Method and apparatus for performance monitoring-related reporting

By allowing separate reporting of prediction accuracy indicators within CSI reporting settings, the method addresses timing constraints in mobile communication systems, ensuring accurate and efficient performance monitoring with reduced overhead.

WO2026101307A1PCT designated stage Publication Date: 2026-05-15LG ELECTRONICS INC
View PDF 1 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
WO · WO
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
LG ELECTRONICS INC
Filing Date
2025-11-07
Publication Date
2026-05-15

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

In mobile communication systems, the challenge arises when prediction accuracy indicators for predicted CSI information are not determined or reported with low accuracy due to timing constraints, leading to inefficiencies in performance monitoring and increased signaling overhead.

Method used

A method is proposed where CSI reporting includes a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI) based on specific reporting settings, allowing separate reporting of predicted information and accuracy indicators, thereby reducing signaling overhead and ensuring accurate reporting.

Benefits of technology

This approach ensures timely and accurate reporting of prediction accuracy, minimizing implementation complexity and optimizing UL resource utilization and terminal power consumption.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure KR2025018256_15052026_PF_FP_ABST
    Figure KR2025018256_15052026_PF_FP_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

A method according to one embodiment of the present specification comprises the steps of: receiving configuration information related to channel state information (CSI); and transmitting the CSI comprising information related to prediction. The configuration information comprises a report configuration related to prediction. The CSI further comprising a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI) is transmitted on the basis of a condition.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Method and apparatus for reporting related to performance monitoring

[0001] This specification relates to a method and apparatus for reporting related to performance monitoring.

[0002] Mobile communication systems were developed to provide voice services while ensuring user mobility. However, mobile communication systems have expanded their scope to include data services as well as voice. Currently, due to the explosive increase in traffic leading to resource shortages and users demanding higher-speed services, more advanced mobile communication systems are required.

[0003] The requirements for next-generation mobile communication systems largely include the ability to accommodate explosive data traffic, a dramatic increase in transmission rates per user, a significantly increased number of connected devices, very low end-to-end latency, and high energy efficiency. To achieve this, various technologies are being researched, such as dual connectivity, massive multiple input multiple output (MMIMO), in-band full duplex, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), super wideband support, and device networking.

[0004] Standardization discussions regarding the performance monitoring operation of UE-side AI / ML in the beam management field of the Rel-19 AI / ML WI have been conducted. Specifically, performance monitoring of CSI predictions (e.g., CSI including at least one of predicted RS (predicted CRI, predicted SSBRI), predicted L1-RSRP, and / or predicted PMI) may be performed. As an example, a terminal may transmit a report (e.g., CSI report) related to monitoring the accuracy of predicted information (e.g., predicted CRI, predicted SSBRI, and / or predicted PMI, etc.). As an example, the report may include a prediction accuracy indicator (e.g., Prediction Accuracy Indicator).

[0005] Meanwhile, standardization discussions were held regarding the support for behaviors that allow reporting settings related to prediction accuracy to be configured identically to or separately from reporting settings related to prediction. For example, a CSI report containing predicted information (e.g., P-CRI(s) / P-SSBRI(s) / P-L1-RSRPS(s)) may additionally include a prediction accuracy indicator (e.g., PAI).

[0006] Given that the prediction accuracy indicator corresponds to performance monitoring results related to the predicted information, it is necessary to specify when the predicted information and the prediction accuracy indicator can be reported together. In other words, if the predicted information and the prediction accuracy indicator are always reported together, the following problems may occur.

[0007] For example, the prediction accuracy indicator may not be determined or may be incompletely determined until the point at which a CSI report containing predicted information is transmitted.

[0008] As a specific example, the time between the terminal determining the predicted information and transmitting the CSI report may be shorter than the time required to determine / calculate the prediction accuracy indicator. In such cases, the prediction accuracy indicator may not be determined, or a prediction accuracy indicator with low accuracy may be reported in terms of performance monitoring.

[0009] As a specific example, the terminal may be unable to perform measurements to determine the prediction accuracy indicator from the time it determines the predicted information until it transmits the CSI report. In such cases, the terminal may not be able to determine the prediction accuracy indicator.

[0010] The purpose of this specification is to propose a method for solving the aforementioned problems.

[0011] The technical problems to be solved in this specification are not limited to those mentioned above, and other technical problems not mentioned will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art to which this specification belongs from the description below.

[0012] A method according to one embodiment of the present specification for solving the aforementioned problems includes the steps of receiving configuration information related to Channel State Information (CSI) and transmitting said CSI, which includes information related to prediction. The configuration information includes reporting settings related to prediction. Based on conditions, the CSI is further characterized by being transmitted, which includes a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI). Accordingly, problems that occur when the prediction accuracy indicator is always reported together with the information related to prediction can be prevented.

[0013] According to the embodiments of this specification, information related to prediction and prediction accuracy indicators can be reported together based on reporting settings related to prediction. Since separate reporting settings for prediction accuracy indicators or monitoring are not required, signaling overhead in RRC settings for performance monitoring can be reduced. In addition, the implementation complexity required to report information related to prediction and prediction accuracy indicators together can be minimized.

[0014] Furthermore, compared to cases where prediction-related information and prediction accuracy indicators are always reported together without defined criteria, the quality and accuracy of the reported prediction accuracy indicators can be guaranteed. Therefore, among the subsequent actions that may be performed after performance monitoring, the action more suitable for the current prediction performance (e.g., maintaining / using the current model if there is no performance degradation, or performing model retraining / model deactivation / model switching due to performance degradation) can be executed.

[0015] In addition, compared to cases where information related to predictions and prediction accuracy indicators are always reported together without defined criteria, procedures related to CSI reporting can be improved in terms of UL resource utilization and terminal power consumption.

[0016] The effects obtainable in this specification are not limited to those mentioned above, and other unmentioned effects will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art to which this specification belongs from the description below.

[0017] Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the overall functions from the perspective of an AI / ML model.

[0018] Figure 2 illustrates a general form of an AI / ML-related procedure performed between a network and a terminal.

[0019] Figure 3 illustrates an example of AI / ML-based beam management operation.

[0020] Figure 4 illustrates an example of an AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting operation.

[0021] Figure 5 illustrates an example of an AI / ML-based positioning operation.

[0022] Figure 6 is a flowchart showing an example of a CSI-related procedure.

[0023] FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method according to one embodiment of the present specification.

[0024] FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a method according to another embodiment of the present specification.

[0025] FIG. 9 is a drawing showing the configuration of a first device and a second device according to an embodiment of the present specification.

[0026] In this specification, "A or B" may mean "only A," "only B," or "both A and B." Alternatively, in this specification, "A or B" may be interpreted as "A and / or B." For example, in this specification, "A, B or C" may mean "only A," "only B," "only C," or "any combination of A, B and C."

[0027] A slash ( / ) or a comma used in this specification may mean "and / or." For example, "A / B" may mean "A and / or B." Accordingly, "A / B" may mean "only A," "only B," or "both A and B." For example, "A, B, C" may mean "A, B or C."

[0028] In this specification, "at least one of A and B" may mean "only A," "only B," or "both A and B." Additionally, in this specification, the expressions "at least one of A or B" or "at least one of A and / or B" may be interpreted as synonymous with "at least one of A and B."

[0029] Additionally, in this specification, "at least one of A, B and C" may mean "only A," "only B," "only C," or "any combination of A, B and C." Also, "at least one of A, B or C" or "at least one of A, B and / or C" may mean "at least one of A, B and C."

[0030] Additionally, parentheses used in this specification may mean "for example." Specifically, when indicated as "control information (PDCCH)," "PDCCH" may be proposed as an example of "control information." In other words, "control information" in this specification is not limited to "PDCCH," and "PDCCH" may be proposed as an example of "control information." Furthermore, even when indicated as "control information (i.e., PDCCH)," "PDCCH" may be proposed as an example of "control information."

[0031] In the following explanation, 'when, if, in case of' can be replaced with 'based on'.

[0032] Technical features described individually within a single drawing in this specification may be implemented individually or simultaneously.

[0033] Hereinafter, preferred embodiments according to the present specification will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The detailed description disclosed below, together with the accompanying drawings, is intended to describe exemplary embodiments of the present specification and is not intended to represent the only embodiment in which the present specification may be practiced. The following detailed description includes specific details to provide a complete understanding of the present specification.

[0034] In this specification, a terminal is a user-side device (user equipment, UE) or a consumer-side device, and may also be referred to as a first node that receives / transmits signals from / to a base station / second node / IAB node / Transmission-Reception Point (TRP). A terminal may correspond to a physical node or a logical node. A terminal may correspond to a user-side endpoint or an intermediate point between other endpoints. In communication between two points not limited to endpoints (including one-to-one / many-to-one / one-to-many / many-to-many communication), a terminal may correspond to a served node. A terminal may be a fixed-location node or a non-fixed-location (or mobile) node.

[0035] In this specification, a Base Station (BS) is a device on the network side and may also be referred to as a second node / IAB node / x-NodeB (x-NodeB, where x may be an abbreviation related to Radio Access Technology (RAT)) / Transmission-Reception Point (TRP). A Base Station may correspond to a physical node or a logical node. A Base Station may correspond to an endpoint on the network side or an intermediate point between other endpoints. In communication between two points not limited to endpoints (including one-to-one / many-to-one / one-to-many / many-to-many communication), a Base Station may correspond to a serving node. A Base Station may be a node with a fixed location or a node with an indefinite location.

[0036] In this specification, higher layer parameters may be set for the terminal, pre-set, or pre-defined. For example, a base station may transmit higher layer parameters to the terminal. For example, the terminal may transmit parameters such as capability to the base station as higher layer parameters. For example, higher layer parameters may be transmitted via RRC (radio resource control) signaling or MAC (medium access control) signaling.

[0037] In this specification, information / state / parameters being "configured" or "pre-configured" may be interpreted as the information / state / parameters being provided / pre-provided to the terminal through pre-defined signaling (e.g., SIB, MAC, RRC) from the base station. In this specification, information / state / parameters being "defined" or "pre-defined" may be interpreted as being known or stored in advance by the base station and the terminal without signaling between the base station and the terminal.

[0038] < AI / ML for Wireless Communication >

[0039] With the advancement of computing technology, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are being adopted across various industries and technological fields. In the field of wireless communication, various discussions are underway regarding the application of AI models trained on ML; notably, the 3GPP standardization process refers to this as AI / ML. In this specification, we use the term "AI / ML" following the terminology currently in use during the 3GPP standardization discussions; however, "AI / ML" may be referred to by various other terms depending on the progress of standardization and implementation in the future. For example, it may be referred to as a "transmission / reception mode" or a "signal / channel / operation / transmission / reception configuration" set for AI / ML, but is not limited thereto. The meanings of the terms currently used in the 3GPP standardization process are briefly summarized as follows.

[0040] - AI / ML Model: Refers to a data-driven algorithm that applies AI / ML technology to generate a set of outputs containing predictive information and / or decision parameters based on a set of inputs.

[0041] - Data collection: This is the process of collecting data necessary for AI / ML model training, data analysis, and inference from network nodes, management entities, or terminals.

[0042] - AI / ML Training: An online or offline process of training an AI model by learning features and patterns that best represent data and acquire an AI / ML model trained for inference.

[0043] - AI / ML Inference: This is the process of making predictions or deriving decisions based on collected data and AI models using trained AI models. Meanwhile, depending on whether the AI / ML model is configured on both the transmitting and receiving devices or on only one, it can be classified into (i) two-sided models and (ii) one-sided models. In the case of (i) two-sided models, cooperative inference is performed through paired AI / ML models. Cooperative inference refers to cooperation between the network and the UE, where one side performs part of the inference and the other performs the remainder. (ii) One-sided models are divided into UE-side models and network-side models. In the case of one-sided models, inference is performed entirely by the UE / network-side models.

[0044] 1. Life Cycle Management (LCM) for AI / ML models

[0045] For AI / ML models, LCM is a concept that encompasses all overall procedures for the model, such as data collection, model training, model deployment, model inference, model monitoring, and model updates.

[0046] Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the overall functions from the perspective of an AI / ML model.

[0047] Referring to FIG. 1, a general AI / ML functional framework can be configured to include a data collection function (10), a model training function (20), a management function (30), an inference function (40), and a model storage function (50).

[0048] The Data Collection function (10) is a function that provides input data to the Model Training function (20), Management function (30), and Inference function (40). The Data Collection function (10) performs data preparation and can provide input data processed through data preparation.

