Debugging method of damage management monitoring system

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of damage management monitoring systems, in particular to a method for debugging a damage management monitoring system, which comprises the following steps of: completing the adaptation of an online debugging device and the damage management monitoring system; detecting parameters which are fed back preliminarily are confirmed through a measuring unit, after reaction time detection is completed through a timing triggering method, working current and power detection is conducted, and all paths of data are sorted; and real-time detection is carried out through analog input feedback signals, and classification marking of all fault point locations is completed. A damage management monitoring system-on-line debugging device linkage system is established, linkage detection of input, output, remote control starting, feedback and other units is achieved, the mode of independent debugging of the units in the prior art is broken, the overall working performance of the damage management monitoring system can be comprehensively verified, and the working efficiency of the damage management monitoring system is improved. The condition of matching failure of each unit in actual operation of the system is effectively avoided, and the integrity and reliability of system debugging are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of damage control monitoring systems, and more specifically to a debugging method for a damage control monitoring system. Background Technology

[0002] The damage control (damage control, measures and actions taken to prevent, limit and eliminate damage to maintain or restore one's own vitality; this invention mainly refers to fire prevention, explosion prevention and fire extinguishing) monitoring system functions to monitor various sensor signals (input signals) on board, detect and judge these signals (measurement signals), and after confirming the alarm signal, send control signals (output signals) to relevant equipment such as water fire fighting, gas fire fighting, air conditioning or release devices, and also send remote manual start signals (remote start signals). The execution status is fed back to the display panel (feedback signals), and the power supply may vary in different locations (power conversion signals).

[0003] Routine maintenance and repair often require significant time and effort to test each function of the system, involving over a dozen different instruments and diverse testing methods. This necessitates multiple personnel to complete the tests, making routine equipment testing and maintenance extremely inconvenient. Furthermore, existing methods lack dedicated power conversion adapters, requiring manual and repeated voltage adjustments to match the system's power requirements. This cumbersome process is prone to voltage mismatch errors, slowing down the debugging process and potentially causing irreversible damage to the circuit modules of the damage control monitoring system due to incompatible voltage. In the hardware connection path testing phase, manual visual inspection or simple tool testing is often used, making it difficult to accurately identify hidden connection problems such as open circuits and short circuits. The lack of a unified connection qualification standard creates potential faults for subsequent signal transmission and testing. Regarding sensor signal simulation, existing debugging methods cannot achieve full coverage simulation output of all sensor signals in the system, making it difficult to comprehensively verify the damage control monitoring system's ability to receive and respond to various alarm and fault signals. Signal detection at some points is prone to omission. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention addresses the technical problems existing in the prior art by providing a debugging method for a damage control monitoring system.

[0005] The technical solution of the present invention to solve the above-mentioned technical problems is as follows: a debugging method for a damage control monitoring system, the method comprising the following specific steps: S1. After shutting down the damage control monitoring system, fix it to the online debugging device adapter through the matching interface connector, and then adapt the power supply level and voltage value to complete the adaptation between the online debugging device and the damage control monitoring system. S2. Introduce a continuity tester and connect it to the sub-unit interface. After conducting continuity testing, build a linkage system of loss control monitoring system and online debugging device. The input debugging unit selects the sensor signal type and performs analog output, and obtains preliminary feedback. The measurement unit confirms the detection parameters of the preliminary feedback. After completing the reaction time detection using the timing trigger method, the working current and power are detected, and all channel data are compiled. S3. Based on the input status of each sensor in the input debugging unit, the output debugging unit is tested, and after verifying the output signal one by one and detecting the output signal strength, the analog input of the remote start unit is executed, and the feedback signal of the analog input is detected in real time to complete the classification and marking of all fault points.

