Design report expert scoring evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of design report evaluation design, and particularly relates to a design report expert scoring evaluation method and a design report expert scoring evaluation system. Design experts, proofreading experts, quality examination experts and auditing experts are designed on the basis of evaluation dimensions and evaluation links of a design report; according to the method, scoring is performed from four dimensions of content inheritance, quality conformity, structure preciseness and report aesthetics, and then design report scores are automatically calculated and output, so that quantitative objective evaluation of the design report is realized, and full play of the efficiency of the design report can be promoted.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application belongs to the field of design report evaluation design technology, and specifically relates to a design report expert scoring evaluation method and system. Background Art

[0002] At present, scientific research institutes have a rather vague definition of the workload of design reports, there are large differences in the evaluation of design reports, and there is unpredictability in the determination of the content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics of design reports, making it difficult to fully realize the effectiveness of design reports.

[0003] This application is proposed in view of the above-mentioned technical defects. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of this application is to provide a design report expert scoring and evaluation method and system to overcome or alleviate at least one of the known technical deficiencies.

[0005] The technical solution of this application is:

[0006] A design report expert scoring and evaluation method, comprising:

[0007] Design report reading steps: read the design report content;

[0008] Design expert scoring steps: Design experts score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0009] Proofreading expert scoring steps: Proofreading experts score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0010] Quality review expert scoring steps: Quality review experts score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0011] Audit expert scoring steps: Audit experts score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0012] Design report scoring steps: automatically calculate and output the design report score based on the scores given by design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts;

[0013] The dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score design reports include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which:

[0014] The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation;

[0015] The quality compliance is scored as meeting the requirements, good compliance, and acceptable compliance;

[0016] The rigor of the structure was scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic;

[0017] The report's aesthetics is scored as follows: charts and graphs are complete and full, charts and graphs are basically complete and full, and charts and graphs are acceptable.

[0018] Optionally, in the above-mentioned design report expert scoring and evaluation method, when the design expert, proofreading expert, quality review expert, and audit expert score the design report:

[0019] If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points will be given to the design report;

[0020] If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 1 point will be given to the design report;

[0021] If the logic of the design report chapters is considered clear, the design report will be given 1 point; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered basically clear, the design report will be given 0.85 points; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered acceptable, the design report will be given 0.75 points;

[0022] If the design report is considered to be complete and full in size, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically complete and full in size, 0.85 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be acceptable in size, 0.75 point will be given to the design report.

[0023] Optionally, in the above-mentioned design report expert scoring and evaluation method, the design report score is calculated specifically as follows:

[0024] A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2×A 审核专家 ;

[0025] in,

[0026] A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics;

[0027] A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0028] A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0029] A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0030] A 审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

[0031] A design report expert scoring and evaluation system, comprising a design report reading module, a design expert scoring module, a proofreading expert scoring module, a quality review expert scoring module, an audit expert scoring module, and a design report scoring module;

[0032] The design report reading module is used to read the design report content;

[0033] The design expert scoring module is used for design experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0034] The proofreading expert scoring module is used for proofreading experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0035] The quality review expert scoring module is used for quality review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0036] The review expert scoring module is used for review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report;

[0037] The design report scoring module automatically calculates and outputs the design report scores based on the scores given by design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts.

[0038] In the design expert scoring module, proofreading expert scoring module, quality review expert scoring module, and audit expert scoring module, the dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score the design report include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which:

[0039] The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation;

[0040] The quality compliance is scored as meeting the requirements, good compliance, and acceptable compliance;

[0041] The rigor of the structure was scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic;

[0042] The report's aesthetics is scored as follows: charts and graphs are complete and full, charts and graphs are basically complete and full, and charts and graphs are acceptable.

