Ultrasonic relieving and nursing method for rheumatism immune arthralgia

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of medical health management, in particular to an ultrasonic relieving and nursing method for rheumatic immune arthralgia, which comprises the following steps: acquiring the change trend of ultrasonic nursing data of a patient for each historical ultrasonic relieving and nursing process of the rheumatic immune arthralgia to obtain the requirement relieving degree of the patient for ultrasonic relieving and nursing; analyzing the score change and score difference of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained in each ultrasonic relieving nursing process to obtain the joint alternative fatigue degree and the joint pain improvement degree of the patient so as to obtain the joint pain relieving evaluation value of the patient; whether the patient needs psychological nursing or not is determined according to the relation between the demand relieving degree and the arthralgia relieving evaluation value, the defect of high subjectivity existing in manual judgment is overcome, and therefore the accuracy of the mode for judging whether the patient needs psychological nursing or not is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of medical and health management, and particularly to an ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain. Background Art

[0002] Rheumatic immune joint pain refers to a clinical syndrome triggered by rheumatic immune diseases, with core symptoms such as joint pain, swelling, and stiffness. The core mechanism of such diseases is the abnormal activation of the immune system, which mistakenly attacks its own tissues (such as joint synovium, cartilage, etc.), leading to inflammatory reactions and tissue damage. Among them, ultrasonic technology has important value in the relief of rheumatic immune joint pain. Ultrasonic waves generate mechanical vibration, thermal effect, and cavitation effect through high-frequency sound waves, accelerating local blood flow, increasing the clearance of inflammatory metabolites, and at the same time combining nursing plans based on diet, rehabilitation exercises, etc. for nursing.

[0003] Rheumatic immune joint pain is an autoimmune disease with a long course and is a typical chronic disease. Currently, in the process of nursing rheumatic immune joint pain, the focus is mainly on disease-centered nursing, and insufficient attention is paid to the psychological state of patients. Due to the long treatment cycle and repeated attacks of rheumatic immune joint pain, the changes in the psychological state of patients during the nursing process will affect the implementation effect of the rehabilitation plan for patients, and thus affect the overall nursing effect. Currently, doctors usually make a subjective judgment based on the physical condition of patients to determine whether psychological nursing is needed, and this judgment method has strong subjectivity and low accuracy. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In order to solve the technical problem of the low accuracy of the existing judgment method for whether patients need psychological nursing, the purpose of the present invention is to provide an ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain, and the specific technical solution adopted is as follows: The present invention provides an ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain, including: Obtaining the change trend of ultrasonic nursing data in each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process of the patient for rheumatic immune joint pain to obtain the degree of demand relief of the patient for ultrasonic relief nursing; Analyzing the score changes and score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained in each ultrasonic relief nursing process to obtain the degree of alternate joint involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain of the patient; Obtaining the joint pain relief evaluation value of the patient from the degree of alternate joint involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain; Determining whether the patient needs psychological nursing according to the relationship between the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value.

[0005] In an exemplary embodiment, the ultrasonic care data includes at least one of ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic care duration; the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data is the average value of the ultrasonic frequency time series data during the ultrasonic relief care process, and the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data is the average value of the ultrasonic intensity time series data during the ultrasonic relief care process.

[0006] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of obtaining the degree of demand relief includes: Obtain the differences in ultrasonic care data between the initial ultrasonic relief care process and each ultrasonic relief care process; According to the reference importance weights of the ultrasonic care data of each ultrasonic relief care process, weight the differences in the ultrasonic care data corresponding to each ultrasonic relief care process; Fuse the differences in the ultrasonic care data of each ultrasonic relief care process after weighting to obtain the degree of demand relief.

[0007] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of obtaining the degree of alternating joint involvement includes: Obtain the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints in the joint pain score table of two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes; the score of the newly added painful joint represents that the score of the joint item changes from 0 to a positive number, and the score of the reduced painful joint represents that the score of the joint item changes from a positive number to 0; Fuse the joint quantity differences between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints of all adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes to obtain the degree of alternating joint involvement; the degree of alternating joint involvement is inversely proportional to the joint quantity difference.

[0008] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of obtaining the degree of improvement in joint pain includes: Obtain the score difference of the same joint item in the joint pain score table of the latter ultrasonic relief care process and the former ultrasonic relief care process during two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes; According to the conditions satisfied by the score differences corresponding to each joint item, obtain the joint pain level corresponding to two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes; According to the joint pain level and the quantity difference of the target joint items during two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes, obtain the sub-degree of improvement in joint pain corresponding to two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes; the target joint item is the joint item with a positive score in the joint pain score table; Fuse the sub-degrees of improvement in joint pain of all adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes to obtain the degree of improvement in joint pain.

[0009] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of obtaining the joint pain level includes: Based on the initial joint pain level and the joint pain level change rule, the joint pain level is obtained; the joint pain level change rule is: traverse each joint item, if the score difference is greater than a preset positive threshold, the joint pain level is incremented by 1; if the score difference is less than a preset negative threshold, the joint pain level is decremented by 1.

[0010] In an exemplary embodiment, determining whether a patient needs psychological care according to the relationship between the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value includes: Based on the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value, the degree of psychological care demand of the patient is obtained; the degree of psychological care demand is directly proportional to the degree of demand relief and inversely proportional to the joint pain relief evaluation value; If the degree of psychological care demand is greater than a preset threshold for the degree of psychological care demand, it is determined that the patient needs psychological care.

