A method, device and medium for formulating rectification strategy based on safety inspection

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method, device and medium for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspection, which relates to the field of intelligent management technology. The method includes: obtaining safety inspection data and performing a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; determining the current site safety factor through a hazard parameter assessment based on the safety parameter granularity; performing a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; performing a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain a rectification range parameter; and determining a rectification strategy through a current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameter and the previous site rectification priority. The present invention solves the technical problems of low efficiency and poor feasibility in formulating safety inspection rectification strategies in the prior art through the above method.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of intelligent management technology, and in particular to a method, device and medium for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspection. Background Art

[0002] In commercial environments, safety has always been a top priority for the management of retail venues like shopping malls and shopping centers. With technological advancements and increasing consumer demand for safety, developing safety rectification strategies for each business within a commercial environment following safety inspections has become a critical step.

[0003] Existing safety rectification methods are constrained by fixed terms. Resolving safety issues typically relies on satisfactory re-inspection results as a sign of rectification completion, but lack sufficient guidance on how businesses should implement rectification measures and the specific measures they should take. Manually formulated rectification strategies require data to be uploaded to the system after inspections for analysis, resulting in poor timeliness and inefficiency. Furthermore, these strategies may not allow for the immediate detection of hidden safety issues during safety inspections. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The embodiments of the present invention provide a method, device and medium for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspection, which solves the technical problems of low efficiency and poor feasibility of formulating safety inspection rectification strategies in the prior art.

[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspections, characterized in that the method includes: obtaining safety inspection data, and performing a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; determining the safety factor of the current place through a hazard parameter assessment based on the safety parameter granularity; performing a place rectification priority assessment on the current place safety factor to determine the current place rectification priority; performing a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current place safety factor to obtain a rectification range parameter; and determining the rectification strategy through a current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameter and the previous place rectification priority.

[0006] In one implementation of the present invention, a security parameter granularity assessment is performed on security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data, specifically including: dividing the security inspection data into data types to obtain inspection data types; wherein the inspection data types include: security inspection parameters, security inspection pictures; dividing the security inspection parameters into branch levels to determine the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameters, and determining the first security parameter granularity based on the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameters; segmenting the features of the security inspection pictures, and based on the security inspection pictures after feature segmentation, determining the second security parameter granularity by grading the effectiveness of security pixels; and determining the security parameter granularity based on the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity.

[0007] In one implementation of the present invention, the safety factor of the current place is determined based on the safety parameter granularity through the hazard parameter evaluation, specifically including: based on the safety parameter granularity, determining the starting parameters of the hazard parameter evaluation through granularity sorting; according to the safety parameter granularity sequence of the starting parameters, determining the hazard status parameters of each area in turn through the regional hazard parameter evaluation; accumulating the data of the hazard status parameters of each area to determine the safety factor of the current place.

[0008] In one implementation of the present invention, a site rectification priority assessment is performed on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority, specifically including: based on the current site safety factor, determining the urgency of each site, and determining the rectification urgency sequence of each site; assigning an urgency weight to the rectification urgency sequence to determine a first priority parameter; based on the current site safety factor, determining the severity of each site, and determining the danger severity sequence of each site; assigning a severity weight to the danger severity sequence to determine a second priority parameter; and taking a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter to determine the current site rectification priority.

[0009] In one implementation of the present invention, a hazard impact range assessment is performed on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place to obtain a rectification range parameter, specifically including: determining the current place safety factor category by safety factor classification based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place; performing safety correlation matching on the current place safety factor categories respectively to determine the maximum hazard impact range; performing a safety mutual impact assessment between the current place safety factor categories to obtain safety factor mutual impact parameters; and obtaining the rectification range parameters based on the maximum hazard impact range and the safety factor mutual impact parameters.

[0010] In one implementation of the present invention, a rectification strategy is determined based on the rectification scope parameters and the current site rectification priority through the current rectification resource assessment, specifically including: based on the rectification scope parameters, obtaining the rectification resource allocation weight through the current rectification resource assessment; according to the rectification resource allocation weight, determining the rectification resource distribution data by delineating the rectification resource scope; based on the current site rectification priority, calibrating the rectification order of the rectification resource distribution data; so as to determine the rectification strategy.

