Examination method and system for territorial space control detailed planning result

Abstract

The invention provides an examination method and system for a territorial space control detailed planning achievement, and the method comprises the steps: 1, formulating a control and regulation achievement library element standard according to a target planning plot and the basic information of territorial space planning, compiling a territorial space controllability detailed planning GIS result file according to the basic information and a control and regulation result library element standard; 2, according to the basic information, control data and review rules are determined; 3, summarizing rule types according to the management and control data and the review rules, determining the rule type to which the management and control data belongs, and setting a review process corresponding to the rule type; and 4, according to the review process, reviewing the territorial space controllability detailed planning GIS result file to obtain a review result. According to the method, the content format of the GIS result file is unified, the review rule is cleared and solidified, the free cutting space of reviews is compressed, the review process can be standardized and processed, and the review efficiency and quality are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of urban planning technology, and in particular to a method and system for reviewing the results of detailed land space control planning. Background Art

[0002] After years of development, my country's urban planning has established a "master plan-detailed urban plan" system. Land and space master plans at all levels have generally yielded initial results, and detailed urban planning is gradually maturing. Land and space regulatory detailed planning, based on the master plan, provides detailed regulations and controls for land use and construction activities on specific plots. The technical review of land and space regulatory detailed planning is a professional review and evaluation of the results of these plans.

[0003] At present, the technical review of the detailed land space control plan is still mainly carried out manually, which has the following problems:

[0004] 1. Due to the disconnect between the work flow of reviewers and the training for regulatory review, it is difficult to ensure the stability of manual review efficiency and review quality. In addition, manual technical review has a large margin of discretion, and reviewers' personal judgments vary, which can easily lead to administrative risks.

[0005] 2. The review rules for different land parcel types are derived from different policy documents. The descriptions in these documents are not clear, precise, or concise enough, making it difficult to sort out the review rules and determine the eligibility of land parcels through simple judgment.

[0006] 3. As Chinese cities gradually shift from incremental planning to stock renewal planning, regulatory detailed planning is also evolving from new compilation and revision to single-plot, small-scale planning adjustments. This shift in planning outputs poses new challenges to the current third-party technical review workflow. Summary of the Invention

[0007] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and system for reviewing the results of national land space control detailed planning, so as to solve the above-mentioned problems existing in the existing manual technical review of national land space control detailed planning.

[0008] In order to solve the above technical problems, the technical solution used in the present invention is:

[0009] The present invention provides a method for reviewing the results of detailed land space control planning, comprising:

[0010] Step 1: Based on the basic information of the target planning plot and its corresponding national land space planning, formulate the element standards of the control planning results database, and compile the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file of the target planning plot according to the basic information and the element standards of the control planning results database;

[0011] Step 2: Determine the control data and the review rules corresponding to the control data based on the basic information;

[0012] Step 3: Summarize the rule types based on the control data and the review rules, determine the rule type to which the control data belongs, and set the review process corresponding to the rule type;

[0013] Step 4: Review the GIS output document of the national land space control detailed planning according to the review process to obtain the review results.

[0014] Preferably, the element standard of the control planning results library includes the layer name and the map group name and layer type to which the layer name corresponds.

[0015] Further preferably, the GIS result file of the national land space control detailed planning includes a first-level directory, a second-level directory, a third-level directory, and a fourth-level directory;

[0016] The first-level directory is named after the result file name, the second-level directory is named after the GIS database corresponding to the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file, the third-level directory is named after the map group name, and the fourth-level directory is named after the layer name.

[0017] Preferably, the rule type includes any one of intersection (IN), beyond the urban development boundary (CITY-OUTSIDE), planned land use compliance (LAND-USE), buffer range (BUFFER), height limit (HEIGHT), maintain status quo (SAME), and management unit connectivity (MANAGE).

[0018] Further preferably, the review rule formula for exceeding the urban development boundary is:

[0019]

[0020] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the urban development boundary, U(d) represents obtaining the land class code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface of the plot beyond the urban development boundary, S() function represents finding the area of ​​the surface, Z(d) represents whether the land class code of plot d is consistent with land and sea use, F represents the land class code set, F = {H2, H3, H4, H5, H14, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9, U, B41, S1, W, G1, G2}.

[0021] Further preferably, the review rule formula for the planned land compliance is:

[0022]

[0023] Where d represents the plot, g represents the planned land and sea use layer, U(d) represents the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection surface between the plot and the planned land and sea use, P(I(d,g)) function represents the CZCSX attribute of the intersection surface, K(I(d,g)) function represents the YDYHELDM attribute of the intersection surface, F represents the YDYHELDM attribute set, F = {120100,120200,120300,120400,120500,120600,131200,131300,15

[0024] class,100200,100300}.

