Safety prevention and control method and device, computer equipment, storage medium and program product

Abstract

The invention relates to a safety prevention and control method and device, computer equipment, a storage medium and a program product. The method comprises the steps of obtaining to-be-detected operation information of a power system, inputting the to-be-detected operation information into a risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result, determining a target historical risk event of which risk event description information is matched with the risk assessment result from historical risk events, and taking the standard processing measure corresponding to the target historical risk event as the processing measure corresponding to the risk assessment result, so that the risk assessment result can be generated based on the risk assessment model, potential safety hazards possibly occurring in the power operation can be prevented according to the risk assessment result, and the efficiency of generating the risk assessment result is improved. And the cost is reduced. Meanwhile, in the embodiment of the invention, the processing measure corresponding to the risk assessment result is also determined, the worker can quickly process the potential safety hazard according to the processing measure, and the safety of the electric power operation is further improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of power safety technology, and in particular to a safety prevention and control method, device, computer equipment, storage medium and program product. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of science and technology, power systems have become an indispensable part of modern society's infrastructure. However, as power systems become increasingly complex and interconnected, the security risks they face are becoming increasingly prominent. To ensure the personal safety of power workers, power systems have implemented various safety control measures. Therefore, preventing potential safety hazards during power operations has become a pressing technical issue in this field. Summary of the Invention

[0003] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a safety control method, device, computer equipment, storage medium and program product that can prevent safety hazards that may occur in power operations in response to the above technical problems.

[0004] In a first aspect, the present application provides a security control method. The method comprises:

[0005] Obtain information on pending inspection operations of the power system;

[0006] Inputting the information of the operation to be inspected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result;

[0007] From the historical risk events, determine the target historical risk events whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result;

[0008] The standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk event will be used as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0009] In one embodiment, determining, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result includes:

[0010] Determine the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event;

[0011] The target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold.

[0012] In one embodiment, determining the target historical risk event based on the historical risk event having a matching degree greater than a preset threshold includes:

[0013] The historical risk event with a matching degree greater than the preset threshold is regarded as a similar event to the risk assessment result;

[0014] Determining the target historical risk event from each of the similar events based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each of the similar events;

[0015] The operation parameters of the standard processing measure include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measure.

[0016] In one embodiment, before determining, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result, the method further includes:

[0017] Obtain risk event description information of the historical risk event;

[0018] Analyze the risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of the historical risk event;

[0019] Based on the type of event and the cause of occurrence, determine the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event.

[0020] In one embodiment, after inputting the information of the operation to be inspected into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment result, the method further includes:

[0021] If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, generating first risk warning information according to the risk assessment result, and sending the first risk warning information to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal;

[0022] and / or,

[0023] After applying the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk event as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, the method further includes:

[0024] According to the risk assessment result and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated and sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0025] In one embodiment, obtaining the to-be-detected operation information of the power system includes:

[0026] The operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at intervals of a preset time; the information collection device is arranged in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0027] In a second aspect, the present application also provides a safety control device. The device includes:

[0028] A first acquisition module is used to acquire the operation information to be detected of the power system;

[0029] An input module is used to input the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result;

[0030] A first determination module is configured to determine, from historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result;

[0031] The second determining module is configured to use the standard handling measure corresponding to the target historical risk event as the handling measure corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0032] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the steps of any of the above methods when executing the computer program.

[0033] In a fourth aspect, the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which implements the steps of any of the above methods when executed by a processor.

[0034] In a fifth aspect, the present application also provides a computer program product, comprising a computer program, which implements the steps of any of the above methods when executed by a processor.

[0035] The above-mentioned safety prevention and control methods, devices, computer equipment, storage media and program products obtain the information of the operation to be detected of the power system, input the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment result, and determine the target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result from the historical risk events, and use the standard processing measures corresponding to the target historical risk event as the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, so as to generate the risk assessment result based on the risk assessment model, so as to prevent the safety hazards that may occur in the power operation according to the risk assessment result, and improve the efficiency of the risk assessment result generation, which is conducive to reducing costs. At the same time, in the embodiment of the present application, the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment results are also determined, and the staff can quickly deal with the safety hazards according to the processing measures, further improving the safety of the power operation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] FIG1 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0037] FIG2 is a flow chart of a security control method provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0038] FIG3 is a flow chart of a method for determining a target historical risk event provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0039] FIG4 is a flow chart of another method for determining a target historical risk event provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0040] FIG5 is a flow chart of a method for determining a standard treatment measure provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0041] FIG6 is a flow chart of a method for risk prevention and control of the entire power operation chain provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0042] FIG7 is a structural block diagram of a safety control device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application more clear, the following further describes this application in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain this application and are not intended to limit this application.

