Method for rapidly evaluating effective power capability of strong impact load on typical component

Abstract

The invention discloses a rapid assessment method for effective power capability of strong impact load on typical members, and the method comprises the following steps: for rectangular cross-section opposite-edge constraint members, bringing key characteristic parameters such as pressure peak value and action time of strong impact uniformly distributed load into a unified calculation framework; a peak pressure ratio coefficient and a natural vibration period of a loaded component are calculated by acquiring a pressure peak value and action time of a strong impact uniform load and an elastic modulus, density, component span and section height of the loaded component, a time coefficient is determined according to the action time and the natural vibration period, and then an effective acting ratio is calculated based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient. Effective power capability rapid comparison of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same component and effective power capability rapid comparison prediction of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on different components are realized. According to the method, an evaluation result with consistent comparability can be obtained, and the efficiency of engineering scheme type selection, parameter optimization and rapid decision can be remarkably improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of engineering evaluation technology, and in particular to a rapid method for evaluating the effective work capacity of typical components under strong impact loads. Background Technology

[0002] The dynamic response and damage evolution of typical components under uniformly distributed impact loads are directly related to the reliability assessment of protective engineering, impact-resistant structures, industrial safety, and critical equipment. Among these, the "effective work capacity" of a component, as a key indicator characterizing the absorption of external load energy and its controlled deformation and energy dissipation under strong impact, can be used to measure the component's safety margin against strong impacts, energy dissipation efficiency, and failure risk. For rectangular cross-section edge-constrained components, whose force paths are clear and widely used in engineering (such as plate / beam components and their equivalent components), rapid assessment and comparison of effective work capacity under uniformly distributed impact loads with different peak values ​​and durations is of great significance for scheme selection, parameter optimization, and rapid engineering decision-making.

[0003] Currently, domestic and international research on assessing the energy dissipation and load-bearing capacity of components under strong impact loads largely relies on nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis, experimental calibration, or computational processes based on complex analytical approximations. These methods typically require detailed model building, selection of constitutive and failure criteria, and time-history integration, resulting in high computational costs, parameter sensitivity, and results significantly influenced by modeling assumptions. When rapid lateral comparisons of different uniformly distributed impact loads (e.g., high-peak short-duration versus low-peak long-duration) are needed during the engineering design phase, or rapid longitudinal comparisons of rectangular cross-section edge-constrained components under the same uniformly distributed impact load, extensive repetitive simulations or experiments are often required, making it difficult to develop a unified, concise, and rapidly implementable effective means of calculating and comparing work capacity. Especially in scenarios involving rapid comparison and prediction of "specified component - multiple loads" and "specified load - multiple components," existing methods still have shortcomings in terms of efficiency, comparability, and engineering usability. Furthermore, with the development of intelligent design and data-driven methods, algorithms such as reinforcement learning in protective structure design usually rely on an iterative closed loop of "simulation-feedback-update". However, traditional simulation is time-consuming, which means that reinforcement learning must wait for the simulation results after each step of calculation before it can proceed to the next step. The training efficiency and the efficiency of effective data screening are significantly restricted, making it difficult to meet the engineering requirements for real-time, instantaneous judgment and rapid iteration.

[0004] As mentioned above, existing methods for calculating and comparing the effective work capacity of rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members under strong impact uniformly distributed loads still suffer from problems such as high computational cost, low efficiency, insufficient comparability, and difficulty in supporting real-time evaluation and intelligent rapid iteration. Therefore, researching a method that can be used to quickly compare the effective work capacity of the same member under different strong impact uniformly distributed loads, and to quickly compare and predict the effective work capacity of different members under the same strong impact uniformly distributed load, is of great significance for improving engineering evaluation efficiency and supporting rapid design and decision-making of protective structures. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The purpose of this invention is to provide a rapid evaluation method for the effective work capacity of typical components under strong impact loads. This method can obtain comparable and consistent evaluation results without repeating high-cost simulations or experiments, which can significantly improve the efficiency of engineering scheme selection, parameter optimization and rapid decision-making. It can also provide rapid evaluation support for simulation feedback iteration and data screening in intelligent design.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following solution: A rapid method for assessing the effective work capacity of a typical structural member under strong impact loads includes the following steps: S1. Obtain the peak pressure and duration of at least one strong impact uniformly distributed load, and obtain the elastic modulus, density, span, and section height of at least one rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S2. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the peak pressure ratio coefficient is calculated based on the peak pressure. S3. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members, the modulus coefficient, cross-section height coefficient and member span coefficient are calculated based on the elastic modulus, cross-section height and member span of different members respectively. S4. Based on the elastic modulus, density, span, section height, and constraint conditions of the rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member, calculate the natural vibration period of the corresponding rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S5. Based on the duration of action of a strong impact uniformly distributed load and its natural period, calculate the time coefficient used to characterize the time history of the load. S6. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient. S7. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on members with different rectangular cross sections and side constraints, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the modulus coefficient, cross section height coefficient, member span coefficient and time coefficient. S8. Based on the effective work ratio, a rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of uniformly distributed impact loads and rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members is performed.

