Establishment method of traceability system for authenticating safety quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for establishing a traceability system for authenticating the safety quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics, and the method comprises the following steps: (1) establishing a cosmetic scientific authentication evaluation system which comprises the establishment of an enterprise authentication rule and an authentication analysis system; comprising all enterprise information, evaluation and grading results in the step (1), and related information can be inquired by scanning a granted two-dimensional code. According to the system, the scientific research strength of the product is evaluated by establishing the evaluation system and the traceability system, and the consumer can effectively obtain the scientific research content of the product based on the traceability system in combination with a two-dimensional code one-object-one-code mode, so that the right to know of the consumer is protected to the greatest extent, and the industry-university-research development in the field of cosmetics is promoted.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of cosmetics, and in particular to a method for establishing a traceability system for authenticating the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics. Background Art

[0002] In recent years, the beauty market has developed rapidly, and the production level of the industry has continued to increase with the needs of consumers. In terms of meeting the needs of safety and basic use, the market and consumers pay more attention to the efficacy and scientificity of products. More companies are willing to increase R&D costs in pursuit of more effective efficacy mechanisms and pathways to create more popular products that are more conducive to market. Therefore, how to effectively disseminate the scientific research content of the brand has become the most concerned issue in the cosmetics industry. The "Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Cosmetics" and related management regulations currently issued by my country mainly stipulate the content of product safety and efficacy claims. There is no provision on how to evaluate the scientific nature of product claims in the market. At present, many brands still exaggerate, falsify or even defraud the brand's R&D strength, scientific research results, and application technology during the marketing and promotion process. It is difficult for consumers to make accurate judgments when choosing products, which seriously damages consumers' right to know and the image of the industry. Summary of the invention

[0003] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics. At the same time, the present invention also provides a method for establishing a cosmetics enterprise certification grading system.

[0004] The system of the present invention evaluates the scientific research strength of the product by establishing an evaluation system and a traceability system. Based on the traceability system combined with the one-to-one QR code method, consumers can effectively obtain the scientific research content of the product, thereby maximizing the protection of consumers' right to know, promoting the development of industry-university-research in the field of cosmetics, safeguarding the market barriers of advantageous enterprises, enhancing the market competitiveness of strong R&D enterprises, and promoting the international competitiveness of China's beauty industry.

[0005] A method for establishing a cosmetics enterprise certification grading system comprises the following steps:

[0006] (1) Quality and safety certification, score S1;

[0007] (2) Scientific certification, score S2, the certification method includes the following steps:

[0008] For E 原料研发 、F 原料产权 , G 原料生产 , H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) ,I 研发奖项 / 专利 , G 配方研发 , K 配方完整产权 , L 团标(原料 / 产品)Score on 8 dimensions, with each dimension having a full score of 100 points;

[0009] Calculation formula; S2 = 0.1E 原料研发 + 0.15F 原料产权 + 0.05G 原料生产 + 0.3H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) + 0.3I 研发奖项 / 专利 + 0.06G 配方研发 + 0.02K 配方完整产权 + 0.02L 团标(原料 / 产品) ;

[0010] (3) Total certification score formula: S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2;

[0011] Finally, the certification of cosmetics enterprises is divided into 4 levels: 95 < S ≤ 100, the certification level is Gold Label A; 85 < S ≤ 95, the certification level is Silver Label B; 60 < S ≤ 85, the certification level is Bronze Label C; 0 ≤ S ≤ 60, the certification level is Gray Label D.

[0012] E 原料研发 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0013] The scoring content includes process extraction Ea, process optimization Eb, safety evaluation Ec, and efficacy evaluation Ed;

[0014] Scoring calculation formula: E 原料研发 = 0.25Ea + 0.25Eb + 0.25Ec + 0.25Ed;

[0015] Among them, the value-taking methods of Ea, Eb, Ec, and Ed are as follows:

[0016] Process extraction Ea: During the R & D process, compare the types of processes: 4 - 5 extraction processes get 25 points; 2 - 3 extraction processes get 10 points; 1 extraction process gets 5 points. If no extraction process materials can be provided, it is 0 points; Select the score of one item from the four as the value of Ea;

[0017] Process optimization Eb: During the R & D process, the number of adjustments and complete data can be provided. 15 - 20 times gets 25 points; 10 - 14 times gets 20 points; 5 - 9 times gets 15 points; 1 - 4 times gets 5 points. If no process optimization materials can be provided, it is 0 points; Select the score of one item from the five as the value of Eb;

[0018] Safety evaluation Ec: Safety evaluation indicators, including hormone detection reports, antibiotic detection reports, pesticide residue detection reports, volatile organic solvent detection reports, and risk substance detection reports. Each of the above 5 reports is 5 points. When there are multiple reports, the scores are added together, and the total is the final value of Ec. If the above reports cannot be provided, it is 0 points;

[0019] Efficacy evaluation Ed: biochemical experiments, cell experiments or skin model experiments need to be completed, among which biochemical experiments are 5 points, cell experiments are 20 points, and skin model experiments are 25 points. If the report cannot be provided, 0 points will be awarded. The score of one of the four is used as the value of Ed;

[0020] F 原料产权 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0021] The scoring includes Fa exclusive ownership and Fb shared ownership;

[0022] Scoring calculation formula: F raw material property rights = Fa + Fb;

[0023] Among them, when the property right is exclusive, Fa is 100 points and Fb is 0 points; when the property right is non-exclusive, Fa is 0 points and Fb is shared property, with a total of 60 points. Then the score is based on the strength of the R&D institution: the scoring content and scores are as follows: 60 points if the original value of the equipment is ≥ 30 million; 50 points if the original value of the equipment is 25 million or less and less than 30 million; 40 points if the original value of the equipment is 15 million or less and less than 25 million; 10 points if the original value of the equipment is less than 15 million; 0 points if the relevant materials cannot be provided;

[0024] G 原料生产 Scoring is based on the strength of the production organization. The scoring rules are as follows: 100 points for annual output value ≥ 100 million; 60 points for annual output value ≤ 50 million and less than 100 million; 40 points for annual output value ≤ 10 million and less than 50 million; 10 points for annual output value less than 10 million; 0 points if no relevant materials can be provided;

[0025] H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows:

[0026] Special journal papers, 100 points; authoritative core journal papers, 95 points; important core journal papers, 80 points; general core journal papers, 75 points; general public journal papers, 60 points; restricted public journal papers, 45 points; when an enterprise has multiple paper results in raw materials or products, choose the highest level of scoring; if no relevant materials can be provided, the score will be 0;

[0027] I 研发奖项 / 专利 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0028] I 研发奖项 / 专利 =I 研发奖项 +I 专利

[0029] I 研发奖项Scoring method: 80 points for national level, 75 points for provincial and ministerial level, 70 points for municipal, department, bureau and bureau level, 50 points for national organizations among public welfare social organizations, 45 points for local organizations among public welfare social organizations, 10 points for national organizations among for-profit social organizations, 5 points for local organizations among for-profit social organizations; when an enterprise has multiple achievements in R&D awards, choose the highest level of scoring;

[0030] I 专利 Scoring method: 5 points if the company's product has one patent, and the points are added together if the company has multiple patents, with a maximum score of 20 points;

[0031] If no R&D awards or patents can be provided, the score will be 0;

[0032] J 配方研发 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0033] The scoring content and scores are as follows: A total of 100 points, then the scoring is based on the strength of the R&D institution: The scoring content and scores are as follows: 100 points if the original value of the equipment is ≥ 30 million; 60 points if the original value of the equipment is 25 million or less and is less than 30 million; 40 points if the original value of the equipment is 15 million or less and is less than 25 million; 10 points if the original value of the equipment is less than 15 million;

[0034] K 配方完整产权 : The ownership of the formula of the enterprise's products is 100 points if it is the registrant; 60 points if it is not the registrant but has a person in charge of quality and safety in the enterprise; 0 points if it has neither person in charge;

[0035] L 团标(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows:

[0036] The scoring content and scores are as follows: Throughout the entire product life cycle, that is, from research and development, production, testing, post-market sales, and any component of raw materials, packaging materials, and design, if it involves innovation of national social group standards, 60 points, local social group standards, 40 points, and 100 points if both are included; if the above materials are not available, the score will be 0.

