Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons for engraftment

Abstract

To provide compositions and methods for obtaining cell populations that may also be used as therapeutic agents.SOLUTION: Provided is an in vitro method for differentiating pluripotent cells, comprising: inducing inhibition of Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling in a cell culture comprising pluripotent cells; and inducing activation of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling and activation of Wingless (Wnt) signaling. Therein the induction of Wnt signaling is performed on the cell culture from a third day to an eleventh day 11 after the start of the induction of inhibition of SMAD signaling to obtain a population of differentiated cells expressing both Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) and LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 α (LMX1A).SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] Government Permits This invention was made in part with government support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) under NIH / NINDS Grant No. NS052671 and NIH / NINDS Grant No. P50 NS047085. Accordingly, the United States Government has certain rights in this invention.

[0002] FIELD OF THE PRESENT APPLICATION The present invention relates to the field of stem cell biology, in particular to the lineage-specific differentiation of pluripotent or multipotent stem cells, which may include, but are not limited to, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) as well as non-embryonic human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), somatic stem cells, stem cells derived from patients with disease, or any other cells capable of lineage-specific differentiation. A method is specifically described for controlling the lineage-specific differentiation of hESCs and / or hiPSCs into floor plate midbrain progenitor cells and then further into a large population of midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons using novel culture conditions. Various uses are further contemplated for the midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons generated using the methods of the present invention, including, but not limited to, in in vitro drug discovery assays, in neurobiological research, and as a therapeutic agent to ameliorate diseases or disorders caused by the loss of dopamine neurons in patients. Further provided are compositions and methods for differentiating midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons from human pluripotent stem cells for use in modeling disease, particularly Parkinson's disease. Additionally, bona fide DA neurons are enriched for markers such as CD142 and A9-type neurons. [Background technology]

[0003] Cell populations that retain the potential to differentiate into multiple specialized cell types are useful for the generation of multiple lineage-specific differentiated cell populations. These cell populations that retain the potential to further differentiate into specialized cells contain pluripotent cells. The source of the pluripotent cells can be embryonic and / or non-embryonic somatic stem cells.

[0004] These lineage-specific differentiated cell populations are believed to be used for cell replacement therapy in patients with diseases that cause a functional deficiency of a particular cell population. In addition to their direct therapeutic value, the lineage-specific differentiated cells are also highly useful research tools for a variety of purposes, including in vitro screening assays to identify, validate, and test the specific function of, or test the delivery of, therapeutic molecules to treat cell lineage-specific diseases.

[0005] Previously, embryonic stem cells and somatic stem cells have been used as therapeutic agents and model systems for neurodegenerative diseases. Research and technological developments related to the controlled differentiation of embryonic stem cells and somatic stem cells have been carried out in the field of diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), such as Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. However, the results of these studies showed that these cells used in vivo had little ability to restore neurological functions in patients, and in many cases caused unfavorable tumor growth in patients.

[0006] Therefore, there is a need for compositions and methods to obtain cell populations that can also be used as therapeutic agents in research to treat diseases that result in the loss of cells with specific functions. Summary of the Invention

[0007] The present invention relates to the field of stem cell biology, in particular to the lineage-specific differentiation of pluripotent or multipotent stem cells, which may include, but are not limited to, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) as well as non-embryonic human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), somatic stem cells, stem cells derived from patients with disease, or any other cells capable of lineage-specific differentiation. A method is specifically described for controlling the lineage-specific differentiation of hESCs and / or hiPSCs into floor plate midbrain progenitor cells and then further into a large population of midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons using novel culture conditions. Various uses are further contemplated for the midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons generated using the methods of the present invention, including, but not limited to, in in vitro drug discovery assays, in neurobiological research, and as a therapeutic agent to ameliorate diseases or disorders caused by the loss of dopamine neurons in patients. Further provided are compositions and methods for differentiating midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons from human pluripotent stem cells for use in modeling disease, particularly Parkinson's disease. Additionally, bona fide DA neurons are enriched for markers such as CD142 and A9-type neurons.

[0008] A kit comprising a first signal transduction inhibitor, a second signal transduction inhibitor, and a third signal transduction inhibitor, wherein the first inhibitor is capable of reducing transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling, the second inhibitor is capable of reducing small mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling, and the third inhibitor is capable of reducing glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) for activation of Wingless (Wnt) signaling. In one embodiment, the first inhibitor is LDN-193189. In another embodiment, the first inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of LDN-193189, derivatives thereof, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the second inhibitor is SB431542. In another embodiment, the second inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of SB431542, derivatives thereof, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the third inhibitor is CHIR99021. In another embodiment, the third inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of CHIR99021, its derivatives, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the kit further comprises a sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator and a fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 8 receptor family signaling activator. In one embodiment, the kit further comprises brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP, and transforming growth factor type beta 3. In one embodiment, the kit further comprises an antibody selected from the group consisting of anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), anti-forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), and anti-LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A). In one embodiment, the kit further comprises a cell selected from the group consisting of a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, an induced pluripotent stem cell, and a genetically engineered cell. In one embodiment, the kit further comprises instructions for differentiating progenitor cells and midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons, hi one embodiment, the kit further comprises instructions for obtaining cells from a patient with Parkinson's disease (PD).

[0009] A composition comprising a cell population contacted with a first signal transduction inhibitor and a second signal transduction inhibitor, wherein more than 40% of the cell population is positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), and the cell population has previously been contacted with a first signal transduction inhibitor, a third signal transduction inhibitor, and a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signal transduction activator, wherein the first inhibitor is capable of reducing transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling, the second inhibitor is capable of reducing glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) signaling for activation of Wingless (Wnt) signaling, and the third inhibitor is capable of reducing small mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling. In one embodiment, the first inhibitor is a small molecule selected from the group consisting of LDN-193189, derivatives thereof, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the second inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of CHIR99021 and inhibitors thereof. In one embodiment, the third inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of SB431542, its derivatives, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II and Smoothened (SMO) receptor small molecule agonists, wherein the agonist is palmorfamine. In some embodiments, the cell population has further been previously contacted with fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8). In one embodiment, the majority of cells comprising the cell population are Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) + LIM+ homeobox transcription factor 1+, α (LMX1A), +NGN2+ and DDC+ floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the cell population is selected from the group consisting of rodent cells, primate cells, and human cells. In one embodiment, the cells are derived from Parkinson's disease (PD) patient cells. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 50% positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2). In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 60% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 70% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 80% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 90% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 95% and up to 100% positive for Forkhead box protein A2.

[0010] A composition comprising an in vitro cell population, wherein a majority of the cells comprising said cell population express tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). + Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) + LIM homeobox transcription factor 1+, alpha (LMX1A) +The composition is floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the greater than 40% of the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are tyrosine hydroxylase positive (TH+). In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 50% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 60% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 70% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 80% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 90% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 95% and up to 100% tyrosine hydroxylase positive. In some embodiments, the cell population comprises a majority of midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are positive for a marker selected from the group consisting of nuclear receptor NURR1 (NR4A2), neuron specific type III beta-tubulin (Tuj1), TTF3, paired-like homeodomain 3 (PITX3), achaete-scute complex (ASCL), early B cell factor 1 (EBF-1), early B cell factor 3 (EBF-3) and transthyretin (TTR). In one embodiment, the midbrain destined FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neuron population is positive for a molecule selected from the group consisting of DA, 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA). In one embodiment, the marker is selected from the group consisting of proteins and nucleic acids. In some embodiments, the midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neuronal population can be transplanted in vivo in a patient selected from the group consisting of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. In one embodiment, the midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons can be transplanted in vivo and can provide dopamine (DA) neuronal function.

[0011] In some embodiments, the present invention provides a composition comprising a cell population contacted with LDN-193189 and CHIR99021, wherein greater than 40% of the cell population is positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), and the cell population has previously been contacted with LDN-193189, SB431542, a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator, and CHIR99021. In one embodiment, the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II and palmorfamine. In one embodiment, greater than 10% of the cell population is double positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) and LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A). In one embodiment, the majority of the cell population is a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the cell population was previously contacted with fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8). In one embodiment, the cell population is selected from the group consisting of rodent cells, primate cells, and human cells. In one embodiment, the human cells are cells derived from a patient with neurological symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). In one embodiment, the cell population is derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In one embodiment, more than 10% of the cell population is selected from the group consisting of forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) double positive and forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) / orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2) double positive cells.

[0012] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for inducing controlled differentiation of cells into a floor plate midbrain progenitor cell population, comprising: a) administering to said cell population a first signal transduction inhibitor, a second signal transduction inhibitor, a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator, and a third signal transduction inhibitor, said first inhibitor capable of reducing transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling, said second inhibitor capable of reducing Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling, and said third inhibitor capable of reducing Wingless (Wnt) signaling. a) providing a third inhibitor capable of reducing Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β (GSK3β) signaling for activation of GSK3β signaling; b) contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor; c) further contacting the cell with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator under conditions for differentiating a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor; and) further contacting the cell with the third inhibitor after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator to differentiate the cell population into a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the contacting with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor is under conditions for giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the contacting with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor is within 1 hour of in vitro cell seeding. In one embodiment, the contacting with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor is within 48 hours of in vitro cell seeding. In one embodiment, said contacting with said first inhibitor and said second inhibitor is within 62 hours of seeding the cells in vitro. In one embodiment, said contacting of said cells with said Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is under conditions capable of giving rise to said differentiated population of floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells.In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is at least 24 hours and up to 36 hours after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is at most 144 hours. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the third inhibitor is under conditions capable of giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the third inhibitor is at least 24 hours and up to 36 hours after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the third inhibitor is at most 192 hours. In one embodiment, the cell population differentiates into the floor plate midbrain progenitor cells by at least 11 days after contacting the cells with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor. In one embodiment, the first inhibitor is SB431542. In one embodiment, the second inhibitor is LDN-193189. In one embodiment, the third inhibitor is CHIR99021. In one embodiment, the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II and palmorfamine. In one embodiment, the method further provides fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8), and contacting the cell population with the FGF8 under conditions capable of giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the FGF8 is for at least 24 hours and up to 36 hours after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor. In one embodiment, the contacting of the cells with the FGF8 is for up to 144 hours. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain progenitor cell population has greater than 40% Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2). + In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain progenitor cell population comprises greater than 40% forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) cells. + LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) ±In one embodiment, the method further comprises step e) of contacting the population of floor-plate mesencephalic progenitor cells with a neuronal maturation medium comprising N2 medium, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) and transforming growth factor type β3 for differentiation of floor-plate mesencephalic progenitor cells into floor-plate mesencephalic dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the method further comprises step e) of contacting the population of floor-plate mesencephalic progenitor cells with a neuronal maturation medium comprising B27 nutritional supplement for differentiation of floor-plate mesencephalic progenitor cells into floor-plate mesencephalic dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the cells contacted with neurobasal medium containing B27 supplement are contacted with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), and transforming growth factor type beta 3 for differentiation of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells into floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are contacted with forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) + LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) + , nuclear receptor-related 1 protein (NURR1) + and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) + In one embodiment, greater than 40% of the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons express tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). +In one embodiment, the population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons differentiates by at least 25 days after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are positive for a molecular identifying marker. In one embodiment, the marker is selected from the group consisting of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), LIM homeobox transcription factor 1, dompamine, 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), alpha, nuclear receptor NURR1 (NR4A2), neuron-specific type III beta-tubulin (Tuj1), TTF3, paired-like homeodomain 3 (PITX3), achaete-scute complex (ASCL), early B-cell factor 1 (EBF-1), early B-cell factor 3 (EBF-3), transthyretin (TTR), synapsin, dopamine transporter (DAT), and G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir3.2 / GIRK2). In one embodiment, the molecule is selected from the group consisting of proteins and nucleic acids. In one embodiment, the molecule is identified using a marker selected from the group consisting of an antibody, a PCR primer, a nucleic acid sequence, and an enzyme assay. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons can be transplanted in vivo in a patient with Parkinson's disease (PD) to provide dopamine (DA) neural function. In one embodiment, the method further comprises providing a patient in need of dopamine-producing neurons, the patient exhibiting at least one neurological symptom, and transplanting floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons into the patient to provide dopamine (DA) neural function. In one embodiment, the neurological symptom is selected from the group consisting of tremors, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity. In one embodiment, the patient exhibits a reduction in the neurological symptom. In one embodiment, the cells are selected from rodent cells, primate cells, and human cells.In one embodiment, the human cells are cells derived from a patient with neurological symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD).

[0013] In one embodiment, the present invention provides an in vivo transplantation method for therapeutic treatment, comprising: a) providing i) a population of floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons, the population expressing tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) at more than 40%; and ii) a subject exhibiting at least one neurological symptom; and b) transplanting the floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons into the subject under conditions that allow the in vivo transplantation to provide dopamine (DA) neuronal function. In one embodiment, the neurological symptom is selected from the group consisting of tremors, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity. In one embodiment, the subject exhibits a reduction in the neurological symptom. In one embodiment, the population of floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a population of floor-plate midbrain progenitor cells treated according to the method of the present invention. In one embodiment, said population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells that has been treated according to a method further comprising contacting said population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells with a neuronal maturation medium comprising N2 medium, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), hybridoma cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP and transforming growth factor type β3 for differentiation of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells into floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, said population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells is derived from a cell population that has been treated according to a method of the invention.In one embodiment, the population of floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells is a method for inducing controlled differentiation of cells into a floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cell population, comprising: a) administering to the subject a cell population selected from the group consisting of: i) a cell population selected from the group consisting of non-embryonic stem cells, embryonic stem cells, induced non-embryonic pluripotent cells, and genetically engineered pluripotent cells; and ii) administering to the subject a first signal transduction inhibitor, a second signal transduction inhibitor, a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator, and a third signal transduction inhibitor, wherein the first inhibitor is capable of reducing Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) / Activin-Nodal signaling, the second inhibitor is capable of reducing Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling, and a third inhibitor is capable of reducing Wingless (Wnt) signaling. a) providing a third inhibitor capable of reducing glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) signaling for activation of GSK3β; b) contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor; c) further contacting the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator under conditions for differentiating a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor; and d) further contacting the cells with the third inhibitor after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator to differentiate the cell population into a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, the population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a cell population selected from the group consisting of an animal, a primate, and a human. In one embodiment, the human cells are cells derived from a patient with symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD).

[0014] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a composition comprising a cell population contacted with LDN-193189 and CHIR99021, wherein more than 40% of the cell population is positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), and the cell population has previously been contacted with LDN-193189, SB431542, a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator, and CHIR99021, wherein the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II and palmorfamine. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 50% positive for Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2). In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 60% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 70% positive for Forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 80% positive for forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 90% positive for forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 95% and up to 100% positive for forkhead box protein A2. In one embodiment, more than 10% of the cell population is selected from the group consisting of forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) double positive and forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) / orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2) double positive cells. In one embodiment, the cell population is at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, at least 95% and up to 100% positive. In one embodiment, at least 20% of the cell population is positive for a marker selected from the group consisting of Nurr1+, CD142, DCSM1, CD63 and CD99. In some embodiments, the cell population is at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, at least 95% up to 100% positive.In some embodiments, the cell population is at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, at least 95% up to 100% positive. In one embodiment, the cell population is selected from the group consisting of rodent cells, primate cells, human cells, and human cells derived from a patient with neurological symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD).

[0015] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for inducing controlled differentiation of cells into a floor plate midbrain progenitor cell population, comprising: a) providing: i) a cell population selected from the group consisting of non-embryonic stem cells, embryonic stem cells, induced non-embryonic pluripotent cells, and genetically engineered pluripotent cells; and ii) a first signal transduction inhibitor, a second signal transduction inhibitor, a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator, and a third signal transduction inhibitor, wherein the first inhibitor is SB431542, the second inhibitor is LDN-193189, the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II and palmorfamine, and the third inhibitor is CHIR99021; and b) providing a first inhibitor and a second inhibitor. and c) contacting the cell population with a cytotoxic agent, wherein the contacting with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor is within 48 hours of in vitro cell seeding, under conditions capable of giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells; c) further contacting the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator under conditions for differentiating the population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator; and d) further contacting the cells with the third inhibitor after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator to differentiate the cell population into a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells. In one embodiment, contacting the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is under conditions capable of giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells such that the contacting of the cells with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator is at least 24 hours and up to 36 hours after contacting the cell population with the first inhibitor and the second inhibitor. In one embodiment, contacting the cells with the third inhibitor is under conditions capable of giving rise to the differentiated population of floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells such that the contacting of the cells with the third inhibitor is at least 24 hours and up to 36 hours after contacting the cell population with the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator.In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain progenitor cell population is greater than 40% Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2). ± LIM homeobox transcription factor 1+, alpha (LMX1A) +In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step e) of contacting said population of floor-plate midbrain progenitor cells with a neuronal maturation medium comprising N2 medium, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP and transforming growth factor type β3 for differentiation of floor-plate midbrain progenitor cells into floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are positive for a set of markers selected from the group consisting of: forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) / tyrosine hydroxylase (TH); forkhead box protein A2 / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha / tyrosine hydroxylase / CD142; forkhead box protein A2 / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha / tyrosine hydroxylase / nuclear receptor associated 1 protein (NURR1); forkhead box protein A2 / LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha / tyrosine hydroxylase / CD142 / nuclear receptor associated 1 protein and tyrosine hydroxylase / alpha-synuclein. In one embodiment, the method further comprises step f) of sorting the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons for expression of CD142 to sort into a population of cells that are at least 80% positive for CD142.In one embodiment, the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons express tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), LIM homeobox transcription factor 1, dompamine, 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), alpha, nuclear receptor NURR1 (NR4A2), neuron-specific type III beta-tubulin (Tuj1), TTF3, paired-like homeobox transcription factor 1 (P1) and alpha-β-tubulin (Tuj2), TTF4, and alpha-β-tubulin (Tuj4). The patient is positive for a marker identifying a molecule selected from the group consisting of odomain 3 (PITX3), achaete-scute complex (ASCL), early B cell factor 1 (EBF-1), early B cell factor 3 (EBF-3), transthyretin (TTR), synapsin, dopamine transporter (DAT), and G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir3.2 / GIRK2), CD142, DCSM1, CD63, and CD99. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a patient in need of dopamine-producing neurons, and a step after e) of treating the patient by transplanting floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons to provide dopamine (DA) neuronal function. In one embodiment, the patient is provided with at least one neurological symptom selected from the group consisting of tremor, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity. In one embodiment, the patient is observed to have at least one neurological symptom selected from the group consisting of tremors, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity, hi one embodiment, the patient shows a reduction in at least one of said neurological symptoms.

[0016] In one embodiment, the present invention provides an in vivo transplantation method for therapeutic treatment, comprising: a) providing a population of floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons, the population of which expresses tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) at more than 40%; and ii) a subject exhibiting at least one neurological symptom selected from the group consisting of tremor, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity; and b) transplanting the floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons into the subject under conditions that allow the in vivo transplantation to provide dopamine (DA) neuronal function. In one embodiment, the subject exhibits a reduction in at least one of the neurological symptoms. In one embodiment, the population of floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a population of cells, further comprising the step of sorting the floor-plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons for expression of CD142 to a population of at least 80% positive cells for CD142. In one embodiment, the population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells following sorting the floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons for CD142 expression into a population of cells that are at least 80% positive for CD142. In one embodiment, the population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a cell population selected from the group consisting of animals, primates, humans, and patients with symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). In one embodiment, the population of floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is derived from a cell population isolated from the group consisting of animals, primates, humans, and patients with symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). [Brief description of the drawings]

