Data quality evaluation method and system in enterprise credit information fusion

Abstract

The invention discloses a data quality evaluation method and system in enterprise credit information fusion, and the method comprises the steps: collecting preset data and market data of an enterprise, and carrying out the preprocessing of the preset data and the market data; the preset data comprises enterprise credit data and related data; performing evaluation feature selection on the related data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data according to the first data to obtain reliable data; performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality evaluation function according to the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and constructing a credit fusion data quality evaluation model according to the quality evaluation function; and optimizing the credit fusion data quality evaluation model according to the evaluation error, inputting to-be-evaluated data into the credit fusion data quality evaluation model, and outputting an evaluation result. The method not only improves the accuracy of data quality evaluation, but also can be directly used in a data quality evaluation system.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of data evaluation, and in particular to a method and system for evaluating data quality in enterprise credit information fusion. Background Art

[0002] In today's business environment, the accuracy and completeness of corporate credit information is crucial to financial institutions, investors and various business partners. Corporate credit information not only reflects the company's ability to fulfill its obligations and operating conditions, but also directly affects the company's financing, cooperation and market competition. Therefore, how to effectively integrate and evaluate the quality of corporate credit information has become a major challenge in the current field of business information analysis.

[0003] Traditional corporate credit information assessment methods mainly rely on preset data such as financial statements and audit reports provided by enterprises. However, these data often have the risk of untimely updates, incomplete information or human tampering, which leads to doubts about the accuracy and reliability of the assessment results. In order to make up for this shortcoming, some institutions have begun to try to introduce market data, such as corporate public information, industry reports, media public opinion, etc., to enrich the dimensions and depth of credit assessment.

[0004] However, the introduction of market data also brings new challenges. On the one hand, market data comes from a wide range of sources and in various formats, and effective preprocessing and integration are required to ensure the accuracy and consistency of the data; on the other hand, there may be deviations or conflicts between market data and enterprise preset data. How to reasonably handle these differences has become a key factor affecting the quality of credit assessment. Therefore, Kou Dai invented a new data quality assessment method to improve the accuracy, reliability and comprehensiveness of enterprise data quality assessment. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion.

[0006] To achieve the above object, the present invention is implemented according to the following technical solutions:

[0007] The present invention comprises the following steps:

[0008] Collecting preset data and market data of the enterprise, and preprocessing the preset data and the market data; the preset data includes enterprise credit data and related data;

[0009] Performing assessment feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data;

[0010] Performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function based on the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model based on the quality assessment function;

[0011] The credit fusion data quality assessment model is optimized according to the assessment error, the data to be assessed is input into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and the assessment result is output.

[0012] Furthermore, the method of performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain the first data includes:

[0013] Calculate the contribution of relevant data:

[0014]

[0015] The zth related data is b z , the contribution of the zth related data is The difference between the zth related data and the ath related data is F z,a , the average value of the difference value of the relevant data is The variance explanation rate of the zth related data is ξ z , related data b z The weight is λ z , the number of relevant data is

[0016] Calculate the evaluation value of the relevant data:

[0017]

[0018] The relevant data b z The evaluation value is S(b z ), the a-th related data is b a , the number of relevant data is Related datab z The marginal probability distribution of is p(b z ), related data b a The marginal probability distribution of is p(b a ), related data b z and related data a The joint probability distribution of z ,b a ), related data b a The contribution of The zth adjustment coefficient is τ z , related data b z and related data a The minimum function is min(b z ,b a);

[0019] The relevant data having an evaluation value greater than 0.4071 is output as the first data.

[0020] Furthermore, the method of performing reliability analysis on the market data according to the first data to obtain reliable data includes:

[0021] Compare and screen market data and market data, and take those with a difference greater than 0.307 as abnormal data, and calculate the reliability of market data:

[0022]

[0023] The reliability of the jth market data at the sth time is g j (s), the number of market data at the sth moment is N s , the number of abnormal data at the sth moment is NC s , the jth market data at the sth time is u j (s), the jth first data at the sth time is u1 j (s);

[0024] When the reliability is greater than 0.6931, the market data is reliable data; otherwise, it is unreliable data and is eliminated.