[0037] The cosmetics certification grading system of the present invention, wherein the certification method for quality and safety certification comprises the following steps:

[0038] It includes four dimensions: safety index, efficacy index, usability index and stability index. The safety score is A, the efficacy score is B, the usability score is C, and the stability score is D. The total quality evaluation score calculation formula is:

[0039] S1=0.5A(0.3C+0.7D)+B

[0040] When any of A, B, C, and D scores 0, the evaluation is terminated and the product is finally evaluated as unqualified; however, according to the "Evaluation Standards for Cosmetic Efficacy Claims", there is no mandatory requirement for efficacy evaluation of products, and when the B value is 0, the subsequent evaluation will continue;

[0041] The value of A is as follows: when the product is detected to contain ingredients prohibited by regulations, the value of A is 0; when ingredients that do not conform to the label are detected, if the ingredient is an antioxidant, preservative, stabilizer, etc., and the content is lower than the maximum limit allowed by the relevant standards of my country, the value of A is 0.6, otherwise the value of A is 0; if the microbial limit test does not meet the national standards, the value of A is 0; if a suspicious skin reaction occurs in the human skin patch test, the value of A is 0.6, if a weak positive reaction or above occurs, the value of A is 0; in other cases, the value of A is 1; when there are multiple possible values ​​for A, the final value of A is the product of multiple possible values ​​of A, that is, A=A1A2···A n The safety testing indicators include five microorganisms, element screening, preservatives, hormones, antibiotics, flavors and fragrances, and human skin patch test;

[0042] The B value is determined as follows: 30 points are assigned when there is reliable human experimental data; 20 points are assigned when there is reliable consumer use test data; when conducting laboratory method evaluation based on an integrated strategy, each module in the integrated strategy is assigned a value according to the weight of evidence, 5 points are assigned to molecular initiation events, 15 points are assigned to key events at the cellular level, 20 points are assigned to key events based on 3D skin models and in vitro tissues, and 5 points are assigned to methods based on animal experimental models with clear mechanisms. Multiple test indicators in each module can be cumulatively assigned, and the total score shall not exceed 30 points; if there are references or research data as supporting materials, 5 points are assigned to each document or data, with a maximum of 10 points; when there are multiple possible values ​​for the B value, the final value of the B value is the sum of multiple possible B values, that is, B=B1+B2+···+B n ; When the same product has multiple efficacy claims, each efficacy claim is scored independently, and then all scores are added together and divided by the number of efficacy claims, that is, Among them, B n is the score of a single efficacy claim, and n is the number of efficacy claims;

[0043] The C value is calculated as follows: the score of each item of usability is 0 to 4 points, and the final C value is obtained by adding up all the scores of the individual items, that is, C = C1 + C2 + ··· + C n ;

[0044] The usability testing indicators include product appearance evaluation, odor evaluation, and skin feel evaluation during and after use. The testing method is performed by professionally trained assessors to conduct sensory evaluation;

[0045] Among them, the inspection indicators for product appearance evaluation include: the texture of the outer packaging material, the pleasantness of the outer packaging material pattern design, the beauty of the outer packaging material color, the feeling of unsealing the outer packaging material, the portability of the inner packaging material packaging, the feeling of unsealing the inner packaging material, the ease of taking out the contents, the controllability of the amount used, the airtightness of the inner packaging material, the pleasantness of the content color and the uniformity of the content paste;

[0046] The detection indexes of the odor evaluation include the odor of the packaging material and the fragrance of the contents;

[0047] The detection indexes of the skin feel evaluation during use include lubricity, extensibility and absorbency;

[0048] The detection indicators of the skin feel evaluation after use include skin feel, coverage feeling and holding time;

[0049] The D value is determined as follows: D=XY(75aZ1+25bZ2); wherein X and Y are the quality sensory and physicochemical property scores in the stability assessment. When all the quality sensory or physicochemical property test items meet the corresponding industry standards, X or Y is 1, otherwise it is 0; a and b are constant terms. When the evaluated sample undergoes short-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.6, after medium-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.8, and after long-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 1; Z1 and Z2 are the thermal stability and light stability evaluation result scores, respectively. When the thermal / light stability test is completed, if the corresponding index is still within the standard range and the deviation of all indexes from the indexes before the experiment is within ±5%, Z1 or Z2 is 1, if the deviation is within ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.8, if the deviation exceeds ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.6, and if any one of the indexes is unqualified, Z1 or Z2 is 0.

[0050] A method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics comprises the following steps:

[0051] (1) Establishment of a cosmetics scientific certification and evaluation system, including the establishment of enterprise certification rules and a certification analysis system:

[0052] Establish enterprise certification rules: including access rules, traceability rules and signature rules. The platform will review the cosmetics companies that intend to enter the platform and grant a QR code after passing the review;

[0053] Certification and analysis system: The platform conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the current batch of cosmetics provided by the applicant enterprise based on the quality and safety certification system and scientific certification system described in the present invention, generates a QR code through the certification traceability system, and grants the current batch of products a label of the corresponding grade, i.e., gold label A grade, silver label B grade, bronze label C grade or gray label D grade; the platform will not grant a label to cosmetics with a quality evaluation score of less than 60 points;

[0054] (2) Construction of a certification and traceability system, in which the database includes all enterprise information, evaluation and grading results in step (1), and relevant information can be queried by scanning the granted QR code.

[0055] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics of the present invention, wherein the certification rules of the access rules in step (1) are as follows: cosmetics enterprises initiate applications and submit materials according to the access process and access requirements, and the platform reviews the materials submitted by them according to the review standards. If they meet the requirements, they will be admitted. If they do not meet the requirements, they need to resubmit the materials as required. If they do not meet the requirements, the acceptance will be suspended and they need to resubmit the application and materials;

[0056] The review items include business license, cosmetics production license, trademark registration certificate, national cosmetics supervision and random inspection certificate, provincial cosmetics supervision and random inspection certificate, production quality management system documents, qualifications of the person in charge of cosmetics quality and safety, cosmetics quality and safety management system, employee health management system, certification of China Credit that the person has not been listed as a dishonest debtor, a letter of commitment that there has been no illegal or criminal behavior in the past three years, and major public opinions.

[0057] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics described in the present invention, wherein the traceability rules described in step (1) are as follows: the platform collects traceability applications and materials submitted by enterprises, forms an on-site audit team according to product types, verifies the production and processing information of the current batch of cosmetics on-site, and the enterprises that meet the requirements and whose information is true are eligible to be granted the traceability code provided by the platform; the materials provided must cover more than 75%, and the qualifications for granting the signature will be cancelled if the necessary items are not met, and combined with the on-site traceability audit by experts, except for the first application for traceability by the enterprise, the products produced in the later batches shall be subject to on-site traceability confirmation at a frequency of not less than 50%; the necessary production and processing information includes the raw material supplier audit form, raw material analysis report, raw material technical parameter table, raw material in and out warehouse form, raw material retention sample + inspection record, packaging material incoming quality control inspection report, packaging material in and out warehouse form, retention sample confirmation record, material input record form, finished product / product inspection information, finished product release audit form and finished product entry detail form;

[0058] Non-essential production and processing information includes raw material safety instructions, packaging material supplier review form, packaging material disinfection record, production formula confirmation form, semi-finished product production process record, semi-finished product inspection information, site clearance record, semi-finished product transfer record, packaging / canning / assembly record and production process inspection quality record.

