Substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system and method

Abstract

The invention provides a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system and method. The system is characterized in that a comprehensive score summarization module is connected with a design evaluation module, an adaptation evaluation module, a construction evaluation module and an acceptance evaluation module; the method comprises the steps of formulating a multi-level evaluation index framework; adopting an expert evaluation method to formulate and screen out an evaluation index framework; performing design evaluation to obtain a total score of design evaluation; performing adaptation assessment to obtain a total score of adaptation assessment; performing construction assessment to obtain a total score of construction assessment; carrying out acceptance assessment to obtain an acceptance assessment total score; evaluating and summarizing to obtain a total score of quality evaluation, and evaluating the engineering design quality according to the condition of the total score of quality evaluation. According to the system and the method, the engineering design quality can be comprehensively and accurately evaluated, comprehensive and reliable data support can be provided for safe construction of the transformer substation and long-term stable operation after investment, and the mastering condition of important projects can be effectively enhanced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of substation civil engineering design quality, and in particular relates to a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system and method. Background Art

[0002] Substation is an indispensable part of the power system. It is the place where voltage and current are transformed, and electric energy is received and distributed. It converts the high-voltage electric energy generated by the power plant into low-voltage electric energy suitable for different users, thus realizing the long-distance transmission and efficient utilization of electric energy. The reasonable construction of the substation has a great impact on its long-term safe use and operation in the future. Usually, quality evaluation is used to determine the reasonable construction of the substation. However, there are many shortcomings in the existing methods for evaluating the design quality of civil engineering of substations, as follows: First, the existing civil engineering design of substations includes design, construction and acceptance, and most of them lack a unified quality evaluation method to evaluate the quality of each stage; Second, the existing methods for evaluating the design quality of civil engineering of substations mostly focus on the evaluation of engineering structure and function, but rarely consider the adaptability of civil engineering of substations to the surrounding natural environment and human environment; Third, the existing methods for evaluating the design quality of civil engineering of substations often require rectification of non-conforming items, and the definition of rectification items and the requirements for rectification are not clear; Fourth, the existing methods for evaluating the design quality of civil engineering of substations make it difficult to see the importance of the project from the evaluation, and the situation of important projects is not well understood. In order to effectively overcome the above shortcomings, it is urgent to provide a new system and method for evaluating the design quality of civil engineering of substations. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of the problems existing in the above-mentioned prior art, the present invention provides a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system and method. The system has a simple structure, can quickly and accurately obtain the total score of the civil engineering design quality evaluation, and can provide reliable technical support for the substation's civil engineering; the method can comprehensively and accurately obtain the evaluation of the engineering design quality, can provide comprehensive and reliable data support for the safe construction of the substation and the long-term stable operation after it is put into use, and can effectively enhance the grasp of important projects.

[0004] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention provides a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system, including a design evaluation module, an adaptation evaluation module, a construction evaluation module, an acceptance evaluation module and a comprehensive score summary module;

[0005] The design evaluation module includes a construction drawing design scoring unit, a civil engineering design scoring unit, a structural design scoring unit, an electrical design scoring unit and a design evaluation score summary unit; the construction drawing design scoring unit is used to record the input construction drawing design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the civil engineering scoring unit is used to record the input civil engineering design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the structural design scoring unit is used to record the input structural design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the electrical design scoring unit is used to record the input electrical design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the design evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the construction drawing design score, the civil engineering design score, the structural design score and the electrical design score to obtain a total design evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0006] The adaptation assessment module includes a natural environment scoring unit, a human environment scoring unit and an adaptation assessment score summary unit; the natural environment scoring unit is used to record the input natural environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the human environment scoring unit is used to record the input human environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the adaptation assessment score summary unit is used to summarize the natural environment score and the human environment score to obtain the total adaptation assessment score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0007] The construction evaluation module includes a construction safety and protection scoring unit, a construction quality scoring unit, a construction cycle scoring unit and a construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction safety and protection scoring unit is used to record the input construction safety and protection score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction quality scoring unit is used to record the input construction quality score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction cycle scoring unit is used to record the input construction cycle score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize the construction safety and protection score, the construction quality score and the construction cycle score to obtain a total construction evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0008] The acceptance evaluation module includes a civil engineering quality acceptance score unit, an electrical installation quality acceptance score unit, a grounding system quality acceptance score unit and an acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the civil engineering quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input civil engineering quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the electrical installation quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input electrical installation quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the grounding system quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input grounding system quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the acceptance evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the civil engineering quality acceptance score, the electrical installation quality acceptance score and the grounding system quality acceptance score to obtain the total acceptance evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0009] The comprehensive score summary module is connected to the design evaluation module, the adaptation evaluation module, the construction evaluation module and the acceptance evaluation module respectively, and is used to summarize and calculate the total design evaluation score, the total adaptation evaluation score, the total construction evaluation score and the total acceptance evaluation score to obtain the total quality evaluation score.

[0010] Furthermore, in order to facilitate real-time viewing of the total quality evaluation score, a display module is also included. The display module is connected to the comprehensive score summary module and is used to receive and display the total quality evaluation score in real time.

[0011] In the present invention, the design evaluation module includes a construction drawing design scoring unit, a civil engineering design scoring unit, a structural design scoring unit, an electrical design scoring unit and a design evaluation score summary unit, which can conveniently record the construction drawing design score, the civil engineering design score, the structural design score and the electrical design score, and can quickly and accurately obtain the total design evaluation score through the design evaluation score summary unit. The adaptation assessment module includes a natural environment scoring unit, a human environment scoring unit and an adaptation assessment score summary unit, so that the adaptation assessment module can conveniently record the natural environment score and the human environment score, and can quickly and accurately obtain the total adaptation assessment score through the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the construction assessment module includes a construction safety and protection scoring unit, a construction quality scoring unit, a construction cycle scoring unit and a construction assessment score summary unit, so that the construction safety and protection score, the construction quality score, and the construction cycle score can be conveniently recorded, and the total construction assessment score can be quickly and accurately obtained through the construction assessment score summary unit; the acceptance assessment module includes a civil engineering quality acceptance scoring unit, an electrical installation quality acceptance scoring unit, a grounding system quality acceptance scoring unit and an acceptance assessment score summary unit, so that the civil engineering quality acceptance score, the electrical installation quality acceptance score, and the grounding system quality acceptance score can be conveniently recorded, and the total acceptance assessment score can be quickly and accurately obtained through the acceptance assessment score summary unit; through the setting of the comprehensive score summary module, it is convenient to quickly and accurately obtain the total quality evaluation score according to the total design assessment score, the total adaptation assessment score, the total construction assessment score and the total acceptance assessment score.

