Network optimization method for satellite-borne distributed radar multi-node synchronous link construction

By dynamically evaluating the signal-to-noise ratio and occlusion, the construction of multi-node synchronization links in the satellite-borne distributed radar system is optimized, which solves the problems of error accumulation and network stability, and achieves more efficient phase synchronization and network performance.

CN120223487AActive Publication Date: 2025-06-27NANJING RES INST OF ELECTRONICS TECH
View PDF 3 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202510704741.6
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-05-29
Publication Date
2025-06-27
Estimated Expiration
2045-05-29

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

In satellite-based distributed radar systems, there are error accumulation and network stability problems in the construction of multi-star synchronization links, especially when there are many nodes, long distances and satellite movements, it is difficult to achieve global optimal phase synchronization.

Method used

A network optimization method for multi-node synchronous link construction is proposed. By dynamically evaluating the signal-to-noise ratio and occlusion situation, automatically adjusting the connection strategy, optimizing the connection between radar points, reducing error accumulation, and improving network stability.

Benefits of technology

It effectively reduces the accumulation of phase synchronization errors, improves the stability and performance of the radar network, can adapt to environmental changes, and optimize network connections.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN120223487A_ABST
    Figure CN120223487A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of spaceborne distributed radars, and discloses a network optimization method for spaceborne distributed radar multi-node synchronous link construction. The method comprises the steps of establishing a distributed multi-satellite system, performing phase synchronization and improving network stability. Aiming at the problems that the number of distributed radar nodes is large and phase synchronization is needed in cooperative work, in the prior art, on one hand, the more complex the network structure is, the longer the link is, the more synchronization error accumulation is; and on the other hand, when the satellite moves, the positions of the nodes can be changed, or when a certain node is unstable, the whole network can be paralyzed. Compared with the prior art, by dynamically evaluating the signal-to-noise ratio and the mutual shielding condition of multiple satellites, the system can adapt to environmental changes, the connection between radar points is optimized, the radar network is more effectively constructed, and the performance of the network is improved.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention mainly relates to the technical field of spaceborne distributed radars, and particularly to a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar. Background Art

[0002] Phase synchronization is a key technology for spaceborne distributed radars. Its essence is that the frequency offset generated by different frequency sources causes phase errors in the echo signal during frequency demodulation with errors. When synchronizing the phase of typical foreign spaceborne distributed InSAR systems such as TanDEM-X, the pulse-alternating synchronization method is mainly adopted, mainly in the form of "one-to-one" synchronization. However, there is little research on "many-to-many" phase synchronization in the context of multiple satellites. In the research on the synchronization of ground-based distributed radars, there is more research on the synchronization of multiple nodes. However, due to the fixed ground position relationship and short distance, there will be a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio when the distance is far in multiple satellites, and the influence of occlusion generated during the movement of multiple satellites, etc.

[0003] The main goal in multi-satellite synchronization is still to minimize the total error after each transmission in the link and achieve global optimality. However, the methods for constructing the synchronization link network are different in different applications. In the context of spaceborne distributed radars, there are many radar nodes, and the intercept distances between the target and the radars are inconsistent, which will cause phase deviation. Therefore, phase synchronization is required to correct the deviation. However, there will still be residual phase synchronization errors after phase synchronization correction. It is necessary to use the network connection method to reduce the residual phase synchronization errors to achieve the optimal performance.

[0004] In current research, there are usually three phase synchronization methods, namely the direct forwarding method, the frequency stabilization method, and the phase synchronization method. Among them, in the phase synchronization method, the master-slave synchronization method is a relatively classic phase synchronization method. Each node only needs to perform point-to-point synchronization with the central node. This method has the advantage of a shorter phase synchronization link, so it has been widely applied. However, in actual application scenarios, when the central node is damaged, the entire radar system network will be paralyzed and unable to work properly.

[0005] Therefore, in order to overcome the deficiencies of the classic master-slave synchronization method, the prior art has proposed a cyclic round-trip phase synchronization method, which improves the stability of the distributed radar system. However, it is difficult to implement when the distance between radar nodes is too far, and when a node is damaged, the phase synchronization link is too long, and the error accumulation will be more.

