Problem scale-based mind differentiation method and device, medium and computer equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a mind differentiation method and device based on a question scale, a medium and computer equipment. The method comprises the following steps: interactively acquiring mind differentiation associated information of a target object by utilizing a mind differentiation question scale; judging the mind differentiation associated information to determine frequency evaluation information to which each piece of mind differentiation associated information belongs; calculating a comprehensive mind score based on the score of each piece of frequency evaluation information; judging a mind differentiation result of the target object according to the mind comprehensive score and a mind evaluation judgment rule; through the steps of the method, the corresponding scale options are input into the mind dialectical equipment, the psychological state of the user can be comprehensively evaluated and diagnosed from the four dimensions of body, mind, condition and meaning, the mind dialectical result of the user can be accurately obtained according to the mind state comprehensive score of the user, and the mind state of the user is diagnosed according to the mind dialectical result of the user.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of psychological state diagnosis and evaluation, and more specifically, to a method, device, medium and computer equipment for mental state differentiation based on a question scale. Background Art

[0002] In the existing technology, the technical theory of diagnosing and evaluating the user's mental state mainly relies on Western mindfulness and meditation concepts, lacks the guidance of traditional Chinese medicine theory, and fails to fully utilize the unique advantages of traditional Chinese medicine in calming the mind and nourishing the spirit. Existing mental diagnosis and differentiation technologies usually rely on limited physiological signals and ignore other potentially useful data, which makes the evaluation dimension relatively single; although physiological signals such as HRV can reflect the state of the autonomic nervous system, they cannot fully capture the user's complex psychological state; mind recognition involves multiple dimensions such as emotions, cognition, and behavior. Existing technologies still have difficulties in comprehensively analyzing this information, especially in the effective combination of psychological factors and physiological data. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of the shortcomings of the prior art, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, device, medium and computer equipment for distinguishing the mind based on a question scale, so as to overcome the shortcoming of the prior art that the judgment standard of the mind identification dimension is too single.

[0004] The above technical objectives of the present invention are achieved through the following technical solutions: a method for distinguishing between mind and spirit based on the scale for distinguishing between mind and spirit, comprising the following steps:

[0005] Using the Mind Syndrome Differentiation Question Scale to interactively obtain the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object; and judging the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency;

[0006] Calculate a comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of frequency evaluation information;

[0007] The mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

[0008] In one embodiment, the calculation of the comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: separately calculating the cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score of the target object; calculating the average score of the cognitive dimension score, the emotional dimension score, the physical and mental dimension score, and the volitional dimension score to obtain a comprehensive mind score.

[0009] In one embodiment, judging the target object's mental syndrome differentiation result according to the mental comprehensive score and mental evaluation judgment rule specifically includes: standardizing the mental comprehensive score based on a preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation to obtain a standard score;

[0010] converting the standard scores into interpretable scores;

[0011] The interpretable scores are processed into intervals to obtain the mind syndrome differentiation results.

[0012] In one embodiment, the standardization of the mental comprehensive score based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation to obtain the standard score specifically includes:

[0013] Z = (AM) / SD;

[0014] Among them, Z represents the standard score; A represents the comprehensive score of mind; M represents the normative mean score; SD represents the normative standard deviation.

[0015] In one embodiment, converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes:

[0016] T = 10 × Z + 50;

[0017] Among them, T represents the explainable score and Z represents the standard score.

[0018] In one embodiment, the processing of the interpretable score into intervals to obtain the mind-spirit differentiation result specifically includes: converting the interpretable score into an evaluation score using the following formula;

[0019]

[0020] Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the total score range, x min represents the lower limit of the total score range, T represents the explainable score, and Q represents the evaluation score; the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object; based on the score range to which the evaluation score belongs, the mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined.

