Production assessment method and device

Abstract

The present application relates to the field of automated production management and primarily discloses a production evaluation method and apparatus. The production evaluation method is used to evaluate production efficiency and includes: receiving verification information from production equipment, the verification information including the identity information of the operator of the production equipment and the equipment information of the production equipment; obtaining production plan information based on the identity information and one of the equipment information; determining whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct based on the identity information, the equipment information, and the production plan information; obtaining production information of the production equipment based on the correct association between the identity information and the equipment information; and generating a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information. The present application can effectively improve production management efficiency and reduce production costs by digitizing and informatizing production data.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of automated production management, and in particular to a production evaluation method and device. Background Art

[0002] In the current method, when production equipment is in production, production data is generated, and then paper document reports are compiled based on the statistical production data. The compiled reports are then presented to the supervisor for review, and finally the paper reports and production data are archived and retained. However, the production equipment and personnel information cannot be associated. Therefore, when production anomalies occur, multiple reports and production data must be retrieved to confirm whether it is a problem with the production equipment or the operator, causing many problems in production management.

[0003] In addition, since production data and reports are all collected manually, it is very likely that the production data will be distorted or even missed due to human statistical errors or calculation errors; at the same time, since there are many operators in the factory, when quality problems occur, it is impossible to track individuals in time through paper methods, which makes it impossible for managers to find the problem points in a timely, accurate and fast manner when troubleshooting quality problems, resulting in wasted production costs.

[0004] Furthermore, due to the complex status of materials input in the production process, it is impossible to timely verify and monitor material input and production status through manual statistics. Summary of the Invention

[0005] In order to address the deficiencies in the prior art, the present application provides a production evaluation method and apparatus to evaluate the production efficiency of production equipment and operators, thereby effectively improving production management efficiency and reducing production costs.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a production assessment method, which comprises:

[0007] Receiving verification information from a production device, the verification information including identity information of an operator of the production device and device information of the production device;

[0008] obtaining production plan information according to one of the identity information and the device information;

[0009] Based on the identity information, the equipment information and the production plan information, determining whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct;

[0010] Based on the correct association between the identity information and the equipment information, obtaining the production information of the production equipment after the production process is completed;

[0011] Based on the production information and the production plan information, a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information is generated.

[0012] Furthermore, the production plan information includes a setting time, and the obtaining of the production information of the production equipment includes: obtaining the production information of the production equipment within the setting time.

[0013] Furthermore, the production information includes production quantity and production yield.

[0014] Furthermore, wherein the equipment information includes positioning information, the production assessment method further comprises the steps of:

[0015] Obtaining the operator's location information; and

[0016] The position information and the positioning information are sent to a data management platform to analyze the production status of the operator.

[0017] Furthermore, wherein the production plan information includes evaluation criteria, the production evaluation method further comprises: setting the evaluation criteria according to the identity information, and the evaluation criteria are used to determine the production evaluation result.

[0018] Furthermore, wherein the production information includes the number of qualified products and the number of unqualified products, generating the production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information includes: comparing the production information and the evaluation standard to generate the production evaluation result.

[0019] Furthermore, the method for generating the production assessment result corresponding to the identity information is:

[0020] parsing the production information and the production plan information into a plurality of evaluation elements, wherein both the production information and the production plan information include the evaluation elements;

[0021] Assigning assessment weights to the assessment elements, where the assessment weights assigned to different assessment elements are the same or different;

[0022] Optimizing the evaluation weight to obtain an optimized weight;

[0023] generating an evaluation algorithm based on the optimization weight, wherein the evaluation algorithm is the average of the product of the optimization weight and the evaluation element;

[0024] The production evaluation result is generated based on the evaluation algorithm.

[0025] Furthermore, the production assessment method also includes: if the identity information and the equipment information are not correctly associated, the production information of the production equipment is not obtained, and the information that the identity information and the equipment information are incorrectly associated is sent to the terminal device, and the terminal device is used to remind the operator or manager.

[0026] Furthermore, it also includes sending at least one of the identity information, the equipment information, the production plan information, the production information and the production evaluation result to a data management platform, and the data management platform stores the information in a database.

[0027] Furthermore, the production evaluation results are sent to a terminal device to display or voice broadcast the production evaluation results.

