Health interview support system, health interview support program, and health interview support method

Abstract

A health interview support system, a health interview support program, and a health interview support method are provided that enable a detailed understanding of the health condition of a person undergoing a health checkup. [Solution] A health interview support system 1 includes a storage unit 2 and a control unit 6. The storage unit 2 stores health checkup information 21, threshold-related information 22, and disease response information 23. The threshold-related information 22 includes first threshold information 223 and second threshold information 224. In a process of displaying a list of health checkup results of multiple health checkup recipients, a display processing unit 69 performs a first display to distinguish test results that are poor values ​​compared to the first threshold from other test results, and performs a second display to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold and the second threshold from other test results. The first display and the second display performed by the display processing unit 69 are different display modes.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a health interview support system, a health interview support program, and a health interview support method that support an interview conducted using the results of a health check. [Background technology]

[0002] Conventionally, systems have been provided that collect the results of health checkups and utilize the results. Health checkups involve many test items (test items), resulting in a large amount of test result data, so if a person in charge were to analyze the test result data one by one, the work would become cumbersome. Therefore, by using a system, the work can be made more efficient and appropriate analysis results can be obtained.

[0003] Generally, normal values ​​(reference values) are set for each test item to determine whether or not a person is healthy, and in a health checkup, it is determined whether or not the test result value is within the range of this normal value. For example, in the field of diagnosis by doctors, a system is used that indicates whether or not each test result is within the normal value, and a smooth diagnosis is performed using the results of the system (for example, see Patent Document 1).

[0004] In the system described in Patent Document 1, one of three grades, A, B, or C, is used for each test result. If the test result is within the range of normal values, it is graded A; if the test result is worse than the normal value but is considered to be relatively close to the normal value, it is graded B; and if the test result is significantly worse than the normal value, it is graded C. Based on each grade displayed in the system, the doctor analyzes the condition of the person undergoing the health checkup and proceeds with the medical treatment. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] JP 2007-317045 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0006] The above-mentioned system is intended only to assist doctors in making diagnoses, and judges the degree of abnormality when the diagnosis result is worse than the normal value. In general, in medical diagnosis, values ​​that show abnormality are suspected of being ill and are treated, while values ​​within the normal range are judged to be in a healthy state. The above-mentioned system is also suited to such diagnosis by doctors.

[0007] In other words, the above system is provided from the viewpoint of being used in the medical field, and aims to analyze data that is worse than the normal value. As a specific method for doing so, the system shows how to determine the degree of abnormality.

[0008] However, when one's health deteriorates, the physical condition of the body gradually deteriorates, and the test results also gradually worsen, until at some point the test results become worse than normal. In other words, the deterioration of health begins before the test results in a health check show values ​​worse than normal, and it is thought that from the perspective of maintaining health, it is important to realize that the deterioration of health has already begun.

[0009] The present invention has been made in consideration of the above-mentioned situation, and aims to provide a health interview support system, a health interview support program, and a health interview support method that make it possible to grasp the health condition of a health checkup subject in detail. [Means for solving the problem]

[0010] (1) The health interview support system according to the present invention is a health interview support system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting an interview for each health examination recipient using the health examination results. The health interview support system includes a diagnosis result storage unit, a first threshold value storage unit, a second threshold value storage unit, and a display processing unit. The diagnosis result storage unit stores health examination results including test results of a plurality of test items for each health examination recipient. The first threshold value storage unit stores a first threshold value that is a boundary with a normal value range for each test item. The second threshold value storage unit stores a second threshold value that is within the normal value range and close to the boundary with the normal value for each test item. The display processing unit performs processing for displaying the contents of the health examination results of the plurality of health examination recipients stored in the diagnosis result storage unit in a list format that displays the test results for each test item. The display processing unit, in a process of displaying a list of health checkup results of a plurality of health checkup recipients, performs a first display to distinguish test results that are poor values ​​compared to the first threshold value from other test results, and performs a second display to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. The first display and the second display performed by the display processing unit are different displays.

[0011] According to this configuration, the first display and the second display can be recognized simultaneously by checking the list displayed by the display processing unit. The first display indicates that the test result is a value that exceeds the normal range, and the second display indicates that the test result is a value that is within the normal range but close to the border with the normal value.

[0012] Therefore, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health condition of each health checkup recipient can be confirmed in detail. For example, if the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient show many first indications, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​indicating abnormalities. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview with the health checkup recipient that the health checkup recipient has poor health. Also, for example, if the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient show many second indications, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​that are within the normal range but close to the border. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview that the health checkup recipient has normal health but requires attention.

[0013] In this way, the health interview support system according to the present invention makes it possible to grasp the health condition of a health checkup recipient in detail. Specifically, it is possible to grasp the health condition in detail not only when the results of the health checkup show abnormal values, but also when the results show normal values.

[0014] Therefore, by using the health consultation support system according to the present invention, it is possible to prevent illness before it occurs.

[0015] (2) The health interview support system may further include an average calculation processing unit, a disease correspondence information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, and a test item extraction processing unit. The average calculation processing unit calculates an average value of test results by age group based on the health check results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit. The disease correspondence information storage unit stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health check results in association with information on a disease related to each test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one disease information from a plurality of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts a test item corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the memory contents stored in the disease correspondence information storage unit. The display processing unit may further perform a process of displaying the average value of the test results by age group calculated by the average calculation processing unit, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value together. The display processing unit may perform a process of narrowing down the average value to the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit, and displaying the age-specific average value of the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

[0016] According to this configuration, it is possible to display the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value only for the test items related to the type of disease.

[0017] Normally, a wide variety of test items are examined during a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the amount of displayed information becomes too much, making it difficult to understand the trends in health conditions. Therefore, by using the above configuration, it is possible to narrow down the results to a specific disease, and then check the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value by limiting the results to the test items related to that disease.

