Grammar class implementation method and system for variable operation tracking integrated in programming language

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of compiler implementation, and discloses a grammar class implementation method and system for variable operation tracking integrated in a programming language, and the method comprises the steps: instantiating a grammar class of an OSE programming language, and building a binding mapping relation between a user interface element and the grammar class, so as to configure a Traceable variable tracking interface; identifying a type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relation to generate an executable intermediate code of the target variable; defining a callback update triggering rule corresponding to the user interface element in the Traceable variable tracking interface, and executing callback update processing of the user interface element based on the callback update triggering rule after the operation behavior of the target variable is intercepted; and fusing a Traceable variable tracking interface, executing the intermediate code and callback the updating result, and outputting an operation tracking result of the target variable. According to the method, the expandability and the code maintainability of the programming language can be improved through the built-in grammar class defined in the OSE programming language.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to a syntax class implementation method and system for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language, belonging to the field of compiler implementation technology. Background Technology

[0002] Variable manipulation tracking integrated into programming languages ​​is a mechanism that automatically monitors and records variable reading, assignment, and scope lifecycle through built-in syntax classes defined in the OSE programming language. It does not rely on runtime reflection or external debugging tools, but is a built-in syntax class feature of the language. Its main purpose is to support full-stack developers in developing traceable variable definition and manipulation code in the ObjectSense (OSE) language. This code can be compiled to generate corresponding front-end and back-end programs, and any changes to back-end variables during program execution can be tracked in real time and synchronously fed back to the front-end interface for visualization.

[0003] However, current mainstream programming languages ​​mainly rely on a combination of external tools and manual coding. By introducing new keywords or integrating third-party logging libraries into the code, variable operations can be tracked. While this approach can enhance the expressiveness of the language, the introduction of new keywords directly increases syntactic complexity. This not only raises the learning threshold for beginners but also makes the language specification itself bloated, affecting the flexibility of language expansion. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention provides a syntax class implementation method and system for variable operation tracking integrated into a programming language. Its main purpose is to improve the scalability and maintainability of the programming language by implementing variable tracking through built-in syntax classes defined in the OSE programming language, rather than new keywords.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this invention provides a syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language, comprising:

[0006] Obtain user interface elements and parse the source code of the OSE programming language; based on the source code, instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language.

[0007] Establish a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and configure a Traceable variable tracing interface within the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship;

[0008] Identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, load the executable intermediate code to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0009] In the Traceable variable tracing interface, the callback update triggering rule corresponding to the user interface element is defined. When the operation is intercepted, the callback update processing of the user interface element is executed based on the callback update triggering rule to obtain the callback update result.

[0010] By integrating the Traceable variable tracing interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result, the operation tracing result of the target variable is output.

[0011] Optionally, based on the binding mapping relationship, a Traceable variable tracing interface is configured within the syntax class, including:

[0012] Identify the syntax class variables to be tracked in the syntax class;

[0013] Based on the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, identify the set of Traceable interface methods to be overridden within the syntax class to determine the basic callback template corresponding to the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0014] Generate the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship;

[0015] The scope of the Traceable interface of the syntax class is determined based on the scope modifier of the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0016] Establish a deterministic association between the Traceable interface method set and the trace-synchronization logic;

[0017] Based on the deterministic association, the configuration of the Traceable variable tracing interface is completed within the effective scope of the Traceable interface.

[0018] Optionally, generating the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship includes:

[0019] Extract the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and UI element identifiers from the binding mapping relationship;

[0020] Based on the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, determine the state change monitoring strategy for the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0021] Based on the interface element identifier, locate the corresponding user interface component instance in the binding mapping relationship, and determine the interface update instruction of the user interface component instance.

[0022] Based on the state change monitoring strategy and the interface update instruction, the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variables to be tracked is generated.

[0023] Optionally, establishing the binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class includes:

[0024] Read the unique identifier and bindable attributes of the user interface element;

[0025] Based on the unique identifier, locate the target variable state source corresponding to the user interface element in the syntax class;

[0026] Based on the association characteristics of the bindable attributes and the target variable state source, define the mapping rules between the user interface elements and the syntax class;

[0027] Based on the target variable state source, generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0028] By integrating the unique identifier, the target variable state source, the mapping rule, and the front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions, a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class is established.

[0029] Optionally, based on the target variable state source, front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule are generated, including:

[0030] Identify the semantic type identifier of the target variable state source, wherein the semantic type identifier includes value semantic type and composite semantic type;

[0031] When the semantic type is identified as a value semantic type, configure the value change synchronization trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0032] When the semantic type is identified as a composite semantic type, configure the structure depth change trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0033] Parse the lifecycle context of the target variable state source to determine the inherent effective scope of the mapping rule;

[0034] Based on the inherent effective scope, set the scope constraint rules corresponding to the value change synchronization triggering condition and the structure depth change triggering condition;

[0035] Identify the access pattern of the target variable state source, and combine the access pattern with the scope constraint rules to generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rules.

[0036] Optionally, based on the source code, instantiating the syntax class of the OSE programming language includes:

[0037] Parse the generic class structure and fully qualified class name of the source code;

[0038] Extract the syntax class identifier from the generic class structure, and based on the fully qualified class name, retrieve the syntax class definition corresponding to the syntax class identifier from the predefined syntax class meta information registry;

[0039] Extract the semantic types and behavioral constraint rules defined in the syntax class;

[0040] Based on the type parameter in the generic class declaration, perform type instantiation processing of the syntax class definition to generate a syntax class template;

[0041] By combining the semantic type and the behavioral constraint rules, the syntax processing node corresponding to the syntax class template is constructed;

[0042] The instantiation scope of the syntax processing node is determined based on the scope context in the source code.

[0043] Based on the mapping relationship between the type parameters and the behavior constraint rules, a semantic association link is established between the syntax processing node and the syntax class template;

[0044] Based on the syntax processing node, the instantiation scope, and the semantic association link, an instance of the syntax class of the OSE programming language is generated to complete the instantiation of the syntax class of the OSE programming language.

[0045] Optionally, identifying the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment includes:

[0046] Based on the type identifier, the value semantics and composite semantics of the target variable are separated, and the type boundaries of the value semantics and the composite semantics are defined;

[0047] Based on the type boundary, a direct storage strategy and lightweight monitoring paradigm for the value semantics in the OSE front-end code compilation scenario are constructed, and a reference storage strategy and deep monitoring control paradigm for the composite semantics in the OSE back-end code compilation scenario are constructed simultaneously.

[0048] By integrating the direct storage strategy, the lightweight monitoring paradigm, the reference storage strategy, and the deep monitoring control paradigm, a tracking and processing paradigm for the target variable is obtained.

[0049] Based on the aforementioned tracing processing paradigm, executable intermediate code for the target variable is generated in the OSE runtime environment.

