Method for evaluating cooperation relationship between human and environmental factors

Abstract

The invention, which belongs to the technical field of human factor engineering, discloses a method for evaluating a collaborative relationship between human and environmental factors, comprising the steps of construction of an evaluation index system, data collection, data analysis and evaluation, and result analysis and application. The construction of the evaluation index system comprises human factor indexes and environment factor indexes, the human factor indexes comprise environment cognition, environment behaviors and environment demand satisfaction degree, and the environment factor indexes comprise natural environment factors and artificial environment factors; the data collection method comprises the steps of questionnaire survey, field observation, data detection, literature lookup and department data collection. The data analysis comprises data preprocessing, index weight determination, comprehensive evaluation model construction and evaluation grade division; the analysis and application of the result comprise result analysis, strategy making and dynamic monitoring and adjustment, the analytic hierarchy process is adopted to determine the weight of each evaluation index, a comprehensive evaluation model is constructed, and evaluation grade division is carried out, so that the evaluation result is more scientific and objective.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The application discloses a method for evaluating the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, belonging to the technical field of human factors engineering. BACKGROUND

[0002] The cooperative relationship between human and environment is crucial for human survival, development and ecological balance. Accurate evaluation of this relationship helps to identify problems and develop reasonable strategies. This relationship involves the impact of human activities on the environment and the feedback of the environment on human activities. Therefore, accurate evaluation of the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors helps us to identify problems and develop reasonable strategies, thereby promoting the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. However, existing evaluation methods often have problems such as imperfect index system, incomplete data collection, and unscientific analysis method, resulting in inaccurate evaluation results and unreasonable strategy development. SUMMARY

[0003] The technical problem to be solved by the present application is to overcome the problems in the prior art, and to provide a method for evaluating the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, so as to solve the above problems.

[0004] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the present application provides the following technical scheme: a method for evaluating the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, comprising the construction of evaluation index system, data collection, data analysis and evaluation, and result analysis and application;

[0005] The construction of the evaluation index system includes human factor index and environmental factor index, the human factor index includes environmental cognition, environmental behavior and environmental demand satisfaction degree, and the environmental factor index includes natural environmental factor and artificial environmental factor;

[0006] The data collection method includes questionnaire survey, field observation, data detection, literature review and department data collection;

[0007] The data analysis includes data preprocessing, index weight determination, comprehensive evaluation model construction and evaluation grade division;

[0008] The result analysis and application includes result analysis, strategy development, dynamic monitoring and adjustment.

[0009] As a preferred, the environmental cognition is to understand the awareness of people on environmental problems and environmental protection knowledge through questionnaire survey, and the cognition of local main environmental pollutants, and the proportion of answering related questions is taken as a quantitative index, and the score is 80-100 points for high cognition level, 50-79 points for medium, and below 50 points for low cognition level;

[0010] The environmental behavior is observing and counting the daily environmental protection behaviors of individuals, such as garbage classification, resource conservation, and water and electricity usage, and quantifying the number of times of correct garbage classification per week, the amount of water and electricity conservation per month, and the like;

[0011] The environmental demand satisfaction degree is understood by means of interviews and questionnaires, and the demand satisfaction degree of people to living environment and working environment is scored and evaluated by 1-5 points, 1 point for extremely unsatisfied, and 5 points for very satisfied;

[0012] The living environment includes living comfort and leisure space, and the working environment includes office environment comfort and working place surrounding environment.

[0013] As preferred, the natural environment factor includes climate condition and ecological resource, the climate condition refers to collecting data of temperature, humidity, precipitation, and wind speed, and evaluating the suitability of human activities; the ecological resource is calculating forest coverage, water resource availability, and biodiversity index, the forest coverage can be directly obtained from relevant geographic information data, and the biodiversity index is calculated by species richness and evenness;

[0014] The artificial environment factor includes infrastructure and environmental pollution condition; the infrastructure is evaluating traffic convenience and public service facilities, and the environmental pollution condition is monitoring atmospheric pollutant concentration and water pollutant index;

[0015] The evaluation of traffic convenience includes bus station coverage rate and road congestion index, and the public service facilities include accessibility of hospitals and schools;

[0016] The monitoring of atmospheric pollutant concentration includes monitoring concentration indexes of PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide in the air, and the water pollutant index includes detecting indexes of chemical oxygen demand and ammonia nitrogen in water, and the index data takes whether reaching the national environmental quality standard as the measurement basis;

[0017] The bus station coverage rate can be obtained by calculating the ratio of service area to total area, and the road congestion index can be obtained by means of traffic monitoring system data.