[0018] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0019] Therefore, when checking the overall situation including multiple health checkup recipients, it becomes possible to intuitively understand detailed health conditions and trends.

[0020] (3) The health interview support system may further include a disease response information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, a test item extraction processing unit, and a patient selection processing unit. The disease response information storage unit stores a plurality of test items included in the health checkup result in association with information on a disease related to each test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one disease information from a plurality of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts a test item corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the memory contents stored in the disease response information storage unit. The patient selection processing unit selects one health checkup examinee from a plurality of health checkup examinees. When one health checkup examinee is selected by the examinee selection processing unit, the display processing unit may further perform a process of individually displaying the health checkup results of the health checkup examinee. In the individual display process of one health checkup examinee by the display processing unit, a process of narrowing down the test items to those extracted by the test item extraction processing unit and displaying the test results of the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value may be performed.

[0021] According to this configuration, when the medical examination results of one medical examinee are individually displayed, the test results, first threshold value, and second threshold value can be displayed only for the test items related to the type of disease.

[0022] Normally, a wide variety of test items are examined in a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the amount of displayed information becomes too much, making it difficult to understand the specific health condition and trends. Therefore, by using the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to narrow down the results to a specific disease, limit the test items related to the disease, and then check the test results, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value.

[0023] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0024] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand detailed health conditions and trends.

[0025] (4) The health interview support system may further include an average calculation processing unit. The average calculation processing unit calculates average values ​​of test results by age group based on the health checkup results of all the people stored in the diagnosis result storage unit. In the individual display process for one health checkup recipient by the display processing unit, when displaying the test results of the narrowed-down test items, the display processing unit may select, from the average values ​​calculated by the average calculation processing unit, average values ​​of test results for the same age group as the health checkup recipient to be displayed, and display the selected average value.

[0026] With this configuration, when checking an individual's health condition, the average value for the same age group can be checked in addition to the individual's test results, i.e., the individual's results can be compared with the average value for the same age group.

[0027] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand much more detailed information.

[0028] (5) The health interview support system may further include a patient extraction processing unit. The patient extraction processing unit extracts health checkup examinees having test results that are worse than the first threshold value or health checkup examinees having test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value, based on the health checkup results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of the health checkup examinees extracted by the patient extraction processing unit.

[0029] According to this configuration, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to health checkup recipients whose test results are poorer than the first threshold value, or health checkup recipients whose test results are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

[0030] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0031] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can achieve an appropriate interview order by narrowing down the health checkup recipients and displaying them in a list, and then prioritizing interviews from those displayed.

[0032] (6) The diagnostic result storage unit may store information on multiple health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health interview support system may further include a patient extraction processing unit. When the most recent health checkup result stored in the diagnostic result storage unit has a test result value worse than the second threshold value and a test result value worse than the previous health checkup result, the patient extraction processing unit extracts a health checkup recipient having that test result. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of the health checkup recipients extracted by the patient extraction processing unit.

[0033] According to this configuration, in a list displaying the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to those whose most recent health checkup results are worse than the second threshold value and whose test result values ​​are worse than the value in the previous health checkup result.

[0034] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0035] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can achieve an appropriate interview order by narrowing down the health checkup recipients and displaying them in a list, and then prioritizing interviews from those displayed.

[0036] (7) The diagnostic result storage unit may store information on multiple health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health interview support system may further include a patient extraction processing unit. When the multiple health checkup results, including the most recent health checkup result, stored in the diagnostic result storage unit, include a result in which the test result value has continuously worsened, the patient extraction processing unit extracts a health checkup recipient having such test result. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of the health checkup recipients extracted by the patient extraction processing unit.

[0037] According to this configuration, in a list display showing the results of a plurality of health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to those whose test results have been continuously deteriorating.

[0038] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0039] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can achieve an appropriate interview order by narrowing down the health checkup recipients and displaying them in a list, and then prioritizing interviews from those displayed.

[0040] (8) The health interview support system may further include a disease response information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, and a test item extraction processing unit. The disease response information storage unit stores each of a plurality of test items included in a health checkup in association with information on a disease related to the test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one disease information from the plurality of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts a test item corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the memory contents stored in the disease response information storage unit. In the process of extracting health checkup recipients, information on the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit may be narrowed down, and the health checkup recipients may be extracted using the narrowed down information as information on the health checkup results.

[0041] According to this configuration, it is possible to narrow down the information on examination items according to the purpose, extract health checkup recipients based on the information, and display a list of the extracted health checkup recipients.

[0042] Therefore, a list display can be made according to purpose.

[0043] For example, if you want to check the trend of your health condition by narrowing down to a certain disease, you can select that disease, and the health checkup recipients will be extracted after narrowing down to the test items related to that disease. This allows you to properly grasp the trend of your health condition.

[0044] (9) A health interview support program according to the present invention causes a computer to function as a system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting interviews for each health examination recipient using the health examination results. The health interview support program causes a computer to execute the steps of: storing health examination results including test results of a plurality of test items for each health examination recipient; storing a first threshold value corresponding to each test item, the first threshold value being the boundary of the normal value range; storing a second threshold value corresponding to each test item, the second threshold value being within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value; and displaying the contents of the health examination results of the plurality of health examination recipients in a list format in which the test results for each test item are displayed. In the display step, in a process of displaying the list of the health examination results of the plurality of health examination recipients, a first display is performed to distinguish test results that are worse than the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is performed to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. The first display and the second display in the display step are different displays.