[0028] Furthermore, it also includes ranking all operators based on the production evaluation results.

[0029] Furthermore, it also includes generating responsibility assessment information based on the production information and the production plan information.

[0030] In a second aspect, the present application provides a production evaluation device, comprising: a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable by the processor, wherein the processor implements the steps of any of the above methods when executing the program.

[0031] This application uses information and digitalization to record the production data of operators during the production process, and through cross-analysis between different data, evaluates the production efficiency of production equipment and operators, effectively improving production management efficiency and reducing production costs. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0032] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without any creative work.

[0033] Figure 1 A flowchart of a production evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0034] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a production evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0035] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a production management system provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] The embodiments of the present application provide a production evaluation method, device, and storage medium.

[0037] The following describes embodiments of the present application in detail. Examples of the embodiments are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar components or components having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are only used to explain the present application and are not to be construed as limiting the present application.

[0038] Those skilled in the art will understand that, unless expressly stated otherwise, the singular forms "a", "an", "said" and "the" used herein may also include the plural forms. It should be further understood that the term "comprising" used in the specification of this application refers to the presence of the described features, integers, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and / or groups thereof. It should be understood that when we refer to an element as being "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected or coupled to the other element, or there may be intermediate elements. In addition, the "connection" used here may also include wired connections, wireless connections or wireless couplings. The term "and / or" used here includes all or any units and all combinations of one or more associated listed items.

[0039] The term "circuit" used in this application can be used to realize the connection of internal components of the device, and to realize information interaction with external devices. Specifically, the circuit can be configured as an input / output interface, a pin, a bus, a circuit or other arbitrary interface mechanisms that can be used to realize the information interaction of each component inside the device. The circuit can also be configured to realize one or more interface mechanisms for communicating with external devices and / or networks. For example, the circuit may include an antenna (one or more antennas) that supports hardware and / or software for realizing communication with a wireless communication network (for example, a cellular network, Wi-Fi, WLAN, etc.) and / or a communication modem or other hardware / software, and for supporting communication via a cable, a digital subscriber line (DSL), a USB, FireWire, an Ethernet or other wired networking methods.

[0040] The term "processor" as used herein may refer to a central processing unit (CPU), other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor. It is understood that the number of processors may be one or more.

[0041] The term "memory" as used herein includes high-speed random access memory and non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, internal memory, plug-in hard disk, Smart Media Card (SMC), Secure Digital (SD) card, flash card, flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid-state memory device. The memory stores a plurality of functional modules composed of program instruction segments (i.e., program code segments). The program instruction segments are used to describe the execution process in the functional modules to present the methods of the embodiments below. One or more modules are stored in the memory and executed by the processor.

[0042] See Figure 1 An embodiment of the present application mainly provides a production evaluation method, comprising the following steps: S1 receiving verification information from production equipment, the verification information including identity information of an operator of the production equipment and equipment information of the production equipment; S2 obtaining production plan information based on one of the identity information and the equipment information; S3 judging whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct based on the identity information, the equipment information and the production plan information; S4 obtaining production information of the production equipment based on whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct; S5 generating a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information.

[0043] S1 receives verification information from the production equipment. The verification information includes the identity information of the production equipment operator and the equipment information of the production equipment. The operator can present an identifying item (such as a brand name, other identification card, or electronic device) to the production equipment for verification. Verification can be performed by RFID, QR code scanning, or manually entering an account and password. After identity comparison and confirmation, the production equipment will have the operator's identity information and equipment information. The operator's identity information is collected by a card reader installed on the production equipment, or a separate card reader, and sent to the production equipment. The processor on the production equipment performs identity authentication to verify whether the operator has permission to perform production operations on the production equipment. The identity information can be the operator's personal data (operator's age, operator's name, operator's department, operator's employee number, operator's position, operator's email address, operator's work status, or other personal data of the operator), and the equipment information can be the production equipment data (production equipment number, production equipment temperature, production equipment operating hours, production equipment status, and other basic production equipment data).

[0044] In some embodiments, the production assessment method further comprises the steps of: obtaining location information of the operator; and sending the location information and positioning information to the management personnel. The equipment information package includes positioning information, which can be the fixed position coordinates of the production equipment in the factory.