[0025] Further preferably, the control data includes an ecological protection red line, the rule type of the ecological protection red line is the intersection, and the review rule formula of the ecological protection red line is:

[0026]

[0027] Where d represents the plot, g represents the ecological protection red line, U(d) represents the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the ecological protection red line, and the S() function represents the area of ​​the surface.

[0028] Alternatively, the control data includes a long-distance oil and gas pipeline, the rule type of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline is the buffer range, and the review rule formula of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline is:

[0029]

[0030] Where d represents the land parcel, g represents the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, U(d) represents the land type code of the land parcel d, B(g) represents the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, I(d,B(g)) represents the intersection of the land parcel and the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, and the S() function represents the area of ​​the surface.

[0031] Alternatively, the control data includes an airport clearance zone and a height control zone, the rule type of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone is the height limit, and the review rule formula of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone is:

[0032]

[0033] Where d represents the plot, g represents the airport clearance zone and height control zone, H(d) represents the building height limit for plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the airport clearance zone and height control zone, L(I(d,g)) represents the clearance requirement for the intersection, and the MIN() function represents the minimum value.

[0034] Alternatively, the control data includes public security facilities, the rule type of the public security facilities is the maintain status quo, and the review rule formula of the public security facilities is:

[0035]

[0036] Where d represents the land parcel, g represents the public security facilities layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of the land parcel d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the land parcel and the public security facilities layer, and the S() function represents finding the area of ​​the surface;

[0037] Alternatively, the control data includes a planning management unit, the rule type of the planning management unit is the management unit connectivity, and the review rule formula of the planning management unit is:

[0038]

[0039] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the planning and management unit layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface where the plot exceeds the planning and management unit, and the S() function represents calculating the area of ​​the surface.

[0040] Another object of the present invention is to provide a review system for the results of detailed land space control planning, including an organization and compilation module, a compilation module, and a third-party review module;

[0041] The organization and compilation module includes a basic information unit, a compilation unit unit, and an audit unit. The basic information unit is used to store basic information uploaded by the organization and compilation unit; the compilation unit unit is used to store a compilation unit name database for selection by the organization and compilation unit, and generates a selection instruction based on the selection of the organization and compilation unit and sends it to the compilation module; the audit unit is used to receive the land and space control detailed planning results for review by the organization and compilation unit, and can send the review results to the compilation module;

[0042] The compilation module includes a receiving unit and a transmitting unit. The receiving unit is used to receive the selected instructions and basic information from the organization compilation module and the review results sent by the third-party review module. The transmitting unit is used to upload the land space control detailed planning results file and send it to the third-party review module.

[0043] The third-party review module includes a machine inspection unit, which is used to receive and read the land space control detailed planning results file and stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements a review method for the land space control detailed planning results as described in any one of claims 1 to 7, and outputs the machine inspection result and determines whether it passes. If the machine inspection result is not passed, the machine inspection result is sent to the compilation module. If the machine inspection result is passed, the machine inspection result and the land space control detailed planning results file are sent to the organization compilation module.

[0044] Preferably, the third-party review module further includes a manual re-inspection unit, which is used to receive the machine inspection result, the land and space control detailed planning outcome file and the uploaded re-inspection result, and determine whether the machine inspection result and the re-inspection result are passed. If both are passed, the machine inspection result, the re-inspection result and the land and space control detailed planning outcome file are sent to the organization and compilation module; otherwise, the machine inspection result and / or the re-inspection result are sent to the compilation module;

[0045] The re-inspection results are obtained by manually re-inspecting the land space control detailed planning outcome document in combination with the machine inspection results.

[0046] Preferably, the review system is connected to a database signal for storing control data, and the control data in the review method is read from the database in real time.

[0047] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the review method for the detailed planning results of land space control described in the present invention are mainly reflected in:

[0048] The present invention unifies the content format of the land space control detailed planning GIS result file of the target planning plot by formulating the element standard of the control planning result library, which can improve the convenience of the review work, and clarifies the review rules while determining the control data, and clarifies and solidifies the review rules, which not only simplifies the sorting of the review rules, but also greatly reduces the discretionary space of the reviewers, ensures the uniformity of the review content and scale, and by summarizing the rule types and setting the review processes corresponding to the rule types, the control data are mapped with the corresponding rule types, so that the review process is standardized and streamlined, which can greatly improve the review efficiency and review quality, and can ensure the stability of the review quality;

[0049] The method of the present invention forms a set of repeatable and applicable standardized review working methods by determining the control data and solidifying the review rules and the review process, saving a lot of repetitive work in manual review work, and conforming to the current development trend of adjusting the control detailed planning to single plot and small-scale planning. By unifying the content format of the control detailed planning result file, it avoids the problem of increasing the difficulty of review due to the diversity of the control planning result file of the same spatial plot, and ensures that the review object file can be applied to the standardized review working method, so it can be applied to multiple reviews of single plot and small-scale planning.

