Intelligent assisted trial processing method, device, computer-readable medium and equipment

Abstract

The embodiments of the present application provide an intelligent assisted trial processing method, apparatus, computer-readable medium, and device. The method includes: displaying a trial key point subpage and a preset judgment item subpage corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the trial key point subpage displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item subpage displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; in response to the selection operation of determining each pending dispute point in the pending dispute point list as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and the conclusion information set for each pending dispute point, generating the judgment reason portion in the judgment document; in response to the selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list as supported or rejected, generating the judgment item portion in the judgment document. The technical solution of the embodiments of the present application can improve trial efficiency and accuracy.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of computer and communication technology, and more specifically, to an intelligent assisted trial processing method, apparatus, computer-readable medium, and device. Background Art

[0002] In the traditional judicial trial process, judges manually analyze case materials and, based on evidence presented, cross-examination, and the judge's judgment, write down the facts the court has determined. They also need to identify key review points, such as the focus of the dispute, and write the reasons for the judgment based on these points. Simultaneously, judges must individually review the plaintiff's finalized claims, ultimately determining whether to support or dismiss them and forming the corresponding judgment. This process is not only time-consuming and laborious, but also prone to human errors leading to misjudgments and omissions of key information, undermining the parties' sense of justice. With the increasing number of cases, courts face increasing trial pressure, and traditional trial methods and resources are no longer able to meet the demands of efficient, rigorous, and accurate trials. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The embodiments of the present application provide an intelligent assisted trial processing method, apparatus, computer-readable medium, and device, which can improve trial efficiency and accuracy.

[0004] Other features and advantages of the present application will become apparent from the following detailed description, or may be learned in part by practice of the present application.

[0005] According to one aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a method for intelligent assisted trial processing is provided, including: displaying a trial key points sub-page and a preset judgment item sub-page corresponding to an intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the trial key points sub-page displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item sub-page displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; in response to a selection operation of determining each pending dispute point in the pending dispute point list as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and conclusion information set for each pending dispute point, generating the content of the judgment reasons part in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case; in response to a selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list as support or rejection, generating the content of the judgment main text part in the judgment document.

[0006] According to one aspect of an embodiment of the present application, an intelligent assisted trial processing device is provided, including: a display unit, configured to display a trial key points sub-page and a preset judgment item sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the trial key points sub-page displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item sub-page displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; a processing unit, configured to generate the content of the judgment reasons part in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case in response to the selection operation of determining each pending dispute point in the pending dispute point list as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and the conclusion information set for each pending dispute point; and generate the content of the judgment main text part in the judgment document in response to the selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list as support or rejection.

[0007] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the processing unit is further configured to: if a trigger operation is received to display the litigation and defense summary sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, the litigation and defense summary sub-page is displayed, and the litigation and defense summary sub-page displays the final litigation request information of the parties, as well as the factual information of the litigation case and the parties' opinion information. The final litigation request information is generated based on the original complaint, amended complaint and litigation request change information of the parties during the trial; in response to an adjustment operation on the final litigation request information, the adjusted litigation request information is displayed, and the litigation request list is generated based on the adjusted litigation request information.

[0008] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned solution, the litigation summary sub-page also displays the changes in the litigation request, and the changes in the litigation request are used to display the change history information of the litigation request of the litigation case.

[0009] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the processing unit is further configured to: if a fact determination sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system is received, the fact determination sub-page is displayed, and the fact determination sub-page displays a fact determination text box and a list of evidence contents of the litigation case; the evidence content list contains at least one piece of evidence content generated based on the case materials of the litigation case, and adjustment options for each piece of evidence content; in response to the adjustment operation of the at least one piece of evidence content, the adjusted evidence content is displayed, and the fact information of the litigation case is generated in the fact determination text box based on the adjusted evidence content.

[0010] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the preset judgment sub-page also displays a selection control for each litigation request in the litigation request list, a deletion control corresponding to each litigation request, and an add litigation request control; wherein, the selection control is used to select the corresponding litigation request as supported or rejected; the deletion control is used to delete the corresponding litigation request in the litigation request list; and the add litigation request control is used to add a new litigation request to the litigation request list.

[0011] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the display unit is configured to: display a navigation bar in the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the navigation bar displays a trigger control for entering the case entity trial page; in response to a trigger operation on the trigger control for entering the case entity trial page, display the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case, wherein the entity trial page contains trigger controls corresponding to each sub-page; if a trigger operation on the trigger control corresponding to the specified sub-page is received, the specified sub-page is displayed.

[0012] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the display unit is further configured to: display the intelligent review page of the intelligent assisted trial system, and the intelligent review page includes a trigger control corresponding to the litigation and defense opinion sub-page; the processing unit is further configured to: respond to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the litigation and defense opinion sub-page, and display the litigation and defense opinion sub-page in the intelligent review page, and the litigation and defense opinion sub-page includes page areas for displaying litigation request opinions and defense opinions, respectively, and an association control for displaying the correspondence between the litigation request opinions and the defense opinions.

[0013] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the association control is used to associate and display the page areas where the corresponding litigation request opinions and defense opinions are located; the processing unit is also configured to: in response to the adjustment operation of the association control, adjust the correspondence between the litigation request opinions and defense opinions displayed in the litigation and defense opinion sub-page.

[0014] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the smart paper marking page also includes a trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page; the processing unit is also configured to: in response to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page, display the evidence cross-examination sub-page in the smart paper marking page, and the evidence cross-examination sub-page displays at least one piece of evidence information and the cross-examination opinions corresponding to each piece of evidence information.

[0015] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the evidence cross-examination sub-page also displays adjustment controls corresponding to the various pieces of evidence information and modification controls corresponding to the cross-examination opinions; the processing unit is also configured to: if a trigger operation of the adjustment control corresponding to the specified evidence information is received, the specified evidence information is adjusted; and if a trigger operation of the modification control corresponding to the specified cross-examination opinion is received, the specified cross-examination opinion is modified.

[0016] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the intelligent marking page also includes a trigger control corresponding to a material screening sub-page; the processing unit is further configured to: in response to a trigger operation on the trigger control corresponding to the material screening sub-page, display the material screening sub-page in the intelligent marking page, the material screening sub-page including folders corresponding to different material types, and a list of electronic material identifications of the litigation case; in response to a trigger operation of moving a specified electronic material identification in the electronic material identification list to a specified folder, move the electronic material corresponding to the specified electronic material identification to the specified folder.

[0017] According to one aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a computer-readable medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the intelligent assisted trial processing method as described in the above embodiment is implemented.

[0018] According to one aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a computer device is provided, comprising: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more computer programs, wherein when the one or more computer programs are executed by the one or more processors, the computer device implements the intelligent assisted trial processing method as described in the above embodiments.

[0019] According to one aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a computer program product is provided, comprising a computer program stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of a computer device reads and executes the computer program from the computer-readable storage medium, causing the computer device to perform the intelligent-assisted trial processing method provided in the various optional embodiments described above.

