Survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft

Abstract

The invention discloses a survivability evaluation method for an advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft. According to the method formed by the survivability evaluation process, an advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft is used as an advanced layout aircraft, and a series of survivability calculation and analysis are carried out by combining a complex confrontation environment where strong enemy confrontation is located and system confrontation of red and blue parties; and finally, a set of survivability evaluation method for the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft is formed. Compared with the original survivability evaluation method for the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, the survivability evaluation method for the original aircraft equipment has the advantage that the relevancy of factors such as adaptability in the confrontation environment of confrontation deduction simulation, efficiency evaluation and high-intensity confrontation and the like is low. According to the invention, a novel idea of survivability evaluation is developed, and the method is combined with equipment demonstration, development and modification of an advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of aviation vehicles, and in particular to a survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamically configured aircraft. Background Art

[0002] In the past, the survivability of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft was usually evaluated using "analytical methods, statistical methods and computer simulation methods". In the past, most of the calculations and analyses focused on the performance parameters of the aircraft, lacking the combination with simulation deduction, effectiveness evaluation and other technical means, resulting in uncertainty in the system contribution of advanced layout aircraft when participating in red-blue confrontation. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct survivability evaluation of advanced layout aircraft to assist in design, thereby ensuring a high mission completion rate from the bottom up. Summary of the invention

[0003] The present application provides a survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft. The method integrates the confrontation route design of advanced layout aircraft, as well as a series of means such as confrontation scenario design, equipment model construction, confrontation simulation, and effectiveness evaluation, taking into account the survivability of advanced layout aircraft and confrontation clusters.

[0004] In a first aspect, a survivability assessment method for an advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft is provided, comprising:

[0005] Step (1), selecting a certain type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as a core component, and collecting data on the advanced layout aircraft, wherein the collected data includes at least one of the following: layout appearance characteristics, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different states, and flight altitude;

[0006] Step (2), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), determining the motion characteristic parameters of the aircraft;

[0007] Step (3), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), determining the equipment characteristic parameters of the aircraft;

[0008] Step (4), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), the motion characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (2), and the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3), confirming the confrontation scene and confrontation environment, and forming the blue team model and the supporting quantity and confrontation position deployment;

[0009] Step (5), using the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3) and combining them with the load design, forming a load package of the equipment model, and carrying out the confrontation scenario design of the advanced layout aircraft;

[0010] Step (6), using the blue team model and the corresponding confrontation deployment in step (4) and the confrontation scenario formed in step (5), carry out iterative confrontation simulation;

[0011] Step (7), using the confrontation simulation results of step (6), conduct effectiveness evaluation analysis;

[0012] Step (8), using the results of the effectiveness evaluation analysis in step (7), analyzing the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft;

[0013] Step (9), using the result of the survivability analysis in step (8), analyzing and correcting the penetration flight profile of the advanced layout aircraft;

[0014] During the analysis, each flight profile is segmented and linearized to form multiple segments including at least one of the following: take-off segment, cruise segment, and penetration segment; for each segment of the k-th flight profile, the geometric mean of the parameters is linearized, and the maneuverability parameters, speed items in the range coefficient, and fuel items are compared and analyzed. After the data is extracted by segmentation and brought into the efficiency calculation formula, the efficiency is calculated according to the formula, and the weighted average solution is completed to obtain the efficiency of the k-th flight profile. The efficiency calculation formula satisfies:

[0015] C i =*ln(B)×b1×b2+ln(∑A1+1)+ln(∑A2)+×D1×S1×H1

[0016]

[0017] C i : Combat effectiveness index of the i-th segment of the flight profile; B: Maneuverability parameter; b1: Engine performance parameter; b2: Aerodynamic effectiveness parameter; A1: Firepower parameter; A2: Detection capability parameter; D1: Maneuverability coefficient; S1: Survivability coefficient; H1: Range coefficient; n is the number of flight profile segments; T i is the duration of the i-th segment of the flight profile; N is the number of flight profiles;

