Genetically modified non-human animals and methods of use thereof

Abstract

Provision of mice transplanted with the human hemolymphatic system (HHLS). [Solution] A genetically modified non-human animal comprising a genome containing at least one nucleic acid encoding at least one of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO operably linked to a promoter, and expressing at least one polypeptide selected from human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61 / 698,002, filed September 7, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61 / 775,171, filed March 8, 2013, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. [Background technology]

[0002] 2. Background of the Invention The goal of biomedical research is to gain a better understanding of human physiology and to use this knowledge to prevent, treat, or cure human diseases. Due to practical and ethical barriers to experimental procedures in human subjects, many studies are performed in small animal models, such as mice. However, mice are not human, and knowledge acquired from animal experiments is not necessarily applicable to humans. In this regard, mice engrafted with a human hemolymphatic system (HHLS) represent a useful small animal model for the study of human hematopoietic and immune functions in vivo.

[0003] HHLS mice are generated by transplantation of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and / or human fetal tissues into recipient mice that are deficient in the innate and adaptive arms of the immune response. The first models of HHLS mice were developed in the late 1980s (Mosier et al., 1988, Nature 335:256-259 (Non-Patent Document 1); McCune et al., 1988, Science 241:1632-1639 (Non-Patent Document 2); Kamel-Reid and Dick, 1988, Science 242:1706-1709 (Non-Patent Document 3)) and have since undergone a series of improvements (Legrand et al., 2006, Journal of Immunology 176:2053-2058 (Non-Patent Document 4); Shultz et al., 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology 7:118-130 (Non-Patent Document 5)). The mouse strains currently used as recipients for the engraftment of the human hematopoietic system share three characteristics. First, they lack B and T cells due to a Scid mutation in the gene encoding the PRKDC protein (Mosier et al., 1988, Nature 335:256-259 (Non-Patent Document 1); McCune et al., 1988, Science 241:1632-1639 (Non-Patent Document 2)) or due to a deletion of one of the two Rag genes (Shultz et al., 2000, Journal of immunology 164:2496-2507 (Non-Patent Document 6); Traggiai et al., 2004, Science 304:104-107 (Non-Patent Document 7)). Second, they lack the common gamma chain of the cytokine receptor (γ cDeletion or mutation of the Il2rg gene, which encodes the Il2rg gene, abolishes IL-15 signaling, resulting in the absence of NK cells (Traggiai et al., 2004, Science 304:104-107 (Non-Patent Document 7); Ito et al. 2002, Blood 100:3175-3182 (Non-Patent Document 8)). Third, the interaction between the SIRPA receptor expressed on mouse macrophages and the CD47 ligand on human cells provides an inhibitory signal to mouse macrophages, conferring phagocytic tolerance to human xenografts (Takenaka et al., 2007, Nature Immunology 8:1313-1323 (Non-Patent Document 9); Takizawa & Manz, 2007, Nature Immunology 8:1287-1289 (Non-Patent Document 10)). When using the NOD genetic background containing natural polymorphisms in the Sirpa gene (Takenaka et al., 2007, Nature Immunology 8:1313-1323 (Non-Patent Document 9); Takizawa & Manz, 2007, Nature Immunology 8:1287-1289 (Non-Patent Document 10); Legrand et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13224-13229 (Non-Patent Document 11)), or by BAC transgenic expression of the human SIRPA gene (Strowig et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13218-13223 (Non-Patent Document 12)), cross-species interactions between SIRPA expressed on mouse cells and human CD47 are achieved. c - / - (NOG (Ito et al. 2002, Blood 100:3175-3182 (Non-Patent Document 8)) or NSG (Ishikawa et al., 2005, Blood 106:1565-1573 (Non-Patent Document 13)) mice or hSIRPA tg RAG2 - / - Gamma c - / -(SRG (Strowig et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13218-13223) (Non-Patent Document 12)) When mice are used as recipients, human HSPC transplantation achieves high levels of human hematopoietic cell engraftment.

[0004] In these recipient strains, human multilineage hematopoietic development is observed, but terminal differentiation, homeostasis, and / or effector function of most human cell types is suboptimal. This condition is hypothesized to be due to reduced or absent cross-reactivity between cytokines secreted by mouse tissues and human receptors expressed on hematopoietic cells (Manz, 2007, Immunity 26:537-541; Willinger et al., 2011, Trends in Immunology 32:321-327). To overcome this limitation, several strategies have been developed to deliver human cytokines to mouse hosts. These methods include injection of recombinant cytokines (Lapidot et al., 1992, Science 255:1137-1141 (Non-Patent Document 16); van Lent et al., 2009, J. Immunol 183:7645-7655 (Non-Patent Document 17)), lentiviral delivery of cDNA encoding cytokines (O'Connell et al., 2010, PloS One 5(8):e12009 (Non-Patent Document 18)), hydrodynamic injection of plasmid DNA (Chen et al., 2009, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:21783-21788 (Non-Patent Document 19)), transgenic expression of cDNA (Nicolini et al., et al., 2004, Leukemia 18(2):341-347 (Non-Patent Document 20); Brehm et al., 2012, Blood 119:2778-2788 (Non-Patent Document 21); Takagi et al., 2012, Blood 119:2768-2777 (Non-Patent Document 22)), or knock-in replacement of genes encoding cytokines (Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2378-2383 (Non-Patent Document 23); Willinger et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2390-2395 (Non-Patent Document 24); Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118:3119-3128 (Non-Patent Document 25)).The latter approach has the advantage of a more physiological expression of the human gene, and furthermore, if the human cytokine is not fully cross-reactive to the mouse receptor, it can induce defects in the mouse cell population, conferring an additional competitive advantage to the human cells. Humanization of the gene encoding thrombopoietin (Tpo) using a knock-in gene replacement strategy resulted in better maintenance of functional human hematopoietic stem cells and increased engraftment in bone marrow (Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2378-2383 (Non-Patent Document 23)); replacement of genes encoding interleukin-3 and GM-CSF (Il3 and Csf2) induced loss of mouse alveolar macrophages (AMs) and development of functional human AMs (Willinger et al., 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2390-2395 (Non-Patent Document 24)); replacement of the Csf1 gene encoding M-CSF resulted in increased numbers of human monocytes in multiple tissues (Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118:3119-3128 (Non-Patent Document 25)).

[0005] The human and mouse hematopoietic lymphoid systems differ in many aspects (Haley, 2003, Toxicology 188:49-71 (Non-Patent Document 26); Mestas & Hughes, 2004, J Immunol 172:2731-2738 (Non-Patent Document 27)). One of the major differences between the two species is in the white blood cell (WBC) percentage. Human blood is rich in myeloid cells, which account for 50-75% of the total WBC. In contrast, in mouse blood, lymphocytes predominate, with only 20-30% of the WBC being of the myeloid lineage. This species difference, the functional and evolutionary significance of which is not understood, is not recapitulated in conventional HHLS mice such as NOG / NSG or SRG. Indeed, in these hosts, the development of the human myeloid system is particularly defective, with myeloid cells accounting for only 5-10% of the human WBC.

[0006] One application of mice with a functional human immune system is the development and testing of human vaccines. Historically, induction of immune responses in vivo has been relatively inefficient (2004, Traggiai et al., Science 304:104-107 (Non-Patent Document 7); 2002, Ito et al., Blood 100:3175-3182 (Non-Patent Document 8); 2005, Ishikawa et al., Blood 106:1565-1573 (Non-Patent Document 13); 2005, Shultz et al., J Immunol 174:6477-6489 (Non-Patent Document 28); 2006, Baenziger et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15951-15956 (Non-Patent Document 29)). Several studies have reported successful pathogen-specific immune responses during infection. Upon dengue virus infection, approximately 50% of mice were reported to produce virus-specific IgM and IgG (2007, Kuruvilla et al. Virology 369:143-152 (Non-Patent Document 30)), whereas other studies reported that the frequency of mice producing antigen-specific IgM and IgG after HIV and EBV infection was less than 20% (2006, Baenziger et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15951-15956 (Non-Patent Document 29); 2008, Yajima et al., J Infect Dis 198:673-682 (Non-Patent Document 31)).Antigen-specific immunoglobulin class switching upon immunization with adjuvant and antigen has also historically been inefficient, with only a portion of immunized animals displaying antigen-specific IgG responses (2004, Traggiai et al., Science 304:104-107 (Non-Patent Document 7); 2002, Ito et al., Blood 100:3175-3182 (Non-Patent Document 8); 2005, Ishikawa et al., Blood 106:1565-1573 (Non-Patent Document 13); 2005, Shultz et al., J Immunol 174:6477-6489 (Non-Patent Document 28); 2009, Watanabe et al., Int Immunol 21:843-858 (Non-Patent Document 32); 2010, Becker et al., PLoS ONE 5 (Non-Patent Document 33)). These studies were performed in NSG mice and BALB / c RAG2 mice. - / - Gamma c - / - Mice, as well as various adjuvant / antigen combinations.

[0007] There is a need in the art for humanized non-human animals that are capable of supporting and sustaining the engraftment of human hematopoietic cells. The present invention addresses this unmet need in the art. [Prior art documents] [Non-patent literature]

[0008] [Non-Patent Document 1] Mosier et al., 1988, Nature 335:256-259 [Non-Patent Document 2] McCune et al., 1988, Science 241:1632-1639 [Non-Patent Document 3] Kamel-Reid and Dick,1988,Science 242:1706-1709 [Non-Patent Document 4] Legrand et al.,2006,Journal of Immunology 176:2053-2058

Non-licensed Document 5

Non-licensed Document 6

Non-licensed Document 7

Non-licensed literature 9

Non-licensed literature 10

Non-licensed Document 11

Non-licensed Document 12

Non-licensed Document 13

Non-licensed Document 14

Non-licensed Document 15

Non-licensed Document 16

Non-licensed Document 17

Non-licensed Document 18

Non-licensed Document 19

Non-licensed Document 20

Non-licensed Document 21

Non-licensed Document 22

Non-licensed Document 23

Non-licensed Document 24

Non-licensed Document 25

Non-licensed Document 26

Non-licensed Document 27

Non-licensed Document 28

Non-Patent Document 29

Non-Patent Document 30

Non-Patent Document 31

Non-Patent Document 32

Non-Patent Document 33

Summary of the Invention

[0009] The present invention generally relates to genetically modified non-human animals that express at least one of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO, and methods of use thereof. Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention is a genetically modified non-human animal that comprises a genome that includes at least one nucleic acid encoding at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO operably linked to a promoter, and expresses at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. In another embodiment, the invention is a genetically modified non-human animal comprising a genome including a nucleic acid encoding human M-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human IL-3, a nucleic acid encoding human GM-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human SIRPA, and a nucleic acid encoding human TPO, each operably linked to a promoter, and expressing a human M-CSF polypeptide, a human IL-3 polypeptide, a human GM-CSF polypeptide, a human SIRPA polypeptide, and a human TPO polypeptide. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal is immunodeficient. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal does not express recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2- / -). In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal does not express IL2 receptor gamma chain (gamma chain- / -). In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal does not express Rag-2 and does not express IL2 receptor gamma chain (Rag-2- / - gamma chain- / -). In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal is a rodent. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal is a mouse. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal also comprises at least one human hematopoietic cell. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal also comprises at least one human cancer cell. In some embodiments, the human cancer cell is a leukemia cell or a melanoma cell.

[0010] In another embodiment, the invention is a method of hematopoietic stem / progenitor cell (HSPC) engraftment in a genetically modified non-human animal expressing at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO, comprising administering at least one HSPC to a genetically modified animal expressing at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. In some embodiments, the HSPC is a human HSPC. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal is a rodent. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal is a mouse. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal is immunodeficient. In one embodiment, the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal does not express recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2- / -). In one embodiment, the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal does not express endogenous IL2 receptor (gamma chain- / -). In one embodiment, the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal does not express endogenous Rag-2 and does not express endogenous gamma chain (Rag-2- / - gamma chain- / -). In one embodiment, the genetically modified animal comprises a human cancer cell. In one embodiment, the human cancer cell is a leukemia cell or a melanoma cell.

[0011] In another embodiment, the present invention is a genetically modified Rag-2- / - gamma chain- / - mouse having a genome comprising at least one nucleic acid encoding at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO operably linked to at least one promoter, and expressing at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal comprises a genome comprising a nucleic acid encoding human M-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human IL-3, a nucleic acid encoding human GM-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human SIRPA, and a nucleic acid encoding human TPO, each operably linked to a promoter, and expresses a human M-CSF polypeptide, a human IL-3 polypeptide, a human GM-CSF polypeptide, a human SIRPA polypeptide, and a human TPO polypeptide. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal is a rodent. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal is a mouse. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal further comprises human hematopoietic cells. In one embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal comprises human cancer cells. In some embodiments, the human cancer cells are leukemia cells or melanoma cells.

