A real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method, relating to expense management and remote control technical field, comprising the following steps: S1, constructs the remote expense state expression result of real-time interaction;S2, remote interactive constraint state is constructed using expense state expression result;S3, using remote controllable expense state constructs real-time interactive closed-loop state;S4, using the interactive expense state of checkable is unified;S5, using stable expense control state constructs real-time interactive remote fee control management result.The application is formed remote controllable expense state by setting remote interactive constraint state based on expense state expression result under the constraint state, so that expense state is no longer in the form of isolated result or static record in remote interactive scene, but is explicitly limited in controllable interactive range, and lays a stable foundation for continuous operation of real-time interactive remote fee control management.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of cost management and remote control technology, specifically to a real-time interactive remote cost control management system and method. Background Technology

[0002] As businesses expand across regions and diversify their operations, expenses are becoming increasingly widespread, frequent, and involve long management chains. Existing expense management systems often rely on centralized data entry and post-event review, resulting in delayed acquisition and control of expense status, making it difficult to support real-time intervention and interactive management in remote scenarios. Given the growing demand for remote management, achieving real-time interaction and effective control of expense status in remote environments while maintaining clear expense control boundaries has become a critical technical challenge for expense management systems.

[0003] In existing technologies, cost management typically only records or statically constrains cost results, lacking technical means to construct remote interactive constraint states based on cost status expression results. Cost status is difficult to clearly define its controllable range during remote interaction, and it is also difficult to form clear constraint boundaries and triggering conditions when interaction is triggered. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the shortcomings of existing technologies, this invention provides a real-time interactive remote expense control management system and method to solve the problems mentioned in the background section.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following technical solution: In a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a real-time interactive remote expense control management method, comprising the following steps: S1. Construct a remote cost status representation result that can be interacted with in real time; S2. Use the cost state expression results to construct the remote interactive constraint state and obtain the remote controllable cost state; S3. Use remotely controllable cost status to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop status and obtain verifiable interactive cost status. S4. Use verifiable interactive cost status to uniformly integrate and obtain a stable cost control status; S5. Use the stable cost control status to build real-time interactive remote cost control management results and obtain system-level cost control management output.

[0006] To further optimize this technical solution, step S1 transforms the objectively existing expense behavior information in the remote expense control management scenario into a unified, standardized, and directly referenceable expense status expression result. Step S1, in constructing the state representation result, includes the following steps: Structured analysis of cost behavior elements; Consistency verification and standardization of cost elements; Construction and encapsulation of cost status fields; Cost status remote interactive feature annotation; The expression for the remote cost status output in step S1 is as follows: ; in, : Real-time interactive remote cost status display results; : Unique identifier for cost status; : Status information of the entity associated with the fee; Status information of the object to which the fee belongs; Information on the time and status of the expense occurrence; : Fee type status indicator; Remote management associated status identifier; : Collection of cost status metadata.

[0007] To further optimize this technical solution, step S2 introduces a remote management perspective based on the cost status expression result formed in step S1, transforming the original cost status into a remotely controllable cost status with the basis for remote intervention, remote judgment, and remote execution. Step S2, in the process of constructing the remote interactive constraint state, includes the following steps: Remote interactive constraint boundary construction; Remote trigger condition set generation; Remote management action mapping; Remotely controllable cost status encapsulation.

[0008] To further optimize this technical solution, in step S2, when constructing the remote interaction constraint boundary, access control technology and state constraint modeling technology are used to limit the controllable range of the cost state based on the cost subject, cost object and remote management attributes, thus forming a set of remote interaction constraint boundaries. Remote interactive constraint boundary is denoted as Its construction expression is: ; Among them: Represents the constraint boundary generation mapping function; Used to define the boundaries within which the fee status can be identified, intervened upon, or adjusted in a remote environment.