[0020] In the technical solutions provided by some embodiments of the present application, a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case can be displayed in the trial points sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, and a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case can be displayed in the preset judgment item sub-page of the case analysis page. Then, in response to the selection operation of determining each pending dispute point in the pending dispute point list as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and the conclusion information set for each pending dispute point, the judgment reasons part of the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case can be generated; and in response to the selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list as supported or rejected, the judgment main text part of the judgment document can be generated. It can be seen that the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application realizes the rapid confirmation of the dispute points of the litigation case and the efficient processing of the litigation requests by displaying a visual interactive interface. The judge only needs to select the dispute focus issue or the non-dispute focus issue in the pending dispute point list and set the corresponding conclusion information to automatically generate the judgment reasons part of the judgment document. Similarly, by selecting each litigation request in the litigation request list as supported or rejected, the judgment main text part of the judgment document can also be automatically generated. This method not only significantly improves trial efficiency, reduces the workload of judges, ensures the rigor of the trial process, but also reduces the risk of misjudgment due to human factors.

[0021] It should be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present application. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] Figure 1 A schematic diagram shows an exemplary system architecture to which the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application can be applied.

[0023] Figure 2 A flowchart of an intelligent assisted trial processing method according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0024] Figure 3 The figure shows a processing flow chart of the intelligent marking module according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0025] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the interface of the material screening process according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0026] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the interface of the litigation and defense opinion link according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0027] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of the interface of the evidence verification link according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0028] Figure 7 A schematic diagram of the interface of the litigation summary link according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0029] Figure 8 A schematic diagram of an interface for determining facts according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0030] Figure 9 A schematic diagram of the interface of the review key points link according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0031] Figure 10 A schematic diagram of an interface for a preset judgment item link according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0032] Figure 11 A block diagram of an intelligent assisted trial processing device according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.

[0033] Figure 12 A schematic diagram of the structure of a computer system suitable for implementing a computer device of an embodiment of the present application is shown. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] Example embodiments will now be described in a more complete manner with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the example embodiments can be implemented in various forms and should not be construed as limited to these examples; rather, these embodiments are provided to make this application more comprehensive and complete and to fully convey the concepts of the example embodiments to those skilled in the art.

[0035] In addition, the features, structures or characteristics described in the present application may be combined in one or more embodiments in any suitable manner. In the following description, there are many specific details so that the embodiments of the present application can be fully understood. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that when implementing the technical solution of the present application, it is not necessary to use all the detailed features in the embodiments, one or more specific details may be omitted, or other methods, elements, devices, steps, etc. may be adopted.

[0036] In the embodiments of the present application, the term "module" or "unit" refers to a computer program or portion of a computer program that has a predetermined function and works together with other related parts to achieve a predetermined goal. It can be implemented in whole or in part using software, hardware (such as processing circuits or memory), or a combination thereof. Similarly, a processor (or multiple processors or memories) can be used to implement one or more modules or units. In addition, each module or unit can be part of an overall module or unit that includes the functionality of the module or unit.

[0037] The block diagrams shown in the accompanying drawings are merely functional entities and do not necessarily correspond to physically separate entities. That is, these functional entities may be implemented in software, in one or more hardware modules or integrated circuits, or in different networks and / or processor devices and / or microcontroller devices.

[0038] The flowcharts shown in the accompanying drawings are for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily include all contents and operations / steps, nor must they be executed in the order described. For example, some operations / steps may be decomposed, while others may be combined or partially combined. Therefore, the actual execution order may vary depending on the actual situation.

[0039] It should be noted that the term "plurality" used in this document refers to two or more. "And / or" describes a relationship between associated objects, indicating that three possible relationships exist. For example, "A and / or B" can represent: A alone, A and B together, or B alone. The character " / " generally indicates an "or" relationship between the associated objects.

[0040] It is understandable that this application can display a prompt interface or pop-up window before and during the collection of relevant data (such as relevant data of a litigation case). This prompt interface or pop-up window is used to remind the user that relevant data is currently being collected, so that this application only starts to execute the relevant steps of obtaining relevant data after obtaining the user's confirmation operation on the prompt interface or pop-up window. Otherwise (that is, when the user does not obtain the confirmation operation on the prompt interface or pop-up window), the relevant steps of obtaining relevant data are terminated, that is, the relevant data is not obtained. In other words, all data collected by this application is collected with the consent and authorization of the user, and the collection, use and processing of relevant data must comply with the relevant laws, regulations and standards of the relevant countries and regions.

[0041] In traditional judicial trial practice, judges must thoroughly study case materials, draw on their professional knowledge and experience to identify and determine the core points of dispute, and then write detailed reasons to explain the basis for their decisions. At the same time, judges must examine the plaintiff's claims one by one, comprehensively considering the facts of the case and the legal provisions, and make decisions to support or reject the claims. This decision, based on the judgment, forms the content of the judgment's main body. This cumbersome process not only requires judges to possess advanced legal literacy and trial skills, but also relies heavily on their personal experience, case-handling capabilities, and subjective judgment, which can easily lead to inefficient trials and inconsistent verdicts. With the deepening of judicial reform and the surge in the number of cases, the traditional trial model can no longer meet society's urgent need for efficient and fair trials.

[0042] It is precisely based on the above problems that the embodiment of the present application proposes an intelligent assisted trial processing solution that can intelligently assist judges in case analysis, confirmation of dispute points and processing of litigation requests, which can improve trial efficiency and ensure trial quality.

[0043] Specifically, if Figure 1 As shown, in a system architecture 100 applying the technical solution of an embodiment of the present application, a terminal device 110, a network 120 and a server 130 may be included. The terminal device 110 may include a smart phone, a tablet computer, a laptop computer, a vehicle-mounted terminal, and the like. The server 130 may be a server that provides various services. It may be an independent physical server, a server cluster or a distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, or a cloud server that provides basic cloud computing services such as cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communications, middleware services, domain name services, security services, content delivery networks (CDNs), and big data and artificial intelligence platforms. Among them, the network 120 may be a medium that provides a communication connection between the terminal device 110 and the server 130, such as a wired communication link or a wireless communication link.

[0044] According to implementation requirements, the system architecture in the embodiment of the present application may have any number of terminal devices 110, networks 120, and servers 130. For example, the server 130 may be a server group composed of multiple server devices.

[0045] In one embodiment of the present application, the terminal device 110 can display a trial key points subpage and a preset judgment item subpage corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system. The trial key points subpage displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item subpage displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case.

[0046] Users (e.g., judges, presiding judges, etc.) can interact with the page displayed on terminal device 110 using input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, touch screen, etc.). For example, if a user triggers an action to select a disputed issue and a non-disputed issue from the list of pending disputed issues, and also sets corresponding conclusion information for each pending disputed issue, terminal device 110 can transmit the user's operation information to server 130 via network 120, which can then generate the content of the judgment reasons section in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case. Alternatively, terminal device 110 can generate the content of the judgment reasons section in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case using its own processor, rather than transmitting the information to server 130.