[0018] The calculated Sort by numerical value, and analyze the performance values ​​of the most advanced aircraft. Value lower than One or more flight profiles are selected. During the flight, at least one parameter of the advanced layout aircraft including the flight altitude, flight speed, overload, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, load characteristics, damage point and maneuverability is adjusted, and the process returns to step (5). After repeated corrections, when each penetration flight profile meets the efficiency value, The value is not less than After the requirement is met, go to step (10);

[0019] Step (10), using the analysis results of survivability in step (9), preliminarily solidify the actions of advanced layout aircraft, adjust the strategy of the confrontation cluster, optimize the coordination mode of the confrontation cluster, reconstruct the actions of non-advanced layout aircraft, and adjust the equipment model;

[0020] Step (11), combined with the adjustment and correction of step (10), the survivability of the entire confrontation cluster is finally evaluated. Under the constraint that the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft is reduced by no more than 5%, if the average survivability of the non-advanced layout aircraft is increased by more than 20%, the penetration trajectory of the core components is modified by modifying the parameters;

[0021] (12) Organize and form a database of battlefield action-penetration trajectories of advanced deployment aircraft.

[0022] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (1), based on the appearance characteristics of the advanced layout aircraft, the value range of the RCS characteristic value, the value range of the fuselage internal volume, the controllability performance score, the maneuverability performance score, the lift-to-drag ratio under different flight conditions, the counter radius, and the flight altitude parameters are determined.

[0023] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (2), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (1), the motion characteristics of the aircraft are analyzed to form a flight altitude and flight speed table of the advanced layout aircraft at different distances facing different targets of the blue side.

[0024] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (3), characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft equipment are constructed based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (1) and the flight altitude and flight speed table of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (2).

[0025] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (4), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in steps (1) to (3), the confrontation scenario and confrontation environment are conceived, the confrontation concept is confirmed, the confrontation unit of the blue side is selected, the blue side model is formed and the model package is completed, as well as the corresponding blue side deployment action strategy, to form a confrontation plan.

[0026] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (5), the design of the confrontation scenario is completed based on the confrontation scenario, confrontation environment, blue team's confrontation unit, and blue team's confrontation deployment action strategy formed in step (4).

[0027] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (6), a judgment is made based on the damage comparison result. If the new damage ratio is judged to be an improvement over the previous damage ratio, the number, formation, and penetration route of the advanced layout aircraft are changed, and the deduced damage ratio is compared, and the process returns to step (6) to carry out iterative confrontation deduction simulation. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the corresponding confrontation assumption is selected based on the last simulation result.

[0028] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (7), based on the determined confrontation scenario, performance evaluation is performed using at least one of the following: ADC method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, TOPSIS analysis method, or SEA method.

[0029] In conjunction with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (8), the survivability of core equipment at different battlefield positions is calculated by combining the results of the effectiveness evaluation and the statistical data of the confrontation simulation to form a position-equipment-survivability database, which is used for extracting, analyzing and comparing equipment survivability data. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0030] P S =1-P D P T P LGH P K / H

[0031] Where P D is the probability of an aircraft being found at a certain location, P T is the probability of an aircraft at a certain position being tracked; P LGH is the probability of successfully launching, guiding and hitting the aircraft; P K / H is the probability of damage to the aircraft when it is hit.

[0032] In combination with the first aspect, in certain implementations of the first aspect, in step (10), a series of combat simulations are performed based on the use of the advanced layout aircraft in step (9), and during the simulation, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit are continuously adjusted; a judgment is made based on the damage comparison results of the combat simulation, and if the new damage ratio is better than the previous damage ratio, the data of the non-core confrontation unit continues to be adjusted. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit are determined based on the last simulation result and then the data is entered into step (11).

[0033] Compared with the prior art, the solution provided by this application includes at least the following beneficial technical effects:

[0034] (1) The present invention avoids the phenomenon that the single application of analytical methods, statistical methods and computer simulation methods in the survivability assessment process of advanced aircraft in the past is out of touch with confrontation simulation, effectiveness evaluation and confrontation application scenario design. At the same time, in view of the continuous innovation of the aerodynamic layout of various types of vehicles, the original survivability assessment process has a low correlation with the confrontation scenario, and its restrictive effect is becoming more and more obvious. The present invention targets advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, and combines confrontation simulation, effectiveness evaluation and confrontation application scenarios to form a set of survivability assessment methods, which comprehensively considers factors such as the battlefield survivability of core equipment and the mission completion rate, which will help the advanced layout aircraft equipment and supporting application scenarios to be gradually implemented in the future.

