Social infrastructure integration management system

Abstract

We provide a multidimensional social infrastructure management system that provides integrated control over systems, contracts, history, notifications, and blocking for individuals, businesses, and government agencies. [Solution] The system automatically performs contract induction, blocking processing, history saving, and resocialization judgment based on user attributes, behavioral history, and consistency with external systems. It then induces notifications and contracts via LINE (registered trademark), SNS, email, etc., and saves evidence such as electronic signatures and logs. Furthermore, it includes a blockade declaration that considers infringement to have occurred if the conclusion is consistent regardless of the order of composition, processing medium, or language, and is capable of adapting to future communication methods and institutional environments, thereby achieving complete protection of intellectual property.

Description

Technical Field

[0005] , , , ,

[0004] , , , , ,

[0001] The present invention relates to information processing technology in the operation of social systems, personal management, and business activities, and particularly to a social infrastructure cooperation management system that realizes cross-system judgment, history control, notification guidance, and contract automation. Mu Related.

Background Art

[0002] Conventionally, in a management system configured by system, department, and country, it has been necessary to make judgments such as contracts, cut-offs, and re-evaluations individually and manually, and the cooperation with communication media such as LINE, email, and SNS has also lacked consistency. Therefore, there has been no configuration that realizes contract guidance, history recording, system consistency judgment, and risk assessment through integrated management.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0003] [[ID=​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The social infrastructure interconnection management system according to the first invention of the present invention is a social infrastructure interconnection management system connected to government agency terminals, corporate terminals and personal terminals via a communication network, comprising a processor, a storage device and a communication interface, wherein the storage device includes: Intellectual property information regarding registered intellectual property, User attribute information, behavioral history information, and external system information concerning the user are stored, and the processor receives information from the government agency terminal, the corporate terminal, and the personal terminal via the communication interface. Input configuration data that shows the processing configuration of the business model to be executed, The user attribute information, the behavioral history information and the external system information are acquired, and the acquired Input configuration data, User attribute information, the behavioral history information, and the external system information are recorded in the storage device. The constituent similarity between the acquired input configuration data and the intellectual property information is calculated, Based on the user attribute information, the behavioral history information and the external system information, A risk score indicating the user's level of risk is calculated, and it is determined that blocking is necessary if the constituent similarity is equal to or greater than a predetermined similarity threshold and the risk score is equal to or greater than a predetermined blocking threshold, and it is determined that contract induction is necessary if the constituent similarity is equal to or greater than the similarity threshold and the risk score is equal to or greater than a warning threshold but less than the blocking threshold. Based on the above determination result, If it is determined that the aforementioned blocking process is necessary, the blocking notice will be sent to notify the user of the complete blocking; if it is determined that the user is necessary to induce a contract, the warning notice will be sent to encourage the user to accept the contract. The system is characterized by transmitting the notification content, electronic signature, transmission medium, sender's IP address, and transmission time information related to the notification process to the administrative agency terminal, the corporate terminal, or the personal terminal via the communication interface, and recording the communication history data in the storage device.

[0006] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the second invention of the present invention, in the first invention, functions as a business management unit that manages the tasks related to the determination, notification and recording of communication history data by having the processor execute a program stored in the storage device, and the business management unit performs the sales management function, employee management function, money management function and date and time management function of the headquarters that manages the operation of the entire system, and further hierarchically below the headquarters, In conjunction with the general agent terminal, agent terminals, referral store terminals, and franchisee terminals connected to the network via the aforementioned communication interface, It is characterized by performing general agent management functions, agent management functions, referral store management functions, and franchise store management functions.

[0007] The third invention relates to the present invention. Ru Company In the second invention, the infrastructure integration management system is: The aforementioned processor, The aforementioned headquarters As a management function , one of the purchase prices of goods or services fixed percentage If BasedPoint issuance: Issuing points that can be converted into money. process ,also is gold Money or Material rewards grant Economic incentives Execute the granting process. It is characterized by the following:

[0008] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the fourth invention of the present invention, in the third invention, the processor receives user attribute information, behavioral history information, and external system information. and the aforementioned intellectual property information Based on this, it is characterized by performing a power reconfiguration process that dynamically changes the power information of users in a public system.

[0009] Social infrastructure interoperability management according to the fifth invention of the present invention system This is the fourth shot Clearly At The aforementioned processor, Using the aforementioned points or economic incentives In a system operation structure that does not exist Based on interactive expression of intent information and behavioral log information ite Making decisions stomach , Non-numerical agreement protocols that control the execution and feasibility of contracts Execute the process It is characterized by doing so.

[0010] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the sixth invention of the present invention, in the fourth invention, the processor analyzes contract condition data belonging to multiple groups of systems using a machine learning model, and checks for inconsistencies between contract conditions. , or a mismatch in conditions between the input configuration data and the intellectual property information. This system is characterized by performing a system consistency optimization process that corrects and evaluates the system to determine whether or not to enter into a contract.

[0011] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the seventh invention of the present invention, in the fourth invention, the processor, when improvement action information or compensation performance information is recorded for a user for whom past records exist, records the information of the user recorded in the storage device The aforementioned communication history data Whether or not to disclose historical information By reducing the aforementioned risk score This system is characterized by performing a stepwise modification of record disclosure control processing and a process to reconstruct the user's social credit information.

[0012] The social infrastructure cooperation management system according to the eighth invention of the present invention is, in the fourth invention, the processor is connected to an external communication medium via the communication interface The aforementioned contract induction notice, The aforementioned interruption notice, The aforementioned warning notice and electronic signature acquisition process, and executes a communication evidence recording process of recording notice logs, electronic signatures, transmission media, sender IP addresses, and transmission time information as evidence information in the storage device.

[0013] The social infrastructure cooperation management system according to the ninth invention of the present invention is, in the fourth invention, based on the user's affiliated organization information, qualification information, or past contract history information In calculating the aforementioned risk score executes an execution permission control process for controlling whether the contract can be executed or the service can be used.

[0014] The social infrastructure cooperation management system according to the tenth invention of the present invention is, in the fourth invention, as the external institution information Related to the aforementioned intellectual property information acquires any one of national institution information, local government institution information, private organization institution information, or corporate contract condition information, and executes an institution collation process for collating the external institution information with the user attribute information.

[0015] The social infrastructure cooperation management according to the eleventh invention of the present invention system is the fifth invention Clearly and in The aforementioned processor, non-numerical agreement protocol In processing, LINE, SMS, chat Execute user interaction using either a bot or a natural language user interface. which is characterized by the following.

[0016] via the aforementioned communication interface The social infrastructure cooperation management system according to the twelfth invention of the present invention is, in the fifth invention, the processor displays the contract document on the user terminal in the non-numerical agreement protocol process, and when the user approves, an electronic signature is given, and a contract signature recording process of recording the electronic signature and the response log in the storage device is executed. via the aforementioned communication interface which is characterized by the following.

