A business risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium

Abstract

The application provides an enterprise risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and a readable storage medium, wherein the method comprises the following steps: obtaining enterprise inherent risk information, enterprise safety management level information, enterprise accident handling capability information and disaster-bearing carrier information of a target enterprise at a current time; simulating accident consequence information caused by an accident of the target enterprise at the current time through an accident simulation model; determining a first risk value of the target enterprise according to the enterprise inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information; determining a second risk value of the target enterprise according to the accident consequence information; determining a first anti-risk value of the target enterprise according to the enterprise safety management level information; determining a second anti-risk value of the target enterprise according to the enterprise accident handling capability information; and calculating an enterprise safety risk value of the target enterprise according to the first risk value, the second risk value, the first anti-risk value and the second anti-risk value. Through the method, the timeliness of enterprise risk assessment can be improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of risk assessment technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, electronic device and readable storage medium for enterprise risk assessment. Background Technology

[0002] Manufacturing enterprises typically refer to companies that produce physical products. During the production process, these enterprises may encounter hazards, such as fires, explosions, and leaks of toxic gases. Therefore, assessing the safety risks of manufacturing enterprises, promptly identifying potential risks, and taking timely countermeasures to prevent accidents and casualties is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of this, the purpose of this application is to provide a method, apparatus, electronic device and readable storage medium for enterprise risk assessment, so as to improve the timeliness of enterprise risk assessment.

[0004] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for enterprise risk assessment, the method comprising:

[0005] The system obtains the target company's inherent risk information, safety management level information, and accident handling capability information at the current moment from the target company's enterprise management system; it also collects the target company's disaster-bearing carrier information at the current moment from the target company's access management system in real time; and it simulates the accident consequences caused by an accident occurring at the target company at the current moment using an accident simulation model.

[0006] Based on the inherent risk information of the enterprise and the disaster-bearing carrier information, a first risk value of the target enterprise is determined; based on the accident consequence information, a second risk value of the target enterprise is determined; based on the enterprise's safety management level information, a first risk resistance value of the target enterprise is determined; and based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information, a second risk resistance value of the target enterprise is determined.

[0007] Based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk mitigation value, and the second risk mitigation value, calculate the target enterprise's enterprise security risk value at the current moment.

[0008] In conjunction with the first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a first possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein the method further includes:

[0009] Calculate the average security risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise security risk values ​​corresponding to each historical time before the current time.

[0010] Determine whether the target enterprise's current security risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value;

[0011] When the enterprise's security risk value exceeds a preset multiple of the average security risk value, an early warning message is sent to the target enterprise and / or the industrial park where the target enterprise is located.

[0012] In conjunction with the first aspect, this application provides a second possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein the inherent risk information of the enterprise includes: the level of each major hazard source, the fire hazard level of the production plant, and the fire hazard level of the stored items; the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: the number of employees, the number of visitors, and the number of people within the accident impact range around the enterprise.

[0013] The step of determining the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information includes:

[0014] Based on the level of each major hazard source, a hazard score value is determined for each major hazard source, and the highest hazard score value among all the hazard scores is taken as the first sub-risk value;

[0015] Based on the fire hazard level of the production plant, a fire hazard score is determined for the production plant, and based on the fire hazard level of the stored items, a fire hazard score is determined for the stored items, with the highest fire hazard score between the production plant and the stored items being used as the second sub-risk value.

[0016] The staff number score is determined based on the range of staff numbers, and the visitor number score is determined based on the range of visitor numbers.

[0017] The third sub-risk value is calculated based on the staff number score and the visitor number score, as well as the preset weights for the staff number score and the visitor number score.

[0018] The score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is determined based on the range of people within the impact range of the accident around the enterprise, and the score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is used as the fourth sub-risk value.

[0019] The sum of the first sub-risk value, the second sub-risk value, the third sub-risk value, and the fourth sub-risk value is determined as the first risk value.

[0020] In conjunction with the first aspect, this application provides a third possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein the accident consequence information includes: economic losses, number of deaths, and number of injuries; and determining the second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information includes:

[0021] The economic loss score is determined based on the economic scope to which the economic loss belongs; the death score is determined based on the number of people to which the death count belongs; and the injury score is determined based on the number of people to which the injury count belongs.

[0022] The highest score among the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score is selected as the second risk value.

[0023] In conjunction with the first aspect, this application provides a fourth possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein the enterprise safety management level information includes: the enterprise's safety production standardization level, whether the enterprise includes a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety, the first safety training time of safety management personnel, the second safety training time of other staff members besides safety management personnel, the number of safety inspections within a specified time period, the number of daily patrols, and the enterprise's historical accident information;

[0024] The step of determining the first risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's security management level information includes:

[0025] The enterprise's safety production standardization score is determined based on the enterprise's safety production standardization level.

[0026] The enterprise's safety management score is determined based on whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety.

[0027] When the target enterprise includes safety management personnel, a first safety training score is determined based on the first safety training time; and a second safety training score is determined based on the second safety training time, so as to select the minimum score from the first safety training score and the second safety training score as the safety training score.

[0028] Based on the number of security inspections, a first security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise; based on the number of patrols on the same day, a second security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise, and the minimum score between the first security inspection score and the second security inspection score is taken as the security inspection score.

[0029] Based on the company's historical incident records, determine the company's historical incident score.

[0030] The sum of the enterprise's safety production standardization score, the enterprise's safety management score, the safety training score, the safety inspection score, and the enterprise's historical accident score is determined as the first risk resistance value.

[0031] In conjunction with the first aspect, this application provides a fifth possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein the enterprise accident handling capability information includes: enterprise rescue team information indicating whether it includes an enterprise rescue team, the number of comprehensive drills within a preset time period, the number of special drills within a preset time period, the number of shelters, the per capita area of ​​shelters, the number of other rescue teams within a specified range besides the enterprise rescue team, and the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise;

[0032] The step of determining the second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information includes:

[0033] Based on the enterprise rescue team information, determine the enterprise rescue team score, and based on the number of comprehensive drills, determine the comprehensive drill score, and based on the number of specialized drills, determine the specialized drill score, so as to determine the first rescue capability score based on the enterprise rescue team score, the comprehensive drill score, and the specialized drill score;

[0034] The number of shelters is determined based on the number of shelters, and the per capita area of ​​shelters is determined based on the per capita area of ​​shelters. The second rescue capability score is then determined based on the number of shelters score and the per capita area of ​​shelters score.

