Weighing system and coupling strip
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- EP · EP
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- SARTORIUS LAB INSTR GMBH & CO KG
- Filing Date
- 2024-06-18
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-06
AI Technical Summary
Existing weighing systems face challenges in achieving high-resolution precision while being robust enough to withstand lateral acceleration forces, particularly during transport, due to limitations in coupling band designs that fail to adequately decouple non-vertical force components.
A coupling band with specific functional areas, including a thin-point joint and a resilience region, designed to provide localized and continuous pivot axes, respectively, made from resilient materials like copper-beryllium alloy, allowing for precise pivoting movements and enhanced robustness against acceleration forces.
The solution enables the construction of extremely high-resolution and robust scales that effectively decouple non-vertical forces, reducing packaging efforts and ensuring the scales remain undamaged during transport, while maintaining precise weight measurements.
Smart Images

Figure EP2024066972_02012025_PF_FP_ABST
Abstract
Description
[0001] Weighing system and coupling belt
[0002] Description
[0003] Field of the invention
[0004] The invention relates to a weighing system comprising a base, a load receiver coupled to the base in a vertically movable manner by means of a parallel link arrangement, and a lever pivotally connected to the base by means of a lever joint, with a first lever arm arranged on one side of the lever joint and a second lever arm arranged on the other side of the lever joint and configured to receive a sensor arrangement, wherein the first lever arm is coupled to the load receiver in a vertical force-transmitting manner by means of a coupling band fixed both to it and to the load receiver.
[0005] The invention further relates to a coupling band, consisting of a sheet metal strip, for the vertical force-transmitting coupling between the load receiver of such a weighing system and the first lever arm of its lever.
[0006] State of the art
[0007] Generic weighing systems and coupling belts for them are known from DE 30 12 344 A1.
[0008] The central component of an electronic scale, particularly one operating according to the principle of electromagnetic compensation, is its weighing system. The term "weighing system" refers to the mechanical lever mechanism by which a load carrier of the scale, which holds the load to be weighed, is connected to the scale's electronic sensor, typically a moving coil arrangement with optical lever position detection. The weighing system comprises a base by means of which it can be fixed to a platform or housing of the scale. A so-called load receptor is hinged to said base via a parallel linkage arrangement, often referred to as a Roberval mechanism. The load carrier mentioned above is fixed directly or indirectly to the load receptor in the final assembly state of the scale.The parallel link arrangement serves to prevent tilting of the load receptor or the weighing object carrier, at least during small deflections of the load receptor, which essentially occur on a circular arc with the radius of one parallel link length. Furthermore, a typical weighing system comprises a lever that serves to transmit displacement and force and is articulated to the base via a lever joint. A first lever arm of said lever is coupled to the load receptor in order to transmit the movement caused by the weight of the weighing object to the lever. A second lever arm of the lever is typically equipped with a receptacle for lever-side components of an electronic sensor, in particular a plunger coil, which interacts in a generally known manner and not further relevant here with other base-side sensor components mounted on the base, in particular a magnet pot.Such a weighing system thus represents the “heart” of a scale, although similar weighing systems can be used in scales that are otherwise differently equipped.
[0009] For the aforementioned coupling between the first lever band and the load receptor, a connection, often referred to as a coupling, is required. This connection is suitable for transmitting vertical forces between the load receptor and the first lever arm, while also being sufficiently flexible to achieve decoupling with respect to any non-vertical force components. As mentioned, a parallel link mechanism can prevent the load receptor from tilting, but cannot prevent its circular arc movement, along with the inherent vertical and horizontal movement components. However, these must not be transmitted to the lever, as the corresponding non-vertical force components would distort the measured weight value, which is unacceptable, especially with extremely high-resolution precision scales.To combine both requirements, namely vertical coupling and non-vertical decoupling, the couplings can be designed in the form of thin sheet metal strips, as in the generic publication mentioned above. If the coupling strip is sufficiently thin, non-vertical decoupling can be achieved even for extremely high-resolution scales. However, it has been found that such weighing systems are extremely susceptible to lateral acceleration forces, such as those typically encountered during transport, especially when shipping scales. Therefore, considerable effort must be put into packaging the scales to ensure that they arrive at the recipient with intact coupling strips.The theoretical approach of fixing the coupling strap to the load receptor and the first lever arm only after the scale has been set up at the destination is practically impossible to implement for legal calibration reasons.