[0006] The current phase synchronization still has problems such as the difficulty in selecting reference satellites, the increasing cumulative errors brought by long links, the influence of the position changes during satellite operation, and the instability of the network caused by the instability of a certain node. The current phase synchronization methods are still difficult to take into account these realistic situations at the same time. Therefore, it is necessary to find a network connection method that minimizes the cumulative error of the link for improvement. Summary of the Invention

[0007] Aiming at the problem that the number of distributed radar nodes is large and phase synchronization is required in collaborative work, on the one hand, the more complex the network structure and the longer the link, the more synchronization error accumulation will be; on the other hand, the movement of the satellite will cause the position change of the node, or the instability of a certain node may cause the paralysis of the entire network. The present invention aims to improve the construction efficiency and performance of the radar network and reduce the cumulative link error by proposing a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronous link of spaceborne distributed radars. This method can dynamically evaluate the connection feasibility between radar points and automatically adjust the connection strategy to cope with complex environmental changes.

[0008] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronous link of spaceborne distributed radars, including the following steps: Step 1: Establish a distributed multi-satellite system: Establish a distributed multi-satellite system composed of N satellites, select the Mth satellite as the main satellite, and each satellite has T phase synchronization horn antennas; Step 2: Perform phase synchronization, including the following steps: S1: Each satellite in the distributed multi-satellite system sends status messages: Each satellite sends information including the starting time, middle time, and ending time of the current work task, as well as its own position and attitude to the main satellite M, and the main satellite M stores the number of phase synchronization horn antennas of each satellite in advance; S2: Determine the phase synchronization reference satellite according to the position and attitude information of each satellite obtained in step S1, put all the satellites that need phase synchronization into the set E, and determine the phase synchronization horn antennas that can be connected to each other for two satellites according to the task; S3: Perform satellite phase synchronization configuration judgment to identify whether the satellite phase synchronization configuration in the distributed multi-satellite system is a direct synchronization satellite or an indirect synchronization satellite; S4: The main satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellite of the direct synchronization satellite; S5: The main satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellite of the indirect synchronization satellite; S6: Perform phase synchronization: The main satellite M sends the phase synchronization pairing result to each satellite, and each satellite transmits the phase synchronization signal according to the phase synchronization pairing result to achieve the phase synchronization of the distributed multi-satellite system.

[0009] Further, it further includes step 3: network stability improvement, including the following steps: S7: When the probability of each node being damaged is independent and the probability of affecting other nodes is independent, put the unconnected line segments that meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and occlusion conditions into set F; S8: Define nodes and connections: Sort according to the number of nodes connected to each node from most to least, and label them respectively as , and for each node The number of connected nodes is denoted as ; S9: Calculate the impact of a single node being damaged: When node is damaged, the nodes directly connected to it will be affected. For each node , the expected value of the number of invalid nodes caused by its damage is p × the number of affected nodes, where p is the probability of a single node being damaged; S10: Calculate the total expected value: The sum of the impacts caused by any node in the network being damaged is the expected value of the entire network being damaged, and the calculation formula is ; S11: Add the connections in set F to the original network to minimize the total expected value.

[0010] Further, in step S2, determining the phase synchronization reference satellite according to the obtained position and attitude information of each satellite includes the following steps: T1: Combine the determined phase synchronization horn antenna to judge the signal-to-noise ratio between satellites i in set E; T2: Judge the occlusion relationship between satellites i in set E; T3: Repeat steps T1 and T2. If there are two satellites i in set E that meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, it is considered connectable, and all connectable satellites are put into set D; If there are still satellites in set E, it means that there are satellites that cannot perform phase synchronization. Then the main satellite M reports an error and feeds back set E to the ground; T4: Select the phase synchronization reference satellite: If there is any satellite P that meets the signal-to-noise ratio threshold with the most satellites i and there is no occlusion, that is, satellite P finds the most connectable satellites, then satellite P is the phase synchronization reference satellite; If there are different satellites that can connect to the same maximum number of satellites i, that is, when finding the most connectable satellites, if there are multiple, randomly select one of them as the phase synchronization reference satellite P.

[0011] Further, in step T1, for any two satellites A and B in set E that need to perform phase synchronization, the signal-to-noise ratio discrimination method includes the following steps: K1: Calculate the slant range between satellites A and B , and the calculation expression is , where represents the position of satellite A, represents the position of satellite B; K2: Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio between satellites A and B, and the calculation expression is , where represents the transmit peak power of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite B, is the wavelength, is the processing gain, is the Boltzmann constant, is the temperature, is the bandwidth, is the receive noise figure, is the loss, is the phase synchronization signal-to-noise ratio between satellite A and satellite B; K3: Perform signal-to-noise ratio judgment, and specify the signal-to-noise ratio threshold according to the actual situation ; If ≥ , it indicates that satellites A and B meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold; If < , it indicates that satellites A and B do not meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold.

