A land space planning data conflict visualized three-dimensional design method
By constructing a three-dimensional model in the early stages of land spatial planning, determining the location of planned land use, and conducting conflict detection and adjustments, the problem of frequent modifications to planning schemes in existing technologies has been solved, enabling efficient planning and design and simultaneous advancement, and improving overall design efficiency.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- 河南省城乡规划设计研究总院股份有限公司
- Filing Date
- 2026-03-09
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-19
AI Technical Summary
In the existing three-dimensional visualization design methods for land spatial planning, planning schemes require extensive modifications and adjustments in the later stages of design, resulting in low planning efficiency. Furthermore, some designs can only proceed after other related designs have fully delineated the area, thus prolonging the overall planning cycle.
By constructing a 3D model using aerial surveying in the early planning stage, the location and area of various planned land uses are determined. Conflict detection and display are carried out in combination with planning conflict rules. Conflict points are accurately located by combining automatic collision detection with manual review. The planning design is adjusted according to the optimization results, and the overall planning is promoted in stages to ensure that the planned land use is adapted to the terrain and reduce the need for subsequent modifications.
It has improved the design efficiency of land and space planning. By quickly identifying and adjusting planning conflicts, it has reduced the amount of revisions required, enabling subsequent detailed planning to proceed in parallel, shortening the planning cycle and improving overall design efficiency.
Smart Images
Figure CN122244303A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of land spatial planning technology, specifically a three-dimensional design method for visualizing land spatial planning data conflicts. Background Technology
[0002] Territorial spatial planning aims to coordinate various development, protection and construction activities. It is a comprehensive and binding spatial arrangement. Its core objective is to optimize the pattern of territorial spatial development and protection, and promote high-quality development and high-quality life. In the process of planning implementation, three-dimensional modeling technology is usually used for visualization to intuitively present the spatial layout and implementation effect of the planning scheme.
[0003] In existing three-dimensional visualization design methods for territorial spatial planning, the common approach is to first summarize and model the entire plan, then conduct conflict detection, and finally make retrospective modifications. This involves first completing various planning designs, integrating the design results into a regional three-dimensional model, and then conducting multi-plan conflict detection based on this model. Based on this, adjustments or optimizations are made to the existing planning schemes. This approach may result in numerous modifications and adjustments to the planning schemes in the later stages of the design process, affecting planning efficiency. Furthermore, some planning designs can only proceed after other related designs have been fully delineated, leading to a relatively long overall planning and design cycle. Summary of the Invention
[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in land spatial planning data, so as to solve the problems mentioned in the background art.
[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following technical solution: A three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in land spatial planning data includes: Step 1: Use aerial photography to survey the topography of the planning area, construct a 3D model of the planning area, and obtain core data on elevation, slope, aspect, topographic relief, soil and rock type, and hydrogeology within the area; Step 2: Establish conflict rules for the planning based on the requirements of land and space planning control; Step 3: Based on the regional planning and development positioning and industrial needs, clarify the location of various planned land uses and determine the land area and preliminary location boundaries; Step 4: Fill the rigid land area of various plans and the preliminary planning boundary into the 3D model of the planning area to form a 3D model of planning design. According to the conflict rules of planning, check whether there are planning conflicts at the boundaries of various plans, display the conflicts on the 3D model, and generate a conflict detection report. Step 5: For the planning boundary conflicts detected, make targeted adjustments based on the planning priority rules and terrain adaptation principles, regenerate the 3D model of the planning design based on the optimization results, and determine the final location and boundary of each planning area; Step Six: Based on the 3D model of the planning design, distribute the detailed planning design tasks for each plan to the designers simultaneously, carry out detailed design of the plan, and summarize the detailed designs of each plan into the 3D model of the planning design to obtain the final 3D model of the planning display.
[0006] Furthermore, in step four, during the process of determining the land area and preliminary location boundaries, priority is given to delineating the land area and core control scope of rigid land use, clarifying the boundary parameters that cannot be adjusted, and determining the reasonable land area range and preliminary layout orientation of flexible land use in combination with terrain adaptability and cost budget, reserving space for adjustment. During the delineation process, terrain conditions must be considered simultaneously to avoid placing large-span, high-land-use planning content in steep slopes or areas with unstable soil and rock, ensuring that the land use planning matches the terrain carrying capacity. Rigid land use includes major infrastructure, basic public service facilities, and ecological protection areas, while flexible land use includes commercial operations, residential clusters, and recreational green spaces.
