DISPENSING DEVICE
Patent Information
- Application Number
- DE602022020182
- Authority / Receiving Office
- DE · DE
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2021-12-30
- Filing Date
- 2022-12-30
- Publication Date
- 2025-08-27
- Estimated Expiration
- 2042-12-30
AI Technical Summary
Multi-part dispensing devices face challenges in maintaining tightness due to multiple sealing interfaces, particularly for sensitive products like food, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals, which require controlled atmosphere regulation to preserve their quality.
A dispensing device with a first and second attachment mechanism between the container, flow-limiting part, and closure, where the holding force ratio of the second mechanism is higher than or equal to 1.5, and the holding force of the second mechanism is between 15 N and 55 N, ensuring a controlled sealing and ergonomic opening.
The device achieves high sealing quality equivalent to a two-part device with a single sealing interface, preserving sensitive products while allowing easy opening and controlled distribution, and maintaining a controlled atmosphere for extended storage.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a dispensing device for storing and dispensing unit products. The invention also relates to a method for assembling and filling a dispensing device.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] For the storage and distribution of unit products, multi-part dispensing devices are known which comprise several components each having a dedicated function. Typically, a dispensing device may comprise a container for storing the unit products, a flow-limiter suitable for dispensing the stored products unit-by-unit, and a closure for reclosably closing the container. One disadvantage of multi-part dispensing devices is that it is difficult to control the tightness of the device due to multiple sealing interfaces. This is particularly a challenge for dispensing devices intended to receive sensitive products, such as food, nutraceutical products, pharmaceutical products or diagnostic products, which require a control of their interior atmosphere, e.g. in terms of humidity level, oxygen level, etc., in order to preserve the sensitive products stored in the device.
[0003] It is these drawbacks that the invention is intended more particularly to remedy by proposing a dispensing device making it possible to have a controlled and predictable sealing of the device, so as to ensure a targeted shelf life of unit products stored in the device, while also offering the possibility of a controlled distribution of the unit products.
[0004] Further related prior art may be found in US 2008 / 210712 A1, EP 3 502 010A1, and EP 2 394 926 A1, which all relate to a dispensing device with a flow-limiting part and a closure.DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The present invention is defined by the independent claim 1. The dependent claims describe optional features and preferred embodiments.
[0006] For this purpose, according to a first aspect, a subject of the invention is a dispensing device for storing and dispensing unit products, including a container, a flow-limiting part and a closure, the dispensing device comprising: a first attachment mechanism between a tubular portion of the container and a tubular portion of the flow-limiting part, the first attachment mechanism being homogeneous over a circumference of the tubular portions of the container and the flow-limiting part, and a second attachment mechanism between a tubular portion of the flow-limiting part and a tubular portion of the closure, the second attachment mechanism being homogeneous over a circumference of the tubular portions of the flow-limiting part and the closure, wherein a ratio of a holding force of the first attachment mechanism to a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 1.5, preferably higher than or equal to 2, the holding force of the first attachment mechanism being defined as the opening force required to disassemble the flow-limiting part from the container while the flow-limiting part is assembled with the closure by means of the second attachment mechanism, the holding force of the second attachment mechanism being defined as the opening force required to disassemble the closure from the flow-limiting part while the flow-limiting part is assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism, wherein the holding force of the first attachment mechanism and the holding force of the second attachment mechanism are both determined using an opening force applied parallel to a longitudinal axis (X1) of the respective tubular portions and with a given opening speed of 150 mm / min.
[0007] According to the invention, a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is selected to be higher than or equal to 15 N.
[0008] According to the invention, a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is further selected to be less than or equal to 55 N, preferably less than or equal to 40 N.
[0009] Hence, a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is selected to be in the range of between 15 N and 55 N, preferably between 15 N and 40 N.
[0010] Within the frame of the invention, an attachment mechanism is said to be homogeneous over a circumference of the tubular portions of two components of the dispensing device between which it is active, when the holding force of the attachment mechanism is substantially the same regardless of the relative angular orientation of the two components. In other words, such a homogeneous attachment mechanism is evenly distributed over a circumference of the tubular portions of the two components and the opening force required to disassemble the two components from each other, applied parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tubular portions of the two components, is substantially the same regardless of the angular position of the point of application of the opening force on the circumference of said tubular portions. By way of non-limiting examples, such a homogeneous attachment mechanism may include continuous snap-fastening members, e.g. a groove and a complementary projecting ring or bulge, fully surrounding the tubular portions of the two components of the dispensing device, or it may include a plurality of discrete retaining elements regularly distributed over the circumference of the tubular portions of the two components.
[0011] Thanks to its specific structure with a controlled difference in holding force between the first attachment mechanism and the second attachment mechanism, the dispensing device according to the invention guarantees a high level of sealing between the three components of the dispensing device. This is particularly important for a dispensing device intended to receive sensitive products and including an active material for the regulation of the atmosphere inside the device. By way of example, the sensitive products may be food, nutraceutical products, pharmaceutical products or diagnostic products, and the active material capable of regulating the atmosphere in the device may be a humidity absorber or an oxygen scavenger. The sealing of such a dispensing device having a controlled atmosphere, represented by its Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR), is key to reach a desired shelf life of the sensitive products stored in the device.