[0017] [Figure 1]Figure 1. Exemplary induction and neurogenic conversion of human ES cell-derived midbrain floor plate progenitors depending on CHIR990221 addition. (a) Immunocytochemical analysis for expression of FOXA2 (red), NESTIN (green, top panel), LMX1A (green, middle panel) and OTX2 (green, bottom panel) at differentiation day 11. (b, c) Quantification of data presented in (a). Data (mean ± SEM) are from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Significance levels for individual markers are presented compared to treatment with LSB only: ANOVA; Dunnett's test: ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; p<0.05). (d) Schematic representation of culture conditions used for the three treatment conditions. (e, f) Table of selected differentially expressed genes at day 11 comparing LSB / S / F8 / CHIR condition with LSB (e) or LSB / S / F8 (f). (g,h) Temporal gene expression analysis of selected markers characteristic of midbrain DA progenitor identity (g) and forebrain and ventral non-DA progenitor identity (h). Scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. [Diagram 2]Exemplary immunocytochemistry and molecular analysis of midbrain DA neuron fates in LSB / S / F8 / CHIR treatment compared to LSB / S / F8 (ventral / hypothalamic) and LSB (dorsal forebrain) fates. (a) Immunocytochemistry analysis for expression of FOXA2 (blue) in combination with Tuj1 (red) / LMX1A (green) (upper panel) and NURR1 (red) / TH (green) (lower panel) at day 25. (b) Quantitative co-expression analysis in LSB / S / F8 / CHIR treated cultures. Data (mean ± SEM) are from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (c, d) Global gene expression analysis was performed at day 25 (triplicate samples for all three conditions). Selected table of the most differentially expressed genes comparing days 13 and 25 in the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR condition (c) and comparing LSB / S / F8 / CHIR treatment with LSB (d, left panel) and LSB / S / F8 (d, right panel). (e) Differential gene expression analysis normalized for key midbrain DA neuron markers. Significance levels for individual markers are presented compared to LSB only treatment: ANOVA; Dunnett's test: ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; p<0.05). Scale bars correspond to 50 μm. [Figure 3-1]Figure 3-1 shows exemplary in vitro maturation, characterization, and functional assessment of floor plate-derived versus rosette-derived midbrain DA neurons. Figure 3-1 shows exemplary (a) immunocytochemistry analysis for TH (red) in combination with LMX1A (green, left panel), FOXA2 (blue, left panel), and NURR1 (green, right panel) at differentiation day 50. (b) Quantification of TH+, FOXA2+, LMX1+, and NURR1+ cells among total cells in rosette-derived versus floor plate-derived (LSB / S / F8 / CHIR) cultures. (c) Quantification of serotonin+ (5-HT) and GABA+ neuronal subtypes in floor plate-derived versus rosette-derived DA neuronal cultures at day 50. (d, e) HPLC analysis to measure DA and metabolites. (d) Representative chromatogram of electrochemical detection of DA in samples of bottom plate-derived cultures. (e) Comparison of DA, DOPAC and HVA levels between bottom plate-derived and rosette-derived cultures. (f) Immunocytochemical analysis of bottom plate-derived cultures (day 80) for TH (red) and synapsin (green). (g-i) Electrophysiological analysis of bottom plate cultures at day 80 of DA neuron differentiation. Phase contrast image (g) and corresponding recording (h) of a patched neuron. (i) Power analysis showing membrane potential oscillations (2 to ~5 Hz) characteristic of DA neuron identity. Significance levels for individual markers (panels b, c, e) are presented for comparison of FP-derived and rosette-derived cultures: Student's T-test: ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; p<0.05). Scale bars correspond to 50 μm in (a), 20 μm in (f, upper panel), 5 μm in (f, lower panel), and 20 μm in (g). (j) Maturation of mDA neurons in vitro (day 65). TH positive neurons still express FoxA2 and extend long fibers typical of mDA neurons. (k) DA release measurement by HPLC: 65-day-old TH+ neurons are functional in vitro. [Figure 3-2]Figure 3-2 shows an exemplary in vitro maturation, characterization, and functional evaluation of floor plate-derived midbrain DA neurons compared to rosette-derived midbrain DA neurons. Figure 3-2 shows an exemplary overview of cells generated by the floor plate midbrain DA neuron protocol described herein. (a) In contrast to previous strategies (e.g., Perrier, AL et al. Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 12543-8 (2004)), the novel protocol described herein is based on the generation of LMX1A / FOXA2-positive midbrain floor plate (left panel) followed by neuronal conversion (middle panel) and DA neuron maturation (right panel). Mature floor plate-generated DA neuron cells retain FOXA2 / LMX1A expression. [Figure 4]Exemplary in vivo survival and function of floor plate-derived human DA neurons in mouse, rat, and monkey PD model host brains. (a-d) Transplants of floor plate-derived DA neurons in 6-OHDA-lesioned adult mice (NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null strain). (a) TH expression and graft morphology at 4.5 months post-transplant. (b) Expression of human specific markers (hNCAM, blue), TH (green), and FOXA2 (red). (c) Quantification of FOXA2+, TH+, and double-labeled cells in floor plate-derived grafts (mean ± SEM at 4.5 months post-transplant, n = 4). (d) Amphetamine-induced rotation analysis comparing floor plate-derived (blue) and rosette-derived (green) grafts. Scale bars correspond to 500 μm in (a), 100 μm in (b), and 40 μm in (4c). (e-p) Transplantation of floor plate-derived DA neurons into 6-OHDA-lesioned adult rats. Immunohistochemical analysis for co-expression of TH (green) with human specific markers (red), hNA (e) and hNCAM (4f). (g) Stereological quantification of total (hNA+) cell numbers, TH+ cell numbers and TH+ cell numbers co-expressing FOXA2. The average graft volume was 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3). (h-j) High power images showing co-expression of TH (green) with midbrain specific transcription factors FOXA2, PITX3 and NURR1 (red). (k-m) Behavioral analysis of animals treated with floor plate-derived DA neuron grafts vs. sham-treated animals. (k) Amphetamine-induced rotational asymmetry. (l) Stepping test: measuring immobility of forelimbs between affected and unaffected sides. (m) Cylinder test: measuring preference between ipsilateral and contralateral paws during rearing. Transplanted animals showed significant improvement in at least three trials (p<0.01 at 4.5–5 months; n=4–6, respectively). (n–p) Immunohistochemical analysis of TH (green) co-expression (red) with DAT (n), GIRK2 (o) and calbindin (p). Significance levels (panels d, k, l, m) are: **p<0.01; p<0.05). Scale bars correspond to 200 μm in (e), 50 μm in (f), 20 μm in (h–j) and 40 μm in (n–p). (q–t) Transplants of floor plate-derived DA neurons into adult 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned rhesus monkeys.(q) Overview of a representative graft site one month after transplantation, as indicated by expression of the human-specific cytoplasmic marker SC-121 (green). (r) TH expression in the graft with a surrounding halo of TH+ fibers (arrows). (s) Analysis of co-expression of SC-121 (red) with TH (green) in the graft nucleus. (t) Analysis of co-expression of FOXA2 (red) in TH+ neurons (green). Scale bars correspond to 2 mm in (q), 500 μm in (r), 200 μm in (s), and 50 μm in (t). (u) Graft-derived fiber extensions (huNCAM+) into the host striatum. (v) Graft-derived cells do not differentiate into glial cells. However, the grafts contained a small number of serotonergic fibers in addition to the TH+ cell population. [Diagram 5] FIG. 1: Exemplary timing of CHIR99021 exposure determines induction of FOXA2 / LMX1A midbrain floor plate progenitors. (a) Immunocytochemistry analysis of FOXA2 (red) / LMX1A (green) at differentiation day 11 after LSB / S / F8 treatment alone or in combination with CHIR treatment starting at various time points indicated. (b) Quantification of the percentage of FOXA2+, LMX1A+ and double-labeled cells at differentiation day 11 after differential initiation of CHIR exposure as described in (a). Significance levels for individual markers are presented compared to no CHIR condition: ANOVA; Dunnett's test: ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; p<0.05). Scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. [Figure 6] Illustrative FGF8 exposure does not play a major role in the induction of FOXA2 / LMX1A midbrain floor plate progenitors. Representative images of FOXA2 (red) / LMX1A (green) expression by immunocytochemistry at differentiation day 11. Cells were exposed to LSB / CHIR in the presence or absence of SHH (palmorphamine+SHH C25II) and FGF8. Scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. [Figure 7]FIG. 1 shows that exposure to exemplary high doses of SHH and / or smoothened small molecule agonist (palmorphamine) is required for efficient midbrain floor plate induction in the presence of CHIR99021. Representative images of FOXA2 (red) / LMX1A (green) immunocytochemistry at differentiation day 11. Cells were treated with LSB / F8 / CHIR in the presence of various concentrations of SHH (SHH-C25II) and the smoothened agonist palmorfamine. Scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. [Figure 8] Figure 1 shows an exemplary analysis of differentially expressed genes between LSB / S / F8 / CHIR and LSB and LSB / S / F8 treated cultures at differentiation days 11 and 25. (a) Hierarchical cluster analysis of global gene expression data from the three conditions at days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13 (samples were assessed in triplicate for each condition and each day). (b) Gene enrichment analysis according to GO classes using DAVID at http: / / david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov. Comparison at day 11 reveals enrichment of both SHH and WNT signaling in the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR condition, consistent with CHIR99021-mediated activation of canonical WNT signaling. Alternative cell fates such as "forebrain development" and "diencephalon" as well as "homeobox" are other GO terms highly enriched at days 11 and 25. (c) Online validation using the Allen Gene Human Expression Database (http: / / human.brain‐map.org) for candidate markers enriched in the midbrain DA neuron condition (LSB / S / F8 / CHIR). According to available human brain region‐specific microarray data, TTF3, EBF1, EBF3 and TTR were expressed. TTR, a classical transcriptional target of FOXA2, was only weakly expressed in adult substantia nigra, suggesting that a primary role for TTR may exist during development or that SHH treatment may cause artificially high TTR expression levels during in vitro differentiation. [Figure 9]Figure 1D: Exemplary differentiation protocols for floor plate induction and midbrain DA neuron generation in representative independent hESC and hiPSC lines. Data are presented for hESC line H1 and hiPSC lines 2C6 (derived from a sporadic PD patient) and SeV6 (Sendai line, no insert). FOXA2 (red) expression at differentiation day 11 and TH (green) / FOXA2 (red) at differentiation day 25 were analyzed after using the floor plate line protocol described in Figure 1D and Figure 10. [Figure 10] Figure 1 shows an exemplary outline of differentiation conditions used for floor plate-derived neuronal cultures and rosette-derived DA neuron cultures. Both protocols used dual SMAD inhibition to promote neural fate acquisition. LDN was used for BMP inhibition in the floor plate protocol, whereas traditional noggin induction was used for rosette cultures. Abbreviations are as follows: LDN: LDN-193189, SB: SB431542, SHH (palmorphamine + SHH C25II), FGF8: FGF8, BAGCT: BDNF + ascorbic acid + GDNF + dbcAMP + TGFβ3. SHH / FGF8 in the rosette protocol was used only SHH C25I in the absence of palmorphamin, following the original suggestion for patterning of rosette-derived DA neuron cultures. Note: palmorphamin treatment at the rosette stage is toxic at concentrations appropriate for patterning of floor plate cells. BASF: BDNF + ascorbic acid + SHH / FGF8. [Figure 11] Exemplary in vitro maturation of floor plate-derived DA neuron cultures. (a) Immunocytochemical analysis of floor plate-derived TH neurons (green) for DAT expression (red; day 80). (b) Extensive Tuj1+ (red) fiber tracts were observed by differentiation day 60, spanning lengths of more than 2 mm. (c) Co-expression of GIRK2 (red) in TH+ neurons (green) at differentiation day 80. Scale bars correspond to 20 μm in (a), 100 μm in (b), and 20 μm in (c). [Figure 12]Exemplary immunohistochemical analysis of short-term (6 weeks) in vivo survival studies in adult untreated (uninjured) mouse striatum (NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null strain). Analysis of floor plate-derived grafts (day 25 cells; 150 x 103 cells / animal). (a) Representative image of graft mid-core showing TH+ cells surrounded by TH+ host fibers. An average of 6,200 TH+ cells (n=3) were present in the graft 6 weeks after transplantation. (b) FOXA2-expressing cells (red) were only found in the graft and not in the surrounding host striatum, indicating the origin of the graft and the midbrain identity of the cells. Nearly all TH+ neurons (green) co-expressed FOXA2 (red). However, a significant proportion of FOXA2+ cells did not co-express TH, suggesting that these cells have not yet acquired a mature DA phenotype or represent a separate population of FOXA2+ neurons that are negative for DA neuron markers. The scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. [Figure 13]Figure 1. Example histological analysis of long-term (4.5 months) transplanted 6-OHDA-lesioned mice (NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null strain) comparing floor plate-derived and rosette-derived grafts. Analysis of floor plate-derived grafts. (a) Example of one of the most floor plate-derived grafts. The graft retains well-defined hNCAM+ (red) cellular structures. (b) Robust hNCAM+ fiber extensions were observed at the graft edge. (c) Serotonergic (5-HT+) fibers (green) in the graft were mostly negative for hNCAM (red), suggesting a host origin. (d) GABAergic neurons and fibers (green) in the graft. Analysis of rosette-derived grafts: (e) Neuronal hyperplasia with compaction of host brain tissue. Most cells were positive for both NCAM (red) and DCX (green), suggesting a neuronal fate. (f) NCAM+ / DCX+ fibers extended to the contralateral side of the non-grafted brain. (g) Multiple DCX+ clusters were observed within the graft core. (h) Few TH+ cells (green) and fibers were observed at the graft margin, and nearly all rosette-derived TH+ cells were negative for FOXA2 (blue) in vivo. Immunohistochemistry analysis of floor plate-derived versus rosette-derived grafts at 4.5 months. Representative images are shown for the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 (red) and neural progenitor marker PAX6 (green) (i), FOXA2 / DCX (j), FOXG1 / hNCAM (j, inset), and astrocytic marker GFAP (green) (k). Scale bars correspond to 500 μm in (a), 50 μm in (b–d), 500 μm in (e), 50 μm in (g–h), 50 μm in (i), 40 μm in (j), and 20 μm in (k). [Figure 14]Figure 13C shows an exemplary histological analysis of a long-term (5 months) transplanted 6-OHDA-lesioned SD rat. (a) Numerous hNA+ (red) cells expressed Tuj1 (green), indicating a neuronal fate identity. (b) GFAP+ fibers (green) within the graft did not co-express hNA (red), suggesting a host origin. (c) Few human serotonergic (5-HT+) cell bodies (green) were observed, while most serotonergic fibers were host-derived, similar to the data in the mouse host (Figure 13C). (d) Other examples of TH+ neurons (green) within the graft were characterized by expression of hNCAM (red), confirming the human identity of the cells in the host brain. Scale bars correspond to 25 μm in panels. [Figure 15]Figure 1 shows an exemplary histological analysis of floor plate-derived grafts in primate brain. H9 hESC-derived floor plate-derived DA neurons and H9-GFP hESC-derived floor plate-derived DA neurons (day 25 cultures; 1.25x106 cells / tract, 3 tracts / hemisphere, 6 tracts total) were transplanted into the striatum of adult MPTP-lesioned rhesus monkeys (n = 2). (a) Top left and right panels: High resolution image reconstructions of representative transplant sites (1 month after transplantation). Graft cytoarchitecture is illustrated by immunohistochemistry for the human specific marker SC-121 (no cross-reactivity with non-human primate tissues). Bottom left panel: SC-121+ fibers extending from the transplant central core. Bottom right panel: Higher resolution image of SC-121+ cells showing neuronal progenitor morphology. (b) Analysis of GFP expression in the transplant central core further confirmed the human identity of those cells, complementing the SC-121 data. Note: For both animals, one hemisphere was transplanted with unlabeled H9-derived cells and the other hemisphere received cells derived from H9-GFP cells (expression of GFP under the control of the EF1a promoter). (c) Higher resolution image of the GFP+ graft using DAB detection showing numerous GFP+ cells at the graft edge, exhibiting neuroblast morphology. (d) Immunohistochemical analysis of areas in the graft core negative for GFP and SC-121. These areas contained numerous host microglia based on Iba1 expression (red) as well as few ED1+ macrophages (blue), suggesting persistent inflammation despite cyclosporine immunosuppression. Scale bars correspond to 500 μm in (a, upper panel), 50 μm in (a, lower left panel), 20 μm in (a, lower right panel), 2 μm in (b), 500 μm in (c, left panel), 50 μm in (c, upper right panel), 100 μm in (c, lower right panel), and 100 μm in (d). [Figure 16]Figure 1 shows an exemplary derivation of TH+ cells from hESCs using a previous MS5 feeder cell-based method in which cells were differentiated into DA neuron-like cells via a rosette cell intermediate. (Top) At P0, hESCs were contacted with molecules (Perrier et al., 2004) to initiate neural induction of Oct4+ cells into rosette cells using MS5 feeder cells. At P1 stage, rosette cells were expanded by contacting the cells with additional molecules to differentiate into P2 stage cells with specific expression patterns, including Pax2+ / En1+ DA progenitor cells that further differentiate into TH+ / En1+ DA neurons. These cells were used for transplantation in 6OHDA-lesioned rats and immunosuppressed by cyclosporine A treatment. These transplantation studies showed very poor in vivo survival of DA-like neurons, including loss of TH+ phenotype, and concerns about further proliferation of undesirable and possibly lethal cells, i.e., teratomas, for the transplanted animals, which would cause further medical problems for the patient, and growth of cells into inappropriate neural types. (A) There were very few surviving TH+ neurons (<50 TH+ cells / animal) in grafts of rosette-derived DA neuron precursor cells 4.5 months after transplantation. However, in contrast to TH+ cells, GFP-labeled cells (GFP was driven by a widespread promoter) were highly viable after transplantation, suggesting that most surviving cells after transplantation were neurons with a non-DA neuron identity (16B). (FIG. 16C) Very few graft-derived cells (hNA+ (green)) co-expressed TH (red), suggesting that most transplanted human cells assumed a non-DA neuron phenotype. Panels 16D-E show that, despite very poor in vivo survival, there was some (albeit very slight and highly variable) improvement in a few behavioral tests, such as amphetamine-induced rotation (D), cylinder test, and spontaneous rotation (E). [Figure 17]FIG. 1 shows an exemplary protocol for the induction of low numbers of floor plate cells. A modified dual SMAD inhibition protocol generated floor plate (fp) cells. High concentrations of SHH were required for the induction of FoxA2+ fp cells, and the addition of caudal patterning cues such as FGF8, Wnt1 or RA did not cause a decrease in FOXA2 expression, but did cause changes in regional identity. (A) Left panel: cells at differentiation day 11 after treatment with NSB (Noggin / SB431542); middle left panel: NSB+SHH (Sonic C25II) treatment; middle panel: NSB+SHH+RA; middle right panel: NSB+SHH+Wnt1; NSB+SHH+FGF8; Note: Treatment with NSB alone does not induce FoxA2 expression. FoxA2+ floor plate cells are only induced in the presence of high doses of SHH. Addition of RA, Wnt1 and FGF8 does not inhibit FoxA2 induction. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of FOXA2 and SIX6 gene expression showing maintenance (or even increase) of FOXA2 expression after treatment with RA or FGF, and concomitant downregulation of SIX6 expression, which marks the most anterior floor plate-like cells. (C) Induction of gene expression of midbrain progenitor and midbrain floor plate markers in the presence of FGF8 and Wnt1. [Figure 18]Figure 13 shows an exemplary protocol for the induction of floor plate cells that show high levels of midbrain features compared to low or absent levels of features in cells generated from the methods used in Figures 16 and 17. A: Midbrain floor plate induction in cell populations contacted with high levels of SHH, FGF8 and CHIR resulted in co-expression of FoxA2 along with expression of midbrain markers LMX1A and Otx2 at differentiation day 11, in contrast to cells contacted with molecules described in the other two methods shown in Figures 16 and 17 (N / SB and SHH / FGF8, respectively). B: Global gene expression analysis at day 11 comparing three groups of cells contacted with molecules from each of the three methods (LDN / SB, SHH / FGF8, LSB / SHH / FGF8 / CHIR), including the third method of the invention. Chart B illustrates genes common among the three treatment conditions and genes unique to each individual condition. Chart B is a preliminary analysis used for the microarray results presented in Figure 1. C: The mRNA levels of midbrain markers FoxA2 and LMX1A were highly enriched in the LSB / SHH / FGF8 / CHIR-treated group compared with the SHH / FGF-treated group. [Figure 19] Figure 1: Exemplary in vitro characterization of dopamine neurons derived from the midbrain region of the floor plate. A: Co-labeling of FoxA2+ neurons with mDA neuron markers TH, Nurr1 and LMX1A at differentiation day 25. B: mRNA expression levels of mDA neuron markers and other midbrain cell types by qRT-PCR in LDN / SB+SHH / FGF8+SHH / FGF8+CHIR treated groups. [Figure 20]Figure 1 shows an exemplary comparable differentiation potential towards midbrain DA neuron fate between PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC cells and wild-type hES (or iPS) cells. PINK1 Q456X mutant PD-iPSC lines were differentiated using the novel floor plate-based midbrain DA neuron method of the present invention, resulting in a comparable midbrain differentiation profile to that obtained from the H9 line. (A-C) Immunocytochemical analysis of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines at differentiation day 11 (midbrain progenitor stage) for FOXA2 (red), LMX1A (green) and DAPI (blue) (A), at differentiation day 25 (post-early mitotic DA neuron stage) for FOXA2 (red) and TH (green) (B), and for NURR1 (red) and TH (green) (C). (D-F) The same set of immunocytochemical analyses performed using H9-derived cells for FOXA2 (red), LMX1A (green) and DAPI (blue) at differentiation day 11 (D), for FOXA2 (red) and TH (green) at differentiation day 25 (E), and for NURR1 (red) and TH (green) (F). [Figure 21] Figure 1: Exemplary PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs exhibit PD-like phenotype of protein aggregation after prolonged differentiation and maturation in vitro. At differentiation day 55, PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs showed evidence of α-synuclein (a major component of Lewy body formation in PD patients) expression in the cytoplasm of TH+ DA neurons. These cells also showed high expression of ubiquitin (a classic Lewy body marker). In contrast, DA neurons derived from control iPS lines showed normal synaptic (as opposed to cytoplasmic) α-synuclein expression and very low levels of ubiquitin expression. (A, B) Immunocytochemical analysis and merged image for α-synuclein (LB509, red), TH (green) at differentiation day 55 of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines (A) and immunocytochemical analysis for α-synuclein (red) and ubiquitin (green) (B). (C, D) Immunocytochemical analysis of α-synuclein (red) and TH (green) (C), and α-synuclein (red) and ubiquitin (green) (D) at day 55 of differentiation of a control iPSC line. [Figure 22]Figure 1. Exemplary expression of aggregated α-synuclein. In PD patient brains, a dimerized, insoluble form of α-synuclein causes aggregation in Lewy bodies. Dimeric α-synuclein shows phosphorylation of serine 129 on α-synuclein. PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC-derived cells showed strong expression of serine 129 phosphorylated α-synuclein, in contrast to the very low level of expression in control iPSC-derived cells. (A, B) Immunocytochemical analysis of serine 129 phosphorylated α-synuclein (green) and DAPI (blue) in PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC-derived cells (A) and comparable control iPSC-derived cells (B) at day 55 of differentiation. [Figure 23]Figure 1 shows that exemplary differences in α-synuclein expression patterns are observed during differentiation protocols. We show that "authentic" midbrain DA neurons have PD-specific vulnerability and a corresponding specific in vitro phenotype. DA neurons obtained using the classical MS5 interstitial feeder cell-based differentiation protocol (Perrier et al., PNAS 2004, incorporated herein by reference) can produce a large number of TH+ neurons. However, according to our data, the TH+ cells resulting from differentiation with the classical MS5 interstitial feeder cell protocol are not authentic midbrain DA neurons. There were a large number of α-synuclein-positive cells in cultures differentiated with the MS5 protocol. However, these cells did not co-express TH. Also, there were no differences in expression patterns between PD-iPSCs and control iPSCs when using the MS5 differentiation strategy. These data indicate that α-synuclein is also expressed in other non-DA cell types, and that such non-DA α-synuclein does not change between disease-derived and control iPSC-derived cells, especially when using the standard MS5 differentiation protocol. And our novel floor plate differentiation protocol generates a large number of TH+ cells that co-express α-synuclein. These TH+ cells express α-synuclein in a cytoplasmic expression pattern. (A, B) Immunocytochemistry analysis of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines (A) and control iPSCs (B) at day 60 of MS5-based differentiation for α-synuclein (LB509, red) and TH (green). (C) Immunocytochemistry analysis of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines at day 55 of floor plate-based differentiation for α-synuclein (red) and TH (green). [Figure 24-1]Figure 1 shows that exemplary DA neurons derived from PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs are more vulnerable to noxious stimuli. PD-iPSC-derived TH+ DA neurons obtained from the floor plate-based protocol of the present invention were more vulnerable to toxin challenge (valinomycin: mitochondrial ionophore, 5uM, 48 hours) than control iPSC-derived cells. In contrast, TH+ neurons obtained by the classical MS5-based protocol did not show differential vulnerability between PD-derived and control-derived cells. (A-F) Representative TH immunocytochemistry at day 60 of differentiation: normal state (no toxin treatment) of both PD-iPSC-derived and control iPSC-derived cells obtained by the bottom plate based protocol (A, PD-iPSC-derived cells are shown), almost complete degradation of TH+ DA neurons in PD-iPSCs after toxin treatment (B), partially degraded TH+ DA neurons derived from control iPSCs (C), normal state of both PD-iPSC-derived and control iPSC-derived cultures obtained by the MS5 based protocol (D, PD-iPSC-derived cells are shown), TH+ neurons after toxin challenge in PD-iPSCs (E), and control iPSC-derived culture obtained by the MS5 protocol (F). [Figure 24-2] Figure 1 shows that exemplary DA neurons derived from PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs are more vulnerable to noxious stimuli. PD-iPSC-derived TH+ DA neurons obtained from the floor plate-based protocol of the present invention were more vulnerable to toxin challenge (valinomycin: mitochondrial ionophore, 5uM, 48 hours) than control iPSC-derived cells. In contrast, TH+ neurons obtained by the classical MS5-based protocol showed no differential vulnerability between PD-derived and control-derived cells. (GH) Low-power images of immunocytochemistry for Tuj1 (red) and TH (green) from the floor plate-based protocol at day 60 of differentiation: PD-iPSCs in normal (G) and toxin-challenged (H) conditions and control iPSCs in normal (I) and toxin-challenged (J) conditions. [Figure 24-3]Figure 1 shows that exemplary DA neurons derived from PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs are more vulnerable to noxious stimuli. PD-iPSC-derived TH+ DA neurons obtained from our floor plate-based protocol were more vulnerable to toxin challenge (valinomycin: mitochondrial ionophore, 5uM, 48 hours) than control iPSC-derived cells. In contrast, TH+ neurons obtained by the classical MS5-based protocol showed no differential vulnerability between PD-derived and control-derived cells. (K-N) Low-power images of immunocytochemistry for Tuj1 (red) and TH (green) by the MS5-based protocol at day 60 of differentiation: PD-iPSCs under normal (K) and toxin-challenged (L) conditions and control iPSCs under normal (M) and toxin-challenged (N) conditions. [Diagram 25] Figure 13 shows an exemplary quantification of cell viability dose response assay for toxin challenge. Cell viability assay using Alamar Blue 48 hours after valinomycin treatment showed differential cell survival at a specific dose range for toxin challenge (5 and 10 uM) when comparing PD-iPSCs with control iPSCs (day 60 of base plate-based differentiation of the present invention). Note: Although this assay tests for all cell death, the most dramatic effect was observed specifically in DA neurons (see Figure 14). Therefore, quantification based on Alamar Blue may underestimate the extent of the differential effect observed in the DA neuron lineage. [Figure 26]Example transplanted human DA neurons derived from pluripotent stem cells have electrophysiological features typical of those found in mouse substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). (A) Top - Reconstitution of pacemaker neurons in the graft area. Bottom - Photomicrographs of brain slices from rats injected with hES-derived neurons 9 months earlier; the grafts are outlined; a higher magnification image is shown in the inset at the bottom. The slices were processed for tyrosine hydroxylase. See white areas. (B) Top - Cell-attached patch recordings from putative DA neurons in the grafts; bottom - Whole-cell recordings from the same cells. Recordings were made in the presence of glutamate and GABA receptor antagonists (50 μM AP5, 10 μM CNQX, and 10 μM gabazine) to eliminate synaptic inputs. These recordings show that the PS-derived neurons were autonomous pacemakers with normal intrasomatic voltage trajectories. Another neuron recorded in the graft had similar properties. (C) For comparison, cell-attached and whole-cell recordings from dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc of an adult mouse are shown. Abbreviations (CTx=cortex, STr=striatum, SNpc=substantia nigra pars compacta, DA=dopamine system). [Figure 27]Figure 1. Exemplary A9 candidate surface markers and CD screen in hPSCs. (a) Venn diagram of transcriptome data from FACS-purified mouse ESC-derived mDA neurons. Among the 107 genes shared between PITX3 and Nurr1, most were known markers of midbrain DA neurons, as well as novel markers were identified expressed in the ventral midbrain. b) One of those markers was DCSM1, a putative surface marker that appears to be enriched in the A9 region according to mRNA in situ expression data (Allen Brain Atlas, Lein, ES et al., Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain, Nature 445:168-176 (2007)). (c-f) CD screen: (c) Representative 96-well plate (one of three 96-well plates used to screen the complete CD panel). Black wells mark CD markers highly expressed in hESC DA neurons at day 25. (e) Summary of CD screening results in hESC-derived DA neurons. (f) An exemplary marker, CD142, a surface marker specifically enriched in DA neurons at the Nurr1+ stage, was found by FACS-mediated isolation and analysis between CD142+ and CD142- cells at day 7 after sorting. [Figure 28]FIG. 27: Exemplary CD142 enriches Nurr1+ midbrain DA neurons and depletes GABAergic and serotonergic neurons. (a) Flow cytometry shows representative CD142 expression at differentiation day 25. (b) CD142 enriches Nurr1+ midbrain DA neurons in hESC lines (e.g., WA09; FIG. 27f) and hiPSC lines tested (C29 and M3X represent two human iPSC lines at differentiation day 25). (c, d) CD142 depletes contaminating GABAergic and serotonergic cells after sorting at day 25 and 3 weeks of in vitro culture. (e, f) CD142 depletes GABAergic and serotonergic neurons in vivo 3 months after transplantation. Cells were sorted for CD142 at day 25. Note: CD142 cells were also enriched for TH and AADC. [Figure 29] FIG. 1 shows exemplary contemplated experimental uses of PSA. PST-expressing and PSTnm-exposed hESC-derived DA neurons are assessed in vitro for effects on DA phenotype and fiber outgrowth. In vivo studies in the 6OHDA rat model will test whether reduction in DA neuron numbers by forced expression of PSA can be matched with behavioral recovery of standard grafts, and whether forced expression of PSA in hESC-derived DA neurons can induce recovery in assays of complex motor function. [Diagram 30]Figure 1: Example use of PST. Overexpression (mouse PST) caused increased PSA-NCAM levels in differentiating mouse ES cells. (A) Quantification of PST mRNA by qPCR in control cells (Nurr1) and cells overexpressing PST (Nurr1 / PST). Data are expressed as fold enrichment of PST levels in Nurr1 / PST cells relative to Nurr1 cells. (B) PSA immunostaining in DA neuron cultures at differentiation day 14 shows increased PSA levels in Nurr1 / PST cells (scale bar: 100 μm). (C) Western blot of NCAM in differentiated cells. Nurr1 / PST cells (lane 2) show increased levels of the polysialylated form of NCAM (smear, brackets) compared to controls (lane 1). PSA is removed from NCAM after endoN treatment (lane 3). (D) Quantification of the intensity of the PSA smear expressed in arbitrary units. (E) FACS analysis of PSA on day 14 of differentiation. Treatment of cells with 20 units of endoN 24 h before the end of differentiation abolished the PST effect. (F) Representative photomicrographs comparing Nurr1 and Nurr1 / PST differentiated cells for GFP immunofluorescence and DA markers. Cells sorted for GFP and reseeded retained the DA phenotype (post-sorting) as before. Scale bar: 100 μm. [Diagram 31] Figure 1. Exemplary FACS analysis of ES-derived DA neurons. Flow cytometry-based isolation of GFP+ and SSEA-1- cells. As double negative and GFP negative controls, J1 mouse ES-cells were used. Approximately 5-10% of cells were sorted as positive. [Diagram 32]Figure 1: Example Nurr1 / PST grafts were more effective in inducing behavioral recovery in a 6OHDA mouse model. Nurr1::GFP cells were differentiated and sorted for the GFP+ / SSEA-1- population on day 14. Cells treated with endoN were cultured for 12 hours before sorting with 20 units of the enzyme. 55,000 cells were transplanted in 1 ml of N2 medium containing BDNF and AA. (A) Animals were scored for amphetamine-induced rotations (rotations / min during 20 min) for 3 weeks before transplantation and then 7 weeks after transplantation. Nurr1 / PST cells significantly improve the outcome compared to Nurr1 controls (2-way ANOVA: p<0.01, with Bonferroni post-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; 6 animals / group). Removal of PSA by endoN abolishes the PST effect (p=0.26). (B) There were more GFP+ cells in endpoint PST grafts than in controls (p<0.05, t-test). (C) Ratio of PSA / GFP immunofluorescence in the core. **p<0.01. Student's t-test (n=5 / graft type). (D) Immunofluorescence of GFP, TH and PSA. Scale bar: 200 μm. (E) Grafted cells express DA markers. Individual z-planes of confocal microscopy images are shown. Scale bar: 20 μm. Values ​​are means ± SEM. [Diagram 33]Figure 1: Exemplary PSA increase increased host striatal innervation by ES-derived DA neurons. PSA-NCAM overexpression increased process outgrowth. (A) Representative photomicrographs of GFP / TH+, GFP / Girk2+ and GFP / Synapsin+ processes in control. Staining in Nurr1 / PST samples was similar. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Representative z-stack projections showing GFP+ processes extending from both Nurr1 and Nurr1 / PST grafts. There are many more GFP+ processes extending from Nurr1 / PST grafts (scale bar: 50 μm). Inset shows GFP+ / TH+ process in the same section. Arrows: direction of outgrowth. (C-E) Quantification of intensity of GFP+ (C,E) and TH+ (D) processes at various distances from the transplant site normalized to intensity closest to the injection area (area divided into 5 zones approximately 100 μm apart). Normalization is to zone I; 2-way ANOVA for both GFP and TH data, n=5 / cell type, p<0.01; values ​​are mean±SEM). Nurr1 / PST grafts extended more neurites into the host striatum, which was partially inhibited by endoN treatment (E). (F) Animal recovery correlated with the degree of neurite outgrowth. Graph shows correlation (linear regression analysis) between the intensity of GFP+ neurites in zone IV and animal recovery for untreated and endoN-treated Nurr1-grafted and Nurr1 / PST-grafted animals. Each value represents one animal (r2=0.65, p<0.001, n=17). [Diagram 34]Figure 1: Exemplary use of PST in methods related to spinal cord injury and expression in motor neurons. In control spinal cords, transplanted GFP Schwann cells (SCs) are restricted to the lesion by host scar tissue (A), whereas PST-modified SCs readily migrate significant distances (B). This PSA engineering resulted in improved locomotor strength, improved BBB subscores (upper line vs. lower line in (C)), and improved hindlimb dexterity (grid-walk test; lower line vs. control in upper line in (D)). (E,H): Differentiation of HB9::GFP mouse ESCs into motor neurons, where PST introduction increases fiber sprouting and cell migration (arrowheads) in vitro (E,F). Transplantation of these PST-cells into the sciatic nerve results in better target innervation, as indicated by the number of neuromuscular junctions (arrows) in the EDL muscle (G,H). [Diagram 35] Figure 1. Use of an exemplary PSTnm enzyme. (A) PSTnm-produced PSA (red, bottom line) inhibits adhesion of Schwann cells in suspension to Schwann cell monolayers more effectively than PSA produced by forced expression of PST (green, middle line). (B) PSA immunoblotting in ESC-derived HB9 motor neurons shows that control samples treated with PSTnm have undetectable PSA levels. Incubation with PSTnm+CMP-sialic acid substrate results in a large PSA band that is eliminated by endoN treatment. (C, D) Polysialylation of these cells by PSTnm and substrate during differentiation enhances neurite outgrowth and cell migration (arrowheads), similar to the effect obtained with the PST gene. (E) PSA immunostaining of day 30 hESC-derived DA neurons. (F) This staining is significantly increased after treatment with PSTnm and substrate. (G) In vivo injection of PSTnm alone has no effect, whereas (H) co-administration of PSTnm with substrate induces massive PSA expression in the mouse striatum. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0018] definition As used herein, the term "disease modeling" refers to methods using experimental organisms or in vitro cell cultures that mimic certain signs or symptoms observed in humans as a result of a disorder. In one embodiment, pluripotent stem cells obtained from an animal model with a genetic mutation that causes a neurological disorder, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), can be cultured and differentiated into neural cells to identify new neuronal characteristics associated with PD. In one embodiment, human pluripotent stem cells obtained from an individual with a genetic mutation that causes a neurological disorder, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), can be cultured and differentiated into neural cells that retain similar defects observed in the individual.

[0019] As used herein, the term "Parkinsonism" refers to a group of disorders that are all related to a lack of dopamine in the basal ganglia, the part of the brain that controls movement. Symptoms include tremors, bradykinesia (excessively slow movements), flexed posture, postural sway, and rigidity. A diagnosis of Parkinsonism requires the presence of at least two of these symptoms, one of which must be tremors or bradykinesia. The most common form of Parkinsonism is idiopathic, or classical Parkinson's disease (PD), but a significant minority of diagnoses, about 15 percent of the total, may have one of the Parkinson-plus syndromes (PPS). These syndromes, also known as atypical Parkinsonism, include corticobasal degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy. In general, Parkinson's disease involves the dysfunction and death of living nerve cells in the brain, primarily in an area of ​​the brain called the substantia nigra. Many of these living nerve cells produce dopamine, and when these neurons die, the amount of dopamine produced by differentiation in the brain decreases, preventing the person from controlling movement normally. The gut also has dopamine cells that degenerate in Parkinson's patients, which may be an important causative factor in the gastrointestinal symptoms that are part of the disease. Individuals experience a different set of symptoms. The main motor signs of Parkinson's include: tremors in the hands, arms, legs, jaw and face; bradykinesia or slow movement; rigidity or stiffness of the limbs and trunk; and postural instability or impaired balance and motor sense.

[0020] As used herein, the term "subject" refers to a mammalian animal (human and animal, i.e., non-human animals) that is the recipient of a particular treatment, including any type of treatment. Typically, the terms "subject" and "patient" are used interchangeably herein in reference to a human subject.

[0021] As used herein, the term "non-human animal" refers to any non-human animal, including, but not limited to, rodents, non-human primates, sheep, cows, ruminants, rabbits, pigs, goats, horses, dogs, cats, birds, and the like.

[0022] As used herein, the term "dopamine" refers to a chemical made by dopamine neurons that send messages to parts of the brain that contain neurons that control movement and coordination.

[0023] As used herein, the term "LSB" refers to two compounds that can reduce or block signal transduction in cells consisting of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling and small mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling. L DN-193189 and S.B. Refers to the combination 431542.

[0024] As used herein, the term "SB431542" refers to a compound that can reduce or block transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling and has CAS number 301836-41-9, C 22 H 18 N 4 O 3 and the name 4-[4-(1,3-benzodioxyol-5-yl)-5-(2-pyridinyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-benzamide. For example, the following structure:

[0025] [ka] In one example, SB431542 is Stemolecule™ SB431542 from Stemgent, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

[0026] As used herein, the term "LDN-193189" refers to the compound having the IUPAC name 4-(6-(4-(piperazin-1-yl)phenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)quinoline, C 25 H 22 N 6DM-3189 is a small molecule having the chemical formula:

[0027] [ka] LDN-193189 can function as a SMAD signaling inhibitor. LDN-193189 is also a highly potent small molecule inhibitor of ALK2, ALK3, and ALK6 protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), inhibiting the signaling of members of the ALK1 and ALK3 families of type I TGFβ receptors, inhibiting the transduction of multiple biological signals, including bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) BMP2, BMP4, BMP6, BMP7, and activin cytokine signals, which subsequently inhibits the SMAD phosphorylation of Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 (Yu et al. (2008) Nat Med 14:1363-1369; Cuny et al. (2008) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18:4388-4392, incorporated herein by reference). In one exemplary embodiment, the LDN-193189 is Stemolecule™ LDN-193189, by Stemgent, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

[0028] As used herein, the term "glycogen synthase kinase 3β inhibitor" or "GSK3β inhibitor" refers to a compound that inhibits the glycogen synthase kinase 3β enzyme. See, e.g., Doble, et al., J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1175-1186, incorporated herein by reference. For purposes of the present invention, a GSK3β inhibitor can activate the WNT signaling pathway. See, e.g., Cadigan, et al., J Cell Sci. 2006;119:395-402; Kikuchi, et al., Cell Signaling. 2007;19:659-671, incorporated herein by reference.

