Logistics capital account level judgment method and device

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of logistics account grade management, and discloses a logistics fund account grade judgment method; obtaining the current transaction amount information of the recommending officer, judging whether it meets the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current recommending officer grade according to the current transaction amount of the recommending officer; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current grade, entering the recommending officer grade judgment process; entering the recommending officer grade judgment process, judging whether the grade of the current recommending officer is assessed by the number of recommendations; if so, entering the recommendation number judgment process; entering the recommendation number judgment process; judging whether the number of recommendations meets the current grade requirement, if not, entering the duration judgment process; entering the duration judgment process, judging whether the grade condition is not met for three consecutive months, if so, the recommending officer grade is reduced by one level, if not, the recommending officer grade remains unchanged; the invention has the advantages of optimizing grade management and improving resource utilization.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of logistics fund account management, and in particular to a logistics fund account level judgment method and device. Background Art

[0002] With the development of e-commerce, the demand for capital accounts in the logistics industry is growing. However, the existing capital account management system often cannot meet the special needs of the logistics industry, such as providing differentiated services to logistics companies of different sizes and business types. Therefore, a logistics capital account level judgment method is needed to solve this problem. Summary of the invention

[0003] The main purpose of the present invention is to solve the problem that the existing fund account management system often cannot meet the special needs of the logistics industry, such as providing differentiated services to logistics companies of different sizes and business types.

[0004] A first aspect of the present invention provides a method for determining the level of a logistics fund account, the method comprising: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; judge whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level requirements are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommending officer's level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommending officer's level will remain unchanged.

[0005] Optionally, also include: The current transaction amount of the recommender is used to determine whether it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level. If it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level, the upgrade condition determination process will be entered; Enter the upgrade condition judgment process to determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If so, enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process; Enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If so, enter the recommendation number condition judgment process; Enter the recommendation number condition judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If so, the recommender will be upgraded and the supplementary agreement will be signed.

[0006] Optionally, also include: Determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged; Determine whether the number of recommendations is a necessary condition for upgrading. If not, the recommender level will be upgraded directly and a supplementary agreement will be signed; Determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged.

[0007] Optionally, also include: Enter the recommendation officer grade judgment process to determine whether the current recommendation officer's grade is assessed based on the number of recommendations. If so, determine whether the number of recommendations meets the current grade requirements. If so, the recommendation officer's grade remains unchanged. If not, determine whether the grade requirements have not been met for three consecutive months. Determine whether the grade requirements are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the grade of the recommending officer will be reduced by one level and a supplementary agreement will be signed. If not, the grade of the recommending officer will remain unchanged.

[0008] Optionally, also include: Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If so, keep the recommender level unchanged.

[0009] Optionally, also include: Determine whether the merchant meets the requirements of the recommender. If not, the merchant cannot become a recommender. If yes, the merchant becomes a recommender and enters the recommendation number determination process. Enter the recommendation number judgment of the recommender to determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, there is no need to upgrade. If it does, the recommender will be upgraded, the rate will be modified, and a signed agreement will be generated; Send the agreement to be signed to the client and update the signing status; Get the agreement signing result information, and determine whether the contract is signed successfully based on the agreement signing result information. If so, the merchant rate will be changed, otherwise, the rate will remain unchanged.

[0010] Optionally, also include: Enter the rule number information, rule description information and rule effective time information; Enter the rule number information, which is a three-digit number. Determine whether the newly entered rule number information already exists. If so, generate a number that exists and re-enter the prompt. If not, save the entered rule number. Enter the rule description information, which should be less than or equal to 15 Chinese characters; Enter the rule effective time, which includes the rule start time and rule end time; determine whether the newly filled in rule effective time overlaps with the existing rule effective time. If so, generate a prompt and ask for a new time period. If not, save the entered rule effective time. Get the rule deletion information and determine whether the rule to be deleted is in an available state. If so, the deletion fails and a prompt is given to increase the available state. If not, a prompt is given to confirm the deletion.