[0049] Here, training data (11) refers to data required as input for the AI / ML model training function (20). monitoring data (12) refers to data required as input for the management (30) of the AI / ML model or AI / ML function. inference data (13) refers to data required as input for the AI / ML inference function (30).

[0050] The Model Training function (20) is a function that performs AI / ML model training, validation, and testing, and can generate model performance metrics that can be used as part of the AI / ML model testing procedure. If necessary, the Model Training function (20) can perform data preparation (e.g., data pre-processing and cleaning, forming and transformation) based on the Training Data (11) delivered from the Data Collection function (10).

[0051] Trained / Updated Model (21): If there is a Model Storage function (50), it is used to transfer trained, validated, and tested AI / ML models to the Model Storage function (50) or to transfer updated versions of the models to the Model Storage function (50).

[0052] The Management function (30) is a function that monitors the operation of an AI / ML model or an AI / ML function.

[0053] Management Instruction (32) is information required as input to manage the Inference function (40). The relevant information may include the selection / (de)activation / switching of an AI / ML model or an AI / ML-based function, and may also include a fallback to a non-AI / ML operation (i.e., not relying on the inference process).

[0054] A Model Transfer / Delivery Request (33) can be used to request model(s) from Model Storage (50).

[0055] Performance Feedback / Retraining Request (31) refers to information required as input to Model Training function (20) (e.g., for the purpose of retraining or updating the model).

[0056] The inference function (40) is a function that provides output from the process of applying an AI / ML model or AI / ML function using data (i.e., inference data (13)) provided by the data collection (10) as input. Data preparation (e.g., data preprocessing and cleaning, formatting and transformation) may also be performed based on the inference data (13) delivered by the data collection (10). If necessary, the inference function (40) may also perform data preparation (e.g., data pre-processing and cleaning, forming and transformation) based on the inference data (13) provided by the data collection function (10).

[0057] Inference Output (41) is data used in the Management function (30) to monitor the performance of an AI / ML model or AI / ML function. Inference Output (41) may include the inference output of an AI / ML model generated by the Inference function (30), and the details of the inference output may vary depending on the use case.

[0058] The Model Storage function (50) is a function that stores a trained / updated model that can be used to perform the Inference function (40).

[0059] Model Transfer / Delivery (51) is used to transfer an AI / ML model to an inference function.

[0060] 2. General AI / ML related procedures between the network and the terminal

[0061] Figure 2 illustrates the general form of AI / ML-related procedures performed between a network and a terminal. While Figure 1 examined the LCM from the perspective of an AI / ML model, Figure 2 describes the general form of procedures performed between a terminal and a network from the perspective of signaling / protocols.

[0062] (1) AI / ML related setup procedure

[0063] Referring to FIG. 2, an AI / ML-related configuration procedure may be performed between the network and the terminal (B05). The AI / ML-related configuration procedure may include information exchange through at least one upper-layer signaling between the terminal and the network, and / or prior preparation / subsequent operations at the terminal / network respectively before / after the upper-layer signaling.

[0064] Specifically, the configuration procedure related to AI / ML may include, but is not limited to, at least one of the following: (i) reporting the capability of the AI / ML-related terminal, (ii) data collection, (iii) model training, (iv) model delivery / transmission, (v) selection of AI / ML functions / models, and (vi) configuration of various operations performed based on the AI / ML model (e.g., AI / ML-based CSI / Positioning / Beam Management).

[0065] (i) The terminal can inform the network of its capabilities, such as models and functions related to AI / ML, that it supports through UE Capability reporting. The network can provide AI / ML-related settings to the terminal based on the terminal's capabilities related to AI / ML reported by the terminal.

[0066] (ii) AI / ML-related configuration procedures may include data collection related to the training / inference of AI / ML models and / or the provision of configuration information regarding data collection. The configuration information regarding data collection may relate to how to configure the method / operation of data collection.

[0067] (iii) AI / ML-related configuration procedures may include training AI / ML models online or offline and / or providing configuration information for AI / ML model training. The configuration information for AI / ML model training may relate to how to configure the method / behavior, etc., of training the AI / ML model.

[0068] (iv) AI / ML-related configuration procedures may include transmitting / transmitting configuration information for a model. The configuration information for a model may include parameters that constitute the AI / ML model and / or an identifier (ID) for the AI / ML model.

[0069] The provided AI / ML model may be a model trained by the network or a model that requires self-training at the terminal. Even when a model trained by the network is provided, the terminal may perform fine-tuning or retraining as necessary. Meanwhile, if a model trained by the network is provided, the terminal may provide data for training to the network.

[0070] (v) The configuration procedure related to AI / ML may include the configuration of how to select AI / ML Functionality / models and / or the selection process for AI / ML Functionality / models. In UE-side AI / ML models or two-sided AI / ML models, the selection of the UE part may be performed through instructions / signaling from the network or the terminal may select it itself. The selection of AI / ML Functionality / models may be performed when multiple AI / ML Functionality / models are configured / provided.

[0071] (vi) The configuration procedure related to AI / ML may include configuration information for various inference operations performed based on AI / ML models, e.g., AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting, AI / ML-based positioning, and / or AI / ML-based beam management.

[0072] (2) Operation based on inference by AI / ML models

[0073] Referring again to FIG. 2, the network and / or terminal can perform inference of the AI / ML model through the trained AI / ML model and perform various operations based on the inference of the AI / ML model (B10). If the AI / ML model is a one-sided model, the inference of the AI / ML model can be performed at either the network or the terminal where the AI / ML model is configured. If the AI / ML model is a two-sided model, each part of the inference of the AI / ML model can be performed at the network and the terminal, and depending on the implementation, such inference can be performed cooperatively between the network and the terminal.

[0074] (i) Actions performed based on the inference of an AI / ML model may include AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting. AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting is intended to improve CSI feedback and may be related to overhead reduction / CSI compression, accuracy improvement, and / or CSI prediction.

[0075] (ii) Actions performed based on the inference of an AI / ML model may include AI / ML-based beam management. AI / ML-based beam management may be related to beam prediction in the time domain, reduction of overhead / latency in the spatial domain, and / or improvement of beam selection accuracy.

[0076] (iii) Actions performed based on the inference of an AI / ML model may include AI / ML-based positioning. AI / ML-based positioning may be relevant to improving positioning accuracy in various scenarios, for example, in non-line-of-sight environments.

[0077] (3) Procedures for AI / ML management

[0078] The network and / or terminal can perform procedures for the management of AI / ML Functionality / model or the settings therefor (B15).

[0079] The network and / or terminal may perform monitoring of AI / ML Functionality / model during the AI / ML model inference or operation based thereon (B10) for the management procedure (B15).

[0080] The management procedure may include, for example, at least one of activation / deactivation, switching, model update, and / or fallback operation for AI / ML Functionality / model. For the signaling of the management procedure, various 3GPP signaling schemes, such as RRC, MAC-CE, DCI, etc., may be used.

[0081] As an example of model switching, multiple model groups are configured, and switching between them can be performed based on models having a common model structure or partially common substructures, and models within the same group may be associated with different input / output formats or processing.

[0082] Model updating involves modifying the parameters used by the model to suit channel conditions that change over time, and fine-tuning is an example of model updating.

[0083] Fallback: In a wireless communication system using an AI / ML model, this may refer to the operation of not using the AI / ML model or operating in a pre-configured / defined default mode when the reliability of the AI / ML model decreases due to internal or external environmental factors.

[0084] For example, the decision on whether to perform a management procedure can be made by the network. For instance, the network may decide to perform the management procedure upon network initiation, or the network may decide to perform the management procedure upon terminal initiation and request.

[0085] As another example, the decision on whether to perform a management procedure can be made by the terminal. For instance, the terminal's decision on the management procedure may be triggered when an event condition set by the network is satisfied, performed by reporting the terminal's decision to the network, or performed autonomously by the terminal.

[0086] 3. Specific operation examples based on AI / ML model inference

[0087] (1) Beam management

[0088] Figure 3 illustrates an example of AI / ML-based beam management operation.

[0089] Referring to FIG. 3, the network / terminal can perform a configuration procedure related to AI / ML-based beam management (C05). The network / terminal can perform a configuration procedure for an AI / ML model to be used for AI / ML-based beam management, and an exchange of configuration information for upper-layer signaling for AI / ML-based beam management. For example, at least one of information related to model inference, configuration for a first set / second set beam, monitoring performance, and assistance information for data collection and beam measurement may be signaled.

[0090] The network / terminal can perform measurements on the first set of beams (C10). The beam measurements may be related to RSRP measurements.

[0091] A network / terminal can obtain information about a second set of beams based on measurement results for a first set of beams (C15). For example, the network / terminal can perform AI / ML inference by using the measurement results for the first set of beams as AI / ML input data. Beam ID information may also be additionally provided as AI / ML input data. Information about the second set of beams may correspond to AI / ML output data. The AI / ML output data may be related to, for example, the probability that each beam will become a top-N beam, the predicted RSRP, etc., for predicting future beam quality, but is not limited thereto.

[0092] According to an embodiment, the network / terminal can transmit and receive information about the acquired second set of beams.

[0093] Specifically, AI / ML-based beam management operations may include at least one of the following BM-Case 1 and BM-Case 2.

[0094] - BM-Case 1: Prediction of the second set of DL beams in the spatial domain using the first set of beam measurements

[0095] - BM-Case 2: Prediction of the second set of DL beams in the time domain through the first set of beam measurements

[0096] In BM-Case 1 and / or 2, both AI / ML model training and inference may be performed on the network or on the terminal. The first set of beams and the second set of beams may be different beams. Or the first set of beams may be a subset of the second set of beams. Or, particularly in BM-Case 2, the first set of beams and the second set of beams may be the same beam.

[0097] The report corresponding to the inference of the UE-side model for BM-Case 1 may relate to the RSRP for the predicted top N beams. The report may include, for example, the predicted RSRP values, and as an example, the predicted RSRP values ​​may be reported together with the actual measured RSRP.

[0098] UE-side AI / ML model inference for BM-Case 2 can report inference results for N future time points through a single report. The report for each time point can correspond to the report in BM-Case 1.

[0099] For performance monitoring of the UE-side model for BM-Case 1 / 2, (i) network-side performance monitoring and / or (ii) UE-assisted performance monitoring may be supported. (i) For network-side performance monitoring, the terminal may report information necessary for the network to calculate performance metrics, for example, by reporting measurement results (e.g., RSRP) and / or RS index for a set of resources for monitoring. (ii) For UE-assisted performance monitoring, the terminal may calculate performance metrics.

[0100] With respect to the NW-side model for BM-Case 1 / 2, quantization of the reported RSRP may be supported, for example, differential RSRP reporting may be supported along existing quantization steps and ranges. The reported content may include information on the RSRP and the corresponding upper N beam, where N can be set by the network.

[0101] With respect to the configuration of the first set of beams and the second set of beams of the UE-side model of BM Case-1, two resource sets may be configured separately for each of the first set and the second set, and the resource sets may be provided through CSI reporting settings. The terminal may perform inference / measurement on the resource set of the first set of beams. The terminal may not be expected to perform measurement / inference on the resource set of the second set of beams. The beam information in the inference report may include resource set information for the first set.

[0102] In relation to the UE-side model, the associated ID may be provided through the CSI framework. The terminal may assume identical / similar characteristics for DL ​​transmit beams / sets (lists) for the same associated ID.

[0103] Regarding UE-assisted performance monitoring for the UE-side models of BM-Case 1 and 2, the following methods may be considered.

[0104] i) Compare prediction results based on resources for monitoring and use the top 1 or top K beam prediction accuracy.

[0105] ii) Use RSRP difference information based on RSRP measurements of resources for monitoring and actual RSRP measurements for at least one of the top N prediction beams.

[0106] iii) Use the difference information between the measured RSRP and the predicted RSRP for the corresponding beam of the resources for monitoring.

[0107] iv) Probability information that the predicted beam will become one of the top 1 or N beams

[0108] For reporting inference results for the UE-side model, quantization of RSRP may be supported, and differential RSRP with existing quantization steps may be supported. The scope of RSRP reporting is such that differential RSRP among multiple beams is supported in the case of BM-case 1, and differential RSRP among multiple beams at multiple time points is supported in the case of BM-case 2.

[0109] For BM-Case 2 of the UE-side model, the network can be configured to report inferences about N future times to the terminal.

