METHOD FOR DATA TRANSMISSION FROM A SPACECRAFT TO THE GROUND VIA AN OPTICAL FREESPACE CHANNEL

DE602021026880T2Active Publication Date: 2025-02-26DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FÜR LUFT UND RAUMFAHRT E V
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
DE602021026880
Authority / Receiving Office
DE · DE
Patent Type
Patents
Current Assignee / Owner
Priority Date
2020-12-03
Filing Date
2021-12-01
Publication Date
2025-02-26
Estimated Expiration
2041-12-01

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing file transfer methods for spacecraft, such as CubeSats, are not suitable for Free Space Optical communication due to resource limitations and the need for high processing power, while traditional protocols like CFDP are not feasible for CubeSats and add complexity.

Method used

A method for file transmission from a CubeSat to ground via a Free Space Optical channel, compliant with the CCSDS standard, which fragments files into Start, Intermediate, and End Transfer Frames, using the Secondary Header for file information and adapting the CCSDS TM Synchronization and Channel Coding standard for stronger error correction and synchronization.

Benefits of technology

This method enables efficient, interoperable file transfer with minimal overhead, suitable for resource-constrained CubeSats, and is adaptable for both non-reliable and reliable data transmission scenarios.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.
Patent Text Reader
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[0001] For the subject matter of the present PCT application the priority of the previous German patent application 10 2020 132 178.3 filed on December 3, 2020 is claimed wherein the subject matter of this previous German patent application is incorporated by reference herewith.

[0002] The present invention relates to a method for file transmission from a spacecraft like e.g. a CubeSat, to ground via a Free Space Optical channel.

[0003] Optical satellite communication is drawing a lot of attention over the past few years. The advantages that this technology has to offer over its traditional RF counterparts includes very high data rates due to higher frequency of infrared spectrum, lower energy consumption, lower beam divergence and inherent security against eavesdropping. With the advent of "New Space" era, wherein the space industry is transitioning from developing large and costly Spacecrafts towards cost-efficient and much smaller CubeSats, these advantages make optical satellite communication an extremely high-valued asset. A constellation of CubeSats carrying this technology would be an irresistible option for applications such as earth observation and monitoring, where transmission of mission data, such as pictures, to the ground is routinely necessary. Traditional file transfer applications such as FTP or CFDP, is often not feasible on CubeSats, since they are often limited in processing power and in resources. Therefore, a need for protocol with minimum overhead becomes extremely important.

[0004] One of the drawbacks of Free Space Optical communication is that it is rendered non-operational in the presence of clouds. One way to overcome this is by having ground station diversity and thus a network of Optical Ground Stations (OGS) so that if the downlink at a predetermined ground station is not possible, it can be performed at an alternate site. Interoperability and having a recommended standard hence become very important as economic considerations require consolidation of networks. The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) is working on providing a standard for the channel coding and synchronization of signals to be used in free space optical communications, based on the existing standards for RF systems.

[0005] In IP based networks, file transfer is performed using protocols such as (S)FTP which operate over TCP / IP. These applications are not feasible for space data communication as the space link is highly intermittent, asynchronous and has larger delays compared to terrestrial networks. This makes it impossible to transfer a large file in one single pass using such traditional applications.

[0006] This method of using provisional headers, reserved fields in order to adapt the system for existing networks and protocols have been proposed in inventions before. WO-A-92 / 13410 (corresponding to DE-T-692 17 747) proposes a method in which multicast addresses are preserved when communicating between LAN networks with different architectures, such as one with large multicast address space (e.g, IEEE 802.3 with approx. 140 trillion addresses) together with networks with small multicast address space (e.g, IEEE 802.5 with 24 to 31 addresses). When at least one first frame with a multicast address as its destination has to be transferred from IEEE 802.3 network through IEEE 802.5 network, the former communication system writes the functional address into a second frame along with the indicator field and forwards it to the IEEE 802.5 network. Based on the indicator field, the IEEE 802.5 network can interpret the representation of the multicast address, which then writes the multicast address translated from the functional address into a destination address field of a third frame before finally forwarding it to a different IEEE 802.3 network, which supports the multicast address structure of the first communication system thereby preserving the multicast address throughout the communication process.

