Five-prevention logic test evaluation method and device for portable transformer substation and storage medium

Abstract

The application discloses a five-prevention logic evaluation method and device of a portable transformer substation and a storage medium. The method acquires five-prevention logic evaluation information of the portable transformer substation, wherein the five-prevention logic evaluation information is used to represent the operation logic of the portable transformer substation to be evaluated. Based on the five-prevention logic evaluation information, the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable transformer substation is determined, wherein the target working state is used to represent whether the evaluation system is in a normal running state. In response to the target working state being the normal running state, a target evaluation mode matched with the target working state is selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Based on the target evaluation mode, the five-prevention logic of the portable transformer substation is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to represent the degree of mastery of the target object of the portable transformer substation to the five-prevention logic. The application solves the technical problem that the five-prevention logic of the portable transformer substation cannot be effectively evaluated.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of substation technology, and more specifically, to a method, device, and storage medium for evaluating the five-proof logic of a portable substation. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, every switching operation of a portable substation must be verified on the five-proof machine before it can be carried out. Therefore, every operator of a portable substation must understand the five-proof logic and master the operation of the five-proof machine. However, conducting evaluation exercises on the five-proof machine will not only affect the normal operation of the portable substation, but may also have unpredictable consequences for the five-proof interlocking system and even electrical equipment in the station, leading to technical problems that make it impossible to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0003] There is currently no effective solution to the technical problem of being unable to effectively evaluate the five-prevention logic of portable substations. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention provides a method, device, and storage medium for evaluating the five-proof logic of portable substations, thereby at least solving the technical problem of the inability to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of portable substations.

[0005] According to one aspect of the invention, a method for evaluating the five-proof logic of a portable substation is provided. The method includes: acquiring five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation, wherein the five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated; determining a target operating state of the evaluation system for the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, wherein the target operating state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operating condition; in response to the target operating state being in normal operating condition, selecting a target evaluation mode matching the target operating state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system; and evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to characterize the degree to which the target object of the portable substation has mastered the five-proof logic.

[0006] Optionally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results, including: in response to the target evaluation mode being sandbox mode, generating operation instructions for the target equipment of the portable substation; based on the operation instructions, detecting the five-prevention logic of the target equipment to obtain the detection results of the target equipment, wherein the detection results are used to characterize whether the logic in the target equipment conforms to the five-prevention logic; and based on the detection results, determining the evaluation results.

[0007] Optionally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation is evaluated to obtain the evaluation result, including: responding to the target evaluation mode being the practice mode, calling the operation ticket of the portable substation to obtain the first operation task of the portable substation; executing the first operation task to obtain the first execution result of the portable substation, wherein the first execution result is used to characterize the execution status of the five-prevention logic of the portable substation; and determining the evaluation result based on the first execution result.

[0008] Optionally, performing a first operation task to obtain a first execution result of the portable substation includes: generating prompt information for the first operation task using an evaluation system based on the first operation task, wherein the prompt information is used to prompt the first target operation to be performed by the first operation task; and determining the first execution result based on the prompt information.

[0009] Optionally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation is evaluated to obtain the evaluation result, including: in response to the target evaluation mode being an examination mode, generating a second operation task for the portable substation; executing the second operation task to obtain a second execution result for the portable substation, wherein the second execution result is used to characterize whether the second target operation required by the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the second execution result.

[0010] Optionally, performing a second operation task to obtain a second execution result of the portable substation includes: obtaining the initial execution state of the second operation task, wherein the initial execution state is used to characterize that the second operation task is in the start execution state; performing the second operation task based on the initial execution state and determining the target execution time of the second operation task; determining the target execution state of the second operation task based on the target execution time, wherein the target execution state is used to characterize that the second operation task is in the execution completion state; and determining the second execution result based on the target execution state.

[0011] Optionally, based on the second execution result, the evaluation result is determined, including: in response to the second execution result indicating that the second target operation does not comply with the five-prevention logic, updating the number of operations of the second target operation to obtain the target number of operations for the second operation task; and determining the evaluation result based on the target number of operations.

[0012] Optionally, the evaluation result is determined based on the target number of operations, including: evaluating the second execution result based on the target number of operations to obtain a score for the second execution result; and determining the evaluation result based on the score.

[0013] According to one aspect of the present invention, a five-proof logic evaluation device for a portable substation is provided. The device further includes: an acquisition unit for acquiring five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation, wherein the five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated; a determination unit for determining a target operating state of the evaluation system for the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, wherein the target operating state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operating condition; a selection unit for selecting a target evaluation mode matching the target operating state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system in response to the target operating state being in normal operating condition; and an evaluation unit for evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result characterizes the degree to which the target object of the portable substation has mastered the five-proof logic.