[0059] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics described in the present invention, wherein the approval rules described in step (1) are as follows: the enterprise needs to submit relevant information about the cosmetic products for review, and those that do not meet the requirements or cannot provide them will be exempted from the approval qualification; the items that need to be verified include the filing certificate materials of the State Council’s drug supervision and administration department, the registration certificate materials of the State Council’s drug supervision and administration department, the raw material registration certificate materials, the safety assessment of cosmetic raw materials and products, and the cosmetic labels.

[0060] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics described in the present invention, wherein the construction of the certification traceability system in step (2) includes the construction route and system design:

[0061] The construction route includes the following parts:

[0062] The platform is based on the SpringCloud microservice architecture and is deployed in the K8s platform environment. It integrates a variety of mainstream open source technologies, including open source databases MySQL, FastDs, and vejs, to provide a scalable, reliable, and high-performance software platform; including routing gateway Spring Cloud2uul, service registration and discovery Eureka, network request RestTemplate, load balancing Ribbon, configuration center Config, fuse Hystrix, service link tracking Sleuth, service monitoring SpringBootAdmin, Spring Boot program, and message bus Bus.

[0063] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics according to the present invention comprises the following steps:

[0064] Business architecture: The overall business of this system includes three major sections: platform management application, enterprise application, and public application;

[0065] System architecture: This system architecture design includes client usage, system users, gateways, service application layer, data layer, database storage and operating environment;

[0066] The deployment architecture includes the following parts:

[0067] Access terminal: including PC applications and mobile applications;

[0068] Access flow: terminal device → DNS → Nginx → service → database;

[0069] DNS deployment: Domain name access is resolved to the public network entrance IP through the public network DNS. The intranet uses K8s domain name resolution to perform DNS resolution on the service cluster. When Nginx is a reverse proxy, each service can be accessed evenly through the domain name to play a load balancing role.

[0070] Equilibrium effect;

[0071] Nginx deployment: deploy multiple Nginx for access load balancing to avoid single point of failure;

[0072] MySQL deployment: Deploy through the Master Slave strategy, which can deploy one master node and multiple slave nodes to avoid

[0073] Single point of failure;

[0074] Redis deployment: Deploy multiple nodes through Sentinel and Shard strategy to avoid Redis single point failure.

[0075] The present invention is different from the prior art in that:

[0076] The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics of the present invention has the following advantages:

[0077] 1. Establishment of the certification system: The domestic certification system is established around the life cycle of cosmetics: raw materials, research and development, production, testing, and the entire chain of circulation after listing. Through the certification of six major sectors, including raw material research and development, raw material production, formula design, process production, inspection and testing, and listing and sales, different grades of products are graded and certified, divided into gold label (Class A), silver label (Class B), copper label (Class C), and gray label (Class D). This certification system can cover more than 95% of cosmetics circulating on the market. The promotion and application of the system can avoid false marketing and counterfeiting to a certain extent, which not only promotes the scientific research and development of the cosmetics industry, but also protects the value of the results of scientific researchers participating in market behavior.

[0078] 2. Establish a traceability platform based on the certification system, including platform management applications, enterprise applications, and public applications. It is built around platform management applications, enterprise applications, and consumer applications, and is built in accordance with the requirements of the second level of information security protection. It also provides a standard unified identification quality safety and efficacy claim authentication code service, and provides the society with convenient, accurate, and authoritative product quality safety and efficacy claim information query services. Enhance the corporate brand image, realize the true transmission of commodity value, and enhance the corporate brand image. Consumers can also quickly identify the authenticity of goods through the product quality safety and efficacy claim information query service of the platform service system, and promote social sharing of quality and safety.

[0079] The innovative product safety quality and scientific research certification system in this invention: for the first time in China, a comprehensive analysis and evaluation is conducted based on six major sectors, including raw material research and development, raw material production, formula design, process production, inspection and testing, and marketing, to establish a certification system for graded certification of products of different grades. This certification system is universal and can cover more than 95% of cosmetics circulating on the market. It can be promoted and applied relatively quickly, which avoids false marketing and counterfeiting to a certain extent, and promotes the scientific research development of the cosmetics industry.

[0080] The present invention establishes a traceability platform based on the certification system, and combines the innovative form of one object one code to disseminate and trace the product. Consumers can learn about the entire life cycle of the product by scanning the code. It provides the society with a convenient, accurate and authoritative product quality safety and efficacy claim information query service.

[0081] The following is a further description of a method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics according to the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0082] Figure 1 The present invention is a flow chart of a method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0083] Example 1

[0084] A method for establishing a cosmetics enterprise certification grading system comprises the following steps:

[0085] (1) Quality and safety certification, score S1;

[0086] (2) Scientific certification, score S2, the certification method includes the following steps:

[0087] The evaluation of the certification system is reviewed by experts organized by the Secretariat of the Scientific Research and Beauty Care Conference. This organization is jointly initiated by academic institutions, scientific research institutes, universities, brand enterprises, industry organizations, and media institutions. Approximately 200 industry experts review the authenticity of scientific research materials. 20 experts are randomly selected for each product to evaluate E 原料研发 、F 原料产权 、G 原料生产 、H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) 、I 研发奖项 / 专利 、G 配方研发 、K 配方完整产权 、L 团标(原料 / 产品) in 8 dimensions. The full score for each dimension is 100 points;

[0088] Calculation formula: S2 = 0.1E 原料研发 + 0.15F 原料产权 + 0.05G 原料生产 + 0.3H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) + 0.3I 研发奖项 / 专利 + 0.06G 配方研发 + 0.02K 配方完整产权 + 0.02L 团标(原料 / 产品) ;

[0089] (3) Total certification score formula: S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2;

[0090] 95 < S ≤ 100, the certification level is Gold Label A; 85 < S ≤ 95, the certification level is Silver Label B; 60 < S ≤ 85, the certification level is Bronze Label C; 0 ≤ S ≤ 60, the certification level is Grey Label D.

[0091] Category A: Brands that can independently master core raw materials, have independent R & D laboratories or invest in or cooperate with joint laboratories to carry out R & D at the raw material end, can achieve independent development from raw materials to formulations, and even production, with a golden

[0092] Category B: Brands that can independently master core formula groups, have independent formula laboratories or outsource formula development, can fully master the exclusive use rights of relevant formulas and their derivative intellectual property rights, with a silver

[0093] Category C: The factories entrusted have considerable formula R & D capabilities, and the R & D results are actually applied to specific products. With a copper color;

[0094] Category D: Products that are only OEM, and the products have qualified efficacy and safety evaluations, with a grey color.

[0095] Among them:

[0096] The scoring rules for E 原料研发 are as follows:

[0097] The scoring content includes four aspects: process extraction Ea, process optimization Eb, safety evaluation Ec, and efficacy evaluation Ed (biochemistry, cell, skin model). No points will be awarded if complete materials are not provided.