[0012] It has been observed that, when the holding force ratio of the first and second attachment mechanisms is selected to be higher than or equal to 1.5 and the holding force of the second attachment mechanism is selected to be in the range of between 15 N and 55 N, preferably between 15 N and 40 N, the sealing properties of the three-part dispenser device with two sealing interfaces are substantially equivalent to the sealing properties of a two-part device comprising only a container and a closure with a single sealing interface. Thus, a dispensing device according to the first aspect of the invention, having a holding force ratio higher than or equal to 1.5 and a holding force of the second attachment mechanism in the range of between 15 N and 55 N, preferably between 15 N and 40 N, makes it possible to preserve sensitive unit products stored in the device, while offering flow reduction properties for the distribution of the unit products and allowing easy opening of the closure by a user.
[0013] A holding force ratio in the range of the invention is also suitable for implementing a method of assembling the dispensing device comprising first a pre-assembly of the flow-limiting part and the closure, and then an assembly of the container with the pre-assembled flow-limiting part and closure. Such an assembly sequence is advantageous in that the pre-assembly of the flow-limiting part and the closure can be carried out by the manufacturer of the components of the dispensing device, while the assembly of the container with the pre-assembled flow-limiting part and closure can be carried out on a packaging line, after a step of filling the container with unit products. Thus, the assembly of the dispensing device can be finalized in a single step on the packaging line, using conventional packaging equipment.
[0014] In order to reach a high level of sealing between the three components of the dispensing device, an essential parameter is that a sufficient contact pressure has to be maintained both at the interface between the closure and the flow-limiting part and at the interface between the flow-limiting part and the container. In particular, when the closure is pre-assembled with the flow-limiting part, and the pre-assembled flow-limiting part and closure are stored for a relatively long period of time before being used to seal a container, the pre-assembled flow-limiting part and closure tend to "conform" to each other during the storage period, resulting in a dimensional change including an increase in the outer diameter of the flow-limiting part and a reduction in the diameter of the sealing skirt of the closure. This generates a reduction in the contact pressure at the interface between the closure and the flow-limiting part and, consequently, a degradation of the sealing quality at this interface. It is the same for the interface between the flow-limiting part and the container, which also requires that a sufficient contact pressure be maintained.
[0015] It has been found by the inventors that, by setting a holding force ratio of more than 1.5 and a holding force of the second attachment mechanism of between 15 N and 55 N, preferably between 15 N and 40N, the sealing properties of the three-part dispenser device with two sealing interfaces are substantially equivalent to the sealing properties of a two-part device comprising only a container and a closure with a single sealing interface. The selected range for the holding force of the second attachment mechanism makes it possible to achieve the required sealing quality while still preserving the ergonomics of use.
[0016] In the context of the invention, the active material for atmosphere regulation may be received in a canister dropped in the container of the dispensing device. As a variant, the active material for atmosphere regulation may be received in a chamber delimited in the closure of the dispensing device. Within the meaning of the invention, an active material is a material capable of regulating the atmosphere in the device. The active material may be any type of active material. In particular, the active material may belong to a group of: humidity absorbers (or desiccants); oxygen scavengers; odor absorbers; and / or emitters of humidity or volatile olfactory organic compounds. Optionally, the active material may be capable of releasing gaseous substances such as moisture or perfume. Such properties can for example be useful for applications where sensitive products require a certain humidity level. Such products are, for example, powders, especially for generating aerosols, gelatin capsules, herbal medicine, gels and creams including cosmetics, and food products.
[0017] Examples of suitable dehydrating agents include, without limitation, silica gels, dehydrating clays, activated alumina, calcium oxide, barium oxide, natural or synthetic zeolites, molecular or similar sieves, or deliquescent salts such as magnesium sulfide, calcium chloride, aluminum chloride, lithium chloride, calcium bromide, zinc chloride or the like. Preferably, the dehydrating agent is a molecular sieve and / or a silica gel.
[0018] Examples of suitable oxygen collecting agents include, without limitation, metal powders having a reducing capacity, in particular iron, zinc, tin powders, metal oxides still having the ability to oxidize, in particular ferrous oxide, as well as compounds of iron such as carbides, carbonyls, hydroxides, used alone or in the presence of an activator such as hydroxides, carbonates, sulfites, thiosulfates, phosphates, organic acid salts, or hydrogen salts of alkaline metals or alkaline earth metals, activated carbon, activated alumina or activated clays. Other agents for collecting oxygen can also be chosen from specific reactive polymers such as those described for example in the patent documents US5,736,616A, WO99 / 48963A2, WO98 / 51758A1 and WO2018 / 149778A1.
[0019] According to one embodiment, the flow-limiting part and the closure are made of polymer-based materials, the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the closure being strictly lower than the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part. The selection of a polymer-based material for the flow-limiting part that is more rigid than the polymer-based material of the closure makes it possible to limit the expansion of the flow-limiting part under the effect of the stress generated by the closure, and thus maintain a sufficient contact pressure at the interface between the closure and the flow-limiting part.
[0020] According to one embodiment, the flow-limiting part and the closure are made of polyolefin-based materials, the polyolefin being the same for the flow-limiting part and the closure and being selected among polyethylene and polypropylene, the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the closure being strictly lower than the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the flow-limiting part. The selection of a same polyolefin for the flow-limiting part and the closure, however with different grades so that the material of the flow-limiting part is more rigid than the material of the closure, contributes to an ergonomic opening of the closure, by minimizing the friction that may exist in the case of contact between two strictly identical materials.
[0021] According to one embodiment, the container is made of a polymer-based material, the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the container being higher than or equal to the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part. The selection of a polymer-based material for the container that is more rigid than the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part makes it possible to limit the expansion of the container under the effect of the stress generated by the flow-limiting part, and thus maintain a sufficient contact pressure at the interface between the flow-limiting part and the container.