[0006] In a preferred embodiment, after the damage control monitoring system is shut down in step S1, it is determined that the AC power supply type of the damage control monitoring system is 220V and / or 380V. The power conversion unit of the online debugging device for the damage control monitoring system is operated, and the conversion switch is activated to switch the power supply line of the online debugging device to an AC voltage level matching the damage control monitoring system. The device's power supply line is then switched to an AC voltage level matching the damage control monitoring system. The output DC voltage is adjusted to the rated DC operating voltage of the damage control monitoring system through voltage regulation, completing the adaptation of the power supply level and voltage value. After completing the adaptation of the power supply level and voltage value, the main power switch of the online debugging device for the damage control monitoring system is closed. The power indicator light on the device panel is observed to be constantly lit. The test buttons of each unit are then lightly touched in sequence to confirm that the button feedback is normal, the indicator lights do not flicker, and the multi-function current and power meter display of the measuring unit has no garbled characters and the value returns to 0, completing the device's own functional self-test.

[0007] In a preferred embodiment, S2 introduces an online debugging device into a continuity tester. This instrument is a portable electronic testing instrument with buzzer prompts and continuity value display functions. It is used to detect whether there are open circuits or short circuits after the circuit is connected. First, the continuity tester performs a self-test to confirm that its testing function is normal, and then the unit interface is connected, specifically as follows: Connect the output interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding output signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system using a dedicated connecting cable. The two ends of the connecting cable are fixed with snap-fit ​​to prevent poor contact. Connect the feedback signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding feedback signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system; Connect the remote control signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the remote control signal simulation interface at the bottom of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system. Connect the detection end of the multi-functional current and power meter of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system in series to both ends of the power supply interface circuit of the damage control monitoring system to ensure that the current and power meter and the power supply circuit form a closed loop; In a preferred embodiment, after the sub-unit interfaces are connected, two probes of a continuity tester are used to contact the metal contacts at both ends of each set of connecting cables to test the connection paths of the input debugging unit, measurement unit, output debugging unit, remote start unit, and feedback signal unit one by one. If the continuity tester beeps and the path value is within the normal continuity range, the connection is considered qualified. If there is no beep and the value exceeds the limit, the connecting cable is immediately unplugged and re-plugged and fixed until all connection paths are qualified. This completes the construction of the damage control monitoring system-online debugging device linkage system with all hardware connections and path tests qualified.

[0008] In a preferred embodiment, S2 uses an input debugging unit comprising 12 dual-channel and / or 24 single-channel sensor analog circuits and corresponding 24 analog action buttons to simulate sensor alarm and fault signals. The circuit board and analog action buttons are connected in a staggered configuration, with each analog action button corresponding to one sensor signal output. The analog action buttons are operated sequentially according to the sensor deployment locations and signal types of the damage control monitoring system. Each button press triggers the corresponding sensor analog circuit board to operate, outputting one sensor alarm signal and / or fault signal to the damage control monitoring system. After output, keep the button pressed for 3 seconds to ensure stable signal transmission to the damage control monitoring system. Sequentially complete the full coverage analog output of 24 single-channel and / or 12 dual-channel sensor signals. Avoid pressing multiple buttons simultaneously to prevent signal superposition and interference. Observe the signal receiving indicator lights of the damage control monitoring system. If the indicator light of the corresponding channel is lit, it is determined that the analog signal transmission of that channel sensor is successful. If the indicator light is not lit, return to step two to re-test the connection path of that channel, or replace the sensor analog circuit board of that channel, until all analog signals can be transmitted normally to the damage control monitoring system. The damage control monitoring system receives all analog input signals and provides initial feedback.