[0012] The system has a simple structure and can quickly and accurately obtain the total score of the civil engineering design quality assessment, and can provide reliable technical support for the civil engineering of the substation.

[0013] The present invention also provides a method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project, which uses a substation civil engineering project design quality evaluation system and includes the following steps:

[0014] Step 1: Develop a multi-level evaluation indicator framework; use expert evaluation method to develop and screen the evaluation indicator framework, so that the evaluation indicator framework is divided into design evaluation stage, adaptation evaluation stage, construction evaluation stage and acceptance evaluation stage;

[0015] Step 2: Conduct design evaluation;

[0016] Based on expert experience and actual engineering conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the design evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the design evaluation stage are construction drawing design, civil engineering design, structural design and electrical design; the multiple second-level indicators of construction drawing design are regulation implementation, document implementation, design progress, standard process requirements, design quality problem prevention and control, construction drawing budget and design document depth; the multiple second-level indicators of civil engineering design are infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill; the multiple second-level indicators of structural design are building structure and equipment support structure; the multiple second-level indicators of electrical design are cable wiring and protection equipment modeling;

[0017] Evaluate the construction drawing design, civil engineering design, structural design and electrical design; have multiple experts score the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on the actual situation, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average scores of the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total design evaluation score;

[0018] Step 3: Conduct an adaptation assessment;

[0019] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the adaptation assessment stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into one or more second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the adaptation assessment stage are natural environment and human environment; the multiple second-level indicators of the natural environment are climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics; one second-level indicator of the human environment is the human environment situation;

[0020] Assess the natural and human environment; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of adaptation assessment;

[0021] Step 4: Conduct construction assessment;

[0022] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the construction evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of construction evaluation are construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; the multiple second-level indicators of construction safety and protection are personnel safety and environmental safety; the multiple second-level indicators of construction quality are material quality and construction technology; the multiple second-level indicators of the construction period are construction plan and construction adjustment;

[0023] Evaluate construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total construction evaluation score;

[0024] Step 5: Conduct acceptance evaluation;

[0025] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the acceptance and evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators for acceptance and evaluation are civil engineering quality acceptance, electrical installation quality acceptance and grounding system quality acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for civil engineering quality acceptance are infrastructure acceptance, building structure acceptance and equipment support structure acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for electrical installation quality acceptance are equipment installation and commissioning acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for grounding system quality acceptance are grounding resistance and grounding quality;

[0026] Evaluate the quality acceptance of civil engineering, electrical installation and grounding system; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of the acceptance evaluation;

[0027] Step 6: Conduct evaluation summary;

[0028] The total score of design evaluation, adaptation evaluation, construction evaluation and acceptance evaluation is summarized to obtain the total score of quality evaluation, and the engineering design quality is evaluated based on the total score of quality evaluation.

[0029] As a preferred embodiment, in step 2, when evaluating the construction drawing design indicators, the implementation of regulations, the implementation of documents, the design progress, standard process requirements, the prevention and control of design quality problems, the construction drawing budget and the depth of design documents are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the implementation of regulations, the scores are given based on the implementation of policies, regulations, procedures and standards; when evaluating the implementation of documents, the scores are given based on the implementation of the preliminary design approval documents; when evaluating the design progress, the scores are given based on the submission time of the materials before the preliminary review of the construction drawings and the submission time of the closing documents after the completion of the construction drawing review; when evaluating the standard process requirements, the scores are given based on the use of non-enterprise standard processes; when evaluating the prevention and control of design quality problems, the scores are given based on the list of key technologies for design quality control of power transmission and transformation projects; when evaluating the construction drawing budget, the scores are given based on the design budget cost of the new project and the delivery of the construction drawings; when evaluating the depth of the design documents, the scores are given using a deduction system;

[0030] When evaluating the civil engineering design indicators, the infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the infrastructure, the scale and demand of the substation are evaluated, whether the land area within the wall meets the normal operation and future expansion of the substation, and whether the layout of the main building structure of the main control building and the distribution room is reasonable and whether the size meets the operation and maintenance requirements of the equipment layout; when evaluating the engineering earthwork, the score is given based on the excavation volume, excavation depth and rationality of the excavation method of the earthwork; when evaluating the rockfill, the score is given based on the quality of the backfill material, the safety and reliability of the structure, whether the rockfill method is appropriate, and the stability of the foundation after backfilling;

[0031] When evaluating the structural design indicators, the building structure and equipment support structure are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the building structure, the score is given based on whether the structural form of the building structure meets the functional requirements of the substation, the geological survey report and the bearing capacity of the foundation, whether the design has a suitable foundation form, and whether the building has sufficient stability on the foundation; when evaluating the equipment support structure, the score is given based on whether the design of the equipment foundation meets the weight, size and operation requirements of the equipment, whether the equipment has sufficient stability and safety, whether the material selection, structural form and connection method of the structure are appropriate, and whether the structure can support the equipment and withstand various loads;

[0032] When evaluating electrical design indicators, the cable wiring and protection equipment selection are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating cable wiring, scores are given based on the rationality of the cable wiring path, conflicts with other facilities, whether the cables can operate safely, whether the cable protection measures are in place, and whether the cables can operate stably and long-term; when evaluating the shape of protection equipment, scores are given based on the type and operating requirements of the electrical equipment, whether the selected protection equipment is appropriate, the location of the protection equipment and the rationality of the vertical beams, and whether the electrical equipment can operate safely.