[0009] To further optimize this technical solution, in step S2, when generating the remote trigger condition set, after completing the constraint boundary construction, based on the event-driven mechanism and time condition determination technology, a trigger condition set for remote determination is further generated based on the cost type and time attribute. The set of remote triggering conditions is denoted as Its construction expression is: ; in: This indicates the trigger condition that generates the mapping function; Used to describe the type of cost and time status.

[0010] To further optimize this technical solution, in step S2, when mapping remote management actions, a correspondence between triggering conditions and remote management actions is constructed based on the set of triggering conditions. Remote management actions are mapped to Its expression is: ; in: This represents a conditional-action mapping function; This represents the set of remote management actions that can be executed when specific triggering conditions are met.

[0011] To further optimize this technical solution, in step S2, when encapsulating the remotely controllable cost status, the cost status expression result, constraint boundaries, triggering conditions, and management action mapping are uniformly encapsulated to form a remotely controllable cost status, the expression of which is: ; in: Indicates the first A basic state representation instance of a remote cost status that can be interacted with in real time; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation The constructed set of remote interactive constraint boundaries; Indicates based on the first An example of a cost status representation The set of remote triggering conditions determined by the fee type and time status; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation When its triggering condition set is met The mapping relationship of remote management actions corresponding to the time.

[0012] To further optimize this technical solution, step S3 introduces an execution feedback and consistency verification mechanism on the basis of the remotely controllable cost state already formed in step S2, and constructs a real-time interactive closed-loop state, so that the cost state is further transformed from being remotely controllable to a cost state in which remote interaction has occurred and the result can be verified. Step S4 integrates and processes the verified interactive cost status output in step S3, transforming the cost execution results scattered across multiple real-time interactive instances into a sustainable and stable cost control status.

[0013] To further optimize this technical solution, step S5 transforms the stable cost control state that has been formed and confirmed in step S4 into a system-level cost control management output result that can be used by the real-time interactive remote cost control management system as a whole. Step S5, in constructing the real-time interactive remote expense control management results, includes the following steps: The system receives and confirms inputs related to maintaining a stable cost control status. System-level mapping encapsulation for stable cost control state; Associated with the status of the real-time interactive remote management link; Generation and confirmation of system-level cost control management outputs.

[0014] A real-time interactive remote expense control management system includes the following modules: expense status expression module, remote interactive constraint construction module, real-time interactive closed-loop verification module, stable expense control integration module, and system-level expense control management output module.

[0015] In a second aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a computer device, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the computer program instructions, when executed by the processor, implement the steps of a real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0016] Thirdly, embodiments of the present invention provide a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein: when the computer program instructions are executed by a processor, they implement the steps of a real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0017] Compared with the prior art, the present invention provides a real-time interactive remote expense control management system and method, which has the following beneficial effects: This real-time interactive remote expense control management system and method sets up a remote interactive constraint state based on the expense status expression result, and forms a remotely controllable expense state under this constraint state. This ensures that the expense state no longer exists as an isolated result or static record in the remote interaction scenario, but is clearly limited to a controllable interactive range. This gives the expense state clear constraint basis and controllable premise during the remote interaction process, avoiding the problems of lack of a unified constraint mechanism and difficulty in effectively controlling the expense state in the prior art. This lays a stable foundation for the continuous operation of real-time interactive remote expense control management. Attached Figure Description

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0019] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a real-time interactive remote expense control management method proposed in this invention. Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the construction process of the remote interactive constraint state of the real-time interactive remote expense control management method proposed in this invention. Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the real-time interactive closed-loop state process of the real-time interactive remote expense control management method proposed in this invention. Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of constructing a real-time interactive remote expense control management method proposed in this invention, and the real-time interactive remote expense control management result flow. Detailed Implementation

[0020] To make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, the specific embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0021] Many specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a full understanding of the invention. However, the invention may also be practiced in other ways different from those described herein, and those skilled in the art can make similar extensions without departing from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.

[0022] Secondly, the term "an embodiment" or "embodiment" as used herein refers to a specific feature, structure, or characteristic that may be included in at least one implementation of the present invention. The phrase "in one embodiment" appearing in different places throughout this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it a single embodiment or an embodiment selectively excluded from other embodiments.