[0011] In an exemplary embodiment, after determining that a patient needs psychological care, the ultrasound relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain further includes: Determining the effective degree of implementation of the patient's rehabilitation plan, where the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan is used to characterize the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation plan; According to the conditions satisfied by the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan, it is determined whether to implement the first psychological care strategy or the second psychological care strategy for the patient. The first psychological care strategy is used for psychological care for the patient in terms of the rehabilitation plan, and the second psychological care strategy is used for psychological care for the patient in terms of emotions.

[0012] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of obtaining the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan includes: Obtaining the activity degree quantization values of the same joint mobility item in the joint function state table of each ultrasonic relief nursing process of the patient implementing the rehabilitation plan, and forming an actual activity degree quantization value sequence for each joint mobility item; Obtaining the Euclidean distance between the actual activity degree quantization value sequence of each joint mobility item and the standard activity degree quantization value sequence; Fusing the Euclidean distances of all joint mobility items to obtain the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan.

[0013] In an exemplary embodiment, determining whether to implement the first psychological care strategy or the second psychological care strategy for the patient according to the conditions satisfied by the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan includes: If the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan is less than a preset threshold for the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan, the patient implements the first psychological care strategy; otherwise, the patient implements the second psychological care strategy.

[0014] The present invention has the following beneficial effects: The present invention comprehensively analyzes the data from two aspects: the degree of relief of the patient's need for ultrasonic relief care and the evaluation value of the relief of the patient's joint pain, so as to accurately determine whether the patient needs psychological care. Compared with the traditional method of manual determination, taking the patient data as the analysis object, it overcomes the defect of strong subjectivity existing in manual determination, thereby improving the accuracy of the judgment method for whether the patient needs psychological care. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] Figure 1 is a flowchart of a method for ultrasonic relief and care of rheumatic immune joint pain provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 is a curve graph showing the change of ultrasonic intensity characteristic data provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 is a flowchart for obtaining the degree of relief of demand provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 is a flowchart for obtaining the degree of alternate joint involvement provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5 is a flowchart for obtaining the degree of improvement of joint pain provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 is a flowchart for judging whether a patient needs psychological care provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 7 is a flowchart of the steps further included in a method for ultrasonic relief and care of rheumatic immune joint pain provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0016] In order to further elaborate on the technical means and effects adopted by the present invention to achieve the predetermined invention purpose, the following, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and preferred embodiments, details the specific embodiments, structures, features and their effects of the present invention. In the following description, different "one embodiment" or "another embodiment" do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. In addition, the specific features, structures or characteristics in one or more embodiments can be combined in any suitable form.

[0017] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those skilled in the technical field to which the present invention belongs. All data information collected in this application has been obtained with full consent and authorization.

[0018] This embodiment provides a method for ultrasonic relief and care of rheumatic immune joint pain, as Figure 1 shown, including: Step S1: Obtain the changing trend of the ultrasonic nursing data in each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process for the patient's rheumatic immune joint pain, and obtain the degree of relief of the patient's need for ultrasonic relief nursing. Step S2: Analyze the score changes and score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained in each ultrasonic relief nursing process, and obtain the degree of alternate joint involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain of the patient. Step S3: Obtain the joint pain relief evaluation value of the patient from the degree of alternate joint involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain. Step S4: Determine whether the patient needs psychological nursing according to the relationship between the degree of relief of need and the joint pain relief evaluation value.

[0019] The following describes the specific implementation process of each step in combination with the accompanying drawings.

[0020] Step S1: Obtain the changing trend of the ultrasonic nursing data in each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process for the patient's rheumatic immune joint pain, and obtain the degree of relief of the patient's need for ultrasonic relief nursing.

[0021] In order to relieve the patient's rheumatic immune joint pain, the patient needs to undergo multiple ultrasonic relief nursing processes. Each ultrasonic relief nursing process that the patient has implemented is called each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process.

[0022] The following briefly introduces the ultrasonic relief nursing process: The patient evenly applies a medical coupling agent to the joint area to be treated to reduce the sound energy loss during ultrasonic propagation. Then set the ultrasonic frequency to 1 - 3 MHz, and the ultrasonic intensity is adjusted within the range. Each ultrasonic relief treatment time is 15 - 30 minutes. The ultrasonic probe performs nursing treatment on the joint in a reciprocating movement manner.

[0023] Obtain the ultrasonic nursing data of each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process of the patient. Determine the change in the patient's need for ultrasonic relief nursing by analyzing the changes in previous ultrasonic relief nursing processes. Since during the operation of the ultrasonic probe, the working duration of the ultrasonic probe, as well as the frequency data and ultrasonic intensity data during the working process, are usually recorded.

[0024] It should be understood that the ultrasonic frequency and ultrasonic intensity of each sampling period are obtained according to a preset sampling period. For any ultrasonic relief nursing process, which contains multiple sampling periods, then multiple ultrasonic frequencies and ultrasonic intensities are obtained in chronological order. For the ultrasonic frequency, arrange them in chronological order to obtain the ultrasonic frequency time - series data corresponding to the ultrasonic relief nursing process; for the ultrasonic intensity, arrange them in chronological order to obtain the ultrasonic intensity time - series data corresponding to the ultrasonic relief nursing process. Then, each ultrasonic relief nursing process corresponds to a set of ultrasonic frequency time - series data and ultrasonic intensity time - series data.

