Enterprise bidding document making auxiliary method

Abstract

The invention discloses an enterprise bidding document making auxiliary method, which relates to the field of document management, and comprises the following steps of: respectively generating a bidding clause set and a candidate response paragraph set by acquiring bidding documents and bidding document drafts, and further generating a clause response constraint establishment table; and correspondingly executing chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check on each bid inviting term, so that the one-by-one binding relationship between the bid inviting terms and the bid response can be established in advance before the bid document enters the formal arrangement; according to the method, each bid invitation clause clearly corresponds to the response chapter, the response paragraph and the response description, so that the problems that the clause response relationship in the existing bidding file is fuzzy and the written content is difficult to prove as effective response content are effectively solved, and the definition and the stability of the basic establishment relationship between the bid invitation clause and the bidding response are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of document management technology, specifically to an auxiliary method for preparing enterprise bidding documents. Background Technology

[0002] With the continuous development of enterprise digital document processing technology and bidding business support technology, the preparation of enterprise bidding documents is gradually evolving from traditional manual preparation methods to information-assisted preparation methods. Based on this, the field of bidding document preparation support technology is beginning to focus more on processes such as bid document generation, clause response establishment, response relationship verification, and version output control. Especially in engineering construction, service outsourcing, information integration, and operation and maintenance support projects, enterprises typically need to address the correspondence between clauses in the tender document and the draft bid document, the organization of response paragraphs, and traceability control during the generation of the final submission version.

[0003] Currently, the process of preparing bidding documents for enterprises typically involves manually searching for bidding clauses, manually looking up historical templates, manually inserting response content, and manually verifying the chapter positions. While a specific requirement in the bidding document may be included in the draft bid, it often lacks a clear corresponding chapter, paragraph, and response description. This results in a loose correspondence between the bidding clauses and the bid response, making it difficult to form a stable, clause-by-clause response structure. Furthermore, even if some clauses have been addressed, the responses are usually scattered across different chapters such as technical solutions, commercial responses, service commitments, and implementation measures. Reviewers still need to repeatedly search and compare page by page, making it difficult to directly locate the specific response position in the bid document from the bidding clauses. Therefore, the existing method generally suffers from problems such as ambiguous clause-response relationships, difficulty in verifying response positions, and low review efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the shortcomings of existing technologies, this invention provides an auxiliary method for preparing enterprise bidding documents, thus solving the problems mentioned in the background section.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents, comprising the following steps: S1. Obtain the tender documents and draft tender documents, and generate a set of tender terms and a set of candidate response paragraphs respectively; S2. Generate a clause response constraint establishment table based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs, and perform chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check based on the clause response constraint establishment table, generate clause establishment completeness value J, and write tender clauses that fail at least one establishment check into the weak clause establishment set. S3. Compare the clause establishment completeness value J with the preset establishment threshold J0. When the clause establishment completeness value J is less than the preset establishment threshold J0, trigger the clause response explicit verification enhancement process based on the establishment of the weak clause set. The clause response explicit verification enhancement process includes clause source location explicit enhancement process, response landing point explicit enhancement process and verification link explicit enhancement process, and generate explicit verification closure value H. S4. Based on the clause completeness value J and explicit verification closure value H, generate the clause traceability control value G, and perform formal version control based on the clause traceability control value G to output the formal submission version and the internal review version.

[0006] Preferably, S1 includes S11; S11. Receive the tender document imported by the user, and perform paragraph boundary recognition processing on the tender document based on line break marks, number marks, list marks, and chapter title marks to obtain several initial clause fragments; then perform clause number extraction processing on each initial clause fragment to obtain the clause number; then perform chapter attribution writing processing based on the nearest chapter title text before the initial clause fragment to obtain the chapter title text; then perform original page position recording processing based on the page number position of the initial clause fragment in the tender document to obtain the page number position; and perform sequential position generation processing according to the order of appearance of the initial clause fragments in the tender document to obtain the tender clause sequential position number; finally, write the clause number, the text content of the initial clause fragment, the chapter title text, the page number position, and the tender clause sequential position number as the tender clause number field, the tender clause content field, the chapter to which the tender clause belongs field, the original page position field, and the tender clause sequential position number field into the tender clause set, respectively.

[0007] Preferably, S1 further includes S12; S12. Based on the title style, chapter number, and table of contents hierarchy in the draft tender document, perform chapter boundary identification on the draft tender document to obtain several chapter blocks. Each chapter block includes a chapter number and a chapter block text area. Within each chapter block, perform paragraph segmentation based on paragraph separators, list item markers, and table cell positions to obtain multiple candidate response paragraphs. Determine the paragraph text corresponding to each candidate response paragraph as the candidate response paragraph text content. Generate paragraph numbers according to the chapter number and the order number within the paragraph to obtain the candidate response paragraph number. Write the chapter number of the chapter block where each candidate response paragraph is located into the chapter belonging item of the corresponding candidate response paragraph to obtain the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs. Initialize the paragraph state for each candidate response paragraph and set the candidate response paragraph state to the draft pending state to obtain the candidate response paragraph state. Then, perform paragraph page position recording based on the page number position of each candidate response paragraph in the draft tender document to obtain the current page position of the candidate response paragraph. Finally, a set of candidate response paragraphs is generated based on the text content of the candidate response paragraph, the candidate response paragraph number, the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, the status of the candidate response paragraph, and the current page position of the candidate response paragraph.

[0008] Preferably, S2 includes S21; S21. After generating the set of tender terms and the set of candidate response paragraphs, the present invention further generates a table of terms response constraints based on the set of tender terms and the set of candidate response paragraphs. First, based on the chapter field of each bidding clause, candidate response paragraphs with the same chapter field as the bidding clause are selected from the candidate response paragraph set, forming the chapter candidate range. Then, for each bidding clause, at least one candidate response paragraph is selected from the corresponding chapter candidate range, and the candidate response paragraph number of the selected candidate response paragraph is written into the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field. Next, the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number is read, and the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs is written into the corresponding bid response chapter field. Subsequently, the description of the correspondence between the current bidding clause and the current candidate response paragraph is received, and the description is written into the corresponding response description text field. At the same time, the formal chapter entry status of the current record is initialized to the non-entry status. Finally, a clause response constraint establishment table is generated based on the bidding clause number field, the corresponding bid response chapter field, the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field, the corresponding response description text field, and the formal chapter entry status.

[0009] Preferably, S2 also includes S22; S22. After generating the clause response constraint establishment table, the present invention performs chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check based on the clause response constraint establishment table. The chapter creation check reads the corresponding bid response chapter field in the clause response constraint creation table and determines whether the field is not empty and whether it is consistent with the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number field belongs. If they are consistent, the chapter creation check is determined to be passed and the chapter creation flag value is output as 1; otherwise, the chapter creation flag value is output as 0. The paragraph creation check reads the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field and determines whether the field is not empty, whether the corresponding candidate response paragraph can be retrieved in the candidate response paragraph set, and whether the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is not in the prohibited entry state. If the above conditions are met, the paragraph creation check is determined to be passed and the paragraph creation flag value is output as 1; otherwise, the paragraph creation flag value is output as 0. The description establishment check is performed by reading the corresponding response description text field and determining whether the field is not empty, whether its valid character count reaches the user-preset minimum length threshold, and whether the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field contains the current tender clause number. If the above conditions are met, the description establishment check is determined to be passed, and the description establishment flag value is output as 1; otherwise, the description establishment flag value is output as 0. The closure establishment check reads the status of the candidate response paragraph corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number and determines whether the status of the candidate response paragraph is confirmed. If so, the entry status of the formal chapter is updated to the entered status, the closure establishment check is confirmed to be passed, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the entry status of the formal chapter is kept as not entered, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 0.

