Method of assessing retinal pigment epithelial cell populations

Abstract

To provide a method of qualifying whether a cell population is a suitable therapeutic for treating an eye condition.SOLUTION: A method comprises analyzing co-expression of premelanosome protein (PMEL17) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of cellular retinaldehyde binding protein (CRALBP), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT) and sex determining region Y-box 9 (SOX 9) in the population of cells.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 27A

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] In some aspects, the present invention relates to retinal pigment epithelial cells, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to evaluating such cells as therapeutics. The present invention also relates to the generation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from embryonic stem cells. [Background technology]

[0002] The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a monolayer of pigment cells located between the neural retina and the choriocapillaris. RPE cells play a critical role in the maintenance and function of the retina and its photoreceptors. These functions include forming the blood-retinal barrier, absorbing stray light, providing nutrients to the neural retina, regenerating visual pigment, and recapturing and recycling shed photoreceptor outer segments.

[0003] Retinal tissue can degenerate for many reasons, including arterial or venous blockage, diabetic retinopathy, and retinopathy of prematurity, which are usually inherited. Diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa, retinoschisis, lattice degeneration, Best's disease, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are characterized by progressive retinal degeneration.

[0004] RPE cells could potentially be used for cell replacement therapy of degenerated RPE in the retinal diseases mentioned above. They could also be used as a vehicle for gene transfer to treat retinal degenerative diseases. These cells could also serve as in vitro models of retinal degenerative diseases, as a tool for high-throughput screening of small molecules for therapeutic efficacy, and for discovering and testing new drugs for retinal degenerative diseases. RPE cells could also be used for basic research on RPE development, maturation, characteristics, properties, metabolism, immunogenicity, function, and interactions with other cell types.

[0005] Human fetal and adult RPE cells have been used as alternative donor sources for allogeneic transplantation. However, practical challenges in obtaining sufficient tissue supplies and ethical concerns regarding the use of tissue from aborted fetuses have limited the widespread use of these donor sources. Given these limitations in the supply of adult and fetal RPE grafts, the potential for alternative donor sources has been explored. Human pluripotent stem cells offer significant advantages as a source of RPE cells for transplantation. Due to their pluripotent developmental potential, human pluripotent stem cells have the potential to differentiate into bona fide functional RPE cells. Given their unlimited self-renewal potential, they could potentially serve as an unlimited donor source of RPE cells. Indeed, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been shown to differentiate into RPE cells in vitro and, after subretinal transplantation in the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rat retinal degeneration model caused by RPE dysfunction, attenuate retinal degeneration and preserve visual function. Therefore, pluripotent stem cells may represent an unlimited source for producing RPE cells.

[0006] Current protocols for obtaining RPE cells from pluripotent stem cells result in a mixed population of pigmented and non-pigmented cells, but a pure population of pigmented cells is desirable for the use of RPE cells in basic research, drug discovery, and cell therapy.

[0007] Background art includes WO2013 / 114360 (Patent Document 1), WO2008 / 129554 (Patent Document 2), and WO2013 / 184809 (Patent Document 3). [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0008] [Patent Document 1] WO2013 / 114360 [Patent Document 2] WO2008 / 129554 [Patent Document 3] WO2013 / 184809 Summary of the Invention

[0009] According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a population of human polygonal RPE cells, wherein at least 95% of the cells co-express a premelanosome protein (PMEL17) and a cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), and wherein the population of cells has a transepithelial electrical resistance of greater than 100 ohms.

[0010] According to one aspect of some embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a population of human RPE cells, wherein at least 80% of the cells co-express pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), and cells within the population secrete each of angiogenin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2), soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha ubiquitous membrane receptor 1 (sTNF-R1).

[0011] According to an embodiment of the present invention, cells within the population secrete each of angiogenin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2), soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha ubiquitous membrane receptor 1 (sTNF-R1).

[0012] According to an embodiment of the invention, the cells secrete angiogenin, TIMP2, sgp130, or sTNF-R1 in a polarized manner.

[0013] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the cells secrete each of angiogenin, TIMP2, sgp130, and sTNF-R1 in a polarized manner.

[0014] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of apical secretion of sgp130 to basolateral secretion of sgp130 is greater than one.

[0015] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of sTNF-R1 is greater than one.

[0016] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of basolateral secretion of angiogenin to apical secretion of angiogenin is greater than one.

[0017] According to an embodiment of the invention, the ratio of apical to basolateral secretion of TIMP2 is greater than one.

[0018] According to an embodiment of the present invention, Oct4 in the population + TRA-1-60 + The cell count is below 1:250,000.

[0019] According to an embodiment of the present invention, at least 80% of the cells express Bestrophin 1 as determined by immunostaining.

[0020] According to an embodiment of the invention, at least 80% of the cells express microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) as determined by immunostaining.

[0021] According to an embodiment of the invention, more than 50% of the cells express paired box gene 6 (PAX-6) as measured by FACS.

[0022] According to an embodiment of the invention, the cells secrete greater than 750 ng of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) per ml per day.

[0023] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the cells secrete PEDF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a polarized manner.

[0024] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of apical to basolateral secretion of PEDF is greater than one.

[0025] According to an embodiment of the present invention, after 8 hours of incubation at 2-8°C, the ratio is still greater than 1.

[0026] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the population of cells has a transepithelial electrical resistance of greater than 100 ohms.

[0027] According to an embodiment of the present invention, after 8 hours of incubation at 2-8°C, the transepithelial electrical resistance of the cells is still greater than 100 ohms.

[0028] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of basolateral secretion of VEGF to apical secretion of VEGF is greater than one.

[0029] According to an embodiment of the present invention, after 8 hours of incubation at 2-8°C, the ratio is still greater than 1.

[0030] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the cell population is capable of rescuing vision in RCS rats after subretinal administration.

[0031] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the cell population is capable of rescuing photoreceptors for at least 180 days following subretinal administration in RCS rats.

[0032] According to an aspect of the invention, the cell population is generated by ex vivo differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

[0033] According to an aspect of the present invention, the cell population comprises: (a) culturing human embryonic stem cells in a medium containing nicotinamide and lacking activin A to produce differentiated cells; (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing nicotinamide and activin A to generate cells further differentiated into the RPE lineage; and (c) culturing the cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage in a medium containing nicotinamide and lacking activin A. It is made by

[0034] According to an embodiment of the present invention, embryonic stem cells are grown in a medium comprising bFGF and TGFβ.

[0035] According to an embodiment of the present invention, embryonic stem cells are cultured on human cord fibroblasts.

[0036] According to an embodiment of the present invention, steps (a)-(c) are carried out under conditions where the atmospheric oxygen level is less than about 10%.

[0037] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises, after step (c), culturing the differentiated cells in a medium in the presence of nicotinamide under conditions where the atmospheric oxygen level is greater than about 10%.

[0038] According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical composition comprising a cell population described herein as an active agent and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

[0039] According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a use of the cell population described herein for treating retinal degeneration.

[0040] According to one aspect of some embodiments of the present invention, (a) culturing pluripotent stem cells in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily member to generate differentiated cells; (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily and a differentiation agent to generate cells further differentiated along the RPE lineage; (c) culturing the cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a member of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) superfamily to generate RPE cells. The present invention provides a method for producing RPE cells, comprising the steps (a) to (c), wherein steps (a) to (c) are carried out under conditions where the atmospheric oxygen level is less than about 10%.

[0041] According to an embodiment of the present invention, step (a) is carried out under non-sticking conditions.

[0042] According to an aspect of the present invention, the non-adherent conditions include a non-adherent culture plate.

[0043] According to an embodiment of the present invention, step (a) comprises: (i) culturing a population of cultured human pluripotent stem cells under non-adherent conditions in a medium containing nicotinamide in the absence of activin A to generate clusters of cells including differentiated cells; and thereafter (ii) culturing the differentiated cells of (i) under adherent conditions in a medium containing nicotinamide in the absence of activin A; Includes.

[0044] According to an embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises the step of dissociating the clusters of cells prior to step (ii) to produce clumps of cells or a single cell suspension of cells.

[0045] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises, after step (c), culturing the differentiated cells in a medium in the presence of a differentiation agent under conditions where the atmospheric oxygen level is greater than about 10%.

[0046] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily is selected from the group consisting of TGFβ1, TGFβ3, and activin A.

[0047] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the differentiation material in step (a) and the differentiation material in step (c) are the same.

[0048] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the differentiation agent in step (a) is nicotinamide (NA) or 3-aminobenzamide.

[0049] According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises, after step (c), selecting polygonal cells.

[0050] According to an aspect of the invention, the method further comprises the step of growing the polygonal cells.

[0051] According to an aspect of the invention, the growing step is carried out on an adherent surface or on an extracellular matrix.

[0052] According to an aspect of the present invention, the pluripotent stem cells include embryonic stem cells.

[0053] According to an embodiment of the present invention, embryonic stem cells are grown in a medium comprising bFGF and TGFβ.

[0054] According to an aspect of the present invention, embryonic stem cells are cultured on human cord fibroblasts.

[0055] [The present invention 1001] 1. A method for qualifying a cell population as a suitable therapeutic for treating an ocular condition, comprising: The method includes analyzing the co-expression of pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT), and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9) in the population of cells, and if the number of cells co-expressing PMEL17 and the at least one polypeptide exceeds a predetermined level, the cell population is determined to be suitable as a therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality. [The present invention 1002] 1001. The method of claim 10, wherein said at least one polypeptide is CRALBP. [The present invention 1003] 1002. The method of claim 1001, wherein said analyzing step is carried out using a flow cytometer. [The present invention 1004] 1001. The method of claim 1001, wherein said analyzing step is carried out by immunostaining. [The present invention 1005] 1001. The method of claim 1001, wherein said cell population is produced by differentiating pluripotent stem cells into RPE cells ex vivo. [The present invention 1006] 1005. The method of claim 1005, wherein said pluripotent stem cells comprise embryonic stem cells. [The present invention 1007] 1006. The method of claim 1006, wherein prior to said differentiating, said embryonic stem cells are grown in a medium comprising bFGF and TGFβ. [The present invention 1008] 1006. The method of claim 1006, wherein prior to said differentiating, prior to step (a), said embryonic stem cells are cultured on human cord fibroblasts. [The present invention 1009] The ex vivo differentiation (a) culturing embryonic stem cells in a medium containing a differentiation agent to produce differentiated cells; and (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily; The method of the present invention 1005 is carried out by [The present invention 1010] 1009. The method of claim 10, wherein said differentiation agent is nicotinamide (NA) or 3-aminobenzamide. [The present invention 1011] The method of claim 1009, wherein the medium in step (a) contains nicotinamide (NA) and lacks at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily, and the medium in step (b) contains NA and at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily. [The present invention 1012] (c) after step (b), culturing the cells in a medium containing nicotinamide (NA) and lacking at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily. The method of the present invention 1011 further comprising: [The present invention 1013] The method of claim 1010, wherein step (a) is carried out for at least two days. [The present invention 1014] 1006. The method of claim 10, wherein said at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily is selected from the group consisting of TGFβ1, TGFβ3, and activin A. [The present invention 1015] 1012. The method of claim 1012, further comprising, after step (c), selecting the polyhedron cells. [The present invention 1016] The method of claim 1015, further comprising the step of proliferating said polygonal cells. [The present invention 1017] 1016. The method of claim 1016, wherein said growing step is carried out on an adherent surface. [The present invention 1018] (a) culturing pluripotent stem cells in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily to generate differentiated cells; (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily member and the differentiation agent to produce cells further differentiated along the RPE lineage; (c) analyzing the secretion of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) from cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage; and (d) culturing the cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily to produce RPE cells. Including, Step (d) is performed when the amount of PEDF is above a predetermined level. A method for producing retinal epithelial cells. [The present invention 1019] 1018. The method of claim 1018, wherein said member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily is selected from the group consisting of TGFβ1, TGFβ3, and activin A. [The present invention 1020] The method of claim 1018, wherein the differentiation agent of step (a) and the differentiation agent of step (d) are the same. [The present invention 1021] The method of claim 1018, wherein the differentiation agent in step (a) is nicotinamide (NA) or 3-aminobenzamide. [The present invention 1022] 1018. The method of claim 1018, wherein said pluripotent stem cells comprise embryonic stem cells. [The present invention 1023] 1023. The method of claim 1022, wherein said embryonic stem cells are grown in a medium comprising bFGF and TGFβ. [The present invention 1024] 1023. The method of claim 1022, wherein said embryonic stem cells are cultured on human cord fibroblasts. [The present invention 1025] A method for determining whether a cell population is eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality, the method comprising a step of analyzing the co-expression of cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT), and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9) in the population of cells, and determining that the cell population is eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality if the number of cells co-expressing CRALBP and the at least one polypeptide is above a predetermined level. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the present invention, exemplary methods and / or materials are described below. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. Furthermore, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be necessarily limiting. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0056] Certain aspects of the present invention are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. Reference will now be made specifically to the drawings in detail, it being emphasized that the matter shown is by way of example and for the purpose of illustratively discussing aspects of the present invention. In this regard, the description taken in conjunction with the drawings will make apparent to those skilled in the art how aspects of the present invention may be practiced. [Figure 1] 1 is a graph showing the linearity of the data. [Figure 2] FACS analysis of negative control hESC cells stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 3] FACS analysis of positive control reference RPE line OpRegen® 5C cells stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 4] FACS analysis of 25% spiked OpRegen® 5C in hESCs stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 5] FACS analysis of 50% spiked OpRegen® 5C in hESCs stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 6] FACS analysis of 75% spiked OpRegen® 5C in hESCs stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 7] FACS analysis of 95% spiked OpRegen® 5C in hESCs stained with anti-CRALBP and anti-PMEL17. [Figure 8] FACS analysis of hESCs stained with isotype controls. [Figure 9] FACS analysis of OpRegen® 5C cells stained with isotype control. [Figure 10] Co-immunostaining with PMEL17 differentiates between RPE cells (CRALBP+PMEL17+) and non-RPE pigment cells (PMEL17+CRALBP-; e.g., melanocytes). [Figure 11]Morphological results of mock tests 4 and 5 at in-process control (IPC) points 5 and 8-10. [Figure 12] Manufacturing process, steps 1-3: Creation of a human cord fibroblast feeder working cell bank. [Figure 13] Manufacturing process, steps 4 and 5: hESC expansion. [Figure 14] Manufacturing process, steps 6-13: Differentiation into RPE (OpRegen®) cells. [Figure 15] Manufacturing process, steps 14-17: Increase in pigment cells. [Figure 16] Detailed OpRegen® manufacturing process and in-process control points (yellow stars, IPCs 1-11). (NUTS Plus, Nutristem medium containing bFGF and TGFβ; NUTS Minus, Nutristem medium without bFGF and TGFβ; NIC, nicotinamide; SB, spheroids). [Figure 17] Levels of CRALBP+PMEL17+ RPE cells along runs 4 and 5 of the OpRegen® mock production. Density plots of IPC points 8 and 11 (*IPC point 8 was tested after cryopreservation), as well as representative density plots of positive control OpRegen® 5C and negative control HAD-C 102 hESCs (%CRALBP+PMEL17+ range in the negative control was 0.02-0.17%). Numbers within each plot indicate the percent CRALBP+PMEL17+ cells from the single live cell gated population. Analysis was performed using FCS express 4 software. [Figure 18] Immunofluorescence staining of mock study 5 IPC points 7, 10, and 11 with antibodies specific for the RPE markers bestrophin 1, MITF, ZO-1, and CRALBP. [Figure 19]Representative color fundus photographs at P60 of Group 2 (BSS+; Figure 19A), the contralateral untreated eye of Group 5 (OD; Figure 19B), and the treated eye of Group 5 (OS; Figure 19C). The hyperpigmented and hypopigmented areas in the high-dose treated eye (OS) are presumed to represent transplanted cells. [Figure 20] Optokinetic tracking acuity thresholds were measured at P60, P100, P150, and P200. Cell treatment groups (Group 3 - 25,000 cells, Group 4 - 100,000 cells, and Group 5 - 200,000 cells) outperformed all controls, with Group 4 (100,000 cells) and Group 5 (200,000 cells) doses achieving the best rescue. The unoperated contralateral eye was comparable to Group 1 (untreated) and Group 2 (vehicle control / BSS+) (not shown). [Figure 21] Graphs showing local (FIG. 21A) and full-field (FIG. 21B) results for a representative rat. [Figure 22] Figure 22A shows a composite of individual images of cresyl violet-stained sections of a representative cell-treated eye. The arrows indicate the location of photoreceptor protection and the estimated location of transplanted cells. Figure 22B shows a comparison of a BSS+ (Group 2)-injected eye with a representative cell-injected eye (representing the multiple-dose group) at postnatal days 60, 100, 150, and 200. GCL: ganglion cell layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium. [Figure 23] Outer nuclear layer thickness measured by nuclei number. Each point represents the number from each animal from each dose group across all ages. [Figure 24-1]Immunofluorescence images of positive control tissues and representative animals treated with experimental cells at P60, P100, P150, and P200 stained with anti-human nuclear marker (HNM, green), anti-premelanosome marker (PMEL17, red), anti-human proliferation marker (Ki67, red), and anti-rat cone arrestin (red). Dapi (blue) was used as background staining to highlight the granular layer. Positive control tissues included human melanoma for PMEL17, human tonsil for Ki67, and young RCS rat retina for cone arrestin. The downward arrow indicates the outer nuclear layer. The upward arrow indicates positively stained human RPE cells (OpRegen®) generated as described herein. [Figure 24-2] See description of Figure 24-1. [Figure 25] 1 is a graph showing cone quantification after subretinal implantation of OpRegen® cells in RCS rats, with cell-treated eyes showing significantly more cones than control eyes at all ages. [Figure 26] Immunofluorescent staining of OpRegen® cells in the subretinal space. Figure 26A shows an area of the retina with numerous RPE cells (red, arrow), a central compartment free of debris (probed with anti-rat rhodopsin antibody, green; arrow), but the debris compartment reconstitutes where cells are absent (periphery). At higher magnification (Figure 26B), there are several outer segments stained for rhodopsin along the transplanted cells. Furthermore, the debris compartment reconstitutes with increasing distance from the transplanted cells. Figures 26C-J are individual slices from the section showing rhodopsin-positive tissue (arrows) within the transplanted cells. [Figure 27A] Figure 27A shows the biodistribution of cells after subretinal injection into NOD-SCID mice. Figure 27A shows the ability of OpRegen® cells to engraft into the NOD-SCID subretinal space 9 months after transplantation. Pigment cells stained positive for human nuclei and PMEL17. Figure 27B shows cells clustering at the bleb site after injection. Figure 27C shows subsequent cell spreading into a monolayer after injection. [Figure 27B]See legend to Figure 27A. [Figure 27C] See legend to Figure 27A. [Figure 28] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a transwell assay that can be used to assay the efficacy of RPE cells. [Figure 29] Figure 1 shows the results of FACS analysis showing PAX6 expression in RPE cells (P2-DP, formulations: Mock IV, Mock V, OpRegen® Batch 2A; HuRPE: normal human RPE from ScienCell) generated as described herein and PAX6 expression along the production (P0). [Figure 30] 1 is a graph showing PAX6 expression in OpRegen® cells as analyzed by FACS (HES, human embryonic stem cells were used as a negative control). [Figure 31] Figure 1 shows the results of FACS analysis showing double staining of PAX6 and CRALBP. [Figure 32A] Graphs showing ELISA assessment of angiogenin secretion by OpRegen® cells. A. Increase in angiogenin secretion along with mock V production. B. Angiogenin secretion by three different batches of OpRegen® cells (passage 3) and on Transwell over a three-week period assessing apical and basolateral secretion (passage 4). C. Angiogenin secretion by RPE7 cells (passage 3). [Figure 32B] See legend to Figure 32A. [Figure 32C] See legend to Figure 32A. [Figure 33A]Figure 1 shows TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 secretion by OpRegen® cells. A. Relative TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 protein levels detected by protein array. B. ELISA TIMP-2 levels at mock V production QC points 3 and 4. C and D. ELISA TIMP-2 secretion levels by different batches of OpRegen® cells (passage 3) and on Transwell over a 3-week period assessing apical and basolateral secretion (passage 4). E. Secreted TIMP-2 levels from RPE7 and HuRPE control cells (passage 3, days 4 and 14). [Figure 33B] See legend to Figure 33A. [Figure 33C] See legend to Figure 33A. [Figure 33D] See legend to Figure 33A. [Figure 33E] See legend to Figure 33A. [Figure 34A] Figure 1 shows sgp130 secretion by OpRegen® cells as measured by ELISA. A. sgp130 secretion levels at mock V production QC points 3 and 4. B-C. Levels of secreted sgp130 by various batches of OpRegen® cells (passage 3) and on Transwell over a 3-week period assessing apical and basolateral secretion (passage 4). D. Levels of secreted sgp130 from RPE7 and HuRPE control cells (passage 3, days 4 and 14). [Figure 34B] See legend to Figure 34A. [Figure 34C] See legend to Figure 34A. [Figure 34D] See legend to Figure 34A. [Figure 35A]Figure 1 shows sTNF-R1 protein levels in OpRegen® cell supernatants as measured by ELISA. A. sTNF-R1 levels in cell supernatants from Mock Test V production QC points 3 and 4. B-C. sTNF-R1 levels in supernatants of OpRegen® batches (passage 3) and on Transwell plates over a 3-week period when apical and basolateral levels were assessed (passage 4). D. sTNF-R1 levels in RPE7 and control HuRPE cell cultures (passage 3) on days 4 and 14. [Figure 35B] See legend to Figure 35A. [Figure 35C] See legend to Figure 35A. [Figure 35D] See legend to Figure 35A. [Figure 36] Morphology of OpRegen® 5C (reference strain), RPE1, and RPE7 on Transwell plates is shown. OpRegen® 5C, RPE1, and RPE7 were imaged weekly (weeks 1–4) after seeding on Transwell plates. OpRegen® 5C formed a homogenous polygonal monolayer from week 1, whereas RPE1 and RPE7 developed heterogeneous morphologies one week after seeding, with holes beginning to appear by week 2. After three weeks of culture, RPE1 cells detached from the Transwell plates. [Figure 37] We demonstrate that RPE1 and RPE7 cells co-express CRALBP and PMEL-17. FACS purity assays demonstrated that 99.91% of RPE1 cells and 96.29% of RPE7 cells were double-positive for the RPE markers CRALBP and PMEL-17, similar to levels observed in OpRegen® mock-test V cells (positive control). HAD-C 102 hESCs were used as a negative control. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0057] Description of Certain Aspects of the Invention In some aspects, the present invention relates to retinal pigment epithelial cells, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to the evaluation of such cells as therapeutic agents. The present invention also relates to the generation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from human embryonic stem cells.