[0035] The score for the number of other rescue teams is determined based on the number of other rescue teams, and the score for arrival time is determined based on the time it takes for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise. The score for the third rescue capability is then determined based on the score for the number of other rescue teams and the score for arrival time.

[0036] The sum of the first rescue capability score, the second rescue capability score, and the third rescue capability score is determined as the second risk resistance value.

[0037] In conjunction with the first aspect, this application provides a sixth possible implementation of the first aspect, wherein calculating the target enterprise's enterprise security risk value at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value includes:

[0038] The enterprise security risk value is calculated using the following formula:

[0039]

[0040] Wherein, C represents the first risk value, S represents the second risk value, M represents the first risk resistance value, and D represents the second risk resistance value.

[0041] Secondly, embodiments of this application also provide an enterprise risk assessment device, comprising:

[0042] The acquisition module is used to acquire the target enterprise's inherent risk information, safety management level information, and accident handling capability information at the current moment from the target enterprise's enterprise management system; and to collect the target enterprise's disaster-bearing carrier information at the current moment in real time from the target enterprise's access management system; and to simulate the accident consequences caused by an accident occurring at the target enterprise at the current moment through an accident simulation model.

[0043] The determination module is used to determine a first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information; and to determine a second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information; and to determine a first risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's safety management level information; and to determine a second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information.

[0044] The first calculation module is used to calculate the enterprise security risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value.

[0045] In conjunction with the second aspect, embodiments of this application provide a first possible implementation of the second aspect, which further includes:

[0046] The second calculation module is used to calculate the average security risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise security risk values ​​corresponding to each historical time before the current time.

[0047] The judgment module is used to determine whether the target enterprise's enterprise security risk value at the current moment is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value;

[0048] The early warning module is used to send early warning information to the target enterprise and / or the industrial park where the target enterprise is located when the enterprise's security risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value.

[0049] In conjunction with the second aspect, this application provides a second possible implementation of the second aspect, wherein the inherent risk information of the enterprise includes: the level of each major hazard source, the fire hazard level of the production plant, and the fire hazard level of stored goods; the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: the number of employees, the number of visitors, and the number of people within the accident impact range around the enterprise; the determining module, when used to determine the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the inherent risk information of the enterprise and the disaster-bearing carrier information, is specifically used for:

[0050] Based on the level of each major hazard source, a hazard score value is determined for each major hazard source, and the highest hazard score value among all the hazard scores is taken as the first sub-risk value;

[0051] Based on the fire hazard level of the production plant, a fire hazard score is determined for the production plant, and based on the fire hazard level of the stored items, a fire hazard score is determined for the stored items, with the highest fire hazard score between the production plant and the stored items being used as the second sub-risk value.

[0052] The staff number score is determined based on the range of staff numbers, and the visitor number score is determined based on the range of visitor numbers.

[0053] The third sub-risk value is calculated based on the staff number score and the visitor number score, as well as the preset weights for the staff number score and the visitor number score.

[0054] The score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is determined based on the range of people within the impact range of the accident around the enterprise, and the score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is used as the fourth sub-risk value.

[0055] The sum of the first sub-risk value, the second sub-risk value, the third sub-risk value, and the fourth sub-risk value is determined as the first risk value.

[0056] In conjunction with the second aspect, this application provides a third possible implementation of the second aspect, wherein the accident consequence information includes: economic losses, number of deaths, and number of injuries; the determining module, when used to determine the second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information, is specifically used for:

[0057] The economic loss score is determined based on the economic scope to which the economic loss belongs; the death score is determined based on the number of people to which the death count belongs; and the injury score is determined based on the number of people to which the injury count belongs.

[0058] The highest score among the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score is selected as the second risk value.

[0059] In conjunction with the second aspect, this application provides a fourth possible implementation of the second aspect, wherein the enterprise safety management level information includes: the enterprise's safety production standardization level, whether the enterprise includes a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety, the first safety training time for safety management personnel, the second safety training time for other staff members besides safety management personnel, the number of safety inspections within a specified time period, the number of daily patrols, and the enterprise's historical accident information; the determining module, when used to determine the first risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise safety management level information, is specifically used for:

[0060] The enterprise's safety production standardization score is determined based on the enterprise's safety production standardization level.

[0061] The enterprise's safety management score is determined based on whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety.

[0062] When the target enterprise includes safety management personnel, a first safety training score is determined based on the first safety training time; and a second safety training score is determined based on the second safety training time, so as to select the minimum score from the first safety training score and the second safety training score as the safety training score.

[0063] Based on the number of security inspections, a first security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise; based on the number of patrols on the same day, a second security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise, and the minimum score between the first security inspection score and the second security inspection score is taken as the security inspection score.

[0064] Based on the company's historical incident records, determine the company's historical incident score.

[0065] The sum of the enterprise's safety production standardization score, the enterprise's safety management score, the safety training score, the safety inspection score, and the enterprise's historical accident score is determined as the first risk resistance value.

[0066] In conjunction with the second aspect, this application provides a fifth possible implementation of the second aspect, wherein the enterprise accident handling capability information includes: enterprise rescue team information indicating whether an enterprise rescue team is included, the number of comprehensive drills within a preset time period, the number of specialized drills within a preset time period, the number of shelters, the average area per person in shelters, the number of other rescue teams within a specified range besides the enterprise rescue team, and the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise; the determining module, when used to determine the second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise accident handling capability information, is specifically used for:

[0067] Based on the enterprise rescue team information, determine the enterprise rescue team score, and based on the number of comprehensive drills, determine the comprehensive drill score, and based on the number of specialized drills, determine the specialized drill score, so as to determine the first rescue capability score based on the enterprise rescue team score, the comprehensive drill score, and the specialized drill score;

[0068] The number of shelters is determined based on the number of shelters, and the per capita area of ​​shelters is determined based on the per capita area of ​​shelters. The second rescue capability score is then determined based on the number of shelters score and the per capita area of ​​shelters score.