[0110] (2) CSI prediction and / or compression

[0111] Figure 4 illustrates an example of an AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting operation.

[0112] Referring to FIG. 4, the network / terminal can perform a configuration procedure related to AI / ML-based CSI (D05). The network / terminal can perform a configuration procedure for an AI / ML model to be used for AI / ML-based CSI, and for the exchange of configuration information for upper-layer signaling for AI / ML-based CSI measurement / reporting. For example, at least one of information related to model inference, settings for RS / resources to be used for CSI measurement, monitoring performance, data collection, and conditions / resources for CSI reporting may be signaled.

[0113] The terminal can perform CSI measurements based on AI / ML model inference (D10). The AI / ML model used by the terminal for CSI measurements may be a UE-side AI / ML model corresponding to a one-side AI / ML model, or an AI / ML model corresponding to the terminal part of a two-side AI / ML model.

[0114] The terminal may report CSI to the network based on the results of CSI measurements (D15). CSI reporting may be performed periodically or non-periodically depending on the configuration, and in the case of non-period CSI reporting, network instructions (not shown), such as DCI, that trigger it may be additionally signaled. CSI reporting may include AI / ML-based CSI content and may additionally include legacy CSI content (e.g., non-AI / ML-based RI, PMI, CQI, etc.) (depending on the configuration / scheduling). AI / ML-based CSI content may be related to at least one of 1) CSI compression to reduce the overhead of CSI reporting and 2) CSI prediction for future time points in the time domain.

[0115] The network can acquire CSI based on the terminal's CSI report.

[0116] If a two-sided AI / ML model is configured, the network can reconstruct the CSI by using the terminal's CSI report as input data to the AI / ML model configured in the network (D20). The inference (output) of the AI / ML model configured in the network may be the reconstructed CSI. In such a two-sided AI / ML model, the terminal-side AI / ML model part can be understood as a CSI encoder, and the network-side AI / ML model part can be understood as a concept similar to a CSI decoder.

[0117] CSI compression is CSI compression in the spatial-frequency domain and can primarily be based on two-sided AI / ML models. CSI prediction can primarily be based on one-sided, specifically UE-side AI / ML models.

[0118] In CSI compression based on a two-sided AI / ML model, AI / ML model training may include at least one of the following: (i) Type 1, in which the two-sided AI / ML model is jointly trained at either the terminal or the network; (ii) Type 2, in which the terminal and the network each jointly train the corresponding parts of the two-sided AI / ML model; and (iii) Type 3, in which the terminal and the network each separately train the corresponding parts of the two-sided AI / ML model, wherein the training of the terminal is mainly related to CSI generation and the training of the network is mainly related to CSI reconstruction. Joint training means that the CSI generation / reconstruction models are trained in the same loop for forward / backward delays, and separate training may mean a sequential method in which one of the terminals or the network starts training first, and then the other performs training.

[0119] (3) Positioning

[0120] Figure 5 illustrates an example of an AI / ML-based positioning operation.

[0121] Referring to FIG. 5, the network / terminal can perform a setup procedure related to AI / ML-based positioning (E05). The network / terminal can perform measurements for positioning (E10). The measurements for positioning may be related to PRS and / or SRS measurements. Based on the measurement results, the network / terminal can obtain information regarding terminal positioning (E15). For example, the network / terminal can perform AI / ML inference by using the measurement results for PRS / SRS as AI / ML input data. The information regarding terminal positioning may correspond to AI / ML output data. The AI / ML output data may be, for example, terminal location or assistance information that serves as the basis for determining terminal location, but is not limited thereto.

[0122] < CSI Related Operations >

[0123] Channel state information (CSI) may include at least one of a channel quality indicator (CQI), a precoding matrix indicator (PMI), a CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI), an SS / PBCH block resource indicator (SSBRI), a layer indicator (LI), a rank indicator (RI), Layer 1-RSRP (Layer 1-Reference Signal Received Power), and / or Layer 1-SINR (Layer 1-Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio).

[0124] In the case of the CSI prediction described below, the CSI related to the prediction may include at least one of the predicted CQI (predicted CQI, P-CQI), predicted PMI (predicted PMI, P-PMI), predicted CRI (predicted CRI, P-CRI), predicted SSBRI (predicted SSBRI, P-SSBRI), predicted LI (predicted LI, P-LI), predicted RI (predicted RI, P-RI), predicted L1-RSRP (predicted L1-RSRP, P-L1-RSRP) and / or predicted L1-SINR (predicted L1-SINR, P-L1-SINR).

[0125] When monitoring the performance / accuracy of the CSI prediction described below, the CSI related to prediction accuracy may include a Prediction Accuracy Indicator (PAI). For example, the PAI may indicate the accuracy of predicted downlink reference signal(s) (e.g., predicted CRI(s) and / or predicted SSBRI(s)), and the PAI may be interpreted / replaced as a Reference Signal-Prediction Accuracy Indicator (RS-PAI). For example, the PAI may indicate the accuracy of predicted CSI (e.g., predicted PMI), and the PAI may be interpreted / replaced as a Channel State Information-Prediction Accuracy Indicator (CSI-PAI).

[0126] Figure 6 is a flowchart showing an example of a CSI-related procedure.

[0127] Referring to FIG. 6, to perform one of the uses of CSI-RS, a terminal (e.g., user equipment, UE) receives configuration information related to CSI from a base station (e.g., general Node B, gNB) via radio resource control (RRC) signaling (S610).

[0128] The configuration information related to the above CSI may include at least one of CSI-IM (interference management) resource information, CSI measurement configuration information, CSI resource configuration information, CSI-RS resource information (e.g., M≥1 CSI-ResourceConfig resource setting), or CSI report configuration information (e.g., N≥1 CSI-ReportConfig reporting setting). As an example, the configuration information may include at least one of one or more CSI resource settings and / or one or more CSI reporting settings.

[0129] For example, the configuration information may include a first CSI resource setting for measurement and a second CSI resource setting for prediction. As a specific example, the measurement related to the prediction of CSI described below may be performed based on the first CSI resource setting. The terminal may perform L1-RSRP measurements on CSI-RS resources or SS / PBCH block resources associated with the first CSI resource setting. As a specific example, the prediction of CSI described below may be performed based on the second CSI resource setting. Based on the L1-RSRP measurements, the terminal may perform predictions on CSI-RS resources or SS / PBCH block resources associated with the second CSI resource setting. In other words, using L1-RSRPs as measurement metrics, the best CRI / best SSBRI (e.g., P-CRI(s), P-SSBRI(s)) may be predicted.

[0130] For example, the above configuration information may include a first CSI reporting setting related to prediction and a second CSI reporting setting related to prediction accuracy.

[0131] Information related to CSI resource configuration can be expressed as CSI-ResourceConfig IE. Information related to CSI resource configuration defines a group including at least one of an NZP (non-zero power) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set. That is, the information related to CSI resource configuration includes a CSI-RS resource set list, and the CSI-RS resource set list may include at least one of an NZP CSI-RS resource set list, a CSI-IM resource set list, or a CSI-SSB resource set list. A CSI-RS resource set is identified by a CSI-RS resource set ID, and one resource set includes at least one CSI-RS resource. Each CSI-RS resource is identified by a CSI-RS resource ID.

[0132] Information related to CSI report configuration (e.g., CSI-ReportConfig IE) includes a reportConfigType parameter representing time domain behavior and a reportQuantity parameter representing the CSI-related quantity to be reported. The time domain behavior may be periodic, aperiodic, or semi-persistent.

[0133] The above reportQuantity parameter includes the channel quality indicator (CQI), precoding matrix indicator (PMI), CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI), SS / PBCH block resource indicator (SSBRI), layer indicator (LI), rank indicator (RI), L1-RSRP (Layer 1-Reference Signal Received Power), L1-SINR (Layer 1-Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio), predicted CQI (P-CQI), predicted PMI (P-PMI), predicted CRI (P-CRI), predicted SSBRI (P-SSBRI), predicted LI (P-LI), predicted RI (P-RI), predicted L1-RSRP (P-L1-RSRP), and / or predicted L1-SINR (predicted It can be set to a value representing at least one of L1-SINR, P-L1-SINR) and / or Prediction Accuracy Indicator (PAI) (or RS-PAI).

[0134] For example, the reportQuantity parameter can be set to cri, ssb-Index, cri-RSRP, or ssb-Index-RSRP. cri represents the CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI). RSRP represents the L1-RSRP (Layer 1-Reference Signal Received Power). ssb-Index represents the SS / PBCH block resource indicator (SSBRI).

[0135] For example, the reportQuantity parameter can be set to p-cri, p-ssb-index, p-cri-RSRP, or p-ssb-index-RSRP. p-cri represents the predicted CRI (predicted CRI, P-CRI). p-ssb-index represents the predicted SSBRI (predicted SSBRI, P-SSBRI). p-cri-RSRP represents the predicted CRI (predicted CRI, P-CRI) and predicted L1-RSRP (predicted L1-RSRP, P-L1-RSRP). p-ssb-index-RSRP represents the predicted SSBRI (predicted SSBRI, P-SSBRI) and predicted L1-RSRP (predicted L1-RSRP, P-L1-RSRP).

[0136] For example, the reportQuantity parameter can be set to pai (or rs-pai). pai (or rs-pai) represents PA (or RS-PAI).

[0137] The measurement resource may include settings for downlink signals and / or downlink resources for which the terminal will perform measurements to determine feedback information. The measurement resource may be set as a set of ZP and / or NZP CSI-RS resources associated with a CSI reporting setting. The NZP CSI-RS resource set may include a CSI-RS set or an SSB set. For example, L1-RSRP may be measured against a CSI-RS set or against an SSB set.

[0138] The terminal measures the CSI based on configuration information related to the above CSI (S620). The CSI measurement may include (1) a process of receiving the terminal's CSI-RS (S621) and (2) a process of computing the CSI through the received CSI-RS (S622). The terminal reports the CSI to the base station (S630).

[0139] resource setting

[0140] Each CSI resource setting 'CSI-ResourceConfig' contains a configuration for S≥1 CSI resource sets (given by the higher layer parameter csi-RS-ResourceSetList). The CSI resource setting corresponds to the CSI-RS-resourcesetlist, where S represents the number of configured CSI-RS resource sets. Here, the list of S≥1 CSI resource sets includes either or both of the NZP CSI-RS resource set(s) and the SS / PBCH block (SSB) set(s) used for L1-RSRP computation, or includes CSI-IM resource set(s).

[0141] Next, one or more CSI resource settings for channel measurement (CM) and interference measurement (IM) are established through higher layer signaling.

[0142] - CSI-IM resource for interference measurement.

[0143] - NZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement.

[0144] - NZP CSI-RS resources for channel measurement.

[0145] That is, the CMR (channel measurement resource) may be an NZP CSI-RS for CSI acquisition, and the IMR (Interference measurement resource) may be an NZP CSI-RS for CSI-IM and IM.

[0146] Here, CSI-IM (or ZP CSI-RS for IM) is primarily used for inter-cell interference measurements.

[0147] Also, the NZP CSI-RS for IM is mainly used for intra-cell interference measurement from multi-users.

[0148] A UE can assume that the CSI-RS resource(s) for channel measurement set for one CSI reporting and the CSI-IM / NZP CSI-RS resource(s) for interference measurement (when the NZP CSI-RS resource(s) are used for interference measurement) have a QCL relationship with respect to 'QCL-TypeD' on a resource-by-resource basis.

[0149] As examined, resource setting can refer to a resource set list.

[0150] For aperiodic CSI, each trigger state set using the higher layer parameter CSI-AperiodicTriggerState is associated with one or more CSI-ReportConfigs, and each CSI-ReportConfig is linked to a periodic, semi-persistent, or aperiodic resource setting.

[0151] One reporting setting (e.g., CSI-ReportConfig) can be associated with up to three resource settings (e.g., CSI-ResourceConfig). For example, one CSI reporting setting may include the ID (e.g., CSI-ResourceConfigId) of at least one CSI resource setting. The at least one CSI resource setting may include a CSI resource setting associated with a measurement.

[0152] Beam Management (BM)

[0153] BM procedures are L1 (layer 1) / L2 (layer 2) procedures for acquiring and maintaining a set of base station (e.g., gNB, TRP, etc.) and / or terminal (e.g., UE) beams that can be used for downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) transmission / reception, and may include the following procedures and terms.

[0154] - Beam measurement: An operation in which a base station or UE measures the characteristics of a received beamforming signal.

