Nuclear power plant water-flooded partition water-tight door configuration method, system, device and medium

Abstract

The application provides a nuclear power plant flooding partition water-tight door configuration method and system, equipment and medium, and belongs to the technical field of nuclear energy safety. The method comprises the following steps: obtaining boundary door basic data of a candidate flooding partition boundary door; identifying boundary door identification labels from the boundary door basic data according to a boundary door identification model; determining target analysis rule data according to the boundary door identification labels and a water-tight door analysis rule table; determining initial configuration labels according to the target analysis rule data and the boundary door basic data; if the initial configuration labels are first flooding protection labels, determining target configuration labels based on flooding partition design data; and if the target configuration labels are first water-tight door labels, configuring water-tight doors at the candidate flooding partition boundary doors. The embodiment of the application can reasonably configure the water-tight doors of the nuclear power plant flooding partitions under the condition that important equipment, key systems or safety facilities of the nuclear power plant are not damaged, so that a more optimized flooding protection measure scheme is obtained.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of nuclear safety technology, and in particular to a method, system, equipment, and medium for configuring watertight doors in flooded zones of nuclear power plants. Background Technology

[0002] Internal flooding is one of the common internal hazards in nuclear power plants. The immersion effect of internal flooding can cause nuclear safety-related equipment to malfunction, thus preventing it from performing its safety functions. Therefore, appropriate prevention and mitigation measures need to be taken to address the issue of internal flooding in nuclear power plants to ensure that nuclear safety is not compromised.

[0003] Based on this, relevant technologies typically classify nuclear power plants into flood zones, delineating areas associated with critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities. Watertight doors are then installed at the boundaries of these flood zones to form flood protection design measures, preventing damage to these critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities. However, when implementing flood protection design measures based on the configuration of watertight doors in nuclear power plant flood zones, these technologies often place watertight doors at the boundaries of each flood zone. This can easily lead to an excessive number of watertight doors, causing difficulties for personnel evacuation and equipment transportation. Therefore, how to provide a more optimized method for configuring watertight doors in nuclear power plant flood zones, ensuring that critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities are not damaged, and rationally configuring watertight doors to avoid difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, thus achieving a more optimized flood protection solution, has become an urgent technical problem to be solved. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The main objective of this application is to propose a method, system, equipment, and medium for configuring watertight doors in flooded areas of nuclear power plants. This method enables the reasonable configuration of watertight doors in flooded areas of nuclear power plants while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities are not damaged. This avoids difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, thereby achieving a more optimized flood protection solution.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, a first aspect of this application proposes a method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant, the method comprising:

[0006] Obtain basic boundary gate data for candidate flooding zone boundary gates of a nuclear power plant; wherein, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate refers to the boundary gate in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooding zones or to isolate the candidate flooding zone from the outside;

[0007] The boundary gate identification is performed on the basic boundary gate data according to the preset boundary gate identification model to obtain the boundary gate identification label; wherein, the boundary gate identification label is used to characterize the type of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0008] The target analysis rule data is determined by matching the boundary door identification tag with the preset watertight door analysis rule table.

[0009] Based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data, flood protection detection is performed to determine the initial configuration marker;

[0010] If the initial configuration marker is a first flood protection marker, obtain the flood partition design data of the candidate flood partition related to the candidate flood partition boundary gate; wherein, the first flood protection marker is used to characterize the flood protection of the candidate flood partition boundary gate;

[0011] Based on the flooding zone design data, watertight door configuration detection is performed on the candidate flooding zone boundary doors to determine the target configuration marker;

[0012] If the target configuration is marked as a first watertight door mark, a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooded zone boundary door; wherein, the first watertight door mark is used to characterize the watertight door configuration of the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0013] In some embodiments, the flooding zoning design data includes flooding source design sub-data, room area sub-data, flooding detection and isolation sub-data, and flooding flow path sub-data;

[0014] The step of detecting watertight door configurations for the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the flooded zone design data and determining target configuration markers includes:

[0015] Based on the flood source design sub-data, the flood detection and isolation sub-data, and the flood flow path sub-data, the flood accumulation is calculated to obtain the candidate maximum flood accumulation.

[0016] The flood height is calculated based on the candidate maximum flood volume and the room area data to obtain the candidate flood height value;

[0017] If the candidate flood height value is less than or equal to the preset flood height threshold, a watertight door alternative configuration marker is determined based on the candidate flood height value.

[0018] The target configuration mark is determined based on the watertight door alternative configuration mark.

[0019] In some embodiments, determining the candidate watertight door configuration marker based on the candidate flooding height value includes:

[0020] Based on the candidate flooding height values, candidate watertight door operations are set up;

[0021] Data extraction is performed on the basic boundary gate data to obtain boundary gate functional sub-data;

[0022] Based on the boundary gate function sub-data, the candidate watertight door operation is detected, and the candidate watertight door configuration flag is determined.

[0023] In some embodiments, after calculating the flood height based on the candidate maximum flood storage volume and the room area sub-data to obtain the candidate flood height value, the method further includes:

[0024] If the candidate flood height value is greater than the preset flood height threshold, a flood flow path alternative operation is set based on the flood flow path sub-data.

[0025] Obtain the regional flow path requirement data of the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0026] Based on the regional flow path requirement data, the flood flow path candidate operation is detected, and the flow path candidate configuration mark is determined.

[0027] The target configuration marker is determined based on the alternative flow path configuration markers.

[0028] In some embodiments, the step of performing flood protection detection based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data to determine the initial configuration marker includes:

[0029] If the target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data, the region type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary region data; wherein, the first analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification label is the first identification label, and the first identification label is used to characterize the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as the factory outer boundary gate.

[0030] If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is located at the boundary of the non-control zone, obtain the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0031] Determine the zoned discharge label based on the type of discharged liquid;

[0032] If the zone emission label is a first emission label, the initial configuration label is determined to be the first flood protection label; wherein, the first emission label is used to characterize that the candidate flood zone associated with the candidate flood zone boundary gate does not meet the emission requirements.

[0033] In some embodiments, the step of performing flood protection detection based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data to determine the initial configuration marker includes:

[0034] If the target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data, the boundary security level items are extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary security level item data; wherein, the second analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification label is the second identification label, and the second identification label is used to characterize the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as the boundary gate of the adjacent factory building;

[0035] If the boundary security level item data represents the same security level items of the same security series with the same security function arranged on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, the region type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary region data;

[0036] The initial configuration marker is determined based on the boundary region data.

[0037] In some embodiments, determining the initial configuration marker based on the boundary region data includes:

[0038] If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooded zones on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate are control zones, the initial configuration marker is determined to be a second flood protection marker; wherein, the second flood protection marker is used to indicate that no flood protection is applied to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0039] If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooding zones on both sides of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate are non-control zones, the initial configuration marker is determined to be the second flooding protection marker.

[0040] If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is a boundary gate between the non-control zone and the control zone, then the initial configuration marker is determined to be the first flooding protection marker.

[0041] To achieve the above objectives, a second aspect of this application proposes a watertight door configuration system for flooded zones in a nuclear power plant, the system comprising:

[0042] The first acquisition module is used to acquire the basic boundary gate data of the candidate flooding zone boundary gates of the nuclear power plant; wherein, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate refers to the boundary gate in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooding zones or to isolate the candidate flooding zone from the outside;

[0043] The identification module is used to identify the boundary gates in the basic boundary gate data according to a preset boundary gate identification model, and obtain boundary gate identification labels; wherein, the boundary gate identification labels are used to characterize the type of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0044] The matching module is used to perform rule matching based on the boundary door identification label and the preset watertight door analysis rule table to determine the target analysis rule data;

[0045] The first detection module is used to perform flood protection detection based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data, and determine the initial configuration marker;

[0046] The second acquisition module is used to acquire flooding partition design data of the candidate flooding partition related to the candidate flooding partition boundary gate if the initial configuration marker is the first flooding protection marker; wherein, the first flooding protection marker is used to characterize flooding protection for the candidate flooding partition boundary gate;

[0047] The second detection module is used to perform watertight door configuration detection on the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the flooded zone design data, and determine the target configuration marker.