[0058] Before describing at least one embodiment of the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the present invention is not necessarily limited to the details set forth in the following description or illustrated by the examples. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways.

[0059] The neural retina initiates vision and is supported by the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Dysfunction, degeneration, and loss of RPE cells are hallmarks of Best's disease, a subtype of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of visual impairment in the Western world. These conditions result in gradual vision loss and often blindness.

[0060] Both the retina and the adjacent RPE arise from the neuroectoderm. In lower species, the RPE regenerates the retina, but in mammals, RPE-mediated regeneration is inhibited and occurs to a very limited extent via stem cells located in the peripheral retinal periphery.

[0061] Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have the potential to serve as an unlimited source of RPE cell donors for transplantation. Mouse, primate, and human ESCs have demonstrated the ability to differentiate into RPE-like cells, attenuate retinal degeneration, and preserve visual function after subretinal transplantation.

[0062] Various protocols have been developed for differentiating human embryonic stem cells into RPE cells (see, for example, WO2008 / 129554).

[0063] The present inventors have now discovered a unique and simple method for qualifying a cell population that has successfully differentiated into RPE cells based on the expression of specific polypeptides. The present inventors have discovered that successful differentiation can be demonstrated using a combination of two specific markers from among the myriad of potential polypeptides expressed on the surface of these differentiated cells.

[0064] The inventors also discovered that secretion of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) may be used as a marker to demonstrate early stages of the RPE differentiation process (see Table 4).

[0065] While further reducing the invention to practice, the inventors have identified additional proteins secreted by RPE cells that may be used as signatures to define RPE cells in some embodiments.

[0066] Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for determining whether a cell population is eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality, the method comprising a step of analyzing the co-expression of pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT), and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9) in the population of cells, and if the number of cells co-expressing PMEL17 and the at least one polypeptide is above a predetermined level, the cell population is determined to be eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating a retinal disorder.

[0067] According to another aspect, there is provided a method for determining whether a cell population is eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality, the method comprising a step of analyzing the co-expression of cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT), and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9) in the population of cells, and determining that the cell population is eligible for a suitable therapeutic substance for treating an ocular abnormality if the number of cells co-expressing CRALBP and the at least one polypeptide is above a predetermined level.

[0068] As used herein, the phrase "suitable therapeutic agent" refers to a cell population that is suitable for treating an ocular abnormality. Therapeutic cells can exert their effect through any one of several mechanisms. One exemplary mechanism is a supportive trophic effect that promotes the survival of degenerating photoreceptors or other cells in the retina. Therapeutic RPE cells may also exert their effect through a regenerative mechanism that replenishes dysfunctional and / or degenerating host RPE cells. According to one embodiment, the RPE cells are mature and have the functional ability to phagocytose shed outer segments of photoreceptors, including rhodopsin. According to another embodiment, the RPE cells are not fully mature.

[0069] Ocular abnormalities for which the cell populations serve as therapeutic agents include, but are not limited to, retinal diseases or disorders generally associated with retinal dysfunction, retinal damage, and / or loss of retinal pigment epithelium. A non-limiting list of abnormalities that can be treated according to the present invention includes retinitis pigmentosa, Leber's congenital amaurosis, hereditary or acquired macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), Best's disease, retinal detachment, gyrate atrophy, choroideremia, pattern dystrophy and other dystrophies of the RPE, Stargardt's disease, RPE and retinal damage caused by any one of light injury, laser injury, inflammatory injury, infectious injury, radiation injury, neovascular injury, or traumatic injury.

[0070] As noted, the method of this aspect of the invention is carried out by measuring the amount (e.g., percent cells) expressing premelanosome protein (PMEL17; SwissProt No. P40967) and at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP; SwissProt No. P12271), lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT; SwissProt No. 095327), and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9; P48436).

[0071] Alternatively, the method of this aspect is carried out by measuring at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of CRALBP (CRALBP; SwissProt No. P12271), and lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT; SwissProt No. 095327), sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX 9; P48436), and PMEL17 (SwissProt No. P40967).

[0072] Thus, for example, CRALBP and PMEL17 may be measured, or PMEL17 and LRAT may be measured, or PMEL17 and SOX9 may be measured, or CRALBP and LRAT may be measured, or CRALBP and SOX9 may be measured.

[0073] It will be appreciated that more than two of the polypeptides mentioned herein may be measured, for example, three of the aforementioned polypeptides, or even all four of the aforementioned polypeptides.

[0074] Methods for analyzing the expression of the aforementioned polypeptides typically involve the use of antibodies that specifically recognize the antigen. Commercially available antibodies that recognize CRALBP include, for example, antibodies manufactured by Abcam (e.g., ab15051 and ab189329, clone B2). Commercially available antibodies that recognize PMEL17 include, for example, antibodies manufactured by Abcam (e.g., ab137062 and ab189330, clone EPR4864). Commercially available antibodies that recognize LRAT include, for example, antibodies manufactured by Millipore (e.g., MABN644). Commercially available antibodies that recognize SOX9 include, for example, antibodies manufactured by Abcam (e.g., ab185230). Analysis can be performed using any method known in the art, including flow cytometry, Western blot, immunocytochemistry, radioimmunoassay, PCR, etc.

[0075] For flow cytometry, antibodies may be attached to fluorescent moieties and analyzed using a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS), or the use of secondary antibodies bearing fluorescent moieties is also envisioned.

[0076] It will be appreciated that because the analyzed polypeptide is an intracellular polypeptide, the cells are typically permeabilized to allow the antibody to bind to the target. First, the cells may be fixed to ensure the stability of soluble antigens or antigens with short half-lives. This should maintain the target protein in its original cellular location. To ensure that the cells remain permeable, the antibody may be prepared in a permeabilization buffer. When gating on cell populations, it will be appreciated that the light scattering profile of the cells in the flow cytometer will change significantly after permeabilization and fixation.

[0077] Methods for permeabilizing cell membranes are known in the art, for example, 1. Formaldehyde followed by detergent: fixation with formaldehyde (e.g., 4.5% or less for 10-15 minutes (this stabilizes the proteins) followed by membrane disruption with detergents such as Triton or NP-40 (0.1-1% in PBS), Tween 20 (0.1-1% in PBS), saponin, digitonin, and Leucoperm (e.g., 0.5% v / v in PBS); 2. Formaldehyde (e.g., 4.5% or less), followed by methanol; 3. Methanol followed by detergent (e.g., 80% methanol followed by 0.1% Tween 20); 4. Acetone Fixation and Permeabilization Includes.

[0078] As used herein, the term "flow cytometry" refers to an assay method in which the proportion of material in a sample (e.g., RPE cells containing a particular marker) is determined by labeling the material (e.g., by binding the material with a labeled antibody), passing a stream of fluid containing the material through a beam of light, separating the light emitted from the sample into its constituent wavelengths with a series of filters and mirrors, and detecting the light.

[0079] Numerous flow cytometers are commercially available, including, for example, the Becton Dickinson FACScan, the Navios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter serial number AT15119 RHE9266), and the FACScalibur (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Antibodies that can be used for FACS analysis are disclosed in Schlossman S, Boumell L, et al., Leucocyte Typing V. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995) and are widely available commercially.

[0080] It will be understood that the expression level of the above-mentioned polypeptide may be determined at the RNA level as well as the protein level. Exemplary methods for confirming the expression of a polypeptide based on the RNA level include, but are not limited to, PCR, RT-PCR, Northern blot, etc.

[0081] To qualify the cells as useful as a therapeutic agent, the amounts of at least two of the co-expressed polypeptides in the cells must be increased above a statistically significant level when compared to non-RPE cells (e.g., undifferentiated embryonic stem cells).

[0082] According to certain embodiments, to determine the eligibility of the cells to be useful as a therapeutic agent, at least 80% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of PMEL17 and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., CRALBP) when assayed by methods known to those skilled in the art (e.g., FACS), more preferably at least 85% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of PMEL17 and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., CRALBP), more preferably at least 90% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of PMEL17 and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., CRALBP), more preferably at least 95% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of PMEL17 and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., CRALBP). More preferably, at least 100% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of PMEL17 and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., CRALBP).

[0083] In another aspect, to qualify the cells as useful as a therapeutic agent, the level of co-expression of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17) (e.g., as measured by mean fluorescence intensity) must be increased by at least 2-fold, more preferably at least 3-fold, more preferably at least 4-fold, even more preferably at least 5-fold, at least 10-fold, at least 20-fold, at least 30-fold, at least 40-fold, or at least 50-fold compared to undifferentiated ESCs.

[0084] According to certain aspects, to determine the eligibility of the cells to be useful as a therapeutic agent, at least 80% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17) when assayed by methods known to those skilled in the art (e.g., FACS); more preferably, at least 85% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17); more preferably, at least 90% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17); more preferably, at least 95% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17); more preferably, 100% of the cells in the population must express detectable levels of CRALBP and one of the above-mentioned polypeptides (e.g., PMEL17).

[0085] Furthermore, the cells can be qualified in an in vivo animal model. One such model is the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rat model. After transplantation, the therapeutic effect of the cells can be analyzed using methods including fundus imaging, optokinetic tracking threshold (OKT), electroretinogram (ERG), histology, cone counting, and rhodopsin uptake. These methods are further described in Example 5 herein below.

[0086] The cells may be qualified or characterized by further techniques including, for example, karyotype analysis, morphology, cell number, and viability, efficacy (barrier function and polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF), levels of residual hESCs, Gram staining, and sterility. Exemplary assays that may be performed are described in Example 4.

[0087] Additionally, the cells may be analyzed for barrier function and levels of secretion of growth factors (e.g., pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) or VEGF, cytokines, interleukins, and / or chemokines) in a polarized manner.

[0088] To analyze secreted PEDF, the supernatant is collected from the cell culture, and the cells are harvested and counted. The amount of PEDF in the cell culture supernatant can be quantified using a PEDF ELISA assay (e.g., ELISAquant™ PEDF Sandwich ELISA Antigen Detection Kit, BioProductsMD, PED613) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

[0089] Furthermore, the direction of secretion of PEDF and VEGF in the cells may be analyzed, which may be performed using a Transwell assay as shown in Figure 28. Before or after qualification, the cells may be preserved (e.g., frozen or cryopreserved) according to methods known in the art, or may be administered directly to a subject.

[0090] The present invention is intended to analyze cell populations comprising retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells from any source.Therefore, this cell population can comprise RPE cells obtained from donors (i.e., the natural RPE cells of the pigmented layer of the retina), or can comprise RPE cells differentiated ex vivo from stem cell populations (hSC-derived RPE cells, for example, pluripotent stem cells, for example, human embryonic stem cells).In another embodiment, RPE cells can be obtained by transdifferentiation.See, for example, Zhang et al., Protein Cell 2014, 5(1): 48-58.The contents of this document are incorporated by reference.

[0091] In one embodiment, the RPE cells analyzed do not express Pax6.

[0092] According to another embodiment, the RPE cells analyzed express Pax6.

[0093] "Retinal pigment epithelial cells," "RPE cells," and "RPE" may be used interchangeably when the context allows, and refer to cell types that are functionally similar to native RPE cells that form the pigment epithelial cell layer of the retina (e.g., when transplanted into the eye, they exhibit functional activity similar to native RPE cells).

[0094] According to one embodiment, RPE cell expresses at least one, two, three, four or five kinds of mature RPE cell markers.Such markers include but are not limited to CARLBP, RPE65, PEDF, PMEL17, bestrophin and tyrosinase.Optionally, RPE cell can also express RPE progenitor cell markers, such as MITF.In another embodiment, RPE cell expresses PAX-6.In another embodiment, RPE cell expresses at least one retinal progenitor cell marker, including but not limited to OTX2, SIX3, SIX6 and LHX2.

[0095] In yet another embodiment, the RPE cells are RPE cells differentiated from embryonic stem cells according to the methods described in the Examples section herein below, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.

[0096] As used herein, the phrase "mature RPE cell marker" refers to an antigen (e.g., a protein) that is elevated (e.g., at least 2-fold, at least 5-fold, at least 10-fold) in mature RPE cells relative to non-RPE cells or immature RPE cells.

[0097] As used herein, the phrase "RPE progenitor cell marker" refers to an antigen (e.g., a protein) that is elevated (e.g., at least 2-fold, at least 5-fold, at least 10-fold) in RPE progenitor cells relative to non-RPE cells.