[0007] Furthermore, in step four, by combining automatic collision detection with manual review, conflict points of various planning boundaries are accurately located, the scope and impact of the conflict are clarified, and the conflict detection report indicates the conflict type, the land use type involved, and the proposed adjustment direction.
[0008] Furthermore, planning conflicts include spatial boundary conflicts, land use control conflicts, and indicator control conflicts. Spatial boundary conflicts refer to overlapping control lines, contradictions between the planned scope and the current scope, and intersections of plot boundaries. Land use control conflicts refer to contradictions between the planned use and the current use, construction projects occupying prohibited construction areas, and inconsistencies between different planned uses. Indicator control conflicts refer to planning indicators such as plot ratio, building height, land area, and arable land retention exceeding the control threshold.
[0009] Furthermore, in step four, when determining the location of various planned land uses, for different types of planned land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, public service, road, and park green space, the cost differences of each type of building under different terrain conditions are clarified in combination with the terrain conditions. Taking into account factors such as lighting, landscape, and construction cost, and superimposing factors such as ecological constraints, transportation accessibility, and public service supporting facilities, the optimal construction area and secondary construction area of each type of building are determined, and areas that are not recommended for construction are identified. At the same time, a dynamic cost coefficient is introduced, which combines factors such as regional building material prices, labor costs, and construction technology levels to achieve dynamic updates of cost quantification.
[0010] Furthermore, priority is given to locating viewing buildings in areas with open views, overlooking natural landscapes or the core urban landscape, while avoiding damage to original landscape resources. High-density buildings are prioritized for locating on flat or gentle slopes and in areas with good soil and rock stability to reduce construction costs and risks. Low-density buildings and parks and green spaces are located on gentle slopes and hilly areas.
[0011] Preferably, the location of various planned land uses is determined by combining the best construction areas, secondary construction areas, and areas not recommended for construction in various plans, based on the overall planning intention.
[0012] Preferably, the overall plan is to be implemented in phases, taking into account the difficulty of engineering construction, terrain adaptability, pace of capital investment and regional development needs. The three-dimensional model of the planning and design of each phase of the project is determined, and the construction focus, scope and objectives of each stage are clarified to achieve the orderliness and flexibility of the plan implementation. At the same time, the connection between the construction of each stage and the requirements for terrain protection are taken into account. The three-dimensional model is dynamically updated in real time during the phased planning process to monitor the construction progress and planning compliance of each stage in real time.
[0013] Furthermore, the first phase of the project prioritizes the construction of major roads and the development of buildings in the core area, establishing the transportation infrastructure and spatial framework of the planned area.
[0014] Furthermore, subsequent phases of engineering planning and design will promote the construction of subdivided roads, as well as the development and expansion of buildings and scenic areas, to realize the formation of regional functions. Finally, the remaining plots within the planning area will be developed and transformed in a targeted manner to improve the supporting functions of the area. The transformation and utilization must be combined with the terrain conditions, location characteristics and regional needs of the remaining plots to accurately position their functions.
[0015] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are: By clearly defining the location of various planned land uses and determining the area and preliminary boundaries in the early stages of planning, the land use scope of various plans is first summarized into the three-dimensional model of the planning area. This facilitates the rapid detection and identification of spatial overlap and conflicts between various plans. Then, based on the pre-set priorities of various plans, adaptive adjustments are made to the location and spatial scope of conflicting plans. After the conflict adjustment is completed and the planning layout is determined, the specific detailed planning and design of the corresponding plots are carried out simultaneously by the specialized design personnel. This helps to reduce the amount of planning modifications. By determining the location and scope of various plans in advance, the subsequent detailed planning of various special projects can be promoted simultaneously, which helps to improve the overall design efficiency of land and space planning.