[0044] With the rapid development of science and technology, power systems have become an indispensable part of modern society's infrastructure. However, as power systems become increasingly complex and interconnected, the security risks they face are becoming increasingly prominent. To ensure the personal safety of power workers, power systems have implemented various safety control measures. Therefore, preventing potential safety hazards during power operations has become a pressing technical issue in this field.

[0045] The security control method provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to the application environment shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 is an internal structure diagram of a computer device provided in the embodiment of the present application. The computer device can be a server, and its internal structure diagram can be as shown in Figure 1. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, and a network interface connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a security control method is implemented.

[0046] Those skilled in the art will understand that the structure shown in FIG1 is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0047] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG2 , FIG2 is a flow chart of a security control method provided in an embodiment of the present application. The method can be applied to the computer device in FIG1 . The method includes the following steps:

[0048] S201, obtaining information on operations to be detected in the power system.

[0049] Optionally, the operation information to be detected may include, for example, work arrangement information, work equipment information, work implementation information, work acceptance information, and other information of the power system operation.

[0050] For example, the work arrangement information may include basic information and work qualification information of responsible personnel, operating personnel, and supervisory personnel.

[0051] Among them, basic information may include, for example, name, gender, work number, job type, age and other information, and work qualification information may include, for example, work certificates related to the corresponding personnel.

[0052] Exemplarily, the working equipment information may include power operation equipment information and site operation equipment information. The power operation equipment information is equipment information directly related to power operation, and the site operation equipment information is auxiliary equipment information for power operation.

[0053] Among them, electrical working equipment may include, for example, screwdrivers, pliers, insulating gloves, insulating tape, insulating shoes, voltage detection pens, foot clips, insulating clothing, insulation resistance testers, etc., and site working equipment may include, for example, excavators, cranes, electric welders, tractors and other auxiliary construction equipment.

[0054] For example, the work implementation information may include operation nature information, operation duration information, operation location information, operation weather information, etc.

[0055] Among them, the operation nature information may include, for example, low-voltage operation, high-voltage operation, live operation, etc., the operation duration information includes the total construction period of the operation, daily working hours, etc., the operation location information includes the operation address, the degree of congestion of the operation space, etc., and the operation weather information includes the weather conditions of the operation, etc.

[0056] For example, the work acceptance information may include the power operation project appearance acceptance information and the power operation project functional acceptance information.

[0057] Among them, the appearance acceptance information of the power operation project refers to whether the external observation of the power operation project is qualified, and the functional acceptance information of the power operation project refers to the trial operation status of the power operation project.

[0058] In one embodiment, an information collection device may be provided in the power system, and the information of the operation to be detected may be obtained from the information collection device at preset time intervals.

[0059] Alternatively, an information collection device may be provided in the power system to collect operation information at intervals. The computer device implementing the aforementioned safety control method may send an information acquisition signal to the information collection device. Upon receiving the information acquisition signal, the information collection device may send the most recently collected operation information as the operation information to be detected to the computer device implementing the aforementioned safety control method.

[0060] Optionally, the information acquisition device may include, for example, an image acquisition device, a temperature acquisition device, a sound acquisition device, a text acquisition device, etc.

[0061] S202: Input the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result.

[0062] In one embodiment, the operation information of historical risk events and the standard risk assessment results corresponding to the operation information of each historical risk event can be obtained, and the operation information of historical risk events and the standard risk assessment results corresponding to the operation information of each historical risk event can be used as a training set. The natural language processing model is trained based on the training set to obtain a risk assessment model.

[0063] Exemplarily, the natural language processing model may include a chinchilla model, a GPT model, etc.

[0064] S203: Determine, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result.

[0065] In a possible implementation, the degree of matching between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each historical risk event may be determined, and then the historical risk event corresponding to the highest degree of matching may be used as the target historical risk event.

[0066] Alternatively, the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event descriptions of each historical risk event can be determined. Historical risk events with a match greater than a preset threshold are then considered similar events to the risk assessment results. The target historical risk event is then determined from each similar event based on the corresponding standard handling measures.