[0010] Preferably, S2 also includes S23; S23. After the above four establishment checks are completed, the present invention will write the tender clauses that fail at least one of the chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check into the weak clauses establishment set. Then, based on the total number of tender terms Nc, the number of tender terms Ns, the number of tender terms Np, the number of tender terms Ne, and the number of tender terms Nk, the completeness value J of the terms is calculated. The completeness value J of the clause is calculated and output using the following algorithm: J = Ns × Np × Ne × Nk / Nc 4 .

[0011] Preferably, S3 includes S31; S31. The completeness value J of the terms can be used to quantitatively reflect the degree of closure of the basic relationship between the bidding terms and the bid response in the current version of the bid document.

[0012] Subsequently, the clause completeness value J is compared with the establishment threshold J0. The establishment threshold J0 is preset by the user based on the minimum release requirement of the clause completeness value J, and its value is between 0 and 1. When the clause completeness value J is greater than or equal to the establishment threshold J0, it is determined that a basic establishment relationship has been formed between the bidding clauses and the bid response in the current version of the bid document, which can enter the formal arrangement stage. When the clause completeness value J is less than the establishment threshold J0, it is determined that there are weak establishment clauses in the current version of the bid document, and an explicit verification enhancement stage is triggered based on the set of weak establishment clauses.

[0013] Preferably, S3 also includes S32; S32. In the explicit verification enhancement phase, the explicit enhancement processing of the clause source location, the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point, and the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link are executed in sequence. Among them, the explicit enhancement processing of the source position of the clause is for each tender clause in the set of weak clauses. It reads the target tender clause number, and retrieves the corresponding chapter and original page of the tender clause in the set of tender clauses based on the target tender clause number. It generates a source position prompt text including the tender clause number, the chapter and original page of the tender clause, and writes the source position prompt text into the front area of ​​the corresponding candidate response paragraph. The explicit enhancement of response landing point processing reads the candidate response paragraph number corresponding to the target tender clause, and reads the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number from the candidate response paragraph set. Then, it writes the target tender clause number, the target tender clause content summary, the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number into the clause index directory. The explicit enhancement processing of the verification link reads the sequential position number of the target bidding terms, retrieves adjacent bidding terms in the bidding terms set, reads the response page position corresponding to the adjacent bidding terms, and writes the adjacent bidding terms number into the corresponding candidate response paragraph, thereby forming a verification link prompt. After the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link is completed, the relevant parameters are statistically analyzed, and the explicit verification closure value H is generated. The explicit verification closure value H is calculated and output using the following algorithm: H = Nt × Nl × Nr / Nu 3 .

[0014] Preferably, S4 includes S41; S41. Based on the explicit verification closure value H and the clause establishment completeness value J, a comprehensive calculation is performed to obtain the clause traceability control value G; the clause traceability control value G is calculated and output using the following algorithm formula: .

[0015] Preferably, S4 also includes S42; S42. Pre-set the freeze threshold G0. The freeze threshold G0 is the version release threshold preset by the user based on the terms traceability control value G, and the value is between 0 and 1. The traceable control value G of the clause is compared with the freezing threshold G0; the specific comparison is as follows: When the traceability control value G of the clause is greater than or equal to the freezing threshold G0, the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is updated to the confirmed status, the status of the formal chapter in the clause response constraint establishment table is updated to the entered status, the tender clause number, the formal response paragraph number, the location of the clause index directory and the clause source prompt in the response paragraph are frozen, and the formal submission version is output. When the traceability control value G of the clause is less than the freezing threshold G0, the candidate response paragraphs that have not completed explicit verification enhancement processing will be kept in an inaccessible state, the establishment of a set of weak clauses and the link break prompt will be retained, the export of the formal submission version will be restricted, and only the internal review version will be output.

[0016] This invention provides an auxiliary method for preparing enterprise bidding documents. It has the following beneficial effects: (1) This method obtains the tender documents and the draft tender documents, generates a set of tender terms and a set of candidate response paragraphs respectively, and further generates a clause response constraint establishment table. It performs a chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check for each tender term. Before the tender documents enter the formal compilation, it can establish the binding relationship between the tender terms and the tender response in advance, so that each tender term clearly corresponds to the response chapter, response paragraph and response description. This effectively solves the problem of ambiguous clause response relationship and difficulty in proving the written content as valid response content in the existing tender documents, and improves the clarity and stability of the basic relationship between the tender terms and the tender response.

[0017] (2) This method triggers explicit verification enhancement processing of clause response when the clause establishment completeness value J is lower than the establishment threshold J0, and sequentially executes explicit enhancement processing of clause source position, explicit enhancement processing of response landing point and explicit enhancement processing of verification link. It can supplement the response content corresponding to the weak clause to form source position prompt text, clause index directory and continuous link prompt, so that the reviewers can directly trace back to the original position of the bidding document from the bidding clause, and further locate the formal response chapter, response page and response paragraph in the bid document. At the same time, it can also form a continuous verification path along adjacent clauses, thereby effectively solving the problems of difficulty in review positioning, difficulty in verifying response position and unsmooth continuous clause verification in the existing bid documents, and improving the explicit positioning capability and continuous verifiability of the bid documents.

[0018] (3) This method combines the control of clause response constraint establishment with the control of explicit verification of clause response in a progressive manner. First, the clause establishment completeness value J is used to determine whether a basic relationship has been established between the bidding clause and the bid response that can enter the formal arrangement stage. Then, explicit verification enhancement processing is performed on the weak clauses. Based on the clause establishment completeness value J, explicit verification closure value H and clause traceability control value G, formal version control is performed. This enables the bid documents to have three control capabilities at the same time: clause binding, clear positioning and continuous traceability. Finally, a traceable response structure from bidding clause to response content is formed. This not only improves the completeness of the bid document response and the efficiency of review and verification, but also reduces the risk of misjudgment caused by clause omission, position drift or verification link breakage, and improves the standardization, credibility and reviewability of the formal submission version. Attached Figure Description

[0019] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps of an auxiliary method for preparing enterprise bidding documents according to the present invention; Figure 2 To establish an inspection flowchart; Figure 3 Enhanced version control flowchart for explicit verification. Detailed Implementation

[0020] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0021] Example 1: This invention provides an auxiliary method for preparing enterprise bidding documents. Please refer to [link / reference]. Figure 1 This includes the following steps: S1. Obtain the tender documents and draft tender documents, and generate a set of tender terms and a set of candidate response paragraphs respectively; S2. Generate a clause response constraint establishment table based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs, and perform chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check based on the clause response constraint establishment table, generate clause establishment completeness value J, and write tender clauses that fail at least one establishment check into the weak clause establishment set. S3. Compare the clause establishment completeness value J with the preset establishment threshold J0. When the clause establishment completeness value J is less than the preset establishment threshold J0, trigger the clause response explicit verification enhancement process based on the establishment of the weak clause set. The clause response explicit verification enhancement process includes clause source location explicit enhancement process, response landing point explicit enhancement process and verification link explicit enhancement process, and generate explicit verification closure value H. S4. Based on the clause completeness value J and explicit verification closure value H, generate the clause traceability control value G, and perform formal version control based on the clause traceability control value G to output the formal submission version and the internal review version.