[0016] In the early stages of planning, by combining the best construction areas, secondary construction areas, and non-recommended construction areas of various plans, and based on the overall planning intention, it is beneficial to quickly determine the location of various planning lands. Then, by combining the planning and design requirements with the construction scale of various plans, the spatial boundaries of the corresponding planning lands can be delineated, which is beneficial to quickly determine the land area and preliminary location boundaries of various planning lands and improves the efficiency of early planning and design. By advancing the overall plan in phases, constructing and defining the planning and design 3D model diagrams for each phase of the project, and forming exclusive 3D model results for each stage of planning and construction, it is convenient to conduct phased and comprehensive visualization and management of the overall regional plan. Attached Figure Description
[0017] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the overall process of the method of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the process for determining the location of planned land use in this invention; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the phased planning process in this invention. Detailed Implementation
[0018] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0019] Please see Figure 1-3 In this embodiment of the invention, a three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in land spatial planning data includes: Step 1: Use aerial photography to survey the topography of the planning area, construct a 3D model of the planning area, and obtain core data on elevation, slope, aspect, topographic relief, soil and rock type, and hydrogeology within the area; Using technologies such as UAV aerial surveying, LiDAR laser scanning, and GIS spatial analysis, core data such as elevation, slope, aspect, topographic relief, soil and rock type, and hydrogeology of the region are obtained. A three-dimensional model of the planning area is established, and the terrain is classified and graded according to its characteristics, including plains, plateaus, hills, mountains, and valleys. Step 2: Establish conflict rules for the planning based on the requirements of land and space planning control; Step 3: Based on the regional planning and development positioning and industrial needs, clarify the location of various planned land uses and determine the land area and preliminary location boundaries; Step 4: Fill the rigid land area of various plans and the preliminary planning boundary into the 3D model of the planning area to form a 3D model of planning design. According to the conflict rules of planning, check whether there are planning conflicts at the boundaries of various plans, display the conflicts on the 3D model, and generate a conflict detection report. By combining automatic collision detection with manual review, conflict points of various planning boundaries can be accurately located, and the scope and degree of impact of the conflict can be clarified. Step 5: For the planning boundary conflicts detected, make targeted adjustments based on the planning priority rules and terrain adaptation principles, regenerate the 3D model of the planning design based on the optimization results, and determine the final location and boundary of each planning area; Step Six: Based on the 3D model of the planning design, distribute the detailed planning design tasks for each plan to the designers simultaneously, carry out detailed design of the plan, and summarize the detailed designs of each plan into the 3D model of the planning design to obtain the final 3D model of the planning display.
[0020] Specifically, in the early stages of planning, the location of various planned land uses is determined by combining the regional planning development positioning and industrial needs. Based on the design requirements of various plans, the land area and preliminary location boundaries are determined. The land area of various plans is first summarized into the three-dimensional model of the planning area. Then, according to the conflict rules, a multi-dimensional conflict investigation is carried out in the three-dimensional model to detect whether there are planning conflicts at the boundaries of various plans, identify various contradictions in the planning layout, clarify the conflict type and scope of impact, and facilitate the rapid detection and identification of spatial overlap and conflict between various plans. Based on the pre-set priorities of various plans, adaptive adjustments are made to the location and spatial scope of conflicting plans and designs. After the conflict adjustment is completed and the planning layout is determined, the specific detailed planning and design of the corresponding plots are carried out simultaneously by the specialized design personnel. The detailed planning is carried out after the planning conflict detection is completed, which helps to reduce the amount of planning modifications. Moreover, by determining the location and scope of various plans in advance, the subsequent detailed planning of each special project can be promoted in parallel, which helps to improve the overall design efficiency of land and space planning. Example 1
[0021] like Figure 1 As shown in this embodiment, the conflict detection report marks the conflict type, the land use type involved, and the direction of adjustment suggestions. Planning conflicts include spatial boundary conflicts, land use control conflicts, and indicator control conflicts. Spatial boundary conflicts refer to overlapping control lines, contradictions between the planned scope and the current scope, and intersections of plot boundaries. Land use control conflicts refer to contradictions between the planned use and the current use, construction projects occupying prohibited construction areas, and inconsistencies between different planned uses. Indicator control conflicts refer to planning indicators such as plot ratio, building height, land use scale, and arable land retention exceeding the control threshold.