[0045] (10) A health consultation support method according to the present invention is executed by a computer and includes the steps of: storing health checkup results including test results of a plurality of test items for each health checkup recipient; storing a first threshold value corresponding to each test item, the first threshold value being the boundary of the normal value range; storing a second threshold value corresponding to each test item, the second threshold value being within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value; and displaying the contents of the health checkup results of the plurality of health checkup recipients in a list format that displays the test results for each test item. In the displaying step, in a process of displaying the list of the health checkup results of the plurality of health checkup recipients, a first display is performed to distinguish test results that are worse than the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is performed to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. The first display and the second display in the displaying step are different displays. Effect of the Invention

[0046] According to the present invention, it is possible to grasp the health condition of a person undergoing a health checkup in detail. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0047] [Figure 1] 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a health interview support system according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Diagram 2] 2 is a block diagram showing in detail the configuration of a storage unit in FIG. 1. [Diagram 3] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on a display unit of the health interview support system, showing a state in which all health checkup recipients are displayed in a list. [Figure 4] 13 is a flowchart showing an example of a process of a control unit of the health interview support system. [Diagram 5] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on a display unit of the health interview support system, showing a state in which extracted health checkup recipients are displayed in a list. [Figure 6]FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on a display unit of the health interview support system, showing a state in which an individual's test results are displayed. [Figure 7] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which an individual's test results and an average value are displayed together. [Figure 8] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on a display unit of the health interview support system, showing a state in which average values ​​by age group are displayed. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0048] 1. Configuration of the Health Interview Support System FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a health interview support system 1 according to one embodiment of the present invention.

[0049] The health interview support system 1 is a health interview support system for collecting the health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting an interview (health interview) for each health examination recipient using the health examination results. The health interview support system 1 is used, for example, in health interviews conducted within an organization such as a company. A health interview is conducted, for example, by collecting information on the health examination results of employees belonging to the organization, having a person in charge such as a health manager confirm the collected information on the health examination results, and then providing individual health guidance to each employee. At this time, by using the health interview support system 1, the person in charge of the health interview (such as a health manager) can grasp the health condition of each individual in detail and can also grasp the tendency of the health condition of the entire organization. Furthermore, it is also possible to appropriately determine the order of the health interviews.

[0050] The health interview support system 1 is configured, for example, by a personal computer or a tablet terminal. Note that, in this embodiment, the health interview support system 1 is described as being a stand-alone system, but the health interview support system 1 may be realized as a cloud-based system that connects a server and a user terminal via the Internet.

[0051] The health interview support system 1 includes a memory unit 2, an operation unit 3, a printing unit 4, a display unit 5, and a control unit 6.

[0052] The storage unit 2 is composed of, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), a hard disk, etc. The storage unit 2 stores health checkup information 21, threshold-related information 22, and disease response information 23. The storage unit 2 is an example of a diagnosis result storage unit, a first threshold storage unit, a second threshold storage unit, and a disease response information storage unit.

[0053] The health checkup information 21 is information on the health checkup results for each health checkup examinee. The health checkup information 21 is configured by collecting information on the results of health checkups taken by individuals and storing the collected information. As will be described later, the health checkup information 21 includes information on the results of multiple test items performed in the health checkup.

[0054] The threshold-related information 22 is information on values ​​that serve as standards for judging the test results included in the medical examination results. As will be described later, the threshold-related information 22 includes information on a plurality of types of standards.

[0055] The disease response information 23 is configured to associate information on a disease with information on examination items related to the disease. Examination items related to a disease are examination items used when determining the progress (presence or absence) of a certain disease. In other words, the disease response information 23 is information that associates information on a disease with information on examination items used when determining the disease.

[0056] The operation unit 3 includes a keyboard and a mouse.

[0057] The printing unit 4 is a component for performing predetermined printing (printing) on ​​a paper medium, and is configured by, for example, a printer.

[0058] The display unit 5 is configured, for example, by a liquid crystal display.

[0059] The control unit 6 includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit). The control unit 6 is electrically connected to the memory unit 2, the operation unit 3, the printing unit 4, and the display unit 5. The control unit 6 functions as an input receiving unit 61, a disease selection processing unit 62, a patient selection processing unit 63, a test item extraction processing unit 64, a discrimination processing unit 65, a patient extraction processing unit 66, an average value calculation processing unit 67, a report creation processing unit 68, a display processing unit 69, and the like, as the CPU executes a program (health interview support program).

[0060] The input receiving unit 61 receives a signal from the operation unit 3 .

[0061] The disease selection processing unit 62 performs a process of selecting one disease from a plurality of diseases based on the signal received by the input receiving unit 61 and the information stored in the memory unit 2.

[0062] The examinee selection processing unit 63 performs a process of selecting one examinee from a plurality of examinees, based on the signal received by the input receiving unit 61 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0063] The examination item extraction processing unit 64 performs processing to extract necessary examination items based on the information on the disease selected by the disease selection processing unit 62 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0064] The discrimination processing unit 65 performs various discrimination processes based on the information of the patient selected by the patient selection processing unit 63, the information of the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64, the information stored in the memory unit 2, and the processing contents of the average value calculation processing unit 67.

[0065] The examinee extraction processing unit 66 performs processing to extract health examination examinees based on the information on the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64, the information stored in the memory unit 2, and the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65.

[0066] The average value calculation processing section 67 performs a process of calculating various average values ​​of the medical examination results based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing section 65 and the information stored in the storage section 2.

[0067] The report creation processing unit 68 performs processing to create a report based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65, information on the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67, and information stored in the storage unit 2. Information on the report created by the report creation processing unit 68 is sent to the printing unit 4.

[0068] The display processing unit 69 performs processing to create display contents to be displayed on the display unit 5 based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65, the information of the examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit 66, the information of the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67, and the information stored in the storage unit 2. The processing contents of the display processing unit 69 are sent to the display unit 5.

[0069] 2. Detailed configuration of the memory unit FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the storage unit 2 in detail.

[0070] As described above, the storage unit 2 stores the health checkup information 21, the threshold-related information 22, and the disease response information 23. The health checkup information 21 is information on the health checkup results for each health checkup examinee. The health checkup information 21 is an information group configured by associating diagnosing person information 211, item information 212, and result information 213.

