number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

[0052] Optionally, the method for determining the optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is: S41 determines the historical passenger volume of the associated flight on different dates based on the change of the historical passenger volume data of the associated flight in different times of the bridge type switching, and determines the passenger volume matching coefficient of the different times of the bridge type switching based on the ratio of the interval time of the bridge type switching times in the type conversion process and the average value of the historical passenger volume of the associated flight on different dates; S42: determining the passenger volume fluctuation coefficients corresponding to different bridge type switching times by using the deviations from the average values ​​of the historical passenger volumes on different dates, and determining the switching reliability coefficient of the bridge type switching times based on the ratio of the passenger volume matching coefficient of the bridge type switching times to the passenger volume fluctuation coefficient; S43 determines the adaptation coefficient of the preferred scheduling scheme based on the switching reliability coefficients of the switching times of different types of corridor bridges in the priority scheduling scheme, and determines the optimal scheme in the preferred scheduling scheme using the adaptation coefficient.

[0053] Furthermore, the optimal solution is used to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors, specifically including: Based on the optimal solution, determine the corresponding jet bridges for different flights; Automatic switching processing of the access control device of the jet bridge corresponding to the flight is performed according to the type of the flight.

[0054] Embodiment 2 The second aspect, as Figure 6 As shown, the present application provides a flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling system, which adopts the above-mentioned flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling method, specifically including: Alternative solution screening module, deviation switching analysis module, preferred solution determination module, access control device control module; The alternative scheme screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling schemes among the available scheduling schemes; The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times in the corridor bridge type switching times; The preferred solution determination module is responsible for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions; The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal solution among the preferred scheduling solutions, and using the optimal solution to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors.

[0055] Optionally, the method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme in the available scheduling scheme is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme, and when it is determined that there is a number of type conversions with an interval duration within a preset interval duration based on the interval durations of different type conversion times in the type conversion process, determine that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme; When there is no type conversion number with an interval duration within the preset interval duration range: When it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not have a number of type conversions with an interval time shorter than a preset interval time, determining whether the available scheduling scheme is an alternative scheduling scheme based on the number of type conversions of the available scheduling scheme and the number of corridor bridges with type conversions; When the available scheduling scheme has a number of type conversions with an interval length less than a preset interval length: When the interval duration of the available scheduling scheme is less than the preset interval duration and the number of type conversions does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme; When the interval duration of the available scheduling scheme is less than the preset interval duration, and the number of type conversions meets the requirement: The number of corridor bridges having a number of type conversions with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration is obtained, and when the number of corridor bridges having a number of type conversions with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme; When the number of bridges with type conversion times whose interval length is less than the preset interval length meets the requirement: Obtaining the number of type conversions in different corridor bridges whose interval duration is less than a preset interval duration, and when there is a corridor bridge whose number of type conversions whose interval duration is less than the preset interval duration is greater than a preset type conversion number threshold, determining that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme; If there is no corridor bridge with an interval time shorter than the preset interval time and a number of type conversions greater than the preset type conversion number threshold: The number of type conversions of different corridor bridges is obtained, and the type switching frequency coefficient of the available scheduling scheme is determined in combination with the interval durations corresponding to the different type conversion numbers, and the type switching frequency coefficient is used to determine whether the available scheduling scheme is an alternative scheduling scheme.

[0056] It should be noted that, when the type switching frequency coefficient of the available scheduling scheme is less than a preset switching frequency coefficient threshold, the available scheduling scheme is determined to be an alternative scheduling scheme.

[0057] Optionally, the above step S41 includes the following contents: S411 determines the historical passenger capacity of the associated flight on different dates based on the change of the historical passenger capacity data of the associated flight in different times of the bridge type switching, and determines the passenger capacity matching coefficient of different times of the bridge type switching based on the ratio of the interval time of the bridge type switching times in the type conversion process and the average value of the historical passenger capacity of the associated flight on different dates. When the average value of the passenger capacity matching coefficient of different times of the bridge type switching does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the preferred scheduling scheme is not the optimal scheme. When the average value of the passenger capacity matching coefficient of different times of the bridge type switching meets the requirement, the process proceeds to step S412. S412: When the preferred scheduling scheme does not have a number of bridge type switching times whose passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S42; when the preferred scheduling scheme does have a number of bridge type switching times whose passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S413; S413 When the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirement and the number of times the bridge type switches is greater than the preset number limit value, it is determined that the preferred scheduling plan is not the optimal plan; when the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirement and the number of times the bridge type switches is not greater than the preset number limit value, proceed to step S42.

