Bus parameter determination method and device, equipment, storage medium and program product
By screening target processes and optimizing busbar parameters based on equipment probabilistics, the problem of resource waste in traditional busbar selection is solved, achieving a balance between busbar safety and economy.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
- Filing Date
- 2026-01-29
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-02
AI Technical Summary
Traditional busbar selection methods often overestimate the maximum power required by the system, leading to resource waste and making it difficult to meet the economic requirements of the power system.
By screening out the target process, and based on the probability that multiple devices are not at their maximum output power at the same time, the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process are determined, including the introduction of a first coefficient, a first current, and a third current, to optimize the bus selection.
While meeting actual operational requirements, it effectively saves busbar configuration resources, reduces power system costs, and makes the busbar both safe and economical.
Smart Images
Figure CN121618647B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This application relates to the field of power distribution technology, and in particular to methods, apparatus, equipment, storage media and program products for determining bus parameters. Background Technology
[0002] In the field of power distribution technology, the busbar, as a key conductive component in substations and power distribution equipment, undertakes the core functions of power collection, distribution and transmission. Therefore, the rationality of its selection will directly affect the safety and economy of the power system.
[0003] Currently, the traditional method of bus selection is to select busbars directly based on the demand current reported by the process department. However, when the process department reports the demand current, it usually overestimates the maximum power required by the system. Therefore, directly using such demand current for busbar selection can easily lead to a waste of busbar resources and make it difficult to meet the economic requirements of the power system. Summary of the Invention
[0004] The main objective of this application is to provide a method, apparatus, equipment, storage medium, and program product for determining bus parameters, aiming to solve the problem that traditional bus selection methods often overestimate the maximum power required by the system, easily leading to a waste of bus resources and failing to meet the economic requirements of the power system.
[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this application proposes a method for determining busbar parameters, the method comprising:
[0006] From multiple processes, at least one target process is selected; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power simultaneously;
[0007] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0008] In one embodiment, determining the bus parameters adapted to the target process based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power includes:
[0009] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power, a first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined, wherein the first coefficient represents the probability that the multiple devices are not simultaneously at maximum output power when the target process is executed;
[0010] Based on the first coefficient, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0011] This embodiment provides a specific implementation method for determining bus parameters by introducing a first coefficient. Specifically, this embodiment introduces a first coefficient to characterize the probability that multiple devices under the target process will not be at maximum output power simultaneously when the target process is executed. The higher the probability represented by this coefficient, the lower the probability that multiple devices under the target process will be at maximum output power simultaneously. Therefore, the total power value that the configured bus needs to support is smaller. This can effectively save bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to have both safety and economy.
[0012] In one embodiment, determining the bus parameters adapted to the target process based on the first coefficient includes:
[0013] Based on the first coefficient, a first current corresponding to the target process is determined, wherein the first current is used to simulate the maximum current flowing through the busbar when the target process is performed.
[0014] Based on the first current, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0015] This embodiment provides a specific implementation method for determining bus parameters by introducing a first current. Specifically, the higher the probability represented by the first coefficient, the lower the probability that multiple devices in the target process are simultaneously at maximum output power. Therefore, the total power value that the bus needs to support is smaller, and thus the maximum current (i.e., the first current) flowing through the bus when actually performing the target process can be considered smaller. By using this relatively small first current for bus selection, the configuration resources of the bus can be effectively saved while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to have both safety and economy.
[0016] In one embodiment, determining the bus parameters adapted to the target process based on the first current includes:
[0017] Based on the type of the target process, the first current and the second current, a third current is determined, wherein the second current is the required current of the target process in the demand table;
[0018] Based on the third current, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0019] This embodiment provides a specific implementation method for determining bus parameters by introducing a third current. Specifically, after determining the first current considering the different maximum output power conditions of multiple devices under the target process, a third current can be determined based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current already in the demand table. The bus parameters determined based on the third current can better adapt to the actual operating conditions of equipment in different types of target processes. Furthermore, the bus selection method also references the second current in the demand table, making the bus selection more closely aligned with the actual operating conditions of different types of processes. This allows for a more rational selection of appropriate bus parameters, ensuring that the configured bus combines safety and economy.
[0020] In one embodiment, determining the third current based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current includes:
[0021] When the target process is a type of first process, the first current or the second current is selected as the third current based on the first current, the second current and the number of devices in the target process.
[0022] This embodiment provides a specific implementation method for determining the third current. Specifically, for first-type processes such as formation or capacity testing, in some cases, the values of the second current in the existing demand table can be directly referenced as the third current. In these cases, the third current can be determined by referring to the first current, the second current, and the number of equipment in the target process, so as to effectively utilize the available values of the second current in the existing demand table. If the value of the second current in the demand table does not meet the requirements, it can be replaced by the calculated value of the first current, which makes it easier to more accurately determine the maximum current that may flow on the bus in different situations, that is, to more accurately determine the third current. Based on the third current, the bus parameters can be determined, and the appropriate bus parameters can be selected more reasonably, so that the configured bus can have both safety and economy.
[0023] In one embodiment, selecting either the first current or the second current as the third current based on the first current, the second current, and the number of devices in the target process includes:
[0024] If it is determined that the first current is less than or equal to the second current and the number of devices in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, the first current shall be used as the third current;
[0025] If it is determined that the first current is greater than the second current, or the number of devices in the target process is less than the second value, the second current shall be used as the third current.
