Comprehensive system and method for field management and personnel capability evaluation of constructional engineering

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of engineering management, and discloses a comprehensive system and method for construction engineering site management and personnel ability assessment, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining project condition records, and forming team work data; processing the team work data to form management work data; aggregating the team work data and the management work data to form work basic data; constructing a post value evaluation model according to the historical work basic data and the historical evaluation report, wherein the post value evaluation model is used for representing a mapping relationship among management capability evaluation, work achievement evaluation, copywriting quality evaluation, work result evaluation and post value evaluation; and obtaining target work basic data representing the work content of the to-be-evaluated object in a specified period, and inputting the target work basic data into the post value evaluation model to obtain a post value evaluation report of the to-be-evaluated object. Dynamic quantitative evaluation of post values of constructional engineering managers is realized, and accuracy and timeliness of evaluation are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of engineering management, and in particular to a comprehensive system and method for construction engineering site management and personnel capability assessment. Background Art

[0002] In engineering construction projects, engineering managers are responsible for the implementation of various technical specifications and standards during the construction process. Their professional ability and experience directly affect the quality of the project. Construction safety is the bottom line of engineering construction. Engineering managers need to comprehensively supervise the safety measures, personnel operations and equipment use at the construction site according to relevant safety regulations, promptly discover and correct safety hazards, and prevent accidents. Their safety management and emergency response capabilities are crucial to ensuring construction safety. Therefore, evaluating the work ability of engineering managers is not only helpful in selecting outstanding talents, but also provides an important basis for cultivating potential professionals.

[0003] At present, the ability assessment of engineering management personnel is mainly carried out through communication between the evaluators and the persons being assessed, as well as the review of the work process materials of the project management department. This method has many defects. On the one hand, it is very time-consuming to complete a single individual assessment; on the other hand, the assessment results are greatly affected by the evaluator's own ability and subjective factors, resulting in the assessment results being not objective and fair, and unable to accurately reflect their job value. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention aims to provide a comprehensive system and method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment, which can quickly assess the value of their positions while improving the objectivity and accuracy of the assessment.

[0005] The basic solution provided by the present invention is: a method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment, the method comprising the following steps:

[0006] S100, obtaining project situation records to form team work data, wherein the project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation and work experience situation; processing the team work data to form management work data; aggregating the team work data and the management work data to form basic work data;

[0007] S200, constructing a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, which is used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment;

[0008] S300, obtaining target work basic data representing the work content of the object to be evaluated within a specified period, and inputting it into a pre-built job value evaluation model to obtain a job value evaluation report for the object to be evaluated.

[0009] The present invention is based on a method for construction engineering site management and personnel competence assessment, and also provides a comprehensive system for construction engineering site management and personnel competence assessment; the system comprises:

[0010] Data collection module: used to obtain project situation records and form team work data. The project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incidents and work experience;

[0011] The data processing module is used to process the team work data to form management work data; aggregate the team work data and management work data to form basic work data;

[0012] Model building module, used to build a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, and used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment;

[0013] The job value assessment module is used to obtain the target work basic data representing the work content of the object to be assessed within a specified period, and input it into a pre-built job value assessment model to obtain a job value assessment report for the object to be assessed.

[0014] The working principle and advantages of the present invention are:

[0015] Traditional assessment is conducted by reviewing documents and combining them with scoring after face-to-face communication between the assessor and the assessee. Supervision diaries and daily records of quality and safety checklists are only used as part of the assessment materials. This combination of methods will improve accuracy when the assessors have a high level and sense of responsibility, but it is also easily affected by the subjective factors of the assessors, resulting in reduced accuracy. At the same time, this method is inefficient and costly, sacrificing the speed and versatility of the assessment, and cannot avoid the complexity and time cost of the process. It is not suitable for the assessment of a large number of grassroots employees.

[0016] To solve these problems, this plan proposes a new evaluation method, which aims to deeply explore the data relationship between electronic materials such as project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation, work experience and personnel job value evaluation, and build an evaluation model. It realizes the rapid, objective and accurate evaluation of personnel job value from multiple dimensions with a single file of daily project work records.