[0025] For any ultrasonic relief nursing process, calculate the average value of the ultrasonic frequencies in the ultrasonic frequency time series data of the ultrasonic relief nursing process as the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data of this ultrasonic relief nursing process; calculate the average value of the ultrasonic intensities in the ultrasonic intensity time series data of the ultrasonic relief nursing process as the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data of this ultrasonic relief nursing process. Thus, the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process are obtained. Arrange the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process in time series to obtain a sequence of changes in ultrasonic frequency characteristic data; arrange the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process in time series to obtain a sequence of changes in ultrasonic intensity characteristic data; arrange the ultrasonic nursing durations corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process in time series to obtain a sequence of changes in ultrasonic nursing duration. At the same time, determine the serial number of each ultrasonic relief nursing process in time series. The earlier the time series, the smaller the serial number. That is, in the order from the front to the back in the time series, each ultrasonic relief nursing process is the first time, the second time, etc. Then, the larger the value of the serial number, the closer it is to the current moment. Taking the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data as an example, Figure 2 is the curve of the change in ultrasonic intensity characteristic data corresponding to the sequence of changes in ultrasonic intensity characteristic data. The abscissa is each ultrasonic relief nursing process, and the ordinate is the ultrasonic intensity, with the unit of (MHz).

[0026] For any ultrasonic relief nursing process, the ultrasonic nursing data includes at least one of the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration. Then, the ultrasonic nursing data can be one of the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration, or two of the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration, or simultaneously include the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration. To achieve comprehensive data processing, in this embodiment, an example is given where the ultrasonic nursing data simultaneously includes the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration.

[0027] Initially, the patient's condition is relatively serious. Then, the ultrasonic intensity and ultrasonic frequency in the ultrasonic relief nursing process are relatively high, and at the same time, the ultrasonic nursing duration is also relatively long. As the ultrasonic relief nursing process progresses, the rheumatic immune joint pain symptoms of the patient gradually relieve with the relief nursing. The ultrasonic intensity, ultrasonic frequency, and ultrasonic nursing duration should develop in a good direction. For example, the ultrasonic intensity and ultrasonic frequency gradually decrease, and the ultrasonic nursing duration gradually shortens. Correspondingly, according to the change trend of the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic relief nursing process of the patient, the degree of relief of the patient's need for ultrasonic relief nursing is obtained. The closer to the current moment, the greater the reference importance of the ultrasonic nursing data and the more reference value it has.

[0028] In an exemplary embodiment, as Figure 3 shown, a specific process for obtaining the degree of demand mitigation is given as follows: Step S1-1: Obtain the difference in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial ultrasonic mitigation nursing process and each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process.

[0029] Obtain the difference in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial (the first in time sequence) ultrasonic mitigation nursing process and the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process. Since the difference in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial and itself is 0, then, instead of calculating the difference in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial and itself, calculate the difference in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial ultrasonic mitigation nursing process and the ultrasonic nursing data of the remaining each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process. In an exemplary embodiment, calculate the difference between the ultrasonic nursing data of the initial ultrasonic mitigation nursing process and the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process. Since under normal circumstances, the ultrasonic nursing data as a whole shows a gradually decreasing trend, then, the difference between the ultrasonic nursing data of the initial ultrasonic mitigation nursing process and the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process should be a positive number (of course, it does not exclude the case where some differences are negative), and the larger the difference, the better the effect of the ultrasonic mitigation nursing process, the more obvious the improvement of the patient's rheumatic immune joint pain, and the more the patient's subsequent demand for ultrasonic mitigation nursing is mitigated, that is, the higher the degree of demand mitigation.

[0030] Step S1-2: Weight the difference in ultrasonic nursing data corresponding to each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process according to the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic mitigation nursing process.

[0031] Since the closer the ultrasonic mitigation nursing process is to the current moment, the greater the reference importance of its ultrasonic nursing data and the more reference value it has. Then, according to the serial number of the ultrasonic mitigation nursing process, obtain the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data of the ultrasonic mitigation nursing process. The following gives a quantification method: ; wherein, represents the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data of the i-th ultrasonic mitigation nursing process, i represents the value of the serial number of the i-th ultrasonic mitigation nursing process, represents the total number of ultrasonic mitigation nursing processes, represents the sum from 1 to . For example: taking the total number of ultrasonic mitigation nursing processes equal to 5 and i equal to 4 as an example, then, the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data of the 4th ultrasonic mitigation nursing process is equal to: 4 / (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5). Thus, the sum of the reference importance weights of the ultrasonic nursing data of all ultrasonic mitigation nursing processes (including the initial one) is 1.

[0032] According to the reference importance weights of the ultrasonic nursing data in each ultrasonic relief nursing process, the differences in the ultrasonic nursing data corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process are weighted. Specifically, the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data in each ultrasonic relief nursing process is multiplied by the corresponding difference in the ultrasonic nursing data.

[0033] Step S1-3: Integrate the differences in the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic relief nursing process after weighting to obtain the degree of demand relief.

[0034] Integrating the differences in the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic relief nursing process after weighting specifically means calculating the sum value of the differences in the ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic relief nursing process after weighting and normalizing this sum value. The result obtained is the degree of demand relief. The following gives a quantization method: ; Among them, represents the degree of demand relief, represents the ultrasonic nursing data of the initial ultrasonic relief nursing process, represents the ultrasonic nursing data of the i-th ultrasonic relief nursing process. represents the normalization function. The normalization function here can be: where, represents the exponential function with the natural constant e as the base, and x represents the object to be normalized.

[0035] When the value of is larger, it indicates that after multiple historical ultrasonic relief nursing processes, the demand for ultrasonic relief nursing is more significantly relieved.

