Sulfonated polycarbamide separation aids for mineral flotation
Sulfonated polycarbamide aids in mineral flotation processes address the hazards of NaSH by offering a safer and more economical alternative for Cu-Mo separation, enhancing mineral recovery efficiency.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- WO · WO
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-08-28
- Publication Date
- 2026-03-12
AI Technical Summary
Conventional mining flotation processes for separating copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) minerals rely on hazardous inorganic depressants like sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH), which pose health, safety, and environmental risks due to strong odor, flammability, and toxic gas generation, along with high consumption and logistical challenges.
The use of a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid, optionally modified with biopolymers and hydrophilic polymers, to selectively depress minerals in flotation processes, reducing or eliminating the need for inorganic depressants such as NaSH.
The sulfonated polycarbamide aid provides a safer, more economical, and environmentally friendly method for mineral separation, maintaining the functionality of conventional depressants while minimizing hazardous chemical use.
Smart Images

Figure IMGF000027_0001 
Figure IMGF000028_0001 
Figure IMGF000029_0001
Abstract
Description
SULFONATED POLYCARBAMIDE SEPARATION AIDS FOR MINERAL FLOTATIONRELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to and any benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 691,396, filed on September 6, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 691,417 filed on September 6, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 691,430 filed on September 6, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 712,104 filed on October 25, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 712,125 filed on October 25, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 712,139 filed on October 25, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,033 filed on January 10, 2025, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,057 filed on January 10, 2025, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,071 filed on January 10, 2025, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,099 filed on January 10, 2025, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,119 filed on January 10, 2025, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 744,131 filed on January 10, 2025, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 760,860 filed on February 20, 2025, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.FIELD
[0002] The invention relates to methods and compositions and for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material. More particularly, the invention relates to methods of selectively depressing minerals utilizing a separation aid containing a sulfonated polycarbamide. A sulfonated polycarbamide reduces, or eliminates, the conventional use of inorganic depressants such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH) in mining flotation processes, including copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) separations.BACKGROUND
[0003] Flotation methods, such as froth flotation, are utilized in the mining industry to selectively extract a desired mineral from a mineral ore bulk material. Industrial mining flotation processes generally include the separation of a bulk material into a floated concentrateand flotation tailings. For example, copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) operations seek to selectively separate and recover the small amount of high-value molybdenum (Mo) minerals from a mineral ore bulk material primarily comprised of copper sulfide minerals, pyrite, and non-sulfide gangue. The minerals are referred to by the valuable metal in the mineral itself.
[0004] Conventionally, Cu-Mo mining flotation mills have utilized inorganic depressants such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH) to selectively depress the copper minerals (Cu) from the mineral ore bulk material. Molybdenum minerals (Mo) and copper minerals (Cu) are inherently hydrophobic, and float in a flotation system. Thus, to separate out the Mo from the Cu in froth flotation, the Cu minerals first must be depressed. In conventional processes, NaSH forms hydrogen sulfide ions and desorbs collectors from Cu minerals, resulting in the depression of Cu. In addition to NaSH, other inorganic reagents are also conventionally used as separation aids to separate Cu from Mo in Cu-Mo mining processes, including sodium sulfide (Na2S), Nokes reagent (P2Ss / NaOH), and sodium cyanide (NaCN).
[0005] That said, these conventional depressant chemicals, including NaSH, exhibit hazards such as strong odor, flammability, and the potential generation of toxic hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas and / or toxic hydrogen cyanide gas. Additionally, these conventional depressant chemicals create manufacturing and logistical challenges. The requisite dosage of NaSH to depress Cu effectively is significant, thus requiring a high consumption of NaSH in industrial facilities, and resulting in substantial cost related to the transportation, handling, and storage of large quantities of hazardous chemicals.
[0006] As such, a need exists for methods of selectively depressing minerals in mining flotation processes with a separation aid that reduces, or eliminates, the use of conventional hazardous inorganic reagents such as NaSH, while still maintaining the requisite functionality of a depressant in mining technologies, particularly Cu-Mo mining technologies. The replacement of conventional depressants such as NaSH would provide substantial economic,environmental, health, and safety benefits to the mining industry, including the Cu-Mo mining industry.SUMMARY
[0007] This invention relates to methods and compositions for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material. The methods include selectively depressing minerals utilizing a separation aid containing a sulfonated polycarbamide, which reduces, or eliminates, the conventional use of separation aids such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH) in mining flotation processes, including copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) separations.
[0008] The method for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material includes the steps of: forming an aqueous pulp comprising water, a mineral ore bulk material, and a separation aid; agitating and floating the aqueous pulp to form a floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings; and separately recovering the floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings. The aqueous pulp may be formed by adding the mineral ore bulk material to the water to form a slurry; mixing the slurry; and adding the separation aid to the slurry while mixing to form the aqueous pulp. The step of agitating and floating the aqueous pulp comprises introducing air at a suitable flow rate to the aqueous pulp thereby floating the floated mineral concentrate.
[0009] In certain aspects, the floated mineral concentrate comprises molybdenum and the flotation tailings comprise copper, iron (Fe), or combinations thereof.
[0010] A separation aid of the invention comprises a polycarbamide formed from the reaction products of formaldehyde and urea. The hydrophilic polymer-modified polycarbamide has a mole ratio of formaldehyde to urea [ .e., formaldehyde:(urea)] is from 0.5 to 2.5, or from 0.8 to 2.0. A sulfonated polycarbamide is then formed as a reaction product of the polycarbamide and a sulfonating agent. The sulfonating agent may include sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium bisulfite,potassium sulfite, or combinations thereof. The sulfonating agent is present in the separation aid in an amount such that a mole ratio of sulfonating agent to urea is from 0.01 to 2.0. In particular, the sulfonating agent may be present in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based on the weight of the separation aid.[OH] A separation aid of the invention may optionally include 0.01 wt.% to 30 wt.% a biopolymer. The biopolymer may comprise one or more of a lignin-based polymer, a polysaccharide, a starch, a hydrocolloid, flour, a soy protein, or combinations thereof. The lignin-based polymer may comprise a lignosulfonate, such as sodium lignosulfonate, calcium lignosulfonate, ammonium lignosulfonate, magnesium lignosulfonate, or mixtures thereof. Exemplary hydrocolloids include anionic hydrocolloids, nonionic hydrocolloids, or combinations thereof. Exemplary starches include natural starch, modified starch, or combinations thereof.
[0012] Alternatively, or in addition to the biopolymer, a separation aid of the invention may be modified with a hydrophilic polymer. The hydrophilic polymer may be acrylamide polymer, such as, for example, N-methylolacrylamide polymer, polyacrylamide, sodium polyacrylate, potassium polyacrylate, poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), sodium polymethacrylate, or combinations thereof. If present, the hydrophilic polymer may be included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 20 wt.%.
[0013] A separation aid of the invention may further include a supplementary sulfur compound as a performance enhancing supplement. The supplementary sulfur compound may include an ionizable thiol group. The supplementary sulfur compound may comprise a sulfite, a sulfate, a thiol -functional compound, a sulfide, a sulfamate, a sulfinic acid, or combinations thereof. In some aspects, the supplementary sulfur compound comprises a sulfide, a disulfide, a sulfinic ester, a thiocyanate, a thiocarboxylic acid, a thioester, a sulfinic acid, adithiocarboxylic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid ester, a sulfamate, a sulfamide, salts of any of the above, or combinations thereof.
[0014] A separation aid of the invention may further optionally include one or more supplemental depressants. If present, the supplemental depressant and polycarbamide may be pre-mixed prior to the addition of the separation aid to the aqueous pulp, or the components may be added separately. Exemplary supplemental depressants include thioglycolic acid (TGA) salts, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) salts, mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) salts, thioglycerin (TG) salts, or combinations thereof. Exemplary thioglycolic acid (TGA) salts include those selected from the group consisting of sodium thioglycolate (S-TGA), calcium thioglycolate (C-TGA), diethylenetriamine thioglycolate (D-TGA), ammonium thioglycolate (A-TGA), or combinations thereof. Exemplary mercaptosuccinic acid salts include disodium mercaptosuccinate (S-MSA), sodium thioglycerolate (S-TG), or combinations thereof. Exemplary EDTA salts include disodium EDTA (S-EDTA), sodium calcium edetate, and tetrasodium EDTA, or combinations thereof.
[0015] In some aspects, the supplemental depressant may further include one or more of sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH), sodium sulfide (Na?S), Nokes reagent, sodium cyanide (NaCN), or combinations thereof, although in certain instances, the separation aid may be free, or substantially free of sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH).
[0016] Aspects of the invention are further directed to the use of a sulfonated polycarbamide as a separation aid in a mineral ore separation process.DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The invention relates to methods for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material, including methods of selectively depressing minerals utilizing a separation aid containing a sulfonated polycarbamide, optionally modified with a biopolymer and / or a hydrophilic polymer. A “separation aid” is a compound orcomposition that facilitates the separation of minerals in a flotation mining process. The term“separation aid” may thus be understood to encompass mining reagents, depression agents, collection agents, and compositions containing them as well as any commonly used term to indicate such an agent for use in froth flotation processes. While describing certain aspects of the mining flotation methods and compositions in detail, the description is to be considered exemplary and is not intended to be limited to the invention.Methods for Separation and Recovery of Minerals from Mineral Ore
[0018] The invention provides a method for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material. The method includes the steps of: 1) forming an aqueous pulp comprising water, a mineral ore bulk material, a separation aid comprising an sulfonated polycarbamide, and optionally one or more mineral collectors; 2) agitating and floating the aqueous pulp to form a floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings; and 3) separately recovering the floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings. As will be described in more detail below, the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid may be modified with a biopolymer, a hydrophilic polymer, or each of a biopolymer and a hydrophilic polymer.
[0019] As a first step, a method of the invention forms an aqueous pulp containing water, a mineral ore bulk material, a separation aid, and optionally one or more mineral collectors. The separation aid contains or itself is a sulfonated polycarbamide. The aqueous pulp may be formed by methods known in the art, for example, by adding the mineral ore bulk material to water to form a slurry, mixing the slurry, and adding the separation aid and optional mineral collector to the slurry while mixing to form the aqueous pulp. Prior to forming an aqueous pulp, the mineral ore bulk material may be subjected to a comminution process to produce smaller or finer mineral ore particles. The comminution process is not particularly limited, and may include any known methods of particle size reduction such as crushing, grinding, etc.
[0020] In general, the methods of the invention may be used with any mineral ore bulk material suitable for separation in flotation mining processes. The mineral ore bulk material may contain, inter alia, minerals including copper (Cu) and molybdenum (Mo) requiring separation. The mineral ore bulk material may also be a copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) concentrate.
[0021] After forming the aqueous pulp, the method includes the step of agitating and floating the aqueous pulp to form a floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings. Agitating the aqueous pulp, alone or enhanced with the introduction of air, can result in “froth” of air bubbles with minerals and optionally mineral collectors attached to the air bubbles. This froth forms all or part of the floated mineral concentrate. The optional mineral collectors may be included in the aqueous pulp to increase the hydrophobicity of the minerals to be floated, such as molybdenum (also referred to as a Mo collector). The mineral collectors may include, for example, liquid hydrocarbons, hydroxyamide, pine oil, kerosine, diesel, and the like.