[0026] This embodiment provides another specific implementation for determining the third current. Specifically, the magnitudes of the first and second currents can be compared, and the number of devices in the target process can be compared with preset first and second values to determine a suitable third current. If the first current is greater than the second current, it is assumed that the second current in the requirements table is sufficient to ensure the reliability of the busbar selection, so the second current can be directly selected as the final third current for determining the busbar parameters. If the first current is less than or equal to the second current, the first current with a relatively smaller value can be considered as the final third current for determining the busbar parameters. In this case, the number of devices in the target process also needs to be considered, because if the number of devices in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, it is necessary to... If there is a significant difference between the second current in the table and the current under actual operating conditions, the calculated first current can be selected as the third current for determining the bus parameters. If the number of devices in the target process is less than the second value, the second current in the existing requirement table can continue to be used as the third current for determining the bus parameters. This application determines the third current through the above-mentioned judgment conditions, which can effectively ensure that the determined third current closely matches the actual operating conditions. This allows for the effective saving of bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to be both safe and economical.
[0027] In one embodiment, determining the third current based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current includes:
[0028] If the target process is of type two, the first current is used as the third current.
[0029] This embodiment provides another specific implementation method for determining the third current. Specifically, for a second type of process such as sorting, it can be assumed that the value of the second current in the existing demand table differs significantly from the actual operating conditions. Therefore, the calculated first current can be directly used as the final third current for determining the bus parameters, so as to effectively ensure that the determined third current closely matches the actual operating conditions.
[0030] In one embodiment, determining the first current corresponding to the target process based on the first coefficient includes:
[0031] Based on the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process, the first current corresponding to the target process is determined.
[0032] This embodiment provides a specific implementation for determining the first current. Specifically, it can refer to a first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process to determine the impact of multiple devices in the target process not being at their maximum output power simultaneously on the maximum current flowing through the bus. Then, it can refer to this impact to determine the first current that is closer to the actual operating conditions, which helps to effectively save bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus can meet the actual operating requirements.
[0033] In one embodiment, determining the first current corresponding to the target process based on the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of the multiple devices in the target process includes:
[0034] Calculate the product of the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of the multiple devices in the target process;
[0035] The ratio between the product and the calculated coefficient is used to obtain the first current corresponding to the target process.
[0036] In one embodiment, determining the first coefficient corresponding to the target process based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power includes:
[0037] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, a second coefficient corresponding to the device in the target process is determined, wherein the second coefficient characterizes the relationship between the maximum power demand of the device in the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0038] Based on the second coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined.
[0039] This embodiment provides a specific implementation method for determining the first coefficient. Specifically, based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power, a second coefficient corresponding to the devices in the target process can be determined. This coefficient, also known as the utilization coefficient, is used to predict the maximum full utilization of the devices in the target process. Specifically, it can be characterized by the relationship between the maximum power demand of the devices in the target process and the total installed capacity. Then, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process can be determined based on the second coefficient, which facilitates the subsequent determination of bus parameters that are more suitable for the target process, so that the bus can effectively save bus configuration resources while meeting actual operating requirements.
[0040] In one embodiment, determining the first coefficient corresponding to the target process based on the second coefficient includes:
[0041] Based on the second coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices under the target process, and the third coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined;
[0042] The third coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power actually required by the equipment in the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0043] This embodiment provides another specific implementation for determining the first coefficient. Specifically, a reasonable first coefficient can be determined based on a second coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices in the target process, and a third coefficient used to characterize the maximum amount of space that the devices in the target process can actually use. Compared to determining the first coefficient solely through expert experience, this application determines the first coefficient by referring to the number of devices in the target process and their related capabilities. This is more in line with the actual operating conditions of the devices in the target process, and the setting is more reasonable. It helps to subsequently assist in determining bus parameters that are more suitable for the target process, so that the bus can effectively save bus configuration resources while meeting actual operating requirements.
[0044] Furthermore, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a busbar parameter determination device, the device comprising:
[0045] A screening module is used to select at least one target process from multiple processes; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power at the same time;
[0046] The determination module is used to determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at their maximum output power at the same time.
[0047] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a bus parameter determination device, the device comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the computer program being configured to implement the steps of the bus parameter determination method as described above.
[0048] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a storage medium, which is a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the bus parameter determination method described above.
[0049] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the bus parameter determination method described above.
[0050] One or more technical solutions proposed in this application have at least the following technical effects:
[0051] Traditionally, the requirements reported by process departments for busbar selection are typically determined based on the sum of the maximum output power of all equipment in a given process. However, during actual process execution, equipment in some processes may not operate at maximum output power simultaneously. Therefore, the required parameters may overestimate the total system output power in practical applications. Using these parameters for busbar selection in such cases can easily waste busbar configuration resources. Consequently, not all equipment in a process will operate at peak power concurrently. To address this, this application, when determining busbar parameters, first filters out target processes from multiple processes. It assumes that during the actual execution of a target process, multiple pieces of equipment may not operate at maximum power simultaneously. For these target processes, the probability of multiple pieces of equipment operating at maximum power at different times can be used to determine the appropriate busbar parameters. This approach effectively saves busbar configuration resources while meeting actual operational requirements, thereby reducing the overall cost of the power system and ensuring that the configured busbar is both safe and economical. Attached Figure Description
[0052] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with this application and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of this application.