[0029] As used herein, the term “CHIR99021” or “CHIR” or “aminopyrimidine” or “3-[3-(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methylpyrrole-2-methylidenyl]-2-indolinone” has the IUPAC name 6-(2-(4-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylamino)ethylamino)nicotinonitrile:

[0030] [ka] CHIR99021 is an example of a small molecule chemical inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), which activates the WNT signaling pathway, that is highly selective, demonstrating nearly 1,000-fold selectivity against a panel of related and unrelated kinases, with an IC of 6.7 nM against human GSK3β. 50 with nanomolar IC against the rodent GSK3β homologue 50 In one exemplary embodiment, CHIR99021 is Stemolecule™ CHIR99021 from Stemgent, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

[0031] As used herein, the term "palmorphamine" refers to a purine derivative, such as CAS No. 483367-10-8, that activates the Hedgehog pathway by targeting smoothened. See, for example, the structure below:

[0032] [ka] In an exemplary embodiment, the palmorfamine is Stemolecule™ palmorfamine from Stemgent, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

[0033] As used herein, the term "signal transduction" in the context of "signal transduction proteins" refers to proteins that are activated or affected by ligand binding to membrane receptor proteins or some other stimulus. Examples of signal transduction proteins include SMADs, WNT complex proteins, and in another embodiment, WNT complex proteins including β-catenin, sonic hedgehog (SHH), notch, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ, activin, nodal, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) proteins, and the like. For many cell surface receptors or internal receptor proteins, ligand-receptor interaction is not directly involved in the cell's response. A ligand-activated receptor must first interact with other proteins inside the cell before the ultimate physiological effect of its ligand on the cell's behavior occurs. In many cases, receptor activation or inhibition is followed by a change in the behavior of a series of several interacting cellular proteins. The overall cellular changes induced by receptor activation are called a signal transduction mechanism or signal transduction pathway.

[0034] As used herein, the term "LSB / S / F8 / CHIR" or "LSB / SHH / FGF8 / CHIR" refers to contacting cells with S, sonic hedgehog activators, F8, FGF8, and CHIR of the present invention, plus LDN-193189 and SB431542 (i.e., LSB). In contrast, "LSB / S / F8" or "SHH / FGF8" or "SHH / FGF" refers to contacting cells with S, sonic hedgehog activators, F8, FGF8, plus LDN-193189 and SB431542 (i.e., LSB), except for CHIR, as found in previously published methods. In a similar abbreviation, "LDN / SB" refers to contacting cells with LDN-193189 and SB431542.

[0035] As used herein, the terms "inhibit" or "block" refer to a reduction in the level of activity of a particular signaling pathway in a cell when treated with a compound (i.e., an inhibitor) compared to the activity of said signaling pathway in cells not treated with such compound or treated with a control.

[0036] As used herein, the term "activate" refers to an increase in the level of activity of a particular signaling pathway in a cell when treated with a compound (i.e., an inhibitor) compared to the activity of said signaling pathway in a cell not treated with such compound or treated with a control. Any level of inhibition or activation of a particular signaling pathway is considered an embodiment of the present invention, if such inhibition or activation results in controlled differentiation of stem cells.

[0037] As used herein, the term "Sma Mothers Against Decapentaplegic" or "Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic" or "SMAD" refers to a signaling molecule.

[0038] As used herein, the terms "WNT" or "Wingless" in the context of a ligand refer to a group of secreted proteins that can interact with WNT receptors, such as receptors in the Frizzled and LRPDerailed / RYK receptor families (i.e., Int1 (integration 1) in humans).

[0039] As used herein, the term "WNT" or "Wingless" in the context of a signaling pathway refers to a signaling pathway that is composed of Wnt family ligands and Wnt family receptors, such as Frizzled and LRPDerailed / RYK receptors, either mediated or not by β-catenin. For purposes described herein, a preferred WNT signaling pathway includes mediated by β-catenin, i.e., WNT / β-catenin.

[0040] As used herein, "canonical pathway" or "classical activation" in the context of WNT refers to one of multiple Wnt downstream signaling pathways, e.g., in the canonical pathway, the primary effect of binding of a Wnt ligand to its receptor is stabilization of cytoplasmic β-catenin by inhibiting the β-catenin degradation complex. Other Wnt pathways are non-canonical.

[0041] As an example, the small molecule CHIR affects the canonical Wnt signaling downstream pathway.

[0042] As used herein, the term "Sonic Hedgehog (SHH or Shh)" refers to a protein that is one of at least three proteins in a mammalian signal transduction pathway family called hedgehog, another being Desert Hedgehog (DHH) and the third being Indian Hedgehog (IHH). Shh interacts with at least two transmembrane proteins by interacting with the transmembrane molecules Patched (PTC) and Smoothened (SMO). Shh normally binds to PCT, which in turn activates SMO as a signal transduction factor. In the absence of SHH, PTC normally inhibits SMO, which in turn activates the transcriptional repressor, so that transcription of certain genes does not occur. When Shh is present and bound to PTC, PTC cannot interfere with the function of SMO. When SMO is uninhibited, certain proteins can enter the cell nucleus and act as transcription factors that activate certain genes (see Gilbert, 2000, Developmental Biology, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates).

[0043] As used herein, the term "activator" or "activator" refers to small molecules, peptides, proteins, and compounds that are activating molecules that cause the controlled differentiation of the cells of the present invention. Exemplary activators include, but are not limited to, CHIR, sonic hedgehog (SHH) C25II, the small molecule smoothoid agonist parmorphamine, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and the like.

[0044] As used herein, the term "sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling activator" refers to any molecule or compound that activates the SHH signaling pathway, including molecules or compounds that bind to PCT or smoothand agonists and the like. Examples of such compounds are the protein sonic hedgehog (SHH) C25II and the small molecule smoothand agonist parmorphamine.

[0045] As used herein, the term "Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II" refers to a recombinant N-terminal fragment of full-length mouse Sonic Hedgehog protein capable of binding to the SHH receptor to activate SHH, an example being R&D Systems catalog number 464-SH-025 / CF.

[0046] As used herein, the term "signal" refers to internal and external factors that control changes in cellular structure and function, and can be chemical or physical in nature.

[0047] As used herein, the term "ligand" refers to molecules and proteins that bind to a receptor (R), examples include, but are not limited to, transforming growth factor beta, activin, nodal, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), and the like.

[0048] As used herein, the term "inhibitor" or "signal transduction inhibitor" relates to inhibition of a signal transduction molecule or pathway of a signal transduction molecule, e.g., inhibitors of SMAD signal transduction, inhibitors of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β (GSK3β), and refers to a compound or molecule (e.g., a small molecule, peptide, peptidomimetic, natural compound, protein, siRNA, antisense nucleic acid, aptamer, or antibody) that interferes with (i.e., reduces, suppresses, eliminates, or blocks) the signal transduction function of that molecule or pathway. In other words, an inhibitor is any compound or molecule that alters any activity of a named protein (signaling molecule, any molecule involved in a named signaling molecule, a named associated molecule, such as glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK30)) (including, but not limited to, signaling molecules described herein) in one example by directly contacting SMAD signaling, by contacting SMAD mRNA, by causing a conformational change in SMAD, by decreasing SMAD protein levels, or by interfering with SMAD interaction with signaling partners (including, for example, those described herein), and by affecting expression of SMAD target genes (including, for example, those described herein). Inhibitors also include molecules that indirectly regulate SMAD biological activity by intercepting upstream signaling molecules. Thus, in one embodiment, an inhibitor of the invention induces (alter) or modifies differentiation of a default cell type to a non-default cell type, for example, one of the methods of the invention comprises progenitor cells differentiated into non-default neural progenitor cells with LDN / SB, CHIR, and a SHH activator (which may inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3β). In a preferred embodiment, the inhibitors of the present invention "alter" or "reduce" or "block" default signaling to control cell differentiation into non-default cell types, for example, as described herein for the differentiation of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells and midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention.Thus, the inhibitors of the present invention are natural compounds or small molecules that modify signal molecule activity to contribute to the differentiation of the starting cell population into floor plate midbrain progenitor cells (day 0). When progenitor cells are contacted with the inhibitors, these small molecules can contribute to further differentiation into midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention. Inhibitors are described in terms of competitive inhibition (binding to an active site and eliminating or reducing the binding of another known binding compound) and allosteric inhibition (binding to a protein and altering the conformation of that protein, interfering with the binding of a compound to the active site of that protein), in addition to inhibition induced by binding to and affecting a molecule located upstream of the named signaling molecule, which in turn causes inhibition of the named molecule. In some cases, inhibitors are referred to as "direct inhibitors," which refers to the inhibition of a signaling target or a signaling target pathway by actually contacting the signaling target. For example, a direct inhibitor of gamma-secretase is a DAPT molecule that binds to the gamma-secretase protein.

[0049] As used herein, the term "derivative" refers to a chemical compound having a similar core structure.

[0050] As used herein, the term "floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells" in the context of in vivo cells located in the midbrain, including those during embryonic development of midbrain neurons, refers to cells that can differentiate into dopamine-producing cells. In some embodiments, "floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells" refers to cells in culture that express an overlapping or identical set of markers compared to the markers expressed by the cells in vivo, i.e., cells in culture that are used to artificially generate in vitro cultured cells that co-express the floor plate marker FOXA2 and the tectal plate markers LMX1A, OTX2, NGN2, and DDC in the cultured cells of the present invention, for example, around day 11 after the initiation of regulated differentiation as described herein. Floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells are preferably "FOXA2+LMX1A+" or "FOXA2 / LMX1A+". In some embodiments, a minority of cells in the differentiated progenitor population are FOXA2 / LMX1A / TH+.

[0051] As used herein, the term "floor plate-derived DA neurons" or "authentic midbrain DA neurons" or "midbrain-destined FOXA2+LMX1A+dopamine (DA) neurons" or "floor plate midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons" or "transplantable midbrain DA neurons" or "mDA neurons" or "FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+" or "FOXA2 / LMX1A / TH" or "FOXA2+LMX1A+NURR1+TH+" or "FOXA2 / LMX1A / NURR1 / TH" refers to a transplantable midbrain DA neuron population obtained by the methods described herein around or by day 25 after the initiation of normal regulated differentiation. In a preferred embodiment, the "authentic midbrain DA neurons" are FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ / NURR1+ / TH+. These neurons were classified as "transplantable" following transplantation experiments in mice and primates that demonstrated the ability of these neurons to ameliorate Parkinson-like neurological symptoms without significant interference from neuronal hyperplasia and teratoma formation. The midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention were maintained in vitro for several months while retaining transplantability.

[0052] As used herein, the cells used to obtain floor plate midbrain progenitor cells and midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons are obtained from a variety of sources including embryonic and non-embryonic sources, e.g., hESCs and non-embryonic hiPSCs, somatic stem cells, disease stem cells, i.e., isolated pluripotent cells isolated from Parkinson's disease patients and genetically engineered stem cells, cancer stem cells, human pluripotent cells or mammalian pluripotent cells, etc.

[0053] As used herein, the term "stem cells" refers to cells that have the ability to divide in culture for an indefinite period of time and give rise to specialized cells. Stem cells can be obtained from animals, including humans, and patients, e.g., human stem cells refer to stem cells that are human. Stem cells can be obtained from a variety of sources, including embryonic and non-embryonic sources, e.g., umbilical cord cells, pediatric cells, and adult cells. For purposes of the present invention, adult stem cells generally refer to cells that were not originally obtained from a fetus, i.e., cells from an infant, abandoned umbilical cord, abandoned placental cells, cells from a child, cells from an adult, etc.

[0054] As used herein, the term "umbilical cord blood stem cells" refers to stem cells collected from the umbilical cord at birth that have the potential to make at least all of the body's blood cells (hematopoietic).

[0055] As used herein, the term "somatic (adult) stem cells" refers to relatively rare undifferentiated cells found in many organs and differentiated tissues that have a limited capacity for both self-renewal (in the laboratory) and differentiation. Such cells vary in their differentiation potential, which is usually restricted to the cell type in the organ of origin.

[0056] As used herein, the term "somatic cell" refers to any cell in the body other than a gamete (egg or sperm), and is sometimes referred to as an "adult" cell.

[0057] As used herein, the term "neural lineage cells" refers to cells that contribute to the nervous system (both central and peripheral) or neural crest cell fates during development or in the adult. The nervous system includes the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nervous system. Neural crest cell fates include cranial, truncal, vagal, sacral, and cardiac, and give rise to parts of the ectodermal mesoderm, cranial cartilage, skull, thymus, teeth, melanocytes, iris pigment cells, cerebral ganglia, dorsal root ganglia, sympathetic / parasympathetic ganglia, endocrine cells, enteric nervous system, and heart.

[0058] As used herein, the term "adult stem cell" refers to somatic stem cells, and in one example, "hematopoietic stem cells," which refer to the stem cells in infants, children, and adults that give rise to all red and white blood cells and platelets.

[0059] As used herein, the term "embryonic stem cell" refers to a primitive (undifferentiated) cell obtained from one of several sources, including, but not limited to, a preimplantation embryo, an artificially created, i.e., in vitro fertilized embryo, etc., that is capable of cell division over extended periods of time in culture without differentiation and is known to have the capacity to develop into cells and / or tissues of the three primary germ layers, i.e., ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal.

[0060] As used herein, the term "endoderm" refers to the layer of cells derived from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, which gives rise to the lungs, other respiratory structures, and digestive organs, or generally the "gut," "in vivo," and has the capacity to give rise to a variety of cell types in vitro.

[0061] As used herein, the term "embryonic stem cell line" refers to a population of embryonic stem cells cultured under in vitro conditions that allow cells of, for example, the human WA-09 cell line, to grow for up to several days, months or years without differentiation.

[0062] As used herein, the term "human embryonic stem cell" or "hESC" refers to a type of pluripotent stem cell obtained from early human embryos up to and including the blastocyst stage that are capable of cell division for extended periods of time in culture without differentiation and are known to give rise to cells and tissues of the three primary germ layers, namely, ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal.

[0063] As used herein, the term "induced pluripotent stem cell" or "iPSC" refers to a type of pluripotent stem cell similar to embryonic stem cells, whereby somatic (adult) cells are reprogrammed to enter an embryonic stem cell-like state by forcing the expression of factors important for maintaining the "stemness" of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Mouse iPSCs were reported in 2006 (Takahashi and Yamanaka), and human iPSCs were reported later in 2007 (Takahashi et al. and Yu et al.). Mouse iPSCs exhibit key characteristics of pluripotent stem cells, including expression of stem cell markers, formation of tumors containing cells derived from all three germ layers, and the ability to contribute to multiple different tissues when injected into mouse embryos very early in development. Human iPSCs also express stem cell markers and can form cells characteristic of all three germ layers. Unlike embryonic stem cells, iPSCs are artificially formed by introducing certain embryonic genes (e.g., OCT4, SOX2, and KLF4 transgenes) (see, e.g., Takahashi and Yamanaka Cell 126, 663-676 (2006), incorporated herein by reference) into somatic cells, e.g., transfected cells C14, C72, and cell lines derived therefrom. Another example of an iPSC is an adult human skin cell or fibroblast transformed with genes (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, LIN28, and KLF4) cloned into a plasmid. See, e.g., Yu, et al., Science DOI: 10.1126 / science.1172482, incorporated herein by reference.

[0064] As used herein, the term "totipotency" refers to the ability to give rise to all of the cell types in the body, as well as all of the cell types that make up extraembryonic tissues, such as the placenta.

[0065] As used herein, the term "pluripotency" refers to the ability to develop into more than one cell type of the body.

[0066] As used herein, the term "pluripotent" refers to cells that have the ability to give rise to at least two, but often many different, cell types of the body. Pluripotent cells often form teratomas after injection into immunosuppressed mice.

[0067] As used herein, the term "pluripotent stem cell" refers to the ability of the cell to develop into at least two different cell types in response to environmental cues, i.e., morphogens, growth factors, signaling molecules, either activators or inhibitors, etc. In some embodiments, pluripotent stem cells refer to the ability of the cell to develop into any one of three developmental layers including endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm.

[0068] As used herein, the term "specialized cell" refers to a type of cell that performs a specific function in a multicellular organism. For example, a group of specialized cells, such as neurons, act together to form a system, such as the nervous system.

[0069] As used herein, the term "neurectoderm" refers to cells or cell fates found early in development or during differentiation of pluripotent stem cells that can give rise to cells of the neural lineage.

[0070] As used herein, the term "cell proliferation marker" refers to the expression of molecules associated with rapidly cycling cells that are not normally present in mature slowly cycling or non-cycling cells, i.e., molecules associated with actively dividing cells versus cells with prolonged cell cycle times or non-cycling cells. Examples of such markers include the Ki67 marker of cell proliferation (Gerdes, et al., Int J Cancer 31:13-20 (1983), incorporated herein by reference) and the phosphorylated histone H3 marker of the G2 / M phase of somatic cell division (Hendzel, et al., Chromosoma 106:348-360 (1997), incorporated herein by reference).

[0071] As used herein, the term "proliferation" refers to an increase in cell number.

[0072] As used herein, the term "differentiation" refers to the process by which unspecialized embryonic cells acquire the characteristics of specialized cells, such as particular types of neurons, brain cells, heart cells, liver cells, or muscle cells. Differentiation is usually controlled by the interaction of the cell's genes with the physical and chemical conditions external to the cell through signaling pathways that involve proteins embedded in the cell surface.

[0073] As used herein, the term "differentiation," when used in reference to cells of a cell differentiation system, refers to the process of differentiating one cell type (e.g., a pluripotent, totipotent or pluripotent cell) into another cell type, such as a targeted differentiated cell.

[0074] As used herein, the term "cell differentiation" refers to the pathway by which less specialized cells (i.e., stem cells) develop or mature to have more distinct morphology and function (e.g., iPSCs develop from neural crest progenitor cells to cells of a neural lineage, to floor plate midbrain progenitor cells, and to midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention).

[0075] As used herein, the term "undifferentiated" refers to cells that have not yet developed into specialized cell types.

[0076] As used herein, the term "default" or "passive" in the context of cell differentiation pathways refers to a pathway in which less specialized cells become a specific differentiated cell type in culture when not treated with a specific compound, i.e., under normal cell culture conditions without contact with at least one morphogen. In other words, default cells arise when cells are not contacted with molecules (i.e., morphogens) that can change the differentiated cell type, e.g., cultures treated with only LSB and not with activators of SHH or activators of Wnt to generate forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2)+ cells of the present invention instead express markers HESS, PAX6, LHX2, and EMX2. In contrast, "non-default" in the context of cells refers to a differentiated cell type that gives rise to a different cell type than the default cell. That is, a non-default cell is a differentiated cell that arises from non-default conditions, such as a cell of the invention, including a forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2)+ neuronal cell, a floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cell, and a midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neuron of the invention, etc. A default cell can also be a default cell that has been contacted with a morphogen to become a non-default cell, such as a non-default floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cell that subsequently becomes a default cell, but has not subsequently been contacted with a morphogen compound, such as a non-default floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cell that is not a midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neuron due to lack of contact with a morphogen, such as CHIR.

[0077] As used herein, the term "morphogen" refers to a compound that affects the differentiation of cells, i.e., determines, at least in part, the fate of a cell. Morphogens can also affect cells to differentiate into non-predetermined cell types.

[0078] As used herein, the term "regulated differentiation" refers to the manipulation of stem cell culture conditions to induce differentiation into specific (e.g., desired) cell types, such as floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells and mesencephalic destined FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the invention. In one embodiment, the term "regulated differentiation" in the context of cells refers to the use of small molecules, growth factor proteins, and other culture conditions that promote the transition of cells from a pluripotent state to more mature or specialized cell fates (e.g., central nervous system cells, neural cells, floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells and mesencephalic destined FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the invention, etc.). In one preferred embodiment, the initiation of regulated differentiation is the contact of cells with LDN / SB on day 0. Cells undergoing regulated differentiation as described herein form non-basal cell types, floor plate mesencephalic progenitor cells and mesencephalic destined FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the invention.

[0079] As used herein, the term "inducing differentiation" in the context of cells refers to changing a given cell type (genotype and / or phenotype) to a non-predetermined cell type (genotype and / or phenotype). Thus, "inducing differentiation in stem cells" refers to inducing cells to divide and become progeny cells with characteristics distinct from stem cells, such as genotype (i.e., changes in gene expression as determined by genetic analysis such as microarrays) and / or phenotype (i.e., changes in expression of proteins such as forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) or a set of proteins, such as positive (+) for forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) and LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) and negative (-) for PAX6).

[0080] As used herein, the term "fate" in the context of cells, such as "cell fate commitment," generally refers to a cell that has a genetically determined lineage and has progeny cells that can become a variety of cell types or a few specific cell types depending on in vivo or in vitro culture conditions. In other words, the predetermined fate of a cell is determined by the cell's environment to lead it down a specific differentiation pathway, such that the cell becomes one cell type instead of another, e.g., the progeny of a stem cell with a "neural fate" that will become a neuronal cell instead of a muscle cell or a skin cell.

[0081] As used herein, the term "neurite outgrowth" or "neural extension" refers to the observation of membrane-enclosed cytoplasmic protrusions extending from a cell.

[0082] In contrast, "neuronal hyperplasia" refers to unwanted and uncontrolled neural proliferation, i.e., uncontrolled proliferation of neurons, uncontrolled growth of transplanted cells at the transplant site. As used herein, the term "teratoma" refers to a non-cancerous tumor of any tissue type that grows from transplanted cells.

[0083] As used herein, the term "teratoma formation" refers to the unwanted proliferation of transplanted cells into non-cancerous tumors of various tissue types.

[0084] As used herein, the term "dopamine neurons" or "dopamine system neurons" generally refers to cells capable of expressing dopamine. "Midbrain dopamine neurons" or "mDA" refer to predestined dopamine-expressing cells in forebrain structures and to dopamine-expressing cells in forebrain structures.

[0085] As used herein, the term "neural stem cell" refers to stem cells found in adult nervous tissue that can give rise to neurons and glial (support) cells. Examples of glial cells include astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.

[0086] As used herein, the term "floor plate" or "FP" or "fp" refers to a region of the neural tube in vivo that extends along the entire ventral midline, also described as the unpaired ventral longitudinal zone of the neural tube, or also referred to as the signaling center of the neural tube. In other words, the neural tube was divided into various regions, with the ventral cells closest to the midline constituting the floor plate. As an example of further cell specification, the chick midbrain FP can be divided into medial (MFP) and lateral (LFP) regions based on gene expression, induction pattern and function. Floor plate cells are found in vivo in several regions of the developing embryo, for example floor plate cells are found in the midbrain, hindbrain, etc. It is believed that in vivo floor plate cells in the midbrain region give rise to cells that are different from cells differentiated from floor plate cells in other regions. One major floor plate marker in the midbrain region is FOXA2.

[0087] As used herein, the term "tectal plate" refers to the dorsal cells closest to the midline. One tectal plate marker is LMX1A. During embryonic development, floor plate cells and tectal plate cells are positioned in distinct locations (ventral vs. dorsal) in the CNS due to the opposing patterning requirements for the induction of these cells.

[0088] As used herein, the term "midbrain" refers to the region between the forebrain (front) and hindbrain (back) of the developing vertebrate brain. The midbrain region gives rise to many areas of the brain, including, but not limited to, the reticular formation, which is a portion of the tegmentum, a region of the brainstem that influences motor function, the cerebral peduncle, which is made up of nerve fibers that connect the cerebral hemispheres to the cerebellum, and a large pigmented nucleus called the substantia nigra. A unique feature of the developing midbrain is the co-expression of the floor plate marker FOXA2 and the tectal plate marker LMX1A.

[0089] As used herein, the term "neuron" refers to a nerve cell, which is the primary functional unit of the nervous system. A neuron consists of a cell body, an axon that is a projection of the cell body, and one or more dendrites. Neurons transmit information to other neurons or cells by releasing neurotransmitters at synapses.

[0090] As used herein, the term "cell culture" refers to the cultivation of cells in vitro in an artificial medium for research or medical treatment.

[0091] As used herein, the term "medium" refers to a liquid that contains nutrients to cover, grow and support cells in culture vessels such as petri plates, multi-well plates, and the like. Medium may also contain growth factors that are added to induce desired changes in the cells.

[0092] As used herein, the term "neuron maturation medium" or "BAGCT" medium refers to a medium that includes N2 medium and further includes brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP, and transforming growth factor type beta3 for differentiation into midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons.

[0093] As used herein, the term "feeder cell layer" refers to cells used in co-culture to maintain pluripotent stem cells. For human embryonic stem cell culture, typical feeder cell layers include mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) or human embryonic fibroblasts that are treated to prevent cell division during culture.

[0094] As used herein, the term "passage" in the context of cell culture refers to the process of dissociating, washing, and seeding cells into new culture vessels after one round of cell growth and proliferation. The number of passages a culture of a given lineage has undergone is an indication of the age and expected stability of the culture.

[0095] As used herein, the term "expressed" in reference to a gene or protein refers to the production of mRNA or protein that can be observed using measurements such as microarray assays, antibody staining assays, and the like.

[0096] As used herein, the term "paired box gene 6" or "PAX6" refers to a marker for non-default neural progenitor cells.

[0097] As used herein, the term "TUJ1" or "neuron-specific type III β-tubulin" in the context of the differentiated cells of the present invention refers to a marker of early neural human cell differentiation, e.g., neural progenitor cells, and is found expressed in neurons of the PNS and CNS.

[0098] As used herein, the term "homodimer" in the context of a SMAD molecule refers to at least two SMAD molecules bound to each other, for example, by a disulfide bond.

[0099] As used herein, the term "contacting" a cell with a compound of the invention refers to placing the compound in a position such that the compound touches the cell to produce a "contacted" cell. Contacting can be achieved using any suitable method. For example, in one embodiment, contacting is by adding the compound to a tube containing the cells. Contacting can also be achieved by adding the compound to a culture of cells.

[0100] As used herein, the term "adherent cells" refers to cells growing in vitro where the cells are attached to the bottom or sides of a culture vessel, can contact the vessel via extracellular matrix molecules and the like, and require the use of enzymes, i.e., trypsin, dispase, etc., to detach the cells from the culture dish / vessel. "Adherent cells" are the opposite of cells in suspension culture, which are not attached and do not require the use of enzymes to detach the cells from the culture vessel.

[0101] As used herein, the term "marker" or "cell marker" refers to a gene or protein that identifies a particular cell or cell type. A marker for a cell may not be limited to one marker, but may refer to a "pattern" of markers, where a specified set of markers can distinguish a cell or cell type from another cell or cell type. For example, the midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention express one or more markers that distinguish floor plate midbrain progenitor cells from less differentiated cells that are precursor cells, i.e., that distinguish forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2)-positive and LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A)-positive cells from HESS+ and PAX6+ cells, as shown, for example, by the exemplary gene expression patterns in Figures 1e and 1f.

[0102] As used herein, the term "positive", including "positive cells" in reference to cells, refers to cells that express a marker, for example, a nucleic acid sequence that hybridizes to a marker nucleic acid sequence in a detectable quantitative and / or qualitative amount above a control or comparative cell, as measured by "staining" with an antibody for that marker using an antibody staining (detection) system, or by a reporter molecule, i.e., a fluorescent molecule, bound to a double-stranded nucleic acid sequence. For example, a cell that is positive for a marker such as forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) refers to a cell that expresses FOXA2 mRNA and / or protein, respectively, as detected by a measurement such as a gene array or an antibody. Such a positive cell may be referred to as FOXA2+. When a cell is positive for more than one marker, for example, when using the designation FOXA2 / LMX1A+, the cell or the majority of the cell population is positive for both FOXA2 and LMX1A.

[0103] As used herein, the term "negative," including "negative cells," in reference to a cell or cell population refers to a cell or population in which there is no detectable signal for a marker or no signal at the level of a control population. For example, cells that fail to stain after contact with, forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) antibody detection methods, or gene arrays including detection of FOXA2 mRNA, etc., are FOXA2- or FOXA2-negative.

[0104] As used herein, the term "reporter gene" or "reporter construct" refers to a genetic construct comprising a nucleic acid that encodes a readily detectable or readily measurable protein, such as a colored protein, a fluorescent protein such as GFP, or an enzyme such as β-galactosidase (lacZ gene).

[0105] As used herein, the term "GFP" refers to any green fluorescent protein DNA sequence that can be expressed in a cell to produce a fluorescent protein, typically used as an indicator marker for the expression of a target gene. Examples of GFP include GFP sequences isolated from coelenterates such as Aequoria victoria, and their synthetic sequence derivatives such as "eGFP".

[0106] The term "sample" is used in its broadest sense. In one sense, the term can refer to cells or tissues. In another sense, the term is intended to include specimens or cultures obtained from any source, and encompasses liquids, solids, and tissues. Environmental samples include environmental materials such as surface matter, soil, water, and industrial samples. These examples should not be construed as limiting the types of samples applicable to the present invention.

[0107] The terms "purified", "purifying", "purification", "isolated", "isolating", "isolation", and grammatical equivalents of these terms, as used herein, refer to reducing the amount of at least one contaminating contaminant from a sample. For example, a desired cell type is purified by at least 10%, preferably at least 30%, more preferably at least 50%, even more preferably at least 75%, and most preferably at least 90% by reducing the corresponding amount of an undesired cell type. For example, the controlled differentiation of the present invention results in a desired increase in the purity of differentiated floor plate midbrain progenitor cells or midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention. In other words, "purify" and its equivalents refer to removing certain cells (e.g., undesired cells) from a sample mechanically, such as by flow cytometer cell sorting, or via controlled differentiation. For example, for differentiation of a purified population of Forkhead Box Protein A2 (FOXA2)+LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A)+ progenitor cells of the present invention, progenitor cells are purified by sorting Forkhead Box Protein A2 (FOXA2)+LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A)+ double positive cells from a mixed cell population by flow cytometry to remove contaminating PAX6 neurons. Midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons are also purified or "selected" from non-dopamine (DA) (default cells) by using a specific method of cell culture comprising the compositions and methods of the present invention. Removal or selection of non-midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons increases the percentage of desired midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons in the sample. Thus, purification of a cell type results in "enrichment" for, ie, an increase in the amount of, the desired cells in a sample, namely, midbrain-fate FOXA2 / LMX1A+ dopamine (DA) neurons.

[0108] As used herein, the term "naturally occurring," when applied to objects (e.g., cells, tissues, etc.) and / or chemicals (e.g., proteins, amino acid sequences, nucleic acid sequences, codons, etc.), means that the objects and / or compounds are / were found in nature. For example, a naturally occurring cell refers to a cell present in an organism that can be isolated from a source in nature and that has not been intentionally modified by man in the laboratory, e.g., an embryonic cell.

[0109] As used herein, the term "in vitro" refers to an artificial environment and to processes or reactions that occur within an artificial environment. Examples of in vitro environments include, but are not limited to, test tubes and cell cultures.

[0110] As used herein, the term "in vivo" refers to the natural environment (e.g., an animal or a cell) and to processes or reactions that occur within a natural environment, such as embryonic development, cell differentiation, neurulation, and the like.

[0111] The terms "derived from" or "constructed from" or "differentiated from" when used in the context of any cell disclosed herein refer to cells obtained (e.g., isolated, purified, etc.) from parent cells in a cell line, tissue (e.g., dissociated embryos or body fluids using any manipulation, such as, but not limited to, single cell isolation, cultured in vivo, treatment and / or mutagenesis). Cells can be derived from other cells using, for example, chemical treatment, irradiation, induction of novel protein expression by, for example, infection with a virus, transfection with a DNA sequence, contact (treatment) with a morphogen, etc., and selection (e.g., by continuous culture) of any cell type contained in the cultured parent cell. Derived cells can be selected from a mixed population by growth factors, response to cytokines, progression of selected cytokine treatment, adhesion, lack of adhesion, selection methods, and similar forces.