[0036] It should be understood that under normal circumstances is a positive value, that is, is a positive value. However, in extreme cases may be 0 or a negative value. Then, if it is 0 or a negative value, it means that after multiple historical ultrasonic relief nursing processes, the joint pain of the patient has not improved at all or has become more severe. Then, the subsequent steps of the present invention will not be executed, but an alarm signal will be directly output to take relevant emergency measures for the patient in a timely manner. Correspondingly, only when is a positive value, will it be normalized and the subsequent steps of the present invention will be executed.

[0037] Since the ultrasonic nursing data includes ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration. Then, when the ultrasonic nursing data are respectively ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration, by using the above process, the degrees of demand relief corresponding to these three types of data are obtained. For the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, in the above formula for calculating the degree of demand relief, represents the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data of the initial ultrasonic relief care process, represents the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data of the i-th ultrasonic relief care process; for the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, in the above formula for calculating the degree of demand relief, represents the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data of the initial ultrasonic relief care process, represents the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data of the i-th ultrasonic relief care process; for the ultrasonic care duration, in the above formula for calculating the degree of demand relief, represents the ultrasonic care duration of the initial ultrasonic relief care process, represents the ultrasonic care duration of the i-th ultrasonic relief care process.

[0038] Calculate the average value of the degree of demand relief corresponding to the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic care duration as the final degree of demand relief of the patient, denoted as .

[0039] Step S2: Analyze the score changes and score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained from each ultrasonic relief care process to obtain the degree of joint alternation involvement and the degree of improvement in joint pain of the patient.

[0040] When the patient has rheumatic immune joint pain, the corresponding rehabilitation plan will be implemented, and combined with each ultrasonic relief care process, joint pain relief and treatment will be achieved.

[0041] After each ultrasonic relief care process, a joint pain score table will be statistically analyzed once to obtain the joint pain score table obtained from each ultrasonic relief care process. The joint pain score table is obtained by the NRS (numerical ratingscale) method. The numerical rating scale NRS is one of the single-dimensional pain scales, consisting of 0 and several consecutive positive numbers, and describes the pain degree in a gradually increasing manner. The joint pain score table includes multiple joint items, each joint item represents each joint, and the score of each joint item represents the pain degree of the corresponding joint. The higher the score, the higher the pain degree. It should be understood that the joint items in the joint pain score table of each ultrasonic relief care process are the same, and the difference lies in that the scores of each joint item may be different.

[0042] And after each ultrasound relief care process, the patient will also fill out a joint function status form to quantify their implementation of the rehabilitation plan. Then, obtain the joint function status forms obtained from each ultrasound relief care process. The joint function status form includes multiple joint range of motion items, each joint range of motion item represents a respective joint, and the numerical value corresponding to each joint range of motion item is the quantified value of the corresponding joint range of motion. The larger the quantified value, the greater the joint range of motion, that is, the larger the range of motion of the joint in a specific direction. In addition, the patient's rehabilitation plan will be adjusted according to the ultrasound relief effect of each ultrasound relief care process, as well as the joint pain score form and the joint function status form.

[0043] After each ultrasound relief care process of the patient, a joint pain score form and a joint function status form are obtained to evaluate the patient's own relief of rheumatic immune joint pain.

[0044] Evaluate the improvement of joint pain according to the joint pain score form. Therefore, analyze the score changes and score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score forms obtained from each ultrasound relief care process to obtain the degree of alternating joint involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain of the patient.

[0045] Due to the fluctuation of the joint range of motion, initially it may be single joint pain, and gradually it may develop into a situation of multiple joint alternating involvement, which in turn affects the patient's overall perception of pain. Then, by analyzing the score changes of each joint item in the joint pain score forms obtained from each ultrasound relief care process, determine whether the patient has the phenomenon of multiple joint alternating involvement, so as to obtain the degree of alternating joint involvement of the patient.

[0046] In an exemplary embodiment, as Figure 4 shown, the following gives a specific obtaining process of the degree of alternating joint involvement: Step S2-1: Obtain the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints in the joint pain score forms of two adjacent ultrasound relief care processes.

[0047] For the convenience of explanation, assume that two adjacent ultrasound relief care processes are the i-th ultrasound relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasound relief care process respectively. Then, the joint pain score form of the i-th ultrasound relief care process is set as the i-th joint pain score form, and the joint pain score form of the (i + 1)-th ultrasound relief care process is set as the (i + 1)-th joint pain score form.

[0048] The newly added painful joints refer to the joint items that are indicated as painless in the i-th joint pain score table but painful in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table. Since in the joint pain score table, a painless joint item indicates a score of 0 for the joint item, and a painful joint item indicates a certain positive score for the joint item. Then, for the newly added painful joint representation of the same joint item, its score in the i-th joint pain score table is 0, and its score in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table is positive, that is, the score of the newly added painful joint representation joint item changes from 0 to positive. Then, obtain the number of joint items whose score in the i-th joint pain score table is 0 and whose score in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table is positive. This number is the number of newly added painful joints. Similarly, for the reduced painful joint representation of the same joint item, its score in the i-th joint pain score table is positive, and its score in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table is 0, that is, the score of the reduced painful joint representation joint item changes from positive to 0. Then, obtain the number of joint items whose score in the i-th joint pain score table is positive and whose score in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table is 0. This number is the number of reduced painful joints. It should be understood that the newly added painful joints refer to the joints that are painless during the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and painful during the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process; the reduced painful joints refer to the joints that are painful during the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and no longer painful during the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process.