[0007] It is not uncommon to propose adaptations and to build on existing standards in order to make the system efficient for certain use cases. WO-A-2010 / 059739 provides different methods for efficient control signaling over shared communication channels with wide dynamic range. It discusses how gateways can be configured to encode and transmit multiple modcode signals which include information regarding modulation, code rate, spreading factor, frame size etc. in their physical layer headers. The terminals decode their setting based on the headers they are configured to decode. The design for such adaptive coding, spreading, and modulating terminal along with the frame structures, FEC, modulation and encoding schemes are also provided. CCSDS standard offers a service called CCSDS File Delivery Protocol (CFDP) in order to address these issues (see [1] to [4]). CFDP operates on the concept of "Virtual Filestores". It relies on the fact that the traditional Spacecrafts have very high processing power as well as access to large memory stores. This makes is possible for CFDP to transfer files to and from the spacecraft mass memory. Files can be transmitted with a unidirectional link, a half-duplex link, or a full-duplex link. The store and forward mechanism allow file transfers considering near-Earth and deep space delays. A decision to trigger the file transfer can also be made autonomously onboard the spacecraft or from the ground. In addition to the purely file delivery-related functions, CFDP also includes file management services to allow control over the storage medium. In its simplest form, the protocol provides a Core file delivery capability operating across a single link. For more complex mission scenarios, the protocol offers Extended operation providing store-and-forward functionality across an arbitrary network, containing multiple links with disparate availability, as well as subnetworks with heterogeneous protocols. In CFDP two modes are available: In the "unacknowledged" mode data delivery failures are not reported to the sender and, therefore, cannot be repaired, although errors will be detected, and erroneous data discarded. In the "acknowledged" mode, the receiver informs the sender of any undelivered file segments. These are then retransmitted, guaranteeing complete file delivery. All these make CFDP the preferred method for file transfer in traditional space data communication systems. However, this comprehensive protocol suite can only be built on top of existing CCSDS Packet level Service. This assumption might not necessarily be true in resource deprived systems such as CubeSats. Hence, CubeSat vendors often employ proprietary protocols for transferring files to the ground. Some employ protocol (such as CubeSat Space Protocol) similar to FTP, but without the overhead coming from IP header while others employ the concept of "virtual files" (COMPASS protocol suite) for transferring data to the ground (see also [5]).

[0008] The above-mentioned techniques are relevant for RF based systems. Although, in theory they can also be adapted to optical communication systems as well, they are not tailored to meet the challenges offered by FSO channel. The channel capacity of FSO channel varies significantly based on the atmospheric affects. The very small beam divergence of optical signal, pointing errors caused to micro vibrations on the satellite, errors due to the misalignments and the refractive index turbulence of the earth's atmosphere can all lead to fluctuations in the downlink signal. This in turn results in short-term reduction in received power at the telescope of an OGS, leading to loss of data. One way to address this issue is to employ strong Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes with sufficient redundancy (parity symbols) in the data transmission making it possible to correct the errors at the receiver later. Such techniques are predominant in all communication systems today. However, this technique is not without its own drawbacks. Since the downlink conditions vary significantly within each link, having very strong codes might be necessary when the link conditions are bad but become quite redundant when the link conditions are good. Secondly, the data transmission is not guaranteed just by the FEC. When the link conditions are extremely adverse, even strong codes may often fall short in correcting all errors induced by the channel. For this reason, FEC is often combined with Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ), in which the receiver requests missing data packages on the return link to the transmitter through acknowledgment (ACKs) schemes. However, ARQ for return link would have to consider the asymmetric channel capacities and the highly lossy return channel thereby increasing the complexity of design.

[0009] In [6] a method for file transmission from a spacecraft like e.g. a CubeSat, to ground, compliant to the Consultative Committee for Space Date Systems (CCSDS) standard, wherein the CCSDS standard defines a Transfer Frame as a fixed length protocol data unit which in turn comprises a Secondary Header and a Data Field. In section 4.6.1.1.5. it is defined to divide file transmission in multiple segments. Furthermore, in section 4.6.1.1.5.1 it is defined that a File Data PDU may additionally contain information characterizing the manner in which the PDU's content aligns with the record structure of the file. This information, termed "record continuation state", shall be included whenever the segmentation control service parameter has requested that record boundaries be respected. In section 5.2 table 5-9 it is specified that file names are part of the Metadata PDUs (PDUS with no file data), thus implying an assigned file name. Moreover, section 5.3 specifies that a PDU can be a start PDU, intermediate PDU or end PDU, the order of which is designated by the "record continuation state".