[0098] According to another embodiment, the RPE cells have a morphology similar to that of natural RPE cells that form the pigmented epithelial cell layer of the retina, ie, they are pigmented cells and / or have a characteristic polygonal shape.

[0099] According to yet another embodiment, the RPE cells can treat diseases such as macular degeneration.

[0100] According to yet another embodiment, the RPE cells meet at least one, two, three, four, or all of the requirements listed herein above.

[0101] The term "hSC-derived RPE cells" is used herein to refer to RPE cells obtained by directed differentiation from hSCs. According to a preferred embodiment, the hSC-derived RPE cells are functional RPE cells as indicated by the parameters defined below. The term "directed differentiation" is used synonymously with the term "RPE-induced differentiation" and should be understood to mean the process of manipulating hSCs under culture conditions that induce / promote differentiation into RPE cell types.

[0102] According to a particular embodiment, RPE cells are obtained by directed differentiation of hSCs in the presence of one or more members of the TGFβ superfamily and exhibit at least one of the following characteristics: - During differentiation, cultured cells respond to TGFβ signaling; - the RPE cells express markers indicative of terminal differentiation, e.g., bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and / or RPE65; - After transplantation (i.e., in situ), RPE cells exhibit a trophic effect that supports the photoreceptors adjacent to the RPE cells; -Furthermore, that in situ, RPE cells can function with phagocytosis of shed photoreceptor outer segments as part of the normal regeneration process of these photoreceptors; Furthermore, in situ, RPE cells are able to create the retinal barrier and function in the visual cycle.

[0103] As used herein, the phrase "stem cells" refers to cells (e.g., pluripotent or multipotent stem cells) that can remain in an undifferentiated state in culture for extended periods of time until induced to differentiate into other cell types (e.g., fully differentiated cells) with specific specialized functions. Preferably, the phrase "stem cells" encompasses embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), adult stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and hematopoietic stem cells.

[0104] According to certain embodiments, the RPE cells are derived from pluripotent stem cells, including human embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells.

[0105] The phrase "embryonic stem cells" refers to embryonic cells that can differentiate into all three germ layers (i.e., endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm) or remain undifferentiated. The phrase "embryonic stem cells" may include cells obtained from embryonic tissues (e.g., blastocysts) formed after conception before embryo implantation (i.e., preimplantation blastocysts), extended blastocyst cells (EBCs) obtained from blastocysts at the postimplantation / pregastrulation stage (see WO2006 / 040763), and embryonic germ (EG) cells obtained from fetal reproductive tissues at any time during pregnancy, preferably before 10 weeks of gestation. Embryonic stem cells of some embodiments of the present invention can be obtained using well-known cell culture methods. For example, human embryonic stem cells can be isolated from human blastocysts. Human blastocysts are typically obtained from human in vivo preimplantation embryos or from in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. Alternatively, single-cell human embryos can be expanded to the blastocyst stage. To isolate human ES cells, the zona pellucida is removed from the blastocyst and the inner cell mass (ICM) is surgically isolated. In this case, trophectoderm cells are lysed and removed from the intact ICM by gentle pipetting. The ICM is then plated in a tissue culture flask containing an appropriate medium that allows for its outgrowth. After 9–15 days, ICM-derived outgrowths are dissociated into clumps by mechanical dissociation or enzymatic digestion, and the cells are then replated on fresh tissue culture medium. Individual colonies exhibiting undifferentiated morphology are selected with a micropipette / stem cell tool, mechanically dissected into fragments / clumps, and replated. The resulting ES cells are then periodically split every 4–7 days.For further details regarding methods for preparing human ES cells, see Reubinoff et al., Nat Biotechnol 2000, May: 18(5): 559; Thomson et al., [U.S. Patent No. 5,843,780; Science 282: 1145, 1998; Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 38: 133, 1998; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7844, 1995]; Bongso et al., [Hum Reprod 4: 706, 1989]; and Gardner et al., [Fertil. Steril. 69: 84, 1998].

[0106] It will be appreciated that commercially available stem cells may also be used in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. Human ES cells can be purchased from the NIH human embryonic stem cells registry [Hypertext Transfer Protocol: / / grants(dot)nih(dot)gov / stem_cells / registry / current(dot)htm] and other European registries. Non-limiting examples of commercially available embryonic stem cell lines include HAD-C 102, ESI, BG01, BG02, BG03, BG04, CY12, CY30, CY92, CY10, TE03, TE32, CHB-4, CHB-5, CHB-6, CHB-8, CHB-9, CHB-10, CHB-11, CHB-12, HUES1, HUES2, HUES3, HUES4, HUES5, HU ES6, HUES7, HUES8, HUES9, HUES10, HUES11, HUES12, HUES13, HUES14, HUES15, HUES16, HUES17, HUES18, HUES19, HUES20, HUES21, HUES22, HUES23, HUES24, HUES25, HUES26, H UES27, HUES28, CyT49, RUES3, WA01, UCSF4, NYUES1, NYUES2, NYUES3, NYUES4, NYUES5, NYUES6, NYUES7, UCLA1, UCLA2, UCLA3, WA077(H7), WA09(H9), WA13(H13), WA14(H14), HUES62, HUES63, HUES64, CT1, CT2, CT3, CT4, MA135, Eneavour-2, WIBR1, WIBR2, WIBR3, WIBR4, WIBR5, WIBR6, HUES45, Shef3, Shef6, BJNhem19, BJNhem20, SA001, and SA001.

[0107] Furthermore, ES cells have been used to generate embryonic stem cells in mice (Mills and Bradley, 2001), golden hamsters [Doetschman et al., 1988, Dev Biol. 127: 224-7], rats [Iannaccone et al., 1994, Dev Biol. 163: 288-92], rabbits [Giles et al. 1993, Mol Reprod Dev. 36: 130-8; Graves & Moreadith, 1993, Mol Reprod Dev. 1993, 36: 424-33], and several livestock species [Notarianni et al., 1991, J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 43: 255-60; Wheeler 1994, Reprod Fertil Dev. 6: 563-8; Mitalipova et al., 2001, Cloning. 3: 59-67], as well as from other species, including non-human primate species (rhesus monkeys and marmosets) [Thomson et al., 1995, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92: 7844-8; Thomson et al., 1996, Biol Reprod. 55: 254-9].

[0108] Expanded blastocyst cells (EBCs) can be obtained from blastocysts at least 9 days post-fertilization, a stage prior to gastrulation. Prior to culturing the blastocysts, the zona pellucida is digested (e.g., with Tyrode's acid solution (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)) to expose the inner cell mass. The blastocysts are then cultured in vitro as whole embryos for at least 9 days but no more than 14 days post-fertilization (i.e., prior to the gastrulation event) using standard embryonic stem cell culture methods.

[0109] Another method for preparing ES cells is described in Chung et al., Cell Stem Cell, Volume 2, Issue 2, 113-117, 7 February 2008. This method involves removing a single cell from an embryo during an in vitro fertilization process, in which the embryo is not destroyed.

[0110] Yet another method for preparing ES cells is by parthenogenesis, a process that also does not destroy the embryo.

[0111] Current ES cell culture methods are primarily based on the use of feeder cell layers that secrete factors necessary for stem cell proliferation while simultaneously inhibiting stem cell differentiation. Exemplary feeder layers include human embryonic fibroblasts, adult fallopian tube epithelial cells, primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (PMEFs), mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), mouse fetal fibroblasts (MFFs), human embryonic fibroblasts (HEFs), human fibroblasts derived from the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells, human fetal muscle cells (HFMs), human fetal skin cells (HFSs), human adult skin cells, human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs), human umbilical cord fibroblasts, human cells derived from the umbilical cord or placenta, and human bone marrow stromal cells (hMSCs). Growth factors may be added to the culture medium to maintain ESCs in an undifferentiated state. Such growth factors include bFGF and / or TGFβ. In another embodiment, agents may be added to the culture medium to maintain hESCs in a naive, undifferentiated state. See, e.g., Kalkan et al., 2014, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369: 20130540.

[0112] Feeder-free systems have also been used in ES cell culture. In these systems, matrices supplemented with serum replacements, cytokines, and growth factors (including IL6 and soluble IL6 receptor chimeras) are used as substitutes for feeder cell layers. Stem cells can be grown on solid surfaces such as extracellular matrices (e.g., Matrigel® or laminin) in the presence of culture media, such as Lonza L7, mTeSR, StemPro, XFKSR, and E8. Unlike feeder-based cultures, which require simultaneous growth of feeder cells and stem cells and may result in mixed cell populations, stem cells grown on feeder-free systems are easily separated from the surface. The culture media used to grow stem cells contain factors that effectively inhibit differentiation and promote stem cell proliferation, such as MEF-conditioned medium and bFGF. However, commonly used feeder-free culture systems use animal-based matrices (e.g., Matrigel®) supplemented with mouse or bovine serum or MEF-conditioned medium (Xu C, et al. (2001). Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 19: 971-4). Animal-based matrices pose the risk of cross-transfer of animal pathogens to human ES cells, thus compromising future clinical applications.

[0113] Numerous methods are known for differentiating ESCs into the RPE lineage, including both directed differentiation protocols, e.g., those described in WO2008 / 129554, 2013 / 184809, and spontaneous differentiation protocols, e.g., those described in U.S. Patent No. 8,268,303 and U.S. Patent Application No. 20130196369, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference.

[0114] According to a particular embodiment, RPE cells are generated from ESC cells using a directed differentiation protocol, for example according to the protocol disclosed in the Examples section.

[0115] In one exemplary differentiation protocol, embryonic stem cells are differentiated into an RPE cell lineage using a first differentiation agent and then further differentiated into RPE cells using members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) superfamily (e.g., TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3 subtypes, and homologous ligands including activins (e.g., activin A, activin B, and activin AB), nodal, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), several bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), e.g., BMP2, BMP3, BMP4, BMP5, BMP6, and BMP7, and growth differentiation factors (GDFs)).

[0116] According to a particular embodiment, the TGFβ superfamily member is selected from the group consisting of TGFβ1, activin A, and TGFβ3.

[0117] According to a particular embodiment, the member of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) superfamily is activin A, for example, 20-200 ng / ml, for example, 100-180 ng / ml activin A.

[0118] The first differentiation agent promotes differentiation into the RPE lineage. For example, the first differentiation agent may promote differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into neural progenitors. Such cells may express neural progenitor markers, such as PAX6.

[0119] According to a particular embodiment, the first differentiation substance is nicotinamide (NA), for example, 1 to 100 mM, 5 to 50 mM, 5 to 20 mM, for example, 10 mM nicotinamide (NA).

[0120] NA, also known as "niacinamide," is an amide derivative form of vitamin B3 (niacin) that is thought to protect and improve beta-cell function. The chemical formula of NA is C6H6N2O. NA is essential for growth and the conversion of food to energy and has been used in the treatment of arthritis and the treatment and prevention of diabetes. TIFF2025118972000002.tif43128

[0121] According to certain embodiments, the nicotinamide is a nicotinamide derivative or a nicotinamide mimetic. As used herein, the term "nicotinamide (NA) derivative" refers to a compound that is a chemically modified derivative of natural NA. In one embodiment, the chemical modification may be the substitution of the pyridine ring of the basic NA structure (via the carbon or nitrogen member of the ring) via the nitrogen or oxygen atom of the amide moiety. During the substitution, one or more hydrogen atoms may be replaced by a substituent, and / or a substituent may be attached to the N atom to form a tetravalent positively charged nitrogen. Thus, the nicotinamide of the present invention includes substituted or unsubstituted nicotinamide. In another embodiment, the chemical modification may be the deletion or replacement of a single group, for example, to form a thiobenzamide analog of NA. All of these are understood by those skilled in organic chemistry. Derivatives in the context of the present invention also include nucleoside derivatives of NA (e.g., nicotinamide adenine).

[0122] A variety of NA derivatives have been described, and some have been described in association with the inhibitory activity of PDE4 enzyme (WO03 / 068233; WO02 / 060875; GB2327675A), or as VEGF-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (WO01 / 55114).For example, the process for preparing 4-aryl-nicotinamide derivatives (WO05 / 014549).Other exemplary nicotinamide derivatives are disclosed in WO01 / 55114 and EP2128244.

[0123] Nicotinamide mimetics include modified nicotinamide and chemical analogs of nicotinamide, which reproduce the action of nicotinamide in the differentiation and maturation of RPE cells from pluripotent cells.Exemplary nicotinamide mimetics include benzoic acid, 3-aminobenzoic acid, and 6-aminonicotinamide.Another class of compounds that can act as nicotinamide mimetics is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.Exemplary PARP inhibitors include 3-aminobenzamide, iniparib (BSI201), olaparib (AZD-2281), rucaparib (AG014699, PF-01367338), veliparib (ABT-888), CEP9722, MK4827, and BMN-673.

[0124] According to a particular embodiment, differentiation is performed as follows: (a) culturing ESCs in a medium containing a first differentiation agent (e.g., nicotinamide); and (b) culturing the cells obtained from step (a) in a medium containing a member of the TGFβ superfamily (e.g., activin A) and a first differentiation agent (e.g., nicotinamide).

[0125] Preferably, step (a) is carried out in the absence of a member of the TGFβ superfamily.

[0126] The above protocol may be continued by culturing the cells obtained in step (b) in a medium containing a first differentiation agent (e.g., nicotinamide) but lacking a member of the TGFβ superfamily (e.g., activin A). This step is referred to herein as step (c).

[0127] The above protocol will now be explained in more detail with further aspects.

[0128] Once a sufficient number of ESCs are obtained, the differentiation process begins. ESCs are typically removed from adherent cell cultures (e.g., using collagenase A, dispase, TrypLE select, or EDTA) and plated onto a non-adherent substrate (e.g., Hydrocell non-adherent cell culture plates) in the presence of nicotinamide (and in the absence of activin A). Exemplary nicotinamide concentrations are 1-100 mM, 5-50 mM, 5-20 mM, e.g., 10 mM. Once the cells are plated onto the non-adherent substrate, the cell culture may be referred to as a cell suspension, preferably a floating cluster in a suspension culture, i.e., an aggregate of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The cell clusters do not adhere to any substrate (e.g., culture plate, carrier). Sources of suspension stem cells have been previously described in WO 06 / 070370, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This step may be carried out for at least 1 day, more preferably 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, or even 10 days. Preferably, the cells are cultured in suspension with nicotinamide (and in the absence of a TGFβ superfamily member, e.g., activin A) for no longer than 2 weeks.

[0129] According to preferred embodiments, when cells are cultured on a non-adherent substrate, atmospheric oxygen conditions are manipulated to have a percentage of about 20%, 15%, 10%, or less than about 20%, 15%, 10%, more preferably less than about 9%, less than about 8%, less than about 7%, less than about 6%, and more preferably about 5% (e.g., 1%-20%, 1%-10%, or 0-5%).

[0130] Examples of non-adherent cell culture plates include non-adherent cell culture plates manufactured by Hydrocell (eg, catalog number 174912), Nunc, and the like.

[0131] Typically, the clusters contain at least 50-500,000, 50-100,000, 50-50,000, 50-10,000, 50-5,000, or 50-1,000 cells. According to one embodiment, the cells in the clusters are not organized into layers but form irregular shapes. In one embodiment, the clusters are devoid of pluripotent embryonic stem cells. In another embodiment, the clusters contain a small number of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (e.g., 5% or less or 3% or less (e.g., 0.01-2.7%) of cells co-expressing OCT4 and TRA1-60 at the protein level). Typically, the clusters contain cells that have partially differentiated in response to nicotinamide. Such cells may express neural progenitor markers, such as PAX6. The cells may also express other lineage progenitor markers, such as alpha-fetoprotein, MIXL1, and Brachyury.

[0132] The clusters may be dissociated using enzymatic or non-enzymatic methods (e.g., mechanical methods) known in the art. According to one embodiment, the cells are dissociated such that they no longer form clusters, e.g., aggregates or clumps of 2 to 100,000 cells, 2 to 50,000 cells, 2 to 10,000 cells, 2 to 5,000 cells, 2 to 1,000 cells, 2 to 500 cells, 2 to 100 cells, or 2 to 50 cells. According to a particular embodiment, the cells are in a single cell suspension.

[0133] The cells (e.g., dissociated cells) are then plated onto an adherent substrate and cultured in the presence of nicotinamide, e.g., 1-100 mM, 5-50 mM, 5-20 mM, e.g., 10 mM nicotinamide (and in the absence of activin A). This step may be carried out for at least 1 day, more preferably 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, or even 14 days. Preferably, the cells are not cultured in the presence of nicotinamide (and in the absence of activin A) in adherent cell culture for more than 1 week.

[0134] Generally speaking, the cells are typically exposed to nicotinamide (at a concentration of 1-100 mM, 5-50 mM, 5-20 mM, e.g., 10 mM) for about 2-3 weeks, preferably 4 weeks or less, before a second differentiation factor (e.g., activin A) is added.

[0135] Examples of adhesive substrates include, but are not limited to, collagen, fibronectin, laminin, (eg, laminin 521).