[0050] Optionally, during the OSE programming language runtime, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, including:

[0051] The executable intermediate code is parsed to intercept the operation instructions of the target variable, wherein the operation interception instructions include LOAD read instructions and STORE write instructions;

[0052] When the OSE programming language is running, the variable access monitor corresponding to the operation interception instruction is activated;

[0053] When the program execution flow of the OSE programming language reaches the bytecode location corresponding to the target variable, the interception processing logic in the executable intermediate code is executed through the variable access monitor to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0054] Optionally, the callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements are defined in the Traceable variable tracing interface, including:

[0055] Obtain the operation type sequence of the tracked variable in the Traceable variable tracking interface and the attribute update sequence corresponding to the user interface element;

[0056] Establish a mapping relationship between the operation type sequence and the attribute update sequence for trigger conditions;

[0057] Based on the trigger condition mapping relationship, construct a variable-interface response rule table corresponding to the tracking variable and the user interface element;

[0058] Extract the reactive update workflow from the variable-interface response rule table;

[0059] Based on the responsive update workflow, define the callback update trigger rules corresponding to the user interface elements.

[0060] To address the aforementioned problems, this invention also provides a syntax class implementation system integrated into variable operation tracking in a programming language, the system comprising:

[0061] A syntax class building module is used to obtain user interface elements, parse the source code of the OSE programming language, and instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code;

[0062] The tracing interface configuration module is used to establish the binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and to configure the Traceable variable tracing interface in the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship.

[0063] The code generation module is used to identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship, so as to generate executable intermediate code of the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0064] The intercept callback module is used to define the callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements in the Traceable variable tracing interface. When the operation is intercepted, the callback update processing of the user interface elements is executed based on the callback update triggering rules to obtain the callback update result.

[0065] The result output module is used to integrate the Traceable variable tracing interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result to output the operation tracing result of the target variable.

[0066] Compared to the problems described in the background art, this embodiment of the invention, by instantiating the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code, can transform the declarative syntax class definition into a concrete entity that can be operated and bound at runtime, providing a functional carrier for establishing a variable tracking mechanism, thereby enhancing the adaptability of the syntax class to diverse syntax class extension scenarios in the OSE programming language and the accuracy of variable tracking functionality; furthermore, by establishing a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, this embodiment of the invention can construct a deterministic data path from the internal state of the program to the external visual presentation, providing a logical basis for the subsequent automatic synchronization of variable state changes to interface updates; ... The binding mapping relationship is described, and a Traceable variable tracking interface is configured within the syntax class. This clarifies the dynamic weaving relationship and operational rules between the syntax class rule boundaries and variable operation behaviors at compile time and runtime, thereby specifically optimizing the declarative syntax simplicity, runtime monitoring granularity, and overall execution performance of the OSE programming language in variable state tracking. Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention identifies the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. This establishes a precise runtime foundation for subsequent variable operation tracking and interface synchronization, ensuring strict matching between the tracking logic and variable characteristics, thereby achieving high performance. Effective and correct responsive behavior; This embodiment of the invention, by loading the executable intermediate code during the OSE programming language runtime to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, can establish a precise control link between the compile-time generated tracing logic and the runtime environment. This allows for the automatic activation of predefined tracing callbacks at critical moments when the target variable is accessed or modified, achieving seamless monitoring and intervention of the program execution flow while maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the original logic. Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention, by executing callback update processing of the user interface elements based on the callback update triggering rules after the operation behavior is intercepted, and obtaining the callback update result, can complete the process from variable state change to visual feedback of the user interface. The final conversion of the feedback achieves real-time consistency between the internal state of the program and its external presentation, simplifies the development process for full-stack developers, and enables the definition and use of front-end and back-end traceable variables within a single programming language. Finally, by integrating the Traceable variable tracking interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update results, this embodiment of the invention outputs the operation tracking results of the target variable. This not only enables the intrinsic integration and declarative control of the OSE programming language variable operation tracking mechanism, significantly improving the development efficiency, runtime performance, and code maintainability of variable operation tracking, but also provides developers with precise insights into the internal state of the program, achieving closed-loop verification of end-to-end observability of program state transitions.Therefore, this invention can improve the scalability and maintainability of programming languages ​​by using the built-in syntax classes defined in the OSE programming language. Attached Figure Description

[0067] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language, provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0068] Figure 2 A system diagram of a syntax class for implementing a syntax class method for tracking variable operations in a programming language, provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0069] Figure 3 The flowchart illustrates the operation of the Traceable variable tracing interface, which is an implementation method of a syntax class for tracing variable operations in a programming language, provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0070] Figure 4 A variable response timing diagram for a syntax class implementation method for tracking variable operations in a programming language, provided as an embodiment of the present invention;

[0071] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of a module for implementing a syntax class system that integrates variable operation tracking in a programming language, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0072] The objectives, features, and advantages of this invention will be further explained in conjunction with the embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. Detailed Implementation

[0073] It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.

[0074] This application provides a syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language. The execution entity of this syntax class implementation method includes, but is not limited to, at least one of the following electronic devices that can be configured to execute the method provided in this application: a server, a terminal, etc. In other words, the syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language can be executed by software or hardware installed on a terminal device or a server device. The server includes, but is not limited to, a single server, a server cluster, a cloud server, or a cloud server cluster.

[0075] Reference Figure 1 The diagram shown is a flowchart illustrating a syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language includes:

[0076] S1. Obtain the user interface elements and parse the source code of the OSE programming language. Based on the source code, instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language.

[0077] By acquiring user interface elements and parsing the source code of the OSE programming language, this invention can establish a traceable association between user interface elements and the state of the backend program, laying a data foundation for subsequent implementation of responsive interface updates.

[0078] The user interface elements refer to the various visual components or interactive objects that constitute the software user interface (UI), and are the direct carriers for users to interact with the program; the OSE programming language, short for ObjectSense programming language, is an extensible dynamic language with a built-in SyntacticClass core metaprogramming mechanism. Its core function is to allow developers to extend the language syntax in a declarative way by using Prefer code blocks and fully qualified class names, without modifying the language compiler or introducing new keywords.

[0079] Furthermore, in this embodiment of the invention, by instantiating the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code, the declarative syntax class definition can be transformed into a runtime operable entity, providing a functional carrier for the variable tracking mechanism, and enhancing the adaptability of the syntax class to OSE extended scenarios and the accuracy of variable tracking. The syntax class is an extensible method carrier of the OSE programming language, and the OSE programming language has built-in syntax classes such as Traceable and supports user customization.

[0080] As an embodiment of the present invention, based on the source code, instantiating the syntax class of the OSE programming language includes:

[0081] Parse the generic class structure and fully qualified class name of the source code;

[0082] Extract the syntax class identifier from the generic class structure, and based on the fully qualified class name, retrieve the syntax class definition corresponding to the syntax class identifier from the predefined syntax class meta information registry;

[0083] Extract the semantic types and behavioral constraint rules defined in the syntax class;

[0084] Based on the type parameter in the generic class declaration, perform type instantiation processing of the syntax class definition to generate a syntax class template;

[0085] By combining the semantic type and the behavioral constraint rules, the syntax processing node corresponding to the syntax class template is constructed;

[0086] The instantiation scope of the syntax processing node is determined based on the scope context in the source code.