[0053] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or related technologies, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments or related technologies will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, those skilled in the art can obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative effort.
[0054] Figure 1 This is one of the flowcharts illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application;
[0055] Figure 2 This is the second flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application;
[0056] Figure 3 This is the third flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application;
[0057] Figure 4 This is the fourth flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application;
[0058] Figure 5 This is a flowchart illustrating the formation process in the method for determining busbar parameters provided in this application;
[0059] Figure 6 This is a flowchart illustrating the capacity process in the busbar parameter determination method provided in this application.
[0060] Figure 7 This is a flowchart illustrating the sorting process in the busbar parameter determination method provided in this application;
[0061] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of the busbar parameter determination device provided in this application;
[0062] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the busbar parameter determination device provided in this application.
[0063] The purpose, features, and advantages of this application will be further explained in conjunction with the embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. Detailed Implementation
[0064] It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the technical solutions of this application and are not intended to limit this application.
[0065] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application pertains; the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the application; the terms “comprising” and “having”, and any variations thereof, in the specification, claims, and foregoing description of the drawings are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion.
[0066] In the description of the embodiments of this application, technical terms such as "first" and "second" are used only to distinguish different objects and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number, specific order, or primary and secondary relationship of the indicated technical features. In the description of the embodiments of this application, "multiple" means two or more, unless otherwise explicitly defined.
[0067] In this document, the term "embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of this application. The appearance of this phrase in various places throughout the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it a separate or alternative embodiment mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It will be explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein can be combined with other embodiments.
[0068] To better understand the technical solution of this application, a detailed description will be provided below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods.
[0069] In related technologies, when selecting busbars, the selection is usually based directly on the required current reported by the process department. This required current is determined based on the sum of the maximum output power of all equipment in a certain process. That is, the required current is set considering the extreme case where all equipment in that process is at maximum output power at the same time, which may lead to an overestimation of the total output power of the system.
[0070] In actual operation, not all equipment will operate at peak power at the same time. If the busbar is selected directly based on the required current, it will easily lead to a waste of busbar resources and make it difficult to meet the economic requirements of the power system.
[0071] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application provides a method for determining bus parameters. The method aims to consider the probability that multiple devices in a target process will not be at their maximum output power simultaneously when calculating the first current used for bus selection. This makes the determined first current more closely match the actual operating conditions of the devices in the target process, thereby effectively saving bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements. This reduces the overall cost of the power system and enables the configured bus to be both safe and economical.
[0072] It should be noted that the executing entity of the embodiments of this application can be a computing service device with data processing, network communication, and program execution functions, such as a tablet computer, personal computer, or mobile phone, or an electronic device capable of performing the above functions. The embodiments of this application and the following examples will be described using an electronic device as an example.
[0073] According to one aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for determining bus parameters, referring to... Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is one of the flowcharts illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application. The method includes steps S101 to S102:
[0074] Step S101: Select the target process from multiple processes;
[0075] In this process, multiple devices can operate at maximum output power at different times.
[0076] It should be noted that the aforementioned target process can be a process in the battery manufacturing process, such as the battery formation process, capacity process, or sorting process. In the actual execution of these processes, the multiple devices used may not be at maximum output power at the same time. This application is only for illustrative purposes and does not impose any limitations.
[0077] It should also be noted that for a certain target process, multiple devices may be set up to perform the target process through at least some of the multiple devices under the target process. These devices under the target process can perform the same or different processing flow under the process, and this application does not limit this.
[0078] Step S102: Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0079] Optionally, the probability that multiple devices in the above target process are not at maximum output power at the same time can be determined by statistically analyzing a large amount of historical data.
[0080] Optionally, the above bus parameters may include parameters such as the number of buses and bus capacity, which are not limited in this application.
[0081] In the bus parameter determination method provided in this application, the traditional process departments report the required parameters for bus selection, which are usually determined based on the sum of the maximum output power of all equipment in a certain process. However, during the actual execution of the process, the equipment in some processes may not be able to operate at maximum output power simultaneously. It can be considered that the required parameters may overestimate the total output power of the system in practical applications. If the required parameters are used for bus selection in this case, it is easy to waste bus configuration resources. Therefore, all equipment in a process often does not operate at peak power at the same time. To address this, when determining bus parameters, this application can first screen out target processes from multiple processes. It is assumed that during the actual execution of the target process, multiple devices in the target process may not be able to operate at maximum power simultaneously. For these target processes, the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process can be determined based on the probability that multiple devices are not able to operate at maximum power simultaneously. This can effectively save bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to be both safe and economical.
