Intelligent management system and method for pediatric inspectors

Abstract

The invention provides an intelligent management method and system for people reviews, and belongs to the technical field of personnel management, and the method specifically comprises the steps: taking a case matched with a reviewer as a matched case, determining the later reviews in the reviews according to the number of the matched cases and the coincidence condition of the matched reviews between different matched cases, and carrying out the subsequent review of the reviews according to the coincidence condition of the matched reviews. Obtaining the number of post-compensation accompanying persons of different matched cases and distribution data of different post-compensation accompanying persons in different cases, and determining post-compensation target cases of the post-compensation accompanying persons in combination with management requirement types of different matched cases; and on the basis of the number of the post-compensation target cases and the coincidence condition of the post-compensation accompanying persons in the different post-compensation target cases, post-compensation processing schemes of the post-compensation accompanying persons in the different post-compensation target cases are determined, and the reliability degree of post-compensation processing is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of personnel management technology, and in particular relates to an intelligent management system and method for people's assessors. Background Technology

[0002] In existing technical solutions, people's jurors are often selected through random selection during court hearings. Specifically, jurors are screened based on their basic information, and then the first juror who meets the number of jurors required for the current case is randomly selected as the final juror.

[0003] In certain circumstances, lay jurors may need to recuse themselves during court proceedings. As a result, different lay jurors may not be suitable for certain cases. This means that if lay jurors with a large number of suitable cases are placed into a random selection pool, some suitable cases may not be able to meet the court hearing requirements due to personnel changes. Therefore, how to select replacement jurors and determine replacement strategies for different cases to ensure the reliability of court proceedings has become an urgent technical problem to be solved.

[0004] To address the aforementioned technical issues, this application specifically provides an intelligent management system and method for people's assessors. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To achieve the objectives of this invention, the following technical solution is adopted: Specifically, this application provides an intelligent management method for people's assessors, which includes: S1 uses the parsed data from the jury management system to determine the matching juries for different cases. By utilizing the update status of the basic data of the matched juries and the overlap with other cases, it determines the management needs for different cases. S2 takes the cases matched with the jurors as matching cases, and determines the alternate jurors among the jurors based on the number of matching cases and the overlap of jurors matched between different matching cases. S3 obtains the number of alternate jurors for different matched cases and the distribution data of different alternate jurors in different cases, and determines the alternate target cases for alternate jurors by combining different management needs of matched cases. S4 determines the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases based on the number of supplementary target cases and the overlap of the composition of supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases.

[0006] A further technical solution is that the matched jurors are jurors whose basic data meets the recusal requirements of the case.

[0007] A further technical solution is that the update status of the basic data includes the update time of the basic data and the interval between the update time and the current time.

[0008] A further technical solution is that the overlap with other cases includes the number of jurors matching other cases.

[0009] A further technical solution involves determining the type of management needs for the case as follows: Based on the update status of the basic data of the matched jurors, determine the matched jurors whose update time is within a preset time range, and use them as the updated matched jurors. Based on the overlap between the updated matched jurors and other cases, determine the number of cases where different updated matched jurors overlap, and use this number as the number of overlapping cases. By matching the number of overlapping cases with different jurors in different updates, the management needs type of the case can be determined.

[0010] A further technical solution involves determining the supplementary handling plan for supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases as follows: The number of cases in which the composition of alternate jurors overlaps in different alternate target cases is determined by the overlap in the composition of alternate jurors. Based on the number of cases where the supplementary reviewers overlap, the supplementary processing position of the supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases is determined, and the risk-selected cases of the supplementary reviewers are determined based on the supplementary processing position. By determining the number of risk-based cases for different supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases, the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases is determined.

[0011] Secondly, this invention provides an intelligent management system for people's assessors, employing the aforementioned intelligent management method for people's assessors, specifically including: Modules for assessing the type of requirements, module for determining jurors, and module for post-trial processing; The requirement type assessment module is responsible for determining the management requirement type for different cases; The juror determination module is responsible for determining the alternate jurors among the jurors. The supplementary processing module is responsible for determining the supplementary processing plan for supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases.