[0049] Obtain the joint quantity difference between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints during the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process, specifically the absolute value of the difference. The smaller the absolute value of this difference, the smaller the gap between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints during the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process, and the more it indicates that the patient has the phenomenon of alternating involvement in the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process, and the greater the degree of joint alternating involvement. The degree of joint alternating involvement is inversely proportional to the joint quantity difference.

[0050] Step S2-2: Integrate the joint quantity differences between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints during all adjacent two ultrasonic relief care processes to obtain the degree of joint alternating involvement.

[0051] Integrate the joint quantity differences between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints during all adjacent two ultrasonic relief care processes. Specifically, calculate the average value of the joint quantity differences between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints during all adjacent two ultrasonic relief care processes, and then perform negative correlation normalization. The result obtained is the degree of joint alternating involvement. The following gives a specific quantification method: ; wherein, represents the degree of alternating joint involvement, represents the number of newly added painful joints corresponding to the i-th ultrasound remission care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasound remission care process, represents the number of reduced painful joints corresponding to the i-th ultrasound remission care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasound remission care process.

[0052] Then, analyze the score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained from each ultrasound remission care process to obtain the degree of improvement of the patient's joint pain. In an exemplary embodiment, as Figure 5 shown, the following gives a specific obtaining process of the degree of improvement of joint pain: Step S2-3: Obtain the score difference of the same joint item in the joint pain score tables of the subsequent ultrasound remission care process and the previous ultrasound remission care process in two adjacent ultrasound remission care processes.

[0053] Obtain the score difference of the same joint item in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table and the i-th joint pain score table. Specifically: for any joint item, subtract the score of this joint item in the i-th joint pain score table from the score of this joint item in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table, and the obtained difference is the score difference corresponding to this joint item, so as to obtain the score differences of each joint item.

[0054] Step S2-4: Obtain the joint pain level corresponding to two adjacent ultrasound remission care processes according to the conditions satisfied by the score differences corresponding to each joint item.

[0055] It should be understood that if the score difference is a positive number, and the larger the value, the more the joint pain has improved, which can be understood as an increase in the joint pain level; similarly, if the score difference is a negative number, and the smaller the value, the more the joint pain has decreased, which can be understood as a decrease in the joint pain level.

[0056] The joint pain level is represented by . Preset an initial joint pain level, and the value of this initial joint pain level can be the number of joint items in the joint pain score table, represented by the letter J. Then, the initial value of is J.

[0057] Preset a joint pain level change rule: if the score difference is greater than the preset positive threshold, the joint pain level is increased by 1, that is ; if the score difference is less than the preset negative threshold, the joint pain level is decreased by 1, that is Among them, based on the score value range, the implementer can determine the specific values of the preset positive threshold and the preset negative threshold according to the actual situation. For example, the preset positive threshold is taken as the value 15, and the preset negative threshold is taken as the value -15.

[0058] Based on the initial joint pain level and the joint pain level change rule, traverse each joint item to obtain the final value, which is used as the required joint pain level. Then, The smaller the value of, the smaller the joint pain level of the patient in the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process compared to the i-th ultrasonic relief care process, and the better the improvement of the joint pain corresponding to the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process; The smaller the value of, the worse the improvement of the joint pain corresponding to the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process. In principle, the maximum value of is 2J, and the minimum value is 0. However, since the improvement of the patient's joint pain is a slow process and a process of continuous improvement from severe to improved, it is impossible that all joints are painful in the previous ultrasonic relief care process and all joints are painless in the subsequent ultrasonic relief care process. That is, in actual situations, it is impossible for the value of to be the maximum value 2J or the minimum value 0. It should be understood that if there is the value of is the maximum value 2J or the minimum value 0, it belongs to a serious abnormality, and the subsequent steps of the present invention are no longer executed, and an alarm signal is directly output to take relevant emergency measures for the patient in time.

[0059] Step S2-5: According to the joint pain level and the quantity difference of the target joint items in two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes, obtain the corresponding joint pain improvement sub-degree of the two adjacent ultrasonic relief care processes.

[0060] For ease of explanation, the joint items with positive scores in the joint pain score table are defined as target joint items, that is, the target joint items are the joints with pain. Obtain the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table and the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table. Subtract the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table from the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table, and the obtained difference is the difference in the number of target joint items between the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process. In principle, the minimum value of this number difference is -J, and the maximum value is J, that is, the numerical range of this number difference is [-J, J]. However, since the improvement of the patient's joint pain is a slow process and a process of continuous improvement from severe to improved, it is impossible that all joints are painful in the previous ultrasonic relief care process and all joints are painless in the next ultrasonic relief care process, or all joints are painless in the previous ultrasonic relief care process and all joints are painful in the next ultrasonic relief care process. That is, in actual situations, it is impossible for the numerical value of this number difference to be the maximum value J or the minimum value -J. It should be understood that if the numerical value of this number difference is the maximum value J or the minimum value -J, it belongs to a serious abnormality, and the subsequent steps of the present invention are no longer executed, and an alarm signal is directly output to take relevant emergency measures for the patient in a timely manner.