[0007] Preferably, the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member in S1 is a plate-type member, a beam-type member, or an equivalent member thereof.

[0008] Preferably, in S2, the calculation of the peak pressure ratio coefficient based on the peak pressure specifically includes: The peak pressure ratio coefficient is determined by the ratio of the peak pressure values ​​under different strong impact uniformly distributed loads, as shown in the following formula:

[0009] in, This is the peak pressure ratio coefficient. The peak pressure of a uniformly distributed, strong impact load A. The pressure peak value is represented by the uniformly distributed impact load B. The uniformly distributed impact load A and the uniformly distributed impact load B are two different uniformly distributed impact loads.

[0010] Preferably, in S4, calculating the natural period of the corresponding rectangular cross-section side-constrained member includes two cases: In the comparative prediction scenarios of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member, the formula for calculating the natural vibration period of the loaded member M is as follows:

[0011] In a comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load is applied to rectangular cross-section members with opposite side constraints, the formulas for calculating the natural vibration periods of the loaded members M and N are as follows:

[0012] in, and Let M and N be the natural periods of the loaded components, respectively. and These are the member constraint coefficients for loaded members M and N, respectively. and Let M and N be the elastic moduli of the loaded components, respectively. and The densities of the loaded components M and N are respectively. and The spans of load-bearing members M and N are respectively. and These are the cross-sectional heights of the loaded components M and N, respectively.

[0013] Preferably, in S5, the calculation of the time coefficient used to characterize the load time history includes two cases: In the comparative prediction scenario where different strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B are applied to the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member M, the time coefficient calculation formula is as follows:

[0014] In the comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load A is applied to rectangular cross-section members with opposite side constraints, the time coefficient is calculated as follows:

[0015] in, and All are time coefficients. and These represent the durations of the uniformly distributed impact loads A and B, respectively; the members with opposite side constraints of different rectangular cross-sections include loaded members M and N. and These are the natural vibration periods of the loaded components M and N, respectively.

[0016] Preferably, in S6, in the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient are used together as the main control parameters affecting the effective work ratio.

[0017] Preferably, in S8, based on the effective work ratio, a rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of a uniformly distributed impact load and a rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member is performed, specifically including: In the comparative prediction scenario where different strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B are applied to the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the formula for calculating the effective work ratio is as follows:

[0018] When the effective work ratio The effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load A on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is determined to be greater than that of the uniformly distributed impact load B. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load B on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is greater than that of the uniformly distributed impact load A. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the two strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is equivalent.

[0019] Preferred options also include: In a comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load is applied to rectangular cross-section members M and N with opposite side constraints, the formula for calculating the effective work ratio is as follows:

[0020] in, The modulus coefficient, This is the section height factor. This refers to the span coefficient of the structural member. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the strong impact uniformly distributed load on the loaded member M is greater than the effective work capacity on the loaded member N. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the strong impact uniformly distributed load on the loaded member N is greater than the effective work capacity on the loaded member M. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load on the loaded members M and N is equivalent.

[0021] The present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements a method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load as described above.

[0022] According to specific embodiments provided by the present invention, the present invention discloses the following technical effects: This invention proposes a rapid assessment method for the effective work capacity of typical structural members under strong impact loads. For rectangular cross-section members with side constraints, while maintaining engineering comparability, key characteristic parameters such as the peak value and duration of uniformly distributed strong impact loads are incorporated into a unified calculation framework. An effective work evaluation quantity and calculation process are established for rapid comparison, enabling rapid comparative calculation of the effective work capacity of the same member under different uniformly distributed strong impact loads, as well as rapid comparative prediction of the effective work capacity of different members under the same uniformly distributed strong impact load. This method allows for rapid comparison of the effective work capacity of loads A and B on member M, and the comparison of the effective work capacity of load A on members M and N, without the need for repeated high-cost numerical simulations or experiments. This provides technical support for the design, selection, and rapid assessment of structural members under strong impact conditions. Attached Figure Description

[0023] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0024] Figure 1 This invention provides a flowchart for the rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of a rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member under different uniformly distributed strong impact loads. Figure 2This is a flowchart illustrating the rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load on side-constrained members with different rectangular cross sections, as described in this invention. Detailed Implementation

[0025] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0026] To make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, the present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.