[0022] In this embodiment, the method first structures the tender documents and draft bid documents, forming a set of tender clauses and a set of candidate response paragraphs, respectively. Then, based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs, a clause response constraint establishment table is generated. This ensures that each tender clause establishes a clear association with its corresponding chapter, paragraph, and response description before entering the formal submission process. Subsequently, a clause establishment completeness value J is generated through chapter establishment checks, paragraph establishment checks, description establishment checks, and closure establishment checks. Tender clauses that fail at least one establishment check are added to the weak clause establishment set. This allows for the early identification of clauses that "have been written but have not yet formed a stable response relationship" before formal compilation. The clauses are defined as follows: When the clause establishment completeness value J is less than the preset establishment threshold J0, the clause response explicit verification enhancement processing is triggered based on the establishment of a weak clause set. Through explicit enhancement processing of clause source location, explicit enhancement processing of response landing point, and explicit enhancement processing of verification link, an explicit verification closure value H is generated, so that reviewers can not only directly find the corresponding response paragraph from a certain bidding clause, but also see the corresponding source location prompt, clause index directory, and continuous verification link between adjacent clauses. Finally, the clause establishment completeness value J and explicit verification closure value H are used to generate the clause traceability control value G, and formal version control is performed based on the clause traceability control value G to output the formal submission version and the internal review version. Therefore, this approach addresses the shortcomings mentioned in the background section, such as "the requirement of Clause X in the tender document is written in the tender document but the corresponding relationship is not clearly defined, leading to difficulties for the evaluators in reading it or even being considered unresponsive, and even if the clause has been responded to, the evaluators still need to repeatedly search through the tender document content." This improvement aligns with the actual tender document review process. For example, in enterprise procurement projects, IT integration projects, or operation and maintenance service projects, when reviewers view the "service response time requirements," they can first locate the corresponding clause through the tender clause set, and then confirm the corresponding chapter, paragraph, and response description through the clause response constraint table. If the clause was originally a weak clause, further enhancements such as explicit enhancement of the clause source location, explicit enhancement of the response landing point, and explicit enhancement of the verification link can be used to quickly locate the specific response page and adjacent clause response position in the formal submission version. This reduces the burden on evaluators to search page by page and manually compare, and lowers the risk of written response content being misjudged as unresponsive due to location drift, ambiguous relationships, or link interruptions.

[0023] Example 2: Please refer to Figure 1 Specifically: S1 includes S11; S11. Receive the tender documents and draft bid documents imported by the user, and perform paragraph boundary recognition processing on the tender documents based on the line break marks, number marks, list marks and chapter title marks in the tender documents to obtain several initial clause fragments; Paragraph boundary recognition processing: To ensure consistent subsequent processing, first convert the bidding documents into an internal text stream with page position attributes; the page position attributes include the page number where the current text is located, the line position where the current text is located, and the title level where the current text is located. Then perform paragraph boundary recognition processing on the text stream of the bidding documents. The paragraph boundary recognition processing is carried out by presetting a set of paragraph boundary recognition rules, which include line break mark recognition rules, number mark recognition rules, list mark recognition rules, and chapter title mark recognition rules. Specifically: After presetting, scan each line in the natural order of the text stream, and determine whether each line of text meets any of the following conditions: Line break mark recognition rule: The current line contains an independent line break end mark, and the indentation or format of the next line changes. Number mark recognition rule: The current line starts with a number mark, and the number marks include Arabic numeral numbers, Chinese numeral numbers, letter numbers, or combined numbers. List mark recognition rule: The current line starts with a list item mark, and the list item marks include a dot, a short dash, a bracket number, or a symbol sequence. Chapter title mark recognition rule: The font style, font size style, bold style, or hierarchical attribute of the current line meets the chapter title mark recognition rule. When any condition is met, the system takes the current position as a new paragraph start boundary, and the text content between two adjacent paragraph start boundaries is sliced into an initial clause segment; each initial clause segment in the initial clause segment sequence retains at least: segment text content, segment start page number, segment start line position, segment end page number, and segment end line position. What this process solves is: splitting the originally continuously typeset bidding documents into fragment objects that can be independently recognized and independently linked. All subsequent clause number extraction, chapter attribution writing, and page position recording are based on the initial clause segment sequence. Perform clause number extraction processing on each initial clause segment. The clause number extraction processing includes identifying first-level numbers, second-level numbers, third-level numbers, and unnumbered sequential numbers to obtain clause numbers. Clause number extraction processing: Identify whether the first part of the segment appears: "1.", "2.", "3."; "一、", "二、", "三、"; "第一章", "第二章"; and other number mark forms used for main-level clauses; if the identification is successful, write the corresponding number into the "bidding clause number" field and mark the clause level as the first-level number. Identify whether the first part of the second-level number pattern appears: "1.1"; "(1)"; "1)"; "一)"; The numbering format used for sub-level clauses; if the identification is successful, the corresponding number will be written into the "Tender Clause Number" field, and the clause level will be marked as a second-level number; Does the segment beginning with the third-level numbering pattern recognition feature: "1.1.1"; "(1.1)"; "①" or "②"? The numbering format is used to subdivide the clauses into different levels; if the identification is successful, the corresponding number will be written into the "Tender Clause Number" field, and the clause level will be marked as a third-level number.

[0024] In the no-number continuation mode, if the current initial clause fragment does not have an explicit number but is located after a clause with an identified number and meets the same list structure condition as the previous clause fragment, the system generates an internal continuation number based on the numbering hierarchy of the previous clause fragment. The method for generating internal sequential numbers is as follows: maintain the prefix of the parent number of the previous clause segment; append the sequential number to the end of the current level; for example: if the previous clause segment is numbered "3.2", and the current segment has no explicit number but belongs to the same list structure, then the current segment can be assigned an internal sequential number such as "3.2-1" or "3.2-2"; After extracting the clause numbers, each initial clause fragment receives: the tender clause number and the clause level identifier; The purpose of extracting clause numbers is not only to name the clauses, but more importantly, to establish the basis for subsequent controls: The link to the candidate response paragraph; The corresponding entry point to the terms and conditions index; The order of judgment in relation to adjacent clauses; Perform chapter attribution writing based on the most recent chapter title text preceding the initial clause fragment to obtain the chapter title text; Based on the initial clause fragment, perform original page position recording processing on the page position in the tender document to obtain the page position; The order position generation process is performed according to the order in which the initial clause fragments appear in the tender documents to obtain the order position number of the tender clauses; The clause number, the text content of the initial clause fragment, the chapter title text, the page number position, and the sequential position number of the bidding clause are respectively written into the bidding clause set as the bidding clause number field, the bidding clause content field, the chapter field to which the bidding clause belongs, the original page position field of the bidding clause, and the sequential position number field of the bidding clause; Chapter title writing process: First, a chapter title cache table is established; the chapter title cache table records the text content and its title level that was most recently identified as a chapter title before the current scan position; then, the following processing is performed on each initial clause fragment: Read the starting line position of the initial clause fragment; Retrieve the nearest chapter title that precedes the starting row position from the chapter title cache table; Write the retrieved chapter title text into the "Chapter to which the tender terms belong" field of the initial clause fragment; If the same initial clause fragment is under multiple levels of chapter headings, the complete chapter affiliation path will be generated in the manner of "most recent level heading + parent heading path"; For example: "Chapter 3 Technical Requirements / 3.2 Service Response Requirements"; "Chapter 4 Commercial Section / 4.1 Bidder Qualification Requirements"; After completing the chapter attribution writing, each initial clause fragment has: the chapter to which the bidding clause belongs; the chapter attribution writing makes each bidding clause not only have a number, but also a structural position; this paves the way for subsequent: screening of the candidate chapter range; explicit enhancement of response landing point processing; chapter positioning in the official version; Original page position record processing: After completing the chapter attribution writing, the original page position record processing is performed: The original page position record processing determines the page position range of the initial clause fragment in the tender document based on the start and end page numbers of the initial clause fragment; Preferably, the starting page number of the initial clause fragment is used as the "original page position of the tender clause"; if the same initial clause fragment spans multiple pages, the system can further record: starting page number, ending page number, starting line position, and ending line position; at least the "original page position of the tender clause" should be written in the independent field; after the original page position is recorded, each initial clause fragment has the "original page position of the tender clause"; the purpose of recording the original page position is to enable the system to link the current response content back to the original position in the tender document when subsequent explicit verification is enhanced, instead of relying on manual searching; Sequential Position Generation Processing: After completing the original page position records, sequential position generation processing is performed. This process sorts all initial clause fragments according to their order of appearance in the tender document text stream. The preferred sorting criteria are: ascending order of starting page number, ascending order of starting line position, and, in the case of the same starting line position on the same page, ascending order of text stream reading. After sorting, a unique sequential position number is assigned to each initial clause fragment, for example: 0001, 0002, and 0003. This sequential position number is written into the "Tender Clause Sequential Position Number" field. After sequential position generation, each initial clause fragment has a "Tender Clause Sequential Position Number." Sequential position generation eliminates the need to infer the order of clauses from their numbers; instead, it allows for direct reliance on the unified sequential position number to complete: adjacent clause retrieval, continuous page span calculation, and explicit enhancement of the verification link. Tender Clause Set Generation: After the aforementioned five processing steps, the system writes all processed initial clause fragments into a unified data object, generating a tender clause set. Each tender clause in the tender clause set includes at least: tender clause number, tender clause content, chapter to which the tender clause belongs, original page position of the tender clause, and sequential position number of the tender clause. In other words, the tender clause set is not simply "extracting a bunch of clauses," but rather a structured clause object set obtained through: paragraph boundary identification, clause number extraction, chapter attribution writing, original page position recording, and sequential position generation; this generation method ensures that any subsequent checks, location, and link judgments are based on fixed fields, rather than on manual reading.