[0050] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the review system for the detailed planning results of land space control described in the present invention are mainly reflected in:

[0051] The review system of the present invention is provided with the organization compilation module, the compilation module and the third-party review module, and supports the three parties involved in the control detailed planning related work, namely the organization compilation unit, the compilation unit and the third-party review unit, to perform process operations and information transmission in the review system. By bringing the three parties together in the review system, the full life cycle management of the control detailed planning compilation can be realized, the efficiency of the three-party communication can be improved, and the detailed information of the entire process can be recorded. The third-party review unit can also perform automatic machine inspection on the control detailed planning result files uploaded by the compilation unit through the machine inspection unit, which can greatly improve the review efficiency and quality. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0052] The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent through a more detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention shown in the accompanying drawings. The same reference numerals indicate the same parts throughout the accompanying drawings, and the drawings are not drawn to scale with actual size. The emphasis is on illustrating the subject matter of the present invention.

[0053] Figure 1 A flowchart of a method for reviewing the results of detailed land space control planning provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0054] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the interface of a GIS output file of a land space control detailed planning provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0055] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the review rules flow for urban development boundaries provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0056] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the review process for planned land and sea use provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0057] Figure 5A schematic diagram of the structure of a review system for detailed land space control planning results provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0058] Reference numeral: None. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0059] The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments, so that those skilled in the art can better understand the present invention and implement it. However, the embodiments given do not limit the present invention. In this embodiment, it should be understood that the directions or positional relationships indicated by terms such as "longitudinal", "transverse", "up", "down", "front", "back", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inside", and "outside" are based on the directions or positional relationships shown in the accompanying drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the present invention, rather than indicating or implying that the device or element referred to must have a specific direction, be constructed and operated in a specific direction, and therefore cannot be understood as a limitation of the present invention.

[0060] It should be noted that when an element is considered to be "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected to the other element and integrated therewith, or there may be an intermediate element. The terms "mounted," "one end," "the other end," and similar expressions used in this invention are for illustrative purposes only.

[0061] It should be noted that the detailed control plan for national land space is a type of planning that makes detailed provisions and controls on the land use and construction activities of specific plots on the basis of the overall plan for national land space. It takes land use control as the core, refines and implements the macro requirements of the overall plan to specific plots, and provides a direct basis for land development, construction project approval, etc., and plays a role in connecting the upper and lower levels and precise control. The implementation method of this specification will be explained with the detailed control plan for national land space of XXX plot in my country as an example, but it does not mean that the method and system in this specification are only applicable to XXX plot, and does not affect its applicability in the detailed control plan of other spatial plots.

[0062] This embodiment provides a review method for the results of detailed land space control planning, such as Figure 1 Shown, including:

[0063] Step 1: Based on the basic information of the target planning plot and its corresponding national land space planning, formulate the element standards of the control planning results database, and compile the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file of the target planning plot according to the basic information and the element standards of the control planning results database;

[0064] The element standards of the regulatory planning results database are shown in Table 1 below:

[0065] Table 1 Detailed planning results elements

[0066]

[0067]

[0068]

[0069] Basic information includes national laws, regulations and policy basis related to land space planning, as well as the planning basis of the province, city, county and township where the target planning plot is located. The latest national basis is as follows:

[0070] Urban and Rural Planning Law of the People's Republic of China (2008);

[0071] In 2019, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued the "Several Opinions on Establishing a National Land Space Planning System and Supervising Its Implementation";

[0072] In 2019, the Ministry of Natural Resources issued the "Notice on Comprehensively Carrying out National Land Space Planning Work";

[0073] In 2020, the General Office of the Ministry of Natural Resources issued the "Notice on Strengthening the Supervision and Management of National Land Space Planning";

[0074] In 2021, the Guangdong Provincial Department of Natural Resources issued the "Notice on Several Guiding Opinions on Strengthening and Improving the Management of Regulatory Detailed Planning (Interim)";