[0047] For example, if a user triggers an action on each claim in the list of claims to support or reject each claim, terminal device 110 can transmit the user's action information to server 130 via network 120, and server 130 can then generate the content of the judgment's main text in the judgment document. Alternatively, terminal device 110 can generate the content of the judgment's main text in the judgment document using its own processor, rather than transmitting the information to server 130.

[0048] The following is a detailed description of the implementation details of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application:

[0049] Figure 2 The flowchart of the intelligent assisted trial processing method according to one embodiment of the present application is shown. The intelligent assisted trial processing method can be executed by an electronic device, which can be a terminal device, a server, or other device with computing and processing functions. Figure 2 As shown, the intelligent assisted trial processing method includes at least steps S210 to S230, which are described in detail as follows:

[0050] In step S210, the trial key points sub-page and the preset judgment item sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system are displayed. The trial key points sub-page displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item sub-page displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case.

[0051] In some optional embodiments, the trial points subpage and the preset judgment subpage can be displayed through a trigger operation in the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system. For example, a navigation bar can be displayed in the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system, and a trigger control for entering the case entity trial page can be displayed in the navigation bar. If a trigger operation of the trigger control is received from the user, the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case can be displayed. The entity trial page can contain trigger controls corresponding to each subpage. If a trigger operation is received for the trigger control corresponding to a specified subpage, the specified subpage can be displayed. It should be noted that the various subpages contained in the entity trial page can include a trial points subpage, a preset judgment subpage, etc., and can also include the litigation summary subpage and the fact determination subpage in the following embodiments.

[0052] It should be noted that the substantive trial page corresponding to the litigation case is mainly used to display content related to the substantive trial of the litigation case, such as the trial points, preset judgment items, litigation and defense summaries, and determined facts related to the litigation case mentioned in the above embodiment. In specific implementation, the sub-pages corresponding to these contents can be classified and displayed according to actual needs, and corresponding button names can be set to trigger the display of the corresponding pages, or the sub-pages corresponding to these contents can be displayed together. The embodiments of this application do not limit this. For example, in one example, the trigger control for entering the substantive trial page of the case can be set to a "Case Analysis and Judgment" control. If a trigger operation is received on the "Case Analysis and Judgment" control, the Case Analysis and Judgment page can be displayed. The Case Analysis and Judgment page can contain trigger controls corresponding to various sub-pages (such as the trial points sub-page, the preset judgment item sub-page, etc.). If a trigger operation is received on the trigger control corresponding to a specified sub-page, the specified sub-page can be displayed on the Case Analysis and Judgment page.

[0053] Optionally, each sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system may be presented with only one sub-page at a time. That is, when displaying sub-page A, if a trigger operation to display sub-page B is received, sub-page B may be switched to be displayed instead of sub-page A. Alternatively, each sub-page may be presented in different areas of the case entity trial page, for example, sub-page A may be displayed in the upper left area of the case entity trial page, and sub-page B may be displayed in the upper right area of the case entity trial page, etc. In this way, multiple sub-pages can be displayed simultaneously for easy viewing by users.

[0054] In step S220, in response to the selection operation of determining each of the to-be-confirmed dispute focuses in the list of to-be-confirmed dispute focuses as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and the conclusion information set for each of the to-be-confirmed dispute focuses, the content of the judgment reasons part in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case is generated.

[0055] In some optional embodiments, an operational control such as a checkbox or selection box may be displayed for each pending dispute in the pending dispute list, allowing the user to select a dispute issue or non-disputed issue by triggering the operational control. Furthermore, an operational control such as an input box or selection box may be displayed for each pending dispute, allowing the user to set the conclusion information for each pending dispute by triggering the operational control.

[0056] In step S230, in response to the selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list to support or reject, the content of the judgment body in the judgment document is generated.

[0057] In some optional embodiments, a selection control for each litigation request in the litigation request list may be displayed in the preset judgment sub-page, and the user may use the selection control to select the corresponding litigation request as support or rejection, where support means supporting the corresponding litigation request and rejection means rejecting the corresponding litigation request.

[0058] Optionally, a delete control for each litigation request in the litigation request list may be displayed in the preset judgment item sub-page, and the user may delete the corresponding litigation request in the litigation request list by triggering the delete control.

[0059] Optionally, the preset judgment item sub-page may display an add litigation request control for the litigation request list, and the user may then trigger the add litigation request control to add a new litigation request to the litigation request list.

[0060] In some optional embodiments, if a trigger operation is received to display a corresponding pleading summary subpage of the intelligent assisted trial system, the pleading summary subpage is displayed. The pleading summary subpage may display the parties' final litigation request information, as well as the facts of the case and the parties' opinions. Optionally, because the parties' litigation requests may change, the parties' final litigation request information may be generated based on the parties' original complaint, amended complaint, and information on changes to the complaint during the trial.

[0061] As mentioned above, the plea and defense summary sub-page can be displayed in the case entity trial page part, that is, the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case can include a trigger control corresponding to the plea and defense summary sub-page. If a trigger operation is received on the trigger control corresponding to the plea and defense summary sub-page, the plea and defense summary sub-page can be displayed.

[0062] Optionally, the Summary of Claims subpage may display an adjustment control for final litigation request information, allowing the user to adjust the final litigation request information by triggering the adjustment control, and the Summary of Claims subpage may simultaneously display the adjusted litigation request information. Optionally, the adjusted litigation request information may be used to generate the litigation request list in the Preset Judgment subpage.

[0063] In some optional embodiments, the litigation summary sub-page may also display changes in the litigation request to intuitively display the change history information of the litigation request (for example, by displaying it in the form of a timeline) for user viewing.

[0064] In some optional embodiments, if a fact determination subpage corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system is received, the fact determination subpage can be displayed, and the fact determination subpage displays a fact determination text box and a list of evidence contents of the litigation case. Among them, the list of evidence contents contains at least one piece of evidence content generated based on the case materials of the litigation case, and adjustment options for each piece of evidence content. The adjustment option can be used to adjust the evidence content (such as deleting the corresponding evidence content, adding the corresponding evidence content, not adopting the corresponding evidence content, etc.). Optionally, the factual information of the litigation case can be generated in the fact determination text box based on the evidence content displayed in the evidence content list. If the evidence content is adjusted, the factual information of the litigation case can also be generated in the fact determination text box based on the adjusted evidence content.

[0065] As mentioned above, the fact determination sub-page can be displayed in the case entity trial page part, that is, the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case can include a trigger control corresponding to the fact determination sub-page. If a trigger operation is received on the trigger control corresponding to the fact determination sub-page, the fact determination sub-page can be displayed.

[0066] In some optional embodiments, an intelligent marking control may also be displayed in the navigation bar of the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system. If a user triggers the intelligent marking control, the intelligent marking page may be displayed.