[0022] According to one embodiment, the container is made of a polyolefin-based material, the polyolefin being selected among polyethylene and polypropylene, the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the container being higher than or equal to the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the flow-limiting part. Here also, the selection of a same polyolefin for the container and the flow-limiting part, however with different grades so that the material of the container is more rigid than the material of the flow-limiting part, minimizes the friction effects.
[0023] According to one feature of the invention, the Melt Flow Index (MFI) of the polymer-based material of the closure is higher than the Melt Flow Index (MFI) of the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part. By way of a non-limiting example, an appropriate selection of constitutive materials for the components of the dispensing device according to the invention may be: polypropylene for the container; and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) for the flow-limiting part and the closure, where the LDPE formulation used for the closure is selected to have a higher Melt Flow Index (MFI) than that of the LDPE formulation used for the flow-limiting part.
[0024] According to one feature of the invention, the Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) of the dispensing device, comprising the container, the flow-limiting part and the closure assembled together, is less than or equal to 1.2 times the WVTR measured for the same container alone sealed in a moisture tight manner.
[0025] According to one feature of the invention, the disassembly of the first attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface of the container and an external contact surface of the flow-limiting part, wherein a deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 1%, the deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface of the container and a maximum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the container and assembled with the closure by means of the second attachment mechanism.
[0026] According to one feature of the invention, the disassembly of the second attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface of the flow-limiting part and an external contact surface of the closure, wherein a deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is less than or equal to 2.5%, the deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part and a maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the closure and assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism.
[0027] According to one embodiment, the first attachment mechanism comprises both an interference press fit between the container and the flow-limiting part, and a snap-fastening connection comprising an inner snap-fastening member of the container and a complementary outer snap-fastening member of the flow-limiting part.
[0028] According to one feature, the inner snap-fastening member of the container has a retaining surface which forms a hard point for the disassembly of the snap-fastening members, and this retaining surface is advantageously inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tubular portion of the container at an angle higher than or equal to 15°, preferably higher than or equal to 20°.
[0029] According to one embodiment, the second attachment mechanism consists of an interference press fit between the flow-limiting part and the closure, in particular without any snap-fastening connection. In this embodiment, a holding force of the second attachment mechanism of at least 15N may be obtained in the absence of undercut to retain the closure, i.e. with a smooth internal surface of the flow-limiting part, without any retaining member. In particular, in In this embodiment, the sealing may be realized between two planes, i.e. the facing surfaces of the flow-limiting part and the closure, or preferably between a line and a plane, for example in the case of the presence of a bulge on at least one of the facing surfaces of the flow-limiting part and the closure.
[0030] According to another embodiment, the second attachment mechanism comprises both an interference press fit between the flow-limiting part and the closure, and a snap-fastening connection comprising an inner snap-fastening member of the flow-limiting part and a complementary outer snap-fastening member of the closure.
[0031] According to one feature, the inner snap-fastening member of the flow-limiting part has a retaining surface which forms a hard point for the disassembly of the second snap-fastening members, and this retaining surface is advantageously inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tubular portion of the flow-limiting part at an angle less than or equal to 20°, preferably less than or equal to 15°.
[0032] According to one feature, the first attachment mechanism is configured such that the force required to assemble the container with the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part and the closure, pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, has a predetermined value, below a given threshold value, which allows an automated assembly of said sub-assembly with the container on a packaging line.
[0033] According to one feature, the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part and the closure, pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, is configured to be assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism by a simple displacement of the sub-assembly and the container toward each other along the direction of the aligned longitudinal axes of the tubular portions of the flow-limiting part and the container.
[0034] In one embodiment, the closure comprises a chamber for an active material intended to control the atmosphere within the container, and a side wall of the chamber forms a contact surface of the closure which is part of the second attachment mechanism and configured to cooperate by friction with a corresponding contact surface of the flow-limiting part. In this embodiment, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure may be determined by a filling rate of the chamber with the active material. Thus, an adjustment of the holding force of the second attachment mechanism may be obtained through a modulation of the quantity of active material introduced in the chamber of the closure.
[0035] In another embodiment, the closure comprises a chamber for an active material intended to control the atmosphere within the container, a side wall of the chamber being surrounded by an outer sealing skirt, with a gap between the side wall and the outer sealing skirt, which outer sealing skirt forms a contact surface of the closure which is part of the second attachment mechanism and configured to cooperate by friction with a corresponding contact surface of the flow-limiting part. In this embodiment, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure is independent from a filling rate of the chamber with the active material, and it may be adjusted according to the design of the outer sealing skirt and the mechanical properties of its constitutive material.
[0036] According to one feature, each of the three components of the dispensing device, i.e. the container, the flow-limiting part and the closure, is based on a suitable polymer material. Examples of suitable polymer materials include, without limitation, radical or linear high- and low-density polyethylene, copolymers of ethylene such as for example ethylene vinyl acetates, ethylene ethyl acrylates, ethylene butyl acrylates, ethylene maleic anhydrides, ethylene alpha olefins, regardless of the methods of polymerization or modification by grafting, polypropylene, polybutylene, polyisobutylene. Polyolefins are advantageously selected, for cost reasons and because they are easy to use. However, other polymer materials can also be considered, such as polyvinyl chloride, copolymers of vinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chlorides, polystyrenes, copolymers of styrene, derivatives of cellulose, polyamides, polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyethylene terephthalates, polybutylene terephthalates, copolyesters, polyphenylene oxides, polymethyl methacrylates, copolymers of acrylate, fluoride polymers, polyimides, polyurethanes, etc.