[0011] In one implementation of the present invention, after determining the rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site through the current rectification resource assessment, the method also includes: sending the rectification strategy to the rectification party and agreeing with the rectification party on the rectification completion deadline; based on the rectification completion deadline, determining the safety re-inspection strategy through re-inspection factor analysis.

[0012] In one implementation of the present invention, a safety re-inspection strategy is determined based on the rectification completion deadline through re-inspection factor analysis, specifically including: determining the re-inspection start date based on the rectification completion deadline, and obtaining re-inspection factors through rectification strategy matching based on the re-inspection start date; performing re-inspection priority evaluation on the re-inspection factors to determine the re-inspection item sequence; and performing time estimation on the re-inspection items in the re-inspection item sequence to determine the safety re-inspection strategy.

[0013] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a rectification strategy formulation device based on safety inspections, characterized in that the device includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor so that the at least one processor can: obtain safety inspection data, and perform a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; determine the current site safety factor through a hazard parameter assessment based on the safety parameter granularity; perform a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; perform a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain a rectification range parameter; determine the rectification strategy through the current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameter and the previous site rectification priority.

[0014] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a non-volatile computer storage medium for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections, which stores computer executable instructions, and is characterized in that the computer executable instructions are configured to: obtain safety inspection data, and perform a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; determine the safety factor of the current place through a hazard parameter assessment based on the safety parameter granularity; perform a place rectification priority assessment on the safety factor of the current place to determine the rectification priority of the current place; perform a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place to obtain a rectification range parameter; determine the rectification strategy through the current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameter and the previous place rectification priority.

[0015] The embodiments of the present invention provide a method, device and medium for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections. By performing security parameter granularity assessment on safety inspection data and formulating site rectification strategies based on the security parameter granularity, the technical problems of low efficiency and poor feasibility of safety inspection rectification strategy formulation in the prior art are solved, and the automatic formulation and subsequent supervision of rectification strategies during safety inspections are realized, thereby improving the efficiency of safety inspection rectification strategy formulation and the feasibility of safety inspection rectification strategies. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] The drawings described herein are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention and constitute a part of the present invention. The exemplary embodiments of the present invention and their descriptions are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute an improper limitation of the present invention. In the drawings:

[0017] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspections provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0018] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the internal structure of a device for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspections provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the present invention more clear, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with specific embodiments of the present invention and corresponding drawings. Obviously, the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0020] The embodiments of the present invention provide a method, device and medium for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections. By performing security parameter granularity assessment on safety inspection data and formulating site rectification strategies based on the security parameter granularity, the technical problems of low efficiency and poor feasibility of safety inspection rectification strategy formulation in the prior art are solved, and the automatic formulation and subsequent supervision of rectification strategies during safety inspections are realized, thereby improving the efficiency of safety inspection rectification strategy formulation and the feasibility of safety inspection rectification strategies.

[0021] The technical solutions proposed in the embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0022] Figure 1 The flow chart of a method for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspection is provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspection, which specifically includes the following steps:

[0023] Step 101: Acquire security inspection data and perform security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data.

[0024] Specifically, it includes: dividing the security inspection data into data types to obtain inspection data types; wherein the inspection data types include: security inspection parameters and security inspection pictures; dividing the security inspection parameters into branch levels to determine the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameters, and determining the first security parameter granularity based on the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameters; segmenting the features of the security inspection pictures, and based on the security inspection pictures after feature segmentation, determining the second security parameter granularity by grading the effectiveness of security pixels; determining the security parameter granularity based on the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity.

[0025] The present invention determines the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data by performing security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data, thereby achieving granularity division of the data collected in the security inspection site and improving the accuracy and standardization of the inspection data analysis.

[0026] In the embodiments of the present invention, detailed explanation is given through the following Example 1.

[0027] Example 1: First, security inspection data is obtained through inspection personnel or inspection devices installed at the inspected site. Generally, the obtained security inspection data includes installation footage, videos, and inspection parameter data corresponding to the site, such as circuit layout, fire protection facilities, etc.

[0028] Then, according to the security sensitivity, security importance and impact degree of the inspection parameter data on site security, the inspection parameters are divided into different branch levels to determine the first security parameter granularity.

[0029] For areas in the inspected places that are difficult to observe and analyze directly, such as narrow gaps, dark surfaces and other visual blind spots, images can be acquired through a small, in-depth camera or COMS.

