International comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation method, system, device, medium and product

Abstract

The invention discloses an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation method, system, device, medium and product, and relates to the technical field of transportation hub evaluation.The method comprises the steps that an evaluation index system of each transportation hub cluster is constructed, and the evaluation index system comprises a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index; a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes are set under each first-level evaluation index, and a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes are set under each second-level evaluation index; weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes, the second-level evaluation indexes and the first-level evaluation indexes in the transportation hub cluster development level are calculated; according to the data and the weight of each three-level evaluation index, obtaining the score and the total score of each evaluation index; and ranking the development level of each transportation hub cluster according to the score of each third-level evaluation index, the score of each second-level evaluation index, the score of each first-level evaluation index and the total score so as to study and judge the development short board of each transportation hub cluster, and the method can effectively identify the short board of the international transportation hub cluster.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of transportation hub evaluation, in particular to a method, system, device, medium and product for evaluating the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster. BACKGROUND

[0002] A transportation hub cluster refers to a comprehensive transportation network system formed by integrating various transportation hub facilities such as railways, airports, ports and land ports in a specific region, which has a synergistic effect. The core feature is to realize the cluster operation of regional transportation resources through "hard facility interconnection" and "soft policy coordination", and to improve the overall transportation efficiency and economic radiation capacity.

[0003] Most existing researches focus on the function and efficiency evaluation of a single hub, or conduct special researches on a hub cluster of a certain type such as ports, airports and railways. However, such researches have significant limitations and cannot realize systematic evaluation of an international transportation hub cluster integrating various transportation modes such as railways, aviation and ports, so as to effectively identify the weaknesses of each international hub cluster. SUMMARY

[0004] The purpose of the present application is to provide a method, system, device, medium and product for evaluating the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, which can effectively identify the weaknesses of an international transportation hub cluster integrating various transportation modes such as railways, aviation and ports.

[0005] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the present application provides the following solutions:

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, which comprises:

[0007] constructing an evaluation index system for each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, the evaluation index system comprising: a first-level evaluation index, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes under each first-level evaluation index, and a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes under each second-level evaluation index, the first-level evaluation index comprising: hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy;

[0008] calculating the weight values of each third-level evaluation index, each second-level evaluation index and each first-level evaluation index in the development level of the transportation hub cluster;

[0009] According to the data of each third-level evaluation index, the weight values of each third-level evaluation index, the weight values of each second-level evaluation index and the weight values of each first-level evaluation index, the scores of each third-level evaluation index, the scores of each second-level evaluation index, the scores of each first-level evaluation index and the total score of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster are obtained;

[0010] The development levels of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters are ranked according to the scores of the third-level evaluation indexes, the scores of the second-level evaluation indexes, the scores of the first-level evaluation indexes and the total scores, so as to determine the development short boards of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters.

[0011] In a second aspect, the present application provides an evaluation system for the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, and the system comprises:

[0012] An index system construction module is configured to construct an evaluation index system for the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, wherein the evaluation index system comprises: first-level evaluation indexes, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes set under each first-level evaluation index, and a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes set under each second-level evaluation index, and the first-level evaluation indexes comprise: hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy.

[0013] A calculation module is configured to calculate the weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes, the second-level evaluation indexes and the first-level evaluation indexes in the development level of the transportation hub cluster.

[0014] A score acquisition module is configured to acquire the third-level evaluation index scores, the second-level evaluation index scores, the first-level evaluation index scores and the total scores corresponding to each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to the data of the third-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the second-level evaluation indexes and the weight values of the first-level evaluation indexes.

[0015] A score ranking determination module is configured to rank the development levels of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters according to the third-level evaluation index scores, the second-level evaluation index scores, the first-level evaluation index scores and the total scores, so as to determine the development short boards of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters.

[0016] In a third aspect, the present application provides a computer device, which comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the method of any one of the above-mentioned subjects.

[0017] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer readable storage medium, which stores a computer program, and the computer program is executed by a processor to implement the steps of the method of any one of the above-mentioned subjects.

[0018] In a fifth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product, which comprises a computer program, and the computer program is executed by a processor to implement the steps of the method of any one of the above-mentioned subjects.