[0021] In one embodiment, the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object, specifically including: when the target object is a male, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [59,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [41,59) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [23,41) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,23) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0022] In one embodiment, the method of determining the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result based on the gender of the target object also includes: when the target object is a female, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [56,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [38,56) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [20,38) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,20) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0023] In one embodiment, judging the target subject's mind syndrome differentiation result according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule further includes:

[0024] According to the cognitive dimension scores, emotional dimension scores, physical and mental dimension scores and volitional dimension scores of the target object, the cognitive dimension dialectical results, emotional dimension dialectical results, physical and mental dimension dialectical results and volitional dimension dialectical results of the target object are judged respectively.

[0025] In one embodiment, the step of determining the target object's cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score, respectively, includes:

[0026] Standardizing the accumulated scores of each mental state dimension based on the preset normative mean score and normative standard deviation of each mental state dimension to obtain the corresponding standard score;

[0027] Convert the standard scores corresponding to each mental state dimension into corresponding interpretable scores;

[0028] The interpretable scores corresponding to each mental state dimension are binned to obtain the mental state evaluation corresponding to the mental state dimension.

[0029] In one embodiment, the cumulative scores of each mental state dimension are standardized based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation of each mental state dimension to obtain the corresponding standard score, specifically including:

[0030] Z i =(A i -M i ) / SD i ,i∈(1,4);

[0031] Among them, Z i represents the standard score of the i-th mental state dimension; A i represents the cumulative score of the i-th mental state dimension; M i represents the normative mean score of the i-th mental state dimension; SDi Represents the norm standard deviation of the i-th dimension.

[0032] In one embodiment, converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes:

[0033] T i =10×Z i +50,i∈(1,4);

[0034] Among them, T i represents the interpretable score of the i-th mental state dimension, Z i represents the standard score of the i-th mental state dimension.

[0035] In one embodiment, the processing of binning the explainable score to obtain a mental score corresponding to the mental state dimension specifically includes:

[0036]

[0037] Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the score interval, x min Indicates the lower limit of the score interval.

[0038] The device for distinguishing mental syndrome based on the mental syndrome differentiation problem scale is characterized in that the device comprises:

[0039] an acquisition unit, for interactively acquiring the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object by using the mind syndrome differentiation problem scale; and judging the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency;

[0040] A calculation unit, used for calculating a comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information;

[0041] A judgment unit is used to judge the mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

[0042] A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which implements the steps of the above method when executed by a processor.

[0043] A computer device comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the steps of the above method when executing the computer program.

[0044] In summary, the present invention has the following beneficial effects: a mind-diagnosis method based on the mind-diagnosis problem scale, using the mind-diagnosis problem scale to interactively obtain the mind-diagnosis related information of the target object; and judging the mind-diagnosis related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind-diagnosis related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: the first occurrence frequency, the second occurrence frequency, the third occurrence frequency, the fourth occurrence frequency and the fifth occurrence frequency; calculating the mind comprehensive score based on the scores of each of the frequency evaluation information; judging the mind-diagnosis result of the target object according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind-diagnosis result specifically includes: normal, mild abnormality, moderate abnormality, severe abnormality; through the above method steps, using the TCM identification scale based on the mind concept in TCM theory, the user's state can be comprehensively evaluated from the four dimensions of body, mind, emotion and intention. Compared with the relatively single physiological indicators in modern medicine, the TCM identification scale pays more attention to the comprehensive state of multiple levels such as emotion, psychology, and spirit, and can more comprehensively reflect the overall health status of the user. The Traditional Chinese Medicine Identification Scale not only focuses on the user's physical health, but also on psychological factors such as emotions, spirit, and cognition. This integrated mind-body assessment method can provide users with a more comprehensive understanding of their health status, especially for psychological stress and emotional disorders. The identification scale can better assess and analyze the patient's mental state through the analysis of a series of psychological characteristics. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0045] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the mind syndrome differentiation method based on the mind syndrome differentiation problem scale of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 2 It is a structural diagram of the mind syndrome differentiation device based on the mind syndrome differentiation problem scale of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 3 is an internal structure diagram of a computer device in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 4 It is the TCM mental state identification scale in the embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Figure 5 is a table of normative data of the scale in the embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 6 is a standard table for identifying the mental state of men in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] Figure 7 This is a standard table for identifying the mental state of women in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0052] In the figure, 1. Acquisition unit; 2. Calculation unit; 3. Judgment unit. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0053] In order to make the purpose, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Several embodiments of the present invention are shown in the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein.