[0023] Example 1: Reference Figures 1-4 This is the first embodiment of the present invention, which provides a real-time interactive remote expense control management method, including the following steps: S1. Construct a remote cost status representation result that can be interacted with in real time; Step S1 is used to transform the objectively existing cost behavior information in the remote cost control management scenario into a unified, standardized cost status expression result that can be directly referenced by the system.

[0024] Step S1, in constructing the state representation result, includes the following steps: Structured analysis of cost behavior elements: Using mature business object modeling techniques, a single expense transaction is treated as a single expense event, and its elements are broken down according to a predefined set of attributes, which includes: The cost is associated with the subject's attributes; Attributes of the object to which the fee is attributed; The time attribute of the expense occurrence; Fee type identifier attribute; Remote management of associated attributes; The parsing process is based on the mapping relationship between existing fields in the expense record and the system's preset attributes.

[0025] Consistency verification and standardization of cost elements: After the element decomposition is completed, each cost element is subjected to consistency verification and standardization processing. Using mature data consistency verification technology, and referencing the pre-established coding mapping relationship and unified time benchmark in the system, the decomposed cost elements are processed as follows: A unified coding and mapping system is implemented for the main entity identifier and the fee attribution identifier; Align the time of expense occurrence with a unified time benchmark; The fee type identifiers are categorized and replaced according to a predefined type system; When inconsistencies in element representation are detected, standardization is performed through corresponding mapping or format conversion methods to ensure that each cost element meets the system's unified representation requirements.

[0026] Construction and encapsulation of cost status fields: After the cost elements are standardized, the standardized cost elements are combined into a set of cost status fields using mature state encapsulation and object composition techniques. The set of cost status fields is a predefined set of fields. There is no derivation or calculation relationship between the fields. They are simply parallel status attributes that together constitute the cost status expression. Subsequently, the set of cost status fields is uniformly encapsulated to form a complete cost status representation object.

[0027] Cost status remote interaction feature annotation: After the cost status representation object is encapsulated, remote interaction basic identification information is attached to the cost status representation object using mature system identification and metadata annotation technologies. This identification information includes at least the following: A unique identifier used to distinguish different fee statuses; Version identifier used to identify the status version; An accessibility identifier used to indicate that the cost status can be remotely referenced by subsequent steps.

[0028] The final expression for the remote cost status output in step S1 is: ; in, The result of the remote cost status expression that can be interacted with in real time serves as the sole input object for step S2; : A unique identifier for the cost status, used to distinguish objects with different cost statuses in the system; : Status information of the entity responsible for the expense, used to represent the standardized identification result of the entity responsible for the expense; : Cost attribution status information, used to characterize the attribution status of costs within an organization, project, or cost unit; : Cost occurrence time status information, representing the cost time expression result after alignment with a unified time base; : Cost type status identifier, used to indicate the predefined cost type category to which the cost belongs; : Remote management associated status identifier, used to indicate that the cost status has the basic conditions to be remotely referenced and interacted with in subsequent steps; The fee status metadata set is used to carry information related to system identification, such as version identifier and access identifier, but does not contain any control or judgment meaning.

[0029] S2. Use the cost state expression results to construct the remote interactive constraint state and obtain the remote controllable cost state; Step S2, based on the cost status expression result formed in step S1, introduces a remote management perspective to transform the original cost status into a remotely controllable cost status with the basis for remote intervention, remote judgment and remote execution.

[0030] Step S2, in the process of constructing the remote interactive constraint state, includes the following steps: Remote interactive constraint boundary construction: Based on the attributes of the cost subject, cost object, and remote management, mature access control technology and state constraint modeling technology are used to limit the controllable range of cost status and form a set of remote interaction constraint boundaries. Remote interactive constraint boundary is denoted as Its construction expression is: ; Among them: Represents the constraint boundary generation mapping function; Used to define the boundaries within which the fee status is allowed to be identified, intervened in, or adjusted in a remote environment; This boundary does not change the data content of the cost itself, but rather clarifies the effective range in which the remote management system can operate, thereby preventing unrestrained remote operations.