[0087] Based on the mapping relationship between the type parameters and the behavior constraint rules, a semantic association link is established between the syntax processing node and the syntax class template;

[0088] Based on the syntax processing node, the instantiation scope, and the semantic association link, an instance of the syntax class of the OSE programming language is generated to complete the instantiation of the syntax class of the OSE programming language.

[0089] The source code refers to a set of text instructions written by developers that conform to the syntax specifications of the OSE programming language, including information such as program logic, data structures, and class definitions; the generic class structure refers to the syntactic structure for declaring formal type parameters in a class or interface definition; the fully qualified class name refers to a complete string that can uniquely identify a class, interface, or enumeration in the OSE programming language's namespace system, mainly composed of the namespace path and a simple class name; the syntactic class identifier refers to the core symbol extracted from the generic class structure that is used to uniquely identify the basic type of the syntactic class, and is a key intermediate identifier linking the generic class structure and the fully qualified class name, such as the generic class structure Traceable. <string>In this context, `Traceable` refers to the syntax class identifier; the syntax class metadata registry is a predefined structured database in the OSE programming language that stores core metadata of syntax classes. Its core function is to associate syntax class identifiers with fully qualified class names and record the basic semantic features of each syntax class. The syntax class definition refers to the metadata description of a class with specific syntax functions built into the OSE programming language, including the interface methods, inheritance relationships, and parsing and code generation rules required during the compilation phase. The semantic type refers to the logical data type that a syntax class needs to distinguish during compilation and runtime, used to determine its value storage method and tracing strategy. This mainly includes value semantics and composite semantics. Value semantics corresponds to basic data types (such as Number and String), while composite semantics corresponds to class instances, arrays, dictionaries, and other composite structures. The behavioral constraint rules refer to the behavioral specifications that syntax class instances must follow at runtime, including interception conditions for variable access, triggering timing of callback methods, and rules for enabling chained tracing. The type parameter refers to the parameter used in the generic syntax class declaration to specify its specific type. For example, in `Traceable`... <string>In this context, String represents a type constraint parameter, indicating that this Traceable instance is specifically designed for tracking string type variables, and the compiler will perform type checking accordingly. The syntax class template refers to the class blueprint generated after the generic syntax class definition is initially instantiated based on the type parameter, and is bound to a specific type. For example, parsing Traceable... <string>Then, a Traceable class structure is generated specifically for tracing String types without being associated with specific variables; this is a syntax class template. The syntax processing node refers to a logical unit in the compiler's abstract syntax tree or intermediate representation that represents an instantiated syntax class and possesses complete tracing capabilities. For example, it could be a specific variable `self.name` (whose type is Traceable). <string>In the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), a dedicated node is created, containing all the logic for intercepting read and write operations and triggering callbacks for this variable. The scope context refers to the location of the syntax class declaration in the source code; it determines the effective lifecycle and accessibility of the syntax class instance, including different levels such as variable, function, and class. For example, `:Traceable` is defined inline within the `Prefer! s:Process` code block. <string>The scope context of `self.name` is the `s:Process` function; the instantiation scope refers to the specific boundary within which the syntax class instance is effective, determined by the scope context. For example, if the scope context is `function`, the instantiation scope is the entire function; if it is `variable`, the instantiation scope is limited to the statement declaring the variable; the mapping relationship refers to the correspondence between type parameters and behavioral constraint rules; the semantic association link refers to the logical connection established between the syntax processing node and the syntax class template to transmit type semantics and behavioral constraints, ensuring that the node can correctly apply the template definition to handle specific variable operations; the syntax class instance refers to the final product of the instantiation process, a concrete syntax class object generated at compile time, available at runtime, bound to a specific variable, and possessing complete tracking and callback capabilities.

[0090] Optionally, the syntax class identifier in the generic class structure can be extracted using a deterministic finite automaton (DFA); the type instantiation process of the syntax class definition can be implemented using a generic template instantiation algorithm; and the mapping relationship between the type parameters and the behavior constraint rules can be obtained using a decision tree classification algorithm.

[0091] To aid in understanding the technical implementation logic of the syntax class of this invention, please refer to... Figure 2 The diagram illustrates a system diagram of a syntax class for implementing variable operation tracking in a programming language, as provided in an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram systematically presents the complete technical chain from syntax class definition to runtime tracking, providing clear engineering guidance for variable operation tracking based on syntax classes. For example, the explicit and implicit syntax class definition methods defined in the diagram allow developers to flexibly choose between named class inheritance or anonymous inlining to declare tracking logic according to actual scenarios. The distinction between value semantics and composite semantics is directly determined by the type identifier and the IsShallow() configuration, which determines the granularity and recursion strategy of the tracking. Furthermore, the collaborative mechanism between the compilation and runtime phases revealed in the diagram clarifies the key path for implementing tracking: the compilation phase transforms declarative syntax into an executable structure through methods such as parsing the AST and creating anonymous classes; the runtime phase achieves real-time monitoring and response to variable operations through steps such as instruction interception, type checking, and callback triggering. This layered, phased processing paradigm not only reduces the implementation complexity of the syntax class but also ensures that the tracking process maintains code simplicity while possessing high performance and high maintainability at runtime.

[0092] S2. Establish a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and configure a Traceable variable tracing interface within the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship.

[0093] This invention establishes a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class. This allows for the construction of a deterministic data path from the internal state of the program to the external visual presentation, providing a logical basis for the subsequent automatic synchronization of variable state changes to interface updates. The binding mapping relationship refers to a set of logical data structures and rules that are automatically established and maintained by the system during the compilation or initialization phase, used to dynamically associate one or more bindable attributes of user interface elements with a specific syntax class instance variable.

[0094] It should be noted that in this invention, developers only need to declare the variable as Traceable in the source code. <t>Type (e.g., Traceable) <string>When the username is selected, the compiler will automatically execute the following binding mapping process to achieve automatic synchronization and updating of variables between the front-end UI and the back-end logic.

[0095] As an embodiment of the present invention, establishing the binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class includes:

[0096] Read the unique identifier and bindable attributes of the user interface element;

[0097] Based on the unique identifier, locate the target variable state source corresponding to the user interface element in the syntax class;

[0098] Based on the association characteristics of the bindable attributes and the target variable state source, define the mapping rules between the user interface elements and the syntax class;

[0099] Based on the target variable state source, generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0100] By integrating the unique identifier, the target variable state source, the mapping rule, and the front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions, a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class is established.