[0112] As used herein, the term "cell" refers to single cells as well as populations of cells (i.e., more than one cell). The population may be a pure population containing one cell type, such as a population of neural cells or a population of undifferentiated embryonic cells. Alternatively, the population may contain more than one cell type, such as a mixed cell population. It is not intended that the number of cells in a population is limited. For example, in one embodiment, a mixed population of cells may contain at least one differentiated cell. In the present invention, there is no limit to the number of cell types that a cell population may contain.

[0113] As used herein, the term "highly enriched population" refers to a population of cells that express a marker at a higher percentage or amount than a comparison population, such as a population of cells in a culture dish, e.g., treating an LSB-contacted cell culture with palmorfamine on day 1 and CHIR on day 3 results in a highly enriched population of floor plate midbrain progenitor cells compared to treatment with LSB alone. In other examples, enriched populations are populations generated by sorting or separating cells expressing one or more markers from cells that do not express the desired marker, such as CD142-enriched populations, A9-enriched populations, and the like.

[0114] The term "cell biology" or "cellular biology" refers to the study of living cells, such as their anatomical form and function, e.g., their physiological properties, structure, organelles, and interactions with their environment, their cell life cycle, cell division, and death.

[0115] The term "nucleotide sequence of interest" refers to any nucleotide sequence (e.g., RNA or DNA) the manipulation of which may be deemed desirable by one of skill in the art for any reason (e.g., treatment of disease, imparting improved traits, expression of a protein of interest in a host cell, expression of a ribozyme, etc.). Such nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to, coding sequences for structural genes (e.g., reporter genes, selectable marker genes, oncogenes, drug resistance genes, growth factors, etc.) and non-coding regulatory sequences that do not code for an mRNA or protein product (e.g., promoter sequences, polyadenylation sequences, termination sequences, enhancer sequences, etc.).

[0116] As used herein, the term "protein of interest" refers to a protein encoded by a nucleic acid of interest.

[0117] The term "gene" refers to a nucleic acid (e.g., DNA or RNA) sequence that comprises coding sequences necessary for the production of a polypeptide or precursor (e.g., proinsulin). A polypeptide can be encoded by a full-length coding sequence or by any portion of the coding sequence, so long as the desired activity or functional property (e.g., enzymatic activity, ligand binding, signal transduction, etc.) of the full-length or fragment is retained. The term also encompasses the coding region of a structural gene and includes sequences of about 1 kb or more on either end that are adjacent to the coding region on both the 5' and 3' ends such that the gene corresponds to the length of the full-length mRNA. Sequences that are located 5' of the coding region and that are present on the mRNA are referred to as 5' non-translated sequences. Sequences that are located 3' or downstream of the coding region and that are present on the mRNA are referred to as 3' non-translated sequences. The term "gene" encompasses both cDNA and genomic forms of genes. A genomic form of a gene or clone of a gene contains the coding region interrupted by non-coding sequences called "introns" or "intervening regions" or "intervening sequences". Introns are segments of a gene that are transcribed into nuclear RNA (hnRNA) and may contain regulatory sequences such as enhancers. Introns are removed or "spliced ​​out" from the nuclear or primary transcript and therefore are absent in the messenger RNA (mRNA) transcript. The mRNA functions during translation to specify the sequence or order of amino acids in a nascent polypeptide.

[0118] As used herein, the term "gene expression" refers to the process of converting the genetic information encoded by a gene into RNA (e.g., mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, or snRNA) by "transcription" of the gene (i.e., by the enzymatic action of RNA polymerase) and, for protein-coding genes, by "translation" of the mRNA into protein. Gene expression can be regulated at many stages in the process. "Upregulation" or "activation" refers to regulation that increases production of the gene expression product (i.e., RNA or protein), while "downregulation" or "repression" refers to regulation that decreases production. Molecules (e.g., transcription factors) involved in upregulation or downregulation are often called "activators" and "repressors," respectively.

[0119] As used herein, the terms "nucleic acid molecule encoding," "DNA sequence encoding," "DNA encoding," "RNA sequence encoding," and "RNA encoding" refer to the order or sequence of deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides along a strand of deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid. The order of these deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides determines the order of amino acids along the polypeptide (protein) chain. The DNA sequence or RNA sequence thus codes for an amino acid sequence.

[0120] The term "isolated" when used with respect to a nucleic acid, as in "isolated oligonucleotide" or "isolated polynucleotide", refers to a nucleic acid sequence that has been identified and separated from at least one component or contaminant with which the nucleic acid sequence is normally associated in its natural source. An isolated nucleic acid exists in a form or state that is different from that in which it is found in nature. In contrast, non-isolated nucleic acids, such as nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA, are found in the form or state in which they exist in nature. For example, a given DNA sequence (e.g., a gene) is found in the vicinity of adjacent genes on the chromosome of a host cell, and an RNA sequence, such as a particular mRNA sequence that encodes a particular protein, is found in a cell as a mixture with many other mRNAs that encode many proteins. However, an isolated nucleic acid that encodes a given protein includes, by way of example, such a nucleic acid in a cell that normally expresses the given protein, but that is present in a chromosomal location that is different from that of the natural cell, or that is otherwise flanked by a nucleic acid sequence that is different from that found in nature. An isolated nucleic acid, oligonucleotide, or polynucleotide may exist in single-stranded or double-stranded form. When the isolated nucleic acid, oligonucleotide or polynucleotide is to be used to express a protein, the oligonucleotide or polynucleotide will contain at least the sense or coding strand (i.e., the oligonucleotide or polynucleotide may be single-stranded), but may contain both the sense and antisense strands (i.e., the oligonucleotide or polynucleotide may be double-stranded).

[0121] As used herein, the term "kit" refers to any delivery system for delivering materials. In the context of cell differentiation, a kit may refer to a combination of materials for contacting stem cells, such as a delivery system that allows for the storage, transfer, or delivery of reaction reagents from one location to another in suitable containers (e.g., tubing, etc.) and / or auxiliary materials (e.g., buffers, instructions for performing cell differentiation, etc.) (e.g., compounds, proteins, detection agents (e.g., antibodies that bind to tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A), etc.). For example, the kit may include suitable reaction reagents for inhibiting signaling pathways, such as inhibitors for reducing transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) / activin-nodal signaling, such as SB431542 (or SB431542 replacements) and the like, inhibitors for reducing SMAD signaling, such as LDN-193189 (or LDN-193189 replacements) and the like, in one example, Wingless (Wnt or Wnts) signaling. inhibitors for lowering glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), otherwise known as WNT signaling activators (WNT agonists), such as CHIR99021 (or CHIR99021 substitutes) and the like, Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling activators (e.g., Smoothened (SMO) receptor small molecule agonists), such as Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II molecule, palmorfamine and the like, fibroblast growth factor receptor activators (e.g., SMO receptor small molecule agonists), such as Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) C25II molecule, palmorfamine and the like, The components include one or more containers (e.g., boxes, or bags, test tubes, Eppendorf tubes, capillary tubes, multi-well plates, and the like) that contain molecules having fibrinogen 8 (FGF8) activity, such as fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8), and neuronal maturation molecules, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, dibutyryl cAMP, and transforming growth factor type beta 3, molecules that can replace these components, and / or contain auxiliary materials.In one embodiment, the reagents in the kit may be in solution, frozen, or lyophilized. In one embodiment, the reagents in the kit may be in individual containers or may be provided in specific combinations, such as combinations of LSB (LDN-193189 and SB431542), sonic hedgehog (SHH) C25II molecule and palmorfamine, sonic hedgehog (SHH) C25II molecule, palmorfamine and CHIR99021, or palmorfamine and CHIR99021, neuronal maturation molecules, and the like.

[0122] Description of the invention The present invention relates to the field of stem cell biology, in particular to the lineage-specific differentiation of pluripotent or multipotent stem cells, which may include, but are not limited to, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) as well as non-embryonic human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), somatic stem cells, stem cells derived from patients with disease, or any other cells capable of lineage-specific differentiation. A method is specifically described for controlling the lineage-specific differentiation of hESCs and / or hiPSCs into floor plate midbrain progenitor cells and then further into a large population of midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons using novel culture conditions. Various uses are further contemplated for the midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+ dopamine (DA) neurons generated using the methods of the present invention, including, but not limited to, in in vitro drug discovery assays, in neurobiological research, and as a therapeutic agent to ameliorate diseases or disorders caused by the loss of dopamine neurons in patients. Additionally, compositions and methods are provided for differentiating midbrain-fate FOXA2+LMX1A+TH+dopamine (DA) neurons from human pluripotent stem cells for use in modeling disease, particularly Parkinson's disease.

[0123] The present invention relates to a feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) that includes selective degeneration of midbrain dopamine (mDA) neurons in the brain of a patient. Since the symptoms of PD are mainly due to selective loss of DA neurons in the substantia nigra of the ventral midbrain, PD is considered to be one of the diseases for which a cell replacement therapeutic strategy is most suitable for treatment. Therefore, many attempts have been made to transplant cells into the brain of a patient to replace the loss of function of midbrain dopamine (mDA) neurons. However, these experiments have been unsuccessful, and symptomatic treatments currently used for patients have a wide variety of successful results. Therefore, new treatments are needed for PD patients to slow down the loss of neurological function.

[0124] Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are a source of cells for application in regenerative medicine. Controlled differentiation of hPSCs into specialized cells such as spinal motor neurons (Li, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 215-221 (2005), incorporated herein by reference) or midbrain dopamine (DA)-like neurons resulting from differentiation by methods other than those of the present invention. The present inventors have discovered, as described herein, that previous dopamine (DA) neurons, referred to herein as dopamine (DA)-like neurons (i.e., Perrier, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference), are not bona fide midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons of the present invention (see Figures 3, 10, 13 and 16). Therefore, we refer to the floor plate-derived dopaminergic neurons produced by the methods described herein, i.e., the dopaminergic neurons of the present invention, as "authentic" because, unlike dopaminergic neurons produced by published methods, the "authentic" dopaminergic neurons of the present invention ameliorate Parkinson's-like neurological symptoms when transplanted into rodents and primates without significant interference from neuronal hyperplasia and teratoma formation. Also, unlike previous methods of producing dopaminergic neurons, the "authentic" dopaminergic neurons of the present invention are produced at a higher percentage from the starting population and retain transplantability for several months in culture.

[0125] Thus, a method for generating authentic midbrain DA neurons has been discovered by using the differentiation method described herein. However, the effective use of hPSCs for cell therapy has lagged behind the progress of cell culture. Although mouse PSC-derived DA neurons have shown efficacy in Parkinson's disease (PD) models (Tabar, et al. Nature Med. 14, 379-381 (2008); Wernig, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US A 105, 5856-5861 (2008), all of which are incorporated herein by reference), DA neurons derived from human PSCs generally show poor in vivo performance (Lindvall and Kokaia, J. Clin. Invest 120, 29-40 (2010), incorporated herein by reference). In addition to not compensating for intrinsic neuronal function loss, there are significant safety concerns when hPSC-derived neurons are used for transplantation related to their teratoma-forming or neuronal hyperplasia potential (Roy, et al. Nature Med. 12, 1259-1268 (2006); Elkabetz, et al. Genes Dev. 22, 152-165 (2008), incorporated herein by reference).

[0126] Another possible source of cells for transplantation are human ESC-derived DA neurons. Previous attempts to generate differentiated cells that look like human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived DA-like midbrain neurons for transplantation into rodent PD models using these cells as a starting cell population resulted in poor in vivo survival of the grafts after transplantation. This failure was most likely due to incomplete midbrain DA neuron differentiation in vitro, which would result in cells that look like midbrain DA neurons but are not transplantable to replace lost neuronal function. Indeed, the inventors herein show that DA-like neurons previously generated in our laboratory and described in publications were not the same cell type as the floor plate midbrain DA neurons of the present invention, nor did they have similar function or transplantability. See, for example, Figures 16 and 17. Thus, the inventors also discovered that the cells had to pass through specific developmental stages to become a suitable replacement cell population for cell-based replacement therapy, as the cells undergo controlled differentiation to generate a cell population containing a large number of properly functioning neurons in the laboratory. The present inventors have also discovered that at least certain developmental stages, such as FOX2A / LIM1A+ day 11 intermediates, must be present to obtain the transplantable DA neurons of the present invention. The present inventors have discovered that if such developmental stages are not present, the resulting DA-like neurons do not have the same functional capacity as the midbrain DA neurons of the present invention obtained from FOX2A / LIM1A+ day 11 intermediates.

[0127] In contrast to previous observations, a novel culture technique is described herein that involves the introduction of a floor plate cell induction system for the induction of human DA neurons that engraft efficiently in vivo. Thus, the past failure to obtain cell populations that mainly contain the committed DA neurons of the present invention (i.e., FOXA2+ and LMX1A+ DA neurons that can engraft efficiently) was believed to be due to failure of transplantation of DA-like neurons, i.e., failure due to incomplete specification of DA-like cells. The previous hypothesis was that the failure of transplantation was due to a specific vulnerability of the cells, i.e., DA-like cultured neurons could not survive transplantation stress. As described herein, midbrain FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ floor plate progenitor cells were obtained from hPSCs 11 days after exposure to small molecule activators of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) and canonical WNT signaling. These day 11 cells, double positive for FOXA2+ and LMX1A+, are contacted with additional small molecules to induce further differentiation into transplantable midbrain DA neurons, positive for TH+FOXA2+ and LMX1A+ by day 25. These mature floor plate midbrain DA neurons can be maintained in vitro for several months. Detailed in vitro molecular profiling, biochemical and electrophysiological data reveal the developmental progression and confirm the identity of the hPSC-derived midbrain DA neurons. In vivo survival and function are demonstrated in three host species of PD animal models. Long-term transplantation in 6-OHDA-lesioned mice and rats shows robust survival of midbrain DA neurons, complete restoration of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior, and improvement of forelimb use and immobility. And scalability is demonstrated by transplantation into Parkinson's monkeys. The good DA neuron survival, function and lack of neuronal hyperplasia in the three animal models tested represent the promise of developing cell-based therapies for PD based on the compositions and methods of the present invention.

[0128] Thus, we envision a primary use of our discovery as the ability to provide an unlimited supply of fully functional floor plate-derived midbrain DA neurons suitable for preclinical and clinical therapeutic applications. Specifically, we have discovered novel protocols for efficient differentiation of mDA neurons from at least pluripotent cell populations isolated from rodents and humans (human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)). Their studies included PINK1 mutant iPS cell lines obtained from human patients with inherited Parkinson's disease (Seibler, et al., The Journal of Neuroscience, 2011, 31(16):5970-5976, incorporated herein by reference). Human stem cell populations (hESCs or hiPSCs) were differentiated into a midbrain phenotype, which became more authentic transplantable DA neurons after contact with neuronal maturation molecules. This protocol was used to demonstrate high yields of hESC progeny by day 11 of controlled differentiation into a midbrain DA (mDA) neuronal phenotype that includes expression of key transcription factors such as TH, FoxA2, ​​and LMX1A, and upon further differentiation produces additional key proteins such as TH. Transplantation of these hESC-derived mDA neurons into immunocompromised rodent and primate hosts demonstrated good in vivo survival of transplanted cells, with functional recovery of behavioral defects, unlike previous in vitro derived DA neurons.

[0129] The advantages of using the method of the present invention for generating DA neurons over other methods are apparent, in part, from the following information. Other methods aimed at generating bona fide midbrain DA neurons that engraft efficiently in vivo have not been successful in using somatic and neural stem cells (for review, see Kriks & Studer, Protocols for generating ES cell-derived dopamine neurons in Development and engineering of dopamine neurons (Pasterkamp et al., eds.) (Landes Biosciences, 2008, incorporated herein by reference). Pluripotent stem cells such as ES cells were subsequently used as a source to generate transplantable cells. Early studies using mouse ES cells in the 1990s demonstrated the feasibility of inducing specific lineages, including neurons, in vitro from pluripotent cells (Okabe, et al., Mech. Dev. 59:89-102 (1996); Bain, et al., Dev. Biol. 168v342-357 (1995), all of which are incorporated herein by reference). Indeed, midbrain DA neurons were not identified in early ex vivo transplantation studies (Ye, et al., Cell These were generated using a controlled differentiation strategy (Lee, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 18v675-679 (2000), incorporated herein by reference) based on developmental insights derived from the DA neuron 1993:755-766 (1998), incorporated herein by reference). Other controlled differentiation strategies have been used to generate other neuronal types, such as somatic motor neurons (Wichterle, et al., Cell 110, 385-397 (2002), incorporated herein by reference). However, these efforts did not result in cell populations containing a high percentage of midbrain DA neurons or cells capable of restoring neuronal function in vivo. In fact, the resulting populations contained a mixture of cell types in addition to midbrain DA neurons.Even the inventors have developed other methods to generate midbrain DA neurons (see in part below), however, these cell populations were also mixtures of cell types and failed to restore neuronal function. In particular, human ES cells were differentiated into early neuroepithelial cells called neural rosettes, and the rosette stage cells were subsequently induced to express midbrain DA neuron progenitor and differentiation markers. These cells went on to show features of functional neurons by electrophysiology, in vitro DA release, and formation of TH immunogold-positive synaptic connections (Perrier, et al. From the cover: Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference). However, despite these promising in vitro data, transplantation of cells in 6OHDA-lesioned mouse hosts produced very few surviving dopaminergic neurons.There is strong evidence for the in vivo functionality of mouse ES-derived DA neurons (Barberi, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 21:1200-1207 (2003); Tabar, et al. Nature Med. 14:379-381 (2008); Bjorklund, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2344-2349 (2002); Kim, et al. Nature 418:50-56 (2002), all of which are incorporated herein by reference), as well as robust in vitro functional characterization of human ES-derived DA neurons (Perrier, et al., From the cover: Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference) and the clear evidence that human fetal DA neurons can survive as striatal xenografts (Brundin, et al. Exp. Brain Res. 70:192-208 (1988); Bjorklund, et al., Neuronal replacement by intracerebral neural implants in animal domdels of neurodegenerative disease. Raven. Press., New York. 455-492 (1988), all of which are incorporated herein by reference). This was a surprising negative result. In the nearly eight years since the first failed attempts to transplant human ES cell-derived DA neurons, there has been little progress in the field.Some limited improvement has been observed using primate pluripotent stem cell sources, cells pretreated with FGF20 or Wnt5A (Sanchez-Pernaute, et al. Long-term survival of dopamine neurons derived from parthenogenetic primate embryonic stem cells (Cyno1) in rat and primate striatum. Stem Cells 23:914-922 (2005), incorporated herein by reference), or human ES cells differentiated in the presence of factors secreted from immortalized mesencephalic stellate cells (Roy, et al., Nature Med. 12:1259-1268 (2006), incorporated herein by reference). However, none of the previous strategies have been successful in generating enriched populations of DA neurons of the invention for use in transplantation methods to restore neuronal function in vivo.

[0130] I. Cell culture methods for inducing neuronal precursor (lineage) cells: Contact of human pluripotent stem cells with S13431542 and LDN-193189 resulted in differentiated neural lineage cells. The following examples describe exemplary methods for providing neural lineage cells that were used during the development of the present invention.

[0131] Dual SMAD inhibition has previously been used as a rapid and highly effective method to induce one of the neural lineage cells from hPSCs (Chambers, et al., Nat Biotechnol 27, (2009), incorporated herein by reference). These neural lineage cells induced by molecules including Noggin had a default pathway that allowed them to develop into central nervous system cells, i.e., a neuronal fate. Follow-up studies reported that using the small molecule Dorsomorphin (DM) instead of Noggin at least partially resulted in similar but not identical differentiated cells with significant differences in culture consistency (Kim, et al., Robust enhancement of neural differentiation from human ES and iPS cells regardless of their innate difference in differentiation propensity. Stem Cell Rev 6, 270-281,(2010); Zhou, et al., High-Efficiency Induction of Neural Conversion in hESC and hiPSC with a Single Chemical Inhibitor of TGF-beta Superfamily Receptors. Stem Cells, 504,(2010), incorporated herein by reference).

[0132] We observed that cells generated using Noggin, despite showing the same developmental stage as LDN-treated cells, express most of the same markers and have similar developmental potential to generate various neural lineages, but also show differences such as a more anterior orientation on the anterior-posterior axis (i.e., more forebrain, more cells expressing FOXG1, etc.) compared to neurons induced using LDN. Thus, although LDN was used instead of Noggin to inhibit BMPs among other signaling pathways, Noggin and LDN may have other types of activities different from inhibiting BMPs.

[0133] Due in part to the high expenditure of using Noggin, the inventors wondered whether the use of BMP inhibitors could substitute for Noggin in the differentiation of cells with a neuronal fate. Thus, a small molecule BMP inhibitor LDN‐193189 (Yu, et al., Nat Med 14, 1363-1369, (2008), incorporated herein by reference) was used during the development of the present invention and was found to replace Noggin in combination with SB431542 to generate cells with a neural fate, i.e., CNS cells, primitive neuroectoderm, from hPSCs (Figure 2A). This combination treatment enhances the potency of these two inhibitors. LDN‐193189 The combination of SB431542 and SB431542 was named LSB.

[0134] Generally, cell differentiation was initiated by treatment of highly confluent monolayer hES or hiPS with dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. A preferred embodiment utilizes a percentage confluence of 50%-100%, and a most preferred embodiment utilizes 70%-80% confluence. It will be apparent to one of skill in the art that the initial seeding density required to achieve the preferred confluence of the present invention will depend on cell type, size, seeding efficiency, survival, adhesion and other parameters, and can be empirically determined without undue experimentation on the part of one of skill in the art. Dual inhibition of SMADs can be achieved by a variety of compounds, including noggin, SB431542, LDN-193189, dorsomorphin, or other molecules that block TGFβ, BMP and activin / nodal signaling. A preferred embodiment utilizes a composition comprising SB431542 and LDN-193189 (collectively LSB) at a concentration of 0.1 μM to 250 μM, or more preferably 1 to 25 μM, or most preferably 10 μM SB431542, and 10 to 5000 nM LDN-193189, or most preferably 100 to 500 nM.

[0135] II. Induction of DA neurons via rosette cell intermediates from hESCs and results of transplantation experiments using these DA-like neurons The inventors have previously used several other controlled differentiation methods that resulted in cell populations containing DA-like neurons. These DA-like neurons were used in transplantation studies, raising concerns about further using these cells for therapeutic applications. For example, the methods described in Perrier et al., 2004 and Fasano et al., 2010, including MS5 neural induction, led to rosette cell formation, and these methods were used to generate day 11 progenitor cells (see, e.g., Figures 2, 16 and 17), which were further used to obtain DA-like neurons. These neurons arose from a low percentage of progenitor cells in the resulting day 11 cell population. Transplantation studies using these neurons showed low post-transplant survival and loss of DA-like neuronal phenotype, in addition to the observed post-transplant development of inappropriate neural types with loss of growth control leading to the development of teratomas. See Figures 16 and 17.

[0136] Specifically, at P0, hESCs were contacted with molecules to initiate neural induction of Oct4+ cells into rosette cells using MS5 feeder cells (Perrier et al., 2004). At P1 stage, rosette cells were expanded by contacting the cells with additional molecules to differentiate the cells into P2 stage cells with specific expression patterns, including Pax2+ / En1+ DA progenitor cells, and further differentiated into TH+ / En1+ DA neurons. These cells were used for transplantation in 6OHDA-lesioned rats and immunosuppressed by cyclosporine A treatment. These transplantation studies showed concerns of low in vivo survival, loss of TH+ phenotype, further proliferation of undesirable and possibly lethal cells, i.e., teratomas, which would cause further medical problems for patients, and growth of cells into inappropriate neural types.

[0137] There were very few surviving TH+ neurons (<50 TH+ cells / animal) in grafts of rosette-derived DA neuron precursor cells at 4.5 months after transplantation (FIG. 16A). However, in contrast to TH+ cells, GFP-labeled cells (GFP was driven by a widespread promoter) were highly viable after transplantation, suggesting that the majority of surviving cells after transplantation were neurons with a non-DA neuron identity (16B). Very few graft-derived cells (hNA+ (green)) co-expressed TH (red), again suggesting that the majority of transplanted human cells assume a non-DA neuron phenotype (FIG. 16C). Panels 16D-E show that, despite the very poor in vivo survival, there was some (slight and highly variable) improvement in a few behavioral tests, such as amphetamine-induced rotation (D), cylinder test, and spontaneous rotation (E). Feeder cell-free neural induction was performed as previously described (Chambers et al., 2009, incorporated herein by reference), but was further modified to yield floor plate cells (Fasano et al., 2010, incorporated herein by reference).

[0138] In the modified dual SMAD inhibition method for differentiating pluripotent cells into floor plate cells, we have previously found that high concentrations of SHH are required for FP induction by day 11. For example, in some embodiments, Sonic C25II was added at 200 ng / ml. In some experiments, DKK-1 (R&D; 100 ng / ml), FGF8 (R&D; 50 ng / ml), Wnt-1 (Peprotech; 50 ng / ml), and retinoic acid (R&D; 1 mM) were added. See FIG. 17. However, none of the cell populations generated at day 11 using previous methods contained a high percentage of FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ midbrain floor plate progenitor cells using the methods of the present invention.

[0139] III. Compounds used to control differentiation: Screening of small molecules using the neuronal lineage cells of the present invention identified compounds that caused cells to differentiate into FOX2A+ and LIMX1A+ neural cells by day 11 of culture. The following example describes the use of the exemplary cells of Section I to screen small molecule candidate compounds and determine whether use of those compounds results in the controlled differentiation of a cell population containing a high percentage of midbrain floor plate neurons by day 11 from initial contact with a dual SMAD inhibitor. The results of this screen were the first to show that activation of the SHH activating molecules FGF8 and Wnt together results in the efficient induction of FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ positive midbrain floor plate cells from hESCs by day 11 of differentiation. We present herein the results of exemplary experiments that reveal the molecules and optimal contact times required to induce the desired FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ positive cell population at day 11.

[0140] Recent mouse genetic studies have demonstrated a critical role for the transcription factor FOXA2 in the development and survival of midbrain DA neurons. A unique feature of the developing midbrain is the co-expression of the floor plate marker FOXA2 and the tectal plate marker LMX1A. Normally, floor plate and tectal plate cells are located in distinct locations (ventral vs. dorsal) in the CNS with opposing patterning requirements for the derivation of these cells. The derivation of region-specific floor plate progenitor cells from hESCs using a modified dual SMAD inhibition protocol was recently described. Canonical Wnt signaling was important for both tectal plate function and midbrain DA neuron development.

[0141] A. CHIR99021 (CHIR) induced high yields of midbrain DA neuron progenitor cell fates by day 11 of culture. As described herein, exposure to CHIR99021 (CHIR), a potent GSK3β inhibitor known to potently activate WNT signaling, induced LMX1A in FOXA2+ floor plate progenitors (Figure 1a). CHIR was more potent than recombinant Wnt3A or Wnt1 in inducing LMX1A expression. The efficiency of LMX1A induction depended on the timing of CHIR exposure, with maximal effects occurring from days 3 to 11 (Figure 5). CHIR induced FOXA2 / LMX1A co-expression, whereas other factors such as FGF8 had only minor effects (Figure 6). Induction of FOXA2 / LMX1A co-expression required strong activation of SHH signaling using the small molecule agonist parmorphamine alone or in combination with recombinant SHH (Figure 7).

[0142] Treatment with SHH agonists (palmorphamine + SHH) and FGF8 (S / F8) in the absence of CHIR99021 showed significantly lower expression of FOXA2 and complete loss of LMX1A expression by day 11 (Fig. 1a, b). Dual SMAD inhibition (exposure to LDN-193189 + SB431542 = "LSB") did not yield FOXA2-expressing cells, but did yield a subset of LMX1A+ cells (Fig. 1a, b). The forward marker OTX2 was robustly induced in LSB- and LSB / S / F8 / CHIR-treated cultures, but not in LSB / S / F8 conditions (Fig. 1a, c). A systematic comparison of the three culture conditions was performed using global temporal gene expression profiling (Fig. 1d). Hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes separated the three treatment conditions by differentiation day 11 (Fig. 8a). Several other SHH downstream targets, including FOXA1, FOXA2, and PTCH1, were among the most differentially regulated transcripts between the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR and LSB treatment sets (Fig. 1e). Expression of LMX1A, NGN2, and DDC indicated establishment of midbrain DA neuron progenitor fate as early as day 11 (Fig. 1e, f). In contrast, LSB cultures enriched for dorsal forebrain progenitor markers such as HESS, PAX6, LHX2, and EMX2. Direct comparison of LSB / S / F8 / CHIR and LSB / S / F8 treatments (Fig. 1f) confirmed selective enrichment of midbrain DA progenitor markers in the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR group and suggested hypothalamic progenitor identity in LSB / S / F8-treated cultures based on differential expression of RAX1, SIX3, and SIX6 (see also POMC expression, OTP expression in Fig. 2d below). A complete list of differentially expressed transcripts (Tables 1, 2), as well as gene ontology analysis (Fig. 8b) (DAVID; http: / / david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) confirmed the enhancement of canonical WNT signaling by CHIR treatment. Raw data are not yet available in GEO (worldwideweb.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / geo / accession#:[TBD]).Comparative temporal analysis of gene expression of midbrain DA progenitor markers (Fig. 1g) and markers of anterior ventral non-DA neuronal fates (Fig. 1h) allocated the three induction conditions to: i) LSB: dorsal forebrain identity; ii) LSB / S / F8: ventral / hypothalamic identity; and iii) LSB / S / F8 / CHIR: midbrain DA progenitor identity.

[0143] Cells resulting from protocols obtained during the development of the present invention were compared to cells obtained by previous methods. See Figures 2 and 18 for an exemplary visual comparison to SHH / FGF8+CHIR treated cells of the present invention. Figure 19A shows an example of FOXA2 / Tuj1 double labeled cells (top panel) and co-labeling of FOXA2 with TH, Nurr1 and LMX1A (bottom panel) after LSB / S / F8 / CHIR treatment. The combination of markers is diagnostic of early stage midbrain DA neuron progenitors. Figure 19B shows gene expression data (for comparison with Figure 2E) for key dopamine neuron progenitor markers.