[0136] After the first stage of directed differentiation (i.e., culturing in the presence of nicotinamide (e.g., 10 mM) under non-adherent culture conditions under hypoxic atmospheric conditions, followed by culturing on an adherent substrate in the presence of nicotinamide under hypoxic atmospheric conditions), the semi-differentiated cells are then cultured on an adherent substrate in the presence of nicotinamide (e.g., 10 mM) and activin A (e.g., 20-200 ng / ml, 100-200 ng / ml, e.g., 140 ng / ml, 150 ng / ml, 160 ng / ml, or 180 ng / ml). This stage may be carried out for 1 day to 10 weeks, 3 days to 10 weeks, 1 week to 10 weeks, 1 week to 8 weeks, 1 week to 4 weeks, e.g., at least 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 3 weeks, at least 4 weeks, at least 5 weeks, at least 6 weeks, at least 7 weeks, or even 8 weeks. Preferably, this step is carried out for about 2 weeks. According to one embodiment, this differentiation step is also carried out under low atmospheric oxygen conditions, i.e., less than about 20%, 15%, or 10%, more preferably less than about 9%, less than about 8%, less than about 7%, or less than about 6%, more preferably about 5% (e.g., 1%-20%, 1%-10%, or 0-5%).

[0137] After the second stage of directed differentiation (i.e., culturing on an adherent substrate in the presence of nicotinamide and activin A), the differentiated cells may optionally be cultured on an adherent substrate for a subsequent differentiation stage, i.e., in the presence of nicotinamide (e.g., 1-100 mM, 5-50 mM, 5-20 mM, e.g., 10 mM) but in the absence of activin A. This stage may be carried out for at least 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 3 weeks, or even 4 weeks. Preferably, this stage is carried out for about 1 week. This differentiation step may be performed under low atmospheric oxygen conditions (i.e., less than about 20%, 15%, 10%, more preferably less than about 9%, less than about 8%, less than about 7%, less than about 6%, more preferably about 5% (e.g., 1%-20%, 1%-10%, or 0-5%)) or normooxygen conditions, or a combination of both (i.e., initially under low atmospheric oxygen conditions, followed by normooxygen conditions if faintly pigmented cells are observed).

[0138] According to certain embodiments, when atmospheric oxygen conditions are returned to normal atmospheric conditions, the cells are cultured in the presence of nicotinamide (e.g., 10 mM) and in the absence of activin A for at least another day (e.g., up to two weeks).

[0139] The basal medium according to the present invention is any known cell culture medium known in the art for supporting cell growth in vitro, typically a medium comprising a defined base solution containing salts, sugars, amino acids, and any other nutrients necessary to maintain cells in a viable state during culture. Non-limiting examples of commercially available basal media that can be used in accordance with the present invention include Nuristem (without bFGF and TGFβ for ESC differentiation, and with bFGF and TGFβ for ESC expansion), Neurobasal™, KO-DMEM, DMEM, DMEM / F12, Lonza L7 system, mTeSR, StemPro, XF KSR, E8, Cellgro™ Stem Cell Growth Medium, or X-Vivo™. Various agents known in the art for cell culture may be added to the basal medium. The following is a non-limiting list of various supplements that can be included in the culture system used in accordance with the present disclosure. - Media containing serum or serum replacements, such as, but not limited to, knock out serum replacement (KOSR), Nutridoma-CS, TCH™, N2, N2 derivatives, or B27, or a combination. - Extracellular matrix (ECM) components, including but not limited to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and gelatin. The ECM may be used to carry one or more members of the TGFβ superfamily of growth factors. -Antibacterial agents, including but not limited to penicillin and streptomycin. - Non-essential amino acids (NEAAs), including but not limited to BDNF, NT3, NT4, and other neurotrophins known to play a role in promoting survival of SCs in culture.

[0140] According to a preferred embodiment, the medium used to differentiate ESCs is Nuristem medium (Biological Industries, 05-102-1A or 05-100-1A).

[0141] According to a particular embodiment, differentiation of the ESCs is carried out under xeno-free conditions.

[0142] According to one embodiment, the proliferation / growth medium is free of xenogeneic contaminants, i.e., free of animal-derived components such as serum, animal-derived growth factors, and albumin. Thus, according to this embodiment, the culturing step is carried out in the absence of xenogeneic contaminants.

[0143] Other methods for culturing ESCs under xeno-free conditions are provided in US Patent Application Publication No. 20130196369, the contents of which are incorporated in their entirety.

[0144] During the differentiation stage, embryonic stem cells may be monitored for their differentiation state. Cell differentiation can be determined by examining cell- or tissue-specific markers known to indicate differentiation.

[0145] Tissue / cell-specific markers can be detected using immunological techniques well known in the art [Thomson JA et al., (1998). Science 282: 1145-7]. Examples include, but are not limited to, flow cytometry for membrane-bound or intracellular markers, immunohistochemistry for extracellular and intracellular markers, and enzyme immunoassay for secreted molecular markers (e.g., PEDF).

[0146] Thus, according to another aspect of the present invention, (a) culturing pluripotent stem cells in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily to generate differentiated cells; (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily and a differentiation agent to generate cells further differentiated along the RPE lineage; (c) analyzing the secretion of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) from cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage; and (d) culturing the cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage in a medium containing a differentiation agent and lacking a member of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) superfamily to generate RPE cells. Including, Step (d) is performed when the amount of PEDF is above a predetermined level; Methods for producing retinal epithelial cells are provided.

[0147] Preferably, step (d) is performed when the level of PEDF is greater than 100 ng / ml / day, 200 ng / ml / day, 300 ng / ml / day, 400 ng / ml / day, or 500 ng / ml / day.

[0148] Another method for determining the efficacy of the cells during or after the differentiation process is by analyzing barrier function and polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF, as shown in Example 4 herein below.

[0149] The cells may be selected and / or expanded once induced into RPE cells.

[0150] According to certain embodiments, the selection is based on negative selection, i.e., the removal of non-RPE cells, which may be performed mechanically by removing non-pigmented cells, by removing non-polygonal cells, or by using surface markers.

[0151] According to another embodiment, the selection is based on positive selection, i.e., selection based on morphology (e.g., pigmented and / or polygonal cells), which may be performed by visual analysis or by using surface markers.

[0152] According to yet another embodiment, the selection is first based on a negative selection and then on a positive selection.

[0153] RPE cell expansion may be performed on extracellular matrices, such as gelatin, collagen, or poly-D-lysine and laminin. For expansion, the cells may be cultured in serum-free KOM, serum-containing medium (e.g., DMEM + 20%), or Nuristem medium (06-5102-01-1A Biological Industries). Optionally, the cells may be exposed to nicotinamide at concentrations of 1-100 mM, 5-50 mM, or 5-20 mM, e.g., 10 mM, during the expansion phase. Under these culture conditions, the pigment cells lose pigmentation and acquire a morphology resembling uterine fibroids. After further prolonged culture and expansion to high-density cultures, the cells regain the characteristic polygonal morphology and, preferably, RPE cell pigmentation.

[0154] RPE cells may be grown in suspension or in monolayers. Growth of RPE cells in monolayer culture may be converted to large-scale growth in bioreactors by methods well known to those skilled in the art.

[0155] Populations of RPE cells generated according to the methods described herein may be characterized according to a number of different parameters.

[0156] Thus, for example, the resulting RPE cells are polygonal in shape and pigmented.

[0157] According to one embodiment, at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or even 100% of the cells within the resulting RPE cell population co-express pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP).

[0158] After administration, the cells described herein can form a monolayer (as shown in Figure 27C).

[0159] According to one embodiment, the transepithelial electrical resistance of the cells in the monolayer is greater than 100 ohms.

[0160] Preferably, the transepithelial electrical resistance of the cells is greater than 150 ohms, 200 ohms, 250 ohms, 300 ohms, 300 ohms, 400 ohms, 500 ohms, 600 ohms, 700 ohms, 800 ohms or even greater than 900 ohms.

[0161] According to certain embodiments, the TEER is between 100 and 1000 ohms, more preferably between 100 and 900 ohms, for example, between 200 and 900 ohms, 300 and 800 ohms, 300 and 700 ohms, 400 and 800 ohms, or 400 and 700 ohms.

[0162] Devices for measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) are known in the art. An exemplary configuration for measuring TEER is shown in FIG.

[0163] It will be understood that the cell populations disclosed herein are free of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. In one embodiment, fewer than 1:250,000 cells are Oct4+, as measured, for example, by FACS. + TRA-1-60 + The cells also do not express or down-regulate hESC-associated GDF3 or TDGF as determined by PCR.

[0164] Another way to characterize the cell populations disclosed herein is by marker expression. Thus, for example, at least 80%, 85%, or 90% of the cells express bestrophin 1, as determined by immunostaining. In one embodiment, 90-95% of the cells express bestrophin.

[0165] In another embodiment, at least 80%, 85%, 87%, 89%, or 90% of the cells express microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) as measured by immunostaining, e.g., 85-95% of the cells express MITF.

[0166] According to another embodiment, at least 50%, 55%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 87%, 89%, or 90% of the cells express paired box gene 6 (PAX-6) as measured by FACS.

[0167] The cells described herein can also be characterized according to the amount and / or type of factor they secrete. Thus, in one embodiment, the cells preferably secrete more than 500, 750, 1000, or even 2000 ng of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) per ml per day (e.g., after 14 days in culture) as measured by ELISA.

[0168] It will be understood that the RPE cells prepared herein secrete PEDF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a polarized manner. According to certain embodiments, the ratio of apical secretion of PEDF to basal secretion of PEDF is greater than 1. According to certain embodiments, the ratio of apical secretion of PEDF to basal secretion of PEDF is greater than 2. According to certain embodiments, the ratio of apical secretion of PEDF to basal secretion of PEDF is greater than 3. Furthermore, the ratio of apical secretion of VEGF to basal secretion of VEGF is greater than 1. According to certain embodiments, the ratio of apical secretion of VEGF to basal secretion of VEGF is greater than 1.5, 2 or 2.5.

[0169] The cells of the invention secrete additional factors, including, for example, angiogenin, the immunomodulatory factors IL-6, sgp130, MIF, sTNF-R1, sTRAIL-R3, MCP-1 and osteoprotegerin, the extracellular matrix regulators TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, and the protein Ax1.

[0170] According to another aspect, at least 80% of the cells in the cell population co-express pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), and further, a portion of the cells (at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%) secrete / release each of angiogenin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2), soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha ubiquitous membrane receptor 1 (sTNF-R1).

[0171] It will be appreciated that in some cases, all cells co-expressing premelanosome protein (PMEL17) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) also secrete / release angiogenin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2), soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha ubiquitous membrane receptor 1 (sTNF-R1).

[0172] In other cases, the majority (more than 50%, 60%, 70%, 80, 90%) of cells co-expressing premelanosome protein (PMEL17) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) also secrete / release angiogenin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2), soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha ubiquitous membrane receptor 1 (sTNF-R1).

[0173] The RPE cells generated herein preferably secrete angiogenin, TIMP2, sgp130, and sTNF-R1 in a polarized manner.

[0174] According to particular embodiments, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of sgp130 is greater than 1. According to particular embodiments, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of sgp130 is greater than 2. According to particular embodiments, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of sgp130 is greater than 3.

[0175] Furthermore, the ratio of apical to basal sTNF-R1 is greater than 1. According to particular embodiments, the ratio of apical to basal sTNF-R1 is greater than 2. According to particular embodiments, the ratio of apical to basal sTNF-R1 is greater than 3.

[0176] Furthermore, the ratio of basolateral secretion of angiogenin to apical secretion of angiogenin is greater than 1. According to particular embodiments, the ratio of basolateral secretion of angiogenin to apical secretion of angiogenin is greater than 1.5, 2, 2.5, or 3.

[0177] Furthermore, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of TIMP2 is greater than 1. According to a particular embodiment, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of TIMP2 is greater than 2. According to a particular embodiment, the ratio of apical to basal secretion of TIMP2 is greater than 3.

[0178] The stability of the cells is another characteristic. Thus, for example, the amount of PEDF secretion remains stable in the cells even after 6, 8, 10, 12, or even 24 hours of incubation at 2-8°C. Furthermore, the polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF remains stable even after 6, 8, 10, 12, or even 24 hours of incubation at 2-8°C. Furthermore, the TEER of the cells remains stable in the cells even after 6, 8, 10, 12, or even 24 hours of incubation at 2-8°C.

[0179] In another embodiment, the cells are characterized as having a therapeutic effect. Thus, for example, the present inventors have shown that cell populations can rescue vision in RCS rats after subretinal administration. Furthermore, the cell populations can rescue photoreceptors (e.g., cone photoreceptors) in RCS rats for up to 180 days (and in some embodiments, for at least 180 days) after subretinal administration.

[0180] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that obtaining RPE cells would be highly beneficial. RPE cells may serve as an in vitro model for developing new drugs that promote RPE cell survival, regeneration, and function. RPE cells may be useful for high-throughput screening of compounds that have toxic or regenerative effects on RPE cells. RPE cells may be used to identify mechanisms, new genes, and soluble or membrane-bound factors important for photoreceptor cell development, differentiation, maintenance, survival, and function.

[0181] RPE cells may also serve as an unlimited source of RPE cells for transplantation, replacement, and support of dysfunctional or altered RPE cells in retinal degeneration. Furthermore, genetically engineered RPE cells may serve as vectors for delivering and expressing genes in the eye and retina after transplantation.

[0182] The RPE cells produced by the method of the present disclosure may be used for large-scale and / or long-term culture of such cells.For this purpose, the method of the present invention must be carried out in a bioreactor and / or cell culture system suitable for large-scale cell production, and in this case, undifferentiated hSCs must be cultured according to the present invention.The general requirements for culturing cells in a bioreactor and / or cell culture system are well known to those skilled in the art.

[0183] The cells can be collected by various methods known in the art. Non-limiting examples include mechanical dissection and dissociation using papain or trypsin (e.g., TrypLE select). Other methods known in the art are also applicable.

[0184] The RPE cells prepared as described herein can be transplanted into various target sites in the eye of a target.In one embodiment, the transplantation of RPE cells is transplanted into the subretinal space of the eye, which is the normal anatomical location of RPE (between photoreceptor outer segments and choroid).In addition, depending on the migration ability and / or positive paracrine effect of the cells, transplantation into other eye compartments can be considered, including the inner or outer retina, the retinal periphery, and the choroid.

[0185] Retinal diseases that can be treated using the RPE cells described herein include, but are not limited to, retinitis pigmentosa, retinoschisis, lattice degeneration, Best's disease, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

[0186] Furthermore, transplantation can be carried out by various techniques known in the art.The method for carrying out RPE transplantation is described in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,962,027, U.S. Patent No. 6,045,791 and U.S. Patent No. 5,941,250, and Eye Graefes Arch Clin Exp Opthalmol March 1997; 235(3): 149-58; Biochem Biophys Res Commun February 24, 2000; 268(3): 842-6; Ophthalmic Surg February 1991; 22(2): 102-8. Methods for performing corneal transplants are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,785, as well as in Eye 1995; 9 (Pt 6 Su): 6-12; Curr Opin Opthalmol August 1992; 3 (4): 473-81; Ophthalmic Surg Lasers April 1998; 29 (4): 305-8; Ophthalmology April 2000; 107 (4): 719-24; and Jpn J Ophthalmol November-December 1999; 43(6): 502-8. If a primarily paracrine effect is used, cells can also be delivered to and maintained in a semipermeable container in the eye, which also reduces exposure of the cells to the host immune system (Neurotech USA CNTF delivery system; PNAS March 7, 2006 vol. 103(10) 3896-3901).

[0187] In one embodiment, transplantation is performed after pars plana vitrectomy by delivering the cells through a small retinal opening into the subretinal space or by direct injection. Alternatively, the cells may be delivered to the subretinal space via a transscleral or transchoroidal approach. Additionally, direct transscleral injection into the vitreous space or delivery to the anterior retinal periphery near the ciliary body can be performed.

[0188] RPE cells can be transplanted in various forms.For example, RPE cells can be introduced into target site in the form of cell suspension, or can be attached on matrix, extracellular matrix, or substrate, for example, on biodegradable polymer, or on a combination.RPE cells can also be transplanted (co-transplanted) with other retinal cells, for example, photoreceptors.

[0189] Therefore, the present invention also relates to pharmaceutical compositions of RPE cells described herein. The compositions are preferably suitable for transplantation into the eye. Thus, for example, RPE cells may be formulated in an intraocular irrigation solution such as BSS plus™.

[0190] It is expected that many related technologies for producing RPE cells will be developed during the term of the patent proceeding from this application, and the term RPE cells is intended a priori to encompass all such new technologies.

[0191] As used herein, the term "about" refers to ±10%.

[0192] The words "comprises," "comprising," "includes," "including," "having," and their conjugations mean "including but not limited to."

[0193] The term "consisting of" means "including and limited to."

[0194] The term "consisting essentially of" means that the composition, method, or structure may include additional ingredients, steps, and / or moieties, as long as the additional ingredients, steps, and / or moieties do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition, method, or structure.

[0195] As used herein, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term "a compound" or "at least one compound" may include multiple compounds, including mixtures thereof.

[0196] Throughout this application, various aspects of the invention may be presented in the form of ranges. It should be understood that the description in range form is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the description of a range should be considered to have specifically disclosed all possible subranges as well as individual numerical values within that range. For example, the description of a range such as 1 to 6 should be considered to have specifically disclosed subranges such as 1 to 3, 1 to 4, 1 to 5, 2 to 4, 2 to 6, 3 to 6, etc., as well as individual numerical values within that range, e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range.

[0197] As used herein, the term "method" refers to methods, means, techniques, and procedures for accomplishing a given task, including, but not limited to, methods, means, techniques, and procedures known to those of ordinary skill in the art of chemistry, pharmacology, biology, biochemistry, and medicine, or readily developed from known methods, means, techniques, and procedures by those of ordinary skill in the art of chemistry, pharmacology, biology, biochemistry, and medicine.