[0037] Combinations of these polymers can be used, if desired. The polymers used to produce the three components of the dispensing device, i.e. the container, the flow-limiting part and the closure, can also contain one or more additives such as fibers, expanding agents, additives such as stabilizers and colorants, sliding agents, demolding agents, adhesion agents or reinforced catching agents and / or any others according to the requirements of usage.
[0038] According to one embodiment, in the assembled configuration of the dispensing device, the first and second attachment mechanisms are positioned within the container and, in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the tubular portion of the container, the first attachment mechanism is further away from the open end of the container than the second attachment mechanism. Since the rigidity of the container increases away from its open end, such an arrangement contributes to a higher holding force of the first attachment mechanism compared to that of the second attachment mechanism.
[0039] According to a second aspect, a subject of the invention is a dispensing device for storing and dispensing unit products, including a container, a flow-limiting part and a closure, the dispensing device comprising: a first attachment mechanism between the container and the flow-limiting part, the first attachment mechanism involving friction between an internal contact surface of the container and an external contact surface of the flow-limiting part, and a second attachment mechanism between the flow-limiting part and the closure, the second attachment mechanism involving friction between an internal contact surface of the flow-limiting part and an external contact surface of the closure, wherein: a deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 1%, the deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface of the container and a maximum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the container and assembled with the closure by means of the second attachment mechanism, and a deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is lower than the deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism while being less than or equal to 2.5%, the deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface of the flow-limiting part and a maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface of the closure, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the closure and assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism.
[0040] Thanks to such a controlled difference between the deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism and the deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism, the dispensing device according to the second aspect of the invention guarantees a high level of sealing between the three components of the dispensing device. In particular, the sealing properties of the three-part dispenser device with two sealing interfaces may be substantially equivalent to the sealing properties of a two-part device comprising only a container and a closure with a single sealing interface. In this way, a dispensing device according to the second aspect of the invention makes it possible to preserve sensitive unit products stored in the device, while offering flow reduction properties for the distribution of the unit products and allowing easy opening of the closure by a user.
[0041] Another subject of the invention is a method for assembling and filling a dispensing device as described above, comprising steps in which: the closure is assembled with the flow-limiting part by means of the second attachment mechanism; the container is filled with unit products; the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part and the closure, pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, is assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism.
[0042] When the closure of the dispensing device comprises a chamber for an active material, a side wall of which forms a contact surface which is part of the second attachment mechanism as described above, the method advantageously comprises steps in which: the chamber of the closure is filled with an active material; the closure having its chamber filled with the active material is assembled with the flow-limiting part by means of the second attachment mechanism; the container is filled with unit products; the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part and the closure, pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, is assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0043] Features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description of several embodiments of a dispensing device and a method according to the invention, this description being given merely by way of example and with reference to the appended drawings in which: Figure 1 is a perspective view of a dispensing device according to a first embodiment of the invention; Figure 2 is a perspective view of the dispensing device of Figure 1, in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the container and assembled with the closure by means of the second attachment mechanism; Figure 3 is a perspective view of the dispensing device of Figure 1, in a configuration where the flow-limiting part is disassembled from the closure and assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism; Figure 4 is a cross section according to plane IV of Figure 1; Figure 5 is a view at larger scale of the detail V of Figure 4; Figure 6 is a cross section similar to Figure 4 for a dispensing device according to a second embodiment of the invention; Figure 7 is a view at larger scale of the detail VII of Figure 6; and Figure 8 is a view similar to Figure 7 for a dispensing device according to a third embodiment of the invention. ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0044] In the first embodiment shown in Figure 1 to 5, the dispensing device 1 is intended for the storage and the dispensing of sensitive unit products, such as diagnostic test strips, or nutraceutical or pharmaceutical products e.g. in the form of pills, lozenges or tablets. The dispensing device 1 comprises three components, including a container 2 for storing the unit products, a flow-limiting part 4 for dispensing the unit products in a controlled manner, preferably unit-by-unit, and a closure 6 for re-closably closing the container 2. In the example shown in the figures, the dispensing device 1 has a cylindrical shape centered on a longitudinal axis X 1 , it being understood that other shapes are also possible in the context of the invention.
[0045] The container 2 comprises a bottom wall 21, a peripheral wall 22 and an open end 25 on the opposite side from the bottom wall 21. The open end 25 is intended to be closed by the closure 6, after insertion of the flow-limiting part 4. The flow-limiting part 4 is configured to prevent the inadvertent discharge of more than one product at a time. To this end, the flow-limiting part 4 comprises an annular wall 41 with a peripheral rim 47 at one end, from which extends a substantially convex guide portion 44. The convex guide portion 44 comprises three curved legs which connect the peripheral rim 47 to a central orifice 49 while delimiting between them three dispensing apertures 48. The convex guide portion 44 ensures the return of a possible excess products that may have been dispensed back in the container 2 through the dispensing apertures 48.
[0046] The closure 6 comprises a top wall 61 and a side wall 62 extending therefrom. The top wall defines a peripheral gripping portion 63, which may comprise ridges or other protruding features configured to facilitate gripping. As clearly visible in Figure 4, the closure 6 comprises a chamber 67 for receiving an active material 7 capable of regulating the atmosphere in the container 2, in particular a desiccant and / or an oxygen scavenger. The chamber 67, delimited between the top wall 61 and the side wall 62, is closed by a gas-permeable cover 8 which retains the active material 7 inside the chamber. In the represented example, the gas-permeable cover 8 is a cardboard held at its periphery by thinner extensions of the side wall 62 which have been crimped. In other embodiments, the gas-permeable cover 8 may be a porous membrane secured to the distal end of the side wall 62, e.g. by heat-sealing, ultrasonic welding, overmolding, etc.