[0048] A configuration module is configured to configure a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary door if the target configuration marker is a first watertight door marker; wherein the first watertight door marker is used to characterize the watertight door configuration of the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0049] To achieve the above objectives, a third aspect of this application provides a computer device, comprising:

[0050] At least one memory;

[0051] At least one processor;

[0052] At least one computer program;

[0053] The at least one computer program is stored in the at least one memory, and the at least one processor executes the at least one computer program to implement the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method described in the first aspect above.

[0054] To achieve the above objectives, a fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program for causing a computer to execute the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method described in the first aspect.

[0055] This application proposes a method, system, equipment, and medium for configuring watertight doors in flooded zones of a nuclear power plant. It can match the door type of candidate flooded zone boundary doors to obtain corresponding target analysis rule data, thereby performing watertight door configuration analysis on the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the target analysis rule data and boundary door basic data. Specifically, it acquires the boundary door basic data of candidate flooded zone boundary doors in the nuclear power plant. Candidate flooded zone boundary doors refer to boundary doors in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooded zones or to isolate a candidate flooded zone from the outside. Boundary door identification is performed on the boundary door basic data according to a preset boundary door identification model to obtain boundary door identification tags. These tags characterize the type of candidate flooded zone boundary doors. After obtaining the boundary door identification tags, rule matching is performed between the boundary door identification tags and a preset watertight door analysis rule table to determine the target analysis rule data corresponding to the candidate flooded zone boundary doors. Finally, flood protection detection is performed based on the target analysis rule data and boundary door basic data to determine the initial configuration marker. If the initial configuration marker is the first flood protection marker, the flood zone design data of the candidate flood zone related to the candidate flood zone boundary gate is obtained. Then, based on the flood zone design data, watertight door configuration detection is performed on the candidate flood zone boundary gates to determine the target configuration marker. If the target configuration marker is the first watertight door marker, a watertight door is configured at the candidate flood zone boundary gate. Therefore, compared to related technologies that simply set a watertight door at each boundary gate, this application can reasonably configure the watertight doors of the nuclear power plant's flood zones while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities of the nuclear power plant are not damaged. This avoids the phenomenon of too many watertight doors causing difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, thus obtaining a more optimized flood protection measure. Attached Figure Description

[0056] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant, provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0057] Figure 2 yes Figure 1 A flowchart of step S140 in the process;

[0058] Figure 3 yes Figure 1 Another flowchart of step S140 in the process;

[0059] Figure 4 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant, provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0060] Figure 5 yes Figure 1 A flowchart of step S160 in the process;

[0061] Figure 6yes Figure 5 A flowchart of step S530 in the process;

[0062] Figure 7 yes Figure 1 Another flowchart of step S160 in the process;

[0063] Figure 8 This is a flowchart illustrating how a protection design scheme is determined by calculating the flooding height, as provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0064] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the watertight door configuration system for the flooded zone of a nuclear power plant provided in the embodiments of this application;

[0065] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of the computer device provided in the embodiments of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0066] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this application clearer, the following detailed description is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of this application.

[0067] It should be noted that although functional modules are divided in the device schematic diagram and a logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in a different order than the module division in the device or the order in the flowchart. The terms "first," "second," etc., in the specification, claims, and the aforementioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence.

[0068] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing embodiments of this application only and is not intended to limit this application.

[0069] Before providing a further detailed description of the embodiments of this application, the nouns and terms used in the embodiments of this application are explained, and the nouns and terms used in the embodiments of this application shall be interpreted as follows:

[0070] Watertight doors are doors designed to prevent water or other liquids from flowing into or out of a specific area. These doors are commonly used in places where water flow needs to be controlled, such as ships, dams, flood control facilities, water treatment plants, and nuclear power plants. Watertight doors effectively prevent water or other liquids from entering or flowing out of a specific area, thus protecting facilities or areas from the effects of floods or other liquid disasters.

[0071] Safety-grade items: These are items that perform a certain safety function.

[0072] Safety functions refer to specific objectives that must be achieved to ensure the safety of facilities or activities in order to prevent and mitigate the radioactive consequences of normal operation of nuclear power plants, anticipate operational transients and accident conditions.

[0073] Flooding source: refers to flooding caused by leaks or ruptures in high-energy and medium-energy pipelines, overflowing or malfunctioning water tanks, activation (or malfunction) of fire protection systems, or flooding from adjacent factory buildings.

[0074] Flood flow path characteristics: refers to the path and characteristics of liquid (usually water) flowing within the system when a flood event may occur in a nuclear power plant.

[0075] System detection characteristics: These refer to the detection systems used in nuclear power plants to monitor flooding events, including sensors, monitoring equipment, and alarm systems. These systems can monitor changes in liquid level or pressure within the system in real time, promptly detect flooding events, and issue alerts to operators so that timely measures can be taken to address the flooding situation.

[0076] Isolation features: These refer to facilities in nuclear power plants used to isolate flood sources to prevent continuous water discharge.

[0077] Internal flooding is one of the common internal hazards in nuclear power plants. The immersion effect of internal flooding can cause nuclear safety-related equipment to malfunction, thus preventing it from performing its safety functions. Therefore, appropriate prevention and mitigation measures need to be taken to address the issue of internal flooding in nuclear power plants to ensure that nuclear safety is not compromised.

[0078] Based on this, relevant technologies typically classify nuclear power plants into flood zones, delineating areas associated with critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities. Watertight doors are then installed at the boundaries of these flood zones to form flood protection design measures, preventing damage to these critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities. However, when implementing flood protection design measures based on the configuration of watertight doors in nuclear power plant flood zones, these technologies often place watertight doors at the boundaries of each flood zone. This can easily lead to an excessive number of watertight doors, causing difficulties for personnel evacuation and equipment transportation. Therefore, how to provide a more optimized method for configuring watertight doors in nuclear power plant flood zones, ensuring that critical equipment, systems, or safety facilities are not damaged, and rationally configuring watertight doors to avoid difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, thus achieving a more optimized flood protection solution, has become an urgent technical problem to be solved.

[0079] Based on this, the embodiments of this application provide a method, system, equipment, and medium for configuring watertight doors in the flooded areas of a nuclear power plant. This method can reasonably configure watertight doors in the flooded areas of a nuclear power plant while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities in the nuclear power plant are not damaged, thereby avoiding difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation and achieving a more optimized flood protection solution.

[0080] The method for configuring watertight doors in flooded zones of nuclear power plants provided in this application can be applied to a terminal, a server, or software running on either a terminal or a server. In some embodiments, the terminal can be a smartphone, tablet, laptop, desktop computer, etc.; the server can be configured as an independent physical server, a server cluster or distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, or a cloud server providing basic cloud computing services such as cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communication, middleware services, domain name services, security services, content delivery networks (CDN), and big data and artificial intelligence platforms; the software can be an application that implements the method for configuring watertight doors in flooded zones of nuclear power plants, but is not limited to the above forms.

[0081] This application can be used in a wide variety of general-purpose or special-purpose computer system environments or configurations. Examples include: personal computers, server computers, handheld or portable devices, tablet devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set-top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network personal computers (PCs), minicomputers, mainframe computers, and distributed computing environments including any of the above systems or devices. This application can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions executed by a computer, such as program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform specific tasks or implement specific abstract data types. This application can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices connected via a communication network. In distributed computing environments, program modules can reside in local and remote computer storage media, including storage devices.

[0082] Please see Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is an optional flowchart of the method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant, provided in an embodiment of this application. In some embodiments of this application, Figure 1 The method described below may specifically include, but is not limited to, steps S110 to S170. Figure 1 These seven steps will be explained in detail.