[0010] DE 32 42 954 A1 discloses a coupling designed as a coupling rod, which has a functional area tapered in thickness and width near its respective fixing areas on the load receptor and the first lever arm. Together, these functional areas are intended to provide the elasticity of the coupling required for non-vertical decoupling. While such coupling rods are more robust than coupling bands, they cannot achieve the degree of non-vertical decoupling required for extremely high-resolution precision scales.
[0011] As a purely exemplary embodiment of the preferred field of application of the present invention, comparators and high-resolution precision balances, in particular ultra-microbalances and microbalances with load ranges between 2 g and 200 g at resolutions of 0.1 pg, 1 pm or up to 5 pg, are mentioned.
[0012] Task
[0013] It is the object of the present invention to provide a weighing system and a coupling belt therefor that enable the construction of extremely high-resolution and at the same time robust scales.
[0014] Description of the invention
[0015] This object is achieved in conjunction with the features of the preamble of claim 1 in that the coupling band has two functional areas which are distinguished from immediately adjacent areas by a reduced width and reduced thickness, namely
[0016] - a thin-point joint, which has a thickness that initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band and then increases again after reaching a point-like minimum thickness in order to define a localized, first pivot axis that extends parallel to the width direction and perpendicular to the length direction of the coupling band, and
[0017] - a resilience region which, in the length direction of the coupling band, has a thickness which initially decreases, remains constant after reaching a thickness minimum over a distance at least corresponding to its width and then increases again in order to define a continuous set of second pivot axes parallel to the first pivot axis.
[0018] The object is further achieved in conjunction with the features of the preamble of claim 16 in that two functional areas are formed spaced apart from one another in the length direction of the sheet metal strip, which are distinguished from immediately adjacent areas by a reduced width and reduced thickness, namely
[0019] - a thin-point joint, which has a thickness that initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band and then increases again after reaching a point-like minimum thickness in order to define a localized, first pivot axis that extends parallel to the width direction and perpendicular to the length direction of the coupling band, and
[0020] - a resilience region which, in the length direction of the coupling band, has a thickness which initially decreases, remains constant after reaching a thickness minimum over a distance at least corresponding to its width and then increases again in order to define a continuous set of second pivot axes parallel to the first pivot axis.
[0021] Preferred embodiments are the subject of the dependent claims.
[0022] The special feature of the present invention lies in the special shape of the coupling band, which is preferably made of a spring-elastic metal material, e.g., a copper-beryllium alloy. First, the idea of multiple functional areas, which are characterized by tapering in the thickness and width directions from the immediately adjacent areas, hereinafter referred to as secondary areas, is transferred to systems with coupling bands. However, the special design of the functional areas, which cannot be adopted due to the different basic shapes of coupling rods on the one hand and coupling bands on the other, plays a key role in the effectiveness of the invention.In particular, the functional region referred to as the thin-point joint is designed to form a precisely localized, first pivot axis around which the immediately adjacent secondary regions can perform a precisely defined pivoting movement relative to one another. The second functional region, in contrast, forms a longer resilience region, which, in contrast to the thin-point joint, does not define a precisely localized pivot axis, but rather an elongated pivot region. This can be understood as a continuous set of individual, parallel, second pivot axes, whereby the secondary regions immediately adjacent to the resilience region can perform a pivoting movement relative to one another about one (arbitrary) or several of these second pivot axes simultaneously, depending on the specific forces acting in the individual case.For the purely non-vertical decoupling of the load receptor and lever, two spaced-apart thin-point joints or a sufficiently long resilience region might be sufficient. However, with regard to robustness against acceleration forces, such as those encountered during transport or shipping of weighing systems or complete scales, this special combination of thin-point joint and resilience region has proven particularly effective, without the mechanical interactions and force distributions being fully understood in detail. Rather, the robustness achieved by the invention must be viewed as an unforeseen, surprising effect.
[0023] Starting from an immediately adjacent secondary area, the thickness profile of the thin-point joint can be described such that the thickness of the coupling band decreases continuously, particularly monotonically, i.e., without any "counter-increases," and, after reaching the Dieken minimum, immediately increases again, particularly monotonically, until the thickness of the adjacent secondary area is reached. It has proven advantageous to design the surface profile symmetrically, preferably in both the length direction and the thickness direction. In particular, the thin-point joint can have a biconcave or bifacial V-shaped thickness profile in the length direction.In the first case, the surface profile on both main surfaces of the coupling band follows a circular arc, with the vertices of the circular arcs on the front and back sides being colocated in the longitudinal direction to form the sharply localized die-cut minimum according to the invention. In the second case, the surface profile of the two main surfaces of the coupling band initially follows a straight-line descending and then a straight-line ascending slope (V-shape), with the two contact lines of the descending and ascending slopes on the front and back sides of the coupling band being colocated in the longitudinal direction to form the sharply localized die-cut minimum according to the invention. Although other thickness profile shapes are conceivable in principle, the ones mentioned have proven particularly advantageous with regard to production, the preferred method of which will be discussed in more detail below.