[0054] In the present invention, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "installed", "connected", "connected", "fixed" and the like should be understood in a broad sense. For example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection, or it can be indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, or it can be the internal connection of two elements. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood according to the specific circumstances. The terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features. Therefore, the features defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of the features.

[0055] In the present invention, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the first feature being "above" or "below" the second feature may include the first and second features being in direct contact, or may include the first and second features being in contact not directly but through another feature between them. Moreover, the first feature being "above", "above" and "above" the second feature includes the first feature being directly above and obliquely above the second feature, or simply indicates that the first feature is higher in level than the second feature. The first feature being "below", "below" and "below" the second feature includes the first feature being directly below and obliquely below the second feature, or simply indicates that the first feature is lower in level than the second feature. The terms "vertical", "horizontal", "left", "right", "above", "below" and similar expressions are for illustrative purposes only, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore should not be understood as limiting the present invention.

[0056] Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments, the present invention is described in detail. For the convenience of understanding the embodiments, the relevant technology is first described. Entering the 21st century, with the deepening of Chinese medicine research and the advancement of internationalization, the development of Chinese medicine scales has entered a standardized stage. Many Chinese medicine scales have adopted the scale compilation method of modern medicine and psychology in the compilation process, focusing on the reliability and validity of the scale, and verified by large-sample clinical trials. In recent years, the standardization and promotion of Chinese medicine scales have gradually received attention. The state and relevant scientific research institutions have begun to formulate the compilation and use standards of Chinese medicine scales to promote the widespread application of Chinese medicine scales in clinical and scientific research.

[0057] The scientific nature of the TCM scale is mainly explained by the following aspects: Reliability: Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the scale at different times, in different environments or between different assessors. A scale with high reliability can obtain consistent results in repeated measurements. Common reliability test methods include test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability and inter-assessor reliability. Validity: Validity refers to whether the scale can accurately measure the content it is intended to measure. Validity includes content validity, structural validity and criterion-related validity. Content validity evaluates whether the scale items fully cover the concepts to be measured; structural validity evaluates whether the scale items reflect the theoretical structure; criterion-related validity evaluates the correlation between the results of the scale and the external standard. Operability: The scale should have good operability, that is, the design of the scale should be simple and easy to understand, easy for clinicians and patients to use, and applicable in different clinical environments. Sensitivity and specificity: Sensitivity refers to the ability of the scale to identify true positives (sick people); specificity refers to the ability of the scale to identify true negatives (healthy people). A highly sensitive and specific scale can more accurately distinguish between sick and healthy people. Based on the above, it can be seen that in the field of traditional Chinese medicine, by designing a scale and selecting questions in the scale, it can scientifically and effectively help doctors judge the patient's condition.

[0058] Embodiment 1

[0059] Based on the above-mentioned related technologies and the technical problems raised in the background technology, the present invention provides a mind-spiritual differentiation method based on a problem scale, such as Figure 1 As shown, including:

[0060] S1. Using the Mind Syndrome Differentiation Question Scale to interactively obtain the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object; and judging the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency;

[0061] S2. calculating a comprehensive score of the mind based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information;

[0062] S3. Determine the target object's mental syndrome differentiation result according to the mental comprehensive score and mental evaluation judgment rules; the mental syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