[0083] Step S110: Obtain the basic boundary gate data of the candidate flooding zone boundary gates of the nuclear power plant;

[0084] Step S120: Based on the preset boundary gate recognition model, perform boundary gate recognition on the basic boundary gate data to obtain the boundary gate recognition label;

[0085] Step S130: Perform rule matching based on the boundary door identification label and the preset watertight door analysis rule table to determine the target analysis rule data;

[0086] Step S140: Perform flood protection detection based on target analysis rule data and boundary gate basic data to determine the initial configuration marker;

[0087] Step S150: If the initial configuration is marked as the first flood protection mark, obtain the flood zone design data of the candidate flood zone related to the candidate flood zone boundary gate;

[0088] Step S160: Based on the flood zoning design data, perform watertight door configuration detection on the candidate flood zoning boundary doors and determine the target configuration marker;

[0089] Step S170: If the target configuration is marked as the first watertight door, configure a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0090] In steps S110-S170 above, this application can match the corresponding target analysis rule data according to the door type of the candidate flooded zone boundary door, and then perform watertight door configuration analysis on the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary door basic data. Therefore, compared with related technologies that simply set a watertight door at each boundary door, this application can reasonably configure the watertight doors of the nuclear power plant flooded zone while ensuring that the important equipment, critical systems or safety facilities of the nuclear power plant are not damaged, avoiding the phenomenon that too many watertight doors will cause difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, so as to obtain a more optimized flood protection measure.

[0091] In step S110 of some embodiments, a flood zone boundary gate in a nuclear power plant refers to a gate located at the boundary of a flood zone, used to ensure that flooding is confined to a specific area, preventing water from flowing into or out of other areas and avoiding impact on other equipment and systems. A candidate flood zone boundary gate refers to a boundary gate in a nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flood zones or to isolate a candidate flood zone from the outside. Generally, candidate flood zone boundary gates are in a closed state. Therefore, multiple candidate flood zone boundary gates can be set up in a nuclear power plant, and each candidate flood zone boundary gate has corresponding boundary gate basic data.

[0092] It should be noted that the method for determining flood zones in a nuclear power plant can be based on information such as the civil engineering structure of the nuclear island building, room layout, and the arrangement of redundancy series of safety-level equipment, dividing the nuclear power plant into multiple different flood zones. After determining multiple flood zones, a gate that isolates any two flood zones can be used as a candidate flood zone boundary gate.

[0093] It should be noted that the boundary door basic data is used to characterize data related to the corresponding candidate flooded zone door, such as door number, rooms on both sides of the door, and special functional requirements of the door. Therefore, based on the divided flooded zones, overall layout plan, door list, etc., the boundary door basic data for each candidate flooded zone boundary door can be determined.

[0094] In step S120 of some embodiments, the boundary gate identification label is used to characterize the type of candidate flooded zone boundary gates. The boundary gate identification model refers to a pre-trained model used to predict the type of each candidate flooded zone boundary gate. That is, by using this boundary gate identification model, the candidate flooded zone boundary gates corresponding to the boundary gate basic data can be automatically identified, so that an identification label is assigned to each candidate flooded zone boundary gate. This process helps to automate the identification of candidate flooded zone boundary gates, improving efficiency and accuracy.

[0095] It should be noted that the pre-trained boundary gate recognition model in this application is a classification model used to classify the basic boundary gate data into different labels. The boundary gate recognition model can be built based on different classification models, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM, a supervised learning algorithm used to solve binary and multi-class classification problems, i.e., it can separate data of different categories by finding an optimal hyperplane), Decision Tree (a tree-structured classification model that classifies data through a series of decision nodes and branches), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, an instance-based learning algorithm that determines the category of a sample by calculating the distance between the sample to be classified and the training samples), etc. The choice can be flexible depending on the characteristics of the dataset, the complexity of the problem, and performance requirements; no specific limitations are made here.

[0096] It should be noted that this application pre-classifies flood zone boundary doors into: factory building outer boundary doors, adjacent factory building boundary doors, column boundary doors, and other boundary doors. Therefore, the boundary door identification labels include a first identification label, a second identification label, a third identification label, and a fourth identification label. The first identification label indicates that the candidate flood zone boundary door is a factory building outer boundary door; the second identification label indicates that the candidate flood zone boundary door is an adjacent factory building boundary door; the third identification label indicates that the candidate flood zone boundary door is a column boundary door; and the fourth identification label indicates that the candidate flood zone boundary door is another type of boundary door. Specifically, a factory building outer boundary door refers to a door leading to the outside; an adjacent factory building boundary door refers to a door between two adjacent factory buildings (i.e., both sides of the boundary door are factory buildings); a column boundary door refers to a boundary door where two flood zones on either side of the boundary door have different safety series of safety level items performing the same safety function; and other boundary doors refer to doors on the boundaries of other flood zones besides the above categories.

[0097] It should be noted that the boundary gate identification label can be a numerical value. That is, by performing boundary gate identification on the basic boundary gate data according to the preset boundary gate identification model, an identification label value can be obtained. And according to the pre-set correspondence between label values ​​and identification labels, the identification label corresponding to the identification label value is determined. For example, the label value corresponding to the first identification label is 1, the label value corresponding to the second identification label is 2, and so on. No specific limitation is made here.

[0098] It should be noted that for boundary gates between adjacent factory buildings, if the two factory buildings on either side of the boundary gate are equipped with safety level items of the same safety function but different safety series, then the boundary gate between the adjacent factory buildings also belongs to the column boundary gate. In practical applications, if a candidate flood zone boundary gate can belong to either the boundary gate between adjacent factory buildings or the column boundary gate, the candidate flood zone boundary gate can be given priority as a column boundary gate, without restriction.

[0099] In step S130 of some embodiments, the watertight door analysis rule table refers to a pre-defined table constructed based on the correspondence between different identification tags and corresponding watertight door analysis rule data. In the watertight door analysis rule table, one identification tag corresponds to one type of watertight door analysis rule data. Each watertight door analysis rule data is used to characterize the analysis rule set for the corresponding identification tag. The target analysis rule data refers to the watertight door analysis rule that matches the boundary door identification tag. That is, the boundary door identification tag is matched with the tags in the watertight door analysis rule table, and the watertight door analysis rule data corresponding to the successfully matched identification tag is used as the target analysis rule data.

[0100] It should be noted that the watertight door analysis rule data stored in the watertight door analysis rule table can be any one of the following: first analysis rule sub-data, second analysis rule sub-data, third analysis rule sub-data, and fourth analysis rule sub-data. Specifically, the first analysis rule sub-data corresponds to the first identification tag, meaning it represents the analysis rule set when the candidate flooded zone boundary door is an outer boundary door of the plant. The second analysis rule sub-data corresponds to the second identification tag, meaning it represents the analysis rule set when the candidate flooded zone boundary door is a boundary door of an adjacent plant. The third analysis rule sub-data corresponds to the third identification tag, meaning it represents the analysis rule set when the candidate flooded zone boundary door is a column boundary door. The fourth analysis rule sub-data corresponds to the fourth identification tag, meaning it represents the analysis rule set when the candidate flooded zone boundary door is another type of boundary door.

[0101] In the above embodiments, this application first divides the flooded areas into zones and determines multiple candidate flooded zone boundary gates based on these zones. Then, based on a boundary gate identification model, it identifies the boundary gate basic data for each candidate flooded zone boundary gate to determine the boundary gate identification label to which each candidate flooded zone boundary gate belongs, thus classifying the flooded zone boundary gates into categories. Based on the boundary gate identification label, it determines the target analysis rule data for analyzing and judging the candidate flooded zone boundary gates, that is, it determines the watertight door analysis principles based on the flooded zone boundary gate category. Compared to related technologies that only uniformly set watertight measures at the boundaries of flooded zones, this application can identify and screen the setting of flooded zone boundary gates according to the characteristics of the plant layout and the specific circumstances of flooding within the area, thereby forming a better flood protection design scheme. This allows for the reasonable configuration of watertight doors in the flooded zones of the nuclear power plant while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities of the nuclear power plant are not damaged, avoiding difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation.

[0102] In step S140 of some embodiments, after determining the target analysis rule data, flood protection detection is performed based on the target analysis rule data and boundary gate basic data, that is, to determine whether the corresponding candidate flooded zone boundary gate needs flood protection. Flood protection refers to taking measures to prevent or reduce damage to important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities of a nuclear power plant caused by liquids. The initial configuration flag is a marker indicating whether flood protection should be applied to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0103] It should be noted that the initial configuration flags include a first flood protection flag and a second flood protection flag. The first flood protection flag indicates that flood protection is applied to the candidate flooded zone boundary gates. The second flood protection flag indicates that no flood protection is applied to the candidate flooded zone boundary gates.