[0024] The precise definition of the pivot axis provided by the thin-point joint can be enhanced by a width profile of the coupling band that corresponds to the thickness profile. Thus, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the thin-point joint has a width that initially decreases monotonically in the longitudinal direction and, after reaching the point-like width minimum colocalized with the associated thickness minimum, increases again monotonically. Here, too, a symmetrical design is particularly advantageous. In particular, the thin-point joint can have a biconcave or bilaterally V-shaped width profile in the longitudinal direction.In the first case, this means that the side edges of the coupling band in the area of the thin-point joint each follow a circular arc, with the vertices of the circular arcs being colocated with one another in the length direction and in particular also with the Dieken minimum. In the second case, the side edges of the coupling band in the area of the thin-point joint initially run in a straight line beveled inwards and, after reaching the width minimum, immediately run again in a straight line beveled outwards, with the two contact lines between the inward and outward-running bevels on both edges of the coupling band being colocated with one another in the length direction and preferably also with the Dieken minimum. The length of the thin-point joint, i.e. the distance between the two secondary regions directly adjacent to the thin-point joint on both sides, is preferably between 2 mm and 20 mm, in particular between 4 mm and 6 mm.The thickness of the thin-point joint at its Dieken minimum is preferably between 10 pm and 100 pm, in particular between 40 pm and 60 pm.
[0025] The same preferably applies to the shape of the resilience region, although—and this is the key difference between a thin-point joint and a resilience region—the region of minimal thickness extends over a larger length of the coupling band. The end regions of the resilience region, i.e., the transition regions to the immediately adjacent secondary regions, preferably have a bifacially rounded or sloped thickness profile in the longitudinal direction. In the first case, the surface profile of the two main surfaces between the immediately adjacent secondary region and the region of minimal thickness follows a circular path. In the second case, the surface profile follows a straight slope.
[0026] The resilience region is also preferably designed with a corresponding thickness and width profile. In other words, this means that the resilience region initially decreases in width along its length and then increases again after reaching a minimum width colocalized with the associated die minimum. The end regions of the resilience region can have a bilaterally rounded or straight-line slanted width profile along its length.
[0027] Advantageously, the length of the resilience region, i.e., the distance between the adjacent adjacent regions on both sides, is between 5 mm and 50 mm, in particular between 6 mm and 10 mm. The thickness of the resilience region in the area of its die minimum is preferably between 50 pm and 150 pm, in particular between 80 pm and 120 pm.
[0028] The length of the entire coupling band is preferably between 20 mm and 150 mm, in particular between 80 mm and 100 mm. The width of the coupling band in the secondary regions is preferably between 5 mm and 10 mm. In a particular embodiment of the invention, the coupling band has not just one, but several resilience regions. These can interact advantageously with regard to robustness, with each resilience region acting individually with regard to non-vertical decoupling, so that the overall achievable degree of decoupling is at least not impaired, and in some cases, can actually be improved.
[0029] As described so far, the inventive design of the coupling belt enables more (thin-point joint) or less (resilience region(s)) sharply localized pivoting movements of the secondary regions of the coupling belt around pivot axes oriented perpendicular to the length and parallel to the width direction. However, the direction of acceleration forces occurring during transport or shipping of weighing systems according to the invention is difficult to predict. It has therefore proven advantageous to additionally provide the inventive coupling belt with a lateral pivoting region that enables pivoting movements around pivot axes oriented perpendicular to the length and width directions.In particular, in a further development of the invention, a lateral pivoting region can be additionally arranged on the coupling belt, in particular in the length direction between the thin-point joint and the resilience region. This lateral pivoting region consists of one or more parallel webs extending in the length direction of the coupling belt, each web having a web width that is less than the thickness of the coupling belt in this region. Due to this relative dimensioning, said webs are more easily bendable in the coupling belt plane defined by the length and width of the coupling belt than perpendicular to it. This thus opens up a further pivoting degree of freedom perpendicular to the pivoting degree of freedom opened up by the thin-point joint and resilience region, which allows the absorption of correspondingly directed acceleration forces. The overall robustness of the weighing system or coupling belt according to the invention is thereby further increased.
