System or Method

Abstract

To provide a system for performing evaluation to an object A viewed from an evaluator B.SOLUTION: A system having at least one computer device comprises: first positive evaluation means for specifying a first positive evaluation value that is an evaluation value of a positive side to an object A viewed from an evaluator B for each element affecting an evaluation to the object A viewed from the evaluator B; first negative evaluation means for specifying a first negative evaluation value that is an evaluation value of a negative side to an object A viewed from an evaluator B for each element; and first difference specification means for specifying a first difference between a first positive total value that is the total value of a first positive evaluation value corresponding to each of multiple elements, and a first negative total value that is the total value of a first negative evaluation value corresponding to each of multiple elements.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 4

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a system or method.

Background Art

[0002] There is a balance sheet as a document representing the financial situation of a company, such as its assets, liabilities, and net assets. Companies utilize the balance sheet to understand their financial situation and formulate plans to improve their performance.

[0003] By the way, a balance sheet visualizes the balance between positive elements such as assets and liabilities and negative elements. Such a method that enables grasping the balance between positive and negative elements is also applicable in fields and applications different from a company's financial situation.

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0004] An object of the present invention is to provide a system for evaluating object A as viewed by evaluator B.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0005] The problems of the present invention are [1] A system including at least one computer device, the system comprising: a first positive evaluation means for specifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspect of object A as viewed by evaluator B for each element that affects the evaluation of object A as viewed by evaluator B; a first negative evaluation means for specifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspect of object A as viewed by evaluator B for each element; a first difference specifying means for specifying a first difference between a first positive total value, which is the total value of the first positive evaluation values corresponding to each of a plurality of elements, and a first negative total value, which is the total value of the first negative evaluation values corresponding to each of the plurality of elements. [2] The system as described in [1] above, wherein the first positive evaluation means identifies a first positive evaluation value based on evaluation points for the positive aspects of each element of the subject A as viewed by evaluator B, and the weights set for each element, which are input from the user terminal, and the first negative evaluation means identifies a first negative evaluation value based on evaluation points for the negative aspects of each element of the subject A as viewed by evaluator B, and the weights set for each element, which are input from the user terminal; [3] The system according to [1] or [2], comprising evaluation display means for displaying a first positive evaluation value for each element, a first negative evaluation value for each element, and the first difference in a manner that can be visually grasped by a figure; [4] A system according to any one of [1] to [3], comprising: a second positive evaluation means for identifying a second positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element of the subject A as viewed by evaluator B in the past or future; a second negative evaluation means for identifying a second negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element of the subject A as viewed by evaluator B in the past or future; and a second difference identification means for identifying a second positive total value, which is the sum of the second positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a second negative total value, which is the sum of the second negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements; [5] The system according to any one of [1] to [4] above, comprising: a third positive evaluation means for identifying a third positive evaluation value which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element from the perspective of object A to evaluator B; a third negative evaluation means for identifying a third negative evaluation value which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element from the perspective of object A to evaluator B; and a third difference identification means for identifying a third positive total value which is the sum of the third positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements and a third negative total value which is the sum of the third negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements; [6] A system according to any one of [1] to [5], comprising a measure input means for receiving input from a user terminal regarding measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element, and / or a measure display means for displaying measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element on the user terminal; [7] A method performed in a system comprising at least one computer device, comprising: a first positive evaluation step of identifying a first positive evaluation value which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of object A as viewed by evaluator B for each element that influences the evaluation of object A as viewed by evaluator B; a first negative evaluation step of identifying a first negative evaluation value which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of object A as viewed by evaluator B for each element; and a first difference identification step of identifying a first positive total value which is the sum of the first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a first negative total value which is the sum of the first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements; This can be achieved. [Effects of the Invention]

[0006] According to the present invention, a system can be provided for performing an evaluation of object A from the perspective of evaluator B. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0007] [Figure 1] This is a block diagram showing the configuration of a system according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] This is a block diagram showing the configuration of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 3] This is a block diagram showing the configuration of a server device according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 4] This figure shows a flowchart of the balance sheet creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 5] This figure shows the display screen of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 6] This figure shows the planning process according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Modes for carrying out the invention]

[0008] The following describes embodiments of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments unless it contradicts the spirit of the invention. The order of each process constituting the flowchart described below is not limited to any order that does not cause contradictions or inconsistencies in the processing content, and it is also possible to omit some of the processes constituting the flowchart or to add new processes to each process constituting the flowchart, as long as it does not cause contradictions or inconsistencies in the processing content.