[0104] In one specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is an optional flowchart of step S140 provided in the embodiments of this application. In some embodiments of this application, step S140 may specifically include, but is not limited to, steps S210 to S240, as described below. Figure 2 These four steps will be explained in detail.

[0105] Step S210: If the target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data, extract the region type based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary region data;

[0106] Step S220: If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is located at the boundary of the non-control zone, obtain the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooding zone related to the candidate flooding zone boundary gate;

[0107] Step S230: Determine the zoned discharge label based on the type of discharged liquid;

[0108] Step S240: If the zone emission label is the first emission label, determine the initial configuration label as the first flood protection label.

[0109] In step S210 of some embodiments, if the target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data, i.e., the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is the outer boundary gate of the factory building, then the region type is first extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary region data. The boundary region data is used to characterize the control type of the flooded zones on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate. The control type of the flooded zone can be a controlled zone or a non-controlled zone.

[0110] It should be noted that a controlled area refers to an area that requires or may require special protective measures or safety protocols, and this area may contain radioactive materials. An uncontrolled area (also known as a monitored area) typically refers to an area that does not require special protective measures or safety protocols.

[0111] In step S220 of some embodiments, since one side of the factory's outer boundary door is outdoors, the corresponding flooded zone is necessarily a non-controlled zone. If the boundary area data indicates that the candidate flooded zone boundary door is located at the boundary of a non-controlled zone, that is, one side of the candidate flooded zone boundary door is outdoors, and the other side of the flooded zone is a non-controlled zone, then the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary door is obtained, i.e., it is determined whether the liquid in the flooded zone on the other side of the candidate flooded zone boundary door can be discharged outside the factory.

[0112] It should be noted that the discharge liquid type refers to the type of liquid discharged from the flooded zone on the other side of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0113] It should be noted that if the boundary area data indicates that the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is located at the boundary of the control area, that is, one side of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is outdoors and the other side of the flooding zone is the control area, then the initial configuration mark is directly determined as the first flood protection mark, that is, flood protection is required.

[0114] In step S230 of some embodiments, a candidate flooded zone refers to a non-outdoor flooded zone within the candidate flooded zone boundary gate. A zone discharge label is used to characterize whether the liquid discharged from the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate meets discharge requirements.

[0115] It should be noted that the zoning emission labels include a first emission label and a second emission label. The first emission label is used to indicate that the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate does not meet the emission requirements. The second emission label is used to indicate that the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate meets the emission requirements.

[0116] It should be noted that the determination of the zoning discharge label based on the type of discharged liquid includes: if the type of discharged liquid indicates that the discharge of the liquid (i.e., leaked water) from the candidate flooded zone to the outside of the plant will not have any environmental impact, then the zoning discharge label is determined as the second discharge label. If the type of discharged liquid indicates that the discharge of the liquid (i.e., leaked water) from the candidate flooded zone to the outside of the plant will have environmental impact, then the zoning discharge label is determined as the first discharge label.

[0117] In step S240 of some embodiments, if the zone emission label is the first emission label, that is, the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate does not meet the emission requirements, then the initial configuration label is determined to be the first flood protection label, that is, the candidate flooded zone boundary gate needs to be flooded.

[0118] It should be noted that if the zone emission label is the second emission label, that is, the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate meets the emission requirements, then the initial configuration label can be determined as the second flood protection label, that is, there is no need to carry out flood protection for the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0119] It should be noted that if the initial configuration is marked as the second flood protection mark, it means that a watertight door does not need to be configured at the boundary door of the candidate flood zone.

[0120] In the above embodiments, for the first analysis rule sub-data corresponding to the outer boundary door of the factory building, if the outer boundary door of the factory building is located at the boundary of the non-controlled area and the leakage water discharged outside the factory building does not cause environmental consequences, a watertight door may not be configured; otherwise, water flood protection is required for the candidate flooded zone boundary door, that is, the protection design scheme can be determined based on the water flood height calculation results.

[0121] In one example, a candidate flooded zone boundary door is identified as a door leading from the safety building at an elevation of ±0.00 meters (i.e., the ground level, used to indicate the building's elevation) to the outside, and this candidate flooded zone boundary door is located in a non-controlled area. Based on this, the candidate flooded zone boundary door corresponds to a first identification tag, and the corresponding target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data. According to this target analysis rule data, based on the boundary area data of the candidate flooded zone boundary door, it is determined that the door is located in a non-controlled area. Furthermore, by analyzing the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary door—that is, analyzing the characteristics of the flood source system within the building of the candidate flooded zone—it is determined that the fluid system within the building does not contain chemical substances. In other words, the corresponding zone discharge tag is a second discharge tag, meaning that the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary door meets the discharge requirements. After a liquid leak within the building, the water flows out through this boundary door and will not affect nuclear safety. Therefore, it can be seen that the initial configuration label of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is the second flood protection label, which means that it is not necessary to configure a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0122] In another specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is another optional flowchart of step S140 provided in the embodiments of this application. In some embodiments of this application, step S140 may also specifically include, but is not limited to, steps S310 to S330, as described below. Figure 3 These three steps will be explained in detail.

[0123] Step S310: If the target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data, extract the boundary security level items based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary security level item data;

[0124] Step S320: If the boundary safety level item data represents safety level items of the same safety series with the same safety function arranged on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, the region type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary region data;

[0125] Step S330: Determine the initial configuration marker based on the boundary region data.

[0126] In step S310 of some embodiments, if the target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data, that is, the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is the boundary gate of the adjacent factory building, then the boundary safety level items are extracted first based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain the boundary safety level item data. The boundary safety level item data can be used to characterize the types of safety level items placed in the flooded zones on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0127] In step S320 of some embodiments, if the boundary safety level item data represents safety level items of the same safety series with the same safety function arranged on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, the region type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary region data. This boundary region data is the same as the boundary region data in step S210 above, and also represents the control type of the flooded zones on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate.

[0128] It should be noted that if the boundary security level item data indicates that the two sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate are arranged with different security level items of the same security function, or if the boundary security level item data indicates that the two sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate are arranged with different security level items of different security functions, then the initial configuration mark is directly determined as the first flood protection mark, that is, flood protection is required.

[0129] In one specific embodiment, step S330 may include, but is not limited to, the following three cases:

[0130] Scenario 1: If the boundary area data indicates that both candidate flooding zones on both sides of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate are control zones, the initial configuration marker is determined to be the second flooding protection marker.

[0131] Scenario 2: If the boundary area data indicates that the candidate flooding zones on both sides of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate are non-control zones, the initial configuration marker is determined to be the second flooding protection marker.

[0132] Scenario 3: If the boundary area data characterizes the candidate flooding zone boundary gate as the boundary gate between the non-control area and the control area, determine the initial configuration marker as the first flooding protection marker.

[0133] For the three scenarios described above, specifically when the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate is the boundary gate of an adjacent factory building, if safety-level items of the same safety function and safety series are arranged on both sides of the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate, and the boundary area data indicates that the candidate flood-prone zones on both sides of the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate are either uncontrolled zones or controlled zones, then the initial configuration marker is determined to be the second flood protection marker, and flood protection is not required, i.e., no watertight door needs to be configured. If safety-level items of the same safety function and safety series are arranged on both sides of the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate, but the boundary area data indicates that the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate is the boundary gate between an uncontrolled zone and a controlled zone, then the initial configuration marker is determined to be the first flood protection marker, and flood protection is required, i.e., a protection design scheme needs to be determined based on the flood height calculation results.

[0134] In one example, a candidate flood-prone zone boundary door is identified as the door between safety building A at elevation +4.90 meters and the access building. If the candidate flood-prone zone boundary door is determined to be the boundary door of an adjacent building, then the corresponding target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data. According to this target analysis rule data, if the boundary area data of the candidate flood-prone zone boundary door indicates that both the access building and safety building A belong to the candidate flood-prone zone, and therefore both have safety-level items of column A (i.e., items of the same safety function and the same safety series), then the initial configuration marker for the candidate flood-prone zone boundary door can be determined as the second flood protection marker, meaning a watertight door is not required.