[0010] [7] describes generally the CCSDS standard, where PDUs are used for communication between spacecraft and ground by optical channel with a space packet protocol based on octets. Section 4.2 describes how these space packets are assembled and transferred. Moreover, in [7] the use of a Secondary Header in the space packet protocol is disclosed, wherein the Secondary Header is a feature of the Space Packet that allows additional types of information that may be useful to the user application.

[0011] EP-A-2 785 010 discloses using the CCSDS standard for satellite communication over an unspecified up / downlink. This document describes primary and secondary header in the frame structure.

[0012] Accordingly, the prior art of file transmission over Free Space Optical channels for spacecrafts with limited resources have the following drawbacks: Traditional terrestrial file delivery applications such as (S)FTP are not suitable for space data communication as the space link is highly intermittent, asynchronous and has higher delays. Traditional space file delivery applications such as CFDP are not suitable for CubeSats as these "New Space" systems do not have high processing power and are resource limited. Having to implement the whole CCSDS stack just for transmitting files not only increases the complexity of design and implementation on such low-end embedded processors but also is not always possible. Due to the bandwidth limitations of the RF systems, a large file cannot be transferred to the ground in one single pass. A file has to be sent over multiple links often over a period of time. The extended features offered by CFDP works very well for such scenarios. For Optical communication systems which offers data rate of 100 Mbps- tens of Gigabit / s, store and forward approach is an overkill and often not necessary. Developing proprietary data transmission system would bring in interoperability issues. Also, developing a new file delivery protocol just for Free Space Optical data communication systems would require building ground station modems for data reception from scratch which has its own economic considerations.

[0013] It is the objective of the present invention to provide a file delivery method which is interoperable, while being compliant with a certain standard and which does not add a large overhead in terms of memory or processing power.

[0014] The present invention provides a method for file transmission from a spacecraft like e.g. a CubeSat, to ground via a Free Space Optical channel, compliant to the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) standard but without having the additional need for any higher layer protocols or CCSDS packet services or applications such as CFDP. It also describes the adaptations that shall be made to the current RF standard, for rendering it suitable for Free Space Optical (FSO) channels.

[0015] The method described here, is compliant to the CCSDS TM Synchronization and Channel Coding standard, wherein CCSDS amongst others define a Transfer Frame as a fixed length protocol data unit which in turn comprises amongst others a Secondary Header and a Data Field assigns a File ID to a file which is to be transmitted, divides the transmission of the file into a start fraction to be transmitted by a Start Transfer Frame which in its Data Field includes the start fraction of the file; and into multiple intermediate fractions to be transmitted by multiple Intermediate Transfer Frames with each Intermediate Transfer Frame including in its Data Field a respective intermediate fraction of the data field; and into an end fraction to be transmitted by an End Transfer Frame which in its Data Field includes the end fraction of the data file, wherein the Secondary Header of the Start Transfer Frame comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as the Start Transfer Frame, wherein the Secondary Header of each of the Intermediate Transfer Frames comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as an Intermediate Transfer Frame, wherein the Secondary Header of the End Transfer Frame comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as the End Transfer Frame, wherein the Secondary Header of the Start Transfer Frames comprises information about the File ID, File length and Name of the file which is to be transmitted, and wherein the Secondary Header of each of these Transfer Frames comprises information about the File ID.

[0016] This method of the invention inherently works for non-reliable data transmission (UDP-like) although it can be used with an additional ARQ, if the application desires guaranteed file delivery (TCP- like).

[0017] In accordance to specific embodiments of the present invention, the following adaptions are proposed for current CCSDS TM Synchronization and Channel Coding standard to suit Free Space Optical Communication channel: Stronger code rates for Reed Solomon, Deep Interleavers (upto depth of 65536), Periodically inserting Synchronization Symbols in between the Transfer Frames, Adding a 32-bit Counter after every Synchronization Symbols for identifying the position of the Interleaved page.