[0075] In 2023, the Ministry of Natural Resources issued the "Notice on Strengthening Detailed National Land Space Planning" and other documents;

[0076] The latest local planning basis for the location of the target planning plot, such as:

[0077] 2023 "XX Provincial Land and Space Planning (2021-2035)";

[0078] 2024 "XX City Land and Space Master Plan (2021-2035)"

[0079] 2024 draft of the "XX District National Land Space Master Plan (2021-2035) of XX City";

[0080] 2024 "Technical Review Manual for Detailed National Land and Space Planning Results in XX District, XX City", etc.;

[0081] Step 2: Based on the above basic information, determine the control data and the review rules corresponding to the control data;

[0082] The control data and corresponding review rules must be determined by sorting out the above basic information.

[0083] Step 3: Summarize the rule types based on the control data and the review rules, determine the rule type to which the control data belongs, and set the review process corresponding to the rule type;

[0084] When the basic information remains constant, the control data and review rules for the same target planning plot remain unchanged during the same period. By utilizing the commonalities among different review rules, summarizing the rule types, and formulating corresponding review processes, the review process can be simplified and review efficiency can be improved.

[0085] Step 4: Review the GIS output document of the national land space control detailed planning according to the review process to obtain the review results;

[0086] This embodiment unifies the content format of the land space control detailed planning GIS result file of the target planning plot by formulating the element standard of the control planning result library, which can improve the convenience of the review work. In addition, the review rules are clarified while determining the control data, and the review rules are clarified and solidified. This not only simplifies the sorting of review rules, but also greatly reduces the discretionary space of reviewers, ensuring the uniformity of review content and scale. Moreover, by summarizing the rule types and setting the review processes corresponding to the rule types, the control data are all mapped to the corresponding rule types, thereby standardizing and streamlining the review process, which can greatly improve the review efficiency and review quality, and can ensure the stability of the review quality.

[0087] The method of the present invention forms a set of repeatable and applicable standardized review working methods by determining the control data and solidifying the review rules and the review process, saving a lot of repetitive work in manual review work, and conforming to the current development trend of adjusting the control detailed planning to single plot and small-scale planning. By unifying the content format of the control detailed planning result file, it avoids the problem of increasing the difficulty of review due to the diversity of the control planning result file of the same spatial plot, and ensures that the review object file can be applied to the standardized review working method, so it can be applied to multiple reviews of single plot and small-scale planning.

[0088] In a preferred embodiment, as shown in Table 1, the element standard for the regulatory planning database includes a layer name, the drawing group name to which the layer name corresponds, and the layer type. This means that a single drawing group can contain one or more different layers. Naming layers ensures uniqueness, facilitating the development of a review process and the verification of compliance for each layer.

[0089] In a further preferred embodiment, Figure 3 As shown, the GIS result file of the national land space control detailed planning includes the first-level directory, the second-level directory, the third-level directory, and the fourth-level directory;

[0090] The first-level directory is named after the result file name, the second-level directory is named after the GIS database corresponding to the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file, the third-level directory is named after the map group name, and the fourth-level directory is named after the layer name.

[0091] This embodiment unifies the format of GIS achievement files, making them clear and easy to read.

[0092] In another preferred embodiment, the rule type includes any one of intersection (IN), beyond the urban development boundary (CITY-OUTSIDE), planned land use compliance (LAND-USE), buffer range (BUFFER), height limit (HEIGHT), maintain status quo (SAME), and management unit connectivity (MANAGE). That is, the rule base for the control detailed planning review can be set as:

[0093] R={R IN ,R CITY-OUTSIDE ,R LAND-USE ,R BUFFER ,R HEIGHT ,R SAME ,R MANAGE}

[0094] The intersection review rules can check out the plots in the control detailed planning output document that intersect with the control layer in space and do not conform to the allowed land class codes or prohibited land class codes set therein.

[0095] The rule for reviewing land outside the urban development boundary can identify plots that do not meet the relevant judgment of the urban development boundary. This rule can identify the following two types of plots:

[0096] Category I:

[0097] (1) Beyond the urban development boundary;

[0098] (2) The land parcel code is not E;

[0099] (3) The plot code is not

[0100] Among H2 / H3 / H4 / H5 / H14 / A2 / A3 / A4 / A5 / A6 / A7 / A9 / U / B41 / S1 / W / G1 / G2;

[0101] Category II:

[0102] (1) Beyond the urban development boundary;

[0103] (2) The land parcel code is not E;

[0104] (3) Plot code

[0105] Among H2 / H3 / H4 / H5 / H14 / A2 / A3 / A4 / A5 / A6 / A7 / A9 / U / B41 / S1 / W / G1 / G2;

[0106] (3) The area of ​​the land plot that exceeds the urban development boundary exceeds 200 square meters;

[0107] (4) The land parcel does not comply with land and sea use planning.