[0101] The unique identifier refers to a string or symbol that uniquely identifies and locates a specific interface element during user interface runtime; the bindable attribute refers to an attribute in the user interface element whose value can be driven by the backend program state and supports automatic updates, such as the text attribute of a text label, the value attribute of an input box, and the enabled state attribute of a button; the target variable state source refers to the core node within the syntax class used to store the core state information of Traceable type target variables. For example, when a developer defines a Traceable type variable `orderAmount` (to store the order amount), the compiler, after instantiating the Traceable syntax class, will create a state source node corresponding to `orderAmount` within that structure. The associated features refer to the inherent matching characteristics between the bindable attributes of front-end user interface elements and the Traceable target variable state source, including attribute data type matching characteristics, operation behavior association characteristics, and semantic logic association characteristics. The mapping rules refer to the attribute binding and data synchronization rules defined based on the associated features between front-end user interface elements and the Traceable target variable state source; these are the core rule system for synchronizing back-end variable state changes to the front-end interface. The front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions refer to the judgment rules defined based on the characteristics of the Traceable target variable state source, which trigger synchronized updates between front-end interface elements and back-end Traceable variables. For example, when the value field of the `orderAmount` state source is assigned / modified, and the operation occurs within the global scope, the synchronized update of the `showValue` attribute of the front-end order amount display component is immediately triggered.

[0102] Optionally, the unique identifier and bindable attributes of the user interface element can be read by the document object model parser; the mapping rules between the user interface element and the syntax class can be defined using a declarative binding engine.

[0103] As another embodiment of the present invention, based on the target variable state source, front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule are generated, including:

[0104] Identify the semantic type identifier of the target variable state source, wherein the semantic type identifier includes value semantic type and composite semantic type;

[0105] When the semantic type is identified as a value semantic type, configure the value change synchronization trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0106] When the semantic type is identified as a composite semantic type, configure the structure depth change trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule;

[0107] Parse the lifecycle context of the target variable state source to determine the inherent effective scope of the mapping rule;

[0108] Based on the inherent effective scope, set the scope constraint rules corresponding to the value change synchronization triggering condition and the structure depth change triggering condition;

[0109] Identify the access pattern of the target variable state source, and combine the access pattern with the scope constraint rules to generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rules.

[0110] The semantic type identifier refers to the identifier information in the target variable state source used to mark the semantic category of the variable; the value semantic type refers to the variable corresponding to the target variable state source representing only a single, indivisible value; the value change synchronization trigger condition refers to the trigger condition configured for the value semantic type, which is usually: synchronization is triggered when the variable is assigned a completely new value. For example, a Traceable <number>A variable of type `self.age` is updated when its value changes from 10 to 20. The composite semantic type refers to a data structure composed of multiple sub-values, such as a class instance or a list. The structure depth change trigger condition refers to the trigger condition configured for the composite semantic type, which not only monitors the reassignment of the variable itself but also determines whether to monitor changes in its internal sub-members based on the return value of `IsShallow()`. For example, a `Traceable`... <person>The variable `self.teacher` of type `self.teacher` can be updated when `self.teacher.name` is modified (even if the reference to `self.teacher` remains unchanged). The lifecycle context refers to the implicit lifecycle information of the state source at the location where it is declared in the source code. The inherent effective scope refers to the valid range of the state source and its tracking logic, determined by the lifecycle context. The scope constraint rule refers to the range restriction imposed on the front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions based on the inherent effective scope of the target variable state source, ensuring that the front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions are only triggered within the inherent effective scope, avoiding invalid synchronization outside the scope. The access mode refers to the allowed read / write permissions and access methods of the target variable state source, determined based on the design rules of syntax classes in the OSE programming language, including types such as read-only, read-write, internal modification only, and access via specific callback methods.

[0111] Optionally, the value change synchronization triggering condition and the structure depth change triggering condition corresponding to the mapping rule can be configured through a callback function registry; the scope constraint rules corresponding to the value change synchronization triggering condition and the structure depth change triggering condition can be set using a scope chain analyzer; and the access mode of the target variable state source can be identified through static code analysis tools.

[0112] Furthermore, by configuring a Traceable variable tracking interface within the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship, this embodiment of the invention can clarify the dynamic relationship and operational rules between the syntax class rule boundaries and variable operation behaviors during compilation and runtime. This allows for targeted optimization of the overall execution performance of the OSE programming language in variable state tracking. The Traceable variable tracking interface refers to the standardized interface provided by the built-in syntax class Traceable in the OSE programming language for implementing full-process tracking of variable operations. This interface logically encapsulates the original variable access path and binds the basic access operations (read / write) of variables with the tracking-synchronization logic defined by the developer, thereby automatically triggering preset response behaviors when variables are operated on.

[0113] As an embodiment of the present invention, based on the binding mapping relationship, a Traceable variable tracing interface is configured within the syntax class, including:

[0114] Identify the syntax class variables to be tracked in the syntax class;

[0115] Based on the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, identify the set of Traceable interface methods to be overridden within the syntax class to determine the basic callback template corresponding to the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0116] Generate the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship;

[0117] The scope of the Traceable interface of the syntax class is determined based on the scope modifier of the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0118] Establish a deterministic association between the Traceable interface method set and the trace-synchronization logic;

[0119] Based on the deterministic association, the configuration of the Traceable variable tracing interface is completed within the effective scope of the Traceable interface.

[0120] The variable to be traced refers to a variable instance declared in the source code of the OSE programming language through the Prefer syntax segment and modified by the Traceable syntax class or its subclasses (including explicit subclasses and anonymous classes); the semantic type refers to the category in the OSE programming language used to distinguish the data structure characteristics of the variable to be traced; the Traceable interface method set refers to one or more subsets of methods that developers need to provide specific implementations in the Traceable interface to achieve a specific tracing purpose. For example, if only variable assignment needs to be tracked, the collection is {BeforeSet, AfterSet}; if complete read and write tracking is required, the collection is {BeforeGet, AfterGet, BeforeSet, AfterSet}. The basic callback template refers to the specific function body written by the developer in the anonymous class definition of the Prefer syntax segment for the aforementioned interface method set; for example, writing `echo "variable.a:name." is modified"` in the AfterSet method is a specific implementation of the tracing logic. The scope modifier refers to the syntax keywords used in the Prefer syntax segment to limit the visibility and scope of an anonymous Traceable class definition, including `variable` (variable level), `function` (function level), and `class` (class level), which respectively indicate that the definition only applies to the current variable, all applicable variables within the current function, or all applicable variables within the current class. The scope of the Traceable interface refers to the syntactic boundary explicitly defined by the scope modifier. For example, a Traceable definition using the class modifier has a scope of the entire class, and all declared Traceable variables of the same class within this scope will automatically inherit the definition. The tracing-synchronization logic refers to the specific execution logic generated based on the binding mapping relationship between the tracing class variable and the interface element, which links variable operation tracing with interface state synchronization. The target callback template refers to the executable method with complete tracing and synchronization functions formed after injecting the tracing-synchronization logic into the basic callback template. The deterministic association relationship refers to an immutable, one-to-one mapping relationship established by the compiler during the compilation phase of the OSE programming language. This relationship permanently binds a specific tracing logic implementation to a specific Traceable interface method and applies it to a specific tracing class variable.