[0025] S1 also includes S12; S12. Based on the title style, chapter number and table of contents level in the draft tender document, perform chapter boundary recognition on the draft tender document to obtain several chapter blocks, each of which includes a chapter number and a chapter block text area; Within each chapter block, paragraph segmentation is performed based on paragraph separators, list item markers, and table cell positions to obtain multiple candidate response paragraphs, and the paragraph text corresponding to each candidate response paragraph is determined as the candidate response paragraph text content; Paragraph numbers are generated by performing paragraph numbering based on chapter number and intra-paragraph sequential numbering to obtain candidate response paragraph numbers; Write the chapter number of the chapter block where each candidate response paragraph is located into the chapter affiliation field of the corresponding candidate response paragraph to obtain the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs; Perform paragraph state initialization for each candidate response paragraph, set the candidate response paragraph state to draft pending state, and obtain the candidate response paragraph state; Based on the page number position of each candidate response paragraph in the draft tender document, perform paragraph page position recording to obtain the current page position of the candidate response paragraph; A set of candidate response paragraphs is generated based on the text content of the candidate response paragraph, the candidate response paragraph number, the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, the status of the candidate response paragraph, and the current page position of the candidate response paragraph. Generating a set of candidate response paragraphs: After receiving the draft tender document, the structure of the draft tender document is organized. The specific process is as follows: Chapter boundary identification: Based on the title style, chapter number, and table of contents level in the draft tender document, the draft content is divided into multiple chapter blocks; Paragraph segmentation: Within each chapter block, the content is further segmented according to paragraph separators, list item markers, and table cell positions to obtain multiple candidate response paragraphs; Paragraph number generation: Generate a unique candidate response paragraph number for each candidate response paragraph in the format of "chapter number + paragraph sequence number"; Paragraph state initialization: Set the initial state for each candidate response paragraph; The initial state is fixed as: draft pending. Paragraph page position record: Records the current page position of each candidate response paragraph in the draft tender document; After completing the above processing, a set of candidate response paragraphs is obtained; each candidate response paragraph in the set of candidate response paragraphs contains at least the following fields: candidate response paragraph number, chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, text content of the candidate response paragraph, current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and status of the candidate response paragraph; The significance here is that instead of directly blurring the entire draft tender document, access permissions and position constraints are imposed on independently controllable candidate response paragraphs.

[0026] In this embodiment, the purpose of step S11 is to first break down the originally continuously formatted and hierarchically mixed content in the tender document into independently processable tender clause objects. Each tender clause object is then supplemented with a tender clause number, the chapter to which it belongs, the original page number, and the sequential position number. This eliminates the need for manual review of the entire tender document for clause location and order determination. Instead, it allows for direct clause attachment, source tracing, and adjacent link judgment based on fixed fields in the tender clause set. The practical significance of this setup is that in procurement, information integration, or operation and maintenance service projects, the same page often contains chapter descriptions, clause requirements, and scoring descriptions simultaneously. Without first forming a tender clause set, it's easy to mix content of different natures, resulting in a candidate response paragraph having content but failing to consistently correspond to a specific tender clause. Step S11 ensures that each requirement in the tender document has a clear source and structural position, thereby improving the accuracy of clause identification and source traceability when generating the subsequent clause response constraint table. The purpose of setting up S12 is to further break down the content in the draft tender document, which is originally organized by chapter, into candidate response paragraphs that can be independently linked, controlled, and positioned. Each candidate response paragraph is supplemented with a candidate response paragraph number, the chapter it belongs to, its text content, its current page position, and its status. The practical significance of this setting is that in actual tender documents, a chapter often contains multiple different response points. For example, the same "Service Implementation Plan" may contain response time content, on-site mechanism content, and emergency support content. Without first creating a set of candidate response paragraphs, the entire chapter content can only be linked to a specific tender clause, easily leading to ambiguity in the clause response relationship and distortion of the response description. Through S12, the response content in the draft tender document can be refined to the paragraph level, thus providing a stable object for subsequent chapter creation checks, paragraph creation checks, and explicit enhancement of response points, improving the linking accuracy and page position accuracy between tender clauses and tender responses. By implementing S11 and S12 in conjunction, a unified data foundation can be formed from both the tender document side and the draft tender document side. This ensures that "a requirement in the tender document" and "a response section in the tender document" already have clear numbering, a clear structural affiliation, and location attributes before being entered into the clause response constraint creation table. Consequently, when generating the clause response constraint creation table, instead of performing a fuzzy comparison between the two original documents, a field-level connection is made between the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs.For example, for a tender requirement of "responding within 30 minutes of a fault occurring and arriving on-site within 2 hours", the tender clause with a tender clause number and original page position can be fixed in S11 first. Then, in S12, the corresponding service commitment in the draft tender document can be split into candidate response paragraphs with candidate response paragraph numbers and the current page position of the candidate response paragraphs. This effectively avoids the problems of "content has been written but the corresponding relationship cannot be proven" and "reviewers need to flip through pages to find the response position".