[0017] Compared with the existing technology, this solution deeply analyzes the data relationship between project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation, work experience and job value assessment, and constructs an assessment model from multiple angles, so that the assessment covers the entire management process of on-site personnel, ensuring the objectivity of the assessment and improving the accuracy of the assessment; at the same time, this solution can quickly extract the corresponding key information from the basic work data and generate an assessment report. By breaking through the data barriers and time limits between daily work and assessment, the personnel job value assessment can be completed at any time at a speed of seconds without affecting the normal development of daily work, which not only improves the assessment efficiency, but also ensures the timeliness of the assessment. The dynamic and flexible assessment method established by this solution provides a more scientific and reasonable assessment scheme for the job value of various on-site projects in the construction industry. While realizing the automated assessment of the job value of construction site management personnel, it also realizes the standardization of the job value assessment work of on-site personnel. This not only enhances the comprehensive understanding of the job value of personnel, but also provides strong support for project management, which helps to improve the quality and safety of the overall project. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0019] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the structure of a comprehensive system for construction work site management and personnel capability assessment provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] The following is a further detailed description through specific implementation methods:

[0021] Example

[0022] Basically as attached Figure 1 As shown: A method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment, the method comprising the following steps:

[0023] S100, obtaining project situation records to form team work data, wherein the project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation, and work experience situation; processing the team work data to form management work data; aggregating the team work data and the management work data to form basic work data;

[0024] Specifically, the on-site personnel use the system end built by this solution to enter data according to the project situation. The way to process the team work data includes automatically summarizing the main contents of the supervision diary into the overall supervision log of the project department; the superiors can check and modify the supervision diary, supervision log and quality and safety checklist filled out by the on-site personnel. The processing method also includes statistics, statistical calculations of various data, the number of items, and statistical values, such as the number of days of managing a certain construction phase, the number of buildings managed, the number of construction content items, the number of items of quality problems and safety problems, the quantitative data obtained after the analysis of the image credibility and text grammatical error data, the number of modifications to the corresponding work content, the number of construction content records, the number of quality problems and safety problems, etc. Project personnel enter the project overview and quality and safety incidents according to the project situation, and employees enter their work experience when they join the company.

[0025] S200, constructs a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, which is used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment.

[0026] Specifically, the construction method of the evaluation model can be selected according to actual needs, such as: it can be based on supervised model training or unsupervised model training. The specific form of the model can also be determined according to actual conditions, and the embodiments of this specification do not make specific limitations.

[0027] Through model training, we determine the adjustable parameter values ​​that can characterize the changes in mapping relationships with application scenarios, such as the adjustable parameter values ​​of k, p, S1, S2, r, s', w' mentioned below. By adjusting the adjustable parameter values, we change the corresponding management ability assessment value, work performance assessment value, document quality assessment value, and work result assessment value, thereby adjusting their proportion in the job value assessment value.

[0028] The mapping relationship in S200 is to calculate the total value according to the management ability evaluation value, the work result evaluation value and the copywriting quality evaluation value, and calculate the position value evaluation value according to the difference between the total value and the work result evaluation value. It includes the following contents:

[0029] S201, management capability assessment is to construct a proficiency model that characterizes the relationship between building type, construction stage and standard working hours; extract the building type, construction stage and working hours from the target work basic data, compare the standard working hours of the building type and construction stage in the proficiency model, and calculate the individual values ​​of the building type and construction stage; aggregate the individual values ​​of all building types and construction stages to obtain the management capability assessment value.

[0030] In this embodiment, a proficiency model is constructed to characterize the relationship between building type, construction stage and standard working time, as shown in Table 1. This table is based on the empirical data formed in the construction industry and can be adjusted dynamically. The construction stage value h of a single type is obtained by comparing the collected personnel data with the empirical data. i , accumulate all h i Get the total management scope.

[0031] Table 1 Proficiency table of various types of building construction stages

[0032]

[0033]

[0034] The management capability assessment is an overall statistic for the entire career, including the newly added management capability assessment value for this project extracted from the supervision diary and the management capability assessment value for other than this project in the career as shown in the work experience.

[0035] The individual values ​​for a building type and construction stage are calculated as:

[0036] Step 1: Use the following formula to calculate the approximate number of working months for a certain type of construction phase:

[0037]

[0038] Among them, h i is the approximate number of working months of the on-site personnel in a certain type of construction phase; t is the number of working days of the on-site personnel in a certain construction phase of a certain building type.