[0018] As preferred, the questionnaire survey is designing questionnaires for different groups of people, and widely collecting data by means of combination of online platform and offline field distribution;

[0019] The field observation is setting observation points in different areas, observing the behavior activities of people, and recording the surrounding environment conditions;

[0020] The data detection is using professional environmental monitoring equipment, such as air quality monitoring station and water quality monitor, to collect environmental factor data for a long time and continuously;

[0021] The literature review and department data collection is to review relevant statistical yearbooks and research reports, obtain regional population data and economic development data, and collect official environmental monitoring data and planning data from environmental protection, meteorological, traffic and other departments.

[0022] Preferably, the data preprocessing is to clean the collected data, remove outliers and error data;

[0023] The index weight determination is to determine the weight of each evaluation index by using the analytic hierarchy process, invite experts in the fields of environmental science and sociology to score the relative importance of each index, construct a judgment matrix, and calculate the weight of each index, and the weight proportion is: the environmental cognition weight is 0.1, the environmental behavior weight is 0.2, and the environmental demand satisfaction degree weight is 0.2;

[0024] The comprehensive evaluation model construction is to construct a comprehensive evaluation model by using a linear weighting method, and the calculation formula is: Wherein C is the comprehensive evaluation score, W i is the weight of the i th index, X i is the standardized score of the i th index, and the index standardization adopts the range standardization method to convert the index values to the [0, 1] interval;

[0025] The evaluation grade division is to divide the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors into four grades according to the comprehensive evaluation score: C is greater than or equal to 0.8, which is excellent, indicating that the cooperation relationship between people and environment is good and promotes each other; 0.6 is less than or equal to C and less than 0.8, which is good, and the cooperation relationship is basically coordinated, but there is still room for improvement; 0.4 is less than or equal to C and less than 0.6, which is general, and some problems need to be paid attention to; C is less than 0.4, which is poor, and the cooperation relationship between people and environment is in conflict, and measures need to be taken to improve it.

[0026] Preferably, the result analysis is to analyze the evaluation results in depth and find out the key factors affecting the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors;

[0027] The strategy development is to develop targeted improvement strategies according to the result analysis, develop strict pollution control measures for areas with serious environmental problems, and carry out environmental protection propaganda and education activities to improve the public environmental protection consciousness for the case of poor environmental behavior of people;

[0028] The dynamic monitoring and adjustment need to evaluate the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors regularly, track the implementation effect of the strategy, and adjust the strategy in time according to the new evaluation results, so as to ensure the effectiveness and adaptability of the evaluation method and improvement measures.

[0029] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present application are as follows:

[0030] The present application has the characteristics of science, system and comprehensiveness, and can accurately reflect the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors. By constructing an evaluation index system including human factor indexes and environmental factor indexes, the present application can comprehensively consider the interaction between human activities and environmental factors. At the same time, a variety of data collection methods are adopted, including questionnaire survey, field observation, data detection, literature search and department data collection, to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data. In terms of data analysis, the present application adopts the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each evaluation index, constructs a comprehensive evaluation model, and divides the evaluation grades, so that the evaluation result is more scientific and objective.

[0031] By applying the method of the present application, we can deeply analyze the key factors of the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, and develop targeted improvement strategies. For areas with serious environmental problems, strict pollution control measures can be developed; for cases where human environmental behavior is poor, environmental protection propaganda and education activities can be carried out to improve public environmental awareness. In addition, the method of the present application also has the functions of dynamic monitoring and adjustment, which can periodically evaluate the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, track the implementation effect of the strategy, and adjust the strategy in time according to the new evaluation result, to ensure the effectiveness and adaptability of the evaluation method and improvement measures. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described clearly and completely below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative labor fall within the scope of protection of the present application.

