Method, system, device and storage medium for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance

Abstract

The embodiment of the present application relates to the field of environmental science, and discloses a kind of enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium.The present application, by determining evaluation index library, obtains the evaluation data of target enterprise in an evaluation period;According to the evaluation data, the corresponding evaluation index is respectively constructed, and the corresponding index score is determined;Based on index score and evaluation index, an enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model is constructed;Based on enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model, the biodiversity performance evaluation index of target enterprise is obtained;Based on the biodiversity performance evaluation index of target enterprise, the enterprise biodiversity performance grade is divided.The above-mentioned evaluation method solves the problems of existing evaluation technology, such as lack of method, difficulty of multi-party participation, and subjectivity of expert scoring.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of environmental science, and in particular to a method, system, device and storage medium for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance. Background Technology

[0002] The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) sets forth three major goals: biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and benefit sharing. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBBF) outlines action goals in three areas: biodiversity conservation, sustainable use of biodiversity, mainstreaming of biodiversity, and implementation tools. China's Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan (2023-2030) sets action goals in four areas: mainstreaming of biodiversity, reducing threats to biodiversity, sustainable use of biodiversity, and capacity for biodiversity governance. For the first time, it prioritizes corporate biodiversity. Currently, relevant biodiversity assessments mainly include traditional indicators covering different levels of species diversity, ecosystem diversity, and genetic diversity; assessments of biodiversity status at regional spatial scales; and biodiversity assessment methods based on conservation objectives.

[0003] However, existing technical methods for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance still suffer from limited operability and measurability, a lack of systematic evaluation content, and the fact that they generally rely on expert reviewers to evaluate companies. Furthermore, the organization and evaluation methods still involve multiple parties, making the implementation process complex and difficult. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a method, system, equipment, and storage medium for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance, in order to solve problems such as the complexity of existing evaluation methods and the difficulty of involving multiple parties.

[0005] To address the aforementioned technical problems, embodiments of the present invention provide a method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance. The method includes: determining an evaluation indicator library, the evaluation indicator library including primary indicators, and the primary indicators including several secondary indicators; acquiring evaluation data of a target enterprise within an evaluation period; constructing corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data and determining corresponding indicator scores; constructing a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the indicator scores and the evaluation indicators; obtaining a biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise based on the corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model; and classifying corporate biodiversity performance levels based on the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise. The primary indicators include biodiversity conservation, sustainable production and management, access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, and collaborative governance.

[0006] The present invention also provides a system for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance, comprising: an evaluation indicator determination module, an evaluation system determination module, and a biodiversity performance assessment module; wherein, the evaluation indicator determination module is used to determine an evaluation indicator library, the evaluation indicator library including primary indicators, the primary indicators including several secondary indicators; the evaluation system determination module is used to acquire evaluation data of the target enterprise within an evaluation period; construct corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data, and determine corresponding indicator scores; construct a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the indicator scores and the evaluation indicators; the biodiversity assessment module, based on the corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model, acquires a biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise; and classifies the corporate biodiversity performance level based on the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise; wherein, the primary indicators include biodiversity conservation, sustainable production and management, access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, and collaborative governance.

[0007] Embodiments of the present invention also provide an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the above-described method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance.

[0008] Embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance.

[0009] As can be seen from the above technical solution, compared with existing technologies, this method addresses the problems of existing evaluation methods, such as weak operability, complex implementation procedures, difficulty in multi-party participation, and high subjectivity of expert scoring. It clarifies the key points and directions of enterprise biodiversity protection and management, and improves the overall management capacity of biodiversity protection in Chinese enterprises. This is achieved by establishing an evaluation index library, obtaining biodiversity performance evaluation data for target enterprises, constructing corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data, determining corresponding indicator scores, building an enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the corresponding indicator scores and evaluation indicators, obtaining the target enterprise's biodiversity performance evaluation index, and classifying the enterprise's biodiversity performance level based on the target enterprise's biodiversity performance evaluation index.