[0012] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: Based on the number of matched cases and the overlap of jurors between different matched cases, alternate jurors are determined. This allows for the selection of jurors with a large number of matched cases and a high degree of overlap in the matched jurors. In other words, jurors with a high degree of fit and a higher probability of not being able to meet the requirements for random selection due to unexpected changes in the later matched jurors caused by the high degree of overlap are selected as alternate jurors. This ensures that when the matched jurors cannot meet the requirements for random selection in matched cases, timely replacements can be made, resulting in a reliable and effective selection of jurors for each case. Based on the number of supplementary target cases and the overlap in the composition of supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases, a supplementary juror handling plan is determined for different supplementary target cases. This avoids the technical problem of low reliability in the supplementary handling of supplementary target cases caused by supplementary jurors in some supplementary target cases being ranked relatively high in other supplementary target cases. The ranking plan is dynamically adjusted in a targeted manner, thereby ensuring the reliability of the selection and handling of supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases when supplementary handling is required.

[0013] Other features and advantages will be set forth in the following description, and the objects and other advantages of the invention are realized and obtained through the structures particularly pointed out in the description and the drawings.

[0014] To make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, preferred embodiments are described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Attached Figure Description

[0015] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from a detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0016] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a smart management method for people's assessors; Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for determining the types of management needs for a case; Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for determining alternate jurors. Figure 4 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for determining the target cases for alternate jurors; Figure 5 This is a framework diagram of an intelligent management system for people's jurors. Detailed Implementation

[0017] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this specification, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0018] In this application, since there is a risk of rescheduling for cases that have not yet gone to trial, jurors with a higher number of matching cases are designated as backup jurors based on the matching of jurors with recusal requirements for cases that have not yet gone to trial. This ensures that the randomly selected jurors can meet the requirements as much as possible when different cases go to trial, and reduces the impact of unexpected situations on the risk of insufficient jurors.

[0019] Updated jurors from other cases that do not overlap are considered non-overlapping jurors. The demand ratio is determined based on the ratio of the number of non-overlapping jurors to the number of jurors required for the case. The associated demand type of the case is determined based on the preset demand type corresponding to the demand ratio.

[0020] Overlapping matching cases are determined by the number of overlapping jurors between matched cases. Overlapping matching cases are those where the number of overlapping jurors is greater than a preset overlap threshold.

[0021] When the management requirement type of the matched case is a type 3 requirement, the matched case is determined to be a target case for the substitute jurors. If it is a type 1 requirement, the matched case is determined not to be a target case for the substitute jurors. When the associated requirement type of the matched case is a type 2 requirement and the number of substitute jurors is less than the preset threshold for the number of substitute jurors, or the number of substitute jurors in the case is less than the number of matched cases, the case is designated as a target case for the substitute jurors.

[0022] Based on the number of cases where the alternate reviewers overlap, the alternate reviewers' alternate handling positions in different alternate target cases are determined. Alternate target cases whose alternate handling positions are ranked fifth or higher are designated as risk-selected cases. By considering the number of risk-selected cases for different alternate reviewers in different alternate target cases, the alternate handling plan for alternate jurors in different alternate target cases is determined.

[0023] Example 1 like Figure 1 As shown, this application provides an intelligent management method for people's assessors, specifically including: S1 uses the parsed data from the jury management system to determine the matching juries for different cases. By utilizing the update status of the basic data of the matched juries and the overlap with other cases, it determines the management needs for different cases. Furthermore, the matched jurors are those whose basic data meets the recusal requirements for the case.

[0024] Specifically, the update status of the basic data includes the update time of the basic data and the interval between the update time and the current time.

[0025] Furthermore, the overlap with other cases includes the number of jurors matching other cases.

[0026] Specifically, such as Figure 2 As shown, the method for determining the management need type of the case is as follows: Based on the update status of the basic data of the matched jurors, determine the matched jurors whose update time is within a preset time range, and use them as the updated matched jurors. Based on the overlap between the updated matched jurors and other cases, determine the number of cases where different updated matched jurors overlap, and use this number as the number of overlapping cases. By matching the number of overlapping cases with different jurors in different updates, the management needs type of the case can be determined.