[0039] In this embodiment, for example, a new employee Zhang San starts working in the foundation construction phase of a residential community on September 1, 2024, and the foundation construction of the house is completed on November 13, 2024. According to the existing algorithm, the number of working days of the employee in the foundation construction phase of the residential community is 74 days. Then the employee's

[0040] Step 2, calculate the individual score: by comparing the number of working months of the personnel in a certain type of construction phase with the preset experience data in the above table, obtain the individual score of the personnel in a certain type of construction phase;

[0041] If h i <e i Then a i =0;

[0042] If e i ≤h i <f i So

[0043] If h i ≥f i So

[0044] Among them, e i The preset entry time for the skill in this construction phase; i The time it takes for the skill to reach the ceiling during the construction phase. i Give the person a single score for a certain construction phase of a certain building type.

[0045] In this embodiment, the h of Zhang San is calculated in the previous step. i =2, according to e i ≤h i <f i , cited Formula, then

[0046]

[0047] Step 3, total individual scores: Calculate the total of all individual scores of the person in this aspect of management ability assessment:

[0048]

[0049] Among them, A is the management ability evaluation value of the person; a i It is the single score of the person in a certain construction stage of a certain building type. In addition, the number of i changes with the number in the model in Table 1.

[0050] In this embodiment, after calculation in step 2, Zhang San a2 = 1, a 18 =3, and the scores of other items are 0, then

[0051] S202, work results evaluation is to extract the number of managed buildings in the filled-in "Supervision Diary", the number of construction content items in the filled-in "Supervision Diary", and the number of quality and safety issues in the filled-in "Quality and Safety Checklist" from the target work basic data, and calculate the work results evaluation value through the following algorithm.

[0052] Step 1: Calculate the score of the Supervision Diary every day, compare the total number of entries in the Supervision Diary and the number of buildings managed every day, and use the comparison results to select the calculation method for the score of the Supervision Diary for that day;

[0053] If j i ≤q i , then b i =0;

[0054] If j i >qi ,So

[0055] Among them, j i is the total number of entries in the supervision diary of the day; q i The number of buildings managed by the person in this project on that day; g i is the number of buildings with no construction content recorded on that day; k is the number of construction content items for a single building that a qualified on-site staff should record every day;

[0056] In this embodiment: Assume that the value of k is 1. If the person manages 3 buildings, and there is no diary for 1 building, and a total of 4 construction contents are written on that day, then j i >q i , 4>3, then

[0057] Step 2: Calculate the score in each "Quality and Safety Checklist", compare the total number of quality and safety issues found each time with the quota of single quality and safety issues, and use the comparison results to select the calculation method for the score of this supervision day.

[0058] If l i ≤p, then

[0059] If l i >p, then

[0060] Among them l i is the total number of quality and safety issues found in the "Quality and Safety Checklist" by the personnel; p is the quota of quality and safety issues that a qualified on-site personnel can usually check at one time; S1 is the weight value of the quality and safety inspection items, and S2 is the number of common quality and safety issues that often occur on construction sites.

[0061] The three adjustable setting values ​​​​p, S1, and S2 will be modified according to actual conditions. For example, if the level of the construction unit is low, the p value will increase; the S1 quota initially formulated by the company is unreasonable and needs to be adjusted; the number of quality and safety common problem items S2 announced by the construction authority changes, etc., so as to dynamically adjust the management capability assessment value according to changes in the application scenarios of this system and improve the accuracy of the assessment.

[0062] In this embodiment: the adjustable setting values ​​are p=4, S1=5, S2=20.

[0063] The total number of quality and safety issues found by the personnel in this "Quality and Safety Checklist" is 3, 3 < 4, then

[0064]

[0065] The total number of quality and safety issues found by the personnel in this "Quality and Safety Checklist" is 5, 5>4, then

[0066]

[0067] Step 3: Sum up individual scores: Build a relationship model that represents the supervision diary, quality and safety checklist, and work performance evaluation, and calculate the sum of the two individual scores of the person in the work performance evaluation:

[0068]

[0069] Among them, B is the work performance evaluation value of the on-site personnel within the specified period; b i is the score of the supervision day on the i-th day; n is the total number of days in the specified cycle; c i is the score of the i-th quality and safety checklist; m is the total number of quality and safety checklist records within the specified period;

[0070] S203, the copywriting quality assessment is to extract the pictures and texts of the work content from the target work basic data, and analyze the picture credibility and text grammatical error data; extract the modification data of the corresponding work content from the target work basic data; and calculate the copywriting quality assessment value based on the picture credibility, text grammatical error data and modification data.