[0033] As a preferred embodiment, in step 3, when evaluating the natural environment indicators, the climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; the climate characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the local climate characteristics of the substation site can ensure that the service life of the substation reaches the expected situation; the address conditions are evaluated to determine whether the soil bearing capacity, groundwater level and earthquake intensity of the substation site can ensure that the substation will not be damaged due to geological problems; when evaluating the hydrological characteristics, the hydrological environment around the substation is evaluated to determine whether the substation will be affected by natural disasters such as floods and waterlogging.

[0034] When evaluating the human environment indicators, the human environment conditions are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the human environment conditions, scores are given based on whether the site selection and construction of the substation conform to the overall layout of the urban planning, whether the operation of the substation will cause trouble to residents' lives, and whether the substation will affect the surrounding historical and cultural cities or scenic spots.

[0035] As a preferred embodiment, in step 4, when evaluating the construction safety and protection indicators, personnel safety and environmental safety are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating personnel safety, the scores are given based on whether the construction workers wear personal protective equipment correctly, whether the construction workers have received necessary safety training, and whether they understand and comply with safety operating procedures; when evaluating environmental safety, the scores are given based on whether there are obvious safety warning signs, whether the construction workers and visitors can identify and comply with safety regulations, whether there are sufficient fire-fighting facilities, whether their effectiveness can be checked regularly, whether there are unobstructed safety passages and emergency evacuation routes at the construction site, and whether they can be evacuated quickly in an emergency;

[0036] When evaluating construction quality indicators, the material quality and construction process are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating material quality, the scores are based on whether the quality of the raw materials entering the construction site meets the national standards and design requirements, whether the storage location of the raw materials is arranged reasonably, and whether the materials can be kept intact before use. When evaluating construction technology, the scores are based on whether the flatness, verticality, and size of the template meet the requirements, whether the template is installed firmly and accurately, whether the specifications, quantity, location, and connection method of the steel bars meet the design requirements, whether the mix ratio, pouring speed, and vibration method of the concrete are appropriate, and whether the quality of the concrete is uniform and free of defects.

[0037] When evaluating the construction cycle indicators, the construction plan and construction adjustments are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the construction plan, scores are given based on whether a detailed construction schedule has been formulated, whether the tasks and time nodes of each stage are clearly defined, whether the construction progress is monitored and evaluated regularly, and whether the construction plan can be adjusted in time to deal with various uncertainties. When evaluating the construction adjustment, scores are given based on whether timely remedial measures can be taken to deal with delays in the construction period, and whether the overall construction period can be guaranteed not to be affected.

[0038] As a preferred embodiment, in step five, when evaluating the quality acceptance indicators of civil engineering projects, the acceptance of infrastructure, building structure and equipment support structure are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the acceptance of infrastructure, the stability, height and material of the wall meet the design requirements, whether there are cracks or inclinations, whether the width, flatness and drainage of the road meet the requirements of vehicle traffic and personnel safety, whether the drainage facilities are unobstructed, and whether the accumulated water can be effectively removed. When evaluating the acceptance of building structure, the building structure form, foundation bearing capacity and foundation form meet the design requirements, whether there are no quality problems, and whether the structural safety of the building meets the design requirements under professional testing methods. When evaluating the acceptance of equipment support structure, the size, position and elevation of the equipment foundation are accurate, whether the stability and bearing capacity of the foundation meet the equipment requirements, and whether the stability, rigidity and safety of the structure meet the weight of the supporting equipment and the dynamic load during operation.

[0039] When evaluating the electrical installation quality acceptance indicators, the equipment installation and commissioning acceptance are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the equipment installation, the points are given based on whether the installation position, fixing method, and wiring of the electrical equipment meet the design requirements, and whether the performance of the equipment is intact. When evaluating the commissioning acceptance, the points are given based on whether the various functions and parameters of the electrical equipment are normal during commissioning, whether the equipment can operate normally and meet the design requirements; whether the protection device is set according to the design requirements, and whether the protection device can timely and accurately cut off the fault circuit when performing simulated fault tests;

[0040] When evaluating the grounding system quality acceptance indicators, the grounding resistance and reception quality are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the grounding resistance, the grounding resistance value of the grounding system is measured using professional instruments, and scores are given based on whether it complies with national standards and design requirements. When evaluating the grounding quality, scores are given based on whether the material of the grounding body and the construction quality of the grounding device meet the requirements, and whether they meet the needs for long-term stable operation of the grounding system.

[0041] In the design evaluation stage, the present invention evaluates the civil engineering design index, structural design index and electrical design collaboratively, and performs quality evaluation on infrastructure, engineering earthwork, rockfill, building structure, equipment support structure and electrical design collaboratively according to the established scoring rules; in the construction evaluation stage, the construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period are evaluated, and the safety protection of construction personnel, construction site environmental safety, material quality, construction process and construction period are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; in the acceptance evaluation stage, the civil engineering quality, electrical installation quality and grounding system quality acceptance are evaluated, and the infrastructure acceptance, building structure acceptance, equipment support structure acceptance, electrical equipment installation and commissioning, protection device acceptance and grounding system quality acceptance are evaluated according to the established scoring rules, and the unified quality evaluation method can be used to complete the quality evaluation of the design, construction and acceptance of the substation civil engineering design. On this basis, the adaptability evaluation of the substation is creatively added, and the climate characteristics, geological conditions, hydrological characteristics and human environment are evaluated according to the established scoring rules, and the adaptability of the substation civil engineering to the surrounding natural environment and human environment is fully considered.