[0012] Furthermore, in step T2, for any two satellites A and B in set E, phase synchronization is required, and the occlusion discrimination method includes the following steps: K4: Calculate for satellite K, where k is a positive integer less than N and not equal to A and B, representing different satellites, and N represents the total number of satellites. The calculation expression is , where represents the angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, represents the arccosine operation, represents the modulo operation, is the position of satellite A, is the position of satellite B, is the position of satellite k; K5: Perform occlusion judgment: If satellite K satisfies or , it means that there is occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B; If satellite K does not satisfy or , it indicates that there is no occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B; Among them, represents the angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, represents the angle between the line connecting satellite A and satellite B and the line connecting satellite k and satellite B, represents the beam width of the synchronous horn antenna, which can be obtained through a distributed multi-satellite system.

[0013] Furthermore, the satellite phase synchronization configuration determination in step S3 includes the following steps: T5: If satellite P and satellite i satisfy the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is a direct synchronization satellite; If satellite P and satellite i do not satisfy the signal-to-noise ratio threshold or there is occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is an indirect synchronization satellite; T6: Repeat step T5 to determine the phase synchronization configurations of all satellites in set D.

[0014] Furthermore, in step S4, the master satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellites of the direct synchronization satellites, including the following steps: T7: For the direct synchronization satellite i in set D, phase synchronization can be directly achieved through the two-way signal between satellite P and satellite i. Therefore, pair satellite i with satellite P, remove satellite i from set D, and add satellite i to the connected satellite set C1; T8: Perform the operations of step T7 on all direct synchronization satellites in set D.

[0015] Furthermore, in step S5, the master satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellites of the indirect synchronization satellites, including the following steps: T9: Initialize the positive integer n = 1; T10: For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn for phase synchronization pairing. Cn is the set that can be confirmed to be connected after n judgments. The specific steps are as follows: Q1: For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn to perform synchronous horn antenna selection, signal-to-noise ratio judgment, and occlusion judgment; If the satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn and the satellite i with the most indirectly synchronized satellites in the set D both meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then the satellite P1 is designated as the first-level phase synchronization reference satellite. The satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn and the satellite i are preferentially paired, and the satellite i that cannot be paired with the satellite P1 and the remaining satellites j in the connected satellite set Cn except the satellite P1 are paired; Q2: Repeat the operation of step Q1 for all satellites in the connected satellite set C n ; Q3: According to the results of steps Q1 and Q2, determine whether the satellite i has a paired satellite. If the satellite i has a paired satellite, then remove the satellite i from the set D and add the satellite i to the connected satellite set C n; Q4: Repeat the operations of Q1 - Q3 for all indirectly synchronized satellites in the set D, designate the subsequently found satellite P2 as the second-level phase synchronization reference satellite, and repeat the above operations; T11: If the number of satellites in the synchronizable satellite set C n+1 is 0 or there are no satellites in the set D, then end the pairing process. Otherwise, let the positive integer n = n + 1 and repeat step T10.

[0016] Furthermore, each satellite in the distributed multi-satellite system has 8 phase synchronization horn antennas.

[0017] Beneficial effects: For the problems of a large number of distributed radar nodes and the need for phase synchronization in collaborative work, in the prior art, on the one hand, the more complex the network structure and the longer the link, the more synchronization error accumulation will be; on the other hand, when the satellite moves, it may cause the position change of the nodes, or the entire network may be paralyzed when a certain node is unstable. The present invention provides a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar. Compared with the prior art, the present invention can dynamically evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio and the mutual occlusion situation of multiple satellites, the system can adapt to environmental changes, optimize the connection between radar points, more effectively construct a radar network, and improve the performance of the network. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] Figure 1 is the main flowchart of the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of determining a phase synchronization reference satellite and connection in the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of determining the first-level phase synchronization reference satellite and connection in the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 It is a schematic diagram completed by the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5 It is a simulation result diagram of the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 It is an optimal simulation result diagram of the network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed implementation manners

[0019] As Figures 1 to 6 shown, the present invention provides a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar.

[0020] Embodiment 1 For clarity and simplicity, we assume that each radar node transmits the same signal, usually denoted as , where is the envelope of the baseband signal, is the carrier frequency, is the initial phase, and t is time, with the unit of t being seconds.

[0021] For mathematical tractability, we assume that only one target is detected. It is considered that at the th second after the transmission of the pulse, the received backscattered signal can be modeled as , where A is the attenuation rate during the transmission process, is the time delay, is the noise.

[0022] The time delay is calculated according to the digital elevation model, and the calculation formula is .

[0023] Assume that in the absence of phase errors, array signal processing also uses the phase difference and time difference between the signals received by multiple radar nodes to estimate the direction of the signal, as well as to perform signal enhancement and interference suppression. Therefore, the layout of distributed coherent radar nodes can be regarded as an array, and each radar node is equivalent to an element in the array.