[0198] As used herein, the term "treating" includes preventing, substantially inhibiting, slowing, or reversing the progression of the abnormality, substantially ameliorating clinical or cosmetic symptoms associated with the abnormality, or substantially preventing the appearance of clinical or cosmetic symptoms associated with the abnormality.

[0199] It is understood that certain features of the invention that are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention that are, for clarity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination, or as appropriate, in any other described embodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments should not be considered essential features of those embodiments, except to the extent that the embodiment is non-functional without those elements.

[0200] Various embodiments and aspects of the present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below find experimental support in the following examples. [Example]

[0201] Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions illustrate certain aspects of the present invention in a non-limiting manner.

[0202] Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory procedures utilized in the present invention include molecular, biochemical, microbiological and recombinant DNA techniques, which are thoroughly explained in the literature. For example, "Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual" Sambrook et al., (1989); "Current Protocols in Molecular Biology" Volumes I-III Ausubel, RM, ed. (1994); Ausubel et al., "Current Protocols in Molecular Biology", John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Maryland (1989); Perbal, "A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning", John Wiley & Sons, New York (1988); Watson et al., "Recombinant DNA", Scientific American Books, New York; Birren et al. (eds) "Genome Analysis: A Laboratory Manual Series", Vol. 1-4, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1998); U.S. Patent No. 4,666,828; Nos. 5,192,659 and 5,272,057; "Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook," Volumes I-III, Cellis, JE, ed. (1994); "Culture of Animal Cells - A Manual of Basic Technique," by Freshney, Wiley-Liss, NY (1994), Third Edition; "Current Protocols in Immunology," Volumes I-III, Coligan, JE, ed.(1994); Stites et al. (eds), Basic and Clinical Immunology (8th Edition), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT (1994); Mishell and Shiigi (eds), Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (1980). Available immunoassay methods are described extensively in the patent and scientific literature. See, for example, U.S. Patent Nos. 3,791,932; 3,839,153; 3,850,752; 3,850,578; 3,853,987; 3,867,517; 3,879,262; 3,901,654; 3,935,074; 3,984,533; 3,996,345; 4,034,074; 4,098,876; 4,879,219; 5,011,771, and 5,281,521. “Oligonucleotide Synthesis” Gait, MJ, ed. (1984); “Nucleic Acid Hybridization” Hames, BD, and Higgins SJ, eds. (1985); “Transcription and Translation” Hames, BD, and Higgins SJ, eds. (1984); “Animal Cell Culture” Freshney, RI, ed. (1986); “Immobilized Cells and Enzymes” IRL Press, (1986); “A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning” Perbal, B., (1984), and “Methods in Enzymology” Vol.1-317, Academic Press; "PCR Protocols: A Guide To Methods And Applications," Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1990); Marshak et al., "Strategies for Protein Purification and Characterization - A Laboratory Course Manual," CSHL Press (1996), all of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Other general references are provided throughout this document. The procedures therein are believed to be well known in the art and are provided for the convenience of the reader. The information contained therein is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

[0203] Example 1 Eligibility assessment of CRALBP / PMEL17 double staining FACS method The purpose of this study was to qualify the CRALBP / PMEL17 dual-staining FACS method by demonstrating its accuracy and precision in at least six independent spiking assays over at least three test days. The assay was qualified using OpRegen® Batch 5C as a positive control and HAD-C 102-hESCs as a negative control. A calibration curve of known amounts of RPE (OpRegen® 5C) spiked into hESCs was used to test the accuracy and precision of different spiking points. The expected accuracy and precision was up to 25% across all points.

[0204] Staining protocol: Negative control hESC cells obtained from a cryopreserved hESC bank (HAD-C 102 p48 4.5.2014) were thawed in Nutristem (containing HSA) according to the sponsor's protocol. Positive control RPE cell stock: OpRegen® Batch 5C cells (reference line) were thawed in 20% HS-DMEM according to the sponsor's protocol. Thawed OpRegen® 5C and HAD-C 102 hESCs were spun down, resuspended in 1 ml of PBS(-), filtered through a 35 μM cell strainer, and counted using trypan blue. The cell concentration was 0.73 x 10 per ml in PBS(-). 6 ~10 6 The cells were adjusted to 100,000 cells / 50 μl. 1 μl / ml FVS450 was added to each cell suspension, followed by vortexing and incubation at 37°C for 6 minutes. The FVS450 was washed with 0.1% BSA and resuspended in 0.1% BSA-Fc-block (5 minutes at room temperature) to block all Fc epitopes on the cells. The cells were then washed with PBS(-) and fixed with 80% methanol (5 minutes at 4°C). The fixed cells were washed once with PBS(-) and once with 0.1% PBS-T, and permeabilized with 0.1% PBS-T (20 minutes at room temperature). The permeabilization solution was replaced with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) blocking solution (200,000 cells / 50 μl) for at least 30 minutes (maximum 1 hour) at room temperature. Quality sample tubes (QS) were prepared during the incubation period, and at the end of the blocking period, the cells were aliquoted and immunostained. Cells were incubated with primary antibody for 30 minutes, followed by washing three times with 0.1% PBS-T, incubation with secondary antibody for 30 minutes, and washing three times with 0.1% PBS-T.

[0205] Negative and positive control cells were stained with viability stain FVS450, fixed, blocked, and permeabilized. Calibration curves of known amounts of positive control RPE (OpRegen® 5C) cells in negative control hESCs at four concentrations (25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% RPE in hESCs) were then generated based on the cell counts measured by trypan blue viability in each population. Negative and positive control cells and the mixed population were immunostained with primary monoclonal antibodies specific for the RPE markers CRALBP and PMEL17, followed by matching secondary antibodies (anti-mouse-FITC and anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 647, respectively). Stained cells were subjected to FACS analysis to measure the percent live single-cell gated CRALBP+PMEL17+ cells.

[0206] result Accuracy: The accuracy of the assay was determined from the results of testing four levels of spiked RPE (25%, 50%, 75%, and 95%). Accuracy was determined for an RPE stock (OpRegen® 5C) relative to potentially 100% RPE cells. Each level value was analyzed from six independent runs / measurements.

[0207] The 50% concentration level was considered the lower limit of quantification with an expected accuracy of up to 25% (50% level was −8.41 to 20.14; 75% and 99.5% levels were −5.32 to 6.88).

[0208] These results met the expected relative bias outcome of up to 25%, demonstrating that this assay is accurate for determining concentrations of CRALBP+PMEL17+ double-positive cells between 50 and 99.5%. Because the OpRegen® 5C yields 99.5% CRALBP+PMEL17+ double-positive RPE cells, a relative bias of less than 25% cannot be guaranteed for results greater than 99.5%.

[0209] (Table 1) TIFF2025118972000003.tif236111

[0210] Intermediate Precision: The intermediary precision of the assay was determined from the results of six assays performed by one operator. Percent single-origin RPE was determined for each assay, and %CY was calculated from these. Table 2 summarizes the test results. As shown, %CY was less than 20% for all concentration levels, allowing for sufficient precision. The %CY for concentration levels of 25%, 50%, 75%, 95%, and 100% RPE were 16.14%, 10.61%, 5.10%, 1.17%, and 0.34%, respectively. These results meet the expected precision. The measured percent RPE values for all concentrations were within 20% of the expected values. These results demonstrate that this assay is precise for measuring RPE concentrations from 25% to 99.5%.

[0211] (Table 2) TIFF2025118972000004.tif230105

[0212] Repeatability: Sample repeatability was tested in three runs (#2, #3, and #4) where two identical OpRegen® SC samples were stained and acquired in parallel. Results confirmed that sample identities obtained within an experiment were reproducible and consistent across samples.

[0213] Linearity / Range: Linearity was measured using data that was found to be accurate and precise, as shown in Figure 1. The regression coefficient between the target value (spiked) and the measured results across the assay range tested (50%-100%) was found to be 0.99. Therefore, the range of this method, which demonstrated acceptable accuracy and precision as well as linearity, is between 50% and 99.5% of RPE cells, covering the expected range of test samples.

[0214] Positive control cells: The provisional level of CRALBP / PMEL17 double-positive cells was set at 95% or higher.

[0215] Negative control cells: The provisional level of CRALBP / PMEL17 double-positive cells for hESCs was set at 2% or less.

[0216] Stability: Results show that the stained samples are stable at 4°C after 1 and 4 days, and accuracy remains within expected acceptance criteria, so data can be obtained within 96 hours of sample preparation.

[0217] conclusion The results presented herein validate the disclosed method and demonstrate its suitability for its intended use in determining in vitro RPE purity in the final OpRegen® product and at different stages along the OpRegen® production process. Over the range of 50%-99.5% RPE cells, the accuracy of the relative bias was <25% and the precision of the %CV was <20%.

[0218] Example 2 Assessing OpRegen® Purity Levels We developed a FACS-based method to assess the purity of human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells and the level of non-RPE cell impurities in RPE cells. Using bioinformatics, cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), a component of the visual cycle, was identified as a unique marker for mature RPE cells. Preliminary studies using a CRALBP-specific monoclonal antibody demonstrated greater than 98% purity in RPE cells generated according to the method described herein. These results were further supported by immunostaining for PMEL17, a melanosome marker found in RPE. Furthermore, unlike some RPE-specific markers, CRALBP is not expressed in melanocytes, a potential neural crest cell contaminant.

[0219] Test samples and controls: Human primary melanocytes (ATCC, PCS-200-013) were used as negative control cells for CRALBP and as positive control cells for PMEL17, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein abundant in melanosomes (melanin granules). HADC102-hESCs (OpRegen® parent line) at P29 were used as negative control cells for both CRALBP and PMEL17. Clinical-grade OpRegen® cells (Batch 2A) and research-grade OpRegen® (produced in a GMP-like mock production; Mock IV D16) were used as test samples. These cells were generated as described in Example 3.

[0220] Immunostaining and FACS analysis: Cells were thawed, stained with Fixable Viability Stain (FVS450) (BD 562247), fixed in 80% methanol, and immunostained with primary mouse anti-CRALBP (clone B2, Abcam ab15051) or its isotype control to mouse IgG2a (Abcam ab170191) and rabbit anti-human PMEL17 (clone EPR4864, Abcam ab137062), followed by secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse (Dako F0479) and goat anti-rabbit (Jackson 111-606-144), respectively.

[0221] FACS data acquisition was performed using a validated Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analysis was performed using FlowJo 7.6.

[0222] result Initial FACS data using an anti-CRALBP monoclonal antibody indicated that OpRegen® had a purity level of >98%. Melanocytes, a potential neural crest cell contaminant, were found to be negative for CRALBP, a unique RPE-specific marker (1.7%). The parental HADC102-hESC line was CRALBP-negative (0.2%), as expected.

[0223] The purity level of OpRegen® remained above 98% even after double staining with CRALBP and PMEL17 (Figure 10). Melanocytes showed positive staining for PMEL17 as expected, but were negative for the double-marked population (approximately 1%). HADC102-hESCs showed negative staining for CRALBP and PMEL17 (0.07%).

[0224] Example 3 Manufacturing process and process control description OpRegen® is produced from the xeno-free, GMP-grade HAD-C 102 hESC line grown on irradiated, xeno-free, GMP-grade human umbilical cord fibroblast feeders. A clinical-grade human fibroblast feeder cell line (CRD008; MCB) and a working cell bank (WCB) were produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and xeno-free conditions, and were appropriately tested, characterized, and banked. These were then used to derive the clinical-grade hESC HAD-C 102 line from surplus human blastocysts under GMP and xeno-free conditions.

[0225] In the initial stages of production, hESCs are expanded as colonies on irradiated feeders. They are then transferred to suspension culture to initiate directed differentiation. Spheroids (SBs) form and are then plated as adherent cultures under conditions for continued directed differentiation toward neural fates and then toward RPE cells. At the end of the differentiation phase, non-pigmented areas are physically excised, and pigmented cells are enzymatically harvested, seeded, and expanded. Purified hESC-derived RPE cells (DS) are harvested at passage 2 and immediately processed into DPs. The duration of the manufacturing process depends on the proliferation rate of hESCs (approximately 2 months from thawing) and typically spans a total of 4-5 months or more.

[0226] Each step of the manufacturing process, including in-process quality control (QC) testing, is briefly described below.

[0227] Steps 1–3: Creation of a human cord fibroblast feeder working cell bank (WCB). Vials of human cord feeder master cell bank (MCB) (CRD008-MCB) at passages 3 and 4 were thawed, expanded in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, SH30081.01, Hyclone) supplemented with 20% human serum (14-498E, Lonza), irradiated (Gamma cell, 220 Exel, MDS Nordion, 3,500 rads), and cryopreserved at passages 7 and 8 to create a working cell bank (WCB). Prior to cryopreservation, samples from the feeder cell cultures were tested for sterility, mycoplasma, and Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL), morphology, karyotype, cell number, and viability. Furthermore, after thawing, the identity of the MCB, its inability to proliferate, and its ability to support undifferentiated HAD-C 102-hESC growth were confirmed. If the WCB passed all QC tests, the bank was released for hESC expansion.

[0228] Production steps 1 to 3 are illustrated in FIG.

[0229] Steps 4 and 5: Expansion of hECs. One vial of human cord fibroblast WCB (CRD008-WCB8 or CRD008-WCB9) was thawed and plated at a concentration of 70,000–100,000 cells / ml / plate in DMEM (SH30081.01, Hyclone) supplemented with 20% human serum (14-498E, Lonza) onto a center-well plate coated with recombinant human gelatin (RhG 100-001, Fibrogen). Cells were incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2 to allow fibroblast attachment. After 1–4 days, samples from the HAD-C 102-hESC MCB were thawed and plated on feeder cells in Nutristem “Plus” medium (GMP-grade and xeno-free) containing the growth factors bFGF and TGF-β (05-102-1A, Biological Industries, Israel) at 37°C and 5% CO for 6–7 days. On days 6–7, hESC cultures were mechanically disrupted (using a sterile tip or a disposable sterile stem cell tool; 14602 Swemed) and passaged to additional freshly prepared plates containing feeder cells at a concentration of 70,000–100,000 cells / plate. This was repeated weekly for several passages to reach the required amount of hESCs to initiate differentiation (Figure 13, steps 4 and 5). Prior to use, expanded HAD-C 102-hESCs were tested for sterility, mycoplasma, LAL, karyotype, and identity with MCB. Furthermore, pluripotent morphological appearance and integrated expression of pluripotency markers (TRA-1-60, Oct4, and alkaline phosphatase) were confirmed (Figure 2, stage 5). Production stages 4 and 5 are illustrated in Figure 13.

[0230] Steps 6-13: Differentiation into RPE cells. The expanded HAD-C 102-hESCs were enzymatically treated with collagenase (4152, Worthington) for further expansion in 6 cm cell culture plates (FIG. 14, step 6). The expanded HAD-C 102-hESCs were then used to generate OpRegen® DS.

[0231] Differentiation of each OpRegen® batch was initiated by mechanical transfer of HAD-C 102-hESC clusters harvested by collagenase A from stage 6 cultures to feeder-free, non-adherent 6 cm Hydrocell culture dishes in the presence of Nutristem "Minus" medium (without the growth factors bFGF and TGF-β; 06-5102-01-1A Biological Industries, special order) supplemented with 10 mM nicotinamide (N-5535, Sigma) (Figure 14, stage 7). Plates were then cultured under hypoxic (5%) conditions (37°C, 5% CO2) for up to 1 week to allow spheroid formation. Age-appropriate spheroids were then collected in suspension, gently dissociated by pipetting, and transferred to human laminin (511, Biolamina)-coated 6-well plates for growth in a hypoxic (5%) atmosphere in the presence of Nutristem "Minus" medium supplemented with 10 mM nicotinamide for an additional week (Figure 14, step 8). Cells continued to grow in a hypoxic (5%) atmosphere for up to four additional weeks; two weeks in the presence of Nutristem "Minus" medium supplemented with 10 mM nicotinamide and 140 ng / ml activin A (G-120-14E, Peprotech) (Figure 14, step 9), followed by two weeks in the presence of Nutristem "Minus" medium supplemented with only 10 mM nicotinamide (Figure 14, step 10). When areas of light pigmentation were clearly visible in the polygonal cell patches, the plates were returned to a normoxic (20%) atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2) and grown for up to two weeks in the presence of Nutristem "Minus" medium containing 10 mM nicotinamide (Figure 14, step 11). By two weeks, enlarged polygonal patches with distinctive pigmentation were clearly visible among areas of non-pigmented cells (Figure 14, step 12). The remaining pigmented cells were peeled and manually harvested after treatment with TrypLE Select (12563-011, Invitrogen) at 37°C for 15 minutes (Figure 14, step 13). Production steps 6-13 are illustrated in Figure 14.

[0232] Steps 14-17: Expansion of OpRegen® cells. Pigment cells were then plated onto 6-well gelatin-coated plates (0.5-1 × 10 cells) for growth in the presence of DMEM (SH30081.01, Hyclone) supplemented with 20% human serum (14-498E, Lonza) for 2-3 days. 6 The cells were then transferred to a 1000-well plate (P0) containing 1000 cells / plate (P0) (Figure 15, step 14). The DMEM was then replaced with Nutristem "Minus" medium, and the cells were grown for 2-3 weeks until the plates were covered with lightly pigmented polygonal cells (Figure 15, step 14). These P0 cells were then expanded for two more passages (P1, P2) in gelatin-coated flasks. After treatment with TrypLE Select at 37°C, the cells in P0 and P1 were harvested, washed, and placed on gelatin-coated flasks and cultured for 2-3 days in the presence of DMEM supplemented with 20% human serum. The DMEM was then replaced with Nutristem "Minus" medium, and the cells were grown for 2-3 weeks until the plates were covered with lightly pigmented polygonal cells (Figure 15, steps 15-16). Cells at P2 grown in T175 flasks were then treated with TrypLE Select at 37°C, harvested, resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 20% human serum, pooled, and counted.