[0017] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 13th invention of the present invention, in the 6th invention, the processor is Calculation of the aforementioned risk score or The aforementioned system consistency optimization process is characterized by performing a system consistency evaluation process that analyzes contract condition data using a machine learning model employing a neural network or random forest, and calculates a consistency score between contract conditions.

[0018] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 14th invention of the present invention, in the 13th invention, the processor provides information on mismatches in condition data between external systems. , or information regarding mismatches between the input configuration data and the intellectual property information Convert the data into tabular data or network map data, calculate correlation scores between external systems, and generate visualization data. and record in the storage device. This system is characterized by performing a process to visualize the correlation between institutions.

[0019] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 15th invention of the present invention, in the 7th invention, the processor, in the record disclosure control process, the user Related to the aforementioned risk score This system is characterized by performing a record disclosure determination process that controls whether or not to disclose or the scope of reference of recorded information based on a credit score or AI determination criteria.

[0020] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 16th invention of the present invention, in the 7th invention, the processor, past recorded data The aforementioned communication history data The system is characterized by converting the data into either PDF, CSV, or log data format, and then performing a record disclosure control process that discloses or withholds the data in stages according to the record disclosure level.

[0021] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 17th invention of the present invention, in the 8th invention, the processor sends a notification using one of the external communication media such as email, SMS, LINE, Slack, or Teams, and after transmission, the communication record data to which an electronic signature has been added The storage device provided This system is characterized by performing communication evidence recording processing to be recorded in a database.

[0022] The social infrastructure interoperability management system according to the 18th invention of the present invention, in the 8th invention, the processor, under any of the conditions of contract refusal, no response, or expiration of the deadline, The aforementioned Warning notifications, feature restrictions and According to the aforementioned blocking notification This method is characterized by performing a stepwise shutdown process that executes complete shutdown in stages.

[0023] The social infrastructure interoperability management system according to the 19th invention of the present invention, in the 8th invention, the processor automatically converts communication record data into a PDF document and generates the PDF document as evidentiary document data that can be submitted as evidence in litigation, contract certification, or administrative evidence. and record in the storage device. It is characterized by performing a process to generate evidence documents.

[0024] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 20th invention of the present invention is a social infrastructure linkage management system described in any of the 4th to 8th inventions, wherein the processor is such that even if the order of the components, naming, display method, execution program language, or communication medium are different, Based on the aforementioned constituent similarities and the calculation results of the risk score The system is characterized by performing a configuration matching determination process that determines whether the contract execution feasibility determination result, the blocking process result, the notification result, and the recording result match.

[0025] Social infrastructure interoperability management according to the 21st invention of the present invention system This refers to the social infrastructure integration management described in any of the 4th to 8th inventions. system In, The processor compares processing result data based on contract status, disconnection status, or record change results, and performs a result matching determination process to determine whether the processing results match. It is characterized by the following:

[0026] Social infrastructure interoperability management related to the 22nd invention of the present invention system This refers to the social infrastructure integration management described in any of the 4th to 8th inventions. system In, The processor performs a future technology application determination process that determines whether the same processing results as the contract execution feasibility determination process, blocking process, notification process, and recording process can be obtained even when using communication technologies including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), quantum communication, or brain-computer interfaces. It is characterized by the following:

[0027] The social infrastructure linkage management system according to the 23rd invention of the present invention is a social infrastructure linkage management system described in any of the 4th to 8th inventions, wherein the processor simultaneously performs blocking processing, notification processing, contract processing, recording processing and evidence recording processing within the same processing flow. This would constitute a complete blockade of intellectual property rights. It is characterized by performing integrated processing.

[0028] The present invention comprises the following specific configurations:

[0029] (1) The control unit makes a decision to permit or block execution based on the user's attributes, contract history, behavioral records, legal and regulatory requirements, etc., and selects the applicable system.

[0030] (2) The Communications Department will coordinate with communication media such as LINE, SNS, email, and SMS to notify users of contracts, changes in contract terms, blocking notices, and resocialization decisions, and will record electronic signature logs, sending IP addresses, timestamps, etc.

[0031] (3) The recording unit records each user's history, notification content, contract acquisition status, blocking results, etc. in chronological order, and implements gradual disclosure control of records (resocialization support) when corrective actions or restoration of conditions occur.

[0032] (4) The matching unit matches user attributes with external systems, local government conditions, license conditions, etc., calculates a risk score, and dynamically decides whether to activate or suspend the contract.

[0033] (5) The pseudocode section is executed by the following function: function notifyUser(userID, medium): message = generateContractPrompt(userID) sendViaMedium(userID, medium, message) logTransmission(userID, medium, message) function evaluateExecutionRisk(userID): riskScore = analyzeBehavior(userID) if riskScore > THRESHOLD: initiateBlock(userID) else: promptLicense(userID)

[0034] (6) Blockade Declaration Structure: The structure of the present invention shall be considered structurally identical insofar as it results in the same judgment, blockade, contract, notification, and evidence, regardless of differences in the order of the structure, processing naming, or medium. Changes in order, language conversion, display format, or means of communication shall not be considered avoidance. Infringement shall be established even with any future means such as AR / VR, quantum communication, and BCI, if the conclusion is the same. [Effects of the Invention]

[0035] This invention enables the automated processing of contracts, blocking, notifications, and history control across systems, with collaboration among individuals, companies, and government agencies. Furthermore, it realizes social infrastructure management that is fair in terms of evidentiary value, provision of second chances, and compliance with the system. In addition, it makes it possible to determine infringement based on the principle of result consistency for all components and media, including future technologies, thereby establishing unavoidability. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0036] The drawings illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention as disclosed herein, including not only essential components of the invention but also optional and preferred embodiments. [Figure 1] Figure 1 is an overall configuration diagram of a multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system illustrating an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] Figure 2(a) is a detailed block diagram of the institutional processing module group, Figure 2(b) is a detailed block diagram of the business management department, and Figure 2(c) is an explanatory diagram of the hierarchical management of agents by the point issuance operations headquarters. [Figure 3] Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of the present invention: a multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure collaborative management method. [Figure 4] Figure 4 shows the communication medium-specific integration configuration diagram. [Figure 5] Figure 5 shows the flowchart for the coordination process by communication medium. [Figure 6] Figure 6 shows the components of the contract induction and deactivation control flow. [Figure 7] Figure 7 is a flowchart of contract induction and deactivation control. [Figure 8] Figure 8 shows the components of the history storage stepwise disclosure control unit. [Figure 9] Figure 9 is a flowchart of the history storage stepwise disclosure control unit. [Figure 10] Figure 10 shows the components of the system verification and contract formation process diagram. [Figure 11] Figure 11 is a flowchart of the system verification and contract formation process. [Figure 12] Figure 12 shows the communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure. [Figure 13] Figure 13 is a flowchart of the communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure. [Figure 14] Figure 14 shows the components of the AI ​​score evaluation and execution blocking decision diagram. [Figure 15] Figure 15 is a flowchart showing the AI ​​score evaluation and execution blocking decision. [Figure 16] Figure 16 shows the components of the contract issuance history and the external submission log processing diagram. [Figure 17] Figure 17 is a flowchart showing the contract issuance history and external submission log processing. [Figure 18] Figure 18 shows the components of the resocialization conditions flowchart. [Figure 19] Figure 19 is a flowchart of the resocialization conditions flow chart. [Figure 20] Figure 20 shows the components of an abstract configuration diagram for comparison with future media. [Figure 21] Figure 21 is a flowchart of the abstract configuration diagram for matching with future media. [Modes for carrying out the invention]