[0063] like Figure 4 As shown, the present application discloses a scale for mental syndrome differentiation problems, wherein the scale for mental syndrome differentiation problems enables the target object to accurately express his or her situation by describing specific problems, and then uses the options selected by the target object to identify and judge the situation of the target object. In the scale for mental syndrome differentiation problems, the options are set based on frequency, and by judging and identifying the frequency of the problem situation, it can assist in judging the degree of the user's abnormal state, and finally, based on the user's mental comprehensive score, the user's mental state is divided into several levels, specifically including: normal, mild abnormality, moderate abnormality, and severe abnormality, so that the user can have a clear understanding of his or her own state. This technical solution can realize intelligent mental state judgment, improve evaluation efficiency and accuracy, and also reduce dependence on professional knowledge, so that ordinary users or health managers can also easily apply it. The technical solution of this application is based on comprehensive evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine theory, refined frequency analysis, quantitative mental comprehensive score, multi-level abnormal judgment, automated evaluation process, and real-time evaluation and dynamic adjustment capabilities. These advantages ensure that the solution can provide accurate, timely, and personalized mental state evaluation and conditioning suggestions in intelligent health management.

[0064] In one embodiment, the calculation of the comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: separately calculating the cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score of the target object; calculating the average score of the cognitive dimension score, the emotional dimension score, the physical and mental dimension score, and the volitional dimension score to obtain a comprehensive mind score.

[0065] like Figure 4As shown, in the present application, the first occurrence frequency corresponds to almost no occurrence; the second occurrence frequency corresponds to occasional occurrence; the third occurrence frequency corresponds to approximately normal number of days; the fourth occurrence frequency corresponds to frequent occurrence; the fifth occurrence frequency corresponds to almost daily occurrence. In order to be able to concretize the relevant questions, each option needs to be set to a corresponding score, the first occurrence frequency corresponds to 0 points; the second occurrence frequency corresponds to 1 point; the third occurrence frequency corresponds to 2 points; the fourth occurrence frequency corresponds to 3 points; the fifth occurrence frequency corresponds to 4 points. By quantifying the scores of each frequency, people's mental state can be effectively quantified, and the uniformity and scope of application of the problem scale in identifying people's mental state can be improved.

[0066] In one embodiment, judging the target object's mind differentiation result based on the comprehensive mind score and the mind evaluation judgment rules specifically includes: standardizing the comprehensive mind score based on a preset normative mean score and a normative standard deviation to obtain a standard score; converting the standard score into an interpretable score; and intervalizing the interpretable score to obtain a mind differentiation result.

[0067] In this application, if Figure 5 As shown, the norm refers to the standard distribution data obtained in a representative sample, which provides a reference standard for explaining the measurement results of individuals. In this application, due to the difference in the mental state of men and women, it is necessary to provide different norms for users of different genders according to the difference in gender. And in the subsequent score interval, there will be corresponding differences due to the difference in gender. In this application, the norm is a group of data representing the composition of the standard sample, which includes the mean and standard deviation of the standard sample. We can judge the position of the individual in the standard sample according to the norm. By calculating the standard score of the user, specifically calculated by the mean score and standard deviation in the norm, that is, the difference between the actual score of the user and the average score divided by the quotient of the standard deviation, its meaning represents a quantitative number of the relative position of the actual score of the user in a group, that is, the state of the user compared to the norm, the closer the distance to the norm, the more normal the user is, and the farther the user is from the norm, the more serious the abnormal state of the user is.

[0068] In one embodiment, the standardization of the mental comprehensive score based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation to obtain the standard score specifically includes:

[0069] Z = (AM) SD;

[0070] Among them, Z represents the standard score; A represents the comprehensive score of mind; M represents the normative mean score; SD represents the normative standard deviation.

[0071] In the present application, the standard score of the user is calculated, specifically, based on the average score and standard deviation in the norm, that is, the quotient of the difference between the user's actual score and the average score divided by the standard deviation. Its meaning is a quantity that represents the relative position of the user's actual score in a group, that is, the status of the user compared to the norm. The closer the user is to the norm, the relatively normal the user is. The farther the user is from the norm, the more serious the user's abnormal state is and the more unstable the mental state is.