[0069] The score for the number of other rescue teams is determined based on the number of other rescue teams, and the score for arrival time is determined based on the time it takes for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise. The score for the third rescue capability is then determined based on the score for the number of other rescue teams and the score for arrival time.

[0070] The sum of the first rescue capability score, the second rescue capability score, and the third rescue capability score is determined as the second risk resistance value.

[0071] In conjunction with the second aspect, this application provides a sixth possible implementation of the second aspect, wherein the first calculation module, when calculating the enterprise security risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value, is specifically used for:

[0072] The enterprise security risk value is calculated using the following formula:

[0073]

[0074] Wherein, C represents the first risk value, S represents the second risk value, M represents the first risk resistance value, and D represents the second risk resistance value.

[0075] Thirdly, embodiments of this application also provide an electronic device, including: a processor, a memory, and a bus, wherein the memory stores machine-readable instructions executable by the processor, and when the electronic device is running, the processor communicates with the memory via the bus, and when the machine-readable instructions are executed by the processor, the steps in any of the possible implementations of the first aspect described above are performed.

[0076] Fourthly, embodiments of this application also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps in any of the possible implementations of the first aspect described above.

[0077] This application provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and readable storage medium for enterprise risk assessment. It acquires enterprise-specific risk information, enterprise safety management level information, and enterprise accident handling capability information from the target enterprise's enterprise management system at the current moment; collects disaster-bearing capacity information of the target enterprise in real time from the target enterprise's access management system at the current moment; and simulates the accident consequences of an accident occurring at the target enterprise at the current moment using an accident simulation model. Based on the enterprise-specific risk information and disaster-bearing capacity information, it determines a first risk value for the target enterprise; based on the accident consequences information, it determines a second risk value for the target enterprise; based on the enterprise safety management level information, it determines a first risk resistance value for the target enterprise; and based on the enterprise accident handling capability information, it determines a second risk resistance value for the target enterprise. Based on the first risk value, second risk value, first risk resistance value, and second risk resistance value, it calculates the enterprise safety risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment. In this embodiment, by acquiring the enterprise-specific risk information, enterprise safety management level information, enterprise accident handling capability information, and disaster-bearing capacity information of the target enterprise at the current moment to determine the enterprise safety risk value, it is beneficial to improve the timeliness of risk assessment.

[0078] To make the above-mentioned objectives, features and advantages of this application more apparent and understandable, preferred embodiments are described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Attached Figure Description

[0079] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. It should be understood that the following drawings only show some embodiments of this application and should not be regarded as a limitation of the scope. For those skilled in the art, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0080] Figure 1A flowchart of an enterprise risk assessment method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown;

[0081] Figure 2 A flowchart of another enterprise risk assessment method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown;

[0082] Figure 3 This illustration shows a structural schematic diagram of an enterprise risk assessment device provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0083] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application is shown. Detailed Implementation

[0084] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of this application clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments. The components of the embodiments of this application described and shown in the accompanying drawings can generally be arranged and designed in various different configurations. Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of this application provided in the accompanying drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed application, but merely represents selected embodiments of this application. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this application without inventive effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0085] Manufacturing enterprises typically refer to companies that produce physical products. During the production process, these enterprises may encounter hazards, such as explosions or ammonia leaks. Therefore, assessing the safety risks of manufacturing enterprises, promptly identifying potential safety risks, and preventing casualties are urgent issues that need to be addressed.

[0086] In existing technologies, when assessing the security risks of an enterprise, historical data of the enterprise is usually used. This results in the calculation of the security risk situation at a historical moment, which cannot reflect the real-time security risk situation of the enterprise, resulting in poor timeliness of the assessment results.

[0087] In view of the above problems, this application provides a method, apparatus, electronic device and readable storage medium for enterprise risk assessment to improve the timeliness and responsiveness of assessment results. The following is a description through embodiments.

[0088] Example 1:

[0089] To facilitate understanding of this embodiment, a detailed description of an enterprise risk assessment method disclosed in this application embodiment will be provided first. Figure 1 A flowchart of an enterprise risk assessment method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown, such as... Figure 1 As shown, the process includes the following steps S101-S103:

[0090] S101: Obtain information on the inherent risks, safety management level, and accident handling capabilities of the target enterprise from its enterprise management system at the current moment; collect information on the disaster-bearing carriers of the target enterprise in real time from its access control system at the current moment; and simulate the accident consequences of an accident occurring at the target enterprise at the current moment using an accident simulation model.

[0091] In this embodiment, the target enterprise is a manufacturing enterprise. The target enterprise's enterprise management system contains information on the enterprise's inherent risks, safety management level, and accident response capabilities at the current moment. The inherent risk information reflects the target enterprise's inherent risk profile. The safety management level information reflects the target enterprise's ability to control safety risks. The accident response capability information reflects the ability to minimize losses through effective emergency response actions in the event of an accident.

[0092] Disaster-bearing carrier information indicates the personnel situation that may be affected after an accident occurs at the target enterprise. Accident consequence information reflects the potential losses that would result from an accident. The access control system includes video footage and entry / exit records for each entrance and exit of the target enterprise. Based on this data, the access control system determines the personnel situation of the target enterprise at the current moment (i.e., disaster-bearing carrier information).

[0093] For example, the accident could be an explosion, an ammonia leak, or the like.

[0094] S102: Based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and disaster-bearing carrier information, determine the target enterprise's first risk value; based on the accident consequence information, determine the target enterprise's second risk value; based on the enterprise's safety management level information, determine the target enterprise's first risk resistance value; and based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information, determine the target enterprise's second risk resistance value.