[0027] Specifically, the case mentioned above, along with the other cases, are all cases that have not yet gone to trial.

[0028] It is understood that the preset time range is determined based on the time interval from the current moment within the preset time range.

[0029] It should be noted that the management needs of the cases are determined by updating the number of overlapping cases with different jurors, specifically including: The updated jurors of other cases that do not overlap are considered as non-overlapping jurors, and the type of associated demand for the case is determined by the number of non-overlapping jurors.

[0030] Specifically, the demand ratio is determined based on the ratio of the number of non-overlapping individuals to the number of jurors required for the case, and the associated demand type for the case is determined based on the preset demand type corresponding to the demand ratio.

[0031] The associated demand types include three types: Type 1 demand, Type 2 demand, and Type 3 demand.

[0032] Understandably, when the ratio of the number of non-overlapping individuals to the number of jurors required for the case is above 1.5, it is classified as a type 1 demand; when it is between 1 and 1.5, it is classified as a type 2 demand; and in other cases, it is classified as a type 3 demand. The number of jurors required for the case refers to the number of jurors that need to be randomly selected for the case.

[0033] It is understandable that when the related demand type of the case is one type of demand, the non-overlapping personnel will be used as the alternate jurors and jurors for the case.

[0034] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the management requirement type of the case is as follows: Based on the update status of the basic data of the matched jurors, determine the matched jurors whose update time is within a preset time range, and use them as the updated matched jurors. Based on the overlap between the updated matched jurors and other cases, determine the number of cases where different updated matched jurors overlap, and use this number as the number of overlapping cases. By matching the number of overlapping cases with different jurors in different updates, the management needs type of the case can be determined.

[0035] Specifically, the ratio of the number of updated matched jurors to the number of jurors required for the case is used as the update matching ratio. The juror matching value is determined based on the ratio of the update matching ratio to the average number of cases with overlapping updated matched jurors. The management requirement type of the case is determined based on the preset requirement type corresponding to the juror matching value.

[0036] S2 takes the cases matched with the jurors as matching cases, and determines the alternate jurors among the jurors based on the number of matching cases and the overlap of jurors matched between different matching cases. Specifically, such as Figure 3 As shown, the method for determining alternate jurors among the jurors is as follows: Based on the overlap of jurors in the matched cases, determine the number of overlapping jurors in different matched cases. The overlapping matching cases among the matching cases are determined based on the number of overlaps. The number of matched cases and the number of overlapping matched cases are used to determine whether the juror is a substitute juror.

[0037] Understandably, overlapping matching cases are those where the number of matching jurors exceeds a preset threshold.

[0038] Specifically, when a juror is not a substitute juror, they are randomly selected from different matching cases.

[0039] Specifically, when the number of cases matched with a juror exceeds a preset threshold for the number of matched cases or the number of overlapping matched cases exceeds a threshold for the number of overlapping matched cases, the juror is determined to be a substitute juror.

[0040] Optionally, the method for determining alternate jurors among the jurors is as follows: S21 obtains the number of matched cases for the juror, determines the number of overlapping jurors for different matched cases based on the overlap of jurors matched between the matched cases, and determines the overlapping matched cases between the matched cases based on the number of overlapping cases. It should be noted that in the above steps, if the number of cases matched with a juror is insufficient to meet the requirements, specifically when the number of cases matched with a juror exceeds the preset threshold for the number of cases matched, then due to the large number of cases matched, the juror needs to be set as a substitute juror.

[0041] Furthermore, it is understandable that when the number of cases a juror is matched with meets the requirements and is within the preset range, i.e. less than 5, then even if they are not selected as alternate jurors, their impact on the jurors of other matched cases and the availability of alternate jurors is not high. Therefore, they can be directly set not to be alternate jurors.

[0042] Additionally, it is understandable that when the number of cases matched with a juror is not within the preset range, it is necessary to determine that there are no overlapping cases. If there are no overlapping cases, then the juror is not considered a substitute juror. If the number of overlapping cases is greater than the threshold for overlapping cases, then the juror is considered a substitute juror.

[0043] Only when the number of overlapping cases does not exceed the threshold for the number of overlapping cases will the determination of overlapping juror cases be carried out.