[0027] Example 3: Please refer to Figure 2 Specifically: S2 includes S21; S21. Generate a clause response constraint establishment table based on the set of bidding clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs. The clause response constraint establishment table filters out candidate response paragraphs from the set of candidate response paragraphs whose chapters are the same as the chapters of the bidding clauses in each set of bidding clauses, and uses these paragraphs as the chapter candidate range. For each tender clause, select at least one candidate response paragraph from the corresponding chapter candidate range, and write the candidate response paragraph number of the selected candidate response paragraph into the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field; Read the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number, and write the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs into the corresponding bid response chapter field; Receive the description of the correspondence between the current tender terms and the current candidate response paragraphs, and write the description into the corresponding response description text field; Enter the current recorded chapter status and initialize it to the unentered status; A table is created based on the tender clause number field, the corresponding bid response chapter field, the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field, the corresponding response description text field, and the formal chapter entry status to form clause response constraints. A clause response constraint establishment table is generated based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs. The clause response constraint establishment table is not automatically generated out of thin air, but is formed through the following process; Chapter Candidate Range Screening: First, based on the chapter type to which the bidding terms belong, screen out the range of chapters that may contain the content of the response to the bidding terms from the set of candidate response paragraphs; For example, if the tender terms fall under "technical requirements", candidate response paragraphs should be selected first from the technical response section; If the tender terms fall under "commercial requirements," candidate response paragraphs should be selected first from the commercial response section. If the tender terms fall under "service requirements", candidate response paragraphs should be selected first from the service plan section. This step is not algorithmic scoring, but rather a range filtering based on chapter affiliation rules; It should be noted that the chapter allocation rules are as follows: the preferred chapter allocation rules include title mapping rules, chapter type mapping rules, and priority filtering rules; The title mapping rule is used to handle situations where there is a direct correspondence between the chapter titles of the bidding terms and the chapter titles in the draft tender documents. The system pre-establishes a chapter title mapping table, which records at least the bidding chapter titles, the tender chapter titles, and the mapping relationship identifier. For example, "Technical Requirements" are mapped to "Technical Response Plan", "Business Requirements" are mapped to "Business Response Documents", "Service Requirements" are mapped to "Service Implementation Plan", "Qualification Requirements" are mapped to "Qualification Supporting Documents", and "Scoring Method" is mapped to "Scoring Response Instructions". Once a chapter to which a certain bidding clause belongs is read, the corresponding bidding chapter title is first retrieved from the chapter title mapping table, and the candidate response paragraphs under the corresponding bidding chapter title are determined as the chapter candidate range. When the title mapping rule is not matched, the chapter type mapping rule is executed. Chapter type fields are set in advance for the chapters of the bidding documents and the chapters of the tender documents. The chapter type fields should at least include technical response, business response, service implementation, qualification certification, quotation explanation, risk commitment and case support. The chapter type fields are preferably written based on the keywords in the chapter title. For example, when the chapter title contains "technology", "parameter", "function" or "response", it should be written in the "Technical Response" category; when the chapter title contains "business", "payment", "delivery" or "schedule", it should be written in the "Business Response" category; when the chapter title contains "service", "operation and maintenance", "implementation" or "guarantee", it should be written in the "Service Implementation" category; when the chapter title contains "qualification", "proof", "certificate" or "certification", it should be written in the "Qualification Proof" category. When the title mapping is not matched, read the chapter type of the chapter to which the current tender terms belong, and filter out the candidate response paragraphs with the same chapter type from the candidate response paragraph set as the second candidate range; When multiple candidate chapters are obtained by filtering through chapter type mapping rules, priority filtering rules are executed, and a chapter priority table is pre-established. The chapter priority table includes at least the bidding chapter type, the tendering chapter type, and the priority value. For example, the priority of the service implementation plan is 1, the priority of the service guarantee measures is 2, and the priority of the emergency response mechanism is 3. The smaller the priority value, the higher the matching priority. Based on this, multiple candidate chapters are prioritized, and one or more chapters with the highest priority are determined as the final chapter candidate range. Thus, the chapter attribution rule achieves controlled screening of the target chapter range in the tender document draft from the chapter to which the tender clause belongs through a progressive method of title mapping, type mapping, and priority screening. Paragraph linking entry: For each tender clause, a list of candidate response paragraphs is provided within the screened chapter range. Users can select at least one candidate response paragraph as the linking object and write the selected candidate response paragraph number into the "corresponding candidate response paragraph number" field. Chapter Attribution Confirmation: The "Corresponding Bid Response Chapter" field is automatically written based on the chapter to which the attached candidate response paragraph belongs; if a bidding clause is attached to multiple candidate response paragraphs, the user is required to specify a main response paragraph, and the "Corresponding Bid Response Chapter" field is written to which the main response paragraph belongs. Response Description Text Entry: Users are required to fill in the "Corresponding Response Description Text" for each tender clause; the corresponding response description text is not a freely expandable solution, but is used for clear explanation: Why does the current candidate response paragraph constitute a response to the current tender terms? Which requirement in the tender terms does the current candidate response paragraph correspond to? Is the current candidate response paragraph a complete response or a partially expanded response? If the user does not fill in the "corresponding response description text", the record will not be allowed to proceed to the next stage; Formal Chapter Entry Status Initialization: When the Clause Response Constraint Creation Table is initially generated, the "Formal Chapter Entry Status" of all records is initialized to: Not Entered; Only after subsequent checks are passed can the relevant candidate response paragraphs be changed to the confirmed status, and the status of the formal chapters be changed. Ultimately, each record in the clause response constraint establishment table must include at least: the tender clause number, the corresponding bid response chapter, the corresponding candidate response paragraph number, the corresponding response description text, and the status of the formal chapter. The key to this step is that instead of generating the tender document first and then going back to annotate the terms, a table for controlling the validity of the "response relationship" should be created before the tender document enters the final version.

[0028] S2 also includes S22; S22. Based on clause response constraints, establish a table to perform chapter establishment checks, paragraph establishment checks, description establishment checks, and closure establishment checks; The chapter creation check reads the corresponding bid response chapter field for each record in the clause response constraint creation table. If the corresponding bid response chapter field is not empty and is consistent with the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, the chapter creation check is determined to be passed and the chapter creation flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the chapter creation check is determined to be failed and the chapter creation flag value is output as 0. The paragraph creation check is performed by reading the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field. If the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field is not empty, the corresponding candidate response paragraph can be retrieved in the candidate response paragraph set, and the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is not in the prohibited entry state, the paragraph creation check is determined to be passed and the paragraph creation flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the paragraph creation check is determined to be failed and the paragraph creation flag value is output as 0. The description establishment check is performed by reading the corresponding response description text field. If the corresponding response description text field is not empty, the number of valid characters in the corresponding response description text reaches the user's preset minimum length threshold, and the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field contains the current tender clause number, the description establishment check is determined to be passed, and the description establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the description establishment check is determined to be failed, and the description establishment flag value is output as 0. The closure establishment check reads the status of the candidate response paragraph corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number. If the candidate response paragraph status is confirmed, the entry status of the formal chapter is updated to the entered status, indicating that the closure establishment check has passed, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the entry status of the formal chapter is kept as not entered, indicating that the closure establishment check has failed, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 0.

[0029] S2 also includes S23; S23. Tender clauses that fail at least one of the following establishment checks—chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check, and closure establishment check—are added to the weak establishment clause set. The total number of tender terms in the tender terms set is counted and defined as the total number of tender terms, Nc. The number of records with a chapter creation flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint creation table is taken as the number of tender clauses with a chapter creation flag value of 1, Ns; The number of records with a paragraph creation flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint creation table is used as the number of tender clauses with a paragraph creation flag value of 1, Np. The statistical clause response constraint establishment table specifies the number of records with a flag value of 1, representing the number of tender clauses with a flag value of 1 (Ne). The number of records with a closure establishment flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint establishment table is taken as the number of tender clauses with a closure establishment flag value of 1, Nk. Then, based on the total number of tender terms Nc, the number of tender terms Ns, the number of tender terms Np, the number of tender terms Ne, and the number of tender terms Nk, the completeness value J of the terms is calculated. The completeness value J of the clause is calculated and output using the following algorithm: J = Ns × Np × Ne × Nk / Nc 4This formula is a product normalization formula. The product normalization formula is used to calculate the clause establishment completeness value J because chapter establishment, paragraph establishment, description establishment, and closure establishment together constitute the closure condition of the basic establishment relationship between the bidding clause and the bid response. The above four establishment conditions are not mutually compensable, but are parallel constraints that must be satisfied simultaneously. By multiplying the chapter establishment ratio, paragraph establishment ratio, description establishment ratio, and closure establishment ratio together and normalizing it by the fourth power of the total number of bidding clauses, the insufficient establishment condition can have a significant inhibitory effect on the clause establishment completeness value JJJ, thereby avoiding the high proportion of a single establishment condition from masking the overall establishment status. It more accurately reflects whether the basic establishment relationship between the bidding clause and the bid response in the current version of the bid document has formed a closed structure that can enter the formal arrangement stage. The denominator uses Nc 4 Essentially, this is to uniformly map the four count values ​​to a comparable range between 0 and 1.