[0082] The following describes the specific implementation method for introducing the first coefficient to determine the bus parameters, using feasible implementation methods as an example:
[0083] In one feasible implementation, Figure 2 This is the second flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application. Figure 2 As shown, in Figure 1 Based on this, step S102 above may include:
[0084] Step S1021: Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power, determine the first coefficient corresponding to the target process;
[0085] Wherein, the first coefficient represents the probability that the plurality of devices are not simultaneously at maximum output power when the target process is performed;
[0086] It should be noted that, for a certain target process, the aforementioned first coefficient represents the probability that multiple devices in the target process will not be at maximum output power at the same time when the process is actually being executed. Here, the first coefficient can be set as an expert's empirical value, or it can be calculated through actual testing or empirical formulas. This application does not impose any restrictions.
[0087] Step S1022: Based on the first coefficient, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0088] Specifically, this embodiment introduces a first coefficient to characterize the probability that multiple devices under the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power when the target process is executed. The higher the probability represented by the coefficient, the lower the probability that multiple devices under the target process are simultaneously at maximum output power. Therefore, the total power value that the bus needs to support is smaller. This can effectively save bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to be both safe and economical.
[0089] The following describes the specific implementation method for determining bus parameters by introducing a first current, using feasible implementation methods as an example:
[0090] In one feasible implementation, Figure 3 This is the third flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application. Figure 2 On the basis of, such as Figure 3 As shown, step S1022 above may include:
[0091] Step S10221: Based on the first coefficient, determine the first current corresponding to the target process;
[0092] The first current is used to simulate the maximum current flowing through the busbar when the target process is performed.
[0093] It should be noted that the first current determined here takes into account the situation where multiple devices are not at maximum output power at the same time under the target process, in order to simulate the maximum current flowing through the bus when the target process is actually performed. This current value is usually less than the required current value set in the extreme case where all devices are at maximum output power at the same time.
[0094] Step S10222: Based on the first current, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0095] Specifically, the appropriate busbar parameters can be selected from a pre-set busbar selection table using the first current. The following busbar selection table can be used as a reference:
[0096] Table 1 Busbar Selection Table
[0097]
[0098] Referring to the table above, if the calculated first current is 1000A (unit: amperes, for example), in order to ensure that the busbar can safely carry 1000A of current, the busbar capacity or power corresponding to 1114A in the table above can be selected as the busbar parameter, in which case only one busbar is needed; or, multiple busbar capacities or powers corresponding to 870A in the table above can be selected as the busbar parameters to ensure that the final busbar can carry 1000A of current. The specific busbar capacity or power and the number of busbars selected can be set according to actual test results or empirical values, and are not limited in this application.
[0099] Table 2 below shows the selection configuration table for the number of busbars, taking the target processes as formation, capacity, and sorting processes as examples:
[0100] Table 2 Selection and Configuration Table
[0101]
[0102] In the field of lithium battery manufacturing, the aforementioned formation PCS and capacity PCS both refer to power conversion systems used in different stages of battery production, but their functional focuses and technical requirements differ:
[0103] The formation process is a mid-stage of the production process (after electrode preparation). It is responsible for the first charge and discharge of the battery, activating the battery materials and forming a stable SEI film. It is a key quality control link. The formation PCS can assist in high-precision, slow, low-current charge and discharge control to ensure that the formation quality of each battery or cell is consistent, safe and reliable.
[0104] The capacity process is a later stage in the production process (after formation). After formation and capacity testing, the battery is subjected to precise testing and screening of performance characteristics such as capacity, internal resistance, and self-discharge. The capacity PCS assists in the high-speed, high-current charging and discharging capability, aiming to complete the test quickly and improve production efficiency.
[0105] In this embodiment, the higher the probability represented by the first coefficient, the lower the probability that multiple devices under the target process are simultaneously at maximum output power. Therefore, the total power value that the bus needs to support is smaller. Consequently, it can be assumed that the maximum current (i.e., the first current) flowing through the bus when the target process is actually executed is smaller. By using this relatively small first current for bus selection, the configuration resources of the bus can be effectively saved on the basis that the configured bus can meet the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured bus to have both safety and economy.
[0106] The following describes the specific implementation method for determining bus parameters by introducing a third current, based on feasible implementation methods:
[0107] In one feasible implementation, step S10222 above includes the following sub-steps:
[0108] Step S10222-1: Determine the third current based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current;
[0109] Wherein, the second current is the required current corresponding to the target process in the demand table.
[0110] It should be noted that the target process mentioned above can be, for example, formation, capacity and sorting in the battery production process, or other types; this is just an example.
[0111] It should also be noted that the above requirement table sets corresponding current requirements for different processes. These currents are usually set relatively high to ensure that the busbars set based on these current requirements meet safety requirements.
[0112] Step S10222-2: Based on the third current, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0113] Specifically, after determining the first current considering the different maximum output power conditions of multiple devices under the target process, a third current can be determined based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current already in the demand table to determine the bus parameters. The bus parameters determined based on the third current can better adapt to the actual operating conditions of equipment in different types of target processes. Furthermore, the above bus selection method also refers to the second current in the demand table, making the bus selection more in line with the actual operating conditions of different types of processes. This allows for a more reasonable selection of appropriate bus parameters, enabling the configured bus to be both safe and economical.
[0114] The following describes the specific implementation method for determining the third current, using feasible implementation approaches:
[0115] In one feasible implementation, step S10222-2 above may include the following steps:
[0116] Step S1-1: If the type of the target process is a first type of process, based on the first current, the second current and the number of devices in the target process, select either the first current or the second current as the third current.