[0019] According to the specific embodiments provided by the present application, the following technical effects are disclosed:

[0020] The application provides an evaluation method, system, device, medium and product for the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, comprising the following steps: constructing an evaluation index system of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, the evaluation index system comprising: first evaluation indexes, multiple second evaluation indexes under each first evaluation index, and multiple third evaluation indexes under each second evaluation index, wherein the first evaluation indexes comprise: hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy; calculating the weight values of each third evaluation index, each second evaluation index and each first evaluation index in the development level of the transportation hub cluster; obtaining the third evaluation index scores, second evaluation index scores, first evaluation index scores and total scores of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to the data of each third evaluation index, the weight values of each third evaluation index, the weight values of each second evaluation index and the weight values of each first evaluation index; and ranking the development levels of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to the third evaluation index scores, second evaluation index scores, first evaluation index scores and total scores, so as to accurately analyze the development short board of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster. The existing research is limited to a single hub or a certain hub cluster, and it is difficult to systematically evaluate and identify the short board of an international transportation hub cluster integrating multiple transportation modes. The evaluation method for the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster provided by the application breaks through the limitation of traditional research, constructs a multi-level evaluation system comprising five first evaluation indexes of hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy, clearly defines the calculation method of each third evaluation index, calculates the weight values of each index, and obtains the index scores and total scores, so as to realize the quantitative ranking of the development level of each transportation hub cluster, accurately analyze the development short board, and provide a scientific basis for hub cluster planning and construction. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0021] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings needed in the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can also be obtained without creative labor.

[0022] Figure 1 is a flowchart of an evaluation method for the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0023] Figure 2 is a functional module schematic diagram of an evaluation system for the development level of an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0024] Figure 3 is a structural schematic diagram of a computer device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0025] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described clearly and completely below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments of the present application. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art without creative work fall within the protection scope of the present application.

[0026] The above purposes, features and advantages of the present application will be more obvious and easy to understand. The present application will be described in further detail below with reference to the drawings and specific embodiments.

[0027] Figure 1 is a flow chart of an evaluation method of the development level of an international comprehensive transport hub cluster according to an exemplary embodiment, as shown in Figure 1 The method includes the following steps S101-S104:

[0028] In step S101, an evaluation index system of each international comprehensive transport hub cluster is constructed, and the evaluation index system includes: a first-level evaluation index, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes under each first-level evaluation index, and a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes under each second-level evaluation index. The first-level evaluation index includes: hinterland scale, hub facility, transport level, opening degree and hub economy.

[0029] The international comprehensive transport hub cluster refers to a multi-modal transport function aggregation formed by taking globally influential aviation, port, railway and highway transport hubs as cores, through an efficient integrated transport network, an integrated logistics system and an industrial collaborative layout in a specific region. The international comprehensive transport hub cluster not only has basic functions such as international passenger and cargo transport distribution, transfer and transshipment, but also realizes efficient allocation of global logistics, capital flow and information flow through system collaboration between hubs, and is a strategic infrastructure combination supporting national participation in global economic competition and promoting regional coordinated development.

[0030] Before constructing the evaluation index system, the evaluation object needs to be determined:

[0031] The international hub cluster in the present disclosure takes a city cluster as a unit, and crosses different provinces and different hub objects. Therefore, the evaluation object mainly includes two types:

[0032] The first type is a statistical index range taking a province as a unit, and the evaluation object is a statistical value of the whole province, such as population, GDP, total import and export value, number of transport airports, etc.

[0033] The second type is the index of international hub in the province, and the evaluation object is the core airport, port and land port with international transportation function in each province, such as the proportion of industrial land within 5 kilometers of hub airport, the number of enterprises within 5 kilometers of hub airport, etc.

[0034] The evaluation index is clear:

[0035] Firstly, the primary evaluation index is clear. The commonly used hub evaluation index mainly focuses on transportation level and hub facilities. On this basis, the radiation capacity of hub, the opening function of hub and the coupling level of hub and urban space industry are fully considered, and three primary evaluation indexes of hinterland scale, opening degree and hub economy are innovatively introduced, which together with hub facilities and transportation level constitute five primary evaluation indexes.

[0036] Secondly, the secondary evaluation index is clear. In the hinterland scale primary evaluation index, the social and economic indexes of hub hinterland are mainly reflected, including three secondary evaluation indexes of population, GDP and transportation related market scale. In the hub facility primary evaluation index, the facility level of various transportation modes needs to be considered, including three secondary evaluation indexes of aviation, port and railway. In the transportation level primary evaluation index, on the basis of commonly used transportation scale index, three secondary evaluation indexes of transportation scale, transportation structure and multimodal transport are introduced. In the opening degree primary evaluation index, the international transportation function of hub is considered, and three secondary evaluation indexes of international transportation network, international transportation scale and the number of opening platforms are introduced. In the hub economy primary evaluation index, the industrial land, enterprise agglomeration and policy support around hub are mainly evaluated, and three secondary evaluation indexes of land scale, industrial development and policy support are introduced.