[0012] [The present invention 1001] A genetically modified non-human animal comprising a genome comprising at least one nucleic acid encoding at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO operably linked to a promoter, and expressing at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. [The present invention 1002] The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention 1001, comprising a genome comprising a nucleic acid encoding human M-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human IL-3, a nucleic acid encoding human GM-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human SIRPA, and a nucleic acid encoding human TPO, each operably linked to a promoter, and expressing a human M-CSF polypeptide, a human IL-3 polypeptide, a human GM-CSF polypeptide, a human SIRPA polypeptide, and a human TPO polypeptide. [The present invention 1003] 1001. The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention, which is immunodeficient. [The present invention 1004] Does not express recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2 - / - ), the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal of the present invention 1003. [The present invention 1005] Does not express IL2 receptor γ chain (γ chain - / - ), the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal of the present invention 1003. [The present invention 1006] Does not express Rag-2 and does not express the IL2 receptor γ chain (Rag-2 - / - Gamma chain - / - ), the genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal of the present invention 1003. [The present invention 1007] The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention 1001 which is a rodent. [The present invention 1008] The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention 1001, which is a mouse. [The present invention 1009] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1001 further comprising human hematopoietic cells. [The present invention 1010] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1001 further comprising human cancer cells. [The present invention 1011] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1010, wherein the human cancer cells are leukemia cells or melanoma cells. [The present invention 1012] 1. A method for hematopoietic stem / progenitor cell (HSPC) engraftment in a genetically modified non-human animal expressing at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO, comprising administering at least one HSPC to a genetically modified animal expressing at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. [The present invention 1013] The method of claim 1012, wherein the genetically modified non-human animal is a rodent. [The present invention 1014] The method of claim 10, wherein the genetically modified non-human animal is a mouse. [The present invention 1015] The method of claim 1012, wherein the genetically modified non-human animal is immunodeficient. [The present invention 1016] Genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animals fail to express recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2) - / - ), the method of the present invention 1015. [The present invention 1017] Genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animals do not express endogenous IL2 receptor (γ chain - / - ), the method of the present invention 1015. [The present invention 1018] A genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal does not express endogenous Rag-2 and does not express endogenous γ chain (Rag-2 - / - Gamma chain - / - ), the method of the present invention 1015. [The present invention 1019] The method of claim 1012, wherein the genetically modified animal comprises a human cancer cell. [The present invention 1020] The method of claim 1019, wherein the human cancer cell is a leukemia cell or a melanoma cell. [The present invention 1021] A genetically modified Rag-2 having a genome comprising at least one nucleic acid encoding at least one of the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO, operably linked to at least one promoter, and expressing at least one polypeptide selected from the group consisting of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO. - / - Gamma chain - / - mouse. [The present invention 1022] 1021. A genetically modified non-human animal of the invention, comprising a genome comprising a nucleic acid encoding human M-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human IL-3, a nucleic acid encoding human GM-CSF, a nucleic acid encoding human SIRPA, and a nucleic acid encoding human TPO, each operably linked to a promoter, and expressing a human M-CSF polypeptide, a human IL-3 polypeptide, a human GM-CSF polypeptide, a human SIRPA polypeptide, and a human TPO polypeptide. [The present invention 1023] The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention 1021 which is a rodent. [The present invention 1024] The genetically modified non-human animal of the present invention 1021 which is a mouse. [The present invention 1025] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1021 further comprising human hematopoietic cells. [The present invention 1026] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1021 further comprising human cancer cells. [The present invention 1027] The genetically modified animal of the present invention 1026, wherein the human cancer cells are leukemia cells or melanoma cells. The following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention will be better understood when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there are shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities of the embodiments shown in the drawings. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0013] [Figure 1A] Figure 1, including Figures 1A-1E, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating that MISTRG mice support high levels of human hematopoietic engraftment. X-ray pretreated neonatal mice of the indicated strains were engrafted with 100,000 human fetal liver- (FL-) CD34+ cells by intrahepatic injection. Human engraftment levels (hCD45+ cells) were measured in the blood after 7-9 weeks and in the BM after 10-12 weeks. (Figure 1A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of the frequency of mouse and human CD45+ cells in the blood and BM of the indicated recipient mice. Numbers next to the gated areas indicate the percentage of total CD45+ cells. (Figure 1B) Combined blood engraftment levels (%hCD45+ cells) data from 19 independent experiments. In each experiment, a single FL-CD34+ cell sample was split and injected into mice of the respective strain. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and the red bars indicate the mean (n = 56–155; ns, non-significant; * p < 0.05 Tukey's test (see Figure 6 for full statistical analysis). The grey horizontal line indicates 10% hCD45+ cells. (Figure 1C) Engraftment levels in the BM of a representative subset of mice (Figure 6C) from panel (Figure 6B) (n = 12–16; * p < 0.05 (Tukey's test; see also Figures 6D-6E). (Figure 1D) Representative flow cytometry analysis of hCD45+ cell engraftment in blood and BM 3 months after intrahepatic injection of 200,000 FL-CD34+ cells into unirradiated neonatal MISTRG mice. (Figure 1E) Human CD45+ cell engraftment levels in blood and BM of MISTRG mice transplanted as in (Figure 1D) (n=16). In this case, the BM of all mice (including mice with blood hCD45+<10%) is shown. [Figure 1B] As described in the legend to Figure 1A. [Figure 1C] As described in the legend to Figure 1A. [Figure 1D] As described in the legend to Figure 1A. [Figure 1E] As described in the legend to Figure 1A. [Figure 2A] Figure 2, including Figures 2A-2K, shows the results of experiments demonstrating that MISTRG mice support efficient myeloid development and maintenance in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues. (Figure 2A) Percentage of human myeloid cells (hCD33+) among human hematopoietic cells (hCD45+) in the blood of the indicated recipient mice engrafted with FL-CD34+ cells by intrahepatic injection after pretreatment with X-rays at neonatal age. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and the red bars indicate the mean (n=20-113; statistical analysis is shown in Figure 7A). (Figure 2B) Human WBC composition in the same mice (n=20-113 mice / group; n=8 human donors; error bars indicate SEM). (Figure 2C) Immunohistological staining of human myeloid cells (hCD68+) in non-lymphoid tissues of the indicated recipient mice. Black bars represent 20 μm, and the images shown are representative of at least three analyzed mice in each group. (Figure 2D and Figure 2E) Representative flow cytometry analysis (Figure 2D) and frequency (Figure 2E) of human monocyte subsets identified by expression of CD14 and CD16 among hCD45+CD33+ cells in the blood of recipient mice (n = 8-12 mice / group; error bars indicate SEM). (Figure 2F and Figure 2G) Cytokine production by human monocytes isolated from the BM of MITRG recipients and stimulated in vitro with LPS (Figure 2F) or R848 (Figure 2G) (error bars indicate SD of triplicates; representative of three independent experiments). (Figure 2H) In vitro phagocytosis of GFP-expressing E. coli by human cells present in the blood of MITRG mice (n = 7). (Figures 2I, 2J, 2K) In vivo cytokine production measured by ELISA in serum or RT-PCR in lungs from mice treated with LPS (Figure I; 90 min, n=15–18), infected with Listeria monocytogenes (Figure 2J; day 2, n=6–15), or infected with Influenza A / PR8 H1N1 (Figure 2K; day 3, n=3–5). (Figures 2A, 2J, 2K) p-values ​​calculated by Tukey's post-hoc test after one-way ANOVA (*p<0.05); (Figure 2I) p-values ​​calculated by unpaired Student's t-test on log10 transformed values. [Figure 2B] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2C] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2D] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2E] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2F] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2G] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2H] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2I] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2J] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 2K] As described in the legend to Figure 2A. [Figure 3A]Figure 3, including Figures 3A-3I, shows the results of experiments demonstrating that MISTRG mice efficiently support human NK cell development and function. (Figure 3A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of human IL-15 and human IL-15Rα mRNA expression in the liver of engrafted NSG mice, engrafted MITRG mice, and engrafted MISTRG mice (n=7-8; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). Expression was normalized to mouse Hprt. (Figure 3B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of human IL-15 and human IL-15Rα mRNA expression in human cell populations purified from the bone marrow of engrafted MITRG mice (n=4-5, error bars indicate SEM). Expression was normalized to human HPRT and is shown relative to hCD14+hCD16- cells. (Figure 3C and Figure 3D) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) in engrafted NSG, engrafted MITRG, and engrafted MISTRG (hCD45+mCD45- cells, gated against lymphocyte gate; numbers next to outlined areas indicate percentages of cells) (Figure 3C) and absolute numbers or frequencies (Figure 3D) (n=8-16; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). (Figure 3E) Absolute numbers of human hepatic NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) and T cells (hCD3+, shown as control) from engrafted MISTRG mice that were left untreated or treated for three consecutive days with liposomally encapsulated clodronate to deplete phagocytes (n=8; p-values ​​calculated by unpaired Student's t-test; ns, non-significant). (Figure 3F) Labeled LCL721.221 (HLA class I negative) and LCL721.45 (class I positive) cells were injected intravenously at a 1:1 ratio, and the percentage of HLA class I positive or negative labeled cells recovered 12 hours later in the spleen was used to calculate specific NK cell cytotoxicity (n=8, p-value calculated by unpaired Student's t-test). (Figure 3G) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of human IFNγ mRNA expression in the liver of NSG and MISTRG mice 2 days after Listeria infection (n=8-9, p-value calculated by unpaired Student's t-test).Expression was normalized to mouse Hprt. (Figure 3H and Figure 3I) Representative flow cytometry analysis (Figure 3H) and frequency (Figure 3I) of IFNγ-expressing degranulated (CD107a+) human hepatic NK cells from uninfected or Listeria-infected NSG and MISTRG mice (n = 4–11; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA). Results are combined from two (Figure 3A, 3E–3I), three (Figure 3B), or four (Figure 3C, 3D) experiments. [Figure 3B] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3C] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3D] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3E] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3F] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3G] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3H] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 3I] As described in the legend to Figure 3A. [Figure 4A]Figure 4, including Figures 4A-4F, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating that human myeloid cells infiltrate and support the growth of tumors in MISTRG. Engrafted and non-engrafted NSG and MISTRG mice were implanted with the human melanoma cell line Me290 in the flank. Some mice were treated with the VEGF inhibitor Avastin™. Tumors were measured 11 days later and dissected for analysis. (Figure 4A) Infiltration of human hematopoietic cells into tumors as determined by expression of mRNA encoding human hematopoietic marker (PTPRC encoding CD45) and myeloid marker (ITGAM encoding CD11b) (n=6-7; p-value calculated by unpaired Student's t-test). (Figure 4B and Figure 4D) Representative immunohistochemistry images of human myeloid cell markers in tumors from NSG, MISTRG, and patients. (Figure 4C) Quantification of the density of CD163+ cells (n=3 samples / group, 3 slides were counted for each sample). (Figure 4E and Figure 4F) Representative images (Figure 4E) and volumes (Figure 4F) of tumors in the indicated groups of mice (n = 7–24 mice / group). p values ​​were calculated by Student's t-test (Figure 4A) or Tukey's post-hoc test following one-way ANOVA (Figure 4C, 4E) (* p < 0.05). [Figure 4B] As described in the legend to Figure 4A. [Figure 4C] As described in the legend to Figure 4A. [Figure 4D] As described in the legend to Figure 4A. [Figure 4E] As described in the legend to Figure 4A. [Figure 4F] As described in the legend to Figure 4A. [Diagram 5]Cytokines involved in HSC function and myeloid development are shown. Schematic of hematopoietic stem cell development into myeloid cells and a non-exhaustive list of cytokines known to regulate this process. Shading indicates the percentage of amino acid identity between human and mouse cytokines. Percentage of amino acid identity is the most objective measure of protein conservation between species, but does not necessarily correlate with functional cross-species cross-reactivity in vivo. Black rectangles indicate cytokines genetically humanized in MISTRG. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; MPP, multipotent progenitor; CMP, common myeloid progenitor; GMP, granulocyte / macrophage progenitor; MEP, megakaryocyte / erythroid progenitor. [Figure 6A] Figure 6, including Figures 6A-6E, shows the results of statistical analysis of engraftment levels in recipient mice. (Figure 6A) Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test; ns, non-significant) of the data presented in Figure 1A (percentage of hCD45+ cells in the blood of recipient mice). (Figure 6B) Number of recipient mice reaching an engraftment level of at least 10% blood hCD45+ cells 7-9 weeks after transplantation. (Figure 6C) Blood engraftment levels of mice used in Figure 1C for analysis of BM. (Figure 6D) Statistical analysis similar to (Figure 6A) of the data presented in Figure 1C (percentage of hCD45+ cells in the BM of recipient mice). (Figure 6E) Absolute number of hCD45+ cells in the BM (2 femurs and 2 tibias) of recipient mice shown in Figure 1C. The reduced number of cells in the BM of MISTRG is due to the smaller size of the mice at that age (10-12 weeks after transplantation) and is caused by the first clinical signs of anemia detailed in Figure 10. [Figure 6B] As described in the legend to Figure 6A. [Figure 6C] As described in the legend to Figure 6A. [Figure 6D] As described in the legend to Figure 6A. [Figure 6E] As described in the legend to Figure 6A. [Figure 7A]Figure 7, including Figures 7A-7H, shows the results of experiments assessing enhanced human myeloid development in MISTRG mice. (Figure 7A) Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test; ns, non-significant) of the data presented in Figure 2A (percentage of hCD33+ cells in the blood of recipient mice). (Figure 7B and Figure 7C) Frequency (Figure 7B) and statistical analysis (Figure 7C) of human myeloid cells (hCD33+) in the BM of recipient mice. (Figure 7D) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human lymphoid and myeloid lineages in the blood of MISTRG. (Figure 7E and Figure 7F) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human monocytes (CD33hiSSCloCD66-) and granulocytes (CD33+SSChiCD66+) in the BM (Figure 7E) and blood (Figure 7F) of MISTRG and human donors. (Figure 7G and Figure 7H) Absolute numbers of human myeloid cells (hCD33+) in the lungs (Figure 7G) and livers (Figure 7H) of recipient mice (n = 8-12; p values ​​calculated by Tukey's post-hoc test following one-way ANOVA, *p<0.05). [Figure 7B] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7C] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7D] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7E] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7F] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7G] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 7H] As described in the legend to Figure 7A. [Figure 8A]Figure 8, including Figures 8A and 8B, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating enhanced development of human monocyte subsets in MISTRG mice. (Figure 8A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human monocyte subsets identified by expression of CD14 and CD16 in hCD45+CD33+ cells in the BM, spleen, lung, and liver of the indicated recipient mice. (Figure 8B) Frequency (error bars represent SEM) and absolute numbers of monocyte subsets in hCD33+ cells in the lung and liver of recipient mice (n=12 mice / group; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). [Figure 8B] As described in the legend to Figure 8A. [Figure 9A] Figure 9, including Figures 9A and 9B, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating that human monocyte subsets are similar in MISTRG and human donors. Expanded immunophenotyping of the indicated subsets of human monocytes in the blood (Figure 9A) and BM (Figure 9B) of MISTRG recipients and human donors. Staining with isotype control and specific antibodies is shown. [Figure 9B] As described in the legend to Figure 9A. [Figure 10A]Figure 10, including Figures 10A-10I, shows the results of experiments demonstrating that human myeloid cells break through human-mouse phagocytic tolerance. (Figure 10A) Mouse RBCs labeled with CFSE were transferred into the indicated mice, and the frequency of labeled cells was measured at the indicated time points. (Figure 10B) Engrafted MISTRG were transferred with mouse RBCs labeled with CFSE, either pretreated or not with clodronic acid to deplete phagocytes, and monitored as in (Figure 10A) (p-values, clodronic acid effect measured by repeated measures ANOVA for 1-3 days). These results show that transferred mouse RBCs are rapidly cleared in vivo by phagocytes present in MISTRG, but not in NSG. (Figure 10C) RBC counts in the blood of non-engrafted mice (n=9-15) or 8-10 weeks after engraftment of human FL-CD34+ cells (n=11-37). p values ​​indicate comparison between non-engrafted and engrafted mice of each genotype (paired Student's t test). (Figure 10D) Correlation between human engraftment levels (percentage of hCD45+ cells in blood) and RBC counts (n=13-22). (Figure 10E) Flow cytometry analysis of mouse (mTer119+) and human (hCD235a+) red blood cells in the blood of non-engrafted MISTRG or engrafted MISTRG showing that red blood cells in the blood of engrafted MISTRG are almost entirely of mouse origin, with human red blood cells being nearly undetectable. (Figure 10F) Representative photographs and spleen weights of engrafted mice (n=3-22) of the indicated strains showing splenomegaly in engrafted MISTRG mice. Spleens from Balb / c mice were used as controls (p values, one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 compared to all other groups, Tukey's post-hoc test). (FIG. 10G) Histological cross-sections of engrafted NSG and engrafted MISTRG spleens stained by H&E illustrating the expansion of red pulp in MISTRG mice with splenomegaly. (FIG. 10H) Flow cytometry analysis of mouse erythroid progenitors (mTer119+mCD71+) accounting for up to 80% of cells in the spleens of engrafted MISTRG. (FIG. 10I) Blood smears of non-engrafted and engrafted MISTRG illustrate enrichment of reticulocytes.Taken together, these results strongly suggest that anemia in MISTRG is due to a lack of human-mouse phagocytic tolerance and that massive extramedullary mouse erythropoiesis cannot compensate for the destruction of mRBCs. Results are representative of at least five mice investigated in each group (Figures 10C, 10E-10I) and two independent experiments (Figures 10A, 10B). [Figure 10B] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10C] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10D] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10E] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10F] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10G] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10H] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 10I] As described in the legend to FIG. 10A. [Figure 11] Figure 11, including Figures 11A and 11B, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating that MISTRG mice deliver human IL-15 / IL-15Rα. (Figure 11A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of human IL-15 and human IL-15Rα mRNA expression in the lungs of engrafted NSG mice, engrafted MITRG mice, and engrafted MISTRG mice (n=7-8; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). Expression was normalized to mouse Hprt. (Figure 11B) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-15Rα expression in human cell populations (hCD45+mCD45-) derived from the blood of engrafted MISTRG mice (representative of n=4). Histograms represent staining with isotype control or IL-15Rα antibody, respectively. Results are representative of two experiments or combined. [Figure 12A]Figure 12, including Figures 12A and 12B, shows the results of an experiment demonstrating enhanced human NK cell development in MISTRG mice. (Figures 12A and 12B) Frequency (Figure 12A) and absolute numbers (Figure 12B) of human NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) in engrafted NSG mice, engrafted MITRG mice, and engrafted MISTRG mice (n=8-16; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). Results are combined from four experiments. [Figure 12B] As described in the legend to Figure 12A. [Figure 13A] Figure 13, including Figures 13A-13F, shows the results of experiments demonstrating that true human NK cells exhibiting enhanced maturation are present in MISTRG mice. (Figure 13A) Flow cytometric analysis of CD94 and CD161 expression on human blood NK cells derived from human donors and engrafted MISTRG (n=3). Histograms represent staining with isotype control Ab or CD94 / CD161 Ab. (Figure 13B) Flow cytometric analysis of KIR expression on human blood NK cells from human donors or engrafted MISTRG mice (n=3). Numbers indicate the frequency of KIR+ cells. (Figure 13C and Figure 13D) CD16 surface expression on human NK cells from engrafted NSG mice, engrafted MITRG mice, and engrafted MISTRG mice (n=4-8; p-values ​​calculated by one-way ANOVA; *p<0.05 Tukey's post-hoc test). (Figure 13E and Figure 13F) Intracellular perforin expression by human liver NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) and T cells (hCD3+) derived from engrafted NSG and MISTRG mice (n=3; p-values ​​calculated by unpaired Student's t-test). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Results are representative or combined from one (Figure 13A and Figure 13B), two (Figure 13E and Figure 13F), or four (Figure 13C and Figure 13D) experiments. [Figure 13B] As described in the legend to Figure 13A. [Figure 13C] As described in the legend to Figure 13A. [Figure 13D] As described in the legend to Figure 13A. [Figure 13E] As described in the legend to Figure 13A. [Figure 13F] As described in the legend to Figure 13A. [Figure 14] Figure 1 shows the results of an experiment demonstrating the effect of human monocyte / macrophage depletion on human NK cell homeostasis in MISTRG mice. Engrafted MISTRG mice were left untreated or treated with liposomally encapsulated clodronate for three consecutive days to deplete phagocytes. Flow cytometry analysis of human monocytes / macrophages (upper panel, gated on hCD33+ cells) and NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) in the liver (n=8) is shown. Results are representative of two experiments. In one of eight mice, clodronate depletion of monocytes / macrophages was not effective and no reduction in NK cell numbers was observed in that mouse. [Figure 15] 1 shows the results of an experiment demonstrating immunohistochemistry of human myeloid cells infiltrating melanoma. Representative immunohistochemical staining of human myeloid cells in tumors from NSG, MISTRG, or human patients. Three subjects per group and three images per subject are shown. [Figure 16] Comparison of engraftment levels and immune cell development and function in recipient mice with single gene exchange, NSG, MISTRG, and humans is shown. [Figure 17]FIG. 17, including FIGS. 17A-17D, shows the results of experiments demonstrating that samples isolated from patients with AML, CMML, and MDS can be engrafted into MISTRG. (FIG. 17A) Characteristics of the samples used (including the type of disease and genetic abnormalities found in the patient samples), the experimental protocol (method of cell purification, number of cells injected into each mouse, and time point after transplantation at which the mice were analyzed), and engraftment results (including number of mice with detectable human engraftment, percentage of human hematopoietic CD45+ cells and myeloid CD33+ cells, and genomic abnormalities observed in human cells isolated from the mice). (FIG. 17B) Representative flow cytometry analysis of granularity (SSC) of myeloid CD33+ cells isolated from mice transplanted with cells from RAEB I patients or normal donors showing reduced granularity in RAEB I samples. (FIG. 17C) Representative FISH analysis of human cells isolated from mice transplanted with RAEB II samples showing loss of chromosome 5q. (Figure 17D) Karyotype of human cells isolated from mice transplanted with CMML samples and showing a deletion of chromosome 6. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0014] Detailed Description The present invention generally relates to genetically modified non-human animals that express at least one of human M-CSF, human IL-3, human GM-CSF, human SIRPA, or human TPO. The present invention also relates to methods of generating and using the genetically modified non-human animals described herein. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals are mice. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals described herein are engrafted with human hematopoietic cells. In various embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals engrafted with the human hematopoietic cells of the invention are useful for in vivo evaluation of hematopoietic and immune cell proliferation and differentiation, for in vivo evaluation of the human hematopoietic system, for in vivo evaluation of cancer cells, for in vivo assessment of immune responses, for in vivo evaluation of vaccines and vaccination regimens, for use in testing the effect of agents that modulate cancer cell proliferation or survival, for in vivo evaluation of cancer treatments, for in vivo generation and collection of immune mediators, including human antibodies, and for use in testing the effect of agents that modulate hematopoietic and immune cell function.