[0037] The embodiments illustrated below, applying the present invention, will be described with reference to the drawings.

[0038] <Embodiment 1> <Overview of Embodiment 1> Figure 1 is an overall diagram of the multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system, Figure 2(a) is a detailed block diagram of the institutional processing module group 13, Figure 2(b) is a detailed block diagram of the business management department 14, and Figure 2(c) is an explanatory diagram of the hierarchical management of agents by the point issuance operations headquarters.

[0039] In Figure 1, the multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system 1 comprises a social infrastructure linkage unit 11, a core function unit 12, a group of institutional processing modules 13, and a business management unit 14. The core function unit 12 includes a communication unit 15, a recording unit 16, and a control unit 17. Furthermore, the social infrastructure linkage unit 11 receives input from government agency terminals 2, corporate terminals 3, and personal terminals 4 as input sources that are the main entities involved in the linkage, and performs social infrastructure linkage.

[0040] The multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system 1, for example, has a point issuance management operations headquarters, which, as shown in Figure 2(c), has a hierarchical structure below it with a general agent, agents, referring stores, and affiliate stores. The operations headquarters terminal installed in the operations headquarters is network-connected to the general agent terminal installed in the general agent, the agent terminals installed in the agents, the referring store terminals installed in the referring stores, and the affiliate store terminals installed in the affiliate stores. Network connectivity is used as appropriate depending on the communication environment, such as broadband, dedicated lines, mobile communication networks, and cloud connectivity. The operations headquarters terminal manages the general agent terminal, the general agent terminal manages the agent terminals, and the agent terminals manage the affiliate store terminals.

[0041] The multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system 1 is installed in the operations headquarters, etc., and can automatically execute contracts with general agents, agents, referral stores, and franchisees.

[0042] The Social Infrastructure Coordination Department 11 coordinates the social infrastructure of government agency terminals 2, corporate terminals 3, and personal terminals 4.

[0043] The core function unit 12 includes a communication unit 15 that performs notification, blocking, and contract induction, a recording unit 16 that performs signature, history, and disclosure control, and a control unit 17 that performs overall control logic.

[0044] As shown in Figure 2(a), the institutional processing module group 13 includes a conversation module 21, a notification module 22, an inquiry module 23, a billing module 24, a notification module 25, a reporting module 26, and a payment module 27.

[0045] <Lower-level business management targets> As shown in Figure 2(b), the business management unit 14 has a sales management function 28, a general agent management function 29, an agent management function 30, a referral store management function 31, a franchisee management function 32, an employee management function 33, a money management function 34, and a date and time management function 35.

[0046] Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of the present invention: a multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure collaborative management method. The multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure collaborative management method will now be described in accordance with the flowchart in Figure 3.

[0047] As shown in Figure 3, the multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system operates via an administrative agency terminal (step 301), a corporate terminal (step 302), or a personal terminal (step 303). Once various inputs are received (step 304), the communication unit operates (processing) (step 305), the recording unit operates (processing) (step 306), and the control unit operates (control) (step 307). This triggers notification (step 308), signing (step 309), and control (e.g., blocking, permission) (step 310). As a result, contract processing / notification / payment, etc., are processed (step 311).

[0048] In this way, sales management, financial management, and time management are performed (Step 312).

[0049] Based on the above configuration, Figures 1, 2(a), (b), and (c) represent the core of the entire patent configuration: communication means (LINE / email, etc.) → notification → recording → judgment → contract induction or blocking → evidence recording. Figure 1 shows a configuration in which all institutional decision-making is processed according to a "constitutive flow." Figures 1, 2(a), (b), and (c) (claims 1-4, 8, 22, and 23) are strongly linked, visually demonstrating the blocking effect and the unavoidability of future infringement.

[0050] Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating the coordination configuration by communication medium. Figure 4 shows the processing structure of "Various Communication Mediums" → "Communication Unit" → "Contract Guidance / Blocking Decision" → "Log Storage". The coordination configuration by communication medium will be explained below.

[0051] In Figure 4, the communication medium-specific cooperation unit 40 of System 1 includes an external communication medium 41, an external communication medium interface unit 42, a communication unit 43, a response content reception determination unit 44, a determination processing unit 45, and a recording unit (evidence generation) 46.

[0052] The external communication medium 41 has the function of a notification entry point. Examples of the external communication medium 41 include LINE, SNS (X, Instagram, Facebook, Threads, etc.), email (Gmail, Outlook, etc.), SMS / phone notifications (voice API), and chatbots (Slack, Teams, custom UI).

[0053] The communications unit 43 performs tasks such as contract notification transmission processing, contract renewal notification processing, blocking warning transmission processing, and license agreement induction processing.

[0054] The response content reception determination unit 44 determines whether consent (signature) has been obtained, whether the response has been ignored / rejected, or whether the deadline has been exceeded.

[0055] The decision processing unit 45 performs the following processes: permission (continued execution), blocking (gradually), and sending a re-direction notification (retry configuration).

[0056] The recording unit (evidence generation) 46 stores electronic signatures, records IP addresses / device information, adds timestamps, and saves logs in PDF / CSV format.

[0057] Figure 5 is a flowchart of the communication medium-specific coordination process. Figure 5 shows the process flowchart for "Various Communication Mediums" → "Communication Department" → "Contract Guidance / Blocking Decision" → "Log Saving". The communication medium-specific coordination process will be explained below according to the flowchart in Figure 5.

[0058] When a message is sent from the communications unit via an external communication medium 41, such as LINE 501, SNS 502, email 503, SMS / phone notification 504, or chatbot 505 as described above (step 506), a contract notification / warning notification / blocking guidance message is sent (step 507).