[0037] Finally, the three-level evaluation indicators and algorithms are determined. In the hinterland scale level one evaluation indicator, in addition to the direct hinterland population, GDP and transportation related market scale of the reaction hub, the land 3-hour transportation circle covered population and land 3-hour transportation circle covered GDP indicators are introduced innovatively, and the land includes railway and highway. In addition to the total value of transportation, storage and postal industry in the transportation related market scale indicator, the scale related indicators of industry, service industry and foreign trade related to the function of the hub are introduced, including: the number of industrial enterprises above designated size, the total retail sales of social consumer goods and the total value of goods import and export; in the hub facility level one evaluation indicator, the transportation and organization capacity indicators of international aviation, port and railway are introduced, including the number of international transport airports, the number of 10,000-ton berths, the number of container railway center stations, the number of cities opening China and Europe and Asian along the line train, the high-speed rail coverage rate of county-level administrative areas, etc.; the transportation scale secondary evaluation indicators of the transportation level one evaluation indicator include: railway passenger traffic volume indicator, railway freight volume indicator, airport passenger throughput indicator, airport cargo and mail throughput indicator, port throughput indicator and port container throughput indicator, the two three-level evaluation indicators of railway freight volume proportion and waterway freight volume proportion are introduced in the transportation structure secondary evaluation indicator, the multi-modal transport indicator aims to reflect the proportion of airport and port access railway sidings, including: the main port core port area railway siding access rate and the number of international airports with railway / track access; in the opening degree level one evaluation indicator, the number of China and Europe and Asian along the line train accessible countries and the number of international and regional navigable cities are introduced in the international transport network secondary evaluation indicator, the airport entry and exit passenger number, the airport import and export trade value, the port foreign trade cargo throughput and the number of cross-border train indicators are introduced in the international transport scale secondary evaluation indicator, the number of customs special supervision zones and the number of ports are introduced in the opening platform number indicator; in the hub economy level one evaluation indicator, the proportion of industrial land around international hub within 5 kilometers is introduced in the land scale secondary evaluation indicator, including the proportion of industrial land around international airport within 5 kilometers, the proportion of industrial land around international port within 5 kilometers and the proportion of industrial land around international land port within 5 kilometers, the number of enterprises around international hub within 5 kilometers is introduced in the industrial development secondary evaluation indicator, including the number of enterprises around international airport within 5 kilometers, the number of enterprises around international port within 5 kilometers and the number of enterprises around international land port within 5 kilometers, the number of state-level logistics hubs, the number of state-level airport economy demonstration zones and the number of state multi-modal transport demonstration projects are introduced in the national policy support indicator.

[0038] The detailed calculation method of the three-level evaluation indicators is shown in Table 1.

[0039] Table 1

[0040]

[0041]

[0042]

[0043] In the above Table 1, the industrial land area: according to the “Classification of Land Use in the Third National Land Survey”, the area of industrial land and commercial service land in the first classification is counted.

[0044] Enterprise screening rules: in the enterprise classification of the enterprise first class, eliminate health and social work industry, resident service, repair and other service industry, mining industry, and agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, fishery and other types of enterprises. Select enterprises with registered capital of 5 million yuan and above in the power, heat, gas and water production and supply industry, real estate industry, construction industry, transportation, warehousing and postal industry, information transmission, software and information technology service industry, manufacturing industry, scientific research and technical service industry, etc.

[0045] In step S102, the weight values of each three-level evaluation index, each two-level evaluation index and each one-level evaluation index in the development level of the traffic hub cluster are calculated.

[0046] In one embodiment, step S102 includes the following sub-steps S1021-S1027:

[0047] S1021, based on the international comprehensive traffic hub cluster and the three-level evaluation index, an evaluation matrix is constructed.

[0048] S1022, the original values of each three-level evaluation index in the evaluation matrix are dimensionless processed to obtain a standard value matrix formed by the standard values of each three-level evaluation index.

[0049] S1023, according to the standard value matrix, the proportion of each hub cluster under each three-level evaluation index is calculated.

[0050] S1024, according to the proportion, the entropy value of each three-level evaluation index is calculated.

[0051] S1025, according to the entropy value, the weight value of each three-level evaluation index is calculated.

[0052] S1026, according to the weight value of the three-level evaluation index corresponding to each two-level evaluation index, the weight value of each two-level evaluation index is calculated.

[0053] S1027, according to the weight value of the two-level evaluation index corresponding to each one-level evaluation index, the weight value of each one-level evaluation index is calculated.