[0108] The planning land compliance review rules can check out plots that do not meet the relevant judgments of planning land. This rule can check the following three types of plots:

[0109] Category I:

[0110] (1) The plot code belongs to H;

[0111] (2) The plot code belongs to H11;

[0112] (3) In the area where the land parcel intersects with the planned land and sea use layer, there is any area whose CZCSX attribute is not one of 10 / 20;

[0113] Category II:

[0114] (1) The plot code belongs to H;

[0115] (2) The land parcel code does not belong to H11;

[0116] (3) The plot code belongs to H14;

[0117] (4) In the patch where the land parcel intersects with the planned land and sea use layer, there is any patch whose CZCSX attribute is not 10;

[0118] Category III:

[0119] (1) The plot code belongs to H;

[0120] (2) The land parcel code does not belong to H11;

[0121] (3) The land parcel code does not belong to H14;

[0122] (4) For any of the plots where the land parcel intersects with the planned land and sea use layers, there exists a plot whose CZCSX attribute is not one of 10 / 20 and whose YDYHFLDM attribute is not among 120100 / 120200 / 120300 / 120400 / 120500 / 120600 / 131200 / 131300 / 15 classes / 100200 / 100300.

[0123] The buffer range review rules can check out the plots in the control detailed planning output file that intersect with a certain buffer range of the control layer and do not conform to the allowed land class codes or prohibited land class codes set therein.

[0124] The height limit review rules can check for plots in the control detailed planning output document that intersect with the space of the control layer and do not comply with the building height limit requirements set therein.

[0125] By maintaining the status quo review rules, it is possible to check out plots in the control detailed planning outcome document that intersect with the special planning layer space and are inconsistent with the special planning, or plots that do not exist in the special planning but are part of this type of special planning.

[0126] The management unit connectivity review rules can check whether there are misalignments, overlaps, and gaps between the planning scope and the boundaries of the affiliated management units and adjacent management units.

[0127] In a further preferred embodiment, according to the relevant provisions of the "Guiding Opinions on Coordinating the Demarcation and Implementation of Three Control Lines in National Land Space Planning" issued by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council, the "Letter from the Ministry of Natural Resources on Carrying out the Demarcation of the 'Three Zones and Three Lines' Nationwide (2022)", the "Guidelines for the Preparation of XX Municipal Land Space Master Plan (Trial)", the "Technical Guidelines for the Preparation of County-level Land Space Master Plans in XX Province (Trial)", the "Technical Guidelines for the Preparation of XX District Land Space Master Plans in XX City (Trial)", and the "Notice of the XX Municipal Planning and Natural Resources Bureau on Issuing the Treatment Measures for Approved Controlled Detailed Planning Land Outside the Urban Development Boundary of Guangzhou (Draft for Comments)", the review rules and procedures for the urban development boundary can be sorted out as follows. Figure 3 As shown, the review rule formula for exceeding the urban development boundary is:

[0128]

[0129] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the urban development boundary, U(d) represents obtaining the land class code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface of the plot beyond the urban development boundary, S() function represents finding the area of ​​the surface, Z(d) represents whether the land class code of plot d is consistent with land and sea use, F represents the land class code set, F = {H2, H3, H4, H5, H14, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9, U, B41, S1, W, G1, G2}.

[0130] In another specific example, according to the "Notice of the Department of Land and Resources of XX Province on Further Standardizing the Revision of the Overall Land Use Plan", the land used for urban and rural construction in the land use plan can be used for the land used for transportation, water use and other construction purposes in the detailed plan, but the reverse is not allowed. Figure 4As shown, the formula for reviewing the compliance of the planned land use is:

[0131]

[0132] Where d represents the plot, g represents the planned land and sea use layer, U(d) represents the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection surface between the plot and the planned land and sea use, P(I(d,g)) function represents the CZCSX attribute of the intersection surface, K(I(d,g)) function represents the YDYHELDM attribute of the intersection surface, F represents the YDYHELDM attribute set, F = {120100,120200,120300,120400,120500,120600,131200,131300,15

[0133] class,100200,100300}.

