Frequency response estimation method to compensate for channel differences in distributed acoustic sensing systems
The proposed method normalizes mel-frequency features across channels in distributed acoustic sensing systems, addressing data variability and enabling efficient neural network training with reduced data requirements.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- GB · GB
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- ASELSAN ELEKTRONIK SANAYI & TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Filing Date
- 2022-11-08
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-21
AI Technical Summary
Existing distributed acoustic sensing systems face challenges in handling channels independently, requiring extensive data for neural network training due to variations in the field, and existing channel equalization methods fail to convert data into a standard version across channels.
Implementing two compensation algorithms to generate standardized mel-frequency features as input for neural networks, reducing variance and normalizing features across channels using offline and online frequency response estimation methods.
Enables the use of less training data and smaller neural network architectures for classification and anomalous event detection by normalizing mel-frequency features across channels.
Smart Images

Figure 00000001_0000 
Figure 00000002_0000 
Figure 00000003_0000
Abstract
Description
Technical Field The present invention is related with frequency response estimation method to compensate for channel differences in distributed acoustic sensing systems. Background In the state of art, channels are handled independently from each other. The neural network models trained with these techniques require a lot of data to cover the variation to be encountered in the field. The application numbered CN112147590A discloses a channel equalization method based on response estimation frequency domain fitting. The method takes into account the inconsistency of all signal receiving channels, reduces the influence of noise on the channel response, and eliminates the problems of zero divisor and amplified out-of-band noise in the frequency domain quotient operation. Channel equalization method does not mention about converting the data obtained from all channels into a standard version as if they were taken from a single channel, therefore the method falls short of solving the problem of using too much data to cover the variation in the field of the neural network models trained by dealing with the channels independently from each other. Summary The invention proposes frequency response estimation method to compensate for channel differences in distributed acoustic sensing systems. In the method, two compensation algorithms are presented to generate standardized mel-frequency features, as an input to the neural networks. By this scheme, the variance of mel-frequency feature space is decreased and normalized among different channels. This enables us to use less training data, smaller architectures for classification and anomalous event detection tasks. Brief Description of the Figures Figure 1 shows a sample of visualized DAS(Distributed Acoustic Sensing) data using SNR(Signal to Noise Ratio) values during a vehicle passage. Figure 2 shows block diagram for offline frequency response estimation algorithm. Figure 3 shows mel-spectrogram image of digging activity at channel 280 (record offset 229). Figure 4 show mel-spectrogram image of digging activity at channel 327 (record offset 276) Figure 5 shows block diagram for online frequency response estimation algorithm. Figure 6 shows block diagram for frequency response difference compensation block. Figure 7 shows mel-frequency features normalization (with online compensation algorithm) visualized. Detailed Description Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) systems are based on the principle of accurately measuring Rayleigh scattered reflections of highly coherent light-pulses sent through fiber optic cable. In the interrogator, the level of the laser pulse reflected as a result of Rayleigh scattered is periodically measured. Each measurement of the Rayleigh back scattered laser pulse corresponds to a location along fiber. From now on, these locations will be named as channels. We measure back-scattered laser pulse every 100ns, hence each channel covers 10m interval along fiber (this result obtained using the light speed in the glass). For a field where 10km fiber installed we would obtain 1000 channel signal. When the laser pulse, sent from sensor, returns from the end of the fiber optic cable, a new laser pulse is sent. Then new measurements are taken for new time point. This enables us to detect acoustic vibrations along the fiber optic cable installed. For channels with no activity, we expect to get similar measurement values at different time stamps. However, for channels where activity occurs at nearby, we expect to see large deviations at different time stamps. A sample of DAS data visualized using SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) values is given in Figure 1. In Figure 1; we see a car, during passage of 2500m route. The white lines (high SNR) correspond to vehicle trajectory. As can be observed from the figure, during vehicle movement acoustic vibrations increase along the fiber optic cable. Hence, we obtain high SNR at nearby channels where car passes. As we move along the fiber optic cable, sensitivity of the DAS systems decrease. This results in different frequency responses for each channel. We propose two methods to compensate for decreasing sensitivity along fiber, by estimating frequency response of each channel. First method uses an offline algorithm to estimate frequency response of each channel, second method uses an online algorithm to do so. To estimate frequency response of different channels, offline frequency response estimation algorithm applies following operations consecutively. The block diagram of the offline frequency response estimation algorithm can be seen in Figure 2. • For a total of L channels (every Kth channel fiber optic cable installed-the smaller the K, the better-) get N recording of an impulsive event like digging. In Figure 3 and Figure 4, we can see the mel-spectrogram image for a digging activity at channels 280 and 327 respectively. • For each record, calculate mel-frequency features at the moments where impulsive event occurs. These mel-frequency features, model frequency response of the impulse followed by the response of the medium (commonly soil). After this step we would obtain NxM mel-frequency features where N is the impulsive event number