[0054] The disclosure adopts entropy weight method to determine the weight. The evaluation matrix formed by m international comprehensive transport hubs cluster and n third-level evaluation indexes can be expressed as follows:

[0055]

[0056] Due to the different units and orders of magnitude of each third-level evaluation index, direct calculation and comparison cannot be performed. The range standardization method is adopted to perform dimensionless processing on the original values of each third-level evaluation index, convert each third-level evaluation index into a standard value, eliminate the differences between different evaluation indexes, and the calculation method is as follows:

[0057] x′ ij =(x ij -x min ) / (x min -x max ),i=1,2,…,m;j=1,2,…,n; (2)

[0058] Wherein: x' ij is the standard value of the jth third-level evaluation index of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster after preprocessing; x ij is the original value of the jth third-level evaluation index of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster, x max and x min are the maximum original value and the minimum original value of the third-level evaluation index, respectively.

[0059] The proportion of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster under the jth third-level evaluation index can be expressed as:

[0060]

[0061] In order to reduce the adverse effects of subjective factors and multi-index information overlap, entropy method is used to calculate the entropy value according to the size of the information provided by each index observation value, and reasonable weight is obtained by correction, which can effectively avoid the deviation caused by subjective factors. The entropy value calculation method of the jth third-level evaluation index is as formula (4).

[0062]

[0063] k=1 / lnm; (5)

[0064] Wherein: e j is the entropy value of the jth third-level evaluation index.

[0065] The weight value of the jth third-level evaluation index can be defined as:

[0066]

[0067] Wherein: w jThe weight value of the jth tertiary evaluation index.

[0068] The weight value of the bth secondary evaluation index can be defined as:

[0069]

[0070] wherein T is the number of tertiary evaluation indexes included in the bth secondary evaluation index.

[0071] The weight value of the ath primary evaluation index can be defined as:

[0072]

[0073] wherein K is the number of secondary evaluation indexes included in the ath primary evaluation index.

[0074] In step S103, according to the data of each tertiary evaluation index, the weight value of each tertiary evaluation index, the weight value of each secondary evaluation index, and the weight value of each primary evaluation index, the score of each tertiary evaluation index corresponding to each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, the score of each secondary evaluation index, the score of each primary evaluation index, and the total score are obtained.

[0075] In one embodiment, step S103 includes performing the following steps S1031-S1034 on each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster:

[0076] S1031, taking the standard value corresponding to each tertiary evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster as the score of the corresponding tertiary evaluation index.

[0077] S1032, according to the weight value of each tertiary evaluation index included in each secondary evaluation index and the score of the corresponding tertiary evaluation index, obtaining the score of each secondary evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster.

[0078] S1033, according to the weight value of each secondary evaluation index included in each primary evaluation index and the score of the corresponding secondary evaluation index, obtaining the score of each primary evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster.

[0079] S1034, according to the weight value of each primary evaluation index included in the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster and the score of the corresponding primary evaluation index, obtaining the total score of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster.

[0080] In step S104, the development level of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster is ranked according to the score of each tertiary evaluation index, the score of each secondary evaluation index, the score of each primary evaluation index, and the total score, so as to judge the development short board of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster.

[0081] Specifically, x' ij The score of the jth third-level evaluation index of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster can be used for comparison and ranking of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters, and a lower score indicates that the international comprehensive transport hub cluster performs poorly in the third-level evaluation index.

[0082] The score of the bth second-level evaluation index of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster is as follows:

[0083]

[0084] After obtaining the scores of the second-level evaluation indexes of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters, comparison and ranking of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters in the second-level evaluation indexes can be performed, and a lower score indicates that the international comprehensive transport hub cluster performs poorly in the second-level evaluation index.

[0085] The score of the ath first-level evaluation index of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster is as follows:

[0086]

[0087] After obtaining the scores of the first-level evaluation indexes of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters, comparison and ranking of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters can also be performed, and a lower score indicates that the international comprehensive transport hub cluster performs poorly in the first-level evaluation index.

[0088] The total score of the ith international comprehensive transport hub cluster is as follows:

[0089]

[0090] S is the number of first-level evaluation indexes included in the total index.

[0091] The total score of different international comprehensive transport hub clusters is the score of the development level of the international comprehensive transport hub cluster, and the higher the ranking, the higher the development level of the international comprehensive transport hub cluster, and the lower the ranking, the lower the development level of the international comprehensive transport hub cluster. By comparing the scores of the first-level, second-level, and third-level evaluation indexes, the development short board of the international comprehensive transport hub cluster in different dimensions can be analyzed, and the lower the score, the lower the development level of the index.