[0010] In addition, the primary indicators include several secondary indicators, including: Biodiversity conservation includes secondary indicators such as site selection for enterprise parks or construction projects, biodiversity restoration, control of invasive alien species, and collection and preservation of important species and genetic resources; Sustainable production and operation includes secondary indicators such as establishing biodiversity-friendly supply chains, promoting the adoption of biodiversity-friendly technologies and processes, and supplying green products and services; Access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources includes secondary indicators such as the acquisition and utilization of biological genetic resources and benefit-sharing; Collaborative governance includes secondary indicators such as addressing climate change, pollution prevention and control, and maintaining human health; Management mechanisms and capacity building include secondary indicators such as formulating and implementing enterprise biodiversity conservation plans, fulfilling biodiversity management responsibilities, conducting biodiversity impact assessments, disclosing biodiversity-related information, conducting biodiversity monitoring and assessment, establishing special funds for biodiversity, popularizing biodiversity and its value among employees and surrounding communities, achieving biodiversity-related scientific research results, and obtaining biodiversity-related honors. By setting multiple evaluation indicators, the effectiveness of enterprise biodiversity work will be objectively analyzed based on the evaluation indicators and procedures. The evaluation methods should be reliable and easy to operate, the data should be comprehensive and credible, and the conclusions and recommendations should be specific and clear.

[0011] Furthermore, based on the evaluation data, corresponding indicator evaluation methods are constructed to obtain corresponding indicator scores. This includes classifying the target enterprises into biodiversity-dependent enterprises and biodiversity-related enterprises based on their production and operation characteristics and their dependence on and impact on biodiversity. For each type of enterprise, n optional bonus evaluation indicators are set, while the remaining evaluation indicators are mandatory, with the mandatory indicators having the same total score. By comprehensively considering the differences between enterprises of different sizes, industries, and types, as well as the varying degrees of dependence on and impact on biodiversity, the evaluation content should be appropriately adjusted based on actual circumstances to effectively guide enterprises in taking biodiversity conservation actions and to improve and enhance them in a professional, standardized, and innovative direction. Attached Figure Description

[0012] One or more embodiments are illustrated by way of example with reference numerals in the accompanying drawings. These illustrations do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments. Elements with the same reference numerals in the drawings are denoted as similar elements. Unless otherwise stated, the figures in the drawings are not to be limited by scale.

[0013] Figure 1 This is a flowchart provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0014] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0015] Figure 3This is a hardware block diagram of the electronic device provided in the embodiments of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0016] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the various embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, those skilled in the art will understand that many technical details are presented in the various embodiments of the present invention to facilitate a better understanding of this application. However, the technical solutions claimed in this application can be implemented even without these technical details and various changes and modifications based on the following embodiments. The division of the various embodiments below is for ease of description and should not constitute any limitation on the specific implementation of the present invention. The various embodiments can be combined with and referenced by each other without contradiction.

[0017] In the embodiments of this application, "and / or" describes the relationship between associated objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can represent the following three situations: A exists alone; A and B exist simultaneously; B exists alone. Among them, A and B can be singular or plural.

[0018] In the embodiments of this application, "at least one item" or its similar expression refers to any combination of these items, including any combination of a single item or a plurality of items. "One or more" means one or more, while "multiple" means two or more. For example, "at least one item" of a, b, or c can represent the following seven cases: a, b, c; a and b; a and c; b and c; a, b, and c. Each of a, b, and c can be an element or a set containing one or more elements.

[0019] The technical solutions, beneficial effects, and related concepts involved in the embodiments of this application will be described in detail below.

[0020] 1. Important species

[0021] Species with high conservation and utilization value or conservation requirements include, but are not limited to, species listed in the national and provincial key protected wild flora and fauna lists, the list of terrestrial wild animals of important ecological, scientific and social value, species listed as critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable in the China Biodiversity Red List, species with extremely small populations listed for rescue and protection by national and local governments, endemic species, and ancient and famous trees.

[0022] 2. Biodiversity-dependent businesses

[0023] Enterprises that directly utilize biodiversity resources in their production and business activities.

[0024] 3. Biodiversity-related businesses

[0025] Enterprises that utilize or influence biodiversity through one or more intermediate objects or processes in their production and business activities.

[0026] 4. Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs)

[0027] The governance and management of geographically defined areas outside of nature reserves can achieve positive, sustainable, and long-term outcomes for in-situ biodiversity conservation, as well as related ecosystem functions and services, and, where applicable, cultural, spiritual, socio-economic, and other local-related values.

[0028] 5. Enterprise Biodiversity Performance Evaluation Index

[0029] Quantitative indicators for measuring the effectiveness of corporate biodiversity actions.