[0042] This method uses expert experience and actual conditions to divide each stage into multiple first-level indicators, and further divides each indicator into multiple second-level indicators. It comprehensively considers the evaluation details of each stage, and can comprehensively and accurately obtain the evaluation of engineering design quality. It can provide comprehensive and reliable data support for the safe construction of substations and long-term stable operation after commissioning, and can effectively enhance the grasp of important projects. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0043] Figure 1 is a flow chart of the present invention;

[0044] Figure 2 It is a quality evaluation diagram of the design evaluation stage in the present invention;

[0045] Figure 3 It is a specific evaluation basis diagram of the depth of the design file in the present invention;

[0046] Figure 4 is a quality evaluation diagram of the adaptation evaluation stage in the present invention;

[0047] Figure 5 It is a quality evaluation diagram of the construction evaluation stage in the present invention;

[0048] Figure 6 It is a quality evaluation diagram of the acceptance stage in the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0049] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0050] like Figures 1 to 6 As shown, the present invention provides a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system, including a design evaluation module, an adaptation evaluation module, a construction evaluation module, an acceptance evaluation module and a comprehensive score summary module;

[0051] The design evaluation module includes a construction drawing design scoring unit, a civil engineering design scoring unit, a structural design scoring unit, an electrical design scoring unit and a design evaluation score summary unit; the construction drawing design scoring unit is used to record the input construction drawing design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the civil engineering scoring unit is used to record the input civil engineering design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the structural design scoring unit is used to record the input structural design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the electrical design scoring unit is used to record the input electrical design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; the design evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the construction drawing design score, the civil engineering design score, the structural design score and the electrical design score to obtain a total design evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0052] The adaptation assessment module includes a natural environment scoring unit, a human environment scoring unit and an adaptation assessment score summary unit; the natural environment scoring unit is used to record the input natural environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the human environment scoring unit is used to record the input human environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the adaptation assessment score summary unit is used to summarize the natural environment score and the human environment score to obtain the total adaptation assessment score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0053] The construction evaluation module includes a construction safety and protection scoring unit, a construction quality scoring unit, a construction cycle scoring unit and a construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction safety and protection scoring unit is used to record the input construction safety and protection score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction quality scoring unit is used to record the input construction quality score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction cycle scoring unit is used to record the input construction cycle score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize the construction safety and protection score, the construction quality score and the construction cycle score to obtain a total construction evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0054] The acceptance evaluation module includes a civil engineering quality acceptance score unit, an electrical installation quality acceptance score unit, a grounding system quality acceptance score unit and an acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the civil engineering quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input civil engineering quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the electrical installation quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input electrical installation quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the grounding system quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input grounding system quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the acceptance evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the civil engineering quality acceptance score, the electrical installation quality acceptance score and the grounding system quality acceptance score to obtain the total acceptance evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module;

[0055] The comprehensive score summary module is connected to the design evaluation module, the adaptation evaluation module, the construction evaluation module and the acceptance evaluation module respectively, and is used to summarize and calculate the total design evaluation score, the total adaptation evaluation score, the total construction evaluation score and the total acceptance evaluation score to obtain the total quality evaluation score.

[0056] In order to facilitate real-time viewing of the total quality evaluation score, a display module is also included. The display module is connected to the comprehensive score summary module and is used to receive and display the total quality evaluation score in real time.

[0057] In the present invention, the design evaluation module includes a construction drawing design scoring unit, a civil engineering design scoring unit, a structural design scoring unit, an electrical design scoring unit and a design evaluation score summary unit, which can conveniently record the construction drawing design score, the civil engineering design score, the structural design score and the electrical design score, and can quickly and accurately obtain the total design evaluation score through the design evaluation score summary unit. The adaptation assessment module includes a natural environment scoring unit, a human environment scoring unit and an adaptation assessment score summary unit, so that the adaptation assessment module can conveniently record the natural environment score and the human environment score, and can quickly and accurately obtain the total adaptation assessment score through the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the construction assessment module includes a construction safety and protection scoring unit, a construction quality scoring unit, a construction cycle scoring unit and a construction assessment score summary unit, so that the construction safety and protection score, the construction quality score, and the construction cycle score can be conveniently recorded, and the total construction assessment score can be quickly and accurately obtained through the construction assessment score summary unit; the acceptance assessment module includes a civil engineering quality acceptance scoring unit, an electrical installation quality acceptance scoring unit, a grounding system quality acceptance scoring unit and an acceptance assessment score summary unit, so that the civil engineering quality acceptance score, the electrical installation quality acceptance score, and the grounding system quality acceptance score can be conveniently recorded, and the total acceptance assessment score can be quickly and accurately obtained through the acceptance assessment score summary unit; through the setting of the comprehensive score summary module, it is convenient to quickly and accurately obtain the total quality evaluation score according to the total design assessment score, the total adaptation assessment score, the total construction assessment score and the total acceptance assessment score.

[0058] The system has a simple structure and can quickly and accurately obtain the total score of the civil engineering design quality assessment, and can provide reliable technical support for the civil engineering of the substation.

[0059] The present invention also provides a method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project, which uses a substation civil engineering project design quality evaluation system and includes the following steps:

[0060] Step 1: Develop a multi-level evaluation indicator framework; use expert evaluation method to develop and screen the evaluation indicator framework, so that the evaluation indicator framework is divided into design evaluation stage, adaptation evaluation stage, construction evaluation stage and acceptance evaluation stage;

[0061] Step 2: Conduct design evaluation;

[0062] Based on expert experience and actual engineering conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the design evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the design evaluation stage are construction drawing design, civil engineering design, structural design and electrical design; the multiple second-level indicators of construction drawing design are regulation implementation, document implementation, design progress, standard process requirements, design quality problem prevention and control, construction drawing budget and design document depth; the multiple second-level indicators of civil engineering design are infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill; the multiple second-level indicators of structural design are building structure and equipment support structure; the multiple second-level indicators of electrical design are cable wiring and protection equipment modeling;

[0063] Evaluate the construction drawing design, civil engineering design, structural design and electrical design; have multiple experts score the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on the actual situation, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average scores of the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total design evaluation score;