[0031] Remote trigger condition set generation: After completing the construction of the constraint boundary, based on the mature event-driven mechanism and time condition determination technology, a set of trigger conditions for remote determination is further generated based on the cost type and time attribute. The set of remote triggering conditions is denoted as Its construction expression is: ; in: This indicates the trigger condition that generates the mapping function; This describes the type of cost characteristics and time status under which a remote system needs to intervene or respond; This set of triggering conditions provides a basis for determining subsequent management actions, enabling remote interaction to have event-driven characteristics.

[0032] Remote management action mapping: Based on the set of triggering conditions, construct the correspondence between triggering conditions and remote management actions; Remote management actions are mapped to Its expression is: ; in: The condition-action mapping function is based on mature rule matching and state-action association technologies. This represents the set of remote management actions that can be executed when specific triggering conditions are met. Management actions are determined based on a predefined library of remote management actions.

[0033] Remotely controllable cost status encapsulation: The cost status expression, constraint boundaries, triggering conditions, and management action mappings are uniformly encapsulated to form a remotely controllable cost status, which is the final output of step S2. Its expression is: ; in: The cost state representation result output by inheriting step S1 indicates the first step. A basic state representation instance of a remote cost status that can be interacted with in real time; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation The constructed set of remote interactive constraint boundaries; Indicates based on the first An example of a cost status representation The set of remote triggering conditions determined by the fee type and time status; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation When its triggering condition set is met The mapping relationship of remote management actions corresponding to the time.

[0034] Existing cost management technologies are mostly centered on cost data statistics, rule verification, or post-event control. Cost status and remote management logic are usually scattered and lack a unified form of status organization. Step S2 introduces remote interaction constraint boundaries, trigger condition sets, and management action mappings into the same cost status object, so that the cost status has the structural foundation for remote interaction and remote execution at the generation stage. This allows the subsequent remote management process to be carried out directly based on the status object without having to repeatedly parse the cost data. The fundamental difference lies in the organization of cost status and the forward timing of embedding control logic, rather than a simple replacement of existing single rules or algorithms.

[0035] S3. Use remotely controllable cost status to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop status and obtain verifiable interactive cost status. Step S3, based on the remotely controllable cost status already established in Step S2, introduces an execution feedback and consistency verification mechanism to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop status, further transforming the cost status from one that can be remotely controlled to one where remote interaction has occurred and the results can be verified.

[0036] Step S3, in the process of constructing the real-time interactive closed-loop state, includes the following steps: Remote management action execution and result acquisition: In this sub-process, when the first Each cost status instance satisfies its corresponding set of remote triggering conditions. At that time, the system uses the remote management action mapping relationship. Execute the corresponding remote management action and obtain the actual execution result of the action, which is recorded as: : in, This indicates that under the constraint boundaries and triggering conditions defined in step S2, for the first... The objective feedback results generated after a cost status instance performs a remote management action are entirely subject to [the following]. and constraint.

[0037] Feedback mapping from execution results to cost status: Obtain the execution result Then, the result needs to be fed back to the cost status expression layer to reflect the actual impact of remote interaction on the cost status. This feedback process is completed through feedback mapping, represented as follows: ; in, The feedback mapping function representing the execution result to the cost status is implemented through mature state mapping, state machine update, or rule table driven technology; This is to express the cost status after the execution feedback is introduced.

[0038] Real-time interactive closed-loop consistency verification: Cost status after feedback is generated Afterwards, it is necessary to verify the consistency of the state changes before and after the interaction in order to confirm whether the remote interaction process has formed an effective closed loop. The consistency check result is as follows: ; in, This indicates the status of the verification result, used to characterize whether the cost status after feedback is still within the remote interaction constraint boundary determined in step S2; It is an engineered consistency verification function used to map the results of remote interaction processes to verifiable states. This ensures a closed-loop interactive state. The integrity and verifiability of the data.