[0030] Using image region growing, we segment objects, equipment, safety hazards, and other targets from the background in the inspection image. Based on the segmented target features, we use the aforementioned branch-level segmentation method to perform granularity division on equipment in the location that is difficult to directly observe and analyze, thereby obtaining the second safety parameter granularity.

[0031] Finally, the relevant parts and the same branches of the first safety parameter granularity and the second safety parameter granularity are merged and data combed to determine the safety parameter granularity.

[0032] The first security parameter granularity represents the security granularity information of the inspection data obtained by the inspection personnel, and the second parameter granularity represents the security granularity information of the area that is not easy to directly observe.

[0033] First, a unified characteristic field is configured for the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity, and the characteristic field has a one-to-one correspondence with the inspection data type corresponding to a certain granularity information.

[0034] Then, the portion of the obtained feature field containing the second security parameter granularity is branched and integrated. Because a particular feature branch represents similar or similar device statuses in the inspection diagram, the finest-grained relevant data within the second security parameter granularity is used as the integrated core data. Its feature field assignment is also matched based on relevant data such as the corresponding device type in the integrated core data.

[0035] Match the feature fields corresponding to the first security parameter granularity with the feature fields corresponding to the second security parameter granularity, and integrate the parts with the same fields. If the fields corresponding to the two granularities are completely different, the inspection data types at that granularity are considered independent and divided into separate branches at the current finest granularity, and the feature fields are reconfigured.

[0036] It should be noted that in the subsequent inspection process, for other inspection data types with the same characteristics in a separate branch, matching is performed based on the earliest assigned characteristic field, and there is no need to assign it again.

[0037] Step 102: Based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the safety factor of the current site through risk parameter evaluation.

[0038] Specifically, it includes: based on the safety parameter granularity, sorting by granularity to determine the starting parameters for the hazard parameter assessment; according to the safety parameter granularity sequence of the starting parameters, assessing the regional hazard parameters in turn to determine the hazard status parameters of each area; accumulating the data of the hazard status parameters of each area to determine the safety factor of the current place.

[0039] The present invention determines the safety factor of the current site through risk parameter evaluation, thereby achieving an evaluation of the current safety status of the site under safety inspection and quantification of the current safety of the site.

[0040] In the embodiments of the present invention, detailed explanation is given through the following Example 2.

[0041] Example 2: Based on the business or work characteristics of the inspected location, key safety parameters are selected as starting parameters. Key safety parameters need to be selected based on the location's personnel flow and fire prevention requirements. For example, in a crowded location, relevant safety parameters such as trampling prevention and fire prevention may be selected as alternative starting parameters.

[0042] After determining the starting parameters, since their granularity branches have already been determined, they can be directly matched to determine the safety parameter granularity sequence. Each parameter in the sequence is evaluated through the regional hazard parameters in turn to determine the hazard status parameters of each area.

[0043] It should be noted that the regional hazard parameter assessment in this embodiment adopts the random forest algorithm to perform abnormality analysis and risk analysis on each area corresponding to the key safety parameters and their subsequent branches in the venue, and quantify the analysis results to determine the hazard status parameters of each area.

[0044] The weighted average of the hazardous state parameters of each area is taken to determine the safety factor of the current site. Taking the site affected by the environment as an example, it can be comprehensively characterized by the following parameters.

[0045] Regarding the selection of each coefficient, first determine the current site safety coefficient and the last inspection safety coefficient, which represent the safety level of the current site and are unitless numbers; the last inspection safety coefficient is the safety coefficient obtained during the last inspection of the site.

[0046] Then, determine the historical correction factor and environmental correction factor. The historical correction factor is a correction factor determined based on the results of previous inspections (all factors are unitless constants and will not be repeated here), which is used to maintain the accuracy of the safety factor of the current location; the environmental correction factor is used to characterize the degree to which the current location is affected by the environment. The set value will be different in different locations.

[0047] Finally, the effectiveness coefficient of the emergency plan is determined to characterize the effectiveness of the immediate response strategy to safety problems in the current place, that is, the ability of the emergency plan to immediately solve safety problems.

[0048] For the historical correction factor, a correction coefficient is determined by statistically analyzing the frequency and severity of historical safety accidents to reflect the impact of historical safety records on the current safety factor;

[0049] Environmental correction factor: Based on the possible impact of environmental factors such as weather, season, humidity, and traffic flow on the safety of the current site, a correction coefficient is determined through expert scoring or historical data analysis;

[0050] The effectiveness coefficient of the emergency plan needs to judge the response effect of the emergency plan instance drill or model prediction.