[0121] Optionally, the set of Traceable interface methods to be rewritten within the syntax class can be identified using an abstract syntax tree traversal algorithm; the deterministic association between the set of Traceable interface methods and the trace-synchronization logic can be established using the compiler's code weaving mechanism.

[0122] As another embodiment of the present invention, generating the tracking-synchronization logic of the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship includes:

[0123] Extract the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and UI element identifiers from the binding mapping relationship;

[0124] Based on the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, determine the state change monitoring strategy for the syntax class variable to be tracked.

[0125] Based on the interface element identifier, locate the corresponding user interface component instance in the binding mapping relationship, and determine the interface update instruction of the user interface component instance.

[0126] Based on the state change monitoring strategy and the interface update instruction, the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variables to be tracked is generated.

[0127] The front-end and back-end synchronization parameters refer to the key data parameters extracted from the binding mapping relationship, which are used to achieve real-time synchronization of the same target variable's operation changes between the back-end OSE language runtime environment and the front-end user interface. This target variable is the same variable entity across the front-end and back-end, and its unique identifier value is generated by the back-end, such as the variable's hashCode. The interface element identifier refers to a string symbol that uniquely identifies a component instance in the user interface. For example, in the OSE interface declaration, a text label can be assigned the identifier "mainView.usernameDisplay". The state change monitoring strategy refers to the specific strategy derived from the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters for monitoring the state changes of the syntax-type variable to be tracked, including the monitoring object, monitoring event, and monitoring frequency. The user interface component instance refers to the specific object created by the program at runtime according to the interface declaration, which can be manipulated by the program logic; it is the entity corresponding to the interface element identifier. The interface update instruction refers to the specific instruction used to control the user interface component instance to complete the state update, including the instruction type and instruction parameters. For example, an instruction could be usernameDisplay.setText(newValue).

[0128] Optionally, the state change monitoring strategy for the syntax class variable to be tracked can be derived using an event response rule engine; the interface update instructions for the user interface component instance can be explicitly defined using a UI instruction generator.

[0129] To visually demonstrate the complete execution logic of the Traceable variable tracing interface in intercepting, analyzing, and responding to variable operations during the OSE programming language runtime, please refer to [link / reference]. Figure 3 The diagram shows the runtime flowchart of the Traceable variable tracing interface, which is an implementation method of a syntax class for variable operation tracing in a programming language, provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The diagram uses "whether the operation object is a Traceable instance" as the initial judgment node, clarifying the triggering condition for runtime interception. Through the branching logic of value semantics / composite semantics, it reveals the differentiated processing strategies corresponding to different data types. The recursive tracing judgment based on the return value of IsShallow() specifically illustrates the implementation mechanism of deep and shallow tracing of composite objects. This hierarchical decision-making and state-driven process design reflects the collaborative working principle between the syntax class's compile-time injection logic and runtime dynamic interception, providing a practical engineering reference for achieving accurate and efficient variable operation tracing.

[0130] S3. Identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, load the executable intermediate code to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0131] This invention, by identifying the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship, generates executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. This establishes a precise runtime foundation for subsequent variable operation tracking and interface synchronization, ensuring that the tracking logic strictly matches the variable characteristics, thereby achieving efficient and correct responsive behavior. The target variable refers to a syntax class instance variable explicitly specified in the binding mapping relationship, serving as a data source and forming a binding relationship with a specific user interface element. The executable intermediate code refers to an intermediate representation (such as bytecode) generated during the compilation phase, situated between the OSE source code and machine code. This code is interpreted and executed in the OSE runtime environment and contains interception and tracking logic for operations on the target variable.

[0132] As an embodiment of the present invention, identifying the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment includes:

[0133] Based on the type identifier, the value semantics and composite semantics of the target variable are separated, and the type boundaries of the value semantics and the composite semantics are defined;

[0134] Based on the type boundary, a direct storage strategy and lightweight monitoring paradigm for the value semantics in the OSE front-end code compilation scenario are constructed, and a reference storage strategy and deep monitoring control paradigm for the composite semantics in the OSE back-end code compilation scenario are constructed simultaneously.

[0135] By integrating the direct storage strategy, the lightweight monitoring paradigm, the reference storage strategy, and the deep monitoring control paradigm, a tracking and processing paradigm for the target variable is obtained.

[0136] Based on the aforementioned tracing processing paradigm, executable intermediate code for the target variable is generated in the OSE runtime environment.

[0137] Among them, value semantics refers to the fact that the data represented by a variable is itself a complete and indivisible value. Variables of this type are typically assigned using a value copy method, and their lifecycle is bound to their scope, not sharing underlying data with other variables. Composite semantics refers to the fact that the data represented by a variable is a variable composite composed of multiple values ​​combined through a specific structure. Variables of this type store references to the data, and assignment operations pass references rather than data copies. Multiple variables can share the same underlying data. Type boundaries refer to the set of rules in the OSE programming language's type system used to clearly distinguish between value semantics and composite semantics. The OSE prefix... The OSE front-end code compilation scenario refers to the entire process and technical environment in which source code written in the OSE programming language and developed for the user interface is converted into executable front-end code using the OSE language-specific compiler. The direct storage strategy refers to the storage rules adopted for the value semantics of target variables in the OSE front-end code compilation scenario. The lightweight monitoring paradigm refers to a set of variable operation monitoring rules adapted to the OSE front-end code execution characteristics, performing minimal monitoring only on core variable operations (such as assignment and reading), without complex logic such as deep traversal or nested detection, to reduce front-end runtime resource consumption and meet the real-time response requirements of the front-end interface. For example, when executing `self.age=20`, this paradigm will trigger `BeforeSet` and `AfterSet` callbacks, but will not and does not need to check the internal structure of the numbers 10 or 20. The OSE back-end code compilation scenario refers to the entire process and technical environment in which source code written in the OSE programming language and developed for the business logic processing side is converted into executable back-end code using the OSE language-specific compiler. The reference storage strategy refers to the storage rules adopted for the composite semantics of target variables in the OSE back-end code compilation scenario. For example, for :Traceable <person>After creating a Traceable instance, the `value` property of `self.parent` stores a memory address pointing to the `Person` instance object, not a complete copy of the object's data. The deep monitoring control paradigm refers to a tracing scheme for composite semantic variables adapted to the runtime characteristics of OSE backend code. This scheme not only monitors changes to the variable's reference itself but also conditionally and recursively monitors the state changes of its internal child members (attributes or elements) based on the return value of its `IsShallow()` method. For example, when `IsShallow()` returns 0 (deep tracing): if `self.parent.address.street` is modified, the `BeforeSet` / `AfterSet` callbacks of `self.parent` and its internal `address` object will be triggered level by level; when `IsShallow()` returns 1 (shallow tracing): the callback is triggered only when `self.parent` is reassigned (e.g., pointing to a new `Person` object), and modifications to its internal child members will not trigger it. The tracing processing paradigm refers to a target variable tracing rule system adapted to the OSE frontend and backend full-stack scenarios, formed by integrating the OSE frontend code's direct storage strategy, lightweight monitoring paradigm, and OSE backend code's reference storage strategy and deep monitoring control paradigm.