[0155] - Beam determination: The operation in which a base station or UE selects its transmit beam (Tx beam) / receive beam (Rx beam).

[0156] - Beam sweeping: An operation that covers a spatial area using transmitting and / or receiving beams for a set time interval in a predetermined manner.

[0157] - Beam report: An operation in which the UE reports information about the beam-formed signal based on beam measurements.

[0158] The BM procedure can be divided into (1) a DL BM procedure using an SS (synchronization signal) / PBCH (physical broadcast channel) Block or CSI-RS, and (2) a UL BM procedure using an SRS (sounding reference signal).

[0159] In addition, each BM procedure may include Tx beam sweeping to determine the Tx beam and Rx beam sweeping to determine the Rx beam.

[0160] DL BM

[0161] The DL BM procedure may include (1) transmission to beamformed DL RS (reference signals) of the base station (e.g., CSI-RS or SS Block (SSB)) and (2) beam reporting of the terminal.

[0162] Here, beam reporting may include preferred DL RS ID(identifier)(s) and the corresponding L1-RSRP(Reference Signal Received Power).

[0163] The above DL RS ID may be SSBRI (SSB Resource Indicator) or CRI (CSI-RS Resource Indicator).

[0164] An example of beam forming using SSB and CSI-RS will be examined in detail below.

[0165] SSB beams and CSI-RS beams can be used for beam measurement. The measurement metric is L1-RSRP per resource / block. SSB is used for coarse beam measurement, while CSI-RS can be used for fine beam measurement. SSB can be used for both Tx beam sweeping and Rx beam sweeping.

[0166] Rx beam sweeping using SSBs can be performed as the UE changes the Rx beam across multiple SSB bursts for the same SSBRI. Here, one SS burst includes one or more SSBs, and one set of SS bursts includes one or more SSB bursts.

[0167] The DL BM procedure is examined below.

[0168] Configuration for beam reporting using SSB is performed during CSI / beam configuration in the RRC connected state (or RRC connected mode).

[0169] - The terminal receives configuration information from the base station. As a specific example, the terminal receives from the base station a CSI-ResourceConfig IE containing a CSI-SSB-ResourceSetList containing SSB resources used for BM.

[0170] Table 1 shows an example of CSI-ResourceConfig IE. As shown in Table 1, BM configuration using SSB is not defined separately, and SSB is configured like a CSI-RS resource.

[0171]

[0172] In Table 1, the csi-SSB-ResourceSetList parameter represents a list of SSB resources used for beam management and reporting in a single CSI-RS resource set. Here, the SSB resource set can be set to {SSBx1, SSBx2, SSBx3, SSBx4, …}. For example, the SSB index can be defined from 0 to 63.

[0173] - The terminal receives a DownLink Reference Signal (DL RS) from the base station. As a specific example, the terminal receives an SSB resource from the base station based on the CSI-SSB-ResourceSetList.

[0174] - The terminal transmits a beam report to the base station. As a specific example, if a CSI-ReportConfig related to reporting on SSBRI (SSB Resource Indicator) and L1-RSRP is configured, the terminal reports the best SSBRI and the corresponding L1-RSRP to the base station.

[0175] That is, if the reportQuantity of the above CSI-ReportConfig IE is set to 'ssb-Index-RSRP', the terminal reports the best SSBRI and the corresponding L1-RSRP to the base station.

[0176] And, if the terminal has a CSI-RS resource configured in the same OFDM symbol(s) as the SSB (SS / PBCH Block) and 'QCL-TypeD' is applicable, the terminal can assume that the CSI-RS and SSB are quasi-co-located in terms of 'QCL-TypeD'.

[0177] Here, the above QCL Type D may mean that the antenna ports are QCL-connected in terms of spatial Rx parameters. When a terminal receives multiple DL antenna ports that are in a QCL Type D relationship, it is acceptable to apply the same receiving beam. Additionally, the terminal does not expect CSI-RS to be established in an RE that overlaps with the RE of the SSB.

[0178] The configuration for beam reporting using CSI-RS is performed in the same manner as the configuration for beam reporting using SSB described above, so a redundant explanation is omitted. The operation of the beam reporting procedure using CSI is described below.

[0179] - The terminal receives configuration information from the base station. As a specific example, the terminal receives from the base station a CSI-ResourceConfig IE containing a CSI-SSB-ResourceSetList containing CSI resources used for BM (e.g., NZP CSI-RS resource set IE).

[0180] - The terminal receives CSI-RS resources within the NZP CSI-RS resource set through different Tx beams (DL spatial domain transmission filters) of the base station.

[0181] - The terminal selects (or determines) the best beam.

[0182] - The terminal reports the ID and associated quality information (e.g., L1-RSRP) for the selected beam to the base station. In this case, the reportQuantity of the CSI report config can be set to 'cri-RSRP'.

[0183] Explanation regarding Rel-17 / 18 beam management >

[0184] In Rel-17, DL DCI (e.g., DCI format 1-1 or 1-2) can indicate both the DL TCI state and the UL TCI state, or it can indicate only the UL TCI state without specifying the DL TCI state. Consequently, the methods used in the existing R15 / R16 for configuring UL beam and power control (PC) are replaced in Rel-17 by the aforementioned method of indicating the UL TCI state. More specifically, in R17, a single UL TCI state can be indicated through the TCI field of the DL DCI; this UL TCI state is applied to all PUSCHs and all PUCCHs after a certain period known as the beam application time, and can be applied to some or all of the indicated SRS resource sets. Additionally, the base station can utilize DCI and / or MAC-CE to perform a terminal common beam update, which performs indication / updates for multiple specific DL / UL channel / RS combinations using a single beam (utilizing joint or separate TCI states). For the target channel / RS of the common beam update, UE-dedicated CORESET and UE-dedicated reception on PDSCH are available for DL, and DG / CG-PUSCH and all or subset of dedicated PUCCH are available for UL, and additionally, AP CSI-RS for tracking / BM and SRS can be set as target channel / RS.In Rel-18, considering the M-TRP environment, the method of indicating multiple UL TCI states (and / or DL ​​TCI states) through the TCI field of DL DCI was standardized, and depending on the S-DCI based M-TRP environment and the M-DCI based M-TRP environment, uplink and downlink resources to which each indicated TCI is applied can be defined / configured.

[0185] In this document, ' / ' means 'and', 'or', or 'and / or' depending on the context.

[0186] In this specification, 'beam' may refer to a source RS for a 'spatial filter' or 'spatial relation', and may be interpreted as a QCL (type-D) RS, a TCI state, or (in the case of an uplink) a spatial relation RS.

[0187] For example, in this specification, 'beam' may refer to a spatial filter determined based on the reference RS or the source RS. The spatial filter may include a spatial domain filter, a spatial domain transmission filter, and a spatial domain receive filter. For example, in this specification, 'beam' may be interpreted or substituted with a reference signal index (RS index), a reference signal resource index (RS resource index), and / or a resource indicator (e.g., RS index, SSB index, CSI-RS resource index, SRS resource index, SSB Resource Indicator (SSBRI), CSI-RS Resource Indicator (CRI), etc.).

[0188] For example, a beam associated with a UL may be referred to as i) a spatial filter (for uplink transmission or uplink reception), ii) a spatial domain filter (for uplink transmission or uplink reception), iii) an uplink spatial domain transmission filter, iv) an uplink spatial domain receive filter, v) an uplink transmission spatial filter (UL Tx spatial filter) or vi) an uplink receive spatial filter (UL Rx spatial filter).

[0189] For example, a beam associated with DL may be referred to as i) a spatial filter (for downlink transmission or downlink reception), ii) a spatial domain filter (for downlink transmission or downlink reception), iii) a downlink spatial domain transmission filter, iv) a downlink spatial domain receive filter, v) a downlink transmission spatial filter (DL Tx spatial filter), or vi) a downlink receive spatial filter (DL Rx spatial filter).

[0190] In NR standards, QCL configuration via TCI state settings and spatial relation configuration are utilized to configure the UL / DL transmit / receive beams of a terminal. In the Rel-15 NR standard, RRC and MAC CE signaling are primarily used for uplink and downlink transmit / receive beams. Dynamic signaling has been permitted only for the PDSCH receive beam by utilizing the TCI state field of the DL grant DCI. A unified TCI framework was introduced through the Rel-17 / 18 NR standards. Specifically, a method was introduced to dynamically manage the common beam by using DCI to indicate the indicated TCI for the receive / transmit beams. Meanwhile, in the Rel-18 AI / ML study item, a study was conducted on performance evaluation and specification impact regarding spatial beam prediction and temporal beam prediction sub-use cases in the field of beam management. This study discussed NW / UE-side AI / ML operations that predict the best beam of Set A based on Set B measurements. In the case of UE-side AI / ML, the behavior of the terminal measuring Set B and reporting the predicted Set A beam can be discussed in the Rel-19 AI / ML work item. In this case, if the terminal's beam prediction performance is poor, actions such as switching the terminal-side AI / ML model / functionality or falling back to non-AI / ML-based conventional beam management instead of AI / ML-based beam management (measurement / reporting) are necessary.

[0191] This specification proposes a performance monitoring method for a terminal-side AI / ML model and proposes an operation in which the terminal reports performance monitoring results to a base station when a specific event occurs.

[0192] < Background related to UE-initiated BM >

[0193] In existing LTE / NR systems, the reporting of terminal CSI / beam information is determined / controlled by the base station / network (except in the case of BFR). This network-initiated / triggered reporting method has a limitation in that terminals must be configured / instructed to send CSI / beam information frequently in environments where the wireless channel is likely to change rapidly. In such environments, problems arise where the overhead of UL resources for CSI / beam reporting and the related DL measurement RS increase, and the terminal's power consumption also increases due to frequent uplink transmissions. Furthermore, the more terminals there are within the cell / TRP coverage area, the greater the UL resource overhead becomes, as UL resources must be allocated to each terminal. To overcome these limitations of the network-initiated / triggered reporting method, the UE-initiated / triggered reporting method or the event-based / triggered reporting method has recently emerged.

[0194] In UE-initiated / triggered reporting or event-based / triggered reporting methods, the terminal decides whether to report and when to report. By performing the report only when necessary (e.g., only when a specific event occurs), UL resource overhead and terminal power consumption can be reduced. Motivated by this, standardization for UE-initiated / triggered beam reporting is scheduled to proceed in NR Rel-19. Furthermore, in 6G communication systems, UE-initiated / triggered or event-based transmission methods may be more actively expanded and applied to ensure the efficient operation of uplink resources.

[0195] In NR systems, representative reporting methods for event-based or UE-initiated / triggered information include SR (scheduling request) and BFR (beam failure recovery). SR reports whether PUSCH allocation is required for UL-SCH transmission, while BFR reports whether a BF has occurred and information related to the new beam. This information is transmitted to the base station via explicit or implicit means (e.g., delivering the new beam index as PRACH resource selection information). The aforementioned SR / BFR information is transmitted either simultaneously or in installments through one or two UL resources (e.g., BFRQ on PUCCH + beam information via MAC-CE on PUSCH).

[0196] In this specification, information transmitted to a network based on the terminal's event and / or via UE-initiated / triggered transmission methods as described above (e.g., SR, BFRQ, new beam information, etc.) is referred to as "event information" for the sake of convenience of explanation. Event information consists of one or more information parts / blocks, and encoding / rate matching / RE mapping may be performed on each part / block unit. Each information part / unit may be transmitted via a different transmission method (e.g., BFRQ via UCI as L1 message, new beam information via MAC-CE as L2 message).

[0197] < Background related to AI / ML beam management >

[0198] In the Rel-18 AI / ML study item, performance analysis and potential specification impact were studied through evaluation when NW and / or UE-side AI / ML models were operating in three use cases: CSI compression / prediction, beam management, and positioning. In particular, for the beam management use case, the study was conducted by dividing the sub-use cases into BM-case1 and BM-case2 to analyze performance and potential specification impact regarding spatial domain beam prediction and temporal beam prediction. The WID objectives of the AI / ML BM, as well as BM-case1 and BM-case2, are summarized in Tables 2 through 4 below.

[0199] - WID goals for AI / ML BM

[0200]

[0201] - BM-case1: Spatial domain downlink beam prediction for beam set A based on measurement results of beam set B

[0202]

[0203] - BM-case2: Temporal downlink beam prediction for Beam Set A based on historical measurement results of Beam Set B

[0204]

[0205] In addition, an example of the operation for data collection of an AI / ML model in a beam management use case is shown in Table 5 below.