[0051] The above coefficients are used as training coefficients of the multiple linear regression algorithm to construct a multiple regression model and determine the linear relationship between the coefficients to obtain the current site safety factor.

[0052] The variables are the current site safety factor, the safety factor from the last inspection, and the emergency plan effectiveness factor. The remaining parameters can be determined before the inspection by analyzing historical data. After the safety factor from the last inspection (the safety factor after rectification) is determined, the emergency plan effectiveness factor is determined based on the current site type.

[0053] It should be noted that the effectiveness coefficient of the emergency plan is based on the current corresponding capabilities of the same emergency measure in the location, and only locations of the same type or similar types use the same emergency measure as the evaluation basis, so as to ensure the accuracy of the effectiveness coefficient of the emergency plan.

[0054] That is to say, the safety factor of the current place depends on the most recent safety status of the current place and the current emergency response effect of the current place, and the other two parameters are used to improve the stability and data accuracy of the safety factor of the current place.

[0055] Step 103: Conduct a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority.

[0056] Specifically, it includes: judging the urgency of each place based on the current safety factor of the place, and determining the rectification urgency sequence of each place; assigning urgency weights to the rectification urgency sequence to determine the first priority parameter; judging the severity of each place based on the current safety factor of the place, and determining the danger severity sequence of each place; assigning severity weights to the danger severity sequence to determine the second priority parameter; and taking a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter to determine the rectification priority of the current place.

[0057] The present invention determines the current site rectification priority by evaluating the site safety factor, thereby achieving a specific analysis of the site safety status and an assessment of the rectification priority, and improving the accuracy and executability of the rectification strategy formulation.

[0058] In the embodiments of the present invention, detailed explanation is given through the following Example 3.

[0059] Example 3: Based on the safety factor, the urgency of rectification of safety inspection sites is determined.

[0060] The urgency of rectification is determined based on the safety factors of the site, such as equipment and signage. The resulting rectification priority is then determined. Rectification is divided into three levels: immediate rectification, emergency rectification, and general rectification, each assigned a different urgency weight. The urgency weights are then ranked to create a rectification urgency sequence.

[0061] The rectification urgency sequence represents the urgency of rectification in each location, and the corresponding quantitative index is the first priority parameter.

[0062] Similarly, it is also necessary to determine the severity of safety inspection sites and determine the hazard severity sequence of each site.

[0063] The rectification severity sequence represents the severity of the negative impact of safety problems in various places on personnel, etc., and the corresponding quantitative indicator is the second priority parameter.

[0064] Finally, a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter is taken to determine the current site rectification priority.

[0065] It should be noted that the current rectification priority of a site is a comprehensive assessment of the rectification site, representing the current rectification intensity and rectification priority of the site.

[0066] Step 104: perform a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain a rectification range parameter.

[0067] Specifically, it includes: based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place, determining the safety factor category of the current place through safety factor classification; performing safety correlation matching on the safety factor categories of the current place respectively to determine the maximum hazard impact range; conducting safety mutual influence assessment between the safety factor categories of the current place to obtain safety factor mutual influence parameters; obtaining rectification range parameters according to the maximum hazard impact range and safety factor mutual influence parameters.

[0068] The present invention evaluates the hazard impact range of the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters, thereby realizing the evaluation of the individual impact and mutual impact of safety factors in the rectification site and the hazard expectation of the site, thereby improving the accuracy of the site safety assessment.

[0069] In the embodiments of the present invention, detailed explanation is given through the following Example 4.

[0070] Example 4: First, based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current location's safety factor, the current location's safety factor category is determined through safety factor classification. Based on the current location's safety factor classification, the current location's equipment is classified into safety factors such as fire, leakage, and safety signs.

[0071] Since the tracing of the release of animals in dangerous situations such as fires will be affected by many factors, a comprehensive analysis of each influencing factor is required.

[0072] Electrical equipment may cause circuit fires. The accumulation of flammable materials and improper management and ventilation can also lead to fires. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct corresponding safety correlation matching to integrate the influencing factors that may cause the same accident or safety problem to obtain the mutual influence parameters of safety factors.

[0073] It should be noted that the security factor mutual influence parameter represents the impact of various devices in the current place on the same security issue, as well as the mutual influence between various devices. The devices in the current place also correspond to the classification of security factors.