[0030] The first embodiment of this invention relates to a method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance. This embodiment establishes an evaluation index library, determines index scores based on the library and corporate evaluation data, further constructs a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model to calculate the performance evaluation index of participating companies' biodiversity, and finally determines the corporate biodiversity performance level. This evaluation method addresses the problems of complex implementation procedures, difficulty in involving multiple parties, and high subjectivity in expert scoring found in existing evaluation methods. It clarifies the key points and directions for corporate biodiversity protection and management, and improves the overall biodiversity protection management capabilities of Chinese enterprises.

[0031] The following describes the implementation details of the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation method in this embodiment. The following content is only for the convenience of understanding and is not necessary for implementing this solution.

[0032] See Figure 1 As shown in the figure, this embodiment provides a method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance, which includes the following steps.

[0033] Step 101: Determine the evaluation index library.

[0034] Step 102: Obtain the evaluation data of the target company within one evaluation period.

[0035] Step 103: Construct corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data and determine the corresponding indicator scores.

[0036] Step 104: Based on the corresponding indicator scores and evaluation indicators, construct a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model.

[0037] Step 105: Based on the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model, obtain the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise.

[0038] Step 106: Based on the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise, classify the enterprise's biodiversity performance level.

[0039] The steps described above are for clarity only. In practice, they can be combined into one step or some steps can be broken down into multiple steps. As long as they include the same logical relationship, they are all within the scope of protection of this patent. Adding insignificant modifications or introducing insignificant designs to the algorithm or process, but without changing the core design of the algorithm and process, are also within the scope of protection of this patent.

[0040] Furthermore, the evaluation indicator library in step 101 consists of two levels of indicators, including five primary indicators: sustainable production and operation, access to and benefit sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, biodiversity conservation, and collaborative governance. The primary indicators include several secondary indicators, totaling 21 items: Biodiversity conservation should cover four aspects: site selection for enterprise parks or construction projects, biodiversity restoration, prevention and control of invasive alien species, and collection and preservation of important species and genetic resources. Sustainable production and operation should cover three aspects: establishing biodiversity-friendly supply chains, promoting the adoption of biodiversity-friendly technologies and processes, and supplying green products and services. Access to and benefit sharing of biological genetic resources should cover two aspects: access to and utilization of biological genetic resources, and benefit sharing. Collaborative governance should cover three aspects: collaborative response to climate change, pollution prevention and control, and maintenance of human health. Management mechanisms and capacity building should cover nine aspects: formulating and implementing enterprise biodiversity-related plans, fulfilling biodiversity management responsibilities, conducting biodiversity impact assessments, disclosing biodiversity-related information, conducting biodiversity monitoring and assessment, establishing special funds for biodiversity, popularizing biodiversity and its value among employees and surrounding communities, obtaining biodiversity-related scientific research results, and receiving biodiversity-related honors.

[0041] In some embodiments, it is necessary to obtain the evaluation data of the participating companies within an evaluation period.

[0042] Specifically, participating companies should provide the following materials as evaluation data, including but not limited to: a statement explaining compliance with basic requirements; a statement identifying the company's biodiversity relevance type; and a description of the evaluation indicators and necessary supporting documentation. These materials may be in the form of reports, documents, maps, or other forms, and must guarantee their authenticity, compliance, and completeness.

[0043] Furthermore, the company must provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that it meets the following conditions; if any one of these conditions is not met, no evaluation will be given:

[0044] a) Enterprises should establish and operate environmental management systems and quality management systems, and comply with the provisions of GB / T24001 and GB / T19001;

[0045] b) In the past three years, there have been no illegal acts, no major or above safety and quality accidents, no records of ecological and environmental damage or ecological and environmental administrative penalties, and no major ideological or public complaints.

[0046] c) Enterprises with good credit records, not listed in the joint disciplinary list of dishonest entities by relevant departments, included in environmental credit evaluation, and not environmentally warning enterprises or environmentally unqualified enterprises.

[0047] d) The enterprise has compliant environmental impact assessment, environmental protection completion acceptance, pollutant discharge permit and other ecological and environmental protection procedures in its production and operation, and complies with applicable laws, regulations and planning policies on ecological and environmental protection, health, fire protection and other aspects during the construction and production process;

[0048] e) Do not use technologies, equipment, raw materials or auxiliary materials that are restricted or phased out by the state, and do not produce products that are restricted or phased out by the state;

[0049] f) During the evaluation process, if any falsification, concealment of information, or violation of the aforementioned participation criteria is found in the materials, the evaluation agency may terminate the evaluation and disqualify the company from participating for the next three years. The evaluation results should be valid for three years. During the validity period, the evaluation agency should conduct follow-up evaluations of the participating companies. If a company fails to meet the aforementioned participation criteria, the evaluation results will automatically become invalid.