[0233] Growth medium samples were taken from each batch for sterility, mycoplasma, and LAL testing. Cell morphology was observed and recorded (Figure 15, step 17). Production steps 14-17 are illustrated in Figure 15.

[0234] Example 4 Process control points The IPC points are illustrated in Figure 16. The sampling points selected to assess hESC impurities and RPE purity along the production process are described below.

[0235] IPC point 1: Mechanically expanded HAD-C 102 hESCs with normal karyotype before differentiation. This is the starting material from which the highest levels of hESCs are expected. This point was added to assess the maximum hESC levels before differentiation.

[0236] IPC point 2: collagenase-expanded HAD-C 102 hESCs prior to differentiation. At this stage, some differentiation is expected, resulting in decreased levels of Oct4 and TRA-1-60 expressing cells, as well as decreased expression levels of GDF3 and TDGF. This point was added to assess hESC impurities during the non-directed differentiation stage.

[0237] IPC Point 3: Spheroids produced one week after induction of hESC differentiation in the presence of nicotinamide under feeder-free conditions. At this early stage of differentiation, the highest levels of hESC impurities are expected during differentiation, and therefore this assessment is expected to present the highest level of safety concern.

[0238] IPC point 4: Cells at the end of Activin A treatment. Activin A directs differentiation toward RPE cells. At this point, a significant decrease in hESC impurities and a significant increase in RPE marker expression are expected. This point was added to monitor hESC differentiation into RPE cells.

[0239] IPC points 5-7: Cells at the end of the differentiation process before and after separating the non-pigmented area (IPC point 6) from the pigmented area (IPC point 7). IPC points 5 and 6 contain cellular impurities, whereas sample 7 corresponds to the product at the end of the differentiation process before enrichment. The cellular contaminants found in sample 6 are present in small amounts in sample 7 and even less in the product.

[0240] IPC point 8: Pigment cells at P0. Pigment cells at the end of the differentiation process, expanded for 2-3 weeks. These cells represent the final product, two steps before the end of the production process.

[0241] IPC point 9: Pigment cells at P1. P0 cells expanded for 2-3 weeks. These cells represent the final product, one step before the end of the production process.

[0242] IPC point 10: Pigment cells in P2 before cryopreservation. P1 cells expanded for 2-3 weeks are collected and pooled. These cells represent the pre-cryopreservation bulk material (DS).

[0243] IPC point 11: Cryopreserved pigment cells at P2. These cells represent the formulation (DP). Throughout the production, at all sampling points, cell culture medium was collected to assess the secretion of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), which is known to be secreted by RPE cells.

[0244] result TRA-1-60 + Oct4 + hESC Quantification: hESC levels in various samples collected along the production process were determined using a sensitive and robust Oct4 / TRA-1-60 dual-staining FACS method. TRA-1-60 was assayed 1 week after removal of feeders and growth factors (TGFβ and bFGF) that support pluripotent cell growth under growth conditions that support early neural / eye field differentiation. + Oct4 + Only 0.0106-2.7% of cells were spheroids (IPC point 3). After adding activin A, which promotes RPE differentiation, TRA-1-60 + Oct4 + The levels of TRA-1-60 cells further decreased to 0.00048–0.0168% (IPC point 4, end of Activin I). At the end of differentiation, after ablation of non-pigmented cells, TRA-1-60 + Oct4 + The cell levels were 0.00033-0.03754% (IPC point 7, pigment cells). At P0, two steps before the end of the production process, the TRA-1-60 levels were 0.00009-0.00108% (below the LOD - close to the LLOQ). + Oct4 +Cells were detected (IPC point 8). TRA-1-60 in P1 (IPC point 9), P2 before cryopreservation (drug prodrug; IPC point 10), and P2 after cryopreservation (DP; IPC point 11). + Oct4 + The levels in the cells are below the assay LLOQ (i.e., 0.00004–0.00047%, 0.00000–0.00016%, and 0.00000–0.00020%, respectively).

[0245] Relative expression of pluripotent hESC markers GDF3 and TDGF: The relative expression of the pluripotency genes GDF3 and TDGF was analyzed at various IPC points along the production process. The expression levels of GDF3 and TDGF gradually decreased. This indicates that TRA-1-60+Oct4 cells were significantly more potent than TRA-1-60 cells along the differentiation process. + This correlated with a gradual decline in cell numbers. At the end of the two stages before the end of the production process, P0, P1, and at the end of pre-cryopreservation P2 (bulk product) and post-cryopreservation P2 (formulation), GDF3 and TDGF expression levels were similar to those observed in the negative control OpRegen® 5C cells.

[0246] CRALBP + PMEL17 + Cell quantification: At the end of the differentiation phase at P0 and P2 (IPC points 8 and 11, respectively), CRALBP was used to measure RPE purity. + PMEL17 + As can be seen from Table 3 and Figure 17, CRALBP at P0 (IPC point 8), two steps before the end of the production process, + PMEL17 + RPE purity levels ranged from 98.53 to 98.83%. Similar RPE purity levels were detected in P2 after cryopreservation (99.61 to 99.76%; IPC point 11) (Table 3).

[0247] (Table 3) TIFF2025118972000005.tif25128DP, Drug Product.* IPC point 8 was tested after cryopreservation and demonstrated an accuracy error of ≦25% from an internal control of RPE cells (OpRegen® 5C, positive control) spiked into hESCs (HAD-C 102, negative control).

[0248] Confocal imaging of cells immunostained for bestrophin 1, MITF, and CRALBP along mock production runs 4 and 5. Cells were immunostained for the RPE markers bestrophin 1, MITF, ZO-1, and CRALBP at the end of the differentiation phase (IPC point 7), the end of the expansion phase (IPC point 10, DS), and after cryopreservation (IPC point 11, DP). Manually isolated non-pigmented cells (IPC point 6) were plated for immunostaining but detached from the plate during fixation and therefore could not be stained. Selected pigmented cells plated for 12 days (mock run 5 only, in parallel with cells in P0 from ongoing production) and 28 days (IPC point 7) stained positive for all RPE markers tested. The percentages of cells expressing bestrophin 1 and MITF were 93% and 93.3–96.5%, respectively. Similar levels of bestrophin 1- and MITF-positive cells were detected in P0 (94.9% and 95.9%, respectively; only mock test 4 was tested), pre-cryopreservation P2 bulk (92.2-92.75% and 93.7-95.5%, respectively), and post-cryopreservation P2 formulation (91.1-95.7% and 83.8-94.9%, respectively; reduced MITF immunostaining in mock test 5 demonstrated outliers in randomly selected areas for analysis). CRALBP (and ZO-1) expression was detected in all IPC7, 10, and 11 samples (Figure 18).

[0249] Relative expression of RPE markers bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 along mock production stages 2, 4, and 5: We measured the relative expression of the RPE genes bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 at various IPC points along the production process. The relative expression levels of bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 gradually increased along the production process. At the end of activin A treatment to direct differentiation into RPE cells (IPC point 4), the relative levels of bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 were 685-fold, 36-fold, and 325-fold higher than their respective relative levels in mechanically passaged hESCs before differentiation (IPC point 1; mock production stage 4). The relative expression levels of bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 peaked from the end of the differentiation stage (IPC point 5) through the P1 stage (IPC point 9). At these stages, the respective expression levels were 5,838–11,841-fold, 211–299-fold, and 5,708–8,687-fold higher than the levels in mechanically passaged hESCs before differentiation (IPC point 1).

[0250] Morphological assessment along mock trials 4 and 5: Cell morphology was analyzed at the end of the differentiation phase (IPC point 5) to estimate the relative area of pigmented cells, and during the expansion phases P0–P2 (IPC points 8–10) to verify confluent polygonal morphology. At the end of the differentiation phase (IPC point 5), the relative area of pigmented cells was estimated before excising the non-pigmented area. The relative area of pigmented cells was 32.5% ± 13.5% (mean ± SD, n = 7 wells of a 6-well plate) in mock trial 4 and 60% ± 13% (mean ± SD, n = 7 wells of a 6-well plate) in mock trial 5 (see representative images in Figure 11). Pigmented cell areas were selected and expanded. Morphology at the end of expansion phases P0 (IPC point 8), P1 (IPC point 9), and P2 (IPC point 10) demonstrated densely packed cultures with a typical polygonal epithelial monolayer morphology (Figure 11).

[0251] PEDF secretion and efficacy measurements along simulated test productions 4 and 5: Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), known to be secreted by RPE cells, was measured in the cell culture medium at various IPC points along simulated test productions 4 and 5. As can be seen in Table 4, very low levels of PEDF, ranging from 4 to 79 ng / mL / day, were secreted by hESCs (IPC points 1 and 2) and spheroids (IPC point 3; end of the first week with nicotinamide). At the end of activin A treatment to direct differentiation toward RPE cells (IPC point 4), the secreted PEDF levels ranged from 682 to 1,038 ng / mL / day, 31-37-fold higher than the levels secreted by spheroids. After incubation of cells with nicotinamide in normoxic conditions (IPC point 5), a further increase (2.2-4.6-fold) in PEDF secretion was observed, ranging from 1,482 to 4,746 ng / mL / day. During the increasing phase (P0–P2, IPC8–10, respectively), PEDF secretion levels ranged from 2,187 to 8,681 ng / mL / day and peaked at P0–P1.

[0252] Table 4. PEDF secretion along simulated trials 4 and 5 TIFF2025118972000006.tif61154ND, not performed; NA, not applicable; DS, drug substance; DP, formulation.

[0253] The tight junctions formed between RPE cells allow for the formation of a blood-retinal barrier and the polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF. PEDF is secreted apically and acts as an antiangiogenic and neurotrophic growth factor on the apical side. VEGF is secreted primarily basally and acts as a proangiogenic growth factor on the choroid plexus endothelium on the basal side. RPE polarization (barrier function and polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF) was measured using a Transwell system at the end of P0 (IPC point 8), at the end of P2 before cryopreservation (IPC point 10), and at the end of P2 after cryopreservation (IPC point 11). As can be seen in Table 5, barrier function / transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF were demonstrated at all IPC points.

[0254] (Table 5) TIFF2025118972000007.tif180155ND, not performed; DS, bulk substance; DP, formulation. PEDF and VEGF were measured by ELISA. PEDF was collected from cells on day 14 while they were cultured in 12-well plates. The cells were then passaged onto Transwell plates and cultured for 6 weeks. During this time, TEER and secretion of VEGF and PEDF from the basolateral and apical sides of the Transwell plates were measured.

[0255] Batch release testing of RPE cells produced in mock runs 4 and 5: To verify that OpRegen® produced in mock runs 4 and 5 was equivalent to GMP-produced OpRegen®, an abbreviated OpRegen® batch release test was performed, including morphology testing at the end of P2 before cryopreservation (IPC point 10, DS), and viability, total cell number / cryovial, identity (bestrophin 1 and MITF expression), hESC impurities, and karyotype analysis at the end of P2 after cryopreservation (IPC point 11, DP). OpRegen® produced in mock runs 4 and 5 passed batch release criteria. OpRegen® produced in mock run 2 was not cryopreserved and therefore could not be tested.

[0256] conclusion Three mock production runs (Mock Runs 2, 4, and 5) were conducted under research-grade conditions using the same GMP production methods, xeno-free GMP-grade cells (HAD-C 102 hESCs grown on irradiated CRD008 feeders), xeno-free GMP-grade reagents, and GMP-grade laboratory equipment used in the GMP production of clinical batches. Mock Runs 2, 4, and 5 were intended to assess the levels of hESC impurities along the production run, and Mock Runs 4 and 5 were also intended to identify those critical to process quality control.

[0257] Using a qualified TRA-1-60 / Oct4 dual-stain FACS assay (LOD 0.0004%, 1 / 250,000, and LLOQ 0.001%, 1 / 100,000) and a qualified flow cytometer, levels of hESC impurities below the assay LOD were observed in negatively selected pigmented cells at the end of differentiation, three steps before the end of the mock 5 production run. In mock runs 2 and 4, performed using a core flow cytometer prior to assay qualification, levels of hESC impurities were below the assay LOD two steps before the end of the production run. Consistent with this data, quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that expression of the pluripotent hESC genes GDF3 and TDGF was downregulated to levels similar to the negative control (OpRegen® 5C cells) two steps before the end of the production run.

[0258] Identity testing performed three steps before the end of production (pigment cell isolation) demonstrated that bestrophin 1 and MITF were expressed in 93% and 96.5% of immunostained cells, respectively, and that CRALBP and ZO-1 were expressed (not quantified). RPE purity testing performed one step beyond (i.e., P0, two steps before the end of production) and after one cycle of negatively selected pigment cell expansion demonstrated that >98.5% of cells were expressed by FACS for CRALBP. + PMEL17 + The results were double positive. Similar levels of RPE purity (i.e., >99.6%) were also detected in the preparations. These results were supported by morphological testing, which demonstrated a typical polygonal epithelial monolayer morphology, and quantitative RT-PCR analysis, which demonstrated that expression of the RPE genes bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65 was upregulated to levels similar to the positive control (OpRegen® 5C cells).

[0259] PEDF, a compound known to be secreted by RPE cells, was measured in the cell culture medium at various stages along the differentiation process in Mock Test Runs 4 and 5. At the end of activin A treatment (IPC point 4), which Idelson et al. (2009) previously showed to direct RPE differentiation, the level of secreted PEDF increased significantly compared to the previous stage (spheroid induction) (31-fold in Mock Test 4 and 37-fold in Mock Test 5). PEDF secretion levels continued to increase, peaking between P0 and P1 (1.7-5.8-fold increase compared to post-activin A levels). Assessment of the relative area of pigment cells at the end of the differentiation process (IPC point 5) was identified as another important quality control measure for assessing RPE differentiation. Using this measure, a two-fold difference in pigment cell yield was observed between Mock Tests 4 and 5 (32.5% in Mock Test 4 and 60% in Mock Test 5). This correlated with similar differences observed in PEDF secretion during this phase (1,482 ng / ml / day in sham 4 and 4,746 ng / ml / day in sham 5).

[0260] In conclusion, TRA-1-60 + Oct4 + No hESC impurities were observed, as evidenced by low expression levels of GDF3 and TDGF, high expression levels of bestrophin 1, CRALBP, and RPE65, as well as high levels of bestrophin 1 single-positive cells and MITF single-positive cells, and abundant CRALBP. + PMEL17 + Correlated with double positive cells (tested one stage past). Important safety and efficacy IPCs were identified at critical production stages.

[0261] Example 5 Effectiveness evaluation Experimental Design: We investigated whether subretinal transplantation of RPE cells, generated as described in Example 4, could slow the progression of RDD in the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rat model.

[0262] On postnatal days (P) 21–23 (before photoreceptor death begins), 25,000, 100,000, or 200,000 RPE cells were transplanted into the subretinal space of one eye of RCS rats. Animals treated with BSS+ (Alcon) and naive untreated animals served as controls. Groups were divided into four survival ages: P60, P100, P150, and P200. Fundus photography was used to identify bleb formation and monitor the quality of the injection.

[0263] Fundus examinations were also performed on days P60, P100, P150, and P200. Visual acuity was measured in all animals at all time points (P60, P100, P150, P200) using optokinetic tracking.

[0264] Focal and full-field ERGs were assessed in all study groups at P60 and P100. On each animal's assigned sacrifice date, both eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryopreserved, embedded in Optimum Cutting Temperature compound (OCT), and cryosectioned. Cresyl violet staining was used to identify and enumerate structural rescue of photoreceptors. Immunofluorescence staining (IF) was used to identify transplanted cells and assess their fate, proliferative status, and ability to phagocytose photoreceptor outer segments. Furthermore, immunofluorescence was used to measure rescue of host cones.

[0265] The study design is summarized in Table 6 herein below.

[0266] (Table 6) TIFF2025118972000008.tif67152

[0267] material and method Cell count: Cells were counted and then aliquoted to the appropriate dosing concentration. The average pre-injection cell viability for all injection time points was 94.0% ± 0.03. The average post-injection cell viability was 92.4% ± 0.02.

[0268] Surgery: Small incisions were made through the conjunctiva and sclera using progressively smaller gauge needles: 18, 22, 25, and 30. A puncture in the outer peripheral part of the cornea was used to reduce intraocular pressure to reduce the risk of the injected cells leaking out. A glass pipette was then inserted into the subretinal space, and 2 μl of the suspension was injected. The sclerotomy was then closed with sutures. Successful injection of cells or buffer solution alone (BSS+) was confirmed first by manually visualizing the subretinal bleb and then by photographing it with a fundus camera (Micron III).

[0269] Optokinetic tracking threshold: Optokinetic tracking threshold was measured and recorded in a blinded manner. OKT data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA or one-way ANOVA with Fisher's LSD post hoc analysis.

[0270] Electroretinagrams (ERGs): Two types of ERGs were measured: an exploratory-style focal ERG, in which a small spot of light was used to stimulate a localized area of the retina, and a standard-style full-field ERG, in which the entire visual field was stimulated.