[0074] The maximum impact range is the maximum impact range of security issues that can be achieved by a current safety factor, that is, the maximum value of other safety factors that can be affected by this safety factor.

[0075] Step 105: Determine the rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site and by evaluating the current rectification resources.

[0076] Specifically, it includes: based on the rectification scope parameters, obtaining the rectification resource allocation weight through the current rectification resource assessment; according to the rectification resource allocation weight, determining the rectification resource distribution data by delineating the rectification resource scope; based on the current site rectification priority, calibrating the rectification order of the rectification resource distribution data; and determining the rectification strategy.

[0077] After determining the rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site through current rectification resource assessment, the method also includes: sending the rectification strategy to the rectification party and agreeing with the rectification party on a rectification completion deadline; based on the rectification completion deadline, determining the safety re-inspection strategy through re-inspection factor analysis.

[0078] Specifically, it includes: determining the re-inspection start date based on the rectification completion deadline, and obtaining the re-inspection elements through matching the rectification strategy according to the re-inspection start date; evaluating the re-inspection priority of the re-inspection elements to determine the re-inspection item sequence; and making time estimates for the re-inspection items in the re-inspection item sequence to determine the safety re-inspection strategy.

[0079] The present invention determines the rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site through the current rectification resource assessment, realizes the automatic formulation and subsequent supervision of the rectification strategy in the safety inspection, and improves the efficiency of the safety inspection rectification strategy formulation and the feasibility of the safety inspection rectification strategy.

[0080] The above is an embodiment of the method proposed by the present invention. Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present invention also provides a rectification strategy formulation device based on safety inspection, the structure of which is as follows: Figure 2 shown.

[0081] Figure 2 The embodiment of the present invention provides a schematic diagram of the internal structure of a rectification strategy formulation device based on safety inspection. Figure 2 As shown, the equipment includes:

[0082] at least one processor 201;

[0083] and, a memory 202 communicatively coupled to the at least one processor;

[0084] The memory 202 stores instructions that can be executed by at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor 201 to enable the at least one processor 201 to:

[0085] Obtain safety inspection data and perform a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the current site safety factor through hazard parameter assessment; perform a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; perform a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain the rectification range parameters; determine the rectification strategy through current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameters and the previous site rectification priority.

[0086] Some embodiments of the present invention provide corresponding Figure 1 A non-volatile computer storage medium for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspections stores computer executable instructions, wherein the computer executable instructions are set to:

[0087] Obtain safety inspection data and perform a safety parameter granularity assessment on the safety inspection data to determine the safety parameter granularity of the safety inspection data; based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the current site safety factor through hazard parameter assessment; perform a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; perform a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain the rectification range parameters; determine the rectification strategy through current rectification resource assessment based on the rectification range parameters and the previous site rectification priority.

[0088] The various embodiments of the present invention are described in a progressive manner. Similar portions between the various embodiments can be referred to in conjunction with each other. Each embodiment focuses on the differences between the other embodiments. In particular, the IoT device and medium embodiments are generally similar to the method embodiments, so their description is relatively simple. For relevant portions, refer to the description of the method embodiments.

[0089] The system and medium provided in the embodiments of the present invention correspond one-to-one to the method. Therefore, the system and medium also have similar beneficial technical effects to their corresponding methods. Since the beneficial technical effects of the method have been described in detail above, the beneficial technical effects of the system and medium will not be repeated here.

[0090] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Thus, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to magnetic disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0091] The present invention is described with reference to flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, as well as combinations of processes and / or blocks in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0092] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0093] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operational steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device for implementing the process. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A step that specifies a function in one or more boxes.

[0094] In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input / output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

[0095] Memory may include non-permanent storage in a computer-readable medium, random access memory (RAM) and / or non-volatile memory in the form of read-only memory (ROM) or flash RAM. Memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.

[0096] Computer-readable media includes permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media that can be implemented by any method or technology to store information. The information can be computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disc (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transmission media that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer-readable media does not include transitory computer-readable media (transitory media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

[0097] It should also be noted that the terms "comprises," "includes," or any other variations thereof are intended to encompass non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, commodity, or apparatus that includes a series of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not explicitly listed, or includes elements inherent to such process, method, commodity, or apparatus. In the absence of further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprises a ..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, commodity, or apparatus that includes the element.