[0033] A method for evaluating the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, the specific implementation is as follows:

[0034] I. Construction of evaluation index system

[0035] 1. Human factor indexes

[0036] Environmental cognition: Through questionnaire survey, understand the awareness of people on environmental problems and environmental protection knowledge, such as the cognition of local main environmental pollutants. Take the proportion of answering related questions as a quantitative index, such as scoring 80-100 points for high cognition level, 50-79 points for medium, and 50 points or less for low cognition level.

[0037] Environmental behavior: Observe and count individual daily environmental protection behavior, such as garbage classification, resource saving (water and electricity usage), etc. Quantify by the number of times of correct garbage classification per week, water and electricity saving amount per month, etc.

[0038] Environmental demand satisfaction: Using a combination of interviews and questionnaires, understand people's demand satisfaction for living environment (such as living comfort, leisure space), work environment (such as office environment comfort, work environment surrounding environment), scoring evaluation from 1-5 points, 1 point for extremely dissatisfied, 5 points for very satisfied.

[0039] 2、Environmental factor index

[0040] Natural environmental factors: including climate conditions and ecological resources. Climate conditions refer to the collection of temperature, humidity, precipitation, wind speed data, and evaluation of its suitability for human activities. Ecological resources are calculated by forest coverage, water resource availability, and biodiversity index. Forest coverage can be directly obtained from relevant geographic information data, and biodiversity index is calculated by species richness and evenness.

[0041] Artificial environmental factors: including infrastructure and environmental pollution status. Infrastructure is to evaluate traffic convenience (including bus stop coverage and road congestion index), public service facilities (including accessibility of hospitals and schools). Environmental pollution status is to monitor air pollutant concentration (including PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide concentration index in the air) and water pollutant index (including chemical oxygen demand and ammonia nitrogen index in water), and the index data is measured by whether it meets the national environmental quality standard.

[0042] II. Data collection methods

[0043] 1. Questionnaire survey: Design questionnaires for different groups of people (such as residents, office workers, students), collect data through online platforms (such as WJX) and offline field distribution. Plan to distribute 1000 questionnaires, and collect not less than 800 valid questionnaires.

[0044] 2. Field observation: Set observation points in different areas (city center, suburb, industrial area, etc.), observe people's behavior activities (such as activity type, time distribution), and record the surrounding environment at the same time. Each observation point observes at least 4 hours a day, and observes for one month.

[0045] 3. Data monitoring: Use professional environmental monitoring equipment such as air quality monitoring station and water quality monitor to collect environmental factor data for a long time and continuously. The data collection frequency is once an hour to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data.

[0046] 4. Literature review and department data collection: Review relevant statistical yearbooks and research reports to obtain regional population data and economic development data. At the same time, collect official environmental monitoring data and planning materials from environmental protection, meteorological, transportation and other departments.

[0047] III. Data analysis and evaluation methods

[0048] 1. Data preprocessing: Clean the collected data to remove outliers and incorrect data. For example, for environmental monitoring data that deviates significantly from the normal range, verify and correct it by comparing with surrounding monitoring point data, equipment calibration, etc.

[0049] 2. Determination of index weight: Determine the weight of each evaluation index by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Invite experts in the fields of environmental science, sociology, etc. to score the relative importance of each index, build a judgment matrix, and calculate the weight of each index. For example, after calculation, the weight of environmental cognition is 0.1, the weight of environmental behavior is 0.2, and the weight of environmental demand satisfaction is 0.2. The weights of the remaining environmental factor indexes are allocated according to the specific circumstances.

[0050] 3. Construction of comprehensive evaluation model: Construct the comprehensive evaluation model by using the linear weighting method. The calculation formula is: where C is the comprehensive evaluation score, W i is the weight of the i-th index, and X i is the standardized score of the i-th index. The index standardization uses the range standardization method to convert the index values to the [0, 1] interval.