[0067] Optionally, the smart examination page may include a trigger control corresponding to the pleadings and defenses subpage. If a user triggers the trigger control corresponding to the pleadings and defenses subpage, the pleadings and defenses subpage may be displayed on the smart examination page. The pleadings and defenses subpage may be used to display information such as litigation request opinions, defense opinions, and statements from relevant personnel.

[0068] Optionally, the pleading and defense subpage may include separate page areas for displaying the litigation request and defense, that is, the litigation request and defense may be displayed in different areas of the pleading and defense subpage, and a correlation control for displaying the correspondence between the litigation request and defense may be displayed on the pleading and defense subpage. Optionally, the correlation control may associate and display the corresponding page areas of the litigation request and defense. For example, the correlation control may be a connecting line, which may be used to connect the corresponding page areas of the litigation request and defense to reflect the corresponding relationship between them.

[0069] Optionally, the user can adjust the relationship between the litigation request and the defense displayed on the litigation and defense sub-page by adjusting the association control. For example, the user can adjust the position and connection point of the association control by dragging, moving, etc. to adjust the relationship between the litigation request and the defense displayed on the litigation and defense sub-page.

[0070] In some optional embodiments, the smart examination page may further include a trigger control corresponding to an evidence cross-examination sub-page. In this case, if a trigger operation is received on the trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page, the evidence cross-examination sub-page may be displayed on the smart examination page. The evidence cross-examination sub-page displays at least one piece of evidence information and cross-examination opinions corresponding to each piece of evidence information. Optionally, the evidence information displayed on the evidence cross-examination sub-page may include various types of evidence information, such as evidence presented by the parties, witness testimony, court evidence collection, and appraisal.

[0071] Optionally, the evidence cross-examination sub-page can also display adjustment controls corresponding to each item of evidence information and modification controls corresponding to the cross-examination opinions. In this case, if a trigger operation is received for the adjustment control corresponding to the specified evidence information, the specified evidence information can be adjusted; if a trigger operation is received for the modification control corresponding to the specified cross-examination opinion, the specified cross-examination opinion can be modified.

[0072] In some optional embodiments, the intelligent examination page may further include a trigger control corresponding to a material screening subpage. In this case, if a trigger operation is received on the trigger control corresponding to the material screening subpage, the material screening subpage may be displayed in the intelligent examination page. Optionally, the material screening subpage includes folders corresponding to different material types, and a list of electronic material identifications for litigation cases. Optionally, folders of different material types may be, for example, folders for the subject qualification materials of litigation participants, folders for indictments, folders for counterclaims, folders for defenses, folders for court transcripts, folders for evidence materials of litigation participants, and the like.

[0073] Optionally, the user can move the specified electronic material identifier in the electronic material identifier list to a specified folder to move the electronic materials corresponding to the specified electronic material identifier to the specified folder, which can facilitate the user to organize and classify various materials of the litigation case.

[0074] The above describes the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application. Figures 3 to 10 The specific implementation details of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application are described in detail:

[0075] In one embodiment of the present application, the intelligent assisted trial system may include an intelligent file reading module and a case analysis module. It should be noted that in this embodiment, the pleading summary, fact determination, trial points and preset judgment items corresponding to the litigation case are classified into the case analysis module for explanation. In other embodiments of the present application, the pleading summary, fact determination, trial points and preset judgment items corresponding to the litigation case can be classified in other arbitrary categories, as long as these links deal with the substantive trial part corresponding to the litigation case. Similarly, in this embodiment, the material screening, basic information, first instance situation, pleading and defense opinions, evidence verification, application situation and other links are classified into the intelligent file reading module for explanation. In other embodiments of the present application, these links can be classified arbitrarily.

[0076] In one embodiment of the present application, the intelligent review module mainly provides an interactive interface for users, connects with the court system, realizes the synchronization and feedback of case node information, provides users with interactive options with a strong sense of experience, implements the functions of manual verification, adjustment and error correction, and finally assists judges in generating the header of the judgment document. According to the content involved in each section of the judgment document, the functions of the intelligent review module are divided into five major links: material screening, basic information, first instance situation, litigation and defense opinions, evidence examination and verification, and application status. In each link, the automatically extracted material node information is manually verified to solve the problem of insufficient accuracy of the integrity, validity, corresponding categories, parties and other attributes of the materials in the intelligent auxiliary system.

[0077] Optionally, the main processing flow of the intelligent marking module is as follows: Figure 3 As shown, the system first pulls all case materials from a third-party system and automatically assigns them to the appropriate categories according to the rules. If the classification is incorrect, manual reclassification can be performed to revise information such as the file name and body. If the classification is correct, the case information is verified against the information entered into the third-party system, the parties' submitted pleadings, and other materials such as cards and certificates. It then determines whether the case is a second-instance trial. If so, the first-instance trial is verified against the effective judgment of the original trial, and the arguments are then verified against the parties' submitted pleadings and court transcripts. If not, the arguments are directly verified against the parties' submitted pleadings and court transcripts. After verification, the evidence cross-examination phase begins, verifying the content of the evidence based on the parties' submitted evidence, cross-examination opinions, and court transcripts. Finally, it determines whether the parties have submitted relevant applications. If so, the content of the applications is verified based on the submitted application materials, tailored to the different types of applications, thus completing the processing flow of the intelligent examination module.

[0078] Specifically, the material screening link, as the most important link in the entire intelligent marking section, is not only related to the smooth progress of subsequent work, but also the key to ensuring the efficient and accurate operation of the entire system. In this process, whether the filing classification of each document material is accurate and whether the determination of the file attributes is appropriate will have a direct impact on the normal output of the subsequent section content and the realization of the overall function. In specific implementation, the system can fully synchronize the documents and materials in the court-related systems to ensure the integrity and timeliness of the information; then, it can classify the cases according to the cause of the case and the trial stage of the case, and set corresponding material classification folders according to the trial requirements of different cases to ensure the accuracy and rationality of the classification; after that, set classification rules based on the file name, file title, signature, etc., and automatically classify and process the synchronized document materials. In addition to automatic classification rules, the system can also provide users with a verification mechanism, through which users can review and verify the classification information automatically generated by the system to ensure that each material is correctly filed in the corresponding folder. After the user performs the corresponding operations and verification, a complete and accurate material cataloging information is finally formed. Through the feedback function, the cataloging order adjusted by the user is returned to the third-party system to ensure the integrity and consistency of the materials in each process of the case trial.

[0079] In one example, if Figure 4 The figure shows a schematic interface diagram of the material screening phase of the intelligent assisted trial system in an embodiment of the present application. The interface can display a material identification list 402 and an archive folder list 401. The system can automatically classify and catalog the acquired materials based on file name, title, signature, etc. Furthermore, the user can drag a material identifier in the material identification list 402 to a folder (for example, by using a mouse or touch input device) to move the corresponding material to the folder.