[0022] In practice, conflicts may arise in land use control, such as residential land being adjacent to industrial land or commercial buildings being located within ecological red lines; conflicts may arise in spatial boundaries, such as road planning crossing mountains or rivers or pipeline laying conflicting with terrain undulations; conflicts may arise in indicator control, such as building density or plot ratio exceeding standards in some areas, exceeding the carrying capacity of the terrain; additional conflicts may arise in supporting facilities, such as insufficient coverage of public service facilities or poor connection of transportation networks. Through functions such as collision detection, sunlight analysis, and line-of-sight analysis of 3D models, conflict points can be accurately located, a conflict list can be generated, and key information such as conflict type, involved area, and degree of impact can be marked to provide a basis for conflict mediation. During the construction of a 3D model of the planning area, urban underground pipe network and underground transportation data can be imported to build an underground 3D model of the planning area. During conflict detection, vertical spatial conflicts can be detected to identify vertical contradictions between above-ground buildings and underground pipelines, rail transit, civil defense projects, and geological space.
[0023] like Figure 1 As shown in this embodiment, in step four, during the process of determining the land area and preliminary location boundary, the land area and core control scope of rigid land are delineated first, the boundary parameters that cannot be adjusted are clarified, and the reasonable land area range and preliminary layout orientation of flexible land are determined in combination with terrain adaptability and cost budget, reserving space for adjustment. During the delineation process, the terrain conditions must be considered simultaneously to avoid placing large-span, high-land-demand planning content in steep slopes or unstable soil and rock areas, ensuring that the land planning matches the terrain carrying capacity. Rigid land includes major infrastructure, basic public service facilities, and ecological protection areas, while flexible land includes commercial operations, residential clusters, and recreational green spaces.
[0024] In practice, the rigid constraints and flexible guidance requirements of the territorial spatial planning should be combined to formulate clear planning priority rules, giving priority to ensuring the implementation of rigid planning content, and then adjusting and optimizing the flexible planning content. The priorities, from highest to lowest, are as follows: rigidly constrained areas such as ecological protection red lines, basic farmland, and water source protection areas; major infrastructure such as transportation, water supply and drainage, and power supply; public service facilities such as education, medical care, and elderly care; residential land; commercial and industrial land; and ecological and recreational land such as parks, green spaces, and leisure spaces. Example 2
[0025] Based on Example 1, such as Figure 2 As shown in this embodiment, when determining the location of various types of planned land in step four, the cost differences of each type of building under different terrain conditions are clarified for different types of planned land such as residential, commercial, industrial, public service, road, and park green space, in combination with the terrain conditions. The quantitative indicators cover site leveling costs, foundation engineering costs, main construction costs, supporting facility costs, and transportation costs. In flat and sloping areas, site leveling costs account for only 3%-5% of the total cost, while in steep and sloping areas, excavation and leveling and the construction of retaining walls are required, and site leveling costs can account for 15%-25%. In mountainous areas, the depth of building pile foundations increases by 30%-50% compared to plain areas, and the foundation engineering costs increase by 20%-40% accordingly. At the same time, dynamic cost coefficients are introduced, which combine factors such as regional building material prices, labor costs, and construction technology levels to achieve dynamic updates of cost quantification. Taking into account factors such as lighting, landscape, and construction costs, and superimposed on ecological constraints, transportation accessibility, and supporting public services, the optimal and secondary construction areas for each type of building are determined, and areas not recommended for construction are identified. Combining the optimal, secondary, and unrecommended construction areas for various plans, and based on the overall planning intention, the location of various planned land uses is determined. Priority is given to locating scenic buildings in areas with open views overlooking natural landscapes or the core urban landscape area, while avoiding damage to original landscape resources. High-density buildings are prioritized for locating on flat or gentle slopes and in areas with good soil and rock stability to reduce construction costs and risks. Low-density buildings and parks and green spaces are located on gentle slopes and hilly areas.
[0026] In practical implementation, the best construction area, secondary construction area, and unrecommended construction area of various plans are combined. Based on the overall planning intention, the best or secondary construction area of a certain type of plan is selected, while the unrecommended construction area of a certain type of plan is avoided. For example, the best choice for high-density residential buildings is to be located on flat slopes. If there is a layout conflict in flat slope areas, gentle slope areas can be selected as the second choice. In addition, high slope areas and hilly areas are avoided during planning. In addition, the spatial boundaries of the corresponding planning land are delineated in combination with the planning and design requirements and the construction scale of various plans. This is conducive to quickly determining the location, area, and preliminary boundaries of various planning lands, and is conducive to improving the efficiency of early planning and design.