[0014] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, the computer-readable storage medium including a stored program, wherein the program, when run by a processor, controls the device where the storage medium is located to execute the method of the present invention.

[0015] According to another aspect of the present invention, a processor is also provided for running a program, wherein the program executes the methods of the present invention during runtime.

[0016] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer program product is also provided, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the present invention.

[0017] According to another aspect of the present invention, an electronic device is also provided, comprising a processor and a memory for storing processor-executable instructions. The processor is configured to execute instructions to implement the methods of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0018] In this embodiment of the invention, the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation is obtained, wherein the five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated; based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation is determined, wherein the target working state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operation; in response to the target working state being in normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state is selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system; based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation is evaluated to obtain the evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to characterize the degree to which the target object of the portable substation has mastered the five-proof logic. In other words, this embodiment of the invention can first obtain the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation, and then, based on the obtained five-proof logic evaluation information, determine the target working state used to characterize whether the evaluation system of the portable substation is in normal operation. If the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Finally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results. Considering that after determining the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, when the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected. Therefore, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation and achieving the technical effect of effectively evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation. Attached Figure Description

[0019] The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and form part of this invention, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and are used to explain the invention, but do not constitute an undue limitation of the invention. In the drawings:

[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a five-prevention logic evaluation method for a portable substation according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a portable substation's five-prevention logic evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0022] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a pop-up warning according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0023] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of an operation task according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the display interface of an examination mode according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of a portable substation five-proof logic evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0026] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present invention, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0027] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," etc., in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this invention are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that the embodiments of the invention described herein can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion; for example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that comprises a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units explicitly listed, but may include other steps or units not explicitly listed or inherent to such processes, methods, products, or apparatus.

[0028] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a five-proof logic evaluation method for portable substations is provided. It should be noted that the steps shown in the flowchart in the accompanying drawings can be executed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions. Although the logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be executed in a different order than that shown here.

[0029] The following describes the five-proof logic evaluation method for portable substations according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0030] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a five-proof logic evaluation method for a portable substation according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 1 As shown, the five-proof logic evaluation method for this portable substation may include the following steps:

[0031] Step S101: Obtain the five-prevention logic evaluation information of the portable substation.

[0032] In the technical solution provided by step S101 of the present invention, the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation can be obtained. The five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated. The portable substation can be a typical 110 kV double busbar connected substation. It should be noted that this is only an example of a portable substation, and the type of portable substation is not specifically limited.

[0033] Optionally, the five-prevention logic evaluation information can be information for evaluating the electrical five-prevention measures. The electrical five-prevention measures include: "preventing accidental opening or closing of circuit breakers", "preventing opening or closing of disconnecting switches under load", "preventing the connection (closing) of grounding wires (grounding switches) while energized", "preventing the closing of circuit breakers with grounding wires (grounding switches) connected", and "preventing accidental entry into energized compartments".

[0034] Optionally, electrical equipment anti-misoperation devices can effectively prevent misoperation that could lead to grounding short circuits and equipment damage, and can also prevent operators from accidentally entering live areas. They are a crucial measure for ensuring power safety. These five protections can be achieved through a series of technical means, such as electrical interlocking, mechanical interlocking, program interlocking, and microcomputer-based anti-misoperation interlocking, to improve the safety and reliability of the power system.

[0035] Step S102: Based on the five-prevention logic evaluation information, determine the target working state of the portable substation evaluation system.

[0036] In the technical solution provided by step S102 of the present invention, after obtaining the five-prevention logic evaluation information, the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation can be determined at this time. The target working state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operation.

[0037] Optionally, Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a portable substation's five-prevention logic evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown below. Figure 2 As shown, the evaluation system includes a main control board, a serial cable, and a serial touch screen. The main control board is used to handle the five-proof logic and control the screen display. The serial cable has bidirectional data transmission and power supply functions. The serial touch screen can be used as an input and output device and is a user-friendly human-computer interaction interface.

[0038] It should be noted that this is only a preferred embodiment for determining the target operating state of the portable substation evaluation system. The process and method for determining the target operating state of the portable substation evaluation system are not specifically limited. As long as the method and process for determining the target operating state of the portable substation evaluation system are based on the obtained five-proof logic evaluation information, they are all within the protection scope of this invention and will not be listed here.

[0039] Step S103: In response to the target working state being the normal operating state, select the target evaluation mode that matches the target working state from the multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system.