[0059] Next, the system performs a process to determine if the user's response has been received (step 508). It then performs a consent signature (step 509), execute permission processing (continue) (step 510), and record (signature, IP address, and evidence log storage) (step 511).

[0060] If the request is rejected or unanswered (step 512), a stepwise blocking process and subsequent notification are performed (step 513).

[0061] Figures 4 and 5 visually demonstrate that the configuration matches claims 8, 17-19, and 23, resulting in consistent results regardless of the communication medium, such as LINE, SNS, or email. The flowchart clearly shows the configurations that will be blocked in cases of rejection, non-response, or expiration. The recording unit supports PDF and CSV output, and the recording can be used for litigation, audits, and license certification thanks to its electronic signature capabilities.

[0062] Figure 6 shows the components of the contract induction / blocking control flowchart (contract induction / blocking control unit 60). Figure 7 shows the blocking control steps when the user does not accept, ignores, or rejects the contract. The components will be described below in accordance with the contract induction / blocking control flowchart in Figure 6.

[0063] In Figure 6, the contract induction interruption control unit 60 of System 1 includes a start condition unit 61, a contract induction processing unit 62, a response selection unit 63, an interruption judgment logic (control unit) 64, and a record storage processing unit 65.

[0064] The start condition unit 61 sets the start condition (starting condition) as the configuration in question infringing on existing registered intellectual property when a user attempts to run this system.

[0065] The contract induction processing unit 62 presents a contract consent screen via a communication medium. For example, it may display a message such as "This configuration is subject to intellectual property protection. Do you agree?" via LINE®, email, Slack®, etc.

[0066] The response selection unit 63 displays the following response options: (1) Agreement to the contract (signature), (2) Rejection, (3) No response (ignore), and (4) Confirmation of contract terms (grace period). By selecting any of the above (1) to (4), the system proceeds to the blocking decision logic.

[0067] In the blocking decision logic (control unit) 64, if the contract is agreed upon, it is determined to permit / continue. If it is rejected / no response, a step-by-step blocking (the following three steps) is performed. Stage 1: Warning notification (renewal inducement) Stage 2: Restricted blocking (UI and function restrictions) Stage 3: Complete Blocking (Execution Stopped, Notification Issued)

[0068] The record storage processing unit 65 saves the contract response details and blocking logs (stage history, IP address, terminal information) to a database (DB) with a timestamp and digital signature. The saved data can be output in CSV / PDF format.

[0069] Figure 7 is a flowchart of contract induction and blocking control. Figure 7 shows the blocking control steps when the user does not accept, ignores, or rejects the contract. The contract induction and blocking control process will be explained below according to the flowchart in Figure 7.

[0070] First, when a user attempts to execute the program, the matching process begins.

[0071] Matching result: If it infringes on the intellectual property structure, it will be marked as "requires a contract" (Step 701).

[0072] Next, the contract agreement screen is presented via the aforementioned communication medium (step 702). If the user chooses to consent (step 703), a decision is made on whether to allow (step 704). If the user chooses to deny, the response in step 1 is performed (step 706), and a warning notification is issued (step 711). If the user chooses not to respond (step 707), the response in step 1 is performed (step 708). If the user chooses to confirm the conditions (step 709), a grace period is set (step 710). In step 711, after issuing a warning notification in step 1, step 2 is implemented: function restriction (step 712), or step 3 is implemented: complete blocking (step 713).

[0073] Save the response content, blocking history, and signature to the database (DB) (Step 714).

[0074] The "staged blocking" process described above is based on claims 18 and 23 and adheres to the principle of structural consistency; therefore, even if the UI and communication medium differ, infringement is established by the result matching. Figures 6 and 7 visually demonstrate that "blocking" is not merely a refusal, but a sophisticated management mechanism involving induction → staged measures → evidence gathering. It functions as an automatic blocking and proof structure for companies, local governments, sales organizations, and API implementation sites when a license has not been obtained.

[0075] Figure 8 shows the components of the history storage and stepwise disclosure control unit of System 1. Figure 9 is a flowchart of the history storage and stepwise disclosure control unit. Figures 8 and 9 show how user records (actions, contracts, blocking, etc.) are stored and under what conditions the scope of disclosure is controlled. The components of the history storage and stepwise disclosure control unit shown in Figure 8 will be described below.

[0076] In Figure 8, the history storage stepwise disclosure control unit 80 includes input history data (recording target) 81, recording format / storage format (recording unit) 82, disclosure permission control logic (control unit) 83, disclosure condition unit (judgment criteria) 84, and output / cooperation unit (external visualization) 85.

[0077] The input history data (recorded items) 81 includes contract response history (agreement / rejection / no response), blocking execution history (stage history: warning → restriction → blocking), user activity log (access date and time / device used / function used), improvement activity log (training attendance, training completion, re-evaluation request), and contract compensation information (compensation for violations or license acquisition).

[0078] The recording format / storage format (recording section) 82 includes digitally signed logs, timestamp recording (ISO8601 format), embedded IP address / terminal information, and storage in JSON / CSV / PDF format. Logs are classified by: stage / action type / institution type.

[0079] The disclosure permission control logic (control unit) 83 sets the disclosure level to: Disclosure level 0: Completely hidden (initial state), Disclosure level 1: Disclosure limited to administrators and internal staff, Disclosure level 2: Identity verification possible under certain conditions, Disclosure level 3: Full disclosure permitted to those who pass a complete re-evaluation.

[0080] Section 84 of the Disclosure Conditions (Judgment Criteria) uses the following as judgment criteria: a period of non-violation (e.g., 180 days or more), completion of an educational program (e.g., in-house e-learning), guarantor approval, acquisition of a new contract, passing a system review, and an AI risk score below a certain standard (e.g., risk less than 10).

[0081] The Output / Linkage Unit (External Visualization) 85 generates PDF disclosure reports (for users / administrators), responds to inquiries to local governments via the administrative linkage API, and outputs formats for reporting / compensation / insurance company inquiries.

[0082] The following describes the step-by-step disclosure control of history storage, following the flowchart in Figure 9.

[0083] First, when a recordable event occurs, the system performs contract response, blocking, action logging, and remediation processes (Step 901).

[0084] Next, save it along with the signature, IP address, and timestamp (step 902). If the disclosure level is 0, completely hide it (step 903). Perform a condition evaluation, Implement corrective actions, monitor progress over time, and conduct AI evaluations (Step 904). Next, Level 1: Administrators only / Level 2: User can view / Level 3: Full disclosure (Step 905). Next, perform external output (PDF / CSV / API query) (Step 906).

[0085] This configuration is in complete agreement with claims 7, 15, 16, and 23. By incorporating a resocialization configuration / non-permanent history control structure, it is also compliant with the European GDPR / Japan's Personal Information Protection Act. By illustrating the "staged disclosure structure" of records, it is a high-level configuration that includes not just log storage, but also management / re-evaluation / social reintegration.