[0117] Specifically, for first-type processes such as formation or capacity testing, in some cases, the value of the second current in the existing demand table can be directly referenced as the third current. These cases can be determined by referring to the first current, the second current, and the number of equipment in the target process, so as to effectively utilize the available second current values in the existing demand table. If the second current value in the demand table does not meet the requirements, it can be replaced by the calculated value of the first current, which makes it easier to more accurately determine the maximum current that may flow on the bus in different situations, that is, to more accurately determine the third current. Based on the third current, the bus parameters can be determined, and the appropriate bus parameters can be selected more rationally, so that the configured bus can be both safe and economical.
[0118] In another feasible implementation, step S10222-2 above may include the following steps:
[0119] Step S2-1: If the target process is of type 2, the first current is used as the third current.
[0120] Specifically, for second-type processes such as sorting, it can be assumed that the value of the second current in the existing demand table differs significantly from the actual operating conditions. Therefore, the calculated first current can be directly used as the third current for determining the bus parameters, so as to effectively ensure that the determined third current closely matches the actual operating conditions.
[0121] In another feasible implementation, step S1-1 above may include the following steps:
[0122] If it is determined that the first current is less than or equal to the second current and the number of devices in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, the first current shall be used as the third current;
[0123] If it is determined that the first current is greater than the second current, or the number of devices in the target process is less than the second value, the second current shall be used as the third current.
[0124] It should be noted that the first and second values mentioned above can be set according to the actual situation, and can be set through testing or experience. The first value can be greater than or equal to the second value.
[0125] For example, for the formation process, the first and second values can both be set to 7; for another example, for the capacity process, the first and second values can both be set to 5. The first and second values in the above examples are values applicable to the corresponding processes, which are obtained through a large amount of experimental data.
[0126] Specifically, when determining the third current, the magnitudes of the first and second currents can be compared, as can the number of devices in the target process and the preset first and second values. Based on the comparison results, the following situations can be identified:
[0127] Case 1: If the first current is greater than the second current, since the data in the demand table usually overestimates the total output power of the system, it can be assumed that the second current is sufficient to ensure the reliability of the bus selection. Therefore, if the first current is greater than the second current, the second current can be directly selected as the third current for the final determination of the bus parameters.
[0128] Scenario 2: If the first current is less than or equal to the second current, the first current with the relatively smaller value can be used as the final third current for determining the bus parameters. In this case, the number of equipment in the target process also needs to be considered. This is because when the number of equipment in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, the difference between the second current in the demand table and the current under actual operating conditions is large. In this case, the calculated first current can be selected as the final third current for determining the bus parameters. If the number of equipment in the target process is less than the second value, the second current in the existing demand table can continue to be used as the final third current for determining the bus parameters.
[0129] In this embodiment of the application, the determination of the third current through the above-mentioned determination conditions can effectively ensure that the determined third current can closely match the actual operating conditions, so as to effectively save the configuration resources of the busbar on the basis that the configured busbar can meet the actual operating requirements, thereby reducing the cost of the entire power system and enabling the configured busbar to have both safety and economy.
[0130] The following describes the specific implementation method for determining the first current, using feasible methods as examples:
[0131] In one feasible implementation, step S10221 above includes the following sub-steps:
[0132] Step S3-1: Based on the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process, determine the first current corresponding to the target process.
[0133] Specifically, the impact of multiple devices not being at their maximum output power simultaneously on the maximum current flowing through the bus can be determined by referring to the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process. This impact can then be used to determine the first current that is closer to the actual operating conditions, which helps to effectively save bus configuration resources while ensuring that the configured bus meets the actual operating requirements.
[0134] For example, step S3-1 above may include:
[0135] Step S3-11: Calculate the product of the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process;
[0136] Step S3-12: Calculate the ratio between the product and the calculation coefficient to obtain the first current corresponding to the target process.
[0137] For example, the first current Ij can be calculated using the following formula:
[0138] Ij=N Kj1 P / / 0.39 / cosφ;
[0139] Where N represents the number of devices in the target process, Kj1 represents the first coefficient, and P represents the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process. 0.39 cosφ represents the calculated coefficient, which is the power factor and is a preset value. The calculated coefficient can be an empirical value or obtained through actual testing; this application does not impose any restrictions on this.
[0140] The following describes the specific implementation method for determining the first coefficient, using feasible implementation methods as an example:
[0141] In one feasible implementation, Figure 4 This is the fourth flowchart illustrating the method for determining bus parameters provided in this application. Figure 2 On the basis of, such as Figure 4 As shown, step S1021 above includes the following sub-steps:
[0142] Step S10211: Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power, determine the second coefficient corresponding to the device in the target process;
[0143] The second coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power demand of the equipment under the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0144] Step S10212: Based on the second coefficient, determine the first coefficient corresponding to the target process.
[0145] Specifically, based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at their maximum output power at the same time, a second coefficient corresponding to the device in the target process can be determined. This coefficient can also be called the utilization coefficient, which is used to predict how fully the device in the target process can be used at most. Specifically, it can be characterized by the relationship between the maximum power demand of the device in the target process and the total installed capacity. Then, based on this second coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process can be determined, which facilitates the subsequent determination of bus parameters that are more suitable for the target process, so that the bus can effectively save bus configuration resources while meeting the actual operating requirements.