[0098] Rating calculation formula: E 原料研发 =0.25Ea+0.25Eb+0.25Ec+0.25Ed;

[0099] Among them, the values ​​of Ea, Eb, Ec and Ed are as follows:

[0100] Process extraction Ea: Types of comparison processes during the research and development process: 4-5 extraction processes 25 points; 2-3 extraction processes 10 points; 1 extraction process 5 points, if the extraction process materials cannot be provided, 0 points; choose one of the four scores as the value of Ea;

[0101] Process optimization Eb: The number of adjustments during the R&D process and the ability to provide complete data: 15-20 times 25 points; 10-14 times 20 points; 5-9 times 15 points; 1-4 times 5 points; if process optimization materials cannot be provided, 0 points; select one of the five scores as the value of Eb;

[0102] Safety evaluation Ec: safety evaluation indicators, including hormone test report, antibiotic test report, pesticide residue test report, volatile organic solvent test report and risk substance test report. Each of the above five reports is 5 points. If there are multiple reports, the scores are added together, and the total score is the final value of Ec. If the above reports cannot be provided, 0 points will be taken;

[0103] Efficacy evaluation Ed: biochemical experiments, cell experiments or skin model experiments need to be completed, among which biochemical experiments are 5 points, cell experiments are 20 points, and skin model experiments are 25 points. If the report cannot be provided, 0 points will be awarded. The score of one of the four is used as the value of Ed;

[0104] The method for establishing a cosmetics enterprise certification and grading system of the present invention comprises:

[0105] F 原料产权 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0106] The scoring includes Fa exclusive ownership and Fb shared ownership;

[0107] Scoring calculation formula: F raw material property rights = Fa + Fb;

[0108] Among them, when the property right is exclusive, Fa is 100 points and Fb is 0 points; when the property right is non-exclusive, Fa is 0 points and Fb is shared property, with a total of 60 points. Then the score is based on the strength of the R&D institution: the scoring content and scores are as follows: 60 points if the original value of the equipment is ≥ 30 million; 50 points if the original value of the equipment is 25 million or less and less than 30 million; 40 points if the original value of the equipment is 15 million or less and less than 25 million; 10 points if the original value of the equipment is less than 15 million; 0 points if the relevant materials cannot be provided;

[0109] G 原料生产 Scoring is based on the strength of the production organization. The scoring rules are as follows: 100 points for annual output value ≥ 100 million; 60 points for annual output value ≤ 50 million and less than 100 million; 40 points for annual output value ≤ 10 million and less than 50 million; 10 points for annual output value less than 10 million; 0 points if no relevant materials can be provided;

[0110] H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows:

[0111] Special journal papers, 100 points, usually refer to papers published in the two top international journals "Science" and "Nature". Authoritative core journal papers, 95 points, include papers included in international retrieval systems such as SCIE, EI, ISTP, SSCI, A&HCI, and papers published in Chinese core journals with authoritative influence in China. Important core journal papers, 80 points, refer to papers published in foreign core journals or important Chinese core journals of the same discipline in China. General core journal papers, 75 points, refer to papers published in journals listed in the "National Chinese Core Journals Overview". General public journal papers, 60 points, refer to papers published in journals publicly issued in China with journal numbers "CN", "ISSN" and postal codes. Restricted public journal papers, 45 points, refer to papers published in journals publicly issued in China but subject to distribution restrictions. When an enterprise has multiple paper results in terms of raw materials or products, the highest level score will be selected; if relevant materials cannot be provided, the score will be 0.

[0112] I 研发奖项 / 专利 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0113] I 研发奖项 / 专利 =I 研发奖项 +I 专利

[0114] I 研发奖项 Scoring method:

[0115] 80 points at the national level, including the National Natural Science Award, the National Technological Invention Award, the National Science and Technology Progress Award, the National International Science and Technology Cooperation Award, the National Social Science Fund Project Achievement Award, the Chinese University Humanities and Social Sciences Achievement Award, the National Spark Award, the National Literature and Art Revitalization Award, the National Teaching Achievement Award, etc. 75 points at the provincial and ministerial level, including the Science and Technology Progress Award of various ministries and commissions, the Outstanding Achievement Award of Humanities and Social Sciences or Philosophy and Social Sciences of various ministries and commissions, various national fund awards, the Soft Science Award of the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Outstanding Achievement Award of Scientific Research of Higher Education Institutions of the Ministry of Education, the National Outstanding Achievement Award of Education Science, the National Outstanding Social Science Achievement Award of Youth, the Fok Ying-Tong Scientific Research Outstanding Achievement Award, the Provincial Science and Technology Progress Award, the Provincial Natural Science Award, the Provincial Technological Invention Award, the Provincial Outstanding Achievement Award of Social Sciences, the Provincial Social Science Fund Project Achievement Award, the Provincial Teaching Achievement Award, the Provincial Spark Award, etc. 70 points at the municipal, department, bureau, and bureau level, including the Science and Technology Progress Award of the Provincial Department of Education, the Outstanding Achievement Award of Social Sciences of the Provincial Department of Education, the Outstanding Achievement Award of Education Science Research of the Provincial Department of Education, the Municipal Science and Technology Progress Award, the Municipal Outstanding Achievement Award of Social Sciences, etc. Social Organization Award: 50 points for national organizations among public welfare social organizations, 45 points for local organizations among public welfare social organizations, 10 points for national organizations among for-profit social organizations, and 5 points for local organizations among for-profit social organizations; when an enterprise has multiple achievements in R&D awards, choose the highest level scoring.

[0116] I 专利 Scoring method: 5 points if the company's product has one patent, and the points are added together if the company has multiple patents, with a maximum score of 20 points; if the company cannot provide R&D awards or patents, the score is 0;

[0117] J 配方研发 The scoring rules are as follows:

[0118] The scoring content and scores are as follows: A total of 100 points, and the scoring is based on the strength of the R&D institution: The scoring content and scores are as follows: 100 points if the original value of the equipment is ≥ 30 million; 60 points if the original value of the equipment is 25 million or less and is less than 30 million; 40 points if the original value of the equipment is 15 million or less and is less than 25 million; 10 points if the original value of the equipment is less than 15 million; 0 points if the relevant materials cannot be provided;

[0119] K 配方完整产权 : The ownership of the formula of the enterprise's products is 100 points if it is the registrant; 60 points if it is not the registrant but has a person in charge of quality and safety in the enterprise; 0 points if it has neither person in charge;

[0120] L 团标(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows:

[0121] The scoring content and scores are as follows: Throughout the entire product life cycle, that is, from research and development, production, testing, post-market sales, and any component of raw materials, packaging materials, and design, if it involves innovation of national social group standards, 60 points, local social group standards, 40 points, and 100 points if both are included; if the above materials are not available, the score will be 0.

[0122] The certification method for quality and safety certification includes the following steps:

[0123] It includes four dimensions: safety index, efficacy index, usability index and stability index. The safety score is A, the efficacy score is B, the usability score is C, and the stability score is D. The total quality evaluation score calculation formula is:

[0124] S1=0.5A(0.3C+0.7D)+B

[0125] When any of A, B, C, and D scores 0, the evaluation is terminated and the product is finally evaluated as unqualified; however, according to the "Evaluation Standards for Cosmetic Efficacy Claims", there is no mandatory requirement for efficacy evaluation of products, and when the B value is 0, the subsequent evaluation will continue;

[0126] Security score is A:

[0127] Safety testing is required, and the testing method can be selected from any of the following according to the circumstances: methods specified in relevant national standards, industry standards, and technical specifications of my country, methods specified in relevant foreign laws and regulations or technical standards; methods published in technical guidelines of authoritative organizations, technical institutions, and industry associations at home and abroad; rapid screening methods published in professional academic journals and periodicals.

[0128] Hair products need to be tested for anti-dandruff agents, whitening and sunscreen products need to be tested for sunscreens, hair dye products need to be tested for hair dyes, perfumes and nail polish products need to be tested for plasticizers and banned volatile organic solvents, makeup products need to be tested for colorants, and risk substances should be tested based on the characteristics of the formula. Whitening products need to be tested for hydroquinone, anti-hair loss products need to be tested for minoxidil, perm products need to be tested for thioglycolic acid, oral products need to be tested for triclosan, triclocarban, soluble fluoride, total fluoride, benzalkonium bromide and hard particles, scrub products and toothpaste products need to be tested for plastic microbeads, and film products need to be tested for fluorescent agents.