[0206]

[0207] In addition, an example of the operation for inference of an AI / ML model in a beam management use case is shown in Table 6 below.

[0208]

[0209] Meanwhile, the Rel-18 AI / ML study discussed NW / UE-sided AI / ML operations that predict the best beam of Set A based on Set B measurements. In the case of UE-sided AI / ML, the terminal needs to measure Set B and report the predicted Set A beam, whereas in the case of NW-sided AI / ML, the terminal needs to report the Set B measurements.

[0210] The standardization agreements for UE-sided AI / ML to date are as follows.

[0211] Agreement

[0212] For UE-side models, at least for BM-Case1, the following is supported regarding the content of the inference result report.

[0213] Option 1: Beam information for the predicted Top K beams within the beam set

[0214] Option 2: Beam information for the predicted Top K beams within the beam set, and the RSRP of the predicted Top K beams

[0215] At least K=1, and for the maximum value, use FFS

[0216] For beam information, FFS

[0217] For the definition of the predicted Top K beam, FFS

[0218] For the definition of the reported RSRP where applicable, FFS

[0219] For other information within the report along with potential down selections among the following options, FFS

[0220] Option 3: Beam information for the predicted Top K beams within the beam set, and probability information for the predicted Top K beams

[0221] Regarding the quantization method of probability information, FFS

[0222] The probability information is the probability that the beam will become the Top 1 or Top K beam.

[0223] Option 4: Beam information for the predicted Top K beams within the beam set, the RSRP of the predicted Top K beams, and the reliability information of the corresponding RSRPs

[0224] Regarding the definition of the reported RSRP, FFS

[0225] Regarding the definition of reliability information and quantization methods, FFS

[0226] Other options are not excluded either.

[0227] Here, the beam set is Set A, which refers to the beams for UE prediction.

[0228] Conclusion

[0229] For the UE-side model, at least during inference, the configuration of Set B (Set B) for measurement is taken from the current CSI framework.

[0230] Agreement

[0231] Regarding UE-side AI / ML model inference, in the case of BM-Case2, one report supports reporting inference results for N (N≥1, FFS for N) future time points.

[0232] The inference result information for a given point in time is identical to one report in BM-Case1.

[0233] Note: Overhead reduction is not excluded.

[0234] Details are on FFS.

[0235] Agreement

[0236] Regarding the RSRP of the predicted Top K beam among the inference result reports for the UE-side model of BM-Case1, if applicable, the following options are additionally investigated.

[0237] Option A: Predicted RSRP

[0238] Option B: Predicted RSRP if the beam is not configured for the corresponding measurement, measured L1-RSRP if the beam is configured for the corresponding measurement

[0239] The predicted RSRP is based on AI / ML output.

[0240] Note: Supporting both Option A and Option B is not excluded.

[0241] Agreement

[0242] For the UE-side model, at least for BM Case-1, CSI-ReportConfig is used for the inference result reporting configuration.

[0243] For details within CSI-ReportConfig, consider FFS, at a minimum, the following:

[0244] Alternative 1: One CSI-ResourceConfigId is configured for Set B.

[0245] FFS: How can the UE determine information about Set A?

[0246] Alternative 2: A single CSI-ResourceConfigId is configured for both Set A and Set B

[0247] FFS: How to configure resource sets of Set A and Set B in CSI-ResourceConfig

[0248] Alternative 3: Separate CSI-ResourceConfigIds are configured for Set A and Set B, respectively.

[0249] Alternative 4: A single CSI-ResourceConfigId is configured for Set B, and Set A is configured using a separate set of resources not represented by the CSI-ResourceConfigId.

[0250] FFS: How to configure / direct a separate set of resources for Set A

[0251] Note: Using separate CSI-ReportConfigs for Set A and Set B is also not excluded.

[0252] Note: Measurements are not performed on Set A, and are performed only on Set B according to CSI-ReportConfig.

[0253] Regarding the association between Set A and Set B, regardless of the presence or absence of additional IE, FFS.

[0254] Other necessary components are not excluded.

[0255] Agreement

[0256] For UE-side AI / ML models in BM-Case1 and BM-Case2:

[0257] Support Type 1 Performance Monitoring, includes the following two options:

[0258] Option 1 (NW-side performance monitoring):

[0259] UE sends reports to NW (to calculate performance metrics in NW)

[0260] Measurement results from resource sets for monitoring (e.g., L1-RSRP and / or RS index) are supported as report content.

[0261] Other content is FFS

[0262] The report is set / triggered by at least NW

[0263] Note: This may or may not have an additional spec impact.

[0264] Option 2 (UE-supported performance monitoring):

[0265] UE calculates performance metrics

[0266] Regarding how to report and what to report, FFS

[0267] Whether to trigger reporting based on events for Option 1 and / or Option 2 is FFS

[0268] FFS Type 2 Performance Monitoring

[0269] Agreement

[0270] The following working assumptions have been established.

[0271] Working Assumption

[0272] In the inference result report for the UE-side model of BM-Case 2, the predicted RSRP of the beam is the predicted RSRP, and this predicted RSRP is based on the AI / ML output.

[0273] Agreement

[0274] For UE-side models, at least for the quantization of RSRP values ​​in inference result reports, the following is supported:

[0275] Support for differential RSRP reporting using existing quantization steps and ranges for L1-RSRP reporting

[0276] For BM-Case1, differential RSRP reporting between multiple beams is supported.

[0277] For BM-Case2, support for differential RSRP reporting between multiple beams across multiple time points.

[0278] Details are FFS

[0279] Agreement

[0280] For the UE-side model, at least in the case of BM Case-1, in the inference result report

[0281] In the CSI report configuration, two resource sets can be configured separately for Set A and Set B.

[0282] Whether to support configuring a resource set solely for Set B is FFS.

[0283] The UE performs measurements on the resource set of Set B for inference, and the UE is not expected to measure the resource set of Set A for inference.

[0284] The beam information in the inference report refers to the resource set of Set A.

[0285] Agreement

[0286] With respect to the UE-side AI / ML models in BM-Case1 and BM-Case2, for Option 2 (UE-supported performance monitoring), further review is conducted, including at least the following alternatives:

[0287] Alternative 1: Compare the Top 1 or Top K beams based on prediction results and measurements from resource sets / resources for monitoring, along with the presence or absence of margins for Top 1 or Top K beam prediction accuracy.

[0288] Alternative 2: Resource set for actual L1-RSRP measurements of one or more predicted Top K beams and monitoring / L1-RSRP difference information based on L1-RSRP measurements from resources

[0289] Alternative 3: RSRP difference information between the predicted RSRP and the measured L1-RSRP of the resource set / corresponding beam(s) of the resource for monitoring

[0290] Note: Resources of Set B for monitoring are not excluded and can be studied.

[0291] Note: This applies only if the model can predict RSRP.

[0292] Alternative 4: Probability information that the predicted beam(s) will become the Top 1 or Top K beams

[0293] Note: This applies only when the model can generate probability information.

[0294] FFS: For Alternatives 1 / 2 / 3, further review the details regarding how to configure resource sets / resources for monitoring.

[0295] Example: Whether / method to use the entire set of Set A for measurement. If not used, how to acquire measurements from the predicted Top 1 or Top K beams to calculate prediction accuracy or RSRP difference.

[0296] For all alternatives, we investigate whether performance information is calculated on a sample-by-sample basis (one-shot) or on a sample set basis (window).

[0297] Agreement

[0298] For the UE-side model of BM-Case 2, to report inference results, NW supports configuring the UE for N future points in time where applicable.

[0299] FFS: How to determine the reference time for those points in time

[0300] FFS: Predictable duration value at time N

[0301] Agreement

[0302] For UE-side AI / ML models in BM-Case1 and BM-Case2, in the case of Option 2 (UE-supported performance monitoring),

[0303] Support at least the following alternatives: Determine Top 1 or Top K beam prediction accuracy (with or without margins) by comparing the prediction results with the Top 1 or Top K beams based on measurements from the resource set / resources.

[0304] FFS: Detailed definition of the metric, including whether to configure or define a window for calculation

[0305] FFS: Includes other details related to how to configure resource sets / resources for monitoring, e.g.

[0306] Example: Whether / how to use the entire set of Set A for measurement. If the entire Set A is not configured, whether / how to define a metric.

[0307] FFS: Other Alternatives

[0308] Agreement

[0309] In BM-Case 2 of the UE-side model, the reference time of the earliest time instance for the prediction result considers at least the following potential down-selection alternatives:

[0310] Option 1: Based on the UL slot for reporting

[0311] Option 2: Based on CSI reference resources corresponding to the report

[0312] Option 3: Based on the latest transmission time of the CSI-RS / SSB resource within Set B for measurement for reporting, and this transmission time is not later than the CSI reference resource

[0313] Agreement

[0314] For UE-side AI / ML models, for BM-Case1, at least for inference, and for at least Set B, the following CSI-RS resource types for CMR are supported:

[0315] Periodic (P) CSI-RS

[0316] Semi-persistent (SP) CSI-RS

[0317] Aperiodic (AP) CSI-RS

[0318] For UE-side AI / ML models, for BM-Case 2, at least for inference, and for at least Set B, the following CSI-RS resource types for CMR are supported:

[0319] Periodic (P) CSI-RS

[0320] Semi-persistent (SP) CSI-RS

[0321] FFS: Aperiodic (AP) CSI-RS

[0322] Note: The above CSI-RS resources refer to resources used for beam management.

[0323] Agreement

[0324] For at least UE-side model monitoring of Monitoring Type 1 Option 2 (if applicable), consider at least the following options and include potential down-selection for monitoring configuration:

[0325] Option 1: Resource set(s) for monitoring and reporting configuration are configured within the CSI reporting configuration used for inference (if applicable).

[0326] FFS: Resource set(s) for monitoring

[0327] The UE measures resource set(s) for monitoring

[0328] FFS: When / how to report monitoring results

[0329] Option 2: Dedicated resource set(s) and reporting configuration for monitoring are configured within the dedicated CSI reporting configuration used for monitoring.

[0330] The dedicated reporting configuration used for monitoring is linked to the inference reporting configuration.

[0331] FFS: A method to check connectivity between RSs within resource set(s) for monitoring and Set A beams.

[0332] The UE measures resource set(s) for monitoring

[0333] FFS: When to report monitoring results

[0334] As mentioned above, in NR standards, QCL configuration via TCI state settings and spatialRelation configuration are utilized to configure the uplink and downlink receiver and transmitter beams of a terminal. In the Rel-15 NR standard, RRC and MAC CE signaling were primarily used for uplink and downlink receiver and transmitter beams, and dynamic signaling was permitted only for the PDSCH receiver beam by utilizing the TCI state field of the DL grant DCI. With the introduction of the unified TCI framework through the Rel-17 / 18 NR standards, a method for dynamically managing the common beam was introduced by indicating the TCI using DCI for receiver and transmitter beams. Meanwhile, in the Rel-18 AI / ML study item, a study was conducted on performance evaluation and specification impact regarding spatial beam prediction and temporal beam prediction sub-use cases in the field of beam management.

[0335] This study discussed NW / UE-sided AI / ML operations that predict the best beam of Set A based on Set B measurements. In the case of UE-sided AI / ML, the terminal needs to measure Set B and report the predicted Set A beam, while in the case of NW-sided AI / ML, the terminal needs to report the Set B measurements.

[0336] Additionally, BM-case1 and BM-case2 are supported for UE-sided AI / ML operations. BM-case1 is an operation for spatial domain DL Tx beam prediction (e.g., operation when the upper layer parameter nroftimeinstance is not set), and BM-case2 is an operation for temporal DL Tx beam prediction (e.g., operation when the upper layer parameter nroftimeinstance is set). Meanwhile, in Rel-19, Set A and Set B can be configured for the CSI report configuration for the inference result report (e.g., a CSI report containing predicted information (P-CRI, P-SSBRI, P-L1-RSRP)) in the BM-case1 and BM-case2 scenarios. In other words, two resource configurations connected to the CSI report configuration can be configured. The two resource configurations may include a first resource configuration for measurement (e.g., Set B configuration) and a second resource configuration for prediction (e.g., Set A configuration). Consensus was reached regarding the time domain behavior of CSI-RS that can be set as Set B.

[0337] In addition, discussions are underway regarding how to configure reports for performance monitoring during the DL Tx beam prediction operation of UE-sided AI / ML, and how to define metrics for performance monitoring.