[0035] (2) Compared with other methods, the survivability assessment method of the present invention innovatively comprehensively considers the battlefield survivability of the core equipment and the survivability of the remaining antagonistic units in the cluster, and uses iterative analysis in the calculation process.

[0036] (3) The present invention incorporates simulation and deduction and confrontation effectiveness evaluation based on the flight trajectory and penetration route of advanced layout aircraft and the customized confrontation scenarios, optimizes the cluster strategy and coordination mode in an iterative manner, and puts forward improvement suggestions for the main parameters of the equipment. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] Figure 1 A flow chart of a survivability assessment method for an advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] The present application is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.

[0039] Figure 1 The flowchart of a method for evaluating the survivability of an advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft is shown. The specific implementation steps of the method are as follows.

[0040] Step (1) selects a certain type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as a target object, and collects data on the advanced layout aircraft, wherein the collected data includes at least one of the following: the appearance characteristics of the layout, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different states, and flight altitude.

[0041] Advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft refers to aircraft that are different from conventional layouts and have advanced aerodynamic layouts (appearance characteristics), such as waverider layout aircraft, tilt-rotor aircraft, variable configuration aircraft, C-wing aircraft, etc.

[0042] In step (1), based on the selected advanced layout aircraft shape characteristics, determine the range of RCS characteristic values, the range of fuselage internal volume (determined based on actual digital model measurements), control performance score, maneuverability score, lift-to-drag ratio under different flight conditions (determined by CFD calculation based on digital model), confrontation radius, and flight altitude parameters.

[0043] Step (2), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), to determine the motion characteristic parameters of the aircraft.

[0044] In step (2), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (1), the motion characteristics of the aircraft are analyzed to form a table of the flight altitude and flight speed of the advanced layout aircraft at different distances (0-500km) facing different targets of the blue side (such as manned early warning aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, small and medium-sized surface ships, large surface ships, etc.).

[0045] Step (3), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), to determine the equipment characteristic parameters of the aircraft.

[0046] In step (3), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (1) and the flight altitude and flight speed table of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (2), the characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft equipment are constructed to provide key parameters for forming a model package of the equipment in the subsequent steps.

[0047] Step (4) combines the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), the motion characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (2), and the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3) to confirm the confrontation scene and confrontation environment, and form a blue side model and its supporting quantity and confrontation position deployment.

[0048] In step (4), based on the various characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in steps (1) to (3), the confrontation scenario and confrontation environment are conceived, the confrontation concept is confirmed, the confrontation unit of the blue side is selected, the blue side model is simplified and the model package is completed, as well as the corresponding blue side deployment action strategy (confrontation plan).

[0049] Step (5), using the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3), combined with the payload design (such as reconnaissance payload, communication payload, weapon payload, etc.), to form a payload package of the equipment model, and carry out the confrontation scenario design of the advanced layout aircraft.

[0050] In step (5), the specific design of the confrontation scenario can be completed based on the confrontation scenario, confrontation environment, blue team's confrontation unit, and blue team's confrontation deployment action strategy formed in step (4).

[0051] Step (6) uses the blue team model and the corresponding confrontation deployment in step (4) and the confrontation scenario formed in step (5) to carry out iterative confrontation simulation.

[0052] In step (6), the simulation is iterated and judged based on the damage comparison results. If the new damage ratio is better than the previous damage ratio, the number, formation, and penetration route of the advanced layout aircraft (core confrontation unit) are changed, and the damage ratio of the simulation is compared, and the step (6) is returned to carry out iterative confrontation simulation. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the corresponding confrontation assumption is selected based on the last simulation result.

[0053] Step (7), using the adversarial simulation results of step (6), conduct performance evaluation analysis.