[0051] 4. Evaluation grade division: According to the comprehensive evaluation score, the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors is divided into four grades: C≥0.8 is excellent, indicating that the cooperation relationship between people and environment is good and mutually promoting; 0.6≤C<0.8 is good, the cooperation relationship is basically coordinated, but there is still room for improvement; 0.4≤C<0.6 is general, there are some problems that need attention; and C<0.4 is poor, the cooperation relationship between people and environment is in conflict and urgent measures need to be taken to improve it.

[0052] Four, result analysis and application

[0053] 1. Result analysis: Analyze the evaluation results in depth to find out the key factors affecting the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors. For example, if the comprehensive evaluation score of a certain area is low, it is found through analysis that it is due to the low score of the environmental pollution status index, and further exploration is needed to find out which pollutants are over-standard.

[0054] 2. Strategy development: According to the result analysis, develop targeted improvement strategies. For areas with serious environmental problems, develop strict pollution control measures; for cases where people's environmental behavior is poor, carry out environmental protection propaganda and education activities to improve public environmental awareness.

[0055] 3. Dynamic monitoring and adjustment: Evaluate the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors regularly (e.g. every year), track the implementation effect of the strategy, and adjust the strategy in a timely manner according to the new evaluation results to ensure the effectiveness and adaptability of the evaluation method and improvement measures.

[0056] The application can accurately reflect the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors. By constructing an evaluation index system including human factor indexes and environmental factor indexes, the application can comprehensively consider the interaction between human activities and environmental factors. At the same time, a variety of data collection methods are adopted, including questionnaire survey, field observation, data detection and literature review and department data collection, to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data. In terms of data analysis, the application adopts the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each evaluation index, constructs a comprehensive evaluation model, and carries out evaluation grade division, so that the evaluation result is more scientific and objective. Through the application of the method of the application, we can deeply analyze the key factors of the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, and develop targeted improvement strategies. For the areas where environmental problems are prominent, strict pollution control measures can be developed; for the case where the environmental behavior of human is poor, environmental protection propaganda and education activities can be carried out to improve the public environmental protection consciousness. In addition, the method of the application also has the functions of dynamic monitoring and adjustment, can regularly evaluate the cooperative relationship between human and environmental factors, track the implementation effect of the strategy, and adjust the strategy in time according to the new evaluation result, to ensure the effectiveness and adaptability of the evaluation method and improvement measures.

[0057] Although embodiments of the present application have been shown and described, it is to be understood that various modifications, substitutions, replacements and changes can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the present application, and the scope of the present application is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the relationship of a human being with an environmental factor, characterized by, The method comprises the following steps: constructing an evaluation index system, collecting data, analyzing and evaluating the data, and analyzing and applying the results. The construction of the evaluation index system comprises human factor indexes and environmental factor indexes, the human factor indexes comprise environmental cognition, environmental behavior, and environmental demand satisfaction, and the environmental factor indexes comprise natural environmental factors and artificial environmental factors. The data collection method comprises questionnaire survey, field observation, data detection, and literature review and department data collection. The data analysis comprises data preprocessing, index weight determination, comprehensive evaluation model construction, and evaluation grade division. The result analysis and application comprises result analysis, strategy formulation, and dynamic monitoring and adjustment.

2. The method of assessing the relationship between a person and an environmental factor according to claim 1, wherein: The environmental cognition is obtained by questionnaire survey, and the cognition of people on environmental problems, environmental protection knowledge, and main local environmental pollutants is understood, and the proportion of correct answers to related questions is taken as a quantitative index, and scores of 80-100 points are taken as high cognition level, scores of 50-79 points are taken as medium cognition level, and scores of less than 50 points are taken as low cognition level. The environmental behavior is observed and counted personal daily environmental protection behaviors, such as garbage classification, resource saving, and water and electricity usage, and the number of correct garbage classification times per week, the amount of water and electricity saving per month, and the like are quantified. The environmental demand satisfaction is obtained by combining interview and questionnaire, and the demand satisfaction of people on living environment and working environment is understood, and scores of 1-5 points are given for evaluation, 1 point is taken as extremely unsatisfied, and 5 points are taken as very satisfied.