[0011] A second aspect of the present invention provides a logistics fund account level determination device, comprising: The transaction amount judgment module is used to obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommending officer, and judge whether the current transaction amount of the recommending officer meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommending officer level according to the current transaction amount of the recommending officer; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, the recommending officer level judgment process is entered; The recommender grade judgment module is used to enter the recommender grade judgment process to determine whether the current recommender grade is assessed based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; The recommendation number judgment module is used to enter the recommendation number judgment process; judge whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; The duration judgment module is used to enter the duration judgment process to determine whether the level conditions are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommending officer's level will be reduced by one level. If not, the recommending officer's level will remain unchanged.

[0012] A third aspect of the present invention provides an electronic device, the electronic device comprising a memory and at least one processor, the memory storing instructions; The at least one processor calls the instructions in the memory to enable the electronic device to execute each step of the logistics fund account level determination method as described above.

[0013] A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, and when the instructions are executed by a processor, the various steps of the logistics fund account level determination method as described above are implemented.

[0014] In the technical solution of the present invention, through a reasonable rating mechanism, it can help logistics companies better understand their own financial health and development potential, encourage companies to strengthen financial management, improve their own competitiveness, thereby promoting the healthy development of the entire logistics industry; improve capital utilization, optimize resource allocation, and invest more resources in companies with high credit ratings, thereby improving overall resource allocation efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for determining a logistics fund account level provided by a first embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 A flow chart of a method for determining a logistics fund account level provided by a second embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 A flowchart of a method for determining an upgrade contract for a recommender who has just entered the system, provided in the third embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of a logistics fund account level determination device provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for judging the level of a logistics fund account, comprising obtaining current transaction amount information of a recommending officer, judging whether the current transaction amount of the recommending officer meets the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current recommending officer level according to the current transaction amount of the recommending officer; if the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current level is not met, entering the recommending officer level judgment process; entering the recommending officer level judgment process to judge whether the level of the current recommending officer is assessed by the number of recommendations; if so, entering the recommendation number judgment process; entering the recommendation number judgment process; judging whether the number of recommendations meets the current level requirement, if not, entering the duration judgment process; entering the duration judgment process to judge whether the level conditions are not met for three consecutive months, if so, the recommending officer level is downgraded by one level, if not, the recommending officer level remains unchanged. The present invention solves the problem that the existing fund account management system often cannot meet the special needs of the logistics industry, such as providing differentiated services to logistics companies of different sizes and business types.

[0017] The terms "first", "second", "third", "fourth", etc. (if any) in the specification and claims of the present invention and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the data used in this way can be interchanged where appropriate, so that the embodiments described herein can be implemented in an order other than that illustrated or described herein. In addition, the terms "including" or "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions, for example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units that are clearly listed, but may include other steps or units that are not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.

[0018] For ease of understanding, the specific process of the embodiment of the present invention is described below. Figure 1 The first embodiment of the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account in the embodiment of the present invention includes: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; if it meets the current level requirements, the recommender level remains unchanged.

[0019] Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level conditions have not been met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommender level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommender level will remain unchanged. The recommender level can be evaluated and downgraded in a timely manner to improve the accuracy of account management.

[0020] See also Figure 2 The second embodiment of the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account in the embodiment of the present invention includes: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; The current transaction amount of the recommender is used to determine whether it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level. If it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level, the upgrade condition determination process will be entered; Enter the upgrade condition judgment process to determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If so, enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process; determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged; Enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If so, enter the recommendation number condition judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If not, the recommending officer level will be directly upgraded and the supplementary agreement will be signed; Enter the recommendation number judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If so, the recommending officer will be upgraded and a supplementary agreement will be signed; determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If not, the recommending officer level will remain unchanged.

[0021] Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; if it meets the current level requirements, the recommender level remains unchanged.

[0022] Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level conditions have not been met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommender level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommender level will remain unchanged. The recommender level can be evaluated and downgraded in a timely manner to improve the accuracy of account management.

[0023] See also Figure 1-3 The third embodiment of the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account in the embodiment of the present invention includes: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; The current transaction amount of the recommender is used to determine whether it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level. If it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level, the upgrade condition determination process will be entered; Enter the upgrade condition judgment process to determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If so, enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process; determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged; Enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If so, enter the recommendation number condition judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If not, the recommending officer level will be directly upgraded and the supplementary agreement will be signed; Enter the recommendation number judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If so, the recommending officer will be upgraded and a supplementary agreement will be signed; determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If not, the recommending officer level will remain unchanged.