[0086] Figure 10 shows the components of the system verification and contract formation process diagram in System 1. Figure 11 is a flowchart of the system verification and contract formation process diagram. Figures 10 and 11 show the configuration that the user intends to implement, the verification logic with "external systems, contract conditions, and legal requirements (intellectual property database)," and the flow of contract guidance decisions. The components of the system verification and contract formation process diagram in Figure 10 will be explained below.

[0087] In Figure 10, the system verification and contract formation process 100 includes input configuration data (user side) 101, external system / intellectual property information group (reference target) data 102, verification unit processing content (matching) 103, judgment result branching process 104, and post-contract formation processing (control unit) 105.

[0088] The input configuration data 101 (user side) includes the business model configuration to be executed (function definition / processing structure), user attributes (affiliated organization / authentication level / role hierarchy), and usage environment information such as time of use, terminal, and location information.

[0089] External Systems and Intellectual Property Information Group (Reference Target) Data 102 includes registered patents, copyrights, designs, and trademarks (intellectual property database), contract and license conditions (obtained via API), criteria for feasibility under the system (by country and local government), and lists of license-holding companies and exclusive use agreement information.

[0090] The matching process 103 in the matching unit performs constituent similarity determination (e.g., 70% or more match), matching of action results (identity of output effects), consistency check with contract subject requirements, and matching of registration area / system compatibility (country / region code base).

[0091] The judgment result branching process 104 branches based on the following criteria. A: Match found → Present license agreement (to Communications Department) B: No match → Normal execution permitted C: Gray assessment → AI-assisted judgment + provisional contract presentation D: Blocked item → Forced blocking + automatic issuance of compensation contract

[0092] The post-contract processing unit (control unit) 105 performs the following: obtaining an electronic signature, saving a consent log (signature / IP / time), generating a contract (PDF / legal submission compatible), automatically releasing permissions and unblocking, and recording contract completion information in the history (recording unit).

[0093] The following explains the system verification and contract formation process according to the flowchart in Figure 11.

[0094] First, after obtaining the user configuration, a set of configuration, attributes, and device information is created (Step 1101).

[0095] Next, a comparison is made with external systems / contract terms / intellectual property databases (Step 1102). If a match is found in the structure (Step 1103), a contract is presented (Step 1104). If no match is found in the structure (Step 1105), permission for execution is granted (Step 1106). If the result is a gray area (Step 1107), an AI-supplementary proposal is made (Step 1108). If blocking is necessary (Step 1109), blocking and compensation are provided (Step 1110).

[0096] If a contract is presented in Step 1104, the contract is agreed to (electronically signed) (Step 1111). If the user completes the AI-completed presentation in Step 1108, the contract is agreed to (electronically signed) (Step 1111).

[0097] After that, the contract is generated, the logs are saved, permissions are released, and the history is updated (Step 1112).

[0098] Figures 10 and 11 correspond to claims 1-4, 6, 13, 14, and 23. They visually demonstrate the configuration for automatically performing "institutional verification" and "contract guidance," reinforcing connectivity with external APIs / contract databases / intellectual property databases. In gray areas, the mechanism for presenting provisional conditions using AI is clearly stated, covering the entire configuration of infringement avoidance, negotiation, and contract renegotiation. With this, the overall design from Figures 1 to 11 is complete.

[0099] Figure 12 shows the communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure. Figure 13 is a flowchart of the communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure. Figures 12 and 13 show the notification process using communication media such as LINE and SNS, the acquisition of responses to those notifications, and the storage of signed records. The communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure in Figure 12 will be explained below.

[0100] In Figure 12, the communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure 120 in System 1 include a communication medium (notification path) 121, a communication processing unit configuration 122, a user response 123, a recording configuration (recording unit) 124, and an external submission / evidence linkage 125.

[0101] The communication medium (notification route) 121 includes LINE official accounts (Messaging API), Twitter / X DM integration (API), Instagram / Facebook Messenger (Meta API), chatbots such as Slack / Teams, and SMS / email (via Gmail / SMTP).

[0102] The configuration 122 of the communication processing unit includes a contract agreement notice (template + signature request), a contract terms change notice (with a re-agreement link), and a blocking notice (time-limited warning). Includes a link to the license agreement (with URL signature).

[0103] User response 123 is as follows: "I agree" → Enter electronic signature (finger / click / button) "I do not agree" → Rejection log recorded No response → Switch to automatic reminder notification "Details confirmation" → Contract screen display + condition presentation

[0104] The record configuration (recording section) 124 includes the signed content (text or electronic signature image), communication medium type (LINE / X / Slack, etc.), sender (administrator) and recipient user IDs / device IDs, timestamp (ISO 8601 format), IP address, user-agent, device type, etc. The signature log is saved in PDF / CSV format and is blockchain-compatible. Blockchain integration is not mandatory and can be optional.

[0105] External Submission / Evidence Integration 125 provides output for litigation and audits (signed PDF files), automatic email attachment to administrators, rights holders, and government agencies, and API notifications after contract conclusion (license database integration). Evidence integration in External Submission / Evidence Integration 125 is not necessarily required and can be offered as an option.

[0106] The communication medium notification configuration and signature storage structure processing will be explained below according to the flowchart in Figure 13.

[0107] First, when a contract notification trigger occurs, a notification template is generated according to the communication medium (step 1301).

[0108] Next, a notification is sent via a communication medium such as LINE, X / DM, or Slack (Step 1302). The notification content includes contracts / terms / blocking warnings, etc. (Step 1303). If the user consents, they sign the consent form; if the user refuses, a refusal log is saved (Step 1304). In Step 1304, if the user does not respond after a specified time has elapsed since the notification, a re-notification is sent.

[0109] Next, the electronic signature, IP address, time, and media name are recorded and stored in the database (DB) (Step 1305).

[0110] Next, we perform PDF / CSV output, external submission API integration, log sealing, etc. (Step 1306).

[0111] Figure 13 corresponds to claims 8, 12, 17-19, and 23. The configuration proceeds to "record + next action (block / re-notify) even if there is no response," making it impossible to evade the system by exploiting the user experience (UX).

[0112] Figure 14 shows the components of the AI ​​score evaluation and execution blocking decision diagram. Figure 15 is a flowchart of the AI ​​score evaluation and execution blocking decision diagram. Figures 14 and 15 show an example of the AI-based risk score calculation and the resulting contract guidance, blocking, and warning decision flow within the multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system 1.

[0113] In FIG. 14, the AI score evaluation and execution interruption determination configuration 140 includes input information (elements used for score calculation) 141, an AI evaluation engine (scoring process) 142, a branch operation 143 of the determination control unit, and a log recording process (recording unit) 144.