[0009] Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the system comprises at least one computer device, for example, a server device. The system may include multiple computer devices, and these multiple computer devices may perform the functions of a server. The system consists of, for example, user terminals 1a and 1b, a server device 2, and a communication network 3. User terminals 1a and 1b can communicate with the server device 2 via the communication network 3. In the following description, we will explain the case in which the system includes a server device 2 and performs the processing according to an embodiment of the present invention while communicating with user terminal 1, but it is also possible to perform these processes on a user terminal operated by a user. More specifically, one computer device such as a user terminal may include the first positive evaluation means, the first negative evaluation means, the first difference identification means, the evaluation display means, the second positive evaluation means, the second negative evaluation means, the second difference identification means, the third positive evaluation means, the third negative evaluation means, the third difference identification means, the policy input means, and / or the policy display means.

[0010] User terminal 1 is a terminal operated by a user of the system. The user of the system is not particularly limited. The system may have one user terminal 1, or it may have two user terminals 1a and 1b.

[0011] User terminals 1a and 1b are not particularly limited as long as they are computer devices having a display screen and an input unit. User terminals 1a and 1b may be stationary or portable and can be carried by the user when moving. Examples of user terminals 1 include conventional mobile phones, tablet devices, smartphones, and desktop or notebook personal computers.

[0012] Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. The user terminal 1 comprises a control unit 11, a main memory 12, a storage unit 13, an input device 14, a display device 15, and a communication interface 16, all of which are connected by a bus.

[0013] The control unit 11 consists of a CPU and ROM. The control unit 11 executes programs stored in the storage unit 13 and controls the user terminal 1. For example, RAM is used as the main memory 12. The main memory 12 is the work area of ​​the control unit 11. The storage unit 13 is a storage area for saving programs and data. The control unit 11 performs calculation processing based on programs read from the main memory 12, programs stored on an external storage medium, and data input by the input device 14.

[0014] The display device 15 has a display screen. The control unit 11 outputs a video signal for displaying an image on the display screen according to the result of the calculation processing. Here, the display screen may be a touch panel equipped with a touch sensor. In this case, the touch panel functions as an input device 14.

[0015] The communication interface 16 can be connected to the communication network 3 wirelessly or by wire, and can transmit and receive data to and from the server device 2 via the communication network 3. The data received via the communication interface 16 is loaded into the main memory 12 and processed by the control unit 11 through arithmetic operations.

[0016] FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a server device according to an embodiment of the present invention. The server device 2 includes a control unit 21, a main memory 22, a storage unit 23, and a communication interface 24, which are respectively connected by a bus.

[0017] The control unit 21 is composed of a CPU and a ROM, executes the program stored in the storage unit 23, and controls the server device 2. The control unit 21 also includes an internal timer for measuring time. The main memory 22 is a work area of the control unit 21. The storage unit 23 is a storage area for storing programs and data. The control unit 21 performs program execution processing based on the program read from the main memory 22, the program stored in an external storage medium, and the information received from the user terminal 1, etc.

[0018] The system of the present invention can identify a first positive evaluation value, which is the evaluation value of the positive aspect of the target A viewed from the evaluator B for each element that affects the evaluation of the target A viewed from the evaluator B; identify a first negative evaluation value, which is the evaluation value of the negative aspect of the target A viewed from the evaluator B for each element; and identify a first difference between a first positive total value, which is the total value of the first positive evaluation values corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, and a first negative total value, which is the total value of the first negative evaluation values corresponding to each of the plurality of elements.