[0018] The present invention will now be described in further detail referring to a specific embodiment and to the drawing in which Fig. 1shows the Transfer Frame structure in CCSDS, Fig. 2shows the Start Frame Format according to the invention, Fig. 3shows the Intermediate and End Frame Formats according to the invention, Fig. 4shows the CFDP Protocol Stack, Fig. 5shows Metadata PDU in CFDP, and Fig. 6shows a functional block diagram of CCSDS Optical Data Link layer with additional Fragmenter

[0019] The present invention relates to a very simple method for transmission of files from optical satellite terminals to the ground complying with this standard but without having the additional need for any higher layer protocols or applications. In the specification the adaptions are described that should be made to the current RF standard, for rendering it suitable for Free Space Optical (FSO) channels.

[0020] In order to overcome the adversities of FSO communication, having strong protection through FEC (to overcome atmospheric effects) and having an interoperable system (to overcome effect of clouds through ground station diversity) seems inevitable. The Optical Communications Coding and Synchronization protocol specified in the CCSDS TM Synchronization and Channel Coding standard addresses these issues. This specification includes the functions for channel coding, interleaving, randomization and synchronization. It also provides the function of transferring transfer frames over the optical space link.

[0021] In the CCSDS standard, TM Transfer frames are fixed length protocol data units with the structure shown in Fig. 1.

[0022] It contains the following fields: A mandatory 6 Byte Primary Header which includes Master Channel Identifier, Virtual Channel Identifier, Operational Control Field Flag, Master Channel Frame count, Virtual Channel Frame Count and lastly Transfer Frame Data Field Status An optional (upto) 64 Byte Secondary Header Data Field An optional 6 Byte Trailer which includes Operational Control Field and Frame Error Control Field.

[0023] In most applications the optional fields including Secondary Header and Trailer are left unused. The invention relates to a method in which the secondary header of the TM Transfer Frame shall be used to embed the file information and is in itself made adequate for file transmissions from Space to Ground over an optical channel. Each file that has to be transferred to the ground will be fragmented into appropriate length transfer frames categorized into following types: Start Frame: Beginning of the file, more frames shall follow Intermediate Frame: Intermediary frames of the file, more frames shall follow End Frame: Final frame marking the end of transmission of the current file

[0024] A Start Frame comprises 64 bytes with the structure shown in Fig. 2.

[0025] According to certain embodiments of the invention, the Start Frame Format can comprise the following field specifications: 2 bit Version Number 6 bit Secondary header length, header length can be a maximum of 64 bytes 1 bit Start field indicating the beginning of the file transfer (will be 1 in this case) 1 bit End field indicating the end of file transfer (will be 1 if this is also the end of the file, 0 otherwise) 2 Reserved bits, can be used for example in identifying the coding scheme during adaptive coding 12 bit File Identifier, maximum of 4096 files can be transferred during each link 4 byte File Length filed indicating the length of the file. Maximum file size is 4GB 57 byte File Name. It can have a maximum of 57 characters

[0026] An Intermediate / End Frame comprises 3 bytes with the structure shown in Fig. 3.

[0027] According to certain embodiments of the invention, the Intermediate / End Frame Format can comprise of the following field specifications: 2 bit Version Number 6 bit Secondary header length, header length can be a maximum of 64 bytes 1 bit Start field indicating the beginning of the file transfer (will be 0 in this case) 1 bit End field indicating the end of file transfer (will be 1 for End Frame, 0 for Intermediate Frame) 2 Reserved bits, Can be used for example in identifying the coding scheme during adaptive coding 12 bit File Identifier, maximum of 4096 files can be transferred during each link

[0028] Although dependent on its size, usually each file will be fragmented into one start frame followed by multiple intermediate frames and finally an end frame. Each of these frames will contain information about a single file only. The File ID and File Length fields will assist in reassembling of the files at the receiver.