[0098] The above are merely embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations of the present invention are possible. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention are intended to be included within the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections, characterized in that: The method comprises: Acquire security inspection data, and perform security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data; Based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the current site safety factor through risk parameter assessment; Conducting a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; Performing a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters; Determining a rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site by evaluating current rectification resources; Performing a security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data specifically includes: Dividing the security inspection data into data types to obtain inspection data types; wherein the inspection data types include: security inspection parameters and security inspection pictures; Performing branch level division on the security inspection parameter to determine hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter, and determining a first security parameter granularity based on the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter; Segmenting the features of the security inspection image, and determining a second security parameter granularity by grading the effectiveness of security pixels based on the feature-segmented security inspection image; determining the security parameter granularity according to the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity; Based on the safety parameter granularity, the current site safety factor is determined through risk parameter assessment, specifically including: Based on the granularity of the safety parameters, the starting parameters of the risk parameter assessment are determined by sorting the granularity; According to the safety parameter granularity sequence of the starting parameters, the dangerous state parameters of each area are determined by evaluating the regional dangerous parameters in turn; Accumulating the data of the dangerous state parameters of each area to determine the safety factor of the current place; Conduct a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority, specifically including: Based on the current safety factor of the site, the urgency of each site is determined, and the rectification urgency sequence of each site is determined; Assigning an urgency weight to the rectification urgency sequence to determine a first priority parameter; According to the safety factor of the current place, the severity of each place is judged, and the danger severity sequence of each place is determined; Assigning severity weights to the hazard severity sequence to determine a second priority parameter; Taking a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter to determine the current site rectification priority; Perform a hazard impact assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters, specifically including: Based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place, determining the safety factor category of the current place by safety factor classification; Conduct safety relevance matching on the current site safety factor categories to determine the maximum hazard impact range; Performing a safety mutual impact assessment between the safety factor categories of the current location to obtain safety factor mutual impact parameters; Obtaining the rectification range parameter according to the maximum hazard impact range and the mutual impact parameter of the safety factors; Based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the current site, a rectification strategy is determined through the current rectification resource assessment, specifically including: Based on the rectification scope parameters, a rectification resource allocation weight is obtained through current rectification resource evaluation; According to the weight of rectification resource allocation, the rectification resource distribution data is determined by delineating the rectification resource scope; Based on the current site rectification priority, the rectification resource distribution data is calibrated in rectification order to determine the rectification strategy.

2. A method for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections according to claim 1, characterized in that: After determining a rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameter and the rectification priority of the previous site by evaluating current rectification resources, the method further includes: Send the rectification strategy to the rectification party and agree with the rectification party on the rectification completion deadline; Based on the rectification completion deadline, determine the safety re-inspection strategy through re-inspection factor analysis.

3. A method for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections according to claim 2, characterized in that: Based on the rectification completion deadline, determine the safety re-inspection strategy through re-inspection factor analysis, including: Based on the rectification completion deadline, determine the re-inspection start date, and obtain the re-inspection elements through rectification strategy matching based on the re-inspection start date; Conduct re-inspection priority assessment on the re-inspection elements to determine the re-inspection item sequence; A time estimate is performed on the review items in the review item sequence to determine the safety review strategy.