[0092] Traditional research focuses on a single hub (such as a port / airport) or a single mode of transportation, which cannot cover multi-modal hub clusters such as railways, aviation, ports, etc., resulting in one-sided evaluation dimensions. The present disclosure constructs an evaluation system including five first-level evaluation indexes of hinterland scale, hub facilities, transportation level, openness, and hub economy, and sets multiple hierarchical subdivision indexes under each first-level evaluation index (such as “aviation, port, and railway” as second-level evaluation indexes under “hub facilities”). The functions of different types of hubs are integrated into a unified framework, breaking the fragmentation of a single mode of transportation and forming a “multi-dimensional cross-evaluation” mode.

[0093] Single hub research only focuses on local functions (such as port efficiency) and lacks evaluation of hub cluster “system synergy” (such as the efficiency of connecting different modes of transportation and the driving effect on regional economy). In the present disclosure, the evaluation is refined layer by layer from the first-level evaluation index to the third-level evaluation index. For example, under the first-level evaluation index of “hub economy”, the second-level evaluation indexes include “land use scale, industrial development, and policy support”, and the second-level evaluation index “land use scale” is further refined into third-level evaluation indexes such as “international airport 5 km range industrial land proportion”, “international port 5 km range industrial land proportion”, and “international land port 5 km range industrial land proportion”. Through the correlation between indexes, a full-chain evaluation of hub clusters is formed.

[0094] There is a lack of quantitative comparison tools in existing technologies, which cannot clearly determine the advantages and disadvantages of each hub cluster through data, and it is difficult to support targeted optimization. The present disclosure determines the weight of each third-level evaluation index in the overall evaluation, for example, the weight of “international transport airport quantity” is higher than that of “transport airport quantity” in the weight value obtained by the entropy weight method, which reflects the characteristics of international hubs. According to the index data and weight, the third-level evaluation index score, second-level evaluation index score, and total score are calculated to form a quantitative ranking. For example, if a hub cluster has a high “transportation level” score but a low “hub economy” score, it can be directly identified as having the shortcoming of “strong transportation function but insufficient economic driving”.

[0095] Traditional researches rarely involve indexes such as "international openness" and "transnational logistics network", and cannot evaluate the status of hub clusters in global supply chain. The present disclosure sets "openness degree" in the first-level evaluation index, including the second-level evaluation indexes such as "international transportation network", "international transportation scale" and "number of open platforms", the second-level evaluation index "international transportation network" includes the third-level evaluation indexes "number of China-Europe block train accessible countries along the route" and "number of international and regional navigable cities", the second-level evaluation index "international transportation scale" includes the third-level evaluation indexes "number of airport inbound and outbound passengers", "total value of airport import and export trade", "port foreign trade cargo throughput" and "number of cross-border block trains", and the second-level evaluation index "number of open platforms" includes the third-level evaluation indexes "number of special customs supervision zones" and "number of ports". For example, the situation of international transportation network can be measured by "number of China-Europe block train accessible countries along the route" and "number of international and regional navigable cities", and the level of international transportation function can be measured by "total value of airport import and export trade", "number of cross-border block trains", "number of special customs supervision zones" and "number of ports". At present, the hub economy is rarely considered in the evaluation of hubs, and this time the level of industrial development around the hub is measured by indexes such as "industrial land proportion within 5km range of hub" and "number of enterprises within 5km range of hub".

[0096] In summary, the existing researches are limited to single hub or certain hub group, and it is difficult to systematically evaluate and identify the short board of international comprehensive transportation hub cluster integrating multiple transportation modes. The development level evaluation method of international comprehensive transportation hub cluster provided by the present patent breaks through the limitation of traditional researches, provides a scientific basis for hub cluster planning and construction, by constructing a multi-level evaluation system including five first-level evaluation indexes such as hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, openness degree and hub economy, clearly defining the calculation method of each third-level evaluation index, calculating the weight value of each index, and obtaining the index score and total score accordingly, and realizing the quantitative ranking of the development level of each transportation hub cluster, so as to accurately analyze the development short board and provide a scientific basis for hub cluster planning and construction.

[0097] Based on the same inventive concept, the present application also provides an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation system for implementing the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation method described above. The implementation scheme of the system for solving the problem is similar to the implementation scheme described in the above method, so the specific limitations in one or more international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation system embodiments provided below can be referred to the limitations of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation method in the above text, which will not be repeated here.