[0030] In this embodiment, the purpose of setting up S21 is to avoid waiting until the entire tender document is completed before reviewing the clauses. Instead, before the tender document enters the formal submission process, a clause response constraint establishment table is generated based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs. This ensures that each tender clause is pre-assigned to a specific candidate response paragraph, a corresponding tender response chapter, and a corresponding response description text. The practical significance of this setting is that in real bidding scenarios, situations often arise where "the content has been written, but it is unclear which tender clause it corresponds to," especially when there are similar expressions in the technical response chapter, commercial response chapter, and service plan chapter, which can easily lead to ambiguity in the clause response relationship. By first executing the chapter candidate range screening, paragraph attachment entry, chapter attribution confirmation, and response description text entry, the originally loose correspondence that relied on manual interpretation can be transformed into a recordable, checkable, and correctable constraint relationship. For example, in a scenario where "service response requirements" correspond to "service implementation plan," if a clause response constraint establishment table is not established first, even if the description "arrive within 2 hours" is seen during subsequent review, it is difficult to directly confirm which tender clause this description corresponds to. However, through S21, the tender clause can be stably linked to the corresponding candidate response paragraph and written into the corresponding bid response chapter and corresponding response description text, thus effectively avoiding the problem of "having written content but being unable to prove a response." The purpose of S22 is to further verify the validity of the clause-response relationship already established in the clause response constraint establishment table, thereby determining whether this relationship has met the basic requirements for entering the formal compilation stage. The reason for setting chapter establishment checks, paragraph establishment checks, description establishment checks, and closure establishment checks separately is that in the actual compilation process, "having a linkage relationship" does not mean "the relationship has been established." For example, some tender clauses may have corresponding candidate response paragraph numbers written in them, but the corresponding bid response chapters may be empty, indicating that the chapter attribution is still unstable; some candidate response paragraphs may exist, but their status is still "prohibited from entry," indicating that the paragraph cannot yet be used as formal response content; and some response description texts may be filled in, but if they are too brief or do not clearly point to the current tender clause, it will be impossible to confirm why this content constitutes a response to that clause during subsequent review. Therefore, the role of S22 is not simply to find out if there is content, but to confirm whether the basic relationship is truly established item by item. With this setting, problems such as "chapter undetermined," "paragraph invalid," "insufficient description," and "status unconfirmed" can be exposed in advance before formal submission. For example, in an information integration project, a tender clause about "fault recovery time" may be attached to a certain section of technical solution content, but if the corresponding candidate response paragraph is still in the "draft pending" status, then this content may still be rewritten or deleted later; through the closure establishment check, this risk can be identified in advance.Therefore, S22 effectively enhances the authenticity, stability, and verifiability of clause response relationships, and provides a direct basis for the subsequent establishment of a set of weak clauses and the generation of the clause establishment completeness value J. The purpose of S23 is to further transform the four establishment check results obtained from S22 into quantifiable overall judgment results. On the one hand, it identifies which bidding clauses are weak; on the other hand, it uses the clause establishment completeness value J to comprehensively assess the basic establishment status of the current version of the tender document. The practical significance of this design is that in real bidding and tendering preparation scenarios, relying solely on manually reviewing the results of chapter establishment checks, paragraph establishment checks, description establishment checks, and closure establishment checks, while it can identify local problems, makes it difficult to determine whether the current version has reached the overall conditions for entering the formal compilation stage. By adding at least one failed tender clause to the weak clause set, we can directly focus on the objects that need further strengthening. Then, by statistically analyzing the total number of tender clauses (Nc), the number of tender clauses with a chapter establishment mark of 1 (Ns), the number of tender clauses with a paragraph establishment mark of 1 (Np), the number of tender clauses with a description establishment mark of 1 (Ne), and the number of tender clauses with a closure establishment mark of 1 (Nk), and calculating the clause establishment completeness value (J), we can express whether the basic establishment relationship between the tender clauses and the bid response in the current version of the tender document forms a closed structure, using a unified result. The reason for using a product-normalized formula to calculate the clause establishment completeness value (J) is that chapter establishment, paragraph establishment, description establishment, and closure establishment are parallel and indispensable basic conditions in this solution; a significant deficiency in one should not be masked by a higher completion rate in other items. For example, in an operation and maintenance service project, even if the chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, and description establishment check are all high, if the Nk corresponding to the closure establishment check is low, it still indicates that a large number of candidate response paragraphs have not actually entered the formal chapter link; at this time, the clause establishment completeness value J will be significantly lowered, thereby avoiding the system from misjudging that "the whole is mature".

[0031] Example 4: Please refer to Figure 3 Specifically: S3 includes S31; S31. Preset the establishment threshold J0. The establishment threshold J0 is pre-set by the user based on the minimum release threshold of the terms establishment completeness value J, and the value is between 0 and 1. The threshold J0 is set based on the requirement that the proportion of chapter establishment, paragraph establishment, description establishment, and closure establishment all meet the basic establishment requirements simultaneously. This is so that if any of the chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check, and closure establishment check is insufficient, the clause establishment completeness value J will be lower than the establishment threshold J0. Compare the completeness value J of the current version of the tender document with the establishment threshold J0, and perform a preliminary comparison assessment; The specific preliminary comparative assessment content is as follows: When the completeness value of the clause establishment J is greater than or equal to the establishment threshold J0, it is determined that the bidding clauses in the current version of the tender document and the tender response have formed a basic establishment relationship that can enter the formal arrangement stage. When the clause establishment completeness value J < establishment threshold J0, it is determined that there are weak clauses in the current version of the tender document, and the explicit verification enhancement stage is triggered based on the set of weak clauses.

[0032] S3 also includes S32; S32. When the initial comparison and evaluation triggers the explicit verification enhancement stage, for the bidding terms that enter the explicit verification enhancement stage, the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position is executed first. After the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position, the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point is executed. After the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position and the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point are completed, the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link is also executed. The explicit enhancement of the source location of the clause is achieved by reading the target tender clause number for each tender clause in the established set of weak clauses, and retrieving the corresponding chapter and original page of the tender clause in the tender clause set based on the target tender clause number. This generates a source location hint text that includes the tender clause number, the chapter to which the tender clause belongs, and the original page of the tender clause. The source location hint text is then written into the preamble of the corresponding candidate response paragraph to complete the explicit enhancement of the source location of the clause. The explicit enhancement of response landing points is achieved by reading the candidate response paragraph number corresponding to the target tender clause, and reading the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number from the candidate response paragraph set. The target tender clause number, the summary of the target tender clause content, the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number are written into the clause index directory to complete the explicit enhancement of response landing points. The explicit enhancement of the verification link is achieved by reading the sequential position number of the target tender clause, retrieving adjacent tender clauses in the tender clause set, reading the response page position corresponding to the adjacent tender clauses, and writing the adjacent tender clause number into the corresponding candidate response paragraph to form a verification link prompt, thus completing the explicit enhancement of the verification link. After completing the explicit enhancement processing of the clause source location and the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point, the system also needs to perform explicit enhancement processing of the verification link. The reason is that review experts often do not look at a clause in isolation, but rather look at several adjacent clauses in succession. If the response content of adjacent clauses jumps too much in the tender document, even if the individual clauses can be found, the overall verification will still be not smooth. Therefore, the system further adds a continuous link identifier to each enhanced response paragraph. The continuous link identifier includes: the previous tender clause number, the next tender clause number, and the sequential position of the current response paragraph in the entire tender document. This continuous link identification allows the reviewer to naturally connect to the previous and next clauses when verifying a particular clause. In this way, the tender documents are no longer just "single-clause correspondences," but form a "continuous response chain"; this step primarily enhances "continuous verifiability." After the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link is completed, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the source location, Nt, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point, Nl, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the verification link, and Nu of the tender clauses in the weak clause set are counted, and an explicit verification closure value H is generated. The explicit verification closure value H is calculated and output using the following algorithm: H = Nt × Nl × Nr / Nu 3 ; Among them, the explicit verification closure value H is used to represent the degree to which the tender clauses in the weak clause set form an explicit verification closure structure after explicit enhancement processing of the clause source position, explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point, and explicit enhancement processing of the verification link.