[0039] Real-time interactive closed-loop state encapsulation: Once the execution result and consistency verification result are obtained, the execution feedback cost status, execution result, and verification result are uniformly encapsulated to form a complete real-time interactive closed-loop status. Only after obtaining the verification result... Only under certain circumstances is the closed-loop interaction considered to be established.

[0040] Step S3 ultimately outputs a verifiable interaction fee status, denoted as: ; in: To express the cost status after introducing remote execution feedback; This refers to the result of a remote management action performed on this fee status instance. This is the consistency verification result based on the given constraint boundaries.

[0041] In existing mature cost management technologies, remote operation is usually based on execution and update, with the execution result directly overwriting the original state, and the interaction process itself is not independently modeled or verified. The difference in step S3 is that it incorporates the remote execution result, state feedback, and consistency verification as an explicit state construction process into the method steps, so that the interaction process itself forms an independent and verifiable closed-loop state object.

[0042] S4. Use verifiable interactive cost status to uniformly integrate and obtain a stable cost control status; Step S4 integrates and processes the verified interactive cost status output in step S3, transforming the cost execution results scattered across multiple real-time interactive instances into a sustainable and stable cost control status.

[0043] Step S4, during the unified integration process, includes the following steps: Cost status structure alignment and field consistency: For multiple verifiable interactive fee statuses, a mature fee data normalization processing method is adopted to structurally align the fee feedback results with the execution identifiers, including: A unified hierarchy for expressing cost status; Perform consistent mapping of the cost result field across different interaction instances; Eliminate structural redundancy or ambiguity caused by differences in interactive scenarios.

[0044] State merging based on verification results: Based on a unified structure, and according to the verification results of each interaction fee status, a rule-based status merging method is adopted to centrally process the fee status, including: Retain the execution results of duplicate confirmations that are consistent; Confirm the status of costs that have been completed and confirmed to be consistent. Cost results within the same control period are recorded together. Confirmation of stabilization of cost control status: After the merging process is completed, a mature status confirmation mechanism is used to confirm the integrated cost results as the current effective cost control status. This status is then used as the cost control benchmark status for the system in subsequent operating cycles, thereby achieving stable maintenance of cost control.

[0045] The final output of step S4 is a stable cost control state, whose expression is: ; in: : indicates the output of step S3. A verifiable interaction fee status, which indicates that the interaction loop construction and consistency verification have been completed; This indicates that the interaction fee status has been verified by the consistency check function in step S3 and is a valid input status that can be accepted in step S4. This indicates that, based on the status integration and merging processing mechanism in the existing mature cost control system, multiple verified interactive cost statuses are processed in a unified manner to form a single, stable cost control result. : This indicates the final output of step S4, namely the stable cost control state, which is: No longer distinguishing specific interactive instances ; It is formed by combining multiple verified interaction fee statuses.

[0046] S5. Use the stable cost control status to build real-time interactive remote cost control management results and obtain system-level cost control management output; Step S5 transforms the stable cost control state that has been formed and confirmed in step S4 into a system-level cost control management output that can be used by the real-time interactive remote cost control management system as a whole.

[0047] Step S5, in constructing the real-time interactive remote expense control management results, includes the following steps: System reception and input confirmation for stable cost control status: The system first receives the stable cost control status from step S4 and confirms that the status has completed cost consistency verification, status merging and stabilization processing, thus possessing complete attributes that can be directly used for system-level management construction.

[0048] System-level mapping encapsulation of stable cost control state: Based on input confirmation, mature system state management and object encapsulation technologies are used to map stable cost control states into system-recognizable management objects, including: Encapsulate the cost control status into a system management unit; Assign it system identification and management attributes; Clarify its applicable scope in the current remote expense control management cycle.