[0071] The diagnostician information 211 is information that indicates the person who has undergone the health checkup. The diagnostician information 211 includes number information such as an employee number, date of birth information, and gender information.

[0072] The item information 212 is information on the examination items carried out in the health checkup. The item information 212 includes information on a plurality of examination items. Examples of the information on the examination items included in the item information 212 include information on BMI, waist circumference, HbA1c, blood glucose, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, insulin, HOMA-R, HOMA-β, creatinine, ALT, AST, γ-GTP, uric acid, and maximum blood pressure.

[0073] The result information 213 is information on the results of tests performed in the health checkup. The result information 213 is associated with each test item included in the item information 212.

[0074] The threshold-related information 22 is information on values ​​that are standards for judging the test results included in the medical examination results. The threshold-related information 22 is a group of information that includes detailed item information 221, characteristic information 222, first threshold information 223, second threshold information 224, and ideal value information 225, which are associated with each other.

[0075] The detailed item information 221 is information on a specific test item. That is, the detailed item information 221 is information on one test item extracted from a plurality of test items included in the item information 212. Specifically, for example, the detailed item information is individual information such as BMI or individual information such as HbA1c.

[0076] The characteristic information 222 is information indicating the characteristics of the test item. In some cases, the higher the test result value of a test item performed in a health checkup, the worse the result, and in other cases, the lower the test result value, the worse the result. In addition, some test items indicate a bad result when both the test result value is high and the test result value is low (some test items indicate a bad result when the value is outside a certain range). The characteristic information 222 indicates such information that is necessary when judging whether the test result is good or bad. In other words, the characteristic information 222 is information indicating whether the numerical value indicating the test result has an abnormal value on either the high side or the low side, or both.

[0077] The first threshold information 223 is information on a reference value (first threshold) indicating a normal value of a test result. That is, the first threshold information 223 is information indicating a boundary with a normal value (boundary between a normal value and an abnormal value). The first threshold information 223 (first threshold) is determined based on, for example, national guidelines. As described later, the first threshold is determined according to each test item.

[0078] The second threshold information 224 is information indicating a second threshold. As described later, the second threshold is determined according to the test item. The second threshold is a value (a value within the normal value range, set near the boundary with the normal value) that is within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value (the boundary between the normal value and the abnormal value). In other words, the second threshold is a set value located on the first threshold side (boundary side) of the ideal value (median value) within the normal value range. The second threshold is a value (threshold value) that serves as a reference for determining a result that is considered to be a normal health state but not an ideal health state and requires attention in the future. The second threshold value is set as a value based on the first threshold value and located in a region slightly closer to the ideal value side (median value) than the value indicated by the first threshold value. For example, in the case of an examination item in which the higher the value, the worse the result (when the first threshold value is the upper limit), the second threshold value is a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold value (upper limit) by a number between 0.60 and 0.98, preferably a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold value (upper limit) by a number between 0.70 and 0.98, and more preferably a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold value (upper limit) by a number between 0.80 and 0.98. Also, for example, in the case of an examination item in which the lower the value, the worse the result, (when the first threshold value is the lower limit), the second threshold value is a value obtained by dividing the first threshold value (lower limit) by a number between 0.60 and 0.98, preferably a value obtained by dividing the first threshold value (lower limit) by a number between 0.65 and 0.95, and more preferably a value obtained by dividing the first threshold value (lower limit) by a number between 0.70 and 0.95.

[0079] The ideal value information 225 is information indicating an ideal value of the test result. The ideal value information 225 is set as a value located in the middle of the range of normal values ​​(a value near the middle). Specifically, the ideal value is a value that has a certain width (range) on the upper and lower sides with the middle of the normal values ​​as the center.

[0080] The disease response information 23 is a group of information that includes disease information 231 and related item information 232 in association with each other.

[0081] The disease information 231 is information indicating the type of disease. Examples of the disease information 231 include diabetes, kidney disease, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, liver disease, obesity, and stress. The disease information 231 is information indicating, for example, any of these diseases.

[0082] The related item information 232 is information indicating the type of test item used to determine whether or not a particular disease is present. For example, when the disease information 231 is "diabetes", "HbA1c", "blood glucose", "insulin", "HOMA-R", and "HOMA-β" are set as the related item information 232. Note that the related item information 232 may partially overlap in multiple pieces of disease response information 23.

[0083] 3. Display format Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit 5 of the health interview support system 1. Fig. 3 shows a state in which all health checkup recipients are displayed in a list on the display screen 7.

[0084] The display screen 7 of the display unit 5 displays the results of processing by the display processing unit 69. Fig. 3 shows a screen configuration (basic screen) that is displayed when starting to use the health interview support system 1. At this time, a list 71, a year column 72, a number of people column 73, a first disease selection button 74, a list display button 75, and a second disease selection button 76 are displayed on the display screen 7.

[0085] The list 71 is arranged in the center of the display screen 7. The list 71 is a table for displaying a list of the test results of a plurality of health checkup recipients.

[0086] The year column 72 and the number of people column 73 are located in the upper right-hand side of the display screen 7. The year column 72 displays the year in which the medical examination (medical examination result) to be displayed was conducted. The number of people column 73 displays the number of people who have undergone the medical examination to be displayed in a list.

[0087] The first disease selection button 74 is located at the top of the display screen 7. The first disease selection button 74 is a button used when extracting medical examinees according to a purpose. As the first disease selection button 74, a button labeled "All" is provided on the far left side. To the right of this button, multiple buttons (buttons corresponding to the types of disease) are provided on which the names of diseases are displayed. Each button allows the selection of "Beyond the first threshold", "Beyond the second threshold", "Worse since this time", "Worse for two consecutive years", "Worse for three consecutive years", or "Normal". As will be described later, examinees are extracted according to the information selected with the first disease selection button 74.

[0088] The list display button 75 is located on the lower left side of the display screen 7. The list display button 75 is a button used when displaying all medical checkup examinees in the list 71 (when displaying the basic screen).