[0129] The value of A is as follows: when the product is detected to contain ingredients prohibited by regulations, the value of A is 0; when ingredients that do not conform to the label are detected, if the ingredient is an antioxidant, preservative, stabilizer, etc., and the content is lower than the maximum limit allowed by the relevant standards of my country, the value of A is 0.6, otherwise the value of A is 0; if the microbial limit test does not meet the national standards, the value of A is 0; if a suspicious skin reaction occurs in the human skin patch test, the value of A is 0.6, if a weak positive reaction or above occurs, the value of A is 0; in other cases, the value of A is 1; when there are multiple possible values ​​for A, the final value of A is the product of multiple possible values ​​of A, that is, A=A1A2···A n The safety test indicators that need to be tested include five microbial items, element screening, preservatives, hormones, antibiotics, flavors and fragrances, and human skin patch test; if the rapid screening method detects suspicious values ​​or exceeds the standard values, the arbitration method in my country's mandatory national standards and technical specifications will be used for retesting.

[0130] Efficacy score is B:

[0131] Efficacy index testing is required, and the testing method can be selected from one or more of the following combinations according to the situation: human efficacy evaluation test; consumer use test; laboratory evaluation method. Literature or research data can be used as auxiliary supporting materials.

[0132]

[0133]

[0134] The B value is determined as follows: 30 points are assigned when there is reliable human experimental data; 20 points are assigned when there is reliable consumer use test data; when conducting laboratory method evaluation based on an integrated strategy, each module in the integrated strategy is assigned a value according to the weight of evidence, 5 points are assigned to molecular initiation events, 15 points are assigned to key events at the cellular level, 20 points are assigned to key events based on 3D skin models and in vitro tissues, and 5 points are assigned to methods based on animal experimental models with clear mechanisms. Multiple test indicators in each module can be cumulatively assigned, and the total score shall not exceed 30 points; if there are references or research data as supporting materials, 5 points are assigned to each document or data, with a maximum of 10 points; when there are multiple possible values ​​for the B value, the final value of the B value is the sum of multiple possible B values, that is, B=B1+B2+···+B n ; When the same product has multiple efficacy claims, each efficacy claim is scored independently, and then all scores are added together and divided by the number of efficacy claims, that is, Among them, B n is the score for a single efficacy claim, and n is the number of efficacy claims.

[0135] The C value is calculated as follows: the score of each item of usability is 0 to 4 points, and the final C value is obtained by adding up all the scores of the individual items, that is, C = C1 + C2 + ··· + C n ; The test is conducted by professionally trained assessors or 200 test subjects for subjective sensory evaluation. The usability test indicators include product appearance evaluation, odor evaluation, and skin feel evaluation during and after use. The test method is conducted by professionally trained assessors for sensory evaluation; among them, the test indicators for product appearance evaluation include: the texture of the outer packaging material, the pleasantness of the outer packaging pattern design, the beauty of the outer packaging color, the feeling of unsealing the outer packaging material, the portability of the inner packaging packaging, the feeling of unsealing the inner packaging material, the ease of taking out the contents, the controllability of the amount used, the airtightness of the inner packaging material, the pleasantness of the color of the contents, and the uniformity of the paste of the contents; the test indicators for odor evaluation include the odor of the packaging material and the fragrance of the contents; the test indicators for skin feel evaluation during use include lubricity, ductility, and absorbency; the test indicators for skin feel evaluation after use include skin feel, coverage feeling, and retention time.

[0136] Stability testing is required, the stability score is D, and the indicators are shown in the following table:

[0137]

[0138]

[0139]

[0140] The D value is determined as follows: D=XY(75aZ1+25bZ2); wherein X and Y are the quality sensory and physicochemical property scores in the stability assessment. When all the quality sensory or physicochemical property test items meet the corresponding industry standards, X or Y is 1, otherwise it is 0; a and b are constant terms. When the evaluated sample undergoes short-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.6, after medium-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.8, and after long-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 1; Z1 and Z2 are the thermal stability and light stability evaluation result scores, respectively. When the thermal / light stability test is completed, if the corresponding index is still within the standard range and the deviation of all indexes from the indexes before the experiment is within ±5%, Z1 or Z2 is 1, if the deviation is within ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.8, if the deviation exceeds ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.6, and if any one of the indexes is unqualified, Z1 or Z2 is 0.

[0141] Example 2

[0142] like Figure 1 As shown, a method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics includes the following steps:

[0143] (1) Establishment of a cosmetics scientific certification and evaluation system, including the establishment of enterprise certification rules and a certification analysis system:

[0144] Establish enterprise certification rules: including access rules, traceability rules and signature authorization rules. The platform will review the cosmetics companies that intend to join the platform and grant a QR code after the review is passed. The platform will conduct basic procedures and regulations for reviewing cosmetics companies that intend to join the platform according to certain standards. Only cosmetics companies that have already joined the platform can participate in the cosmetics traceability services and grading and authorization services provided by the platform.

[0145] The certification rules for the access rules are as follows: cosmetics companies initiate applications and submit materials in accordance with the access process and access requirements. The platform reviews the materials submitted by them according to the review standards. If they meet the requirements, they will be allowed to enter. If they do not meet the requirements, they will need to resubmit the materials as required. If they do not meet the requirements, the application will be suspended and they will need to reapply and submit the materials. Cosmetics companies must provide materials and information truthfully and ensure the authenticity and validity of the relevant materials and information. If their qualifications or information are false, they will be included in the list of non-honest companies by the platform, and the platform will no longer accept their entry applications.

[0146] The audit items, methods, basis and applicable enterprise types are shown in the table below.

[0147]

[0148] The traceability rules are as follows: the platform collects traceability applications and materials submitted by enterprises, forms an on-site audit team based on product types, verifies the production and processing information of the current batch of cosmetics on-site, and enterprises that meet the requirements and whose information is true are eligible to be granted the traceability code provided by the platform; the materials provided must cover more than 75%, and those that do not meet the required items will be disqualified from signing, and combined with the on-site traceability audit by experts, in addition to the first application for traceability by the enterprise, the products of the later batches will be subject to on-site traceability confirmation at a frequency of no less than 50%;

[0149] Mandatory production and processing information includes raw material supplier audit form, raw material analysis report (COA), raw material technical parameter table (TDS), raw material in and out warehouse form, raw material retention sample + inspection record, packaging material incoming quality control (IQC) inspection report, packaging material in and out warehouse form, retention sample confirmation record (including version confirmation, first piece), material feeding record form, finished product / product inspection information (including original records), finished product release audit form and finished product entry details form;

[0150] Non-essential production and processing information includes material safety data sheet (MSDS), packaging material supplier review form, packaging material disinfection record, production formula confirmation form, semi-finished product production process record, semi-finished product inspection information (including original records), site clearance record (semi-finished product), semi-finished product transfer record, packaging / canning / assembly record and production process inspection quality record.

[0151] The rules for granting the license are as follows: Enterprises need to submit relevant information about their cosmetic products for review. Those that do not meet the requirements or cannot provide the information will be exempted from the licensing qualification; the items that need to be verified, the verification methods and the basis are shown in the table below:

[0152]

[0153] Certification grading system: The platform conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the current batch of cosmetics provided by the applicant enterprise based on the quality and safety certification system and the scientific certification system in Example 1, generates a QR code through the certification traceability system, and grants the current batch of products a label of the corresponding grade, i.e., gold label A, silver label B, bronze label C or gray label D; the platform will not grant a label to cosmetics whose quality evaluation score does not reach 60 points.

[0154] (2) Construction of certification and traceability system, including construction route and system design:

[0155] The construction route includes the following parts:

[0156] The platform is based on the SpringCloud microservice architecture and deployed in the K8s platform environment. It integrates a variety of mainstream open source technologies, such as the open source database MySQL, FastDs, vejs and other technologies, to provide a scalable, reliable and high-performance software platform.

