A multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling

By establishing a finite element model and considering the water-pier interaction method, the problem of the dynamic interaction between water and piers in the prior art is solved, and a more accurate bridge seismic response analysis is achieved.

CN116244998BActive Publication Date: 2025-05-23CIVIL AVIATION UNIV OF CHINA
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202310273713.4
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2023-03-20
Publication Date
2025-05-23
Estimated Expiration
2043-03-20

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The existing multi-point excitation reaction spectrum method cannot consider the dynamic interaction of water on the bridge pier, affecting the self-vibration characteristics and seismic response of the bridge structure.

Method used

By establishing a structural finite element model, combining radiation wave theory to calculate the dynamic water pressure, bringing it into the vibration control equation of the structure, considering the water-pier interaction, deriving the structural response expression, and calculating the average peak of the structural seismic response.

Benefits of technology

It can effectively consider the dynamic interaction between water and bridge piers, improve the accuracy and practicality of calculations, and provide more reliable bridge seismic response analysis.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN116244998B_ABST
    Figure CN116244998B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention discloses a multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling, which is characterized by comprising the following steps: Step 1: Establish a structural finite element model based on general finite element software, and output the mass matrix M and stiffness matrix K of the structure through the software; Step 2: Calculate the dynamic water pressure P generated by the water-pier dynamic interaction based on the radiation wave theory; Step 3: Substitute the determined dynamic water pressure P into the vibration control equation of the structure, and simplify the control equation to obtain the vibration control equation considering the water-pier interaction; Step 4: Calculate the structural formation and natural frequency after considering the water-pier interaction according to the vibration control equation determined in the above step 3. The present invention can not only calculate the seismic response of the bridge under multi-point excitation, but also consider the dynamic interaction between the water body and the pier.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Claims

1. A multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling, Features: The specific steps include: Step 1: Establish a structural finite element model based on general finite element software, and output the mass matrix M and stiffness matrix K of the structure through the software; Step 2: Based on the radiation wave theory, calculate the dynamic water pressure P generated by the dynamic interaction between water and bridge piers; Step 3: Determine the dynamic water pressure P, substitute it into the vibration control equation of the structure, and simplify the control equation to obtain the vibration control equation considering the water-pier interaction; Step 4: Based on the vibration control equation determined in step 3 above, calculate the structural formation and natural frequency after considering the water-pier interaction; Step 5: According to the vibration control equation determined in step 3 above and the formation and natural frequency determined in step 4 above, based on the random vibration theory, the structural response expression is derived, and a calculation program is compiled to solve the average peak value of the structural seismic response.

2. According to the multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect as described in claim 1, Features: The method for determining the dynamic water pressure P in step 2 is: Dynamic water pressure P of the pier and the acceleration x″ at the pier bottom under seismic action g , relative acceleration x″ of the pier: P=-(M 1 x″ g +M 2 x″) (1) Where M 1 、M 2 are the rigid hydrodynamic added mass and elastic hydrodynamic added mass matrices respectively, The matrices M are 1 、M 2 elements; W is the cross-sectional length of the bridge pier perpendicular to the earthquake direction, ρ is the water density, h is the water depth of the bridge pier, k 0 , k m is the wave number, k i =(2i-1)π / (2h);σ=ω 2 / g, ω is the frequency of ground motion, g is the acceleration of gravity; H 1 (·) is the first-order Hankel function of the second kind, K 1 (·) is the modified second-kind first-order Bessel function; z j is the height of the bridge pier node j, Γ i is the integration range, z is the height of the dynamic water pressure calculation point.

3. According to claim 2, a multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect, Features: The method for determining the vibration control equation of the structure described in step 3 is: Under multi-point excitation, the structural vibration equation is: In the formula, x=[x 1 ,…,x n ] T The n-dimensional displacement column vector representing the unconstrained degrees of freedom of the superstructure, u = [u 1 ,…,u m ] T represents the m-dimensional displacement column vector of the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier support; M, C and K are the n×n-dimensional mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the unconstrained degrees of freedom of the structure, respectively. g , C g and K g are the m×m-dimensional mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier support, M c , C c and K c They represent the n×m-dimensional coupled mass, damping and stiffness matrices between the above two groups of degrees of freedom, respectively, and F is the m-dimensional reaction force column vector at the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier bottom; Substitute the hydrodynamic pressure P determined in step 2 into the load vector on the right side of the equal sign in equation (4): Decompose the displacement x of the unconstrained degree of freedom of the structure into the pseudo-static displacement x s and dynamic displacement x d , substitute into equation (5) and expand the first equation. When solving the quasi-static displacement, x related to the dynamic displacement d , x′, u′, x″, u″ are all 0, so the quasi-static displacement can be calculated by the following formula: x s =-K -1 K c u=Ru(6) Where R is the influence matrix; Substitute equation (6) into equation (5) and expand the second line. After simplification, we can get: (M+M 2 )x′ d ′+Cx′ d +Kx d =-(M+M 1 )Ru″(7) The above is the vibration control equation of the bridge structure considering the water-pier interaction.

4. According to claim 3, a multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect, Features: The method for determining the structural formation and natural frequency described in step 4 is: After considering the water-pier interaction, the structural system formation Φ=[φ 1 φ 2 …φ n ]、Self-oscillation frequency ω=(ω 1 ω 2 …ω n ), mass matrix M+M 2 , and the stiffness matrix K satisfy the following relationship: |K-ω i 2 (M+M 2 )|=0 (8) 5. According to the multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect as described in claim 4, Features: The method for deriving the structural response expression described in step 5 is: The structural dynamic displacement and structural formation satisfy the following relationship: x d =Φy (10) In the formula, y=[y 1 y 2 …y n ] is the coordinate vector; Substituting equation (10) into equation (7), and using the orthogonality of the formation, we can obtain: In the formula, r k is the kth column of the influence matrix R; For the natural frequency ω i , damping ratio ζ i A single degree of freedom system, under the excitation u′ k Response s under the action of ki satisfy: From formula (11) and formula (13), we can get: For any structural response RS, the bending moment, shear force, and displacement can all be expressed linearly by the structure, that is: RS=q T x=q T (x s +x d )(15) Where q is the transformation vector; Substituting equations (6), (10), and (14) into equation (13), we can obtain: a k =q T r k (17) According to random vibration theory, the power spectrum G of the response RS zz for: In the formula, a l Calculated by formula (17), subscript k is replaced by l; b lj Calculated by formula (18), subscript ki is replaced by lj, where k and l represent the numbers of the pier support, and i and j represent the structural formation numbers; H i (iω) is the frequency response function, G xy is the cross power spectrum of random processes x and y; By integrating both sides of the above equation in the frequency domain, we can get the mean square value σ of the response RS. Z for: Where σ ul and σ slj Calculate by equations (22) and (23) respectively, subscript u k and ki Replace with u l and lj ,u k 、u l is the excitation displacement time history at the pier support k and l, s ki 、s lj Calculated by formula (13); Usually, the maximum value of a random process and its root mean square satisfy the following equation: E(max|z|)=p z s z (27) In the formula, p z 、p uk 、p ski is the peak factor, D k (ω i ,ζ i ) is the incentive u k The response spectrum of i , i The value at Substituting equations (27)-(29) into (21), we can obtain: Calculations show that is approximately equal to 1, so:

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Deep-water pier seismic response evaluation method taking water-pier coupling effect into consideration

    CN102521514A

  • Method for detecting structural damage of bridge by using test vehicle

    CN109855823A