[0025] Furthermore, the method of performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain the coefficient of variation includes:

[0026] Sort the reliable data according to the time sequence, and input the sorted reliable data into the deviation analysis model;

[0027] Calculate the change in reliable data:

[0028]

[0029] The cth reliable data at the sth time is f c (s), the cth reliable data at the s+1th moment is f c (s+1), the bandwidth parameter is The suppression coefficient is γ, and the number of reliable data is The kernel density estimation function is The norm function is ||·||, and the change in the cth reliable data between the sth moment and the s+1th moment is h c (s,s+1);

[0030] Calculate the sensitive correlation of reliable data:

[0031]

[0032] The sensitive correlation of the cth reliable data is The upper limit of the timing is T s , the average value of the cth reliable data is The control constant is ε;

[0033] Take the reliable data with a sensitivity correlation greater than 0 as the key data and calculate the difference coefficient of the key data:

[0034]

[0035] The cth key data is f c , the coefficient of difference for the dth evaluation is

[0036] Furthermore, a method for constructing a quality assessment function based on the variance coefficient, reliable data and corporate credit data includes:

[0037] Obtain enterprise credit through enterprise credit information and give the quality evaluation function expression:

[0038]

[0039] The coefficient of variation for the dth evaluation is The enterprise credit assessed at the dth time is y d , the quality evaluation function for the dth evaluation is The jth reliable data is q j , the number of reliable data is M1, and the number of evaluation data is M.

[0040] Furthermore, a method for constructing a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function includes:

[0041] According to the quality assessment function, the objective function of the credit fusion data quality assessment model is given, and the expression is:

[0042]

[0043] The objective function of the dth evaluation is The actual quality assessment value for the dth evaluation is The loss function is L(·,·), and the prediction quality evaluation value of the d-th evaluation is

[0044] Credit fusion data quality assessment models include time series comparison algorithm, isolation forest algorithm, and machine learning algorithm;

[0045] The time series comparison algorithm obtains time-varying features by analyzing and comparing the trends of different time series data and identifying the differences between input data;

[0046] The isolation forest algorithm constructs multiple isolated trees, uses randomly selected features to isolate time-varying features, calculates the average path length in all isolated trees, and marks time-varying features with a small number of isolations and a path length less than the average path length as abnormal, thus obtaining labeled data;

[0047] The machine learning algorithm learns the objective function and the quality assessment pattern of historical data by building a model, and automatically evaluates and labels the input data using the quality assessment pattern and labeled data.

[0048] Furthermore, the method for optimizing the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error includes:

[0049] Introducing the intelligent group optimization algorithm, taking the evaluation error as the fitness function and the minimum evaluation error as the search target;

[0050] The chaotic mapping of particle population is expressed as:

[0051]

[0052] The i-th original sequence is x i , the i+1th chaotic mapping sequence is x i+1 , the control parameter is η, and the random number between 0 and 1 is r1;

[0053] Take the particle position with the smallest fitness as the best position and calculate the particle position:

[0054]

[0055] The initial optimal position of the particle is The control coefficient is v, and the position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is

[0056] Use the inhibition factor to update the particle position and obtain the inhibition position. The expression is:

[0057]

[0058] The suppression factor is χ, and the random number between -1 and 1 is The optimal position of the particle at the tth iteration is The position of the wth particle at the tth iteration is The suppression position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is The current number of iterations is t, and the maximum number of iterations is t max ;

[0059] Adaptive weights are used to update the particle positions to obtain the adapted positions. The expression is:

[0060]

[0061] The adaptive weight of the tth iteration is The balance factor is σ, the attenuation coefficient is ρ, and the suppression position of the wth particle in the tth iteration is The normally distributed random number is β, and the best position of the tth iteration is The adaptation position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is

[0062] Iterate continuously until the evaluation error is minimized, otherwise adjust the particle population and update the adaptive weight.

[0063] In the second aspect, a data quality assessment system in enterprise credit information fusion includes:

[0064] Data collection module: used to collect the preset data and market data of the enterprise, and pre-process the preset data and the market data; the preset data includes the enterprise credit data and related data;

[0065] Selection and analysis module: used for performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data;

[0066] Deviation modeling module: used for performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function according to the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function;

[0067] Optimization output module: used to optimize the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error, input the data to be assessed into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and output the assessment result.

[0068] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0069] The present invention is a data quality assessment method and system in enterprise credit information fusion. Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following technical effects:

[0070] The present invention can improve the accuracy of data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion through preprocessing, evaluation feature selection, reliability analysis, deviation analysis, construction of quality assessment function, model building and model optimization steps, thereby improving the precision of data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion, optimizing data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion, greatly saving resources and improving work efficiency, and can realize automatic evaluation of data quality in enterprise credit information fusion, and perform data fusion and data adjustment on data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion in real time, which is of great significance to data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion, can adapt to data quality assessment in enterprise credit information fusion of different standards and data quality assessment needs in different enterprise credit information fusions, and has a certain universality. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0071] Figure 1 The present invention is a flowchart of the steps of a method for evaluating data quality in enterprise credit information fusion. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0072] The present invention is further described below by means of specific embodiments. The illustrative embodiments and descriptions of the present invention are used to explain the present invention but are not intended to limit the present invention.