[0089] The second disease selection button 76 is a button for selecting which disease category test items are to be displayed when displaying the medical examination results. As the second disease selection button, a plurality of buttons (buttons corresponding to the types of diseases) displaying disease names are provided. As will be described later, test items are extracted according to the information selected with the second disease selection button 76, and the test results of the test items are displayed.

[0090] 4. Setting thresholds etc. When using the health interview support system 1, the operator first operates the operation unit 3 to input various setting information. Then, the input reception unit 61 receives the input and stores the information in the storage unit 2. As a result, threshold-related information 22 and disease response information 23 are stored in the storage unit 2, as shown in FIG.

[0091] Specifically, first, the normal value (reference value: first threshold value) for each test item is determined based on national guidelines, etc. In this case, the value indicated in the guidelines, etc. may be used as the normal value (first threshold value) as is, or an original value obtained by correcting that value may be used as the normal value (first threshold value). Then, based on the determined first threshold value, the second threshold value and the ideal value for each item are determined.

[0092] These determined values ​​are then set as threshold-related information 22 and stored in the storage unit 2. At this time, the characteristics of each inspection item are also set.

[0093] In addition, the disease correspondence information 23 is also set and stored in the storage unit 2. Specifically, one disease is identified from a plurality of diseases, the disease is set as disease information 231, and information on the type of test item used to determine the presence or absence of the disease and its progress is set as related item information 232, and stored in the storage unit 2 as the disease correspondence information 23. For example, when "diabetes" is identified (selected) as the disease information 231, "HbA1c", "blood glucose", "insulin", "HOMA-R", and "HOMA-β" are selected as the related item information 232, and a setting is made to associate these. When "liver disease" is identified (selected), "AST", "ALT", and "γ-GTP" are selected as the related item information 232, and a setting is made to associate these. When "dyslipidemia" is identified (selected), "neutral fat", "HDL cholesterol", and "LDL cholesterol" are selected as the related item information 232, and a setting is made to associate these. In the setting work, such disease correspondence information 23 is created for each disease and stored in the storage unit 2.

[0094] 5. Control Actions When using the health interview support system 1, first, information on the results of health examinations performed on each person (employee) in the organization is collected and stored in the storage unit 2 as health examination information 21. The health examination results may be collected in a format in which each individual sends the results to the health interview support system 1, or in a format in which the system staff inputs the information on the individual's health examination results submitted on paper into the health interview support system 1. The health examination information 21 includes information on the results of health examinations multiple times (multiple years).

[0095] 4 is a flowchart showing an example of the processing of the control unit 6 of the health interview support system 1. In the following, the processing of the health interview support system 1 will be described with reference to FIG.

[0096] When the operator starts the operation of the health interview support system 1, the discrimination processing unit 65 first reads out the health checkup information 21 and the threshold-related information 22 stored in the storage unit 2. Then, the discrimination processing unit 65 discriminates whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is worse than the value (first threshold) indicated by the first threshold information 223 (first discrimination process). Similarly, the discrimination processing unit 65 discriminates whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is included between the value (first threshold) indicated by the first threshold information 223 and the value (second threshold) indicated by the second threshold information 224 (second discrimination process). Furthermore, the discrimination processing unit 65 discriminates whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is included in the ideal value information 225 (third discrimination process). At this time, the discrimination processing unit 65 performs discrimination processing using the item information 212 included in the health checkup information 21 and the detailed item information 221 included in the threshold-related information 22 as common information (step S101).

[0097] Then, the display processing unit 69 displays a list 71 on the display screen 7 based on the contents of the discrimination process by the discrimination processing unit 65 and the health checkup information 21 in the storage unit 2. In this case, the list 71 displays the results of all the health checkup recipients (step S102).

[0098] Specifically, the display processing unit 69 displays, on the list display screen, each of the test results determined to be a poor value in the first discrimination process, the test results determined to be a value between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process, and the test results determined to be an ideal value in the third discrimination process, in different colors. For example, the display processing unit 69 colors the test results determined to be a value worse than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process in a color that attracts attention, such as red (first display), colors the test results determined to be a value between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process in a color that attracts attention, such as green (second display), and colors the test results determined to be an ideal value in the third discrimination process in a color different from the above colors, such as gold (third display).

[0099] For example, in this example, in the test results of employee number "3", the value shown in column 711, which is the result of "systolic blood pressure", is determined to be worse than the first threshold value, and the background is colored in a more attention-grabbing color such as red (see FIG. 3). Similarly, in the test results of employee number "3", the value shown in column 712, which is the result of "uric acid", is determined to be between the first threshold value and the second threshold value, and the background is colored in a relatively attention-grabbing color such as green. Also, in the test results of employee number "3", the value shown in column 713, which is the result of "AST", is determined to be an ideal value, and the background is colored in a color different from the above-mentioned colors, such as gold.

[0100] The way of expressing the results of each discrimination process (first to third display ways) may be any way as long as it can be distinguished from other test results and the way of expressing the results of each discrimination process is different from each other. For example, the test results that are judged to be worse than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process may be surrounded by a solid line frame, the test results that are judged to be between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process may be surrounded by a dotted line frame, and the test results that are judged to be the ideal value in the third discrimination process may be surrounded by a two-dot chain line frame.

[0101] By checking the list 71 displayed in this way, the person in charge can grasp the detailed health condition of each health checkup recipient (employee). For example, if many test results are determined to be worse than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is poor (some kind of illness is suspected). Also, for example, if many test results are determined to be between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is normal but that future attention is required from the perspective of disease prevention. Also, for example, if many test results are determined to be ideal values ​​in the third discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is ideal.

[0102] In this state, the operator can extract medical checkup recipients (employees) to be displayed in list 71 according to the purpose, and can cause the extracted medical checkup recipients to be displayed in list 71.