[0095] In one possible implementation, the enterprise's inherent risk information includes: the level of each major hazard source, the fire hazard level of the production plant, and the fire hazard level of stored goods; the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: the number of employees, the number of visitors, and the number of people within the accident impact range around the enterprise; when determining the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and disaster-bearing carrier information in step S102, the specific steps S10201-S10206 can be followed:

[0096] S10201: Based on the level of each major hazard source, determine the hazard score value of each major hazard source, and take the highest hazard score value among all hazard scores as the first sub-risk value.

[0097] In this embodiment, there are four levels of major hazard sources. Table 1 shows the hazard score values ​​corresponding to the levels of each major hazard source provided in this application embodiment.

[0098] The level of major hazard sources Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Risk score 100 60 30 10

[0099] Table 1

[0100] In this embodiment, the hazard score of each major hazard source is determined based on its level and a pre-defined correspondence between each level and its hazard score. For example, when the target enterprise includes two major hazard sources, with the first major hazard source at level one and the second at level two, the hazard score for the first major hazard source is determined to be 100, and the hazard score for the second major hazard source is 60. Following the bottom-line thinking principle, the highest-level major hazard source is used to represent its hazard level; therefore, the highest hazard score is taken as the first sub-risk value, which in this embodiment is 100.

[0101] S10202: Determine the fire hazard score of the production plant based on its fire hazard rating, and determine the fire hazard score of the stored items based on their fire hazard rating, using the highest fire hazard score between the production plant and the stored items as the second sub-risk value.

[0102] In this embodiment, there are five fire hazard levels for the production plant. Table 2 shows the fire hazard score values ​​of the production plant corresponding to the fire hazard levels provided in this embodiment.

[0103] Fire hazard rating of production plant Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Fire hazard score of production plant 100 60 30 10 0

[0104] Table 2

[0105] Based on the fire hazard rating of the target company's production plants and the pre-defined correspondence between the fire hazard ratings of each production plant and their fire hazard scores, the fire hazard scores of the target company's production plants are determined. When the target company contains multiple production plants, a bottom-line approach requires that the fire hazard score of the production plant with the highest fire hazard rating be determined as the final fire hazard score for that production plant.

[0106] In this embodiment, there are five fire hazard levels for the stored items. Table 3 shows the fire hazard score values ​​of the stored items corresponding to the fire hazard levels provided in this embodiment.

[0107] Fire hazard rating of stored items Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Fire hazard score of stored items 100 60 30 10 0

[0108] Table 3

[0109] Based on the fire hazard rating of the target company's stored items and the pre-defined correspondence between the fire hazard ratings of various stored items and their fire hazard scores, the fire hazard scores of the target company's stored items are determined. When the target company contains multiple types of stored items, according to the bottom-line principle, the fire hazard score of the stored item with the highest fire hazard rating is determined as the final fire hazard score of the stored item.

[0110] After determining the fire hazard scores of the production plant and the stored items, based on the bottom-line thinking requirement, the highest fire hazard score among the two is taken as the second sub-risk value.

[0111] S10203: Determine the staff number score based on the range of staff numbers, and determine the visitor number score based on the range of visitor numbers.

[0112] In this embodiment, the number of staff members is divided into four ranges. Table 4 shows the staff member score values ​​corresponding to each range of staff members provided in this embodiment.

[0113] Number of staff N1 Staff Number Score N1≥1000 100 1000>N1≥300 10 300>N1≥20 10 N1<20 2

[0114] Table 4

[0115] In this embodiment, the number of visitors is divided into four ranges. Table 5 shows the visitor number score values ​​corresponding to each visitor range provided in this embodiment. In this embodiment, considering that visitors are unfamiliar with the factory area, the risks they bear are relatively high.

[0116]

[0117] Table 5

[0118] S10204: Calculate the third sub-risk value based on the staff number score and the visitor number score, as well as the weights preset for the staff number score and the visitor number score.

[0119] In this embodiment, the third sub-risk value is calculated using the following formula:

[0120] C1=ω1C 11 +ω2C 12

[0121] Where C1 represents the third sub-risk value, C 11 C represents the score for the number of staff members. 12 ω1 represents the score for the number of visitors, ω2 represents the preset weight for the score for the number of staff, and ω1 represents the preset weight for the score for the number of visitors.

[0122]

[0123]

[0124] Where N1 represents the number of staff and N2 represents the number of visitors.

[0125] S10205: Determine the score of the scope of impact of an accident around the enterprise based on the range of people within the scope of the accident's impact, and use the score of the scope of impact of an accident around the enterprise as the fourth sub-risk value.

[0126] In this embodiment, it is considered that when an accident occurs at the target enterprise, it may not only cause harm to the personnel within the target enterprise, but also affect the people in the surrounding area. Specifically, the number of people within the affected area can be the number of permanent residents in the vicinity of the target enterprise (e.g., within a specified radius centered on the target enterprise).

[0127] In this embodiment, the number of people within the scope of the accident surrounding the enterprise is divided into 5 ranges. Table 6 shows the score value of the scope of the accident surrounding the enterprise corresponding to the number of people within each scope of the accident surrounding the enterprise provided in this embodiment.

[0128] N3 people within the affected area of ​​the accident surrounding the enterprise Score for the scope of impact of accidents around the enterprise N3≥50000 100 50000>N3≥10000 70 10000>N3≥1000 40 1000>N3≥100 10 N3<100 5

[0129] Table 6

[0130] S10206: The sum of the first sub-risk value, the second sub-risk value, the third sub-risk value, and the fourth sub-risk value is determined as the first risk value.

[0131] In one possible implementation, the accident consequence information includes: economic losses, number of deaths, and number of injuries; when performing step S102 to determine the second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information, the following steps S10211-S10212 can be followed:

[0132] S10211: Determine the economic loss score based on the economic scope to which the economic loss belongs; determine the death score based on the number of deaths to which the death count belongs; and determine the injury score based on the number of injuries to which the injury count belongs.