[0043] Optionally, in the above-mentioned design report expert scoring and evaluation system, in the design expert scoring module, the proofreading expert scoring module, the quality review expert scoring module, and the audit expert scoring module, when the design expert, the proofreading expert, the quality review expert, and the audit expert score the design report:

[0044] If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points will be given to the design report;

[0045] If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 1 point will be given to the design report;

[0046] If the logic of the design report chapters is considered clear, the design report will be given 1 point; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered basically clear, the design report will be given 0.85 points; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered acceptable, the design report will be given 0.75 points;

[0047] If the design report is considered to be complete and full in size, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically complete and full in size, 0.85 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be acceptable in size, 0.75 point will be given to the design report.

[0048] Optionally, in the above-mentioned design report expert scoring and evaluation system, in the design report scoring module, the calculation of the design report score is specifically as follows:

[0049] A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2×A 审核专家 ;

[0050] in,

[0051] A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics;

[0052] A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0053] A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0054] A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0055] A审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

[0056] This application has at least the following beneficial technical effects:

[0057] The invention provides a design report expert scoring and evaluation method and system thereof. Based on the evaluation dimensions and assessment links of the design report, the design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts and audit experts are designed to score the design report from the four dimensions of content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor and report aesthetics in the four links of design, proofreading, quality review and audit, and then the design report score is automatically calculated and output, so as to realize the quantitative and objective evaluation of the design report and promote the full play of the effectiveness of the design report. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0058] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the design report expert scoring and evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application;

[0059] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the design report expert scoring and evaluation system provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0060] In order to better illustrate the present embodiment, some parts of the drawings may be omitted, enlarged or reduced, and do not represent the size of the actual product. In addition, the drawings are only used for illustrative purposes and should not be construed as limitations on the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0061] In order to make the technical solution and advantages of the present application clearer, the technical solution of the present application will be described in further detail in detail and in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It can be understood that the specific embodiments described here are only partial embodiments of the present application, which are only used to explain the present application, not to limit the present application. It should be noted that, for the convenience of description, only the parts related to the present application are shown in the accompanying drawings, and other related parts can refer to the general design.

[0062] In addition, unless otherwise defined, the technical terms or scientific terms used in the description of this application shall have the usual meanings understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. The words used in the description of this application to indicate orientation are only used to indicate relative directions or positional relationships. When the absolute position of the described object changes, its relative positional relationship may also change accordingly. The word "include" used in the description of this application indicates that the elements or objects appearing before the word include the elements or objects listed after the word and their equivalents, but does not exclude other elements or objects.

[0063] In addition, it should be noted that, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the words "installation", "connection" and similar terms used in the description of this application should be understood in a broad sense. For example, the connection can be a fixed connection or a detachable connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium. Technical personnel in the field can understand its specific meaning in this application according to the specific circumstances.

[0064] The evaluation dimensions of a design report include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics. The evaluation process usually includes design, proofreading, quality review, and audit. Therefore, an embodiment of the present application provides a design report expert scoring and evaluation method and system thereof.

[0065] The design report expert scoring and evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application is as follows: Figure 1 As shown, the following steps are included:

[0066] Design report reading steps: read the design report content, and also obtain the length, word count, chapters and levels of the design report.

[0067] Design expert scoring steps: Design experts score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0068] Proofreading expert scoring steps: Proofreading experts score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0069] Quality review expert scoring steps: Quality review experts score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0070] Audit expert scoring steps: Audit experts score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0071] Design report scoring steps: Based on the scores of design experts, proofreading experts, quality control experts, and audit experts on the design report, the design report score is automatically calculated and output.

[0072] The dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score design reports include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which:

[0073] The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation. If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point is given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points are given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points are given to the design report;

[0074] The quality conformity is scored as conforming to the requirements (100% conforming to the requirements), good conformity (85-95% conforming to the requirements), and acceptable conformity (75-85% conforming to the requirements). If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have good conformity, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable conformity, 1 point will be given to the design report;

[0075] The rigor of the structure is scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic. If the design report is considered to have clear chapter logic, 1 point is given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have basically clear chapter logic, 0.85 points are given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable chapter logic, 0.75 points are given to the design report;

[0076] The report aesthetics is scored as follows: complete and full chart format, basically complete and full chart format, and acceptable chart format. If the design report is considered to have complete and full chart format, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have basically complete and full chart format, 0.85 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable chart format, 0.75 points will be given to the design report.