[0022] The step of agitating and floating the aqueous pulp may comprise introducing a gas, such as air or nitrogen, into the aqueous pulp at a suitable flow rate to generate bubbles and agitating the aqueous pulp thereby causing a froth to form and floating a mineral concentrate. Conversely, the flotation tailings, which remain in the slurry, make up the residual of the mineral ore bulk material depressed using the separation aid and are not collected in the floated mineral concentrate.
[0023] Following the formation of the floated mineral concentrate and the flotation tailings, the method comprises separately recovering the floated mineral concentrate from the aqueous pulp. The particular equipment and procedure for recovering floated mineral concentrate is well known to those of skill in the art. For instance, the floated mineral concentrate may be periodically collected as froth that has accumulated on the surface of the aqueous pulpundergoing agitation. A suitable procedure for recovering the floated mineral concentrate is described in U.S. Patent No. 10,654,048.
[0024] The type of recovered floated mineral concentrate is not limited and will depend on the mineral ore bulk material undergoing separation by a mining flotation process. Accordingly, the recovered floated mineral concentrate may be any mineral suitable for separation in flotation mining processes. In one aspect, the floated mineral concentrate contains molybdenum (Mo). Similarly, the type of recovered flotation tailing is not limited, and will depend on the mineral ore undergoing separation by a mining flotation process. The recovered flotation tailing may then be any mineral suitable for separation in flotation mining processes. For example, the flotation tailing may contain copper (Cu) and / or iron (Fe) minerals.Sulfonated Polycarbamides
[0025] A separation aid of the invention contains, or is itself, a sulfonated polycarbamide and functions to selectively depress one or more minerals in a flotation mining process. A sulfonated polycarbamide is generally more hydrophilic relative to the mineral it is being used to depress. When the sulfonated polycarbamide interacts with the mineral, it alters the relative wettability of the surface of the mineral making it more hydrophilic. This, in turn, acts to depress certain minerals during a flotation process.
[0026] The sulfonated polycarbamide may be prepared using a one-, two-, three- or more stage polymer synthesis process. The polymer synthesis stages may be completed in various sequences or synthesis routes. For instance, in a first exemplary synthesis route, a first stage may include the sulfonation of a urea compound, and a second stage forms a polycarbamide by the reaction of urea and formaldehyde, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide. Optionally, additional stage(s) include the addition of supplementary sulfur compounds, asperformance enhancing supplements, biopolymers, hydrophilic polymers, and / or supplemental depressants.
[0027] In a second exemplary synthesis route, a first stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide, and a second stage includes the sulfonation of the polycarbamide by the introduction of one or more sulfonating agents, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide. Optionally, additional stage(s) include the addition of supplementary sulfur compounds, as performance enhancing supplements, biopolymers, hydrophilic polymers, and / or supplemental depressants.
[0028] In a third exemplary synthesis route, a first stage includes the formation of a sulfonated polycarbamide, and a second stage modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide with a biopolymer. Optionally, additional stage(s) include the addition of supplementary sulfur compounds, as performance enhancing supplements, hydrophilic polymers, and / or supplemental depressants.
[0029] In a fourth exemplary synthesis route, a first stage includes the formation of a sulfonated polycarbamide and the modification of the sulfonated polycarbamide with a hydrophilic polymer, thereby forming a hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide. Optionally, additional stage(s) include the addition of supplementary sulfur compounds, as performance enhancing supplements, biopolymers, and / or supplemental depressants.
[0030] For clarity purposes, the process will be described herein as a series of stages and steps, but it should be appreciated that the various steps and stages of the synthesis process may not necessarily occur stepwise, but rather in some instances may occur simultaneously or in situ.Preparation of a Polycarbamide
[0031] The methods of forming the polycarbamide are not limited and may include any known polymer syntheses. A polycarbamide may be formed via a two-step process, including: a first step of combining formaldehyde and urea; and a second step of controlling the degree of polymerization of the polycarbamide.
[0032] In an exemplary method, the first step of forming a polycarbamide includes charging formaldehyde into a reactor and adjusting the pH of the formaldehyde solution to a neutral or alkaline pH. The formaldehyde may be paraformaldehyde (i.e., 100% formaldehyde), or aqueous formaldehyde having a concentration up to 60% formaldehyde, including, for example, formaldehyde concentrations of 20%-58%, 25%-55%, and 30%-53%. Aqueous formaldehyde having an amount of formaldehyde greater than 20% is preferred. When paraformaldehyde is used, an amount of water may also be charged to the reactor to form an aqueous formaldehyde solution. The pH of the formaldehyde solution is adjusted to a neutral or alkaline pH, for example, a pH of 7 to 9, such as, for example, a pH of 7.2 to 8.4, or about 7.4 to 8.2, or about 7.5. Any pH adjuster known in the art may be used. Exemplary pH adjusters include, but are not limited to, triethanolamine (TEA), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sulfuric acid, formic acid, and the like.
[0033] A first urea charge (Ui) is added to the formaldehyde solution. The first urea charge (Ui) may constitute the total urea (U) of the polycarbamide. In other aspects, the total urea (U) may include multiple urea charges at different steps in the synthesis process. The reaction is heated (via exotherm and an additional heat source) and held at an elevated temperature; for example, at a temperature from 90°C to 110°C, from 90°C to 107°C, from 95°C to 105°C, or from 99°C to 102°C. The reaction is held for a time sufficient to form various (hydroxymethyl)urea intermediates. For example, the reaction may be held for a period of 30 to 60 minutes, 30 to 45 minutes, or 40 to 50 minutes.
[0034] The second step of forming a polycarbamide controls the degree of polymerization via targeted adjustments to the system. The synthesis of a polycarbamide may take place under acidic conditions, including at a pH of less than 7, such as a pH of 3 to 6, a pH of 3.5 to 5.5, or a pH of 4.5 to 5.5. The pH may be adjusted using pH adjusters known in the art such as the exemplary pH adjusters mentioned above.
[0035] The synthesis of the polycarbamide ends at a target viscosity on the Gardner-Holdt (G-H) bubble viscosity scale, including a viscosity of A to UV. The target viscosity may be reached by adjusting the temperature and / or pH of the system. The pH of the system at the viscosity adjustment stage may be from 7 to 9, such as, for example, a pH of 7.2 to 8.4, or about 7.4 to 8.2, or about 7.5. The pH may be adjusted as known in the art using exemplary pH adjusters such as those mentioned above. After reaching the target viscosity, the system may be cooled to a temperature from 50°C to 90°C, from 50°C to 70°C, from 55°C to 65°C, or from 55°C to 60°C.
[0036] Optionally, a second urea charge (U2) is added during the synthesis of the poly carbamide. The total urea (U) may include the first urea charge (Ui) plus the second urea charge (U2), z.e., U = Ui + U2. The batch temperature may be further cooled to a temperature of from 25°C to 60°C, from 25°C to 45°C, from 25°C to 40°C, including approximately 20°C to 25°C. The pH of the batch may likewise be adjusted as needed. The system may be held with continuous stirring for a time sufficient to dissolve the second urea, for example for from 30 to 60 minutes, from 5 to 30 minutes, or from 5 to 15 minutes.
[0037] Accordingly, a polycarbamide useful in the invention is the reaction products of formaldehyde and urea. The molar ratio of formaldehyde to the combination of total urea z.e., [formaldehyde:urea], [F / U], may range from 0.5 to 3, for example, from 0.7 to 2.8, from 0.8 to 2.5, or from 0.8 to 2.0. A polycarbamide may also be adjusted to any desired degree of polymerization as is known in the art. The degree of polymerization can be adjusted byutilizing a different target end viscosity, a different F / U mole ratio, and / or a different manufacturing pH range.Sulfonating Agent
[0038] In the multi-stage polymer synthesis process, a sulfonating agent, or mixture of sulfonating agents, is reacted with a urea compound or the polycarbamide to form a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid. The method of producing the sulfonated polycarbamide is not particularly limited, and the synthesis stages may occur in various orders. For instance, a sulfonating agent may be added directly to a polycarbamide composition that was formed in a prior stage. Alternatively, the sulfonating agent may be reacted with a urea compound in a first step, followed by the formation of a polycarbamide by reacting the sulfonated urea compound and formaldehyde.
[0039] The sulfonating agent may be added to the synthesis process in an amount such that a mole ratio of sulfonating agent to urea z.e., [sulfonating agent:urea], may range from 0.01 to 2.0, including, for example, from 0.05 to 1.5, 0.08 to 1.0, and 0.1 to 0.5.
[0040] Within the molar ratios provided above, the amount of sulfonating agent added to the synthesis process may be defined in terms of weight percent, based on the total weight of the separation aid formed from the process. In this regard, the sulfonating agent may be added to the synthesis process in an amount from 0.1 wt.% (weight percent) to 50 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid formed therefrom, such as, for example, from 0.5 wt.% to 40 wt.%, from 0.5 wt.% to 30 wt.%, from 0.8 wt.% to 25 wt.%, from 0.2 wt.% to 10 wt.%, from 0.5 wt.% to 8 wt.%, or from 1 wt.% to 6 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid.
[0041] According to a first exemplary synthesis route urea and formaldehyde are reacted at a neutral or alkaline pH in an excess of formaldehyde, forming the intermediate urea compound (hydroxymethyl)urea. The urea and formaldehyde may be present in a mole ratio ofabout 1.1 to 4.0, including, for example, 1.5 to 3.8, or 2.0 to 3.5, to form various (hydroxymethyl)urea intermediates, such as bis(hydroxymethyl)urea. A sulfonating agent, or mixture of sulfonating agents, is introduced into the batch at an elevated temperature and a neutral or alkaline pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as, for example, a pH of 7.2 to 8.4, or about 7.4 to 8.2, or about 7.5. The elevated temperature may range from about 70°C to about 95°C, or from about 75°C to about 90°C and the composition may be mixed or otherwise agitated for a period of time sufficient to sulfonate the (hydroxymethyl)ureas, such as, for example, from 10 minutes to 60 minutes or 20 minutes to 50 minutes. The sulfonated (hydroxymethyl)urea compound may then be further reacted in a following synthesis stage with formaldehyde, forming sulfonated polycarbamide.
[0042] According to a second exemplary synthesis route, a sulfonating agent, or mixture of sulfonating agents, is added to a polycarbamide mixture after formation thereof and the sulfonating agent and polycarbamide are mixed under neutral or alkaline conditions (i.e., 7.0 - 9.0). The sulfonating agent may be added to the polycarbamide at an elevated temperature in the range from about 90°C to about 110°C, or from about 95°C to about 105°C and held for a period of time to ensure sulfonation of the polycarbamide, such as for a period of 1 to 5 hours, or 2 to 4.5 hours, or 2.5 to 4 hours. In some aspects, the mixture may be held at the elevated temperature until a time when no hydrophobe is formed using a hydrophobe test at this temperature (about 90°C to about 110°C). A sufficient hydrophobe test includes adding a drop of the polymer solution to a beaker of water to test the cloudiness of the water. As the sulfonation is progressed, the hydrophobe is observed less and the water becomes less cloudy.
[0043] The sulfonating agent comprises, or consists of, an alkali metal sulfite, such as, for example, sodium metabisulfite (“SMBS”), sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium sulfite, potassium bisulfite, potassium metabisulfite (“PMBS”), or combinations thereof. In any aspect,the sulfonating agent may comprise SMBS, PMBS, sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, potassium bisulfite, potassium sulfite, or a mixture thereof.