[0024] Delay processing is performed on the signal received by each node, and the expression is , , since kT is relatively small, its influence on the amplitude can be ignored. Let , .

[0025] Since it is necessary to eliminate the phase offset caused by different distances between multiple nodes and the target, it is necessary to process the in , therefore , , since the connection of multiple nodes is not "one-to-one" pair-transfer synchronization, the error will accumulate with transmission, and the error of the channel link cannot be eliminated according to the network connection. Therefore, this embodiment only considers the phase residual error caused by noise.

[0026] Assume that each node has a phase residual error. The phase accumulation objective function of the phase noise residual error for the multi-node network connection is , where to There are a total of n terms.

[0027] Assume that the noise phases all conform to the Gaussian white noise zero-mean distribution. Therefore, the noise phase is the Gaussian white noise phase error generated by A points in the first-layer connection, satisfying the Gaussian distribution , the noise is the Gaussian white noise phase error generated by B points in the first-layer connection, satisfying the Gaussian distribution , and so on. The noise is the Gaussian white noise phase error generated by N points in the nth-layer connection, satisfying the Gaussian distribution .

[0028] , When is monotonically decreasing. Therefore .

[0029] At this time, if it is required that the signal accumulation L is the largest, it is necessary to preferentially satisfy the maximum value in sequence, that is, adopt the greedy strategy to give priority to the connection of the first layer in the network connection, and then adopt the greedy strategy to consider the priority connection of the second layer, and so on until all connectable nodes are connected.

[0030] The simulation verifies that the link connection method proposed according to the optimal criterion of phase accumulation in the theoretical analysis is optimal. For the same 100 nodes, the connection methods of connecting 100 layers with only one node in each layer and connecting 1 layer with 100 nodes in each layer are simulated. 1000 Monte Carlo experiments are respectively used for simulation and then the average value of L is calculated. At this time = 0.5, approximately simulating a phase error of 5°. As shown by Figure 6 , the simulation results show that as the number of layers increases, the phase accumulation will gradually deviate from the theoretical value. According to the greedy strategy, preferentially connecting the front layer numbers is more in line with the principle of optimal phase accumulation.

[0031] A network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar, and the specific implementation steps are as follows: (1-0)Establishment of a distributed multi-satellite system. Construct a distributed multi-satellite system containing N satellites, and designate the Mth satellite as the master satellite, which is called "master satellite M" in the following steps.

[0032] (2-0)Phase synchronization process.

[0033] (2-1)Transmission of status information. Each satellite sends its own position, attitude and other information to the master satellite in real time. The master satellite M needs to first store the number of phase synchronization horn antennas of each satellite.

[0034] (2-2)Determine the phase synchronization reference satellite based on the position and attitude information of each satellite obtained in step (2-1). Select the set E of satellites that need to perform phase synchronization, and determine the phase synchronization connection ability between satellites according to the mission requirements.

[0035] (2-3)Establishment of the phase synchronization reference satellite.

[0036] (2-4)Determine the satellite pairs that can directly perform phase synchronization.

[0037] (2-5)Determine the first-level reference satellite for phase synchronization and determine the satellite pairs that need indirect phase synchronization.

[0038] (2-6)Perform phase synchronization. The master satellite M sends the phase synchronization pairing result to each satellite, and each satellite transmits the phase synchronization signal according to the phase synchronization pairing result to achieve the phase synchronization of the entire system.

[0039] (3-0)Optimization of network stability.

[0040] (3-1)Define nodes and connections: Clearly define the nodes in the network and their connection methods.

[0041] (3-2)Evaluation of the impact of node damage: Calculate the impact of a single node damage.

[0042] (3-2)Calculate the total expected value: Based on the current state of the network, calculate its total expected value.

[0043] (3-3)Network connection optimization: Add connections to the original network to minimize the total expected value.

[0044] Example 2 A network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar, as Figure 1 shown, includes the following steps: (1-0) Establish a distributed multi-satellite system. Establish a distributed multi-satellite system composed of N satellites, and select the Mth satellite as the master satellite, hereinafter referred to as master satellite M. In this embodiment, a distributed multi-satellite system including 10 satellites as shown in the figure is established, and each satellite has 8 phase-synchronized horn antennas.

[0045] (2-0) Perform phase synchronization. As Figure 2 , Figure 3 , Figure 4 shown, the specific steps are as follows: (2-1) Each satellite sends status information. Each satellite sends information such as its own position and attitude at the start time, middle time, and end time of the current work task to the master satellite, and the master satellite M stores the number of phase-synchronized horn antennas of each satellite in advance. (2-2) Determine the phase synchronization reference satellite based on the position and attitude information of each satellite obtained in (2-1). Put all the satellites that need phase synchronization into the set E, and determine the phase-synchronized horns that can be connected to each other between two satellites according to the task.