[0044] S22 determines the number of overlapping jurors in different matched cases based on the overlap of jurors in the matched cases of the jury, and determines the juror overlap cases in the matched cases based on the number of other matched cases that overlap in different matched jurors. Furthermore, in one possible embodiment, a juror overlap case is a case in which the average number of other matching cases involving different jurors is greater than a preset case number threshold.

[0045] Understandably, if there are many cases with overlapping jurors in the above steps, i.e., when the number exceeds the preset threshold, then because the jurors in different matched cases are highly correlated, they can be directly identified as alternate jurors.

[0046] It should also be noted that if the number of cases with overlapping jurors is small, that is, if the proportion of cases with overlapping jurors in the matched cases is less than the preset threshold, then the correlation between jurors in different matched cases is not high. Therefore, in the above steps, if the number of matched cases is not within the preset range, it can be directly determined that they do not belong to the alternate jurors.

[0047] S23 determines whether a juror is an alternate juror based on the number of cases with overlapping jurors and the number of matched cases, combined with the average number of other matched cases where matched cases overlap in different matched jurors.

[0048] In another embodiment, the number of matched cases excluding cases with overlapping jurors is determined based on the number of matched cases and the number of cases with overlapping jurors. These are then considered as non-overlapping cases. The juror demand deviation value is determined based on the ratio of the number of non-overlapping cases to the average number of other matched cases that overlap with non-overlapping cases in different matched jurors. When the demand deviation value is less than a preset demand deviation threshold, the juror is determined to be a substitute juror.

[0049] S3 obtains the number of alternate jurors for different matched cases and the distribution data of different alternate jurors in different cases, and determines the alternate target cases for alternate jurors by combining different management needs of matched cases. Specifically, such as Figure 4 As shown, the method for determining the target cases for the supplementary jurors is as follows: Obtain the number of alternate jurors for the matched cases, and determine the number of cases in which different alternate jurors are located based on the distribution data of the alternate jurors for the matched cases in different cases. Based on the management needs type of the matched cases, the number of alternate jurors, and the number of matched cases for different alternate jurors, the alternate target cases for the alternate jurors are determined.

[0050] It is understood that when the management requirement type of the matched case is three types, the matched case is determined to be a backup target case for the backup juror; if it is a single type, the matched case is determined not to be a backup target case for the backup juror.

[0051] Specifically, when the associated demand type of the matched case is a type II demand and the number of alternate jurors is less than the preset threshold for the number of alternate jurors, or when the number of alternate jurors in the case is less than the number of matched cases, i.e., less than the preset threshold, then the demand for the matched case is relatively high, and therefore it can be used as the target case for alternate jurors.

[0052] Optionally, the method for determining the target cases for the replacement jurors is as follows: S31 Obtain the management requirement type of the matched case, and determine the number of matched cases with the management requirement type of the third type and the number of matched cases with the management requirement type of the second type, and designate the matched cases with the management requirement type of the second type as the target matched cases; Specifically, in the above steps, if the management demand type is three types of demand, it is directly determined that it belongs to the supplementary target case of the supplementary juror. In addition, it can be understood that when the number of matching cases with the management demand type of three types of demand is large, that is, when it exceeds a certain target number threshold, no judgment is required. Since the number of supplementary target cases is large, it can be directly determined that the remaining matching cases do not belong to the supplementary target cases.

[0053] In one possible embodiment, the target number threshold is determined based on the product of a preset scaling factor and the number of matched cases.

[0054] In another embodiment, if the sum of the number of matching cases of the three types of management needs and the number of matching cases of the second type of management needs is not greater than a certain target number threshold, then no judgment is required, and all matching cases of the second type of management needs and the first type of management needs are directly used as the target cases for the supplementary jurors. In other cases, further screening of matching cases of the second type of management needs is required.

[0055] S32 obtains the number of alternate jurors for the target matching case, determines the number of cases in which different alternate jurors are located based on the distribution data of the alternate jurors for the target matching case in different cases, and determines the matching requirement value of the target matching case in combination with the number of alternate jurors for the target matching case. It should be noted that if the number of alternate jurors for the target matching case is small in the above steps, specifically less than a certain threshold, the target matching case can be used as the alternate target case for the alternate jurors because the number of alternate jurors is small.