[0044] In either synthesis process, an optional stabilizing agent may be included, such as one or more monomeric polyols. Suitable monomeric polyols may include, for example, diols, triols, tetrols, and mixtures thereof. The monomeric polyols may be sugar alcohols (e.g., sorbitol, glycerol, and glycols (e.g., ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and the like). The monomeric polyol may be optionally added at any stage of the polymer synthesis. Hydrophilic Polymer
[0045] Optionally, the synthesis process further includes the addition of one or more hydrophilic monomers that are polymerized during the synthesis of the sulfonated polycarbamide to form a hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid. Upon polymerization, the hydrophilic polymer may be included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% (weight percent) to 20 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid, such as, for example, from 0.05 wt.% to 18 wt.%, from 0.075 wt.% to 15 wt.%, from 0.1 wt.% to 12 wt.%, from 0.25 wt.% to 10 wt.%, from 0.5 wt.% to 8 wt.%, or from 1 wt.% to 6 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid. In some aspects, the hydrophilic polymer is included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.5 wt.% to 10 wt.%, based on the total weight of the separation aid.
[0046] The hydrophilic polymer component comprises the reaction product of one or more hydrophilic monomers. In some aspects, the hydrophilic polymer is formed via radical polymerization of a hydrophilic monomer. Exemplary hydrophilic monomers include, without limitation, acrylamide monomers, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and the like. The hydrophilic monomer may comprise, or consist of, an acrylamide monomer. Exemplary hydrophilic polymers include, without limitation, N-methylolacrylamide polymer, poly(N,N- dimethylacrylamide), polyacrylamide, sodium polyacrylate, potassium polyacrylate, sodiumpolymethacrylate, potassium polymethacrylate, or combinations thereof. The hydrophilic polymer may comprise, or consist of, an acrylamide polymer. The hydrophilic polymer may comprise, or consist of, N-methylolacrylamide polymer.
[0047] The method for adding a hydrophilic polymer to the sulfonated polycarbamide solution is not particularly limited. For example, the method may include the addition of hydrophilic monomer(s) to the reactor during formation of the sulfonated poly carbamide. For example, an acrylamide monomer (e.g., N-methylolacrylamide or nMA) may be added during the sulfonated polycarbamide synthesis process and mixed under acidic conditions. Upon incorporation of an initiator, the acrylamide monomer may undergo radical polymerization, forming the hydrophilic polymer (e.g., polynMA). The initiator may comprise any initiator commonly used in the art for radical polymerization, including peroxide or azo compounds. One exemplary initiator that would be suitable for use in the aforementioned reaction is ammonium persulfate. The initiator may be included in the liquid batch solution in an amount (solids) of about 0.001% - 2.0%, such as 0.01% - 0.5%.
[0048] The incorporation of the hydrophilic polymer into the sulfonated polycarbamide solution improves the storage stability of the final polymer compound. The hydrophilic monomer may be added to the reactor at an elevated temperature and a pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as, for example, a pH of 7.2 to 8.4, or about 7.4 to 8.2, or about 7.5. The elevated temperature may range from 70°C-95°C, or from 75°C-90°C and the composition may be mixed or otherwise agitated for 10 minutes to 60 minutes or 20 minutes to 50 minutes Biopolymer Additive
[0049] Optionally, the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid may be further modified by a biopolymer or mixture of biopolymers. Thus, if present, the method of forming a sulfonated poly carbamide includes the addition of a biopolymer or a mixture of biopolymers to the sulfonated polycarbamide to form a biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamideseparation aid, or in some aspects, a biopolymer and hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0050] The biopolymer may be included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.01 wt.% (weight percent) to 30 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid, such as, for example, from 0.05 wt.% to 25 wt.%, from 0.075 wt.% to 20 wt.%, from 0.1 wt.% to 18 wt.%, from 0.25 wt.% to 15 wt.%, from 0.5 wt.% to 12 wt.%, from 0.75 wt.% to 10 wt.%, from 0.9 wt.% to 8 wt.%, or from 1 wt.% to 5 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid.
[0051] The method for adding a biopolymer to the sulfonated polycarbamide solution is not particularly limited. For example, one or more biopolymers may be added to the sulfonated polycarbamide during the synthesis process and mixed under neutral or alkaline conditions. The biopolymer may be dispersed in the polycarbamide solution and may incorporate within the polycarbamide via hydrogen bonding. Such an incorporation of the biopolymer into the polycarbamide improves the storage stability of the final polymer compound. The biopolymer may be added to the sulfonated polycarbamide at an elevated temperature and a pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as, for example, a pH of 7.2 to 8.4, or about 7.4 to 8.2, or about 7.5. The elevated temperature may range from about 70°C to about 95°C, or from about 75°C to about 90°C and the composition may be mixed or otherwise agitated for 10 minutes to 60 minutes or 20 minutes to 50 minutes.
[0052] The biopolymer may comprise, or consist of lignin-based polymers, a polysaccharide, a starch, a hydrocolloid, or combinations thereof. The lignin-based polymers may comprise, for example a lignosulfonate, such as, for example, sodium lignosulfonate, calcium lignosulfonate, ammonium lignosulfonate, magnesium lignosulfonate, and the like. The hydrocolloid may comprise an anionic hydrocolloid, a nonionic hydrocolloid, or combinations thereof. Exemplary anionic hydrocolloids include, without limitation, sodium alginate (ALG), a xanthan gum (XG), carrageenan, high-methoxy pectin (HMOP), low-methoxy pectin (LMOP), and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Exemplary nonionic hydrocolloids include, without limitation, arabic gum (AG), a guar gum, locust bean gum, konjac glucomannan, and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC).
[0053] The biopolymer may comprise, or consist of a starch, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), a guar gum, a xanthan gum, flour, a soy protein, or combinations thereof. The starch may be a natural starch and / or a modified starch. Exemplary natural starches include, without limitation, com starch, potato starch, tapioca starch, arrowroot, and wheat rice. Exemplary modified starches include, without limitation, a cationic starch, an anionic starch, a zwitterionic starch, and a carboxylated starch. Exemplary guar gums include, without limitation, a natural guar gum, a cationic guar gum, and an anionic guar gum. Exemplary xanthan gums include, without limitation, a natural xanthan gum, a cationic xanthan gum, and an anionic xanthan gum. The flour may comprise a natural flour, a cationic flour, or combinations thereof. The soy protein may comprise a natural soy protein, a cationic soy protein, an anionic soy protein, or combinations thereof.Supplementary Sulfur Compound
[0054] A separation aid of the invention may further optionally include a supplementary sulfur compound. Accordingly, the separation aid may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the sulfonated polycarbamide (optionally modified with a biopolymer and / or a hydrophilic polymer) and a supplementary sulfur compound. The supplementary sulfur compound, if included, is added in addition to and independently of the sulfonating agent introduced above. The supplementary sulfur compound may serve as a performance enhancing supplement to the sulfonated poly carbamide, z.e., both to improve the stability of the sulfonated polycarbamide, and to improve the depression of copper or other minerals in the disclosed methods.
[0055] The sulfur compound may comprise an organic or inorganic sulfur compound. The sulfur compound may comprise a compound having an ionizable thiol group. The sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, a sulfite, a sulfate, a thiol -functional compound, a sulfide, a sulfamate, a sulfinic acid, or combinations thereof. The sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, a sulfide, a disulfide, a sulfinic ester, a thiocyanate, a thiocarboxylic acid, a thioester, a sulfinic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid ester, a sulfamate, a sulfamide, salts of any of the above, or combinations thereof. The sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium thiosulfate, thiourea, thiourea-formaldehyde polymer, sodium thiocyanate, sodium thiocarboxylate, methanethiol, ethanethiol, 2-mercaptoethanol, dimercaptosuccinic acid, cysteine, sodium sulfide, ammonium sulfide, sodium sulfamate, ammonium sulfamate, sodium sulfinate, or combinations thereof. In one aspect the sulfur compound is sodium metabisulfite, a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer, or a mixture thereof. In other aspects, the sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, a thiourea derivative selected from the group consisting of cyclohexyl thiourea, phenylthiourea, and N-allylthiourea.
[0056] The supplementary sulfur compound may be included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid, including an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 40 wt.%, including from 0.1 wt.% to 30 wt.%, including from 0.5 wt.% to 30 wt.%, including from 0.2 wt.% to 10 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid.Supplemental Depressants
[0057] A separation aid of the invention may also contain one or more supplemental depressants, which act or aid to disperse a particular mineral. In particular, the supplemental depressants aid in depressing certain minerals, such as copper and / or iron, during a flotation process to further separate such materials from those to be collected at the top of a separationvessel as part of the froth. The depressants are hydrophilic in nature and come into contact with the hydrophobic target minerals, such as copper. The copper-depressant complex that forms is now more hydrophilic than the original copper mineral. This hydrophilicity causes the surface- modified copper to remain in the aqueous pulp instead of attaching to hydrophobic bubbles, so the copper is depressed or settles out under the influence of gravity rather than floating to the top after attachment to a bubble.
[0058] Accordingly, a separation aid of the invention may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the sulfonated polycarbamide (optionally modified with a biopolymer and / or a hydrophilic polymer), an optional supplementary sulfur compound, and a supplemental depressant. Thus, a method for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material may include the steps of pre-mixing a sulfonated polycarbamide and one or more supplemental depressants to form a separation aid, followed by adding the separation aid to the aqueous pulp. Alternatively, or in addition to adding the supplemental depressant in a second step, the supplemental depressant may be incorporated during the formation of the sulfonated polycarbamide, forming a one-part system.
[0059] A supplemental depressant or mixture of supplemental depressants may be included in a separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid, such as from 0.5 wt.% to 40 wt.%, from 0.8 wt.% to 30 wt.%, from 0.8 wt.% to 25 wt.%, from 0.2 wt.% to 10 wt.%, from 0.5 wt.% to 8 wt.%, including from 1 wt.% to 6 wt.%.
[0060] Exemplary supplemental depressants include, without limitation, thioglycolic acid (TGA) salts, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) salts, mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) salts, thioglycerin (TG) salts, or combinations thereof. The supplemental depressants are formed by neutralizing thioglycolic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, mercaptosuccinic acid, or thioglycerin with a base or an amine to form sodium, calcium, amine, or ammoniumsalts. Exemplary bases include sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and exemplary amines include amines, diamines, triamines, and tetramines, including diethylenetriamine (DETA) and ammonia. The supplemental depressants may be in a solid or aqueous form.
[0061] The supplemental depressants may comprise, or consist of, a thioglycolic acid (TGA) salt. The thioglycolic acid (TGA) salt may be an alkali metal TGA salt, an alkaline earth metal TGA salt, or an amine TGA salt. An amine thioglycolic acid (TGA) salt may be selected from the group consisting of amine-, diamine-, triamine-, and tetraamine- TGA salts, or combinations thereof. The thioglycolic acid (TGA) salt may be selected from the group consisting of mono- or di-sodium thioglycolate (S-TGA), calcium thioglycolate (C-TGA), diethylenetriamine thioglycolate (D-TGA), ammonium thioglycolate (A-TGA), or combinations thereof.