[0027] like Figures 1-2 As shown, the present invention provides a rapid assessment method for the effective work capacity of a typical component under strong impact load, comprising the following steps: S1. Obtain the peak pressure and duration of at least one strong impact uniformly distributed load, and obtain the elastic modulus, density, span, and section height of at least one rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S2. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the peak pressure ratio coefficient is calculated based on the peak pressure. S3. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members, the modulus coefficient, cross-section height coefficient and member span coefficient are calculated based on the elastic modulus, cross-section height and member span of different members respectively. S4. Based on the elastic modulus, density, span, section height, and constraint conditions of the rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member, calculate the natural vibration period of the corresponding rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S5. Based on the duration of action of a strong impact uniformly distributed load and its natural period, calculate the time coefficient used to characterize the time history of the load. S6. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient. S7. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on members with different rectangular cross sections and side constraints, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the modulus coefficient, cross section height coefficient, member span coefficient and time coefficient. S8. Based on the effective work ratio, a rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of uniformly distributed impact loads and rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members is performed.

[0028] Specifically, the method of the present invention includes: 1. A method for quickly comparing and predicting the effective work capacity of a rectangular cross-section member under different strong impact uniformly distributed loads: Step 1: Determine the peak pressure of the strong impact loads A and B. and and duration of action and .

[0029] Step 2: Determine the elastic modulus of the loaded member M ,density Component span and cross-sectional height .

[0030] Step 3: From the pressure peak in Step 1 and Calculate peak pressure ratio coefficient .

[0031] Step 4: Calculate the natural period of the loaded member M based on the parameters in Step 2. .

[0032] Step 5: Based on the action time in Step 1 and and the natural period in step 4 Calculate time coefficient .

[0033] Step 6: Based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient in Step 3 and the time coefficient in step 5 The effective work ratio is calculated using relevant formulas. .

[0034] Step 7: Based on the effective work ratio in Step 6 The numerical values ​​predict the relative levels of the effective work capacity of strong impact loads A and B on the loaded member M.

[0035] Peak pressure ratio coefficient in step 3 The calculation formula is as follows: (1) The natural period of vibration of the loaded member M in step 4 The calculation formula is as follows: (2) in, This is the component constraint coefficient, which depends on the actual constraint conditions. It is taken as 6.481 for fixed supports on opposite sides and 2.849 for simply supported sides.

[0036] Time coefficient in step 5 The calculation formula is as follows: (3) Effective work ratio in step 6 The calculation formula is as follows: (4) The prediction in step 7 is based on the effective work ratio from step 6. Compare the value with 1. If... Then the effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded member M is greater than that of the strong impact load B; if Then the effective work capacity of the strong impact load B on the loaded member M is greater than that of the strong impact load A; if The effective work capacity of the strong impact loads A and B on the loaded member M is equivalent.

[0037] 2. A method for quickly comparing and predicting the effective work capacity of rectangular cross-section members with opposite side constraints under the same strong impact uniformly distributed load. Step 1: Determine the duration of the strong impact load A .

[0038] Step 2: Determine the elastic modulus of the loaded components M and N. and ,density and Component span and Cross-sectional height and .

[0039] Step 3: Calculate the modulus coefficient based on the parameters in Step 2. Section height coefficient and component span coefficient .

[0040] Step 4: Calculate the natural vibration periods of the loaded members M and N based on the parameters in Step 2. and .

[0041] Step 5: Based on the action time in Step 1 and the natural period in step 4 and Calculate time coefficient .

[0042] Step 6: From the modulus coefficient in Step 3 Section height coefficient Component span coefficient and the time coefficient in step 5 The effective work ratio is calculated using relevant formulas. .

[0043] Step 7: Based on the effective work ratio in Step 6 The numerical value predicts the relative level of the effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded components M and N.

[0044] Modulus coefficient in step 3 Section height coefficient and component span coefficient The calculation formula is as follows: (5) The natural vibration periods of loaded members M and N in step 4 and The calculation formula is as follows: (6) in, and This is the component constraint coefficient, which depends on the actual constraint conditions. It is taken as 6.481 for fixed supports on opposite sides and 2.849 for simply supported sides.

[0045] Time coefficient in step 5 The calculation formula is as follows: (7) Effective work ratio in step 6 The calculation formula is as follows: (8) The prediction in step 7 is based on the effective work ratio from step 6. Compare the value with 1. If... Then the effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded member M is greater than that on the loaded member N; if Then the effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded member N is greater than that on the loaded member M; if The effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded components M and N is equivalent.