[0054] In step (7), based on the determined confrontation scenario, the effectiveness is evaluated using the ADC method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, TOPSIS analysis method or SEA method.

[0055] Step (8), using the results of the performance evaluation analysis in step (7), analyze the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft.

[0056] In step (8), the results of the effectiveness evaluation and the statistical data of the confrontation simulation are combined to calculate the survivability of the core equipment at different battlefield locations to form a location-equipment-survivability database, which can be used to extract, analyze and compare equipment survivability data. The calculation formula is as follows.

[0057] P S =1-P D P T P LGH P K / H

[0058] Where P D is the probability of an aircraft being discovered at a certain location (simulation and statistical average), P T is the probability of an aircraft at a certain position being tracked (simulation and deduction statistical average value). LGH P is the probability that a missile or artillery shell is successfully launched, guided (or aimed) and hits an aircraft. K / H is the probability of damage to the aircraft when it is hit.

[0059] Step (9), using the results of the survivability analysis in step (8), analyze and correct the penetration flight profile of the advanced layout aircraft.

[0060] In the analysis process, refer to Table 1 and linearize each flight profile into segments to form take-off segment, cruise segment, penetration segment, etc. Linearize the geometric mean of parameters for each segment of the k-th flight profile, and calculate the maneuverability parameters, speed term (V max , H d ), fuel item (K m ) for comparative analysis, the data is extracted in sections and then brought into the efficiency calculation formula, and the efficiency is calculated according to the formula, and the weighted average solution is completed to obtain the efficiency of the kth flight profile The performance calculation formula is as follows:

[0061] C i =*ln(B)×b1×b2+ln(∑A1+1)+ln(∑A2)+×D1×S1×H1

[0062] The meaning of each term in the above formula: C i : Combat effectiveness index; B: maneuverability parameters; b1: engine performance parameters; b2: aerodynamic efficiency parameters; A1: firepower parameters; A2: detection capability parameters; D1: control effectiveness coefficient; S1: survivability coefficient; H1: range coefficient.

[0063] Table 1

[0064]

[0065] The maneuverability parameter B consists of four indicators: maximum speed V max , ceiling H d , maximum positive overload N ymax , minimum negative overload N ymin , the calculation formula is:

[0066]

[0067] The range coefficient is used to reflect the drone's ability to stay in the air on the battlefield and has a significant impact on the drone's sustained combat capability. m is the maximum range of the fuel in the aircraft, and the calculation formula is:

[0068]

[0069] K is the reference range, which is selected according to the technical characteristics of the selected equipment.

[0070]

[0071] The calculated Sort by numerical value, and select one or more flight profiles (penetration trajectories) with low efficiency values ​​of advanced layout aircraft, that is, Value lower than During the flight, the flight altitude, flight speed, overload, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, load characteristics, damage points, maneuverability and other equipment parameters of the advanced layout aircraft are improved and adjusted, and then return to step (5). After repeated corrections, when each penetration flight profile meets the requirements of not less than After the requirement is met, go to step (10).

[0072] Step (10), using the analysis results of survivability in step (9), preliminarily solidify the actions (penetration trajectory) of advanced layout aircraft, adjust the counter-cluster strategy, optimize the coordination mode of the counter-cluster, reconstruct the actions of non-advanced layout aircraft, and adjust the equipment model.

[0073] In step (10), a series of combat simulations are conducted based on the use of the advanced layout aircraft (core confrontation unit) in step (9). During the simulation, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit are continuously adjusted.

[0074] The judgment is made based on the damage comparison results of the combat simulation (which can be done using war game simulation software). If the new damage ratio is higher than the previous damage ratio, the data of the non-core confrontation unit will continue to be adjusted. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit will be determined based on the last simulation result, and then the data will be entered into step (11).

[0075] Step (11), combined with the adjustment and correction of step (10), makes a final assessment of the survivability of the entire confrontation cluster. Under the constraint that the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft (one or more) is reduced by no more than 5%, if the average survivability of the non-advanced layout aircraft can be improved by more than 20%, the penetration trajectory of the core components can be modified by modifying the parameters.