[0046] (2-2-1) Combine the determined synchronized horn antennas to judge the signal-to-noise ratio between satellites i in the set E; for any two satellites, such as satellite A and satellite B that need to perform phase synchronization, the signal-to-noise ratio discrimination method is as follows: (2-2-1-1) Calculate the slant range R AB between satellite A and B, and the calculation method is as follows: ,

[0047] In the formula, P A represents the position of satellite A, and P B represents the position of satellite B.

[0048] (2-2-1-2) Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio between satellite A and B, and the calculation method is as follows: ,

[0049] In the formula, represents the transmit peak power of the phase-synchronized horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase-synchronized horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase-synchronized horn antenna of satellite B, is the wavelength, is the processing gain, is the Boltzmann constant, is the temperature, is the bandwidth, is the receive noise figure, is the loss, and all the above parameters can be obtained through the distributed multi-satellite system. is the phase synchronization signal-to-noise ratio between satellite A and satellite B.

[0050] (2-2-1-3) Perform signal-to-noise ratio judgment, and agree on the signal-to-noise ratio threshold SNR according to the actual situation min .

[0051] If ≥ , it indicates that satellite A and satellite B meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold.

[0052] If < , it indicates that satellite A and satellite B do not meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold.

[0053] In this embodiment, the minimum signal-to-noise ratio is set to 10 dB. Satellite 1 and satellite 4, satellite 10 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 2 and satellite 9 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 3 and satellite 8, satellite 10 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 4 and satellite 9 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 5 and satellite 6, satellite 7 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 6 and satellite 7, satellite 8, satellite 9 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold. Satellite 8 and satellite 10 meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold.

[0054] (2-2-2) Judge the occlusion relationship between satellites i in set E. For any two satellites, such as satellite A and satellite B that need to perform phase synchronization, the occlusion judgment method is as follows: (2-2-2-1) For satellite k, perform the following calculations. Where k is a positive integer less than N and not equal to A and B, representing different satellites, and N represents the total number of satellites.

[0055] ,

[0056] In the formula, represents the angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, represents the arccosine operation, represents the modulo operation. is the position of satellite A, is the position of satellite B, is the position of satellite k.

[0057] (2-2-2-2) Perform occlusion judgment.

[0058] If there exists a satellite k that satisfies the following conditions, it means that there is an occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B. If there does not exist a satellite k that satisfies the following conditions, it means that there is no occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B.

[0059] or ,

[0060] Among them, is expressed as the included angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, is expressed as the included angle between the line connecting satellite A and satellite B and the line connecting satellite k and satellite B, represents the beam width of the synchronous horn antenna, which can be obtained through a distributed multi-satellite system.

[0061] In this embodiment, satellite 1 and satellite 3 are blocked by satellite 10, so there is occlusion; satellite 6 and satellite 10 are blocked by satellite 8, so there is occlusion; satellite 7 and satellite 8 are blocked by satellite 6, so there is occlusion; there is no occlusion between the remaining satellites in pairs.

[0062] (2-2-3) Repeat (2-2-1) to (2-2-2). If there are two satellites i in set E that satisfy the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, it is considered connectable. Put all connectable satellites into set D. If there are still satellites in set E, it means that there are satellites that cannot perform phase synchronization. Then the master satellite M reports an error and feeds back set E to the ground. For example, if a certain satellite is very far from other satellites and there is an impossible connection situation, this satellite cannot perform phase synchronization anyway and cannot enter set D.

[0063] (2-2-4) Selection of the phase synchronization reference satellite: If there is any satellite P that satisfies the signal-to-noise ratio threshold with the most satellites i and there is no occlusion, that is, satellite P finds the most connectable satellites, then satellite P is the phase synchronization reference satellite.

[0064] If there are different satellites that can connect to the same maximum number of satellites i, that is, when finding the most connectable satellites, if there are multiple, randomly select one of them as the phase synchronization reference satellite P. In this embodiment, satellite 6 is the phase synchronization reference satellite, and the maximum number of satellites it can connect to is 4, Figure 2 、 3 、4. The phase reference satellite is represented as a blue circle.

[0065] (2-3)Satellite phase synchronization configuration judgment, the steps are as follows: (2-3-1)If there are satellite P and satellite i in (2-2-3) that satisfy the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is a direct synchronization satellite.