[0049] Associated with the status of the real-time interactive remote management link: After completing the system mapping, associate the system management object with the real-time interactive remote expense control management link, enabling it to: As the result of cost control management during the current system operation cycle; It is directly inherited or referenced when subsequent remote interactions are triggered. Generation and confirmation of system-level expense control management output: After the mapping and association are completed, the system will recognize the management object as the output result of the system-level cost control management and use it as the final output state of this method process in the current control cycle.

[0050] The expression output by the system-level cost control management is: ; in, This indicates the stable cost control status output in step S4, which has been completed: A unified integration that verifies the status of interactive fees; State merging and stabilization confirmation; Furthermore, specific interactive instances are no longer distinguished.

[0051] This refers to the system-level mapping and management construction process based on existing mature system state management technologies, and its technical role includes only: Encapsulate the stable cost control status into a system-recognizable management object; Assign it system-level management attributes and invocation identifiers; Establish its status association with the real-time interactive remote expense control management link.

[0052] In the real-time interactive remote expense control management system and method, the system-level expense control management output in step S5 serves as the unified expense control result within the current operating cycle of the system, and is used to constrain and support expense management behavior in subsequent remote interaction processes. This output result is constructed from a stable expense control state and can be directly identified and invoked by each expense control management unit of the system. It is used to determine the executable scope of remote expense instructions, the inheritance benchmark of expense states, and the reference for expense feedback during interaction. During system operation, when a new remote interaction or expense control request occurs, the system-level expense control management output participates in the interaction process as the currently valid expense control management state, thereby ensuring that remote interaction behavior remains consistent with existing expense control results, achieving continuity and controllability of real-time interactive remote expense control management.

[0053] Compared to existing mature cost management technologies that typically display, record, or unidirectionally execute a stable cost control state as a static result, this step logically elevates the stable cost control state to a system-level cost control management output. This makes it an effective state component in the operation of the real-time interactive remote cost control management system, continuously participating in the system-level interactive management chain. Through this connection between state construction and system mapping, the cost control result no longer exists merely as a process endpoint, but as a management state that can be inherited and referenced by the system to support subsequent real-time interactive processes, without relying on new algorithms or complex calculation methods.

[0054] Example 2: This embodiment provides a real-time interactive remote expense control management system, including the following functional modules: The cost status expression module, corresponding to step S1, is used to construct a real-time interactive remote cost status expression result. This module receives cost-related status information from the remote cost control scenario and, through mature cost status modeling and expression technology, uniformly expresses the cost execution status, cost change characteristics, and their interactive relationships, forming a cost status expression result that can be used for subsequent analysis and control. This module provides the basic input for subsequent remote interaction and cost control of the system.

[0055] The remote interaction constraint construction module, corresponding to step S2, constructs remote interaction constraint states based on the cost state results output by the cost state expression module, forming a remotely controllable cost state. Through cost constraint boundary determination, trigger condition identification, and cost state mapping processing, the module ensures the controllability of the cost state during the remote interaction process, providing a constraint foundation for the subsequent construction of the interaction closed loop.

[0056] The real-time interactive closed-loop verification module, corresponding to step S3, is used to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop state based on the remotely controllable cost status and generate a verifiable interactive cost status. The module uses an interactive feedback acquisition and consistency verification mechanism to compare and verify the cost status before and after the remote interaction, ensuring that the interaction execution result remains consistent with the established constraints, thereby outputting a verifiable interactive cost status result.

[0057] The stable cost control integration module, corresponding to step S4, is used to uniformly integrate multiple verifiable interactive cost states to form a stable cost control state. Through state structure alignment, result merging, and stabilization confirmation, the module transforms scattered interactive cost results into a cost control state that the system can sustainably use, providing a stable foundation for system-level management output.

[0058] The system-level cost control management output module, corresponding to step S5, constructs system-level cost control management output based on the stable cost control state. Through system state mapping and management object encapsulation, the module transforms the stable cost control state into a cost control management result that is identifiable and inheritable by the entire system. This result continuously participates in the real-time interactive remote cost control management process, serving as the system's final cost control management output within the current control cycle.