[0056] It should also be noted that even if the number of alternate jurors is not small, i.e. not less than a certain threshold, if the number of cases in which different alternate jurors are located is less than the number of matching cases, and the number of alternate jurors does not meet the requirements, i.e. is less than the preset threshold, then the demand for matching cases is relatively high, and therefore these cases can be used as the target cases for alternate jurors.

[0057] Additionally, it is understandable that if the number of alternate jurors whose number of cases is less than the number of matching cases meets the requirements, that is, if the number of alternate jurors whose number of cases is less than the number of matching cases is greater than the preset threshold, then there are many alternate jurors whose number of cases is even less. Therefore, it can be determined that under the current situation of alternate jurors, they do not belong to the alternate target cases.

[0058] Specifically, in one possible embodiment, the matching requirement value for the target matching case is determined based on the number of cases in which different alternate jurors are located and the number of alternate jurors in the target matching case. Specifically, the matching deviation value of different alternate jurors is determined by the ratio of the number of cases in which different alternate jurors are located to the matching cases of the alternate jurors. The matching requirement value is determined by the difference between the preset value and the sum of the matching deviation values ​​of the alternate jurors in different target matching cases.

[0059] S33 determines the backup target cases for the backup jurors based on the matching requirement value of the target matching cases and the number of target matching cases.

[0060] Understandably, the target matching cases are determined by subtracting the number of matching cases of the three types of management needs from the target number threshold, and then determining the supplementary target cases that belong to the supplementary jurors among the target matching cases by subtracting the number of matching cases of the three types of management needs from the target number threshold.

[0061] S4 determines the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases based on the number of supplementary target cases and the overlap of the composition of supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases.

[0062] Specifically, the method for determining the supplementary juror handling plan in different supplementary target cases is as follows: The number of cases in which the composition of alternate jurors overlaps in different alternate target cases is determined by the overlap in the composition of alternate jurors. Based on the number of cases where the supplementary reviewers overlap, the supplementary processing position of the supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases is determined, and the risk-selected cases of the supplementary reviewers are determined based on the supplementary processing position. By determining the number of risk-based cases for different supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases, the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases is determined.

[0063] It is understandable that the risk-selected cases are the supplementary target cases whose supplementary processing position is before the preset position. Specifically, the supplementary target cases whose supplementary processing position is before the fifth position are considered as risk-selected cases.

[0064] It should be noted that the supplementary reviewers' supplementary processing positions in different supplementary target cases are determined by sorting the number of cases in which the supplementary reviewers overlap from smallest to largest.

[0065] Understandably, by determining the number of risk-based cases involving different alternate jurors in different alternate target cases, the alternate juror handling plan for different alternate target cases is determined, specifically including: When there are no risk-selected cases for the supplementary reviewers, the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases is determined according to the supplementary handling position of the supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases, that is, the supplementary handling position is used as the supplementary handling order.

[0066] When there are risky selection cases among the supplementary reviewers, the number of risky selection cases for different supplementary reviewers in the supplementary target cases of the supplementary reviewers is used to determine if there are supplementary target cases where the number of risky selection cases for each supplementary reviewer does not meet the requirements, that is, when the number of risky selection cases for each supplementary target case is greater than the preset risky case number threshold. Then, based on the number of supplementary reviewers in different risky selection cases, the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary reviewers in different risky selection cases is determined. Based on the supplementary handling position of the supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases, the supplementary handling plan for the supplementary jurors in supplementary target cases other than risky selection cases is determined.

[0067] Understandably, when the number of backup reviewers in the risk-selected cases is large, i.e., exceeds a certain threshold, the backup reviewers are directly not allowed to perform backup processing in the risk-selected cases. When the number of backup reviewers in the risk-selected cases is small, i.e. does not exceed a certain threshold, the backup processing order of the backup reviewers in the risk-selected cases is determined from small to large based on the number of backup target cases for which the number of risk-selected cases for each backup reviewer does not meet the requirements. That is, the order is determined by the number of backup target cases for which the number of risk-selected cases for each backup reviewer is greater than the preset threshold for the number of risk-selected cases.