[0040] In the technical solution provided by step S103 of the present invention, after obtaining the target working state of the evaluation system, if the target working state of the evaluation system is a normal operating state, then it is necessary to select a target evaluation mode that matches the target working state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. The target evaluation mode can be a mode that has been preset in the evaluation system, such as practice mode, sandbox mode, and exam mode.

[0041] For example, based on the obtained five-defense logic assessment information, it can be determined that the assessment system has been successfully started and is in normal operation. Furthermore, from the multiple preset modes in the assessment system, the target assessment mode can be selected as the sandbox mode.

[0042] It should be noted that this is only a preferred implementation of determining the target evaluation mode of the evaluation system. The process and method of determining the target evaluation mode of the evaluation system are not specifically limited. As long as the evaluation system is in normal operation, the process and method of determining the target evaluation mode from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system are within the protection scope of this invention, and will not be listed here.

[0043] Step S104: Based on the target evaluation mode, evaluate the five-prevention logic of the portable substation and obtain the evaluation results.

[0044] In the technical solution provided by step S104 of the present invention, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation can be evaluated according to the target evaluation mode obtained above, so as to obtain the evaluation results.

[0045] Optionally, the evaluation results are used to characterize the degree to which the target of the portable substation understands the five-prevention logic. The target can be the evaluation personnel of the portable substation, the maintenance personnel of the portable substation, or the user, etc. It should be noted that this is only an example of the target.

[0046] For example, after selecting the sandbox mode as the target evaluation mode, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation can be evaluated in this sandbox mode, and the evaluation results can be obtained to further understand the learning of the five-prevention logic related content by the maintenance personnel of the portable substation.

[0047] In steps S101 to S104 of this invention, the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation is obtained, wherein the five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated; based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation is determined, wherein the target working state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operation; in response to the target working state being in normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state is selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system; based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation is evaluated to obtain the evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to characterize the degree to which the target object of the portable substation has mastered the five-proof logic. In other words, this embodiment of the invention can first obtain the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation, and then, based on the obtained five-proof logic evaluation information, determine the target working state used to characterize whether the evaluation system of the portable substation is in normal operation. If the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Finally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results. Considering that after determining the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, when the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected. Therefore, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation and achieving the technical effect of effectively evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0048] The method described in this embodiment will be further described below.

[0049] As an optional implementation method, the five-proof logic of the portable substation is evaluated based on the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation result, including: in response to the target evaluation mode being sandbox mode, generating operation instructions for the target device of the portable substation; based on the operation instructions, detecting the five-proof logic of the target device to obtain the detection result of the target device, wherein the detection result is used to characterize whether the logic in the target device conforms to the five-proof logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the detection result.

[0050] In this embodiment, after obtaining the target evaluation mode, if the target evaluation mode is sandbox mode, operation instructions for the target equipment of the portable substation can be generated. Based on these operation instructions, the five-proof logic of the target equipment can be detected to obtain the detection results. Based on these detection results, the evaluation result can be determined. The target equipment can be a preset device, such as a switch or disconnector.

[0051] Optionally, when the target evaluation mode is sandbox mode, the evaluation system receives click operations from the user and can then generate operation instructions for the target device. The click operation refers to clicking the electrical symbol of the target device. For example, in sandbox mode, the user can simulate operating the device by clicking its electrical symbol.

[0052] Optionally, in response to the test result indicating that the logic in the target device conforms to the five-proof logic, the evaluation system can directly implement the operations contained in the target device, thereby updating the logic state of the target device and determining that the evaluation result has passed. For example, after simulating the operation of the target device, if the operation conforms to the five-proof logic, the system will implement it and change the state of the device.

[0053] Optionally, in response to a test result indicating that the logic in the target device does not conform to the five-proof logic, the evaluation system issues a warning in the form of a pop-up window, displays which of the five proofs is violated, and determines that the evaluation result at this time is a failure. For example, Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a pop-up warning according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 3 As shown, after simulating the operation of the target device, if the operation violates the five-prevention logic, a warning will be given in the form of a pop-up window, indicating which specific rule of the five-prevention was violated. For example, a pop-up window will appear on the display interface and display the warning message: "Trip switch under load!".

[0054] As an optional implementation method, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation is evaluated based on the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation result, including: responding to the target evaluation mode being the practice mode, calling the operation ticket of the portable substation to obtain the first operation task of the portable substation; executing the first operation task to obtain the first execution result of the portable substation, wherein the first execution result is used to characterize the execution status of the five-prevention logic of the portable substation; and determining the evaluation result based on the first execution result.