[0019] Target A is not particularly limited as long as it is a target for evaluation. For example, it can be a person, an organization or group such as a company, a thing (including animals, plants, and other goods), a concept (for example, the concept of "own house" and the concept of "rental" when evaluating whether to own a house or rent it, and the concept of each occupation (such as doctor, teacher, police officer, etc.) when evaluating each occupation), an intangible or incorporeal thing (such as an investment product), etc. Also, the evaluator B is not particularly limited. For example, an organization or group consisting of multiple people such as a person or a company can be the evaluator.

[0020] "Evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B" is not particularly limited either. For example, it can include evaluation of another person from the perspective of a person, evaluation of an organization or group from the perspective of a person, evaluation of a thing from the perspective of a person, evaluation of a person from the perspective of an organization or group, evaluation of another organization or group from the perspective of an organization or group, evaluation of a thing from the perspective of an organization or group, etc.

[0021] Also, when applying the system of the present invention to the evaluation of another person from the perspective of a person, the relationship between the person who conducts the evaluation and the person who is the evaluation target is not particularly limited. For example, it can include evaluation of a wife from the perspective of a husband, evaluation of a husband from the perspective of a wife, evaluation of a child from the perspective of a parent, evaluation of a parent from the perspective of a child, evaluation of a subordinate from the perspective of a superior, evaluation of a superior from the perspective of a subordinate, evaluation of a friend of a person from the perspective of that person, etc.

[0022] "Factors that affect the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B" are not particularly limited as long as they can affect the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B, and can be appropriately set according to evaluator B and target A. For example, when conducting an evaluation of a wife from the perspective of a husband or an evaluation of a husband from the perspective of a wife, "spirit", "economy", "time", "children", "parents' home", "appearance", etc. can be set as factors that affect the evaluation. For example, when conducting an evaluation of a subordinate from the perspective of a superior, "spirit", "skill", "potential", "work content", "personality", "health", etc. can be set as factors that affect the evaluation.

[0023] The following describes the application of the present invention to evaluations between spouses. The balance sheet creation process will be explained. Figure 4 is a flowchart of the balance sheet creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention. The husband operates user terminal 1a, and the wife operates user terminal 1b. First, an evaluation of the husband is made from the wife's perspective.

[0024] The wife operates user terminal 1b and logs into the system. She inputs qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband for each of several factors that affect the marital relationship (Step S1). These factors include "emotional state," "financial situation," "time," "children," "family," and "appearances."

[0025] Qualitative evaluations can be entered, for example, as text information. Methods for entering qualitative evaluations include typing text using a keyboard (including a software keyboard), displaying multiple options for qualitative evaluations on a screen and checking checkboxes, and filling out a questionnaire about qualitative evaluations on paper in advance and reading the completed questionnaire using OCR or similar technology. Qualitative evaluations are entered from both positive and negative aspects. For example, a qualitative evaluation of the positive aspects of "mental state" might include "has a positive personality" and "can cooperate with those around them." On the other hand, a qualitative evaluation of the negative aspects of "mental state" might include "is disliked by the public" and "doesn't allow for dependence."

[0026] Quantitative evaluations are entered as numerical values ​​within a specified range (for example, numbers between 0 and 5). Quantitative evaluations are also entered from both positive and negative aspects. For positive aspects, a higher numerical value indicates a stronger degree of positivity, while for negative aspects, a higher numerical value indicates a stronger degree of negativity.

[0027] The wife, while referring to the qualitative evaluations, enters a numerical value for the positive aspect (e.g., "3") and a numerical value for the negative aspect (e.g., "4") for each of the aforementioned elements. In addition, if the wife enters multiple qualitative evaluations for a single element, she can enter a quantitative evaluation for each of those qualitative evaluations. For example, she could enter "5" for the positive qualitative evaluation of "has a positive personality" and "4" for "can get along with those around her," and enter "5" for the negative qualitative evaluation of "causes public disapproval" and "4" for "doesn't allow her to be spoiled."

[0028] The qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband that were entered are sent to server device 2 (step S2). When server device 2 receives the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband (step S3), the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the husband are stored in the storage unit 23 of server device 2 (step S4).