[0062] The supplemental depressant may comprise, or consist of, an aminopolycarboxylic acid salt, as aminopolycarboxylic acid can form complexes with metal ions including, but not limited to, copper, iron, cobalt, and the like. The aminopoly carboxylic acid salt may be selected from the group consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) salts, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) salts, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) salts, iminodiacetic acid (IDA) salts, or combinations thereof. The supplemental depressant may comprise, or consist of, mono- or di-sodium EDTA (S-EDTA). The supplemental depressant may comprise, or consist of, mono- or di-sodium mercaptosuccinate (S-MSA), mono- or disodium thioglycerolate (S-TG), or combinations thereof. The supplemental depressant may also be one or more conventional depressants, such as, for example, sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH), sodium sulfide (Na?S), Nokes reagent, sodium cyanide (NaCN), or combinations thereof. In some aspects, the supplemental depressants may include a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer formed from a reaction of thiourea and free formaldehyde.Supplementary Sulfur Compound
[0063] A separation aid of the invention may further optionally include a supplementary sulfur compound. Accordingly, the separation aid may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the sulfonated polycarbamide and a supplementary sulfur compound. The supplementary sulfur compound, if included, is added in addition to and independently of the sulfonating agent. The supplementary sulfur compound may serve as a performance enhancing supplement to the sulfonated poly carbamide, z.e., both to improve the stability of the sulfonated polycarbamide, and to improve the depression of copper or other minerals in the disclosed methods.
[0064] The supplementary sulfur compound may comprise an organic or inorganic sulfur compound. The supplementary sulfur compound may comprise a compound having an ionizable thiol group. The sulfur supplementary compound may comprise, or consist of, a sulfite, a sulfate, a thiol-functional compound, a sulfide, a sulfamate, a sulfinic acid, or combinations thereof. The supplementary sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, a sulfide, a disulfide, a sulfinic ester, a thiocyanate, a thiocarboxylic acid, a thioester, a sulfinic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid ester, a sulfamate, a sulfamide, salts of any of the above, or combinations thereof.
[0065] The supplementary sulfur compound may comprise, or consist of, sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium thiosulfate, thiourea, thioureaformaldehyde polymer, sodium thiocyanate, sodium thiocarboxylate, methanethiol, ethanethiol, 2-mercaptoethanol, dimercaptosuccinic acid, cysteine, sodium sulfide, ammonium sulfide, sodium sulfamate, ammonium sulfamate, sodium sulfinate, or combinations thereof. In one aspect the supplementary sulfur compound is sodium metabisulfite, a thioureaformaldehyde polymer, or a mixture thereof. In other aspects, the supplementary sulfurcompound may comprise, or consist of, a thiourea derivative selected from the group consisting of cyclohexyl thiourea, phenylthiourea, and N-allylthiourea.
[0066] The supplementary sulfur compound may be included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid, including an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 40 wt.%, including from 0.1 wt.% to 30 wt.%, including from 0.5 wt.% to 30 wt.%, including from 0.2 wt.% to 10 wt.%, based upon the total weight of the separation aid.
[0067] A method for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material may include preparing the supplemental depressant prior to mixing the sulfonated polycarbamide and the supplemental depressant. The preparation of the supplemental depressant may comprise any known synthesis method.
[0068] The sulfonated polycarbamide of the invention (including any optional supplemental depressants) may be used in a mining flotation process in a dosage amount from 0.5 kg / T to 15 kg / T, including, for example, a dosage amount from 0.7 kg / T to 10 kg / T, or from 0.9 kg / T to 9 kg / T, or from 1 kg / T to 7 kg / T, or from 1.5 kg / T to 5.5 kg / T, including all endpoints and subranges therebetween. Preferably, the sulfonated polycarbamide separating agent includes less than 5 kg / T of NaSH, such as, for example, less than 3 kg / T, less than 2.5 kg / T, less than 2 kg / T, less than 1.5 kg / T, or less than 1 kg / T NaSH.
[0069] The sulfonated polycarbamide reduces, or eliminates, the use of conventional separation aid depressants such as NaSH, Na?S, Nokes reagent, and NaCN in mining flotation processes, including copper-molybdenum separations. Accordingly, in some aspects, the separation aid is devoid of NaSH, Na?S, Nokes reagent, and NaCN. In some aspects, the separation aid is devoid of NaSH.
[0070] Thus, a method is provided for depressing certain minerals, such as copper and iron, in mining flotation processes with a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid that reduces, oreliminates, the use of conventional hazardous reagents such as NaSH. NaSH produces hydrogen sulfide gas upon decomposition, which is highly toxic, flammable, corrosive, and malodorous. In contrast, the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid produces no gas and is not corrosive, thus allowing safer industrial handling.
[0071] Furthermore, if present, the biopolymer ingredients of the inventive composition provide a sustainable alternative to the conventional use of NaSH. The biopolymer materials, if present, including, inter alia, starch and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), are considered “natural” and the hydrophilic polymer materials if present, are environmentally friendly, and thus alleviate the concerns associated with conventional hazardous inorganic depressants.
[0072] Further, NaSH and other conventional inorganic depressants are oxidized and rendered ineffective when air is used to generate bubbles during the flotation process, causing mines to either use higher amounts of NaSH to compensate for the loss of efficacy due to oxidation, or else to use nitrogen gas to substantially reduce the oxidation of NaSH during flotation separation. However, the use of nitrogen gas adds cost to a flotation process and has been found to only minimally reduce NaSH (or other inorganic depressant) consumption. In contrast, a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid of the invention is not readily oxidized by air, and thus there is no need to use nitrogen gas to generate bubbles during the flotation process. This provides both manufacturing efficiencies, as well as cost reductions. Additionally, the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid operates effectively across a pH range of 8 to 14, which increases the flexibility in flotation circuit conditions, compared to NaSH, which requires a narrow pH range (about 10.5-12.5) to maintain effectiveness.
[0073] It was surprisingly found that the biopolymer and / or hydrophilic polymer components change the rheology of the sulfonated polycarbamide and improve the depression of copper and other minerals in a flotation mining process. This improved depression results in less copper recovery at the surface of the flotation cell.
[0074] The floated mineral concentrate recovery of the inventive method is the same or similar to, or improved compared to that of an otherwise identical method that uses NaSH as a sole separation aid. In some aspects, the flotation tailings recovery of the inventive method is the same or similar to that of an otherwise identical method that uses NaSH as a sole separation aid. By providing equal or better depression of minerals, such as copper, at much lower sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid treatment levels than conventional NaSH separation aids, the disclosed methods thus provide substantial economic benefits.
[0075] Unexpectedly, the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid provides high recovery rates of molybdenum and is at least comparable, if not improved, over the molybdenum recovery rates achieved through the use of NaSH. Percent recovery is defined as the total amount of molybdenum recovered after the flotation process (froth) divided by the total amount of molybdenum present in the mineral concentrate prior to the flotation process. The percent recovery of molybdenum is at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 77%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, or at least about 90%.
[0076] Additionally, the use of the sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid selectively removes molybdenum from the mineral concentrate without also recovering significant quantities of unwanted minerals, such as copper and iron. For instance, the percent recovery of copper as a contaminant in the molybdenum is less than about 10%, including, for example, 8% or less, 7% or less, 6% or less, 5.5% or less, 5% or less, and 4.5% or less. In some instances, the percent recovery of copper is between 1-3%. As above, the percent recovery is the total amount of copper recovered after the flotation process (froth) divided by the total amount of copper present in the mineral concentrate prior to the flotation process.
[0077] In sum, as described, the invention relates the advantageous use of a sulfonated polycarbamide as a separation aid in a mineral ore separation process.EXAMPLES
[0078] The following examples are included for the purposes of illustration, and do not limit the scope of the general inventive concepts described herein.Sulfonated Polycarbamide with Sulfur CompoundExample 1-Preparation of Separation AidsExample 1 (a)
[0079] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing sulfonated polycarbamide using a two-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea (including step 1), and the second stage forms the poly carbamide (including steps 2 and 3).
[0080] In step 1, formaldehyde is charged into a reactor and the pH is adjusted to 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5. Aqueous formaldehyde (53% concentration) is used for the polymer synthesis. Alternatively, urea-formaldehyde concentrate (UFC) may be used for the polymer synthesis. An exemplary UFC is composed of 60 wt.% formaldehyde, 25 wt.% urea, and 15 wt.% water. The pH adjusters include triethanolamine (TEA) and 50% NaOH, as well as optionally 6% sulfuric acid, or 10% formic acid, as needed. A sulfonating agent, such as sodium metabisulfite (SMBS), is then charged to the batch in an amount between 0.1 wt.%-40 wt.%, preferably 0.5 wt.%-20 wt.%. Thereafter, a first urea charge (Ul) is added to the reactor, and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably 95°C-102°C. The batch is held at this temperature for 30-90 minutes, preferably for 30-70 minutes. The F / Ui \i.e., formaldehyde:urea] mole ratio is from 1.5-4.0, preferably from 2.0-3.5. The urea and formaldehyde are reacted near neutral, at a pH range of 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5, to form various hydroxymethylureas (z.e., UF methylolation). During this step, the sulfonation of hydroxymethylureas occurs from reacting hydroxymethylureas and SMBS.
[0081] The second stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide by reacting urea and formaldehyde in steps 2 and 3, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0082] In step 2, the temperature is reduced to 45°C-85°C (preferably to 55°C-75°C) and the pH is decreased to an acidic range of 2.0 - 5.0, preferably to 2.5 - 4.5. The pH adjusters include acidic pH adjusters, such as 6% sulfuric acid, formic acid, and / or TEA, as needed. The second step is ended at a target Gardner-Holt (G-H) bubble viscosity of “A- UV” by increasing the pH to about 7.0 - 9.0, preferably to 7.5 - 8.5, using TEA and 50%NaOH as the pH adjusters. After reaching the target viscosity, vacuum cooling or cooling water is applied to lower the temperature (around 60°C-65°C) of the batch. A water charge is employed in this step to adjust the solids content and the viscosity of the batch to the desired range.
[0083] In step 3, the reaction mixture is cooled to about 50°C-70°C, preferably to 55°C- 65°C, and a second urea charge (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at 40°C-60°C, preferably at 45°C - 55°C, for 5 - 60 minutes, preferably for 15 - 45 minutes. The pH was adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The final F / (Ui + U2) mole ratio is from about 0.5 - 2.5, preferably from 0.8 - 2.0. The process for manufacturing the sulfonated polycarbamide is completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0084] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 1 is provided below in Table 1.Table 1 : Synthesis of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation AidExample 1 (b)
[0085] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing sulfonated polycarbamides with a supplementary sulfur compound using a three-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea (including step 1), the second stage forms the polycarbamide (including step 2), and the third stage modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide with a supplementary sulfur compound (including steps 3 and 4) to further improve mineral depression.
[0086] The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea as outlined in step 1 of Example 1(a). The second stage includes the formation of a poly carbamide as outlined in step 2 of Example 1(a).
[0087] The third stage includes the addition of a supplementary sulfur compound and includes steps 3 and 4. The supplementary sulfur compound may include, for example, a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer. In step 3, about 0.1 wt.% - 40 wt.%, preferably about 0.5 wt.% - 30 wt.%, of thiourea (T) is added to the reactor. A thiourea-formaldehyde polymer is formed from the reaction between thiourea (T) and residual free formaldehyde (F). Optionally, if there is not enough free formaldehyde present in the polymer system, 53% formaldehyde (Fi) may be charged into the batch with pH adjustment to 7.0 - 9.0, preferably to 7.5 - 8.5, using TEA and 50% NaOH, optionally with 6% sulfuric acid and / or formic acid. The batch is maintained at 50°C - 75°C, preferably to 55°C - 70°C for 10 - 60 minutes, preferably for 20 - 50 minutes. The (F + Fi) / (Ui + T) [z.e., total formaldehyde: (urea + thiourea)] is from 1.0 - 3.5, preferably from 1.5 - 3.0.