[0067] S204: Use the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0068] Optionally, risk event description information of historical risk events can be obtained, and then the risk event description information can be analyzed to determine the event type and cause of the historical risk event, and based on the event type and cause, determine the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event.

[0069] In an embodiment of the present application, by obtaining the information of the operation to be detected of the power system, the information of the operation to be detected is input into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment result, and from the historical risk events, the target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result is determined, and the standard treatment measures corresponding to the target historical risk event are used as the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, so that the risk assessment result can be generated based on the risk assessment model, so as to prevent the potential safety hazards that may occur in the power operation according to the risk assessment result, and improve the efficiency of the risk assessment result generation, which is conducive to reducing costs. At the same time, in an embodiment of the present application, the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result are also determined, and the staff can quickly deal with the safety hazards according to the treatment measures, further improving the safety of the power operation.

[0070] Referring to Figure 3, Figure 3 is a flow chart of a method for determining a target historical risk event provided by an embodiment of the present application. This embodiment involves a possible implementation method for determining, from historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment results. Based on the above embodiment, the above S203 includes the following steps:

[0071] S301, determining the matching degree between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each historical risk event.

[0072] For example, keywords in the risk assessment results can be extracted to determine the degree of match between the keywords in the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event. If the degree of overlap between the keywords in the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of the historical risk events is higher, the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event is higher.

[0073] Keywords in the risk assessment results may include, for example, equipment name, equipment type, operation type, operator type, operation environment, etc.

[0074] S302: Determine a target historical risk event based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold.

[0075] In a possible implementation, a historical risk event with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold may be determined as a target historical risk event.

[0076] Alternatively, historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold can be used as similar events of the risk assessment results, and then the target historical risk event can be determined from each similar event based on the standard processing measures corresponding to each similar event.

[0077] In an embodiment of the present application, the degree of match between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each historical risk event is determined, and the target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold, so that the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result can be determined based on the standard treatment measures of the target historical risk event, avoiding the need to redetermine the treatment measures every time a risk event occurs, improving the efficiency of determining the treatment measures, and thereby improving the efficiency of handling risk events and improving the safety of the power system.

[0078] Referring to Figure 4, Figure 4 is a flow chart of another method for determining a target historical risk event provided by an embodiment of the present application. This embodiment involves a possible implementation method for determining a target historical risk event based on historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold. Based on the above embodiment, the above S302 includes the following steps:

[0079] S401: historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are used as similar events in the risk assessment result.

[0080] For example, a preset threshold can be set according to actual needs, and then the matching degrees between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event are sorted in order from large to small, and the matching degrees greater than the preset threshold are selected, and the historical risk events with matching degrees greater than the preset threshold are used as similar events of the risk assessment results.

[0081] S402 : Determine a target historical risk event from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard processing measures corresponding to each similar event.

[0082] The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

[0083] In a possible implementation, if the operating parameter of the standard treatment measure is the operating difficulty of the standard treatment measure, a similar event corresponding to the standard treatment measure with the lowest operating difficulty may be used as the target historical risk event.

[0084] Alternatively, if the operational parameters of the standard handling measures are operational difficulty and the number of historical selections, each similar event can be comprehensively scored based on the operational difficulty and the number of historical selections, and then the similar event corresponding to the highest score can be determined as the target historical risk event.

[0085] In an embodiment of the present application, historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are used as similar events of the risk assessment result, and the target historical risk event is determined from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each similar event. The operating parameters of the standard treatment measures include at least one of the operational difficulty of the standard treatment measures, the number of historical selections, and the update time. Since the target historical risk event is determined from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each similar event in the embodiment of the present application, it is possible to comprehensively evaluate multiple similar events that match the risk assessment result based on the feasibility of implementing the standard treatment measures, thereby improving the feasibility of the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result and further improving the safety of the power system.

[0086] Referring to Figure 5, Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining a standard treatment measure provided by an embodiment of the present application. Based on the above embodiment, before the above S302, the method further includes the following steps:

[0087] S501: Obtain risk event description information of historical risk events.

[0088] Optionally, a risk assessment result of a historical risk event may be obtained and then used as the risk event description information of the historical risk event. Alternatively, the operation information of the historical risk event may be used as the risk event description information of the historical risk event.

[0089] S502: Analyze the risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of the historical risk event.

[0090] For example, the event type of a historical risk event may include the risk level, equipment type, operation type, and time of occurrence. The cause of a historical risk event may include, for example, missing staff arrangements, insufficient staff arrangements, missing work equipment, uninspected work equipment, substandard work equipment, inappropriate weather conditions for work, inappropriate operation duration, and missing work inspection personnel.