[0046] Example 1: Quickly compare the effective work capacity of a high-peak short-duration uniformly distributed load A with a low-peak long-duration uniformly distributed load B on a specified component M.

[0047] Step 1: Determine the peak pressure values ​​of the strong impact loads A and B in this embodiment 1. =2.5×10⁶ Pa and =1.8×10⁶ Pa, and the duration of action. =0.015 s and =0.03 s.

[0048] Step 2: Determine the elastic modulus of the loaded component M in this embodiment 1. =2×10¹¹ Pa, density =7850kg / m3, component span =2 m and cross-sectional height =0.2 m.

[0049] Step 3, from the pressure peak in Step 1 and Calculate peak pressure ratio coefficient The formula for calculating the peak pressure ratio coefficient in Example 1 is as follows: (1) The peak pressure ratio can be calculated. =1.389.

[0050] Step 4: Calculate the natural vibration period of the loaded member M based on the parameters in Step 2. The formula for calculating the natural vibration period in this embodiment 1 is as follows: (2) Since the constraint method of component M in this embodiment 1 is fixed support on opposite sides, we take... =6.481. The natural period of vibration of the loaded member M can be calculated. =0.00384 s.

[0051] Step 5, based on the action time in Example 1 of this embodiment. and and natural period Calculate time coefficient The calculation formula is: (3) The correlation coefficient in Example 1 can be calculated. =0.92993.

[0052] Step 6, based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient in Step 3 and the time coefficient in step 5 The effective work ratio can be calculated using the following formula. : (4) The effective work ratio in Example 1 can be calculated. =1.67.

[0053] Step 7, based on the effective work ratio in Step 6 The numerical values ​​predict the relative levels of the effective work capacity of strong impact loads A and B on the loaded member M. In this embodiment 1, it can be based on... The calculation result >1 is used to predict: For the load-bearing member M specified in this embodiment 1, the effective work capacity of the high peak short-duration load A in this embodiment 1 is greater than the effective work capacity of the low peak long-duration load B in this embodiment 1.

[0054] Example 2: A method for quickly comparing the effective work capacity of components M and N under a specified strong impact uniformly distributed load A.

[0055] Step 1: Determine the peak pressure of the strong impact load A in this embodiment 2. =2.5×10⁶ Pa, and the duration of action. =0.015 s.

[0056] Step 2: Determine the elastic modulus of the loaded components M and N in this embodiment 2. = =2×10¹¹ Pa, density = =7850 kg / m3, component span =2 m and =8 m, cross-section height = =0.2 m.

[0057] Step 3: Calculate the modulus coefficient based on the parameters from Step 2. Section height coefficient and component span coefficient The formulas for calculating each coefficient are as follows: (5) The modulus coefficient in Example 2 can be obtained by calculation. =1, Section height coefficient =1 and component span coefficient =0.25.

[0058] Step 4: Calculate the natural vibration periods of the loaded members M and N based on the parameters from Step 2. and The calculation formula is: (6) In this embodiment 2, both components M and N are constrained by opposite-edge fixed supports. =6.481. Calculation yields... =0.00384 s, =0.0614 s.

[0059] Step 5, based on the action time in step 1 of this embodiment 2. and the natural period in step 4 and Calculate time coefficient The calculation formula is: (7) The time coefficient in Example 2 can be calculated. =3.1.

[0060] Step 6, from the modulus coefficient in step 3 Section height coefficient Component span coefficient and the time coefficient in step 5 The effective work ratio can be calculated using the following formula. : (8) The effective work ratio in Example 2 can be calculated. =0.6.

[0061] Step 7, based on the effective work ratio in Step 6 The numerical value predicts the relative levels of the effective work capacity of the strong impact load A on the loaded components M and N. In this embodiment 2, it can be based on... The calculation results <1 predict that the strong impact load A specified in this embodiment 2 has a greater effective work capacity on the loaded member N in this embodiment 2 than on the loaded member M in this embodiment 2.

[0062] The present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements a method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load as described above.

[0063] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each embodiment can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms, and of course, it can also be implemented by hardware. Based on this understanding, the above technical solutions, in essence or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk, etc., and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods described in the various embodiments or some parts of the embodiments.

[0064] This document uses specific examples to illustrate the principles and implementation methods of the present invention. The descriptions of the above embodiments are only for the purpose of helping to understand the method and core ideas of the present invention. Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that, based on the ideas of the present invention, there will be changes in the specific implementation methods and application scope. Therefore, the content of this specification should not be construed as a limitation of the present invention.