[0088] Step 4 occurs as outlined in step 3 of Example 1(a): the reaction mixture is cooled to about 50°C - 70°C, preferably to 55°C - 65°C, and a second urea charge (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at 40°C - 60°C, preferably at 45°C - 55°C, for 5 - 60minutes, preferably for 15 - 45 minutes. The pH was adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The final F / (Ui + U2) mole ratio is from about 0.5 - 2.5, preferably from 0.8 - 2.0. The process for manufacturing the sulfonated polycarbamide is completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0089] A summary of exemplary synthesis processes of Example 1(b) is provided below in Table 2.Table 2: Synthesis of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation AidsExample 1 (c)
[0090] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing sulfonated polycarbamide using a two-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide(includes step 1), and the second stage includes sulfonation of the poly carbamide (steps 2 and 3).
[0091] In step 1, formaldehyde is charged into a reactor and the pH is adjusted to 0.5-3.0, preferably 1.0-2.5, using pH adjusters such as 6% sulfuric acid and / or formic acid. Aqueous formaldehyde (53% concentration) is used for the polymer synthesis. Alternatively, ureaformaldehyde concentrate (UFC) may be used for the polymer synthesis. An exemplary UFC is composed of 60 wt.% formaldehyde, 25 wt.% urea, and 15 wt.% water. A first urea charge (Ui) is added to the reactor, and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably to 95°C-102°C. The batch is held at this temperature for 30-90 minutes, preferably for 30-70 minutes. The F / Ui \i.e., formaldehyde:urea] mole ratio is from 2-4.0, preferably from 2.5-3.5. The temperature is lowered to 55°C-85°C, preferably at 60°C-80°C, while adjusting the pH to 6.0-8.0, preferably to 6.5-7.5, using TEA.
[0092] The second stage includes the sulfonation of the poly carbamide in steps 2 and 3, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0093] In step 2, a sulfonating agent, such as SMBS, and di ethylene glycol (DEG) are charged to the batch and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably to 95°C- 102°C. The level of sulfonating agent may be varied from 0.1 wt.%-40 wt.%, preferably 0.5 wt.%-20 wt.%. The temperature is held for 2 - 5 hours, preferably 2.5 - 4.5 hours, or until no hydrophobe was observed using a hydrophobe test at this temperature. The hydrophobe test included adding a drop of the polymer solution to a beaker of water to confirm if the polymer drop turns white or cloudy. The sulfonation of the polycarbamide occurs by reacting the polycarbamide with the sulfonating agent. As sulfonation progresses, less hydrophobe is observed.
[0094] In step 3, the reaction mixture is cooled to about 50°C-70°C, preferably to 55°C- 65°C, and a second urea charge (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at40°C-60°C, preferably at 45°C-55°C, for 5-60 minutes, preferably for 15-45 minutes. The pH was adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The final F / (Ui + U2) mole ratio is from about 0.5-2.5, preferably from 0.8-2.0. The process for manufacturing the sulfonated polycarbamide is completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0095] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 1(c) is provided below in Table 3. Table 3: Synthesis of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation AidsExample 1 (d)
[0096] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing sulfonated polycarbamides with a supplementary sulfur compound using a three-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide (including step 1); the second stage modifies the polycarbamide with a supplementary sulfur compound (including step 2); and the third stage includes sulfonation of the modified polycarbamide (including steps 3 and 4).
[0097] In step 1, formaldehyde is charged into a reactor and the pH is adjusted to 0.5-3.0, preferably 1.0-2.5, using pH adjusters such as 6% sulfuric acid and / or formic acid. Aqueous formaldehyde (53% concentration) is used for the polymer synthesis. Alternatively, ureaformaldehyde concentrate (UFC) may be used for the polymer synthesis. An exemplary UFCis composed of 60 wt.% formaldehyde, 25 wt.% urea, and 15 wt.% water. A first urea charge (Ui) and about 0.1 wt.% - 40 wt.%, preferably 0.5%-30%, of thiourea (T) is added to the reactor while the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably to 95°C-102°C. The batch is held at this temperature for 20-90 minutes, preferably for 30-70 minutes. A polycarbamide forms between the urea and formaldehyde under acidic conditions, with a pH of 1.5-3.5. The F / Ui [z.e., formaldehyde:urea] mole ratio is from 2-4.0, preferably from 2.5-3.5. The temperature is lowered to 55°C-85°C, preferably at 60°C-80°C, while adjusting the pH to 6.0-8.0, preferably to 6.5 -7.5, using TEA.
[0098] The second stage includes the modification of the polycarbamide with a supplementary sulfur compound. In step 2, a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer supplementary sulfur compound is formed from the reaction between thiourea and formaldehyde at this step. The mole ratio of F / (Ui + T) is about 1.0-3.5, preferably about 1.5-3.0. The batch is held for 40 - 80 minutes, preferably for 50-70 minutes, at 90°C-107°C, preferably to 95°C-102°C. The temperature is then lowered to 55°C-85°C, preferably at 60°C-80°C, while adjusting the pH to 6.0-8.0, preferably to 6.5-7.5 using TEA.
[0099] In stage 3, step 3, a sulfonating agent, such as SMBS, and di ethylene glycol (DEG) are charged to the batch and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably to 95°C- 102°C. The level of sulfonating agent may be varied from 0.1 wt.%-40 wt.%, preferably 0.5 wt.%-20 wt.%. The temperature is held for 2-5 hours, preferably 2.5-4.5 hours, or until no hydrophobe was observed using a hydrophobe test at this temperature. The hydrophobe test included adding a drop of the polymer solution to a beaker of water to confirm if the polymer drop turns white or cloudy. The sulfonation of the polycarbamide occurs by reacting the polycarbamide with the sulfonating agent. As sulfonation progresses, less hydrophobe is observed.
[0100] In step 4, the reaction mixture is cooled to about 50°C-70°C, preferably to 55°C- 65°C, and a second urea charge (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at 40°C-60°C, preferably at 45°C-55°C, for 5-60 minutes, preferably for 15 - 45 minutes. The pH was adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The final F / (Ui + T + U2) mole ratio is from about 0.5-2.5, preferably from 0.8-2.0. The process for manufacturing the sulfonated polycarbamide is completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0101] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 1(d) is provided below in Table 4. Table 4: Synthesis of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation Aids
[0102] The chemical composition of each exemplary sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid, Compounds A-E, are shown in Table 5.Table 5: Chemical Preparation of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation Aids (wt.%)1: 53% concentration aqueous formaldehyde; 2: 6% concentration aqueous sulfuric acid; 3: Triethanolamine; 4: sodium metabisulfite; 5: Diethylene glycol.
[0103] The sulfonated polycarbamide separation aids were thereafter examined for pH, solids, viscosity, color, and stability at both 4°C and 20°C-25°C storage, as summarized in Table 6. Each of the exemplary sulfonated polycarbamide separation aids demonstrate very good storage stability at 20°C-25°C, as well as 4°C storage stability, without any phase separation or precipitation.Table 6: Characteristics of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide Separation Aids1: synthesis style, 2: room temperature.Example 2- Flotation Tests
[0104] Lab-scale flotation tests were conducted using sulfonated polycarbamides,Compounds A-E, as described in Example 1. The tests were conducted using a Metso D-12V flotation machine (manufactured by Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.). The minerals (Cu, Mo)from the floated concentrates as well as the tailing were measured by XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) analyzer (manufactured by Thermo Scientific Niton XL3t GOLDD+). The Cu- Mo bulk concentrate was obtained from a copper mine in Arizona in the United States. The Cu-Mo concentrate contained typical industry levels of Cu and Mo, which are around 20% to 30% copper and 0.2% to 1.0% molybdenum. The sulfonated polycarbamides were employed with or without supplemental depressants for the flotation tests. When the sulfonated polycarbamides were employed with supplemental depressants for the flotation study, the sulfonated polycarbamides and the supplemental depressants may be added separately, or they may be pre-mixed prior to the test and added as a one-part system.
[0105] The lab-scale flotation cell test was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) thaw 500 g of ore sample (Cu-Mo concentrate) in a warm water bath; (2) transfer the Cu-Mo bulk concentrate to a flotation cell; (3) start the impeller and adjust the speed to about 900 rpm; (4) control the pulp (Cu-Mo concentrate) level to be just below the target (not to overflow before the air) and mix the slurry; (5) check the pulp pH and ORP (Oxidation-Reduction Potential) prior to the addition of chemicals (control NaSH or exemplary sulfonated polycarbamides); (6) slowly add chemicals to the flotation cell (e.g., control NaSH: ~ 550 mV ORP for full Cu depression); (7) add diesel as Mo collector if needed; (8) start and adjust air to the target flow rate (2 L / min or as needed); (9) float concentration 1 (first scrape of float bubbles) for 2 min in a collection pan (concentration 1) and measure the weight of the concentration 1 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 1); (10) record pH and ORP; (11) replace the collection pan and float concentration 2 for 3 min in a collection pan (concentration 2) and measure the weight of the concentration 2 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 2); and (12) record pH and ORP.
[0106] The XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) measurement was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) vacuum-dry concentration 1 (float concentration 1) and concentration2 (float concentration 2), as well as the tailing (depressed mineral), and measure the weight of each material (z.e., the total mineral concentrate is the sum of vacuum-dried concentration 1, vacuum-dried concentration 2, and vacuum-dried tailing); (2) oven-dry the materials overnight at 125°C, and measure the weight of each material; (3) measure and analyze the minerals from each material, and select Cu, Mo, Fe amounts on the XRF device; and (4) analyze Cu, Mo, Fe concentrations and obtain the recovery and grade of these minerals.