[0033] In this embodiment, the purpose of method S31 is to transform the clause completeness value J into an executable release condition by establishing a threshold J0, thereby distinguishing between "the current version of the tender document that has already formed a basic establishment relationship" and "the current version of the tender document that still has weak response establishment clauses". The practical significance of this setting is that, in the actual tender preparation process, simply obtaining the clause completeness value J is insufficient to directly guide subsequent actions, because different projects and different preparation stages have different tolerance levels for basic establishment relationships; only by introducing the establishment threshold J0 can the clause completeness value J be transformed into a clear preliminary comparative evaluation result. For example, in a service outsourcing project, if the clause completeness value J has reached the establishment threshold J0, it indicates that the chapter correspondence, paragraph correspondence, description correspondence, and closure state between the tender clauses and the tender response have been basically stable, and the formal arrangement stage can begin; conversely, if the clause completeness value J is lower than the establishment threshold J0, it indicates that although some content has been written into the tender document draft, there is still a problem of unstable establishment of the clause response relationship. S31 avoids sending immature draft versions directly to the final version, thereby improving the accuracy of basic relationship judgments and the targeting of subsequent enhancement triggers. S32 aims to further enhance the explicit verification of tender clauses in the weak clause set, transforming the original "content exists but verification is inconvenient" response relationship into a "traceable, locatable, and continuously verifiable" one. This involves explicit enhancement of clause source location, response landing point, and verification link, addressing the three practical problems of "unclear source," "location not found," and "unsmooth continuous verification," respectively. For example, when reviewers view a "service response requirement," if they only know that the relevant content was mentioned in the tender document but cannot quickly return to the original location in the tender document or directly find the corresponding response page in the final submission, then even if the content exists, the verification efficiency remains low. By explicitly enhancing the source location of the clause, the tender clause number, the chapter to which the tender clause belongs, and the original page position of the tender clause can be directly provided; by explicitly enhancing the response landing point, the target tender clause number, the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, and the current page position of the candidate response paragraph can be written into the clause index directory; by explicitly enhancing the verification link, the adjacent tender clause numbers can be written into the corresponding candidate response paragraph, so that reviewers can naturally connect to the previous and next clauses when verifying a certain clause.

[0034] Example 5: Please refer to Figure 1 Specifically: S4 includes S41; S41. Based on the explicit verification closure value H and the clause establishment completeness value J, a comprehensive calculation is performed to obtain the clause traceability control value G; the clause traceability control value G is calculated and output using the following algorithm formula: ; The clause traceability control value G is used to comprehensively converge to characterize the basic relationship establishment and explicit verification enhancement results, reflecting whether a traceability control structure has been formed between the tender clauses and the tender response in the current version of the tender document.

[0035] S4 also includes S42; S42. Pre-set the freeze threshold G0. The freeze threshold G0 is the version release threshold preset by the user based on the terms traceability control value G, and the value is between 0 and 1. The freezing threshold G0 is set based on the requirement that both the basic relationship closure and the explicit verification closure must meet the formal submission requirements, so that if either the clause completeness value J or the explicit verification closure value H is insufficient, the clause traceability control value G will be lower than the freezing threshold G0. The traceable control value G of the clause is compared with the freezing threshold G0; the specific comparison is as follows: When the traceability control value G of the clause is greater than or equal to the freezing threshold G0, the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is updated to the confirmed status, the status of the formal chapter in the clause response constraint establishment table is updated to the entered status, the tender clause number, the formal response paragraph number, the location of the clause index directory and the clause source prompt in the response paragraph are frozen, and the formal submission version is output. When the traceability control value G of the clause is less than the freezing threshold G0, the candidate response paragraphs that have not completed explicit verification enhancement processing will be kept in an inaccessible state, the establishment of a set of weak clauses and the link break prompt will be retained, the export of the formal submission version will be restricted, and only the internal review version will be output.

[0036] In this embodiment, the purpose of method S41 is to unify and converge the clause establishment completeness value J and the explicit verification closure value H to form a comprehensive control result that can simultaneously reflect the "basic establishment relationship" and the "explicit verification enhancement result," namely, the clause traceability control value G. The practical significance of this setting is that the clause establishment completeness value J only indicates whether a basic establishment relationship has been formed between the bidding clauses and the bid response in the current version of the tender document, while the explicit verification closure value H only indicates whether the weak clauses have met the explicit verification conditions after enhancement. Whether the final version has a basis for release often requires consideration of both aspects simultaneously. For example, if the clause establishment completeness value J is high but the explicit verification closure value H is low, it indicates that the basic connection relationship is relatively complete, but the verification enhancement of the weak clauses is still insufficient; conversely, if the explicit verification closure value H is high but the clause establishment completeness value J is low, it indicates that some enhancement processing is sufficient, but the overall basic establishment relationship is still unstable. By calculating the traceability control value G of the clauses, these two situations can be unified into a single control result, thereby more accurately reflecting whether a traceability control structure has been formed between the tender clauses and the tender response in the current version of the tender document, and thus improving the consistency of the release judgment in subsequent versions.

[0037] Although embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents, characterized in that: Includes the following steps: S1. Obtain the tender documents and draft tender documents, and generate a set of tender terms and a set of candidate response paragraphs respectively; S2. Generate a clause response constraint establishment table based on the set of tender clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs, and perform chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check and closure establishment check based on the clause response constraint establishment table, generate clause establishment completeness value J, and write tender clauses that fail at least one establishment check into the weak clause establishment set. S3. Compare the clause establishment completeness value J with the preset establishment threshold J0. When the clause establishment completeness value J is less than the preset establishment threshold J0, trigger the clause response explicit verification enhancement process based on the establishment weak clause set. The clause response explicit verification enhancement process includes clause source location explicit enhancement process, response landing point explicit enhancement process and verification link explicit enhancement process, and generate explicit verification closure value H. S4. Based on the completeness value J and the explicit verification closure value H, generate the clause traceability control value G, and perform formal version control based on the clause traceability control value G to output the formal submission version and the internal review version.

2. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 1, characterized in that: S1 includes S11; S11. Receive the tender documents and draft bid documents imported by the user, and perform paragraph boundary recognition processing on the tender documents based on the line break marks, number marks, list marks and chapter title marks in the tender documents to obtain several initial clause fragments; For each of the initial clause fragments, a clause number extraction process is performed, which includes identifying first-level numbers, second-level numbers, third-level numbers, and sequential numbers for unnumbered clauses to obtain the clause number. The chapter attribution writing process is performed based on the chapter title text most recent before the initial clause fragment to obtain the chapter title text; Based on the initial clause fragment, perform original page position recording processing on the page position in the tender document to obtain the page position; The order position generation process is performed according to the order in which the initial clause fragments appear in the tender document to obtain the order position number of the tender clauses; The clause number, the text content of the initial clause fragment, the chapter title text, the page number position, and the sequential position number of the bidding clause are respectively written into the bidding clause set as the bidding clause number field, the bidding clause content field, the chapter field to which the bidding clause belongs, the original page position field of the bidding clause, and the sequential position number field of the bidding clause.

3. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 1, characterized in that: S1 further includes S12; S12. Based on the title style, chapter number and table of contents level in the draft tender document, perform chapter boundary recognition on the draft tender document to obtain several chapter blocks, each of which includes a chapter number and a chapter block text area; Within each chapter block, paragraph segmentation is performed based on paragraph separators, list item markers, and table cell positions to obtain multiple candidate response paragraphs, and the paragraph text corresponding to each candidate response paragraph is determined as the candidate response paragraph text content; Paragraph numbers are generated by performing paragraph numbering based on chapter number and intra-paragraph sequential numbering to obtain candidate response paragraph numbers; Write the chapter number of the chapter block where each candidate response paragraph is located into the chapter affiliation field of the corresponding candidate response paragraph to obtain the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs; For each candidate response paragraph, paragraph state initialization is performed, and the candidate response paragraph state is set to draft pending state to obtain the candidate response paragraph state; Based on the page number position of each candidate response paragraph in the draft tender document, paragraph page position recording is performed to obtain the current page position of the candidate response paragraph; A set of candidate response paragraphs is generated based on the text content of the candidate response paragraph, the candidate response paragraph number, the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, the status of the candidate response paragraph, and the current page position of the candidate response paragraph.

4. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 3, characterized in that: S2 includes S21; S21. Generate a clause response constraint establishment table based on the set of bidding clauses and the set of candidate response paragraphs. The clause response constraint establishment table filters out candidate response paragraphs in the set of candidate response paragraphs whose chapters are the same as the chapters of the bidding clauses based on the chapter field of each bidding clause in the set of bidding clauses, and uses them as the chapter candidate range. For each tender clause, select at least one candidate response paragraph from the corresponding chapter candidate range, and write the candidate response paragraph number of the selected candidate response paragraph into the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field; Read the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number, and write the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs into the corresponding bid response chapter field; Receive the description of the correspondence between the current tender terms and the current candidate response paragraphs, and write the description into the corresponding response description text field; Enter the current recorded chapter status and initialize it to the unentered status; A table is created based on the fields for tender clause number, corresponding bid response chapter, corresponding candidate response paragraph number, corresponding response description text, and the status of the formal chapter to generate clause response constraints.

5. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 4, characterized in that: S2 further includes S22; S22. Based on the aforementioned clause response constraints, establish a table to perform chapter establishment checks, paragraph establishment checks, description establishment checks, and closure establishment checks; The chapter establishment check reads the corresponding bid response chapter field for each record in the clause response constraint establishment table. If the corresponding bid response chapter field is not empty and is consistent with the chapter to which the candidate response paragraph belongs, the chapter establishment check is determined to be passed and the chapter establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the chapter establishment check is determined to be failed and the chapter establishment flag value is output as 0. The paragraph establishment check is performed by reading the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field. If the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field is not empty, the corresponding candidate response paragraph can be retrieved in the candidate response paragraph set, and the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is not prohibited from entering, the paragraph establishment check is determined to be passed and the paragraph establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the paragraph establishment check is determined to be failed and the paragraph establishment flag value is output as 0. The description establishment check is performed by reading the corresponding response description text field. If the corresponding response description text field is not empty, the number of valid characters in the corresponding response description text reaches the user-preset minimum length threshold, and the corresponding candidate response paragraph number field contains the current tender clause number, the description establishment check is determined to be passed, and the description establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the description establishment check is determined to be failed, and the description establishment flag value is output as 0. The closure establishment check reads the status of the candidate response paragraph corresponding to the candidate response paragraph number. When the candidate response paragraph status is confirmed, the formal chapter entry status is updated to the entered status, the closure establishment check is determined to be passed, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 1. Otherwise, the formal chapter entry status is kept as not entered, the closure establishment check is determined to be failed, and the closure establishment flag value is output as 0.

6. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 5, characterized in that: S2 also includes S23; S23. Tender clauses that fail at least one of the following establishment checks—chapter establishment check, paragraph establishment check, description establishment check, and closure establishment check—are added to the weak establishment clause set. The total number of tender terms in the tender terms set is counted and defined as the total number of tender terms, Nc. The number of records with a chapter creation flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint creation table is taken as the number of tender clauses with a chapter creation flag value of 1, Ns; The number of records with a paragraph creation flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint creation table is used as the number of tender clauses with a paragraph creation flag value of 1, Np. The statistical clause response constraint establishment table specifies the number of records with a flag value of 1, representing the number of tender clauses with a flag value of 1 (Ne). The number of records with a closure establishment flag value of 1 in the statistical clause response constraint establishment table is taken as the number of tender clauses with a closure establishment flag value of 1, Nk. Then, based on the total number of tender terms Nc, the number of tender terms Ns, the number of tender terms Np, the number of tender terms Ne, and the number of tender terms Nk, the completeness value J of the terms is calculated.

7. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 6, characterized in that: S3 includes S31; S31. Pre-set establishment threshold J0, wherein the establishment threshold J0 is pre-set by the user based on the minimum release threshold of the clause establishment integrity value J, and the value is between 0 and 1; The completeness value J of the current version of the tender document is compared with the establishment threshold J0, and a preliminary comparison evaluation is performed. The specific preliminary comparative assessment content is as follows: When the completeness value of the clause establishment J is greater than or equal to the establishment threshold J0, it is determined that the bidding clauses in the current version of the tender document and the tender response have formed a basic establishment relationship that can enter the formal arrangement stage. When the clause establishment completeness value J < establishment threshold J0, it is determined that there are weak clauses in the current version of the tender document, and the explicit verification enhancement stage is triggered based on the set of weak clauses.

8. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 7, characterized in that: S3 further includes S32; S32. When the initial comparison and evaluation triggers the explicit verification enhancement stage, for the bidding terms that enter the explicit verification enhancement stage, the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position is executed first. After the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position, the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point is executed. After the explicit enhancement processing of the term source position and the explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point are completed, the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link is also executed. The explicit enhancement process for the source position of the tender clause involves reading the target tender clause number for each tender clause in the established set of weak tender clauses, and retrieving the corresponding chapter and original page position of the tender clause in the tender clause set based on the target tender clause number. This generates a source position prompt text that includes the tender clause number, the chapter and original page position of the tender clause, and writes the source position prompt text into the pre-position area of ​​the corresponding candidate response paragraph. The explicit enhancement of the response landing point is achieved by reading the candidate response paragraph number corresponding to the target tender clause, and reading the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number from the candidate response paragraph set. The target tender clause number, the summary of the target tender clause content, the chapter to which the corresponding candidate response paragraph belongs, the current page position of the candidate response paragraph, and the candidate response paragraph number are then written into the clause index directory. The explicit enhancement process of the verification link reads the sequential position number of the target bidding clause, retrieves adjacent bidding clauses in the bidding clause set, reads the response page bit corresponding to the adjacent bidding clause, and writes the adjacent bidding clause number into the corresponding candidate response paragraph. After the explicit enhancement processing of the verification link is completed, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the source location, Nt, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the response landing point, Nl, the number of tender clauses that have completed explicit enhancement processing of the verification link, and Nu, the number of tender clauses in the weak clause set are counted, and an explicit verification closure value H is generated.

9. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 8, characterized in that: S4 includes S41; S41. Based on the explicit verification closure value H and the clause establishment integrity value J, a comprehensive calculation is performed to obtain the clause traceability control value G.

10. The method for assisting in the preparation of enterprise bidding documents according to claim 9, characterized in that: S4 further includes S42; S42. Pre-set a freezing threshold G0, wherein the freezing threshold G0 is a version release threshold preset by the user based on the terms traceability control value G, and the value is between 0 and 1. The traceable control value G of the aforementioned clause is compared with the freezing threshold G0; the specific comparison is as follows: When the traceability control value G of the clause is greater than or equal to the freezing threshold G0, the status of the corresponding candidate response paragraph is updated to the confirmed status, the status of the formal chapter in the clause response constraint establishment table is updated to the entered status, the tender clause number, the formal response paragraph number, the location of the clause index directory and the clause source prompt in the response paragraph are frozen, and the formal submission version is output. When the traceability control value G of the clause is less than the freezing threshold G0, the candidate response paragraphs that have not completed explicit verification enhancement processing will be kept in an inaccessible state, the establishment of a weak clause set and the link break prompt will be retained, the export of the formal submission version will be restricted, and only the internal review version will be output.

Images