[0015] definition Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Such terms are found, defined, and used in context in a variety of standard reference texts, including, by way of example, J. Sambrook and DW Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 3rd Ed., 2001; FMA Russell, Ed., Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, Current Protocols; 5th Ed., 2002; B. Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th Ed., Garland, 2002; DL Nelson and MMCox, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th Ed., WH Freeman & Company, 2004; and Herdewijn, P. (Ed.), Oligonucleotide Synthesis: Methods and Applications, Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana Press, 2004. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are described.

[0016] As used herein, each of the following terms has the meaning associated with it in this section.

[0017] The articles "a" and "an" are used herein to refer to one or to more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. For example, "an element" means one element or more than one element.

[0018] "About," as used herein, when referring to a measurable value such as an amount, duration, etc., is meant to encompass variations of ±20% or ±10%, more preferably ±5%, even more preferably ±1%, and even more preferably ±0.1% from the specified value, as such variations are appropriate for performing the disclosed methods.

[0019] The term "abnormal," when used with respect to an organism, tissue, cell, or component thereof, refers to an organism, tissue, cell, or component thereof that differs in at least one observable or detectable characteristic (e.g., age, treatment, time, etc.) from the organism, tissue, cell, or component thereof that exhibits the "normal" (expected) respective characteristic. A characteristic that is normal or expected for one cell or tissue type may be abnormal for a different cell or tissue type.

[0020] The term "antibody," as used herein, refers to an immunoglobulin molecule capable of specifically binding to a specific epitope on an antigen. An antibody may be an intact immunoglobulin derived from natural or recombinant sources or may be an immunoreactive portion of an intact immunoglobulin. Antibodies in the present invention can exist in a variety of forms, including, for example, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, intracellular antibodies ("intrabodies"), Fv, Fab, and F(ab)2, as well as single chain antibodies (scFv), heavy chain antibodies such as camelid antibodies, and humanized antibodies (Harlow et al., 1999, Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY; Harlow et al., 1989, Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Houston et al., 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883; Bird et al., 1988, Science 242:423-426).

[0021] The term "cancer", as used herein, is defined as a disease characterized by unregulated proliferation and / or growth of abnormal cells. Cancer cells can spread locally or through the bloodstream and lymphatic system to other body parts. As used herein, cancer includes both solid tumors and hematopoietic malignancies. Examples of various cancers to which the present invention is applicable include, but are not limited to, breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, skin cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, bone cancer, brain cancer, lymphoma, leukemia, lung cancer, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorder, etc.

[0022] "Constitutive" expression is the state in which a gene product is produced in a living cell under most or all physiological conditions of the cell.

[0023] The "coding region" of a gene consists of nucleotide residues of the coding strand of the gene and nucleotides of the non-coding strand of the gene that are homologous or complementary, respectively, to the coding region of the mRNA molecule produced by transcription of the gene.

[0024] A "coding region" of an mRNA molecule also consists of nucleotide residues of the mRNA molecule that pair with the anticodon region of a transfer RNA molecule during translation of the mRNA molecule, or that code for a stop codon. Thus, a coding region can include nucleotide residues that constitute codons for amino acid residues that are not present in the mature protein encoded by the mRNA molecule (e.g., amino acid residues in a protein export signal sequence).

[0025] A "disease" is a state of an animal's health in which the animal is unable to maintain homeostasis and, if the disease is not remitted, the animal's health continues to deteriorate.

[0026] In contrast, a "disorder" in an animal is a state of health in which the animal is able to maintain homeostasis, but in which the state of health of the animal is less favorable than it would be if the disorder were not present. If left untreated, the disorder does not necessarily cause a further decrease in the state of health of the animal.

[0027] A disease or disorder is "alleviated" if the severity of a symptom of the disease or disorder, the frequency with which such symptoms are experienced by the patient, or both, are reduced.

[0028] An "effective amount" or "therapeutically effective amount" of a compound is an amount of the compound sufficient to provide a beneficial effect to the subject to which the compound is administered. An "effective amount" of a delivery vehicle is an amount sufficient to effectively bind or deliver the compound.