[0077] In the design report review process, proofreading and quality review are two links that connect the previous and the next. The weight of the experts' scoring of the design report can be designed to be larger. The design report score can be calculated as follows:

[0078] A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2×A 审核专家 ;

[0079] in,

[0080] A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics;

[0081] A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0082] A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0083] A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0084] A 审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

[0085] The design report expert scoring and evaluation system provided in the embodiment of the present application is as follows: Figure 2 As shown, the design report expert scoring and evaluation method disclosed in the above embodiment is used to implement the design report reading module, the design expert scoring module, the proofreading expert scoring module, the quality review expert scoring module, the audit expert scoring module, and the design report scoring module.

[0086] The design report reading module is used to read the content of the design report, and can also simultaneously obtain the length, word count, chapters and levels of the design report.

[0087] The design expert scoring module is used for design experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0088] The proofreading expert scoring module is used for proofreading experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0089] The quality review expert scoring module is used for quality review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0090] The review expert scoring module is used for review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report.

[0091] The design report scoring module automatically calculates and outputs the design report scores based on the scores given to the design report by design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts.

[0092] The dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score design reports include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which:

[0093] The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation. If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point is given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points are given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points are given to the design report;

[0094] The quality conformity is scored as conforming to the requirements (100% conforming to the requirements), good conformity (85-95% conforming to the requirements), and acceptable conformity (75-85% conforming to the requirements). If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have good conformity, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable conformity, 1 point will be given to the design report;

[0095] The rigor of the structure is scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic. If the design report is considered to have clear chapter logic, 1 point is given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have basically clear chapter logic, 0.85 points are given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable chapter logic, 0.75 points are given to the design report;

[0096] The report aesthetics is scored as follows: complete and full chart format, basically complete and full chart format, and acceptable chart format. If the design report is considered to have complete and full chart format, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have basically complete and full chart format, 0.85 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to have acceptable chart format, 0.75 points will be given to the design report.

[0097] In the design report review process, proofreading and quality review are two links that connect the previous and the next. The weight of the experts' scoring of the design report can be designed to be larger. The design report score can be calculated as follows:

[0098] A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2× A 审核专家 ;

[0099] in,

[0100] A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics;

[0101] A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0102] A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0103] A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions;

[0104] A 审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

[0105] In a specific embodiment, the design output design report score is as follows:

[0106] The above-mentioned embodiment discloses a design report expert scoring and evaluation method and system, which are based on the evaluation dimensions of the design report and its assessment links, and are designed to have design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts score the design, proofreading, quality review, and audit from the four dimensions of content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics in the four links of design, proofreading, quality review, and audit, and then automatically calculate and output the design report score, thereby realizing quantitative and objective evaluation of the design report, and promoting the full realization of the effectiveness of the design report.

[0107] In addition, technicians in the field should also be able to realize that the various modules of the design report expert scoring and evaluation system disclosed in the embodiments of the present application can be implemented by electronic hardware, computer software, or a combination of the two. In order to clearly illustrate the interchangeability of hardware and software, this application generally describes them according to their functions. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Technicians in the field can choose to adopt different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application and its actual constraints, but such implementation should not be considered to exceed the scope of this application.

[0108] So far, the technical solution of the present application has been described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments shown in the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of protection of the present application is obviously not limited to these specific embodiments. Without departing from the principles of the present application, those skilled in the art can make equivalent changes or substitutions to the relevant technical features, and the technical solutions after these changes or substitutions will fall within the scope of protection of the present application.