[0047] In this first embodiment, by way of a non-limiting example: all of the container 2, the flow-limiting part 4 and the closure 6 are obtained by injection molding of polymer materials; the constitutive polymer material of the container 2 is a polypropylene having a tensile module of 1350 MPa (ISO527) and a flexural modulus of 1200 MPa (ASTM D790); the constitutive polymer material of the flow-limiting part 4 is a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) having a tensile modulus of 200 MPa (ISO527) and a Melt Flow Index (MFI) of 1.5 g / 10 min (ISO1133-1, 190°C / 2.16 kg); the constitutive polymer material of the closure 6 is a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) having a tensile module of 140 MPa (ISO527), a flexural modulus of 130 MPa (ASTM D790) and a Melt Flow Index (MFI) of 7.5 g / 10 min (ISO1133-1, 190°C / 2.16 kg). According to an advantageous feature, the constitutive polymer material of the flow-limiting part 4 is a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) containing an antiblocking agent.
[0048] The dispensing device 1 comprises a first attachment mechanism between the container 2 and the flow-limiting part 4, and a second attachment mechanism between the flow-limiting part 4 and the closure 6. The first attachment mechanism comprises an interference press fit between the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2 and the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4, combined with a snap-fastening connection between an inner peripheral groove 24 of the peripheral wall 22 of the container and an outer peripheral ring 42 of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part. The second attachment mechanism only comprises an interference press fit between the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4 and an outer peripheral bulge 64 of the side wall 62 of the closure 6.
[0049] The disassembly of both the first and second attachment mechanisms involves friction between contact surfaces. More precisely, the disassembly of the first attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface 23 formed by an upper portion of the peripheral wall 22 of the container including the inner groove 24, and an external contact surface 43 formed by the outer peripheral ring 42 of the flow-limiting part. The inner groove 24 of the container has a retaining surface S 24 , which forms a geometrical hard point for the disassembly of the outer ring 42 out of the inner groove 24. Advantageously, in this example, the retaining surface S 24 is inclined, with respect to the direction of the longitudinal axis X 1 , at an angle α of the order of 22°, i.e. higher than 20°. Such a relatively high inclination angle α of the retaining surface S 24 ensures a strong resistance to disassembly of the first attachment mechanism.
[0050] The disassembly of the second attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface 45 formed by the flat annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part and an external contact surface 65 formed by the outer bulge 64 of the side wall 62 of the closure. Interestingly, in this first embodiment, since the contact surface 65 of the closure is defined by the side wall 62 delimiting the chamber 67, the maximum circumference of the contact surface 65 of the closure may be determined by a filling rate of the chamber 67 with the active material. Thus, an adjustment of the holding force of the second attachment mechanism may be obtained through a modulation of the quantity of active material introduced in the chamber 67. In this first embodiment, since the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part is flat, there is no geometrical hard point on the way for the disassembly of the outer bulge 64 relative to the flat wall 41. As the flat annular wall 41 is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis X 1 of the dispensing device, in this example, the inclination angle β of the retaining surface formed by the flat annular wall 41, with respect to the direction of the longitudinal axis X 1 , is substantially zero. It is understood that the flow-limiting part 4 has a draft angle of between 0.5° and 2°, but the inclined surface resulting from this draft angle is not a retention surface since the annular wall 41 flares toward the free end of the flow-limiting part 4 opposite from the convex guide portion 44.
[0051] In this first embodiment, the deformation required for the disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is selected to be higher than or equal to 1%, thanks to the selection of appropriate values for the inner diameter of the upper portion of the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2 located between the inner groove 24 and the open end 25 of the container, the diameter at the bottom of the inner groove 24 of the container, and the outer diameter at the apex of the outer ring 42 of the flow-limiting part 4. The inner diameter of the upper portion of the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2 defines the minimum circumference L 23 of the contact surface 23 of the container, whereas the outer diameter at the apex of the outer ring 42 of the flow-limiting part 4 defines the maximum circumference L 43 of the contact surface 43 of the flow-limiting part. It is noted that the values of the minimum circumference L 23 and the maximum circumference L 43 are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 is disassembled from the container 2 and assembled with the closure 6 by means of the second attachment mechanism, which corresponds to the configuration shown in Figure 3. By way of example, in this illustrative embodiment, the minimum circumference L 23 is 94.3 mm; the maximum circumference L 43 is 96.1 mm; the deformation required for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is 1.9%.
[0052] In the same way, the deformation required for the disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is selected to be less than or equal to 2.5%, thanks to the selection of appropriate diameters for the upper portion of the flat annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4 and the outer bulge 64 of the closure 6 which define, respectively, the minimum circumference L 45 of the contact surface 45 of the flow-limiting part and the maximum circumference L 65 of the contact surface 65 of the closure. Here, it is noted that the values of the minimum circumference L 45 and the maximum circumference L 65 are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 is disassembled from the closure 6 and assembled with the container 2 by means of the first attachment mechanism, which corresponds to the configuration shown in Figure 2. By way of example, in this illustrative embodiment, the minimum circumference L 45 is 86.1 mm; the maximum circumference L 65 is 87.3 mm; the deformation required for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is 1%.