[0103] FIG. 5 shows a state in which the extracted medical checkup recipients are displayed as a list in the list 71 on the display screen 7.

[0104] For example, when the operator selects "Beyond first threshold" of the button labeled "All" of the first disease selection button 74, all medical examination results are targeted, and medical examinees having test results worse than the first threshold are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. In this case, the examinee extraction processing unit 66 extracts medical examinees having results judged by the discrimination processing unit 65 to be worse than the first threshold. Then, the display processing unit 69 displays the medical examination results of the examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit 66 in the list 71. In this case, since all examination items are targeted, the examination items are not narrowed down (YES in step S103 -> NO in step S104 -> step S107 -> step S106).

[0105] In this case, when the "outside second threshold" of the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74 is selected, all health checkup results are targeted, and health checkup recipients whose test results fall between the first threshold and the second threshold are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0106] In addition, when "It's worse since this time" is selected from the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and if the test result value in the most recent health checkup result is worse than the second threshold value and the test result value in question is worse than the value in the previous health checkup result (previous year), the health checkup recipients with that test result are extracted (selected) and displayed in list 71.

[0107] Furthermore, when "Poor for 2 consecutive years" is selected from the button labeled "All" of the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and if there are any test results that have continuously worsened in the health checkup results over a three-year period (three times) including the most recent health checkup result, the health checkup recipients with those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. Similarly, when "Poor for 3 consecutive years" is selected from the button labeled "All" of the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup recipients are targeted, and if there are any test results that have continuously worsened in the health checkup results over a four-year period (four times) including the most recent health checkup result, the health checkup recipients with those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0108] When "worse from this time", "worse for 2 consecutive years", or "worse for 3 consecutive years" is selected in the first disease selection button 74 and a patient is extracted, a display is displayed to distinguish the corresponding test item, as shown in frame 714 in Fig. 5. This makes it possible to display the corresponding item in a manner that is easy to understand while displaying the first to third displays. For example, Fig. 5 shows an example of the display when "worse from this time" is selected.

[0109] In addition, when "Normal" is selected from the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and if all test results are better than the second threshold value, health checkup recipients who have those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0110] Also, when a selection is made from a button displaying a disease name as the first disease selection button 74, the disease selection processing unit 62 first identifies information on the disease. For example, when a selection is made from a button displaying "diabetes" among the first disease selection buttons 74, the disease selection processing unit 62 identifies "diabetes" as the disease. Then, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts information (type) of test items associated with "diabetes" based on the disease correspondence information 23 stored in the storage unit 2. In this example, "HbA1c", "blood glucose", "insulin", "HOMA-R", and "HOMA-β" are associated with "diabetes" as the disease correspondence information 23, so the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts these items as test items. Then, the examinee extraction processing unit 66 narrows down the test items to the extracted ones and performs a process of examinee extraction.

[0111] For example, when "Beyond First Threshold" of the button labeled "Diabetes" of the first disease selection button 74 is selected, the information on the narrowed-down test items "HbA1c," "Blood Glucose," "Insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" is targeted, and health checkup recipients who have test results for that information that are worse than the first threshold value are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. In this way, for example, health checkup recipients suspected of diabetes are displayed (YES in step S103 → YES in step S104 → step S105 → step S106).

[0112] That is, by selecting a button that displays the disease name of the first disease selection button 74, it is possible to extract medical checkup recipients limited to each disease field. Note that the specific processing for each button is the same as the processing for the "All" button described above.

[0113] In this way, it becomes possible to extract health checkup recipients according to the category of each disease.

[0114] In addition, when the operator selects one health checkup recipient from the multiple health checkup recipients displayed in list 71, the health checkup results of only that health checkup recipient (one person) are displayed in list 71.

[0115] At this time, as a specific process, the examinee selection processing unit 63 selects (identifies) one health checkup examinee. Then, the discrimination processing unit 65 discriminates (identifies) the health checkup results of the health checkup examinee identified by the examinee selection processing unit 63. The display processing unit 69 displays the results discriminated (identified) by the discrimination processing unit 65 in a list 71. For example, in FIG. 5, when the health checkup examinee numbered "2" is selected, only the health checkup results of that examinee are displayed in the list 71 (not shown).

[0116] Then, when the second disease selection button 76 is selected in this state, the health check results of the health checkup recipient are displayed, and the results of the test items related to the selected disease are displayed (YES in step S108 → YES in step S109 → step S110).

[0117] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a display form on the display screen 7, showing a state in which an individual's test results are displayed.

[0118] When the test results of an individual are displayed, an attribute display column 77, a disease column 78 and a test result display screen 79 are displayed on the display screen 7.

[0119] For example, when an operator selects one health checkup examinee from multiple health checkup examinees and then selects the "Diabetes" button of the second disease selection button 76, the health checkup results (test results) of that health checkup examinee, which are test results related to "Diabetes", are displayed. In this case, the attributes (number, sex, age) of that health checkup examinee are displayed in the attribute display field 77, "Diabetes" is displayed in the disease field 78, and the test results of the test items (HbA1c, blood glucose, insulin, HOMA-R, HOMA-β) used to determine the presence or absence and progress of diabetes are displayed on the test result display screen 79. Furthermore, information on the first and second thresholds is also displayed on the test result display screen 79.

[0120] As a specific process at this time, first, the disease selection processing unit 62 specifies "diabetes" as the disease. Then, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts information (type) of the test item associated with "diabetes" based on the disease correspondence information 23 stored in the storage unit 2. In this example, since "HbA1c", "blood glucose", "insulin", "HOMA-R", and "HOMA-β" are associated with "diabetes" as the disease correspondence information 23, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts these items as the test items. Then, the display processing unit 69 displays the results of the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64 on the test result display screen 79. At this time, the display processing unit 69 displays information on the first threshold value and the second threshold value for each test item together.