[0144] Generally, the materials and methods used herein are described below. Human ESCs (H9, H1) and iPSC lines (2C6 and SeV6) were subjected to a modified dual SMAD inhibition (Chambers, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:275-280 (2009), incorporated herein by reference) base plate induction (Fasano, et al., Cell Stein Cell 6:336-347 (2010), incorporated herein by reference) protocol. Exposure to SHH C25II, palmorfamine, FGF8 and CHIR99021 was optimized for the midbrain floor plate and for the generation of a new population of DA neurons (see FIG. 1d). Floor plate induction was followed by further maturation (days 11-25, or longer than 25 days in culture, up to at least 100 days in culture) in Neurobasal / B27-based differentiation medium in the presence of DA neuron survival and maturation factors such as AA, BDNF, GDNF, TGFβ3, and dbcAMP (Perrier, et al. Proc Nati Acad Sci US A101:12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference) (see full methods for details). The resulting DA neuron populations were subjected to detailed phenotypic characterization by immunocytochemistry, qRT-PCR, global gene expression profiling, HPLC analysis for detection of dopamine, and in vitro electrophysiological recordings. In vivo studies were performed in hemiparkinsonian rodents (mice or rats injected with 6OHDA toxin on one side of the animal's brain). These studies were performed in adult NOD-SCID IL2Rgc mice (Jackson labs) and adult Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic Farms) that received 6-hydroxydopamine lesions by stereotactic injection of the toxin as previously described, and in two adult rhesus monkeys treated with a unilateral carotid artery injection of MPTP.

[0145] DA neurons were stereotactically injected into the striatum of these animals (150 × 10 3 cells, 250 × 10 in rats3 cells), and in monkeys, a total of 7.5 × 10 6 Cells (supplying 6 channels; 3 channels on each side of the brain). Behavioral assays including amphetamine-mediated rotation assays and tests for focal akinesia and limb use ("stepping test" and "cylinder test") were performed at monthly intervals after implantation. Rats and mice were sacrificed 18-20 weeks after implantation, and the primates 1 month after implantation. The grafts were characterized by stereological analysis of cell numbers and graft volumes, and a global phenotypic characterization was performed by immunohistochemistry. Cultivation of undifferentiated human ES cells. hESC lines H9 (WA-09, XX, 27-55 passages since October 2009), H1 (WA-01, XY, 30-40 passages since June 2010) and iPS cell lines 2C6 (Kim, et al. Cell Stem Cell 8:695-706 (2011), incorporated herein by reference) (XY, 20-30 passages) and SeV6 (XY, 20-30 passages; derived from MRC-5 embryonic fibroblasts using the non-insertion four-factor Sendai vector system (Ban, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2011) 108(34):14234-14239:10.1073 / pnas.1103509108, incorporated herein by reference)) were generated using human ES cell-based cm 2 0.5 x 10 3 Pieces to cm 2 100x10 3 Cells were maintained on mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs, Global Stem, Rockville, MD) which tend to cluster in optimal 20% knockout serum replacement (KSR, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)-containing human ES cell medium (previously described (Kim, et al. Cell Stem Cell 8:695-706 (2011), incorporated herein by reference) at seeding densities estimated to range from 0% to 40%. Use of knockout serum replacement can range from 0% to 40%.

[0146] Neural induction.Modified dual SMAD inhibition (Chambers, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:275-280 (2009), incorporated herein by reference) and floor plate induction (Fasano, et al. Cell Stem Cell 6:336-347 (2010), incorporated herein by reference) protocols were used to induce floor plate midbrain dopamine neurons using 100 nM LDN-193189 (100 nM (0.5-50 μM range, Stemgent, Cambridge, MA), SB431542 (10 μM (0.5-50 μM range, Tocris, Ellisville, MI), SHH The assays used were based on timed exposure to C25II (100 ng / ml (concentration range 10-2000 ng / ml; R&D, Minneapolis, MN), palmorfamine (2 μM (concentration range 10-500 ng / ml; Stemgent), FGF8 (100 ng / ml (concentration range 10-500 ng / ml; R&D), and CHIR99021 (CHIR; 3 μM (concentration range 0.1-10 μM; Stemgent).

[0147] For the bottom plate induction protocol, "SHH" treatment refers to the exposure of cells to a combination of 100 ng / ml SHH C25II + palmorfamine (2 μM). Cells were seeded (35-40 × 10 3 cells / cm 2), and cultured for 11 days on Matrigel or Geltrex (used as purchased) (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in DMEM-containing knockout serum replacement medium (KSR) (15% knockout serum replacement, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10 μM (range of concentrations from 1 to 25 μM) β-mercaptoethanol). Starting on differentiation day 5, KSR medium was gradually converted to N2 medium by mixing at a ratio of 75% (KSR):25% (N2) on days 5-6, 50% (KSR):50% (N2) on days 7-8, and 25% (KSR):75% (N2) on days 9-10, as previously described (Chambers, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:275-280 (2009), incorporated herein by reference). CHIR was added (up to day 13) and BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, 20 ng / ml with a range of 5–100; R&D), ascorbic acid (AA; 0.2 mM (range of 0.01–1 mM), Sigma, St. Louis, MI), GDNF (glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, 20 ng / ml (range of 1–200 ng / ml); R&D), TGFβ3 (transforming growth factor type β3, 1 From day 11, the medium was changed to Neurobasal medium / B27 medium (1:50 dilution) / L-glutamine (effective range of 0.2–2 mM))-containing medium (NB / B27; Invitrogen) supplemented with 0.1ng / ml (concentration range of 0.1–25ng / ml; R&D), dibutyryl cAMP (0.5mM (concentration range of 0.05–2mM; Sigma), and DAPT (10nM (concentration range of 0.5–50nM; Tocris).On day 20, cells were dissociated using Accurase® (Innovative Cell Technology, San Diego, CA) and grown in high cell density conditions (e.g., 300 to 400k cells / cm) on dishes pre-coated with polyornithine (PO) at 15 μg / ml (concentration range from 1 to 50 μg / ml) / laminin (1 μg / ml) (concentration range from 0.1 to 10 μg / ml) / fibronectin (2 μg / ml (concentration range from 0.1 to 20 μg / ml)) in differentiation medium (NB / B27 + BDNF, AA, GDNF, dbcAMP (at concentration ranges described herein), TGFβ3, and DAPT (at concentration ranges described herein)) until the desired maturation stage for a given experiment. 2 ) and reseeded.

[0148] For rosette lineage DA neuron induction, we partially followed a previously described protocol (Perrier, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference) with at least one exception: dual SMAD inhibition was used to promote the initial neural induction step. Briefly, hESCs were induced towards a neural fate by co-culturing with irradiated MS5 cells in KSR supplemented with SB431542 and Noggin (250 ng / ml (concentration range 10-1000 ng / ml); R&D) on differentiation days 2-8, and SHH+FGF8 on days 6-11. After 11 days in KSR, neural rosettes were manually isolated and cultured in N2 medium supplemented with SHH, FGF8, BDNF, and AA as previously described (Perrier, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12543-8 (2004), incorporated herein by reference) (P1 phase). After 5-7 days in the P1 phase, rosettes were again mechanically harvested and cultured in Ca-free medium for 1 hour. 2 / Mg 2After incubation in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), cells were triturated and replated on polyornithine (PO) / laminin / fibronectin coated plates. Patterning using SHH / FGF8 was continued for 7 days at the P2 stage, followed by terminal differentiation in the presence of BDNF, AA, GDNF, TGFb3 and dbcAMP as described above until the desired maturation stage for a given experiment (usually 5-7 days for transplantation studies or 32 days for in vitro functional studies).

[0149] Gene expression analysis. Total RNA was extracted from control LSB, LSB / SHH / FGF8, and LSB / SHH / FGF8 / CHIR conditions on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 25 of differentiation using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). For microarray analysis, total RNA was processed by the MSKCC Genomics Core Facility and hybridized to Illumina Human Reference 12 bead arrays according to the manufacturer's specifications. Comparisons were performed between days and conditions using the LIMMA package from Bioconductor (worldwideweb.bioconductor.org). Genes found to have adjusted P values ​​less than 0.05 and fold changes greater than 2 were considered significant. Some of the descriptive microarray data analyses and presentations were performed using a commercially available software package (Partek Genomics Suite (version 6.10.0915)). For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA at day 25 of each condition was reverse transcribed (Quantitech, Qiagen) and amplified material was detected using commercial Taqman gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA), and the data were normalized to HPRT. Each data point represents nine technical replicates from three independent biological samples. Raw data from the microarray studies are not yet available in GEO (worldwideweb.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / geo).

[0150] Animal surgery.Rodent and monkey procedures were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Biosafety Committee (IBC), and Embryonic Stem Cell Research Committee (ESCRO).

[0151] mouse. NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null mice (20–35 g body weight; Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were anesthetized with ketamine (90 mg / kg; Akorn, Decatur, IL) and xylazine (4 mg / kg; Fort Dodge, IA). 6-hydroxydopamine (10 μg (concentration range 0.1–20 μg) 6-OHDA (Sigma-Aldrich) was stereotactically injected into the striatum at the following coordinates (in millimeters): AP, 0.5 (from the cranial suture, i.e., bregma, used as a reference for stereotactic surgery); ML, −2.0; DV, −3.0 (from the dura, the membrane that encases the brain, used as a reference). Mice with successful lesions (average >6 rotations / min) were selected for implantation. A total of 150 × 10 3 Cells were injected in a volume of 1.5 μl into the striatum at the following coordinates (in mm): AP, 0.5; ML, −1.8; DV, 3.2. Mice were sacrificed 18 weeks after implantation.

[0152] Rat.Adult female Sprague-Dawley (Taconic, Hudson, NY) rats (180–230 g) were anesthetized with ketamine (90 mg / kg) and xylazine (4 mg / kg). Unilateral lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway of the medial forebrain bundle were established by stereotactic injection of 6-OHDA (3.6 mg / ml in 0.2% ascorbic acid and 0.9% saline (Sigma)) at two sites (Studer, et al. Nature Neurosci. 1:290–295 (1998), incorporated herein by reference). Rats were selected for transplantation if amphetamine-induced rotations exceeded 6 rotations / min by 6–8 weeks after injection. 250 × 103 cells were transplanted into the striatum of each animal (coordinates: AP +1.0 mm, ML -2.5 mm, and V -4.7 mm; -2.5 sawtooth set). Control rats received PBS instead. Surgical procedures have been described previously (Studer, et al. Nature Neurosci. 1:290-295 (1998), incorporated herein by reference). Daily intraperitoneal injections of 15 mg / kg cyclosporine (Bedford Labs, Bedford, OH) were started 24 hours before cell transplantation and continued until sacrifice 20 weeks after cell transplantation. Primate animals.Two adult (17-18 years old; 10-12 kg; female) rhesus monkeys were made hemiparkinsonian by intracarotid MPTP administration followed by weekly intravenous MPTP administration resulting in bilateral parkinsonism (Kordower, et al. Science 290:767-773 (2000), incorporated herein by reference). Both animals showed symptoms of parkinsonism compatible with a moderately severe lesion based on behavioral analysis including hunched back, lameness, and rigidity (rigidity of movement), spatial neglect (motor awareness to stimuli on one side), and bradykinesia (onset of slow movement). A modified Parkinson's Disease Clinical Rating Scale (CRS) can be used to assess these parameters in monkeys. On the day of implantation surgery, animals were sedated with ketamine (3.0 mg / kg, intramuscularly) and dexdomitor (0.02-0.04 mg / kg intramuscularly), intubated to maintain a stable airway, and anesthetized with isoflurane. They were then mounted in a stereotaxic frame for surgery. Both rhesus monkeys underwent a single surgical procedure with three intracranial injections of human floor plate-derived DA cultures based on stereotaxic coordinates (Paxinos, et al. The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic Press, 2000), incorporated herein by reference). Bilateral injections of cells (10 ul / injection; 125,000 cells / ul) were performed at three sites (one in the posterior caudate nucleus, two in the precommissural putamen and overlying white matter) for a total volume of 30 μl per hemisphere. Cells were delivered from a 50 μl Hamilton syringe with a 28G needle at a rate of 1 μl / min using an infusion pump attached to a stereotactic micromanipulator. After completion of the infusion, the needle was left in place for an additional 2-5 minutes to allow the infusion to diffuse from the needle tip before the syringe was slowly withdrawn. From immediately after surgery until 72 hours postoperatively, animals received analgesics (buprenex, 0.01 mg / kg intramuscularly, twice daily for 72 hours postoperatively; meloxicam, 0.1 mg / kg subcutaneously, once daily for 72 hours postoperatively) as well as antibiotics (cephazolin, 25 mg / kg intramuscularly, twice daily).The animals received cyclosporine A (Neoral, Sandimmune) orally (gradually tapering from 30 mg / kg to 15 mg / kg) starting 48 hours before surgery until sacrifice 1 month after implantation.

[0153] Behavioral assays. Amphetamine-induced rotation (mice and rats) and stepping tests (rats) were performed before and 4, 8, 12, and 18 weeks after transplantation. Rotational behavior in mice was recorded 10 min after intraperitoneal injection of d-amphetamine (10 mg / kg, Sigma) and recorded for 30 min. Rotational behavior in rats was recorded 40 min after intraperitoneal injection of d-amphetamine (5 mg / kg) and automatically evaluated by the TSE VideoMot2 system (Germany). Data were presented as the average number of rotations per minute. The stepping test was adapted from Blume, et al. Exp. Neurol. 219:208-211 (2009) and Crawley, et al. What's Wrong With My Mouse: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice (Wiley-Liss, 2000), all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, each rat was placed on a flat surface and its hind limbs were raised by gently lifting its tail so that only its forepaws touched the table. The experimenter dragged the rat backwards 1 meter at a constant speed. The number of adaptive steps of both the contralateral and ipsilateral forepaws were counted. Data were presented as a percentage of contralateral adaptive steps / (contralateral + ipsilateral adaptive steps). The cylinder test was performed by placing each animal in a glass cylinder and counting the number of ipsilateral and contralateral paw contacts (out of 20 contacts) to the wall of the cylinder as previously described (Tabar, et al. Nature Med. 14:379-381 (2008), incorporated herein by reference). Tissue processing of rodents and primates is described below.

[0154] Mice and rats:Animals (mice and rats) received an intraperitoneal overdose of pentobarbital (50 mg / kg) for induction of deep anesthesia and were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains were removed and post-fixed in 4% PFA, then immersed in 30% sucrose solution for 2–5 days. After embedding in OCT compound (Sakura Finetech, Torrance, CA), the brains were sectioned on a cryostat.

[0155] Primates: Animals were sacrificed under deep anesthesia with ketamine (10 mg / kg, intramuscular (IM)) and pentobarbital (25 mg / kg, intravenous (IV)) by carotid perfusion with heparinized 0.9% saline followed by cold 4% PFA fixative (pH 7.4). Immediately after primary fixation, brains were removed from the skull and postfixed 24-36 h after suspension in 4% PFA. They were then rinsed, resuspended in 10% sucrose on a slow shaker at 4°C, and allowed to "sink". The process was then repeated with 20% sucrose followed by 30% sucrose. Whole brains were cut coronally into 40 um serial sections on a freezing sliding microtome and stored suspended in cryopreservation medium at -20°C.

[0156] Immunohistochemistry: Cells were fixed in 4% PFA and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) containing 0.3% Triton. Brain tissue sections were washed in cold PBS and treated similarly. Primary antibodies were diluted in 1–5% BSA or normal goat serum and incubated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. A comprehensive list of antibodies and suppliers is provided in Table 6. Appropriate Alexa488-, Alexa555-, and Alexa647-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) were used with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAN) nuclear counterstain (Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL). For some analyses, biotinylated secondary antibodies were used, followed by visualization with DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) chromogen.

[0157] HPLC analysis. Reverse-phase HPLC with electrochemical detection to measure levels of dopamine, homovanillic acid (HVA), and DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid) was performed as previously described (Roy, et al. Nature Med. 12:1259-1268 (2006); Studer, et al. Brain Res. Bull. 41:143-150 (1996), all of which are incorporated herein by reference). Culture samples were collected in perchloric acid on differentiation day 65. For some experiments, DA was measured directly in the medium using the same detection system, but after aluminum extraction of dopamine and its metabolites using a commercially available kit as previously described (Studer, et al. Brain Res. Bull. 41:143-150 (1996), all of which are incorporated herein by reference).

[0158] Electrophysiological recordings: Cultures were transferred to a recording chamber on an upright microscope (Eclipse E600FN; Nikon) equipped with a 40x water-immersion objective and perfused with saline containing the following in mM: 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 25 NaHCO 3 , 1.25NaH 2 PO 4 , 2CaCl, 1MgCl 2 , and 25 glucose (34°C; 95% O 2 The saline solution was saturated with 5% CO2; pH 7.4; 298 mOsm / L. The saline flow rate was 2–3 ml / min and passed through an in-line heater (SH-27B with TC-324B controller; Warner Instruments). A cooled CCD digital camera (Photometrics CoolSNAP ES 2Neurons were visualized by video microscopy using a 30-mm gyroscope (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA). Cells selected for electrophysiological recordings had a neuron-like morphology with fine branched neurites. Somatic whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed in the current clamp setting using a MultiClamp700B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Signals were filtered for 1–4 kHz and digitized using a Digidata1440A (Molecular Devices) for 5–20 kHz. Recording patch electrodes were made from filamented borosilicate glass (Sutter Instruments) pulled on a Flaming Brown glass electrode fabricator (P-97, Sutter Instruments) and had a resistance of 4–6 MΩ in the bath. Electrodes were filled with an internal solution containing the following in mM: 135K‐MeSO 4 , 5 KCl, 5 HEPES, 0.25 EGTA, 10 phosphocreatine-di(tris), 2 ATP-Mg, and 0.5 GTP-Na (pH 7.3, osmolarity adjusted to 290-300 mOsm / L). The amplifier bridge circuit was adjusted to compensate for the electrode resistance and monitored. The electrode capacitance was compensated for. If the series resistance increased by more than 20% during recording, the data were discarded because the increased resistance suggested a partial technical failure during the recording.

[0159] Cell counting and stereological analysis.The percentage of marker-positive cells at the floor plate stage (day 11) Fig. 1, midbrain dopamine neuron progenitor stage (day 25) Fig. 2, and mature DA neuron stage (day 50 and after) Figs. 3 and 11 were determined in samples from at least three independent experiments. Images for quantification were selected in a uniform random manner, and each image was first scored for the number of DAPI-positive cell nuclei, followed by counting the number of cells expressing the marker of interest. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Quantification of human cells (identified with anti-hNA) and TH+ neurons within the grafts was performed on every tenth section in which the graft was visible. Cell numbers and graft volumes were determined using the Cavalieri estimator using an optical fractionator probe and Stereo Investigator software (MBF Biosciences, VT) as previously described in Tabar, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 23:601-606 (2005) (incorporated herein by reference). Data are presented as estimated total cell numbers and total graft volumes ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

[0160] The following formulations set forth exemplary cell culture media used for the development of embodiments of the present invention.

[0161] hESC Maintenance Medium (1 liter): 800 mL DMEM / F12, 200 mL Knockout Serum Replacement, 5 mL 200 mM L-Glutamine, 5 mL Pen / Strep, 10 mL 10 mM MEM Minimal Non-Essential 15 Amino Acids Solution, 55 μM 13-Mercaptoethanol, and bFGF (final concentration is 4 ng / mL).

[0162] KSR medium for hESC differentiation (1 liter): 820 mL Knockout DMEM, 150 mL Knockout Serum Replacement, 10 mL 200 mM L-Glutamine, 10 mL Pen / Strep, 10 mL 10 mM MEM, and 55 μM 13-mercaptoethanol.

[0163] N2 medium for hESC differentiation(1 liter): DMEM / F12 powder and 985 ml distilled water, 1.55 g glucose (Sigma, catalog number G7021), 2.00 g sodium bicarbonate (Sigma, catalog number S5761), putrescine (100 uL aliquot of 1.61 g dissolved in 100 mL distilled water; Sigma, catalog number P5780), progesterone (20 uL aliquot of 0.032 g dissolved in 100 mL 100% ethanol; Sigma, catalog number P8783), sodium selenite (60 uL aliquot of 0.5 mM solution in distilled water; BioShop Canada, catalog number SEL888), and 100 mg transferrin (Celliance / Millipore, catalog number 4452-01), and 10 mL of 5 mM 25 mg of insulin in NaOH (Sigma, catalog number 16634).

[0164] Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS for preparation of PMEF (primary mouse embryonic fibroblast (PMEF) feeder cells) (1 Liter): 885 mL DMEM, 100 mL FBS, 10 mL Pen / Strep, and 5 mL L-glutamine.

[0165] Alpha Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) containing 10% FBS for preparation of MS-5 feeder cell media (1 liter): 890 mL alpha MEM, 100 mL FBS, 10 mL Pen / Strep Gelatin solution (500 ml): Dissolve 0.5 g gelatin in 500 ml warm Milli-Q water (50-60°C). Cool to room temperature.

[0166] The following is an outline of an exemplary method to monitor the production of mature DA neurons generally used for transplantation (see also conditions shown in Table 7). Day 13 is the midbrain floor plate stage characterized by co-expression of FOXA2 / LMX1A. In addition to expression of FOXA2 and LMX1A, loss of OCT4 expression and lack of induction of forebrain markers PAX6 and FOXG1 were found. Day 25 is the midbrain DA neuron progenitor stage characterized by continuous expression of FOXA2 / LMX1A and expression of neuronal marker (TUJ1) and DA markers (NURR1, TH). The number of proliferating Ki67+ cells and PAX6 and FOXG1 forebrain neural progenitors were monitored when these markers were not desired. For unbiased and rapid quantification of immunofluorescence data, an Operetta (Perkin-Elmer) high content microscope was used for the measurements. qRT-PCR assays were also used for confirmation of immunofluorescence data for each marker. In some embodiments, cell lines (cultures) that pass these preliminary in vitro tests are used for transplantation. See Table 7. In some embodiments, mature DA neurons are cryopreserved on day 25 (range 20-25) in medium containing 7% DMSO (range 3%-12%) without serum until thawed for use in transplantation. In some embodiments, cell samples are stored in liquid nitrogen. In some embodiments, cells are stored in a cryogenic refrigerator. Other embodiments contemplate the use of cryoprotectants in addition to DMSO, such as myo-inositol, polyvinyl alcohol, serum replacements, caspase inhibitor compounds, etc. After thawing, cells are tested for viability, marker expression, etc. before use in transplantation. In some embodiments, thawed cells are tested for maintenance of function in long-term in vitro and in vivo assays to monitor cryopreservation conditions.

[0167] B. Tests to identify additional factors for the generation of functional DA neurons. It is contemplated to use additional "removal" and "addition" experiments of tissue culture components in the generation of the cells of the invention. For example, it has been shown that the use of FGF8 results in the cells of the invention, but is not required for the generation of these cells. These experiments are expanded to additional reagents such as those listed in Table 8 as additives to cell culture along with the four "core" molecules that result in the DA neurons of the invention, namely i) Alk4 / 5 / 7 ("TGFβ") inhibitor (SB431542), ii) Alk2 / 3 ("BMP") inhibitor (LDN-193189), iii) Smoothened ("SHH") agonist (palmorphamine), and iv) GSK3β inhibitor (CHIR99021).

[0168] As described herein, the use of SB431542 and LDN193189 showed efficient neural conversion of pluripotent stem cells, while the addition of palmorfamine and CHIR99021 to these cells showed midbrain floor plate induction. Other chemicals and recombinant proteins have been used or can be used to provide long-term trophic support and / or promote differentiation. Some of these compounds will be used in further studies to clarify their role in cell differentiation as described herein.

[0169] For these experiments the performance of other compounds is compared with exemplary limits of DA neuron differentiation (Table 7) versus the use of four core factors (Table 8).

[0170] These types of experiments are believed to reveal the minimal number of factors necessary to generate authentic DA neurons of the present invention.

[0171] C. Embodiments for establishing dose-response curves of possible proliferative contaminating cells (pluripotent hESCs, neural rosettes). No teratomas or excessive hyperplasia were observed within the grafts up to at least 5 months of survival in vivo during the development of the present invention. To monitor safety for long-term studies to reflect the longitivity of the grafts considered in humans, cell number thresholds are contemplated for determining clinically relevant contamination limits of problematic cell types such as undifferentiated hESCs that can develop into teratomas or primitive neuroectodermal progenitor cells that can proliferate significantly. Thus, some embodiments are contemplated for further enrichment of dopamine neurons in the cells used for transplantation, i.e., depletion of contaminating cell types prior to transplantation. See Table 7 for exemplary limits.

[0172] The following describes an exemplary set of additional normalizations in assays for validation of the enhancement strategy: For hESCs, a defined mixture of hES-derived DA neurons and undifferentiated (Oct4+ / Nanog+) cells is used to monitor for clinical symptoms suggesting population effects and / or animal death in animal studies. Dose responses of 1 hES cell per 10,000 hESC-derived DA cells, 1 / 5000, 1 / 1000 and 1 / 100 are performed. Cells are injected intrastriatal and animals receive immunosuppression. Rats are closely monitored and sacrificed upon neurological symptoms or at a maximum of 6 months. Brains are analyzed for graft volume and composition as described herein. Cell ratios are adjusted until a clear in vivo threshold for the appearance of teratomas is established. A similar strategy is followed for the determination of the level of contamination of primitive neuroectodermal progenitors. The presence of early neural progenitors has considerable potential for proliferation and extensive differentiation towards central nervous system as well as peripheral nervous system (PNS) fates. Graft analysis consisted of IHC for rosette cells (PLZF expression), their CNS progeny (neural progenitors expressing Nestin / Sox2 or forebrain progenitors expressing FoxG1) as well as graft volume and proliferation index (% Ki67+ of total viable cells).

[0173] IV. Parkinson's Disease Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, estimated to affect 4.1-4.6 million patients worldwide, a number expected to more than double by 2030. Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease, affecting approximately 1 million patients in the United States, with 60,000 new cases diagnosed with Parkinson's disease each year. The disease has a large socioeconomic impact as it results in significant morbidity and mortality, and the total direct and indirect costs of PD, including medical costs and lost income, are estimated to be approximately $25 billion annually in the United States alone. There is currently no cure for Parkinson's disease (PD), an age-related, progressive, and disabling disorder. PD is pathologically characterized by selective loss of midbrain DA neurons in the substantia nigra. Thus, the cardinal feature of PD is the progressive, severe, and irreversible loss of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons that ultimately leads to disabling motor dysfunction. Pharmacological, motor system, gene and surgical therapies have been developed for PD, but none of these approaches have yet been able to restore proper DA neuron function. Long-term control of motor symptoms in patients often remains suboptimal, and while recognizing the importance of progressive non-dopamine-responsive motor and non-motor symptoms, the underlying problem of long-term dopamine-responsive symptom control remains an area of ​​significant therapeutic need. A wide range of pathologies affecting both the central and peripheral nervous systems are recognized in PD, and the cardinal features of PD (partly bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor) are essentially related to the loss of DA neurons and are dopamine-responsive. Thus, treatment with neuronal replacement is contemplated for PD because of the rather selective loss of midbrain DA neurons that are responsible for most motor symptoms of the disease. A healthy human brain has approximately one million DA neurons. Thus, in one embodiment, DA neuron replacement is contemplated, which requires a relatively small number of surviving cells compared to most other disorders in the CNS.

[0174] One challenge in the development of cell-based therapies for PD has been the identification of a suitable source of cells to be used in neuronal replacement. This search has continued for over 30 years, and many potential sources for DA neuron replacement have been proposed (Kriks, Protocols for generating ES cell-derived dopamine neurons in Development and engineering of dopamine neurons (eds. Pasterkamp, ​​RJ, Smidt, & Burbach) (Landes Biosciences, 2008; Fitzpatrick, et al., Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 11:2189-2208 (2009)). Catecholaminergic cells derived from the adrenal medulla (Madrazo, et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 316, 831-834 (1987)), carotid body grafts (Arjona, et al., Neurosurgery 53:321-328 (2003)), or encapsulated retinal pigment epithelial cells (Spheramine trial Bakay, et al., Front Biosci. 9, 592-602 (2003)). Some of these sources, including (2004), have progressed to early-stage clinical trials in the past. However, most of these trials have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy and have resulted in low long-term survival and low DA release from the transplanted cells. Another approach has been the transplantation of fetal midbrain DA neurons, which has been performed in over 300 patients worldwide (Brundin, et al., Prog. Brain Res. 184, 265-294 (2010); Lindvall, & Kokaia, J. Clin. Invest 120:29-40 (2010)). Therapeutic procedures using human fetal tissue in these patients have shown evidence of DA neuron survival and in vivo DA release up to 10 or 20 years after transplantation in some patients. However, in many patients, fetal tissue transplants have failed to replace DA neuronal function.Furthermore, fetal tissue transplantation is plagued by multiple challenges, including low-volume and low-quality donor tissue, ethical and practical issues surrounding tissue procurement, and poorly understood heterogeneity of transplanted cells, some of which contribute to variable clinical outcomes. Examples of fetal transplantation are described in Mendez, et al. Nature Med.(2008); Kordower, et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:1118-1124 (1995); Piccini, et al. Nature Neuroscience 2:1137-1140 (1999). However, clinical results have been mixed, with positive data from early open-label studies (Lindvall, et al. Science 247:574-577 (1990); Widner, et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 327:1556-1563 (1992); Brundin, et al. Brain 123:1380-1390 (2000); Freed, et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 327:1549-1555 (1992); Freeman, et al. Bilateral fetal nigral transplantation into the postcommissural putamen in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 38:379-388 (1995)). However, two larger NIH-sponsored placebo-controlled clinical trials in the United States found modest results (Freed, et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 710-719 (2001); Olanow, et al. Ann. Neurol. 54:403-414 (2003)). There are many hypotheses for the limited efficacy observed in human fetal transplant trials, including that fetal transplants may not provide sufficient numbers of cells at the correct developmental stage for optimal therapeutic effect.Furthermore, fetal tissues are poorly differentiated by cell type, and there is variability in the stage and quality of each tissue sample (Bjorklund, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2, 437-445 (2003)). Another factor may be a low-level inflammatory host response to the graft (Bjorklund, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2, 437-445 (2003)).

[0175] In contrast, stem cell-derived cell sources or other types of cell types compatible with use in supplying cells for transplantation are believed to overcome many of the challenges associated with fetal tissue transplantation and could provide an unlimited source of DA neurons at an optimal stage for transplantation. After nearly 20 years of attempts using various potential stem cell sources, the inventors have succeeded in obtaining authentic human midbrain DA neurons derived from pluripotent stem cells that can ameliorate neurological abnormalities in murine and primate animals. This novel differentiation strategy is highly efficient and has led to robust in vivo engraftment of these cells, induction of functional recovery in PD disease models, and a lack of adverse events such as inappropriate cell proliferation, supported by preclinical data. FDA approval of human ES cell-based strategies for treating PD is contemplated, as the FDA has approved testing of other human ES cell derivatives in spinal cord injury (Strauss, Nat. Biotechnol. 28:989-990 (2010)) and macular degeneration (Schwartz, et al. Lancet 379:713-720 (2012)).