[0064] Step 3: Conduct an adaptation assessment;

[0065] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the adaptation assessment stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into one or more second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the adaptation assessment stage are natural environment and human environment; the multiple second-level indicators of the natural environment are climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics; one second-level indicator of the human environment is the human environment situation;

[0066] Assess the natural and human environment; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of adaptation assessment;

[0067] Step 4: Conduct construction assessment;

[0068] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the construction evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of construction evaluation are construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; the multiple second-level indicators of construction safety and protection are personnel safety and environmental safety; the multiple second-level indicators of construction quality are material quality and construction technology; the multiple second-level indicators of the construction period are construction plan and construction adjustment;

[0069] Evaluate construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total construction evaluation score;

[0070] Step 5: Conduct acceptance evaluation;

[0071] Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the acceptance and evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators for acceptance and evaluation are civil engineering quality acceptance, electrical installation quality acceptance and grounding system quality acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for civil engineering quality acceptance are infrastructure acceptance, building structure acceptance and equipment support structure acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for electrical installation quality acceptance are equipment installation and commissioning acceptance; the multiple second-level indicators for grounding system quality acceptance are grounding resistance and grounding quality;

[0072] Evaluate the quality acceptance of civil engineering, electrical installation and grounding system; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of the acceptance evaluation;

[0073] Step 6: Conduct evaluation summary;

[0074] The total score of design evaluation, adaptation evaluation, construction evaluation and acceptance evaluation is summarized to obtain the total score of quality evaluation, and the engineering design quality is evaluated based on the total score of quality evaluation.

[0075] As a preferred embodiment, in step 2, when evaluating the construction drawing design indicators, the implementation of regulations, the implementation of documents, the design progress, standard process requirements, the prevention and control of design quality problems, the construction drawing budget and the depth of design documents are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the implementation of regulations, the scores are given based on the implementation of policies, regulations, procedures and standards; when evaluating the implementation of documents, the scores are given based on the implementation of the preliminary design approval documents; when evaluating the design progress, the scores are given based on the submission time of the materials before the preliminary review of the construction drawings and the submission time of the closing documents after the completion of the construction drawing review; when evaluating the standard process requirements, the scores are given based on the use of non-enterprise standard processes; when evaluating the prevention and control of design quality problems, the scores are given based on the list of key technologies for design quality control of power transmission and transformation projects; when evaluating the construction drawing budget, the scores are given based on the design budget cost of the new project and the delivery of the construction drawings; when evaluating the depth of the design documents, the scores are given using a deduction system;

[0076] When evaluating the civil engineering design indicators, the infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the infrastructure, the scale and demand of the substation are evaluated, whether the land area within the wall meets the normal operation and future expansion of the substation, and whether the layout of the main building structure of the main control building and the distribution room is reasonable and whether the size meets the operation and maintenance requirements of the equipment layout; when evaluating the engineering earthwork, the score is given based on the excavation volume, excavation depth and rationality of the excavation method of the earthwork; when evaluating the rockfill, the score is given based on the quality of the backfill material, the safety and reliability of the structure, whether the rockfill method is appropriate, and the stability of the foundation after backfilling;

[0077] When evaluating the structural design indicators, the building structure and equipment support structure are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the building structure, the score is given based on whether the structural form of the building structure meets the functional requirements of the substation, the geological survey report and the bearing capacity of the foundation, whether the design has a suitable foundation form, and whether the building has sufficient stability on the foundation; when evaluating the equipment support structure, the score is given based on whether the design of the equipment foundation meets the weight, size and operation requirements of the equipment, whether the equipment has sufficient stability and safety, whether the material selection, structural form and connection method of the structure are appropriate, and whether the structure can support the equipment and withstand various loads;

[0078] When evaluating electrical design indicators, the cable wiring and protection equipment selection are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating cable wiring, scores are given based on the rationality of the cable wiring path, conflicts with other facilities, whether the cables can operate safely, whether the cable protection measures are in place, and whether the cables can operate stably and long-term; when evaluating the shape of protection equipment, scores are given based on the type and operating requirements of the electrical equipment, whether the selected protection equipment is appropriate, the location of the protection equipment and the rationality of the vertical beams, and whether the electrical equipment can operate safely.

[0079] As a preferred embodiment, in step 3, when evaluating the natural environment indicators, the climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; the climate characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the local climate characteristics of the substation site can ensure that the service life of the substation reaches the expected situation; the address conditions are evaluated to determine whether the soil bearing capacity, groundwater level and earthquake intensity of the substation site can ensure that the substation will not be damaged due to geological problems; when evaluating the hydrological characteristics, the hydrological environment around the substation is evaluated to determine whether the substation will be affected by natural disasters such as floods and waterlogging.

[0080] When evaluating the human environment indicators, the human environment conditions are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the human environment conditions, scores are given based on whether the site selection and construction of the substation conform to the overall layout of the urban planning, whether the operation of the substation will cause trouble to residents' lives, and whether the substation will affect the surrounding historical and cultural cities or scenic spots.

[0081] As a preferred embodiment, in step 4, when evaluating the construction safety and protection indicators, personnel safety and environmental safety are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating personnel safety, the scores are given based on whether the construction workers wear personal protective equipment correctly, whether the construction workers have received necessary safety training, and whether they understand and comply with safety operating procedures; when evaluating environmental safety, the scores are given based on whether there are obvious safety warning signs, whether the construction workers and visitors can identify and comply with safety regulations, whether there are sufficient fire-fighting facilities, whether their effectiveness can be checked regularly, whether there are unobstructed safety passages and emergency evacuation routes at the construction site, and whether they can be evacuated quickly in an emergency;

[0082] When evaluating construction quality indicators, the material quality and construction process are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating material quality, the scores are based on whether the quality of the raw materials entering the construction site meets the national standards and design requirements, whether the storage location of the raw materials is arranged reasonably, and whether the materials can be kept intact before use. When evaluating construction technology, the scores are based on whether the flatness, verticality, and size of the template meet the requirements, whether the template is installed firmly and accurately, whether the specifications, quantity, location, and connection method of the steel bars meet the design requirements, whether the mix ratio, pouring speed, and vibration method of the concrete are appropriate, and whether the quality of the concrete is uniform and free of defects.