[0029] Next, the husband operates the user terminal 1a to log in to the system and requests the server device 2 to send qualitative and quantitative evaluations of himself (step S5). Upon receiving the request (step S6), the server device 2 sends the qualitative evaluations of positive and negative aspects, as well as the quantitative evaluations of positive and negative aspects, stored in the storage unit 23, to the user terminal 1a (step S7).

[0030] When the user terminal 1a receives these qualitative and quantitative evaluations (step S8), these qualitative and quantitative evaluations are displayed on the display screen of the user terminal 1a. In this way, the husband can understand his wife's evaluation of him.

[0031] In this embodiment, steps S1 to S8 allow the wife to operate the user terminal 1b to input qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband, and the husband to view these input evaluations on the user terminal 1a operated by the husband. However, steps S1 to S8 can be omitted. In this case, the husband, without checking the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of his wife, considers the matters he believes should be evaluated and performs step S9, which will be described later. That is, for each of the aforementioned elements, the husband inputs a quantitative evaluation from his wife of his husband (himself) that he considers appropriate, within a predetermined range of values, for both positive and negative aspects.

[0032] In this embodiment, the wife operates the user terminal 1b to input qualitative and quantitative evaluations of her husband, and these evaluations are stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2. The husband can view the qualitative and quantitative evaluations stored in the storage unit 23 on the user terminal 1a. However, the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the wife that are input on the user terminal 1b may be stored in the storage unit of an external server device instead of the storage unit 23 of the server device 2. The user terminal 1a can access the storage unit of the external server device to receive the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the wife and display them on the display screen.

[0033] The husband operates the user terminal 1a and, based on the qualitative and quantitative evaluations entered by his wife, considers the aspects he believes should be evaluated and adds to the qualitative evaluation of himself. The husband operates the user terminal 1a and, for each of the aforementioned elements, inputs a quantitative evaluation from his wife of himself that he considers appropriate for both the positive and negative aspects, within a predetermined range of numerical values ​​(for example, a number between 0 and 5) (step S9). Hereinafter, the final quantitative evaluation from the wife of the husband that is entered will be referred to as the evaluation point.

[0034] The input evaluation points for each element are transmitted to the server device 2 (step S10). Upon receiving the evaluation points for the positive aspects and the evaluation points for the negative aspects of each element in the server device 2 (step S11), the evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects and the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects of each element are determined based on these evaluation points and the weighting of each element (step S12).

[0035] The weight values ​​for each element are pre-set. These weight values ​​may be entered via either user terminal 1a or 1b, or they may be set appropriately by the system operator according to evaluator B and subject A. It is preferable that the sum of the weight values ​​for each element be a predetermined value (for example, "100"). For example, if the elements are "mental state," "economic status," "time," "children," "family home," and "vanity," the weight values ​​can be set as follows: "mental state" = "20," "economic status" = "30," "time" = "15," "children" = "25," "family home" = "9," and "vanity" = "1." In this case, the sum of the weight values ​​is "100."

[0036] The identification of the evaluation value in step S12 is not particularly limited as long as it is based on evaluation points and element-specific weightings, but for example, it can be identified by multiplying the evaluation points by the element-specific weightings.

[0037] Regarding the weighting values, "Mental Health" is "20", "Economy" is "30", "Time" is "15", "Children" is "25", "Family Home" is "9", and "Vanity" is "1". Regarding the evaluation points for positive aspects, "Mental Health" is "4.5", "Economy" is "5", "Time" is "4", "Children" is "4", "Family Home" is "4", and "Vanity" is "4". Regarding the evaluation points for negative aspects, "Mental Health" is "4", "Economy" is "4", and "Time" is "1". If "spirit" is "3", "children" is "2", "parents' home" is "2", and "vanity" is "1", the evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects will be "mental" "90", "economic" "150", "time" "60", "children" "100", "parents' home" "36", and "vanity" "4", and the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects will be "mental" "80", "economic" "120", "time" "45", "children" "50", "parents' home" "18", and "vanity" "1".