[0176] Further embodiments include "enhancement" strategies to control cell purity to promote axon fiber outgrowth and include novel safety / regulatory features in the transplantation strategies contemplated. For example, in some embodiments, methods of cell purification are presented, starting from simple surface marker screens (e.g., CD142) for the cell type of interest to meaningful enrichment strategies for specific neuronal types. In some embodiments, it is contemplated to use this method to source cells for use in humans. Additionally, in other embodiments, engineered expression of PSA-NCAM is contemplated for enhancing axon outgrowth for use in in vivo nerve repair. Such applications include promoting long-distance axon outgrowth to treat motor neuron disease, Huntington's disease, or other disorders that primarily affect projection neurons. Further embodiments are contemplated for GMP-qualified pluripotent cell sources and the like. Because the transplantation methods described herein require small numbers of DA neurons and are based on relatively cost-effective small molecule methods developed for DA neuron induction, it is believed that DA neuron replacement therapy will be at a reasonable cost per patient.

[0177] One possible biological limitation of transplantation approaches in PD is the fact that neuronal degeneration in PD progresses to affect many cell types other than midbrain dopamine neurons, especially in the later stages of the disease. Indeed, in long-term studies, non-DA-responsive symptoms predominate in late PD, leading to dysphagia, falls, dementia, and other significant morbidities. However, some non-motor symptoms would benefit from restoration of dopamine system function. Furthermore, it is believed that the use of hESC-derived DA neurons in the early stages of the disease would prevent some of the secondary PD symptoms, including degeneration of the dopamine-responsive population in the striatum. However, even in the absence of an impact on the non-DA-responsive symptoms of the disease, restoration of long-term functional dopamine systems in the striatum would be a major achievement for the treatment of this currently incurable disorder. In the case of Parkinson's disease, there are several alternative therapies available, including drug-based strategies and surgical approaches such as deep brain stimulation. In some embodiments, the efficacy of restoration is believed to be comparable to or even exceed the levels achieved by alternative therapies. In other embodiments, it is believed that the use of this mature DA neuron cell transplantation therapy is particularly beneficial for certain subsets of patients. In other embodiments, the use of this mature DA neuron cell transplantation therapy is contemplated for use as an add-on to existing drug and surgical approaches. One major benefit of using the mature DA neuron cell transplantation therapy of the present invention is the unique neurorestorative nature after transplantation, i.e., long-term recovery of neuronal function, which can be used in patients for gradual removal of drug therapy. Cell transplantation is believed to affect a range of DA-related symptoms that are different from those that respond to drugs or other therapies. Thus, in one embodiment, mature DA neuron transplantation is contemplated for use with DBS. In another embodiment, mature DA neurons are contemplated for use in conjunction with therapeutic methods.

[0178] A) Parkinson's Disease and Current Treatments. Significant progress has been made in identifying rare genetic alterations that contribute to familial forms of PD. However, for the majority of PD cases, the contribution of any underlying genetic predisposition remains unknown. Traditional treatment strategies in PD are limited by the fact that 30-70% of all DA neurons in the substantia nigra have irreversibly degenerated at the time of clinical symptom onset. One treatment option is pharmacological replacement of missing DA neurons using the DA precursor L-dopa. However, despite the dramatic initial response of some PD patients to L-dopa therapy, long-term clinical outcomes remain poor, and severe side effects of L-dopa therapy, including motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, frequently occur in later stage disease. Because pulsatile delivery of L-dopa has a major role in the development of these late stage motor complications, a "smoother" and more physiological delivery of dopamine, i.e., from the transplanted cells of the present invention, for example, would therefore be highly desirable. In addition to pharmacological strategies, several surgical treatment options exist. These include removal or functional inactivation of cells in the basal ganglia by pallidotomy, or deep brain stimulation by targeting the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus interna. Although these surgical options are alternatives for some patients, they provide relief from disease symptoms but do not restore normal DA function. In addition, surgical and non-surgical side effects have been reported, including hardware failure, infection, stroke, bleeding, and the like. Other treatment options include delivery of growth factors such as GDNF or neurturin using direct intraparenchymal infusion or viral expression by gene therapy. Initial open-label studies in PD showed promising results for GDNF, but subsequent controlled studies in larger sets of patients failed to confirm any benefit and raised safety concerns that may result from the production of anti-GDNF antibodies in a subset of patients. AAV-based delivery of neurturin, a GDNF-related molecule, also failed to show any significant clinical benefit in large placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials.Early data from a phase 2 trial of AAV-carrying glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) injections into the subthalamic nucleus have been reported (Lancet Neurology, April 2011). However, clinical benefit was modest at best in this trial. Efforts toward neurotrophic factor-based or alternative neuroprotective strategies may provide temporary relief to patients, but none of these strategies are able to restore / replace DA neurons already lost due to disease, which is the primary goal of cell replacement therapy.

[0179] B) Cellular therapy in PD. Clinical symptoms become evident in PD after 70-80% of striatal dopamine neurons and about 50% of nigral dopamine neurons are lost. However, midbrain dopamine neurons develop by 8.5 weeks after conception, and there has been little evidence of dopamine neuron replacement throughout the remainder of the lifespan. Thus, dopamine neurons by the time of disease onset are decades old, with no natural mechanisms to replace these cells, and thus cell transplants may be required to replace those cells in the brains of PD patients. DA neuron replacement in PD was performed in the 1980s based on the use of adrenal medulla-derived chromaffin cells. These hormone-producing cells were shown to switch neurotransmitter phenotype from adrenaline to DA when ectopically placed into the CNS. Hundreds of PD patients worldwide were transplanted using this approach, but it became clear over time that the survival of the transplanted cells was very poor and that they only had a transient effect at best. Thus, this approach was quickly abandoned for clinical use. In contrast, fetal midbrain tissue transplants were based on more detailed preclinical studies in rodent models showing robust long-term engraftment and improved function across a panel of DA-related behavioral assays. Encouraged by those preclinical data, fetal transplants proceeded at multiple centers in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Those studies showed clear evidence of functional long-term engraftment with increased DA release in the transplanted area as measured by fluorodopa PET and subsequent histological examination in several patients who died of unrelated causes. However, the use of fetal grafts raised two potential problems with cell-based therapeutic approaches. First, an unanticipated problem with fetal grafts was the induction of graft-induced dyskinesia (GID) in approximately 15% of patients. Although the mechanism of GID remains controversial, recent evidence has demonstrated that serotonergic neurons are capable of inappropriate storage and release of DA. Another possible mechanism suggested to explain GID was the uneven distribution of DA neurons, a heterogeneous distribution that could result in hot spots of DA release.In contrast, during the development of the present invention, a method was discovered for detecting and reducing serotonin neurons that would reduce the incidence of GID. Furthermore, injection of mature DA neurons would result in a uniform distribution of mature neurons, including the extension of dopamine fiber terminals within the host striatum. Another problem with fetal transplantation therapy was (and is) the limited availability of fetal midbrain tissue at the appropriate developmental stage. An alternative strategy to address the limited supply problem by using fetal pig-derived DA neurons has been attempted clinically. However, DA neuron survival in those xenografts was poor, and the entire approach was abandoned. Recent trials using retinal pigment epithelium also failed to show any benefit. In contrast, it is believed that the use of human ES cells as a source of transplanted cells would provide an unlimited source of cells for generating dopamine neurons to be used for transplantation.

[0180] V. Compounds and culture methods have been discovered for the controlled differentiation of FOXA2+ and LMX1A+ positive neuronal progenitor cells into midbrain DA (mDA) neurons of the present invention. The inventors discovered during the development of the present invention that the timing of CHIR99021 exposure determines the induction of FOXA2 / LMX1A midbrain floor plate progenitors. Thus, the inventors tested immunocytochemistry of FOXA2 / LMX1A on differentiation day 11 after LSB / S / F8 treatment (i.e., treatment of cells with LSB, S, i.e., SHH, and FGF8 (F8)) alone or in combination with CHIR starting at various time points, i.e., days 0-11, 1-11, 3-11, 5-11, 7-11, and compared with duplicate cultures of cells without CHIR treatment. Quantification of the percentage of FOXA2+ cells, LMX1A+ cells, and double-labeled cells was then performed on differentiation day 11 after differential initiation of CHIR exposure as described in the immunocytochemistry analysis.

[0181] A. CHIR99021 (C) is an agent for inducing FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ cells from LSB cultured cells contacted with a Hedgehog activator and palmorfamine by day 11. The following example describes the use of an exemplary method for testing the efficacy of each compound for inducing neuron-regulated differentiation of mDA neurons.

[0182] This example describes the discovery and exposure timing of small molecules to effect controlled differentiation of FOXA2+LMX1A+DA neurons of the present invention. The following is a summary of some of the experimental findings described herein: Treatment of dual SMAD-inhibited cells with SHH agonists (palmorphamine+SHH) and FGF8 (S / F8) in the absence of CHIR99021 showed significantly lower expression of FOXA2 and complete loss of LMX1A expression by day 11 (Figure 1a, b). The anterior marker OTX2 was robustly induced in LSB- and LSB / S / F8 / CHIR-treated cultures, but not under LSB / S / F8 conditions (Figure 1a, c).

[0183] A cell population containing pluripotent cells was selected by the inventors for the starting population and seeded on day 0. The cells are cultured to near confluence (between 60-100% confluence) before differentiation. These cells were contacted with a dual SMAD inhibitor on day 0 (i.e., exposure to LDN-193189+SB431542="LSB"). The inventors followed the cell population with regular feeding of fresh LSB-containing nutritional supplements until day 11 and found that some remaining cells were LMX1A+ but did not express FOXA2 (Fig. 1a, b). We seeded starting cells in duplicate and then contacted the cells with different exposure regimes, i.e., contacting the cells on day 0, or day 1, or day 2, etc. for a specific time, i.e., 24 hours, 48 ​​hours, etc., to test the cell types (i.e., gene expression patterns / protein expression patterns) after contact with mixtures containing any of the following SHH agonists (Parmorphamine+SHH) and FGF8 (S / F8). ​​The three main exemplary culture conditions tested were: 1) contacting cells with LDN / SB (LSB) on day 0, then contacting with fresh LSB until day 5, and from day 5, contacting cells with fresh LDN without SB until day 11. 2) cells were contacted with LDN / SB (LSB) on day 0, then with fresh LSB until day 5, and from day 5 the cells were contacted with fresh LDN without SB until day 11, while during this period the cells were further contacted with fresh palmorphamin, SHH and FGF8 until day 7. 3) cells were contacted with LDN / SB (LSB) on day 0, then with fresh LSB until day 5, and from day 5 the cells were contacted with fresh LDN without SB until day 11, while during this period the cells were further contacted with fresh palmorphamin, SHH and FGF8 until day 7, while during this period the cells were further contacted with fresh CHIR starting on day 3 of culture until day 11, varying some of these key conditions to determine the optimal yield for the cell type.

[0184] B. In vitro characterization of FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ cells derived from the midbrain region of the floor plate compared with DA progenitors generated using other techniques. A systematic comparison of the three culture conditions was performed using global temporal gene expression profiling (Fig. 1d). Hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes separated the three treatment conditions by differentiation day 11 (Fig. 8a). Several other SHH downstream targets, including FOXA1, FOXA2, and PTCH1, were among the most differentially regulated transcripts between the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR and LSB treatment sets (Fig. 1e). Expression of LMX1A, NGN2, and DDC indicated the establishment of a midbrain DA neuron progenitor fate as early as day 11 (Fig. 1e, f). In contrast, LSB cultures enriched for dorsal forebrain progenitor markers such as HESS, PAX6, LHX2, and EMX2. Direct comparison of LSB / S / F8 / CHIR and LSB / S / F8 treatments (Fig. 1f) confirmed selective enrichment of midbrain DA progenitor markers in the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR group and suggested hypothalamic progenitor identity in LSB / S / F8-treated cultures based on differential expression of RAX1, SIX3, and SIX6 (see also POMC expression, OTP expression in Fig. 2d below). An exemplary list of differentially expressed transcripts is shown, i.e., Tables 1, 2, and gene ontology analysis at day 11 (Fig. 8b) (DAVID; http: / / david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) confirmed the enhancement of canonical WNT signaling by CHIR treatment. Raw data are not yet available in GEO (worldwideweb.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / geo / accession#:[TBD]). Comparative temporal analysis of gene expression of midbrain DA progenitor markers (Fig. 1g) and markers of anterior ventral non-DA neuronal fates (Fig. 1h) allocated the three induction conditions to: i) LSB: dorsal forebrain identity; ii) LSB / S / F8: ventral / hypothalamic identity; and iii) LSB / S / F8 / CHIR: midbrain DA progenitor identity.

[0185] VI. Further differentiation of FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ day 11 cells into midbrain DA neurons by day 25 and sustained differentiation up to day 65. The precursor FOXA2+ / LMX1A+ cells were maintained in a medium that promotes neuronal maturation (BAGCT, see Example I) for further differentiation. For comparison, DA neuron precursor cells were generated using two other techniques. The following types of comparisons were made between the populations of differentiated cells resulting from the previous method and the method of the present invention: A) immunocytochemistry analysis for TH in combination with LMX1A, FOXA2, and NURR1 at differentiation day 50, B) quantification of TH+, FOXA2+, LMX1+, and NURR1+ cells among total cells comparing rosette-derived cultures with bottom plate-derived (LSB / S / F8 / CHIR) cultures. (C) Quantification of the percentage of serotonin+ (5-HT) and GABA+ neuronal subtypes (non-DA neuron contaminating cells) at day 50 in bottom plate DA neuron cultures and rosette-derived DA neuron cultures. And (D) HPLC analysis to measure dopamine and metabolites: comparison of DA, DOPAC and HVA levels between bottom plate-derived and rosette-derived cultures.

[0186] By day 25, the three progenitor populations gave rise to Tuj1+ neurons (Fig. 2a) and cells expressing TH, the rate-limiting enzyme in DA synthesis. However, LSB / S / F8 / CHIR treatment gave rise to TH+ cells that co-expressed LMX1A and FOXA2 and showed strong induction of the nuclear receptor NURR1 (NR4A2) (Fig. 2a, b). Comparison of gene expression in day 13 and day 25 cultures confirmed robust induction of other postmitotic DA neuron markers (Fig. 2c). Characterization of DA neuron identity at day 25 in LSB-treated cultures compared to LSB / S / F8-treated cultures confirmed enrichment of known midbrain DA neuron transcripts and identified multiple novel candidate markers (Fig. 2d, Tables 3-5, Fig. 8b). For example, the most enriched transcript in LSB / S / F8 / CHIR (midbrain DA group) was TTF3, a gene not originally associated with midbrain DA neuron development but strongly expressed in human substantia nigra (Fig. 8c; Allen Brain Atlas: http: / / human.brain-map.org).

[0187] Similar data were obtained for EBF-1, EBF-3 (Fig. 8c) as well as TTR, a known transcriptional target of FOXA2 in liver. Data obtained during the development of the present invention showed enrichment of several PITX genes in midbrain DA progenitors. PITX3, a classical marker of midbrain DA neurons, was also robustly expressed at differentiation day 25 (Fig. 2e). And unrelated hESC and hiPSC lines could readily recapitulate both midbrain floor plate induction and DA neuron induction (Fig. 9). The data presented herein demonstrate that the LSB / S / F8 / CHIR protocol, in contrast to other tested protocols, produces cells expressing a marker profile consistent with a midbrain DA neuron fate.

[0188] The in vitro and in vivo characteristics of floor plate-derived DA neurons were compared with DA-like neurons obtained from neural rosette intermediates (Figs. 10 and 16). Neural rosette patterning represents the currently most widely used strategy to obtain DA neurons from hPSCs. Both floor plate-based and rosette-based protocols were superior in generating TH+ neurons capable of long-term in vitro survival (differentiation day 50; Fig. 3-1a). However, the percentage of TH+ cells was significantly higher in floor plate-derived cultures (Fig. 3-1b). TH+ cells from both protocols showed co-expression of NURR1, whereas floor plate-derived DA neurons co-expressed FOXA2 and LMX1A (Figs. 3-1a, b and 3-2).

[0189] Few GABA- and serotonin (5-HT)-positive neurons were observed (Fig. 3-1c). DA and its metabolites DOPAC and HVA were present in cultures generated by either protocol, but DA levels were approximately 8-fold higher in bottom plate cultures (Fig. 3-1d, e). Midbrain DA neurons showed extensive fiber outgrowth and robust expression of mature neuronal markers, including synapsin, dopamine transporter (DAT), and G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir3.2, also called GIRK2, expressed in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) DA neurons) (Fig. 3-1f, Fig. 11). SNpc DA neurons display an electrophysiological phenotype in vivo that distinguishes them from most other neurons in the brain. Specifically, they exhibit slow (1–3 Hz) and spontaneous voltage spikes. These slow voltage spikes are accompanied by slow subthreshold oscillatory voltages. After 2–3 weeks in vitro, SNpc DA neurons cultured from early postnatal mice exhibit these same physiological characteristics. DA neurons differentiated from hESCs consistently (4 / 4 studies) displayed this characteristic physiological phenotype (Figure 3-1g–i).

[0190] In vitro maintenance of mDA neurons at day 65 demonstrated that TH+ neurons continued to express FoxA2 and extended long fibers typical of mDA neurons (Figure 3-1j). Measurement of DA release by HPLC demonstrated that 65-day-old TH+ neurons were functional in vitro (Figure 3-1k).

[0191] In summary, neurogenic conversion of midbrain floor plate progenitor cells and development of an optimized floor plate midbrain DA neuron differentiation protocol are described herein. Floor plate-derived DA neurons were obtained from human ES cells after small molecule-based activation of SHH and canonical WNT signaling during early differentiation stages (Figure 3-2). These hES cells developed from FOXA2 / LMX1A double-positive midbrain floor plate stage to Tuj1+ juvenile neurons with co-expression of FOXA2 / LMX1A, and then to mature DA neurons (Figure 3-2a, b) with electrophysiological attributes characteristic of substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc; A9 type) midbrain DA neurons, including robust DA release, and autonomous pacemaker activity (Figure 3-2c). Remarkably, this was a highly efficient process, with more than half of the cells in the culture dish adopting a mature midbrain marker profile (see Figure 3-2b).

[0192] VII. In vivo characterization of floor plate-derived midbrain dopamine neurons as transplanted neurons. The following example describes the use of the exemplary method of the present invention for use in therapeutic cell replacement. One major challenge in the field is the ability to generate functional hPSC-derived midbrain DA neurons that engraft in vivo or generate teratomas without the risk of neuronal hyperplasia or inappropriate differentiation into non-midbrain neurons. Based on fetal tissue transplantation studies, the inventors considered that the time of cell cycle withdrawal indicated by the expression of NURR1 may be an appropriate time for transplantation (approximately differentiation day 25, FIG. 2). Initial studies using day 25 cells in uninjured adult mice showed robust survival of hPSC-derived FOXA2+ / TH+ neurons 6 weeks after transplantation (FIG. 12). Long-term survival of FOXA2+ / TH+ cells in Parkinson's disease hosts without causing neuronal hyperplasia was tested. To this end, we performed 6-hydroxy-dopamine (6-OHDA) injury (Tabar, et al. Nature Med. 14:379-381 (2008), incorporated herein by reference) in NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null mice, a line that efficiently supports xenograft survival (Quintana, et al. Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells. Nature 456:593-598 (2008), incorporated herein by reference) with particular sensitivity to exposure to rare tumorigenic cells. Both floor plate-derived and rosette-derived DA neuron cultures were transplanted (150 × 10 3 4.5 months after transplantation, floor plate-derived DA neuron grafts showed a well-defined graft core composed of FOXA2-coexpressing TH+ cells and the human-specific marker hNCAM (Fig. 4a-c). Functional analysis demonstrated a complete rescue of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior. In contrast, rosette-derived neuron grafts showed few TH+ neurons, did not result in a significant reduction in rotational behavior (Fig. 4d), and showed extensive neuronal hyperplasia (20 mm 3(Figure 13). The extensive hyperplasia of rosette-derived neural cells used for transplantation reported herein was comparable to previous studies using rosette-derived DA grafts from our group (Kim, et al. miR-371-3 Expression Predicts Neural Differentiation Propensity in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 8:695-706 (2011), incorporated herein by reference) and other groups (Hargus, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:15921-15926 (2010), incorporated herein by reference). The hyperplasia could be due to the longer survival time (4.5 months vs. 6 weeks), the lack of FACS purification prior to transplantation, and the selection of NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null hosts. The number of proliferative Ki67+ cells was minimal in floor plate-derived grafts (<1% of total cells), whereas rosette-derived grafts retained pockets of proliferative neural precursor cells. Neural hyperplasia is thought to be driven by early anterior neuroectodermal cells within the graft (Elkabetz, et al. Genes Dev. 22:152-165 (2008); Aubry, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. SA 105:16707-16712 (2008), incorporated herein by reference). This hypothesis was supported by the expression of the forebrain marker FOXG1 in rosette-derived but not floor plate-derived grafts. Although a small percentage of astroglial cells was present in both floor plate- and rosette-derived grafts, the majority of GFAP+ cells were negative for human markers indicative of host origin (Figure 13).

[0193] The results in NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null mice described herein showed robust long-term survival of FOXA2+ / TH+ neurons, complete recovery of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior, and loss of any signs of neuronal hyperplasia. However, some of these results could be attributable to the specific use of NOD-SCID IL2Rgc null mice. To test this hypothesis, floor plate-derived DA neuron cultures (250 × 10 3 Five months after transplantation, graft survival was robust (Fig. 4e-h), with an average of >15,000 TH+ cells co-expressing FOXA2 (Fig. 4g) and human nuclear antigen (hNA) (Fig. 4e), and TH+ / hNCAM+ fibers emanating from the graft core into the surrounding host striatum (Fig. 4f). TH+ cells expressed midbrain DA neuron markers PITX3 and NURR1 in addition to FOXA2 (Fig. 4h-j). Behavioral analysis showed complete recovery of amphetamine-induced rotational asymmetry in contrast to sham-transplanted animals, which showed no improvement (Fig. 4k). Transplanted animals also showed improvement in the stepping test (Fig. 4l) and cylinder test (Fig. 4m), which measure forelimb immobility, assays that do not rely on pharmacological stimulation of the DA system. A delayed (approximately 3-4 months after transplantation) recovery is expected for human DA neurons and depends on the rate of in vivo maturation, including the level of DAT expression (Fig. 4n). The presence of TH+ cells expressing Kir3.2 channels (GIRK2) or calbindin indicates that DA neurons in the SNpc (A9) and ventral tegmental area (A10) are present in the grafts (Fig. 4o,p).

[0194] As seen in mice (Figure 13), serotonergic and GABAergic cells were rare among rat cells (less than 1% of total cells), as were mostly host-derived GFAP+ glial cells (7% of total cells; Figure 14). Few serotonergic neurons were detected in the grafts, although hNCAM-negative cells, likely host-derived serotonergic fibers, were observed (Figure 14).

[0195] Transplantation of floor plate-derived DA neurons in mice, rats, and monkeys demonstrated remarkable recovery of neuronal function in rodent and primate species. Short-term (6-week) survival assays were extended for up to 5 months after transplantation into the mouse striatum of immunocompromised host mice subjected to 6OHDA injury for surprisingly long-term survival. Indeed, a direct comparison of the traditional rosette-based method of DA neuron generation (Perrier, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 12543-8 (2004)) compared to the novel floor plate-based DA neuron differentiation protocol described herein demonstrated that floor plate-derived DA neurons are capable of long-term DA neuron transplantation, whereas rosette-based neurons are not (Figure 4a-c).

[0196] In particular, robust induction of behavioral recovery of amphetamine-induced rotations in 6-OH-lesioned mice transplanted with floor plate (fp)-derived (blue line) and rosette-derived (red line) DA neurons (Fig. 4d) indicated that fp-derived neurons had a higher recovery rate. Mice transplanted with floor plate-derived DA neurons showed almost complete recovery of amphetamine scores. Animals transplanted with rosette-derived DA neurons showed a lower behavioral recovery, with some recovering to the initial high number of rotations over time.

[0197] Healthy graft function was also found in the 6OHDA-lesioned rat model, which unlike PD mice tolerates more complex behavioral assays and addresses DA neuron survival in a xenograft setting after pharmacological immunosuppression, a treatment that more closely mimics human transplantation protocols. Good graft survival, evidenced by maintenance of DA fiber outgrowth and midbrain-specific transcription factor expression, confirmed the long-term survival of floor plate-derived neurons expressing bona fide midbrain DA neuron markers (Figure 4e–j). A series of functional assays showed significant improvements in both drug-induced rotations (amphetamine-induced rotations) and spontaneous behavioral tests (cylinder test and stepping test).

[0198] The results presented herein demonstrated good graft survival and behavioral analysis results in two independent mouse models. However, the number of DA neurons required in mouse or rat brains represents a small fraction of the larger number of cells required for transplantation in primates and humans. To test the scalability of this protocol, a pilot transplant study was performed in two adult MPTP-lesioned rhesus monkeys.

[0199] In addition, it was initially unknown whether the methods and cells described herein would also restore neuronal function in primates, information that could be used to help enable the use of these methods and cells in humans. Thus, an initial set of studies was performed in at least two monkeys to test short-term (4-6 weeks) in vivo survival and maintenance of midbrain DA neuron phenotype in the primate brain. Those studies described herein showed robust survival of TH / FOXA2-positive midbrain DA neurons and evidence of reinnervation of the host striatum (Figure 4q-t). Transplantation of larger numbers of cells, similar to those estimated to be in the range of numbers required for future human transplantation studies, led to robust midbrain DA neuron survival. In addition to these short-term data, a set of long-term studies in rhesus monkeys was performed to evaluate 3-month survival of cells and an optimized immunosuppressive regimen of daily Cellcept, Prograf, and prednisone (used as a combined triple therapy). Surprisingly, robust 3-month survival of human ES-derived midbrain DA neurons in primate brains was found, along with a greatly reduced inflammatory host response to the grafts compared to the robust host microglial response observed in initial transplant studies (see FIG. 15).

[0200] Specifically, methods relevant for monkey testing include culturing 50 x 10 cells by day 25 of differentiation using the floor plate protocol. 6The results of this study included obtaining as many as 10 transplantable DA neuron progenitor cells. The classical dose was 3 mg of MPTP hydrochloride (range 0.5-5 mg) injected into the carotid artery. This was followed by a systemic injection of MPTP at 0.2 mg / kg i.v. Cells were injected into three locations (posterior caudate and precommissural putamen) on each side of the brain (total of six routes, 1.25 × 10 6 Cells / tract), and animals were immunosuppressed with cyclosporine A. One side of the brain was injected with DA progenitor cells derived from a GFP-expressing subclone of H9, and the other side was transplanted with cells derived from unlabeled H9 cells. Results showing neuronal transplants in rhesus monkeys with continued FOX2A expression and TH production are shown in Figure 4q-t. One month after transplantation, robust survival of midbrain DA neurons was observed based on expression of GFP (Figure 15) and a human-specific cytoplasmic marker (SC-121) (Figure 4q). Each transplanted nucleus was surrounded by a halo of TH+ fibers that extended up to 3 mm into the host (Figure 4r). The transplanted nuclei were composed of TH+ neurons that co-expressed SC-121 (Figure 4s) and FOXA2 (Figure 4t). SC-121- and GFP-negative areas within the grafts contained Iba1+ host microglia (Figure 15), indicating incomplete immunosuppression.

[0201] In summary, transplantation of de novo DA neuronal populations in primates, i.e., adult MPTP (3 mg MPTP hydrochloride (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 5 mg MPTP hydrochloride)-lesioned rhesus monkeys, containing severe >95% loss of endogenous midbrain DA neurons. MPTP exposure caused observable changes and symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease in humans.

[0202] In summary, a novel floor plate-based hPSC differentiation protocol that faithfully recapitulates midbrain DA neuron development has been discovered. The availability of cells with fundamental characteristics of midbrain DA neurons will enable a wide range of biomedical applications, such as basic developmental studies, high-throughput drug discovery, and PD-iPSC-based disease modeling. Importantly, this study conclusively establishes a method to obtain a scalable source of FOXA2+ / TH+ neurons for neural transplantation, a major step on the road to exploring cell-based therapies for PD.

[0203] Furthermore, derivation of bona fide midbrain DA neurons from hESCs demonstrated superior in vivo performance (see FIG. 4) and DA neuron yield at the time of transplantation (approximately 40% mature neurons in the population at differentiation days 25-30, exceeding the percentage (usually approximately 10%) obtained after dissection of human fetal ventral midbrain tissue (Sauer, et al., Reston. Neurol. Neurosci. 2:123-135 (1991)).

[0204] The following is a brief description of the materials and methods used to assess the extent of two key parameters post-transplant: duration of survival and behavioral assessment. For short-term studies aimed at confirming, for example, cell survival or phenotypic configuration, behavioral assessments are contemplated and animals are tested for survival approximately 4-8 weeks after transplantation. Long-term studies include behavioral assessments post-transplantation and animal survival for at least 5 months after transplantation. When analyzing augmentation strategies such as PSA-NCAM modification, behavioral assessments may include more complex parameters such as the staircase test for skilled forelimb use.

[0205] An exemplary protocol for assessing in vivo outcomes has at least four major components and includes: i- injury induction, ii- core behavioral analysis, iii- transplantation, and iv- tissue analysis. Although these methods were used in rats, in some embodiments, these methods can be used in other species.

[0206] i-Injury induction.Unilateral injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) in the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) is one standard approach to induce Parkinson's disease-like symptoms in rats. 6-OHDA is a neurotoxin that is transported retrogradely to the substantia nigra via the nigrostriatal pathway in the MFB, thereby causing neuronal cell death via damage to mitochondrial respiratory enzymes. Targeted neurons include A9 dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and A10 neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Because this injury model causes a large-scale unilateral removal of dopamine in the caudate-putamen complex (CPU), it has been widely tested and accepted as an excellent preclinical model for testing the neurochemical and behavioral outcomes of advanced PD. Behavioral outcomes are also well described and include spontaneous and drug-induced rotations as well as impaired limb use (see below). Although bilateral models of Parkinsonism may better mimic the human disease, they cause adiposity and inability to swallow in rats.

[0207] The method was performed in anesthetized animals (ketamine / xylazine) by stereotactic injection into two sites along the medial forebrain bundle. The efficiency of complete lesion induction was highly dependent on the experience of the experimental operator and ranged from 60-80% during the development of the present invention. Animals were allowed to recover and were subsequently subjected to a battery of behavioral tests beginning 2 weeks after surgery.

[0208] ii- Core Behavioral Analysis. Behavioral analysis begins 2 weeks after surgery and continues after implantation until the animals are sacrificed. The objectives of behavioral analysis are 1) to establish that the lesion is stable and complete and that the animals do not show abrupt recovery of symptoms, a phenomenon seen in partially injured animals, and 2) to demonstrate the effect of dopamine neuron implantation on established behavioral parameters.

[0209] a-Rotational behavior.Rats are observed for spontaneous rotations and D-amphetamine-induced (ipsilateral) rotations (10 mg / kg). A threshold of >6 rotations per minute is required as an indication of significant injury. Apomorphine-induced rotations can also be analyzed, but a positive result is considered to require >80-90% removal of dopamine innervation in the caudate-putamen and is less consistent with MFB lesions compared to CPU lesions. Triplicate data were obtained at 2-week intervals and averaged. Rats with rotation scores below 6 were not included in the study.