[0338] Specifically, performance monitoring of AI / ML models / functionalities on the terminal side can be divided based on the monitoring results into whether the base station or the terminal makes the Life Cycle Management (LCM) decision for the said AI / ML model / functionality. In Rel-18 / 19, if the base station makes the LCM decision, it is defined as Type 1 performance monitoring, and if the terminal makes the LCM decision, it is defined as Type 2 performance monitoring. Type 1 monitoring can be further subdivided as follows.

[0339] Type 1 monitoring can be divided into i) Type 1 - Option 1 performance monitoring, which is an operation in which the base station side performs performance monitoring (by receiving the answer sheet for Set A from the terminal), and ii) Type 1 - Option 2 performance monitoring, in which the base station side performs performance monitoring but the terminal calculates and reports a performance metric (by verifying the answer sheet for Set A).

[0340] In addition, referring to the last agreement above, in Type 1 Option 2 of UE-side model monitoring where the terminal calculates and reports performance metrics, Option 1 and Option 2 are considered as methods for the report configuration for performance monitoring. Option 1 is a method in which the resource set for monitoring is also configured in the report configuration for inference. Option 2 is a method in which monitoring is performed by configuring a dedicated resource set in a separate report configuration (for performance monitoring purposes) independently of the report configuration for inference.

[0341] In the case of Option 1, Set A and Set B are configured in the report configuration for inference. The base station may set the pre-configured Set A (or a subset of Set A) as the resource set for monitoring, or configure a separate resource set other than Set A and Set B in the report configuration for inference. Based on this configuration, the terminal can perform performance monitoring of the AI / ML model while performing inference.

[0342] In the case of Option 2, a dedicated report configuration and a dedicated resource set are utilized for performance monitoring. Based on these settings, the terminal can perform performance monitoring of an AI / ML model. In this case, signaling is required to connect the dedicated report configuration with the corresponding report configuration for inference. Additionally, additional information regarding the relationship between the dedicated resource set and the beams of Set A, which serve as the ground truth, and related signaling are additionally required.

[0343] In this specification, a method for setting a performance monitoring related report when a terminal performs DL Tx beam prediction of BM-case1 / BM-case2 using UE-sided AI / ML is proposed, and a subsequent terminal operation is proposed.

[0344] In this specification, ' / ' may be interpreted as 'and', 'or', or 'and / or' depending on the context.

[0345] Proposal 1

[0346] The base station can set the resource set(s) for monitoring in the report configuration for inference (similar to Option 1 among the methods for report configuration for performance monitoring described above). The terminal can report the inference result using the report configuration, and the terminal can also report the performance monitoring result.

[0347] For example, the resource set(s) for monitoring may be i) Set A set in the report configuration for the inference or ii) a subset of Set A.

[0348] For example, the above performance monitoring result may be information based on a performance monitoring reporting method. As a specific example, the above reporting method may be a) or b) below.

[0349] a) A method in which the terminal reports measurement results for Set A and the base station calculates the metric (e.g., Option 1 of Type 1 performance monitoring)

[0350] b) A method in which the terminal performs measurements on Set A and calculates and reports performance metrics (e.g., Option 2 of Type 1 performance monitoring)

[0351] According to the reporting method described above, the performance monitoring result may include at least one of the following 1) to 5).

[0352] 1) Actual measurement results for Set A or a subset of Set A (e.g., actual measured Top-K beam (+ corresponding L1-RSRP value))

[0353] 2) Calculated performance metric value

[0354] 3) Information on whether the calculated performance metric value passes a predefined threshold (e.g., whether an event occurred)

[0355] 4) (Regarding Type 2 performance monitoring) Recommendation of LCM actions for the AI / ML model / functionality related to the inference based on the corresponding metric value (e.g., continue the model, switch the model, deactivate the model, or fallback to legacy beam report, etc.)

[0356] 5) LCM Decision Details (Regarding Type 2 Performance Monitoring)

[0357] In the following, Proposal 1-1 describes a method for reporting inference results (e.g., prediction-related information, P-CRI, P-SSBRI, P-L1-RSRP) and performance monitoring results (e.g., prediction accuracy indicator, PAI) together by utilizing the above-mentioned report configuration for inference (e.g., prediction-related reporting settings).

[0358] Proposal 1-1

[0359] Based on the report configuration for the inference in Proposal 1 above, the inference result and the performance monitoring result may be reported together. In this case, the transmission period of the resource set corresponding to Set A (or / and the terminal's reception period) may be longer than the transmission period of the resource set corresponding to Set B (or / and the terminal's reception period) (e.g., transmission period related to Set A > transmission period related to Set B). This takes into account the following technical considerations. When the terminal performs only inference, it is sufficient to measure only Set B without needing to measure Set A and report the predicted Set A Top-K beam corresponding to the AI / ML output. To prevent unnecessary base station transmission and terminal reception of the resource set corresponding to Set A, the transmission period related to Set A may be set / defined to be longer than the transmission period related to Set B.

[0360] However, when the terminal measures Set A corresponding to a longer period, ambiguity arises regarding the terminal's operation regarding at which reporting point the performance monitoring result should be reported. Additionally, if the inference result and the performance monitoring result are always reported together without defined criteria, the UL resource utilization and the accuracy of the monitoring results may be degraded. Embodiments for solving this problem 1 are described below. In this specification, the expression 'resource set (or resource) is transmitted / received' may be interpreted / replaced with 'Reference Signal (RS)(s) are transmitted / received (by the base station / terminal) based on the resource set (or resource).

[0361] Example 1 for solving Problem 1

[0362] The base station may set a specific valid period for reporting performance monitoring results in the terminal in the report configuration for the above-mentioned inference. If a resource set related to Set A is transmitted or received within the said valid period, the terminal may report the inference result and the performance monitoring result together. For example, a terminal (configured / defined to transmit a report containing the inference result at each reporting time) may transmit a report including the inference result and a performance monitoring report (based on the inference result and the reception of Set A) in addition to the inference result report at the first (valid) reporting time (in the time domain) after the time of receiving Set A.

[0363] Example 2 for solving Problem 1

[0364] The base station may set a specific valid period for reporting performance monitoring results in the report configuration for the above inference. If the reporting cycle of the above report configuration arrives within the said valid period, the terminal may report the inference result and the performance monitoring result together. For example, a terminal (configured / defined to transmit a report containing the inference result at each reporting cycle) may transmit a report that includes the inference result based on the Set A measurement immediately prior to the above reporting cycle (time domain), in addition to the performance monitoring report (based on the inference result and the reception of the said Set A).

[0365] Example 3 for solving Problem 1

[0366] The base station may set a specific valid period for reporting a performance monitoring result in the report configuration for the above inference. i) If a resource set related to Set A is transmitted / received within the said valid period, and ii) if the reporting cycle of the said report configuration arrives within the said period (condition: arrival of the reporting cycle after receiving Set A), the terminal may report the inference result and the performance monitoring result together. For example, a terminal (configured / defined to transmit a report containing the inference result at every reporting cycle) may transmit a report that includes the inference result report and a performance monitoring report (based on the inference result and the reception of Set A) in addition to the inference result report at the time of reporting after receiving the said Set A.

[0367] As a specific example of the above embodiments 1 / 2 / 3, it may be assumed that the transmission period of the resource set associated with Set A is 100 ms, and the transmission period of the resource set associated with Set B and the reporting period of the report configuration are 20 ms. In this case, for every transmission period (100 ms) of the resource set associated with Set A, the specific valid period may be set / defined with a length of 10 ms near the time of transmission / reception of the resource set associated with Set A. Depending on the conditions of each of the above embodiments, the terminal may perform inference result reporting and performance monitoring reporting together.

[0368] Example 4 for solving Problem 1

[0369] In the report configuration for the above inference, after a certain period of time (e.g., X symbols / slots) from the Set A transmission / reception time (e.g., symbol / slot), the terminal may report the inference result and the performance monitoring result together. For example, in the report configuration for the above inference, the performance monitoring result may be reported together by reporting the earliest (valid) inference result after X = 0, 1, 2, ... (symbol / slot) time from the Set A transmission / reception time (e.g., symbol / slot). For example, the X value may be set / instructed by the base station. For example, the X value may be predefined between the terminal and the base station.

[0370] Example 5 for solving Problem 1

[0371] In the report configuration for the above inference, S slots (where S is a natural number) can be determined, defined, or set as a valid period starting from the time of transmission / reception of Set A (e.g., slot). If the terminal performs an (inference) report related to the report configuration within the above valid period, the terminal may send a performance monitoring result (based on the reception of Set A) along with the inference result report. If the terminal does not perform an (inference) report within the above valid period, the terminal may not send the performance monitoring result. In other words, if the reporting time falls outside the above valid period, the terminal may report only the inference result.

[0372] Example 6 for solving Problem 1

[0373] In the report configuration for the above inference, whenever the inference result reporting cycle reaches B times, the terminal may report the inference result and the performance monitoring result together (B is a natural number).

[0374] For example, whenever the above reporting cycle reaches its Bth, the terminal may transmit a performance monitoring result (based on the reception of Set A) along with the inference result related to the report configuration.

[0375] For example, the above B value may be set to a terminal by a base station. For example, the B value may be determined / defined according to the transmission period of Set A (and Set B). As a specific example, the B value may be defined as ceil(transmission period of Set A / transmission period of Set B). As a specific example, the B value may be defined / determined as floor(transmission period of Set A / transmission period of Set B). As a specific example, the B value may be defined / determined based on ceil(transmission period of Set A / transmission period of Set B) and floor(transmission period of Set A / transmission period of Set B).

[0376] For example, in the above embodiments 1 to 6, the time of transmission / reception of Set A (e.g., symbol / slot) may be the time when the resource located first in time among the resources in the resource set associated with Set A is transmitted / received.

[0377] For example, in the above embodiments 1 to 6, the time of transmission / reception of Set A (e.g., symbol / slot) may be the time when the resource located last in time among the resources in the resource set associated with Set A is transmitted / received.

[0378] For example, in the above embodiments, whether to additionally report performance monitoring in the report configuration for inference can be turned on / off by base station settings (e.g., RRC / MAC CE / DCI).

[0379] For example, in the above embodiments, Set A can be replaced with a subset of Set A.

[0380] For example, in the above embodiments, the performance monitoring report may not be performed at every valid period. As a specific example, a single performance monitoring report within a single valid period may be an excessively instantaneous metric value, as it may be related to a metric for a single inference result at that point in time. Therefore, whenever N valid periods arrive (N is a natural number), the performance monitoring result of the above embodiments may be reported by the terminal (as a metric calculated value for N inference results). In other words, whenever N valid periods (accompanying the reporting cycle of the inference result) arrive, the terminal may report the performance monitoring result together with the inference result. The performance monitoring result may be based on metric(s) calculated / determined based on N inference results.

[0381] Since the valid period and the N value are set by the base station in the above operations, the base station can determine whether only the inference result is reported at a given reporting time and whether the performance monitoring result is also reported at a given reporting time. Therefore, regarding changes in the reporting payload size or / and changes in PUSCH / PUCCH resources based on whether the performance monitoring result is included, the base station can adaptively receive the corresponding report.

[0382] For example, an event regarding the performance monitoring result report can be configured on the terminal by the base station. For example, the event regarding the performance monitoring result report can be predefined. The terminal can perform the performance monitoring result report within a valid period only when the event configured / defined as above occurs (only when the conditions related to the event are satisfied).

[0383] As a specific example, if the metric calculated in each of the N valid periods is summed (the metric value for the N inference results) and is below or above a predefined threshold, the terminal can perform a report including the performance monitoring result when the N valid periods arrive. At this time, since the base station cannot know whether an event has occurred on the terminal side for each of the N valid periods, the base station can perform blind detection / decoding on the terminal report during valid periods when there is a possibility that the event report will be performed, on two types of reports: one reporting payload size in which only the inference result is reported, and another reporting payload size in which the performance monitoring result is also included.

[0384] Problem 2

[0385] In the above proposal 1, regarding the report configuration for inference, there are the following two reporting instances.

[0386] i) A reporting instance where the terminal performs only inference result reporting

[0387] ii) A reporting instance where the terminal performs performance monitoring result reporting in addition to inference result reporting

[0388] Accordingly, the reporting payload size may vary for each reporting instance of the report configuration. In this case, Problem 2 may occur, where the reported contents (e.g., inference result & performance monitoring result) exceed the maximum payload size of the PUCCH / PUSCH set for reporting related to the report configuration. Proposal 2 below describes a method to resolve Problem 2.