[0098] In one exemplary embodiment, as shown in Figure 2 an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation system is provided, which comprises:

[0099] The index system construction module 11 is configured to construct an evaluation index system of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster, the evaluation index system comprising: a first-level evaluation index, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes under each first-level evaluation index, and a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes under each second-level evaluation index, the first-level evaluation index comprising: hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree, and hub economy;

[0100] The calculation module 12 is configured to calculate the weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes, the second-level evaluation indexes, and the first-level evaluation indexes in the development level of the transportation hub cluster;

[0101] The score acquisition module 13 is configured to acquire the third-level evaluation index scores, the second-level evaluation index scores, the first-level evaluation index scores, and the total scores of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to the data of the third-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the second-level evaluation indexes, and the weight values of the first-level evaluation indexes;

[0102] The score ranking determination module 14 is configured to rank the development levels of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters according to the third-level evaluation index scores, the second-level evaluation index scores, the first-level evaluation index scores, and the total scores, so as to determine the development bottlenecks of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters.

[0103] As an optional implementation, the second-level evaluation indexes of the hinterland scale first-level evaluation index comprise population, GDP, and transportation-related market scale; the third-level evaluation indexes of the population second-level evaluation index comprise permanent population and land 3-hour traffic circle covered population, the third-level evaluation indexes of the GDP second-level evaluation index comprise total GDP and land 3-hour traffic circle covered GDP, and the third-level evaluation indexes of the transportation-related market scale second-level evaluation index comprise total value of transportation, warehousing, and postal services, number of industrial enterprises above designated size, total retail sales of social consumer goods, and total value of goods import and export, wherein the industrial enterprises above designated size refer to industrial enterprises with annual main business income of 20 million yuan or more.

[0104] As an optional implementation, the second-level evaluation indexes of the opening degree first-level evaluation index comprise international transportation network, international transportation scale, and number of opening platforms, the third-level evaluation indexes of the international transportation network second-level evaluation index comprise number of China-Europe and Asian countries along the line reached by block trains and number of international and regional navigable cities, the third-level evaluation indexes of the international transportation scale second-level evaluation index comprise number of airport entry-exit passengers, total value of airport import and export trade, port foreign trade cargo throughput, and number of cross-border block train shipments, and the third-level evaluation indexes of the number of opening platforms second-level evaluation index comprise number of special customs supervision zones and number of ports.

[0105] As an optional implementation, the first-level evaluation index of the hub economy includes second-level evaluation indexes including land use scale, industry development and policy support, the second-level evaluation index of land use scale includes third-level evaluation indexes including proportion of industrial land within 5 kilometers of an international airport, proportion of industrial land within 5 kilometers of an international port and proportion of industrial land within 5 kilometers of an international land port, the second-level evaluation index of industry development includes third-level evaluation indexes including number of enterprises within 5 kilometers of an international airport, number of enterprises within 5 kilometers of an international port and number of enterprises within 5 kilometers of an international land port, and the second-level evaluation index of policy support includes third-level evaluation indexes including number of accumulatively approved national logistics hubs, number of national airport economy demonstration zones and number of created national multimodal transport demonstration projects.

[0106] As an optional implementation, the first-level evaluation index of the hub facility includes second-level evaluation indexes including aviation, port and railway, the second-level evaluation index of aviation includes third-level evaluation indexes including number of transport airports and number of international transport airports, the second-level evaluation index of port includes third-level evaluation indexes including number of berths with a capacity of more than 10,000 tons, annual cargo throughput of the port and designed annual throughput of container berths, and the second-level evaluation index of railway includes third-level evaluation indexes including number of container railway centers, number of cities where China-Europe and Asian along the line trains are opened and high-speed rail coverage rate of county-level administrative regions.

[0107] As an optional implementation, the first-level evaluation index of the transport level includes second-level evaluation indexes including transport scale, transport structure and multimodal transport, the second-level evaluation index of transport scale includes third-level evaluation indexes including railway passenger volume, railway freight volume, port throughput, port container throughput, airport passenger throughput and airport cargo and mail throughput, the second-level evaluation index of transport structure includes third-level evaluation indexes including proportion of railway freight volume and proportion of waterway freight volume, and the second-level evaluation index of multimodal transport includes third-level evaluation indexes including railway special line access rate of a core port area of a major port and number of international airports with railway / rail access.

[0108] As an optional implementation, the computing module 12 is specifically configured to:

[0109] construct an evaluation matrix based on the international comprehensive transport hub cluster and the third-level evaluation indexes;

[0110] perform non-dimensional processing on original values of the third-level evaluation indexes in the evaluation matrix to obtain a standard value matrix formed by standard values of the third-level evaluation indexes;

[0111] calculate a proportion of each hub cluster under each third-level evaluation index according to the standard value matrix;

[0112] calculate an entropy value of each third-level evaluation index according to the proportion;

[0113] calculate a weight value of each third-level evaluation index according to the entropy value;

[0114] According to the weight values of the corresponding third-level evaluation indexes of each secondary evaluation index, the weight values of each secondary evaluation index are calculated;

[0115] According to the weight values of the corresponding secondary evaluation indexes of each primary evaluation index, the weight values of each primary evaluation index are calculated.