[0076] (12) Organize and form a database of battlefield action-penetration trajectories of advanced deployment aircraft.

[0077] The present invention provides a survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, which combines the survivability assessment of advanced layout aircraft with confrontation simulation and effectiveness assessment of confrontation system, takes the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as the core confrontation unit, and conducts a series of survivability calculations and analyses in combination with the complex confrontation environment of the confrontation with a strong enemy and the system confrontation between the red and blue sides. This method is mainly used for survivability assessment in the confrontation simulation process of future new aviation aircraft, and is applicable to the field of aviation aircraft technology.

[0078] At the same time, due to the high uncertainty of the use of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft in future confrontation environments, its survivability is extremely important in the confrontation process. With the help of confrontation simulation deduction, supporting indicator system, effectiveness evaluation and other auxiliary means, the survivability of the confrontation unit is combined with the confrontation action design (penetration trajectory, flight route, confrontation unit coordination, inter-machine communication, etc.), and a set of survivability assessment methods is formed for complex confrontation environments. The survivability assessment method can be used to assist in the formation of quantitative support for the battlefield action design of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft. At the same time, the survivability assessment method can be used as a feedback means to correct the demonstration and design work of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, which has strong engineering significance and application prospects.

[0079] The present invention analyzes the equipment characteristics of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, combines their application methods and action characteristics on the battlefield, and jointly designs the equipment characteristics, confrontation concepts and confrontation environment of the confrontation unit, attaches importance to the confrontation with strong enemies, and effectively supports a series of work such as the subsequent development direction of unmanned equipment, core technology summary, engineering prototype design and research and development.

[0080] Compared with the existing survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, the survivability assessment method for the original aircraft equipment has a low correlation with factors such as confrontation simulation, effectiveness assessment, and adaptability in the confrontation environment of high-intensity confrontation. The present invention has opened up a new idea for survivability assessment, which is combined with the equipment demonstration, development, and modification of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft.