[0073] The present invention provides a data quality assessment method and system for enterprise credit information fusion, comprising the following steps:

[0074] like Figure 1 As shown, in this embodiment, the following steps are included:

[0075] Collecting preset data and market data of the enterprise, and preprocessing the preset data and the market data; the preset data includes enterprise credit data and related data;

[0076] In actual assessment, corporate credit data includes financial statements and audit reports; related data includes industry ratings, historical default records, and legal cases; market data includes corporate product sales data, corporate public information, product industry reports, media opinions, customer feedback, and maintenance and repairs;

[0077] Take XXX medium-sized enterprise as the research object and obtain the preset data and market data for 2023, which includes product A and product B;

[0078] Performing assessment feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data;

[0079] In actual evaluation, the first data is the relevant data of product A; reliable data is the enterprise product sales data, enterprise public information, product industry reports, and customer feedback;

[0080] Performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function based on the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model based on the quality assessment function;

[0081] In the actual evaluation, the coefficient of variation was 0.057;

[0082] Optimizing the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error, inputting the data to be assessed into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and outputting the assessment result;

[0083] In the actual assessment, the quality assessment score of the preset data for 2023 was 0.6954.

[0084] In this embodiment, the method of performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain the first data includes:

[0085] Calculate the contribution of relevant data:

[0086]

[0087] The zth related data is b z , the contribution of the zth related data is The difference between the zth related data and the ath related data is F z,a , the average value of the difference value of the relevant data is The variance explanation rate of the zth related data is ξ z , related data b z The weight is λ z , the number of relevant data is

[0088] Calculate the evaluation value of the relevant data:

[0089]

[0090] The relevant data b z The evaluation value is S(b z ), the a-th related data is b a , the number of relevant data is Related datab z The marginal probability distribution of is p(b z ), related data b a The marginal probability distribution of is p(b a ), related data b z and related dataa The joint probability distribution of z ,b a ), related data b a The contribution of The zth adjustment coefficient is τ z , related data b z and related data a The minimum function is min(b z ,b a );

[0091] Outputting the relevant data with an evaluation value greater than 0.4071 as the first data;

[0092] In the actual evaluation, the contribution is 0.794 and the evaluation value is 0.481.

[0093] In this embodiment, the method of performing reliability analysis on the market data according to the first data to obtain reliable data includes:

[0094] Compare and screen market data and market data, and take those with a difference greater than 0.307 as abnormal data, and calculate the reliability of market data:

[0095]

[0096] The reliability of the jth market data at the sth time is g j (s), the number of market data at the sth moment is N s , the number of abnormal data at the sth moment is NC s , the jth market data at the sth time is u j (s), the jth first data at the sth time is u1 j (s);

[0097] When the reliability is greater than 0.6931, the market data is reliable data; otherwise, it is unreliable data and is eliminated.

[0098] In this embodiment, the method of performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain the coefficient of variation includes:

[0099] Sort the reliable data according to the time sequence, and input the sorted reliable data into the deviation analysis model;

[0100] Calculate the change in reliable data:

[0101]

[0102] The cth reliable data at the sth time is f c (s), the cth reliable data at the s+1th moment is f c(s+1), the bandwidth parameter is The suppression coefficient is γ, and the number of reliable data is The kernel density estimation function is The norm function is ||·||, and the change in the cth reliable data between the sth moment and the s+1th moment is h c (s,s+1);

[0103] Calculate the sensitive correlation of reliable data:

[0104]

[0105] The sensitive correlation of the cth reliable data is The upper limit of the timing is T s , the average value of the cth reliable data is The control constant is ε;

[0106] Take the reliable data with a sensitivity correlation greater than 0 as the key data and calculate the difference coefficient of the key data:

[0107]

[0108] The cth key data is f c , the coefficient of difference for the dth evaluation is

[0109] In this embodiment, the method of constructing a quality assessment function based on the difference coefficient, reliable data and enterprise credit data includes:

[0110] Obtain enterprise credit through enterprise credit information and give the quality evaluation function expression:

[0111]

[0112] The coefficient of variation for the dth evaluation is The enterprise credit assessed at the dth time is y d , the quality evaluation function for the dth evaluation is The jth reliable data is q j , the number of reliable data is M1, and the number of evaluation data is M.