[0071] Specifically, extract pictures and text of the work content, use image recognition technology to identify and compare the similarity, time watermark and other contents of the photos uploaded in the "Supervision Diary" and "Quality and Safety Checklist", and determine whether outdated photos are used to deceive the system. Checking and comparing the time watermarks of photos will help determine whether the pictures were taken on the same day, and further determine whether the management personnel uploaded past pictures and filled in the construction content to deceive the system before arriving at the site to take pictures.

[0072] After checking the text of the construction content, quality problem description, and safety problem description through grammar checking technology, the number of grammatical errors therein is recorded.

[0073] After the "Supervision Diary" is filled out, the superior will pull the construction content of the "Supervision Diary" in the "Supervision Diary". If it is considered that the expression is inappropriate, it may be modified, or if it is filled out incorrectly, it will be deleted as a management work data record.

[0074] After each person fills in the quality and safety issues in the "Quality and Safety Checklist", the superior will modify or delete it during review and record it as management work data.

[0075] Step 1: Check the quality score of the copywriting within the specified period by calculating the following formula:

[0076]

[0077] Among them, C is the copywriting quality assessment value within the specified period of the object to be evaluated; v is the total number of construction content items in the "Supervision Diary" within the specified period; w is the total number of quality and safety issue items in the "Quality and Safety Checklist" within the specified period; x is the total number of modified and deleted items in the construction content within the specified period; y is the total number of modified and deleted items in the quality and safety issues within the specified period; z is the total number of grammatical errors detected by the grammar check system in the construction content within the specified period; u is the total number of grammatical errors detected by the grammar check system in the quality and safety issues within the specified period; r is the copywriting quality coefficient, which can be adjusted dynamically to change the proportion of copywriting quality in the job value.

[0078] In this embodiment: Assume that r=100, there are 423 diary construction content records in the specified period of the personnel, 229 quality and safety issues in the "Quality and Safety Checklist", 198 construction contents are modified or deleted, 115 quality and safety issues are modified and deleted, 21 grammatical errors are found in the construction content by the grammar check system, and 13 grammatical errors are found in the quality and safety issues by the grammar check system.

[0079] The total score of the copywriting quality within the specified period of the person

[0080] Step 2: Calculate the photo quality deduction within the specified period using the following formula:

[0081] D=g+e'+f'

[0082] Among them, D is the photo quality score of the object to be evaluated within the specified period; g is the number of photos without time watermarks within the specified period; e' is the number of photos whose time watermark date does not match the date of the day within the specified period; f' is the number of photos with 100% similarity within the specified period. The photos used to calculate g include the construction content photos in the "Supervision Diary", the quality photos and safety photos in the "Quality and Safety Checklist"; the photos used to calculate e' only check the construction content photos; when calculating f', the construction content photos are only compared with the construction content photos, the quality problem photos are only compared with the quality problem photos, and the safety problem photos are only compared with the safety problem photos.

[0083] In this embodiment: if there are 2 photos without time watermarks in the period specified by the person, the watermark date of 1 photo does not match the date of the day, and the similarity of 2 photos is 100%, then the photo quality deduction D in the period specified by the person is D=g+e'+f'=2+1+2=5.

[0084] Step 3: Calculate the work quality score within the specified period using the following formula

[0085] E=CD

[0086] Among them, E is the total score of work quality within the specified period; C is the total score of copywriting quality within the specified period; D is the deduction for the quality of photos of the person in the specified period.

[0087] S204, work result evaluation is to extract bad data of work content from the target work basic data, the bad data includes the number of accidents and the amount of fines imposed on the company after the accident; compare the amount of fines imposed on the company after the accident with the fine threshold, select the calculation method of the work result evaluation value based on the comparison result, and calculate the work result evaluation value.

[0088] Specifically, it is calculated by the following formula:

[0089] If t'=0 then G=r'×s'

[0090] If w'>t'>0 then G=(r'×s') 2

[0091] If t'≥w' then G=(r'×s') 3

[0092] Among them, F is the total score of quality and safety accidents within the specified period of the object to be evaluated; r' is the number of accidents under the jurisdiction; s' is the accident score, which is a modifiable parameter; t' is the amount of the fine imposed on the company after the accident; w' is the fine threshold, which is a modifiable parameter.