[0135] It should be noted that if the target analysis rule data is the third analysis rule sub-data, that is, the candidate flooding partition boundary gate is the column boundary gate, then the corresponding initial configuration mark is directly determined as the first flooding protection mark, that is, flooding protection needs to be performed.

[0136] It should be noted that if the target analysis rule data is the fourth analysis rule sub-data, that is, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is another boundary gate, the fourth analysis rule sub-data is characterized by determining the initial configuration marker through qualitative analysis or feedback from engineering experience.

[0137] If, based on qualitative analysis or feedback from engineering experience, it is determined that flooding within the area of ​​the candidate flooded zone boundary door does not affect nuclear safety functions, the corresponding initial configuration marker can be designated as the second flood protection marker, meaning that no watertight door needs to be configured; otherwise, the corresponding initial configuration marker is designated as the first flood protection marker, meaning that a protection design scheme needs to be determined based on the flooding height calculation results.

[0138] In one specific embodiment, such as Figure 4 As shown, Figure 4 The method illustrates matching the corresponding watertight door analysis rules based on the type of candidate flooded zone boundary doors, and determining the initial configuration marker of the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the matched target analysis rule data. The specific process has been described in detail in the above embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0139] In step S150 of some embodiments, if the initial configuration is marked as the first flood protection mark, then flood protection needs to be applied to the candidate flood-prone zone boundary gate, that is, the protection design scheme needs to be determined based on the flood height calculation results. In order to save costs and better avoid difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, some watertight door alternatives can be used instead of watertight doors, but it is necessary to determine whether they meet the criteria for using watertight door alternatives instead of watertight doors.

[0140] It should be noted that flood zoning design data refers to data used to determine whether watertight doors can be used as an alternative to watertight doors. Flood zoning design data includes flood source design sub-data, room area sub-data, flood detection and isolation sub-data, and flood flow path sub-data. Flood source design sub-data refers to design data related to the source causing flooding, which may include information such as the cause, location, scale, and prediction of flooding. Flood source design sub-data includes flood source parameters and layout information. Flood source parameters refer to design-related parameters such as pipe diameter, wall thickness, temperature, and pressure. Layout information refers to the room information for the flood source. Room area sub-data refers to area parameters related to the area where the flood zoning is located, which may include the area size, layout, or available space. Flood detection and isolation sub-data refers to data used to detect and isolate floods or waterlogging, which may include information on flood detection equipment, isolation measures, and early warning systems, used to promptly detect flooding and take measures to reduce losses. Flood detection and isolation sub-data includes system detection characteristics and isolation characteristics. Flooding path data refers to the path data of flooding sources flowing within a specific area. It can include flooding path characteristics such as the direction, speed, and locations the water flows through, and is used to analyze the propagation path and impact range of flooding sources.

[0141] In step S160 of some embodiments, after obtaining the flooding zone design data, watertight door configuration detection is performed on the candidate flooding zone boundary doors based on the flooding zone design data to determine the target configuration marker. The target configuration marker is used to characterize whether a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooding zone boundary door.

[0142] It should be noted that the target configuration markers include a first watertight door marker and a second watertight door marker. The first watertight door marker indicates that a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooded zone boundary door. The second watertight door configuration marker indicates that a watertight door is an alternative configuration for the candidate flooded zone boundary door, i.e., no watertight door is configured. Therefore, this application provides more than one option for configuring a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary door requiring flood protection; alternative configurations of watertight doors can be used to reduce configuration costs and facilitate better personnel evacuation and equipment transportation.

[0143] In one specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 5 , Figure 5 This is an optional flowchart of step S160 provided in the embodiments of this application. In some embodiments of this application, step S160 may specifically include, but is not limited to, steps S510 to S540, as described below. Figure 5 These four steps will be explained in detail.

[0144] Step S510: Calculate the flood storage volume based on the flood source design sub-data, flood detection and isolation sub-data, and flood flow path sub-data to obtain the candidate maximum flood storage volume;

[0145] Step S520: Calculate the flood height based on the candidate maximum flood storage volume and room area data to obtain the candidate flood height value;

[0146] Step S530: If the candidate flood height value is less than or equal to the preset flood height threshold, determine the watertight door candidate configuration mark based on the candidate flood height value;

[0147] Step S540: Determine the target configuration mark based on the watertight door alternative configuration mark.

[0148] In step S510 of some embodiments, determining whether to configure a watertight door as an alternative for the candidate flooded zone boundary door involves calculating the protection design scheme based on the flood height. Specifically, the flood accumulation is first calculated based on flood source design sub-data, flood detection and isolation sub-data, and flood flow path sub-data to obtain the candidate maximum flood accumulation. The candidate maximum flood accumulation refers to the drainage accumulation of a candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary door. This candidate maximum flood accumulation is equal to the difference between the inflow and outflow over a preset time interval. The inflow mainly comes from the leakage caused by the release of the flood source, while the outflow is the amount of water discharged through drainage paths such as holes, floor drains, and door gaps.

[0149] In step S520 of some embodiments, the candidate maximum flood storage volume can be equivalent to the water storage volume of a candidate flood zone associated with the candidate flood zone boundary gate. After obtaining the candidate maximum flood storage volume, the flood height is calculated based on the candidate maximum flood storage volume and room area sub-data. That is, the candidate flood height value (i.e., the water level height at which the area or room is flooded) is equal to the candidate maximum flood storage volume divided by the room area sub-data (i.e., the area occupied by this region).

[0150] In step S530 of some embodiments, a preset flooding height threshold is used to characterize the height threshold for configuring a watertight door, such as 200 mm, 300 mm, etc., which is not specifically limited here. If the candidate flooding height value is less than or equal to the preset flooding height threshold, the flooding height is considered low, and alternative measures for watertight doors (i.e., alternative watertight door configurations) can be set to ensure that nuclear safety-critical items are not affected by internal flooding. In this case, the alternative watertight door configuration can be marked as the second watertight door configuration mark, meaning that a watertight door does not need to be configured.

[0151] In one specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 6 , Figure 6This is an optional flowchart of step S530 provided in the embodiments of this application. In some embodiments of this application, step S530 may specifically include, but is not limited to, steps S610 to S630, as described below. Figure 6 These three steps will be explained in detail.

[0152] Step S610: Set candidate watertight door alternative operations based on candidate flooding height values;

[0153] Step S620: Extract data from the basic data of the boundary gate to obtain the functional sub-data of the boundary gate;

[0154] Step S630: Based on the boundary gate function sub-data, perform watertight door candidate operation detection on the candidate watertight door candidate operation and determine the watertight door candidate configuration mark.

[0155] In step S610 of some embodiments, if the candidate flood height value is less than or equal to a preset flood height threshold, although it may not be necessary to install a watertight door, it is still necessary to confirm whether the alternative watertight door measures are feasible, that is, to conduct a feasibility analysis of the alternative watertight door measures. The candidate watertight door alternative operation refers to a watertight door alternative measure that requires a feasibility assessment.

[0156] It should be noted that alternative operations for candidate watertight doors include: setting up slopes, thresholds, raising the height of equipment, etc.

[0157] In step S620 of some embodiments, the boundary gate functional sub-data is used to characterize the functional requirements of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate. For example, if the candidate flooded zone boundary gate has evacuation requirements, the corresponding boundary gate functional sub-data characterizes that the candidate flooded zone boundary gate cannot have a threshold set.

[0158] In step S630 of some embodiments, detecting watertight door alternative operations based on boundary gate function sub-data refers to assessing the feasibility of watertight door alternative measures. Watertight door alternative configuration markers are used to characterize the feasibility of candidate watertight door alternative operations. These markers include a first watertight door configuration marker and a second watertight door configuration marker. The first watertight door configuration marker indicates that the candidate watertight door alternative operation can be performed on the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate. The second watertight door configuration marker indicates that the candidate watertight door alternative operation cannot be performed on the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate. Therefore, if the candidate flooded zone boundary gate has evacuation requirements, the corresponding boundary gate function sub-data indicates that the candidate flooded zone boundary gate cannot have a threshold set, and in this case, the watertight door alternative configuration marker can be determined to be the second watertight door configuration marker.