[0053] The respective holding forces of the first attachment mechanism and the second attachment mechanism of the dispensing device 1 according to the first embodiment have been determined using an automated force tester (Chatillon TCD200).Holding force of the first attachment mechanism
[0054] Several sub-assemblies comprising the container 2 assembled with the flow-limiting part 4 were fixed on the force tester. The flow-limiting part 4 was submitted to a vertical force exerted by a hook that displaces upwardly, i.e. parallel to the longitudinal axis X 1 of the dispensing device. The vertical force was applied to the lower surface of the peripheral rim 47 of the flow-limiting part 4, with a traction speed of 150 mm / min. The vertical force was recorded until the flow-limiting part 4 was removed from the container 2.Holding force of the second attachment mechanism
[0055] Closed dispensing devices 1, comprising all of the container 2, the flow-limiting part 4 and the closure 6 assembled together, were fixed on the force tester. The closure 6 was submitted to a vertical force exerted by a hook that displaces upwardly, i.e. parallel to the longitudinal axis X 1 of the dispensing device. The vertical force was applied to a point of the gripping portion 63 of the closure with a traction speed of 150 mm / min. The vertical force was recorded until the closure 6 was removed from the flow-limiting part 4.
[0056] The corresponding opening forces (N) were recorded in the table below, and the corresponding holding force ratio was computed: First attachment mechanismSecond attachment mechanismHolding force ratioMeasured opening force (N)55.0525.722.155.5826.612.147.3628.031.755.7317.953.154.7924.932.251.4030.341.758.3418.963.151.7320.192.652.9633.711.654.2028.551.9minimum47.3617.951.6maximum58.3433.713.1average53.7125.502.2
[0057] It is noted that the above measurements of the opening force for the first attachment mechanism have been obtained in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 was not assembled with the closure 6 by means of the second attachment mechanism. In practice, the presence of the closure 6 attached to the flow-limiting part 4 by means of the second attachment mechanism increases the holding force of the first attachment mechanism. This is because the sealing pressure applied by the external contact surface 65, formed by the outer bulge 64 of the closure, onto the internal contact surface 45 formed by the flat annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part, tends to increase the outer diameter at the apex of the outer ring 42 of the flow-limiting part 4, which defines the maximum circumference L 4 s of the contact surface 43 of the flow-limiting part.
[0058] As a result, the deformation and the opening force required to deactivate the first attachment mechanism, i.e. to disassemble the flow-limiting part 4 from the container 2, increases when the closure 6 is assembled with the flow-limiting part 4 by means of the second attachment mechanism, compared to when the closure 6 is not assembled with the flow-limiting part 4. Hence, in the table above, the data of the opening force for the first attachment mechanism and of the holding force ratio are underestimated compared to a case where the opening force for the first attachment mechanism is measured in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 is assembled with the closure 6 by means of the second attachment mechanism.
[0059] The air-tightness of several closed dispensing devices 1 of the first embodiment, comprising the container 2, the flow-limiting part 4 and the closure 6 assembled together, has also been determined, through measurements of the Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) according to ASTM-D7709. To evaluate the leak rate induced by the double sealing interface at the first and second attachment mechanisms, the WVTR values of the dispensing devices 1 have been compared to reference values obtained for the same containers 2 sealed in a moisture tight manner. In this example, WVTR reference values were obtained by sealing an aluminum foil seal to the open end 25 of the containers. Alternatively, WVTR reference values for the containers alone may be obtained by gluing a metal plate to the open end 25 of the containers with epoxy or hot-melt adhesive, or by using a moisture tight reference closure, which may also optionally be tightened to the container with a sealing resin.
[0060] The WVTR measurements were recorded in the table below. In each case, the measured values were obtained for a container 2 molded from polypropylene; a flow limiting part 4 and a closure 6 molded from low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The container had a wall thickness of 1.1 mm, a circular cross section with external diameter of 32.2 mm and an overall height of 53 mm. WVTR of container (40°C, 75%RH)WVTR of dispensing device (40°C, 75%RH)Minimum0.94 mg / day.pack0.92 mg / day.packMaximum0.99 mg / day.pack1.12 mg / day.packMean0.96 mg / day.pack0.99 mg / day.packStandard deviation0.0170.079RSD (%)0.8%3.5%
[0061] The absolute value of the WVTR varies according to dimensional parameters (exchange surface resulting from height and diameter, wall thickness) and material selection. However, it has been observed that, when the holding force ratio of the first and second attachment mechanisms is selected in the range of the invention, the sealing properties of the three-part dispenser device with two sealing interfaces are substantially equivalent to the sealing properties obtainable for a two-part device comprising only a container and a closure with a single sealing interface. As shown above, the WVTR of the dispensing device 1, comprising all of the container 2, the flow-limiting part 4 and the closure 6 assembled together, is less than or equal to 1.2 times a reference WVTR measured for the container alone sealed in a moisture tight manner.
[0062] Thus, the dispensing device 1 of the first embodiment, having a holding force ratio in the range of the invention, makes it possible to preserve sensitive unit products stored in the device, while offering flow reduction properties for the distribution of the unit products and allowing an easy opening of the closure by a user, in particular with an opening force of the closure of less than 35 N.
[0063] In the second embodiment shown in Figures 6 and 7, elements that are similar to those of the first embodiment have the same references. The dispensing device 1 of the second embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that the sealing portion of the closure 6 is formed by an outer sealing skirt 66 of the closure, instead of the side wall 62 of the chamber 67. In this second embodiment, the side wall 62 of the chamber 67 is surrounded by the outer sealing skirt 66, with a gap between the side wall 62 and the outer sealing skirt 66. The outer sealing skirt 66 forms a contact surface 68 of the closure which is part of the second attachment mechanism and configured to cooperate by friction with the contact surface 45 of the flow-limiting part.