[0133] In this embodiment, Table 7 shows the score values ​​corresponding to the economic scope, death range, and injury range of each economic loss provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0134] Economic loss N4 (ten thousand yuan) Number of injured N5 Death toll N6 Score N4≥10000 N5≥100 N6≥30 100 10000>N4≥5000 100>N5≥50 30>N6≥10 80 5000>N4≥1000 50>N5≥10 10>N6≥3 60 N4<1000 N5<10 N6<3 40

[0135] Table 7

[0136] S10212: Select the highest score from the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score as the second risk value.

[0137] Following the principle of choosing the highest value, the highest score among the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score corresponding to the target enterprise is selected as the second risk value.

[0138] In one possible implementation, the enterprise safety management level information includes: the enterprise's safety production standardization level, whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety, the first safety training time for safety management personnel, the second safety training time for other staff members besides safety management personnel, the number of safety inspections within a specified time period, the number of daily patrols, and the enterprise's historical accident information; when determining the target enterprise's first risk resistance value based on the enterprise safety management level information in step S102, the following steps S10221-S10226 can be followed:

[0139] S10221: Determine the enterprise's safety production standardization score based on the enterprise's safety production standardization level.

[0140] In this embodiment, there are three levels of enterprise safety production standardization. Based on the target enterprise's safety production standardization level and the pre-set safety production standardization scores corresponding to each level, the target enterprise's safety production standardization score is determined. Table 8 shows the safety production standardization scores corresponding to each level provided in this embodiment.

[0141] Enterprise Safety Production Standardization Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Enterprise Safety Production Standardization Score 100 90 80

[0142] Table 8

[0143] S10222: Determine the enterprise's safety management score based on whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety.

[0144] In this embodiment, Table 9 shows the mapping relationship between the safety management organization, safety management personnel and enterprise safety management score provided in this application embodiment.

[0145] Information on enterprise safety management organizations and personnel Enterprise safety management score There is a corporate safety management organization and full-time corporate safety management personnel. 100 There is no corporate safety management organization, but there are full-time corporate safety management personnel. 80 There is no corporate safety management organization, but there are part-time corporate safety management personnel. 60 There is no corporate safety management organization, and no corporate safety management personnel. 0

[0146] Table 9

[0147] S10223: When the target enterprise has safety management personnel, a first safety training score is determined based on the first safety training time; and a second safety training score is determined based on the second safety training time, so that the minimum score between the first and second safety training scores is selected as the safety training score.

[0148] In this embodiment, Table 10 shows the correspondence between the first safety training time and the first safety training score of the safety management personnel provided in this application embodiment.

[0149]

[0150] Table 10

[0151] In this embodiment, Table 11 shows the correspondence between the second safety training time and the second safety training score of other staff provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0152] Second safety training time for other staff Second safety training score Complete 24 hours of pre-job safety training and 20 hours of retraining annually. 100 Pre-employment safety training hours are less than 24 hours. 50 Untrained 0

[0153] Table 11

[0154] According to the barrel theory, the level of safety training is determined by the shortest plank. Therefore, the safety training score is the minimum of the first and second safety training scores.

[0155] S10224: Determine the first safety inspection score of the target enterprise based on the number of safety inspections; determine the second safety inspection score of the target enterprise based on the number of patrols on the day, and take the minimum score between the first and second safety inspection scores as the safety inspection score.

[0156] In this embodiment, Table 12 shows the correspondence between the number of security checks and the first security check score provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0157] Number of security checks First security check score 3 times or more 100 2 times 80 1 time 60 0 times 0

[0158] Table 12

[0159] Table 13 shows the correspondence between the number of daily inspections and the second security inspection score provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0160] Number of patrols per day Second security check score 2 times or more 100 1 time 80 0 times 0

[0161] Table 13

[0162] According to the barrel theory, the target company's safety inspection score is the minimum score between the first and second safety inspection scores.

[0163] S10225: Determine the score for the company's historical accidents based on the company's historical accident record.

[0164] For example, the enterprise's historical accident information refers to the enterprise's accident information over the past 5 years. Table 14 shows the correspondence between the enterprise's historical accident information and the enterprise's historical accident score provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0165] Accidents involving this company in the past 5 years Enterprise historical accident score No accidents have occurred in the past 5 years. 100 There have been no accidents with injuries or fatalities in the past 5 years. 60 There have been accidents in the past 5 years that have resulted in minor injuries. 30 There have been accidents in the past 5 years that have resulted in serious injuries. 20 There has been one fatal accident in the last 5 years. 10 There have been two or more fatal accidents in the past five years. 0

[0166] Table 14

[0167] S10226: The sum of the enterprise's safety production standardization score, enterprise safety management score, safety training score, safety inspection score, and enterprise historical accident score is determined as the first risk resistance value.

[0168] In one possible implementation, the enterprise accident response capability information includes: enterprise rescue team information indicating whether it includes the enterprise's rescue team, the number of comprehensive drills within a preset time period, the number of specialized drills within a preset time period, the number of shelters, the average area per person in shelters, the number of other rescue teams within a specified range besides the enterprise's rescue team, and the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise; when determining the target enterprise's second risk resistance value based on the enterprise accident response capability information in step S102, the specific steps S10231-S10234 can be followed:

[0169] S10231: Based on the information of the enterprise rescue team, determine the score of the enterprise rescue team, and based on the number of comprehensive drills, determine the score of the comprehensive drills, and based on the number of special drills, determine the score of the special drills, so as to determine the score of the first rescue capability based on the enterprise rescue team score, the comprehensive drill score, and the special drill score.

[0170] In this embodiment, specialized drills refer to drills targeted at a specific type of accident, such as drills for earthquakes or fires. Comprehensive drills refer to drills that do not distinguish between accident types. Table 15 shows the correspondence between the enterprise rescue team information and the enterprise rescue team score values ​​provided in this application embodiment.