[0159] In step S540 of some embodiments, if the watertight door candidate configuration flag corresponding to at least one candidate watertight door candidate operation is a first watertight door configuration flag, that is, the candidate watertight door candidate operation is performed on the candidate flooded partition related to the candidate flooded partition boundary door, then the target configuration flag can be determined as a second watertight door flag. In this case, the candidate watertight door candidate operation can be performed on the candidate flooded partition related to the candidate flooded partition boundary door. If the watertight door candidate configuration flag corresponding to each candidate watertight door candidate operation is a second watertight door configuration flag, that is, the candidate watertight door candidate operation cannot be performed on the candidate flooded partition related to the candidate flooded partition boundary door, then the target configuration flag can be determined as a first watertight door flag, and a watertight door can only be configured at the candidate flooded partition boundary door.

[0160] In one specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 7 , Figure 7 This is another optional flowchart of the method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant provided in this application embodiment. After step S530, this application may further include, but is not limited to, steps 710 to S740, as described below. Figure 7 These four steps will be explained in detail.

[0161] Step S710: If the candidate flood height value is greater than the preset flood height threshold, set up flood flow path alternative operations based on the flood flow path sub-data.

[0162] Step S720: Obtain the regional flow path requirement data of the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate;

[0163] Step S730: Based on the regional flow path requirement data, perform flow path alternative operation detection on the flooded flow path alternative operation and determine the flow path alternative configuration mark;

[0164] Step S740: Determine the target configuration mark based on the alternative configuration mark of the flow path.

[0165] In step S710 of some embodiments, if the candidate flood height value is greater than the preset flood height threshold, a flood flow path feasibility analysis needs to be performed, that is, a flood flow path alternative operation is set based on the flood flow path sub-data. The flood flow path alternative operations include: unsealed holes, ground grids, hoisting holes, and other operations that allow water to flow smoothly to lower floors.

[0166] In steps S720 and S730 of some embodiments, the regional flow path requirement data refers to the flooding flow path data of the candidate flooding zone associated with the candidate flooding zone boundary gate. The flow path candidate configuration flag indicates whether the candidate flooding zone associated with the candidate flooding zone boundary gate can be configured with a flooding flow path candidate operation.

[0167] It should be noted that the flow path candidate configuration markers include a first flow path configuration marker and a second flow path configuration marker. The first flow path configuration marker indicates that a flooding flow path candidate operation should be performed on a candidate flooding zone associated with a candidate flooding zone boundary gate. The second flow path configuration marker indicates that a flooding flow path candidate operation cannot be performed on a candidate flooding zone associated with a candidate flooding zone boundary gate. For example, if the opening on the floor where the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is located requires fireproof sealing, then an unsealed opening cannot be set as a flooding flow path candidate operation. In this case, the flow path candidate configuration marker corresponding to this flooding flow path candidate operation is the second flow path configuration marker.

[0168] In step S740 of some embodiments, if the path candidate configuration marker corresponding to at least one flooding path candidate operation is a first path configuration marker, then the target configuration marker is determined to be a second watertight gate marker, meaning that a flooding path candidate operation can be performed in the candidate flooding zone associated with the candidate flooding zone boundary gate. At this time, after performing the flooding path candidate operation, steps S510-S520 need to be re-executed to obtain a new candidate flooding height value. If the new candidate flooding height value is less than or equal to a preset flooding height threshold, then steps S530 to S540 are re-executed. If the new candidate flooding height value is greater than the preset flooding height threshold, then steps S710 to S740 are re-executed.

[0169] It should be noted that if all flooded flow path candidate operation corresponding to the flow path candidate configuration mark is the second flow path configuration mark, then the target configuration mark is determined to be the first watertight gate mark. That is, flooded flow path candidate operation cannot be performed in the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, but a watertight gate is configured instead.

[0170] In the above embodiments, if setting up candidate watertight doors is not feasible due to certain factors (such as equipment transportation requirements, personnel evacuation requirements, etc.), the feasibility of setting up unobstructed flood flow paths can be analyzed. If the flood height is high, the feasibility of setting up unobstructed flood flow paths can be analyzed. If the flood flow path is feasible, the flood height can be recalculated to analyze whether it is necessary to set up watertight doors. Therefore, by continuously analyzing various feasibility studies, this application can rationally configure watertight doors in flood-prone areas of nuclear power plants while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities of the nuclear power plant are not damaged, avoiding difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, and thus obtaining a more optimized flood protection solution.

[0171] In one example, a candidate flood-prone boundary door is identified as the door leading to the outside from the safety building at an elevation of ±0.00 meters, located in the controlled area. In this case, the candidate flood-prone boundary door is the outer boundary door of the building, corresponding to the first identification tag, and the corresponding target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data. According to the first analysis rule sub-data, this candidate flood-prone boundary door belongs to the controlled area, and a protection design scheme needs to be determined based on the flood height calculation results. For the selected flood-prone door area related to the candidate flood-prone boundary door, the flood height is relatively low because there is a ground grid as a flood flow path in this area. To limit water flow to the outside of the building after flooding, flood protection is required. However, since the candidate flood-prone boundary door here has evacuation requirements, a threshold cannot be set, meaning the alternative watertight door is not feasible. Furthermore, after a feasibility analysis of the flood flow path, it is determined that there is no watertight door alternative protection design scheme that can be implemented for this boundary door. Therefore, a watertight door must be configured for the candidate flood-prone boundary door here.

[0172] In another example, a candidate flood-prone boundary door is identified as the door between safety building A and safety building B at an elevation of +4.90 meters. This candidate flood-prone boundary door is designated as a column boundary door, and its corresponding target analysis rule data is the third analysis rule sub-data. Based on this analysis rule, a protection design scheme needs to be determined according to the flood height calculation results. However, since the floor where this candidate flood-prone boundary door is located is a cable floor, the main flood source is the water volume caused by the activation of the fire protection system. Calculations show that the flood volume and flood height on this floor are relatively large. Analysis indicates that the openings on this floor need to be fireproofed, and unsealed openings cannot be used as flood flow paths. Therefore, there is no watertight door alternative protection design scheme available for this candidate flood-prone boundary door. Thus, a watertight door must be installed for this candidate flood-prone boundary door.

[0173] In another example, a candidate flood zone boundary gate was identified as the gate between the flood zones in column A and column B of the fuel building at elevation +13.30 meters. This candidate flood zone boundary gate was determined to be a column boundary gate, and the corresponding target analysis rule data was the third analysis rule sub-data. Based on this analysis rule, a protection design scheme needs to be determined according to the flood height calculation results. Therefore, the largest flood source in the two flood zones related to the candidate flood zone boundary gate was identified as flooding caused by the failure of the PTR (fuel building reactor and spent fuel pool cooling and treatment system) pipeline. At the same time, the maximum flow rate of the PTR system failure is 640 cubic meters per hour, so the flood volume and flood height of the floor where the candidate flood zone boundary gate is located are relatively large. The feasibility of setting a flood flow path needs to be analyzed. After analysis, it is permissible to set unsealed openings on this floor, with ground openings of 0.16 square meters each on the floor of the rooms on both sides. Through calculation, with the flood flow path set, the flood water level height will not exceed 0.2 meters. Based on this, it is determined that the alternative operation for the watertight door at this boundary gate is to allow the installation of a 200 mm threshold. Therefore, the candidate flooded zone boundary gate here does not need to be equipped with a watertight door, but it is necessary to set up an unsealed hole in the ground with an effective area of ​​0.16 square meters and install a 200 mm threshold as an alternative protective measure for the watertight door.

[0174] In another embodiment, a candidate flood-prone boundary door is identified as the front door of the main control room in Safety Building C at elevation +13.20 meters. This candidate flood-prone boundary door is designated as another boundary door, and the corresponding target analysis rule data is the fourth analysis rule sub-data. Based on this analysis rule, since this area is the main control room area with frequent personnel access, and according to engineering experience, it can be determined that if flooding occurs here, it can be detected by personnel in a timely manner. Through qualitative analysis, it is determined that flooding in this area will not affect nuclear safety functions. Therefore, according to the fourth analysis rule sub-data, a watertight door is not required for this boundary door.