[0068] Example 2 Secondly, such as Figure 5 As shown, this invention provides an intelligent management system for people's assessors, employing the aforementioned intelligent management method for people's assessors, specifically including: Modules for assessing the type of requirements, module for determining jurors, and module for post-trial processing; The requirement type assessment module is responsible for determining the management requirement type for different cases; The juror determination module is responsible for determining the alternate jurors among the jurors. The supplementary processing module is responsible for determining the supplementary processing plan for supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases.

[0069] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner. Similar or identical parts between embodiments can be referred to mutually. Each embodiment focuses on describing the differences from other embodiments. In particular, the embodiments of apparatus, devices, and non-volatile computer storage media are basically similar to the method embodiments, so the descriptions are relatively simple; relevant parts can be referred to the descriptions of the method embodiments.

[0070] The foregoing has described specific embodiments of this specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims may be performed in a different order than that shown in the embodiments and may still achieve the desired result. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific or sequential order shown to achieve the desired result. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are possible or may be advantageous.

[0071] The above description is merely one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. Various modifications and variations can be made to the one or more embodiments of this specification by those skilled in the art. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification should be included within the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A method for intelligent management of people's assessors, characterized in that, Specifically, it includes: By analyzing the data from the jury management system, we can determine the juries that match different cases. By utilizing the update status of the basic data of the matched juries and their overlap with other cases, we can determine the management needs for different cases. Cases matched with the jurors are designated as matched cases. Based on the number of matched cases and the overlap of jurors matched between different matched cases, alternate jurors are determined from among the jurors. Obtain the number of alternate jurors for different matched cases and the distribution data of different alternate jurors in different cases, and determine the target cases for alternate jurors by combining the different management needs of matched cases. Based on the number of the supplementary target cases and the overlap in the composition of the supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases, the supplementary juror handling plan is determined in different supplementary target cases.

2. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The matched jurors are those whose basic data meets the recusal requirements for the case.

3. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The update status of the basic data includes the update time of the basic data and the interval between the update time and the current time.

4. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The overlap with other cases includes the number of jurors matching other cases.

5. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method for determining the management needs type of the aforementioned case is as follows: Based on the update status of the basic data of the matched jurors, determine the matched jurors whose update time is within a preset time range, and use them as the updated matched jurors. Based on the overlap between the updated matched jurors and other cases, determine the number of cases where different updated matched jurors overlap, and use this number as the number of overlapping cases. By matching the number of overlapping cases with different jurors in different updates, the management needs type of the case can be determined.

6. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 5, characterized in that, The preset time range is determined based on the time interval from the current moment within a preset time range.

7. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method for determining alternate jurors among the jurors is as follows: Based on the overlap of jurors in the matched cases of the aforementioned jurors, determine the number of overlapping jurors in different matched cases. The overlapping matching cases among the matching cases are determined based on the number of overlaps. The number of matched cases and the number of overlapping matched cases are used to determine whether the juror is a substitute juror.

8. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 7, characterized in that, Overlapping matching cases are those where the number of matching jurors exceeds a preset overlap threshold.

9. The intelligent management method for people's assessors as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method for determining the supplementary juror handling plan in different supplementary target cases is as follows: The number of cases in which the composition of alternate jurors overlaps in different alternate target cases is determined by the overlap in the composition of alternate jurors. Based on the number of cases where the supplementary reviewers overlap, the supplementary processing position of the supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases is determined, and the risk-selected cases of the supplementary reviewers are determined based on the supplementary processing position. By determining the number of risk-based cases for different supplementary reviewers in different supplementary target cases, the supplementary juror handling plan is determined for different supplementary target cases.

10. A smart management system for people's assessors, characterized in that, The intelligent management method for people's assessors according to any one of claims 1-9 specifically includes: Modules for assessing the type of requirements, module for determining jurors, and module for post-trial processing; The requirement type assessment module is responsible for determining the management requirement type for different cases; The juror determination module is responsible for determining the alternate jurors among the jurors. The supplementary processing module is responsible for determining the supplementary processing plan for supplementary jurors in different supplementary target cases.

Images