[0045] Furthermore, the operator's body information can be detected, and the operator's movement trajectory can be obtained through the body information. By comparing the operator's movement trajectory with the production equipment positioning information, the operator's complete movement trajectory or path can be obtained. For example, the operator's facial image can be detected by a camera in the factory, or the operator's position can be located through a mobile electronic device. The data collected by the camera or the location information of the mobile electronic device is sent to the manager's terminal device, so that the manager can know the operator's movement trajectory in the factory and compare the operator's coordinates in the factory with those of the equipment. As long as the operator's movement trajectory in the factory passes through the production equipment, the operator's complete movement trajectory or path in the factory can be confirmed. In addition, the operator's complete movement trajectory in the factory can be compared with the operation time of the production equipment to strengthen the confirmation that the operator is working on the designated production equipment.

[0046] At the same time, the operator's movement trajectory or path can also be sent to the data management platform to analyze the operator's production status. The data management platform can be run on a cloud server or a local server.

[0047] In another embodiment, the production equipment can also use visual sensors to verify the operator's attire before sending verification information to the controller. For example, a sensor on the production equipment, such as a camera, can detect an image of the operator's body information. After identification and comparison, it can determine whether the operator's attire complies with factory production specifications. If the operator's attire does not comply with the specifications, an alarm or reminder message can be sent to the management staff.

[0048] The terminal device can be a display, a personal computer, a mobile phone, a tablet computer, etc. In addition, the reminder information can be played in the form of sound by connecting the playback device to the terminal device.

[0049] S2 obtains production plan information based on one of the identity information and the equipment information. The production plan information can be a production schedule. A reasonable production schedule is set according to the personal data of the operator in the identity information or the production equipment data in the equipment information. This production schedule can help managers understand the overall production status of the factory. A set time can be set in the production schedule. For example, if the set time is two hours, the production plan information will set the production schedule within two hours of the set time.

[0050] S3 determines whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct based on the identity information, the equipment information, and the production plan information. The operator's personal data in the identity information, the production equipment data in the equipment information, and the production schedule in the production plan information are compared to confirm that the operator and production equipment in the three pieces of information are the same.

[0051] In some embodiments, if the operator and production equipment in the verification information (including identity information and equipment information) are not exactly the same as the operator and production equipment in the production plan information, an alarm or reminder message can be sent to the terminal device to let the operator or manager know.

[0052] S4 obtains production information of the production equipment based on the correct association between the identity information and the equipment information. Upon confirming that the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct, for example, that the operator and the production equipment are identical, the production information of the production equipment is obtained. Production information may include production capacity, production quantity, production yield, etc. Production yield may be based on daily reports, input counts collected through on-site material scanning, number of good products, number of defective products, or number of completed products.

[0053] S5 generates a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information, and compares the evaluation criteria of the operator's production information and the production plan information, for example, comparing whether the production quantity and production yield meet the evaluation criteria.

[0054] The method for generating production evaluation results corresponding to identity information is as follows: Production information and production plan information are parsed into multiple evaluation elements, both of which include evaluation elements; evaluation weights are assigned to the evaluation elements, with different evaluation elements assigned the same or different weights; the evaluation weights are optimized to obtain optimized weights; and based on the optimized weights, an evaluation algorithm is generated, which is the average of the product of the optimized weights and the evaluation elements. Evaluation elements can include attendance rate, daily report count, completion of primary work, additional work, work efficiency, and product development status.

[0055] In some implementations, all operators are ranked based on the production assessment results. Based on these rankings, a quality ranking is established by conducting a horizontal comparative assessment of each machine type, process, and station, according to the KPI targets for each project. A reward and punishment system is then established to enhance operator responsibility, improve production efficiency and yield, reduce management oversight of on-site operators, and focus on improving product quality and production capacity, maximizing management value.

[0056] In some embodiments, responsibility assessment information is generated based on the production information and the production plan information. The degree of fit between the production information and the production plan information can be used to determine whether the responsible supervisor of the operator needs to be associated, thereby refining the division of responsibilities and improving management efficiency.