[0009] In a preferred embodiment, S2 collects the time interval from the start of the sensor alarm signal output by the input debugging unit to the time interval from the time the damage control monitoring system recognizes the signal and triggers the alarm prompt, and uses this as the reaction time. The power supply circuit current and power values ​​of the damage control monitoring system after receiving the analog input signal are used as the system operating current and power. The reaction time detection is performed using a timing-triggered method. Specifically, the timing module of the measurement unit is linked with the signal output terminal of the input debugging unit and the alarm signal trigger terminal of the damage control monitoring system. The trigger start condition of the timing module is set to the output alarm signal of the input debugging unit, and the stop condition is the alarm prompt triggered by the damage control monitoring system. Any alarm signal from the input debugging unit is simulated again, triggering the timing module to start timing. When the damage control monitoring system issues an audible and visual alarm prompt, the timing module automatically stops and records the timing value as the detection and judgment reaction time of the alarm signal. The reaction time detection is performed on all alarm signal channels in sequence, and the average value is taken as the final reaction time.

[0010] In a preferred embodiment, when the input debugging unit continuously outputs an analog signal and the damage control monitoring system is in normal working condition, S2 directly reads the real-time display value of the multi-functional current and power meter of the measurement unit, records the ampere number of the working current and the watt number of the working power respectively, and takes the average value after removing the maximum and minimum values ​​as the final detection value of the working current and power. The average response time, average system operating current, and average system operating power of all circuits are recorded in tabular form in the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system to complete the storage of raw test data.

[0011] In a preferred embodiment, S3 uses the input state of each sensor simulated by the input debugging unit as the detection basis to verify whether the control signal sent by the damage control monitoring system after receiving different input signals meets the design functional requirements, and completes the output debugging unit detection; In a preferred embodiment, step S3 introduces a voltage and current testing pen, which is a portable signal testing tool that can detect the voltage and current intensity of electrical signals. This is used to verify the effective transmission strength of the output signal. The probe of the testing pen is brought into contact with the output signal interface of the output debugging unit to detect the voltage and current values ​​of each normal output signal. The values ​​are compared with the rated output signal parameters of the damage control monitoring system. If the detected values ​​are within ±5% of the rated parameters, the signal strength is deemed qualified. If the values ​​exceed the range, the signal strength deviation value is recorded.

[0012] In a preferred embodiment, S3 further includes: while the damage control monitoring system is in the working state of receiving simulated signals from the input debugging unit, activating the remote control signal simulation of the remote control start unit, outputting a remote manual remote control start electrical signal to the damage control monitoring system console, holding each signal output for 5 seconds to ensure that the system has enough time to identify and respond to the remote control command. This unit can simulate inputting various remote control start electrical signals, sending remote manual remote control commands to the damage control monitoring system console, and verifying the start control function of each corresponding fire-fighting execution device after the system receives the remote control signal. The device panel is equipped with remote control signal simulation buttons, each button corresponding to a remote control start signal of a fire-fighting execution device, which is matched one by one with the remote control start commands of water fire-fighting, gas fire-fighting, and other equipment. Reconnect the damage control monitoring system to the ship's fire-fighting equipment temporarily. Observe whether the corresponding fire-fighting equipment starts after each remote control start signal is issued. At the same time, check the remote control start feedback indicator on the damage control monitoring system console. If the equipment starts normally and the console indicator is lit, the remote control start function is deemed to be qualified. If only the indicator is lit but the equipment does not move, the system remote control signal output is deemed to be normal but the execution equipment connection is faulty. If neither responds, the remote control start unit or receiver module is deemed to be faulty. Mark the fault points of different types respectively. During the input debugging unit's output signal verification and the remote start unit's real-time detection, continuously observe the response status of the corresponding feedback signal indicator light after each output signal and remote start signal of the feedback signal unit are issued. If the indicator light is constantly on, it is determined that the damage control monitoring system has received the action feedback signal from the fire-fighting execution equipment, and the input, output, and remote start signal functions are normal. If the indicator light flashes, it is determined that the feedback signal transmission is abnormal and there is signal interference. If the indicator light is off, it is determined that there is no feedback signal transmission and the feedback path between the system and the execution equipment is faulty. Complete the final classification and labeling of all fault points.