[0210] b- Stepping test. This is a test for forelimb immobility. The experimenter lifts the rat with one hand, immobilizes the hind limbs (slightly raises the trunk) and with the other hand fixes the forelimb that is not being monitored. The other forelimb must now support the body weight. The rat is moved slowly laterally in both forehand and backhand positions. The number of adaptation steps is counted for both directions and both limbs.

[0211] c-Cylinder test. This is a test for asymmetry of forelimb use. The rat is placed in a transparent cylinder. The rat's rearing behavior is recorded over a period of 5 minutes. The behavior is analyzed during rearing and landing. The percentage of simultaneous and asymmetric use of the paws during these movements is determined. This can be performed by a computerized video monitoring system. Negative results in these tests have been found to correlate with dopamine depletion, and results have been shown to improve following restorative implantation as described herein.

[0212] iii-Transplantation. Animals receive stereotactic injections of dopamine neurons into the striatum 3 weeks after parkinsonism-induced injury, and behavioral tests confirm sufficient injury. Coordinates for injection are established. The same set of behavioral tests are performed every 2 months after transplantation for various periods (on average 5 months are required to achieve stable behavioral recovery).

[0213] iv-Tissue analysis.Animals are euthanized and perfused. Brains are sectioned and processed for immunohistochemistry and stereological analysis. Antibodies include TH, FoxA2, ​​Pitx3, Nurr1, Lmx1a, Girk2 for dopamine neuron identity and function, DAT: 5-HT to identify serotoninergic neurons; human NCAM or human nuclear antigen for human identity; nestin, Sox2 for neural progenitor cells; Ki-67 for proliferation; Oct4, Nanog for pluripotency markers; α-fetoprotein; myosin; cytokeratin for multiple lineage markers to exclude teratoma formation. Quantitative parameters include graft volume (Cavalieri estimate), total and dopamine cell numbers (using TH / FoxA2 double-labeled neurons) and proliferation index (% Ki67+). The antibodies described are commercially available and used during the development of the present invention.

[0214] In some embodiments, the use of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats is contemplated to better model the human situation. SD rats receive daily intraperitoneal injections of cyclosporine (15 mg / kg) beginning the day before transplantation until sacrifice. Morbidity associated with long-term injections of an aqueous form of cyclosporine (Neoral, an oral solution used in humans) was negligible.

[0215] In some embodiments, exemplary methods are provided for scaling up mDA neuron cultures. See Table 9. In certain embodiments, the use of such methods is contemplated in producing GMP-level cultures for clinical use.

[0216] Evaluation parameters. The use of in vivo studies was contemplated for short-term and long-term graft efficacy. Results obtained during the development of the present invention showed identical tissue characterization in both cases, and an increase in the percentage of TH+ cells among the long-term survivors due to differentiation of the transplanted progenitor cells was expected.

[0217] On average, 15,000 TH+ / FoxA2+ neurons per 250,000 cells were transplanted and animals survived 5 months after transplantation. Significantly fewer dual-labeled cells survived and were counted in short-term survivors. Thus, the in vivo yields shown in Table 9 are considered conservative estimates. Exemplary parameters used to assess pass / fail status for the outcome of the graft compositions are shown in Table 10.

[0218] In long-term grafts, behavioral assessment is an essential component of the performance of hES line products. Indicators that define loss and recovery of function are best described for amphetamine rotation, where healthy grafts should normalize behavior and occasionally cause contralateral locomotion due to DA imbalance. The limits listed in Table 11 are exemplary indicators that will be determined during the development of the present invention.

[0219] In some embodiments, cell sources for use in the differentiation methods of the invention include, but are not limited to, WA09 cell line, ACT (M09) cell line, Bio-Time cell line, and Roslin cell line. In some embodiments, cell sources for use in the differentiation methods of the invention include, but are not limited to, GMP grade lines. In some embodiments, cell sources for use in the differentiation methods of the invention include, but are not limited to, the generation of mature DA neurons for use in short-term transplantation survival assays. In some embodiments, cell sources for use in the differentiation methods of the invention include, but are not limited to, the generation of mature DA neurons for use in transplantation experiments involving behavioral assessments. Controls consist of research grade WA09 and sham saline treated groups. Statistical analysis uses ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test.

[0220] A. Complex behavioral assays to assess the degree of reinnervation. Standard behavioral tests (described herein) showed a direct correlation with the number of surviving dopamine neurons within the graft. In rats treated with the mature DA neurons of the present invention, behavioral tests showed maximal recovery, with an estimated recovery of approximately 30% of DA neurons required to reduce amphetamine-induced rotation. Thus, once a threshold of DA neuron survival in the host is reached (estimated 800-1200 DA neurons in the rat model), it can be difficult to distinguish behavioral differences that reflect augmentation strategies. A micrografting approach has been described in which multiple small grafts, as opposed to large grafts, are placed throughout the striatum. Although controlling for the total number of DA cells grafted, differences in behavioral outcomes were observed when comparing the two groups. Rats with multiple small grafts showed earlier and more extensive behavioral recovery in drug-induced rotation and stepping tests compared to animals with a single large graft and the same number of DA neurons and the same amount of dopamine release. Surprisingly, there was a clear difference in the skillful use of the forelimbs, with animals with widespread small grafts showing improvement, whereas rats bearing standard grafts did not. Skillful use of the forelimbs is considered a task that requires spatial and temporal control of DA release, and thus proper communication between the grafted neurons and the host striatum. Thus, in some embodiments, the use of the mature DA neurons of the present invention in transplantation methods results in the recovery of forelimb use. Thus, in some embodiments, the mature DA neurons of the present invention are administered to one location in the striatum. In other embodiments, the mature DA neurons of the present invention are administered to at least two or more locations in the striatum.

[0221] B. Successful forelimb use (or staircase) test. The forelimb test analyzes the forelimb extension and grasping. Forelimb tests were performed before and after injury and after transplantation. Animals were fasted for 48 hours before testing and were tested daily for 5 days before injury and then twice at 3-week intervals after injury. After transplantation the test was repeated two more times at the 3rd and 5th months. Animals were placed in a plexiglass chamber equipped with a double staircase. Food pellets were placed on both sides of the 5 steps for pre-implantation testing and on one side (the side of the affected limb opposite to the rotation) after transplantation. Animals were tested for a set time frame (e.g. 10 min). The number and percentage of pellets eaten (successfully reached) and taken were calculated and compared to the pre-injury performance of each individual animal. There were several variations of this test regarding the number and timing of test repetitions.

[0222] VIII. Cells differentiated using the methods described herein exhibited electrophysiological responses in situ similar to DA cells. The following example describes the use of an exemplary method of the invention to determine the functional capacity of midbrain DA neurons resulting from differentiation by the methods described herein. Substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) DA neurons exhibit an electrophysiological phenotype in vivo that distinguishes them from most other neurons in the brain. Specifically, these neurons exhibit slow (1-3 Hz) bursts of potential uptake. This slow uptake is also accompanied by slow subthreshold oscillatory potentials. After 2-3 weeks in vitro, SNpc DA neurons cultured from early postnatal mice exhibit these same physiological characteristics. To determine whether mDA neurons of the invention exhibited a comparable electrophysiological phenotype, they were tested for their electrical response signatures. Midbrain DA neurons of the invention at days 80-100 in culture were tested by single cell recordings. These mDA neurons differentiated from hESCs consistently (4 / 4 tests) exhibited this distinctive physiological phenotype by exhibiting specific autonomous internal standard addition behaviors and oscillatory membrane potential changes (FIG. 3g-i). This behavior is known as autonomous pacemaker activity and is a specific property of midbrain DA neurons and in particular the subtype of midbrain dopamine neurons most relevant to Parkinson's disease (substantia nigra-type midbrain DA neurons).

[0223] It is contemplated to use electrophysiological measurements in acute slice preparations, i.e. preparations from biopsy samples of transplanted areas.In one embodiment, A9-type graft-derived DA neurons and A10-type graft-derived DA neurons are distinguished in vivo based on the test of the autonomic pacemaking activity specific to A9-type dopamine neurons, which are the most affected in PD.In other words, A10-type neurons do not have pacemaking activity.

[0224] Conditions were established for in vivo recordings of human pluripotent stem cell-derived DA neurons in acute slice preparations. See Figure 26. Specifically, transplanted pluripotent stem cell-derived human DA neurons were measured for and found to have electrophysiological characteristics typical of those found in mouse substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). The top panel of Figure 26A shows the reconstitution of pacemaker neurons in the graft area. The bottom panel shows an example photomicrograph of a brain slice made from a rat injected with hES-derived neurons 9 months prior. The outline of the graft is shown. A higher magnification image is shown in the inset at the bottom. The slice was processed for tyrosine hydroxylase, which stands out as white (Figure 26B). Additionally, the top panel shows an example cell-attached patch recording from a putative DA neuron in the cell graft. The bottom panel shows an example whole-cell recording from the same cell. Recordings were performed in the presence of glutamate and GABA receptor antagonists (50 μM AP5, 10 μM CNQX, and 10 μM gabazine) to eliminate synaptic inputs. These recordings showed that PS-derived neurons were autonomous pacemakers with normal intrasomatic voltage trajectories. Another neuron recorded in the graft sample had similar properties (Figure 26C). For comparison, cell-attached and whole-cell recordings from dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc of adult mice are shown. Abbreviations (CTx=cortex, STr=striatum, SNpc=substantia nigra pars compacta, DA=dopamine system). This data shows in vivo functional testing of transplanted rat striatum several months after transplantation. Thus, in some embodiments, in vivo functional testing of transplanted tissue shows recovery of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc).

[0225] IX. Controlled differentiation of PINK1 mutant genetic PD-iPS cells (PINK1 mutant) into DA neurons revealed Parkinson's disease-like abnormalities in mature DA neurons.

[0226] This example describes the discovery that a large population of midbrain DA neurons was generated with the characteristics of PD patient neurons when a cell line from a PD patient obtained in a manner that did not cause destruction of the embryo, i.e., PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC cells, was used as a cell population to obtain FOXA2 / LIM1XA / TH+ DA neurons of the present invention.

[0227] In one embodiment, because of the potential advantages of using treated cells in in vitro testing for: 1) observing differentiation or functional abnormalities compared to authentic DA neurons derived from humans without neurological symptoms, then 2) using those abnormalities in the development of therapeutic treatments to ameliorate the observed abnormalities, and 3) treating patients with those therapeutic treatments to reduce, i.e., ameliorate, the symptoms of Parkinson's disease, the inventors contemplate isolating a starting cell population from patients with symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) for use in a method to generate authentic DA neurons in vitro.

[0228] In one embodiment, because of the potential benefit of reduced immunological rejection, i.e., reduced transplant rejection, the inventors contemplate isolating a starting cell population from the same patient with Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms to obtain authentic DA neurons for use in the transplantation process. In other embodiments, reduced transplant rejection is contemplated by using an initial cell source isolated from a major histocompatibility antigen (MHC)-matched human (i.e., twin) or a human with an acceptable MHC histomatch for transplantation (e.g., a relative of the patient) or an unrelated human expressing overlapping MHC molecules.

[0229] A. Controlled differentiation demonstrated that genetic PD-iPSC PINK1 cells contain the ability to develop into midbrain-like DA neurons. See Figures 20-25. PINK1 Q456X mutant PD-iPSC lines were differentiated using the novel floor plate-based midbrain DA neuron protocol (method) described herein to produce midbrain DA neurons that express a differentiation profile equivalent to that obtained from H9 lines differentiated with the novel floor plate-based midbrain DA neuron protocol (Figure 20). This example describes the discovery that a large population of midbrain DA neurons was generated with the characteristics of PD patient neurons when a PD patient cell line obtained by a method that does not cause embryo destruction, i.e., PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC cells, was used as a cell population to obtain FOXA2 / LIM1XA / TH+ DA neurons of the present invention.

[0230] PINK1 Q456X mutant PD-iPSC lines were differentiated using our novel floor plate-based midbrain DA neuron protocol (Methods) and produced a midbrain differentiation profile comparable to that obtained from iPSC H9 lines. (A-C) Immunocytochemical analysis of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines at differentiation day 11 (midbrain progenitor stage) for FOXA2 (red), LMX1A (green) and DAPI (blue) (A), and at differentiation day 25 (post-early mitotic DA neuron stage) for FOXA2 (red) and TH (green) (B), and for NURR1 (red) and TH (green) (C). (D-F) The same set of immunocytochemical analyses performed using H9-derived cells for FOXA2 (red), LMX1A (green) and DAPI (blue) at differentiation day 11 (D), for FOXA2 (red) and TH (green) at differentiation day 25 (E), and for NURR1 (red) and TH (green) (F).

[0231] B. Genetic PD-iPSCs expressed a PD-like phenotype of protein aggregation. Figures 21-24. We found that PINK1 mutant PD-iPSCs showed evidence of α-synuclein (a major component of Lewy bodies in PD patients) expression in the cytoplasm of TH+ DA neurons at day 55 of differentiation using a novel floor plate-based midbrain DA neuron induction protocol (Figures 21a-b). (A, B) Immunocytochemical analysis and merged image for α-synuclein (LB509, red), TH (green) (A) and immunocytochemical analysis for α-synuclein (red) and ubiquitin (green) (B) at day 55 of differentiation of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines. These α-synuclein positive cells also showed high expression of ubiquitin (a classical Lewy body marker). In contrast, DA neurons derived from control iPSC lines showed normal synaptic (as opposed to cytoplasmic) α-synuclein expression and very low levels of ubiquitin expression (Figure 21c-d). (C, D) Immunocytochemical analysis of α-synuclein (red) and TH (green) (C), and α-synuclein (red) and ubiquitin (green) (D) at day 55 of differentiation of control iPSC lines.

[0232] C. Expression of aggregated α-synuclein. In the brains of PD patients, a dimerized, insoluble form of α-synuclein causes aggregation in Lewy bodies. Dimeric α-synuclein shows phosphorylation of serine 129 on α-synuclein. On the same day of differentiation, PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC-derived cells showed strong expression of serine 129 phosphorylated α-synuclein, in contrast to the very low level of expression in control iPSC-derived cells (Figure 22).

[0233] PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC-derived cells showed strong expression of serine 129 phosphorylated α-synuclein, in contrast to the very low levels of expression in control iPSC-derived cells. (A, B) Immunocytochemical analysis of serine 129 phosphorylated α-synuclein (green) and DAPI (blue) in PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC-derived cells (A) and comparable control iPSC-derived cells (B) at day 55 of differentiation.

[0234] D. Differences in α-synuclein expression patterns are observed during differentiation protocols. We hypothesized that floor plate-derived “authentic” midbrain DA neurons exhibit PD-specific vulnerability and corresponding specific in vitro phenotypes. DA neurons obtained using the classical MS5 interstitial feeder cell-based differentiation protocol (Perrier et al., PNAS 2004, incorporated herein by reference) yielded a large number of TH+ neurons. However, based on data obtained during the development of the present invention, we demonstrated that MS5-based TH+ cells are not authentic floor plate-derived midbrain DA neurons. There were a large number of α-synuclein-positive cells in cultures differentiated by the MS5 protocol. However, these cells did not co-express TH. Also, there were no differences in expression patterns between PD-iPSCs and control iPSCs when using the MS5 differentiation strategy (Figure 23a-b). These data indicate that α-synuclein is also expressed in other non-DA cell types, and that such non-DA α-synuclein does not change between disease-derived and control iPSC-derived cells, especially when using standard MS5 differentiation protocols. These are DA-like rosette-derived neurons reported in publications (e.g., Perrier PNAS 2004). These MS5-based TH+ (=DA-like) cells are used for comparison in Figures 3, 10, 13, and 16. These data indicate that α-synuclein is also expressed in other non-DA cell types, and that such non-DA α-synuclein does not change between disease-derived and control iPSC-derived cells, especially when using standard MS5 differentiation protocols. And the new floor plate-based differentiation protocol described herein generates a large number of TH+ cells that co-express α-synuclein. These TH+ cells express α-synuclein in a cytoplasmic expression pattern. (Fig. 24A, B) Immunocytochemistry analysis of α-synuclein (LB509, red) and TH (green) of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines (A) and control iPSCs (B) at day 60 of MS5-based differentiation. (C) Immunocytochemistry analysis of α-synuclein (red) and TH (green) of PINK1 mutant PD-iPSC lines at day 55 of floor plate-based differentiation.

[0235] E. DA neurons derived from genetic PD-iPSCs are more vulnerable to noxious stimuli (Figures 24-25). PD-iPSC-derived TH+ DA neurons obtained from the floor plate-based protocol were more vulnerable to toxin challenge (valinomycin: mitochondrial ionophore, 5uM (concentration range from 1-10uM), 48 hours) than control iPSC-derived cells. In contrast, TH+ neurons obtained by the classical MS5-based protocol did not show differential vulnerability between PD-derived and control-derived cells (Figure 24). Total cell viability assays using Alamar Blue 48 hours after valinomycin treatment also showed differential cell survival at a specific range for toxin challenge (5 and 10uM) when comparing PD-iPSCs and control iPSCs (Figure 25). Normal conditions for both PD-iPSC-derived and control iPSC-derived cultures obtained from the MS5-based protocol (D, PD-iPSC-derived cells are shown), TH+ neurons after toxin challenge in PD-iPSCs (E), and control iPSC-derived culture obtained from the MS5 protocol (F). (GH) Low power images of immunocytochemistry for Tuj1 (red) and TH (green) from the floor plate-based protocol at differentiation day 60: PD-iPSCs in normal (G) and toxin challenge (H) and control iPSCs in normal (I) and toxin challenge (J). (KN) Low power images of immunocytochemistry for Tuj1 (red) and TH (green) from the MS5-based protocol at differentiation day 60: PD-iPSCs in normal (K) and toxin challenge (L) and control iPSCs in normal (M) and toxin challenge (N).

[0236] F. Exemplary quantification of cell viability dose response assay for toxin challenge. Cell viability assay using Alamar Blue 48 hours after valinomycin treatment showed differential cell survival at a specific dose range for toxin challenge (5 and 10 uM) when comparing PD-iPSCs to control iPSCs (day 60 of base plate-based differentiation). Note: Although this assay tests for all cell death, the most dramatic effect was observed specifically in DA neurons (see FIG. 14). Therefore, quantification based on Alamar Blue may underestimate the extent of the differential effect observed in the DA neuron lineage.

[0237] X. Large-Scale Culture Contemplates Using the Compositions and Methods of the Invention to Provide Exemplary mDA Neurons The present description provides exemplary methods and uses for large-scale production of mDA neurons resulting from differentiation with the compositions and methods described herein. Scalable production methods (i.e., methods believed to be successful in generating mDA neurons from cultures containing relatively small numbers of cells) have been shown to produce cell populations capable of transplantable mDA neurons at day 25. See, inter alia, Table 9 for PINK iPSC cells).

[0238] XI. Methods for enrichment of midbrain DA neurons Several methods were developed and tested prior to and during the development of the present invention with the goal of enriching cell populations for midbrain DA neuron progenitor cells by overcoming the problem(s), for example, by removing contaminating cell populations, including but not limited to contaminating pluripotent stem cells. Initial studies were performed using primary embryonic mouse neuron populations, embryonic rat neuron populations, and mouse ESC-derived populations. In addition to having the goal of increasing neural populations for use in DA neuron enrichment, the mouse ESC studies included the development of methods to prevent the formation of teratomas, which was a problem with previous methods. These strategies included negative selection for cell surface markers expressed in pluripotent cells (e.g., SSEA1) along with positive selection of cells expressing a neural marker (NCAM). Using mouse cells, several genetic reporter strategies were proposed for use in identifying enriched neural cells in DA neuron transplantation paradigms (e.g., identifying cells with expression of SOX1, Corin / Lmx1a, Ngn2, TH, Pitx, or DAT). Functional studies were performed in primary cells from Ngn2 reporter mice (Thomposon et al., Exp Neurol. 198(1):183-98 (2006)) and primary cells from Lmx1A reporter mice that were also sorted for choline (Jonsson, Exp Neurol. 219(1):341-54 (2009)). For mouse ESC-derived populations, studies were performed using SOX1 (Barraud et al., Eur J Neurosci. 2005 22(7):1555-69), TH (Kelly et al., Minerva Endocrinol. 1991 16(4):203-6), Pitx3 (Hedlund et al., Stem Cells. 2008 26(6):1526-36) and DAT (Zhou et al., Stem Cells. 2009 27(12):2952-61) mouse ESC reporter lines.In addition, during the development of the present invention, we performed comprehensive transplantation studies directly comparing the in vivo outcomes of three purified mouse ESC-derived populations representing successive stages of DA neuron development: midbrain progenitors (Hes5::GFP), early postmitotic cells (Nurr1::GFP), and mature DA neurons (Pitx3::YFP). These studies identified Nurr1-expressing DA development as particularly suitable for transplantation, and demonstrated that purified DA neurons were capable of efficient engraftment in vivo. Furthermore, these results were used to select cells at differentiation day 25 (the day of onset of Nurr1 expression) for use in transplantation of hESC-DA neurons into mouse, rat, and rhesus monkey models of PD.

[0239] During the development of the present invention, the generation of bona fide midbrain DA neurons from hESCs showed excellent in vivo performance (see FIG. 4), with the use of the protocol described herein resulting in a yield of DA neurons of approximately 40% at the time of transplantation. This percentage exceeded the percentage of DA neurons obtained after dissection of human fetal ventral midbrain tissue (usually approximately 10%). Thus, when using cell purification strategies, the use of a hESC-based source of DA neurons as described herein is contemplated to improve purity even further. In addition, genetic reporter lines have been developed, including human cell lines such as the Nurr1::GFP line for use with hESCs similar to the reporter lines used in mouse studies. However, the use of genetic reporters can be problematic for translational use in humans, as GFP is immunogenic in humans and therefore not suitable for human use. Furthermore, the approximately 10 cells required per transplantation in addition to the potentially high cost and lower cell yields after recovery from storage conditions. 9 Given the length of time that would be required to sort individual cells, FACS sorting can be problematic for establishing clinical-grade DA neuron master cell banks (i.e., developing frozen stocks of human DA neurons for use in transplantation).

[0240] In contrast to genetic reporter systems and FACS-based cell isolation, the inventors contemplated the isolation of DA neurons based on the expression of surface markers using alternative strategies to cell isolation techniques that have been considered for use in PD patients. For example, magnetic bead sorting (e.g., the CliniMACS® system) is widely used in FDA-approved cell-based applications and has been shown to be effective in isolating up to 10 DA neurons under GMP-compliant conditions, i.e., conditions approved for the isolation of cells for human use. 10 This allows for rapid and cost-effective isolation of individual cells. Thus, in some embodiments, for enrichment of Nurr1+ neurons for use in transplantation, magnetic bead sorting using, for example, CD142 bound to magnetic beads, is contemplated for enrichment of mature DA neurons.

[0241] XII. Identification of cell surface markers for use in methods of providing mature DA neurons Cell surface marker expression data collected during the development of the present invention demonstrated the identification of several novel cell surface markers expressed in midbrain DA neurons. Specifically, markers were found to further identify specific cells that will mature into cells, such as DA neurons, mature DA neurons of the present invention, and A9 cells. Two main strategies were used to identify such surface markers. First, a random gene expression screen in a genetic reporter line (Fig. 27a) revealed several candidate markers, including CD142, and a marker named DCSM1 (Fig. 27b) that is selectively expressed in midbrain DA neurons and appears to specifically label A9-type DA neurons. The second strategy was the use of a CD cell surface marker screen in hESC-derived DA neurons testing 242 commercially available antibodies in a 96-well format (Fig. 27c, d). Results from one such exemplary screen (Figure 27e) identified at least five validated markers enriched in midbrain DA neurons, including CD63, CD99, and DCSM1 as well as CD142, a marker that selectively labeled Nurr1+ DA neuron stages (Figure 27f).

[0242] Specifically, as shown in FIG. 27, a CD surface marker screen tested up to 242 individual antibodies on WA09-derived DA neurons at differentiation day 25. These results were compared to duplicate screens of a wide range of other WA09-derived neuronal cell types (e.g., hESC-derived HB9::GFP+ motor neurons, hESC-derived cerebral cortical neurons, hESC-derived Nkx2.1::GFP+ ventral forebrain progenitors, and several other hESC-derived neuronal types). The resulting database of surface marker expression profiles was then used to select candidate CD markers that were selectively enriched for any given subtype, such as midbrain DA neurons (FIG. 27). One of the markers discovered associated with hESC DA neuron differentiation was CD142. CD142 sorting of cells specifically enriched hESC-derived DA neurons at the Nurr1+ stage while eliminating other neuronal subtypes. In some embodiments, CD142 is expressed before Nurr1+. In some embodiments, a midbrain DA neuronal population sorted for CD142 comprises Nurr1+ cells and Nurr1- cells. In some embodiments, a midbrain DA neuronal population sorted for CD142 comprises Nurr1- cells. In some embodiments, a Nurr1-CD142+ sorted cultured midbrain DA neuronal population begins to express Nurr1 (i.e., becomes Nurr1+) up to 2 days after sorting.

[0243] In addition to CD142, CD63 and CD99 were markers enriched in hESC-derived DA neurons. Thus, in some embodiments, DA neuron cultures are enriched for DA neurons by sorting or selection with markers including, but not limited to, CD142, CD63, CD99, DCSM1, Nurr1+, etc. CD142 typically labels approximately 30% of the total cell population at differentiation day 25 (Figure 28a). The selectivity of CD142 for the Nurr1+ DA neuron stage was confirmed in multiple unrelated hESC and hiPSC lines (Figure 28b). Importantly, in addition to enriching for DA neurons, CD142 selectively depletes other neuronal subtypes, such as GABAergic and serotonergic neurons (Figures 28c-f). In vivo studies were performed demonstrating the ability of CD142 to generate highly pure DA neuron grafts without detectable contaminating GABAergic and serotonergic neurons. Serotonergic neurons are a cell type that has been implicated in human fetal tissue transplantation as a potential cause of graft-induced dyskinesia. Although the transplantation method described herein using unpurified cells already yielded very few serotonergic neurons, the use of CD142 should further reduce this risk.

[0244] A. Markers for Identifying A9-Type Mature mDA Neurons. A9- and A10-derived DA neurons were found to have distinct in vitro and in vivo functional properties and innervation patterns specific to their roles in mestriato- and mesolimbic functions, respectively. During development of the present invention, the inventors discovered that authentic mDA neurons (FIG. 4) generated by the methods of the present invention yield neurons with more A9 characteristics than A10 characteristics. In particular, authentic mDA neurons that are TH+ at least partially expressed Girk2, a marker used to define A9-type DA neurons. In addition, many mature DA neurons exhibited autonomous pacemaker activity, a functional property present in A9-type DA neurons but absent in A10-type DA neurons. However, some in vitro generated TH+ cells did not have A9 identity. Thus, the inventors contemplated an enrichment method such as that described herein to provide a population of human A9-type authentic mDA neurons purified relative to (A10) neurons. As described herein, the inventors have discovered at least two markers unique to A9 type neurons and at least two markers unique to A10 type neurons. Thus, in some embodiments, A9 type neurons are distinguished by (Girk2, Aldh1) from A10 (calbindin, Otx2) markers.

[0245] B. Definition of a marker set that increased the yield of midbrain DA neurons with the A9 subtype. At least two strategies were considered for the definition of A9-specific surface markers. Candidate markers were obtained from gene expression screens such as those described herein, and candidate CD antibodies were obtained from surface marker screens such as those described herein. population. Alternatively, global transcriptome analysis (using BAC transgenesis technology; see Fig. 27a, b) in purified populations of mouse ESC-derived mDA neurons at distinct differentiation stages. Surface markers were found in the surface marker profile for DA neurons derived from WA09RCB using the following exemplary method. Differentiation day 25 RCB WA09-derived DA neurons were detached and replated in 96-well plates, followed by exposure to 242 CD antibodies and data analysis using an Operetta high content scanner. At least five additional antibodies that bind to CD markers identified in these screens (e.g., CD142, CD63, and CD99) were tested for the amount of DA enrichment. Candidate CD4+ and CD4+ cells were assessed using DA QC assays, including expression of FOXA2 / TH and TH / Nurr1 (see Table 7). In some embodiments, global gene expression profiles are considered for comparison of unsorted cells to CD142+ cells. In some embodiments, cells sorted / separated for expression of desired markers were used in short-term and long-term in vivo studies described herein. Among other things, the DA neuron-specific marker identified in these studies was a surface marker gene called DCSM1 (DA cell surface marker 1). Based on in situ expression data, expression was found to be in the ventral midbrain in both developing and adult mouse brains (FIG. 27) as well as in human adult brains, but more surprisingly, at least A9-selective. A large number of cells expressing DCSM1 expression were observed in hESC-derived DA neurons.In vitro assays for A9 versus A10 identity included long-term differentiation of marker+ cells (days 50 and 75 of differentiation) and (i) analysis of expression of A9 (Girk2, Aldh1) versus A10 (calbindin, Otx2) markers in mature neurons, (ii) analysis of differential axon guidance responses to netrin-1 and Sema3, and (iii) enriched A9 neurons were assessed by electrophysiological studies. A9 DA neurons exhibited the specific functional properties described herein for hESC-derived A9 neurons. In vivo studies were performed on cells expressing DCSM1 and other markers to confirm (i) expression of A9 markers (Girk2, Aldh1) versus A10 markers (calbindin, Otx2), (ii) graft DA fiber outgrowth, and (iii) electrophysiological A9 properties in slice-prepared grafted cells (see FIG. 26).

[0246] XIII. Use of Polysialic Acid (PSA) and Polysialic Acid Transferase (PST) Enzymes Graft integration and the extent of DA fiber outgrowth are challenges in transplantation methods, including fetal transplantation trials in PD patients. One problem encountered with graft tissues and cells is the limitation of fiber outgrowth from these grafts when treating patients. This problem is particularly critical in humans, as patient recovery requires extensive striatal reinnervation. In previous methods, achieving sufficient reinnervation after tissue transplantation required multiple injections of cell deposits throughout the striatum. Each injection can cause striatal damage and inflammation along with other surgical risks. Such risks include vascular damage during cell injection, which could potentially cause stroke or seizures in patients. PSA is a natural cell surface sialic acid homopolymer (i.e., α2,8-linked sialic acid) that has been identified as a post-translational modification (by the action of polysialic acid transferase (PST) enzymes) of other cell surface molecules, such as (polysialylated) neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), NCAM (CD56), and the like. PSA appears to function in regulating the plasticity of several cell behaviors that require changes in cell-cell interactions, including cell migration and axonal outgrowth. PSA is highly expressed in embryos, but is downregulated in adult tissues, with the exception of localized regions of the CNS that maintain structural and physiological plasticity (e.g., hippocampus, suprachiasmatic nucleus, SVZ). Thus, in some embodiments, it is contemplated to use polysialic acid (PSA) to promote fiber outgrowth of transplanted cells. Examples of the use of PSA in other cell types are described in WO 2006 / 042105, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the inventors contemplate the use of authentic DA neurons in combination with PSA as described herein.