Claims

1. A design report expert scoring and evaluation method, characterized in that: include: Design report reading steps: read the design report content; Design expert scoring steps: Design experts score the design report based on the content of the design report; Proofreading expert scoring steps: Proofreading experts score the design report based on the content of the design report; Quality review expert scoring steps: Quality review experts score the design report based on the content of the design report; Audit expert scoring steps: Audit experts score the design report based on the content of the design report; Design report scoring steps: automatically calculate and output the design report score based on the scores given by design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts; The dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score design reports include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which: The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation; The quality compliance is scored as meeting the requirements, good compliance, and acceptable compliance; The rigor of the structure was scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic; The report's aesthetics is scored as follows: charts and graphs are complete and full, charts and graphs are basically complete and full, and charts and graphs are acceptable.

2. The design report expert scoring and evaluation method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: When design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts score the design report: If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points will be given to the design report; If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 1 point will be given to the design report; If the logic of the design report chapters is considered clear, the design report will be given 1 point; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered basically clear, the design report will be given 0.85 points; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered acceptable, the design report will be given 0.75 points; If the design report is considered to be complete and full in size, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically complete and full in size, 0.85 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be acceptable in size, 0.75 point will be given to the design report.

3. The design report expert scoring and evaluation method according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The calculation design report score is as follows: A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2×A 审核专家 ; in, A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics; A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

4. A design report expert scoring and evaluation system, characterized in that: It includes design report reading module, design expert scoring module, proofreading expert scoring module, quality review expert scoring module, audit expert scoring module and design report scoring module; The design report reading module is used to read the design report content; The design expert scoring module is used for design experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report; The proofreading expert scoring module is used for proofreading experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report; The quality review expert scoring module is used for quality review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report; The review expert scoring module is used for review experts to score the design report based on the content of the design report; The design report scoring module automatically calculates and outputs the design report scores based on the scores given by design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts. In the design expert scoring module, proofreading expert scoring module, quality review expert scoring module, and audit expert scoring module, the dimensions for design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts to score the design report include content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics, among which: The content inheritance is scored as basic inheritance, basic innovation, and complete innovation; The quality compliance is scored as meeting the requirements, good compliance, and acceptable compliance; The rigor of the structure was scored as follows: clear chapter logic, basically clear chapter logic, and acceptable chapter logic; The report's aesthetics is scored as follows: charts and graphs are complete and full, charts and graphs are basically complete and full, and charts and graphs are acceptable.

5. The design report expert scoring and evaluation system according to claim 4 is characterized in that: In the design expert scoring module, proofreading expert scoring module, quality review expert scoring module, and audit expert scoring module, when the design experts, proofreading experts, quality review experts, and audit experts score the design report: If the design report is considered to be basically inherited, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically innovative, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be completely innovative, 3 points will be given to the design report; If the design report is considered to meet the requirements, 3 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 2 points will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to meet the requirements well, 1 point will be given to the design report; If the logic of the design report chapters is considered clear, the design report will be given 1 point; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered basically clear, the design report will be given 0.85 points; if the logic of the design report chapters is considered acceptable, the design report will be given 0.75 points; If the design report is considered to be complete and full in size, 1 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be basically complete and full in size, 0.85 point will be given to the design report; if the design report is considered to be acceptable in size, 0.75 point will be given to the design report.

6. The design report expert scoring and evaluation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: In the design report scoring module, the calculation of the design report score is as follows: A i =0.2×A 设计专家 +0.3×A 校对专家 +0.3×A 质审专家 +0.2×A 审核专家 ; in, A i To calculate the score of the i-th scoring dimension of the design report, i can be content inheritance, quality compliance, structural rigor, and report aesthetics; A 设计专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 校对专家 The design experts will score the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 质审专家 To score the design report for the quality review experts based on the corresponding scoring dimensions; A 审核专家 To review the experts' scores for the design report based on the corresponding scoring dimensions.

Images