[0093] In this example: s'=5, w'=30,000 yuan, there was one accident in the jurisdiction of the person (r'=1), and he was fined 10,000 yuan (w'=1), so F=(r'×s') 2 =5 2 =25.

[0094] S300, obtaining the target work basic data of the object to be evaluated within the specified period, and inputting the work basic data into the trained job value evaluation model to obtain the job value evaluation report of the object to be evaluated; the evaluation report includes the job value evaluation value and the key information table.

[0095] Among them, the post value assessment value G of the object to be assessed within the specified period is: G = A + B + EF. Among them, A, B, E, and F are calculated according to the corresponding contents in S200. Through the adjustable parameter values ​​in the post value assessment model that characterize the mapping relationship that changes with the application scenario, the management ability assessment value, work achievement assessment value, copywriting quality assessment value, and work result assessment value are determined accordingly, thereby adjusting the proportion of each single assessment value in the post value assessment value.

[0096] Display the key information referenced by the job evaluation value, which is used for later review of whether there are errors in the evaluation, and can also be used to optimize the evaluation system. The key information displayed is shown in Table 2.

[0097] Table 2 Key information table showing the scoring results

[0098]

[0099] S400, adjusting the designated period, obtaining a new capability assessment value of the subject to be assessed, comparing the new capability assessment value with the capability assessment value obtained before the preset period adjustment, and obtaining a comparative assessment report.

[0100] For example, the changing trends of job value assessment values ​​in different months, quarters and years, as well as the changing trends of corresponding key information values, can be used to evaluate the dynamic development of personnel positions by comparing them by time periods, thereby promoting the improvement of personnel's job capabilities.

[0101] like Figure 2 As shown, in order to implement the above-mentioned method for construction project site management and personnel competence assessment, the present solution also provides a comprehensive system for construction project site management and personnel competence assessment; the system comprises:

[0102] Data collection module: used to obtain project situation records and form team work data. The project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incidents and work experience;

[0103] The data processing module is used to process the team work data to form management work data; aggregate the team work data and management work data to form basic work data;

[0104] Model building module, used to build a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, and used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment;

[0105] The job value assessment module is used to obtain the basic work data of the object to be assessed within a specified period, and input the basic work data into a pre-built job value assessment model to obtain a job value assessment report for the object to be assessed.

[0106] The method also includes a self-learning module, which is used to inform the person filling out the work content by means of a message notification when the work content is modified, and to compare and display the different contents before and after the work content is modified. This method is conducive to the filling out personnel to discover their own shortcomings through the self-learning module, and helps the filling out personnel to improve their business capabilities and language expression skills.

[0107] It is understandable that the above system can execute all the processes of the above method, which will not be repeated here. At the same time, the method and system can be applied in the client or server, and the client can be a smart phone, a tablet computer, a smart wearable device (smart watch, virtual reality glasses, virtual reality helmet, etc.), a smart car device and other electronic devices; in addition, the system can be laid out and built through an app.

[0108] The comprehensive system and method for construction project site management and personnel capacity assessment provided in this embodiment deeply analyzes the data relationship between project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation, work experience and job value assessment, and constructs an assessment model from multiple angles, so that the assessment covers the entire management process of on-site personnel, ensures the objectivity of the assessment, and improves the accuracy of the assessment; at the same time, through this solution, the corresponding key information can be quickly extracted from the basic work data and an assessment report can be generated. By breaking through the data barriers and time constraints between daily work and assessment, it is not affected by interference factors on the project site, so that the personnel job value assessment can be completed at any time at a speed of seconds without affecting the normal development of daily work, which not only improves the assessment efficiency, but also ensures the timeliness of the assessment. The dynamic and flexible assessment method established by this solution provides a more scientific and reasonable assessment scheme for the job value of various on-site projects in the construction industry. This not only enhances the comprehensive understanding of the job value of personnel, but also provides strong support for project management, which helps to improve the quality and safety of the overall project.