[0055] In this embodiment, after obtaining the target evaluation mode, if the target evaluation mode is the practice mode, the operation ticket of the portable substation can be called first to obtain the first operation task of the portable substation. Then, the first operation task is executed to obtain the first execution result of the portable substation. Finally, the evaluation result is obtained based on the first execution result.

[0056] Optionally, the first operation task is the operation task corresponding to the relevant content in the invoked operation ticket, for example, Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of an operation task according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 4 As shown, the operational tasks can be: switching from operation of the first busbar (1M) to operation of the second busbar (2M), switching from hot standby to cold standby, switching a switch from cold standby to maintenance, switching a line from cold standby to maintenance, switching from 1M hot standby to 2M hot standby, switching from cold standby to hot standby, switching a switch from maintenance to cold standby, and switching a line from maintenance to cold standby, etc. It should be noted that only the first operational task is illustrated here.

[0057] For example, users can first select an operation task, which is adapted from typical operation tickets of substations, including representative switching operations such as hot busbar switching, cold busbar switching, and main transformer load transfer in double busbar connection. Then, the selected operation task is executed, so that users can not only learn the five-prevention logic, but also become familiar with the content and steps of substation disconnector operation.

[0058] As an optional embodiment, performing a first operation task to obtain a first execution result of the portable substation includes: generating prompt information for the first operation task using an evaluation system based on the first operation task; and determining the first execution result based on the prompt information.

[0059] In this embodiment, after obtaining the first operation task, the evaluation system can be used to generate prompt information for the first operation task, and then the first execution result can be determined based on the prompt information.

[0060] Optionally, the prompt information is used to indicate the first target operation that the first operation task needs to perform. The first target operation can be each step of the operation that needs to be performed during the execution of the first operation task.

[0061] For example, in practice mode, after selecting an operation task, the device status in a wiring diagram can be adjusted to the corresponding preset status of the operation task, and the next operation to be performed will be displayed on the screen.

[0062] As an optional implementation method, the five-prevention logic of the portable substation is evaluated based on the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation result, including: in response to the target evaluation mode being an examination mode, generating a second operation task for the portable substation; executing the second operation task to obtain a second execution result for the portable substation, wherein the second execution result is used to characterize whether the second target operation required by the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the second execution result.

[0063] In this embodiment, if the obtained target evaluation mode is an examination mode, a second operation task of the portable substation can be generated, and then the second operation task can be executed to obtain a second execution result of the portable substation. Based on the second execution result obtained above, the purpose of determining the evaluation result can be achieved.

[0064] Optionally, the second operation task can be the same as the first operation task, such as switching from the first busbar (1M) to the second busbar (2M), switching from hot standby to cold standby, switching from cold standby to maintenance, switching from cold standby to maintenance, switching from 1M hot standby to 2M hot standby, switching from cold standby to hot standby, switching from maintenance to cold standby, and switching from maintenance to cold standby, etc.

[0065] Optionally, the second operation task can also be a task corresponding to the five-prevention logic, such as tripping under load, closing under load, closing the grounding switch while energized, closing the grounding switch, and operating in the wrong bay. It should be noted that this is only an example of the second operation task, and the name of the second operation task is not specifically limited.

[0066] Optionally, after obtaining the second execution result, if the second execution result indicates that the second target operation required for the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic, then the evaluation result can be determined as having passed the evaluation; if the second execution result indicates that the second target operation required for the second operation task does not conform to the five-prevention logic, then the evaluation result can be determined as having failed the evaluation.

[0067] As an optional embodiment, executing a second operation task to obtain a second execution result of the portable substation includes: obtaining the initial execution state of the second operation task, wherein the initial execution state is used to characterize that the second operation task is in the start execution state; based on the initial execution state, executing the second operation task and determining the target execution time of the second operation task; based on the target execution time, determining the target execution state of the second operation task, wherein the target execution state is used to characterize that the second operation task is in the execution completion state; and based on the target execution state, determining the second execution result.

[0068] In this embodiment, an initial execution state can be obtained first to characterize the second operation task as being in the start execution state. Based on the initial execution state, the second operation task is executed, thereby determining the target execution time of the second operation task. Then, based on the target execution time, the target execution state used to characterize the second operation task as being in the execution completion state can be determined. Finally, based on the target execution state obtained above, the second execution result can be determined.

[0069] Optionally, the target execution time can be the time required to complete the second operation task, simply referred to as the execution time, for example, 4 minutes and 45 seconds. After obtaining the target execution time, an evaluation system can be used to display the target execution time on the interface.

[0070] As an optional embodiment, determining the evaluation result based on the second execution result includes: in response to the second execution result indicating that the second target operation does not comply with the five-prevention logic, updating the number of operations of the second target operation to obtain the target number of operations for the second operation task; and determining the evaluation result based on the target number of operations.