[0175] In one specific embodiment, please refer to Figure 8 , Figure 8 The flowchart illustrates the process of determining a protection design scheme through flood height calculation. Specifically, it involves performing watertight door configuration checks on candidate flood zone boundary doors based on flood zone design data to determine whether to install watertight doors at the candidate flood zone boundary doors or use the alternative watertight door configuration. The specific steps include:

[0176] Step S810: Collect design input.

[0177] It should be noted that the design input at this time refers to the flood zoning design data, which may include flood source design sub-data, room area sub-data, flood detection and isolation sub-data, and flood flow path sub-data.

[0178] Step S820: Calculate the candidate flooding height values.

[0179] It should be noted that the calculation method for the candidate flooding height value at this time can refer to steps S510-S520 above, and will not be repeated here.

[0180] Step S830: Determine whether the candidate flood height value is less than or equal to the preset flood height threshold. If yes, proceed to step S841; otherwise, proceed to step S842.

[0181] It should be noted that the preset flooding height threshold can be 200 mm, without any specific limitation.

[0182] Step S841: Conduct a feasibility analysis of alternative measures for watertight doors, and then proceed to step S850.

[0183] It should be noted that this step involves first setting up multiple candidate watertight door alternatives, and then conducting a feasibility analysis of watertight door alternative measures for each candidate watertight door alternative.

[0184] Step S842: Set up alternative flooded flow paths based on the flooded flow path sub-data, and then execute step S860.

[0185] It should be noted that the alternative flooding paths at this time include alternative measures such as ground grids and holes.

[0186] Step S850: Determine whether the set watertight door replacement measure is feasible. If yes, the corresponding watertight door replacement measure is feasible, and proceed to step S870; otherwise, proceed to step S842.

[0187] It should be noted that the method for determining whether the watertight door alternative is feasible can refer to steps S620-S630 above, and no specific limitations are made here.

[0188] Step S860: Determine whether the set alternative flooding path is feasible. If yes, it is feasible, and proceed to step S820; if no, it is not feasible, and proceed to step S880.

[0189] Step S870: Set up watertight door alternative measures.

[0190] It should be noted that, for the above steps, the candidate watertight door alternative operation can be performed in the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0191] Step S880: Install a watertight door.

[0192] It should be noted that for the above steps, watertight doors can only be configured at the boundary doors of the candidate flooded zones.

[0193] In step S170 of some embodiments, if the target configuration is marked as a first watertight door, a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooded zone boundary door. If the target configuration is marked as a second watertight door, a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooded zone boundary door, which allows for alternative watertight door configurations or alternative flooded flow paths at the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0194] The method for configuring watertight doors in flood-prone zones of nuclear power plants provided in this application can determine the analysis principles, i.e., target analysis rule data, for watertight doors in flood-prone zones based on the characteristics of the plant layout and the specific circumstances of flooding within the area, according to the internal flooding scenario and its impact on nuclear power plant safety. An appropriate analysis process is then established based on the target analysis rule data to reconfigure the existing watertight doors at the boundaries of flood-prone zones in nuclear power plants, reducing the number of watertight doors at these boundaries, improving the convenience of personnel passage, and enhancing the economic efficiency of nuclear power plant construction. Compared to related technologies that uniformly set watertight measures at the boundaries of flood-prone zones without identifying and screening the setting of watertight doors based on the characteristics of the plant layout and the specific circumstances of flooding within the area, this application can form a superior flood protection design scheme. Furthermore, although related technologies may disclose more accurate methods for calculating flood levels, they do not consider optimization strategies for flood protection measures. Therefore, this application can reasonably configure watertight doors in the flooded areas of a nuclear power plant while ensuring that important equipment, critical systems, or safety facilities are not damaged, thereby avoiding difficulties in personnel evacuation and equipment transportation, and thus obtaining a more optimized flood protection solution.

[0195] Please see Figure 9 , Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration system provided in an embodiment of this application. The system can implement the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method described in the above embodiment. The system includes:

[0196] The first acquisition module 910 is used to acquire the basic data of the boundary gates of the candidate flooding zones of the nuclear power plant; wherein, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate refers to the boundary gate in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooding zones or to isolate a candidate flooding zone from the outside.

[0197] The identification module 920 is used to identify boundary gates based on the preset boundary gate identification model and obtain boundary gate identification labels; wherein, the boundary gate identification labels are used to characterize the type of candidate flooded zone boundary gates;

[0198] Matching module 930 is used to perform rule matching based on boundary door identification label and preset watertight door analysis rule table to determine target analysis rule data;

[0199] The first detection module 940 is used to perform flood protection detection based on target analysis rule data and boundary gate basic data, and to determine the initial configuration marker;

[0200] The second acquisition module 950 is used to acquire flooding partition design data of candidate flooding partitions related to candidate flooding partition boundary gates if the initial configuration is marked as the first flooding protection mark; wherein, the first flooding protection mark is used to characterize flooding protection for candidate flooding partition boundary gates;

[0201] The second detection module 960 is used to perform watertight door configuration detection on candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on flooded zone design data, and determine the target configuration mark.

[0202] The configuration module 970 is used to configure a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary door if the target configuration marker is the first watertight door marker; wherein, the first watertight door marker is used to characterize the watertight door configuration of the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

[0203] It should be noted that the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration system of this application embodiment is used to implement the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method of the above embodiment. The nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration system of this application embodiment corresponds to the aforementioned nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method. For the specific processing process, please refer to the aforementioned nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method, which will not be repeated here.

[0204] This application also provides a computer device comprising: at least one memory, at least one processor, and at least one computer program. The at least one computer program is stored in the at least one memory, and the at least one processor executes the at least one computer program to implement the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method according to any of the above embodiments. The computer device can be any smart terminal, including tablet computers, in-vehicle computers, etc.

[0205] Please see Figure 10 , Figure 10 The illustration shows the hardware structure of a computer device according to another embodiment, the computer device comprising:

[0206] The processor 1010 can be implemented using a general-purpose central processing unit (CPU), microprocessor, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits, and is used to execute relevant programs to implement the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of this application.

[0207] The memory 1020 can be implemented as a read-only memory (ROM), static storage device, dynamic storage device, or random access memory (RAM). The memory 1020 can store the operating system and other applications. When the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of this specification are implemented through software or firmware, the relevant program code is stored in the memory 1020 and is called and executed by the processor 1010 to execute the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method of the embodiments of this application.

[0208] The input / output interface 1030 is used to implement information input and output;

[0209] The communication interface 1040 is used to enable communication and interaction between this device and other devices. Communication can be achieved through wired means (such as USB, Ethernet cable, etc.) or wireless means (such as mobile network, WIFI, Bluetooth, etc.).

[0210] Bus 1050 transmits information between various components of the device (e.g., processor 1010, memory 1020, input / output interface 1030, and communication interface 1040);

[0211] The processor 1010, memory 1020, input / output interface 1030 and communication interface 1040 are connected to each other within the device via bus 1050.

[0212] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program for causing a computer to execute the nuclear power plant flooded zone watertight door configuration method described in the above embodiments.

[0213] Memory, as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-transitory software programs and non-transitory computer-executable programs. Furthermore, memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-transitory memory, such as at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-transitory solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, memory may optionally include memory remotely located relative to the processor, and these remote memories can be connected to the processor via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

[0214] The embodiments described in this application are for the purpose of more clearly illustrating the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, and do not constitute a limitation on the technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this application. As those skilled in the art will know, with the evolution of technology and the emergence of new application scenarios, the technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this application are also applicable to similar technical problems.

[0215] Those skilled in the art will understand that the technical solutions shown in the figures do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of this application, and may include more or fewer steps than shown, or combine certain steps, or different steps.

[0216] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the modules can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0217] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or some of the steps in the methods disclosed above, as well as the functional modules / units in the systems and devices, can be implemented as software, firmware, hardware, or suitable combinations thereof.

[0218] The terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “fourth,” etc. (if present) in the specification and accompanying drawings of this application are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that the embodiments of this application described herein can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms “comprising” and “having,” and any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion; for example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that comprises a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units explicitly listed, but may include other steps or units not explicitly listed or inherent to such processes, methods, products, or apparatus.