[0013] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: It establishes a linkage system between the damage control monitoring system and the online debugging device, realizing the linkage detection of various units such as input, output, remote start, and feedback. This breaks the existing technology's mode of independent debugging of each unit, enabling comprehensive verification of the overall performance of the damage control monitoring system. It effectively avoids the failure of coordination between units during actual operation, improves the integrity and reliability of system debugging, reduces the difficulty of daily debugging and maintenance of the damage control monitoring system, and effectively ensures the stable and reliable operation of the damage control monitoring system. This provides solid technical support for the safety protection of ships in terms of fire prevention, explosion prevention, and firefighting. Attached Figure Description

[0014] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the user interface of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0015] The technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0016] As attached Figure 1-2 As shown, this embodiment provides a debugging method for a damage control monitoring system, the method including the following specific steps: S1. After shutting down the damage control monitoring system, fix it to the online debugging device adapter through the matching interface connector, and then adapt the power supply level and voltage value to complete the adaptation between the online debugging device and the damage control monitoring system. S2. Introduce a continuity tester and connect it to the sub-unit interface. After conducting continuity testing, build a linkage system of loss control monitoring system and online debugging device. The input debugging unit selects the sensor signal type and performs analog output, and obtains preliminary feedback. The measurement unit confirms the detection parameters of the preliminary feedback. After completing the reaction time detection using the timing trigger method, the working current and power are detected, and all channel data are compiled. S3. Based on the input status of each sensor in the input debugging unit, the output debugging unit is tested, and after verifying the output signal one by one and detecting the output signal strength, the analog input of the remote start unit is executed, and the feedback signal of the analog input is detected in real time to complete the classification and marking of all fault points.

[0017] After shutting down the damage control monitoring system (S1), determine that the AC power supply type of the damage control monitoring system is 220V and / or 380V. Operate the power conversion unit of the online debugging device for the damage control monitoring system, start the conversion switch, switch the power supply line of the online debugging device to the AC voltage level that matches the damage control monitoring system, switch the power supply line of the device to the AC voltage level that matches the damage control monitoring system, and adjust the output DC voltage to the rated DC operating voltage of the damage control monitoring system through voltage regulation to complete the adaptation of the power supply level and voltage value.

[0018] Specifically, after completing the power supply level and voltage value matching, close the main power switch of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system, observe whether the power indicator light on the device panel is constantly lit, and lightly touch the test buttons of each unit in sequence to confirm that the button feedback is normal, the indicator light does not flicker, the multi-function current and power meter display of the measuring unit has no garbled characters and the value returns to 0, thus completing the device's own functional self-test.

[0019] S2 introduces an online debugging device into the continuity tester. This portable electronic tester features a buzzer prompt and continuity value display function, used to detect whether there are open circuits or short circuits after circuit connection. First, the continuity tester performs a self-test to confirm its normal testing function, then the unit interface connections are performed, specifically as follows: Connect the output interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding output signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system using a dedicated connecting cable. The two ends of the connecting cable are fixed with snap-fit ​​to prevent poor contact. Connect the feedback signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding feedback signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system; Connect the remote control signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the remote control signal simulation interface at the bottom of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system. Connect the detection end of the multi-functional current and power meter of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system in series to both ends of the power supply interface circuit of the damage control monitoring system to ensure that the current and power meter and the power supply circuit form a closed loop; After connecting the sub-unit interfaces, use the two probes of the continuity tester to contact the metal contacts at both ends of each set of connecting lines, and check the connection paths of the input debugging unit, measurement unit, output debugging unit, remote start unit, and feedback signal unit one by one. If the continuity tester beeps and the path value is within the normal conduction range, the connection is considered qualified. If there is no beep and the value exceeds the limit, immediately re-plug the connecting line and fix it until all connection paths are qualified. This completes the construction of the damage control monitoring system-online debugging device linkage system with all hardware connections and path tests qualified.