[0071] In this embodiment, after obtaining the second execution result, if the second target operation does not conform to the five-prevention logic, the number of operations of the second target operation needs to be updated to obtain the target number of operations for the second operation task. Then, based on the target number of operations, the evaluation result can be determined.

[0072] Optionally, the number of operations can be the number of erroneous operations, or simply the number of erroneous operations. Then the target number of operations can be the updated number of erroneous operations, that is, the total number of erroneous operations, for example, 16.

[0073] For example, Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the display interface of an examination mode according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 5 As shown, the total number of erroneous operations was 16, the time taken was 04:45, the number of erroneous operations for the load-bearing tripping task was 5, the number of erroneous operations for the load-bearing closing task was 4, the number of erroneous operations for the live grounding switch task was 0, the number of erroneous operations for the grounding switch closing task was 6, and the number of erroneous operations for the wrong interval task was 1.

[0074] For another example, the exam mode is similar to the practice mode, but there are no on-screen prompts; users must rely on their own knowledge and experience to complete the switching operation. If the operation violates the five-prevention logic, the system will not display a pop-up message but will record the number of incorrect operations. After the user completes the operation, the system will display the time taken for the operation and the number of various incorrect operations on the settlement page.

[0075] As an optional implementation method, determining the evaluation result based on the target number of operations includes: evaluating the second execution result based on the target number of operations to obtain a score for the second execution result; and determining the evaluation result based on the score.

[0076] In this embodiment, after obtaining the target number of operations, the second execution result can be evaluated to obtain a score for the second execution result. This score can then be used to determine the final evaluation result. The score can be determined based on the target number of operations and the target execution time. For example, ... Figure 5 As shown, examiners can use this information to score the students' exams in order to obtain assessment results.

[0077] In this embodiment, the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation can be obtained first. Then, based on the obtained five-proof logic evaluation information, a target working state can be determined to characterize whether the evaluation system of the portable substation is in normal operation. If the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Finally, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated according to the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation results. Considering that after determining the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, when the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected. Thus, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated according to the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation results, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation and achieving the technical effect of effectively evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0078] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be illustrated below with reference to preferred embodiments.

[0079] The five-prevention system is a crucial device in substations for preventing misoperation. Any normal switching operation must undergo simulation and logical judgment by the five-prevention system to effectively prevent human error and power grid accidents. It is vital for the safe operation of the substation and even the stability and reliability of the power grid. The substation's five-prevention logic is implemented through a microcomputer-based anti-misoperation interlocking device, displaying the electrical connection relationships and real-time status of each power device in the substation's primary wiring diagram.

[0080] Currently, every switching operation of a portable substation must be verified on the five-proof machine before it can be carried out. Therefore, every operator of a portable substation must understand the five-proof logic and master the operation of the five-proof machine. However, conducting evaluation exercises on the five-proof machine will not only affect the normal operation of the portable substation, but may also have unpredictable consequences for the five-proof interlocking system and even electrical equipment in the station, leading to technical problems that make it impossible to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0081] Therefore, to solve the above problems, this invention proposes a method for evaluating the five-proof logic of portable substations. This method first acquires the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation. Then, based on the acquired evaluation information, it determines the target operating state used to characterize whether the evaluation system of the portable substation is in normal operation. If the target operating state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target operating state can be selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Finally, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results. Considering that after determining the target operating state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, when the target operating state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target operating state can be selected. Therefore, based on the target evaluation mode, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated to obtain the evaluation results, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of portable substations and achieving the technical effect of effectively evaluating the five-proof logic of portable substations.

[0082] In this embodiment, a training device integrating the five-prevention logic of various primary equipment in a typical substation can be proposed. This device allows substation operators to learn in depth about the five-prevention logic of each primary equipment under various states. It can simulate the opening and closing states of the primary equipment and the judgment results of the relevant blocking logic, and display the judgment results.

[0083] Optionally, the device can achieve the following objectives: It is not connected to actual electrical equipment and anti-misoperation interlocking devices. Instead, it abstracts the station equipment to be simulated into a single wiring diagram. The built-in five-proof logic table determines the interlocking relationships between devices. If the input operation does not conform to the five-proof logic, the operation is not performed and a warning is issued. To facilitate on-site training by experts and instructors, the device must be sufficiently portable, with a size and weight no larger than a laptop. It should be battery-powered for training anytime, anywhere, both indoors and outdoors. The device should have an external communication interface to connect various peripherals, such as simulated electrical equipment and five-proof keys, implementing the five-proof logic outside the screen and deepening trainees' understanding of anti-misoperation interlocking operations. The device should also have a program download interface for future software upgrades and maintenance, allowing for customized functions by replacing the software without changing the hardware.