[0271] Histology and Immunohistochemistry: Both eyes from each animal were collected, fixed, cryoprotected, embedded, and frozen. Frozen blocks were cryosectioned at 12 μm. Approximately 60 slides were obtained, with four sections per slide.

[0272] Cresyl violet: Cresyl violet-stained sections were examined for (1) injection sites and sutures, (2) evidence of photoreceptor rescue, (3) evidence of transplanted cells, and (4) inappropriate pathology. For each slide, the maximum thickness of the outer nuclear layer was also recorded to quantify rescue.

[0273] Immunofluorescence (IF): Slides of RPE cell-treated eyes selected for IF were selected from cresyl violet-stained sections containing cells in the subretinal space consistent with the size and morphology of transplanted human cells. Additionally, protection of the host ONL was used as a secondary criterion. All IF staining was performed as a double stain. DAPI served as a background nuclear stain. At least one slide from every cell-treated animal was used for each run.

[0274] Run #1 was performed using rabbit monoclonal anti-melanoma gp100 (PMEL17, clone EPR4864; human specific, Abcam catalog number ab137062) co-stained with mouse monoclonal anti-nuclear marker (HuNu, clone 3E1.3, Millipore, catalog number MAB4383) to detect human RPE and non-RPE cells.

[0275] Run #2 was performed using rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 (Ki67; clone EPR3610, human specific, Abcam, catalog no. ab92742) and an anti-nuclear marker to detect human proliferating cells.

[0276] Run #3 was performed using rabbit polyclonal anti-rat cone arrestin (Millipore catalog number ab15282) to assess cone counts in sections (see section 6.8.3). Additionally, selected slides were stained with a combination of mouse monoclonal anti-rhodopsin (clone Rho1D4, Millipore, MAB5356) and PMEL17 to identify transplanted human cells containing host rhodopsin / outer segments as a measure of phagocytic activity.

[0277] Cone counts: Confocal z-stack images were acquired from retinal sections obtained from all cell-implanted eyes and from age-matched saline-injected controls. Sections from cell-injected eyes were selected in the photoreceptor rescue zones previously assessed using cresyl violet-stained sections. Three observers counted cones in a blinded manner. The triplicate counts were then averaged, and counts were compared between treatment groups and ages.

[0278] Rhodopsin uptake: A potential rescue mechanism used by transplanted cells is the uptake of photoreceptor outer segments and shed debris. Removal of the debris compartment reduces toxic stress on photoreceptors and thus helps sustain photoreceptor survival. Here, we selected specific animals to evaluate rhodopsin uptake by RPE cells based on cell viability and photoreceptor protection index. This evaluation was performed using immunofluorescence.

[0279] result Fundus imaging: Fundus images collected at necropsy of cell-treated eyes revealed hyperpigmented and hypopigmented areas of the retina corresponding to where subretinal blebs formed during surgery and where cells were deposited in the subretinal space (Figure 19A-C). These patchy areas were not evident in either BSS+-injected or uninjected eyes.

[0280] Optokinetic tracking threshold: OKT thresholds were rescued in all cell-treated groups at all ages (Figure 20). Cell-treated groups outperformed unoperated or saline-injected eyes at all ages. There was a significant dose-dependent effect between the low dose (25K) and the two higher doses (100K (p<0.0001) and 200K (p<0.0001)), particularly at older ages; however, no clear benefit on OKT was observed from the mid-dose (100K) through the high dose (200K) (p=0.5646). While OKT thresholds were rescued in all cell-treated groups, absolute visual acuity slowly declined over time. OKT thresholds in untreated and saline-injected animals continued to decline over the course of the study. BSS+-injected eyes were not different from the naive untreated group (p=0.6068) or untreated fellow eyes.

[0281] Local ERG: Local ERG was measured in all experimental rats (n=252) at approximately P60. As shown in Figure 21A, individual animals treated with RPE cells performed well and significantly outperformed controls.

[0282] Full-field ERG: Full-field ERGs were measured from 125 RCS rats at P60 and 63 RCS rats at P100. As shown in Figure 21B, individual animals treated with RPE cells performed well and significantly outperformed controls.

[0283] Cresyl violet staining: An exemplary composite photograph of a cresyl violet stained section is shown in Figure 22A. Representative images from BSS+ injected eyes and cell-treated eyes (images from multiple groups) are shown in Figure 22B.

[0284] Outer nuclear layer thickness (ONL) was measured as the primary indicator of photoreceptor rescue. Data were recorded as the maximum number of photoreceptor nuclei present in each dose group across ages (Figure 23). ONL thickness in cell-treated groups at P60, P100, and P150 was significantly thicker than BSS+-treated eyes (all p<0.0001). In terms of the percentage of animals with evidence of photoreceptor rescue, 76-92% of animals had evidence of photoreceptors at P60, 80-90% at P100, 72-86% at P150, and 0-18% at P200.

[0285] Immunofluorescence: Transplanted RPE cells were identified as positive by immunofluorescence in animals of each life age (Figure 24). However, with increasing age, the number of animals with identified cells decreased. Repeated staining of additional slides from animals that initially showed no transplanted cells identified positive cells in additional animals, but not in all cases.

[0286] Although IF analysis did not reveal transplanted cells in all animals, measurements of ONL thickness indicated that 70-90% of cell-treated animals had significant photoreceptor rescue, as confirmed by OKT rescue. This suggests that most treated eyes had transplanted cells at some point. The proliferation marker Ki67 was used to identify proliferating human cells. No Ki67-positive human cells were observed (Figure 24).

[0287] Cone counts: The number of cones in animals receiving cell transplants was significantly higher than in control eyes (Figure 25; p=<0.0001 for each comparison). In general, there was no difference in cone numbers across low, medium, and high dose cells. Representative images from each age are shown in Figure 24.

[0288] Rhodopsin uptake: In each case tested (n=6), fluorescently labeled rhodopsin was observed in the transplanted RPE cells (Figures 26A-J), confirming that the transplanted cells ingested outer segment debris after transplantation.

[0289] conclusion When transplanted into the subretinal space of RCS rats, RPE cells rescued their visual acuity above that of controls at all ages tested. ERG responses were preserved when the grafts were large enough or in accessible retinal areas for evaluation. Rod and cone photoreceptors were rescued in the transplanted area by 180 days after transplantation. Collectively, this data demonstrates that OpRegen® maintains the functional and structural integrity of the host retina over the long term. Therefore, OpRegen® has great potential for the treatment of human RPE cell disorders, such as RP and AMD.

[0290] Example 6 RPE cell stability short term stability Formulated RPE cells in BSS plus (produced as described in Example 4) were prepared in a final volume of 600-1000 μl per vial. Short-term stability was tested at 0, 4, 8, and 24 hours. Cells were found to be stable at all time points.

[0291] RPE cell viability and cell concentration were stable at 8 hours of incubation for all dose formulations; percent mean viability (±SD) for the following concentrations: Low concentration (70 x 10 per 100 μl of BSS plus 3 The percentage of patients with HIV infection (p<0.05) changed from 93%±5 at time 0 to 91%±1 at time 8, showing no significant decrease. High concentration (70 x 10 per 100 μl of BSS plus 3 The percentage of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) changed from 92% ± 3 at time 0 to 91% ± 2 at time 8, showing no significant decrease.

[0292] The medium concentration tested (250 × 10 per 100 μl of BSS plus 3 There were no significant changes across time points for individuals.

[0293] The overall range for all time points and prescribed doses was 88% to 97% from time point 0 to time point 8. A 2% reduction was found when averaging all results for time point 0 (93% ± 3) and time point 8 (91% ± 1).

[0294] No significant changes in cell concentration were observed at either time point or prescribed dose. Cell concentration remained unchanged in all three studies except for a slight decrease (2%) seen in one batch at the higher dose.

[0295] The appearance of the various dosage formulations did not change throughout the time points tested. The cell suspensions were free of foreign particles and undissociated aggregates.

[0296] At all time points tested, the identity and purity of each formulated RPE cell dose was stable for up to 24 hours and within batch release standards. At 8 hours (for all formulated RPE cell doses), the levels of MITF-positive and bestrophin-positive cells were 86-97% and 90-94%, respectively, and CRALBP levels were 86-97% and 90-94%, respectively. + PMEL17 + The level of double positive cells ranged from 98.35 to 99.64%.

[0297] The formulated RPE cell doses maintained efficacy at all time points tested (4, 8, and 24 hours), and both secreted high levels of PEDF and formed polarized RPE monolayers with a predominantly apical secretion of PEDF and a basolateral secretion of VEGF. Results at the 8-hour time point tested: TEER ranged from 376 to 724 ohms, apical-to-basal PEDF ratios ranged from 2.77 to 5.70, and basolateral-to-apical VEGF ratios ranged from 2.04 to 3.88.

[0298] Sterility was maintained at all incubation time points for all cell dose formulations.

[0299] These results support OpRegen® cell stability for at least 8 hours in the final formulation for all clinical doses when kept at 2-8° C. Based on the partial data collected (identity, sterility, and mid-dose efficacy), a safety margin of up to 24 hours exists.

[0300] The results of the short-term stability assay are summarized in Table 7 below.

[0301] (Table 7) TIFF2025118972000009.tif66155

[0302] Long-term stability: Three batches of RPE cells were frozen in vapor phase liquid nitrogen. Testing of long-term stability during cryopreservation began after the day of freezing. Results are available 3 years after freezing. The following parameters were assessed: viability, cell number, RPE identity (% bestrophin-1 positive cells and % MITF positive cells), RPE purity (FACS %CRALBP) + PMEL17 + RPE cells), efficacy (polarization and PEDF secretion), karyotyping, and sterility are tested. At each time point, the required number of vials are thawed and the cells are prepared for assay as described herein.

[0303] The results of the long-term stability assay are summarized in Table 8 below.

[0304] (Table 8) TIFF2025118972000010.tif90151

[0305] result Viability, total cell number / vial, and RPE identity were maintained over the three-year period. Furthermore, as shown, the data demonstrated potency and purity at levels similar to those collected prior to storage.

[0306] A normal karyotype was observed after 4 years of cryopreservation, indicating that long-term storage in vapor phase has not thus far had a detrimental effect on RPE genomic stability.

[0307] Sample sterility was demonstrated by testing all clinical batches for the absence of bacterial / fungal growth at 3 months. Another batch tested negative after 4 years of cryopreservation. Based on these uniformly acceptable stability results thus far, spanning 3 years of stability testing, it can be concluded that the RPE cell product is stable for at least 3 years when stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen at temperatures below -180°C.

[0308] Example 7 Safety and Biodistribution The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival, biodistribution, and safety of RPE cells (generated as described in Example 4) after subretinal administration to male and female NOD-SCID mice over a 6-month study period.

[0309] NOD-SCID mice (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid), 5–6 weeks old at the time of injection, were injected with either BSS Plus (vehicle control) or two doses of RPE cells suspended in 1 μL of BSS Plus: 50 × 10 3 cells or 100 x 10 3 cells (maximum feasible dose). RPE was administered subretinal via the intravitreal route (proposed clinical administration route) using a 33G Hamilton needle. A single dose of 50 x 10 cells was injected. 3 cells or 100 x 10 3Cells were injected into one eye, while the other eye served as an internal control. Each dosing run included mice (male and female) from each group. Mice entered into the study after pretesting were randomly assigned to the various test groups. Two rounds of randomization were performed. A weight-based randomization procedure was used to assign animals to treatment groups before vehicle / test article administration. After administration, sequential randomization was used to assign animals to the final treatment group. Animals suitable for use in the study were transferred to the target study. Mice with ocular abnormalities, abnormal clinical observations, or weights less than 16 grams during pretesting, as well as mice with unsuccessful subretinal RPE injections, were excluded from the study.

[0310] Study Measurements: Evaluation of RPE safety in this study was based on animal mortality, clinical observations, body weight, ophthalmological examination, clinical pathology (hematology and blood chemistry), gross evaluation with gross pathology, organ weights (absolute and relative to body and brain weight), histopathological evaluation of eyes and various organs. Evaluation of RPE viability and biodistribution was performed by histopathological and immunofluorescence staining evaluation of eyes and various organs and qPCR analysis. The following measurements were performed: · Clinical observation; ·body weight; Ophthalmological examination (including gross and biomicroscopic examination); · Surgical microscopic examination of the quality of subretinal injections (fundus examination) using a LEICA M80 Stereo microscope; Complete blood count and blood chemistry; · Autopsy and gross pathology; · Organ weights (absolute and relative to body and brain weight); Collection, fixation, and paraffin blocking of the contralateral treated and untreated eyes, including the optic nerve; Blinded hematoxylin-eosin histopathology of eyes and tissues (sternum with bone marrow, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, mandibular lymph nodes, spinal cord, spleen, thymus, masses, and gross lesions); Blinded semi-quantification of pigmented cells in hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides; Blinded immunostaining of selected slides adjacent to representative hematoxylin-eosin slides demonstrating pigment cell grafts in the eye for human markers (human nuclei) + RPE marker (human PMEL17), and assessment of human RPE cells and non-RPE cells, human markers (human nuclei) + proliferation marker (human Ki67), and assessment of human proliferating cells and non-human proliferating cells, RPE marker (RPE65) + proliferation marker (human Ki67), and assessment of RPE human proliferating cells and non-RPE human proliferating cells; Blinded immunostaining of selected slides adjacent to representative hematoxylin-eosin slides demonstrating teratomas, tumors, abnormal cells, and lesions for human markers (human nuclei) to exclude human origin; Collection and extraction of genomic DNA from blood, bone marrow (collected from the thigh), brain, left and right eye with optic nerve, heart, left and right kidney, liver, lung, mandibular lymph node, ovary, skeletal biceps femoris, spinal cord, spleen, testis, and thymus, and qPCR analysis of human β-globin; Hematoxylin and eosin histopathology on tissues (other than those mentioned above) found to be positive for human beta-globin in animals from the same group and time point.

[0311] result No RPE-related toxicological findings were noted during in-life examinations, including detailed clinical observations, body weights, ophthalmologic examinations, and clinical pathology consisting of hematology and serum clinical chemistry. Detailed clinical and ophthalmologic examinations revealed that mice treated with RPE pigment cells at both dose levels exhibited a dark discoloration of the left eye on an albino background. Ophthalmologic examination of surviving animals revealed this to consist of dark pigmented foci in the mid-vitreal. The pigmented foci were randomly distributed along a line extending from the temporal posterior lens capsule to the nasal retinal surface. These foci were interpreted as RPE cells leaking from the injection cannula during removal from the eye after injection or into the vitreous humor after subretinal implantation, as evidenced by vitreous reflux observed during injection.

[0312] All ocular lesions observed in this study were thought to be secondary to anesthesia, surgical injection procedures, or incidental age-related changes. Multiple pigmented foci were found in the vitreous humor, suggesting that RPE cells may be able to survive within the vitreous. Microscopically, pigmented cells were present in the vitreous in some RPE-treated animals.

[0313] In terms of biodistribution, as assessed by qPCR using a set of human β-globin gene probes / primers at 2-week, 2-month, and 6-month intervals, 100 × 10 3Left eyes treated with OpRegen® cells were RPE DNA positive in 8 / 12, 11 / 12, and 16 / 16 animals, with group mean levels of 38, 47, and 249 copies per μg of total ocular DNA, respectively, indicating an increasing trend over time. There were no significant differences between males and females. In these animals, RPE DNA was not detected in the untreated right eye and all non-ocular tissues, including blood, femoral bone marrow, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, mandibular lymph node, ovary, skeletal biceps femoris, spinal cord, spleen, testis, and thymus, except for the spinal cord (27 copies / μg DNA) from one 2-week male animal and the skeletal muscle (16 copies / μg DNA) and spinal cord (below the level of eligibility) from one 2-week female animal (presumably due to inadvertent contamination with exogenous human DNA during DNA extraction from these tissues).

[0314] Macroscopic changes related to the RPE were limited to black discoloration or black foci in the left eyes of several animals at 2- and 6-month intervals, consistent with clinical observations and / or ophthalmologic examinations during life. These changes correlated with pigment cells and were not considered adverse as determined by microscopic examination of surviving animals in the high-dose group and animals euthanized near death or found dead in both dose groups. Pigment cells were present in the treated left eyes of nearly all surviving mice examined at each time point in the high-dose group (in the subretinal space of 11 / 12, 12 / 12, and 16 / 16 at 2-week, 2-month, and 6-month intervals), as well as in animals euthanized near death or found dead in the low- and high-dose groups. The most common locations of pigment cells, as confirmed by immunostaining for human cell- and RPE-specific biomarkers, were the subretinal space and vitreous. In the subretinal space, pigment cells tended to be confined to the injection site at early time points, whereas at later time points, they were present at locations distant from the injection site, suggesting localized spread of the cells. In males, the mean total number of pigment cells per eye at 6 months was slightly increased compared with that at 2 weeks or 2 months. This increase in the number of human-derived pigment cells was supported by qPCR analysis.

[0315] Long-term engraftment of RPE cells is shown in Figure 27A. Nine months after transplantation, pigment cells in the NOD-SCID subretinal space stained positive for human nuclei and PMEL17.

[0316] Figure 27B is a photograph showing cells confluent at the site of the bleb after injection, and Figure 27C is a photograph showing subsequent cell spreading into a monolayer after injection.

[0317] RPE was not associated with any organ weight changes. There were no gross or microscopic changes in the untreated right eye and non-ocular organs examined in this study, including the brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, mandibular lymph node, spinal cord, spleen, and thymus. In animals examined in the high-dose group, anti-human nuclear biomarker antibody staining (human nuclei) was detected in 64% of left eyes examined at 2 weeks, 36% at 2 months, and 73% at 6 months.