[0083] When evaluating the construction cycle indicators, the construction plan and construction adjustments are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the construction plan, scores are given based on whether a detailed construction schedule has been formulated, whether the tasks and time nodes of each stage are clearly defined, whether the construction progress is monitored and evaluated regularly, and whether the construction plan can be adjusted in time to deal with various uncertainties. When evaluating the construction adjustment, scores are given based on whether timely remedial measures can be taken to deal with delays in the construction period, and whether the overall construction period can be guaranteed not to be affected.

[0084] As a preferred embodiment, in step five, when evaluating the quality acceptance indicators of civil engineering projects, the acceptance of infrastructure, building structure and equipment support structure are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the acceptance of infrastructure, the stability, height and material of the wall meet the design requirements, whether there are cracks or inclinations, whether the width, flatness and drainage of the road meet the requirements of vehicle traffic and personnel safety, whether the drainage facilities are unobstructed, and whether the accumulated water can be effectively removed. When evaluating the acceptance of building structure, the building structure form, foundation bearing capacity and foundation form meet the design requirements, whether there are no quality problems, and whether the structural safety of the building meets the design requirements under professional testing methods. When evaluating the acceptance of equipment support structure, the size, position and elevation of the equipment foundation are accurate, whether the stability and bearing capacity of the foundation meet the equipment requirements, and whether the stability, rigidity and safety of the structure meet the weight of the supporting equipment and the dynamic load during operation.

[0085] When evaluating the electrical installation quality acceptance indicators, the equipment installation and commissioning acceptance are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the equipment installation, the points are given based on whether the installation position, fixing method, and wiring of the electrical equipment meet the design requirements, and whether the performance of the equipment is intact. When evaluating the commissioning acceptance, the points are given based on whether the various functions and parameters of the electrical equipment are normal during commissioning, whether the equipment can operate normally and meet the design requirements; whether the protection device is set according to the design requirements, and whether the protection device can timely and accurately cut off the fault circuit when performing simulated fault tests;

[0086] When evaluating the grounding system quality acceptance indicators, the grounding resistance and reception quality are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the grounding resistance, the grounding resistance value of the grounding system is measured using professional instruments, and scores are given based on whether it complies with national standards and design requirements. When evaluating the grounding quality, scores are given based on whether the material of the grounding body and the construction quality of the grounding device meet the requirements, and whether they meet the needs for long-term stable operation of the grounding system.

[0087] As a preferred method, each parameter of each project is evaluated according to the established scoring rules. In the evaluation of each parameter, the judgment is made according to the content of the established standard. If it meets the content of the standard, the evaluation is qualified. The full score of each parameter is 10 points, and the score is (qualified number / total number)*10. The score of 10-7.5 (inclusive) is recorded as A, 7.5-5 (inclusive) is recorded as B, and 5-0 is recorded as C. A grade requires continuous improvement, B grade requires rectification within a time limit, and C grade requires immediate rectification; according to the actual situation of each parameter in each project, weights are assigned to each parameter in the early stage of the evaluation, and the score is combined with the assigned weight to obtain a weighted result. The importance of the project parameters and the current situation are analyzed according to the weighted result; finally, the final result of the parameter is obtained by combining the rating and weighted results. The result is passed or failed, and the relevant quality records are archived and preserved, including construction drawings, design changes, construction logs, quality inspection reports, etc. According to the quality evaluation records, the design quality of the substation civil engineering is analyzed in stages and the results are summarized.

[0088] In the design evaluation stage, the present invention evaluates the civil engineering design index, structural design index and electrical design collaboratively, and performs quality evaluation on infrastructure, engineering earthwork, rockfill, building structure, equipment support structure and electrical design collaboratively according to the established scoring rules; in the construction evaluation stage, the construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period are evaluated, and the safety protection of construction personnel, construction site environmental safety, material quality, construction process and construction period are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; in the acceptance evaluation stage, the civil engineering quality, electrical installation quality and grounding system quality acceptance are evaluated, and the infrastructure acceptance, building structure acceptance, equipment support structure acceptance, electrical equipment installation and commissioning, protection device acceptance and grounding system quality acceptance are evaluated according to the established scoring rules, and the unified quality evaluation method can be used to complete the quality evaluation of the design, construction and acceptance of the substation civil engineering design. On this basis, the adaptability evaluation of the substation is creatively added, and the climate characteristics, geological conditions, hydrological characteristics and human environment are evaluated according to the established scoring rules, and the adaptability of the substation civil engineering to the surrounding natural environment and human environment is fully considered.

[0089] This method uses expert experience and actual conditions to divide each stage into multiple first-level indicators, and further divides each indicator into multiple second-level indicators. It comprehensively considers the evaluation details of each stage, and can comprehensively and accurately obtain the evaluation of engineering design quality. It can provide comprehensive and reliable data support for the safe construction of substations and long-term stable operation after commissioning, and can effectively enhance the grasp of important projects.