[0080] The basic information link of the intelligent review module is mainly to obtain case information of the litigation case, including case status, party information, court attendance, and litigation costs. When obtaining this information, the preset material element extraction rules can be used to automatically extract case material node information, filter the extracted case information on the page and display it, and prompt any questionable information; users can check whether the information that needs to be verified lacks the reference material, manually verify the information with inconsistent source information, and proofread the questionable information, and finally obtain accurate case information, which is output in the "case number, party information, case origin, and signature" section of the judgment document.

[0081] Optionally, when automatically extracting case material node information using pre-set material element extraction rules, data related to "Case Status" can be based on data entered into relevant court systems and automatically synchronized to the intelligent assisted trial system, with court transcripts used as verification material. For non-first instance cases, the original case number will be based on the judgment document sent back for retrial or ordered by the higher court. This data will be identified and captured, then displayed in the corresponding field. Data related to "Party Information" can be based on data entered into relevant court systems, with court transcripts used as supporting materials for verification. Data related to "Plaintiff Information" can be identified and captured using data entered into relevant court systems, supplemented by court transcripts, party cards, power of attorney, and correspondence. The system's pre-set information comparison rules prioritize verification of supporting materials and display the required information in the corresponding fields. Data related to "Court Attendance" can be based on data entered into relevant court systems, supplemented by court transcripts, and then identified and captured, then displayed in the corresponding fields. Data related to "Litigation Expenses" can be identified and captured based on litigation expense information, fee payment notices, court transcripts, and other materials from relevant court systems. After the data in each of the above aspects are obtained, they can be displayed on the page of the intelligent assisted trial system for users to view.

[0082] The main reason for setting up the first-instance situation link in the intelligent review module is that during the trial of the second-instance case, the first-instance situation of the case needs to be verified to ensure the consistency and accuracy of the case trial. When verifying the first-instance situation, the first-instance effective judgment document related to the case can be confirmed, parsed, and divided into five parts: basic situation, first-instance litigation request, judgment result, facts determined, and judgment reasons; then, the above-mentioned parts can be extracted according to the extraction rules preset by the system and displayed in the corresponding parts of the intelligent assisted trial system page, so that users can verify the content of each part and manually revise the information. After the user confirms, the information finally confirmed by the user will be output in the "Original Trial Judgment Situation" section of the judgment document.

[0083] The pleading and defense section of the intelligent examination module primarily analyzes pleading and defense information. Specifically, pleading and defense opinions are divided into three categories: complaint, defense, and narrative. The "pleading" section displays the opinions of the parties involved in the litigation, including the plaintiff, counterclaimant, and appellant; the "defense" section displays the opinions of the opposing party, including the defendant, counterclaimant, and appellee; and the "narrative" section includes the opinions of third parties / the original plaintiff / the original defendant / the original third party. Data related to pleading and defense opinions comes from the following catalogs: the complaint, counterclaim, appeal, reply, court transcripts, and investigation and interrogation records. When presenting a case, the system uses pre-set extraction rules to extract the claims, facts and reasons, defense opinions, and narrative opinions of each party from the materials. Based on the party information confirmed in the basic information, the pleading and defense relationships are automatically established. Users can also verify the content of each section and modify the pleading and defense relationships and file attributes based on their actual circumstances. The final confirmed information is output in the "Litigation Opinion" section of the judgment document.

[0084] In one example, if Figure 5 The figure shows a schematic diagram of the interface of the intelligent assisted trial system for the litigation and defense opinion phase in an embodiment of the present application. In this interface, the information of the "litigation" can be displayed in area 501 of the interface, and the information of the "defense" can be displayed in area 502 of the interface. Then, the corresponding "litigation" and "defense" are automatically connected through the association control. The user can adjust the information of the "litigation" and "defense" according to the actual situation, and can adjust the correspondence between the "litigation" and "defense" by dragging or other methods.

[0085] The evidence examination phase of the intelligent examination module primarily involves analyzing evidence and conducting cross-examination. Specifically, during the trial process, the evidence submitted by the parties must be verified, a process that generally consists of presenting evidence, cross-examination, and authentication. Given the necessity and complexity of this practical operation, the evidence examination phase is broken down into two key components: a detailed presentation of the evidence and cross-examination of these findings.

[0086] Alternatively, data related to evidence cross-examination can be sourced from the evidence submitted by the parties in the "Evidence Submitted by Litigation Participants" catalog during material screening. Each type of evidence must be categorized. In practice, case evidence primarily comes from self-submitted evidence by the parties, testimony provided by witnesses based on their own experiences, evidence obtained by the court ex officio, and appraisal reports or conclusions issued by professional appraisal institutions. Therefore, evidence can be categorized into four types: evidence submitted by the parties, witness testimony, court evidence, and appraisals. Subsequently, different types of evidence and cross-examination opinions can be extracted and displayed in their corresponding locations within the intelligent assisted trial system interface. Using the list of evidence submitted by the parties as an outline, each item of evidence can be linked to specific evidentiary materials, and cross-examination opinions can be linked to the corresponding evidence content. Users can manually verify and proofread this evidence and cross-examination information to gain a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the various evidentiary contents involved in the case, laying a solid foundation for a fair adjudication. The user's final confirmation of the complete evidence content of the case is output in the "Evidence and Cross-Examination" section of the judgment document.

[0087] In one example, if Figure 6 The figure shows the interface diagram of the intelligent assisted trial system for the evidence cross-examination link in the embodiment of the present application. Different types of evidence can be displayed in this interface, and the corresponding cross-examination opinions can be displayed. For example, Figure 6 The area 601 in the figure displays the evidence information presented by the parties, and the corresponding cross-examination opinions are displayed in the area 602 below the area 601.

[0088] The application status section of the intelligent examination module primarily captures and displays relevant application information from the parties. Specifically, during the trial process, based on the actual circumstances and the principle of autonomy of will, parties have the right to legally submit applications to safeguard their rights. Since the material screening process can catalog different applications corresponding to different types of applications, different extraction rules can be pre-set based on the application type. Application materials are parsed based on the elements required for adjudication documents, and the extracted content is displayed in the corresponding location within the intelligent assisted trial system interface. Users can also verify the extracted content. The intelligent assisted trial system can also automatically determine whether a ruling has been made on the application. If so, it interacts with basic information, pleadings, and other information, and accordingly modifies party information and litigation cost information. If no ruling has been made, it interacts with the document generation function, automatically generating the corresponding ruling and the common section of the adjudication document (i.e., the "document header") based on the application status, laying the foundation for users to write adjudication documents.

[0089] In one embodiment of this application, the case analysis module primarily assists judges in generating the substantive portion of judgment documents. Based on the business process logic of judges' daily process of compiling the substantive portion of judgment documents, case analysis is divided into four major sections: pleading summary, fact determination, trial key points, and pre-determined judgment items. The case analysis module integrates and summarizes the substantive information of the case through technical means such as material extraction, rule generation, and model generation. By using these four sections and combining them with daily case handling strategies, judges can generate a complete substantive portion of the judgment document.