[0030] With regard to the production of a coupling band according to the invention, it has proven advantageous to use a method comprising the steps:
[0031] - Providing a coupling band blank made of a resilient metal sheet, - Laser processing the coupling band blank to create lengths of varying thickness and / or width. Compared to machining processes, non-contact laser processing has the advantage of not introducing any mechanical stress into the coupling band. Compared to chemical processes, such as lithography or etching, laser processing is significantly faster and less complex. Furthermore, it has proven extremely valuable in terms of flexibility in shaping the transition areas between functional and secondary areas.
[0032] Regardless of the specific machining method, the blank will preferably have a uniform thickness over its length, which will only be changed in the functional area by machining.
[0033] Further details and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following specific description and drawings.
[0034] Brief description of the drawings
[0035] They show:
[0036] Figure 1: a schematic representation of an inventive
[0037] weighing system,
[0038] Figure 2: a side view of a coupling band according to the invention,
[0039] Figure 3: a top view of the coupling band of Figure 2 and
[0040] Figure 4: a plan view of an alternative embodiment of a coupling band according to the invention.
[0041] Description of preferred embodiments
[0042] Like reference numerals in the figures indicate like or similar elements. Figure 1 shows a weighing system 10 according to the invention already equipped with a load carrier 12. The weighing system 10 comprises a base that serves as the reference point for all movements within the weighing system 10. A load receptor 18 is articulated to the base 14 via a Roberval mechanism with two parallel links 16 for vertical movement (vertical movement arrow 20). The load receptor 18 is coupled to the weighing carrier 12 in such a way that the weight of a weighing object placed on the weighing carrier 12 results in a vertical force being applied to the load receptor 20.
[0043] Furthermore, the base 14 is coupled to a lever 24 via a lever joint 22. The lever 24 has a first lever arm 241, shown to the left of the lever joint 22 in Figure 1, and a second lever arm 242, shown to the right of the lever joint 22 in Figure 1. The coupling between the base 14 and the lever 24 is designed such that the lever 24 can perform a pivoting movement about the lever joint 22 in the drawing plane of Figure 3. A sensor receptacle 243 is arranged in the end region of the second lever arm 242. The sensor receptacle 243 serves to accommodate lever-side sensor components 261, which can interact with base-side sensor components 262 of an electronic sensor 26, which are fixed to the base 14. In particular, the sensor 26 may be a moving coil arrangement which enables a gravimetric measurement according to the principle of electromagnetic compensation known to the person skilled in the art.Within the scope of the invention, however, another type of sensor technology is also conceivable in principle.
[0044] In order to transmit the vertical weight forces exerted by the weighing object on the load receptor 18 to the lever 24, in particular its first lever arm 241, the load receptor 20 is connected to the first lever arm 241 by means of a coupling band 30. In particular, the coupling band 30 can be screwed or otherwise fixed to the load receptor 20 on the one hand and to the first lever arm 241 on the other. Since the deflection movements of both the load receptor 20 and the lever 24 are not purely linear in nature, but follow a circular arc movement, while the weight forces to be measured act purely vertically, the force transmission via the coupling band requires the vertical components to be transmitted with as little loss as possible and the non-vertical components to be decoupled.For this purpose, the coupling band 30 has two functional areas, namely a thin-point joint 32 and a resilience region 34, the details of which will be described below in the context of Figures 2 and 3.
[0045] Figures 2 and 3 show a particularly preferred embodiment of a coupling belt according to the invention, as it can be used in particular for constructing a weighing system according to Figure 1. Figures 2 and 3 will be described together below.