[0389] Proposal 2

[0390] When a terminal reports inference results and performance monitoring results together using an inference-related report configuration, the payload size associated with the report may exceed the maximum payload size of the PUCCH / PUSCH set for the report. The terminal may drop or omit specific reporting contents based on the following priority rule.

[0391] For example, the priority of reporting contents may be monitoring result > inference result. (Partial)drop / omission of the above inference result may be performed based on the following examples.

[0392] For example, in the case of inference results related to Top-K predicted results, the priority can be defined as Top-K < Top-(K-1) < .. < Top-1. The terminal can omit reporting information related to Top-K beams starting with the lowest priority. Specifically, the terminal can perform omissions in order of lowest priority (e.g., omission of reporting information related to Top-K, Top-(K-1..).

[0393] For example, in the relevant reporting instance, the terminal can drop / omission all inference result reports and perform only monitoring result reports.

[0394] Additionally, it can be assumed that the inference result and the measurement result related to Set A are the same. For example, it can be assumed that the predicted Top-K beams and the actual measured Top-K beams are all the same (i.e., the predicted beam accuracy is perfect) (the performance metric score is perfect). In such a case, in a reporting instance where monitoring reporting is also performed, the terminal may perform the report as follows. For example, the terminal may report only the information that it is perfect (e.g., O / X 1 bit) as the content of the performance monitoring result report. In other words, the terminal may report the inference result and the aforementioned 1 bit. For example, the terminal may omit the monitoring report itself. In this case, even if the report is omitted, since the base station recognizes that the time is a reporting instance where monitoring reporting is also performed, it may interpret / consider the terminal's intention of the report as the metric being perfect and operate accordingly.

[0395] The embodiments of the above proposals 1 and 2 may be operated by a combination of specific embodiments.

[0396] The embodiments of the above proposals 1 and 2 are applicable to Option 2 as a method for a report configuration for performance monitoring in Type 1 Option 2 of UE-side model monitoring. According to Option 2, a dedicated resource set is set as the resource set for monitoring, and a dedicated report configuration separate from the inference-related report configuration is set as the report configuration for performance monitoring.

[0397] An example of a terminal (or base station) operation based on at least one of the aforementioned embodiments (e.g., at least one of the embodiments of Proposal 1 to 2) is as follows.

[0398] 1) The terminal (base station) receives (transmits) settings related to beam measurement / reporting.

[0399] The above settings may include reporting settings related to Set A and Set B.

[0400] The report settings may include inference result reporting settings and / or monitoring result reporting settings.

[0401] 2) The terminal (base station) receives (transmits) a message scheduling the transmission of a beam measurement report.

[0402] The transmission of reports scheduled by the base station described above may have periodic / semi-persistent / aperiodic time domain behavior. For example, the report configuration type associated with the report may be set to periodic, semi-persistent, or aperiodic.

[0403] The above report may be an inference result report utilizing UE-sided AI / ML.

[0404] 3) The terminal (base station) transmits (receives) a beam measurement report based on the above message.

[0405] The above report may also include performance monitoring results of UE-sided AI / ML based on embodiments of proposals 1 and 2.

[0406] The above terminal / base station operation is merely an example, and each operation (or step) is not necessarily essential; depending on the terminal / base station implementation method, the beam measurement / reporting operation of the terminal according to the aforementioned embodiments may be omitted or added.

[0407] The above embodiments may be operated by a combination of specific embodiments.

[0408] In terms of implementation, the operations of the base station / terminal according to the embodiments described above (e.g., operations based on at least one of proposals 1 to 2) can be processed by the device of FIG. 9 (e.g., the processor (110, 210) of FIG. 9).

[0409] In addition, the operations of the base station / terminal according to the above-described embodiment (e.g., operations based on at least one of proposals 1 to 2) may be stored in memory (e.g., 140, 240 of FIG. 9) in the form of instructions / programs (e.g., instruction, executable code) for driving at least one processor (e.g., 110, 210 of FIG. 9).

[0410] The embodiments described above will be explained in detail below with reference to FIGS. 7 and FIGS. 8 regarding the operation of the terminal and base station. The methods described below are distinguished only for convenience of explanation, and it is understood that a part of one method may be substituted with a part of another method or combined with one another and applied.

[0411] FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method according to one embodiment of the present specification.

[0412] Referring to FIG. 7, a method according to one embodiment of the present specification includes a step of receiving setting information related to CSI (S710) and a step of transmitting CSI including information related to prediction (S720).

[0413] In S710, the terminal receives configuration information related to Channel State Information (CSI) from the base station.

[0414] For example, the above configuration information may include information based on at least one of the above-described CSI-related operations and proposals 1 to 2. As a specific example, the above configuration information may include i) one or more reporting settings (e.g., N≥1 CSI-ReportConfig reporting setting) and ii) one or more resource settings (e.g., M≥1 CSI-ResourceConfig resource setting).

[0415] Each of the above one or more reporting configurations may be associated with up to three resource configurations. In other words, each reporting configuration may include the IDs (e.g., CSI-ResourceConfigId) of up to three resource configurations.

[0416] The above one or more reporting settings may include at least one of i) a first reporting setting related to prediction and / or ii) a second reporting setting related to prediction accuracy.

[0417] For example, the report quantity of the first report setting above may be set to p-cri, p-cri-RSRP, p-ssb-index, or p-ssb-index-RSRP. p-cri represents the predicted CSI-RS Resource Indicator (P-CRI). p-ssb-index represents the predicted SSB Resource Indicator (P-SSBRI). In p-cri-RSRP or p-ssb-index-RSRP, RSRP represents the predicted Layer1-Reference Signal Received Power (P-L1-RSRP).

[0418] For example, the above prediction may be performed based on a measurement. The measurement may be performed based on a first resource configuration (e.g., CSI-ResourceConfig) associated with the first reporting configuration. For example, the first reporting configuration may be linked to a first resource configuration associated with the measurement and a second resource configuration associated with the prediction. The first reporting configuration may include the ID of the first resource configuration and the ID of the second resource configuration. Each ID may be based on the CSI-ResourceConfigId.

[0419] For example, the above measurements may include Layer1-Reference Signal Received Power (L1-RSRP) measurements. Based on the L1-RSRP measurements, i) at least one predicted CSI-RS Resource Indicator (P-CRI), ii) at least one predicted SSB Resource Indicator (P-SSBRI), and / or iii) at least one predicted Layer1-Reference Signal Received Power (P-L1-RSRP) may be determined.

[0420] More specifically, predictions for CSI-RS resources or SSB resources associated with the second resource configuration may be performed based on the L1-RSRP measurements. Specifically, predicted L1-RSRPs of CSI-RS resources or SSB resources associated with the second resource configuration may be determined. For example, best CRI(s) or best SSBRI(s) may be determined based on the order or ranking of the predicted L1-RSRPs. For example, information related to prediction included in the CSI described below (e.g., at least one P-CRI or at least one P-SSBRI) may be based on the best CRI(s) or best SSBRI(s).

[0421] For example, the report quantity of the second report setting above can be set to pai (or rs-pai).

[0422] The above one or more resource settings may include i) a first resource setting and a second resource setting related to the first reporting setting and / or ii) a third resource setting related to the second reporting setting.

[0423] Each resource configuration (e.g., CSI-ResourceConfig) may include information about a resource set (e.g., csi-SSB-ResourceSetList or nzp-CSI-RS-ResourceSetList based on csi-RS-ResourceSetList). For example, the resources within the resource set may be SSB resources or CSI-RS resources based on csi-RS-ResourceSetList. csi-SSB-ResourceSetList may include information for referencing the SSB resources (e.g., CSI-SSB-ResourceSetIds). nzp-CSI-RS-ResourceSetList may include information for referencing the CSI-RS resources (e.g., NZP-CSI-RS-ResourceSetIds).

[0424] For example, the first resource setting may include information about a first resource set for measurement (e.g., Set B described above). As a specific example, the first resource setting may include a list of SSB resources or CSI-RS resources for measurement.

[0425] For example, the second resource setting may include information regarding a second resource set for the prediction (e.g., Set A described above). As a specific example, the second resource setting may include a list of SSB resources or CSI-RS resources for the prediction. For example, the prediction accuracy indicator reported according to the embodiments of Proposal 1 described above may be determined based on a measurement based on the resource set associated with the second resource setting.

[0426] According to one embodiment, the setting information may include reporting setting(s) according to the above-described Option 1 or Option 2.

[0427] For example, the above setting information may include a reporting setting related to a prediction (e.g., the first reporting setting) (Option 1).

[0428] For example, the above setting information may include a reporting setting related to a prediction (e.g., the first reporting setting) and a reporting setting related to a prediction accuracy (or a prediction accuracy indicator) (e.g., the second reporting setting described above) (Option 2). In other words, the above setting information (including the reporting setting related to the prediction) may further include a reporting setting related to the prediction accuracy indicator (e.g., the second reporting setting).

[0429] In S720, the terminal transmits the CSI containing information related to the above prediction to the base station.

[0430] For example, the CSI may be based on an inference report in the embodiments described above. The information related to the prediction may include predicted CSI parameter(s). Specifically, the information related to the prediction may include predicted CSI parameter(s) (e.g., P-CRI(s), P-SSBRI(s), and / or P-L1-RSRP(s)) based on the report quantity of the reporting setting (e.g., the first reporting setting). Specifically, the CSI may include at least one of i) at least one predicted CSI-RS Resource Indicator (P-CRI), ii) at least one predicted SSB Resource Indicator (P-SSBRI), and / or iii) at least one predicted Layer1-Reference Signal Received Power (P-L1-RSRP).

[0431] According to one embodiment, the CSI may be transmitted, further including a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI) based on conditions.

[0432] For example, the above PAI may be based on the performance monitoring result described above. For example, the above PAI may be interpreted / replaced with a Reference Signal-Prediction Accuracy Indicator (RS-PAI). For example, the above PAI may be based on a hit rate. The hit rate may be determined based on whether an actual measured best beam (e.g., CRI / SSBRI) based on a measurement (e.g., a measurement based on a resource set related to the second resource setting described above) matches a top K beam(s) based on prediction (e.g., P-CRI / P-SSBRI(s)). Specifically, the above PAI may be determined based on whether at least one of the resources determined based on the measurement maps to the at least one P-CRI or the at least one P-SSBRI.

[0433] For example, the above conditions may be based on Examples 1 to 6 of Proposal 1-1. This will be explained in detail below.

[0434] According to one embodiment, a valid period related to monitoring may be set based on the reporting setting (e.g., the first reporting setting). The condition may be defined based on the valid period. This embodiment may be based on one of embodiments 1 to 3 of Proposal 1-1.

[0435] For example, the CSI further including the PAI may be transmitted based on the reception of reference signals based on a resource set associated with the report setting within the above effective period. This embodiment may be based on Embodiment 1 of Proposal 1-1.

[0436] For example, the CSI including the PAI may be transmitted based on the fact that the reporting cycle based on the above reporting setting has arrived within the above effective cycle. This embodiment may be based on Embodiment 2 of Proposal 1-1.

[0437] For example, i) reference signals based on a resource set associated with the reporting setting are received within the effective period, and ii) based on the fact that a reporting period based on the reporting setting has arrived within the effective period: the CSI further including the PAI may be transmitted. This embodiment may be based on Embodiment 3 of Proposal 1-1.

[0438] According to one embodiment, the condition may be defined based on a time point. Specifically, the CSI including the PAI may be transmitted after a time according to a specific value from the time point in which reference signals based on a resource set associated with the reporting setting are received. This embodiment may be based on Embodiment 4 of Proposal 1-1. The specific value may be based on the X value described above. The time according to the specific value may be X symbols or X slots.

[0439] According to one embodiment, the condition may be defined based on a valid period associated with monitoring. The valid period may be defined as slots after the point in time when reference signals based on a resource set associated with the reporting setting are received. Within the slots, the CSI including the PAI may be transmitted. This embodiment may be based on Example 5 of Proposal 1-1. The slots may be based on the aforementioned S slots (S is a natural number).

[0440] According to one embodiment, the condition may be defined based on a reporting period associated with the reporting setting. Whenever the reporting period arrives a specific number of times, the CSI including the PAI may be transmitted. This embodiment may be based on Example 6 of Proposal 1-1. The specific number of times may be based on the B value described above.