[0157] Routing gateway Spring Cloud2uul; 2uul is the gateway component of the microservice system, dedicated to dynamic routing, filtering, monitoring, elastic scaling and security.

[0158] Service registration and discovery Eureka: Eureka is a service registration and discovery component of a microservice system, providing service registration and discovery functions.

[0159] Network request RestTemplate: Restemplate is a network request framework for accessing the RESTfUIAPI interface.

[0160] Load balancing Ribbon: Ribbon is a load balancing component. Ribbon is a load balancer for service consumers. One is combined with RestTemplae and the other is combined with Feig. Feign integrates Ribbon by default. Declarative call Feign: A simple and convenient tool for calling SpringCloud services, making the JavaHttp client calling process simple.

[0161] Configuration Center Config: Centrally manage configuration files, which can be read from the ConfigServer service or warehouse.

[0162] Fuse Hystrix: Hystrix provides the function of a fuse, which can prevent linkage failures in distributed systems.

[0163] Service Link Tracking Sleuth: Sleuth is a component in Spring Cloud. Its main function is to provide a solution for service link tracking in a distributed system.

[0164] Service monitoring SpringBootAdmin: SpringBootAdmin is used to manage and monitor one or more

[0165] Spring Boot program, use Spring Boot Admin to monitor Spring Cloud microservices.

[0166] Message Bus: Spring Cloud Bus integrates Spring's event handling mechanism with the sending and receiving of message middleware, and can easily connect multiple service nodes connected to message middleware in distributed applications to achieve message intercommunication.

[0167] System design includes the following steps:

[0168] Business architecture: The overall business of this system includes three major sections: platform management application, enterprise application, and public application;

[0169] System architecture: This system architecture design includes client usage, system users, gateways, service application layer, data layer, database storage and operating environment;

[0170] The deployment architecture includes the following parts:

[0171] Access terminal: including PC applications and mobile applications;

[0172] Access flow: terminal device → DNS → Nginx → service → database; the database includes all the enterprise information, evaluation and grading results in step (1), and relevant information can be queried by scanning the granted QR code.

[0173] DNS deployment: Domain name access is resolved to the public network entrance IP through the public network DNS. The intranet uses K8s domain name resolution to perform DNS resolution on the service cluster. When Nginx is a reverse proxy, each service can be accessed evenly through the domain name to play a load balancing role.

[0174] Equilibrium effect;

[0175] Nginx deployment: deploy multiple Nginx for access load balancing to avoid single point of failure;

[0176] MySQL deployment: Deploy through the Master Slave strategy, which can deploy one master node and multiple slave nodes to avoid

[0177] Single point of failure;

[0178] Redis deployment: Deploy multiple nodes through Sentinel and Shard strategy to avoid Redis single point failure.

[0179] Example 3

[0180] Cosmetics company A adopts the cosmetics company certification grading system for grade certification, which includes the following steps:

[0181] (1) Quality and safety certification, score S1;

[0182] The scoring method of the present invention is used for scoring, and the final comprehensive score of A value is 1, the comprehensive score of B item is (50+50) / 2=50 points, the score of C value is 98 points, and the score of D value is 1×1(75×1×1+25×1×1)=100. Based on the above evaluation results, the quality evaluation score S1 of the essence of a certain brand in this embodiment is 99.7 points.

[0183] (2) Scientific certification, score S2:

[0184] About 200 industry experts reviewed the authenticity of scientific research materials, and 20 experts were randomly selected for each product to score the company's products;

[0185] Calculation formula: S2 = 0.1E 原料研发 +0.15F 原料产权 +0.05G 原料生产 +0.3H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) +0.3I 研发奖项 / 专利 +0.06G 配方研发 +0.02K 配方完整产权 +0.02L 团标(原料 / 产品) ;

[0186] The scoring method of the present invention is used to score the essence of cosmetics company A, and the scoring results of each index are E 原料研发 100 points, F 原料产权 G 原料生产 100 points, H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) 80 points, I 研发奖项 / 专利 90 points, G 配方研发 100 points, K 配方完整产权 100 points, L 团标(原料 / 产品) 100 points, the calculated S2 is 91 points.

[0187] (3) Total certification score formula: S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2;

[0188] S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2 = 96.22 points;

[0189] Finally, when 95 < S ≤ 100, the certification level is Gold Standard A level;

[0190] Type A: Brands that can independently master core raw materials, have independent R & D laboratories or invest in, cooperate with joint laboratories to carry out R & D at the raw material end, can achieve independent development from raw materials to formulations, and even production, and are matched with gold color.

[0191] According to the access rules, traceability rules and signature rules of the present invention, the platform audits cosmetics enterprise A, and grants a QR code after passing the audit.

[0192] Example 4

[0193] Cosmetics enterprise B uses the cosmetics enterprise certification and grading system for level certification, including the following steps:

[0194] (1) Conduct quality and safety certification, and the score is S1;

[0195] Using the scoring method of the present invention for scoring, finally the comprehensive score of item A is 1, the comprehensive score of item B is (40 + 40) / 2 = 40 points, the score of item C is 80 points, and the score of item D is 1×1(75×0.8×1 + 25×0.8×1) = 80. Based on the above evaluation results, the quality evaluation score S1 of a certain brand of essence in this example is 80 points.

[0196] (2) Conduct scientific certification, and the score is S2:

[0197] Approximately 200 industry experts review the authenticity of scientific research materials, randomly select 20 experts for each product, and score the enterprise's products;

[0198] Calculation formula; S2 = 0.1E 原料研发 +0.15F 原料产权 +0.05G 原料生产 +0.3H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) +0.3I 研发奖项 / 专利 +0.06G 配方研发 +0.02K 配方完整产权 +0.02L 团标(原料 / 产品) ;

[0199] Using the scoring method of the present invention, score the eye cream of cosmetics enterprise B, and the index scoring results are E 原料研发 100 points, F 原料产权 100 points, G 原料生产 100 points, H 论文发表(原料 / 产品)80 points, I 研发奖项 / 专利 80 points, G 配方研发 40 points, K 配方完整产权 60 points, L 团标(原料 / 产品)4 0 points, and S2 is calculated to be 82.4 points.

[0200] (3) Total certification score formula: S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2;

[0201] S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2 = 80.96 points;

[0202] Finally, 60 < S ≤ 85, and the certification level is bronze label C level;

[0203] Category C: The entrusted factory has considerable formula R & D capabilities, and the R & D results are actually applied to specific products. It is accompanied by copper color.

[0204] According to the access rules, traceability rules and signature authorization rules of the present invention, the platform audits cosmetics enterprise B, and grants a QR code after passing the audit.

[0205] Example 5

[0206] A certain consumer purchased the essence product of cosmetics enterprise A in Example 3 and the eye cream product of cosmetics enterprise B in Example 4. By scanning the QR code on the product, the consumer queried information about the enterprise, product, product formula, test report, evaluation result, grading result, circulation information, etc. in the traceability system of the present invention. The consumer learned the full life cycle content of the product by scanning the code, and the system of the present invention provides a convenient, accurate and authoritative product quality safety and efficacy claim information query service to the society.