[0046] The coupling band 30 is essentially designed as a specially shaped sheet metal strip, preferably made of a spring-elastic material, in particular a copper-beryllium alloy. Its total length can be, for example, approximately 60 mm. The coupling band 30 comprises several functional regions and regions arranged between or adjacent thereto, which are generally referred to here as secondary regions. The terminal secondary regions 36 primarily serve to fix the coupling band 30 to the load receiver 18 or to the first lever arm 241. They are provided with through holes 361 through which fixing screws can be passed for clamping the coupling band to the load receiver 18 or the first lever arm 241. As a first functional region, a thin-point joint 32 adjacent to the right-hand terminal secondary region 36 is provided in Figures 2 and 3. The thin-point joint 32 is characterized by a taper both in the thickness direction (cf.Figure 2) and in the width direction (cf. Figure 3). In the embodiment shown, both the thickness and width tapers are symmetrical, biconcave in nature. However, the radii of the biconcave constrictions are chosen differently. In particular, the radius of the die taper is chosen to be significantly larger than that of the width taper. In the embodiment shown, the total length of the width taper section is approximately twice the total length of the thickness taper section. The latter can, for example, be approximately 3 mm, so that the former is approximately 6 mm with such dimensions. The die taper is essentially responsible for the function of the thin-point joint 341. The decisive factor here is that a well-defined, well-localized die minimum exists, through which a sharply localized pivot axis 321 is created.As a second functional region, a resilience region 34 adjacent to the left, terminal secondary region 36 is provided in Figures 2 and 3. This region is also characterized by a taper in the thickness direction (see Figure 2) and in the width direction (see Figure 3). The taper in the thickness direction takes the form of bifacially symmetrical inclined ramps 342, which lead to a longer section of constant, minimal thickness. The taper in the width direction, on the other hand, is shaped as bilateral curves that transition into a longer section of constant, minimal width. The total lengths of the taper sections in the thickness direction and in the width direction are selected differently in the illustrated embodiment. In particular, the length of the taper section in the width direction is selected to be longer than the length of the taper section in the thickness direction. The latter can be, for example, approximately 6 mm.The function of resilience region 34 is primarily determined by the tapering in the thickness direction. The decisive factor here is the existence of a longer section with a constant, minimal thickness, which creates a continuous set of pivot axes 341.
[0047] In the illustrated embodiment, a further functional region, namely the lateral pivot region 39, is provided within the central secondary region 38 located between the thin-point joint 32 and the resilience region 34. In the illustrated embodiment, this consists of two elongated through-holes 391 adjacent to one another in the width direction of the coupling band 30, which create a web 392 between one another and between themselves and the respective lateral edge of the secondary region 38. The width of these webs 392 is less than the thickness of the secondary region 38 at this point, resulting in pivotability in the coupling band plane, i.e. in the drawing plane of Figure 3. Embodiments are also conceivable in which more or fewer than the three parallel webs 392 shown in Figure 3 are realized.In particular, it is possible to design the through holes 391 to be open at the sides, so that the marginal webs shown in Figure 3 are omitted and the lateral pivoting region 39 essentially consists only of a centrally arranged web 392. This embodiment exhibits particularly high lateral pivoting elasticity. The interaction of the described functional areas, in particular the thin-point joint 32 and the resilience region 34, leads to the desired non-vertical decoupling of the load receptor 18 and the lever 24, as well as to a particularly robust weighing system 10 with respect to acceleration forces. The packaging required for transporting such weighing systems can therefore be significantly reduced.
[0048] Figure 4 shows an alternative design of the coupling band 30, which, instead of a single resilience region 34, has three resilience regions 34' arranged in parallel and laterally spaced from each other by through holes. Such a design can further increase the robustness of the weighing system without noticeably impairing the decoupling of the non-vertical force components. Furthermore, reference can be made in full to the above statements regarding Figure 3.
[0049] Of course, the embodiments discussed in the specific description and shown in the figures represent only illustrative embodiments of the present invention. In light of the disclosure herein, a broad spectrum of possible variations is available to the skilled person. In particular, there is considerable freedom regarding the choice of the base material for the coupling band. In addition to embodiments made from a single material, coupling band base bodies composed of multiple material components, for example, assembled using additive manufacturing processes, are also conceivable. The specific dimensioning must be adapted, in particular, to the intended use in scales, based on their intended load capacity and resolution.