[0029] "Encoding" refers to the inherent property of a specific sequence of nucleotides of a polynucleotide, such as a gene, cDNA, or mRNA, to serve as a template for the synthesis of other polymers and macromolecules in biological processes that have either a defined sequence of nucleotides (i.e., rRNA, tRNA, and mRNA) or a defined sequence of amino acids, and the biological properties ascribed thereto. Thus, a gene encodes a protein if transcription and translation of the mRNA corresponding to the gene produces the protein in a cell or other biological system. Both the coding strand, whose nucleotide sequence is identical to the mRNA sequence and is generally provided in a sequence listing, and the non-coding strand, which is used as a template for transcription of the gene or cDNA, can be said to encode the protein or other product of that gene or cDNA.

[0030] As used herein, "endogenous" refers to any material that is derived from or produced within an organism, cell, tissue, or system.

[0031] As used herein, the term "exogenous" refers to any material introduced from an organism, cell, tissue, or system, or produced outside of an organism, cell, tissue, or system.

[0032] The terms "expression construct" and "expression cassette" are used herein to refer to a double-stranded recombinant DNA molecule that contains a desired nucleic acid coding sequence and contains one or more regulatory elements necessary or desirable for expression of the operably linked coding sequence.

[0033] As used herein, the term "fragment" as applied to a nucleic acid or polypeptide refers to a subsequence of a larger nucleic acid or polypeptide. A "fragment" of a nucleic acid can be at least about 15 nucleotides long; e.g., at least about 50 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides; at least about 100 to about 500 nucleotides, at least about 500 to about 1000 nucleotides, at least about 1000 nucleotides to about 1500 nucleotides; or about 1500 nucleotides to about 2500 nucleotides; or about 2500 nucleotides (and any integer value in between). A "fragment" of a polypeptide can be at least about 15 nucleotides long; e.g., at least about 50 amino acids to about 100 amino acids; at least about 100 to about 500 amino acids, at least about 500 to about 1000 amino acids, at least about 1000 amino acids to about 1500 amino acids; or at least about 1500 amino acids to about 2500 amino acids; or about 2500 amino acids (and any integer value in between).

[0034] As used herein, the terms "gene" and "recombinant gene" refer to a nucleic acid molecule that contains an open reading frame encoding a polypeptide. Such natural allelic variations can typically result in 1-5% variation in the nucleotide sequence of a given gene. Alternative alleles can be identified by sequencing the gene of interest in a number of different individuals. This can be readily performed by using hybridization probes to identify identical loci in various individuals. All such nucleotide variations and resulting amino acid polymorphisms or variations that are the result of natural allelic variations and do not alter functional activity are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.

[0035] "Homologous" as used herein refers to the subunit sequence similarity between two polymeric molecules, e.g., between two nucleic acid molecules, e.g., two DNA molecules or two RNA molecules, or between two polypeptide molecules. When a subunit position is occupied by the same monomeric subunit in both of the two molecules, e.g., when a position is occupied by adenine in each of the two DNA molecules, they are homologous at that position. The homology between two sequences is a direct function of the number of positions that match or are homologous, e.g., if half of the positions in the sequences of two compounds (e.g., 5 positions in a polymer 10 subunits long) are homologous, the two sequences are 50% homologous, and if 90% of the positions, e.g., 9 out of 10, are matched or homologous, the two sequences share 90% homology. For example, the DNA sequences 5'-ATTGCC-3' and 5'-TATGGC-3' share 50% homology.

[0036] The terms "human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells" and "human HSPCs," as used herein, refer to human self-renewing, multipotent hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

[0037] "Inducible" expression is the condition in which a gene product is produced in a living cell in response to the presence of a signal in the cell.

[0038] As used herein, "instructional material" includes publications, records, diagrams, or other media of expression that can be used to inform of the usefulness of the compounds, compositions, vectors, or delivery systems of the present invention in the kits to achieve relief of various diseases or disorders as described herein. Optionally or alternatively, the instructional material can describe one or more methods of alleviating a disease or disorder in a mammalian cell or tissue. The instructional material of the kits of the present invention can be, for example, attached to a container containing the identified compounds, compositions, vectors, or delivery systems of the present invention or shipped together with a container containing the identified compounds, compositions, vectors, or delivery systems. Alternatively, the instructional material can be shipped separately from the container with the intention that the instructional material and the compounds are used cooperatively by the recipient.

[0039] The term "operably linked" as used herein refers to a polynucleotide in a functional relationship with a second polynucleotide. Describing two polynucleotides as "operably linked" means that a single-stranded or double-stranded nucleic acid portion contains two polynucleotides arranged within the nucleic acid portion in such a manner that at least one of the two polynucleotides can exert a characteristic physiological effect on the other. For example, a promoter operably linked to a coding region of a gene can promote transcription of the coding region. Preferably, when the nucleic acid encoding a desired protein further comprises a promoter / control sequence, the promoter / control sequence is located at the 5' end of the sequence encoding the desired protein to drive expression of the desired protein in the cell. The nucleic acid encoding the desired protein and its promoter / control sequence together constitute a "transgene".

[0040] The term "polynucleotide", as used herein, is defined as a chain of nucleotides. Furthermore, a nucleic acid is a polymer of nucleotides. Thus, nucleic acid and polynucleotide are interchangeable as used herein. Those skilled in the art have the general knowledge that a nucleic acid is a polynucleotide that can be hydrolyzed into monomeric "nucleotides". Monomeric nucleotides can be hydrolyzed into nucleosides. As used herein, polynucleotide includes, but is not limited to, all nucleic acid sequences obtained by any means available in the art, including, but not limited to, recombinant means, i.e., cloning of nucleic acid sequences from recombinant libraries or cell genomes using conventional cloning technology and PCR, etc., and synthetic means.

[0041] As used herein, the terms "peptide", "polypeptide" and "protein" are used interchangeably and refer to compounds composed of amino acid residues covalently linked by peptide bonds. A protein or peptide must contain at least two amino acids, and there is no limit to the maximum number of amino acids that can make up a protein or peptide sequence. A polypeptide includes any peptide or protein that contains two or more amino acids joined to each other by peptide bonds. As used herein, the term refers to both short chains, also commonly referred to in the art as, for example, peptides, oligopeptides, and oligomers, and longer chains, commonly referred to in the art as proteins, of which there are many types. "Polypeptides" include, among others, for example, biologically active fragments, substantially homologous polypeptides, oligopeptides, homodimers, heterodimers, variants of polypeptides, modified polypeptides, derivatives, analogs, fusion proteins. Polypeptides include natural peptides, recombinant peptides, synthetic peptides, or combinations thereof. The term "peptide" typically refers to short polypeptides. The term "protein" typically refers to large polypeptides.

[0042] The term "progeny" as used herein refers to descendants or offspring, including differentiated or undifferentiated progeny cells derived from a parent cell. In one usage, the term progeny refers to a descendant cell that is genetically identical to the parent. In another usage, the term progeny refers to a descendant cell that is genetically and phenotypically identical to the parent. In yet another usage, the term progeny refers to a descendant cell that is differentiated from the parent cell.

[0043] The term "promoter" as used herein refers to a DNA sequence that is operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence to be transcribed, such as a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a desired molecule. A promoter is generally located upstream of a nucleic acid sequence to be transcribed, providing a site for specific binding by RNA polymerase and other transcription factors. In a specific embodiment, a promoter is generally located upstream of a nucleic acid sequence to be transcribed to produce a desired molecule, providing a site for specific binding by RNA polymerase and other transcription factors. The promoters included may be constitutive promoters or may provide inducible expression; they may provide ubiquitous expression, tissue-specific expression, or cell type-specific expression.

[0044] Ranges: Throughout this disclosure, various aspects of the invention may be presented in a range format. It should be understood that the description in range format is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of the invention. Thus, the description of a range should be considered to specifically disclose all possible subranges and individual numerical values ​​within that range. For example, the description of a range such as 1-6 should be considered to specifically disclose subranges such as 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 2-4, 2-6, 3-6, etc., as well as individual numbers within that range, for example, 1, 2, 2.7, 3, 4, 5, 5.3, and 6. This is true regardless of the breadth of the range.

[0045] A "recombinant polypeptide" is one produced by expression of a recombinant polynucleotide.

[0046] The term "control element" as used herein refers to a nucleotide sequence that regulates some aspect of the expression of a nucleic acid sequence. Exemplary control elements include enhancers, internal ribosome entry sites (IRES), introns; origins of replication, polyadenylation signals (pA), promoters, enhancers, transcription termination sequences, and upstream control domains, which illustratively contribute to the replication, transcription, and post-transcriptional processing of nucleic acid sequences. Those skilled in the art can select these and other control elements for use in expression constructs using only routine experimentation. Expression constructs can be produced recombinantly or synthetically using well-known methodologies.

[0047] The term "specifically binds", as used herein with respect to an antibody, refers to an antibody that recognizes a specific antigen but does not substantially recognize or bind other molecules in a sample. For example, an antibody that specifically binds to an antigen from one species can also bind to that antigen from one or more species. However, such cross-species cross-reactivity does not, in itself, alter the classification of the antibody as specific. In another example, an antibody that specifically binds to an antigen can also bind to different allelic forms of the antigen. However, such cross-reactivity does not, in itself, alter the classification of the antibody as specific.

[0048] In some contexts, the terms "specific binding" or "specifically binding" can be used with respect to the interaction of an antibody, protein, or peptide with a second chemical species to mean that the interaction is dependent on the presence of a particular structure (e.g., an antigenic determinant or epitope) on the chemical species; for example, an antibody recognizes and binds to a specific protein structure rather than the entire protein. If an antibody is specific for epitope "A", then in a reaction containing labeled "A" and an antibody, the presence of a molecule containing epitope A (or free, unlabeled A) will reduce the amount of labeled A that binds to the antibody.

[0049] The term "synthetic antibody," as used herein, refers to an antibody produced using recombinant DNA technology, such as, for example, an antibody expressed by a bacteriophage as described herein. The term should also be taken to mean an antibody produced by synthesis of a DNA molecule encoding an antibody and expressing an antibody protein, or an amino acid sequence specifying an antibody, obtained using DNA or amino acid sequence synthesis technology that is available and well known in the art.

[0050] The term "variant" as used herein refers to a nucleic acid or peptide sequence that differs in sequence from a reference nucleic acid or peptide sequence, respectively, but retains the essential biological properties of the reference molecule. The sequence change of a nucleic acid variant may not change the amino acid sequence of the peptide encoded by the reference nucleic acid, or may result in amino acid substitution, addition, deletion, fusion, and truncation. The sequence change of a peptide variant is typically limited or conservative, so that the sequences of the reference peptide and the variant are generally similar and, in many regions, identical. The variant peptide and the reference peptide may differ in amino acid sequence by any combination of one or more substitutions, additions, deletions. A nucleic acid or peptide variant may be naturally occurring, such as an allelic variant, or may be a variant that is not known to occur naturally. Non-naturally occurring variants of nucleic acids and peptides may be produced by mutagenesis techniques or direct synthesis.

[0051] As used herein, the term "genetically modified" refers to an animal whose germ cells contain an exogenous human nucleic acid or human nucleic acid sequence. As a non-limiting example, a genetically modified animal can be a transgenic animal or a knock-in animal, so long as it contains a human nucleic acid sequence.

[0052] As used herein, "knock-in" refers to a genetic modification that replaces the genetic information encoded at a chromosomal locus in a non-human animal with a different DNA sequence.

[0053] explanation The present invention relates to a method for the treatment of human inflammatory bowel disease (herein referred to as MIST). M -CSF, human I L-3 / GM-CSF, human S IRPA, and Human TThe present invention relates to a genetically modified non-human animal that expresses PO. The present invention also relates to methods of generating and using the genetically modified non-human animals described herein. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal is a mouse. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal is an immunodeficient mouse. In a specific embodiment, the immunodeficient mouse expresses RAG2 - / - Gamma c - / - In another specific embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal of the invention expresses human M-CSF, human IL-3 / GM-CSF, and human TPO, and expresses RAG2 and γ c In another specific embodiment, the genetically modified non-human animal of the invention expresses human M-CSF, human IL-3 / GM-CSF, human SIRPA, and human TPO, and does not express RAG2 and γ c (referred to herein as MISTRG). In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals described herein are engrafted with human hematopoietic cells.

[0054] In various embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals engrafted with the human hematopoietic cells of the invention are useful for in vivo evaluation of hematopoietic and immune cell proliferation and differentiation, for in vivo evaluation of the human hematopoietic system, for in vivo evaluation of cancer cells, for in vivo assessment of immune responses, for in vivo evaluation of vaccines and vaccination regimens, for use in testing the effect of agents that modulate cancer cell proliferation or survival, for in vivo evaluation of cancer treatments, for in vivo generation and collection of immune mediators, including human antibodies, and for use in testing the effect of agents that modulate hematopoietic and immune cell function.