[0134] In another preferred embodiment, the control data includes an ecological protection red line, and the rule type of the ecological protection red line is the intersection. According to the "Guiding Opinions on the Overall Delineation and Implementation of Three Control Lines in National Land Space Planning" issued by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council, and the "Notice on Strengthening the Management of Ecological Protection Red Lines (Trial)" issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, and the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, through analysis of the above documents, the review rule for the ecological protection red line can be defined as the land type code of the plot that intersects the ecological protection red line is E. The review rule for the ecological protection red line can be expressed using a mathematical formula as follows:

[0135]

[0136] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the ecological protection red line, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the ecological protection red line, and the S() function represents calculating the area of ​​the surface.

[0137] In another preferred embodiment, the control data includes long-distance oil and gas pipelines. According to the "Code for Design of Gas Pipeline Engineering (GB 50251-2015)" and the "Code for Design of Oil Pipeline Engineering (GB 50253-2014)", the review rules for long-distance oil and gas pipelines can be defined as not allowing R / A plots within a certain buffer zone, that is, the rule type of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline is the buffer range. The review rule formula for the long-distance oil and gas pipeline can be expressed using a mathematical formula as follows:

[0138]

[0139] Where d represents the land parcel, g represents the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, U(d) represents the land type code of the land parcel d, B(g) represents the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, I(d,B(g)) represents the intersection of the land parcel and the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, and the S() function represents the area of ​​the surface.

[0140] In another preferred embodiment, the control data includes an airport clearance zone and a height control zone. According to the opinions of the relevant management bureau of the Civil Aviation Administration, the building height limit of the plot is not allowed to exceed the corresponding airport clearance requirements. The rule type of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone can be set to the height limit. The review rules of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone can be expressed using mathematical formulas as follows:

[0141]

[0142] Where d represents the plot, g represents the airport clearance zone and height control zone, H(d) represents obtaining the building height limit of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the airport clearance zone and height control zone, L(I(d,g)) represents the clearance requirement of the intersection, and the MIN() function represents finding the minimum value.

[0143] In another preferred embodiment, the control data includes public security facilities. According to the relevant provisions that "for independent land-occupying facilities, their site selection and layout shall implement a detailed planning map (i.e., the control planning plot guide layer); relevant construction standards, construction sequence, etc. shall refer to the approved special planning results (corresponding vector data layers and paper results). For non-independent land-occupying facilities, their site selection and layout, construction standards, construction sequence, etc. shall refer to both the detailed planning map and the approved special planning results, and be implemented after coordination. According to this requirement, the area and plot code (H4) of the plot shall be consistent with the public security facility layer", the rule type of the public security facility is set to the status quo, and the mathematical formula for expressing the review rule of the public security facility is:

[0144]

[0145] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the public security facilities layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the public security facilities layer, and the S() function represents calculating the area of ​​the surface.

[0146] In another preferred embodiment, the control data includes a planning management unit. According to the relevant provisions that "there is no misalignment, overlap, or gap between the planning scope and the boundaries of the management unit to which it belongs and the adjacent management unit. There is no misalignment, overlap, or gap between the boundary of the plot and the boundary line of the adjacent management unit", the rule type of the planning management unit is set to the management unit connectivity. The mathematical formula for expressing the review rule of the planning management unit is:

[0147]

[0148] Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the planning and management unit layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface where the plot exceeds the planning and management unit, and the S() function represents calculating the area of ​​the surface.

[0149] In addition, if Figure 5 As shown, an embodiment of a review system for the results of detailed land space control planning is also provided, including an organization and preparation module, a preparation module and a third-party review module;

[0150] The organization and compilation module includes a basic information unit, a compilation unit unit, and an audit unit. The basic information unit is used to store basic information uploaded by the organization and compilation unit, such as the planning compilation scope, control plan base data, compilation requirements, and compilation specifications; the compilation unit unit is used to store a compilation unit name database for selection by the organization and compilation unit, and generates a selection instruction based on the selection of the organization and compilation unit and sends it to the compilation module; the audit unit is used to receive the land and space control detailed planning outcome document for review by the organization and compilation unit, and can send the review result to the compilation module;

[0151] The compilation module includes a receiving unit and a transmitting unit. The receiving unit is used to receive the selected instructions and basic information from the organization compilation module and the review results sent by the third-party review module. The transmitting unit is used to upload the land space control detailed planning results file and send it to the third-party review module.

[0152] The third-party review module includes a machine inspection unit, which is used to receive and read the land space control detailed planning results file and stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the aforementioned method for reviewing the land space control detailed planning results, and outputs the machine inspection result and determines whether it passes. If the machine inspection result is not passed, the machine inspection result is sent to the compilation module. If the machine inspection result is passed, the machine inspection result and the land space control detailed planning results file are sent to the organization compilation module.