[0061] When this number difference is negative, the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table is less than the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table, and the smaller the numerical value of this number difference, the less the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table is less than the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table. That is, the number of joints with pain increases and the greater the increase, the less optimistic the improvement of joint pain, and the lower the degree of improvement of joint pain corresponding to the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process; when this number difference is positive, the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table is greater than the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table, and the greater the numerical value of this number difference, the greater the number of target joint items in the i-th joint pain score table is greater than the number of target joint items in the (i + 1)-th joint pain score table. That is, the number of joints with pain decreases and the greater the decrease, the more optimistic the improvement of joint pain, and the higher the degree of improvement of joint pain corresponding to the i-th ultrasonic relief care process and the (i + 1)-th ultrasonic relief care process. Then, the degree of improvement of joint pain is proportional to this number difference. For ease of subsequent calculation, normalize this number difference, and the normalization method is as follows: ; Wherein, represents the difference in the number of normalized target joint items corresponding to the $i$-th ultrasound relief care process and the $(i + 1)$-th ultrasound relief care process. represents the difference in the number of target joint items corresponding to the $i$-th ultrasound relief care process and the $(i + 1)$-th ultrasound relief care process. After normalization, the value range is $(0, 1)$. It should be noted that to ensure the significance of the calculation results, in the case of a denominator of 0 during the fractional operation in the embodiments of the present invention, a tuning factor greater than 0 needs to be added to the denominator for addition to prevent the denominator from being 0. The value of the tuning factor is set by the implementer according to the actual situation, and this application does not make special restrictions.

[0062] According to the joint pain levels of the $i$-th joint pain score table and the $(i + 1)$-th joint pain score table, and the difference in the number of normalized target joint items corresponding to the $i$-th ultrasound relief care process and the $(i + 1)$-th ultrasound relief care process, the degree of improvement in joint pain corresponding to the $i$-th ultrasound relief care process and the $(i + 1)$-th ultrasound relief care process is obtained. In an exemplary embodiment, a specific quantification method for the degree of improvement in joint pain is given as follows: ; wherein, represents the degree of improvement in joint pain corresponding to the $i$-th ultrasound relief care process and the $(i + 1)$-th ultrasound relief care process, represents the joint pain levels of the $i$-th joint pain score table and the $(i + 1)$-th joint pain score table.

[0063] represents the negative correlation normalization of . Through the above analysis, the value range after negative correlation normalization is $(0, 1)$.

[0064] Step S2-6: Integrate the degrees of improvement in joint pain for all adjacent two ultrasound relief care processes to obtain the degree of improvement in joint pain.

[0065] Integrating the degrees of improvement in joint pain for all adjacent two ultrasound relief care processes specifically means calculating the average value of the degrees of improvement in joint pain for all adjacent two ultrasound relief care processes, and the result obtained is the degree of improvement in joint pain. The calculation formula is as follows: ; wherein, is the degree of improvement in joint pain.

[0066] Step S3: Obtain the joint pain relief evaluation value of the patient from the degree of alternating joint involvement and the degree of improvement in joint pain.

[0067] The degree of alternating joint involvement and the degree of improvement in joint pain of the patient are obtained through step S2. The degree of alternating joint involvement and the degree of improvement in joint pain are integrated to obtain the evaluation value of joint pain relief for the patient. Among them, the higher the degree of alternating joint involvement of the patient, the less optimistic the joint pain relief situation of the patient. Then, the lower the evaluation value of joint pain relief; the lower the degree of improvement in joint pain of the patient, the less optimistic the joint pain relief situation of the patient. Then, the lower the evaluation value of joint pain relief. Therefore, the evaluation value of joint pain relief is inversely proportional to the degree of alternating joint involvement and directly proportional to the degree of improvement in joint pain. In an exemplary embodiment, a specific quantification method for the evaluation value of joint pain relief is given as follows: ; wherein, represents the evaluation value of joint pain relief, which characterizes the evaluation value of the patient's own improvement in joint pain. The calculation formula here means that first, a negative correlation normalization is performed on the degree of alternating joint involvement , and then a weighted sum is performed on the negatively correlated normalized degree of alternating joint involvement and the degree of improvement in joint pain . The weights are both 0.5 to achieve the integration of the two.

[0068] Step S4: Determine whether the patient needs psychological care according to the relationship between the required relief degree and the evaluation value of joint pain relief.

[0069] According to step S1, the required relief degree of the patient for ultrasonic relief care is obtained , and according to steps S2 and S3, the evaluation value of joint pain relief of the patient is obtained . Usually, when the value of the required relief degree is larger, it means that the patient's need for ultrasonic relief care is smaller, indicating that the patient is less dependent on ultrasonic equipment for joint pain relief, indicating that the recovery of rheumatic immune joint pain is getting better and better. The corresponding evaluation value of the patient's own improvement in joint pain should also be larger.

[0070] When the value of the required relief degree is larger and the value of is smaller, it means that the evaluation value of the patient's own improvement in joint pain and the required relief degree of ultrasonic relief care do not match, which may be caused by the patient's psychology, non-compliance of rehabilitation exercises, etc. At this time, psychological care needs to be provided to the patient. On the contrary, if the value of the required relief degree is smaller and the value of is larger, it means that the patient feels good about his own joint pain situation and the less psychological care needs to be provided to the patient.

[0071] Therefore, according to the required relief degree and the evaluation value of joint pain relief to determine whether the patient needs psychological care. In an exemplary embodiment, as Figure 6 shown, a specific determination process of whether the patient needs psychological care is given: Step S4-1: Obtain the degree of the patient's psychological care need from the degree of demand relief and the evaluation value of joint pain relief.