[0050] In some embodiments, when evaluating biodiversity among participating enterprises, they are categorized into biodiversity-dependent enterprises and biodiversity-related enterprises based on their production and operational characteristics and their dependence on and impact on biodiversity. For biodiversity-dependent enterprises, any evaluation indicator in the evaluation indicator library is mandatory; for biodiversity-related enterprises, the evaluation indicator library includes n optional bonus indicators, with the remaining indicators being mandatory. The scores for each mandatory evaluation indicator differ for different enterprise types, but the total score for all mandatory evaluation indicators is the same.

[0051] Specifically, biodiversity-dependent enterprises are those whose business operations and survival are highly dependent on the natural environment and ecosystem services. These enterprises typically utilize natural resources such as water, soil, forests, and marine resources in their production processes, and their products and services may have direct or indirect impacts on ecosystems. Biodiversity-linked enterprises are those whose production and operations are directly or indirectly related to biodiversity. Although these enterprises may not directly engage in biodiversity conservation or utilization, their activities impact biodiversity and are therefore considered biodiversity-linked.

[0052] Specifically, different weights are assigned to each indicator for different types of enterprises. The total score for all mandatory evaluation indicators is 100 points. For enterprises related to biodiversity, the total score is 121 points (including 21 points for 7 optional bonus items). See Tables A.1 and A.2 for the scores of each indicator in the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation.

[0053] Tables A.1 and A.2 respectively provide the biodiversity performance evaluation index library and scoring standards for biodiversity-dependent enterprises and biodiversity-related enterprises.

[0054] Table A.1 Biodiversity Performance Evaluation Indicator Database and Scoring Standards for Biodiversity-Dependent Enterprises

[0055]

[0056]

[0057]

[0058]

[0059]

[0060] Table A.2 Biodiversity Performance Evaluation Indicator Database and Scoring Standards for Biodiversity-Related Enterprises

[0061]

[0062]

[0063]

[0064]

[0065]

[0066] In some embodiments, corresponding evaluation indicators are constructed based on the evaluation data of participating enterprises, the indicator scores are determined, and a performance evaluation model for enterprise biodiversity is further constructed.

[0067] Specifically, based on the scores of all secondary indicators and the number of secondary indicators, the evaluation score P for the enterprise's biodiversity performance is obtained by summing them up.

[0068]

[0069] In the formula, a is the score of the secondary indicator, and n is the number of indicators.

[0070] Specifically, the calculation of the aforementioned corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model can be completed through an expert committee review and scoring process. The expert committee should consist of at least five industry, technical, and standards experts in biodiversity-related fields. Based on the evaluation indicator library and indicator scores, they will independently evaluate and quantitatively score the participating companies. In other words, the evaluation score P for corporate biodiversity performance is obtained by summing the scores of each expert based on all secondary indicators and the number of secondary indicators. Furthermore, those skilled in the art should understand that the above indicators and scores are not unique and can be adaptively adjusted based on specific circumstances and different evaluation objectives, comprehensively considering national policies, industry development characteristics, and the company's outstanding contributions. Alternatively, to avoid the influence of subjective emotions, a large language model can be used in conjunction with the evaluation indicators to analyze the evaluation data provided by the company, ultimately deriving the corresponding evaluation indicator scores.

[0071] In some embodiments, after summing the scores of the secondary indicators and the number of scored secondary indicators to obtain the evaluation score P of the enterprise's biodiversity performance, the method further includes:

[0072] The score of the corresponding primary indicator is determined based on the score of the secondary indicator;

[0073] Based on the proportional relationship between the scores of each primary indicator and the full score, several indicators are selected from the primary evaluation indicators as the final evaluation indicators, and the total score of the final evaluation indicators is calculated as the final evaluation score P. ′ To facilitate understanding, an example based on Table A.1 is provided here. If a company's scores for the first indicator are 20, 19, 4, 8, and 29, then the percentages of each score relative to the full score can be calculated as 83.3%, 79.2%, 66.7%, 66.7%, and 85.3%, respectively. Here, indicators A, B, and E from the first-level indicators in Table A.1 can be selected as the final evaluation score, i.e., P. ′ =20 + 19 + 29 = 68. Each company can choose based on its actual scoring, selecting the indicator score with the largest proportion as the final evaluation score P. ′Alternatively, you can choose other primary indicators with a smaller weighting or all primary indicators to calculate the final evaluation score.