[0072] In one embodiment, converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes:

[0073] T = 10 × Z + 50;

[0074] Among them, T represents the explainable score and Z represents the standard score.

[0075] In this application, the standard score is a distribution with the norm mean as the mean and the norm standard deviation as the standard deviation, but such a score is not intuitive and does not conform to people's usual judgment habits of data. Therefore, it is necessary to convert the standard score into a more intuitive and interpretable score, that is, to convert the score into an integer score so that the score can adapt to people's daily habits.

[0076] In one embodiment, the processing of the interpretable score into intervals to obtain the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes:

[0077] The explainable score is converted into an evaluation score using the following formula;

[0078]

[0079] Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the total score range, x min represents the lower limit of the total score range, T represents the explainable score, and Q represents the evaluation score;

[0080] The score interval corresponding to each mental syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object; and the mental syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined based on the score interval to which the evaluation score belongs.

[0081] In this application, the interpretable score is converted into an evaluation score, which specifically contains two purposes. First, the standard score is limited to between 0 and 100 points so that the score can conform to people's usage habits; second, the score is used to evaluate people's status. The higher the score, the more stable people's status is, and the lower the score, the greater the probability of abnormal status. Since there are certain differences in the mental state of men and women, different judgment criteria need to be set according to different genders.

[0082] In one embodiment, the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object, specifically including: when the target object is a male, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [59,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [41,59) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [23,41) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,23) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0083] In one embodiment, the method of determining the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result based on the gender of the target object also includes: when the target object is a female, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [56,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [38,56) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [20,38) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,20) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0084] By partitioning and evaluating each dimension of mental state, the difficulty of users' understanding of mental state evaluation can be further reduced, and a specific evaluation result can be provided, which will help users deepen their understanding of their own mental diagnosis results and take corresponding measures in a timely manner.

[0085] In one embodiment, judging the target object's mind dialectical result based on the comprehensive mind score and the mind evaluation judgment rules also includes: judging the target object's cognitive dimension dialectical result, emotional dimension dialectical result, physical and mental dimension dialectical result and volitional dimension dialectical result respectively based on the target object's cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score and volitional dimension score.

[0086] In order to facilitate users to have a detailed understanding of their own situation in each dimension, in addition to identifying the comprehensive dimension, it is also necessary to identify the user's four dimensions so that the user can identify their mental state in each dimension. In the scale norm data, there are corresponding norm scores for the scores of each mental dimension. The corresponding norm score is selected according to the user's gender, and then the cumulative score of each mental dimension is standardized to obtain the user's standard score. The standard score is then converted into an interval score in the form of a percentage system, and the state of each mental dimension of the user is diagnosed according to the interval to which the interval score belongs.

[0087] In one embodiment, the step of determining the target object's cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score, respectively, includes:

[0088] Standardizing the accumulated scores of each mental state dimension based on the preset normative mean score and normative standard deviation of each mental state dimension to obtain the corresponding standard score;

[0089] Convert the standard scores corresponding to each mental state dimension into corresponding interpretable scores;

[0090] The interpretable scores corresponding to each mental state dimension are binned to obtain the mental state evaluation corresponding to the mental state dimension.

[0091] In one embodiment, the cumulative scores of each mental state dimension are standardized based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation of each mental state dimension to obtain the corresponding standard score, specifically including:

[0092] Z i =(A i -M i ) / SD i ,i∈(1,4);

[0093] Among them, Z i represents the standard score of the i-th mental state dimension; A i represents the cumulative score of the i-th mental state dimension; M i represents the normative mean score of the i-th mental state dimension; SD i Represents the norm standard deviation of the i-th dimension.

[0094] In one embodiment, converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes:

[0095] T i =10×Z i +50,i∈(1,4);

[0096] Among them, T i represents the interpretable score of the i-th mental state dimension, Z i represents the standard score of the i-th mental state dimension.