Claims

1. A rapid assessment method for the effective work capacity of a typical component under strong impact load, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: S1. Obtain the peak pressure and duration of at least one strong impact uniformly distributed load, and obtain the elastic modulus, density, span, and section height of at least one rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S2. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the peak pressure ratio coefficient is calculated based on the pressure peak value. S3. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on rectangular cross-section edge-constrained members, the modulus coefficient, cross-section height coefficient and member span coefficient are calculated based on the elastic modulus, cross-section height and member span of different members respectively. S4. Based on the elastic modulus, density, span, section height, and constraint conditions of the rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member, calculate the natural vibration period of the corresponding rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member. S5. Based on the duration of the strong impact uniformly distributed load and the natural vibration period, calculate the time coefficient used to characterize the time history of the load. S6. In the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient. S7. In the comparative prediction scenario of the same strong impact uniformly distributed load acting on members with different rectangular cross sections and side constraints, the effective work ratio is calculated based on the modulus coefficient, cross section height coefficient, member span coefficient and time coefficient. S8. Based on the effective work ratio, quickly compare and predict the effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load and the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member.

2. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 1, characterized in that, The rectangular cross-section side-constrained member in S1 is specifically a plate-type member, a beam-type member, or an equivalent member thereof.

3. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 2, characterized in that, In step S2, calculating the peak pressure ratio coefficient based on the peak pressure specifically includes: The peak pressure ratio coefficient is determined by the ratio of the peak pressure values ​​under different strong impact uniformly distributed loads, as shown in the following formula: in, This is the peak pressure ratio coefficient. The peak pressure of a uniformly distributed, strong impact load A. The pressure peak value is represented by the uniformly distributed impact load B. The uniformly distributed impact load A and the uniformly distributed impact load B are two different uniformly distributed impact loads.

4. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S4, calculating the natural vibration period of the corresponding rectangular cross-section side-constrained member includes two cases: In the comparative prediction scenarios of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads acting on the same rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member, the formula for calculating the natural vibration period of the loaded member M is as follows: In a comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load is applied to rectangular cross-section members with opposite side constraints, the formulas for calculating the natural vibration periods of the loaded members M and N are as follows: in, and Let M and N be the natural periods of the loaded components, respectively. and These are the member constraint coefficients for loaded members M and N, respectively. and Let M and N be the elastic moduli of the loaded components, respectively. and The densities of the loaded components M and N are respectively. and The spans of load-bearing members M and N are respectively. and These are the cross-sectional heights of the loaded components M and N, respectively.

5. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 4, characterized in that, In step S5, the calculation of the time coefficient used to characterize the load time history includes two cases: In the comparative prediction scenario where different strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B are applied to the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member M, the time coefficient calculation formula is as follows: In the comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load A is applied to rectangular cross-section members with opposite side constraints, the time coefficient is calculated as follows: in, and All are time coefficients. and These represent the durations of the uniformly distributed impact loads A and B, respectively; the members with opposite side constraints of different rectangular cross-sections include loaded members M and N. and These are the natural vibration periods of the loaded components M and N, respectively.

6. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 5, characterized in that, In S6, in the comparative prediction scenario of different strong impact uniformly distributed loads on the same component, the peak pressure ratio coefficient and the time coefficient together serve as the main control parameters affecting the effective work ratio.

7. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 6, characterized in that, In step S8, based on the effective work ratio, a rapid comparison and prediction of the effective work capacity of a uniformly distributed impact load and a rectangular cross-section edge-constrained member is performed, specifically including: In the comparative prediction scenario where different strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B are applied to the same rectangular cross-section side-constrained member, the formula for calculating the effective work ratio is as follows: When the effective work ratio The effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load A on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is determined to be greater than that of the uniformly distributed impact load B. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load B on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is greater than that of the uniformly distributed impact load A. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the two strong impact uniformly distributed loads A and B on the rectangular cross-section side-constrained member is equivalent.

8. The method for rapidly assessing the effective work capacity of a typical component under a strong impact load according to claim 7, characterized in that, Also includes: In a comparative prediction scenario where the same strong impact uniformly distributed load is applied to rectangular cross-section members M and N with opposite side constraints, the formula for calculating the effective work ratio is as follows: in, The modulus coefficient, This is the section height factor. This refers to the span coefficient of the structural member. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the strong impact uniformly distributed load on the loaded member M is greater than the effective work capacity on the loaded member N. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the strong impact uniformly distributed load on the loaded member N is greater than the effective work capacity on the loaded member M. When the effective work ratio It is determined that the effective work capacity of the uniformly distributed impact load on the loaded members M and N is equivalent.

9. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements a rapid assessment method for the effective work capacity of typical components under strong impact loads as described in claims 1-8.

Images