[0121] The person in charge can grasp the detailed health condition of the health checkup recipient (employee) for each disease by checking the test result display screen 79 displayed in this way. Then, for example, by sharing this display content during an interview, it is possible to promote a deeper understanding of the employee's own health condition.

[0122] Moreover, on this display screen, by operating a button (not shown), it is possible to select to display average values ​​by age group as well.

[0123] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display screen 7, showing a state in which the individual test results and the average value are displayed together.

[0124] For example, when a button not shown is selected to display the average values ​​by age group (same age), the state shown in Fig. 7 is displayed on the display screen 7. In Fig. 7, the average values ​​of the individual and the same age group are displayed in a bar graph so as to be superimposed on the individual's test results shown in Fig. 6. This allows the individual's test results to be checked while being compared with the average values ​​of the same age group.

[0125] As a specific process at this time, first, the age of the displayed individual is determined by the discrimination processing unit 65. Then, based on the information on the age determined by the discrimination processing unit 65 and the health checkup information 21 in the storage unit 2, the average value calculation processing unit 67 calculates the average value for that age group. The display processing unit 69 displays the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67 on the test result display screen 79.

[0126] Also, at this time, for example, when a report creation button (not shown) is selected, the report creation processing unit 68 creates a report on the relationship between the individual's test results and each threshold (first threshold and second threshold). For example, if there are test results that are worse than the first threshold or test results that are between the first and second thresholds, these test results are listed in the report and their details are displayed. Also, if there are test results that are ideal values, test results that are tending to worsen, or test results that are worse than each threshold but tending to improve, their explanations are also included in the report. The created report information is sent to the printing unit 4 and printed. This report can also be used in health interviews.

[0127] Furthermore, on the display screen 7, in addition to displaying such individual values, it is also possible to display average values ​​by age group, which will be described later.

[0128] FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display screen 7, showing a state in which average values ​​by age group are displayed.

[0129] For example, when the result information of multiple health checkup recipients is displayed in list 71 as shown in FIG. 3, when the second disease selection button 76 is selected, a screen showing average values ​​by age group is displayed as shown in FIG. 8 (YES in step S108 → NO in step S109 → step S111).

[0130] At this time, a disease column 81, a year display button 82, a gender display button 83, and a test result display screen 84 are displayed on the display screen 7. By operating the year display button 82 and the gender display button 83, it is also possible to display the average value by year or by gender. Note that the screen that is displayed first displays the average values ​​for all years and for both men and women.

[0131] As a specific process at this time, first, the disease is identified by the disease selection processing unit 62. Then, based on the information of the disease, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts information on the test items. The discrimination processing unit 65 identifies the information extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64 and the age of the health checkup recipient from the information displayed in the list 71. The average value calculation processing unit 67 calculates the average value for each age group based on the information identified by the discrimination processing unit 65. The display processing unit 69 displays the calculation results of the average value calculation processing unit 67 on the test result display screen 84. The display processing unit 69 also displays the first threshold value and the second threshold value together on the test result display screen 84.

[0132] At this time, for example, when a report creation button (not shown) is selected, the report creation processing unit 68 creates a report on the relationship between the average value by age group and each threshold value (the first threshold value and the second threshold value). The created report is sent to the printing unit 4 and printed as a report.

[0133] 6. Effects (1) According to this embodiment, as shown in Fig. 3, in the health interview support system 1, in the list 71 displayed on the display screen 7, test results that are worse than the first threshold value and test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value are displayed in a manner that distinguishes them from other test results. In addition, these test results are displayed in different display manners. For example, test results that are worse than the first threshold value are displayed in a color that is easy to attract attention, such as red, and test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value are displayed in a color that attracts relatively more attention, such as green.

[0134] Therefore, by checking the list 71, the health condition of each medical examination recipient can be confirmed in detail. For example, if the medical examination results of a certain medical examination recipient show many red indications, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​indicating abnormal values. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview with the medical examination recipient that the health condition is not good. Also, for example, if the medical examination results of a certain medical examination recipient show many green indications, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​that are within the normal range but close to the border. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview that the health condition is normal but caution is required.

[0135] In this way, the health interview support system 1 makes it possible to grasp the health condition of a health checkup recipient in detail. Specifically, it is possible to grasp the health condition in detail not only when the results of the health checkup show abnormal values, but also when the results show normal values.

[0136] Therefore, by using the health consultation support system 1, it is possible to prevent illness before it occurs.

[0137] (2) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in Fig. 8, the average value of the test results by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value can be displayed together on the display screen 7. Furthermore, the test items at that time are narrowed down to those corresponding to the selected disease.

[0138] Normally, a wide range of test items are examined during a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the amount of displayed information becomes too much, making it difficult to understand the trends in health conditions. With the health interview support system 1, it is possible to narrow down the results to a certain disease field, limit the test items related to that disease, and then check the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value.

[0139] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0140] Therefore, when checking the overall situation including multiple health checkup recipients, it becomes possible to intuitively understand detailed health conditions and trends.

[0141] (3) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6, when displaying an individual's health checkup results on the display screen 7, the results can be narrowed down to a certain disease field, and the test items can be limited to those related to that disease, and then the test results, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value can be displayed.

[0142] Normally, a wide variety of test items are examined during a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the amount of displayed information becomes too much, making it difficult to understand the specific health condition and trends. Therefore, by using the above-mentioned configuration, the test results, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value are displayed after narrowing down to a specific disease and limiting the test items related to the disease.

[0143] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0144] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand detailed health conditions and trends.

[0145] (4) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7, when the test results of an individual are displayed, the average value for the same age group is displayed together with the test results of the individual.

[0146] This allows you to compare your individual results with the average for your age group.

[0147] As a result, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand even more detailed information.

[0148] (5) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, it is possible to perform a process for extracting health checkup recipients whose test results are worse than the first threshold value (a process performed by selecting “outside first threshold value”), and a process for extracting health checkup recipients whose test results are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value (a process performed by selecting “outside second threshold value”).