[0084] In this embodiment, the training device can be a device constructed through an assessment system, wherein, as described above... Figure 2 As shown, the evaluation system includes a main control board, a serial cable, and a serial touch screen. The main control board is used to handle the five-proof logic and control the screen display. The serial cable has bidirectional data transmission and power supply functions. The serial touch screen can be used as an input and output device and is a user-friendly human-computer interaction interface.

[0085] Optionally, this device uses an integrated serial touchscreen as its input and output device. All operations are performed through the touchscreen, providing a user-friendly human-machine interface. Using the development tools provided with the serial touchscreen, image display and touch feedback functions can be easily implemented, significantly reducing development time. After the user touches a specific area on the screen, the serial touchscreen transmits the touch information to the microcontroller on the main control board via a serial interface. The microcontroller analyzes and processes the input information based on the current system state, and then controls the screen's display content via the serial interface. The serial touchscreen and the microcontroller main control board constitute a simple yet efficient embedded system. The serial touchscreen functions like a computer monitor, while the microcontroller integrates components from the computer motherboard, such as a central processing unit (CPU), memory, program / data storage, and input / output (I / O) ports.

[0086] In this embodiment, a typical substation with a 110kV double busbar connection is used as the basis. The five-proof logic of all primary equipment such as switches and disconnectors in the substation is demonstrated through the primary wiring in the typical substation model. Based on this, three modes, namely "sandbox mode", "practice mode" and "examination mode", which are different from the previous five-proof computer, are developed specifically for training five-proof needs.

[0087] Optionally, in sandbox mode, users can simulate operating the device by clicking its electrical symbol. If this operation conforms to the five-proof logic, the system will implement it and change the device's state. Figure 3 As shown, after simulating the operation of the target device, if the operation violates the five-prevention logic, a warning will be given in the form of a pop-up window, indicating which specific rule of the five-prevention was violated.

[0088] Optionally, similar to the exam mode, the practice mode allows users to first select an operation task, such as... Figure 4 As shown, these operation tasks are adapted from typical substation operation tickets, including representative switching operations such as hot busbar switching, cold busbar switching, and main transformer load transfer in double busbar connection. The selected operation tasks are then executed, allowing users to not only learn the five-prevention logic, but also become familiar with the content and steps of substation disconnector operation.

[0089] For example, in practice mode, after selecting an operation task, the device status in a wiring diagram can be adjusted to the corresponding preset status of the operation task, and the next operation to be performed will be displayed on the screen.

[0090] Optionally, the exam mode is similar to the practice mode, but there are no on-screen prompts; users must rely on their own knowledge and experience to complete the switching operation. If the operation violates the five-prevention logic, the system will not display a pop-up prompt but will record the number of incorrect operations. After the user completes the operation, the system will display the time taken for the operation and the number of various incorrect operations on the settlement page, as shown below. Figure 5 As shown, examiners can use this information to score the candidates' exams.

[0091] In this embodiment, the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation can be obtained first. Then, based on the obtained five-proof logic evaluation information, a target working state can be determined to characterize whether the evaluation system of the portable substation is in normal operation. If the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system. Finally, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated according to the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation results. Considering that after determining the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, when the target working state is normal operation, a target evaluation mode matching the target working state can be selected. Thus, the five-proof logic of the portable substation can be evaluated according to the target evaluation mode to obtain the evaluation results, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation and achieving the technical effect of effectively evaluating the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0092] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a portable substation five-proof logic evaluation device is provided. It should be noted that this portable substation five-proof logic evaluation device can be used to execute a portable substation five-proof logic evaluation method as described in Embodiment 1.

[0093] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of a portable substation five-proof logic evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown below. Figure 6 As shown, a portable substation five-proof logic evaluation device 600 may include: an acquisition unit 601, a determination unit 602, a selection unit 603, and an evaluation unit 604.

[0094] The acquisition unit 601 is used to acquire the five-prevention logic evaluation information of the portable substation, wherein the five-prevention logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation that needs to be evaluated.

[0095] The determining unit 602 is used to determine the target working state of the portable substation evaluation system based on the five-prevention logic evaluation information, wherein the target working state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operation.

[0096] Selection unit 603 is used to select a target evaluation mode that matches the target working state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system in response to the target working state being the normal operating state.

[0097] The evaluation unit 604 is used to evaluate the five-prevention logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode and obtain the evaluation results. The evaluation results are used to characterize the degree of mastery of the five-prevention logic by the target object of the portable substation.