[0116] As an optional implementation, the score acquisition module 13 is specifically configured to perform the following steps on each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster:

[0117] The standard value corresponding to each third-level evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster is taken as the score of the corresponding third-level evaluation index;

[0118] According to the weight values of the third-level evaluation indexes included in each secondary evaluation index and the scores of the corresponding third-level evaluation indexes, the scores of each secondary evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster are acquired;

[0119] According to the weight values of the secondary evaluation indexes included in each primary evaluation index and the scores of the corresponding secondary evaluation indexes, the scores of each primary evaluation index of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster are acquired;

[0120] According to the weight values of the primary evaluation indexes included in the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster and the scores of the corresponding primary evaluation indexes, the total score of the current international comprehensive transportation hub cluster is acquired.

[0121] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, which can be a server or a terminal, and its internal structure diagram can be as shown in Figure 3 The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface (I / O) and a communication interface. Among them, the processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected through a system bus, and the communication interface is connected to the system bus through the input / output interface. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and external devices. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with external terminals through network connection. The computer program is executed by the processor to implement an international comprehensive transportation hub cluster development level evaluation method.

[0122] Those skilled in the art can understand that, Figure 3The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of part of the structure related to the scheme of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the scheme of the present application is applied. The specific computer device can include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0123] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is also provided, including a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, and the processor implementing the steps in the above method embodiments when executing the computer program.

[0124] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided, storing a computer program, and the computer program implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0125] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, and the computer program implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0126] It should be noted that the user information (including but not limited to user device information, user personal information, etc.) and data (including but not limited to data for analysis, stored data, displayed data, etc.) involved in the present application are all information and data authorized by the user or authorized by all parties, and the collection, use and processing of related data need to comply with relevant regulations.

[0127] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed, the processes of the above-mentioned embodiments of the methods can be included. Any reference to memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical storage, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive memory (ReRAM), magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration but not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM), etc.

[0128] The database involved in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. The non-relational database can include a distributed database based on a blockchain, etc., without being limited thereto. The processor involved in the embodiments provided in the present application can be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, etc., without being limited thereto.

[0129] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. In order to make the description concise, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described, however, as long as the combinations of the technical features do not exist contradictory, they should be considered as the scope of the present application.