[0027] like Figure 3 As shown in this embodiment, the overall plan is gradually advanced in phases, taking into account the difficulty of engineering construction, terrain adaptability, pace of capital investment and regional development needs. The three-dimensional model of the planning and design of each phase of the project is determined, and the construction focus, scope and objectives of each stage are clarified to achieve the orderliness and flexibility of the plan implementation. At the same time, the connection between the construction of each stage and the requirements for terrain protection are taken into account. During the phased planning process, the three-dimensional model is dynamically updated in real time to monitor the construction progress and planning compliance of each stage.
[0028] In practice, the overall plan is implemented in phases, and three-dimensional models of the planning and design of each phase are constructed and determined to form a unique three-dimensional model of planning and construction for each stage. This facilitates the phased and comprehensive visualization and management of the overall regional plan.
[0029] like Figure 3 As shown in this embodiment, the first phase of the project planning and design prioritizes the construction of main roads and the development of buildings in the core area to establish the transportation infrastructure and spatial framework of the planning area. Subsequent phases of the project planning and design promote the construction of subdivided roads, as well as the development and expansion of buildings and scenic spots to realize the formation of regional functions. Finally, the remaining plots in the planning area are targeted for development and transformation to improve the supporting functions of the area. The transformation and utilization need to be combined with the terrain conditions, location characteristics and regional needs of the remaining plots to accurately position their functions.
[0030] In practice, the road construction in the first phase of the project focuses on the regional main road network. It plans and constructs through main roads in combination with the terrain features, prioritizing the paving of flat and gentle slope areas, avoiding steep slopes, unstable soil and rock areas and ecologically sensitive core areas, so as to reduce construction difficulty and cost. For road sections that must cross hills and valleys, low-disturbance construction methods are adopted, such as optimizing the route along the mountains and water, reducing the amount of excavation and filling, and simultaneously constructing slope protection and drainage facilities to ensure road traffic safety and terrain stability. The architectural development selects core plots with superior terrain conditions and strong transportation accessibility, focusing on basic housing needs and basic public service facilities, and controlling the development scale and building density. For example, it will lay out a small number of multi-story residential groups, community service centers, and small supermarkets to meet the initial population influx and basic living needs. During the first phase of construction, the current terrain status monitoring and data archiving will be completed simultaneously to provide data for subsequent planning adjustments in multiple phases of the project. Subsequent phases of project planning and design gradually advance the construction of subdivided roads and the development and expansion of most buildings and scenic areas, achieving the initial formation of regional functions. Among them, the construction of subdivided roads focuses on improving the network of secondary arterial roads and branch roads, connecting the main roads of the first phase with various functional areas. For areas with complex terrain such as mountains and plateaus, adaptive road network design is adopted, such as planning winding mountain branch roads according to the terrain and designing layered roads using terrain elevation differences to improve regional traffic accessibility. Building development is gradually unfolding, covering diverse types of planning such as residential, commercial, and cultural. The planning layout is optimized in combination with the terrain features. In flat areas, high-rise residential clusters and medium-sized commercial complexes are arranged; in gentle slopes and hilly areas, low-density residences, cultural and tourism buildings and characteristic scenic spots are arranged. Based on the original terrain, characteristic parks such as mountain landscapes and river valley leisure areas are created. At the same time, the coverage of municipal supporting facilities is promoted. In the final project planning and design, the remaining plots in the area will be developed and transformed to improve space utilization efficiency. For example, plots with flat terrain, convenient transportation, and proximity to residential clusters will be transformed into public parking lots and standardized farmers' markets. For plots with average terrain conditions that are not suitable for large-scale building development, simple commercial streets and simple parks will be created. The simple parks will focus on ecological greening, preserving the original vegetation and topography. Targeted repairs and optimizations will be carried out for the terrain-related issues existing in the transformed plots. At the same time, the overall regional plan will be reviewed and optimized. The results of multiple phases of construction will be integrated through a 3D model, and local functional layouts and style details will be fine-tuned to achieve the integrity and coordination of the regional plan. The comprehensive display of the regional plan will help improve the planning effect of the 3D design display.