[0064] As in the first embodiment, the first attachment mechanism comprises an interference press fit between the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2 and the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4, combined with a snap-fastening connection between an inner peripheral groove 24 of the peripheral wall 22 of the container and an outer peripheral ring 42 of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part. The disassembly of the first attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface 23 formed by an upper portion of the peripheral wall 22 of the container including the inner groove 24, and an external contact surface 43 formed by the outer peripheral ring 42 of the flow-limiting part. The inner groove 24 of the container has a retaining surface S 24 inclined, with respect to the direction of the longitudinal axis X 1 , at an angle α of the order of 22°, i.e. higher than 20°.
[0065] In this second embodiment, the second attachment mechanism comprises an interference press fit between the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4 and the outer skirt 66 of the closure 6, combined with a snap-fastening connection between an inner peripheral groove 46 of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part and an outer peripheral bulge 67 of the outer skirt 66 of the closure. The disassembly of the second attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface 45 formed by the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part including the inner groove 46, and an external contact surface 68 formed by the outer bulge 69 of the outer skirt 66 of the closure. The inner groove 46 of the flow-limiting part has a retaining surface S 46 inclined, with respect to the direction of the longitudinal axis X 1 , at an angle β of the order of 12°, i.e. less than 15°.
[0066] Here again, the deformation required for the disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is selected to be higher than or equal to 1%, thanks to the selection of appropriate values for the inner diameter of the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2, the diameter at the bottom of the inner groove 24 of the container 2 and the outer diameter at the apex of the outer ring 42 of the flow-limiting part 4, where the inner diameter of the peripheral wall 22 of the container 2 defines the minimum circumference L 23 of the contact surface 23 of the container, whereas the outer diameter at the apex of the outer ring 42 of the flow-limiting part 4 defines the maximum circumference L 43 of the contact surface 43 of the flow-limiting part. The values of the minimum circumference L 23 and the maximum circumference L 43 are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 is disassembled from the container 2 and assembled with the closure 6 by means of the second attachment mechanism, which corresponds to the configuration shown in Figure 3. By way of example, in this illustrative second embodiment, the minimum circumference L 23 is 94.3 mm; the maximum circumference L 43 is 96.8 mm; the deformation required for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is 2.6%.
[0067] In the same way, the deformation required for the disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is selected to be less than or equal to 2.5%, thanks to the selection of appropriate diameters for the inner diameter of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4, the diameter at the bottom of the inner groove 46 of the flow-limiting part 4 and the outer diameter at the apex of the outer bulge 69 of the closure, where the inner diameter of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part 4 defines the minimum circumference L 45 of the contact surface 45 of the flow-limiting part, whereas the apex of the outer diameter of the outer bulge 69 of the closure 6 defines the maximum circumference L 68 of the contact surface 68 of the closure. The values of the minimum circumference L 45 and the maximum circumference L 68 are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part 4 is disassembled from the closure 6 and assembled with the container 2 by means of the first attachment mechanism, which corresponds to the configuration shown in Figure 2. By way of example, in this illustrative embodiment, the minimum circumference L 45 is 85.4 mm; the maximum circumference L 68 is 87.3 mm; the deformation required for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is 2.1%.
[0068] The respective holding forces of the first attachment mechanism and the second attachment mechanism of the dispensing device 1 according to the second embodiment have been determined as in the first embodiment, using an automated force tester (Chatillon TCD200), yielding an average holding force ratio higher than 2.
[0069] In the third embodiment shown in Figure 8, elements that are similar to those of the first and second embodiments have the same references. The dispensing device 1 of the third embodiment differs from the second embodiment only in that the snap-fastening connection is between the outer peripheral bulge 67 of the outer skirt 66 of the closure and an inner peripheral bead 46' of the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part, instead of the inner peripheral groove 46. The disassembly of the second attachment mechanism involves friction between the internal contact surface 45 formed by the annular wall 41 of the flow-limiting part including the inner bead 46', and the external contact surface 68 formed by the outer bulge 69 of the outer skirt 66 of the closure. The inner bead 46' of the flow-limiting part has a retaining surface S 46' inclined, with respect to the direction of the longitudinal axis X 1 , at an angle β of the order of 12°, i.e. less than 15°.
[0070] As can be seen from the above description of several embodiments of a dispensing device according to the invention,
[0071] The invention is not limited to the examples described and shown. In particular, other materials and shapes than those described above can be considered for the three components of a dispensing device according to the invention. For example, in embodiments where the dispensing device is intended for the storage and dispensing of very small unit products such as granules, it is preferable to remove the peripheral rim 47 of the flow-limiting part 4, and connect the legs of the convex guide portion 44 directly to the annular wall 41, to avoid any risk of the granules being trapped in the interspace between the peripheral rim 47 and the closure 6.