[0171] Corporate rescue team information Corporate rescue team score There are dedicated corporate rescue teams 1 There are part-time corporate rescue teams 0.8 No corporate rescue teams 0

[0172] Table 15

[0173] For example, the preset time period is one year. Table 16 shows the correspondence between the number of comprehensive drills and the comprehensive drill scores within the preset time period provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0174] Number of comprehensive drills per year Comprehensive exercise score 2 times or more 100 1 time 60 0 0

[0175] Table 16

[0176] Table 17 shows the correspondence between the number of special drills and the score of the special drills within the preset time period provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0177] Number of special drills per year Specialized drill score 4 times or more 100 3 times 80 2 times 60 1 time 40 0 0

[0178] Table 17

[0179] In this embodiment, the first rescue capability score is calculated using the following formula:

[0180]

[0181] Where D1 represents the score for the first rescue capability, D 11 D represents the score of the company's rescue team. 12 D represents the score of the comprehensive exercise. 13 This indicates the score for the specialized drill.

[0182] S10232: Determine the number of shelters based on the number of shelters, and determine the per capita area of ​​shelters based on the per capita area of ​​shelters, so as to determine the second rescue capability score based on the number of shelters score and the per capita area of ​​shelters score.

[0183] Table 18 shows the correspondence between the number of refuge sites provided in the embodiments of this application and the refuge site number score.

[0184] Number of shelters Number of shelters score 2 1 1 0.8 0 0

[0185] Table 18

[0186] Table 19 shows the correspondence between the per capita area of ​​the refuge sites and the per capita area score of the refuge sites provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0187]

[0188] Table 19

[0189] The second rescue capability score is calculated using the following formula:

[0190] D2 = D 21 D 22

[0191] Where D2 represents the score for the second rescue capability, D 21 D represents the score for the number of shelters. 22 This represents the score for the average area per person in the shelter.

[0192] S10233: Determine the score for the number of other rescue teams based on the number of other rescue teams, and determine the score for arrival time based on the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise, so as to determine the score for the third rescue capability based on the score for the number of other rescue teams and the score for arrival time.

[0193] In this embodiment, the designated range refers to the area within a 15-minute drive of the target company. Other rescue teams refer to rescue teams other than the target company's own rescue team, such as rescue teams from other surrounding companies, or fire brigades, etc. Table 20 shows the correspondence between the number of other rescue teams provided in this embodiment and the score values ​​of the number of other rescue teams.

[0194] Number of other rescue teams within a 15-minute drive Other rescue teams' number score 3 or more 1 2 0.9 1 0.8 none 0.6

[0195] Table 20

[0196] Table 21 shows the correspondence between the time taken by other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise and the arrival time score provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0197] The time T (minutes) for the nearest other rescue team to arrive at the target company. Arrival Time Score T≤5 100 5＜T≤8 90 8＜T≤15 80 T≥15 60

[0198] Table 21

[0199] The score for third-party rescue capability is calculated using the following formula:

[0200] D3 = D 31 D 32

[0201] Where D3 represents the score for the third rescue capability, D 31 D represents the score for the number of other rescue teams. 32 This indicates the score for arrival time.

[0202] S10234: The sum of the first rescue capability score, the second rescue capability score, and the third rescue capability score is determined as the second risk resistance value.

[0203] S103: Calculate the target company's security risk value at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk mitigation value, and the second risk mitigation value.

[0204] In this embodiment, the first risk value and the second risk value are positively correlated with the enterprise's security risk value, while the first risk resistance value and the second risk resistance value are negatively correlated with the enterprise's security risk value. A higher enterprise security risk value indicates a higher level of enterprise risk.

[0205] Specifically, the enterprise security risk value can be calculated using the following formula:

[0206]

[0207] Where C represents the first risk value, S represents the second risk value, M represents the first risk tolerance value, and D represents the second risk tolerance value.

[0208] In one possible implementation, after S103 is executed to calculate the target company's security risk value at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value, the following steps can be performed: based on the target company's risk score at each moment, draw the target company's risk change trend curve for the target company's management personnel to view.

[0209] In one possible implementation, Figure 2 A flowchart of another enterprise risk assessment method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown, such as... Figure 2 As shown, after executing S103 to calculate the target company's security risk value at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk mitigation value, and the second risk mitigation value, the following steps S1041-S1043 can be executed further:

[0210] S1041: Calculate the average security risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise security risk values ​​corresponding to each historical time before the current time.

[0211] S1042: Determine whether the target enterprise's current security risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value.

[0212] S1043: When the enterprise's safety risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average safety risk value, an early warning message shall be sent to the target enterprise and / or the industrial park where the target enterprise is located.

[0213] For example, the preset multiplier can be 1.5 times (i.e., 150%).

[0214] Example 2:

[0215] Based on the same technical concept, this application also provides an enterprise risk assessment device. Figure 3 This application provides a schematic diagram of the structure of an enterprise risk assessment device according to an embodiment of the present application. Figure 3 As shown, the device includes:

[0216] The acquisition module 301 is used to acquire the target enterprise's inherent risk information, safety management level information, and accident handling capability information at the current moment from the target enterprise's enterprise management system; and to collect the target enterprise's disaster-bearing carrier information at the current moment in real time from the target enterprise's access management system; and to simulate the accident consequences caused by an accident occurring at the target enterprise at the current moment through an accident simulation model.

[0217] The determining module 302 is used to determine a first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information; and to determine a second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information; and to determine a first risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's safety management level information; and to determine a second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information.

[0218] The first calculation module 303 is used to calculate the enterprise security risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value.

[0219] Optional, also includes:

[0220] The second calculation module is used to calculate the average security risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise security risk values ​​corresponding to each historical time before the current time.

[0221] The judgment module is used to determine whether the target enterprise's enterprise security risk value at the current moment is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value;

[0222] The early warning module is used to send early warning information to the target enterprise and / or the industrial park where the target enterprise is located when the enterprise's security risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value.