[0107] The results of the lab-scale flotation cell tests are summarized in Tables 7-11. Premixed blends of separation aids and / or supplemental depressants are indicated as various “mixtures” and the contents of such are detailed below each Table.Table 7: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #1)Table 8: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #2)Mixture 1= 0.5kg / T Comp. B + 0.5kg / T S-EDTA + 0.5kg / T D-TGA;Mixture 2 = Ikg / T Comp. B + 0.9kg / T S-EDTA + 1 ,4kg / T D-STGA + 0.3kg / T C-TGATable 9: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #3)Mixture 3 = 0.5kg / T Comp. B + l.lkg / T S-EDTA + Ikg / T D-TGA + 1.6kg / TS-TGA + 0.7kg / T C-TGA , Mixture 4 = 0.5kg / T Comp. B + 0.4kg / T S-EDTA + 0.4kg / T D-STGA + 0.4kg / T S-TGA ,Mixture 5 = Ikg / T Comp. B + 0.9kg / T S-EDTA + 1.4kg / T D-TGA + 0.3kg / T C-TGATable 10. Flotation cell test resultsMixture 6 = Ikg / T S-EDTA + 0.4kg / T D-TGA + 3.8kg / T S-TGA + 7.3kg / T C-TGA ,Mixture 7 = 1.6kg / T Comp. B + 1 ,6kg / T S-EDTA + 1.8kg / T D-STGA + 0.9kg / T S-TGA + 0.4kg / T C-TGA , Mixture 8 = 2.5kg / TComp. B + 1.5kg / T S-EDTA + 2.5kg / T D-TGA + 2kg / T S-TGA + 0.5kg / T C-TGATable 11. Flotation cell test results
[0108] As detailed in Tables 7-11, the sulfonated polycarbamide compositions described herein, with and without supplemental depressants, provided similar recovery of Cu and Mo as the control NaSH, and reduced or replaced NaSH at much lower chemical treatment levels. For example, the sulfonated poly carbamide composition with supplemental depressants and S- TGA supplemental depressant (Candidate 3 in Table 8, Comp. B with S-TGA) demonstrated better Cu depression (lower Cu recovery value) than the control NaSH at 50% total reduced chemical treatment level (than the control NaSH). The sulfonated polycarbamide composition(Candidate 1 in Table 7, Comp. A) showed better Cu-Mo recovery data than the control NaSH at 75% total reduced chemical treatment level than the control NaSH (0.5kg / T Comp. A vs. 2kg / T NaSH) and were able to replace 100% NaSH utilizing the 100% organic polymer option. The sulfonated polycarbamide composition with a mixture of supplemental depressants (Candidate 8 in Table 9, Mixture 5 with S-TGA) demonstrated slightly better Cu depression (lower Cu recovery value) than the control NaSH at 28% total reduced chemical treatment level (than the control NaSH) and provided 100% NaSH replacement option.Biopolymer-Modified Sulfonated PolycarbamidesExample 3-Preparation of Separation AidsExample 3(a)
[0109] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide using a three-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea (including step 1), the second stage forms the polycarbamide (including step 2), and the third stage modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide with a biopolymer (including steps 3 and 4).
[0110] In step 1, formaldehyde is charged into a reactor and the pH is adjusted to 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5. Aqueous formaldehyde (53% concentration) is used for the polymer synthesis. Alternatively, urea-formaldehyde concentrate (UFC) may be used for the polymer synthesis. An exemplary UFC is composed of 60 wt.% formaldehyde, 25 wt.% urea, and 15 wt.% water. The pH adjusters include triethanolamine (TEA) and 50% NaOH, as well as optionally 6% sulfuric acid, or 10% formic acid, as needed. A sulfonating agent, such as sodium metabisulfite (SMBS), is then charged to the batch in an amount between 0.1 wt.%-40 wt.%, preferably 0.5 wt.%-20 wt.%. Thereafter, a first urea charge (Ul) is added to the reactor, and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably 95°C-102°C. The batch is held at this temperature for 20-90 minutes, preferably for 30-70 minutes. The F / Ui \i.e.,31formaldehyde:urea] mole ratio is from 1.5-4.0, preferably from 2.0-3.5. The urea and formaldehyde are reacted near neutral, at a pH range of 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5, to form various hydroxymethylureas (z.e., UF methylolation). During this step, the sulfonation of hydroxymethylureas occurs from reacting hydroxymethylureas and SMBS.[OHl] The second stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide by reacting urea and formaldehyde in steps 2 and 3, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0112] In step 2, the temperature is reduced to 45°C-85°C (preferably to 55°C-75°C) and the pH is decreased to an acidic range of 2.0 - 5.0, preferably to 2.5 - 4.5. The pH adjusters include acidic pH adjusters, such as 6% sulfuric acid, formic acid, and / or TEA, as needed. The second step is ended at a target Gardner-Holt (G-H) bubble viscosity of “A- UV” by increasing the pH to about 7.0 - 9.0, preferably to 7.5 - 8.5, using TEA and 50%NaOH as the pH adjusters. After reaching the target viscosity, vacuum cooling or cooling water is applied to lower the temperature (around 60°C-65°C) of the batch. A water charge is employed in this step to adjust the solids content and the viscosity of the batch to the desired range.
[0113] The third stage includes the addition of a biopolymer (e.g., starch) to the sulfonated polycarbamide in steps 3 and 4, thereby forming a biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0114] In step 3, the temperature of the sulfonated polycarbamide product is adjusted to about 70°C-90°C, preferably to 75°C-90°C, and a premixture of starch and water is added to the reactor. At this step, starch is dispersed first in the polycarbamide solution and de-natured (or untangled), which causes the starch to swell. The batch temperature is held for 5-60 minutes, preferably 15-50 minutes, and the polymer viscosity increases over time. The starch level ranges from 0.01 wt.%-10 wt.%, preferably from 0.1 wt.%-4 wt.%. The pH at this step is 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5. After reaching the target viscosity (such as a target Gardner-Holt (G-H) bubble viscosity of “E-X”), vacuum cooling or cooling water was applied to lower thetemperature of the batch to 60°C-65°C. A water charge is employed at this step to adjust the solids content and the viscosity of the batch to the desired range.
[0115] In the fourth step, the reaction mixture was cooled to about 50°C-70°C, preferably 55°C-65°C, and the second urea (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is then further reduced to a temperature of 40°C-60°C, preferably 45°C-55°C and held for 5-60 minutes, preferably 15-45 minutes. The pH is adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid and / or 10% formic acid. The final (total F) / (total U), or F / (Ui + U2) mole ratio was from 0.5-2.5, preferably 0.8-2.0. The process for manufacturing the biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide was completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0116] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 3(a) is provided below in Table 12.Table 12: Synthesis of Exemplary Biopolymer-Modified Sulfonated PolycarbamideExample 3(b)
[0117] Exemplary separation aids are prepared by synthesizing biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamides with a supplementary sulfur compound using a four-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea (including step 1), thesecond stage forms the polycarbamide (including step 2), the third stage modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide with a supplementary sulfur compound (including steps 3 and 4), and the fourth stage further modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide with a biopolymer (including step 5).
[0118] The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea as outlined in step 1 of Example 3(a). The second stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide as outlined in step 2 of Example 3(a).
[0119] The third stage includes the addition of a supplementary sulfur compound and includes steps 3 and 4. The supplementary sulfur compound may include, for example, a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer.
[0120] In step 3, supplementary sulfur compounds are included as performance-enhancing supplements. The exemplary types of sulfur compounds include sodium metabisulfite, a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer, and combinations of thereof. The level of sulfur compound varies from 0.1 wt.% to 40 wt.%. In samples comprising thiourea-formaldehyde polymer, thiourea (T) is added to the reactor and a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer is formed from the reaction between thiourea (T) and residual free formaldehyde (F). Optionally, if there is not enough free formaldehyde present in the polymer system, 53% formaldehyde (Fi) may be charged into the batch with pH adjustment to 7.0 - 9.0, preferably to 7.5 - 8.5, using TEA and 50% NaOH, optionally with 6% sulfuric acid and / or formic acid. The batch is maintained at 50°C - 75°C, preferably to 55°C - 70°C for 10 - 60 minutes, preferably for 20 - 50 minutes. The (F + Fi) / (Ui + T) [z.e., total formaldehyde: (urea + thiourea)] is from 1.0 - 3.5, preferably from 1.5 - 3.0.
[0121] In step 4, the reaction mixture is cooled to about 50°C - 70°C, preferably to 55°C -65°C, and a second urea charge (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at40°C - 60°C, preferably at 45°C - 55°C, for 5 - 60 minutes, preferably for 15 - 45 minutes. ThepH was adjusted to 7.0-9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The final F / (Ui + U2) mole ratio is from about 0.5 - 2.5, preferably from 0.8 - 2.0.
[0122] The fourth stage of the reaction (z.e., step 5 of the overall process) constitutes the modification of the sulfonated poly carbamide with a biopolymer, e.g., lignosulfonate, starch, and / or carboxymethylcellulose.
[0123] In step 5, the reaction mixture is cooled to about 30°C - 50°C (preferably to 35°C - 45°C) and a liquid sodium lignosulfonate (50% aqueous solution) as the biopolymer is added to the reactor. The temperature is held at 30°C - 50°C (preferably at 35°C - 45°C) for 5 - 60 minutes (preferably for 15 - 45 minutes). The pH was adjusted to 7.0 - 9.5 (preferably to 7.5 - 9.0) using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid. The level of the liquid sodium lignosulfonate can be varied from around 0.1% - 30% (preferably from around 0.5% - 15%). The manufacturing process for the biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide with supplementary sulfur compounds is completed by cooling the batch to 22°C - 26°C.
[0124] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 3(b) is provided below in Table 13.Table 13: Synthesis of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamide
[0125] The chemical composition of each exemplary sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid,Compounds F and G, are shown in Table 14.Table 14: Chemical Preparation of Exemplary Sulfonated Polycarbamides (wt.%)1: 53% concentration aqueous formaldehyde; 2: 6%> concentration aqueous sulfuric acid; 3: Triethanolamine; 4: sodium metabisulfite; 5: cationic starch powder (premix with water before charge), 6: sodium ligno sulfonate (50%> liquid solution).
[0126] The biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aids were thereafter examined for pH, solids, viscosity, color, and stability at both 4°C and 20°C-25°C storage, as summarized in Table 4. Each of the exemplary biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aids demonstrate very good storage stability at 20°C-25°C (room temperature), as well as 4°C storage stability, without any phase separation or precipitation.Table 15: Characteristics of Exemplary Sulfonated Poly carbamide Separation Aids1: synthesis style.Example 4
[0127] Lab-scale flotation tests were conducted using sulfonated polycarbamides, Compounds F and G, as described in Example 3. The tests were conducted using a Metso D- 12V flotation machine (manufactured by Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.). The minerals (Cu, Mo) from the floated concentrates as well as the tailing were measured by XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) analyzer (manufactured by Thermo Scientific Niton XL3t GOLDD+). The Cu- Mo bulk concentrate was obtained from a copper mine in Arizona in the United States. The Cu-Mo concentrate contained typical industry levels of Cu and Mo, which are around 20% to 30% copper and 0.2% to 1.0% molybdenum. The biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamides were employed with or without supplemental depressants for the flotation tests. When the biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamides were employed with supplemental depressants for the flotation study, the biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamides and the supplemental depressants may be added separately, or they may be pre-mixed prior to the test and added as a one-part system.
[0128] The lab-scale flotation cell test was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) thaw 500 g of ore sample (Cu-Mo concentrate) in a warm water bath; (2) transfer the Cu-Mo bulk concentrate to a flotation cell; (3) start the impeller and adjust the speed to about 900 rpm; (4) control the pulp (Cu-Mo concentrate) level to be just below the target (not to overflow before the air) and mix the slurry; (5) check the pulp pH and ORP (Oxidation-Reduction Potential) prior to the addition of chemicals (control NaSH or exemplary biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamides); (6) slowly add chemicals to the flotation cell (e.g., control NaSH: ~ 550 mV ORP for full Cu depression); (7) add diesel as Mo collector if needed; (8) start and adjust air to the target flow rate (2 L / min or as needed); (9) float concentration 1 (first scrape of float bubbles) for 2 min in a collection pan (concentration 1) and measure the weight of the concentration 1 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 1); (10) recordpH and ORP; (11) replace the collection pan and float concentration 2 for 3 min in a collection pan (concentration 2) and measure the weight of the concentration 2 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 2); and (12) record pH and ORP.
[0129] The XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) measurement was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) vacuum-dry concentration 1 (float concentration 1) and concentration 2 (float concentration 2), as well as the tailing (depressed mineral), and measure the weight of each material (z.e., the total mineral concentrate is the sum of vacuum-dried concentration 1, vacuum-dried concentration 2, and vacuum-dried tailing); (2) oven-dry the materials overnight at 125°C, and measure the weight of each material; (3) measure and analyze the minerals from each material, and select Cu, Mo, Fe amounts on the XRF device; and (4) analyze Cu, Mo, Fe concentrations and obtain the recovery and grade of these minerals.