[0020] S2 includes an input debugging unit with 12 dual-channel and / or 24 single-channel sensor analog circuits and corresponding 24 analog action buttons to simulate sensor alarm and fault signals. The circuit board and analog action buttons are connected in a staggered pair configuration. Each analog action button corresponds to one sensor signal output. The analog action buttons are operated sequentially according to the sensor deployment locations and signal types of the damage control monitoring system. Each button press triggers the corresponding sensor analog circuit board to output one sensor alarm and / or fault signal to the damage control monitoring system. After each signal output, the button is held in place. Press the button for 3 seconds to ensure stable signal transmission to the damage control monitoring system. Sequentially complete the full-coverage analog output of 24 single-channel and / or 12 dual-channel sensor signals. Avoid pressing multiple buttons simultaneously to prevent signal superposition and interference. Observe the signal receiving indicator lights of the damage control monitoring system. If the indicator light for the corresponding channel is lit, it is determined that the analog signal transmission of that sensor channel is successful. If the indicator light is not lit, return to step two to re-test the connection path of that channel, or replace the sensor analog circuit board of that channel, until all analog signals can be transmitted normally to the damage control monitoring system. The damage control monitoring system receives all analog input signals and provides initial feedback.

[0021] S2 collects the time interval from the start of the sensor alarm signal output by the input debugging unit to the time when the damage control monitoring system recognizes the signal and triggers the alarm prompt, and uses this as the reaction time. The power supply circuit current and power values ​​of the damage control monitoring system after receiving the analog input signal are used as the system operating current and power. The reaction time detection is performed using a timing-triggered method. Specifically, the timing module of the measurement unit is linked with the signal output terminal of the input debugging unit and the alarm signal trigger terminal of the damage control monitoring system. The trigger start condition of the timing module is set to the output alarm signal of the input debugging unit, and the stop condition is the alarm prompt triggered by the damage control monitoring system. Any alarm signal from the input debugging unit is simulated again, triggering the timing module to start timing. When the damage control monitoring system issues an audible and visual alarm prompt, the timing module automatically stops and records the timing value as the detection and judgment reaction time of the alarm signal. The reaction time detection is performed on all alarm signal channels in sequence, and the average value is taken as the final reaction time.

[0022] When the input debugging unit continuously outputs analog signals and the damage control monitoring system is in normal working condition, S2 directly reads the real-time display value of the multi-functional current and power meter of the measurement unit, records the ampere number of the working current and the watt number of the working power respectively, and takes the average value after removing the maximum and minimum values ​​as the final detection value of the working current and power. The average response time, average system operating current, and average system operating power of all circuits are recorded in tabular form in the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system to complete the storage of raw test data.

[0023] S3 uses the input state of each sensor simulated by the input debugging unit as the detection basis to verify whether the control signal sent by the damage control monitoring system after receiving different input signals meets the design functional requirements, and completes the output debugging unit detection. The S3 introduces a voltage and current testing pen, a portable signal testing tool that can detect the voltage and current intensity of electrical signals. It is used to verify the effective transmission strength of the output signal. The probe of the testing pen is placed in contact with the output signal interface of the output debugging unit to detect the voltage and current values ​​of each normal output signal. The values ​​are compared with the rated output signal parameters of the damage control monitoring system. If the detected values ​​are within ±5% of the rated parameters, the signal strength is deemed qualified. If the values ​​are outside the range, the signal strength deviation value is recorded.