[0113] In this embodiment, the method for constructing a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function includes:

[0114] According to the quality assessment function, the objective function of the credit fusion data quality assessment model is given, and the expression is:

[0115]

[0116] The objective function of the dth evaluation is The actual quality assessment value for the dth evaluation is The loss function is L(·,·), and the prediction quality evaluation value of the d-th evaluation is

[0117] Credit fusion data quality assessment models include time series comparison algorithm, isolation forest algorithm, and machine learning algorithm;

[0118] The time series comparison algorithm obtains time-varying features by analyzing and comparing the trends of different time series data and identifying the differences between input data;

[0119] The isolation forest algorithm constructs multiple isolated trees, uses randomly selected features to isolate time-varying features, calculates the average path length in all isolated trees, and marks time-varying features with a small number of isolations and a path length less than the average path length as abnormal, thus obtaining labeled data;

[0120] The machine learning algorithm learns the objective function and the quality assessment pattern of historical data by building a model, and automatically evaluates and labels the input data using the quality assessment pattern and labeled data.

[0121] In this embodiment, the method for optimizing the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error includes:

[0122] Introducing the intelligent group optimization algorithm, taking the evaluation error as the fitness function and the minimum evaluation error as the search target;

[0123] The chaotic mapping of particle population is expressed as:

[0124]

[0125] The i-th original sequence is x i , the i+1th chaotic mapping sequence is x i+1 , the control parameter is η, and the random number between 0 and 1 is r1;

[0126] Take the particle position with the smallest fitness as the best position and calculate the particle position:

[0127]

[0128] The initial optimal position of the particle is The control coefficient is v, and the position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is

[0129] Use the inhibition factor to update the particle position and obtain the inhibition position. The expression is:

[0130]

[0131] The suppression factor is χ, and the random number between -1 and 1 is The optimal position of the particle at the tth iteration is The position of the wth particle at the tth iteration is The suppression position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is The current number of iterations is t, and the maximum number of iterations is t max ;

[0132] Adaptive weights are used to update the particle positions to obtain the adapted positions. The expression is:

[0133]

[0134] The adaptive weight of the tth iteration is The balance factor is σ, the attenuation coefficient is ρ, and the suppression position of the wth particle in the tth iteration is The normally distributed random number is β, and the best position of the tth iteration is The adaptation position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is

[0135] Iterate continuously until the evaluation error is minimized, otherwise adjust the particle population and update the adaptive weight.

[0136] In the second aspect, a data quality assessment system in enterprise credit information fusion includes:

[0137] Data collection module: used to collect the preset data and market data of the enterprise, and pre-process the preset data and the market data; the preset data includes the enterprise credit data and related data;

[0138] Selection and analysis module: used for performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data;

[0139] Deviation modeling module: used for performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function according to the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function;

[0140] Optimization output module: used to optimize the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error, input the data to be assessed into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and output the assessment result.

[0141] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Collecting preset data and market data of the enterprise, and preprocessing the preset data and the market data; the preset data includes enterprise credit data and related data; Performing assessment feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data; Performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function based on the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model based on the quality assessment function; The credit fusion data quality assessment model is optimized according to the assessment error, the data to be assessed is input into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and the assessment result is output.

2. According to claim 1, a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion is characterized in that: The method of performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data includes: Calculate the contribution of relevant data: The zth related data is b z , the contribution of the zth related data is The difference between the zth related data and the ath related data is F z,a , the average value of the difference value of the relevant data is The variance explanation rate of the zth related data is ξ z , related data b z The weight is λ z , the number of relevant data is m; Calculate the evaluation value of the relevant data: The relevant data b z The evaluation value is S(b z ), the a-th related data is b a , related data b z The marginal probability distribution of is p(b z ), related data b a The marginal probability distribution of is p(b a ), related data b z and related data a The joint probability distribution of z ,b a ), related data b a The contribution of The zth adjustment coefficient is τ z , related data b z and related data a The minimum function is min(b z ,b a ); The relevant data having an evaluation value greater than 0.4071 is output as the first data.

3. According to the data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion of claim 1, it is characterized by: The method for performing reliability analysis on the market data according to the first data to obtain reliable data includes: Compare and screen market data and market data, and take those with a difference greater than 0.307 as abnormal data, and calculate the reliability of market data: The reliability of the jth market data at the sth time is g j (s), the number of market data at the sth moment is N s , the number of abnormal data at the sth moment is NC s , the jth market data at the sth time is u j (s0, the jth first data at the sth time is u1 j (s); When the reliability is greater than 0.6931, the market data is reliable data; otherwise, it is unreliable data and is eliminated.