[0114] The input information (elements used for score calculation) 141 includes user attributes (affiliation / hierarchy / usage qualification), execution configuration details (target function / contract structure), behavior history (past violations / warnings / contract responses), comparison results with external systems (match rate / infringement risk), information about the used terminal (IP / OS / UserAgent, etc.), usage region / time zone (system application conditions), and the like.

[0115] The AI evaluation engine (scoring process) 142 weights the input information and outputs a composite score. The evaluation criteria are shown below.

[0116] <AI Evaluation Criteria> Score range: 0 - 100 points (the higher the score, the higher the risk) Model structure: Selectable from NN (neural network), decision tree, XGBoost, etc. Risk classification: 0 - 39 points: Permissible target 40 - 69 points: Contract induction + warning 70 - 89 points: Interruption candidate 90 - 100 points: Immediate interruption + compensation linkage

[0117] The branch operation 143 of the determination control unit executes the following according to the score. Permission → Execution continues Warning → Contract induction link transmission Interruption → Temporary stop + Contract presentation Immediate interruption → Complete interruption + Automatic notification + Compensation contract issuance

[0118] The log recording process (recording unit) 144 logs the score value, evaluation classification, reasons, processing branch details, timestamp / signature information / media / terminal information. The log storage format is JSON / CSV / PDF (for submission), etc.

[0119] The following explains AI score evaluation and execution blocking determination according to the flowchart in Figure 15.

[0120] First, when a user requests execution, the AI ​​evaluation engine inputs attributes + history + configuration (step 1501).

[0121] Next, a risk score (0-100 points) is calculated (Step 1502). The AI ​​evaluation is performed in the range of (0-39 points), (40-69 points), (70-89 points), and (90-100 points) (Step 1503). A score of (0-39 points) is evaluated as [permission] (Step 1504), (40-69 points) as [contract inducement + warning] (Step 1505), (70-89 points) as [candidate for blocking] (Step 1506), and (90-100 points) as [immediate blocking + compensation] (Step 1507).

[0122] Next, all score results and processing history are recorded and saved in the database (DB) (Step 1508).

[0123] This configuration corresponds to claims 1 to 8. The three elements of "numerical risk assessment," "phased response," and "automated blocking" are all present, providing evidence to support the "effectiveness of the invention and the practicality of processing." The AI-based judgment serves as "justification for blocking based on an unavoidable logic," making it a valuable tool for later litigation.

[0124] Figure 16 shows the components of the contract issuance history and external submission log processing in System 1. Figure 17 is a flowchart of the contract issuance history and external submission log processing. Figures 16 and 17 show a structure that records, formats, and documents the history of user agreement and signing of contracts as logs, making them available for external submission.

[0125] The following describes the components of the contract issuance history and external submission log processing shown in Figure 16.

[0126] In Figure 16, the contract issuance history and external submission log processing configuration 160 includes a contract issuance trigger (contract formation process) 161, a contract history recording configuration 162, a storage format (recording section) 163, an external submission configuration 164, and a record protection configuration 165.

[0127] The contract activation trigger (contract formation process) 161 occurs when the user "agrees" to the contract and enters their electronic signature. After agreement, the contract formation flag is turned ON, and the target configuration and contract terms are finalized at the time of issuance.

[0128] The contract history record configuration 162 consists of user ID, affiliation, contract target configuration ID, agreement content (contract text / agreement content), signature information (signature image or string), transmission medium (LINE / email / Slack, etc.), time, IP, terminal information, User-Agent information, and contract scheme version history (V1.0, etc.), and is recorded with a log ID (unique ID).

[0129] The storage format (record section) 163 may be configured as follows: JSON: for API output for machine processing, CSV: for review, verification, and administrative responses, and PDF: for submission, audit, and legal evidence. The storage location may be configured to be a DB / cloud storage / distributed ledger (selectable) depending on the purpose of use of the contract, evidence, and data.

[0130] External submission configuration 164 uses the following automated submission destinations and methods. <Automatic submission destination> Intellectual property rights holders (contract performance report) Government (certificate of eligibility for subsidies) Legal affairs / Courts (Handling infringement lawsuits) Insurance company (coverage) <How to submit> Sending an email attachment API notification integration (HTTPS) Blockchain-linked proof (hash record)

[0131] The record protection configuration 165 performs tamper detection by hash value generation. It may also be configured to include digitally signed timestamps (JST or UTC), version control, and historical difference comparison functions.

[0132] The contract issuance history and external submission log processing flow will be explained below, following the flowchart in Figure 17.

[0133] First, once the user agrees to the contract and enters their signature, the contract is concluded, and the configuration ID, signature, and agreement text are finalized (Step 1701).

[0134] Next, contract history including user, signature, medium, IP, etc. is recorded in the database (Step 1702). Contracts, supporting documents, etc. are generated as PDFs, formatted as CSVs, output as JSON, etc. (Step 1703). Notifications are sent via API, email attachments, signed PDFs, etc., and the documents are submitted externally (Step 1704). Externally submitted documents are protected with record protection including timestamps, hashes, and history storage (Step 1705).

[0135] Figures 16 and 17 correspond to claims 5, 9, 14, 16, and 20. By illustrating the entire process from evidence log generation → format conversion → external submission → signature protection, it is demonstrated that the structure is fully compliant with litigation, contract disputes, subsidy audits, and proof of rights. Both defense and evidentiary value are achieved through "signature log consistency," "submission to external communication destinations," and "electronic signatures and timestamps."

[0136] Figure 18 is a diagram showing the components of the resocialization conditions flow. Figure 19 is a flowchart of the resocialization conditions flow. Figures 18 and 19 visually illustrate the process by which users who were previously blocked or recorded can rejoin the system and become active again once they meet certain re-evaluation conditions.

[0137] The components of the resocialization condition flow shown in Figure 18 are described below. In Figure 18, the resocialization condition flow configuration 180 includes a start condition: recorded / blocked user 181, a re-evaluation request (user-side action) 182, a re-evaluation judgment configuration (control unit + AI judgment) 183, a branch based on the judgment result 184, and history reflection and re-recording process 185.

[0138] Starting conditions: Recorded and blocked user 181 is a person who has previously violated a contract, is not under contract, or is subject to blocking, and is currently under usage restrictions (Level 0: fully blocked or Level 1: partially restricted). The history is saved and sealed in the record section.

[0139] Re-evaluation request (user action) 182 involves expressing intent to renew the contract (with signature), submitting a record of participation in educational programs and guidelines, providing proof of compensation payment, and offering third-party guarantees. A report on behavioral improvements such as volunteer activities (activity logs, activity records, etc.) may also be submitted, along with a re-evaluation request.