[0090] The litigation and defense summary section of the case analysis module mainly analyzes the final claims, facts and reasons, defense opinions, statements and other relevant information of the litigation case. Specifically, as a key link in the case trial, the core significance of the final claim is to clarify and fix the claims of the parties to the case. In the early stages of litigation, the parties will submit a detailed original complaint based on the damage to their own rights and interests and relevant laws and regulations, but during the litigation process, the parties may choose to change the original complaint and submit a new complaint to more accurately reflect their claims. In addition, during the trial, the parties may also propose changes to the litigation requests in court based on new circumstances, new evidence or new claims of the other party in the court investigation. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis, comparison and integration can be conducted based on the original complaint submitted by the parties, the changed complaint and the litigation requests changed in court during the trial to generate a final claim for the parties.

[0091] Facts and reasons, defense opinions, and statements of opinion are also important components of case materials, each reflecting the full picture of the case and the positions of each party from different perspectives. The facts and reasons section details the parties' understanding of the facts of the case and the legal basis supporting their claims. The defense opinion is the defendant's response to the plaintiff's lawsuit, including a denial of some or all of the plaintiff's allegations and the presentation of their own defense. The statement of opinion may involve the plaintiff, defendant, or third party further explaining the facts of the case, their understanding of the applicable law, and their expectations for the case's outcome. These materials are presented in the pleading summary module, helping the judge to fully understand the case and grasp the disputed issues and core claims of each party.

[0092] In one example, if Figure 7 The following is a schematic diagram of the interface for the pleading summary phase of the intelligent assisted trial system in an embodiment of the present application. In this interface, the parties' final pleadings are displayed in area 701, and adjustments can be made to these pleadings (e.g., deletions or additions). Changes to the parties' pleadings can also be displayed in area 702 for the judge to review. This interface also displays relevant information such as facts and reasons, defense opinions, and statements for the judge to review and confirm.

[0093] The fact-finding phase of the case analysis module first collects various materials submitted by all parties involved in the case, including but not limited to the formal complaint, detailed evidence, cross-examination submissions from both parties regarding these evidence, and detailed court transcripts. These materials together constitute the foundational database for determining the case's facts. The fact-finding phase then proceeds to the next stage of summarization, organizing and integrating the collected information to create a preliminary factual framework for the case for user reference. This preliminary case factual framework is a preliminary, yet subject to further verification, and may contain elements that require further verification and refinement. Users must draw on their extensive professional knowledge and case handling experience to examine each factual point, verify relevant evidence, analyze the cross-examination submissions from all parties, and, where necessary, consult relevant legal provisions and judicial interpretations to ensure that the determined case facts are both objectively realistic and legally logical. Through in-depth verification and adjustment of the preliminary case facts, users ultimately create a complete, accurate, and traceable preview of the case's facts.

[0094] In one example, if Figure 8 The figure shows a schematic diagram of the interface for the fact-finding phase of the intelligent assisted trial system in an embodiment of the present application. In this interface, acquired evidence can be displayed in area 801, and the user can adjust this evidence (e.g., set it to be rejected, regenerate it, add evidence content, etc.). At the same time, preliminary case facts can be displayed in area 802 based on the evidence content for the user's reference.

[0095] The Case Analysis module's key trial points section primarily involves carefully and in-depth comparison of the parties' litigation opinions, defense arguments, and courtroom debates, systematically identifying the case's key and non-controversial points. Users can then, based on the specific circumstances of the case and their own professional knowledge and practical experience, filter out the key and non-controversial points that truly apply to the case from the listed disputed issues and provide conclusions on each of these points. Once the user has assessed all the key and non-controversial points, combined with the system's pre-set document rules, they ultimately form the final judgment reasoning section of the complete judgment document.

[0096] In one example, if Figure 9 The figure shows an interface diagram of the intelligent assisted trial system for the trial key points in an embodiment of the present application. In this interface, the sorted out dispute points and non-dispute points can be displayed to facilitate the user to filter out the key dispute points and non-dispute points that are truly applicable to the case, and conclusions can be given one by one for the selected focus issues in area 901.

[0097] The Case Analysis module's Preset Judgment Items intelligently pre-determines the main text of the judgment (i.e., the judgment items) based on the specific litigation requests of the parties involved. This allows users to review these pre-determined judgment items individually based on the overall circumstances of the case. Through in-depth analysis of the case's facts, evidence, key issues, and legal basis, users can choose to support or reject each pre-determined judgment item. After selecting the outcome of the pre-determined judgment item, users combine their own experience and writing habits with pre-set standardized document generation rules to ultimately form the judgment item content of the complete judgment document.

[0098] In one example, if Figure 10 Shown is a schematic diagram of the interface of the intelligent assisted trial system for the preset judgment link in an embodiment of the present application. In this interface, the relevant litigation request can be displayed in area 1001, and the judgment item can also be displayed to facilitate the user to choose whether to support the litigation request.

[0099] In the technical solution of the above embodiment, by displaying a visual interactive interface, the automatic acquisition, analysis, display, adjustment and confirmation of information related to the litigation case are realized, and efficient processing of each link in the litigation process is achieved, which not only significantly improves the trial efficiency and reduces the workload of judges, but also reduces the risk of misjudgment due to human factors.

[0100] The following describes an embodiment of the device of the present application, which can be used to execute the intelligent assisted trial processing method in the above embodiment of the present application. For details not disclosed in the embodiment of the device of the present application, please refer to the embodiment of the intelligent assisted trial processing method in the above embodiment of the present application.

[0101] Figure 11 A block diagram of an intelligent assisted trial processing device according to an embodiment of the present application is shown. The intelligent assisted trial processing device can be applied to an electronic device, which can be a terminal device, a server, or other device with computing and processing functions.

[0102] Reference Figure 11 As shown, an intelligent assisted trial processing device 1100 according to an embodiment of the present application includes: a display unit 1102 and a processing unit 1104.

[0103] Among them, the display unit 1102 is configured to display the trial key points sub-page and the preset judgment sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, the trial key points sub-page displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment sub-page displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; the processing unit 1104 is configured to generate the content of the judgment reasons part in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case in response to the selection operation of determining each pending dispute point in the pending dispute point list as a dispute focus issue or a non-dispute focus issue, and the conclusion information set for each pending dispute point; and generate the content of the judgment body part in the judgment document in response to the selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list as support or rejection.

[0104] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the processing unit 1104 is further configured to: if a trigger operation is received to display the litigation and defense summary sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, the litigation and defense summary sub-page is displayed, and the litigation and defense summary sub-page displays the final litigation request information of the parties, as well as the factual information of the litigation case and the parties' opinion information. The final litigation request information is generated based on the original complaint, amended complaint and litigation request change information of the parties during the trial; in response to an adjustment operation on the final litigation request information, the adjusted litigation request information is displayed, and the litigation request list is generated based on the adjusted litigation request information.