[0024] Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; if it meets the current level requirements, the recommender level remains unchanged.

[0025] Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level conditions have not been met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommender level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommender level will remain unchanged. The recommender level can be evaluated and downgraded in a timely manner to improve the accuracy of account management.

[0026] For example, if a recommender is at the Star Rank (service fee rate of 5.0%), and fails to meet the requirements of this rank (minimum recommended merchants ≥ 50, and minimum monthly loan amount ≥ 5 million yuan) for three consecutive months, then during the third rank evaluation, the recommender's rank will be downgraded to the Brilliant Rank (service fee rate of 5.2%). Tier Changes and Rate Updates After the recommender meets the downgrade conditions, the level changes, and the system automatically changes the rate of the recommender to the rate corresponding to the level (this item does not verify whether the order batch is completed, the system automatically changes the rate), and the signing status of the recommender changes to "unsigned". The merchant enters the Anxinfu platform and needs to sign a supplementary agreement on the new rate. After the agreement is signed and the effective time arrives, the rate officially takes effect; Supplementary note: If there are unfinished batches of the original rate, the rate consistency check will be performed during the payment review process. If the order rate is inconsistent with the online rate, the page will tosat and prompt "The order rate is inconsistent with the merchant's current online rate, please reject and re-make the order~", and the payment will not be initiated.

[0027] It also includes: judging whether the merchant meets the recommendation officer conditions. If not, the merchant cannot become a recommendation officer. If yes, the merchant becomes a recommendation officer and enters the recommendation officer recommendation number judgment; Enter the recommendation number judgment of the recommender to determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, there is no need to upgrade. If it does, the recommender will be upgraded, the rate will be modified, and a signed agreement will be generated; Send the agreement to be signed to the client and update the signing status; Get the agreement signing result information, and determine whether the contract is signed successfully based on the agreement signing result information. If so, the merchant rate will be changed, otherwise, the rate will remain unchanged.

[0028] See also Figure 1-3 The fourth embodiment of the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account in the embodiment of the present invention includes: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; Transaction amount information The current transaction amount of the recommender is used to determine whether it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level. If it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level, the upgrade condition determination process will be entered; Enter the upgrade condition judgment process to determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If so, enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process; determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged; Enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If so, enter the recommendation number condition judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If not, the recommending officer level will be directly upgraded and the supplementary agreement will be signed; Enter the recommendation number judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If so, the recommending officer will be upgraded and a supplementary agreement will be signed; determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If not, the recommending officer level will remain unchanged.

[0029] Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; if it meets the current level requirements, the recommender level remains unchanged.

[0030] Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level conditions have not been met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommender level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommender level will remain unchanged. The recommender level can be evaluated and downgraded in a timely manner to improve the accuracy of account management.

[0031] For example, if a recommender is at the Star Rank (service fee rate of 5.0%), and fails to meet the requirements of this rank (minimum recommended merchants ≥ 50, and minimum monthly loan amount ≥ 5 million yuan) for three consecutive months, then during the third rank evaluation, the recommender's rank will be downgraded to the Brilliant Rank (service fee rate of 5.2%). Tier Changes and Rate Updates After the recommender meets the downgrade conditions, the level changes, and the system automatically changes the rate of the recommender to the rate corresponding to the level (this item does not verify whether the order batch is completed, the system automatically changes the rate), and the signing status of the recommender changes to "unsigned". The merchant enters the Anxinfu platform and needs to sign a supplementary agreement on the new rate. After the agreement is signed and the effective time arrives, the rate officially takes effect; Supplementary note: If there are unfinished batches of the original rate, the rate consistency check will be performed during the payment review process. If the order rate is inconsistent with the online rate, the page will tosat and prompt "The order rate is inconsistent with the merchant's current online rate, please reject and re-make the order~", and the payment will not be initiated.