[0024] S3 also includes: when the damage control monitoring system is in the working state of receiving input and debugging unit analog signals, start the remote control start unit to simulate remote control signals, and output a remote manual remote control start electrical signal to the damage control monitoring system console. Each signal is maintained for 5 seconds after output to ensure that the system has enough time to recognize and respond to the remote control command. This unit can simulate input of various remote control start electrical signals and send remote manual remote control commands to the damage control monitoring system console to verify the start control function of each corresponding fire-fighting execution equipment after the system receives the remote control signal. The device panel is equipped with remote control signal simulation buttons. Each button corresponds to a remote control start signal of a fire-fighting execution equipment and is matched one by one with the remote control start commands of water fire-fighting, gas fire-fighting and other equipment. Reconnect the damage control monitoring system to the ship's fire-fighting equipment temporarily. Observe whether the corresponding fire-fighting equipment starts after each remote control start signal is issued. At the same time, check the remote control start feedback indicator on the damage control monitoring system console. If the equipment starts normally and the console indicator is lit, the remote control start function is deemed to be qualified. If only the indicator is lit but the equipment does not move, the system remote control signal output is deemed to be normal but the execution equipment connection is faulty. If neither responds, the remote control start unit or receiver module is deemed to be faulty. Mark the fault points of different types respectively. During the input debugging unit's output signal verification and the remote start unit's real-time detection, continuously observe the response status of the corresponding feedback signal indicator light after each output signal and remote start signal of the feedback signal unit are issued. If the indicator light is constantly on, it is determined that the damage control monitoring system has received the action feedback signal from the fire-fighting execution equipment, and the input, output, and remote start signal functions are normal. If the indicator light flashes, it is determined that the feedback signal transmission is abnormal and there is signal interference. If the indicator light is off, it is determined that there is no feedback signal transmission and the feedback path between the system and the execution equipment is faulty. Complete the final classification and labeling of all fault points.

Claims

1. A debugging method for a damage control monitoring system, characterized in that, The method includes the following specific steps: S1. After shutting down the damage control monitoring system, fix it to the online debugging device adapter through the matching interface connector, and then adapt the power supply level and voltage value to complete the adaptation between the online debugging device and the damage control monitoring system. S2. Introduce a continuity tester and connect it to the sub-unit interface. After conducting continuity testing, build a linkage system of damage control monitoring system and online debugging device. The input debugging unit selects the sensor signal type and performs analog output, and obtains preliminary feedback. The measurement unit confirms the detection parameters of the preliminary feedback. After completing the reaction time detection using the timing trigger method, the working current and power are detected, and all channel data are compiled. S3. Based on the input status of each sensor in the input debugging unit, the output debugging unit is tested, and after verifying the output signal one by one and detecting the output signal strength, the analog input of the remote start unit is executed, and the feedback signal of the analog input is detected in real time to complete the classification and marking of all fault points.

2. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 1, characterized in that, After the S1 shutdown of the damage control monitoring system, it is determined that the AC power supply type of the damage control monitoring system is 220V and / or 380V. The power conversion unit of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system is operated, the conversion switch is activated, the power supply line of the online debugging device is switched to the AC voltage level matching the damage control monitoring system, the power supply line of the device is switched to the AC voltage level matching the damage control monitoring system, and the output DC voltage is adjusted to the rated DC operating voltage of the damage control monitoring system through voltage regulation, thus completing the adaptation of the power supply level and voltage value.

3. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 1, characterized in that, S2 introduces the online debugging device into the continuity tester and connects it to the sub-unit interface, specifically as follows: Connect the output interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding output signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system using a dedicated connecting cable. The two ends of the connecting cable are fixed with snap-fit. Connect the feedback signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the corresponding feedback signal interface at the lower end of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system; Connect the remote control signal interface of the damage control monitoring system to the remote control signal simulation interface at the bottom of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system. Connect the detection terminal of the multi-functional current and power meter of the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system in series to both ends of the power supply interface circuit of the damage control monitoring system.

4. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 1, characterized in that, After connecting the sub-unit interfaces, use the two probes of the continuity tester to contact the metal contacts at both ends of each set of connecting lines, and check the connection paths of the input debugging unit, measurement unit, output debugging unit, remote start unit, and feedback signal unit one by one. If the continuity tester beeps and the path value is within the normal conduction range, the connection is considered qualified. If there is no beep and the value exceeds the limit, immediately re-plug the connecting line and fix it until all connection paths are qualified. This completes the construction of the damage control monitoring system-online debugging device linkage system with all hardware connections and path tests qualified.

5. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The S2 includes an input debugging unit with 12 dual-channel and / or 24 single-channel sensor simulation circuits and corresponding 24 simulation action buttons to simulate sensor alarm signals and fault signals. According to the sensor deployment points and signal types of the damage control monitoring system, the simulation action buttons are operated one by one in sequence to trigger the corresponding sensor simulation and output a sensor alarm signal and / or fault signal to the damage control monitoring system. After each signal is output, the full coverage simulation output of 24 single-channel and / or 12 dual-channel sensor signals is completed in sequence. The damage control monitoring system receives all simulation input signals and provides preliminary feedback.

6. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 5, characterized in that, The S2 collects the time interval from the start of the sensor alarm signal output by the input debugging unit to the time when the damage control monitoring system recognizes the signal and triggers the alarm prompt, and uses this as the reaction time. The power supply circuit current and power values ​​of the damage control monitoring system after receiving the analog input signal are used as the system operating current and power. The reaction time detection is performed using a timing-triggered method. Specifically, the timing module of the measurement unit is linked with the signal output terminal of the input debugging unit and the alarm signal trigger terminal of the damage control monitoring system. The trigger start condition of the timing module is set to the output alarm signal of the input debugging unit, and the stop condition is the alarm prompt triggered by the damage control monitoring system. Any alarm signal from the input debugging unit is simulated again, triggering the timing module to start timing. When the damage control monitoring system issues an audible and visual alarm prompt, the timing module automatically stops and records the timing value as the detection and judgment reaction time of the alarm signal. The reaction time detection is performed on all alarm signal channels in sequence, and the average value is taken as the final reaction time.

7. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 6, characterized in that, When the input debugging unit continuously outputs analog signals and the damage control monitoring system is in normal working condition, S2 directly reads the real-time display value of the multi-functional current and power meter of the measurement unit, records the ampere number of the working current and the watt number of the working power respectively, and takes the average value after removing the maximum and minimum values ​​as the final detection value of the working current and power. The average response time, average system operating current, and average system operating power of all circuits are recorded in tabular form in the online debugging device of the damage control monitoring system to complete the storage of raw test data.

8. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 1, characterized in that, S3 uses the input state of each sensor simulated by the input debugging unit as the detection basis to verify whether the control signal sent out by the damage control monitoring system after receiving different input signals meets the design functional requirements, and completes the output debugging unit detection.

9. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The S3 introduces a voltage and current detection pen. The probe of the detection pen is brought into contact with the output signal interface of the output debugging unit to detect the voltage and current values ​​of each normal output signal. The values ​​are compared with the rated output signal parameters of the damage control monitoring system. If the detected values ​​are within ±5% of the rated parameters, the signal strength is deemed qualified. If the values ​​are outside the range, the signal strength deviation value is recorded.

10. The debugging method of a damage control monitoring system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The S3 further includes: while the damage control monitoring system is in the working state of receiving the input debugging unit's analog signal, starting the remote control signal simulation of the remote control start unit and outputting a remote manual remote control start electrical signal to the damage control monitoring system's control console; Reconnect the damage control monitoring system to the ship's fire-fighting equipment temporarily. Observe whether the corresponding fire-fighting equipment starts after each remote control start signal is issued. At the same time, check the remote control start feedback indicator on the damage control monitoring system console. If the equipment starts normally and the console indicator is lit, the remote control start function is deemed to be qualified. If only the indicator is lit but the equipment does not move, the system remote control signal output is deemed to be normal but the execution equipment connection is faulty. If neither responds, the remote control start unit or receiver module is deemed to be faulty. Mark the fault points of different types respectively. While verifying the output signal in the input debugging unit and performing real-time detection in the remote start unit, continuously observe the response status of the corresponding feedback signal indicator after each output signal of the feedback signal unit and the remote start signal are issued, and complete the final classification and marking of all fault points.

Images