[0223] Optionally, the inherent risk information of the enterprise includes: the level of each major hazard source, the fire hazard level of the production plant, and the fire hazard level of stored goods; the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: the number of employees, the number of visitors, and the number of people within the accident impact range around the enterprise; when the determining module 302 is used to determine the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the inherent risk information of the enterprise and the disaster-bearing carrier information, it is specifically used for:

[0224] Based on the level of each major hazard source, a hazard score value is determined for each major hazard source, and the highest hazard score value among all the hazard scores is taken as the first sub-risk value;

[0225] Based on the fire hazard level of the production plant, a fire hazard score is determined for the production plant, and based on the fire hazard level of the stored items, a fire hazard score is determined for the stored items, with the highest fire hazard score between the production plant and the stored items being used as the second sub-risk value.

[0226] The staff number score is determined based on the range of staff numbers, and the visitor number score is determined based on the range of visitor numbers.

[0227] The third sub-risk value is calculated based on the staff number score and the visitor number score, as well as the preset weights for the staff number score and the visitor number score.

[0228] The score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is determined based on the range of people within the impact range of the accident around the enterprise, and the score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is used as the fourth sub-risk value.

[0229] The sum of the first sub-risk value, the second sub-risk value, the third sub-risk value, and the fourth sub-risk value is determined as the first risk value.

[0230] Optionally, the accident consequence information includes: economic losses, number of deaths, and number of injuries; when the determining module 302 determines the second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information, it is specifically used for:

[0231] The economic loss score is determined based on the economic scope to which the economic loss belongs; the death score is determined based on the number of people to which the death count belongs; and the injury score is determined based on the number of people to which the injury count belongs.

[0232] The highest score among the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score is selected as the second risk value.

[0233] Optionally, the enterprise safety management level information includes: the enterprise's safety production standardization level, whether the enterprise includes a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety, the first safety training time for safety management personnel, the second safety training time for other staff besides safety management personnel, the number of safety inspections within a specified time period, the number of daily patrols, and the enterprise's historical accident information; the determining module 302, when used to determine the target enterprise's first risk resistance value based on the enterprise safety management level information, is specifically used for:

[0234] The enterprise's safety production standardization score is determined based on the enterprise's safety production standardization level.

[0235] The enterprise's safety management score is determined based on whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety.

[0236] When the target enterprise includes safety management personnel, a first safety training score is determined based on the first safety training time; and a second safety training score is determined based on the second safety training time, so as to select the minimum score from the first safety training score and the second safety training score as the safety training score.

[0237] Based on the number of security inspections, a first security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise; based on the number of patrols on the same day, a second security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise, and the minimum score between the first security inspection score and the second security inspection score is taken as the security inspection score.

[0238] Based on the company's historical incident records, determine the company's historical incident score.

[0239] The sum of the enterprise's safety production standardization score, the enterprise's safety management score, the safety training score, the safety inspection score, and the enterprise's historical accident score is determined as the first risk resistance value.

[0240] Optionally, the enterprise accident handling capability information includes: enterprise rescue team information indicating whether it includes an enterprise rescue team, the number of comprehensive drills within a preset time period, the number of specialized drills within a preset time period, the number of shelters, the average area per person in shelters, the number of other rescue teams within a specified range besides the enterprise rescue team, and the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise; the determining module 302, when determining the second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise accident handling capability information, is specifically used for:

[0241] Based on the enterprise rescue team information, determine the enterprise rescue team score, and based on the number of comprehensive drills, determine the comprehensive drill score, and based on the number of specialized drills, determine the specialized drill score, so as to determine the first rescue capability score based on the enterprise rescue team score, the comprehensive drill score, and the specialized drill score;

[0242] The number of shelters is determined based on the number of shelters, and the per capita area of ​​shelters is determined based on the per capita area of ​​shelters. The second rescue capability score is then determined based on the number of shelters score and the per capita area of ​​shelters score.

[0243] The score for the number of other rescue teams is determined based on the number of other rescue teams, and the score for arrival time is determined based on the time it takes for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise. The score for the third rescue capability is then determined based on the score for the number of other rescue teams and the score for arrival time.

[0244] The sum of the first rescue capability score, the second rescue capability score, and the third rescue capability score is determined as the second risk resistance value.

[0245] Optionally, when the first calculation module 303 calculates the enterprise security risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value, it is specifically used for:

[0246] The enterprise security risk value is calculated using the following formula:

[0247]

[0248] Wherein, C represents the first risk value, S represents the second risk value, M represents the first risk resistance value, and D represents the second risk resistance value.

[0249] Example 3:

[0250] Based on the same technical concept, embodiments of this application also provide an electronic device. Figure 4This application provides a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application. Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device 400 includes a processor 401, a memory 402, and a bus 403. The memory stores machine-readable instructions that can be executed by the processor. When the electronic device is running, the processor 401 communicates with the memory 402 through the bus 403. The processor 401 executes the machine-readable instructions to perform the steps of the method described in Embodiment 1.

[0251] Example 4:

[0252] Based on the same technical concept, Embodiment 4 of this application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, which is executed by a processor to perform the steps of the method described in Embodiment 1.

[0253] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working processes of the devices, electronic devices, and computer-readable storage media described above can be referred to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0254] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and methods can be implemented in other ways. The apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the division of modules is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. Furthermore, multiple modules or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Additionally, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some communication interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between devices or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0255] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0256] In addition, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit.