[0146] In another feasible implementation, step S10212 above may include:
[0147] Based on the second coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices under the target process, and the third coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined;
[0148] The third coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power actually required by the equipment in the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0149] Specifically, a reasonable first coefficient can be determined based on the second coefficient, the number of equipment in the target process, the number of interfaces of the equipment in the target process, and the third coefficient used to characterize how fully the equipment in the target process can actually be used. Compared with determining the first coefficient solely through expert experience, this application refers to the first coefficient determined by the number of equipment in the target process and related capabilities, which is more in line with the actual operating conditions of the equipment in the target process and is set more reasonably. This helps to subsequently determine bus parameters that are more suitable for the target process, so that the bus can effectively save bus configuration resources while meeting actual operating requirements.
[0150] The following examples illustrate the bus parameter determination method provided in this application. Examples are provided for the formation, capacity, and sorting processes, respectively:
[0151] 1) Example 1, formation process:
[0152] Figure 5 This is a flowchart illustrating the formation process in the busbar parameter determination method provided in this application, as shown below. Figure 5 As shown, first calculate Kut=K1 / Km, where Kut represents the utilization coefficient, which is the second coefficient in the above embodiment, K1 represents the total coefficient, which is the third coefficient in the above embodiment, and Km represents the maximum coefficient, which can be taken as an empirical value, for example, 1.56.
[0153] After calculating Kut, the simultaneity coefficient Kj can be calculated using the following formula:
[0154] Kj=IFERROR(((N Kut)+POWER(N / n,0.5) n (K1-Kut)) / (N K1),"");
[0155] Wherein, IFERROR() represents returning empty text to avoid displaying error values when the formula has an error (such as a denominator of 0 or a negative number in the square root), POWER() represents the power calculation function, N represents the number of devices under the above target process, and n represents the number of interfaces of the devices under the above target process.
[0156] After calculating Kj, the first coefficient Kj1 can be calculated using the following formula, where Kj1 can be understood as the corrected total coefficient: Kj1 = K1 Kj.
[0157] After obtaining the first coefficient Kj1, the first current Ij can be calculated using the following formula:
[0158] Ij=N Kj1 P / / 0.39 / cosφ;
[0159] Wherein, P represents the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices under the above target process. For the formation process, P is, for example, 600kW. This value can be obtained by measurement and can be set according to the actual situation.
[0160] Assume the target process corresponds to a current requirement (i.e., the second current) of I in the demand table. 发 I 发 It can be obtained through the following formula: I 发 =P 发 0.8 / / 0.39 / cosφ, where P 发 The required power for the target process is shown in the demand table, but I is not explicitly given in the demand table. 发 In this case, I can be obtained using the above formula. 发 .
[0161] Compare Ij and I 发 The size of N is determined, and the size of N is compared with the first and second values. Here, the first and second values are both set to 7. Then: if Ij≤I 发 And if N≥7, then the third current I=Ij; otherwise, the third current I=Ij.发 .
[0162] After determining the third current I, appropriate bus parameters can be selected using Table 1 above.
[0163] In addition, after selecting the bus parameters, the ratio between the third current I and the selected bus capacity can be calculated as the load rate. The load rate must be less than the preset third value for the selected bus parameters to be considered compliant. The third value can be set according to the actual situation, for example, it can be set to 100%. This value is usually set to less than or equal to 100%.
[0164] 2) Example 2, Capacity Process:
[0165] Figure 6 This is a flowchart illustrating the capacity process in the busbar parameter determination method provided in this application, as shown below. Figure 6 As shown, the process is largely the same as the formation process described above, and will not be repeated here. The main difference is:
[0166] <1> Selection of P value: For capacity processes, P is, for example, 800kW.
[0167] <2> Selection of the first and second values: If both the first and second values are 5, then if Ij≤I 发 And if N≥5, then the third current I=Ij; otherwise, the third current I=Ij. 发 .
[0168] 3) Example 3, Sorting process:
[0169] Figure 7 This is a flowchart illustrating the sorting process in the bus parameter determination method provided in this application, as shown below. Figure 7 As shown, the process is largely the same as the formation process described above, and will not be repeated here. The main difference is:
[0170] <1> Selection of P value: For the sorting process, P is, for example, 800kW.
[0171] <2> The sorting process does not need to perform the above-mentioned judgment steps to determine the third current. Instead, the third current I=Ij can be directly set and the subsequent busbar selection can be carried out.
[0172] It should be noted that the above examples are only for understanding this application and do not constitute a limitation on the method for determining bus parameters in this application. Any simple modifications based on this technical concept are within the protection scope of this application.
[0173] On the other hand, this application also provides a busbar parameter determination device, please refer to Figure 8 , Figure 8This is a schematic diagram of the busbar parameter determination device provided in this application. The busbar parameter determination device includes:
[0174] The screening module 801 is used to screen at least one target process from multiple processes; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power at the same time;
[0175] The determination module 802 is used to determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at their maximum output power at the same time.
[0176] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is specifically used for:
[0177] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not simultaneously at maximum output power, a first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined, wherein the first coefficient represents the probability that the multiple devices are not simultaneously at maximum output power when the target process is executed;
[0178] Based on the first coefficient, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0179] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0180] Based on the first coefficient, a first current corresponding to the target process is determined, wherein the first current is used to simulate the maximum current flowing through the busbar when the target process is performed.