Claims

1. A substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system, characterized in that: It includes design assessment module, adaptation assessment module, construction assessment module, acceptance assessment module and comprehensive score summary module; The design evaluation module includes a construction drawing design scoring unit, a civil engineering design scoring unit, a structural design scoring unit, an electrical design scoring unit and a design evaluation score summary unit; the construction drawing design scoring unit is used to record the input construction drawing design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; The civil engineering scoring unit is used to record the input civil engineering design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; The structural design scoring unit is used to record the input structural design score and send it to the design evaluation score summary unit; The electrical design scoring unit records the input electrical design scores and sends them to the design evaluation score summary unit; The design evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the construction drawing design score, civil engineering design score, structural design score and electrical design score to obtain a total design evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module; The adaptation assessment module includes a natural environment scoring unit, a human environment scoring unit and an adaptation assessment score summary unit; the natural environment scoring unit is used to record the input natural environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the human environment scoring unit is used to record the input human environment score and send it to the adaptation assessment score summary unit; the adaptation assessment score summary unit is used to summarize the natural environment score and the human environment score to obtain the total adaptation assessment score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module; The construction evaluation module includes a construction safety and protection scoring unit, a construction quality scoring unit, a construction cycle scoring unit and a construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction safety and protection scoring unit is used to record the input construction safety and protection score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction quality scoring unit is used to record the input construction quality score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction cycle scoring unit is used to record the input construction cycle score and send it to the construction evaluation score summary unit; the construction evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize the construction safety and protection score, the construction quality score and the construction cycle score to obtain a total construction evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module; The acceptance evaluation module includes a civil engineering quality acceptance score unit, an electrical installation quality acceptance score unit, a grounding system quality acceptance score unit and an acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the civil engineering quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input civil engineering quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the electrical installation quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input electrical installation quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the grounding system quality acceptance score unit is used to record the input grounding system quality acceptance score and send it to the acceptance evaluation score summary unit; the acceptance evaluation score summary unit is used to summarize and calculate the civil engineering quality acceptance score, the electrical installation quality acceptance score and the grounding system quality acceptance score to obtain the total acceptance evaluation score, and send it to the comprehensive score summary module; The comprehensive score summary module is connected to the design evaluation module, the adaptation evaluation module, the construction evaluation module and the acceptance evaluation module respectively, and is used to summarize and calculate the total design evaluation score, the total adaptation evaluation score, the total construction evaluation score and the total acceptance evaluation score to obtain the total quality evaluation score.

2. A substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: It also includes a display module, which is connected to the comprehensive score summary module and is used to receive and display the total quality evaluation score in real time.

3. A method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project, using a substation civil engineering design quality evaluation system as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step 1: Develop a multi-level evaluation indicator framework; use expert evaluation method to develop and screen the evaluation indicator framework, so that the evaluation indicator framework is divided into design evaluation stage, adaptation evaluation stage, construction evaluation stage and acceptance evaluation stage; Step 2: Conduct design evaluation; Based on expert experience and actual engineering conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the design evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the design evaluation stage are construction drawing design, civil engineering design, structural design and electrical design; the multiple second-level indicators of construction drawing design are regulation implementation, document implementation, design progress, standard process requirements, design quality problem prevention and control, construction drawing budget and design document depth; the multiple second-level indicators of civil engineering design are infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill; the multiple second-level indicators of structural design are building structure and equipment support structure; Several secondary indicators of electrical design are cable routing and protection equipment modeling; Evaluate construction drawings, civil design, structural design, and electrical design; Multiple experts score the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average scores of the multiple secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total design evaluation score; Step 3: Conduct an adaptation assessment; Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the adaptation assessment stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into one or more second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of the adaptation assessment stage are natural environment and human environment; the multiple second-level indicators of the natural environment are climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics; one second-level indicator of the human environment is the human environment situation; Assess the natural and human environment; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of adaptation assessment; Step 4: Conduct construction assessment; Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the construction evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators of construction evaluation are construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; the multiple second-level indicators of construction safety and protection are personnel safety and environmental safety; the multiple second-level indicators of construction quality are material quality and construction technology; the multiple second-level indicators of the construction period are construction plan and construction adjustment; Evaluate construction safety and protection, construction quality and construction period; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total construction evaluation score; Step 5: Conduct acceptance evaluation; Based on expert experience and actual project conditions, multiple first-level indicators are constructed for the acceptance evaluation stage, and each first-level indicator is divided into multiple second-level indicators; the multiple first-level indicators for acceptance evaluation are civil engineering quality acceptance, electrical installation quality acceptance, and grounding system quality acceptance; The multiple secondary indicators for civil engineering quality acceptance are infrastructure acceptance, building structure acceptance, and equipment support structure acceptance; The multiple secondary indicators for electrical installation quality acceptance are equipment installation and commissioning acceptance; The multiple secondary indicators for grounding system quality acceptance are grounding resistance and grounding quality; Evaluate the quality acceptance of civil engineering, electrical installation and grounding system; have multiple experts score one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator based on actual conditions, then take the average score of each secondary indicator, and finally summarize the average score of one or more secondary indicators corresponding to each primary indicator to obtain the total score of the acceptance evaluation; Step 6: Conduct evaluation summary; The total score of design evaluation, adaptation evaluation, construction evaluation and acceptance evaluation is summarized to obtain the total score of quality evaluation, and the engineering design quality is evaluated based on the total score of quality evaluation.