[0059] Example 3: This embodiment provides a scenario of a real-time interactive remote expense control management system and method in practical application: Take a multi-regional enterprise group as an example. This group operates in multiple cities simultaneously, and each business unit frequently incurs expenses for travel, procurement, and services in its daily operations. To achieve remote, unified management and real-time control of these expenses, the company deployed a real-time interactive remote expense control management system.

[0060] During system operation, the cost status expression module first provides a unified representation of the cost execution status of each business unit within the current business cycle, generating a remote cost status expression result that can be interacted with in real time. This result not only reflects the current status of cost occurrence but also supports status referencing during subsequent remote interactions.

[0061] Subsequently, the remote interactive constraint construction module, based on the expense status expression result and combined with the enterprise's established expense management rules, constructs a remote interactive constraint status, ensuring that the expense status has a clearly controllable range in remote management scenarios. When the headquarters management system initiates a remote expense control command, the system can respond to expense execution under this constraint status.

[0062] During the interaction between cost execution and remote control, the real-time interactive closed-loop verification module compares and verifies the cost status before and after the interaction, confirming that the execution result of the remote control command is consistent with the constraint status, thus forming a verifiable interactive cost status. This process ensures that remote interaction does not introduce uncertainty into the cost status.

[0063] At the end of a cost control cycle, the stable cost control integration module integrates multiple verifiable interactive cost states, eliminates duplicate or discrete interactive results, and forms a stable cost control state, enabling the system to obtain cost control results that can be used sustainably.

[0064] Finally, the system-level expense control management output module encapsulates the stable expense control state into a system-level expense control management output, which is then provided externally as the unified expense management result for the current operating cycle. In subsequent business operations, when new remote interactions or expense control requests occur, the system directly inherits and manages the state based on this system-level expense control management output, thereby enabling continuous operation of real-time interactive remote expense control management in actual business scenarios.

[0065] Example 4: This embodiment also provides a computer device applicable to a real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method, including a memory and a processor; the memory is used to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is used to execute the computer-executable instructions to realize the real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method proposed in the above embodiment.

[0066] This embodiment also provides a storage medium on which a computer program is stored. When the program is executed by a processor, it implements a real-time interactive remote fee control management system and method as proposed in the above embodiments.

[0067] The computer device can be a terminal, comprising a processor, memory, communication interface, display screen, and input devices connected via a system bus. The processor provides computing and control capabilities. The memory includes non-volatile storage media and internal memory. The non-volatile storage media stores the operating system and computer programs. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs stored in the non-volatile storage media. The communication interface is used for wired or wireless communication with external terminals; wireless communication can be achieved through Wi-Fi, carrier networks, NFC (Near Field Communication), or other technologies. The display screen can be an LCD screen or an e-ink screen. The input devices can be a touch layer covering the display screen, buttons, a trackball, or a touchpad on the computer device's casing, or an external keyboard, touchpad, or mouse.

[0068] If a function is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the various embodiments of this invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0069] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-including system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0070] More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: electrical connections (electronic devices) having one or more wires, portable computer disk drives (magnetic devices), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, computer-readable media can even be paper or other suitable media on which programs can be printed, because programs can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other media, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in computer memory.

[0071] It should be understood that various parts of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0072] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and are not intended to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, and all such modifications or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A real-time interactive remote expense control management method, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: S1. Construct a remote cost status representation result that can be interacted with in real time; S2. Use the cost state expression results to construct the remote interactive constraint state and obtain the remote controllable cost state; S3. Use remotely controllable cost status to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop status and obtain verifiable interactive cost status. S4. Use verifiable interactive cost status to uniformly integrate and obtain a stable cost control status; S5. Use the stable cost control status to build real-time interactive remote cost control management results and obtain system-level cost control management output.

2. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S1 transforms the objectively existing expense behavior information in the remote expense control management scenario into a unified, standardized, and directly referenceable expense status expression result. Step S1, in constructing the state representation result, includes the following steps: Structured analysis of cost behavior elements; Consistency verification and standardization of cost elements; Construction and encapsulation of cost status fields; Cost status remote interactive feature annotation; The expression for the remote cost status output in step S1 is as follows: ； in, : Real-time interactive remote cost status display results; : Unique identifier for cost status; : Status information of the entity associated with the fee; Status information of the object to which the fee belongs; Information on the time and status of the expense occurrence; : Fee type status indicator; Remote management associated status identifier; : Collection of cost status metadata.

3. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S2, based on the cost status expression result formed in step S1, introduces a remote management perspective to transform the original cost status into a remotely controllable cost status with the basis for remote intervention, remote judgment, and remote execution. Step S2, in the process of constructing the remote interactive constraint state, includes the following steps: Remote interactive constraint boundary construction; Remote trigger condition set generation; Remote management action mapping; Remotely controllable cost status encapsulation.

4. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S2, when constructing the remote interaction constraint boundary, based on the cost subject, cost object, and remote management attributes, access control technology and state constraint modeling technology are used to limit the controllable range of the cost state, forming a set of remote interaction constraint boundaries. Remote interactive constraint boundary is denoted as Its construction expression is: ； in: Represents the constraint boundary generation mapping function; Used to define the boundaries within which the fee status can be identified, intervened upon, or adjusted in a remote environment.

5. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S2, when generating the remote trigger condition set, after completing the constraint boundary construction, based on the event-driven mechanism and time condition determination technology, a trigger condition set for remote determination is further generated based on the cost type and time attribute. The set of remote triggering conditions is denoted as Its construction expression is: ； in: This indicates the trigger condition that generates the mapping function; Used to describe the type of cost and time status.

6. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S2, when mapping remote management actions, a correspondence between triggering conditions and remote management actions is constructed based on the set of triggering conditions. Remote management actions are mapped to Its expression is: ； in: This represents a conditional-action mapping function; This represents the set of remote management actions that can be executed when specific triggering conditions are met.

7. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S2, when encapsulating the remotely controllable cost status, the cost status expression result, constraint boundaries, triggering conditions, and management action mapping are uniformly encapsulated to form the remotely controllable cost status, the expression of which is: ； in: Indicates the first A basic state representation instance of a remote cost status that can be interacted with in real time; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation The constructed set of remote interactive constraint boundaries; Indicates based on the first An example of a cost status representation The set of remote triggering conditions determined by the fee type and time status; Indicates that for the first An example of a cost status representation When its triggering condition set is met The mapping relationship of remote management actions corresponding to the time.

8. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S3, based on the remotely controllable cost status already established in step S2, introduces an execution feedback and consistency verification mechanism to construct a real-time interactive closed-loop status, thereby transforming the cost status from one that can be remotely controlled to one that has undergone remote interaction and whose results can be verified. Step S4 integrates and processes the verified interactive cost status output in step S3, transforming the cost execution results scattered across multiple real-time interactive instances into a sustainable and stable cost control status.

9. The real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S5 transforms the stable cost control state that has been formed and confirmed in step S4 into a system-level cost control management output result that can be used by the real-time interactive remote cost control management system as a whole. Step S5, in constructing the real-time interactive remote expense control management results, includes the following steps: The system receives and confirms inputs related to maintaining a stable cost control status. System-level mapping encapsulation for stable cost control state; Associated with the status of the real-time interactive remote management link; Generation and confirmation of system-level cost control management outputs.

10. A real-time interactive remote expense control management system, constructed based on the real-time interactive remote expense control management method according to any one of claims 1-9, characterized in that, The system includes the following modules: The module includes a cost status expression module, a remote interactive constraint construction module, a real-time interactive closed-loop verification module, a stable cost control integration module, and a system-level cost control management output module.

Images