[0097] In one embodiment, the processing of binning the explainable score to obtain a mental score corresponding to the mental state dimension specifically includes:

[0098]

[0099] Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the score interval, x min Indicates the lower limit of the score interval.

[0100] Specifically, in this embodiment, the interval judgment method of each dimension of the user's mind is the same as the judgment method of the comprehensive dimension of the mind, which is also based on the norm score and the norm standard deviation to analyze the user's state and finally provide a judgment conclusion for each dimension of the mind. Since there are four dimensions in the scale, i∈(1,4) indicates that each variable corresponds to the four dimensions.

[0101] Embodiment 2

[0102] See also Figure 2 , a mind-diagnosis device based on a question scale, the device comprising:

[0103] The acquisition unit 1 is used to interactively acquire the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object by using the mind syndrome differentiation problem scale; and judge the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency and a fifth occurrence frequency;

[0104] A calculation unit 2, used for calculating a comprehensive score of mind based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information;

[0105] The judgment unit 3 is used to judge the mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mild abnormality, moderate abnormality, and severe abnormality.

[0106] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 2 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the present application scheme, and does not constitute a limitation of the present application scheme. The specific mind-spiritual differentiation device based on the question scale may include more or less components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0107] Embodiment 3

[0108] A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the mind-spirit differentiation method based on a question scale as described in Example 1.

[0109] Embodiment 4

[0110] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as follows: Figure 3As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface and a database connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. When the computer program is executed by the processor, the mind-spirit dialectical method based on the problem scale is implemented.

[0111] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0112] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0113] Using the Mind Syndrome Differentiation Question Scale to interactively obtain the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object; and judging the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency;

[0114] Calculate a comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of frequency evaluation information;

[0115] The mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

[0116] In one embodiment, the calculation of the comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: separately calculating the cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score of the target object; calculating the average score of the cognitive dimension score, the emotional dimension score, the physical and mental dimension score, and the volitional dimension score to obtain a comprehensive mind score.

[0117] In one embodiment, judging the target object's mind differentiation result based on the comprehensive mind score and the mind evaluation judgment rules specifically includes: standardizing the comprehensive mind score based on a preset normative mean score and a normative standard deviation to obtain a standard score; converting the standard score into an interpretable score; and intervalizing the interpretable score to obtain a mind differentiation result.

[0118] In one embodiment, the standardization of the mental comprehensive score based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation to obtain the standard score specifically includes:

[0119] Z = (AM) SD;

[0120] Among them, Z represents the standard score; A represents the comprehensive score of mind; M represents the normative mean score; SD represents the normative standard deviation.

[0121] In one embodiment, converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes:

[0122] T = 10 × Z + 50;

[0123] Among them, T represents the explainable score and Z represents the standard score.

[0124] In one embodiment, the processing of the interpretable score into intervals to obtain the mind-spirit differentiation result specifically includes: converting the interpretable score into an evaluation score using the following formula;

[0125]

[0126] Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the total score range, x min represents the lower limit of the total score range, T represents the explainable score, and Q represents the evaluation score; the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object; based on the score range to which the evaluation score belongs, the mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined.

[0127] In one embodiment, the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object, specifically including: when the target object is a male, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [59,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [41,59) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [23,41) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,23) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0128] In one embodiment, the method of determining the score range corresponding to each mind syndrome differentiation result based on the gender of the target object also includes: when the target object is a female, the mind score range is: the evaluation score between [56,100) corresponds to "normal"; the evaluation score between [38,56) corresponds to "mild abnormal"; the evaluation score between [20,38) corresponds to "moderate abnormal"; the evaluation score between [0,20) corresponds to "severe abnormal".

[0129] In one embodiment, judging the target subject's mental syndrome differentiation result according to the mental comprehensive score and mental evaluation judgment rule further includes:

[0130] According to the cognitive dimension scores, emotional dimension scores, physical and mental dimension scores and volitional dimension scores of the target object, the cognitive dimension dialectical results, emotional dimension dialectical results, physical and mental dimension dialectical results and volitional dimension dialectical results of the target object are judged respectively.