[0138] Optionally, the type boundaries of the value semantics and the composite semantics can be defined using the partitioning principle in set theory; the direct storage strategy of the value semantics and the reference storage strategy of the composite semantics can be constructed using an object layout optimizer; the lightweight monitoring paradigm of the value semantics and the deep monitoring control paradigm of the composite semantics can be generated using a callback strategy selector.

[0139] Furthermore, in this embodiment of the invention, by loading the executable intermediate code during the OSE programming language runtime to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, predefined tracking callbacks can be automatically activated at critical moments when the target variable is accessed or modified, achieving seamless monitoring and intervention of the program execution flow while maintaining the integrity of the original logic and execution efficiency. The operation behavior refers to the data access and modification actions initiated on the target variable during program execution, specifically including reading and writing variable values ​​and the execution of related underlying instructions.

[0140] As an embodiment of the present invention, during the runtime of the OSE programming language, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, including:

[0141] The executable intermediate code is parsed to intercept the operation instructions of the target variable, wherein the operation interception instructions include LOAD read instructions and STORE write instructions;

[0142] When the OSE programming language is running, the variable access monitor corresponding to the operation interception instruction is activated;

[0143] When the program execution flow of the OSE programming language reaches the bytecode location corresponding to the target variable, the interception processing logic in the executable intermediate code is executed through the variable access monitor to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0144] The operation interception instructions refer to the low-level virtual machine instructions specifically generated by the OSE compiler during the compilation phase to identify and monitor access to specific variables. These include the LOAD read instruction and the STORE write instruction. The LOAD read instruction triggers monitoring when reading a variable's value, while the STORE write instruction triggers monitoring when modifying a variable's value. These are the basic primitives for program access to variable data. The variable access monitor is a monitoring hook routine registered in the OSE runtime environment and bound to the Traceable object instance. This monitor embeds callback dispatch logic, responsible for calling the corresponding BeforeGet / AfterGet or BeforeSet / AfterSet callback methods before and after the execution of the LOAD / STORE instructions. The program execution flow refers to the OSE virtual machine... The dynamic process of sequentially interpreting and executing bytecode instructions; it represents the execution state and context of the program at any given time, and its progress is reflected by the movement of the instruction pointer; the bytecode position refers to the specific memory address or instruction sequence index where the LOAD or STORE instruction is located in the compiled executable intermediate code. When the instruction pointer moves to this position, it means that the program is about to perform an actual read or write operation on the target variable; the interception processing logic refers to a series of predefined condition judgments and callback execution steps in the variable access monitor. Its core logic includes: 1) checking whether the target variable is a Traceable instance; 2) if so, pausing the default execution flow of the current instruction; 3) scheduling the execution of the corresponding pre-callback according to the instruction type; 4) executing the original variable access operation to get or set the value; 5) scheduling the execution of the corresponding post-callback.

[0145] Optionally, the executable intermediate code's operation interception instructions on the target variable can be parsed by a bytecode parser; the variable access monitor corresponding to the operation interception instructions can be implemented using a bytecode instrumentation tool.

[0146] S4. Define the callback update triggering rule corresponding to the user interface element in the Traceable variable tracing interface. When the operation is intercepted, execute the callback update processing of the user interface element based on the callback update triggering rule to obtain the callback update result.

[0147] This invention, by defining callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements in the Traceable variable tracking interface, can establish a precise and automated response mechanism from variable state changes to interface visual updates, ensuring strong consistency between backend data and frontend presentation. The callback update triggering rule refers to the conditional execution logic predefined within the callback method of the Traceable variable tracking interface, used to describe how to drive the corresponding user interface element to update its state when a specific variable operation occurs.

[0148] As an embodiment of the present invention, the callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements are defined in the Traceable variable tracing interface, including:

[0149] Obtain the operation type sequence of the tracked variable in the Traceable variable tracking interface and the attribute update sequence corresponding to the user interface element;

[0150] Establish a mapping relationship between the operation type sequence and the attribute update sequence for trigger conditions;

[0151] Based on the trigger condition mapping relationship, construct a variable-interface response rule table corresponding to the tracking variable and the user interface element;

[0152] Extract the reactive update workflow from the variable-interface response rule table;

[0153] Based on the responsive update workflow, define the callback update trigger rules corresponding to the user interface elements.

[0154] The tracking variable refers to a variable whose operation is tracked using the Traceable syntax class in the OSE programming language; the operation type sequence refers to an ordered list of operation categories that can be monitored by the tracking variable at runtime; the attribute update sequence refers to a set of attribute update operations to be executed in chronological order for the user interface elements bound to the tracking variable. For example, for the bound variable self.isActive, its attribute update sequence could be ["control.enabled","control.color"], indicating that the "enabled state" and "color" of the bound control need to be updated synchronously; the trigger condition mapping relationship refers to the correspondence rule between the operation type sequence of the tracking variable and the attribute update sequence of the user interface element. For example, a mapping relationship could be {"Operation Type":"AfterSet","Update Attribute":["usernameLabel.text"]}, indicating that the text of the username label should be updated after the variable is assigned a value. The variable-interface response rule table refers to a complete set of corresponding rules, organized in a structured table format based on trigger condition mapping relationships, that tracks the corresponding variable operations and interface element attribute updates. It includes key information such as operation type, trigger condition, UI element identifier, attribute update operation, and execution priority. The responsive update workflow refers to a series of ordered and executable interface update steps extracted from the variable-interface response rule table and triggered for specific variable operations. It describes the complete automated process from variable state change to final interface rendering. For example, for the AfterSet operation of self.amount, the workflow could be: [Check the validity of the new value -> Convert to currency format -> Update the amountDisplay text -> Update the statusIndicator color according to the value].

[0155] Optionally, the mapping relationship between the operation type sequence and the attribute update sequence can be established by a decision tree model; the responsive update workflow in the variable-interface response rule table can be extracted by a directed acyclic graph analyzer.

[0156] Furthermore, in this embodiment of the invention, after the operation is intercepted, the callback update triggering rule is used to execute the callback update processing of the user interface element to obtain the callback update result. This can complete the final conversion from variable state change to user interface visual feedback, achieve real-time consistency between the internal state of the program and the external presentation, simplify the development process for full-stack developers, and implement the definition and use of front-end and back-end Traceable variables within a single programming language. The callback update processing refers to the complete execution process of driving the corresponding user interface element to perform state synchronization after the Traceable variable tracking interface intercepts the operation of the target variable, according to the predefined callback update triggering rule.