[0038] Next, calculate the difference between the sum of the positive aspect ratings for each element and the sum of the negative aspect ratings for each element (Step S13). The sum of the positive aspect ratings is "440", and the sum of the negative aspect ratings is "314", so the difference is "126".

[0039] In step S13, when calculating the difference, in addition to simply subtracting the smaller of the two values ​​(the sum of positive and negative evaluations) from the larger of the two, the following methods can also be used.

[0040] For example, if the larger of the sum of positive evaluation values ​​and the sum of negative evaluation values ​​is set to a predetermined value (e.g., "100"), then the sum of the other evaluation value and the difference between the sum of evaluation values ​​can be increased or decreased by the same ratio. For example, if the sum of positive evaluation values ​​is "440" and the sum of negative evaluation values ​​is "314", the sum of positive evaluation values ​​can be decreased to "100", and the sum of negative evaluation values ​​can be decreased to "71.4" (rounded to two decimal places). Then, the difference between the sum of positive evaluation values ​​and the sum of negative evaluation values ​​will be "28.6".

[0041] If the sum of the positive valuations is greater than the sum of the negative valuations, the husband can be considered to have "net worth" in his relationship with his wife. The difference in these sums represents the size of that net worth. On the other hand, if the sum of the negative valuations is greater than the sum of the positive valuations, the husband can be considered to be in a state of "insolvency" in his relationship with his wife. The difference in these sums represents the size of that excess debt.

[0042] Furthermore, if the sum of the positive aspect evaluation values ​​is set to a predetermined value (for example, "100"), then each individual positive aspect evaluation value can be increased or decreased by the same ratio. In the above case, the positive aspect evaluation values ​​would decrease from "90" to "20.5", "Economy" from "150" to "34.1", "Time" from "60" to "13.6", "Children" from "100" to "22.7", "Family Home" from "36" to "8.2", and "Vanity" from "4" to "0.9". The negative aspect evaluation values ​​would decrease from "80" to "18.2", "Economy" from "120" to "27.3", "Time" from "45" to "10.2", "Children" from "50" to "11.4", "Family Home" from "18" to "4.1", and "Vanity" from "1" to "0.2".

[0043] Next, image data is generated to display the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values ​​in a manner that can be visually grasped by a graph (step S14). The shape of the graph in the generated image data is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, a bar graph (a graph mimicking a balance sheet), a pie chart, or a radar chart.

[0044] The evaluation points for the positive aspects and negative aspects of each element received in step S11, the evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects and negative aspects of each element identified in step S12, the difference between the sum of the evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects and the sum of the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects of each element calculated in step S13, and the image generated in step S14 are stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2 (step S15).

[0045] In step S14, the generated image data is sent to the user terminal 1a (step S16). Upon receiving the image data at the user terminal 1a (step S17), the generated image is displayed on the display screen of the user terminal 1a (step S18). Steps S1 to S18 complete the balance sheet creation process.

[0046] Figure 5 shows the display screen of a user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 displays the evaluation values ​​of the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation values ​​of the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values ​​in a manner that can be visually grasped through the diagram.

[0047] Figure 5(a) shows the balance sheet created in the above case. In step S18, bar graphs 31a and 31b are displayed, for example, as shown in display screen 30. The bar graph (bar shape) 31a on the left corresponds to the evaluation values ​​32a to 32f for the positive aspects of each element, and the bar graph 31b on the right corresponds to the evaluation values ​​32g to 32l for the negative aspects of each element.

[0048] The vertical length of the bar graph 31 corresponds to the magnitude of the valuation value of each element. In Figure 5(a), net assets 33 are placed below the valuation values ​​32g to 32l of the negative aspects, making the vertical length of bar graph 31a the same as the vertical length of bar graph 31b. On the other hand, Figure 5(b) shows the balance sheet in the case of insolvency. In Figure 5(b), insolvency 33 is placed below the valuation values ​​32a to 32f of the positive aspects, making the vertical length of bar graph 31a the same as the vertical length of bar graph 31b.

[0049] By viewing the display screen 30 as shown in Figure 5, it becomes possible to visually grasp the evaluation values ​​32a to 32f for the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation values ​​32g to 32l for the negative aspects of each element, and the size of the net assets 33.