[0050] List of reference symbols
[0051] 10 Weighing system
[0052] 12 weighing carriers
[0053] 14 Base
[0054] 16 parallel links
[0055] 18 load receptors
[0056] 20 Vertical movement arrow
[0057] 22 Lever joint
[0058] 24 levers
[0059] 241 first lever arm
[0060] 242 second lever arm
[0061] 26 Sensor
[0062] 261 lever-side sensor component
[0063] 262 base side lever component
[0064] 30 coupling band
[0065] 32 Thin joint
[0066] 321 Swivel axis
[0067] 34, 34' Resilience region
[0068] 341 sets of swivel axes
[0069] 36 terminal side area
[0070] 361 through hole
[0071] 38 central side area
[0072] 39 Lateral swivel range
[0073] 391 through hole
[0074] 392 jetty
Claims
Patent claims 1. A weighing system (10) comprising a base (14), a load receiver (18) coupled to the base (14) in a vertically movable manner by means of a parallel link arrangement, and a lever (24) pivotably connected to the base (14) by means of a lever joint (22), with a first lever arm (241) arranged on one side of the lever joint (22) and a second lever arm (242) arranged on the other side of the lever joint (22) and configured to receive a sensor arrangement, wherein the first lever arm (241) is coupled to the load receiver (18) in a vertical force-transmitting manner by means of a coupling band (30) fixed both to the first lever arm and to the load receiver (18), characterized in that the coupling band (30) has two functional areas which are distinguished from immediately adjacent areas by a reduced width and reduced thickness, namely - a thin-point joint (32) which has a thickness which initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band (30) and then increases again after reaching a point-like thickness minimum in order to define a localized, first pivot axis (321) which extends parallel to the width direction and perpendicular to the length direction of the coupling band (30), and - a resilience region (34, 34') which has a thickness which initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band (30), remains constant after reaching a thickness minimum over a distance at least corresponding to its width and then increases again in order to define a continuous family of second pivot axes (341) parallel to the first pivot axis (321).
2. Weighing system (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that the thin-point joint (32) has a biconcave or bifacial V-shaped thickness profile in the longitudinal direction.
3. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the thin-point joint (32) has a width which initially decreases in the longitudinal direction and then increases again after reaching a punctual width minimum colocalized with the associated Dieken minimum.
4. Weighing system (10) according to claim 3, characterized in that the thin-point joint (32) has a biconcave or bilaterally V-shaped width profile in the longitudinal direction.
5. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the thin-point joint (32) has a length between 2 mm and 20 mm, in particular between 4 mm and 6 mm.
6. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the thin-point joint (32) has a thickness of between 10 pm and 100 pm, in particular between 40 pm and 60 pm, at its minimum thickness.
7. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the end regions of the resilience region (34, 34') have a bifacially rounded or oblique thickness profile in the longitudinal direction.
8. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the resilience region (34, 34') has a width which initially decreases in the longitudinal direction and then increases again after reaching a width minimum which extends colocalized with the associated Dieken minimum.
9. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the resilience region (34, 34') has a length between 5 mm and 50 mm, in particular between 6 mm and 10 mm.
10. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the resilience region (34, 34') has a thickness between 50 pm and 150 pm, in particular between 80 pm and 120 pm, in the region of its die minimum.
11. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the coupling band has a plurality of resilience regions (34').
12. Weighing system (10) according to claim 11, characterized in that the plurality of resilience regions (34') are arranged parallel to one another.
13. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that a lateral pivoting region (39) is arranged in the longitudinal direction between the thin-point joint (32) and the resilience region (34, 34'), which consists of one or more parallel webs (392) extending in the longitudinal direction of the coupling band (30), each having a web width which is less than the thickness of the coupling band (30) in this region.
14. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the length of the coupling band (30) is between 20 mm and 150 mm, in particular between 80 mm and 100 mm.
15. Weighing system (10) according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the width of the coupling band (30) outside the functional areas (32; 34, 34') and - if present - the lateral pivoting area (39) is between 5 mm and 10 mm.
16. Coupling band (30), consisting of a sheet metal strip, for the vertical force-transmitting coupling between a load receiver (18) of a weighing system (10) and a first lever arm (241) of a lever (24) of the weighing system (10), characterized in that two functional areas are formed spaced apart from one another in the longitudinal direction of the sheet metal strip, which are distinguished from immediately adjacent areas by a reduced width and reduced thickness, namely - a thin-point joint (32) which has a thickness which initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band (30) and then increases again after reaching a point-like thickness minimum in order to define a localized, first pivot axis (321) which extends parallel to the width direction and perpendicular to the length direction of the coupling band (30), and - a resilience region (34, 34') which has a thickness which initially decreases in the length direction of the coupling band (30), remains constant after reaching a thickness minimum over a distance at least corresponding to its width and then increases again in order to define a continuous family of second pivot axes (341) parallel to the first pivot axis (321).
17. Coupling band (30) according to claim 16, characterized in that it has a plurality of resilience regions (34').
18. Coupling band (30) according to claim 17, characterized in that the plurality of resilience regions (34') are arranged parallel to one another.
19. Coupling band (30) according to one of claims 16 to 18, obtained by - Providing a coupling band blank made of a spring-elastic metal sheet, - Laser processing of the coupling band blank to create lengths of different thickness and / or width.