[0140] The re-evaluation decision configuration (control unit + AI judgment) 183 recalculates the AI ​​risk score and makes a re-evaluation decision based on whether it has improved since the previous assessment. The re-evaluation decision configuration (control unit + AI judgment) 183 also automatically verifies the re-contract conditions to ensure they match the original contract configuration. It performs a scoring evaluation based on social credit score and improvement bonus points. The configuration also allows for manual authorization by the administrator and verifies whether or not the external guarantor has given their consent.

[0141] Branch 184 based on the judgment result: If the conditions are met, the record disclosure level will be relaxed (Level 2 or Level 3). If re-participation in the system is permitted, the contract will be renewed and the restrictions will be lifted. If the conditions are insufficient, the non-disclosure of records will continue and the restrictions will remain in place. If the company is ineligible, it will be blocked again and re-notified (log added).

[0142] The history reflection and re-recording process 185 sets the "re-evaluated" flag to ON and performs a new signature record + contract reissue (PDF). Then, the re-execution history + improvement log is added to the record section.

[0143] The flowchart structure of the resocialization conditions will be explained below, following the flowchart in Figure 19.

[0144] First, for users with a history of being blocked, the seal record is currently being retained (Level 0 or Level 1) (Step 1901).

[0145] Next, a reassessment application is submitted, along with signatures, training materials, and guarantees (Step 1902). Then, the reassessment process is carried out, including score calculation, contract consistency, and bonus point evaluation (Step 1903).

[0146] If the conditions are met, permission will be granted; if they are insufficient / unsuitable, continued restrictions will be imposed (Step 1904).

[0147] Next, the following series of processes are performed: contract renewal → history update → restriction removal → record re-save (Step 1905).

[0148] Figures 18 and 19 correspond to claims 7, 15, 16, and 23. By structurally defining the resocialization process and clarifying it through an automated processing flow, the patent structure demonstrates social ethics, a re-evaluation process, and institutional consistency. It is a mechanism for intellectual property protection and human rights considerations that includes gradual, conditional disclosure and a trust restoration protocol, rather than history erasure or permanent blocking.

[0149] Figure 20 is a diagram showing the components of the abstract configuration diagram for matching with future media. Figure 21 is a flowchart of the abstract configuration diagram for matching with future media. Figures 20 and 21 visually demonstrate that the configuration is such that infringement is established through constituent agreement and agreement of action results, even when including future communication means, input UIs, and control technologies (AR / VR / BCI / quantum communication, etc.).

[0150] The following describes the components of the abstract configuration diagram of the future media shown in Figure 20. In Figure 20, the abstract configuration 200 for matching with future media includes an example of future media / technology (abstract category) 201, an abstraction processing structure (input layer normalization) 202, an abstract configuration matching unit (control / determination) 203, and result branching and sealing configuration processing 204.

[0151] Examples of future media and technologies (abstract category) 201 may include AR (Augmented Reality Input UI), VR (Virtual Space UI / Virtual Contract UI), BCI (Brain-Computer Interface: Input via brainwaves), quantum communication / quantum authentication (high-speed, tamper-free transmission), virtual personality AI (metaverse-compatible NPC / contract agent AI), voice contract control (signing simply by speaking), and haptic / gaze-triggered contract response.

[0152] The abstraction processing structure (input layer normalization) 202 converts all communication, input, and authentication information into "configuration patterns." Even if the communication method or UI differs, the results of actions such as "contract acceptance / rejection," "blocking," and "log saving" are considered to be the same. <Abstract definition> Input = Arbitrary UI (BCI / Voice / Eye Gaze) Communication = arbitrary means of transmission (including quantum communication) Response = Yes / No / Silent

[0153] The abstract configuration matching unit (control / determination) 203 maps the output of each media to a standard configuration, and determines that an infringement has occurred if the mapping result "effectively matches" a previously registered configuration. Furthermore, it certifies a configuration match when the conclusion matches "regardless of expression, order, or means of transmission."

[0154] The result branching and blocking configuration process 204 performs automatic blocking or contract induction if the results match. The result branching and blocking configuration process 204 records a log with signature information corresponding to the new media. It performs format conversion (PDF, etc.) for submission, litigation, and evidence handling. If the results differ, it becomes a reference record (non-infringement).

[0155] The abstract configuration for matching with future media will be explained below, following the flowchart in Figure 21.

[0156] First, when input or communication occurs from a future medium, a response is made from AR / VR / BCI / quantum communication, etc. (Step 2101).

[0157] Next, an abstract structure transformation process is performed to visualize the input → Yes / No / Silent / Contract details (Step 2102).

[0158] Next, a mapping match is performed based on constitutive agreement and action outcome agreement (step 2103).

[0159] Next, if the effects match, the blockade is successful. If the effects do not match, it will be recorded as a reference (step 2104).

[0160] Process the data regardless of the medium, and perform blocking / contract induction / signature log recording (Step 2105).

[0161] Figures 20 and 21 correspond to claims 1-7. They visually and structurally disclose that "there is no way to avoid future technologies." The logic of normalizing and abstracting future media as "configuration patterns" maximizes the persuasiveness of the "effects of the invention" section.

[0162] Thus, in this embodiment, individuals, companies, and government agencies can collaborate across systems to automatically process contracts, blocking, notifications, and history control, and a social infrastructure management system is realized that is fair in terms of evidentiary value, provision of second opportunities, and compliance with the system. In addition, infringement determination based on the result-matching principle becomes possible for all components and media, including future technologies, and unavoidability can be established. [Explanation of Symbols]

[0163] 1. Multidimensional resource-integrated social infrastructure linkage management system 2. Government agency terminals 3. Enterprise terminals 4. Personal devices 11. Social Infrastructure Collaboration Department 12 Core Functional Unit 13 Institutional Processing Modules 14 Business Management Department 15 Communications Department 16 Records Section 17 Control Unit 28. Sales Management Function 29. General Agent Management Function 30 Agency management functions 31. Referral Store Management Function 32 Affiliate store management function 33. Employee Management Function 34. Money management function 35 Date and time management function

Claims

1. A social infrastructure integration management system that connects to government agency terminals, corporate terminals, and personal terminals via a communication network, Processor and Memory device and Communication interface, Equipped with, The aforementioned storage device stores intellectual property information relating to registered intellectual property, user attribute information relating to users, behavioral history information, and external system information. The aforementioned processor, Through the aforementioned communication interface, input configuration data indicating the processing configuration of the business model to be executed, user attribute information, behavioral history information, and external system information are acquired from the administrative agency terminal, the corporate terminal, and the personal terminal. The acquired input configuration data, user attribute information, behavioral history information, and external system information are recorded in the storage device. The system calculates the structural similarity between the acquired input configuration data and the intellectual property information, and calculates a risk score indicating the user's risk level based on the user attribute information, the behavioral history information, and the external system information. It determines that blocking is necessary if the structural similarity is above a predetermined similarity threshold and the risk score is above a predetermined blocking threshold, and it determines that contract induction is necessary if the structural similarity is above the similarity threshold and the risk score is above a warning threshold but below the blocking threshold. Based on the determination result, if it is determined that the blocking process is necessary, a blocking notification notifying complete blocking is sent; if it is determined that contract induction is necessary, a warning notification prompting acceptance of the contract is sent via the communication interface to the government agency terminal, the corporate terminal, or the personal terminal. The storage device records communication history data, including the notification content, electronic signature, transmission medium, sender's IP address, and transmission time information related to the notification process. Social infrastructure integration management system.