[0105] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned solution, the litigation summary sub-page also displays the changes in the litigation request, and the changes in the litigation request are used to display the change history information of the litigation request of the litigation case.

[0106] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the processing unit 1104 is further configured to: if a fact determination sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system is received, the fact determination sub-page is displayed, and the fact determination sub-page displays a fact determination text box and a list of evidence contents of the litigation case; the evidence content list contains at least one piece of evidence content generated based on the case materials of the litigation case, and adjustment options for each piece of evidence content; in response to the adjustment operation of the at least one piece of evidence content, the adjusted evidence content is displayed, and the fact information of the litigation case is generated in the fact determination text box based on the adjusted evidence content.

[0107] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the preset judgment sub-page also displays a selection control for each litigation request in the litigation request list, a deletion control corresponding to each litigation request, and an add litigation request control; wherein, the selection control is used to select the corresponding litigation request as supported or rejected; the deletion control is used to delete the corresponding litigation request in the litigation request list; and the add litigation request control is used to add a new litigation request to the litigation request list.

[0108] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the display unit 1102 is configured to: display a navigation bar in the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the navigation bar displays a trigger control for entering the case entity trial page; in response to a trigger operation on the trigger control for entering the case entity trial page, display the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case, wherein the entity trial page contains trigger controls corresponding to each sub-page; if a trigger operation on the trigger control corresponding to the specified sub-page is received, the specified sub-page is displayed.

[0109] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the display unit 1102 is further configured to: display the intelligent review page of the intelligent assisted trial system, and the intelligent review page includes a trigger control corresponding to the litigation and defense opinion sub-page; the processing unit 1104 is further configured to: respond to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the litigation and defense opinion sub-page, and display the litigation and defense opinion sub-page in the intelligent review page, and the litigation and defense opinion sub-page includes page areas for displaying litigation request opinions and defense opinions, respectively, and an association control for displaying the correspondence between the litigation request opinions and the defense opinions.

[0110] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the association control is used to associate and display the page areas where the corresponding litigation request opinions and defense opinions are located; the processing unit 1104 is also configured to: in response to the adjustment operation of the association control, adjust the correspondence between the litigation request opinions and defense opinions displayed in the litigation and defense opinion sub-page.

[0111] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the smart paper marking page also includes a trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page; the processing unit 1104 is also configured to: in response to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page, display the evidence cross-examination sub-page in the smart paper marking page, and the evidence cross-examination sub-page displays at least one piece of evidence information and the cross-examination opinions corresponding to each piece of evidence information.

[0112] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the evidence cross-examination sub-page also displays adjustment controls corresponding to the various pieces of evidence information and modification controls corresponding to the cross-examination opinions; the processing unit 1104 is also configured to: if a trigger operation is received for the adjustment control corresponding to the specified evidence information, the specified evidence information is adjusted; and if a trigger operation is received for the modification control corresponding to the specified cross-examination opinion, the specified cross-examination opinion is modified.

[0113] In some embodiments of the present application, based on the aforementioned scheme, the smart marking page also includes a trigger control corresponding to a material screening sub-page; the processing unit 1104 is also configured to: in response to a trigger operation on the trigger control corresponding to the material screening sub-page, display the material screening sub-page in the smart marking page, the material screening sub-page including folders corresponding to different material types, and a list of electronic material identifications of the litigation case; in response to a trigger operation of moving a specified electronic material identification in the electronic material identification list to a specified folder, move the electronic material corresponding to the specified electronic material identification to the specified folder.

[0114] Figure 12 A structural diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing a computer device in an embodiment of the present application is shown. The computer device may be the device for executing the intelligent assisted trial processing method in the aforementioned embodiment.

[0115] It should be noted that Figure 12 The computer system 1200 of the computer device shown is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0116] like Figure 12 As shown, computer system 1200 may include a central processing unit (CPU) 1201, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes, such as the methods described in the above embodiments, based on programs stored in read-only memory (ROM) 1202 or programs loaded from storage 1208 into random access memory (RAM) 1203. RAM 1203 also stores various programs and data required for system operation. CPU 1201, ROM 1202, and RAM 1203 are interconnected via a bus 1204. An input / output (I / O) interface 1205 is also connected to bus 1204.

[0117] The following components can be connected to the I / O interface 1205: an input section 1206 including a keyboard, mouse, and the like; an output section 1207 including devices such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), and speakers; a storage section 1208 including a hard disk; and a communication section 1209 including a network interface card such as a LAN (Local Area Network) card or a modem. The communication section 1209 performs communication processing via a network such as the Internet. A drive 1210 is also connected to the I / O interface 1205 as needed. Removable media 1211, such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, magneto-optical disk, or semiconductor memory, is installed in the drive 1210 as needed, so that computer programs read from the removable media can be installed in the storage section 1208 as needed.

[0118] In particular, according to embodiments of the present application, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments of the present application include a computer program product comprising a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, the computer program being configured to perform the methods illustrated in the flowcharts. In such embodiments, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from a network via the communication section 1209 and / or installed from removable media 1211. When executed by the central processing unit (CPU) 1201, the computer program performs the various functions defined in the system of the present application.

[0119] It should be noted that the computer-readable medium described in the embodiments of the present application may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium, or any combination thereof. A computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to, an electrical connection having one or more conductors, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), flash memory, optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In the present application, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a computer program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In the present application, a computer-readable signal medium may include a data signal propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, which carries a computer-readable computer program. Such propagated data signals may take various forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer-readable signal medium may also be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium that can transmit, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to wireless, wired, or any suitable combination thereof.

[0120] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible implementation architecture, functions and operations of the systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present application. Among them, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, program segment, or a part of the code, and the above-mentioned module, program segment, or a part of the code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in an order different from that marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram or flowchart, and the combination of boxes in the block diagram or flowchart, can be implemented with a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or can be implemented with a combination of dedicated hardware and a computer program.

[0121] The units involved in the embodiments described in this application may be implemented by software or hardware, and the units described may also be set in a processor. In some cases, the names of these units do not constitute limitations on the units themselves.

[0122] As another aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable medium, which may be included in the computer device described in the above embodiments, or may exist independently and not be incorporated into the computer device. The computer-readable medium carries one or more computer programs, and when the one or more computer programs are executed by the computer device, the computer device implements the method described in the above embodiments.

[0123] It should be noted that, although several modules or units of the device for action execution are mentioned in the above detailed description, this division is not mandatory. In fact, according to the embodiment of the application, the features and functions of two or more modules or units described above can be concretized in one module or unit. On the contrary, the features and functions of one module or unit described above can be further divided into multiple modules or units to be concretized.

[0124] Through the description of the above embodiments, it is easy for those skilled in the art to understand that the example embodiments described here can be implemented by software or by combining software with necessary hardware. Therefore, the technical solution according to the embodiment of the present application can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (which can be a CD-ROM, USB flash drive, mobile hard disk, etc.) or on the network, and includes several instructions to enable a computer device to execute the method according to the embodiment of the present application. For example, you can execute Figure 2 The intelligent assisted trial processing method shown.