[0207] The above-described embodiments are only used to describe the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention. Without departing from the design spirit of the present invention, various deformations and improvements made by those of ordinary skill in the art to the technical solutions of the present invention should fall within the protection scope determined by the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for establishing a cosmetics enterprise certification grading system, characterized by: It includes the following steps: (1) Conduct quality and safety certification, and the score is S1; (2) Conduct scientific certification, and the score is S2. The certification method includes the following steps: For E 原料研发 、F 原料产权 , G 原料生产 , H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) ,I 研发奖项 / 专利 , G 配方研发 , K 配方完整产权 , L 团标(原料 / 产品) The score is scored on 8 dimensions, with a full score of 100 for each dimension; Calculation formula: S2 = 0.1E 原料研发 +0.15F 原料产权 +0.05G 原料生产 +0.3H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) +0.3I 研发奖项 / 专利 +0.06G 配方研发 +0.02K 配方完整产权 +0.02L 团标(原料 / 产品) ; (3) Total certification score formula: S = 0.6S1 + 0.4S2; Finally, the certification of cosmetics enterprises is divided into 4 levels: 95 < S ≤ 100, the certification level is Gold Label A level; 85 < S ≤ 95, the certification level is Silver Label B level; 60 < S ≤ 85, the certification level is Bronze Label C level; 0 ≤ S ≤ 60, the certification level is Gray Label D level.

2. The method for establishing a certification grading system for cosmetics enterprises according to claim 1, wherein: E 原料研发 The scoring rules are as follows: The scoring content includes process extraction Ea, process optimization Eb, safety evaluation Ec, and efficacy evaluation Ed; Rating calculation formula: E 原料研发 =0.25Ea+0.25Eb+0.25Ec+0.25Ed; Among them, the value-taking methods of Ea, Eb, Ec, and Ed are as follows: Process extraction Ea: During the R & D process, compare the types of processes: 25 points for 4 - 5 extraction processes; 10 points for 2 - 3 extraction processes; 5 points for 1 extraction process; 0 points if the extraction process materials cannot be provided; Select the score of one item from the four as the value of Ea; Process optimization Eb: During the R & D process, the number of adjustments and complete data can be provided. 25 points for 15 - 20 times; 20 points for 10 - 14 times; 15 points for 5 - 9 times; 5 points for 1 - 4 times; 0 points if the process optimization materials cannot be provided; Select the score of one item from the five as the value of Eb; Safety evaluation Ec: Safety evaluation indicators, including hormone detection reports, antibiotic detection reports, pesticide residue detection reports, volatile organic solvent detection reports, and risk substance detection reports. Each of the above 5 reports is 5 points. When there are multiple reports, the scores are added together, and the total score is the final value of Ec. 0 points are taken if the above reports cannot be provided; Efficacy evaluation Ed: It is necessary to complete biochemical experiments, cell experiments, or skin model experiments. Among them, biochemical experiments are 5 points, cell experiments are 20 points, and skin model experiments are 25 points. 0 points are taken if the report cannot be provided. Select the score of one item from the four as the value of Ed.

3. The method for establishing a certification grading system for cosmetics enterprises according to claim 1, wherein: F 原料产权 The scoring rules are as follows: The scoring content includes Fa exclusive property rights and Fb co-owned property rights; Scoring calculation formula: F raw material property rights = Fa + Fb; Among them, for exclusive property rights, Fa takes a value of 100 points and Fb takes a value of 0 points; for non-exclusive property rights, Fa takes a value of 0 points and Fb is co-owned property rights, with a total of 60 points. Then, score according to the strength of the R & D institution: The scoring content and scores are as follows: If the original value of the equipment ≥ 30 million, then 60 points; 25 million ≤ the original value of the equipment < 30 million, then 50 points; 15 million ≤ the original value of the equipment < 25 million, then 40 points; The original value of the equipment < 15 million, then 10 points; 0 points are taken if the relevant materials cannot be provided; G 原料生产 Scoring is based on the strength of the production organization. The scoring rules are as follows: 100 points for annual output value ≥ 100 million; 60 points for annual output value ≤ 50 million and less than 100 million; 40 points for annual output value ≤ 10 million and less than 50 million; 10 points for annual output value less than 10 million; 0 points if no relevant materials can be provided; H 论文发表(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows: Special journal papers, 100 points; authoritative core journal papers, 95 points; important core journal papers, 80 points, general core journal papers, 75 points, general public journal papers, 60 points, restricted public journal papers, 45 points; When the enterprise has multiple paper achievements in terms of raw materials or products, select the highest level of one item for scoring; If the relevant materials cannot be provided, the score is taken as 0; I 研发奖项 / 专利 The scoring rules are as follows: I 研发奖项 / 专利 =I 研发奖项 +I 专利 I 研发奖项 Scoring method: 80 points for national level, 75 points for provincial and ministerial level, 70 points for municipal, department, bureau and bureau level, 50 points for national organizations among public welfare social organizations, 45 points for local organizations among public welfare social organizations, 10 points for national organizations among for-profit social organizations, 5 points for local organizations among for-profit social organizations; when an enterprise has multiple achievements in R&D awards, choose the highest level of scoring; I 专利 Scoring method: 5 points if the company's product has one patent, and the points are added together if the company has multiple patents, with a maximum score of 20 points; If no R&D awards or patents can be provided, the score will be 0; J 配方研发 The scoring rules are as follows: The scoring content and scores are as follows: A total of 100 points, and the scoring is based on the strength of the R&D institution: The scoring content and scores are as follows: 100 points if the original value of the equipment is ≥ 30 million; 60 points if the original value of the equipment is 25 million or less and is less than 30 million; 40 points if the original value of the equipment is 15 million or less and is less than 25 million; 10 points if the original value of the equipment is less than 15 million; 0 points if the relevant materials cannot be provided; K 配方完整产权 : The ownership of the formula of the enterprise's products is 100 points if it is the registrant; 60 points if it is not the registrant but has a person in charge of quality and safety in the enterprise; 0 points if it has neither person in charge; L 团标(原料 / 产品) The scoring rules are as follows: The scoring content and scores are as follows: Throughout the entire product life cycle, that is, from research and development, production, testing, post-market sales, and any component of raw materials, packaging materials, and design, if it involves innovation of national social group standards, 60 points, local social group standards, 40 points, and 100 points if both are included; if the above materials are not available, the score will be 0.