[0055] Genetically Modified Non-Human Animals The present invention includes genetically modified non-human animals that express at least one of human M-CSF, human IL-3 / GM-CSF, human SIRPA, human TPO, and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals that express a human nucleic acid also express the corresponding non-human animal nucleic acid. In other embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals that express a human nucleic acid do not express the corresponding non-human animal nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the genetically modified animals are animals in which one or more genes have been knocked out to render the animal an immunodeficient animal, as described elsewhere herein. To make a genetically modified non-human animal, a nucleic acid encoding a human protein can be incorporated into a recombinant expression vector in a form suitable for expression of the human protein in a non-human host cell. In various embodiments, the recombinant expression vector comprises one or more control sequences operably linked to the nucleic acid encoding the human protein in a manner that allows transcription of the nucleic acid into mRNA and translation of the mRNA into a human protein. The term "control sequence" is art-recognized and is intended to include promoters, enhancers, and other expression control elements (e.g., polyadenylation signals). Such control sequences are known to those of skill in the art and are described in Goeddel, Gene Expression Technology: Methods in Enzymology 185, 1990, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. It should be understood that the design of the expression vector can depend on such factors as the choice of the host cell to be transfected and / or the amount of human protein to be expressed.

[0056] Genetically modified animals can be produced, for example, by introducing a nucleic acid encoding a human protein (typically linked to an appropriate control element, such as a constitutive or tissue-specific enhancer) into an oocyte, for example, by microinjection, and allowing the oocyte to develop in a female foster animal. Intronic sequences and polyadenylation signals can also be included in the transgene to increase the efficiency of expression of the transgene. Methods for generating genetically modified animals, particularly animals such as mice, have become conventional in the art and are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,736,866 and 4,870,009, and in 1986, Hogan et al., A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Genetically modified founder animals can be used to breed additional animals carrying the transgene. Genetically modified animals carrying transgenes encoding the human proteins of the invention may further be crossed with other genetically modified animals carrying other transgenes, or with knockout animals, e.g., knockout animals that do not express one or more of their genes. In various embodiments, the genetically modified animals of the invention are mice, rats, or rabbits.

[0057] In some embodiments, the genetically modified animals of the present invention express one or more human nucleic acids from the native promoter and native control elements of the non-human animal. In other embodiments, the genetically modified animals of the present invention express human nucleic acids from native human promoters and native control elements. Those skilled in the art will understand that the genetically modified animals of the present invention include genetically modified animals that express at least one human nucleic acid from any promoter. Examples of promoters useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, DNA pol II promoter, PGK promoter, ubiquitin promoter, albumin promoter, globin promoter, ovalbumin promoter, SV40 early promoter, Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter, retroviral LTR, and lentiviral LTR. Expression systems of promoters and enhancers useful in the present invention also include inducible and / or tissue-specific expression systems.

[0058] In some embodiments, the invention includes a genetically modified immunodeficient animal having a genome comprising a nucleic acid encoding a human polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, and expressing the encoded human polypeptide. In various embodiments, the invention includes a genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal having a genome comprising an expression cassette comprising a nucleic acid encoding at least one human polypeptide operably linked to a promoter and a polyadenylation signal, and further comprising an intron, and expressing the encoded human polypeptide.

[0059] In various embodiments, various methods are used to introduce human nucleic acid sequences into immunodeficient animals to generate genetically modified immunodeficient animals that express human genes. Such techniques are well known in the art and include, but are not limited to, pronuclear microinjection, transformation of embryonic stem cells, homologous recombination, and knock-in techniques. Methods for generating genetically modified animals that may be used include those described by Sundberg and Ichiki (2006, Genetically Engineered Mice Handbook, CRC Press), Hofker and van Deursen (2002, Genetically modified Mouse Methods and Protocols, Humana Press), Joyner (2000, Gene Targeting: A Practical Approach, Oxford University Press), Turksen (2002, Embryonic stem cells: Methods and Protocols in Methods Mol Biol., Humana Press), Meyer et al. (2010, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 107:15022-15026), and Gibson (2004, A Primer Of Genome Science 2 nd ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer), U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,251, Rathinam et al. (2011, Blood 118:3119-28), Willinger et al. (2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108:2390-2395), Rongvaux et al. (2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108:2378-83), and Valenzuela et al. (2003, Nat Biot 21:652-659).

[0060] In some embodiments, the compositions and methods of the present invention are used in combination with a IL2 receptor γ chain deficient (i.e., γ c - / -The present invention also includes genetically modified immunodeficient animals having a deficiency in the number and / or function of B cells and / or T cells in combination with a deficiency in the number and / or function of NK cells (by a gene encoding a human polypeptide) and having a genome comprising a human nucleic acid operably linked to a promoter and expressing the encoded human polypeptide. The generation of the genetically modified animals of the present invention can be accomplished by methods such as DNA injection of an expression construct into preimplantation embryos or by the use of stem cells such as embryonic stem (ES) cells or induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

[0061] In one embodiment, the human nucleic acid is expressed by the native regulatory elements of the human gene. In another embodiment, the human nucleic acid is expressed by the native regulatory elements of the non-human animal. In another embodiment, the human nucleic acid is expressed from a ubiquitous promoter. Non-limiting examples of ubiquitous promoters useful in the expression construct of the compositions and methods of the present invention include 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1) promoter, β-actin promoter, ROSA26 promoter, heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) promoter, EF-1α gene encoding elongation factor 1α (EF1) promoter, eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF-4A1) promoter, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) promoter, and CMV (cytomegalovirus) promoter.

[0062] In other embodiments, the human nucleic acid is expressed from a tissue-specific promoter.Non-limiting examples of tissue-specific promoters useful in the expression construct of the compositions and methods of the present invention include promoters of genes expressed in the hematopoietic system, such as M-CSF promoter, IL-3 promoter, GM-CSF promoter, SIRPA promoter, TPO promoter, IFN-β promoter, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) promoter, CD45 (also called lymphocyte common antigen) promoter, Flt-1 promoter, endoglin (CD105) promoter, and ICAM-2 (intercellular adhesion molecule 2) promoter. These and other promoters useful in the compositions and methods of the present invention are known in the art, as exemplified by Abboud et al. (2003, J. Histochem & Cytochem. 51:941-949), Schorpp et al. (1996, NAR 24:1787-1788), McBurney et al. (1994, Devel. Dynamics, 200:278-293), and Majumder et al. (1996, Blood 87:3203-3211). In addition to including a promoter, one or more additional control elements, such as enhancer elements or intron sequences, are included in various embodiments of the present invention. Examples of enhancers useful in the compositions and methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, cytomegalovirus (CMV) early enhancer elements and SV40 enhancer elements. Examples of intron sequences useful in the compositions and methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, β-globin introns or generic introns. Other additional regulatory elements useful in some embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, transcription termination sequences and mRNA polyadenylation (pA) sequences.

[0063] In some embodiments, the method of introducing a human nucleic acid expression construct into a preimplantation embryo includes linearization of the expression construct prior to injection into the preimplantation embryo. In a preferred embodiment, the expression construct is injected into a fertilized oocyte. Fertilized oocytes can be collected from superovulated females the day after mating and injected with the expression construct. Injected oocytes are cultured overnight or transferred directly into the oviducts of pseudopregnant females 0.5 days after mating. Methods for superovulation, oocyte collection, expression construct injection, and embryo transfer are known in the art and described in Manipulating the Mouse Embryo (2002, A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). Descendants can be evaluated for the presence of the introduced nucleic acid by DNA analysis (e.g., PCR, Southern blot, DNA sequencing, etc.) or protein analysis (e.g., ELISA, Western blot, etc.).

[0064] In other embodiments, expression constructs can be transfected into stem cells (ES cells or iPS cells) using well-known methods such as electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, and lipofection. The cells can be evaluated for the presence of the introduced nucleic acid by DNA analysis (e.g., PCR, Southern blot, DNA sequencing, etc.) or protein analysis (e.g., ELISA, Western blot, etc.). Cells that are determined to have incorporated the expression construct can then be microinjected into preimplantation embryos. For detailed descriptions of methods known in the art useful for the compositions and methods of the invention, see Nagy et al. (2002, Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), Nagy et al. (1990, Development 110:815-821), U.S. Patent No. 7,576,259, U.S. Patent No. 7,659,442, U.S. Patent No. 7,294,754, and Kraus et al. (2010, Genesis 48:394-399).

[0065] The genetically modified non-human animals of the invention can be crossed with immunodeficient animals to produce immunodeficient animals that express at least one human nucleic acid. Various aspects of the invention provide genetically modified animals that contain human nucleic acid in substantially all of their cells, and in some, but not all, of their cells. One or more copies of the human nucleic acid, either adjacent or separated from each other, can be integrated into the genome of the cells of the genetically modified animal.

[0066] In some embodiments, the present invention is a genetically modified non-human mouse engrafted with at least one human hematopoietic cell. In other embodiments, the present invention is a method for engrafting a genetically modified non-human animal with human hematopoietic cells. The engrafted human hematopoietic cells useful in the compositions and methods of the present invention include any human hematopoietic cells. Non-limiting examples of human hematopoietic cells useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, hematopoietic cells at any stage of differentiation of any lineage, including HSC, HSPC, LIC (leukemia initiating cells), and terminally differentiated hematopoietic cells of any lineage. Such hematopoietic cells can be derived from any tissue or location of a human donor, including, but not limited to, bone marrow, peripheral blood, liver, fetal liver, or umbilical cord blood. Such hematopoietic cells can be isolated from any human donor, including healthy donors and donors with diseases such as cancer, including leukemia.

[0067] In other embodiments, the invention is a method for engrafting a genetically modified non-human animal with human hematopoietic cells. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal to which human hematopoietic cells are engrafted is an immunodeficient animal. Engraftment of hematopoietic cells in the genetically modified animals of the invention is characterized by the presence of human hematopoietic cells in the engrafted animal. In a specific embodiment, engraftment of hematopoietic cells in an immunodeficient animal is characterized by the presence of differentiated human hematopoietic cells in the engrafted animal to which the hematopoietic cells are provided, as compared to a suitable control animal.

[0068] In some embodiments, animals of the invention are implanted with human cancer cells (e.g., human solid tumors, etc.) in addition to human hematopoietic cells. In various embodiments, the human cancer cells can be cancer cell lines or primary human cancer cells isolated from a patient, derived from any of a number of different types of cancer (including, by way of non-limiting example, melanoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, etc.). In some embodiments, the human cancer cells and HSPCs are isolated from the same patient and implanted into the same non-human animal.

[0069] The genetically modified non-human animals provided in various embodiments of the present invention have a variety of utilities, such as, but not limited to, for use as models for hematopoietic cell growth and differentiation, for the in vivo evaluation of the human hematopoietic system, for the in vivo evaluation of cancer cells, for the in vivo study of immune responses, for the in vivo evaluation of vaccines and vaccination regimens, for use in testing the effect of agents that modulate cancer cell growth or survival, for the in vivo evaluation of cancer treatments, for the in vivo generation and collection of immune mediators such as antibodies, and for use in testing the effect of agents that affect hematopoietic and immune cell function.

[0070] Engraftment of human hematopoietic cells in genetically modified and / or immunodeficient non-human animals has traditionally required pretreatment prior to administration of hematopoietic cells, either sublethal irradiation of the recipient animal with high frequency electromagnetic radiation, typically using gamma or X-rays, or treatment with radiation-like drugs such as busulfan or nitrogen mustard. Pretreatment is believed to reduce the number of host hematopoietic cells, create appropriate microenvironmental factors for engraftment of human hematopoietic cells, and / or create a microenvironmental niche for engraftment of human hematopoietic cells. Standard methods for pretreatment are known in the art, as described herein and in J. Hayakawa et al, 2009, Stem Cells, 27(1):175-182. A method for engraftment of human hematopoietic cells in an immunodeficient animal is provided by an embodiment of the present invention, comprising providing human hematopoietic cells to the immunodeficient animal, with or without irradiating the animal prior to administration of the hematopoietic cells. Provided according to an embodiment of the invention is a method for the engraftment of human hematopoietic cells in an immunodeficient animal comprising the step of providing human hematopoietic cells to a genetically modified non-human animal of the invention, with or without the step of administering a radioactive drug such as busulfan or nitrogen mustard to the animal prior to administration of the hematopoietic cells.

[0071] In some embodiments, the method of hematopoietic cell engraftment in a genetically modified non-human animal according to embodiments of the invention comprises providing human hematopoietic cells to a genetically modified animal of the invention as described elsewhere herein. In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animal of the invention is an immunodeficient animal that is deficient in the number and / or function of non-human B cells, the number and / or function of non-human T cells, and / or the number and / or function of non-human NK cells. In other embodiments, the immunodeficient animal has severe combined immune deficiency (SCID). SCID refers to a condition characterized by the absence of T cells and deficiency of B cell function. Examples of SCID include X-linked SCID characterized by gamma chain gene mutations in the IL2RG gene and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(+)NK(-); and autosomal recessive SCID characterized by Jak3 gene mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(+)NK(-), ADA gene mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(-)NK(-), IL-7R alpha chain mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(+)NK(+), CD3 delta or epsilon mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(+)NK(+), RAG1 / RAG2 mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(-)NK(+), Artemis gene mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(-)NK(+), CD45 gene mutations and lymphocyte phenotype T(-)B(+)NK(+). In some embodiments, the genetically modified non-human animals of the invention are characterized by RAG1 - / - It is.

[0072] In some embodiments, the methods of hematopoietic cell engraftment in genetically modified animals according to embodiments of the present invention involve the use of genetically modified animals that have a severe combined immunodeficiency mutation (Prkdc), commonly referred to as a scid mutation. scidThe method includes providing human hematopoietic cells to a genetically modified non-human animal having a scid mutation. The scid mutation is well known and is located on mouse chromosome 16 as described in Bosma et al. (1989, Immunogenetics 29:54-56). Mice homozygous for the scid mutation are characterized by a lack of functional T and B cells, lymphopenia, hypoglobulinemia, and a normal hematopoietic microenvironment. The scid mutation can be detected, for example, by detection of a marker for the scid mutation using well known methods.