[0091] S503: Determine the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk events based on the event type and cause.

[0092] In an exemplary embodiment, assuming that the event type of the historical risk event is high risk and the cause is missing staff arrangements, the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event are determined to be immediate suspension of operations and adjustment of missing staff.

[0093] In another exemplary embodiment, assuming that the event type of the historical risk event is the risk level and the cause is the lack of staff arrangement, the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event are determined to be continuing the operation and adjusting the missing staff.

[0094] In an embodiment of the present application, risk event description information of historical risk events is obtained and analyzed to determine the event type and cause of the historical risk event. Based on the event type and cause, the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event are determined. In this way, the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk event can be jointly determined based on the event type and cause, thereby improving the pertinence and accuracy of the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk events.

[0095] Based on the above embodiment, after S202, the method further includes the following steps:

[0096] If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, first risk warning information is generated according to the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal;

[0097] Optionally, the abnormal working status of the power system may include, for example, lack of staff arrangements, insufficient staff arrangements, lack of working equipment, lack of inspection of working equipment, non-compliance of working equipment with requirements, inappropriate weather conditions for work implementation, inconsistent working hours, lack of work acceptance personnel, etc.

[0098] For example, there are welding machines at a power operation site, but there is a lack of operators with welder certificates. This is a case of missing staff arrangements; a power operation has a construction period requirement, but the detailed list of operators cannot be completed within the construction period. This is a case of insufficient staff arrangements; the nature of a power operation is high-voltage operation, but the operators are not equipped with sufficient insulating shoes, insulating gloves, etc. This is a case of missing work equipment; the insulation resistance tester used in a power operation has no trial report uploaded. This is a case of missing work equipment inspection; the nature of a power operation is high-voltage operation, but the level of insulating cap equipped by the operators is suitable for low-voltage construction scenarios. This is a case of substandard work equipment; a power operation requires live work, but it is a thunderstorm that day. This is a case of inappropriate weather conditions for the work implementation; the working hours of a power operation exceed the daily stipulated hours. This is a case of inappropriate working hours, which can easily lead to fatigue during construction; there is no acceptance inspection after the completion of a power operation. This is a case of missing work acceptance personnel.

[0099] In an embodiment of the present application, if the risk assessment result indicates that there is an abnormality in the working state of the power system, a first risk warning information is generated based on the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device. The first risk warning information can be sent to the target device as soon as possible, thereby improving the efficiency of handling risk events and further improving the safety of power equipment.

[0100] Based on the above embodiment, after S204, the method further includes the following steps:

[0101] According to the risk assessment result and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated and sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0102] After determining the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, a second risk warning information can be jointly generated based on the risk assessment results and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, and the second risk warning information can be sent to the target device, so that the treatment measures that can handle the risk event can be sent to the target device in a timely manner to remind the power operation personnel to handle the risk event according to the treatment measures, further improving the efficiency of handling risk events and improving the safety of the power system.

[0103] Based on the above embodiment, the above step S201 can be implemented in the following manner:

[0104] The power system operation information to be detected is obtained from the information collection device at intervals of a preset time.

[0105] Among them, the information collection equipment is set in the power system to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0106] In one embodiment, an information collection device may be provided in the power system, and the information of the operation to be detected may be obtained from the information collection device at preset time intervals.

[0107] Alternatively, an information collection device may be provided in the power system to collect operation information at intervals. The computer device implementing the aforementioned safety control method may send an information acquisition signal to the information collection device. Upon receiving the information acquisition signal, the information collection device may send the most recently collected operation information as the operation information to be detected to the computer device implementing the aforementioned safety control method.

[0108] Optionally, the information acquisition device may include, for example, an image acquisition device, a temperature acquisition device, a sound acquisition device, a text acquisition device, etc.

[0109] In the embodiment of the present application, the operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at preset intervals, which can continuously detect the working status of the power system, improve the safety of the power system, and save manpower and material resources.

[0110] Referring to FIG6 , FIG6 is a flow chart of a method for risk prevention and control of the entire power operation chain provided by an embodiment of the present application. The method includes the following steps:

[0111] S601, obtaining the operation information to be detected of the power system from the information collection device at every preset time interval.

[0112] S602: Input the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result.

[0113] S603: If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, first risk warning information is generated according to the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device.