[0098] Optionally, the evaluation unit 604 includes: a first generation module, used to generate operation instructions for the target equipment of the portable substation in response to the target evaluation mode being sandbox mode; a detection module, used to detect the five-proof logic of the target equipment based on the operation instructions and obtain the detection result of the target equipment, wherein the detection result is used to characterize whether the logic in the target equipment conforms to the five-proof logic; and a first determination module, used to determine the evaluation result based on the detection result.

[0099] Optionally, the evaluation unit 604 further includes: a calling module, used to call the operation ticket of the portable substation in response to the target evaluation mode being practice mode, and obtain the first operation task of the portable substation; a first execution module, used to execute the first operation task and obtain the first execution result of the portable substation, wherein the first execution result is used to characterize the execution status of the five-prevention logic of the portable substation; and a second determination module, used to determine the evaluation result based on the first execution result.

[0100] Optionally, the first execution module may include: a generation submodule, used to generate prompt information for the first operation task based on the first operation task and using the evaluation system, wherein the prompt information is used to prompt the first target operation to be performed by the first operation task; and a first determination submodule, used to determine the first execution result based on the prompt information.

[0101] Optionally, the evaluation unit 604 may further include: a second generation module, used to generate a second operation task for the portable substation in response to the target evaluation mode being an examination mode; a second execution module, used to execute the second operation task and obtain a second execution result for the portable substation, wherein the second execution result is used to characterize whether the second target operation required by the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic; and a third determination module, used to determine the evaluation result based on the second execution result.

[0102] Optionally, the second execution module may include: an acquisition submodule, used to acquire the initial execution state of the second operation task, wherein the initial execution state is used to indicate that the second operation task is in the start execution state; an execution submodule, used to execute the second operation task based on the initial execution state and determine the target execution time of the second operation task; a second determination submodule, used to determine the target execution state of the second operation task based on the target execution time, wherein the target execution state is used to indicate that the second operation task is in the execution completion state; and a third determination submodule, used to determine the second execution result based on the target execution state.

[0103] Optionally, the third determining module may include: an updating submodule, used to update the number of operations of the second target operation in response to the second execution result being that the second target operation does not comply with the five-prevention logic, so as to obtain the target number of operations for the second operation task; and a fourth determining submodule, used to determine the evaluation result based on the target number of operations.

[0104] Optionally, the fourth determining submodule can be used to evaluate the second execution result based on the target number of operations, and obtain a score for the second execution result; and to determine the evaluation result based on the score.

[0105] In this embodiment, an acquisition unit acquires the five-proof logic evaluation information of the portable substation, wherein the five-proof logic evaluation information is used to characterize the operating logic of the portable substation to be evaluated; a determination unit determines the target working state of the evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-proof logic evaluation information, wherein the target working state is used to characterize whether the evaluation system is in normal operation; a selection unit responds to the target working state as normal operation and selects a target evaluation mode that matches the target working state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system; the evaluation unit evaluates the five-proof logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode and obtains the evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to characterize the degree of mastery of the five-proof logic by the target object of the portable substation, thereby solving the technical problem of not being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation and achieving the technical effect of being able to effectively evaluate the five-proof logic of the portable substation.

[0106] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, the computer-readable storage medium including a stored program, wherein, when the program is run by a processor, it controls the device where the readable storage medium is located to execute the five-prevention logic evaluation method for portable substations in the embodiment.

[0107] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a processor is also provided for running a program, wherein the program executes the five-prevention logic evaluation method for portable substations in the embodiment.

[0108] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a computer program product is also provided, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the five-prevention logic evaluation method for portable substations in the embodiments of the present invention.

[0109] According to embodiments of the present invention, an electronic device is also provided, comprising a processor and a memory for storing processor-executable instructions. The processor is configured to execute instructions to implement the five-prevention logic evaluation method for portable substations according to embodiments of the present invention.

[0110] The sequence numbers of the above embodiments of the present invention are for descriptive purposes only and do not represent the superiority or inferiority of the embodiments.

[0111] In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts not described in detail in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0112] In the several embodiments provided by this invention, it should be understood that the disclosed technical content can be implemented in other ways. The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for example, the division of units can be a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection of units or modules can be electrical or other forms.

[0113] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. Similarly, the components shown as units may or may not be physical units; they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment, depending on actual needs.

[0114] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of the present invention can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit.