2. The aforementioned social infrastructure integration management system is The processor functions as a business management unit that manages the tasks related to the determination, notification, and recording of the communication history data by executing a program stored in the storage device. The aforementioned Business Management Department The headquarters, which manages the overall operation of the system, performs sales management functions, employee management functions, financial management functions, and date and time management functions. Furthermore, hierarchically below the headquarters, it works in conjunction with the general agent terminal, agent terminals, referral store terminals, and franchisee terminals connected to the network via the communication interface to execute general agent management functions, agent management functions, referral store management functions, and franchisee management functions. The social infrastructure integration management system according to feature 1.

3. The aforementioned processor, as a management function of the headquarters, The system performs a point issuance process that issues points that can be converted into cash based on a certain percentage of the purchase price of goods or services, or an economic incentive granting process that provides monetary or material rewards. The social infrastructure integration management system according to feature 2.

4. The aforementioned processor, Based on user attribute information, behavioral history information, external system information, and the aforementioned intellectual property information, an authorization reconfiguration process is executed to dynamically change the user's authorization information within the public system. The social infrastructure collaboration management system according to feature 3.

5. The aforementioned processor, In a system operation configuration that does not use the aforementioned points or economic incentives, decision-making is performed based on interactive declaration of intent information and behavioral log information, and a non-numerical agreement protocol process is executed to control the execution and feasibility of contracts. The social infrastructure integration management system according to feature 4.

6. The aforementioned processor, This process involves analyzing contract condition data belonging to multiple institutional groups using a machine learning model, correcting and evaluating inconsistencies between contract conditions or mismatches between the input configuration data and the intellectual property information, and then performing an institutional consistency optimization process to determine whether the contract is valid or not. The social infrastructure integration management system according to feature 4.

7. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 4, The aforementioned processor, For users for whom past records exist, if improvement behavior information or compensation performance information is recorded, a record disclosure control process is executed to gradually change whether or not the historical information, which is the communication history data related to the user recorded in the storage device, can be disclosed by reducing the risk score, and a process is executed to reconstruct the user's social credit information. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

8. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 4, The aforementioned processor, The contract induction notification, the blocking notification, the warning notification, and the electronic signature acquisition process are executed via the communication interface using an external communication medium, and the notification log, electronic signature, transmission medium, sender IP address, and transmission time information are recorded as evidence information in the storage device using a communication evidence recording process. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

9. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 4, The aforementioned processor, Based on the user's organizational information, qualification information, or past contract history information, the system executes an execution feasibility control process in calculating the risk score to determine whether the contract can be executed or whether the service can be used. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

10. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 4, The aforementioned processor, The system matching process is performed to obtain one of the following as external system information related to the intellectual property information: national system information, local government system information, private organization system information, or corporate contract terms information, and to compare the said external system information with the user attribute information. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

11. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 5, The aforementioned processor, In non-numerical consensus protocol processing, user interaction is performed using either LINE, SMS, a chatbot, or a natural language user interface. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

12. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 5, The aforementioned processor, In the non-numerical agreement protocol processing, the contract text is displayed on the user terminal via the communication interface, an electronic signature is applied if the user accepts it, and a contract signature recording process is executed in which the electronic signature and response log are recorded in the storage device. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

13. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 6, The aforementioned processor, In the calculation of the risk score or the system consistency optimization process, a system consistency evaluation process is performed in which contract condition data is analyzed using a machine learning model that uses a neural network or a random forest, and consistency scores are calculated between contract conditions. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

14. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 13, The aforementioned processor, The system performs a system correlation visualization process that converts mismatch information in condition data between external systems, or mismatch information in conditions between the input configuration data and the intellectual property information, into tabular data or network map data, calculates correlation scores between external systems, generates visualization data, and records it in the storage device. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

15. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 7, The aforementioned processor, In the aforementioned record disclosure control process, a record disclosure determination process is executed to control whether or not to disclose the record information or the scope of reference based on the user's credit score or AI determination conditions related to the risk score. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

16. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 7, The aforementioned processor, The communication history data, as historical record data, is converted into either PDF, CSV, or log data format, and a record disclosure control process is executed to disclose or withhold the data in stages according to the record disclosure level. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

17. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 8, The aforementioned processor, The system performs a communication evidence recording process that sends a notification using one of the following external communication media: email, SMS, LINE, Slack, or Teams, and then records the communication record data, to which an electronic signature has been added after transmission, in a database provided on the storage device. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

18. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 8, The aforementioned processor, A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by performing a phased blocking process that, under any of the following conditions, is implemented in stages: a warning notification, a function restriction, and a complete blocking notification.

19. In the social infrastructure linkage management system described in claim 8, The aforementioned processor, The system performs an evidence document generation process that automatically converts communication record data into PDF documents, generates the PDF documents as evidence data that can be submitted as evidence in litigation, contract certificates, or administrative evidence, and records them on the storage device. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

20. In the social infrastructure linkage management system according to any one of claims 4 to 8, The aforementioned processor, Even if the order, naming, display method, executable program language, or communication medium of the components differ, a configuration matching determination process is performed to determine whether the contract execution feasibility determination result, blocking processing result, notification result, and recording result match based on the aforementioned configuration similarity and the calculation result of the risk score. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

21. In the social infrastructure linkage management system according to any one of claims 4 to 8, The aforementioned processor, The system performs a result matching determination process that compares processing result data based on contract status, disconnection status, or record change results, and determines whether the processing results match. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

22. In the social infrastructure linkage management system according to any one of claims 4 to 8, The aforementioned processor, Even when using communication technologies including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), quantum communication, or brain-computer interfaces, a future technology application determination process is performed to determine whether the same processing results as the contract execution feasibility determination process, blocking process, notification process, and recording process can be obtained. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

23. In the social infrastructure linkage management system according to any one of claims 4 to 8, The aforementioned processor, By simultaneously executing blocking, notification, contract, recording, and evidence recording processes within the same processing flow, an integrated process is implemented to create a configuration that completely blocks intellectual property rights. A social infrastructure integration management system characterized by the following features.

Images