[0219] It should be understood that in this application, "at least one (item)" means one or more, and "more than" means two or more. "And / or" is used to describe the relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, "A and / or B" can represent three cases: only A exists, only B exists, and both A and B exist simultaneously, where A and B can be singular or plural. The character " / " generally indicates that the preceding and following related objects are in an "or" relationship. "At least one (item) of the following" or similar expressions refer to any combination of these items, including any combination of single or plural items. For example, at least one (item) of a, b, or c can represent: a, b, c, "a and b", "a and c", "b and c", or "a and b and c", where a, b, and c can be single or multiple.

[0220] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of the units described above is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between apparatuses or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0221] The units described above as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0222] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit.

[0223] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes multiple instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing programs, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0224] The preferred embodiments of the present application have been described above with reference to the accompanying drawings, but this does not limit the scope of the claims of the present application. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, and improvements made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and substance of the embodiments of the present application shall be within the scope of the claims of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for configuring watertight doors in a flooded zone of a nuclear power plant, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtain basic boundary gate data for candidate flooding zone boundary gates of a nuclear power plant; wherein, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate refers to the boundary gate in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooding zones or to isolate the candidate flooding zone from the outside; The boundary gate identification is performed on the basic boundary gate data according to the preset boundary gate identification model to obtain the boundary gate identification label; wherein, the boundary gate identification label is used to characterize the type of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate; The target analysis rule data is determined by matching the boundary door identification label with the preset watertight door analysis rule table. Flood protection detection is performed based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data to determine the initial configuration mark. Specifically, this includes: if the target analysis rule data is the first analysis rule sub-data, region type extraction is performed based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary region data. The first analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification label is the first identification label. The first identification label is used to characterize the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as an external boundary gate of the factory building. If the boundary region data characterizes the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as located at the boundary of a non-controlled area, the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is obtained. A zone discharge label is determined based on the discharge liquid type. If the zone discharge label is the first discharge label, the initial configuration mark is determined to be the first flood protection rule. The protection markings include: the first emission tag being used to characterize that the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate does not meet emission requirements; if the target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data, boundary safety level items are extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary safety level item data, wherein the second analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification tag is the second identification tag, and the second identification tag is used to characterize that the candidate flooded zone boundary gate is the boundary gate of an adjacent factory building; if the boundary safety level item data characterizes that the same safety level items with the same safety function and the same safety series are arranged on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, the area type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary area data, and the initial configuration markings are determined based on the boundary area data; If the initial configuration marker is a first flood protection marker, obtain the flood zone design data of the candidate flood zone related to the candidate flood zone boundary gate; wherein, the first flood protection marker is used to characterize the flood protection of the candidate flood zone boundary gate, and the flood zone design data includes flood source design sub-data, room area sub-data, flood detection isolation sub-data, and flood flow path sub-data; Based on the flooding zone design data, watertight door configuration detection is performed on the candidate flooding zone boundary doors to determine the target configuration marker; If the target configuration is marked as a first watertight door mark, a watertight door is configured at the candidate flooded zone boundary door; wherein, the first watertight door mark is used to characterize the watertight door configuration of the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of detecting watertight door configurations for the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the flooded zone design data and determining target configuration markers includes: Based on the flood source design sub-data, the flood detection and isolation sub-data, and the flood flow path sub-data, the flood accumulation is calculated to obtain the candidate maximum flood accumulation. The flood height is calculated based on the candidate maximum flood volume and the room area data to obtain the candidate flood height value; If the candidate flood height value is less than or equal to the preset flood height threshold, a watertight door alternative configuration marker is determined based on the candidate flood height value. The target configuration mark is determined based on the watertight door alternative configuration mark.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The process of determining the candidate watertight door configuration markers based on the candidate flooding height values ​​includes: Based on the candidate flooding height values, candidate watertight door operations are set up; Data extraction is performed on the basic boundary gate data to obtain boundary gate functional sub-data; Based on the boundary gate function sub-data, the candidate watertight door operation is detected, and the candidate watertight door configuration flag is determined.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, After calculating the flood height based on the candidate maximum flood storage volume and the room area sub-data to obtain the candidate flood height value, the method further includes: If the candidate flood height value is greater than the preset flood height threshold, a flood flow path alternative operation is set based on the flood flow path sub-data. Obtain the regional flow path requirement data of the candidate flooded zone associated with the candidate flooded zone boundary gate; Based on the regional flow path requirement data, the flood flow path candidate operation is detected, and the flow path candidate configuration mark is determined. The target configuration marker is determined based on the alternative flow path configuration markers.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Determining the initial configuration marker based on the boundary region data includes: If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooded zones on both sides of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate are control zones, the initial configuration marker is determined to be a second flood protection marker; wherein, the second flood protection marker is used to indicate that no flood protection is applied to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate; If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooding zones on both sides of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate are non-control zones, then the initial configuration marker is determined to be the second flooding protection marker. If the boundary region data indicates that the candidate flooding zone boundary gate is a boundary gate between the non-control zone and the control zone, then the initial configuration marker is determined to be the first flooding protection marker.

6. A watertight door configuration system for flooded zones in a nuclear power plant, characterized in that, The system includes: The first acquisition module is used to acquire the basic boundary gate data of the candidate flooding zone boundary gates of the nuclear power plant; wherein, the candidate flooding zone boundary gate refers to the boundary gate in the nuclear power plant used to isolate any two candidate flooding zones or to isolate the candidate flooding zone from the outside; The identification module is used to identify the boundary gates in the basic boundary gate data according to a preset boundary gate identification model, and obtain boundary gate identification labels; wherein, the boundary gate identification labels are used to characterize the type of the candidate flooded zone boundary gate; The matching module is used to perform rule matching based on the boundary door identification label and the preset watertight door analysis rule table to determine the target analysis rule data; The first detection module is used to perform flood protection detection based on the target analysis rule data and the boundary gate basic data, and determine the initial configuration mark. Specifically, it includes: if the target analysis rule data is first analysis rule sub-data, extracting the region type based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary region data, wherein the first analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification label is the first identification label, and the first identification label is used to characterize the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as an external boundary gate of the factory building; if the boundary region data characterizes the candidate flooded zone boundary gate as located at the boundary of a non-control zone, obtaining the discharge liquid type of the candidate flooded zone related to the candidate flooded zone boundary gate, determining the zone discharge label based on the discharge liquid type, and determining the initial configuration mark if the zone discharge label is the first discharge label. The first flood protection label is used to characterize that the candidate flood zone associated with the candidate flood zone boundary gate does not meet the discharge requirements. If the target analysis rule data is the second analysis rule sub-data, boundary safety level items are extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary safety level item data. The second analysis rule sub-data refers to the flood protection detection rule set when the boundary gate identification label is the second identification label. The second identification label is used to characterize that the candidate flood zone boundary gate is the boundary gate of an adjacent factory building. If the boundary safety level item data characterizes that the same safety level items with the same safety function and the same safety series are arranged on both sides of the candidate flood zone boundary gate, the area type is extracted based on the boundary gate basic data to obtain boundary area data. The initial configuration label is determined based on the boundary area data. The second acquisition module is used to acquire the flooding zone design data of the candidate flooding zone related to the candidate flooding zone boundary gate if the initial configuration marker is the first flooding protection marker; wherein, the first flooding protection marker is used to characterize the flooding protection of the candidate flooding zone boundary gate, and the flooding zone design data includes flooding source design sub-data, room area sub-data, flooding detection isolation sub-data, and flooding flow path sub-data; The second detection module is used to perform watertight door configuration detection on the candidate flooded zone boundary doors based on the flooded zone design data, and determine the target configuration marker. A configuration module is configured to configure a watertight door at the candidate flooded zone boundary door if the target configuration marker is a first watertight door marker; wherein the first watertight door marker is used to characterize the watertight door configuration of the candidate flooded zone boundary door.

7. A computer device, characterized in that, include: At least one memory; At least one processor; At least one computer program; The at least one computer program is stored in the at least one memory, and the at least one processor executes the at least one computer program to implement the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program for causing a computer to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images