[0081] Although the present invention is disclosed as above in the form of a preferred embodiment, it is not intended to limit the present invention. Any person skilled in the art may make possible changes and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention shall be based on the scope defined by the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A survivability assessment method for advanced aerodynamic aircraft, characterized in that: include: Step (1), selecting a certain type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as a core component, and collecting data on the advanced layout aircraft, wherein the collected data includes at least one of the following: layout appearance characteristics, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different states, and flight altitude; Step (2), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), determining the motion characteristic parameters of the aircraft; Step (3), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), determining the equipment characteristic parameters of the aircraft; Step (4), combining the data collection results of the advanced layout aircraft in step (1), the motion characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (2), and the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3), confirming the confrontation scene and confrontation environment, and forming the blue team model and the supporting quantity and confrontation position deployment; Step (5), using the equipment characteristic parameters of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (3) and combining them with the load design, forming a load package of the equipment model, and carrying out the confrontation scenario design of the advanced layout aircraft; Step (6), using the blue team model and the corresponding confrontation deployment in step (4) and the confrontation scenario formed in step (5), carry out iterative confrontation simulation; Step (7), using the confrontation simulation results of step (6), conduct effectiveness evaluation analysis; Step (8), using the results of the effectiveness evaluation analysis in step (7), analyzing the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft; Step (9), using the result of the survivability analysis in step (8), analyzing and correcting the penetration flight profile of the advanced layout aircraft; During the analysis, each flight profile is segmented and linearized to form multiple segments including at least one of the following: take-off segment, cruise segment, and penetration segment; for each segment of the k-th flight profile, the geometric mean of the parameters is linearized, and the maneuverability parameters, speed items in the range coefficient, and fuel items are compared and analyzed. After the data is extracted by segmentation and brought into the efficiency calculation formula, the efficiency is calculated according to the formula, and the weighted average solution is completed to obtain the efficiency of the k-th flight profile. The efficiency calculation formula satisfies: C i =*ln(B)×b1×b2+ln(∑A1+1)+ln(∑A2)+×D1×S1×H1 C i : The combat effectiveness index of the i-th segment of the flight profile; B: maneuverability parameter; b1: engine performance parameter; b2: aerodynamic efficiency parameter; A1: firepower parameter; A2: detection capability parameter; D1: control efficiency coefficient; S1: survivability coefficient; H1: range coefficient; n is the number of flight profile segments; T i is the duration of the i-th segment of the flight profile; the duration N is the number of flight profiles; The calculated Sort by numerical value, and analyze the performance values ​​of the most advanced aircraft. Value lower than One or more flight profiles are selected. During the flight, at least one parameter of the advanced layout aircraft including the flight altitude, flight speed, overload, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, load characteristics, damage point and maneuverability is adjusted, and the process returns to step (5). After repeated corrections, when each penetration flight profile meets the efficiency value, The value is not less than After the requirement is met, go to step (10); Step (10), using the analysis results of survivability in step (9), preliminarily solidify the actions of advanced layout aircraft, adjust the strategy of the confrontation cluster, optimize the coordination mode of the confrontation cluster, reconstruct the actions of non-advanced layout aircraft, and adjust the equipment model; Step (11), combined with the adjustment and correction of step (10), the survivability of the entire confrontation cluster is finally evaluated. Under the constraint that the survivability of the advanced layout aircraft is reduced by no more than 5%, if the average survivability of the non-advanced layout aircraft is increased by more than 20%, the penetration trajectory of the core components is modified by modifying the parameters; (12) Organize and form a database of battlefield action-penetration trajectories of advanced deployment aircraft.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (1), the value range of the RCS characteristic value, the value range of the fuselage internal volume, the control performance score, the maneuverability score, the lift-to-drag ratio under different flight conditions, the confrontation radius, and the flight altitude parameters are determined in combination with the shape characteristics of the advanced layout aircraft.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (2), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in step (1), the motion characteristics of the aircraft are analyzed to form a table of flight altitude and flight speed of the advanced layout aircraft at different distances facing different targets of the blue side.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that In step (3), based on the characteristic data of the advanced configuration aircraft formed in step (1) and the flight altitude and flight speed table of the advanced configuration aircraft formed in step (2), the characteristic parameters of the advanced configuration aircraft equipment are constructed.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (4), based on the characteristic data of the advanced layout aircraft formed in steps (1) to (3), the confrontation scene and confrontation environment are conceived, the confrontation concept is confirmed, the confrontation unit of the blue side is selected, the blue side model is formed and the model package is completed, as well as the corresponding blue side deployment action strategy, to form a confrontation plan.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (5), the design of the confrontation scenario is completed based on the confrontation scenario, confrontation environment, blue team's confrontation unit, and blue team's confrontation deployment action strategy formed in step (4).

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (6), a judgment is made based on the damage comparison results. If the new damage ratio is better than the previous damage ratio, the number, formation, and penetration route of the advanced layout aircraft are changed, and the simulated damage ratio is compared, and the process returns to step (6) to carry out iterative confrontation simulation. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the corresponding confrontation scenario is selected based on the last simulation result.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (7), based on the determined confrontation scenario, at least one of the following is used to perform performance evaluation: ADC method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, TOPSIS analysis method or SEA method.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step (8), the survivability of core equipment at different battlefield locations is calculated by combining the results of effectiveness evaluation and the statistical data of confrontation simulation to form a location-equipment-survivability database. The database is used for extracting, analyzing and comparing equipment survivability data. The calculation formula is as follows: P S =1-P D P T P LGH P K / H Where P D is the probability of an aircraft being found at a certain location, P T is the probability of an aircraft at a certain position being tracked; P LGH is the probability of successfully launching, guiding and hitting the aircraft; P K / H is the probability of damage to the aircraft when it is hit.

10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In step (10), a series of combat simulations are performed based on the use of the advanced layout aircraft in step (9). During the simulation, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit are continuously adjusted. A judgment is made based on the damage comparison results of the combat simulation. If the new damage ratio is higher than the previous damage ratio, the data of the non-core confrontation unit will continue to be adjusted. If the damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, the deployment position, flight altitude, speed characteristics, and flight trajectory of the non-core confrontation unit are determined based on the last simulation result and then the data is entered into step (11).

Images