4. The cosmetics certification and grading system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The authentication method of the quality and safety authentication comprises the following steps: It includes four dimensions: safety index, efficacy index, usability index and stability index. The safety score is A, the efficacy score is B, the usability score is C, and the stability score is D. The total quality evaluation score calculation formula is: S1=0.5A(0.3C+0.7D)+B When any of A, B, C, and D scores 0, the evaluation is terminated and the product is finally evaluated as unqualified; however, according to the "Evaluation Standards for Cosmetic Efficacy Claims", there is no mandatory requirement for efficacy evaluation of products, and when the B value is 0, the subsequent evaluation will continue; The value of A is as follows: when the product is detected to contain ingredients prohibited by regulations, A is taken as 0; when ingredients that do not conform to the label are detected, if the ingredient is an antioxidant, preservative, stabilizer, etc., and the content is lower than the maximum limit allowed by the relevant standards of my country, A is taken as 0.6, otherwise A is taken as 0; if the microbial limit test does not meet the national standards, A is taken as 0; if a suspicious skin reaction occurs in the human skin patch test, A is taken as 0.6, if a weak positive reaction or above occurs, A is taken as 0; in other cases, A is taken as 1; when there are multiple possible values ​​for A, the final value of A is the product of multiple possible A values, that is, A=A1A2···A n The safety testing indicators include five microorganisms, element screening, preservatives, hormones, antibiotics, flavors and fragrances, and human skin patch test; The B value is determined as follows: 30 points are assigned when there is reliable human experimental data; 20 points are assigned when there is reliable consumer use test data; When evaluating laboratory methods based on an integrated strategy, each module in the integrated strategy is assigned a value based on the weight of evidence. Molecular initiation events are assigned 5 points, key events based on the cellular level are assigned 15 points, key events based on 3D skin models and in vitro tissues are assigned 20 points, and methods based on animal experimental models with clear mechanisms are assigned 5 points. Multiple experimental indicators in each module can be cumulatively assigned, and the total score shall not exceed 30 points. If there are references or research data as supporting materials, each document or data shall be assigned 5 points for the B value, with a maximum of 10 points. When there are multiple possible values ​​for the B value, the final value of the B value is the sum of the multiple possible B values, that is, B = B1 + B2 + ··· + B n ; When the same product has multiple efficacy claims, each efficacy claim is scored independently, and then all scores are added together and divided by the number of efficacy claims, that is, Among them, B n is the score of a single efficacy claim, and n is the number of efficacy claims; The C value is calculated as follows: the score of each item of usability is 0 to 4 points, and the final C value is obtained by adding up all the scores of the individual items, that is, C = C1 + C2 + ··· + C n ; The usability testing indicators include product appearance evaluation, odor evaluation, and skin feel evaluation during and after use. The testing method is performed by professionally trained assessors to conduct sensory evaluation; Among them, the inspection indicators for product appearance evaluation include: the texture of the outer packaging material, the pleasantness of the outer packaging material pattern design, the beauty of the outer packaging material color, the feeling of unsealing the outer packaging material, the portability of the inner packaging material packaging, the feeling of unsealing the inner packaging material, the ease of taking out the contents, the controllability of the amount used, the airtightness of the inner packaging material, the pleasantness of the content color and the uniformity of the content paste; The detection indexes of the odor evaluation include the odor of the packaging material and the fragrance of the contents; The detection indexes of the skin feel evaluation during use include lubricity, extensibility and absorbency; The detection indicators of the skin feel evaluation after use include skin feel, coverage feeling and holding time; The D value is determined as follows: D=XY(75aZ1+25bZ2); wherein X and Y are the quality sensory and physicochemical property scores in the stability assessment. When all the quality sensory or physicochemical property test items meet the corresponding industry standards, X or Y is 1, otherwise it is 0; a and b are constant terms. When the evaluated sample undergoes short-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.6, after medium-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 0.8, and after long-term thermal / light stability evaluation, a / b is 1; Z1 and Z2 are the thermal stability and light stability evaluation result scores, respectively. When the thermal / light stability test is completed, if the corresponding index is still within the standard range and the deviation of all indexes from the indexes before the experiment is within ±5%, Z1 or Z2 is 1, if the deviation is within ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.8, if the deviation exceeds ±10%, Z1 or Z2 is 0.6, and if any one of the indexes is unqualified, Z1 or Z2 is 0.

5. A method for establishing a traceability system for certifying the safety, quality and efficacy evaluation of cosmetics, characterized by: The steps include: (1) Establishment of a cosmetics scientific certification and evaluation system, including the establishment of enterprise certification rules and a certification analysis system: Establish enterprise certification rules: including access rules, traceability rules and signature rules. The platform will review the cosmetics companies that intend to enter the platform and grant a QR code after passing the review; Certification grading system: The platform conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the current batch of cosmetics provided by the applicant enterprise based on the quality and safety certification system and scientific certification system described in any one of claims 1 to 4, generates a QR code through the certification traceability system, and grants the current batch of products a label of the corresponding grade, i.e., gold label A, silver label B, bronze label C or gray label D; the platform will not grant a label to cosmetics with a quality evaluation score of less than 60 points; (2) Construction of a certification and traceability system, in which the database includes all enterprise information, evaluation and grading results in step (1), and relevant information can be queried by scanning the granted QR code.

6. The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying cosmetic safety, quality and efficacy evaluation according to claim 5, characterized in that: The certification rules for the access rules described in step (1) are as follows: cosmetics companies initiate applications and submit materials in accordance with the access process and access requirements. The platform reviews the materials submitted by them according to the review standards. If they meet the requirements, they will be allowed to enter. If they do not meet the requirements, they need to resubmit the materials as required. If they do not meet the requirements, the application will be suspended and they need to resubmit the materials. The review items include business license, cosmetics production license, trademark registration certificate, national cosmetics supervision and random inspection certificate, provincial cosmetics supervision and random inspection certificate, production quality management system documents, qualifications of the person in charge of cosmetics quality and safety, cosmetics quality and safety management system, employee health management system, certification of China Credit that the person has not been listed as a dishonest debtor, a letter of commitment that there has been no illegal or criminal behavior in the past three years, and major public opinions.

7. The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying cosmetic safety, quality and efficacy evaluation according to claim 5, characterized in that: The traceability rules described in step (1) are as follows: the platform collects the traceability application and materials submitted by the enterprise, forms an on-site audit team according to the product type, verifies the production and processing information of the current batch of cosmetics on-site, and the enterprise that meets the requirements and whose information is true is eligible to be granted the traceability code provided by the platform; the materials provided must cover more than 75%, and the enterprise that does not have the necessary items will be disqualified from signing, and combined with the expert on-site traceability audit, except for the enterprise's first application for traceability, the products of the later batches shall be subject to on-site traceability confirmation at a frequency of not less than 50%; the necessary production and processing information includes the raw material supplier review form, raw material analysis report, raw material technical parameter table, raw material in and out warehouse form, raw material retention sample + inspection record, packaging material incoming quality control inspection report, packaging material in and out warehouse form, retention sample confirmation record, material input record form, finished product / product inspection information, finished product release review form and finished product in-warehouse detailed form; Non-essential production and processing information includes raw material safety instructions, packaging material supplier review form, packaging material disinfection record, production formula confirmation form, semi-finished product production process record, semi-finished product inspection information, site clearance record, semi-finished product transfer record, packaging / canning / assembly record and production process inspection quality record.

8. The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying cosmetic safety, quality and efficacy evaluation according to claim 5, characterized in that: The approval rules described in step (1) are as follows: the enterprise needs to submit relevant information about the cosmetic product for review. If it does not meet the requirements or cannot provide it, it will be exempted from the approval qualification; the items that need to be verified include the filing certificate materials of the State Council Drug Supervision and Administration Department, the registration certificate materials of the State Council Drug Supervision and Administration Department, the raw material registration certificate materials, the safety assessment of cosmetic raw materials and products, and the cosmetic label.

9. The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying cosmetic safety, quality and efficacy evaluation according to claim 5, characterized in that: The construction of the certification and traceability system described in step (2) includes the construction route and system design: The construction route includes the following parts: The platform is based on the SpringCloud microservice architecture and deployed in the K8s platform environment. It integrates a variety of mainstream open source technologies, including the open source database MySQL, FastDs, and vejs, to provide a scalable, reliable, and high-performance software platform. Including routing gateway Spring Cloud2uul, service registration and discovery Eureka, network request RestTemplate, load balancing Ribbon, configuration center Config, fuse Hystrix, service link tracking Sleuth, service monitoring SpringBootAdmin, Spring Boot program and message bus Bus.

10. The method for establishing a traceability system for certifying cosmetic safety, quality and efficacy evaluation according to claim 9, characterized in that: The system design includes the following steps: Business architecture: The overall business of this system includes three major sections: platform management application, enterprise application, and public application; System architecture: This system architecture design includes client usage, system users, gateways, service application layer, data layer, database storage and operating environment; The deployment architecture includes the following parts: Access terminal: including PC applications and mobile applications; Access flow: terminal device → DNS → Nginx → service → database; DNS deployment: Domain name access is resolved to the public network entry IP through the public network DNS. The intranet uses K8s domain name resolution to perform DNS resolution on the service cluster. When Nginx is used as a reverse proxy, each service can be evenly accessed through the domain name, which plays a load balancing role. Nginx deployment: deploy multiple Nginx for access load balancing to avoid single point of failure; MySQL deployment: Deploy through the Master Slave strategy, which can deploy one master node and multiple slave nodes to avoid single point failure; Redis deployment: Deploy multiple nodes through Sentinel and Shard strategy to avoid Redis single point failure.

Images