[0157] Alternatively, the callback update processing of the user interface elements can be executed through a command-line executor. For example, each update rule can be instantiated as a specific command object (such as UpdateTextCommand), and these commands can be executed sequentially by a unified invoker.

[0158] S5. Integrate the Traceable variable tracing interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result to output the operation tracing result of the target variable.

[0159] This invention, by integrating the Traceable variable tracking interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result, outputs the operation tracking result of the target variable. This not only achieves endogenous integration and declarative control of the OSE programming language variable operation tracking mechanism, significantly improving development efficiency, runtime performance, and code maintainability, but also provides developers with precise insights into the program's internal state, enabling closed-loop verification of end-to-end observability of program state transitions. The operation tracking result refers to a structured record of the complete lifecycle of a target variable's operation, formed by integrating interception information from the Traceable variable tracking interface, the runtime status of the executable intermediate code, and execution feedback from callback update processing. This record simultaneously contains verifiable data on variable state change semantics and interface synchronization effects. For example, a complete tracking result can record: the variable `self.count` undergoes a `STORE` operation within the function `s:increment`, changing its value from 5 to 6; this operation successfully triggers the `AfterSet` callback of the Traceable interface; the corresponding intermediate code interception point executes the counting verification logic at bytecode offset 0x5678; ultimately, it successfully updates the `text` property of the UI element `counterLabel` from "5" to "6".

[0160] To more intuitively demonstrate the collaborative workflow of the Traceable variable tracing interface, variable tracing interception, and UI callback updates in a complete application scenario, please refer to [link / reference]. Figure 4 The diagram shows a variable response sequence diagram of a syntax class implementation method for variable operation tracking in a programming language, provided by an embodiment of the present invention. By placing the abstract concepts of interception triggering and callback update within the specific context of "front-end component loading" and "back-end variable modification," the diagram clearly demonstrates that the technical components of the present invention (such as the Traceable interface) do not exist in isolation, but rather serve as a core driving layer that can be seamlessly embedded into a complete distributed application architecture and drive its core data flow. Steps 10-11 (variable change, sending and receiving webcalls) in the diagram intuitively illustrate how, when a variable tracked by Traceable changes in the back-end, a cross-network update event webcall should be automatically triggered through the logic in a predefined callback interface (such as AfterSet), thereby helping to illustrate the practical utility of the mechanism of the present invention in complex systems.

[0161] Compared to the problems described in the background art, this embodiment of the invention, by instantiating the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code, can transform the declarative syntax class definition into a concrete entity that can be operated and bound at runtime, providing a functional carrier for establishing a variable tracking mechanism, thereby enhancing the adaptability of the syntax class to diverse syntax class extension scenarios in the OSE programming language and the accuracy of variable tracking functionality; furthermore, by establishing a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, this embodiment of the invention can construct a deterministic data path from the internal state of the program to the external visual presentation, providing a logical basis for the subsequent automatic synchronization of variable state changes to interface updates; ... The binding mapping relationship is described, and a Traceable variable tracking interface is configured within the syntax class. This clarifies the dynamic weaving relationship and operational rules between the syntax class rule boundaries and variable operation behaviors at compile time and runtime, thereby specifically optimizing the declarative syntax simplicity, runtime monitoring granularity, and overall execution performance of the OSE programming language in variable state tracking. Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention identifies the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. This establishes a precise runtime foundation for subsequent variable operation tracking and interface synchronization, ensuring strict matching between the tracking logic and variable characteristics, thereby achieving high performance. Effective and correct responsive behavior; This embodiment of the invention, by loading the executable intermediate code during the OSE programming language runtime to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, can establish a precise control link between the compile-time generated tracing logic and the runtime environment. This allows for the automatic activation of predefined tracing callbacks at critical moments when the target variable is accessed or modified, achieving seamless monitoring and intervention of the program execution flow while maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the original logic. Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention, by executing callback update processing of the user interface elements based on the callback update triggering rules after the operation behavior is intercepted, and obtaining the callback update result, can complete the process from variable state change to visual feedback of the user interface. The final conversion of the feedback achieves real-time consistency between the internal state of the program and its external presentation, simplifies the development process for full-stack developers, and enables the definition and use of front-end and back-end traceable variables within a single programming language. Finally, by integrating the Traceable variable tracking interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update results, this embodiment of the invention outputs the operation tracking results of the target variable. This not only enables the intrinsic integration and declarative control of the OSE programming language variable operation tracking mechanism, significantly improving the development efficiency, runtime performance, and code maintainability of variable operation tracking, but also provides developers with precise insights into the internal state of the program, achieving closed-loop verification of end-to-end observability of program state transitions.Therefore, this invention can improve the scalability and maintainability of programming languages ​​by using the built-in syntax classes defined in the OSE programming language.

[0162] like Figure 5 The diagram shown is a functional block diagram of a syntax class implementation system for tracking variable operations in a programming language, according to the present invention.

[0163] The syntax class implementation system 200 for variable operation tracking in programming languages, as described in this invention, can be installed in an electronic device. Depending on the functions implemented, the syntax class implementation system for variable operation tracking in programming languages ​​may include a syntax class construction module 201, a tracking interface configuration module 202, a code generation module 203, an interception callback module 204, and a result output module 205. The module described in this invention can also be called a unit, referring to a series of computer program segments that can be executed by the processor of an electronic device and perform a fixed function, stored in the memory of the electronic device.

[0164] In this embodiment of the invention, the functions of each module / unit are as follows:

[0165] The syntax class construction module 201 is used to obtain user interface elements, parse the source code of the OSE programming language, and instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code.

[0166] The tracing interface configuration module 202 is used to establish a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and to configure a Traceable variable tracing interface within the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship.

[0167] The code generation module 203 is used to identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship, so as to generate executable intermediate code of the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

[0168] The interception callback module 204 is used to define the callback update triggering rule corresponding to the user interface element in the Traceable variable tracking interface. When the operation behavior is intercepted, the callback update processing of the user interface element is executed based on the callback update triggering rule to obtain the callback update result.

[0169] The result output module 205 is used to integrate the Traceable variable tracking interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result to output the operation tracking result of the target variable.

[0170] In detail, the modules in the syntax class implementation system 200 for variable operation tracking in programming languages ​​described in this embodiment of the invention adopt the same approach as described above when in use. Figure 1 The technique used is the same as the syntax class implementation method for variable operation tracking in programming languages ​​described above, and can produce the same technical effect, so it will not be repeated here.

[0171] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the details of the exemplary embodiments described above, and that the present invention can be implemented in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the present invention.