[0153] The review system of this embodiment is provided with the organization compilation module, the compilation module and the third-party review module, which supports the three parties involved in the control detailed planning related work, namely the organization compilation unit, the compilation unit and the third-party review unit to perform process operations and information exchange in the review system. By bringing the three parties together in the review system, the whole life cycle management of the control detailed planning compilation can be realized, the efficiency of the three-party communication can be improved, and the detailed information of the entire process can be recorded. In addition, the third-party review unit can also perform automatic machine inspection on the control detailed planning result documents uploaded by the compilation unit through the machine inspection unit, which can greatly improve the review efficiency and quality.

[0154] The machine inspection results can be in the form of text descriptions or in the form of a list report as shown in Table 2 below:

[0155] Table 2 Review report

[0156]

[0157]

[0158]

[0159] Further preferably, the third-party review module also includes a manual re-inspection unit, which is used to receive the machine inspection result, the land and space control detailed planning outcome file and the uploaded re-inspection result, and judge whether the machine inspection result and the re-inspection result are passed. If both are passed, the machine inspection result, the re-inspection result and the land and space control detailed planning outcome file are sent to the organization and compilation module; otherwise, the machine inspection result and / or the re-inspection result are sent to the compilation module;

[0160] The re-inspection results are obtained by manually re-inspecting the land space control detailed planning outcome document in combination with the machine inspection results.

[0161] After the manual re-inspection unit is set up in the system of this embodiment, manual re-inspection can be combined to further ensure the reliability and timeliness of the review results.

[0162] Further preferably, the review system is signal-connected to a database storing control data, and the control data used in the review method is read from the database in real time. Because the database is updated in real time, the control data in this embodiment can be read from the database in real time, ensuring the real-time and integrity of the control data. This avoids the problem of review errors caused by the lack of timeliness of control data derived during traditional regulatory review and comparison, which occurs when control data is exported during a specific time period. Specifically, in the case of an Oracle database, business personnel can update the control data in the database in real time by simply updating the Oracle data.

[0163] In this specification, unless otherwise expressly specified or limited, when a first feature is "above" or "below" a second feature, it can mean that the first and second features are in direct contact, or that the first and second features are in indirect contact through an intermediary. Furthermore, when a first feature is "above," "above," or "above" a second feature, it can mean that the first feature is directly above or diagonally above the second feature, or simply means that the first feature is at a higher level than the second feature. When a first feature is "below," "below," or "below" a second feature, it can mean that the first feature is directly below or diagonally below the second feature, or simply means that the first feature is at a lower level than the second feature.

[0164] In the description of this specification, the description with reference to the terms "preferred embodiment", "further embodiment", "other embodiments" or "specific example" means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present application. In this specification, the schematic expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described can be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art can combine and combine different embodiments or examples described in this specification and the features of different embodiments or examples, unless they are contradictory.

[0165] Although the embodiments of the present application have been shown and described above, it can be understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and cannot be understood as limitations on the present application. Ordinary technicians in this field can change, modify, replace and modify the above embodiments within the scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for reviewing the results of detailed land space control planning, characterized by: include: Step 1: Based on the basic information of the target planning plot and its corresponding national land space planning, formulate the element standards of the control planning results database, and compile the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file of the target planning plot according to the basic information and the element standards of the control planning results database; Step 2: Determine the control data and the review rules corresponding to the control data based on the basic information; Step 3: Summarize the rule types based on the control data and the review rules, determine the rule type to which the control data belongs, and set the review process corresponding to the rule type; Step 4: Review the GIS output document of the national land space control detailed planning according to the review process to obtain the review results.

2. The examination method according to claim 1, wherein: The element standard of the control planning results library includes the layer name and the map group name and layer type to which the layer name corresponds.

3. The examination method according to claim 2, wherein: The GIS output files of the national land space control detailed planning include the first-level directory, the second-level directory, the third-level directory, and the fourth-level directory; The first-level directory is named after the result file name, the second-level directory is named after the GIS database corresponding to the national land space control detailed planning GIS result file, the third-level directory is named after the map group name, and the fourth-level directory is named after the layer name.

4. The examination method according to claim 1, wherein: The rule type includes any one of intersection (IN), exceeding the urban development boundary (CITY-OUTSIDE), planned land use compliance (LAND-USE), buffer range (BUFFER), height limit (HEIGHT), maintaining the status quo (SAME), and management unit connectivity (MANAGE).