[0130] The principles and implementation modes of the present application are described by applying specific examples in the present application. The above-mentioned embodiments are only used to help understand the method and its core idea of the present application; at the same time, for those skilled in the art, according to the idea of the present application, the specific implementation mode and application range will be changed. In conclusion, the content of the present application should not be understood as a limitation.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the development level of an international comprehensive transport hub cluster, characterized in that, The method comprises: An evaluation index system of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster is constructed, the evaluation index system comprises: a first-level evaluation index, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes are arranged under each first-level evaluation index, a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes are arranged under each second-level evaluation index, the first-level evaluation index comprises: hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy; The weight values of each third-level evaluation index, each second-level evaluation index and each first-level evaluation index in the development level of the transportation hub cluster are calculated; According to the data of each third-level evaluation index, the weight value of each third-level evaluation index, the weight value of each second-level evaluation index and the weight value of each first-level evaluation index, the third-level evaluation index score, the second-level evaluation index score, the first-level evaluation index score and the total score corresponding to each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster are obtained; The development levels of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster are ranked according to the third-level evaluation index score, the second-level evaluation index score, the first-level evaluation index score and the total score, so as to judge the development short board of each international comprehensive transportation hub cluster.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein, The second-level evaluation indexes included in the hinterland scale first-level evaluation index include population, GDP and transportation-related market scale; the third-level evaluation indexes included in the population second-level evaluation index include permanent population and land 3-hour traffic circle covered population, the third-level evaluation indexes included in the GDP second-level evaluation index include total GDP and land 3-hour traffic circle covered GDP, and the third-level evaluation indexes included in the transportation-related market scale second-level evaluation index include total value of transportation, warehousing and postal services, number of large-scale industrial enterprises, total retail sales of social consumer goods and total value of goods import and export.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein, The second-level evaluation indexes included in the opening degree first-level evaluation index include international transportation network, international transportation scale and number of opening platforms, the third-level evaluation indexes included in the international transportation network second-level evaluation index include number of China-Europe and Asian countries along the line reached by block trains and number of international and regional navigable cities, the third-level evaluation indexes included in the international transportation scale second-level evaluation index include number of airport entry and exit passengers, total value of airport import and export trade, port foreign trade cargo throughput and number of cross-border block trains, and the third-level evaluation indexes included in the number of opening platforms second-level evaluation index include number of special customs supervision zones and number of ports.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein, The second-level evaluation indexes included in the hub economy first-level evaluation index include land use scale, industrial development and policy support, the third-level evaluation indexes included in the land use scale second-level evaluation index include proportion of international airport 5-kilometer range industrial land, proportion of international port 5-kilometer range industrial land and proportion of international land port 5-kilometer range industrial land, the third-level evaluation indexes included in the industrial development second-level evaluation index include number of enterprises in the 5-kilometer range of international airport, number of enterprises in the 5-kilometer range of international port and number of enterprises in the 5-kilometer range of international land port, and the third-level evaluation indexes included in the policy support second-level evaluation index include number of cumulative approved national logistics hubs, number of national airport economy demonstration zones and number of created national multimodal transport demonstration projects.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein, The computing the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes, the two-level evaluation indexes and the one-level evaluation indexes in the development level of the traffic hub cluster comprises: constructing an evaluation matrix based on the international comprehensive traffic hub cluster and the three-level evaluation indexes; performing non-dimensional processing on the original values of the three-level evaluation indexes in the evaluation matrix to obtain a standard value matrix formed by the standard values of the three-level evaluation indexes; calculating the proportion of each hub cluster under each three-level evaluation index according to the standard value matrix; calculating the entropy values of each three-level evaluation index according to the proportions; calculating the weight values of each three-level evaluation index according to the entropy values; calculating the weight values of the two-level evaluation indexes according to the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes corresponding to the two-level evaluation indexes; calculating the weight values of the one-level evaluation indexes according to the weight values of the two-level evaluation indexes corresponding to the one-level evaluation indexes.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein, The obtaining the three-level evaluation index scores, the two-level evaluation index scores, the one-level evaluation index scores and the total scores corresponding to each international comprehensive traffic hub cluster according to the data of the three-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the two-level evaluation indexes and the weight values of the one-level evaluation indexes comprises: performing the following steps on each international comprehensive traffic hub cluster: taking the standard value corresponding to each three-level evaluation index of the current international comprehensive traffic hub cluster as the score of the corresponding three-level evaluation index; obtaining the two-level evaluation index scores of the current international comprehensive traffic hub cluster according to the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes included in the two-level evaluation indexes and the scores of the corresponding three-level evaluation indexes; obtaining the one-level evaluation index scores of the current international comprehensive traffic hub cluster according to the weight values of the two-level evaluation indexes included in the one-level evaluation indexes and the scores of the corresponding two-level evaluation indexes; obtaining the total score of the current international comprehensive traffic hub cluster according to the weight values of the one-level evaluation indexes included in the current international comprehensive traffic hub cluster and the scores of the corresponding one-level evaluation indexes.

7. An evaluation system for the development level of an international comprehensive transport hub cluster, characterized by, The system comprises: an index system construction module configured to construct an evaluation index system of the international comprehensive traffic hub cluster, the evaluation index system comprising one-level evaluation indexes, a plurality of two-level evaluation indexes set under each one-level evaluation index, and a plurality of three-level evaluation indexes set under each two-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation indexes comprising hinterland scale, hub facility, transportation level, opening degree and hub economy; a calculation module configured to calculate the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes, the two-level evaluation indexes and the one-level evaluation indexes in the development level of the traffic hub cluster; a score obtaining module configured to obtain the three-level evaluation index scores, the two-level evaluation index scores, the one-level evaluation index scores and the total scores corresponding to each international comprehensive traffic hub cluster according to the data of the three-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the three-level evaluation indexes, the weight values of the two-level evaluation indexes and the weight values of the one-level evaluation indexes. The scoring ranking determination module is configured to rank the development levels of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters according to the scores of the third-level evaluation indexes, the scores of the second-level evaluation indexes, the scores of the first-level evaluation indexes, and the total scores, so as to determine the development short boards of the international comprehensive transportation hub clusters.

8. A computer device comprising: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the evaluation method of the development level of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to any one of claims 1-6.

9. A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program, characterized in that, The computer program is executed by the processor to implement the steps of the evaluation method of the development level of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product comprising a computer program, characterized in that, The computer program is executed by the processor to implement the steps of the evaluation method of the development level of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to any one of claims 1-6. The computer program is executed by the processor to implement the steps of the evaluation method of the development level of the international comprehensive transportation hub cluster according to any one of claims 1-6.

Images