[0072] According to the degree of demand relief and the evaluation value of joint pain relief , obtain the degree of the patient's psychological care need. The greater the value of the degree of demand relief , and the smaller the value of , the more psychological care is needed for the patient. Then, the degree of the patient's psychological care need is directly proportional to the degree of demand relief and inversely proportional to the evaluation value of joint pain relief . The following gives a specific quantification method for the degree of psychological care need: ; wherein represents the degree of the patient's psychological care need. The higher the degree of the patient's psychological care need, the more psychological care the patient needs.

[0073] Step S4-2: If the degree of psychological care need is greater than the preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need, it is determined that the patient needs psychological care.

[0074] In this embodiment, a preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need is set. This preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need is used to compare with the degree of psychological care need to determine whether the degree of the patient's psychological care need is relatively high, so as to judge whether the patient needs psychological care. It should be understood that the numerical range of this preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need is greater than 1. On the premise of meeting the above determination requirements, the specific value of this preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need is flexibly set by the implementer. In this embodiment, this preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need is set to 2.

[0075] Compare the degree of psychological care need with the preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need. If the degree of psychological care need is greater than the preset threshold of the degree of psychological care need, it is determined that the patient needs psychological care; otherwise, it means that the patient does not need psychological care. Among them, psychological care refers to psychological counseling for the patient, and the corresponding psychological care strategy can be selected according to the actual situation.

[0076] In an exemplary embodiment, it is unclear whether psychological care for the patient should be provided in terms of emotions or in terms of a rehabilitation program. Among them, psychological care in terms of emotions means providing care for the patient in aspects such as stress reduction and anxiety. Therefore, the specific psychological care plan can be determined by combining the implementation of the patient's rehabilitation program. Specifically, as Figure 7 shown, after it is determined that the patient needs psychological care, the ultrasonic relief and care method for rheumatic immune joint pain provided in this embodiment further includes the following steps: Step S5: Determine the effectiveness of the patient's rehabilitation program implementation.

[0077] Determine the effectiveness of the patient's rehabilitation program implementation. The effectiveness of the rehabilitation program implementation is used to characterize the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation program. The higher the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program implementation, the better the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation program.

[0078] Each ultrasonic relief care process corresponds to a joint function status table. The joint function status table includes the joint function status of the patient. For any joint mobility item in the joint function status table, obtain the mobility quantization values of the same joint mobility item in the joint function status table of each ultrasonic relief care process of the patient, and arrange them in chronological order to obtain the actual mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item, thereby obtaining the actual mobility quantization value sequences of each joint mobility item. Quantify the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation program according to the mobility of each joint of the patient. If the mobility of each joint is too large or too small, it will affect the patient's judgment of the pain degree of their own joints.

[0079] In the rehabilitation program, for each ultrasonic relief care process, each joint has a standard mobility, that is, each joint mobility item has a standard mobility quantization value. Then, for each ultrasonic relief care process, obtain the standard mobility quantization value sequence of each joint mobility item.

[0080] Then, for any joint mobility item, obtain the Euclidean distance between the actual mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item and the standard mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item. The smaller the Euclidean distance, the more similar the actual mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item is to the standard mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item, that is, the smaller the difference between the actual mobility of this joint and the standard mobility corresponding to the rehabilitation program, the better the implementation of the rehabilitation program, and the higher the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program implementation; the larger the Euclidean distance, the less similar the actual mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item is to the standard mobility quantization value sequence of this joint mobility item, that is, the larger the difference between the actual mobility of this joint and the standard mobility corresponding to the rehabilitation program, the worse the implementation of the rehabilitation program, and the lower the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program implementation.

[0081] Then, fuse the Euclidean distances of all joint range of motion items to obtain the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution. In an exemplary embodiment, a specific quantification process of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is given as follows: ; Wherein, represents the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution, represents the Euclidean distance, represents the number of joints that need to be moved in the rehabilitation program, that is, the number of joint range of motion items in the joint function status table, represents the standard range of motion quantization value sequence of the k-th joint range of motion item, represents the actual range of motion quantization value sequence of the k-th joint range of motion item.

[0082] The higher the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution, the better the execution of the rehabilitation program.

[0083] Step S6: Determine whether to implement the first psychological care strategy or the second psychological care strategy for the patient according to the conditions satisfied by the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution.

[0084] It is set that the first psychological care strategy is used for psychological care regarding the rehabilitation program for the patient, and the second psychological care strategy is used for psychological care regarding the patient's emotions.

[0085] In this embodiment, a threshold value of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is preset. This preset threshold value of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is used to compare with the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution to determine whether the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is relatively high, so as to judge whether to implement the first psychological care strategy or the second psychological care strategy for the patient. It should be understood that the numerical range of this preset threshold value of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is 0 - 1. On the premise of meeting the above determination requirements, the specific value of this preset threshold value of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is flexibly set by the implementer. In this embodiment, this preset threshold value of the effective degree of rehabilitation program execution is set to 0.5.

[0086] Compare the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan with the preset threshold of the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan. If the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan is less than the preset threshold of the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan, it indicates that the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation plan is not good, and there may be a situation of excessive or too little joint movement. In the subsequent psychological care process, it is necessary to provide effective psychological counseling to the patient regarding the implementation of the rehabilitation plan to avoid the impact of excessive or too little movement on the patient's psychology, thereby affecting the patient's perception of their own joint pain. Then the patient implements the first psychological care strategy. If the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan is greater than or equal to the preset threshold of the effective degree of the implementation of the rehabilitation plan, it indicates that the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation plan is better. At this time, the patient may have negative emotions such as anxiety and high stress. Therefore, when conducting psychological care subsequently, it focuses on dredging the patient's emotions. Then the patient implements the second psychological care strategy.