[0066] If satellite P and satellite i do not satisfy the signal-to-noise ratio threshold, or there is occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is an indirect synchronization satellite.

[0067] (2-3-2)Repeat (2-3-1) to determine the phase synchronization configurations of all satellites in set D.

[0068] The satellites belonging to direct synchronization are: Satellite 5, Satellite 7, Satellite 8, Satellite 9; The satellites belonging to indirect synchronization are: Satellite 1, Satellite 2, Satellite 3, Satellite 4, Satellite 10.

[0069] (2-4)The master satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellites of the direct synchronization satellites.

[0070] (2-4-1)For the direct synchronization satellite i in the set D, phase synchronization can be directly achieved through the transmission signal between satellite P and satellite i. Therefore, satellite i is paired with satellite P. Remove satellite i from the set D and add satellite i to the connected satellite set C1.

[0071] (2-4-2)Perform the operation of (2-4-1) on all the directly synchronized satellites in the set D.

[0072] In this embodiment, after (2-4-1) and (2-4-2), the satellites included in the connected satellite set C1 are: Satellite 5, Satellite 7, Satellite 8, Satellite 9; As Figure 2 shown by the blue line segment in the figure, Satellite 6 is paired with Satellite 5, Satellite 7, Satellite 8, and Satellite 9.

[0073] The remaining satellites in the set D are: Satellite 1, Satellite 2, Satellite 3, Satellite 4, Satellite 10.

[0074] (2-5)The master satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellites of the indirect synchronization satellites, including the following steps.

[0075] (2-5-1)Initialize the positive integer n = 1.

[0076] (2-5-2)For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in the set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn for phase synchronization pairing. Cn is the set that can be confirmed to be connected after n judgments. For example, after initially determining the reference satellite, find the satellites that can be connected to it and put all these satellites into the set C1. Then, find the indirectly synchronized reference satellite in C1 and find the satellites in the remaining D set that can be connected to the indirectly synchronized reference satellite, and put all these satellites into the set C2, and so on. The specific steps are as follows: (2-5-2-1)For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in the set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn to perform phase synchronization horn antenna selection, signal-to-noise ratio judgment, and occlusion judgment.

[0077] If the satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn is connected to the largest number of indirectly synchronized satellites i in set D, and both meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then satellite P1 is designated as the primary phase synchronization reference satellite. The satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn is preferentially paired with satellite i. The satellite i that cannot be paired with satellite P1 and the remaining satellites j in the connected satellite set Cn excluding satellite P1 are paired.

[0078] (2-5-2-2) Repeat the operation of (2-5-2-1) for all satellites in the connected satellite set C n .

[0079] (2-5-2-3) According to the results of (2-5-2-1) and (2-5-2-2), determine whether satellite i has a paired satellite. If satellite i has a paired satellite, then remove satellite i from set D and add satellite i to the connected satellite set C n .

[0080] (2-5-2-4) Repeat the operations of (2-5-2-1), (2-5-2-2), and (2-5-2-3) for all indirectly synchronized satellites in set D. Designate the subsequently found satellite P2 as the secondary phase synchronization reference satellite, and so on.

[0081] In this embodiment, the primary phase synchronization reference satellite is satellite 8. Figure 3 , 4 The primary phase synchronization reference satellite is represented as a green circle, and the satellites preferentially paired with it are satellite 3 and satellite 10. In Figure 3 , 4 They are connected by green line segments; the satellites that cannot be paired with it are satellite 1, satellite 2, and satellite 4. Among them, satellite 2 and satellite 4 can be paired with satellite 9. In Figure 3 , 4 They are connected by green line segments.

[0082] The secondary phase synchronization reference satellite is satellite 4. Figure 4 The secondary phase synchronization reference satellite is represented as a yellow circle, and satellite 1 is paired with satellite 4. In Figure 4 They are connected by a yellow line segment.

[0083] (2-5-3) If the number of satellites in the synchronizable satellite set C n+1 is 0 or there are no satellites in set D, then end the pairing process. Otherwise, let the positive integer n = n + 1 and repeat (2-5-2).

[0084] (2-6) Perform phase synchronization. The master star M sends the phase synchronization pairing result to each star, and each star transmits the phase synchronization signal according to the phase synchronization pairing result to achieve the phase synchronization of the entire system.

[0085] Improvement of network stability in (3-0). Segments that meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and occlusion conditions but are not connected are placed in set F. Assume that the probability of each node being damaged is independent, and the probability of affecting other nodes is independent.

[0086] (3-1)Define nodes and connections: Sort the nodes (i.e., each satellite) according to the number of connected nodes from most to least, and label them respectively as , and for each node , the number of connected nodes is denoted as (degree).