Claims
1. Dispensing device (1) for storing and dispensing unit products, including a container (2), a flow-limiting part (4) and a closure (6), the dispensing device comprising: - a first attachment mechanism between a tubular portion (22) of the container (2) and a tubular portion (41) of the flow-limiting part (4), the first attachment mechanism being homogeneous over a circumference of the tubular portions of the container and the flow-limiting part, and - a second attachment mechanism between a tubular portion (41) of the flow-limiting part (4) and a tubular portion (62; 66) of the closure (6), the second attachment mechanism being homogeneous over a circumference of the tubular portions of the flow-limiting part and the closure, wherein a ratio of a holding force of the first attachment mechanism to a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 1.5, preferably higher than or equal to 2, the holding force of the first attachment mechanism being defined as the opening force required to disassemble the flow-limiting part from the container while the flow-limiting part is assembled with the closure by means of the second attachment mechanism, the holding force of the second attachment mechanism being defined as the opening force required to disassemble the closure from the flow-limiting part while the flow-limiting part is assembled with the container by means of the first attachment mechanism, wherein the holding force of the first attachment mechanism and the holding force of the second attachment mechanism are both determined using an opening force applied parallel to a longitudinal axis (X1) of the respective tubular portions and with a given opening speed of 150 mm / min, and wherein a holding force of the second attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 15 N and less than or equal to 55 N, preferably less than or equal to 40 N.
2. Dispensing device according to claim 1, wherein the second attachment mechanism consists of an interference press fit between the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6), without any snap-fastening connection.
3. Dispensing device according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6) are made of polymer-based materials, the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the closure (6) being strictly lower than the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part (4).
4. Dispensing device according to claim 3, wherein the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6) are made of polyolefin-based materials, the polyolefin being the same for the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6) and being selected among polyethylene and polypropylene, the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the closure (6) being strictly lower than the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the flow-limiting part (4).
5. Dispensing device according to claim 3 or claim 4, wherein the container (2) is made of a polymer-based material, the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the container (2) being higher than or equal to the tensile modulus of the polymer-based material of the flow-limiting part (4).
6. Dispensing device according to claim 4, wherein the container (2) is made of a polyolefin-based material, the polyolefin being selected among polyethylene and polypropylene, the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the container (2) being higher than or equal to the tensile modulus of the polyolefin-based material of the flow-limiting part (4).
7. Dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) of the dispensing device (1), comprising the container (2), the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6) assembled together, is less than or equal to 1.2 times the WVTR measured for the same container (2) alone sealed in a moisture tight manner.
8. Dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the disassembly of the first attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface (23) of the container (2) and an external contact surface (43) of the flow-limiting part (4), wherein a deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism is higher than or equal to 1%, the deformation for disassembly of the first attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface (23) of the container and a maximum circumference of the contact surface (43) of the flow-limiting part to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface (43) of the flow-limiting part, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part (4) is disassembled from the container (2) and assembled with the closure (6) by means of the second attachment mechanism.
9. Dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the disassembly of the second attachment mechanism involves friction between an internal contact surface (45) of the flow-limiting part (4) and an external contact surface (65; 68) of the closure (6), wherein a deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism is less than or equal to 2.5%, the deformation for disassembly of the second attachment mechanism being defined as the ratio of, on the one hand, the absolute value of the difference between a minimum circumference of the contact surface (45) of the flow-limiting part and a maximum circumference of the contact surface (65; 68) of the closure to, on the other hand, the maximum circumference of the contact surface (65; 68) of the closure, where the circumference values are taken in a configuration where the flow-limiting part (4) is disassembled from the closure (6) and assembled with the container (2) by means of the first attachment mechanism.
10. Dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the first attachment mechanism comprises both an interference press fit between the container (2) and the flow-limiting part (4), and a snap-fastening connection comprising an inner snap-fastening member (24) of the container and a complementary outer snap-fastening member (42) of the flow-limiting part.
11. Dispensing device according to claim 10, wherein the inner snap-fastening member (24) of the container (2) has a retaining surface (S24) which forms a hard point for the disassembly of the snap-fastening members (24, 42), this retaining surface (S24) being inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis (X1) of the tubular portion (22) of the container at an angle (α) higher than or equal to 15°, preferably higher than or equal to 20°.
12. Dispensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the closure (6) comprises a chamber (67) for an active material (7) intended to control the atmosphere within the container (2), a side wall (62) of the chamber forming a contact surface (65) of the closure which is part of the second attachment mechanism and configured to cooperate by friction with a corresponding contact surface (45) of the flow-limiting part.
13. Dispensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the closure (6) comprises a chamber (67) for an active material intended to control the atmosphere within the container (2), a side wall (62) of the chamber being surrounded by an outer sealing skirt (66), with a gap between the side wall (62) and the outer sealing skirt (66), the outer sealing skirt (66) forming a contact surface (68) of the closure which is part of the second attachment mechanism and configured to cooperate by friction with a corresponding contact surface (45) of the flow-limiting part.
14. Dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein, in the assembled configuration of the dispensing device, the first and second attachment mechanisms are positioned within the container (2) and, in the direction of the longitudinal axis (X1) of the tubular portion (22) of the container, the first attachment mechanism is further away from the open end (25) of the container than the second attachment mechanism.
15. Method for assembling and filling a dispensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising steps in which: - the closure (6) is assembled with the flow-limiting part (4) by means of the second attachment mechanism; - the container (2) is filled with unit products; - the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6), pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, is assembled with the container (2) by means of the first attachment mechanism.
16. Method for assembling and filling a dispensing device according to claim 12, comprising steps in which: - the chamber (67) of the closure (6) is filled with an active material (7); - the closure (6) having its chamber (67) filled with the active material (7) is assembled with the flow-limiting part (4) by means of the second attachment mechanism; - the container (2) is filled with unit products; - the sub-assembly comprising the flow-limiting part (4) and the closure (6), pre-assembled by means of the second attachment mechanism, is assembled with the container (2) by means of the first attachment mechanism.