[0058] Optionally, the above step S42 includes the following contents: S421 determines the passenger volume fluctuation coefficients corresponding to different bridge type switching times by using the deviations from the average values ​​of historical passenger volumes on different dates. When there is a bridge type switching time with a passenger volume fluctuation coefficient greater than a preset fluctuation coefficient threshold, the process proceeds to step S422. When there is no bridge type switching time with a passenger volume fluctuation coefficient greater than the preset fluctuation coefficient threshold, the process proceeds to step S423. S422: The number of bridge type switching times when the passenger volume fluctuation coefficient is greater than the preset fluctuation coefficient threshold is taken as the fluctuation switching times. When there is a bridge type switching time when the passenger volume matching coefficient does not meet the requirement among the fluctuation switching times, it is determined that the preferred scheduling scheme does not belong to the optimal scheme. When there is a bridge type switching time when the passenger volume matching coefficient does not meet the requirement among the fluctuation switching times, the process proceeds to step S423. S423 determines the switching reliability coefficient of the number of bridge type switching times based on the ratio of the passenger capacity matching coefficient of the number of bridge type switching times to the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient. When the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different bridge type switching times does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the preferred scheduling scheme is not the optimal scheme. When the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different bridge type switching times meets the requirements, proceed to step S43.

[0059] Specifically, the adaptation coefficient of the priority scheduling scheme is determined according to the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different corridor bridge type switching times and the average value of the proportion of the switching reliability coefficients of the corridor bridge type switching times that are greater than a preset reliability coefficient threshold.

[0060] It should be noted that the optimal solution is the preferred scheduling solution with the largest adaptation coefficient.

[0061] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts between the embodiments can be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. In particular, for the device, equipment, and non-volatile computer storage medium embodiments, since they are basically similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the partial description of the method embodiment.

[0062] The above is a description of a specific embodiment of the specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recorded in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0063] The above description is only one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. For those skilled in the art, one or more embodiments of this specification may have various changes and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification shall be included in the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A bridge transfer scheduling method based on flight information, characterized in that: Specifically include: Determine available scheduling schemes for the jet bridges using the time of different types of flights, and determine alternative scheduling schemes in the available scheduling schemes based on type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling schemes and the interval duration of different type conversion processes; Determine the deviation switching number in the number of bridge type switching according to the deviation of the bridge use time of the flight associated with the number of bridge type switching of the alternative scheduling solution and the interval time of the type conversion process; Determine a preferred scheduling scheme among the alternative scheduling schemes according to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling schemes; Determine the changes in historical passenger data of associated flights in the preferred scheduling scheme at different times of jet bridge type switching, and determine the optimal scheme in the preferred scheduling scheme in combination with the interval lengths of different jet bridge type switching times during the type conversion process, and use the optimal scheme to automatically switch the access control devices of different jet bridges.

2. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The types of flights mentioned include international flights and domestic flights.

3. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the available scheduling scheme of the corridor bridge is: With the constraint that different flights have corresponding jet bridges, the available jet bridges for different flights are determined based on the types and distribution periods of different flights and the distribution data of jet bridges; The available allocated bridges of different flights are combined to generate an available scheduling plan for the bridges.

4. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges between international types and domestic types.

5. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme among the available scheduling schemes is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme; Based on the intervals of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determine the type conversion times whose intervals are shorter than a preset interval; Based on the number of corridor bridges having type conversion times with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration, it is determined whether the available scheduling solution is an alternative scheduling solution.

6. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that: When the number of corridors with type conversion times whose interval duration is less than the preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of corridors, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme.

7. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is: Determine the historical passenger volume of the associated flights on different dates based on the changes in the historical passenger volume data of the associated flights with different times of jet bridge type switching, and determine the passenger volume fluctuation flights among the associated flights based on the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger volume on different dates does not meet the requirements; The number of bridge type switching times when the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuation flight is used as the fluctuation switching times, and the interval time of the fluctuation switching times during the type conversion process is used to determine the number of fluctuation switching times within a preset time interval; The optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is determined according to the number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

8. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that: The optimal solution is a preferred scheduling solution with the smallest number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

9. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The optimal solution is used to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors, specifically including: Based on the optimal solution, determine the corresponding jet bridges for different flights; Automatic switching processing of the access control device of the jet bridge corresponding to the flight is performed according to the type of the flight.

10. A flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling system, using a flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that: Specifically include: Alternative solution screening module, deviation switching analysis module, preferred solution determination module, access control device control module; The alternative scheme screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling schemes among the available scheduling schemes; The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times in the corridor bridge type switching times; The preferred solution determination module is responsible for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions; The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal solution among the preferred scheduling solutions, and using the optimal solution to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors.

Images