[0087] (3-2)Calculate the impact of a single node being damaged. When node is damaged, the nodes directly connected to it will be affected. For each node , the expected value of the number of invalid nodes (including itself) caused by its damage is p×the number of affected nodes, where p is the probability of a single node being damaged.

[0088] (3-2)Calculate the total expected value. The sum of the impacts caused by any node in the network being damaged is the expected value of the entire network being damaged. The calculation formula is: .

[0089] (3-3)Add the connections in set F to the original network to minimize the total expected value.

[0090] The present invention aims to provide a network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar. Compared with the prior art, the present invention can dynamically evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio and the mutual occlusion situation of multiple satellites, the system can adapt to environmental changes, optimize the connections between radar points, more effectively construct a radar network, and improve the performance of the network.

[0091] Finally, it should be noted that the above are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the embodiments, for those skilled in the art, they can still modify the technical solutions recorded in the foregoing embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements on some of the technical features. However, any modifications, equivalent replacements, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar, characterized in that It includes the following steps: Step 1: Establish a distributed multi-satellite system: Establish a distributed multi-satellite system composed of N satellites, select the Mth satellite as the main satellite, and each satellite has T phase-synchronized horn antennas; Step 2: Perform phase synchronization, including the following steps: S1: Each satellite in the distributed multi-satellite system sends status messages: Each satellite sends information including its respective position and attitude at the start time, middle time, and end time of the current working task to the main satellite M, and the main satellite M stores the number of phase-synchronized horn antennas of each satellite in advance; S2: Determine the phase synchronization reference satellite according to the position and attitude information of each satellite obtained in step S1, put all the satellites that need to be phase-synchronized into the set E, and determine the phase-synchronized horn antennas that can be connected to each other between two satellites according to the task; S3: Perform satellite phase synchronization configuration judgment to identify whether the satellite phase synchronization configuration in the distributed multi-satellite system is a directly synchronized satellite or an indirectly synchronized satellite; S4: The main satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellite of the directly synchronized satellite; S5: The main satellite M determines the phase synchronization pairing satellite of the indirectly synchronized satellite; S6: Perform phase synchronization: The main satellite M sends the phase synchronization pairing result to each satellite, and each satellite transmits the phase synchronization signal according to the phase synchronization pairing result to achieve the phase synchronization of the distributed multi-satellite system.

2. The network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to claim 1, wherein, It also includes step 3: Network stability improvement, including the following steps: S7: When the probability of each node being damaged is independent and the probability of affecting other nodes is independent, put the line segments that meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and occlusion conditions but are not connected into the set F; S8: Define nodes and connections: Sort the nodes according to the number of connected nodes from most to least, and label them respectively as , each node The number of connected nodes is denoted as ; S9: Calculate the impact of a single node failure: When a node fails, the nodes directly connected to it will be affected. For each node , the expected number of invalid nodes caused by its failure is p × the number of affected nodes, where p is the probability of a single node failure; S10: Calculate the total expected value: The sum of the impacts caused by the damage of any node in the network is the expected value of the damage of the entire network. The calculation formula is ; S11: Add the connections in the set F on the basis of the original network to minimize the total expected value.

3. The network optimization method for constructing the on-orbit distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that In step S2, determining the phase synchronization reference satellite according to the obtained position and attitude information of each satellite includes the following steps: T1: Combine the determined phase-synchronized horn antennas to judge the signal-to-noise ratio between satellites i in the set E; T2: Judge the occlusion relationship between satellites i in the set E; T3: Repeat steps T1 and T2. If there are two satellites i in the set E that meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, it is considered that they can be connected, and put all the connectable satellites into the set D; If there are still satellites in the set E, it means that there are satellites that cannot perform phase synchronization, then the main satellite M reports an error and feeds back the set E to the ground; T4: Perform phase synchronization reference satellite selection: If there is any satellite P that satisfies the signal-to-noise ratio threshold with the most satellites i and there is no occlusion, that is, satellite P finds the most connectable satellites, then satellite P is the phase synchronization reference satellite; If there are different satellites that can be connected to the same maximum number of satellites i, that is, when looking for the most connectable satellites, if there are multiple, randomly select one of them as the phase synchronization reference satellite P.