[0073] In another embodiment, the method of hematopoietic cell engraftment in a genetically modified animal according to the present invention comprises providing human hematopoietic cells to a genetically modified immunodeficient non-human animal having an IL2 receptor gamma chain deficiency, alone or in combination with a severe combined immunodeficiency (scid) mutation. The term "IL2 receptor gamma chain deficiency" refers to a reduction in the IL2 receptor gamma chain. The reduction in the IL2 receptor gamma chain can be due to gene deletion or mutation. The reduction in the IL2 receptor gamma chain can be detected, for example, by detection of a deletion or mutation in the IL2 receptor gamma chain gene and / or a reduction in IL2 receptor gamma chain expression using well-known methods.

[0074] In addition to naturally occurring human nucleic acid and amino acid sequences, the term encompasses variants of human nucleic acid and amino acid sequences. As used herein, the term "variant" defines either an isolated naturally occurring genetic variant of a human or a recombinantly prepared variation of a human, each of which contains one or more mutations compared to the corresponding wild-type human. For example, such mutations may be one or more amino acid substitutions, additions, and / or deletions. The term "variant" also includes non-human orthologs. In some embodiments, the variant polypeptide of the present invention has at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity with the wild-type human polypeptide.

[0075] The percent identity between two sequences is determined using the techniques described elsewhere herein. Standard molecular biology techniques such as site-directed mutagenesis and PCR-mediated mutagenesis can be used to introduce mutations. Those skilled in the art will recognize that one or more amino acid mutations can be introduced without altering the functional properties of human proteins.

[0076] To generate human protein variants, conservative amino acid substitutions can be generated in human proteins.Conservative amino acid substitutions are recognized in the art as the substitution of one amino acid with another amino acid with similar characteristics.For example, each amino acid can be described as having one or more of the following characteristics: positively charged, negatively charged, aliphatic, aromatic, polar, hydrophobic, and hydrophilic.Conservative substitutions are the substitution of one amino acid with a specified structural or functional characteristic with another amino acid with the same characteristics. Acidic amino acids include aspartic acid, glutamic acid; basic amino acids include histidine, lysine, arginine; aliphatic amino acids include isoleucine, leucine, and valine; aromatic amino acids include phenylalanine, glycine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; polar amino acids include aspartic acid, glutamic acid, histidine, lysine, asparagine, glutamine, arginine, serine, threonine, and tyrosine; hydrophobic amino acids include alanine, cysteine, phenylalanine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, valine, and tryptophan; conservative substitutions include the substitution of amino acids within each group.Amino acids can also be described in terms of relative size, and alanine, cysteine, aspartic acid, glycine, asparagine, proline, threonine, serine, and valine are all typically considered small.

[0077] Human variants may include synthetic amino acid analogs, amino acid derivatives, and / or non-standard amino acids, illustratively including, but not limited to, alpha-aminobutyric acid, citrulline, canavanine, cyanoalanine, diaminobutyric acid, diaminopimelic acid, dihydroxy-phenylalanine, dienkolinic acid, homoarginine, hydroxyproline, norleucine, norvaline, 3-phosphoserine, homoserine, 5-hydroxytryptophan, 1-methylhistidine, methylhistidine, and ornithine.

[0078] The human variants are encoded by nucleic acids that have a high degree of identity to the nucleic acid encoding the wild-type human. The complementary strand of the nucleic acid encoding the human variant specifically hybridizes to the nucleic acid encoding the wild-type human under high stringency conditions.

[0079] The term "nucleic acid" refers to an RNA or DNA molecule having more than one nucleotide in any form, including single-stranded, double-stranded, oligonucleotide, or polynucleotide. The term "nucleotide sequence" refers to the order of nucleotides in a single-stranded form of a nucleic acid, either oligonucleotide or polynucleotide.

[0080] Nucleic acids encoding the human variants may be isolated or produced recombinantly or synthetically, using well-known methodologies.

[0081] Methods for isolating human hematopoietic cells, administering human hematopoietic cells to a host animal, and assessing their engraftment are well known in the art. Hematopoietic cells for administration to a host animal can be obtained from any tissue that contains hematopoietic cells, such as, but not limited to, umbilical cord blood, bone marrow, peripheral blood, peripheral blood mobilized by cytokines or chemotherapy, and fetal liver. Hematopoietic cells can be administered to newborn or adult animals by administration via various routes, such as, but not limited to, intravenous, intrahepatic, intraperitoneal, intrafemoral, and / or intratibial.

[0082] Engraftment of human hematopoietic cells in the genetically modified animals of the present invention can be assessed by any of a variety of methods, such as, but not limited to, flow cytometric analysis of cells in the animals to which the human hematopoietic cells have been administered, at one or more time points following administration of the hematopoietic cells.

[0083] Exemplary methods for isolating human hematopoietic cells, administering human hematopoietic cells to a host animal, and assessing engraftment of human hematopoietic cells in the host animal are described herein, as well as in Pearson et al. (2008, Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 81:1-15), Ito et al. (2002, Blood 100:3175-3182), Traggiai et al. (2004, Science 304:104-107), Ishikawa et al. (2005, Blood 106:1565-1573), Shultz et al. (2005, J. Immunol. 174:6477-6489), and Holyoake et al. (1999, Exp Hematol. 27:1418-27).

[0084] In some embodiments of the invention, human hematopoietic cells are isolated from the original source material to obtain a population of cells enriched for a particular hematopoietic cell population (e.g., HSC, HSPC, LIC, CD34+, CD34-, lineage-specific markers, etc.). The isolated hematopoietic cells may or may not be a pure population. In one embodiment, the hematopoietic cells useful in the compositions and methods of the invention are depleted of cells with a particular marker, such as CD34. In another embodiment, the hematopoietic cells useful in the compositions and methods of the invention are enriched by selection for a marker, such as CD34. In some embodiments, the hematopoietic cells useful in the compositions and methods of the invention are cell populations in which CD34+ cells comprise about 1-100% of the cells, although in certain embodiments, cell populations in which CD34+ cells comprise less than 1% of the total cells can also be used. In certain embodiments, hematopoietic cells useful in the compositions and methods of the invention are T cell depleted cell populations in which CD34+ cells comprise about 1-3% of the total cells, lineage depleted cell populations in which CD34+ cells comprise about 50% of the total cells, or CD34+ positive selected cell populations in which CD34+ cells comprise about 90% of the total cells.

[0085] In the context of generating a human hematopoietic and / or immune system in a genetically modified non-human animal expressing at least one human gene, the number of hematopoietic cells administered is not considered limiting. Thus, as a non-limiting example, the number of hematopoietic cells administered can be about 1×10 3 ~Approx. 1×10 7 As another non-limiting example, when the recipient is a mouse, the number of HSPCs administered can range from about 3×10 to about 5×10. 3 ~Approx. 1×10 6 The number of cells that need to be administered can range from 1 to 200 CD34+ cells, although in various embodiments, more or less may be used. For other species of recipient, the number of cells that need to be administered can be determined using only routine experimentation.

[0086] In general, engraftment can be considered successful when the number (or percentage) of human hematopoietic cells present in the genetically modified non-human animal is greater than the number (or percentage) of human cells administered to the non-human animal over the life span of the administered human hematopoietic cells. Detection of the progeny of the administered hematopoietic cells can be achieved, for example, by detection of human DNA in the recipient animal or by detection of fully human hematopoietic cells, for example, by detection of a human cell surface marker such as CD45. Serial transfer of human hematopoietic cells from the first recipient to a second recipient and engraftment of the human hematopoietic cells in the second recipient is a further optional test of engraftment in the first recipient. Engraftment can be detected by flow cytometry as 0.05% or more human CD45+ cells in blood, spleen, or bone marrow 1-4 months after administration of the human hematopoietic cells. For example, cytokines (eg, GM-CSF) can be used to mobilize stem cells as described in Watanabe (1997, Bone Marrow Transplantation 19:1175-1181). EXAMPLES

[0087] The present invention will be described in more detail by referring to the following experimental examples. These examples are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting unless otherwise specified. Therefore, the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the following examples in any way, but should be construed as embracing any variations that become evident as a result of the teachings provided herein.

[0088] Without further description, it is believed that one of ordinary skill in the art can, using the preceding description and the following illustrative examples, make and utilize the compounds of the present invention and practice the methods recited in the claims. Accordingly, the following examples specifically point out preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not to be construed as limiting in any way the remainder of the disclosure.

[0089] Example 1: Functional innate immune responses and solid tumor support in human hematolymphoid mice As described herein, mice engrafted with a human hemolymphoid system (HHLS) represent a powerful tool for predictive human preclinical in vivo studies. A major limitation of current HHLS mice is the incomplete development of human cells important for innate immunity. Herein, we report a novel mouse strain in which multiple genes encoding cytokines have been genetically humanized. These humanized cytokines act synergistically to efficiently support human hematopoiesis and the development and function of human monocytes / macrophages and NK cells. In the tumor microenvironment, human macrophages acquire an immunosuppressive phenotype and support the growth of human cancers. This novel model of HHLS mice with a more complete functional human innate immune system has enormous potential to facilitate in vivo studies of the physiology and pathology of human innate immunity.

[0090] Monocytes and macrophages are the main cellular components of the innate immune response (Auffray et al., 2009, Annual review of immunology 27, 669). On the one hand, these cells can sense infection and mediate direct antimicrobial functions by diverse mechanisms such as phagocytosis or secretion of proinflammatory factors. On the other hand, monocytes / macrophages can acquire immunosuppressive functions that are important for the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair. Moreover, these anti-inflammatory properties are co-opted by tumor-infiltrating macrophages, providing a survival advantage to evolving tumors through diverse mechanisms (Allavena and Mantovani, 2012, Clinical and experimental immunology 167, 195; Qian and Pollard, 2010, Cell 141, 39).

[0091] Small animal models such as mice are frequently used to study mammalian immune responses in vivo. However, fundamental differences in immune function exist between different species (Mestas and Hughes, 2004, Journal of Immunology 172, 2731; Rongvaux et al., 2013, Annual review of immunology 31, 635). In particular, major phenotypic and functional species-specific differences exist in monocyte / macrophage populations, and in general, knowledge acquired from mouse studies is only partially applicable to humans (Auffray et al., 2009, Annual review of immunology 27, 669; Rongvaux et al., 2013, Annual review of immunology 31, 635; Chow et al., 2011, Nature reviews Immunology 11, 788). One promising approach to study the specificity of human hematopoiesis and immune functions in vivo is the use of mice carrying a human hemolymphoid system (HHLS) (Rongvaux et al., 2013, Annual review of immunology 31, 635; Shultz et al., 2012, Nature reviews Immunology 12, 786). However, in current HHLS mice, there are major defects in the development and function of several human immune cell types, such as monocytes / macrophages and NK cells (Rongvaux et al., 2013, Annual review of immunology 31, 635). These defects are most likely due to reduced cross-reactivity of mouse cytokines to their corresponding human receptors (Manz, 2007, Immunity 26, 537).To overcome this limitation, strategies were developed to replace mouse genes encoding cytokines with human counterparts (Willinger et al., 2011, Trends in immunology 32, 321), and this approach resulted in significant improvements in the development and function of individual human cell types (Figure 16) (Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118, 3119; Willinger et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2390; Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2378).

[0092] Hematopoiesis is a tightly controlled developmental process in which pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into more committed progenitor cells and then into mature blood cells (Kondo et al., 2003, Annual review of immunology 21, 759; Doulatov et al., 2012, Cell stem cell 10, 120). This process requires specific cytokines that support successive developmental stages (Figure 5). Synergy between multiple humanized cytokines will likely be required to fully recapitulate human myelopoiesis in mice. Thus, in the hSIRPAtg RAG2- / -IL-2Rγ- / - background (Traggiai et al., 2004, Science 304, 104; Strowig et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13218), genes encoding M-CSF (Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118, 3119), IL-3 / GM-CSF (Willinger et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2390), and TPO (Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2378) are identical to their human counterparts (Willinger et al., 2011, Trends in immunology). 32,321) to generate a novel mouse strain designated MISTRG.