[0087] It should be noted that the above sequence of embodiments of the present invention is only for description and does not represent the superiority or inferiority of the embodiments. The processes depicted in the accompanying drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired result. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0088] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner. The same or similar parts among the embodiments can be referred to each other, and the key points of each embodiment are the differences from other embodiments.

Claims

1. An ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain, characterized in that Including: Obtain the change trend of the ultrasonic nursing data in each historical ultrasonic relief nursing process for the patient's rheumatic immune joint pain, and obtain the degree of demand relief of the patient for ultrasonic relief nursing; Analyze the score changes and score differences of each joint item in the joint pain score table obtained in each ultrasonic relief nursing process, and obtain the degree of joint alternated involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain of the patient; Obtain the joint pain relief evaluation value of the patient from the degree of joint alternated involvement and the degree of improvement of joint pain; Determine whether the patient needs psychological nursing according to the relationship between the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value; The process of obtaining the degree of joint alternated involvement includes: Obtain the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints in the joint pain score table of two adjacent ultrasonic relief nursing processes; the newly added painful joints represent that the score of the joint item changes from 0 to a positive number, and the reduced painful joints represent that the score of the joint item changes from a positive number to 0; Fuse the joint number differences between the number of newly added painful joints and the number of reduced painful joints in all adjacent two ultrasonic relief nursing processes to obtain the degree of joint alternated involvement; the degree of joint alternated involvement is inversely proportional to the joint number difference.

2. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 1, characterized in that, The ultrasonic nursing data includes at least one of ultrasonic frequency characteristic data, ultrasonic intensity characteristic data, and ultrasonic nursing duration; the ultrasonic frequency characteristic data is the average value of the ultrasonic frequency time series data in the ultrasonic relief nursing process, and the ultrasonic intensity characteristic data is the average value of the ultrasonic intensity time series data in the ultrasonic relief nursing process.

3. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The process of obtaining the degree of demand relief includes: Obtain the differences in ultrasonic nursing data between the initial ultrasonic relief nursing process and each ultrasonic relief nursing process; Weight the differences in ultrasonic nursing data corresponding to each ultrasonic relief nursing process according to the reference importance weight of the ultrasonic nursing data in each ultrasonic relief nursing process; Fuse the weighted differences in ultrasonic nursing data of each ultrasonic relief nursing process to obtain the degree of demand relief.

4. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of obtaining the degree of improvement of joint pain includes: Obtain the score difference of the same joint item in the joint pain score table of the latter ultrasonic relief nursing process and the former ultrasonic relief nursing process in two adjacent ultrasonic relief nursing processes; Obtain the joint pain grade corresponding to two adjacent ultrasonic relief nursing processes according to the conditions satisfied by the score differences corresponding to each joint item; Obtain the sub-degree of improvement of joint pain corresponding to two adjacent ultrasonic relief nursing processes according to the joint pain grade and the number difference of the target joint items in two adjacent ultrasonic relief nursing processes; the target joint item is the joint item with a positive score in the joint pain score table; Fuse the sub-degrees of improvement of joint pain in all adjacent two ultrasonic relief nursing processes to obtain the degree of improvement of joint pain.

5. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 4, characterized in that, The process of obtaining the joint pain grade includes: Based on the initial joint pain level and the joint pain level change rule, the joint pain level is obtained; the joint pain level change rule is: traverse each joint item, if the score difference is greater than the preset positive threshold, the joint pain level is incremented by 1; if the score difference is less than the preset negative threshold, the joint pain level is decremented by 1.

6. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 1, characterized in that, Determining whether the patient needs psychological nursing according to the relationship between the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value includes: Obtaining the degree of psychological nursing demand of the patient from the degree of demand relief and the joint pain relief evaluation value; the degree of psychological nursing demand is directly proportional to the degree of demand relief and inversely proportional to the joint pain relief evaluation value; If the degree of psychological nursing demand is greater than the preset psychological nursing demand degree threshold, it is determined that the patient needs psychological nursing.

7. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 1, characterized in that, After determining that the patient needs psychological nursing, the ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain further includes: Determining the effective degree of implementation of the patient's rehabilitation plan, where the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan is used to characterize the patient's implementation of the rehabilitation plan; Determining whether to implement the first psychological nursing strategy or the second psychological nursing strategy for the patient according to the conditions satisfied by the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan, where the first psychological nursing strategy is used for psychological nursing regarding the rehabilitation plan for the patient, and the second psychological nursing strategy is used for psychological nursing regarding the patient's emotions.

8. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain according to claim 7, characterized in that, The process of obtaining the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan includes: Obtaining the quantified activity values of the same joint mobility item in the joint function state table of each ultrasonic relief nursing process of the patient implementing the rehabilitation plan to form the actual quantified activity value sequence of each joint mobility item; Obtaining the Euclidean distance between the actual quantified activity value sequence of each joint mobility item and the standard quantified activity value sequence; Fusing the Euclidean distances of all joint mobility items to obtain the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan.

9. The ultrasonic relief and nursing method for rheumatic immune joint pain as described in claim 7, characterized in that, Determining whether to implement the first psychological nursing strategy or the second psychological nursing strategy for the patient according to the conditions satisfied by the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan includes: If the effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan is less than the preset effective degree of implementation of the rehabilitation plan threshold, the patient implements the first psychological nursing strategy; otherwise, the patient implements the second psychological nursing strategy.

Images