5. The examination method according to claim 4, wherein: The formula for reviewing the scope beyond the urban development boundary is: Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the urban development boundary, U(d) represents obtaining the land class code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface of the plot beyond the urban development boundary, S() function represents finding the area of ​​the surface, Z(d) represents whether the land class code of plot d is consistent with land and sea use, F represents the land class code set, F = {H2, H3, H4, H5, H14, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9, U, B41, S1, W, G1, G2}.

6. The examination method according to claim 4, wherein: The formula for reviewing the compliance of the planned land use is as follows: Where d represents the plot, g represents the planned land and sea use layer, U(d) represents the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection surface between the plot and the planned land and sea use, P(I(d,g)) function represents the CZCSX attribute of the intersection surface, K(I(d,g)) function represents the YDYHELDM attribute of the intersection surface, F represents the YDYHELDM attribute set, F = {120100,120200,120300,120400,120500,120600,131200,131300,15 class,100200,100300}.

7. The examination method according to claim 4, wherein: The control data includes an ecological protection red line, the rule type of the ecological protection red line is the intersection, and the review rule formula of the ecological protection red line is: Where d represents the plot, g represents the ecological protection red line, U(d) represents the land type code of plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the ecological protection red line, and the S() function represents the area of ​​the surface. Alternatively, the control data includes a long-distance oil and gas pipeline, the rule type of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline is the buffer range, and the review rule formula of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline is: Where d represents the land parcel, g represents the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, U(d) represents the land type code of the land parcel d, B(g) represents the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, I(d,B(g)) represents the intersection of the land parcel and the buffer zone of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline, and the S() function represents the area of ​​the surface. Alternatively, the control data includes an airport clearance zone and a height control zone, the rule type of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone is the height limit, and the review rule formula of the airport clearance zone and the height control zone is: Where d represents the plot, g represents the airport clearance zone and height control zone, H(d) represents the building height limit for plot d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the plot and the airport clearance zone and height control zone, L(I(d,g)) represents the clearance requirement for the intersection, and the MIN() function represents the minimum value. Alternatively, the control data includes public security facilities, the rule type of the public security facilities is the maintain status quo, and the review rule formula of the public security facilities is: Where d represents the land parcel, g represents the public security facilities layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of the land parcel d, I(d,g) represents the intersection of the land parcel and the public security facilities layer, and the S() function represents finding the area of ​​the surface; Alternatively, the control data includes a planning management unit, the rule type of the planning management unit is the management unit connectivity, and the review rule formula of the planning management unit is: Among them, d represents the plot, g represents the planning and management unit layer, U(d) represents obtaining the land type code of plot d, D(d,g) represents the surface where the plot exceeds the planning and management unit, and the S() function represents calculating the area of ​​the surface.

8. A review system for the results of detailed land space control planning, characterized by: It includes organization compilation module, compilation module and third-party audit module; The organization establishment module includes a basic information unit, an establishment unit unit and an audit unit. The basic information unit is used to store the basic information uploaded by the organization establishment unit; The organization unit unit is used to store the organization unit name library for selection by the organization organization unit, and generates a selection instruction according to the selection of the organization organization unit and sends it to the organization module; The review unit is used to receive the land space control detailed planning outcome document for review by the organization and compilation unit, and can send the review result to the compilation module; The compilation module includes a receiving unit and a transmitting unit. The receiving unit is used to receive the selected instructions and basic information from the organization compilation module and the review results sent by the third-party review module. The transmitting unit is used to upload the land space control detailed planning results file and send it to the third-party review module. The third-party review module includes a machine inspection unit, which is used to receive and read the land space control detailed planning results file and stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements a review method for the land space control detailed planning results as described in any one of claims 1 to 7, and outputs the machine inspection result and determines whether it passes. If the machine inspection result is not passed, the machine inspection result is sent to the compilation module. If the machine inspection result is passed, the machine inspection result and the land space control detailed planning results file are sent to the organization compilation module.

9. The review system according to claim 8, characterized in that: The third-party review module also includes a manual re-inspection unit, which is used to receive the machine inspection result, the land and space control detailed planning result file and the uploaded re-inspection result, and determine whether the machine inspection result and the re-inspection result are passed. If both are passed, the machine inspection result, the re-inspection result and the land and space control detailed planning result file are sent to the organization and compilation module; otherwise, the machine inspection result and / or the re-inspection result are sent to the compilation module; The re-inspection results are obtained by manually re-inspecting the land space control detailed planning outcome document in combination with the machine inspection results.

10. The review system according to claim 8, wherein: The review system is connected to a database signal for storing control data, and the control data in the review method is read from the database in real time.

Images