4. A method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project according to claim 3, characterized in that: In step 2, when evaluating the construction drawing design indicators, the implementation of regulations, document implementation, design progress, standard process requirements, prevention and control of design quality problems, construction drawing budget and design document depth are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the implementation of regulations, scores are given based on the implementation of policies, regulations, procedures and standards; when evaluating the implementation of documents, scores are given based on the implementation of preliminary design approval documents; when evaluating the design progress, scores are given based on the submission time of materials before the preliminary review of the construction drawings and the submission time of closing documents after the completion of the construction drawing review; when evaluating the standard process requirements, scores are given based on the use of non-enterprise standard processes; when evaluating the prevention and control of design quality problems, scores are given based on the list of key technologies for design quality control of power transmission and transformation projects; when evaluating the construction drawing budget, scores are given based on the design budget cost of the new project and the delivery of the construction drawings; when evaluating the depth of the design documents, scores are given using a deduction system; When evaluating the civil engineering design indicators, the infrastructure, engineering earthwork and rockfill are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating the infrastructure, the scale and demand of the substation are evaluated, whether the land area within the wall meets the normal operation and future expansion of the substation, and whether the layout of the main building structure of the main control building and the distribution room is reasonable and whether the size meets the operation and maintenance requirements of the equipment layout; when evaluating the engineering earthwork, the score is given based on the excavation volume, excavation depth and rationality of the excavation method of the earthwork; when evaluating the rockfill, the score is given based on the quality of the backfill material, the safety and reliability of the structure, whether the rockfill method is appropriate, and the stability of the foundation after backfilling; When evaluating the structural design indicators, the building structure and equipment support structure are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; When evaluating the building structure, the score is based on whether the structural form of the building structure meets the functional requirements of the substation, the geological survey report and the bearing capacity of the foundation, whether the design has a suitable foundation form, and whether the building has sufficient stability on the foundation; when evaluating the equipment support structure, the score is based on whether the design of the equipment foundation meets the weight, size and operation requirements of the equipment, whether the equipment has sufficient stability and safety, whether the material selection, structural form and connection method of the structure are appropriate, and whether the structure can support the equipment and withstand various loads. When evaluating electrical design indicators, the cable wiring and protection equipment selection are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; when evaluating cable wiring, scores are given based on the rationality of the cable wiring path, conflicts with other facilities, whether the cables can operate safely, whether the cable protection measures are in place, and whether the cables can operate stably and long-term; when evaluating the shape of protection equipment, scores are given based on the type and operating requirements of the electrical equipment, whether the selected protection equipment is appropriate, the location of the protection equipment and the rationality of the vertical beams, and whether the electrical equipment can operate safely.

5. A method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project according to claim 3, characterized in that: In step three, when evaluating the natural environment indicators, the climate characteristics, address conditions and hydrological characteristics are evaluated according to the established scoring rules; the climate characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the local climate characteristics of the substation site can ensure that the substation service life reaches the expected situation; the address conditions are evaluated to determine whether the soil bearing capacity, groundwater level and earthquake intensity of the substation site can ensure that the substation will not be damaged due to geological problems; when evaluating the hydrological characteristics, the hydrological environment around the substation is scored based on whether it will be affected by natural disasters such as floods and waterlogging. When evaluating the human environment indicators, the human environment conditions are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the human environment conditions, scores are given based on whether the site selection and construction of the substation conform to the overall layout of the urban planning, whether the operation of the substation will cause trouble to residents' lives, and whether the substation will affect the surrounding historical and cultural cities or scenic spots.

6. A method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step 4, when evaluating construction safety and protection indicators, personnel safety and environmental safety are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating personnel safety, scores are given based on whether construction workers wear personal protective equipment correctly, whether construction workers have received necessary safety training, and whether they understand and comply with safety operating procedures. When evaluating environmental safety, scores are given based on whether there are obvious safety warning signs, whether construction workers and visitors can identify and comply with safety regulations, whether there are sufficient fire-fighting facilities, whether their effectiveness can be checked regularly, whether there are unobstructed safety passages and emergency evacuation routes at the construction site, and whether they can be evacuated quickly in an emergency. When evaluating construction quality indicators, the material quality and construction process are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating material quality, the scores are based on whether the quality of the raw materials entering the construction site meets the national standards and design requirements, whether the storage location of the raw materials is arranged reasonably, and whether the materials can be kept intact before use. When evaluating construction technology, the scores are based on whether the flatness, verticality, and size of the template meet the requirements, whether the template is installed firmly and accurately, whether the specifications, quantity, location, and connection method of the steel bars meet the design requirements, whether the mix ratio, pouring speed, and vibration method of the concrete are appropriate, and whether the quality of the concrete is uniform and free of defects. When evaluating the construction cycle indicators, the construction plan and construction adjustments are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the construction plan, scores are given based on whether a detailed construction schedule has been formulated, whether the tasks and time nodes of each stage are clearly defined, whether the construction progress is monitored and evaluated regularly, and whether the construction plan can be adjusted in time to deal with various uncertainties. When evaluating the construction adjustment, scores are given based on whether timely remedial measures can be taken to deal with delays in the construction period, and whether the overall construction period can be guaranteed not to be affected.

7. A method for evaluating the design quality of a substation civil engineering project according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step five, when evaluating the quality acceptance indicators of civil engineering projects, the acceptance of infrastructure, building structure and equipment support structure is evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the acceptance of infrastructure, the acceptance is scored based on whether the stability, height and materials of the fence meet the design requirements, whether there are cracks and tilts, whether the width, flatness and drainage of the road can meet the requirements of vehicle traffic and personnel safety, whether the drainage facilities are unobstructed and whether they can effectively remove water accumulation; when evaluating the acceptance of building structure, the acceptance is scored based on whether the building structure form, foundation bearing capacity and foundation form meet the design requirements, whether there are no quality problems, and whether the structural safety of the building meets the design requirements under professional testing methods; When evaluating the acceptance of the equipment support structure, the score is given based on whether the size, position, and elevation of the equipment foundation are accurate, whether the stability and bearing capacity of the foundation meet the equipment requirements, and whether the stability, rigidity, and safety of the structure meet the weight of the supported equipment and the dynamic load during operation; When evaluating the electrical installation quality acceptance indicators, the equipment installation and commissioning acceptance are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the equipment installation, the points are given based on whether the installation position, fixing method, and wiring of the electrical equipment meet the design requirements, and whether the performance of the equipment is intact. When evaluating the commissioning acceptance, the points are given based on whether the various functions and parameters of the electrical equipment are normal during commissioning, whether the equipment can operate normally and meet the design requirements; whether the protection device is set according to the design requirements, and whether the protection device can timely and accurately cut off the fault circuit when performing simulated fault tests; When evaluating the grounding system quality acceptance indicators, the grounding resistance and reception quality are evaluated according to the established scoring rules. When evaluating the grounding resistance, the grounding resistance value of the grounding system is measured using professional instruments, and scores are given based on whether it complies with national standards and design requirements. When evaluating the grounding quality, scores are given based on whether the material of the grounding body and the construction quality of the grounding device meet the requirements, and whether they meet the needs for long-term stable operation of the grounding system.

Images