[0125] Those skilled in the art will readily conceive of other embodiments of the present application after considering the specification and practicing the embodiments disclosed herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the present application that follow the general principles of this application and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art that are not disclosed herein.

[0126] It should be understood that the present application is not limited to the exact structures described above and shown in the drawings, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present application is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims

1. An intelligent assisted trial processing method, characterized in that: include: Displaying the trial key points sub-page and the preset judgment item sub-page corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the trial key points sub-page displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item sub-page displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; In response to a selection operation for determining each of the to-be-confirmed focus of dispute in the list of to-be-confirmed focus of dispute as a focus of dispute or a non-focus of dispute, and in response to conclusion information set for each of the to-be-confirmed focus of dispute, generating a judgment reasoning section in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case; In response to a selection operation of supporting or rejecting each litigation request in the litigation request list, generating content of the main text of the judgment in the judgment document; The intelligent assisted trial processing method further includes: If a trigger operation is received to display the corresponding litigation summary subpage of the intelligent assisted trial system, the litigation summary subpage is displayed, and the litigation summary subpage displays the final litigation request information of the parties, as well as the factual information of the litigation case and the opinions of the parties. The final litigation request information is generated based on the original litigation statement, the amended litigation statement, and the litigation request changes during the trial process of the parties; In response to the adjustment operation on the final litigation request information, the adjusted litigation request information is displayed, and the litigation request list is generated based on the adjusted litigation request information.

2. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The litigation summary sub-page also displays the changes in the litigation request, which is used to display the change history information of the litigation request of the litigation case.

3. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The intelligent assisted trial processing method further includes: If a request is received to display a sub-page of facts determined by the intelligent assisted trial system, the sub-page of facts determined is displayed, wherein the sub-page of facts determined includes a text box for fact determination of the litigation case and a list of evidence contents; the list of evidence contents includes at least one piece of evidence content generated based on the case materials of the litigation case, and adjustment options for each piece of evidence content; In response to an adjustment operation on the at least one item of evidence content, the adjusted evidence content is displayed, and factual information of the litigation case is generated in the fact determination text box based on the adjusted evidence content.

4. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The preset judgment item subpage also displays a selection control for each litigation request in the litigation request list, a deletion control corresponding to each litigation request, and an add litigation request control; Among them, the selection control is used to select the corresponding litigation request as support or rejection; the deletion control is used to delete the corresponding litigation request in the litigation request list; and the addition litigation request control is used to add a new litigation request in the litigation request list.

5. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The sub-page displaying the trial key points and the preset judgment items corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system includes: Displaying a navigation bar in the system interface of the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the navigation bar displays a trigger control for entering the case substantive trial page; In response to a trigger operation on the trigger control for entering the case entity trial page, displaying the entity trial page corresponding to the litigation case, wherein the entity trial page includes trigger controls corresponding to various sub-pages; If a trigger operation of a trigger control corresponding to a specified sub-page is received, the specified sub-page is displayed.

6. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The intelligent assisted trial processing method further includes: Displaying an intelligent examination paper page of the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the intelligent examination paper page includes a trigger control corresponding to a litigation and defense opinion subpage; In response to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the litigation and defense opinion sub-page, the litigation and defense opinion sub-page is displayed in the intelligent paper review page. The litigation and defense opinion sub-page includes page areas for displaying the litigation request opinion and the defense opinion respectively, and an association control for displaying the correspondence between the litigation request opinion and the defense opinion.

7. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The association control is used to associate and display the corresponding litigation request opinions and defense opinions in the page areas; The intelligent assisted trial processing method also includes: in response to the adjustment operation of the associated control, adjusting the correspondence between the litigation request opinion and the defense opinion displayed in the litigation and defense opinion sub-page.

8. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The intelligent examination page also includes a trigger control corresponding to the evidence cross-examination sub-page; The intelligent assisted trial processing method further includes: In response to the trigger operation of the trigger control corresponding to the evidence verification sub-page, the evidence verification sub-page is displayed in the smart marking page, and the evidence verification sub-page displays at least one piece of evidence information and the verification opinions corresponding to each piece of evidence information.

9. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to claim 8, characterized in that: The evidence cross-examination sub-page also displays adjustment controls corresponding to the various pieces of evidence information, and modification controls corresponding to the cross-examination opinions; The intelligent assisted trial processing method further includes: If a trigger operation of an adjustment control corresponding to the specified evidence information is received, the specified evidence information is adjusted; as well as If a trigger operation of a modification control corresponding to a specified cross-examination opinion is received, the specified cross-examination opinion is modified.

10. The intelligent assisted trial processing method according to any one of claims 6 to 9, characterized in that: The intelligent marking page also includes a trigger control corresponding to the material screening sub-page; the intelligent assisted trial processing method also includes: In response to a trigger operation on a trigger control corresponding to the material screening subpage, the material screening subpage is displayed on the intelligent examination page, wherein the material screening subpage includes folders corresponding to different material types and a list of electronic material identifiers of the litigation case; In response to a triggering operation of moving a designated electronic material identifier in the electronic material identifier list to a designated folder, the electronic material corresponding to the designated electronic material identifier is moved to the designated folder.

11. An intelligent assisted trial processing device, characterized in that: include: A display unit is configured to display a trial key points subpage and a preset judgment item subpage corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, wherein the trial key points subpage displays a list of pending dispute points corresponding to the litigation case, and the preset judgment item subpage displays a list of litigation requests corresponding to the litigation case; a processing unit configured to, in response to a selection operation for determining each of the to-be-confirmed focus of dispute in the list of to-be-confirmed focus of dispute as a focus of dispute or a non-focus of dispute, and conclusion information set for each of the to-be-confirmed focus of dispute, generate a content of a reasoning section in the judgment document corresponding to the litigation case; and generating the content of the main text of the judgment in the judgment document in response to a selection operation of setting each litigation request in the litigation request list to support or reject; The processing unit is further configured to: upon receiving a trigger operation to display a pleading summary subpage corresponding to the intelligent assisted trial system, display the pleading summary subpage, wherein the pleading summary subpage displays the final litigation request information of the parties, as well as the factual information of the litigation case and the opinions of the parties, wherein the final litigation request information is generated based on the original complaint, amended complaint, and litigation request changes during the trial process of the parties; In response to the adjustment operation on the final litigation request information, the adjusted litigation request information is displayed, and the litigation request list is generated based on the adjusted litigation request information.

12. A computer-readable medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the intelligent assisted trial processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 10 is implemented.

13. A computer device, characterized in that: include: one or more processors; A memory for storing one or more computer programs, which, when executed by the one or more processors, enables the computer device to implement the intelligent assisted trial processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 10.

14. A computer program product, characterized in that The computer program product includes a computer program, which is stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The processor of a computer device reads and executes the computer program from the computer-readable storage medium, so that the computer device executes the intelligent assisted trial processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 10.

Images