[0032] It also includes: judging whether the merchant meets the recommendation officer conditions. If not, the merchant cannot become a recommendation officer. If yes, the merchant becomes a recommendation officer and enters the recommendation officer recommendation number judgment; Enter the recommendation number judgment of the recommender to determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, there is no need to upgrade. If it does, the recommender will be upgraded, the rate will be modified, and a signed agreement will be generated; Send the agreement to be signed to the client and update the signing status; Get the agreement signing result information, and determine whether the contract is signed successfully based on the agreement signing result information. If so, the merchant rate will be changed, otherwise, the rate will remain unchanged.

[0033] Optionally, also include: Enter the rule number information, rule description information and rule effective time information; Enter the rule number information, which is a three-digit number. Determine whether the newly entered rule number information already exists. If so, generate a number that exists and re-enter the prompt. If not, save the entered rule number. Enter the rule description information, which should be less than or equal to 15 Chinese characters; Enter the rule effective time, which includes the rule start time and rule end time; determine whether the newly filled in rule effective time overlaps with the existing rule effective time. If so, generate a prompt and ask for a new time period. If not, save the entered rule effective time. Get the rule deletion information and determine whether the rule to be deleted is in an available state. If so, the deletion fails and a prompt is given to increase the available state. If not, a prompt is given to confirm the deletion.

[0034] The above describes the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account in an embodiment of the present invention. The following describes the device for determining the level of a logistics fund account in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 4 In the embodiment of the present invention, the logistics fund account level judgment device includes: The transaction amount determination module 401 is used to obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommending officer, and determine whether the current transaction amount of the recommending officer meets the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current recommending officer level according to the current transaction amount of the recommending officer; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirement of the current level, the recommending officer level determination process is entered; The recommending officer level judgment module 402 is used to enter the recommending officer level judgment process to determine whether the current recommending officer's level is assessed by the recommendation number; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; The recommendation number determination module 403 is used to enter the recommendation number determination process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirement, and if not, enter the duration determination process; The duration judgment module 404 is used to enter the duration judgment process to judge whether the level conditions are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommending officer level is reduced by one level. If not, the recommending officer level remains unchanged.

[0035] above Figure 4The logistics fund account level determination device in the embodiment of the present invention is described in detail from the perspective of modular functional entities, and the electronic device in the embodiment of the present invention is described in detail from the perspective of hardware processing.

[0036] Figure 5 7 is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The electronic device 700 may have relatively large differences due to different configurations or performances, and may include one or more processors (central processing units, CPU) 710 (for example, one or more processors) and a memory 720, and one or more storage media 730 (for example, one or more mass storage devices) storing application programs 733 or data 732. Among them, the memory 720 and the storage medium 730 can be temporary storage or permanent storage. The program stored in the storage medium 730 may include one or more modules (not shown in the figure), and each module may include a series of instruction operations in the electronic device 700. Furthermore, the processor 710 may be configured to communicate with the storage medium 730 to execute a series of instruction operations in the storage medium 730 on the electronic device 700.

[0037] The electronic device 700 may also include one or more power supplies 740, one or more wired or wireless network interfaces 750, one or more input and output interfaces 750, and / or one or more operating systems 731, such as Windows Serve, Mac OS X, Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that Figure 5 The structure of the electronic device shown does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device, and may include more or less components than shown in the figure, or combine some components, or arrange the components differently.

[0038] The present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium, which may be a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium or a volatile computer-readable storage medium. Instructions are stored in the computer-readable storage medium. When the instructions are executed on a computer, the computer executes the steps of the logistics capital account level determination method.

[0039] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the above-described system, device, or unit can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment and will not be repeated here.

[0040] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention is essentially or the part that contributes to the prior art or the whole or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions to enable a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), disk or optical disk and other media that can store program code.

[0041] As described above, the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit the same. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features thereof may be replaced by equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for determining the level of a logistics capital account, characterized in that: The logistics fund account level determination method includes: Obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommender, and determine whether the current transaction amount meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommender level based on the current transaction amount of the recommender; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, enter the recommender level judgment process; Enter the recommender level judgment process to determine whether the current recommender level is based on the number of recommendations; if so, enter the recommendation number judgment process; Enter the recommendation number judgment process; judge whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; Enter the time judgment process to determine whether the level requirements are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommending officer's level will be downgraded by one level. If not, the recommending officer's level will remain unchanged.

2. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: The current transaction amount of the recommender is used to determine whether it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level. If it meets the transaction amount requirement of the current recommender level, the upgrade condition determination process will be entered; Enter the upgrade condition judgment process to determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If so, enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process; Enter the recommendation number necessity judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number is a necessary condition for upgrading. If so, enter the recommendation number condition judgment process; Enter the recommendation number condition judgment process to determine whether the recommendation number meets the upgrade conditions. If so, the recommender will be upgraded and the supplementary agreement will be signed.

3. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 2, characterized in that: Also includes: Determine whether the transaction amount of the current recommender level meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged; Determine whether the number of recommendations is a necessary condition for upgrading. If not, the recommender level will be upgraded directly and a supplementary agreement will be signed; Determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, keep the recommender level unchanged.

4. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 3, characterized in that: Also includes: Enter the recommendation officer grade judgment process to determine whether the current recommendation officer's grade is assessed based on the number of recommendations. If so, determine whether the number of recommendations meets the current grade requirements. If so, the recommendation officer's grade remains unchanged. If not, determine whether the grade requirements have not been met for three consecutive months. Determine whether the grade requirements are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the grade of the recommending officer will be reduced by one level and a supplementary agreement will be signed. If not, the grade of the recommending officer will remain unchanged.

5. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 4, characterized in that: Also includes: Enter the recommendation number judgment process; determine whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If so, keep the recommender level unchanged.

6. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 5, characterized in that: Also includes: Determine whether the merchant meets the requirements of the recommender. If not, the merchant cannot become a recommender. If yes, the merchant becomes a recommender and enters the recommendation number determination process. Enter the recommendation number judgment of the recommender to determine whether the number of recommendations meets the upgrade conditions. If not, there is no need to upgrade. If it does, the recommender will be upgraded, the rate will be modified, and a signed agreement will be generated; Send the agreement to be signed to the client and update the signing status; Get the agreement signing result information, and determine whether the contract is signed successfully based on the agreement signing result information. If so, the merchant rate will be changed, otherwise, the rate will remain unchanged.

7. The method for determining the level of logistics funds account according to claim 6, characterized in that: Also includes: Enter the rule number information, rule description information and rule effective time information; Enter the rule number information, which is a three-digit number. Determine whether the newly entered rule number information already exists. If so, generate a number that exists and re-enter the prompt. If not, save the entered rule number. Enter the rule description information, which should be less than or equal to 15 Chinese characters; Enter the rule effective time, which includes the rule start time and rule end time; determine whether the newly filled in rule effective time overlaps with the existing rule effective time. If so, generate a prompt and ask for a new time period. If not, save the entered rule effective time. Get the rule deletion information and determine whether the rule to be deleted is in an available state. If so, the deletion fails and a prompt is given to increase the available state. If not, a prompt is given to confirm the deletion.

8. A logistics fund account level judgment device, characterized in that: include: The transaction amount judgment module is used to obtain the current transaction amount information of the recommending officer, and judge whether the current transaction amount of the recommending officer meets the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current recommending officer level according to the current transaction amount of the recommending officer; if it does not meet the transaction amount quantity requirements of the current level, the recommending officer level judgment process is entered; The recommender grade judgment module is used to enter the recommender grade judgment process and determine whether the current recommender grade meets the recommendation number; If yes, then enter the recommendation number judgment process; The recommendation number judgment module is used to enter the recommendation number judgment process; judge whether the recommendation number meets the current level requirements. If it does not meet the current level requirements, enter the duration judgment process; The duration judgment module is used to enter the duration judgment process to determine whether the level conditions are not met for three consecutive months. If so, the recommending officer's level will be reduced by one level. If not, the recommending officer's level will remain unchanged.

9. An electronic device, comprising a memory and at least one processor, wherein instructions are stored in the memory; The at least one processor calls the instructions in the memory so that the electronic device executes each step of the logistics fund account level determination method as described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, characterized in that: When the instructions are executed by the processor, the various steps of the method for determining the level of a logistics fund account as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images