[0172] Finally, it should be noted that in the above embodiments, each embodiment can be combined with each other or independent. Deleting any one of them will not affect the technical implementation of other embodiments. The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and not to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention.< / person> < / person> < / number> < / string> < / t> < / string> < / string> < / string> < / string> < / string>

Claims

1. A syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking into a programming language, characterized in that, The methods include: Obtain user interface elements and parse the source code of the OSE programming language; based on the source code, instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language. Establish a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and configure a Traceable variable tracing interface within the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship; Identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, load the executable intermediate code to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable. In the Traceable variable tracing interface, the callback update triggering rule corresponding to the user interface element is defined. When the operation is intercepted, the callback update processing of the user interface element is executed based on the callback update triggering rule to obtain the callback update result. By integrating the Traceable variable tracing interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result, the operation tracing result of the target variable is output.

2. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the binding mapping relationship, a Traceable variable tracing interface is configured within the syntax class, including: Identify the syntax class variables to be tracked in the syntax class; Based on the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, identify the set of Traceable interface methods to be overridden within the syntax class to determine the basic callback template corresponding to the syntax class variable to be tracked. Generate the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship; The scope of the Traceable interface of the syntax class is determined based on the scope modifier of the syntax class variable to be tracked. Establish a deterministic association between the Traceable interface method set and the trace-synchronization logic; Based on the deterministic association, the configuration of the Traceable variable tracing interface is completed within the effective scope of the Traceable interface.

3. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 2, characterized in that, Generating the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variable to be tracked under the binding mapping relationship includes: Extract the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and UI element identifiers from the binding mapping relationship; Based on the front-end and back-end synchronization parameters and the semantic type of the syntax class variable to be tracked, determine the state change monitoring strategy for the syntax class variable to be tracked. Based on the interface element identifier, locate the corresponding user interface component instance in the binding mapping relationship, and determine the interface update instruction of the user interface component instance. Based on the state change monitoring strategy and the interface update instruction, the tracking-synchronization logic for the syntax class variables to be tracked is generated.

4. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Establishing the binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class includes: Read the unique identifier and bindable attributes of the user interface element; Based on the unique identifier, locate the target variable state source corresponding to the user interface element in the syntax class; Based on the association characteristics of the bindable attributes and the target variable state source, define the mapping rules between the user interface elements and the syntax class; Based on the target variable state source, generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule; By integrating the unique identifier, the target variable state source, the mapping rule, and the front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions, a binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class is established.

5. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 4, characterized in that, Based on the target variable state source, generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rule, including: Identify the semantic type identifier of the target variable state source, wherein the semantic type identifier includes value semantic type and composite semantic type; When the semantic type is identified as a value semantic type, configure the value change synchronization trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule; When the semantic type is identified as a composite semantic type, configure the structure depth change trigger condition corresponding to the mapping rule; Parse the lifecycle context of the target variable state source to determine the inherent effective scope of the mapping rule; Based on the inherent effective scope, set the scope constraint rules corresponding to the value change synchronization triggering condition and the structure depth change triggering condition; Identify the access pattern of the target variable state source, and combine the access pattern with the scope constraint rules to generate front-end and back-end synchronization triggering conditions corresponding to the mapping rules.

6. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the source code, instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language, including: Parse the generic class structure and fully qualified class name of the source code; Extract the syntax class identifier from the generic class structure, and based on the fully qualified class name, retrieve the syntax class definition corresponding to the syntax class identifier from the predefined syntax class meta information registry; Extract the semantic types and behavioral constraint rules defined in the syntax class; Based on the type parameter in the generic class declaration, perform type instantiation processing of the syntax class definition to generate a syntax class template; By combining the semantic type and the behavioral constraint rules, the syntax processing node corresponding to the syntax class template is constructed; The instantiation scope of the syntax processing node is determined based on the scope context in the source code. Based on the mapping relationship between the type parameters and the behavior constraint rules, a semantic association link is established between the syntax processing node and the syntax class template; Based on the syntax processing node, the instantiation scope, and the semantic association link, an instance of the syntax class of the OSE programming language is generated to complete the instantiation of the syntax class of the OSE programming language.

7. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Identifying the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship to generate executable intermediate code for the target variable in the OSE runtime environment includes: Based on the type identifier, the value semantics and composite semantics of the target variable are separated, and the type boundaries of the value semantics and the composite semantics are defined; Based on the type boundary, a direct storage strategy and lightweight monitoring paradigm for the value semantics in the OSE front-end code compilation scenario are constructed, and a reference storage strategy and deep monitoring control paradigm for the composite semantics in the OSE back-end code compilation scenario are constructed simultaneously. By integrating the direct storage strategy, the lightweight monitoring paradigm, the reference storage strategy, and the deep monitoring control paradigm, a tracking and processing paradigm for the target variable is obtained. Based on the aforementioned tracing processing paradigm, executable intermediate code for the target variable is generated in the OSE runtime environment.

8. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, During the execution of the OSE programming language, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable, including: The executable intermediate code is parsed to intercept the operation instructions of the target variable, wherein the operation interception instructions include LOAD read instructions and STORE write instructions; When the OSE programming language is running, the variable access monitor corresponding to the operation interception instruction is activated; When the program execution flow of the OSE programming language reaches the bytecode location corresponding to the target variable, the interception processing logic in the executable intermediate code is executed through the variable access monitor to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable.

9. The syntax class implementation method for integrating variable operation tracking in a programming language as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements are defined in the Traceable variable tracing interface, including: Obtain the operation type sequence of the tracked variable in the Traceable variable tracking interface and the attribute update sequence corresponding to the user interface element; Establish a mapping relationship between the operation type sequence and the attribute update sequence for trigger conditions; Based on the trigger condition mapping relationship, construct a variable-interface response rule table corresponding to the tracking variable and the user interface element; Extract the reactive update workflow from the variable-interface response rule table; Based on the responsive update workflow, define the callback update trigger rules corresponding to the user interface elements.

10. A syntax class implementation system for variable operation tracking integrated into a programming language, characterized in that, The system includes: A syntax class building module is used to obtain user interface elements, parse the source code of the OSE programming language, and instantiate the syntax class of the OSE programming language based on the source code; The tracing interface configuration module is used to establish the binding mapping relationship between the user interface elements and the syntax class, and to configure the Traceable variable tracing interface in the syntax class based on the binding mapping relationship. The code generation module is used to identify the type identifier of the target variable in the binding mapping relationship, so as to generate executable intermediate code of the target variable in the OSE runtime environment. The executable intermediate code includes front-end executable code and back-end executable code. When the OSE programming language is running, the executable intermediate code is loaded to intercept the operation behavior of the target variable. The intercept callback module is used to define the callback update triggering rules corresponding to the user interface elements in the Traceable variable tracing interface. When the operation is intercepted, the callback update processing of the user interface elements is executed based on the callback update triggering rules to obtain the callback update result. The result output module is used to integrate the Traceable variable tracing interface, the executable intermediate code, and the callback update result to output the operation tracing result of the target variable.

Images