A multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling
By establishing a finite element model and considering the water-pier interaction method, the problem of the dynamic interaction between water and piers in the prior art is solved, and a more accurate bridge seismic response analysis is achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202310273713.4
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2023-03-20
- Publication Date
- 2025-05-23
- Estimated Expiration
- 2043-03-20
AI Technical Summary
The existing multi-point excitation reaction spectrum method cannot consider the dynamic interaction of water on the bridge pier, affecting the self-vibration characteristics and seismic response of the bridge structure.
By establishing a structural finite element model, combining radiation wave theory to calculate the dynamic water pressure, bringing it into the vibration control equation of the structure, considering the water-pier interaction, deriving the structural response expression, and calculating the average peak of the structural seismic response.
It can effectively consider the dynamic interaction between water and bridge piers, improve the accuracy and practicality of calculations, and provide more reliable bridge seismic response analysis.
Smart Images

Figure CN116244998B_ABST
Abstract
Claims
1. A multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling, Features: The specific steps include: Step 1: Establish a structural finite element model based on general finite element software, and output the mass matrix M and stiffness matrix K of the structure through the software; Step 2: Based on the radiation wave theory, calculate the dynamic water pressure P generated by the dynamic interaction between water and bridge piers; Step 3: Determine the dynamic water pressure P, substitute it into the vibration control equation of the structure, and simplify the control equation to obtain the vibration control equation considering the water-pier interaction; Step 4: Based on the vibration control equation determined in step 3 above, calculate the structural formation and natural frequency after considering the water-pier interaction; Step 5: According to the vibration control equation determined in step 3 above and the formation and natural frequency determined in step 4 above, based on the random vibration theory, the structural response expression is derived, and a calculation program is compiled to solve the average peak value of the structural seismic response.
2. According to the multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect as described in claim 1, Features: The method for determining the dynamic water pressure P in step 2 is: Dynamic water pressure P of the pier and the acceleration x″ at the pier bottom under seismic action g , relative acceleration x″ of the pier: P=-(M 1 x″ g +M 2 x″) (1) Where M 1 、M 2 are the rigid hydrodynamic added mass and elastic hydrodynamic added mass matrices respectively, The matrices M are 1 、M 2 elements; W is the cross-sectional length of the bridge pier perpendicular to the earthquake direction, ρ is the water density, h is the water depth of the bridge pier, k 0 , k m is the wave number, k i =(2i-1)π / (2h);σ=ω 2 / g, ω is the frequency of ground motion, g is the acceleration of gravity; H 1 (·) is the first-order Hankel function of the second kind, K 1 (·) is the modified second-kind first-order Bessel function; z j is the height of the bridge pier node j, Γ i is the integration range, z is the height of the dynamic water pressure calculation point.
3. According to claim 2, a multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect, Features: The method for determining the vibration control equation of the structure described in step 3 is: Under multi-point excitation, the structural vibration equation is: In the formula, x=[x 1 ,…,x n ] T The n-dimensional displacement column vector representing the unconstrained degrees of freedom of the superstructure, u = [u 1 ,…,u m ] T represents the m-dimensional displacement column vector of the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier support; M, C and K are the n×n-dimensional mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the unconstrained degrees of freedom of the structure, respectively. g , C g and K g are the m×m-dimensional mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier support, M c , C c and K c They represent the n×m-dimensional coupled mass, damping and stiffness matrices between the above two groups of degrees of freedom, respectively, and F is the m-dimensional reaction force column vector at the constrained degrees of freedom at the pier bottom; Substitute the hydrodynamic pressure P determined in step 2 into the load vector on the right side of the equal sign in equation (4): Decompose the displacement x of the unconstrained degree of freedom of the structure into the pseudo-static displacement x s and dynamic displacement x d , substitute into equation (5) and expand the first equation. When solving the quasi-static displacement, x related to the dynamic displacement d , x′, u′, x″, u″ are all 0, so the quasi-static displacement can be calculated by the following formula: x s =-K -1 K c u=Ru(6) Where R is the influence matrix; Substitute equation (6) into equation (5) and expand the second line. After simplification, we can get: (M+M 2 )x′ d ′+Cx′ d +Kx d =-(M+M 1 )Ru″(7) The above is the vibration control equation of the bridge structure considering the water-pier interaction.
4. According to claim 3, a multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect, Features: The method for determining the structural formation and natural frequency described in step 4 is: After considering the water-pier interaction, the structural system formation Φ=[φ 1 φ 2 …φ n ]、Self-oscillation frequency ω=(ω 1 ω 2 …ω n ), mass matrix M+M 2 , and the stiffness matrix K satisfy the following relationship: |K-ω i 2 (M+M 2 )|=0 (8) 5. According to the multi-point excitation response spectrum calculation method considering fluid-solid coupling effect as described in claim 4, Features: The method for deriving the structural response expression described in step 5 is: The structural dynamic displacement and structural formation satisfy the following relationship: x d =Φy (10) In the formula, y=[y 1 y 2 …y n ] is the coordinate vector; Substituting equation (10) into equation (7), and using the orthogonality of the formation, we can obtain: In the formula, r k is the kth column of the influence matrix R; For the natural frequency ω i , damping ratio ζ i A single degree of freedom system, under the excitation u′ k Response s under the action of ki satisfy: From formula (11) and formula (13), we can get: For any structural response RS, the bending moment, shear force, and displacement can all be expressed linearly by the structure, that is: RS=q T x=q T (x s +x d )(15) Where q is the transformation vector; Substituting equations (6), (10), and (14) into equation (13), we can obtain: a k =q T r k (17) According to random vibration theory, the power spectrum G of the response RS zz for: In the formula, a l Calculated by formula (17), subscript k is replaced by l; b lj Calculated by formula (18), subscript ki is replaced by lj, where k and l represent the numbers of the pier support, and i and j represent the structural formation numbers; H i (iω) is the frequency response function, G xy is the cross power spectrum of random processes x and y; By integrating both sides of the above equation in the frequency domain, we can get the mean square value σ of the response RS. Z for: Where σ ul and σ slj Calculate by equations (22) and (23) respectively, subscript u k and ki Replace with u l and lj ,u k 、u l is the excitation displacement time history at the pier support k and l, s ki 、s lj Calculated by formula (13); Usually, the maximum value of a random process and its root mean square satisfy the following equation: E(max|z|)=p z s z (27) In the formula, p z 、p uk 、p ski is the peak factor, D k (ω i ,ζ i ) is the incentive u k The response spectrum of i , i The value at Substituting equations (27)-(29) into (21), we can obtain: Calculations show that is approximately equal to 1, so:
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Deep-water pier seismic response evaluation method taking water-pier coupling effect into consideration
CN102521514A
Method for detecting structural damage of bridge by using test vehicle
CN109855823A