[0093] Neonatal MISTRG mice and MITRG (lacking the hSIRPA transgene) littermates were sublethally irradiated and transplanted with human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells according to standard protocols (Traggiai et al., 2004, Science 304, 104). RAG2- / -IL2-Rγ- / - (RG) mice, which share an identical genetic background but lack all humanized alleles, and commercially available NOD-Scid IL2-Rγ- / - (NSG) mice were used as controls. Blood engraftment levels (percentage of hCD45+ cells) (Figures 1A and 1B; and Figure 6A) were lower in RG mice and higher in NSG recipients, as previously reported (Strowig et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13218; Brehm et al., 2010, Clinical Immunology 135, 84). The percentage of blood hCD45+ cells was similar in MISTRG and NSG. Blood engraftment was also significantly increased in MITRG compared to RG, suggesting that combined gene humanization overcomes the need to induce phagocytic tolerance through SIRPα / CD47 cross-reactivity (Strowig et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13218; Takenaka et al., 2007, Nature immunology 8, 1313; Legrand et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13224), possibly by attenuating mouse innate responses. Mice with at least 10% human CD45+ cells in the blood were selected for further experimental procedures (Figure 6B). In the majority of both MISTRG recipients, the percentage of hCD45+ cells in the bone marrow (BM) exceeded 90% and reached up to 99% (Figures 1A and 1C; and Figures 6C-6E), and the high efficiency of engraftment in the BM was independent of SIRPα / CD47 interaction.To test the ability of humanized cytokines to support human hematopoiesis in more competitive conditions, human CD34+ cells were transplanted into unirradiated MISTRG. This protocol resulted in human CD45+ cells in the blood and BM of all recipients (Figures 1D and 1E), and notably, half of the mice showed high chimerism comparable to the highest levels measured in recipients engrafted after X-ray pretreatment (compare Figure 1E with Figures 1B and 1C). The data described herein show that genetic exchange of multiple cytokines in MISTRG creates a microenvironment in which mouse hematopoiesis in the bone marrow is almost completely replaced by human hematopoiesis, obviating the need for radiation to induce pathology.

[0094] We next assessed the ability of MISTRG mice to support human myelopoiesis. Human myeloid cells (hCD33+) were present in significantly higher percentages in the blood and bone marrow of MISTRG compared to RG and NSG (Figure 2A; and Figures 7A-7C). The increased percentage of myeloid cells in MISTRG resulted in a blood composition that resembles the physiological composition of myeloid cell-enriched human blood, which is fundamentally different from lymphoid-enriched mouse blood (Mestas and Hughes, 2004, Journal of Immunology 172, 2731; Rongvaux et al., 2013, Annual review of immunology 31, 6354) (Figure 2B; and Figure 7D). Both monocytes (CD33hiSSCloCD66-) and granulocytes (CD33+SSChiCD66+) were present in the BM (Figure 7E), and the human myeloid cell population in peripheral blood was largely composed of monocytes (Figure 7F), suggesting that terminal differentiation and egress from the BM or peripheral survival of human granulocytes is not yet optimal in this mouse environment. Importantly, however, human myeloid cells were abundant in non-lymphoid tissues such as lung, liver, and colon of MISTRG, as shown by immunohistochemistry (hCD68+ cells) (Figure 2C) or flow cytometry (hCD33+) (Figures 7G and 7H), significantly exceeding the number of human myeloid cells found in NSG mice by approximately 10-fold.

[0095] In humans, three subsets of monocytes have been described, phenotypically and functionally, based on the expression of CD14 and CD16 markers (Auffray et al., 2009, Annual review of immunology 27, 669; Cros et al., 2010, Immunity 33, 375). All three subpopulations of human monocytes (CD14+CD16-, CD14+CD16+, and CD14dimCD16+) were present in lymphoid tissues of MISTRG and non-lymphoid tissues such as lung and liver (Figures 2D and 2E; and Figures 8A and 8B). In contrast, in NSG, in addition to a lower frequency of myeloid cells, only CD14+CD16- monocytes and some CD14+CD16+ monocytes could be consistently detected, and few CD14dimCD16+ cells were shown. The extensive immunophenotype of monocyte subpopulations found in the MISTRG (CD33, CD11b, CD115, CD62L, and CX3CR1) closely paralleled the equivalent subsets in human peripheral blood (Figure 9). Human CD14+CD16- and CD14+CD16+ monocytes isolated from the BM of the MISTRG produced high levels of inflammatory cytokines in response to TLR4 and TLR7 / 8 ligands (LPS and R848, respectively) (Figures 2F and 2G). In in vitro assays performed on WBCs of MITRG, both CD14+CD16- and CD14+CD16+ cells had a high capacity to phagocytose GFP-expressing E. coli, whereas CD14dimCD16+ monocytes had limited phagocytic capacity (Figure 2H), again reflecting the physiological properties of the corresponding subpopulations in human blood (Cros et al., 2010, Immunity 33, 375). When challenged in vivo with LPS or infected with bacterial and viral human pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes and influenza A, respectively, MITRG mice responded by producing large amounts of human inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-6, and IFNγ, respectively), whereas NSG mice showed a significantly lower response, approximately 1 log lower (Figures 2I-2K).These results demonstrate that the human monocyte subsets that develop in MISTRG are functional, in vitro and in vivo. However, a drawback of the presence of functional human phagocytes in mice is the breakthrough of human-mouse phagocytic tolerance, to which mouse RBCs are particularly susceptible (Figures 10A and 10B). This destruction of mouse RBCs led to anemia (Figures 10C-10I) and limited the lifespan of engrafted mice to 10-12 weeks (MISTRG) or 12-16 weeks (MITRG).

[0096] Myeloid cells can support the development and differentiation of other immune cells through the production of cytokines. We assessed whether the bone marrow compartment of MISTRG mice is a source of human cytokines such as IL-15. Consistent with this notion, human IL-15 and human IL-15Rα mRNA expression was found to be increased more than 10-fold in MISTRG when compared to NSG (Figure 3A; and Figure 11A). To define in more detail the cellular origin of human IL-15 / IL-15Rα in MISTRG, we measured the abundance of human IL-15 and human IL-15Rα transcripts in purified human cell populations. Human IL-15Rα mRNA expression was higher in human myeloid cells (hCD33+) than in non-myeloid cells (hCD33-) (Figure 3B). Notably, CD14+CD16+ monocytes showed enrichment of both IL-15 and IL-15Rα transcripts (Figure 3B). Expression of human IL-15Rα protein on the surface of human myeloid cells from MISTRG was confirmed by flow cytometry (FIG. 11B).

[0097] Based on these findings, we assessed whether MISTRG mice support the development of human immune cells dependent on IL-15 transpresentation, such as NK cells (Ma et al., 2006, Annual review of immunology 24, 657; Soderquest et al., 2011, Blood 117, 4511). Because mouse IL-15 is not sufficient to support human NK cells in vivo, efficient development of human NK cells in the current HHLS mouse model requires exogenous pharmacological delivery of human IL-15 / IL-15Rα (Huntington et al., 2009, Journal of experimental medicine 206, 25; Chen et al., 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 21783; Pek et al., 2011, Immunobiology 216, 21823-25). As previously reported (Huntington et al., 2009, Journal of experimental medicine 206, 25; Chen et al., 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 21783; Pek et al., 2011, Immunobiology 216, 218), very few human NK cells (hNKp46+hCD3-) were observed in engrafted NSGs (Figures 3C and 3D; and Figures 12A and 12B). In contrast, human NK cells were readily detected in multiple tissues of engrafted MISTRGs, and were approximately 10-fold increased compared to NSGs (Figures 3C and 3D; and Figures 12A and 12B). Apart from the bone marrow, MITRG had fewer human NK cells than MISTRG, most likely due to the previously reported requirement of human SIRPα for the survival of human NK cells in the periphery (Legrand et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13224).hNKp46+hCD3- cells in MISTRG mice expressed typical NK cell surface markers CD94, CD161, and killer cell inhibitory receptors (KIRs) closely similar to human controls, and therefore represented true NK cells (Figures 12A and 12B). In addition to its effects on development, IL-15 also promotes NK cell maturation. Consistent with that, surface expression of the maturation marker CD16 and the amount of the lytic granule protein perforin were found to be higher in NK cells derived from MISTRG compared to NSG (Figures 13C-13F).

[0098] Although the cellular origin of IL-15 transpresentation in vivo in humans is currently unknown, human myeloid cells can support human NK cell proliferation in vitro (Huntington et al., 2009, Journal of experimental medicine 206, 25). To test whether transpresentation of human IL-15 by human monocytes / macrophages is the basis for improved human NK cell development in MISTRG, mice were treated with liposomally encapsulated clodronate to deplete phagocytes (Figure 14). Phagocyte depletion also induced a significant reduction in human NK cells (Figure 3E), suggesting that human monocytes / macrophages are indeed the key cell type that transpresents IL-15 to support human NK cell homeostasis in vivo.

[0099] NK cells participate in the innate defense against pathogens by killing cells lacking MHC class I expression (loss of self) (Raulet, 2006, Seminars in immunology 18, 145) and by producing the key cytokine IFNγ (Vivier et al., 2008, Nature immunology 9, 503). In line with the higher perforin expression (Figures 13E and 13F), a significantly enhanced NK cell cytotoxic activity against human cells lacking MHC class I was observed in vivo in MISTRG compared to NSG (Figure 3F). NK cells are an early source of IFNγ following Listeria infection. Accordingly, at day 2 postinfection, expression of human IFNγ mRNA in the liver was found to be more than 10-fold higher in MISTRG than in NSG (Figure 3G). At single cell resolution, NK cells derived from Listeria-infected MISTRG showed production of human IFNγ without ex vivo restimulation (Figure 3H) at a significantly higher frequency than NSG (Figure 3I). NK cells in MISTRG also had lytic activity (degranulation) after Listeria infection, as indicated by cell membrane exposure of CD107a (Figure 3H). Overall, MISTRG supports human NK cell development, differentiation, and function through efficient production of human myeloid cells, thereby overcoming one major limitation of current HHLS mouse models.

[0100] Next, we assessed the role of human myeloid cells in the context of the tumor microenvironment. Thus, the human melanoma cell line Me290 was used as a tumor model (Valmori et al., 1998, Journal of immunology 160, 1750). Clinical observations have shown that myeloid cells infiltrate tumors in several solid tumors, and that high density of infiltrating macrophages correlates with poor patient prognosis in most types of cancer (Qian and Pollard, 2010, Cell 141, 39; Coussens et al., Science 339, 286; Egeblad et al., 2010, Developmental cell 18, 884; Nelson and Bissell, 2006, Annual review of cell and developmental biology 22, 287; Bingle et al., 2002, T Journal of pathology 196, 254). Accordingly, a higher degree of human myeloid cell infiltration into tumors was detected in MISTRG than in NSG, as indicated by expression of human PTPRC and ITGAM mRNA (encoding CD45 and CD11b, respectively) (Figure 4A). Closely similar to human tumors in patients, cells expressing macrophage markers CD163 and CD14 were abundant in tumors from MISTRG, but were nearly undetectable in the same tumors from NSG (Figures 4B and 4C; and Figure 15). The majority of CD163+ cells also expressed low levels of HLA-DR and high levels of CD206 (Figures 4B and 4D). This immunophenotype is commonly associated with "M2-like" macrophages (Hao et al., 2012, Clinical & developmental immunology 2012, 948098; Tang, 2013, Cancer Lett 332, 3).

[0101] The M2 subtype of macrophages promotes tumor progression through diverse effector mechanisms, including proliferation signals to cancer cells, antiapoptotic signals, proangiogenic activity, and allowing cancer cells to escape from the primary tumor and form metastases (Qian and Pollard, 2010, Cell 141, 39; Coussens et al., Science 339, 286; Egeblad et al., 2010, Developmental cell 18, 884). We assessed whether macrophage infiltration into tumors in MISTRG could promote tumor growth. Notably, the size of tumors in CD34+ engrafted MISTRG, which were heavily infiltrated with human CD163+HLA-DRlowCD206+ macrophages, was significantly larger than tumors in NSG mice not infiltrated with human macrophages, and was observed to be the same small size as seen in non-engrafted NSG mice or non-engrafted MISTRG mice (Figures 4E and 4F). One of the mechanisms by which macrophages support tumor growth is through the production of cytokines or enzymes that promote angiogenesis and immunosuppression. VEGF is an important multifunctional tumor-supporting molecule (Kandalaft et al., Current topics in microbiology and immunology 344, 129; Motz and Coukos, Immunity 39, 61), and to test whether this factor is involved in tumor growth in MISTRG, mice were treated with the human VEGF inhibitor Avastin™. This treatment completely reversed the tumor growth phenotype (Figure 4F), thereby demonstrating that myeloid cells in MISTRG support melanoma growth through a VEGF-dependent mechanism. Overall, these results indicate that MISTRG mice fulfill a critical need for a model that recapitulates the role of human macrophages in tumor development and allows the study of the interaction between human tumors and human macrophages in vivo, particularly at the onset of tumor development.

[0102] The data described herein demonstrate that provision of multiple human cytokines to MISTRG mice results in synergistic effects on human hematopoiesis and direct or indirect support for human immune cell function (Figure 16). The MISTRG model of HHLS mice presents a unique opportunity to study human innate immune responses in vivo.

[0103] Materials and methods are described below.

[0104] Mouse strains Generation of mice by knock-in replacement of genes encoding TPO, IL-3 / GM-CSF, and M-CSF, or BAC transgenic expression of human SIRPα in a RAG2- / -γc- / - Balb / c × 129 genetic background has been reported (Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118, 3119; Willinger et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2390; Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2378; Strowig et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13218). These strains were crossed to obtain MITRG (M-CSFh / hIL-3 / GM-CSFh / hTPOh / hRAG2- / -γc- / -) and MISTRG (M-CSFh / hIL-3 / GM-CSFh / hhSIRPAtgTPOh / hRAG2- / -γc- / -) mice, which are viable, healthy, and fertile. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions with continuous treatment with enrofloxacin-containing drinking water (Baytril, 0.27 mg / ml). NOD Scidγc- / - (NSG) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory.