[0057] See Figure 2 The present application also provides an embodiment of a production evaluation device 10 that can be used to implement the above-mentioned production evaluation method, including: a memory 110 and at least one processor 120. The memory 110 stores instructions, and the memory 110 and the at least one processor 120 are interconnected via a line; the processor 120 can call the instructions in the memory 110 to enable the production evaluation device to execute the production evaluation method of the first embodiment. In this embodiment, the memory 110 and the processor 120 can be cloud-based memory 110 and processor 120, or they can be locally located memory 110 and processor 120. In addition, the processor 120 can be connected to a communicator 130 to send information to other external devices through the communicator 130.

[0058] The production evaluation device may further include one or more power supplies, one or more wired or wireless network interfaces, one or more input / output interfaces, and / or one or more operating systems, such as Windows Server, Mac OS X, Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the production evaluation device described in this embodiment does not limit the scope of the production evaluation device and may include more or fewer components than in this embodiment, or combine certain components, or arrange the components differently.

[0059] The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When executed by a processor, the aforementioned production evaluation method is executed. The computer-readable storage medium may be a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium or a volatile computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores instructions that, when executed on a computer, cause the computer to implement the production evaluation method of the first embodiment.

[0060] The computer-readable storage medium of this embodiment can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art. For the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the method or device described above can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment and will not be repeated here.

[0061] like Figure 3 As shown, an embodiment of the present application further provides a production management system, which includes: a production system for completing production, inspection and obtaining the identity information; and a production evaluation system for generating the production evaluation results.

[0062] The production system includes production equipment, detection equipment and scanning equipment; the production equipment is used to produce products under the operation of an operator; the detection equipment is used to detect the products; and the scanning equipment is used to obtain the identity information.

[0063] The production evaluation system includes an information acquisition module and an information processing module; the information acquisition module is used to obtain the identity information, the equipment information, the production information and the production plan information; the information processing module is used to generate the production evaluation result.

[0064] If the aforementioned functional modules are implemented in the form of software and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for enabling a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the system or method described in each embodiment of the present application. The aforementioned storage medium includes: various media that can store program codes, such as a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk.

[0065] As described above, the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, rather than to limit them. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the above embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application.

Claims

1. A production assessment method comprising: Receiving verification information from a production device, the verification information including identity information of an operator of the production device and device information of the production device; acquiring production plan information according to at least one of the identity information and the equipment information; Based on the identity information, the equipment information and the production plan information, determining whether the association between the identity information and the equipment information is correct; Based on the correct association between the identity information and the device information, obtaining the production information of the production equipment; generating a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information; Wherein, the production plan information includes a setting time, and the obtaining of production information of the production equipment includes: obtaining production information of the production equipment within the setting time, the production information including production quantity and production yield; Wherein, the production plan information includes evaluation criteria, and the production evaluation method further comprises: setting the evaluation criteria according to the identity information, wherein the evaluation criteria are used to determine the production evaluation result; The step of generating a production evaluation result corresponding to the identity information based on the production information and the production plan information includes: parsing the production information and the production plan information into a plurality of evaluation elements; assigning assessment weights to the assessment elements; Optimizing the evaluation weight to obtain an optimized weight; generating an evaluation algorithm based on the optimization weight, wherein the evaluation algorithm is the average of the product of the optimization weight and the evaluation element; The production evaluation result is generated based on the evaluation algorithm.

2. The production evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The equipment information includes positioning information, and the production assessment method further comprises the steps of: Obtaining the operator's location information; and The position information and the positioning information are sent to a data management platform to analyze the production status of the operator.

3. The production evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: The production evaluation method further includes: if the association between the identity information and the device information is incorrect, sending information indicating that the association between the identity information and the device information is incorrect to a terminal device, so as to alert an operator or manager via the terminal device. 4 . The production evaluation method according to claim 1 , further comprising sending at least one of the identity information, the equipment information, the production plan information, the production information, and the production evaluation result to a data management platform for storage.

5. The production evaluation method according to claim 1, further comprising sending the production evaluation result to a terminal device to display or voice broadcast the production evaluation result. 6 . The production evaluation method according to claim 1 , further comprising ranking all operators based on the production evaluation results. 7 . The production evaluation method according to claim 1 , further comprising generating responsibility assessment information based on the production information and the production plan information.

8. A production evaluation device comprising: A processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable by the processor, characterized in that the processor implements the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing the program.

Images