[0130] The results of the lab-scale flotation cell tests are summarized in Tables 16-17.Table 16: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #6)Table 17: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #7)
[0131] As detailed in Tables 16-17, the sulfonated polycarbamide compositions described herein, with and without supplemental depressants, provided similar recovery of Cu and Mo as the control NaSH, and reduced or replaced NaSH at much lower chemical treatment levels.For example, the sulfonated polycarbamide composition (Candidate 14 in Table 16, Comp. F) demonstrated sufficient and comparable Cu depression compared to the control NaSH at 75% total reduced chemical treatment level and was able to replace 100% NaSH using 100% organic polymer. The biopolymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide composition with supplementary sulfur and S-TGA supplemental depressant (Candidate 15 in Table 17, Comp. G with S-TGA) demonstrated comparable Cu depression data as the control NaSH at 50% lower total chemical treatment levels (than control NaSH level) and exhibited 100% NaSH replacement.Hydrophilic Polymer-Modified Sulfonated PolycarbamideExample 5-Preparation of Separation Aids
[0132] An exemplary separation aid is prepared by synthesizing hydrophilic polymer- modified sulfonated polycarbamide using a four-stage polymer process. The first stage includes the sulfonation of (hydroxymethyl)urea (including step 1), the second stage forms the polycarbamide (including step 2), the third stage forms a hydrophilic polymer and modifies the sulfonated polycarbamide therewith (including step 3), and the fourth stage includes further modification with a supplementary sulfur compound (including steps 4 and 5).
[0133] In step 1, formaldehyde is charged into a reactor and the pH is adjusted to 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5. Aqueous formaldehyde (53% concentration) is used for the polymer synthesis. Alternatively, urea-formaldehyde concentrate (UFC) may be used for the polymer synthesis. An exemplary UFC is composed of 60 wt.% formaldehyde, 25 wt.% urea, and 15 wt.% water. The pH adjusters include triethanolamine (TEA) and 50% NaOH, as well as optionally 6% sulfuric acid, or 10% formic acid, as needed. A sulfonating agent, such as sodium metabisulfite (SMBS), is then charged to the batch in an amount between 0.1 wt.%-40 wt.%, preferably 0.5 wt.%-20 wt.%. Thereafter, a first urea charge (Ul) is added to the reactor, and the temperature is increased to 90°C-107°C, preferably 95°C-102°C. The batch is held atthis temperature for 20-90 minutes, preferably for 30-70 minutes. The F / Ui [i.e., formaldehyde:urea] mole ratio is from 1.5-4.0, preferably from 2.0-3.5. The urea and formaldehyde are reacted near neutral, at a pH range of 7.0-9.0, preferably 7.5-8.5, to form various hydroxymethylureas (i.e., UF methylolation). During this step, the sulfonation of hydroxymethylureas occurs from reacting hydroxymethylureas and SMBS.
[0134] The second stage includes the formation of a polycarbamide by reacting urea and formaldehyde in step 2, thereby forming a sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0135] In step 2, the temperature is reduced to 45°C-85°C (preferably to 55°C-75°C) and the pH is decreased to an acidic range of 2.0 - 5.0, preferably to 2.5 - 4.5. The pH adjusters include acidic pH adjusters, such as 6% sulfuric acid, formic acid, and / or TEA, as needed. The second step is ended at a target Gardner-Holt (G-H) bubble viscosity of “A- UV” by increasing the pH to about 7.0 - 9.0, preferably to 7.5 - 8.5, using TEA and 50%NaOH as the pH adjusters. After reaching the target viscosity, vacuum cooling or cooling water is applied to lower the temperature (around 60°C-65°C) of the batch. A water charge is employed in this step to adjust the solids content and the viscosity of the batch to the desired range.
[0136] The third stage includes the formation of a hydrophilic polymer (e.g., poly(N- methyloacrylamide)) to the sulfonated polycarbamide in steps 3 and 4, thereby forming a hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid.
[0137] In step 3, the temperature is adjusted to 45°C - 80°C (preferably to 55°C - 70°C) and nMA (N-methylolacrylamide) is charged to the reactor. After nMA is dissolved, ammonium persulfate (APS) is slowly charged to the batch as an initiator for a radical polymerization of nMA. The level of initiator, on a solids basis, is 0.001 wt.%-2 wt.%, preferably 0.01 wt.%-0.5 wt.% in the 100% liquid batch solution. The batch temperature is adjusted to about 45°C - 85°C (preferably to 55°C - 75°C). After the completion of the APS charge, the pH is decreased to an acidic range of 3.5-6.0, preferably 4.0-5.5. The pH adjustersinclude 6% sulfuric acid, 10% formic acid, and / or triethanolamine (TEA) as needed. The hydrophilic polymer (nMA) begins to form during this step, and the viscosity of the batch increases over time. The third steps end at a target Gardner-Holt (G-H) bubble viscosity of “D- UV” (preferably K - V) at 80°C. The hydrophilic polymer (N-methylolacrylamide polymer) is mainly formed via radical polymerization during this step and some minor amounts of polycarbamide is also formed in this step under acidic conditions. After reaching the target viscosity, vacuum cooling or cooling water is applied to lower the temperature of the batch to 50°C-75°C, preferably 55°C-70°C. A water charge is employed in this step to adjust the solids content and the viscosity of the batch. The level of nMA can be varied in the range from 0.1%- 20% (preferably around 0.5% - 10%).
[0138] The fourth stage includes the addition of a supplementary sulfur compound, as a performance enhancing supplement, to the hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated poly carbamide in steps 4 and 5.
[0139] In step 4, thiourea (T) is added to the batch for improved Cu depression (or potentially other minerals as well), at 50°C-75°C (preferably at 55°C-70°C). The batch is held for 10 - 60 minutes (preferably for 20 - 40 minutes) at 50°C-75°C (preferably at 55°C-70°C). The batch pH was adjusted to 7.0-9.0 (preferably to 7.5 - 8.5) using TEA (triethanolamine) and 50% NaOH with or without 6% sulfuric acid and / or 10% formic acid. During this step, thiourea is reacted with formaldehyde, which is presented without reacting with urea from the previous steps and forms a thiourea-formaldehyde polymer. The level of thiourea can be varied in the range from about 0.1 wt.% - 40 wt.% (preferably from 0.5 wt.% - 30 wt.%). These supplementary sulfur compounds improve the stability of the hydrophilic polymer-modified polycarbamide as well as Cu depression (or potentially other minerals). See Tables 3-5. The mole ratio of F / (Ui+ T) can range from about 1 - 3.5 (preferably varying from about 1.5 - 3).
[0140] In step 5, the reaction mixture is cooled to 50°C-70°C, preferably 55°C-65°C, and the second urea (U2) is added to the reactor. The batch temperature is held at 40°C-60°C, preferably 45°C-55°C for 5-60 minutes, preferably 15-45 minutes. The pH is adjusted to 7- 9.5, preferably 7.5-9.0, using TEA and 6% sulfuric acid and / or 10% formic acid. The final (total F) / (UI+T+U2), mole ratio was from 0.5-2.5, preferably 0.8-2.0. The process for manufacturing the hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide was completed by cooling the batch to 20°C-26°C.
[0141] A summary of the synthesis process of Example 5 is provided below in Table 18. Table 18: Synthesis of Exemplary Hydrophilic Polymer-Modified Sulfonated Polycarbamide
[0142] The chemical composition of the exemplary sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid, Compound H, is shown in Table 19.Table 19: Chemical Preparation of Exemplary Hydrophilic Polymer-Modified Sulfonated Polycarbamide (wt.%)1: 53% concentration aqueous formaldehyde; 2: 6%> concentration aqueous sulfuric acid; 3: Triethanolamine; 4: sodium metabisulfite; 5: 6: N-methylacrylamide, 7: ammonium persulfate.
[0143] The hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid was thereafter examined for pH, solids, viscosity, color, and stability at both 4°C and 20°C-26°C storage, as summarized in Table 20. The exemplary hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide separation aid demonstrated very good storage stability at 20°C-26°C (room temperature), as well as 4°C storage stability, without any phase separation or precipitation.Table 20: Characteristics of Exemplary Hydrophilic Polymer-Modified SulfonatedPolycarbamide Separation AidExample 6
[0144] Lab-scale flotation tests were conducted using the hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide, Compound H, as described in Example 5. The tests were conductedusing a Metso D-12V flotation machine (manufactured by Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.). The minerals (Cu, Mo) from the floated concentrates as well as the tailing were measured by XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) analyzer (manufactured by Thermo Scientific Niton XL3t GOLDD+). The Cu-Mo bulk concentrate was obtained from a copper mine in Arizona in the United States. The Cu-Mo concentrate contained typical industry levels of Cu and Mo, which are around 20% to 30% copper and 0.2% to 1.0% molybdenum. The hydrophilic polymer- modified sulfonated polycarbamide was employed with or without supplemental depressants for the flotation tests. When the hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide was employed with supplemental depressants for the flotation study, the hydrophilic polymer- modified sulfonated polycarbamide and the supplemental depressants may be added separately, or they may be pre-mixed prior to the test and added as a one-part system.
[0145] The lab-scale flotation cell test was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) thaw 500 g of ore sample (Cu-Mo concentrate) in a warm water bath; (2) transfer the Cu-Mo bulk concentrate to a flotation cell; (3) start the impeller and adjust the speed to about 900 rpm; (4) control the pulp (Cu-Mo concentrate) level to be just below the target (not to overflow before the air) and mix the slurry; (5) check the pulp pH and ORP (Oxidation-Reduction Potential) prior to the addition of chemicals (control NaSH or exemplary hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide); (6) slowly add chemicals to the flotation cell (e.g., control NaSH: ~ 550 mV ORP for full Cu depression); (7) add diesel as Mo collector if needed; (8) start and adjust air to the target flow rate (2 L / min or as needed); (9) float concentration 1 (first scrape of float bubbles) for 2 min in a collection pan (concentration 1) and measure the weight of the concentration 1 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 1); (10) record pH and ORP; (11) replace the collection pan and float concentration 2 for 3 min in a collection pan (concentration 2) and measure the weight of the concentration 2 before the vacuum dry (mass pull 2); and (12) record pH and ORP.
[0146] The XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) measurement was conducted according to the following procedure: (1) vacuum-dry concentration 1 (float concentration 1) and concentration 2 (float concentration 2), as well as the tailing (depressed mineral), and measure the weight of each material (z.e., the total mineral concentrate is the sum of vacuum-dried concentration 1, vacuum-dried concentration 2, and vacuum-dried tailing); (2) oven-dry the materials overnight at 125°C, and measure the weight of each material; (3) measure and analyze the minerals from each material, and select Cu, Mo, Fe amounts on the XRF device; and (4) analyze Cu, Mo, Fe concentrations and obtain the recovery and grade of these minerals.