[0050] Steps S1 to S18 involve evaluating the husband from the wife's perspective at the present time, but it is also possible to evaluate the husband from the wife's perspective in the past, for example. When evaluating the husband from the wife's perspective in the past, the processes of steps S1 to S18 can also be applied.

[0051] In order to perform an evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective in the past, in step S1, instead of inputting a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at the present time on user terminal 1b, the user terminal 1b is used to input a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at a certain point in the past. Also, in step S9, instead of inputting a quantitative evaluation of the husband (himself) at the present time within a predetermined range on user terminal 1a, the user terminal 1a is used to input a quantitative evaluation of the husband (himself) at a certain point in the past within a predetermined range.

[0052] Furthermore, it is possible to create an evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective, representing a future goal. The processes in steps S1 to S18 can also be applied to creating an evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective in the future.

[0053] In order to create an evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective in the future, in step S1, instead of inputting a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband at the present time on user terminal 1b, the user terminal 1b is used to input a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the husband as a target at a certain point in the future. Also, in step S9, instead of inputting a quantitative evaluation of the husband (himself) at the present time within a predetermined range on user terminal 1a, the user terminal 1a is used to input a quantitative evaluation of the husband (himself) as a target at a certain point in the future within a predetermined range.

[0054] In step S14, image data can be generated that includes a graph displaying, in an understandable manner, the current evaluation values ​​for the positive aspects of each element, the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values, as well as a graph displaying, in an understandable manner, the past and / or future evaluation values ​​for each element, the evaluation values ​​for the negative aspects of each element, and the difference between the above total values. It is also possible to display not only a bar graph corresponding to the current evaluation, but also bar graphs corresponding to past and / or future evaluations side by side.

[0055] Furthermore, while steps S1 to S18 evaluate the husband from the wife's perspective at the present time, it is also possible to evaluate the wife from the husband's perspective. In this case, in steps S1 to S18, the processes executed on user terminal 1a are executed on user terminal 1b operated by the wife, and the processes executed on user terminal 1b are executed on user terminal 1b operated by the husband. In addition, in step S14, it is possible to display not only a bar graph corresponding to the evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective, but also a bar graph corresponding to the evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective side by side.

[0056] Ideally, a wife should have a net worth of assets in her husband's eyes, and a husband should also have a net worth of assets in his eyes. If a wife has a net worth of assets in her eyes, but a husband has a net worth of debt in his eyes, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as a service-oriented one. If a wife has a net worth of debt in her eyes, and a husband has a net worth of assets in his eyes, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as an exploitative one. If a wife has a net worth of debt in her eyes, and a husband has a net worth of debt in his eyes, then from the husband's perspective, the relationship can be described as a quagmire. In this way, the state of a marital relationship can be accurately grasped from the wife's perspective on the husband's eyes, and from the husband's perspective on the wife's eyes.

[0057] Furthermore, the system according to the embodiment of the present invention can automatically identify which type a relationship falls into, such as ideal, service-oriented, exploitative, or quagmire, based on the wife's evaluation of the husband and the husband's evaluation of the wife. Here, four types—ideal, service-oriented, exploitative, and quagmire—are given as examples, but different names may be used, the criteria for classifying the types may differ from those above, and the number of types to be classified may not be four. The system according to the embodiment of the present invention can identify which of a predetermined number of types the relationship between the wife and husband falls into, based on the wife's evaluation of the husband and the husband's evaluation of the wife, according to predetermined criteria and rules. The relationship between the wife and husband, based on the wife's evaluation of the husband and the husband's evaluation of the wife, can be displayed on user terminal 1a or user terminal 1b.

[0058] Next, the plan creation process will be explained. The husband and / or wife can display the image generated in step S14 on the display screen and, while referring to it, operate the user terminal 1 to create a plan to improve their relationship (i.e., a plan to improve their balance sheet). Figure 6 is a diagram showing the plan creation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0059] The husband or wife operates user terminal 1 to access server device 2 and log in to the system. The husband or wife operates user terminal 1 to input their evaluation of the husband from the wife's perspective, or measures to improve the evaluation of the wife from the husband's perspective (step S21). The input of measures is performed by text input. It is also possible to input measures for each of the aforementioned elements. For example, for "Economy," a measure such as "Increase sales through a side business" can be input.