4. The network optimization method for constructing a multi-node synchronization link of a spaceborne distributed radar according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step T1, for any two satellites A and B in the set E that need to perform phase synchronization, the signal-to-noise ratio discrimination method includes the following steps: K1: Calculate the slant range between satellites A and B , and the calculation expression is , where represents the position of satellite A, represents the position of satellite B; K2: Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio between satellites A and B. The calculation formula is , where represents the transmit peak power of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite A, is the transmit gain of the phase synchronization horn antenna of satellite B, is the wavelength, is the processing gain, is the Boltzmann constant, is the temperature, is the bandwidth, is the receive noise figure, is the loss, is the phase synchronization signal-to-noise ratio between satellites A and B; K3: Perform signal-to-noise ratio judgment and specify the signal-to-noise ratio threshold according to the actual situation ; If ≥ , it indicates that satellite A and satellite B meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold; If < , it indicates that satellite A and satellite B do not meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold.

5. The network optimization method for constructing a spaceborne distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step T2, for any two satellites A and B in the set E that need to perform phase synchronization, the occlusion discrimination method includes the following steps: K4: Calculate satellite K, where k is a positive integer less than N and not equal to A and B, representing different satellites, N represents the total number of satellites, and the calculation formula is , where represents the angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, represents the arccosine operation, represents the modulo operation, is the position of satellite A, is the position of satellite B, is the position of satellite k; K5: Perform occlusion judgment: If satellite K satisfies or , it indicates that there is an occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B; If satellite K does not satisfy or , it indicates that there is no occlusion in the phase synchronization link between satellite A and satellite B; Among them, is represented as the included angle between the line connecting satellite B and satellite A and the line connecting satellite k and satellite A, is represented as the included angle between the line connecting satellite A and satellite B and the line connecting satellite k and satellite B, represents the beam width of the synchronous horn antenna, which can be obtained through a distributed multi-satellite system.

6. The network optimization method for constructing a spaceborne distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 3, wherein Step S3: Satellite phase synchronization configuration judgment, including the following steps: T5: If satellite P and satellite i meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is a direct synchronization satellite; If satellite P and satellite i do not meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold, or there is occlusion, then the phase synchronization configuration of the i-th satellite is an indirect synchronization satellite; T6: Repeat step T5 to determine the phase synchronization configurations of all satellites in set D.

7. The network optimization method for constructing the on-orbit distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 6, wherein In step S4, the master satellite M determines the phase synchronization paired satellites of the direct synchronization satellites, including the following steps: T7: For the direct synchronization satellite i in set D, phase synchronization can be directly achieved through the transmission signal between satellite P and satellite i. Therefore, pair satellite i with satellite P, remove satellite i from set D, and add satellite i to the connected satellite set C1; T8: Perform the operation of step T7 on all direct synchronization satellites in set D.

8. The network optimization method for constructing the on-orbit distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, In step S5, the master satellite M determines the phase synchronization paired satellites of the indirect synchronization satellites, including the following steps: T9: Initialize the positive integer n = 1; T10: For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn for phase synchronization pairing. Cn is the set that can be confirmed to be connected after n judgments. The specific steps are as follows: Q1: For the indirectly synchronized satellite i in set D, use the satellite j in the connected satellite set Cn to perform phase synchronization horn antenna selection, signal-to-noise ratio judgment, and occlusion judgment; If the satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn and the most indirectly synchronized satellites i in set D both meet the signal-to-noise ratio threshold and there is no occlusion, then set satellite P1 as the first-level phase synchronization reference satellite. The satellite P1 in the connected satellite set Cn is preferentially paired with satellite i. The satellite i that cannot be paired with satellite P1 and the remaining satellites j in the connected satellite set Cn except satellite P1 are paired; Q2: Repeat the operation of step Q1 for all satellites in the connected satellite set C n ; Q3: According to the results of steps Q1 and Q2, determine whether satellite i has a paired satellite. If satellite i has a paired satellite, then remove satellite i from set D and add satellite i to the set C of connected satellites n; Q4: Repeat the operations of Q1 - Q3 for all indirectly synchronized satellites in set D, set the subsequently found satellite P2 as the second-level phase synchronization reference satellite, and repeat the above operations; T11: If the number of satellites in the set C of synchronous satellites is 0 or there are no satellites in the set D, then end the pairing process; otherwise, let the positive integer n = n + 1, and repeat step T10. n+1 If the number of satellites in set C of the synchronous satellites is 0 or there are no satellites in set D, then terminate the pairing process; otherwise, increment the positive integer n by 1 and repeat step T10.

9. The network optimization method for constructing a spaceborne distributed radar multi-node synchronization link according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, Each satellite in the distributed multi-satellite system has 8 phase synchronization horn antennas.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Broadband satellite communication system navigation service method, system, equipment and medium

    CN114422020A

  • Satellite synchronization method and device based on wheel type formation satellite constellation

    CN117434553A

  • Satellite network distributed time synchronization control method and system

    CN119030654A