[0031] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the details of the exemplary embodiments described above, and that the invention can be implemented in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the embodiments should be considered in all respects as exemplary and non-limiting, and the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description. Thus, all variations falling within the meaning and scope of equivalents of the claims are intended to be included within the present invention. No reference numerals in the claims should be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.
[0032] Furthermore, it should be understood that although this specification describes embodiments, not every embodiment contains only one independent technical solution. This narrative style is merely for clarity. Those skilled in the art should consider the specification as a whole, and the technical solutions in each embodiment can also be appropriately combined to form other embodiments that can be understood by those skilled in the art.
Claims
1. A three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in land spatial planning data, characterized in that, include: Step 1: Use aerial photography to survey the terrain of the planning area and construct a 3D model of the planning area; Step 2: Establish conflict rules for the planning based on the requirements of land and space planning control; Step 3: Based on the regional planning and development positioning and industrial needs, clarify the location of various planned land uses and determine the land area and preliminary location boundaries; Step 4: Fill the rigid land area of various plans and the preliminary planning boundary into the 3D model of the planning area to form a 3D model of planning design. According to the conflict rules of planning, check whether there are planning conflicts at the boundaries of various plans, display the conflicts on the 3D model, and generate a conflict detection report. Step 5: For the planning boundary conflicts detected, make targeted adjustments based on the planning priority rules and terrain adaptation principles, regenerate the 3D model of the planning design based on the optimization results, and determine the final location and boundary of each planning area; Step Six: Based on the 3D model of the planning design, distribute the detailed planning design tasks for each plan to the designers simultaneously, carry out detailed design of the plan, and summarize the detailed designs of each plan into the 3D model of the planning design to obtain the final 3D model of the planning display.
2. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step four, during the process of determining the land area and preliminary location boundaries, priority is given to delineating the land area and core control scope of rigid land use, clarifying the boundary parameters that cannot be adjusted, and determining the reasonable land area range and preliminary layout orientation of flexible land use in combination with terrain adaptability and cost budget, reserving space for adjustment.
3. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step four uses a combination of automatic collision detection and manual review to accurately locate conflict points at various planning boundaries, clarify the scope and impact of the conflict, and mark the conflict type, land use type involved, and suggested adjustment direction in the conflict detection report.
4. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 1, characterized in that, The planning conflicts include spatial boundary conflicts, land use control conflicts, and indicator control conflicts.
5. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to any one of claims 1-4, characterized in that, In step four, when determining the location of various planned land uses, for different types of planned land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, public service, road, and park green space, the cost differences of each type of building under different terrain conditions are clarified in combination with the terrain conditions. Taking into account factors such as lighting, landscape, and construction cost, and superimposing factors such as ecological constraints, transportation accessibility, and public service supporting facilities, the optimal construction area and secondary construction area of each type of building are determined, and areas that are not recommended for construction are identified.
6. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 5, characterized in that, Priority should be given to locating scenic buildings in areas with open views, and high-density buildings should be prioritized for locating on flat or gentle slopes and in areas with good soil and rock stability. Low-density buildings and parks and green spaces should be located on gentle slopes and hilly areas.
7. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 5, characterized in that, Based on the best construction areas, secondary construction areas, and areas not recommended for construction in various plans, and in accordance with the overall planning intentions, determine the location of various planned land uses.
8. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to any one of claims 1-4, characterized in that, Taking into account the difficulty of engineering construction, terrain adaptability, pace of capital investment and regional development needs, the overall plan will be implemented in phases, and the three-dimensional model drawings of the planning and design of each phase of the project will be determined.
9. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 8, characterized in that, The first phase of the project's planning and design prioritizes the construction of major roads and the development of buildings in the core area, establishing the transportation infrastructure and spatial framework for the planned area.
10. The three-dimensional design method for visualizing conflicts in territorial spatial planning data according to claim 9, characterized in that, Subsequent phases of project planning and design will advance the construction of detailed roads, as well as the development and expansion of buildings and scenic areas, to realize the formation of regional functions. Finally, the remaining plots within the planning area will be developed and transformed in a targeted manner to improve the supporting functions of the area.