[0105] Preparation of human HSPCs and engraftment into recipient mice Recipient mice were engrafted with human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as described (Rathinam et al., 2011, Blood 118, 3119; Willinger et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2390; Rongvaux et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2378; Traggiai et al., 2004, Science 304, 104; Strowig et al., 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13218). Fetal liver samples were cut into small pieces and treated with collagenase D (Roche, 100 ng / mL) for 45 min at 37°C to prepare cell suspensions. Human CD34+ cells were purified by positive immunomagnetic selection with anti-human CD34 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) after density gradient centrifugation (Lymphocyte Separation Medium, MP Biomedicals). Cells were frozen in FBS containing 10% DMSO and maintained in liquid nitrogen.

[0106] For engraftment, neonatal mice (within 2 days of age) were sublethally irradiated (X-ray irradiation; RG, 2 × 180 cGy, 4-hour intervals; NSG, 1 × 100 cGy; MISTRG, 1 × 150 cGy) and 100,000 FL-CD34+ cells were injected into the liver in 20 μL of PBS using a 22-gauge needle (Hamilton Company). In certain experiments (Figures 1D and 1E), 200,000–300,000 cells were injected into unirradiated MISTRG neonatal recipients. Mice were bled 7–9 weeks later and the percentage of human CD45+ cells was measured by flow cytometry. Mice in which human CD45+ cells comprised at least 5% (RG) or 10% (NSG, MITRG, and MISTRG) of the total (mouse and human combined) CD45+ population were selected for further experimental procedures. Mice were sacrificed or used for experiments 9-12 weeks after implantation.

[0107] All experiments were performed in accordance with the protocols of the Yale University Human Investigation Committee and the Yale Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

[0108] Immunophenotypic analysis of human cell populations To prepare WBCs, heparinized blood was treated twice with ACK lysis buffer to eliminate RBCs. Single cell suspensions of spleen and bone marrow (flushed from femurs and tibias) were treated with ACK lysis buffer. Liver and lung leukocytes were isolated by density gradient centrifugation after mechanical dissociation of tissues and digestion with 100 U / ml collagenase IV and 0.02 mg / ml DNase I (Sigma) for 1 h at 37°C.

[0109] For FACS analysis, antibodies against the following antigens were used:

[0110] Mouse antigens: CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD71 (RI7217), Ter119.

[0111] Human antigens: CD1c (BDCA1, clone L161), CD3 (UCHT1), CD11b (ICRF44), CD11c (3.9), CD14 (M5E2), CD16 (3G8), CD19 (HIB19), CD33 (WM53), CD45 (HI30), CD62L (DREG-56), CD66 (ASL-32), CD94 (DX22), CD107a (H4A3), CD115 (9-4D2-1E4), CD123 (6H6), CD14 1 (BDCA3, M80), CD161 (HP-3G10), CD235a (HI264), CD303 (BDCA2, 201A), NKp46 (9E2), IL-15Rα (JM7A4), CX3CR1 (2A9-1), HLA-A, B, C (W6 / 32), HLA-DR (L243), IFNγ (B27), KIR2DL1 / S1 (HP-MA4), KIR2DL2 / L3 (DX27), KIR3DL1 (DX9), perforin (dG9).

[0112] Human lineage cocktail: CD3, CD15, CD19, CD56, NKp46.

[0113] All antibodies were obtained from Biolegend, BD Biosciences, or Miltenyi Biotec. Data were acquired by FACSDiva on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by FlowJo software.

[0114] For histological analysis, spleen, lung, liver, and colon tissues were fixed overnight in IHC zinc fixative (BD Biosciences) or 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or anti-human CD68 antibody (clone PGM1) followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and developed with the peroxidase substrate 3,3'-diaminobenzidine.

[0115] In vitro phagocytosis assay E. coli expressing GFP were grown overnight at 37°C in LB medium until the OD600 reached 1.5-1.8, at which point the bacteria were diluted and grown for 1-2 hours until the OD600 reached approximately 1.0. E. coli were washed three times with PBS and diluted to 1 × 10 7 Approximately 2 × 10 per WBC 8 coli in a volume of 200 μl for 4 hours at 37° C. After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry.

[0116] In vitro TLR stimulation and in vivo infection Human monocyte subsets were isolated from mouse BM. Briefly, BM cells were collected and pooled from the hind limbs and spines of six mice. Human CD33+ cells were enriched by magnetic isolation (EasySep CD33 Selection Kit, StemCell Technologies). CD14+CD16- and CD14+CD16+ subsets were purified on a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences). 100,000 cells in 200 μl medium were cultured overnight in the presence of TLR4 ligand LPS (E.Coli 0111:B4, Sigma-Aldrich, 100 ng / ml) or TLR7 / 8 ligand R848 (Invivogen, 10 μg / ml).

[0117] For in vivo stimulation, 35 μg of LPS ( E. Coli 0111:B4, Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 μl PBS was injected intraperitoneally, and serum was collected 90 min later.

[0118] 3×10 3Mice were infected with colony forming units (CFU) of Listeria monocytogenes (strain 10403S) by intravenous injection. Forty-eight hours after infection, serum and tissues were collected for ELISA and qPCR, respectively. Liver lymphocytes from uninfected or infected mice were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C / 5%CO2 in medium containing monensin (GolgiStop, BD Biosciences) and anti-human CD107a antibody. Cells were then stained for surface antigens, permeabilized using Cytofix / Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences), and stained for intracellular human IFNγ.

[0119] 2×10 4 Mice were infected intranasally with PFU of influenza A / PR8(H1N1) virus, and lungs were harvested for qPCR analysis 3 days postinfection.

[0120] Cytokine concentrations (human TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β) in mouse serum and culture supernatants were measured using ELISA MAX standard kits (Biolegend) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

[0121] RBC analysis RBC counts were measured with Hemavet 950 (Drew Scientific). Blood smears were stained with Wright-Giemsa. For mouse RBC transfer experiments, blood was obtained from RG mice, labeled with CFSE (20 μM, 15 min at 37° C.), washed three times with PBS, and 200 μl of labeled RBCs were injected via retro-orbital vein injection. After 5 min, mice were bled to determine the initial frequency of CFSE-positive cells among Ter119+ cells by flow cytometry (day 0, 100%). Blood was then collected at the indicated time points, and the maintenance of CFSE-labeled Ter119+ cells was calculated as a percentage of the day 0 value.

[0122] In vivo phagocyte depletion Phagocytic cells were depleted by intravenous retro-orbital injection of 100 μl of clodronate-loaded liposomes (Van Rooijen and Sanders, 1994, Journal of immunological methods 174, 83). Clodronate liposomes were injected three times a day, and human NK cells in mouse livers were analyzed 24 hours after the last injection. For RBC phagocytosis assays, clodronate liposomes were injected 3 days and 1 day before the transfer of CFSE-labeled RBCs.

[0123] Quantitative RT-PCR Total RNA was extracted from tissues or purified cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and used for cDNA synthesis with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system with primer-probe sets purchased from ABI. Expression values ​​were calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method and normalized to mouse Hprt or human HPRT as indicated.

[0124] In vivo NK cell cytotoxicity assay In vivo human NK cell cytotoxicity was determined according to a previously reported protocol (Strowig et al., 2010, Blood 116, 4158). LCL721.221 (HLA class I negative) and LCL721.45 (class I positive) cells were mixed in a 1:1 ratio, labeled with CellTrace Violet (Invitrogen), and injected intravenously (1 × 10) into engrafted NSG or MISTRG mice. 7 Mice were sacrificed 12 hours later and single cell suspensions of spleens were prepared and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of HLA class I positive and negative among the violet cells was measured and specific lysis was calculated as (MHC class I positive-MHC class I negative) x 100 / MHC class I positive.

[0125] Tumor formation Human melanoma cell line Me290 (Valmori et al., 1998, Journal of immunology 160, 1750) was grown to approximately 90% confluency and cells (approximately 7 million cells per mouse) were injected subcutaneously into the flank of mice under anesthesia. For some experiments, starting from the day of tumor implantation, mice were treated with anti-human VEGF antibody Avastin™ (Roche; 100 μg intravenously) every other day. Tumor size was measured after 11 days and volume was calculated using the following formula: volume = 0.5 × length 2 × width.

[0126] Patient and mouse tissues were frozen in OCT (Optimum Cutting Temperature, Sakura Finetek). Frozen sections (7 μm) were treated consecutively with Triton 100X 0.1% for 15 min, hyaluronidase 0.03% for 15 min, Background Buster (Innovex bioscience) for 15 min, Fc Receptor Block (Innovex bioscience) for 15 min, and Background Buster for 15 min. Sections were then stained with primary antibodies diluted in PBS supplemented with 5% BSA and 0.01% saponin for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and stained with secondary antibodies for 40 min at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1 μg / mL) for 2 min.

[0127] Primary antibodies: human CD14 (1:200, UCHM1, AbD Serotec); human CD163 (1:200, EDHu-1, AbD Serotec); human CD206 (1:100, 15-2, AbD Serotec); human HLA-DR (1:100, LN3, Biolegend). For CD163 / CD206 combined staining, both antibodies were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 Antibody Labeling Kit (Molecular Probes) before tissue staining.

[0128] Secondary antibodies: goat anti-rat Alexa Fluor 568; goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488; goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 588, or goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 (1:700, Molecular Probes).

[0129] Immunofluorescence imaging was performed on an Eclipse Ti inverted microscope system (Nikon Instruments Inc.) operated via NIS-Element Ar software (Nikon Instruments Inc).

[0130] Tumors from three different melanoma patients, three NSGs, and three MISTRGs were selected for quantification of the density of CD163+ cell infiltration. From each tumor, three frozen sections were stained for human CD163. From each stained section, three representative images were acquired, for a total of 27 representative images from each group (patients, MISTRGs, and NSGs). For each image, CD163+ cells were counted using NIS-Element Ar software (Nikon Instruments Inc.). Each image was analyzed by simultaneous zooming on each channel separately and overlay using the "split channels + overlay" display.

[0131] statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism 5 software using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test, two-tailed unpaired Student's t test, or repeated measures ANOVA.

[0132] Example 2: Human myeloid neoplasms can be engrafted into MISTRG Myeloid leukemia is a type of cancer that affects cells of the myeloid lineage. Myeloid leukemia is classified into various types, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The risk of developing myeloid leukemia increases with age, and the prevalence of these diseases is likely to increase with the aging of the population. Although curative and supportive care approaches are available in the clinic, a better understanding of this group of diseases and novel treatments are needed.

[0133] One of the methods used to study human leukemias relies on xenotransplantation of patient samples into immunodeficient mice. However, currently available recipient mice are not optimal for this purpose: only a fraction of AML samples can be successfully engrafted; robust engraftment of MPD, CMML, or MDS (including RCUD, RAEB I, and RAEB II) has not been reported so far. Therefore, optimized strains of recipient mice are needed for better engraftment of human myeloid leukemias.

[0134] It is demonstrated herein that MISTRG supports better engraftment of human hematopoietic cells and results in almost complete exchange of mouse hematopoiesis to human hematopoiesis in bone marrow.It is also demonstrated herein that the samples isolated from patients with AML, CMML and MDS can be engrafted with MISTRG (Figure 17).

[0135] Thus, the genetically modified non-human animals described herein represent novel in vivo animal models of human myeloid leukemia that will be useful for (i) studying the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of the disease; (ii) identifying predictive or prognostic informative biomarkers; (iii) identifying novel targets for therapy; and (iv) testing therapies in preclinical and patient-specific settings.

[0136] The disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Although the present invention has been disclosed with respect to specific embodiments, it is apparent that other embodiments and variations of the present invention may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The appended claims are intended to be construed to include all such embodiments and equivalent variations.

Claims

1. A nucleic acid encoding a human M-CSF polypeptide, operably linked to a promoter; A nucleic acid encoding a human IL-3 polypeptide operably linked to a promoter; a nucleic acid encoding a human GM-CSF polypeptide operably linked to a promoter; a nucleic acid encoding a human SIRPα polypeptide operably linked to a promoter; and A nucleic acid encoding a human TPO polypeptide operably linked to a promoter. mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells,

2. replacement of the mouse M-CSF gene with a nucleic acid encoding a human M-CSF polypeptide at the mouse M-CSF locus; replacement of the mouse IL-3 gene with a nucleic acid encoding a human IL-3 polypeptide at the mouse IL-3 locus; replacement of the mouse GM-CSF gene with a nucleic acid encoding a human GM-CSF polypeptide at the mouse GM-CSF locus; Insertion of a nucleic acid encoding a human SIRPα polypeptide; and replacement of the mouse TPO gene with a nucleic acid encoding a human TPO polypeptide at the mouse TPO locus; The mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell of claim 1, comprising in its genome:

3. 2. The mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell of claim 1, comprising a gene knockout of recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2) and a gene knockout of IL2 receptor gamma chain (IL2rg).

4. 3. The mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell of claim 2, comprising a gene knockout of recombination activating gene 2 (Rag-2) and a gene knockout of IL2 receptor gamma chain (IL2rg).

5. A mouse embryo comprising the mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. 1. A method of making a genetically modified mouse comprising a nucleic acid encoding a human M-CSF polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, a nucleic acid encoding a human IL-3 polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, a nucleic acid encoding a human GM-CSF polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, a nucleic acid encoding a human SIRPα polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, and a nucleic acid encoding a human TPO polypeptide operably linked to a promoter, comprising: The method comprising producing a genetically modified mouse from the mouse embryo of claim 5.

Images