4. A device for formulating rectification strategies based on safety inspections, characterized in that: The device comprises: at least one processor; and, a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to: Acquire security inspection data, and perform security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data; Based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the current site safety factor through risk parameter assessment; Conducting a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; Performing a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain a rectification range parameter; Determining a rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site by evaluating current rectification resources; Performing a security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data specifically includes: Dividing the security inspection data into data types to obtain inspection data types; wherein the inspection data types include: security inspection parameters and security inspection pictures; Performing branch level division on the security inspection parameter to determine hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter, and determining a first security parameter granularity based on the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter; Segmenting the features of the security inspection image, and determining a second security parameter granularity by grading the effectiveness of security pixels based on the feature-segmented security inspection image; determining the security parameter granularity according to the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity; Based on the safety parameter granularity, the current site safety factor is determined through risk parameter assessment, specifically including: Based on the granularity of the safety parameters, the starting parameters of the risk parameter assessment are determined by sorting the granularity; According to the safety parameter granularity sequence of the starting parameters, the dangerous state parameters of each area are determined by evaluating the regional dangerous parameters in turn; Accumulating the data of the dangerous state parameters of each area to determine the safety factor of the current place; Conduct a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority, specifically including: Based on the current safety factor of the site, the urgency of each site is determined, and the rectification urgency sequence of each site is determined; Assigning an urgency weight to the rectification urgency sequence to determine a first priority parameter; According to the safety factor of the current place, the severity of each place is judged, and the danger severity sequence of each place is determined; Assigning severity weights to the hazard severity sequence to determine a second priority parameter; Taking a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter to determine the current site rectification priority; Perform a hazard impact assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters, specifically including: Based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place, determining the safety factor category of the current place by safety factor classification; Conduct safety relevance matching on the current site safety factor categories to determine the maximum hazard impact range; Performing a safety mutual impact assessment between the safety factor categories of the current location to obtain safety factor mutual impact parameters; Obtaining the rectification range parameter according to the maximum hazard impact range and the mutual impact parameter of the safety factors; Based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the current site, a rectification strategy is determined through the current rectification resource assessment, specifically including: Based on the rectification scope parameters, a rectification resource allocation weight is obtained through current rectification resource evaluation; According to the weight of rectification resource allocation, the rectification resource distribution data is determined by delineating the rectification resource scope; Based on the current site rectification priority, the rectification resource distribution data is calibrated in rectification order to determine the rectification strategy.

5. A non-volatile computer storage medium for formulating a rectification strategy based on safety inspections, storing computer-executable instructions, characterized in that: The computer executable instructions are configured to: Acquire security inspection data, and perform security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data; Based on the safety parameter granularity, determine the current site safety factor through risk parameter assessment; Conducting a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority; Performing a hazard impact range assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters; Determining a rectification strategy based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the previous site by evaluating current rectification resources; Performing a security parameter granularity assessment on the security inspection data to determine the security parameter granularity of the security inspection data specifically includes: Dividing the security inspection data into data types to obtain inspection data types; wherein the inspection data types include: security inspection parameters and security inspection pictures; Performing branch level division on the security inspection parameter to determine hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter, and determining a first security parameter granularity based on the hierarchical distribution data of the security inspection parameter; Segmenting the features of the security inspection image, and determining a second security parameter granularity by grading the effectiveness of security pixels based on the feature-segmented security inspection image; determining the security parameter granularity according to the first security parameter granularity and the second security parameter granularity; Based on the safety parameter granularity, the current site safety factor is determined through risk parameter assessment, specifically including: Based on the granularity of the safety parameters, the starting parameters of the risk parameter assessment are determined by sorting the granularity; According to the safety parameter granularity sequence of the starting parameters, the dangerous state parameters of each area are determined by evaluating the regional dangerous parameters in turn; Accumulating the data of the dangerous state parameters of each area to determine the safety factor of the current place; Conduct a site rectification priority assessment on the current site safety factor to determine the current site rectification priority, specifically including: Based on the current safety factor of the site, the urgency of each site is determined, and the rectification urgency sequence of each site is determined; Assigning an urgency weight to the rectification urgency sequence to determine a first priority parameter; According to the safety factor of the current place, the severity of each place is judged, and the danger severity sequence of each place is determined; Assigning severity weights to the hazard severity sequence to determine a second priority parameter; Taking a weighted average of the first priority parameter and the second priority parameter to determine the current site rectification priority; Perform a hazard impact assessment on the safety inspection data corresponding to the current site safety factor to obtain rectification range parameters, specifically including: Based on the safety inspection data corresponding to the safety factor of the current place, determining the safety factor category of the current place by safety factor classification; Conduct safety relevance matching on the current site safety factor categories to determine the maximum hazard impact range; Performing a safety mutual impact assessment between the safety factor categories of the current location to obtain safety factor mutual impact parameters; Obtaining the rectification range parameter according to the maximum hazard impact range and the mutual impact parameter of the safety factors; Based on the rectification scope parameters and the rectification priority of the current site, a rectification strategy is determined through the current rectification resource assessment, specifically including: Based on the rectification scope parameters, a rectification resource allocation weight is obtained through current rectification resource evaluation; According to the weight of rectification resource allocation, the rectification resource distribution data is determined by delineating the rectification resource scope; Based on the current site rectification priority, the rectification resource distribution data is calibrated in rectification order to determine the rectification strategy.

Images