[0441] According to one embodiment, based on the maximum payload size associated with Uplink Control Information (UCI), a portion of the CSI including the information associated with the prediction and the PAI may be omitted or dropped. This embodiment may be based on Proposal 2.

[0442] For example, the portion of the above CSI may be the information related to the above prediction. In this case, the above CSI may include only the above PAI.

[0443] For example, the portion of the above CSI may include a portion of the information related to the prediction determined based on a priority order. Specifically, the information related to the prediction may be based on the predicted CSI parameters described above (e.g., P-CRI(s) / P-SSBRI(s) / P-L1-RSRP(s) related to the Top-1 beam, Top-2 beam, etc., Top-K beam). Among the predicted CSI parameters, at least one predicted CSI parameter may be determined based on a priority order. The at least one predicted CSI parameter may be omitted or dropped. In other words, among the predicted CSI parameters, the predicted CSI parameter with the lowest priority level (e.g., P-CRI / P-SSBRI / P-L1-RSRP related to the Top-K beam among the Top-1 beam, Top-2 beam, etc., Top-K beam) may be omitted or dropped first.

[0444] For example, the above CSI can be interpreted / replaced with a CSI report.

[0445] In the embodiments described above, the resource set associated with the report configuration may be i) Set A (e.g., the second resource configuration), ii) a subset of Set A (e.g., a subset of the second resource configuration), or iii) a dedicated resource set for monitoring (e.g., a dedicated resource set associated with the dedicated report configuration for monitoring in the case of Option 2).

[0446] Specifically, the resource set associated with the report setting may be based on i) a resource setting associated with the report setting, ii) a subset of the resource setting associated with the report setting, or iii) a resource setting associated with a report setting connected to the report setting (e.g., the second report setting) (e.g., the third resource setting). For example, the report setting connected to the report setting may be a report setting associated with the prediction indicator included in the setting information (e.g., the second report setting).

[0447] Operations based on S710 to S720 described above can be implemented by the device of FIG. 9. For example, referring to FIG. 9, the terminal (200) can control one or more transceivers (230) and / or one or more memories (240) to perform operations based on S710 to S720.

[0448] The embodiments described above will be explained in detail below in terms of base station operation.

[0449] S810 to S820 described below correspond to operations based on S710 to S720 described in FIG. 7. Considering the above correspondence, redundant descriptions are omitted. That is, the specific description of the base station operation described below can be replaced by the description / embodiment of FIG. 7 corresponding to the operation.

[0450] FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a method according to another embodiment of the present specification.

[0451] Referring to FIG. 8, a method according to another embodiment of the present specification includes a step of transmitting setting information related to CSI (S810) and a step of receiving CSI including information related to prediction (S820).

[0452] In S810, the base station transmits configuration information related to Channel State Information (CSI) to the terminal.

[0453] For example, the above setting information may include a reporting setting related to a prediction (e.g., the first reporting setting) (Option 1).

[0454] For example, the above setting information may include a reporting setting related to a prediction (e.g., the first reporting setting) and a reporting setting related to a prediction accuracy (or a prediction accuracy indicator) (e.g., the second reporting setting described above) (Option 2). In other words, the above setting information (including the reporting setting related to the prediction) may further include a reporting setting related to the prediction accuracy indicator (e.g., the second reporting setting).

[0455] In S820, the base station receives the CSI containing information related to the prediction from the terminal.

[0456] According to one embodiment, the CSI may be received, further including a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI) based on conditions.

[0457] Operations based on the above-described S810 to S820 can be implemented by the device of FIG. 9. For example, referring to FIG. 9, a base station (100) can control one or more transceivers (130) and / or one or more memories (140) to perform operations based on S810 to S820.

[0458] The operations / terms based on the embodiments described above are described under the assumption of an existing system (e.g., a 5G system). However, this is for the convenience of explanation and is not intended to limit the scope of application of the technical problems and means for solving problems that are to be solved by this specification to a specific system. That is, the technical problems / technical issues / problems mentioned in this specification may exist in other systems (e.g., a 6G system). It is evident that the embodiments of this specification can be extended to solve problems that exist in other systems as well. Therefore, for the extended application of the embodiments of this specification to other systems, terms defined / described based on a 5G system may be replaced / changed with terms defined in other systems (or generalized terms not specific to one system). For example, PRACH, PUSCH, PUCCH, or SRS may be replaced / changed to uplink signals (or uplink channels). For example, SSB, CSI-RS, PDSCH, and PDCCH may be replaced / changed to downlink signals (or downlink channels).

[0459] Hereinafter, an apparatus to which the embodiments of the present specification can be applied (an apparatus implementing the method / operation according to the embodiments of the present specification) will be described with reference to FIG. 9.

[0460] FIG. 9 is a drawing showing the configuration of a first device and a second device according to an embodiment of the present specification.

[0461] The first device (100) may include a processor (110), an antenna unit (120), a transceiver (130), and a memory (140).

[0462] The processor (110) performs baseband-related signal processing and may include an upper layer processing unit (111) and a physical layer processing unit (115). The upper layer processing unit (111) may process operations of the MAC layer, RRC layer, or higher upper layers. The physical layer processing unit (115) may process operations of the PHY layer. For example, if the first device (100) is a base station device in base station-terminal communication, the physical layer processing unit (115) may perform uplink reception signal processing, downlink transmission signal processing, etc. For example, if the first device (100) is a first terminal device in terminal-terminal communication, the physical layer processing unit (115) may perform downlink reception signal processing, uplink transmission signal processing, sidelink transmission signal processing, etc. In addition to performing baseband-related signal processing, the processor (110) may also control the overall operation of the first device (100).

[0463] The antenna section (120) may include one or more physical antennas, and if it includes multiple antennas, it may support MIMO transmission and reception. The transceiver (130) may include an RF (Radio Frequency) transmitter and an RF receiver. The memory (140) may store information processed by the processor (110) and software, operating systems, applications, etc. related to the operation of the first device (100), and may include components such as a buffer.

[0464] The processor (110) of the first device (100) may be configured to implement the operation of the base station in base station-terminal communication (or the operation of the first terminal device in terminal-terminal communication) in the embodiments described in this disclosure.

[0465] The second device (200) may include a processor (210), an antenna unit (220), a transceiver (230), and a memory (240).

[0466] The processor (210) performs baseband-related signal processing and may include an upper layer processing unit (211) and a physical layer processing unit (215). The upper layer processing unit (211) may process operations of the MAC layer, RRC layer, or higher upper layers. The physical layer processing unit (215) may process operations of the PHY layer. For example, if the second device (200) is a terminal device in base station-terminal communication, the physical layer processing unit (215) may perform downlink reception signal processing, uplink transmission signal processing, etc. For example, if the second device (200) is a second terminal device in terminal-terminal communication, the physical layer processing unit (215) may perform downlink reception signal processing, uplink transmission signal processing, sidelink reception signal processing, etc. In addition to performing baseband-related signal processing, the processor (210) may also control the overall operation of the second device (210).

[0467] The antenna section (220) may include one or more physical antennas, and may support MIMO transmission and reception if it includes multiple antennas. The transceiver (230) may include an RF transmitter and an RF receiver. The memory (240) may store information processed by the processor (210) and software, operating systems, applications, etc. related to the operation of the second device (200), and may include components such as a buffer.

[0468] The processor (210) of the second device (200) may be configured to implement the operation of the terminal in base station-terminal communication (or the operation of the second terminal device in terminal-terminal communication) in the embodiments described in this disclosure.

[0469] In the operation of the first device (100) and the second device (200), the details described in the examples of the present disclosure regarding the base station and terminal (or the first terminal and the second terminal in terminal-to-terminal communication) in base station-to-terminal communication may be applied in the same way, and redundant descriptions are omitted.

[0470] Here, the wireless communication technology implemented in the device of the present disclosure may include LTE, NR, and 6G, as well as Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) for low-power communication. For example, NB-IoT technology may be an example of Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) technology and may be implemented according to standards such as LTE Cat NB1 and / or LTE Cat NB2, but is not limited to the names mentioned above.

[0471] Additionally or alternatively, the wireless communication technology implemented in the device of the present disclosure may perform communication based on LTE-M technology. For example, LTE-M technology may be an example of LPWAN technology and may be referred to by various names such as eMTC (enhanced Machine Type Communication). For example, LTE-M technology may be implemented in at least one of various standards such as 1) LTE CAT 0, 2) LTE Cat M1, 3) LTE Cat M2, 4) LTE non-BL (non-Bandwidth Limited), 5) LTE-MTC, 6) LTE Machine Type Communication, and / or 7) LTE M, and is not limited to the names mentioned above.

[0472] Additionally or generally, the wireless communication technology implemented in the device of the present disclosure may include at least one of ZigBee, Bluetooth, and a Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) for low-power communication, but is not limited to the names mentioned above. For example, ZigBee technology can create personal area networks (PANs) related to small / low-power digital communication based on various standards such as IEEE 802.15.4 and may be referred to by various names.

Claims

1. Regarding the method, A step of receiving configuration information related to Channel State Information (CSI), wherein the configuration information includes reporting settings related to prediction; and The method includes the step of transmitting the CSI containing information related to the above prediction; wherein A method characterized by transmitting the above CSI, which further includes a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI), based on conditions.

2. In Paragraph 1, Based on the above reporting settings, a valid period related to monitoring is set, and A method characterized by the above conditions being defined based on the above effective period.

3. In Paragraph 2, A method characterized by transmitting the CSI further including the PAI based on the reception of reference signals based on a resource set associated with the report setting within the above effective period.

4. In Paragraph 2, A method characterized by transmitting the CSI further including the PAI based on the fact that the reporting cycle based on the above reporting settings has arrived within the above valid cycle.

5. In Paragraph 2, i) Reference signals based on a resource set associated with the reporting setting are received within the above effective period, and ii) based on the fact that a reporting period based on the reporting setting has arrived within the above effective period: A method characterized by transmitting the above CSI, which further includes the above PAI.

6. In Paragraph 1, The above conditions are defined based on time, and A method characterized by transmitting the CSI, which further includes the PAI, after a time according to a specific value from the point in time when reference signals based on a resource set associated with the above reporting settings are received.

7. In Paragraph 1, The above conditions are defined based on the valid period related to monitoring, and The above effective period is defined as slots after the point in time when reference signals based on the resource set associated with the above reporting setting are received, and A method characterized by transmitting the CSI, which further includes the PAI, within the above slots.

8. In Paragraph 1, The above conditions are defined based on the reporting cycle associated with the above reporting settings, and A method characterized by transmitting the CSI containing the PAI whenever the above reporting cycle arrives a specific number of times.

9. In Paragraph 1, A method characterized by the above setting information further including a reporting setting related to the above prediction accuracy indicator.

10. In Paragraph 1, A method characterized by omitting or dropping a portion of the CSI, including the information related to the prediction and the PAI, based on the maximum payload size associated with Uplink Control Information (UCI).

11. In Paragraph 10, A method characterized in that the portion of the above CSI is the above information related to the above prediction.

12. In Paragraph 10, A method characterized in that the portion of the above CSI includes a portion of the above information related to the above prediction determined based on priority order.

13. In Paragraph 3, Paragraph 5, Paragraph 6, or Paragraph 7, A method characterized in that the resource set associated with the above-mentioned report setting is based on i) a resource setting associated with the above-mentioned report setting, ii) a subset of the resource setting associated with the above-mentioned report setting, or iii) a resource setting associated with the report setting connected to the above-mentioned report setting.

14. In the terminal, One or more transmitters / receivers; One or more processors; and It includes one or more memories connected to the above one or more processors and storing instructions, A terminal characterized by the above instructions enabling the terminal to perform all steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, based on execution by the one or more processors.

15. A device comprising one or more memories and one or more processors connected to the one or more memories, An apparatus characterized in that the above one or more memories store instructions that cause the apparatus to perform all steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, based on execution by the above one or more processors.

16. In a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for storing instructions, A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium characterized by instructions executable by one or more processors such that the terminal performs all steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 13.

17. Regarding the method, A step of transmitting configuration information related to Channel State Information (CSI), wherein the configuration information includes reporting settings related to prediction; and The method includes the step of receiving the CSI containing information related to the above prediction; wherein A method characterized by receiving the above CSI, which further includes a prediction accuracy indicator (PAI) based on conditions.

18. Regarding base stations, One or more transmitters / receivers; One or more processors; and It includes one or more memories connected to the above one or more processors and storing instructions, A base station characterized by the above instructions, based on execution by one or more processors, having the base station perform all steps of the method according to claim 17.