3. The method of assessing the relationship between a person and an environmental factor according to claim 2, wherein: The living environment comprises living comfort and leisure space, and the working environment comprises office environment comfort and working place surrounding environment.

4. The method of assessing the relationship between a human and an environmental factor of claim 1, wherein: The natural environmental factors comprise climate conditions and ecological resources, the climate conditions refer to collected data of temperature, humidity, precipitation, and wind speed, and the suitability of the data to human activities is evaluated; the ecological resources are calculated forest coverage, water resource availability, and biodiversity index, the forest coverage can be directly obtained from related geographic information data, and the biodiversity index is calculated by species richness and evenness; The artificial environmental factors comprise infrastructure and environmental pollution status; the infrastructure is evaluated traffic convenience and public service facilities, and the environmental pollution status is monitored atmospheric pollutant concentration and water pollutant index.

5. The method of assessing the relationship between a person and an environmental factor according to claim 4, wherein: The evaluation of traffic convenience comprises bus station coverage rate and road congestion index, and the public service facilities comprise accessibility of hospitals and schools; The monitoring of atmospheric pollutant concentration comprises monitoring concentration indexes of PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide in the air, and the water pollutant index comprises detecting indexes of chemical oxygen demand and ammonia nitrogen in water, and the index data is taken as a measurement basis whether the national environmental quality standard is reached.

6. The method of assessing the relationship between a human and an environmental factor according to claim 5, wherein: The bus station coverage rate can be obtained by calculating the ratio of service area to total area, and the road congestion index can be obtained by means of traffic monitoring system data.

7. The method of assessing the relationship between a human and an environmental factor of claim 1, wherein: The questionnaire survey is designed for different groups of people, and data is collected by means of online platform and offline field distribution combination; The field observation is to set observation points in different areas, observe human behavior activities, and record surrounding environment conditions; The data detection is to detect environmental pollution indexes, such as atmospheric pollutant concentration, water pollutant index, and the like. The data detection is long-term and continuous collection of environmental factor data by using professional environmental monitoring equipment such as air quality monitoring station and water quality monitor. The literature review and department data collection is to review relevant statistical yearbook and research report to obtain regional population data and economic development data, and to collect official environmental monitoring data and planning information from environmental protection, meteorological and transportation departments.

8. The method of assessing the relationship between a human and an environmental factor of claim 1, wherein: The data preprocessing is to clean the collected data to remove abnormal values and error data. The index weight determination is to determine the weight of each evaluation index by using analytic hierarchy process, to invite experts in the fields of environmental science and sociology to score the relative importance of each index, to construct a judgment matrix, and to calculate the weight of each index. The comprehensive evaluation model is constructed by using linear weighting method, and the calculation formula is: Wherein C is the comprehensive evaluation score, W i is the weight of the i th index, X i is the standardized score of the i th index, and the index standardization adopts the range standardization method to convert the index values to the interval [0, 1]; The evaluation grade division is to divide the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors into four grades according to the comprehensive evaluation score: C≥0.8 is excellent, indicating that the cooperation relationship between people and environment is good and promotes each other; 0.6≤C<0.8 is good, the cooperation relationship is basically coordinated but still has room for improvement; 0.4≤C<0.6 is general, there are some problems that need attention; C<0.4 is poor, the cooperation relationship between people and environment is in serious conflict and urgent measures need to be taken to improve it.

9. The method of assessing the relationship between a human and an environmental factor of claim 1, wherein: The result analysis is to analyze the evaluation results in depth to find out the key factors affecting the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors. The strategy development is to develop targeted improvement strategies according to the result analysis, to develop strict pollution control measures for areas with serious environmental problems, and to carry out environmental protection propaganda and education activities to improve public environmental awareness for people with poor environmental behavior. The dynamic monitoring and adjustment need to evaluate the cooperation relationship between people and environmental factors regularly, track the implementation effect of the strategy, adjust the strategy in time according to the new evaluation results, and ensure the effectiveness and adaptability of the evaluation method and improvement measures.

Images