4. According to claim 1, a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion is characterized in that: The method of performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a coefficient of variation comprises: Sort the reliable data according to the time sequence, and input the sorted reliable data into the deviation analysis model; Calculate the change in reliable data: The cth reliable data at the sth moment is f c (s), the cth reliable data at the s+1th moment is f c (s+1), the bandwidth parameter is The suppression coefficient is γ, the number of reliable data is n, and the kernel density estimation function is The norm function is ||·||, and the change in the cth reliable data between the sth moment and the s+1th moment is h c (s,s+1); Calculate the sensitive correlation of reliable data: The sensitive correlation of the cth reliable data is The upper limit of the timing is T s , the average value of the cth reliable data is The control constant is ε; Take the reliable data with a sensitivity correlation greater than 0 as the key data and calculate the difference coefficient of the key data: The cth key data is f c , the coefficient of difference for the dth evaluation is θ d .

5. According to claim 1, a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion is characterized in that: The method for constructing a quality assessment function according to the difference coefficient, reliable data and enterprise credit data includes: Obtain enterprise credit through enterprise credit information and give the quality evaluation function expression: The coefficient of variation for the dth evaluation is θ d , the enterprise credit assessed at the dth time is y d , the quality evaluation function for the dth evaluation is The jth reliable data is q j , the number of reliable data is M1, and the number of evaluation data is M.

6. According to claim 1, a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion is characterized in that: The method for constructing a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function includes: According to the quality assessment function, the objective function of the credit fusion data quality assessment model is given, and the expression is: The objective function of the dth evaluation is The actual quality assessment value for the dth evaluation is The loss function is L(·,·), and the prediction quality evaluation value of the d-th evaluation is Credit fusion data quality assessment models include time series comparison algorithm, isolation forest algorithm, and machine learning algorithm; The time series comparison algorithm obtains time-varying features by analyzing and comparing the trends of different time series data and identifying the differences between input data; The isolation forest algorithm constructs multiple isolated trees, uses randomly selected features to isolate time-varying features, calculates the average path length in all isolated trees, and marks time-varying features with a small number of isolations and a path length less than the average path length as abnormal, thus obtaining labeled data; The machine learning algorithm learns the objective function and the quality assessment pattern of historical data by building a model, and automatically evaluates and labels the input data using the quality assessment pattern and labeled data.

7. According to claim 1, a data quality assessment method in enterprise credit information fusion is characterized in that: The method for optimizing the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error includes: Introducing the intelligent group optimization algorithm, taking the evaluation error as the fitness function and the minimum evaluation error as the search target; The chaotic mapping of particle population is expressed as: The i-th original sequence is x i , the i+1th chaotic mapping sequence is x i+1 , the control parameter is η, and the random number between 0 and 1 is r1; Take the particle position with the smallest fitness as the best position and calculate the particle position: The initial optimal position of the particle is The control coefficient is v, and the position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is Use the inhibition factor to update the particle position and obtain the inhibition position. The expression is: The suppression factor is χ, the random number between -1 and 1 is l, and the optimal position of the particle at the tth iteration is The position of the wth particle at the tth iteration is The suppression position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is The current number of iterations is t, and the maximum number of iterations is t max ; Adaptive weights are used to update the particle positions to obtain the adapted positions. The expression is: The adaptive weight of the tth iteration is The balance factor is σ, the attenuation coefficient is ρ, and the suppression position of the wth particle in the tth iteration is The normally distributed random number is β, and the best position of the tth iteration is The adaptation position of the wth particle in the t+1th iteration is Iterate continuously until the evaluation error is minimized, otherwise adjust the particle population and update the adaptive weight.

8. A data quality assessment system in enterprise credit information fusion, used to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that: include: Data collection module: used to collect the preset data and market data of the enterprise, and pre-process the preset data and the market data; The preset data includes enterprise credit data and related data; Selection and analysis module: used for performing evaluation feature selection on the relevant data to obtain first data, and performing reliability analysis on the market data based on the first data to obtain reliable data; Deviation modeling module: used for performing deviation analysis on the reliable data to obtain a difference coefficient, constructing a quality assessment function according to the difference coefficient, the reliable data and the enterprise credit data, and building a credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the quality assessment function; Optimization output module: used to optimize the credit fusion data quality assessment model according to the assessment error, input the data to be assessed into the credit fusion data quality assessment model, and output the assessment result.

Images