record contains and M is the mel-frequency feature number. If the record in Figure 3 were used for this analysis, we would obtain 8x48 mel-frequency features for the representation of the frequency response of the channel 280. • For each channel where records are taken, get the average of mel-frequency features for different impulsive events. For each channel, this step generates averaged mel-frequency features with size IxM from NxM mel-frequency features generated at the previous step (If we were to apply this step to the record in Figure 3, we would obtain averaged mel-frequency features with size 1x48, from the mel-frequency features with size 8x48, to represent frequency response of the channel 280). After doing this operation for a total of L-channel, we would obtain mel-frequency features with size LxM which represents frequency response of the impulsive activity for different channels. • To be able to cover all channels along fiber optic cable, interpolate previously calculated mel-frequency features (with size LxM) with K (channel interval number used to get a recording along fiber, during analysis) along channel axis. This step will produce CxM mel-frequency features (estimate of the frequency response of each channel), where C is the channel number fiber optic cable installed. • Then calculate mel-frequency transformation coefficients values (with size lxM) for each channel such that when divided by previously calculated mel-frequency features corresponding to same channel, produces mel-frequency features for the C / 2th channel (center channel). This operation effectively finds mel-frequency transformation coefficients for each channel to transform frequency response of the channel to the frequency response of the C / 2th channel. After this step, we will obtain IxM mel-frequency transformation coefficients for each channel. (Total of CxM mel-frequency transformation coefficients for all channels). To estimate frequency response of different channels, online frequency response estimation algorithm applies following operations consecutively. The block diagram of the online frequency response estimation algorithm can be seen in Figure 5. • For each channel calculate the mel-frequency features at every window length W. This step will produce IxM mel-frequency features for each channel. We would obtain total of CxM mel-frequency features for all channels (C is channel number fiber optic cable installed) at every window. • Store mel-frequency features calculated at the previous step for last N windows. In memory we will have NxM mel-frequency features for each channel, and total of CxNxM mel-frequency features for all channels. • Find median mel-frequency feature representation of each channel, using mel-frequency features data generated, at last N windows. This step will produce IxM median mel-frequency features (estimate of the frequency response of the channel) from the NxM mel-frequency features which are generated at last N window for each channel. • After having done above operations for all channels, we would obtain median mel-frequency features (with size CxM, where C is the channel number). We will use these parameters as mel-frequency transformation coefficients to compensate for frequency response differences among channels. After having calculated mel-frequency transformation coefficients (by estimating mel-frequency response of each channel) either with offline or online method for all channels, at runtime do the following operations to compensate frequency response differences among channels. The block diagram of the compensation algorithm can be seen in Figure 6. • Calculate mel-frequency features as usual for each channel. Then for each channel get the corresponding mel-frequency transformation coefficients (with size IxM). • To compensate for differences among frequency response of each channel, divide each mel-frequency feature with the corresponding mel-frequency transformation coefficient to obtain standardized mel-frequency response representation of the channel. • In Figure 7, we can see the result of the online compensation algorithm described, during a train pass. Upper image in the Figure 7, represents uncompensated mel-frequency features, below image represents compensated mel-frequency features. As can be seen from the figure, background noise and foreground activity are clearly separated after compensation scheme. We can apply either of these two compensation algorithms to generate standardized mel-frequency features, as an input to the neural networks. By this scheme we decrease the variance of mel-frequency feature space, and normalize among different channels. This enables us to use less training data, smaller architectures for classification and anomalous event detection tasks.
Claims
1. Frequency response estimation method to compensate for channel differences in distributed acoustic sensing systems comprising steps of:5 • calculating mel-frequency transformation coefficients by estimating mel-frequency response of each channel,• calculating mel-frequency features for each channel and getting the calculated corresponding mel-frequency transformation coefficients,• dividing each mel-frequency feature with the corresponding mel-frequency10 transformation coefficient to obtain standardized mel-frequency responserepresentation of the channel.10 10252. The frequency response estimation method of claim 1 wherein calculating mel-frequency transformation coefficients is an offline method comprising steps of:15 • getting recordings of impulsive events for each channel,• calculating mel-frequency features at the moments where impulsive event occurs for each record,• calculating the average of mel-frequency features for different impulsive events for each channel where records are taken,20 • interpolating the calculated mel-frequency features with channel intervalnumber used to get a recording along fiber along channel axis to be able to cover all channels along fiber optic cable,• calculating mel-frequency transformation coefficients values for each channel such that when divided by calculated mel-frequency features corresponding25 to same channel, produces mel-frequency features for the center channel.
3. The frequency response estimation method of claim 1 wherein calculating mel-frequency transformation coefficients is an online method comprising steps of:• calculating mel-frequency features at every window for each channel,30 • storing the mel-frequency features calculated for last arbitrary chosen numberof windows,• finding median mel-frequency feature representation of each channel, using mel-frequency features data generated, at last chosen number of windows.