[0318] The highest levels of human nuclei were found in pigment cell populations within the subretinal space, followed by the vitreous. Anti-human RPE-specific biomarker PMEL17 staining was observed in most animals tested, whereas another RPE-specific biomarker, RPE65, was detected at varying levels across time points. These RPE-specific biomarkers were detected primarily in the subretinal space and less in the vitreous. Ki67, a human cell proliferation biomarker, was detected in only a few cells in a minority of animals, primarily in pigment cells within the vitreous and, to a lesser extent, in pigment cells within the subretinal space. The incidence of Ki67 positivity decreased over time, remaining in only one animal at 6 months. Ki67-positive cells were not associated with any abnormal morphology.

[0319] Several microscopic changes were observed at the injection site across all time points and study groups and were thought to be related to the surgical injection procedure. Some of these changes were slightly more prevalent in animals examined at the high dose at 6 months. For example, retinal detachment was observed in one animal, and the incidence or severity of retinal degeneration / atrophy or fibroplasia was slightly increased compared with the vehicle control group.

[0320] There were no RPE-dependent effects on animal mortality or survival.

[0321] conclusion Following a single injection of RPE at dose levels up to 100,000 cells / μl / eye, no local or systemic toxicological, lethal, or tumorigenic effects were observed in the NOD / SCID animal model over the 6-month study period. Biodistribution of RPE cells was limited to the treated left eye, with subretinal cells spreading locally from the subretinal injection site as a function of time. At 2-week, 2-month, and 6-month intervals, RPE cells were primarily present in the subretinal space in most animals examined in the high-dose group, followed by the vitreous. Positive immunostaining with antibodies against human nuclear-specific biomarkers and / or human RPE-specific biomarkers was variable. Persistence of RPE cells in the eye was estimated for at least 6 months, with very limited cell proliferation. Limited proliferation occurred primarily in the vitreous and did not result in adverse effects. There was evidence of an increase in RPE cell numbers over time in treated eyes, but this was accompanied by a decrease in proliferation in the subretinal population examined. The RPE-specific markers RPE65 and PMEL17 were expressed primarily in RPE cells within the subretinal space, as opposed to within the vitreous. The majority of Ki67-positive cells were found within the vitreous. The latter suggests that the increase in RPE cells over time is restricted to the vitreous space and that the expression of specific RPE markers RPE65 and PMEL17 may be regulated by the microenvironment. In conclusion, based on the data presented above, there were no significant safety issues associated with the RPE cell injections described herein compared with the vehicle control group.

[0322] Example 8 Pax-6 expression in RPE cells Objective: To develop a FACS-based method for assessing PAX-6 levels in human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells.

[0323] material and method Frozen RPE cells (prepared as described in Example 4) were thawed, spun down, resuspended in 1 ml of PBS minus, filtered through a 35 μM cell strainer, and counted using an NC-200 cell counter. The cell concentration was approximately 1×10 per ml in PBS minus.6 The cells were adjusted to 1000 cells. 1 μl / ml of FVS450 was added per ml of cell suspension, followed by vortexing and incubation at 37°C for 6 minutes. The FVS450 was quenched with 0.1% BSA(-Ig)-PBS minus and resuspended in 0.1% BSA(-Ig)-Fc-block (5 minutes at room temperature) to block all Fc epitopes on the cells. The cells were then fixed and stained with anti-Pax-6 antibody (AF647, catalog number 562249).

[0324] result As can be seen in Figure 29, cells in P0 and P2 are PAX6 positive (81.5%-82.5% for P0, 91.3%-96.1% for P2). P2 was passaged at the end of the production run, while P0 was two expansion steps before. As shown in Figures 29 and 30, the data showed consistency across batches. Furthermore, we demonstrated by FACS analysis that RPE cells double stained for PAX-6 and CRALBP (Figure 31).

[0325] Example 9 Identification of proteins secreted by RPE cells Objective: To identify a signature of proteins (known and novel) secreted by OpRegen® (RPE cells) that can be used as a batch release efficacy assay as well as a process control assay.

[0326] Supernatants were collected from RPE cells (generated as described in Example 3) cultured under various culture conditions as shown below. Supernatants were then screened using G6 and G7 RayBiotech arrays according to the manufacturer's instructions after screening the relevant arrays and supernatants overnight. 1. Thawed RPE preparation cells (0.5 × 10 cells at passage 3) cultured on 12-well plates for 4 and 14 days. 6 cells / well) (referred to herein as OpRegen®). 2. Thawed RPE preparation cells cultured for 14 days on 12-well plates, then cultured on Transwell plates (according to AM-RPE-15) for 3 weeks, exhibiting a TEER of over 500 Ω. Supernatants were collected from the apical and basolateral chambers. 3. Cells prepared according to the protocol described in Example 3 before (QC3) and after (QC4) activin A treatment. 4. Nutristem medium without TGFβ and FGF (Nut-).

[0327] Supernatants were also collected from the following cell cultures and tested by ELISA. 1. Thawed OpRegen® formulated cells cultured for 14 days on a 12-well plate and then cultured for 3 weeks on a Transwell plate (according to AM-RPE-15), exhibiting TEERs of 355 Ω and 505 Ω, respectively. Supernatants were collected from day 14 (passage 3) and from the apical and basolateral chambers. 2. Thawed RPE7 cells (passage 3, 0.5 × 10 cells) cultured for 14 days on a 12-well plate. 6 cells / well). 3. Mock test VI cells at the end of passage 1 of the production run, isolated enzymatically or mechanically (as described in Example 3) and then grown on laminin 521. These cells were tested for efficacy according to AM-RPE-15, with supernatants collected from cells at day 14 (passage 2) on 12-well plates and from cells harvested from the apical and basolateral chambers after 3 weeks on Transwell plates. 4. Day 4 and Day 14 Passage 3 Fetal HuRPE Cells (0.5 × 10 6 cells / well).

[0328] Validation of the ELISA tests was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions associated with each ELISA kit. In each protocol, incubation with the supernatant was overnight.

[0329] Study design: Supernatants were collected from cells cultured under various culture conditions and kept at -80° C. After protein array analysis, validation of hits was measured by ELISA.

[0330] result The G7 array results are shown in Table 9 herein below.

[0331] (Table 9) TIFF2025118972000011.tif212147TIFF2025118972000012.tif163153

[0332] The G6 array results are shown in Table 10 herein below.

[0333] (Table 10) TIFF2025118972000013.tif51145TIFF2025118972000014.tif234145TIFF2025118972000015.tif91145

[0334] RPE-secreted proteins can be divided into three functional groups: (1) angiogenic proteins, e.g., VEGF and angiogenin; (2) extracellular matrix regulators, e.g., TIMP-1 and TIMP-2; and (3) immunomodulatory proteins, e.g., IL-6, MIF, sgp130, sTNF-R1, sTRAIL-R3, MCP-1, and osteoprotegerin. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ax1 was also found to be secreted by RPE cells. Six proteins (angiogenin, TIMP-2, MIF, sgp130, sTNF-R1, and sTRAIL-R3) that showed high levels of secretion and / or a polarized (apical / basolateral) secretion pattern were selected for validation by ELISA. Array data also confirmed VEGF secretion, as seen in the polarized assay.

[0335] Angiogenin: Protein array data demonstrated an increase in angiogenin secretion along the production process (Tables 9 and 10). These results were confirmed by ELISA, which demonstrated that differentiated cells treated with nicotinamide before adding activin A secreted angiogenin levels of 0.52 ng / mL, whereas after 2 weeks of treatment with nicotinamide and activin A, angiogenin secretion levels increased to 0.91 ng / mL (Figure 32A). After thawing, RPE cells (0.5x10) were cultured in 12-well plates for 2 weeks. 6 cells / well; passage 3) secreted angiogenin (Figure 32B). Polarized RPE cells (week 3 on Transwell plates; TEER >350 Ω, apical / basal PEDF and basal / apical VEGF ratios >1) secreted angiogenin in a polarized manner toward the basolateral side, with little or no apical secretion (basal angiogenin levels ranged from 0.1 to 0.25 ng / mL, and apical angiogenin levels ranged from 0.05 to 0.12 ng / mL; Figure 32B). RPE7 cells, generated according to Idelson et al., 2009, were unable to produce barrier function in the Transwell system (TEER <100 Ω), but were able to secrete VEGF and PEDF. The ability of RPE7 cells to secrete angiogenin was tested when plated in 12-well plates for 14 days. At 14 days in culture, RPE7 secreted angiogenin at levels within the range of RPE cells generated as described herein (Figure 32C).

[0336] Secretion of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2: Protein array screening demonstrated the secretion of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 from polarized and non-polarized RPE cells (Figures 33A-E). Interestingly, array data demonstrated polarized secretion of TIMP-2 apically and TIMP-1 basolaterally (Figure 33A). ELISA data confirmed that TIMP-2 was primarily secreted apically by all RPE batches tested to date (Figures 33C-D, apical range of 69.9-113.3 ng / mL and basolateral range of 11.9-43.7 ng / mL). TIMP-2 was also secreted by non-polarized OpRegen® cells at levels similar to those secreted by normal human fetal RPE cells (HuRPE, ScienCell) (Figures 33C-E). RPE7 cells also secreted TIMP-2 at levels similar to those of OpRegen® cells (Figures 33C-E). Interestingly, very low levels of TIMP-2 were detected at the QC3 and QC4 checkpoints along the production process (Figure 33B).

[0337] sgp130 secretion by OpRegen® cells: Protein array data also demonstrated increased sgp130 secretion along the OpRegen® production process, as seen at IPC / QC checkpoints 3 and 4 (Tables 9 and 10). ELISA data confirmed higher levels of sgp130 secretion after 2 weeks of treatment with activin A (IPC / QC4; 1.64 ng / mL) compared to levels secreted by cells after treatment with nicotinamide and before the addition of activin A (IPC / QC3; 0.68 ng / mL) (Figure 34A). OpRegen® cells (0.5 x 10) cultured in 12-well plates for 2 weeks after thawing were 6 cells / well; passage 3) secreted sgp130 (Figures 34B-C). RPE7 cells cultured under similar conditions secreted levels of sgp130 within the range of OpRegen® cells (1.0 ng / mL on day 14; Figure 34D). Fetal HuRPE cells secreted low levels of sgp130 on days 4 and 14.

[0338] Polarized OpRegen® cells secreted sgp130 apically in a polarized manner with little or no secretion to the basolateral side (apical sgp130 secretion levels ranged from 0.93 to 2.06 ng / mL, and basolateral sgp130 levels ranged from 0 to 0.2 ng / mL; Figure 34B-C).

[0339] Released sTNF-R1: Very low levels of released sTNF-R1 were detected in the supernatants of differentiated cells by ELISA before (IPC / QC3 0.01 ng / mL) and after (IPC / QC4 0.02 ng / mL) 2-week treatment with nicotinamide and activin A (Figure 35A). OpRegen® cells (0.5×10 6 cells) were thawed and cultured in 12-well plates for 2 weeks. 6 HuRPE cells cultured under similar conditions had similar levels of sTNF-R1 in the culture supernatant, whereas RPE7 cells showed relatively low levels of sTNF-R1 (Figure 35D).

[0340] Polarized OpRegen® cells secreted high levels of released sTNF-R1 apically (apical sTNF-R1 levels ranged from 0.22 to 1.83 ng / mL, and basolateral sTNF-R1 levels ranged from 0.01 to 0.11 ng / mL; Figure 35C-D).

[0341] sTRAIL-R3: Protein array data detected sTRAIL-R3 in the supernatants of OpRegen® cells (Tables 9 and 10). ELISA confirmed the presence of sTRAIL-R3 along the OpRegen® production process (493 pg / mL in QC3 and 238 pg / mL in QC4). There was no sTRAIL-R3 in fetal HuRPE cultures and very low levels of sTRAIL-R3 (4 pg / mL) in RPE7 cultures.

[0342] MIF detection: Protein array data detected MIF in the supernatants of OpRegen® cells (Tables 9 and 10). ELISA confirmed the presence of MIF along the OpRegen® production process (100.3 ng / mL in QC3 and 44.7 ng / mL in QC4). Polarized OpRegen® cells demonstrated high levels of MIF on the apical side (apical MIF levels ranged from 26.6 to 138.3 ng / mL, and basolateral MIF levels ranged from 1.9 to 30.5 ng / mL).

[0343] Example 10 Comparison of OpRegen® with RPE1 and RPE7 Objective: To compare OpRegen® (RPE cells) with RPE cells generated according to the protocol of Idelson et al., 2009.

[0344] material and method OpRegen® (RPE cells) were generated as described in Example 3.

[0345] RPE cells were generated according to the protocol of Idelson et al., 2009, and designated RPE1 and RPE7.

[0346] Using the Transwell system (as shown in Figure 28), we were able to develop polarized RPE monolayers with stable barrier properties and polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF. We assessed the barrier function of the RPE monolayer using transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements, and the polarized secretion of PEDF and VEGF using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cells were thawed and cultured for 14 days in the presence of nicotinamide. PEDF secretion was tested on days 7 and 14. Cells were then transferred to Transwells (Costar 3460, 0.4 μm) for an additional 4 weeks. During this time, TEER was measured, and media was collected weekly from the upper and lower Transwell chambers (to assess cytokine secretion) for up to 4 weeks. If cells are polarized, TEER should be greater than 100 Ω, and the ratios of apical to basolateral PEDF secretion and basolateral to apical VEGF secretion should be greater than 1.

[0347] All OpRegen® batches tested demonstrated the ability to produce barrier function (TEER ranged from 368 to 688 Ω) and secrete PEDF and VEGF in a polarized manner (apical PEDF / basolateral PEDF ratios ranged from 3.47 to 8.75 and basolateral VEGF / apical VEGF ratios ranged from 1.39 to 2.74) (see Table 11).

[0348] (Table 11) TIFF2025118972000016.tif90154ND: TEER was less than 100 Ω and was not measured. Large holes were observed in the culture.

[0349] RPE1 and RPE7, produced under GMP conditions according to Idelson et al. (2009), failed to produce barrier function (TEER<100Ω) in three independent studies. Cells seeded on Transwells failed to produce a homogenous, closed polygonal monolayer, and large holes were observed (Figure 36). Although these cells were unable to produce barrier function, RPE1 and RPE7 were able to secrete PEDF (see Table 11) and VEGF (not shown) at levels similar to OpRegen®. These CRALBPs + PMEL17 + The purity levels were 99.91% and 96.29%, respectively, similar to OpRegen® (Figure 37).

[0350] Based on these data, it can be concluded that RPE1 and RPE7 are defective in their ability to form tight junctions.

[0351] While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.

[0352] All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference herein. Furthermore, citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention. To the extent section headings are used, they should not be construed as necessarily limiting.

Claims

1. 1. A method for qualifying a population of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells as a suitable therapeutic for treating an ocular condition, comprising: The method includes analyzing the co-expression of a pre-melanosome protein (PMEL17) and a cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), and determining the cell population as being suitable for a therapeutic agent for treating an ocular abnormality when the number of cells co-expressing the PMEL17 and the CRALBP is above a predetermined level; and wherein the predetermined level is that at least 95% of the cells co-express detectable levels of PMEL17 and CRALBP.

2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the RPE cells secrete pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a polarized manner.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cell population is produced by differentiating pluripotent stem cells into RPE cells.

4. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the pluripotent stem cells comprise embryonic stem cells, and prior to said differentiating, the embryonic stem cells are grown in a medium comprising bFGF and TGFβ.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the embryonic stem cells are cultured on human cord fibroblasts prior to said differentiation.

6. The differentiation (a) culturing embryonic stem cells in a medium containing a differentiation agent to produce differentiated cells; and (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing at least one member of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily. The method of claim 3, wherein the method is carried out by

7. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the differentiation agent in step (a) is nicotinamide (NA) or 3-aminobenzamide.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the medium in step (a) contains nicotinamide (NA) and lacks at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily, and the medium in step (b) contains NA and at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily.

9. (c) after step (b), culturing the cells in a medium containing nicotinamide (NA) and lacking at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising a step of selecting the polyhedron cells after step (c).

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of expanding the polygonal cells.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the growing step is carried out on an adherent surface.

13. The method of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the at least one member of the TGFβ superfamily is selected from the group consisting of TGFβ1, TGFβ3, and activin A.

14. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the differentiation agent is nicotinamide (NA).

15. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the cell population is generated by: (a) culturing human embryonic stem cells in a medium containing nicotinamide and lacking activin A to generate differentiated cells; (b) culturing the differentiated cells in a medium containing nicotinamide and activin A to produce cells further differentiated along the RPE lineage; (c) culturing the cells further differentiating into the RPE lineage in a medium containing nicotinamide and lacking activin A.

16. 16. The method of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the growing step is carried out on an adherent surface or on an extracellular matrix.

17. 17. The method of any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the ocular abnormality is retinal degeneration.

18. 18. The method of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the ocular abnormality is age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa, Leber's congenital amaurosis, hereditary or acquired macular degeneration, Best's disease, retinal detachment, gyrate atrophy, choroideremia, pattern dystrophy, Stargardt's disease, or RPE or retinal damage due to damage caused by any one of light injury, laser injury, inflammatory injury, infectious injury, radiation injury, neovascular injury, or traumatic injury.

19. The method of any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein the RPE cells are derived from pluripotent stem cells.

20. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the pluripotent stem cells are human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).

21. 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the pluripotent stem cells are human embryonic stem cells (hESCs).

Images