[0074] In some embodiments, the final evaluation score P for corporate biodiversity performance is obtained by summing. ′ Subsequently, based on multiple final evaluation scores P ′ The Biodiversity Performance Index (BBEI) for enterprises is calculated. After removing the highest and lowest scores, the average score is calculated as the final BBEI result.

[0075]

[0076] Among them: final evaluation score P ′ , where a is the score of the evaluation indicator, n is the number of evaluation indicators, and m is the number of calculations.

[0077] In some embodiments, after obtaining the biodiversity assessment index of the target enterprise, the enterprise's biodiversity performance level is classified, and the enterprise's biodiversity assessment index is divided into several intervals; the enterprise's biodiversity performance level is determined according to the range in which the target enterprise's biodiversity assessment index falls; wherein, the enterprise's biodiversity performance level is divided into AAA, AA, and A levels from high to low. The classification criteria are shown in Table 1.

[0078] Table 1. Enterprise Biodiversity Performance Rating Standards

[0079] Corporate Biodiversity Performance Level Enterprise Biodiversity Performance Evaluation Index AAA level BBEI≥95 AA grade 90≤BBEI Grade A 85≤BBEI<90

[0080] Furthermore, after determining the evaluation results and ratings of participating companies, the companies can publish the results to the public for social oversight. The evaluation agency can summarize the achievements and best practices of participating companies in their biodiversity actions and publish evaluation reports periodically.

[0081] See Figure 2As shown, another embodiment of the present invention relates to a system for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance. The system includes: an evaluation indicator determination module, an evaluation system determination module, and a biodiversity assessment module. The evaluation indicator determination module is used to determine an evaluation indicator library, which includes primary indicators, each of which includes several secondary indicators. The evaluation system determination module is used to acquire evaluation data of the target enterprise within an evaluation period; construct corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data, and determine corresponding indicator scores; construct a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the indicator scores and evaluation indicators. The biodiversity assessment module, based on the corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model, acquires the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise; and classifies the enterprise's biodiversity performance level based on the target enterprise's biodiversity performance evaluation index. The primary indicators include biodiversity conservation, sustainable production and management, access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, and collaborative governance.

[0082] It is readily apparent that this embodiment is a system embodiment corresponding to the method embodiment for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance provided in this application. This embodiment can be implemented in conjunction with the method embodiment for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance provided in this application. The relevant technical details mentioned in any embodiment remain valid in this embodiment, and will not be repeated here to reduce repetition. Correspondingly, the relevant technical details mentioned in this embodiment can also be applied to other embodiments.

[0083] It is worth mentioning that all modules involved in this embodiment are logical modules. In practical applications, a logical unit can be a physical unit, a part of a physical unit, or a combination of multiple physical units. Furthermore, to highlight the innovative aspects of this invention, this embodiment does not introduce units that are not closely related to solving the technical problem proposed by this invention; however, this does not mean that other units are absent from this embodiment.

[0084] Another embodiment of the present invention relates to an electronic device, such as... Figure 3 As shown, it includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the above embodiments.

[0085] The memory and processor are connected via a bus, which can include any number of interconnecting buses and bridges, connecting various circuits of one or more processors and memories. The bus can also connect various other circuits, such as peripheral devices, voltage regulators, and power management circuits, which are well known in the art and will not be described further herein. The bus interface provides an interface between the bus and the transceiver. The transceiver can be a single element or multiple elements, such as multiple receivers and transmitters, providing a unit for communicating with various other devices over a transmission medium. Data processed by the processor is transmitted over the wireless medium via an antenna, which further receives data and transmits it to the processor.

[0086] The processor manages the bus and general processing, and also provides various functions, including timing, peripheral interfaces, voltage regulation, power management, and other control functions. Memory is used to store data used by the processor during operation.

[0087] Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the method embodiments described above.

[0088] That is, those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. This program is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a device (which may be a microcontroller, chip, etc.) or processor to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as a USB flash drive, a portable hard drive, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.

[0089] Those skilled in the art will understand that the above embodiments are specific embodiments for implementing the present invention, and in practical applications, various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance, characterized in that, The method includes: A database of evaluation indicators is established, which includes primary indicators and several secondary indicators. Obtain evaluation data for the target company within an evaluation period; Based on the evaluation data, corresponding evaluation indicators are constructed and corresponding indicator scores are determined. Based on the indicator scores and the evaluation indicators, a corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model is constructed. Based on the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model, obtain the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise; Based on the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprises, the enterprises' biodiversity performance levels are classified. The primary indicators include biodiversity conservation, sustainable production and management, access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, and collaborative governance.

2. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of constructing corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data and determining the corresponding indicator scores includes: Based on the production and operation characteristics of the target enterprises and their dependence on and impact on biodiversity, the target enterprises are divided into biodiversity-dependent enterprises and biodiversity-related enterprises. For different types of enterprises, n optional bonus evaluation indicators are selected from the evaluation indicator library, while the remaining evaluation indicators are mandatory. All mandatory evaluation indicators have the same total score.

3. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation index library includes primary indicators, and the primary indicators include several secondary indicators, including: The biodiversity conservation includes secondary indicators: site selection for enterprise parks or construction projects, biodiversity restoration, prevention and control of invasive alien species, important species, and collection and preservation of genetic resources; The sustainable production and operation include secondary indicators: establishing biodiversity-friendly supply chains, promoting the adoption of biodiversity-friendly technologies and processes, and supplying green products and services; The acquisition and benefit sharing of biological genetic resources includes secondary indicators: acquisition and utilization of biological genetic resources, and benefit sharing; The collaborative governance includes secondary indicators: addressing climate change, pollution prevention and control, and safeguarding human health; The management mechanism and capacity building include secondary indicators: formulating and implementing corporate biodiversity-related plans, fulfilling biodiversity management responsibilities, conducting biodiversity impact assessments, disclosing biodiversity-related information, conducting biodiversity monitoring and assessment, establishing special funds for biodiversity, popularizing biodiversity and its value among employees and surrounding communities, achieving biodiversity-related scientific research results, and obtaining biodiversity-related honors.

4. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The construction of an enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the indicator scores and the evaluation indicators includes: Based on the scores of the secondary indicators and the number of secondary indicators that have been scored, the evaluation score P of the enterprise's biodiversity performance is obtained by summing them up. Wherein, a is the score of the secondary indicator, and n is the number of secondary indicators that have been scored.

5. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 4, characterized in that, After summing the scores of the secondary indicators and the number of scored secondary indicators to obtain the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation score P, the process also includes: Based on the scores of the secondary indicators, the scores of the corresponding primary indicators are determined; Based on the proportional relationship between the scores of each primary indicator and the full score, several indicators are selected from the primary evaluation indicators as final evaluation indicators, and the total score of the final evaluation indicators is calculated as the final evaluation score P. ′ .

6. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 5, characterized in that, The process of obtaining the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise based on the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model includes: Based on the aforementioned corporate biodiversity performance evaluation model, multiple final evaluation scores P for the target corporate biodiversity performance are calculated multiple times within an evaluation cycle. ′ ; Based on the multiple final evaluation scores P ′ Calculate the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation index. Where: P ′ The final evaluation score is given by 'a', where 'a' is the score of each evaluation indicator, 'n' is the number of evaluation indicators, and 'm' is the number of calculations.

7. The method for evaluating enterprise biodiversity performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of classifying enterprises' biodiversity performance levels based on the target enterprise's biodiversity performance evaluation index includes: The enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation index is divided into several intervals; The biodiversity performance level of the target enterprise is determined based on the range within which its biodiversity performance evaluation index falls; wherein, The biodiversity performance ratings for enterprises are divided into three levels from highest to lowest: AAA, AA, and A.

8. A system for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance, characterized in that, The system includes: an evaluation index determination module, an evaluation system determination module, and a biodiversity assessment module; in, The evaluation index determination module is used to determine the evaluation index library, which includes primary indicators and several secondary indicators. The evaluation system determination module is used to acquire evaluation data of the target enterprise within an evaluation period; construct corresponding evaluation indicators based on the evaluation data and determine the corresponding indicator scores; and construct an enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model based on the indicator scores and the evaluation indicators. The biodiversity assessment module, based on the enterprise biodiversity performance evaluation model, obtains the biodiversity performance evaluation index of the target enterprise; and classifies the enterprise's biodiversity performance level based on the target enterprise's biodiversity performance index. The primary indicators include biodiversity conservation, sustainable production and management, access to and benefit-sharing of biological genetic resources, management mechanisms and capacity building, and collaborative governance.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as, A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the method for evaluating corporate biodiversity performance as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images