[0029] It must be noted that these headers are vital for reassembling the files. If the start frame is missing, even when all the intermediate frames and the end frame are received without any errors, it would not be possible to reassemble the file on the ground since some critical information such as the File Length and File Name are not available. Hence very strong protection against Headers is very important. For the sake of simplicity, when the start frame is not recoverable the missing Start Frame or the whole file can be retransmitted. Alternate approaches such as ARQ or sending the missing Frame over RF link can also be employed. When using ARQ for reliable delivery of files, an additional Frame Count field (from the primary header) shall be considered while reassembling the files.

[0030] The method according to the invention and described here does not bring any benefit for high end satellites which already have the CCSDS packet services available or already have standard networking stack such as TCP / IP at their disposal. The invention described here is targeted for smaller embedded processors such as in Cubesats, which do not have the luxury of implementing the CCSDS packet services just for the purpose of file transmission and yet are required to be interoperable for multiple ground stations.Differences of the invention to CFDP

[0031] The benefit of the invention will be further described in view of CFDP.

[0032] CFDP is a more comprehensive protocol compared to the one proposed in this patent. It can perform operation on files such as: Put requests, Directory Listing, Status Report, Message to User, Filestore request, Fault handling etc. The protocol assumes the availability of an underlying communication system i.e, it has to be built on top of the existing packet standards such as CCSDS Packet Service, TCP / IP or UDP / IP (see Fig. 4).

[0033] However, in the method according to the invention, the file to be transmitted is implemented directly in the CCSDS TM / TC Frames, thereby foregoing the need for implementing any of the higher layer protocols and services.

[0034] In addition to the File content itself, CFDP Sender also transfers data, called the metadata, that aid the receiver in effectively utilizing the file. File Data PDUs convey the contents of the files being delivered, while File Directive PDUs convey only metadata and other non-file information that advances the operation of the protocol. The structure of the metadata PDU is shown in Fig. 5.

[0035] The method described for file transfer according to the present invention is different from that of conventional file transfer method such as CFDP. The complexity of such a system is very low. Since the optical links are capable of transferring tens of Gigabits per second, store and forward mechanism is not necessary (which typically is one of the biggest advantages of CFDP extended procedures).Adaptations to CCSDS TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING Blue Book

[0036] The CCSDS standard for High Photon Efficiency (HPE) data processing systems is proposed in the OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS CODING AND SYNCHRONIZATION blue book [1]. However, this standard does not yet include (at the time of this invention) the O3K (on off keying) systems. Hence, a few adaptations on the existing CCSDS TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING have also been included. Current Standard specifies Reed Solomon Encoder RS (255,223) with code rate 0,8745. Typically, these encoders can correct 16 symbols per codeword (223) symbols. As explained earlier, it is vital to have strong protection against the headers for the file transfer method according to the invention to perform efficiently. Hence an option is provided to have stronger code rates than specified by the standard. Current Standard specifies Interleaver depth of maximum 8. Optical channel is bursty in nature and it can have short fades that can last typically a few milliseconds. Having channel interleaver with a maximum depth of 8 does not serve this purpose. Hence an option is provided to have deep interleaver with depth up to 65536. Current Standard specifies having synchronization symbols just at the beginning of the transfer frames. The maximum length of transfer frames in RF is about 16320 bits. However, because of the deep interleaver and because of the very high data rates of the optical communication system, the maximum length of the transfer frame can extend up to a few million bits. This will most definitely complicate the receivers on the ground. In order to avoid this issue, an option is provided to have Synchronization symbols in between the transfer frames.

[0037] A complete functional block diagram of the CCSDS Optical Data Link Layer together with the proposed Fragmenter is seen in Fig. 6.

[0038] The Fragmenter module is responsible for converting files into respective Start / Intermediate / End Frames. These Frames are further processed by a Reed Solomon Encoder (with variable code rates) for adding redundancy / parity symbols so that it is possible to correct the errors at the receiver. The Codeblocks are then sent through an Interleaver module. Free Space Optical channel is bursty in nature and often induces short fades (lasting a few milliseconds). Having a deep Interleaver will spread the errors over multiple Codeblocks making it possible to correct the errors at the receiver. The Codeblocks are further sent through a Scrambler for helping with randomization and DC balancing. Finally, a Synchronization Marker is attached at the beginning / or in between the transfer frame and the obtained channel access data unit (CADU) will be sent over the optical channel. This setup allows some of the existing RF modem infrastructure to be reused for Optical satellite communication systems.