[0147] The results of the lab-scale flotation cell tests are summarized in Table 21.Table 21 : Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #8)Mix 1 = Ikg / T Comp. A + 0.9kg / T S-EDTA + 1.4kg / TD-TGA + 0.3kg / T C-TGATable 22: Flotation Cell Test Results (Study #9)
[0148] As detailed in Tables 21-22, the hydrophilic polymer-modified sulfonated polycarbamide compositions described herein, with and without supplemental depressants, provided similar recovery of Cu and Mo as the control NaSH, and reduced or replaced NaSH at much lower chemical treatment levels. For example, the hydrophilic polymer-modifiedsulfonated poly carbamide composition and S-TGA co-reactant (Candidate 17, Comp. H with S-TGA) demonstrated comparable Cu depression data as the control NaSH at 50% lower total chemical treatment levels (than control NaSH level) and exhibited 100% NaSH replacement.
[0149] It is possible to utilize the various inventive concepts in combination with one another. Additionally, any particular feature recited as relating to a particularly disclosed aspect of the methods and systems of the present disclosure should be interpreted as available for use with all disclosed aspects of the methods and systems of the present disclosure, unless incorporation of the particular feature would be contradictory to the express terms of the disclosed aspect. Additional advantages and modifications will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
[0150] Therefore, the disclosure, in its broader aspects, is not limited to the specific details presented therein, the representative apparatus, or the illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concepts.
[0151] The terminology as set forth herein is for description only and should not be construed as limiting the invention. All references to singular characteristics or limitations of the invention shall include the corresponding plural characteristic or limitation, and vice versa, unless otherwise specified or clearly implied to the contrary by the context in which the reference is made. Unless otherwise specified, “a,” “an,” “the,” and “at least one” are used interchangeably. Furthermore, as used in the description and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are inclusive of their plural forms, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
[0152] To the extent that the term “includes” or “including” is used in the description or the claims, it is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as that term is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, to the extentthat the term “or” is employed (e.g., A or B) it is intended to mean “A or B or both.” When the applicants intend to indicate “only A or B but not both” then the term “only A or B but not both” will be employed. Thus, use of the term “or” herein is the inclusive, and not the exclusive use.
[0153] All ranges and parameters, including but not limited to percentages, parts, and ratios, disclosed herein are understood to encompass any and all sub-ranges assumed and subsumed therein, and every number between the endpoints. For example, a stated range of “ 1 to 10” should be considered to include any and all sub-ranges beginning with a minimum value of 1 or more and ending with a maximum value of 10 or less (e.g., 1 to 6.1, or 2.3 to 9.4), and to each integer (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) contained within the range.
[0154] The methods and compositions of the present disclosure can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the elements of the invention as described, as well as any additional or optional element described herein, or which is otherwise useful in flotation mining applications.
Claims
CLAIMSThe claimed invention is:
1. A method for the separation and recovery of one or more minerals from a mineral ore bulk material, the method comprising: forming an aqueous pulp comprising water, a mineral ore bulk material, and a separation aid, the separation aid comprising a sulfonated polycarbamide; agitating and floating the aqueous pulp to form a floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings; and separately recovering the floated mineral concentrate and flotation tailings.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfonated poly carbamide comprises a polycarbamide formed from the reaction products of formaldehyde and urea.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the sulfonated poly carbamide has a mole ratio of formaldehyde to urea is from 0.5 to 2.5.
4. The method of any one of claims 2 and 3, wherein a mole ratio of formaldehyde to urea from 0.8 to 2.0.
5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the sulfonated polycarbamide comprises a reaction product of a polycarbamide and a sulfonating agent.
6. The method of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the sulfonating agent comprises an alkali metal sulfite.
7. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the sulfonating agent comprises sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium bisulfite, potassium sulfite, or combinations thereof.
8. The method of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the sulfonating agent is included in an amount such that a mole ratio of sulfonating agent to urea is from 0.01 to 2.0.
9. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the sulfonating agent is present in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based on the weight of the separation aid.
10. The method of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the sulfonated poly carbamide is modified with at least one biopolymer.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the biopolymer comprises lignin-based polymer, a polysaccharide, a starch, a hydrocolloid, flour, soy protein, carboxymethylcellulose, or combinations thereof.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the lignin-based polymer comprises lignosulfonate.
13. The method of claim 11 or 12, wherein the lignin-based polymer is selected from the group consisting of lignosulfonate, calcium lignosulfonate, ammonium lignosulfonate, magnesium lignosulfonate, or mixtures thereof.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein the starch comprises a natural starch, a modified starch, or combinations thereof.
15. The method of any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein the biopolymer is present in the separation aid in an amount from 0.01 wt.% to 30 wt.%.
16. The method of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the sulfonated poly carbamide is modified with a hydrophilic polymer.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the hydrophilic polymer is an acrylamide polymer.
18. The method of claim 16 or claim 17, wherein the hydrophilic polymer is selected from the group consisting of N-methylolacrylamide polymer, polyacrylamide, sodium polyacrylate, potassium polyacrylate, poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide, sodium polymethacrylate, or combinations thereof.
19. The method of any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein the hydrophilic polymer is present in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 20 wt.%.
20. The method of any one of claims 1 to 19, wherein the separation aid further includes a supplementary sulfur compound.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises an ionizable thiol group.
22. The method of claim 20 or claim 21, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises a sulfite, a sulfate, a thiol-functional compound, a sulfide, a sulfamate, a sulfinic acid, or combinations thereof.
23. The method of any one of claims 20 to 22, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises a sulfide, a disulfide, a sulfinic ester, a thiocyanate, a thiocarboxylic acid, a thioester, a sulfinic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid ester, a sulfamate, a sulfamide, salts of any of the above, or combinations thereof.
24. The method of any one of claims 1 to 23, wherein the separation aid further comprises a supplemental depressant.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the sulfonated polycarbamide and the supplemental depressant are pre-mixed prior to the addition of the separation aid to the aqueous pulp.
26. The method of claim 24 or claim 25, wherein the supplemental depressant comprises thioglycolic acid (TGA) salts, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) salts, mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) salts, thioglycerin (TG) salts, or combinations thereof.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the thioglycolic acid (TGA) salt is selected from the group consisting of sodium thioglycolate (S-TGA), calcium thioglycolate (C-TGA), diethylenetriamine thioglycolate (D-TGA), ammonium thioglycolate (A-TGA), or combinations thereof.
28. The method of claim 14 or claim 15, wherein the supplemental depressant comprises disodium EDTA (S-EDTA), disodium mercaptosuccinate (S-MSA), sodium thioglycerolate (S- TG), or combinations thereof.
29. The method of any one of claims 24 to 28, wherein the supplemental depressant further comprises one or more of sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH), sodium sulfide (Na2S), Nokes reagent, sodium cyanide (NaCN), or combinations thereof.
30. The method of any one of claims 1 to 29, wherein the separation aid is devoid of sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH).
31. The method of any one of claims 1 to 30, wherein the step of forming the aqueous pulp comprises: adding the mineral ore bulk material to the water to form a slurry; mixing the slurry; and adding the separation aid to the slurry while mixing to form the aqueous pulp.
32. The method of any one of claims 1 to 31, wherein the step of agitating and floating the aqueous pulp comprises: introducing air at a suitable flow rate to the aqueous pulp thereby floating the floated mineral concentrate.
33. The method of any one of claims 1 to 32, wherein the floated mineral concentrate recovery is the same or improved compared to that of an otherwise identical method that uses sodium hydrosulfide as a sole separation aid.
34. The method of any one of claims 1 to 33, wherein the flotation tailings recovery is the same or similar to that of an otherwise identical method that uses sodium hydrosulfide as a sole separation aid.
35. The method of any one of claims 1 to 34, wherein the floated mineral concentrate comprises molybdenum.
36. The method of any one of claims 1 to 35, wherein the flotation tailings comprise copper, iron (Fe), or combinations thereof.
37. Use of a sulfonated polycarbamide as a separation aid in a mineral ore separation process.
38. The use of a sulfonated poly carbamide as a separation aid as claimed in claim 37, wherein the sulfonated polycarbamide is modified with at least one of a biopolymer and a hydrophilic polymer.
39. A separation aid composition comprising: a sulfonated polycarbamide comprising: a polycarbamide comprising a reaction product of a polycarbamide and a sulfonating agent, wherein the polycarbamide is a reaction product of formaldehyde and urea with a mole ratio of formaldehyde to urea from 0.5 to 2.5.
40. The separation aid composition of claim 39, wherein the mole ratio of formaldehyde to urea is from 0.8 to 2.0.
41. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 40, wherein the sulfonating agent comprises an alkali metal sulfite.
42. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 41, wherein the sulfonating agent comprises sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium bisulfite, potassium sulfite, or combinations thereof.
43. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 42, wherein the sulfonating agent is included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%, based on the total weight of the separation aid composition.
44. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 43, wherein sulfonating agent is included in the separation aid in an amount from 0.5 wt.% to 10 wt.%, based on the total weight of the separation aid composition.
45. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 44, wherein the separation aid further includes 0.01 wt.% to 30 wt.% of a biopolymer.
46. The separation aid composition of claim 45, wherein the biopolymer comprises ligninbased polymer, a polysaccharide, a starch, a hydrocolloid, flour, soy protein, carboxymethylcellulose, or combinations thereof.
47. The separation aid composition of claim 46, wherein the lignin-based polymer comprises lignosulfonate.
48. The separation aid composition of claim 46 or claim 47, wherein the lignin-based polymer is selected from the group consisting of lignosulfonate, calcium lignosulfonate, ammonium lignosulfonate, magnesium lignosulfonate, or mixtures thereof.
49. The separation aid composition of claim 46, wherein the starch comprises a natural starch, a modified starch, or combinations thereof.
50. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 49, wherein the separation aid further includes 0.1 wt.% to 20 wt.% of a hydrophilic polymer, based on the total weight of the sulfonated polycarbamide.
51. The separation aid composition of claim 50, wherein the hydrophilic polymer comprises an acrylamide polymer.
52. The separation aid composition of claim 50 or claim 51, wherein the hydrophilic polymer comprises N-methylolacrylamide polymer, polyacrylamide, sodium polyacrylate, potassium polyacrylate, poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide, sodium polymethacrylate, or combinations thereof.
53. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 52, wherein the separation aid composition further comprises a supplemental depressant.
54. The separation aid composition of claim 53, wherein the supplemental depressant comprises thioglycolic acid (TGA) salts, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) salts, mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) salts, thioglycerin (TG) salts, or combinations thereof.
55. The separation aid composition of claim 53 or claim 54, wherein the separation aid composition comprises from 0.2 to 15 wt.% of the supplemental depressant, based on the total weight of the separation aid composition.
56. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 55, wherein the composition is devoid of sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH).
57. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 39 to 56, wherein the separation aid further includes a supplementary sulfur compound.
58. The separation aid composition of claim 57, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises an ionizable thiol group.
59. The separation aid composition of claim 57 or claim 58, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises a sulfite, a sulfate, a thiol -functional compound, a sulfide, a sulfamate, a sulfinic acid, or combinations thereof.
60. The separation aid composition of any one of claims 57 to 59, wherein the supplementary sulfur compound comprises a sulfide, a disulfide, a sulfinic ester, a thiocyanate, a thiocarboxylic acid, a thioester, a sulfinic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid, a dithiocarboxylic acid ester, a sulfamate, a sulfamide, salts of any of the above, or combinations thereof.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Recovery of molybdenum using sodium metabisulfite and a thiocarbonate depressant
US10654048B2
Preparation of urea-formaldehyde condensates, and the use thereof
DE3346679A1
process for the production of condensation products
DE889225C
Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US20080017552A1