[0115] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the various embodiments of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), portable hard drives, magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0116] The above are merely preferred embodiments of the present invention. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can make various improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these improvements and modifications should also be considered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A five-proofing logic evaluation method of a portable substation, characterized by, The method comprises the following steps: acquiring five-prevention logic evaluation information of a portable substation, wherein the five-prevention logic evaluation information is used to represent the operation logic of the portable substation that needs to be evaluated; determining a target working state of an evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-prevention logic evaluation information, wherein the target working state is used to represent whether the evaluation system is in a normal running state; in response to the target working state being the normal running state, selecting a target evaluation mode matching the target working state from a plurality of evaluation modes of the evaluation system; evaluating the five-prevention logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to represent the degree of mastery of the target object of the portable substation to the five-prevention logic; wherein the step of evaluating the five-prevention logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode to obtain an evaluation result comprises the following steps: in response to the target evaluation mode being a sandbox mode, generating an operation instruction of a target device of the portable substation; detecting the five-prevention logic of the target device based on the operation instruction to obtain a detection result of the target device, wherein the detection result is used to represent whether the logic in the target device conforms to the five-prevention logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the detection result; in response to the target evaluation mode being a practice mode, calling an operation ticket of the portable substation to obtain a first operation task of the portable substation; executing the first operation task to obtain a first execution result of the portable substation, wherein the first execution result is used to represent the execution of the five-prevention logic of the portable substation; and determining the evaluation result based on the first execution result; 2. The method of claim 1, wherein, in response to the target evaluation mode being an examination mode, generating a second operation task of the portable substation; executing the second operation task to obtain a second execution result of the portable substation, wherein the second execution result is used to represent whether a second target operation required to be executed in the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the second execution result. The step of executing the first operation task to obtain a first execution result of the portable substation comprises the following steps: generating prompt information of the first operation task by using the evaluation system based on the first operation task, wherein the prompt information is used to prompt a first target operation required to be executed in the first operation task; 3. The method of claim 1, wherein, determining the first execution result based on the prompt information. The step of executing the second operation task to obtain a second execution result of the portable substation comprises the following steps: acquiring an initial execution state of the second operation task, wherein the initial execution state is used to represent that the second operation task is in a starting execution state; based on the initial execution state, performing the second operation task, determining a target execution time of the second operation task; based on the target execution time, determining a target execution state of the second operation task, wherein the target execution state is used to represent that the second operation task is in an execution completion state; based on the target execution state, determining the second execution result.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein, based on the second execution result, determining the evaluation result, comprising: in response to the second execution result being that the second target operation does not conform to the five-prevention logic, updating the operation number of the second target operation to obtain a target operation number of the second operation task; based on the target operation number, determining the evaluation result.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein, based on the target operation number, determining the evaluation result, comprising: based on the target operation number, evaluating the second execution result to obtain an evaluation score of the second execution result; based on the evaluation score, determining the evaluation result.

6. A five-proofing logic evaluation device of a portable substation, characterized by, comprising: an acquisition unit, configured to acquire five-prevention logic evaluation information of a portable substation, wherein the five-prevention logic evaluation information is used to represent an operation logic of the portable substation that needs to be evaluated; a determination unit, configured to determine a target working state of an evaluation system of the portable substation based on the five-prevention logic evaluation information, wherein the target working state is used to represent whether the evaluation system is in a normal running state; a selection unit, configured to select a target evaluation mode matched with the target working state from multiple evaluation modes of the evaluation system in response to the target working state being the normal running state; an evaluation unit, configured to evaluate a five-prevention logic of the portable substation based on the target evaluation mode to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result is used to represent a mastery degree of the five-prevention logic by a target object of the portable substation; wherein the evaluation unit is further configured to generate an operation instruction of a target device of the portable substation in response to the target evaluation mode being a sandbox mode, detect the five-prevention logic of the target device based on the operation instruction to obtain a detection result of the target device, wherein the detection result is used to represent whether the logic in the target device conforms to the five-prevention logic, and determine the evaluation result based on the detection result; and further configured to call an operation ticket of the portable substation to obtain a first operation task of the portable substation in response to the target evaluation mode being a practice mode, execute the first operation task to obtain a first execution result of the portable substation, wherein the first execution result is used to represent an execution situation of the five-prevention logic of the portable substation, and determine the evaluation result based on the first execution result. The method further comprises: in response to the target evaluation mode being an examination mode, generating a second operation task of the portable transformer substation; executing the second operation task to obtain a second execution result of the portable transformer substation, wherein the second execution result is used to represent whether a second target operation required by the second operation task conforms to the five-prevention logic; and determining the evaluation result based on the second execution result.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer readable storage medium comprises a stored program, wherein the program, when executed by a processor, controls a device where the storage medium is located to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images