[0247] A. Increasing PSA in DA neurons for use in PD patients.To provide methods and cells that build on previous results with the use of small animal models, significant challenges remain, including limited survival of grafted cells and poor fiber innervation of the host tissue. The impact of these limitations is likely to be more significant in the larger human striatum, and therefore enhanced survival and innervation are necessary for effective clinical application of ES-derived DA neurons. Improved fiber outgrowth and graft integration in animal models, including the use of at least one injection and up to several injections, may represent a reduction in the risks associated with multiple injections or poor distribution of DA neurons in vivo.

[0248] Modulation of cell interactions by polysialic acid (PSA) is one of the factors that promotes cell distribution, axonal outgrowth, and target innervation during vertebrate development. See, for example, Rutishauser, Polysialic acid in the plasticity of the developing and adult vertebrate nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9, 26~35 (2008). PSA was a carbohydrate polymer bound to neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) that weakened cell-cell interactions and thereby promoted tissue plasticity. In the glial scar, enhanced expression of PSA in the adult brain promoted migration of neuronal precursor cells from the subventricular zone to the cerebral cortex and improved axonal outgrowth (El et al. Use of polysialic acid in repair of central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 16989~16994 (2006)). As described herein, genetically increasing PSA expression in purified mouse ES-derived DA neurons resulted in improved graft cell numbers, widespread DA neuron fiber extension into the host striatum, and, surprisingly, enhanced behavioral recovery in mice with Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, genetically engineering ESC-derived DA neurons to increase cell surface PSA levels concomitantly increased in vivo survival and fiber extension into the host striatum. An exemplary embodiment for using mammalian, i.e., mouse or human, PST genes is shown in FIG. 29. Another exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 29 shows the use of bacterial PST, i.e., PSTnm. Specifically, as described herein, increasing PSA in cells used in mature DA neuron-based cell therapy is contemplated for use in the treatment of PD.

[0249] B. Use of mouse PST to increase PSA expression. In vivo results showed increased neurite outgrowth and restoration of amphetamine-induced turning in 6-OHDA mice receiving mouse PST cell-modified grafts, while the same number of cells not modified with PST failed to achieve the same (Figure 33). Also, improved DA fiber innervation was observed to correlate with improved behavioral treatment outcomes in PD mouse models, for example when small (injection of approximately 50,000 cells) PSA-positive cell grafts were created, resulting in graft incorporation and fiber outgrowth that was approximately 70% of the area targeted compared to the use of larger (over 100,000 cells) grafts for comparison. Side-by-side comparison of PSA-enhanced ES-derived DA neuron grafts and control-treated ES-derived DA neuron grafts (when grafts were by transplantation of 55,000 cells each) showed behavioral restoration in the PSA group that was not observed with control cells. Transplantation of 100,000 ES-derived DA neurons in mouse brain showed behavioral recovery in both PSA-treated and control-treated ES-derived DA neurons, suggesting that grafts derived from 100,000 cells are sufficient to reinnervate mouse brain without PSA enhancement. Therefore, in another embodiment, it is contemplated to use genetically engineered expression of PSA expression on the surface of authentic DA neurons in a method for treating patients with PD. When PSA is induced in the neural cells of the present invention, it is identical to the PSA polymer that occurs naturally in brain cells, and therefore, unlike the use of other cell surface molecules for genetic engineering of therapeutic cell types, cells genetically engineered for PSA expression are expected to have little antigenicity in vivo when used for cells for transplantation methods in humans. Furthermore, high PSA levels in transplanted cells, whether neural progenitor cells (Battista et al., J Neurosci. 30(11):3995-4003 (2010)), Schwann cells (Ghosh et al., Glia. 60(6):979-92(2012)), or the ES-derived DA neurons of the present invention, did not cause detectable side effects when used in various adult rodent models.Expression of PSA to effective levels by genetic engineering required the action of a single polysialic acid transferase (PST) enzyme whose sole product is this unique glycopolymer. Remarkably, the amount of protein expressed and the nature of the enzyme product were highly consistent and closely resembled the PSA found naturally in embryonic tissues.

[0250] As described herein, genetically engineered expression of PSA in neural cells used in transplantation methods is contemplated. In particular, it is envisioned to use PSA in the preparation of cells for therapeutic use by overcoming the problems encountered when using other types of induced cell surface marker expression. Furthermore, the receptor for PSA is also uniform in structure across species and is found on the majority of cell surfaces, so the use of PSA expression was reproducible in protocols across vertebrate species (e.g., using mouse PST gene expressed in human cells). Engineering the PST gene into hESCs to increase PSA on DA neurons. The gene encoding human polysialic acid transferase (hPST) was introduced into a hESC line (WA01) using a lentiviral vector (pLenty, Invitrogen) and as described herein. Twenty selected clones were expanded and analyzed for PST expression. PST-expressing hESC clones were differentiated to ensure that PST was not silenced in DA neurons. Quantification of PSA-NCAM at different differentiation stages (days 0, 11, 25, and 50) was performed using FACS analysis and immunofluorescence (Operetta). Positive clones were subjected to a set of DA neuron quality control (QC) parameters outlined in Table 7. At least three clones that retained uniformly high levels of PSA-NCAM during differentiation and performed well in the QC parameters (Table 7) were advanced to the evaluation of neurite outgrowth in PST-overexpressing hESC-derived DA neurons. Selected control and PST-overexpressing hESC clones were differentiated into DA neurons using standard protocols described herein, followed by fixing and analyzing cells at days 25 and 50. The number and length of TH-positive fibers in such cultures were quantified with an Operetta high content microscope. The Neurite Analysis module of Harmony Software 3.0 quantified the number and length of neurites with and without PST, and data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Proceeding from the above in vitro studies, PST-overexpressing and control hESC clones were re-differentiated into DA neurons and transplanted into a rat model of PD.Short-term transplants (4-6 weeks) were performed to determine viability, PSA-NCAM expression, and neurite outgrowth. For each clone that underwent short-term in vivo transplantation, parameters were subjected to long-term transplantation studies. For these studies, animals were maintained at a standard dose (200 × 10 3 These studies asked whether increasing PSA would translate to increased long-term survival after transplantation (5 months) and whether lower numbers of DA neurons could match or surpass the functional capacity of non-PST grafts transplanted with standard cell doses (Figure 27).

[0251] In addition, complex behavioral assays that are sensitive to the degree of striatal reinnervation were monitored to further distinguish functional capacity between PST and control DA neuron grafts. After completion of behavioral assays, animals were sacrificed and fiber outgrowth was quantified using human-specific antibodies to NCAM and SC121 and antibodies to TH (see also Figure 29). The intensity and spread of hNCAM+, SC121+, and TH+ grafts were measured, as well as the percentage of human cells co-expressing DA neuron markers (TH, FOXA2) and PSA. The density of NCAM / TH+ halos of neurites emanating from the grafts was quantified at various distances. Data were compared between groups using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests. In addition, sections were examined for qualitative changes (e.g., branching, thickness, graft distribution, and shape). In addition, some grafts are processed for slice electrophysiological assessment of A9 phenotype, synapse formation with the host striatum, as well as innervation by endogenous afferents (see FIG. 26).

[0252] The next example demonstrates that enhanced polysialic acid expression improves the function of ES-derived dopamine neuron grafts in mice with Parkinson's disease.

[0253] ES cells expressing GFP under the control of the Nurr1 promoter (Nurr1::GFP ES cells) were stably transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing polysialic acid transferase (PST) ubiquitously. The transduced cells showed a dramatic increase in PST mRNA compared to the controls (Fig. 30A). It was observed that expression of PST was sufficient for PSA synthesis on NCAM. Accordingly, PSA-NCAM expression was greatly elevated in PST-modified cells on day 14 of DA neuron differentiation (Fig. 30B-E). Both endogenous and inducible cell surface PSA on ES-derived DA neurons could be removed by phage endoneuraminidase (endoN), which specifically cleaves the unique α-2,8-linked sialic acid polymer of PSA (Fig. 30E). Surprisingly, PST transduction was not observed to affect the expression of neuronal or midbrain markers in GFP-purified DA neurons (Fig. 30F).

[0254] Other studies in 6OHDA-lesioned hemiparkinsonian mice have shown that transplantation of approximately 100,000 ES-derived DA neuron progenitor cells is necessary to result in robust functional recovery as judged by the amphetamine-promoted rotation test. This study required transplanting a suboptimal number of cells so that an increase in PSA expression could be assessed. To transplant a highly enriched population of DA neurons in which contaminating pluripotent cells had been depleted, differentiation day 14 cultures were FACS-purified for Nurr1-inducible GFP expression and for the absence of SSEA-1 expression (Figure 31). In the absence of PST overexpression, a reduction in the minimum effective transplant size by half (55,000 Nurr1+ DA cells) failed to result in detectable behavioral recovery. In contrast, in the presence of increased PSA expression, the same number of Nurr1 / PST DA neurons resulted in significant correction of PD sexual behavioral impairment (p<0.01; 2-way ANOVA) and complete recovery approximately 5 weeks after surgery (Figure 32A). The functional recovery obtained with Nurr1 / PST was partially reversed by endoN treatment (Figure 32A), indicating that removal of PSA prior to transplantation by incubation with endoN demonstrated the specificity of PSA functional enhancement.

[0255] Animals were processed for immunohistochemistry 2 months after transplantation to investigate the characteristics of the transplanted cells. There was a difference in the number of surviving Nurr1+ neurons, in that animals transplanted with PST transducins had on average twice as many GFP+ cells as animals transplanted with control cells (9,300±1,400 GFP+ cells vs. 4,230±1010 GFP+ cells per graft between PST and control samples, respectively; FIG. 32B, p<0.05, Student's t-test). Furthermore, Nurr1 / PST grafts also showed higher levels of PSA expression in vivo (FIG. 32C,D). However, the percentage of cells expressing the midbrain DA markers TH and FoxA2 within the transplanted nuclei was similar for Nurr1 and Nurr1 / PST cells (TH: 62.0% ± 8.0 vs. 51.3% ± 7.0, p = 0.33; FoxA2: 63.2% ± 8.6 vs. 55.4% ± 2.0, p = 0.3, respectively; Figure ​ Figure32E).

[0256] Neurites emerging from Nurr1 and Nurr1 / PST cells displayed comparable levels of TH, Girk2 (a G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel), and synapsin (Figure 33A). Unlike other studies of transplanted Schwann cells (Ghosh, et al. Glia 60, 979-992 (2012)), enhanced PSA expression had little effect on DA cell migration from the transplant site. However, there was a clear change in neurite outgrowth. As shown in Figure 33B, there were more DA neurites emerging from Nurr1 / PST cells compared to Nurr1+ controls. When the immunofluorescence intensity of GFP and TH was quantified in five consecutive 100 μm zones from the transplant, Nurr1 / PST grafts displayed a much higher relative density of processes (Figure 33C,D; p<0.01 for both GFP and TH, 2-way ANOVA). When quantifying this effect, the relative density of processes was normalized to that observed in the zone most proximal to the graft core. Such normalization was required to correct for the greater number of viable cells in Nurr1 / PST grafts and to confirm the specific effect of PSA on neurite outgrowth. Specificity was also shown when cell surface PSA was removed by endoN treatment prior to grafting. Thus, pretreatment with endoN reduced distal fiber outgrowth to control levels (Figure 33E).

[0257] These findings indicated that at least some of the effects of PSA on graft function occurred through enhanced fiber innervation in the striatum. Thus, there was a strong correlation between graft function and the relative extent of outgrowth of GFP-positive fibers, for example, into zone IV (Figure 33F; p<0.001, r2=0.65, n=17). Remarkably, the relationship between fiber outgrowth and behavior was consistent across experimental groups (control, PSA-increased, and endoN-treated), indicating that graft host innervation is a parameter of behavioral recovery in Parkinson's disease model mice. Several factors contributed mechanistically to the increased fiber outgrowth, including increased permeability of the zone of reactive glia enveloping the graft core, increased neuronal sprouting potential, improved outgrowth into the surrounding host tissue (e.g., easier growth cone transfer), and prevention of premature communication of the graft core with nearby host tissue. The exemplary mechanisms are consistent with the promotion of process outgrowth during normal development and the role of PSA in the adult nervous system.

[0258] The experiments described herein have demonstrated the use of modified PSA in DA neuron transplantation, which results in superior outcomes compared to transplants derived from other types of cells. The data clearly show that increasing PSA results in a significant increase in the ability of transplanted DA neurons to innervate the host striatum and reduce PD sexual dysfunction. Thus, clinical transfer procedures with DA neurons of the present invention are contemplated for providing cells prior to transplantation. In some embodiments, the cells are genetically engineered for expression of PSA. In some embodiments, PST may be delivered directly to cells prior to transplantation by in vitro exposure to its purified enzyme and substrate. In some embodiments, it is believed that the PSA strategy for human transfer procedures in PD transplantation minimizes the need for multiple injections, thereby reducing the surgical risks associated with these multiple injections.

[0259] In other embodiments, it is contemplated that this technique will be used for other cell types and species to increase migration of transplanted Schwann cells, for example, in creating bridges (e.g., intercellular connections) for axonal re-extension at the site of spinal cord injury.

[0260] The following are exemplary materials and methods used in this example. Animals: Six-week-old 129S3 / SvImJ mice (Jackson Laboratory) were housed under temperature control with food and water available ad libitum. Experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH and Institutional Animal Use Guidelines and were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and Biosafety Committee (IBC).

[0261] 6OHDA injection and amphetamine-induced test: Animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (10 mg / kg) and injected with 2 μl of 6OHDA (4 μg / μl in saline, 0.5% ascorbic acid) into the right striatum. Injections were performed with a Hamilton syringe at the following coordinates: 0.5 mm posterior to bregma, 1.8 mm lateral, and 2.5 mm ventral to the brain surface. Before surgery, animals received a single intraperitoneal injection of desipramine (25 mg / Kg, Sigma). Two weeks after surgery, animals were scored in the amphetamine-induced rotation test. The animals were placed in a 30 cm diameter clear plastic cylinder for 30 min, after which they received a single intraperitoneal injection of amphetamine (10 mg / Kg, Sigma). After 20 min, the number of ipsilateral / contralateral rotations was recorded for a further 20 min. Animals were scored once a week for 7 weeks, after which they were deeply anesthetized and perfused transcardially with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4). Brains were removed and postfixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C, then sectioned on a vibratome (Pelco-101, Ted Pella) into 40 μm-thick sagittal slices.

[0262] Cell differentiation and transplantation: Nurr1::GFP BAC transgenic BAC mouse ES reporter cell line (i.e., GFP expression is driven by the Nurr1 promoter)5 was transduced with lentivirus (pLenti, Invitrogen) containing the mouse PST gene under the control of the CMV promoter. ES cells were cultured on mitomycin C-treated MEFs (Stem Cell Technologies) in DMEM (Invitrogen), 10% FBS (Hyclone) supplemented with 1,400 units / ml LIF (ESGRO; Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 U / ml penicillin, and 100 ps / ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). DA differentiation was induced according to Barberi et al., Nat Biotechnol 21, 1200-1207 (2003) with modifications. Briefly, cells (10,000 cells / 10 cm dish) were differentiated on MS5 feeder cells in gelatin-coated dishes and cultured on serum replacement medium (SRM) for 4 days. Sonic hedgehog (SHH, 200 ng / ml) and FGF8 (100 ng / ml) were added on day 4. On day 7 of differentiation, the medium was changed to N2 supplemented with SHH, FGF8 and bFGF (10 ng / ml). On day 11, terminal differentiation was induced by withdrawal of SHH, FGF8 and bFGF and addition of ascorbic acid (AA, 200 μM) and BDNF (20 ng / ml).

[0263] Cells were harvested on days 14-15 by 45 min of Accutase treatment, washed once with N2, and incubated with AlexaFluor-647-conjugated anti-SSEA-1 antibody (BD Pharmingen) for 25 min. Cells were washed once with N2 and resuspended in HEPES buffer containing 0.1% BSA. DAPI was added to assess viability. FACS was performed using a MoFlo cell sorter to sort populations of interest for GFP fluorescence (Nurr1). Populations positive for AlexaFluor-647 (SSEA-1) were negatively sorted. Naïve J1 mouse ES cells at the same differentiation stage were used for GFP negative control.

[0264] Nurr1::GFP sorted cells were analyzed for viability and resuspended in N2 containing BDN and AA to a final concentration of 55,000 cells / μl. A fine glass capillary with a 50 μm tip was used to inject 1 μl into the injured mouse striatum at the following coordinates: 0.3 mm posterior to bregma, 1.5 mm lateral, and 2.2 mm ventral to the brain surface. An aliquot of the cell suspension was replated onto Matrigel-coated 6 mm dishes for further characterization.

[0265] For immunofluorescence analysis, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 10 min, washed twice with PBS, blocked with 5% BSA (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS), and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with primary antibodies: rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000, Invitrogen), mouse IgM anti-PSA (1:2000, 5A5), mouse anti-NeuN (1:800, Chemicon), mouse anti-TH (1:1000, Sigma), goat anti-FoxA2 (1:800, Santa Cruz), and goat anti-Engrailed (1:800, Santa Cruz). Cells were then incubated with Cy-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Jackson).

[0266] EndoN treatment: The night before harvest, cells were treated with 20 units of endoN, a phage enzyme that specifically removes PSA 7-9, to remove PSA from NCAM. Cells were then harvested and injected as previously described, but resuspended in N2 containing BDNF and AA and 5 units of endoN. We have previously assessed that injection of the same amount of endoN alone into injured mice does not improve animal behavior.

[0267] In vitro analysis of PST mRNA and PSA-NCAM: For Western blot analysis, cells were treated with WB buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, containing 1% NP40, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1x protease / phosphatase inhibitors added just before extraction), sonicated twice for 5 s, centrifuged, and resuspended in Laemmli buffer (LB). An aliquot without LB was saved for protein determination. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto 6% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels (Bio-Rad). Proteins were transferred electrophoretically to polyvinylidene membranes (Millipore). The membrane was blocked for 1–6 h in 0.1% Triton X-100 TBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk (TBS-T) and incubated overnight with anti-NCAM antibody (1:10,000, Santa Cruz) in TBS-T containing 5% milk. Blots were then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000, Jackson) and detected using ECL detection (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Protein levels were quantified using Image J software.

[0268] For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Sigma), reverse transcribed (Qiagen), and amplified using 0.2 μM forward and reverse primers in 10 μl of 2× SYBR reaction mixture and a final volume of 20 μl. For PSA-NCAM FACS analysis, cells were harvested by Accutase treatment for 45 min, washed once, and incubated with mouse IgM anti-PSA (1:250, 5A5) for 25 min on ice, washed once with N2 medium, and incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgM (1:250, Jackson) for an additional 25 min on ice. Cells were washed once with N2, resuspended in 0.1% BSA containing 7AAD, and analyzed on a FACS Calibur cell sorter. No primary antibody was added as a control.

[0269] Immunohistological and stereological methods: Free-floating coronal sections were blocked in 0.1% Triton X-100, 5% donkey serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature and then incubated for 48 h at 4°C with various antibodies: rabbit anti-GFP (1:300), chicken anti-GFP (1:200, Chemicon), mouse anti-TH (1:200), mouse IgM anti-PSA (1:1000), mouse anti-NeuN (1:400), goat anti-FoxA2 (1:300), rabbit anti-Girk2 (1:300, Alomone Labs), and mouse anti-Synapsin (1:200, BD Transduction Laboratories). Sections were then washed and incubated with secondary antibodies: Cy2-, Cy3-, and Cy5-conjugated donkey antibodies (1:400, Jackson). For PSA, Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-IgM (1:500 Jackson) was used. Incubation was performed for 2 hours at room temperature. Sections were washed twice in PBS and mounted on slides in Mowiol (Calbiochem). One of three coronal sections of the brain was analyzed for each immunolabeling. Digital images were collected with a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with a c-Apochromat 40x objective (water immersion) using three lasers (Argon 488, HeNe543 and HeNe633). The number of GFP+ and TH+ cells was counted under a 40x objective in one of three sections covering the whole brain to estimate the total number of cells per graft. Doubly labeled cells were analyzed in a single optical plane across the entire z-axis.

[0270] For analysis of the percentage of GFP / TH+ and GFP / FoxA2+ labeled cells, 100 GFP+ cells were analyzed for each marker. For analysis of process outgrowth, confocal z-scans were performed at 0.8 μm intervals over the entire z-axis (20-40 μm) using a 1 μm pinhole under a 40x objective. Sections were scanned until no processes were observed outward from the injection site. 3D projections encompassing the entire scanned area were aligned consecutively. For GFP and TH intensity analysis, the entire scanned area was divided into five consecutive zones, each 100 μm away from the implant, and the intensity was measured using Image J software. Data were normalized to the intensity in the zone closest to the implant (Zone I) to adjust for any possible differences in implant size.

[0271] Statistical analysis: Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparisons were performed using Student's t-test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-hoc test. Linear regression analysis was performed and quantified using Pearson correlation.

[0272] C. Overexpression of human PST genes (polysialic acid transferase) Groups of injured animals received one of three doses of wild type cells, cells expressing PST, or cells pretreated with PST enzyme. The animals were processed for behavioral testing according to the paradigms discussed in Table 11 (amphetamine rotation, cylinder test, stepping test). Selected doses (e.g., 200,000, 100,000, 50,000 cells) were successfully used in mice such that the resulting neurons exhibited the results described herein for the mouse PST gene.

[0273] D. Direct administration of purified PST enzyme to cells. In other words, a non-transgenic method of PSA induction. Pretreatment of cells with PST enzyme leads to polysialylation and increased expression of surface PSA. Although mammalian PSTs are low-abundance membrane proteins that operate in the Golgi, purified 2,8-polysialylate transferase (PSTnm) from Neisseria meningitides operates in the extracellular environment and produces polymers that are chemically identical to mammalian PSA when using a commercially available non-toxic substrate (i.e., CMP-sialic acid). As an example, an active fragment of this enzyme was effective in attaching PSA to therapeutic proteins in vitro to increase their in vivo pharmacokinetics. In the presence of CMP-sialic acid, PSA was synthesized by PSTnm directly on the surface of a wide variety of cell types, including mouse and human ESCs in vitro (Figure 35A-E). Direct injection of PSTnm plus substrate causes increased PSA accumulation at the cell surface in adult brain regions including the cerebral cortex, striatum and spinal cord (Fig. 35G-H) in vivo. PSA produced by PSTnm was degraded by endoN (Fig. 35B), which removes induced PSA, indicating that PSTnm-produced PSA has functional properties equivalent to endogenous PSA (Fig. 35A, C, D). PSA expression by PSTnm occurred in less than 1 hour, overcoming the slow PST transgene induction. Expression was sustained for several weeks in vivo, after which the PSA marker decreased, thus overcoming the side effects of prolonged induction of the PST transgene. Thus, the use of exposure of cells to PSTnm+substrate in vitro appears to be a simple alternative strategy to cause increased PSA levels in hESC-derived DA neurons and other cell types for use in transplantation methods. In part, this alternative approach for translation, i.e., use in human transplantation methods, has the advantage of being non-invasive, i.e., avoiding the use of gene transfer methods, GMP grade reagents are used in these methods to fit clinical use protocols, and the transient nature of expression of biochemically engineered PSA fits the expected time frame for DA fibers to depart from the transplant core and enter the host brain, necessary to avoid some of the dangerous side effects of using engineered cells for transplantation.

[0274] The next example demonstrates enzymatic engineering of PSA onto hESC-derived DA neurons to enhance transplantation efficacy using purified bacterial polysialic acid transferase, PSTnm.

[0275] Although effective, PST gene transfection required genetic modification of hESCs with limited control over the duration of polysialylation. This example describes the finding that exogenous PSTnm induced PSA instead of gene delivery (see FIG. 35). In FIG. 35A, PST-treated Schwann cells (SCs) (green middle line) increased adhesion time, whereas PSA produced by PSTnm inhibited adhesion. Notably, (A) PSA produced by PSTnm (red bottom line) inhibited adhesion of Schwann cells in suspension to Schwann cell monolayers more effectively than PSA produced by forced expression of PST (green middle line). (B) Immunoblotting of PSA in ESC-derived HB9 motor neurons shows that control samples treated with PSTnm alone had undetectable PSA levels. Incubation with PSTnm+CMP-sialic acid substrate resulted in a large PSA band that was eliminated by endoN treatment. (C,D) Polysialylation of these cells by PSTnm and substrate during differentiation enhances neurite outgrowth and cell migration (arrowheads), similar to the effect obtained with PST genes. (E) PSA immunostaining of hESC-derived DA neurons at day 30. (F) This staining is significantly increased after treatment with PSTnm and substrate. (G) In vivo injection of PSTnm alone has no effect, whereas (H) coadministration of PSTnm with substrate induces massive PSA expression in the mouse striatum.

[0276] Therefore, it is contemplated that mature DA neurons exogenously treated with PSTnm will be used to generate cells for transplantation. Both mammalian PST and PSTnm have generated PSA chains that are chemically identical. The increase in PSA on hESC-derived DA neurons (Figure 35F) should persist for several weeks, sufficient for DA fibers to exit the transplant core. Since PSTnm is removed prior to transplantation, immunogenicity of this enzyme to contaminating transplanted cells should not be a cause.

[0277] PSTnm was generated from a genetically engineered fragment with enhanced solubility and activity characteristics (Willis et al., Characterization of the alpha-2,8-polysialyltransferase from Neisseria meningitidis with synthetic acceptors, and the development of a self-priming polysialyltransferase fusion enzyme. Glycobiology 18, 177-186 (2008)). hESC cultures were induced to differentiate into DA neurons prior to exposure to PSTnm, substrate, or both. Cultures were examined at various time points of exposure (10 min to 6 h) to determine the rate and level of polysialylation by quantitative immunofluorescence (Operetta) and Western blotting. Thus, using the conditions described herein, day 25 differentiated hESC-derived DA neurons are incubated with optimal concentrations of PSTnm and substrate. PSA+mDA neurons are transplanted in short-term and long-term assays as described herein and in FIG. 29.

[0278] E. Application for Spinal Cord Injury. Several studies aimed at the ultimate use in human patients and the strategies described herein have shown the broad potential of these methods, including PST gene delivery by injecting lentiviral vectors expressing PST directly into the CNS to promote axonal regeneration and migration of endogenous progenitor cells. One such strategy for use in human-directed methods targets spinal cord injury. In one type of spinal cord regeneration method, Schwann cell grafts were used as part of a therapy to reconstruct the cellular bridges used in in vivo axonal regeneration. However, the recovery of the patient's motor function, including good muscle control, resisted any therapeutic intervention. As shown herein, enhanced PSA expression in Schwann cells used for transplantation caused enhanced migration and axonal extension of Schwann cells, which further caused a dramatic effect on motor function enhancement (Figure 30A-D). Thus, in some embodiments, it is contemplated to utilize elevated PSA expression in Schwann cells in vitro in transplantation methods in humans with spinal cord injury. Another strategy for the use of engineered PSA expression, by upregulation of the PST gene in a human manner, involves HB9 ESC-derived motor neurons, where induction of the PST gene in these neurons via lentiviral vector-based gene expression caused a dramatic increase in axonal outgrowth both in culture and after transplantation in mice for the repair of mechanically induced sciatic nerve injury. The latter caused improved specific targeting of muscle tissue (Figure 30E-H). Thus, in anothe...

Claims

1. 1. An in vitro method for differentiating pluripotent cells, comprising: The method comprises: Inducing inhibition of Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic (SMAD) signaling in cell cultures containing pluripotent cells; and inducing activation of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling and activation of Wingless (Wnt) signaling; wherein the induction of Wnt signaling is performed on the cell culture from day 3 to day 11 from the start of induction of inhibition of SMAD signaling to obtain a population of differentiated cells expressing both forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) and LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A).

2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the pluripotent cells comprise pluripotent stem cells and greater than 10% of a population of cells differentiated from the pluripotent stem cells express both FOXA2 and LMX1A.

3. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the pluripotent cells comprise pluripotent stem cells and greater than 40% of a population of cells differentiated from the pluripotent stem cells express both FOXA2 and LMX1A.

4. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the pluripotent cells are selected from the group consisting of human, non-human primate, or rodent non-embryonic stem cells, embryonic stem cells, induced non-embryonic pluripotent cells, and genetically engineered pluripotent cells.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the inducing of activation of SHH signalling and activation of Wnt signalling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one SMAD signalling inhibitor, at least one SHH signalling activator, and at least one Wnt signalling activator.

6. The method of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the pluripotent cells differentiate into cells expressing both FOXA2 and LMX1A within 11 days from the start of induction of inhibition of SMAD signaling.

7. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the differentiated cells expressing FOXA2 and LMX1A further express at least one marker selected from the group consisting of Girk2, CD142, and DCSM1.

8. a. Inducing the inhibition of SMAD signaling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one SMAD signaling inhibitor; wherein the at least one SMAD signaling inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of LDN-193189, SB431542, noggin, dorsomorphin, and combinations of two or more thereof; b. Inducing activation of the SHH signaling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one SHH signaling activator, wherein the at least one SHH signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of parmorphamine, recombinant SHH, purified SHH, smoothened agonists (SAGs), and combinations of two or more thereof; c. Inducing activation of Wnt signaling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one Wnt signaling activator; wherein the at least one Wnt signaling activator is selected from the group consisting of CHIR99021, Wnt3A, Wnt1, and combinations of two or more thereof; The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that

9. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the differentiated cells that express FOXA2 and LMX1A do not express at least one marker selected from the group consisting of PAX6, EMX2, and LHX2.

10. The method of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein inducing inhibition of SMAD signaling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one SMAD signaling inhibitor; wherein the at least one SMAD signaling inhibitor comprises at least one TGFβ / Activin-Nodal signaling inhibitor and at least one bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling inhibitor.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one TGFβ / activin-nodal signaling inhibitor is SB431542.

12. 12. The method of claim 10 or 11, wherein the at least one bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling inhibitor is LDN193189.

13. 13. The method of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the inducing activation of Wnt signaling comprises exposing the pluripotent cells to at least one Wnt signaling activator; wherein the at least one Wingless (Wnt) signaling activator comprises a glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) signaling inhibitor.

14. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) signaling inhibitor is CHIR99021.

15. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the in vitro differentiated cells are midbrain floor plate progenitor cells.

16. The method further comprises inducing the differentiated cells to mature into dopamine neurons; The induction of the differentiated cells to mature into dopamine neurons comprises:

2. The method of claim 1, comprising contacting the differentiated cells with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ascorbic acid (AA), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), transforming growth factor type beta 3 (TGFβ3), or a combination thereof.

Images