[0131] Embodiment 5

[0132] Furthermore, the present application also provides a comparison relationship, which corresponds the mind differentiation results in the present application with the physiological parameters of the human body, so as to verify that the mind differentiation method of the present application can accurately reflect the results of the mind state identification.

[0133] In modern medicine, whether the mind is normal is reflected in the physiological index parameters of the human body, which can be evaluated using the HRV parameter. HRV (heart rate variability parameter) reflects the ability of the autonomic nervous system to regulate the heart, mainly the activity of the vagus nerve (parasympathetic nerve) and the sympathetic nerve. The level of HRV can reflect the body's stress level, emotional fluctuations and overall psychosomatic health. The HRV index mainly includes two parameters: SDNN (standard deviation): reflects the overall HRV. Usually a high SDNN value indicates health and better autonomic nervous regulation. LF / HF ratio: reflects the relative balance of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. A high ratio usually means that the sympathetic nerves are dominant, reflecting a greater stress response.

[0134] In this application, the total score of mind differentiation corresponds to the evaluation results of normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal and severely abnormal; reflected in the HRV parameter, the state of people's mind differentiation can be evaluated by defining the interval range of the HRV parameter, specifically:

[0135] When people's total scores are normal, the values ​​of the two parameters of the HRV index are approximately: SDNN>100ms; LF / HF ratio<2; in this state, HRV is high, indicating that the heart's autonomic nervous system is well regulated, the parasympathetic nervous system is dominant, the emotions are stable, and the mind is peaceful.

[0136] When people's total scores are evaluated as mildly abnormal, the values ​​of the two parameters of the HRV index are approximately: SDNN: 70-100ms; LF / HF ratio: 2-3; in a mildly abnormal state, HRV decreases slightly and the activity of the sympathetic nerves increases. Patients may experience some mild anxiety, palpitations, mild insomnia or mood swings.

[0137] When people's total score is moderately abnormal, the values ​​of the two parameters of the HRV index are approximately: SDNN: 50-70ms; LF / HF ratio: 3-5; moderate abnormality is usually accompanied by more significant autonomic nervous imbalance. At this time, the sympathetic nervous system is significantly dominant, and patients may show persistent anxiety, tension, obvious insomnia, palpitations and mood swings, and the body's adaptability is reduced.

[0138] When people's total scores are evaluated as severely abnormal, the values ​​of the two parameters of the HRV index are approximately: SDNN < 50ms; LF / HF ratio > 5; in a severely abnormal state, HRV decreases significantly, the sympathetic nerves are strongly active, and the parasympathetic nerves hardly play a role. Patients may be in a state of continuous mental tension, severe insomnia, restlessness, increased palpitations, and even more severe anxiety and depression symptoms.

[0139] In order to verify the accuracy of the mind recognition scale, the present application also provides a verification method: 200 experimental subjects are randomly selected to ensure that the sample covers different ages, genders and health conditions, including people with healthy mental states and people with obvious abnormal mental states.

[0140] Use Figure 4 The mental state identification scale shown is used to identify people's mental state, and the mental state of each subject is calculated using the treatment scheme described in Example 1. The mental state identification results of each subject are obtained, including normal mind, mildly abnormal mind, moderately abnormal mind, and severely abnormal mind;

[0141] Use standardized HRV measurement equipment to measure HRV for all experimental subjects for at least 5 minutes, ensuring that the measurement environment of all subjects under experimental conditions is consistent (for example, in a quiet, relaxed state). Calculate key HRV parameters such as SDNN and LF / HF ratio.

[0142] The verification results show that among the 200 subjects, the results of the mind-spirit differentiation of 196 subjects are in line with the above-mentioned HRV index value range. The HRV indexes of the other four subjects may be affected by factors such as age, gender, stress, and sleep.