[0149] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0150] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can achieve an appropriate interview order by narrowing down the health checkup recipients and displaying them in a list, and then prioritizing interviews from those displayed.

[0151] (6) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, when the test result value in the most recent health checkup is worse than the second threshold value and the test result value is worse than the value in the previous health checkup, a process of extracting health checkup recipients having that test result (a process of selecting “worse this time”) can be performed.

[0152] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0153] (7) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, when the test result values ​​have continuously worsened in multiple health checkup results, including the most recent health checkup result, as shown in FIG. 3, a process can be performed to extract health checkup recipients who have such test results (a process to be performed by selecting "poor for two consecutive years" and a process to be performed by selecting "poor for three consecutive years").

[0154] Therefore, appropriate health checkup recipients can be selected and displayed according to the purpose.

[0155] In the present embodiment, the case where the numerical value has deteriorated for two or three consecutive years has been taken as an example, but a period of deterioration of four years or more may be selected.

[0156] (8) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in step S104 of FIG. 4, in the process of extracting health checkup recipients, information is narrowed down to test items corresponding to the disease, and health checkup recipients are extracted based on the narrowed down information.

[0157] Therefore, a list display can be made according to purpose.

[0158] For example, if one wishes to check the trend of health conditions by focusing on a particular disease, one can select that disease, narrow down the search to examination items related to that disease, and then extract health checkup recipients.

[0159] Therefore, the trend of the health condition can be properly understood.

[0160] 7. Variations In the above embodiment, the first to third displays displayed on the list 71 of the display screen 7 are described as being displayed in different background colors. However, these displays need only be distinguishable from one another, and are not limited to being distinguished by color. For example, the numerical values ​​in each display may be surrounded by a frame (line) and the frame (line) may be of a different type.

[0161] In the above embodiment, as shown in Fig. 7, the test results of an individual (individual) are shown in a line graph, and the average value of the same age group is shown in a bar graph so as to be superimposed on the individual result, but the display form is not limited to that shown in the embodiment as long as the test results of an individual and the average value of the same age group are displayed together. For example, both the test results of an individual and the average value of the same age group may be displayed side by side in a bar graph.

[0162] Furthermore, the types of diseases and types of test items shown in the above embodiment are merely examples, and can be set as appropriate.

[0163] Furthermore, in the above embodiment, the health interview support system 1 has been described as being a stand-alone system, but the health interview support system 1 can also be realized as a cloud-based system.

[0164] The above-mentioned program (health consultation support program) may be provided in a recorded state on a recording medium. [Explanation of symbols]

[0165] 1. Health interview support system 2 Storage section 5 Display section 6. Control Unit 21 Health Check Information 22 Threshold-related information 23 Disease Response Information 62 Disease Selection Processing Unit 63 Patient Selection Processing Unit 64 Test item extraction processing section 65 Discrimination processing section 66 Patient Extraction Processing Unit 67 Average calculation processing unit 69 Display processing section 211 Diagnostician Information 212 Item information 213 Results information 221 Detailed item information 222 Characteristics Information 223 First Threshold Information 224 Second Threshold Information 231 Disease information 232 Related item information

Claims

1. A health consultation support system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination subjects and supporting an interview for each health examination subject using the health examination results, comprising: a medical examination result storage unit that stores medical examination results including test results of a plurality of test items for each medical examination examinee; a first threshold value storage unit that stores a first threshold value that is a boundary between a normal value range and each test item; a second threshold value storage unit that stores a second threshold value that is within the range of normal values ​​and is close to the boundary of the normal values ​​according to each test item; a patient selection processing unit for selecting one health checkup patient from a plurality of health checkup patients; a display processing unit that, when a health checkup examinee is selected by the examinee selection processing unit, performs processing to individually display the health checkup results of the health checkup examinee, The health interview support system, in which the display processing unit performs an individual display process for one health checkup recipient, performs a process of displaying the test results of the test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

2. A disease correspondence information storage unit that stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health check result in association with information on a disease related to each test item; A disease selection processing unit that selects one piece of disease information from a plurality of pieces of disease information; Further comprising an examination item extraction processing unit that extracts examination items corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the memory contents stored in the disease response information memory unit, 2. The health interview support system according to claim 1, wherein the display processing unit performs an individual display process for one health checkup patient, narrowing down the test items to those extracted by the test item extraction processing unit, and displaying the test results of the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

3. Further comprising an average calculation processing unit that calculates an average value of the examination results by age group based on the health examination results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit, The health interview support system according to claim 2, wherein, in the individual display processing for one health checkup patient by the display processing unit, when displaying the test results of the narrowed-down test items, the display processing unit selects, from the average values ​​calculated by the average value calculation processing unit, an average value of test results for the same age group as the health checkup patient to be displayed, and displays the selected average value together.

4. A health consultation support program for causing a computer to function as a system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting interviews for each health examination recipient using the health examination results, comprising: storing the health checkup results including the test results of a plurality of test items for each health checkup examinee; storing a first threshold value that is a boundary between the normal value range and each test item; storing a second threshold value that is within the range of normal values ​​and is close to the boundary of the normal values ​​for each test item; selecting one health checkup recipient from a plurality of health checkup recipients; and when one medical examination recipient is selected, displaying the medical examination results of the selected medical examination recipient individually. The display step includes a process of displaying the test results of the test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

5. A health consultation support method executed on a computer, comprising: storing the health checkup results including the test results of a plurality of test items for each health checkup examinee; storing a first threshold value that is a boundary between the normal value range and each test item; storing a second threshold value that is within the range of normal values ​​and is close to the boundary of the normal values ​​for each test item; selecting one health checkup recipient from a plurality of health checkup recipients; When one health checkup recipient is selected, the health checkup results of the selected health checkup recipient are individually displayed, The health consultation support method, wherein the display step displays the test results of the test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

Images