[0060] The information regarding the policy that has been entered is sent to the server device 2 (step S22). When the server device 2 receives the information regarding the policy (step S23), the information regarding the policy is stored in the storage unit 23 of the server device 2 (step S24). In step S24, the information regarding the policy can be stored in association with the aforementioned elements. Steps S21 to S24 complete the plan creation process.

[0061] The information regarding the measures stored in step S24 can be viewed on either the user terminal 1a operated by the husband or the user terminal 1b operated by his wife. In other words, if the measures are mutually evaluated, it is possible to view information regarding each other's measures. For example, the information regarding the measures entered by the husband operating user terminal 1a in step S21 can be viewed not only on user terminal 1a but also on user terminal 1b operated by the wife. Each measure is displayed on the display screen in a manner that allows it to be understood that it is a measure corresponding to the aforementioned elements.

[0062] In the above embodiment, the system of the present invention consisted of a user terminal 1 and a server device 2, but for example, the balance sheet creation process and plan creation process described above may be performed on a single computer device. [Explanation of Symbols]

[0063] 1. User terminal 2 Server devices 3. Communication Network 11 Control Unit 12 Main Memory 13 Storage Section 14 Input devices 15 Display device 16 Communication Interfaces 21 Control Unit 22 Main Memory 23 Storage Section 24 Communication Interfaces 30 display screen 31 Bar graph 32 Evaluation Value

Claims

1. A system comprising at least one computer device, A first positive evaluation means for identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of subject A as viewed by evaluator B, for each element that influences the evaluation of subject A from evaluator B's perspective, A first negative evaluation means for identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element as seen by evaluator B of subject A, A first difference identification means for identifying the first difference between a first positive total value, which is the sum of first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and a first negative total value, which is the sum of first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, A measure input means that receives input from a user terminal regarding measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element, and / or a measure display means that displays measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element on the user terminal. A system equipped with these features.

2. The first positive evaluation means identifies a first positive evaluation value based on the evaluation points for the positive aspects of each element of subject A as viewed by evaluator B, and the weights set for each element, which are input from the user terminal. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first negative evaluation means identifies a first negative evaluation value based on evaluation points for the negative aspects of each element of the subject A as viewed by evaluator B, and the weights set for each element, which are input from the user terminal.

3. A second positive evaluation means for identifying a second positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of each element of subject A as viewed by evaluator B, in the past or future; A second negative evaluation means for identifying a second negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element of subject A as viewed by evaluator B, in the past or future; A second difference identification means for identifying the second difference between the second positive total value, which is the sum of the second positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and the second negative total value, which is the sum of the second negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements. The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

4. A third positive evaluation means for identifying a third positive evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the positive aspects of evaluator B from the perspective of target A for each of the aforementioned elements, A third negative evaluation means for identifying a third negative evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the negative aspects of evaluator B from the perspective of target A for each of the aforementioned elements, A third difference identification means for identifying the third difference between the third positive total value, which is the sum of the third positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and the third negative total value, which is the sum of the third negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements. The system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising:

5. A method performed in a system comprising at least one computer device, The first positive evaluation step involves identifying a first positive evaluation value, which is the evaluation value of the positive aspects of subject A from evaluator B's perspective for each element that influences evaluator B's evaluation of subject A, and A first negative evaluation step involves identifying a first negative evaluation value, which is the evaluation value of the negative aspects of each element as seen by evaluator B, A first difference identification step involves identifying the first difference between the first positive total, which is the sum of the first positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements, and the first negative total, which is the sum of the first negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to each of the multiple elements. A measure input means that receives input from a user terminal regarding measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element, and / or a measure display step that displays measures to improve the evaluation of target A from the perspective of evaluator B for each element on the user terminal. A method having

Images