[0039] The invention can be used for file transfer in following applications File transfer from optical terminals on Spacecraft / UAV / HAPs to ground Earth observation satellites or Remote sensing satellites that have to transfer pictures to the ground File transfer from any space data communication system that is compliant with CCSDS TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING standard LIST OF REFERENCES

[0040] [1] CCSDS OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS CODING AND SYNCHRONIZATION Blue Book: https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 142x0b1.pdf [2] CCSDS TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING Blue Book: https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 131x0b3e1.pdf [3] CCSDS FILE DELIVERY PROTOCOL (CFDP) INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Green Book: https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 720x1g3.pdf [4] CCSDS TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL Blue Book: https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 132x0b2.pdf [5] Giggenbach, Dirk & Moll, Florian & Fuchs, Christian & Cola, Tomaso & Mata Calvo, Ramon. (2011). Space communications protocols for future optical satellite-downlinks. 62nd International Astronautical Congress 2011, IAC 2011. 4 [6] CCSDS Secretariat: "Recommendation for Space Data System Standards CCSDS FILE DELIVERY PROTOCOL (CFDP) RECOMMENDED STANDARD CCSDS 727.0-B-5 BLUE BOOK", 1 July 202 (2020-07-01), pages 1-151, XP055895916, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 727x0b5.pdf [retrieved on 2022-02-28] [7] CCSDS Secretariat: "Recommendation for space Data System Standards BLUE BOOK RECOMMENDED STANDARD SPACE PACKET PROTOCOL", In: "Recommendation for Space Data System Standards BLUE BOOK RECOMMENDED STANDARD SPACE PACKET PROTOCOL", 1 June 2020 (2020-06-01), XP055895911, pages 1-54, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https: / / public.ccsds.org / Pubs / 133x0b2e1.pdf [retrieved on 2022-02-28] WO-A-92 / 13410 WO-A-2010 / 059739 EP-A-2 785 010 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

[0041] FTPFile Transfer Protocol CFDPCSSDS File Delivery Protocol OGSOptical Ground Station CCSDSConsultative Committee for Space Data Systems FSO (channel)Free Space Optical (channel) TCPTransmission Control Protocol IPInternet Protocol FECForward Error Correction ARQAutomatic Repeat Request ACKsAcknowledgement schemes UDPUser Datagram Protocol PDUProtocol Data Unit HPEHigh Photon Efficiency UAVUnmanned (or uninhabitated or unpiloted) Aerial Vehicle HAPHigh Altitude Platform

Claims

1. Method for file transmission from a spacecraft like e.g. a CubeSat, to ground via a Free Space Optical channel, compliant to the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems - CCSDS-standard, wherein the CCSDS standard define a Transfer Frame as a fixed length protocol data unit which in turn comprises a Secondary Header and a Data Field, the method comprising - assigning a File ID to a file which is to be transmitted, - dividing the transmission of the file into a start fraction to be transmitted by a Start Transfer Frame which in its Data Field includes the start fraction of the file, and into multiple Intermediate fractions to be transmitted by multiple Intermediate Transfer Frames with each Intermediate Transfer Frame including in its Data Field a respective intermediate fraction of the data field, and into an end fraction to be transmitted by an End Transfer Frame which in its Data Field includes the end fraction of the data file, - wherein the Secondary Header of the Start Transfer Frame comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as the Start Transfer Frame, - wherein the Secondary Header of each of the Intermediate Transfer Frames comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as an Intermediate Transfer Frame, - wherein the Secondary Header of the End Transfer Frame comprises information for specifying the Transfer Frame as the End Transfer Frame, - wherein the Secondary Header of the Start Transfer Frame comprises information about the File ID, File length and Name of the file which is to be transmitted, and - wherein the Secondary Header of each of these Transfer Frames comprises information about the File ID.

2. Method according to claim 1, further comprising one of the following: - Periodically inserting Synchronization Symbols in between the Transfer Frames, - Adding a 32-bit Counter after every Synchronization Symbols for identifying the position of the Interleaved page.