[0143] In summary, the method of mind differentiation proposed in this application can judge people's mental state more simply and accurately, and propose a more scientific method for the study of mind differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine.

[0144] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application can include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).

[0145] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0146] The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. All technical solutions under the concept of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention. It should be pointed out that for ordinary technicians in this technical field, some improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present invention should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. The mind-spirit differentiation method based on the question scale is characterized by: include: Using the Mind Syndrome Differentiation Question Scale to interactively obtain the mind syndrome differentiation-related information of the target object, and judging the mind syndrome differentiation-related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation-related information belongs; The frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency; Calculate a comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of frequency evaluation information; The mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

2. The method of mental syndrome differentiation based on the problem scale according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation of the mental comprehensive score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: Calculating the cognitive dimension score, emotional dimension score, physical and mental dimension score, and volitional dimension score of the target object respectively; The average scores of the cognitive dimension score, the emotional dimension score, the physical and mental dimension score, and the volitional dimension score are calculated to obtain a comprehensive mental score.

3. The method of mental syndrome differentiation based on the question scale according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The step of judging the target object's mental syndrome differentiation result according to the mental comprehensive score and the mental evaluation judgment rule specifically includes: The mental comprehensive score is standardized based on the preset normative mean score and normative standard deviation to obtain the standard score; converting the standard scores into interpretable scores; The interpretable scores are processed into intervals to obtain the mind syndrome differentiation results.

4. The method for distinguishing mental symptoms based on a problem scale according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The method of standardizing the mental comprehensive score based on the preset norm mean score and norm standard deviation to obtain the standard score specifically includes: Z = (AM) / SD; Among them, Z represents the standard score; A represents the comprehensive score of mind; M represents the normative mean score; SD represents the normative standard deviation.

5. The method for distinguishing mental symptoms based on a problem scale according to claim 4 is characterized in that: The converting the standard score into an interpretable score specifically includes: T = 10 × Z + 50; Among them, T represents the explainable score and Z represents the standard score.

6. The method for distinguishing mental symptoms based on a problem scale according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The process of processing the interpretable score into intervals to obtain the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: The explainable score is converted into an evaluation score using the following formula; Among them, x max represents the upper limit of the total score range, x min represents the lower limit of the total score range, T represents the explainable score, and Q represents the evaluation score; The score interval corresponding to each mental syndrome differentiation result is determined based on the gender of the target object; and the mental syndrome differentiation result of the target object is determined based on the score interval to which the evaluation score belongs.

7. The method for distinguishing mental symptoms based on a question scale according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The step of judging the target object's mental syndrome differentiation result according to the mental comprehensive score and the mental evaluation judgment rule also includes: According to the cognitive dimension scores, emotional dimension scores, physical and mental dimension scores and volitional dimension scores of the target object, the cognitive dimension dialectical results, emotional dimension dialectical results, physical and mental dimension dialectical results and volitional dimension dialectical results of the target object are judged respectively.

8. A mental syndrome differentiation device based on a question scale, characterized in that: The device comprises: an acquisition unit, for interactively acquiring the mind syndrome differentiation related information of the target object by using the mind syndrome differentiation problem scale; and judging the mind syndrome differentiation related information to determine the frequency evaluation information to which each of the mind syndrome differentiation related information belongs; the frequency evaluation information specifically includes: a first occurrence frequency, a second occurrence frequency, a third occurrence frequency, a fourth occurrence frequency, and a fifth occurrence frequency; A calculation unit, used for calculating a comprehensive mind score based on the scores of each item of the frequency evaluation information; A judgment unit is used to judge the mind syndrome differentiation result of the target object according to the mind comprehensive score and the mind evaluation judgment rule; the mind syndrome differentiation result specifically includes: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the mind-spirit differentiation method based on a question scale as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

10. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the mind-spirit differentiation method based on the question scale as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

Images