[0257] If the aforementioned functions are implemented as software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a processor-executable, non-volatile, computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a portion of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0258] Finally, it should be noted that the above-described embodiments are merely specific implementations of this application, used to illustrate the technical solutions of this application, and not to limit them. The scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Although this application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that any person skilled in the art can still modify or easily conceive of changes to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or make equivalent substitutions for some of the technical features, within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application. Such modifications, changes, or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, and should all be covered within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of protection of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for enterprise risk assessment, characterized in that, The method includes: The system obtains the target company's inherent risk information, safety management level information, and accident handling capability information at the current moment from the target company's enterprise management system; it also collects the target company's disaster-bearing carrier information at the current moment from the target company's access management system in real time; and it simulates the accident consequences caused by an accident occurring at the target company at the current moment using an accident simulation model. Based on the inherent risk information of the enterprise and the disaster-bearing carrier information, a first risk value of the target enterprise is determined; based on the accident consequence information, a second risk value of the target enterprise is determined; based on the enterprise's safety management level information, a first risk resistance value of the target enterprise is determined; and based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information, a second risk resistance value of the target enterprise is determined. Based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk mitigation value, and the second risk mitigation value, calculate the target enterprise's enterprise security risk value at the current moment.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Calculate the average security risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise security risk values ​​corresponding to each historical time before the current time. Determine whether the target enterprise's current security risk value is greater than a preset multiple of the average security risk value; When the enterprise's security risk value exceeds a preset multiple of the average security risk value, an early warning message is sent to the target enterprise and / or the industrial park where the target enterprise is located.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The inherent risk information of the enterprise includes: the level of each major hazard source, the fire hazard level of the production plant, and the fire hazard level of stored items; the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: the number of employees, the number of visitors, and the number of people within the accident impact range around the enterprise. The step of determining the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information includes: Based on the level of each major hazard source, a hazard score value is determined for each major hazard source, and the highest hazard score value among all the hazard scores is taken as the first sub-risk value; Based on the fire hazard level of the production plant, a fire hazard score is determined for the production plant, and based on the fire hazard level of the stored items, a fire hazard score is determined for the stored items, with the highest fire hazard score between the production plant and the stored items being used as the second sub-risk value. The staff number score is determined based on the range of staff numbers, and the visitor number score is determined based on the range of visitor numbers. The third sub-risk value is calculated based on the staff number score and the visitor number score, as well as the preset weights for the staff number score and the visitor number score. The score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is determined based on the range of people within the impact range of the accident around the enterprise, and the score of the impact range of the accident around the enterprise is used as the fourth sub-risk value. The sum of the first sub-risk value, the second sub-risk value, the third sub-risk value, and the fourth sub-risk value is determined as the first risk value.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The accident consequence information includes: economic losses, number of deaths, and number of injuries; determining the second risk value of the target enterprise based on the accident consequence information includes: The economic loss score is determined based on the economic scope to which the economic loss belongs; the death score is determined based on the number of people to which the death count belongs; and the injury score is determined based on the number of people to which the injury count belongs. The highest score among the economic loss score, the death toll score, and the injury toll score is selected as the second risk value.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The enterprise safety management level information includes: the enterprise's safety production standardization level, whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety, the first safety training time of safety management personnel, the second safety training time of other staff members besides safety management personnel, the number of safety inspections within a specified time period, the number of patrols on the same day, and the enterprise's historical accident information. The step of determining the first risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's security management level information includes: The enterprise's safety production standardization score is determined based on the enterprise's safety production standardization level. The enterprise's safety management score is determined based on whether the enterprise has a safety management organization and / or safety management personnel responsible for enterprise safety. When the target enterprise includes safety management personnel, a first safety training score is determined based on the first safety training time; and a second safety training score is determined based on the second safety training time, so as to select the minimum score from the first safety training score and the second safety training score as the safety training score. Based on the number of security inspections, a first security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise; based on the number of patrols on the same day, a second security inspection score is determined for the target enterprise, and the minimum score between the first security inspection score and the second security inspection score is taken as the security inspection score. Based on the company's historical incident records, determine the company's historical incident score. The sum of the enterprise's safety production standardization score, the enterprise's safety management score, the safety training score, the safety inspection score, and the enterprise's historical accident score is determined as the first risk resistance value.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The enterprise accident response capability information includes: enterprise rescue team information indicating whether it includes the enterprise rescue team, the number of comprehensive drills within a preset time period, the number of special drills within a preset time period, the number of shelters, the per capita area of ​​shelters, the number of other rescue teams within a specified range besides the enterprise rescue team, and the time taken for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise. The step of determining the second risk resistance value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information includes: Based on the enterprise rescue team information, determine the enterprise rescue team score, and based on the number of comprehensive drills, determine the comprehensive drill score, and based on the number of specialized drills, determine the specialized drill score, so as to determine the first rescue capability score based on the enterprise rescue team score, the comprehensive drill score, and the specialized drill score; The number of shelters is determined based on the number of shelters, and the per capita area of ​​shelters is determined based on the per capita area of ​​shelters. The second rescue capability score is then determined based on the number of shelters score and the per capita area of ​​shelters score. The score for the number of other rescue teams is determined based on the number of other rescue teams, and the score for arrival time is determined based on the time it takes for other rescue teams to reach the target enterprise. The score for the third rescue capability is then determined based on the score for the number of other rescue teams and the score for arrival time. The sum of the first rescue capability score, the second rescue capability score, and the third rescue capability score is determined as the second risk resistance value.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of calculating the target enterprise's security risk value at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value includes: The enterprise security risk value is calculated using the following formula: Wherein, C represents the first risk value, S represents the second risk value, M represents the first risk resistance value, and D represents the second risk resistance value.

8. A business risk assessment device, characterized in that, include: The acquisition module is used to acquire the target enterprise's inherent risk information, enterprise safety management level information, and enterprise accident handling capability information at the current moment from the target enterprise's enterprise management system. And collect disaster-bearing carrier information of the target enterprise in real time from the access management system of the target enterprise at the current moment; And through an accident simulation model, the consequences of an accident occurring at the target company at the current moment are simulated; The determination module is used to determine the first risk value of the target enterprise based on the enterprise's inherent risk information and the disaster-bearing carrier information; And based on the accident consequences information, determine the second risk value of the target enterprise; And based on the enterprise's safety management level information, determine the target enterprise's first risk resistance value; And based on the enterprise's accident handling capability information, determine the target enterprise's second risk resistance value; The first calculation module is used to calculate the enterprise security risk value of the target enterprise at the current moment based on the first risk value, the second risk value, the first risk resistance value, and the second risk resistance value.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: The device includes a processor, a memory, and a bus, wherein the memory stores machine-readable instructions executable by the processor, and when the electronic device is in operation, the processor communicates with the memory via the bus, and the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the processor, perform the steps of the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images