[0114] S604: Determine the matching degree between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each historical risk event.

[0115] S605: historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are used as similar events in the risk assessment result.

[0116] S606: Determine a target historical risk event from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard processing measures corresponding to each similar event.

[0117] S607: Use the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0118] S608: Generate second risk warning information according to the risk assessment result and the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, and send the second risk warning information to the target device.

[0119] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above are displayed in sequence according to the instructions of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence in the order indicated by the arrows. Unless otherwise specified herein, there is no strict order restriction on the execution of these steps, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a portion of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed and completed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a portion of steps or stages in other steps.

[0120] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiments of the present application also provide a security control device for implementing the aforementioned security control method. The implementation solution provided by the device is similar to the implementation solution described in the aforementioned method. Therefore, the specific limitations of one or more security control device embodiments provided below can be referred to the limitations of the security control method above and will not be repeated here.

[0121] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG7 , FIG7 is a structural block diagram of a security control device provided in an embodiment of the present application. The device 700 includes:

[0122] The first acquisition module 701 is used to acquire the operation information to be detected of the power system.

[0123] The input module 702 is used to input the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result.

[0124] The first determining module 703 is configured to determine, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result.

[0125] The second determining module 704 is configured to use the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk event as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0126] In one embodiment, the first determining module 703 includes:

[0127] The first determining unit is used to determine the matching degree between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each historical risk event.

[0128] The second determining unit is configured to determine a target historical risk event based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold.

[0129] In one embodiment, the second determining unit includes:

[0130] The first determining subunit is configured to take historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold as similar events in the risk assessment result.

[0131] The second determining subunit is configured to determine a target historical risk event from each similar event according to an operating parameter of a standard processing measure corresponding to each similar event.

[0132] The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

[0133] In one embodiment, the apparatus 700 further includes:

[0134] The second acquisition module is used to obtain risk event description information of historical risk events.

[0135] The analysis module is used to analyze the risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of historical risk events.

[0136] The third determination module is used to determine the standard handling measures corresponding to historical risk events based on the event type and cause.

[0137] In one embodiment, the apparatus 700 further includes:

[0138] The first risk reminder module is used to generate first risk warning information based on the risk assessment result if the risk assessment result indicates that there is an abnormality in the working state of the power system, and send the first risk warning information to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that there is an abnormality in the working state of the current power system.

[0139] and / or,

[0140] The second risk reminder module is used to generate second risk warning information based on the risk assessment results and the corresponding processing measures of the risk assessment results, and send the second risk warning information to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0141] In one embodiment, the first acquisition module 701 includes:

[0142] The acquisition unit is used to acquire the operation information to be detected of the power system from the information acquisition device at each preset time interval; the information acquisition device is set in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0143] Each module in the aforementioned security control device can be implemented in whole or in part through software, hardware, or a combination thereof. Each module can be embedded in or independent of a processor in a computer device in hardware form, or can be stored in a computer device's memory in software form, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each module.

[0144] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0145] Obtain information on pending inspection operations of the power system;

[0146] Input the information of the operation to be inspected into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment results;

[0147] From historical risk events, identify target historical risk events whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment results;

[0148] The standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events shall be used as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0149] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0150] Determine the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event;

[0151] The target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than the preset threshold.

[0152] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0153] Historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are considered similar events in the risk assessment results;

[0154] Determine the target historical risk event from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each similar event;

[0155] The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

[0156] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0157] Obtain risk event description information of historical risk events;

[0158] Analyze risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of historical risk events;

[0159] Determine the standard handling measures corresponding to historical risk events based on the type of event and the cause of occurrence.

[0160] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0161] If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, first risk warning information is generated according to the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal;

[0162] and / or,

[0163] After using the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, the method further includes:

[0164] According to the risk assessment result and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated and sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0165] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0166] The operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at every preset time interval; the information collection device is set in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0167] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0168] Obtain information on pending inspection operations of the power system;

[0169] Input the information of the operation to be inspected into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment results;

[0170] From historical risk events, identify target historical risk events whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment results;

[0171] The standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events shall be used as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0172] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0173] Determine the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event;

[0174] The target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than the preset threshold.

[0175] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0176] Historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are considered similar events in the risk assessment results;

[0177] Determine the target historical risk event from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each similar event;

[0178] The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

[0179] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0180] Obtain risk event description information of historical risk events;

[0181] Analyze risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of historical risk events;

[0182] Determine the standard handling measures corresponding to historical risk events based on the type of event and the cause of occurrence.