[0181] Based on the first current, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
[0182] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0183] Based on the type of the target process, the first current and the second current, a third current is determined, wherein the second current is the required current of the target process in the demand table;
[0184] Based on the third current, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0185] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further configured to: when the type of the target process is a first type of process, select either the first current or the second current as the third current based on the first current, the second current and the number of devices in the target process.
[0186] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0187] If it is determined that the first current is less than or equal to the second current and the number of devices in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, the first current shall be used as the third current;
[0188] If it is determined that the first current is greater than the second current, or the number of devices in the target process is less than the second value, the second current shall be used as the third current.
[0189] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further configured to: when the type of the target process is a second type of process, use the first current as the third current.
[0190] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further configured to: determine the first current corresponding to the target process based on the first coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of the multiple devices under the target process.
[0191] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0192] Calculate the product of the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of the multiple devices in the target process;
[0193] The ratio between the product and the calculated coefficient is used to obtain the first current corresponding to the target process.
[0194] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0195] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, a second coefficient corresponding to the device in the target process is determined, wherein the second coefficient characterizes the relationship between the maximum power demand of the device in the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0196] Based on the second coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined.
[0197] In some embodiments, the determining module 802 is further specifically used for:
[0198] Based on the second coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices under the target process, and the third coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined;
[0199] The third coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power actually required by the equipment in the target process and the total installed capacity.
[0200] The bus parameter determination device provided in this application, which adopts the bus parameter determination method in the above-described method embodiment, can solve the problem that traditional bus selection methods usually overestimate the maximum power required by the system, which easily leads to the waste of bus resources and makes it difficult to meet the economic requirements of the power system.
[0201] Compared with related technologies, the beneficial effects of the bus parameter determination device provided in this application are the same as those of the bus parameter determination method provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features in the bus parameter determination device are the same as those disclosed in the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.
[0202] This application provides a bus parameter determination device, which includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, which are executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the bus parameter determination method in any of the above embodiments.
[0203] The following is for reference. Figure 9 , Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the bus parameter determination device provided in this application, illustrating a structure suitable for implementing the bus parameter determination device in the embodiments of this application. The bus parameter determination device in the embodiments of this application may include, but is not limited to, mobile terminals such as mobile phones, laptops, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants), PADs (Portable Application Description), PMPs (Portable Media Players), in-vehicle terminals (e.g., in-vehicle navigation terminals), and fixed terminals such as digital TVs and desktop computers. Figure 9 The bus parameter determination device shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitations on the functionality and scope of use of the embodiments of this application.
[0204] like Figure 9As shown, the bus parameter determination device may include a processing unit 901 (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.), which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 902 or a program loaded from a storage device 903 into a random access memory (RAM) 904. The RAM 904 also stores various programs and data required for the operation of the bus parameter determination device. The processing unit 901, ROM 902, and RAM 904 are interconnected via a bus 905. An input / output (I / O) interface 906 is also connected to the bus. Typically, the following systems can be connected to the I / O interface 906: input devices 907 including, for example, touchscreens, touchpads, keyboards, mice, image sensors, microphones, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.; output devices 908 including, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), speakers, vibrators, etc.; storage devices 903 including, for example, magnetic tapes, hard disks, etc.; and communication devices 909. Communication device 909 allows the bus parameter determination device to communicate wirelessly or wiredly with other devices to exchange data. Although the figure shows bus parameter determination devices with various systems, it should be understood that implementation or possession of all the systems shown is not required. More or fewer systems may be implemented alternatively.
[0205] Specifically, according to the embodiments disclosed in this application, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments disclosed in this application include a computer program product comprising a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, the computer program containing program code for performing the methods shown in the flowcharts. In such embodiments, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from a network via a communication device, or installed from storage device 903, or installed from ROM 902. When the computer program is executed by processing device 901, it performs the functions defined in the methods of the embodiments disclosed in this application.
[0206] The bus parameter determination device provided in this application, employing the bus parameter determination method described in the above embodiments, can solve the technical problem that traditional bus selection methods often overestimate the maximum power required by the system, easily leading to wasted bus resources and failing to meet the economic requirements of the power system. Compared with related technologies, the beneficial effects of the bus parameter determination device provided in this application are the same as those of the bus parameter determination method provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features of this bus parameter determination device are the same as those disclosed in the previous embodiment method, and will not be repeated here.
[0207] It should be understood that the various parts disclosed in this application can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the description of the above embodiments, specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.
[0208] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any variations or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.
[0209] This application provides a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) stored thereon, the computer-readable program instructions being used to execute the bus parameter determination method in the above embodiments.
[0210] The computer-readable storage medium provided in this application may be, for example, a USB flash drive, but is not limited to, electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, devices, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to: electrical connections having one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination thereof. In this embodiment, the computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, system, or device. The program code contained on the computer-readable storage medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to: wires, optical cables, RF (Radio Frequency), etc., or any suitable combination thereof.
[0211] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium may be included in the bus parameter determination device; or it may exist independently and not assembled into the bus parameter determination device.