[0109] The above is only an embodiment of the present invention. The common sense such as the known specific structure and characteristics in the scheme is not described in detail here. The ordinary technicians in the relevant field are aware of all the common technical knowledge in the technical field of the invention before the application date or priority date, can obtain all the existing technologies in the field, and have the ability to apply the conventional experimental means before that date. The ordinary technicians in the relevant field can improve and implement the scheme in combination with their own abilities under the enlightenment given by this application. Some typical known structures or known methods should not become obstacles for the ordinary technicians in the relevant field to implement this application. It should be pointed out that for the technicians in this field, without departing from the structure of the present invention, several deformations and improvements can be made, which should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention, and these will not affect the effect of the implementation of the present invention and the practicality of the patent.

Claims

1. A method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment, characterized in that: The method comprises the following steps: S100, obtaining project situation records to form team work data, wherein the project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incident situation and work experience situation; processing the team work data to form management work data; aggregating the team work data and the management work data to form basic work data; S200, constructing a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, which is used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment; S300, obtaining target work basic data representing the work content of the object to be evaluated within a specified period, and inputting it into a pre-built job value evaluation model to obtain a job value evaluation report for the object to be evaluated.

2. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The mapping relationship in S200 is to calculate the total value according to the management ability evaluation value, the work result evaluation value and the copy quality evaluation value, and calculate the position value evaluation value according to the difference between the total value and the work result evaluation value.

3. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that: Construct a proficiency model that characterizes the relationship between building type, construction stage and standard working hours; extract building type, construction stage and working hours from the target work basic data, compare the standard working hours of the building type and construction stage in the proficiency model, and calculate the single item value of the building type and construction stage; Aggregate the individual values ​​of all building types and construction stages to obtain the management capacity assessment value of the object to be assessed.

4. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that: Construct a relationship model that represents supervision diary, quality and safety checklist and work performance evaluation: Among them, B is the work performance evaluation value of the object to be evaluated within the specified period; b i is the score of the supervision day on the i-th day; n is the total number of days in the specified cycle; c i is the score of the i-th quality and safety checklist; m is the total number of quality and safety checklists in the specified period; The supervision diary and quality and safety checklist data are extracted from the target work basic data, input into the above relationship model, and obtain the work achievement evaluation value of the object to be evaluated.

5. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 4, characterized in that: Compare the total number of entries in the daily supervision diary and the number of buildings managed every day, and use the comparison results to select the method for confirming and calculating the score of the supervision diary for that day; compare the total number of quality and safety problem entries found each time with the total number of standard quality and safety problem entries, and use the comparison results to select the method for confirming and calculating the score of this quality and safety inspection list.

6. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that: Extract pictures and texts of the work content from the target work basic data, and confirm the credibility of the pictures and the grammatical errors of the texts; Extract modification data of corresponding work content from target work basic data; The copy quality assessment value of the object to be evaluated is calculated based on the image credibility, text grammatical error data and modification data.

7. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that: Extract negative data of work content from the basic data of target work, including the number of accidents, the amount of fines imposed on the company after the accident and the fine threshold; compare the amount of fines imposed on the company after the accident with the fine threshold, select the confirmation method of the work result evaluation value based on the comparison result, and calculate the work result evaluation value of the object to be evaluated.

8. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that: Through the adjustable parameter values ​​in the job value evaluation model that characterize the mapping relationship that changes with the application scenario, the proportion of the management ability evaluation value, the work performance evaluation value, the copy quality evaluation value and the work result evaluation value when calculating the job value evaluation value is determined accordingly.

9. The method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further includes S400, adjusting the designated period, obtaining a new job value assessment value of the object to be assessed, comparing the new job value assessment value with the job value assessment value obtained in S300, obtaining a comparative assessment result, and updating the result in the job value assessment report of the object to be assessed.

10. An integrated system for construction site management and personnel competence assessment, characterized in that: Execute the method for construction site management and personnel competence assessment according to any one of claims 1 to 9; the system comprises: Data collection module: used to obtain project situation records and form team work data. The project situation records include project overview, supervision diary, supervision log, quality and safety checklist, quality and safety incidents and work experience; The data processing module is used to process the team work data to form management work data; aggregate the team work data and management work data to form basic work data; Model building module, used to build a job value assessment model based on historical work basic data and historical assessment reports, and used to characterize the mapping relationship between management ability assessment, work performance assessment, document quality assessment, work result assessment and job value assessment; The job value assessment module is used to obtain the target work basic data representing the work content of the object to be assessed within a specified period, and input it into a pre-built job value assessment model to obtain a job value assessment report for the object to be assessed.

Images