[0183] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0184] If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, first risk warning information is generated according to the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal;

[0185] and / or,

[0186] After using the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, the method further includes:

[0187] According to the risk assessment result and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated and sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0188] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0189] The operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at every preset time interval; the information collection device is set in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0190] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, comprising a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0191] Obtain information on pending inspection operations of the power system;

[0192] Input the information of the operation to be inspected into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment results;

[0193] From historical risk events, identify target historical risk events whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment results;

[0194] The standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events shall be used as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

[0195] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0196] Determine the degree of match between the risk assessment results and the risk event description information of each historical risk event;

[0197] The target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than the preset threshold.

[0198] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0199] Historical risk events with a matching degree greater than a preset threshold are considered similar events in the risk assessment results;

[0200] Determine the target historical risk event from each similar event based on the operating parameters of the standard treatment measures corresponding to each similar event;

[0201] The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

[0202] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0203] Obtain risk event description information of historical risk events;

[0204] Analyze risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of historical risk events;

[0205] Determine the standard handling measures corresponding to historical risk events based on the type of event and the cause of occurrence.

[0206] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0207] If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, first risk warning information is generated according to the risk assessment result, and the first risk warning information is sent to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal;

[0208] and / or,

[0209] After using the standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, the method further includes:

[0210] According to the risk assessment result and the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated and sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the treatment measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

[0211] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0212] The operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at every preset time interval; the information collection device is set in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

[0213] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiments can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the above-mentioned embodiments. In particular, any reference to memory, database, or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can take various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The databases involved in the various embodiments provided herein may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include, but are not limited to, distributed databases based on blockchains. The processors involved in the various embodiments provided herein may be, but are not limited to, general-purpose processors, central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), data processing logic devices based on quantum computing, and the like.

[0214] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0215] The above-described embodiments merely represent several implementation methods of the present application. While the descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be noted that a person of ordinary skill in the art may make various modifications and improvements without departing from the spirit of the present application, and these modifications and improvements fall within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present application shall be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A safety control method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtain the information of the power system operations to be tested; Inputting the to-be-detected operation information into a risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result; From the historical risk events, determine a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result; The standard handling measures corresponding to the target historical risk events are used as the handling measures corresponding to the risk assessment results.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The step of determining, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result includes: Determining the matching degree between the risk assessment result and the risk event description information of each of the historical risk events; The target historical risk event is determined based on the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that Determining the target historical risk event according to the historical risk event whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold includes: Taking the historical risk events whose matching degree is greater than a preset threshold as similar events of the risk assessment result; Determining the target historical risk event from each of the similar events according to the operating parameters of the standard processing measures corresponding to each of the similar events; The operation parameters of the standard processing measures include at least one of the operation difficulty, the number of historical selections, and the update time of the standard processing measures.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Before determining, from the historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result, the method further includes: Obtain risk event description information of the historical risk event; Analyze the risk event description information to determine the event type and cause of the historical risk event; Determine the standard handling measures corresponding to the historical risk events based on the event type and cause of occurrence.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After inputting the to-be-detected operation information into the risk assessment model to obtain the risk assessment result, the method further comprises: If the risk assessment result indicates that the working state of the power system is abnormal, generating first risk warning information according to the risk assessment result, and sending the first risk warning information to the target device; the first risk warning information is used to indicate that the working state of the current power system is abnormal; and / or, After using the standard processing measures corresponding to the target historical risk events as the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment results, the method further includes: According to the risk assessment result and the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment result, second risk warning information is generated, and the second risk warning information is sent to the target device; the second risk warning information includes the processing measures corresponding to the risk assessment result.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The obtaining of the to-be-detected operation information of the power system includes: The operation information to be detected of the power system is obtained from the information collection device at intervals of a preset time; the information collection device is arranged in the power system and is used to collect the operation information of the power system.

7. A safety control device, characterized in that: The device comprises: A first acquisition module is used to acquire the operation information to be detected of the power system; An input module, used for inputting the information of the operation to be detected into the risk assessment model to obtain a risk assessment result; A first determination module is used to determine, from historical risk events, a target historical risk event whose risk event description information matches the risk assessment result; The second determination module is used to use the standard processing measure corresponding to the target historical risk event as the processing measure corresponding to the risk assessment result.

8. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images