[0212] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs, which, when executed by the bus parameter determination device, cause the bus parameter determination device to perform the following steps:
[0213] From multiple processes, at least one target process is selected; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power simultaneously;
[0214] Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
[0215] Computer program code for performing the operations of this application can be written in one or more programming languages or a combination thereof, including object-oriented programming languages such as Java, Smalltalk, and C++, and conventional procedural programming languages such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving remote computers, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer via any type of network—including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN)—or can be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).
[0216] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of this application. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions indicated in the blocks may occur in a different order than those indicated in the drawings. For example, two consecutively indicated blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.
[0217] The modules described in the embodiments of this application can be implemented in software or hardware. The names of the modules do not necessarily limit the functionality of the unit itself.
[0218] The readable storage medium provided in this application is a computer-readable storage medium that stores computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) for executing the above-described bus parameter determination method. This addresses the problem that traditional bus selection methods often overestimate the maximum power required by the system, easily leading to wasted bus resources and failing to meet the economic requirements of the power system. Compared with related technologies, the beneficial effects of the computer-readable storage medium provided in this application are the same as those of the bus parameter determination method provided in the above embodiments, and will not be elaborated upon here.
[0219] This application also provides a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the bus parameter determination method described above.
[0220] The computer program product provided in this application can solve the problem that traditional bus selection methods often overestimate the maximum power required by the system, easily leading to wasted bus resources and failing to meet the economic requirements of the power system. Compared with related technologies, the beneficial effects of the computer program product provided in this application are the same as those of the bus parameter determination method provided in the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.
[0221] The above description is only a part of the embodiments of this application and does not limit the patent scope of this application. All equivalent structural transformations made under the technical concept of this application and using the contents of the specification and drawings of this application, or direct / indirect applications in other related technical fields, are included in the patent protection scope of this application.
Claims
1. A bus parameter determination method characterized by, include: A target process is selected from multiple processes; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power simultaneously; Based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at maximum output power at the same time, a second coefficient corresponding to the device in the target process is determined, wherein the second coefficient characterizes the relationship between the maximum power demand of the device in the target process and the total installed capacity. Based on the second coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices under the target process, and the third coefficient, the first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined; wherein, the third coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power actually required by the devices under the target process and the total installed capacity, and the first coefficient represents the probability that the multiple devices are not at maximum output power at the same time when the target process is executed; Based on the first coefficient, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
2. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the bus parameters adapted to the target process based on the first coefficient includes: Based on the first coefficient, a first current corresponding to the target process is determined, wherein the first current is used to simulate the maximum current flowing through the busbar when the target process is performed. Based on the first current, determine the bus parameters that are compatible with the target process.
3. The method as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The step of determining the bus parameters adapted to the target process based on the first current includes: Based on the type of the target process, the first current and the second current, a third current is determined, wherein the second current is the required current of the target process in the demand table; Based on the third current, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
4. The method as described in claim 3, characterized in that, Determining the third current based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current includes: When the target process is a type of first process, the first current or the second current is selected as the third current based on the first current, the second current and the number of devices in the target process.
5. The method as described in claim 4, characterized in that, The step of selecting either the first current or the second current as the third current based on the first current, the second current, and the number of devices in the target process includes: If it is determined that the first current is less than or equal to the second current and the number of devices in the target process is greater than or equal to the first value, the first current shall be used as the third current; If it is determined that the first current is greater than the second current, or the number of devices in the target process is less than the second value, the second current shall be used as the third current.
6. The method as described in claim 3, characterized in that, Determining the third current based on the type of the target process, the first current, and the second current includes: If the target process is of type two, the first current is used as the third current.
7. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 6, characterized in that, The step of determining the first current corresponding to the target process based on the first coefficient includes: Based on the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process, the first current corresponding to the target process is determined.
8. The method as described in claim 7, characterized in that, The step of determining the first current corresponding to the target process based on the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of multiple devices in the target process includes: Calculate the product of the first coefficient, the number of devices in the target process, and the sum of the maximum output power of the multiple devices in the target process; The ratio between the product and the calculated coefficient is used to obtain the first current corresponding to the target process.
9. A busbar parameter determination device, characterized in that, include: A screening module is used to select at least one target process from multiple processes; wherein multiple devices in the target process support not being at maximum output power at the same time; The determination module is used to determine a second coefficient corresponding to the equipment in the target process based on the probability that multiple devices in the target process are not at their maximum output power at the same time. The second coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power demand of the equipment in the target process and the total installed capacity. Based on the second coefficient, the number of devices under the target process, the number of interfaces of the devices under the target process, and the third coefficient, a first coefficient corresponding to the target process is determined; wherein, the third coefficient represents the relationship between the maximum power actually required by the devices under the target process and the total installed capacity, and the first coefficient represents the probability that the multiple devices are not at maximum output power at the same time when the target process is executed; based on the first coefficient, bus parameters adapted to the target process are determined.
10. A busbar parameter determination device, characterized in that, The device includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the computer program being configured to implement the steps of the bus parameter determination method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.
11. A storage medium, characterized in that, The storage medium is a computer-readable storage medium, and a computer program is stored on the storage medium. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the bus parameter determination method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.
12. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the bus parameter determination method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.