Flame-retardant cardboard and its manufacturing method
The flame-retardant cardboard design with a polymer-enhanced flame-retardant layer and overcoat layer addresses production costs and peeling issues, ensuring effective and durable flame resistance.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- JP2021093564
- Authority / Receiving Office
- JP · JP
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2021-06-03
- Publication Date
- 2025-08-06
- Estimated Expiration
- 2041-06-03
AI Technical Summary
Existing methods for making flame-retardant corrugated cardboard face challenges such as high production costs, complexity, and the risk of flame retardant peeling due to heat or friction, particularly when using surface coatings or inorganic layers.
A flame-retardant cardboard design that includes a paper layer, a flame-retardant layer containing a specific polymer and flame retardant, and an overcoat layer, which suppresses penetration and peeling, allowing for a small coating amount and simplified production.
The design achieves high flame retardancy with reduced material usage, cost-effectiveness, and improved durability against heat and friction, meeting flame retardancy standards without additional treatments.
Smart Images

Figure 0007719635000004 
Figure 0007719635000005 
Figure 0007719635000006
Abstract
Description
[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a flame-retardant corrugated board and a method for producing the same. [Background technology]
[0002] Corrugated cardboard as a packaging material is sometimes required to be flame retardant or fireproof. To impart flame retardancy or fireproofness to corrugated cardboard, two common methods are used: one is to incorporate a flame retardant such as aluminum hydroxide or silicon dioxide gel into pulp before making the cardboard, and the other is to coat a flame retardant on paper having an inorganic surface layer such as calcium carbonate.
[0003] For example, Patent Document 1 proposes a corrugated cardboard liner that exhibits flame retardancy by forming a coating film containing a flame retardant and an acrylic resin on the surface.
[0004] Furthermore, Patent Document 2 proposes a liner in which an inorganic layer containing one of calcium carbonate, kaolin, and titanium dioxide is laminated on a paper layer, and a flame retardant consisting of a complex compound of phosphorus and nitrogen is added to the portion other than the inorganic layer, with the inorganic layer side positioned outside the paper layer.
[0005] However, when a flame retardant or flame retardant is applied to the surface of a liner, the coating layer formed by the flame retardant on the surface of the paper is often weak. Therefore, there is a risk that the coating layer may peel off due to heat or friction when the flame retardant itself is applied or when the liner is processed into cardboard. To prevent this peeling, Patent Document 3 proposes a method of protecting the coating layer by laminating a laminate material such as a plastic film on top of it. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]
[0006] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Publication No. 2020-139233 [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2013-91210 [Patent Document 3] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 8-133269 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]
[0007] However, the method of incorporating a flame retardant into pulp and making paper requires mass production using a paper machine, which has the problem of not being able to accommodate small-lot production.On the other hand, the method of coating the surface of the liner with a flame retardant, such as that described in Patent Document 1, requires a large amount of a relatively flammable acrylic resin with an oxygen index (OI: JIS K7201-2), which is an index of flame retardancy, of about 18 to prevent the coated flame retardant from penetrating the liner and form a coating film on the liner surface, which has a problem with flame retardancy.
[0008] Furthermore, as in the method described in Patent Document 2, forming an inorganic layer on the surface of the paper layer and then coating the flame retardant on top of that can prevent the flame retardant from penetrating into the paper, but this requires coating the inorganic layer over the entire surface of the paper, which not only complicates the production process but also poses problems in terms of cost.
[0009] Therefore, the object of this invention is to provide a liner and flame-retardant cardboard that is low-cost and has high flame retardant performance, by using a method of applying a flame retardant by coating, which suppresses the penetration of the flame retardant compared to ordinary liners and allows a flame-retardant layer to be formed on the surface with a small amount of coating. [Means for solving the problem]
[0010] This invention solves the above problem by providing a flame-retardant cardboard that uses flame-retardant paper as a liner, which has a paper layer, a flame-retardant layer containing a flame retardant and a polymer with a molecular weight of 8,000 to 10,000,000, and an overcoat layer that protects the flame-retardant layer, with the overcoat layer being arranged on the surface side of the flame-retardant layer.
[0011] By including the above-mentioned polymer in the flame-retardant layer containing a flame retardant, the strength of the coating film forming the flame-retardant layer is improved, and the penetration of the flame retardant from the surface of the paper layer to deeper layers is suppressed, making it easier to form the coating film. This allows the flame-retardant layer to be formed with a small coating amount without providing an inorganic layer as in Patent Document 2. In other words, this configuration simplifies the production process, reduces the cost of forming the flame-retardant layer, and still ensures high flame retardancy.
[0012] A water-soluble polymer can be suitably used as the polymer. Water-soluble salts, which are often used as flame retardants for paper, wood, etc., tend to aggregate and lose uniformity when mixed with an emulsion of a water-insoluble polymer, but a coating solution containing a water-soluble polymer does not aggregate and is more likely to form a highly uniform flame retardant layer when coated.
[0013] Accordingly, a water-soluble salt can be suitably used as the flame retardant.
[0014] Furthermore, by providing an overcoat layer on the surface side of the flame-retardant layer, the flame-retardant layer will not peel off even when subjected to heat or friction when manufacturing cardboard using this flame-retardant paper as a liner, and the cardboard can be made while maintaining its flame-retardant properties.
[0015] The procedure for manufacturing a liner for the flame-retardant corrugated board of this invention can be as follows: a coating solution containing a flame retardant and a polymer with a molecular weight of 8,000 to 10,000,000 is applied to one surface of a paper layer to form a flame-retardant layer, and an overcoat agent is applied to the surface of the flame-retardant layer opposite the paper layer to form an overcoat layer. A viscosity of the coating solution of 20 mPa·s to 1900 mPa·s is preferred to facilitate the formation of a flame-retardant layer. [Effects of the Invention]
[0016] According to this invention, it is possible to obtain a flame-retardant corrugated board having a liner with high flame-retardant performance on the liner surface while reducing the amount of flame retardant required. [Brief explanation of the drawings]
[0017] [Figure 1] Cross-sectional view of a liner used in an embodiment of the flame-retardant corrugated board according to the present invention. [Figure 2] Cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the flame-retardant corrugated board according to the present invention. [Figure 3] (a) Photograph showing the results of the flame retardancy test in Example 1, (b) Photograph showing the results of the flame retardancy test in Example 2, (c) Photograph showing the results of the flame retardancy test in Comparative Example 2, (d) Photograph showing the results of the flame retardancy test in Example 14 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to embodiments. The present invention relates to a corrugated board having flame retardant properties. A cross-sectional view of a liner 15 used in the corrugated board according to this embodiment is shown in Fig. 1, and a cross-sectional view of the corrugated board itself is shown in Fig. 2.
[0019] The liner 15 has a paper layer 11, a flame-retardant layer 12 containing a flame retardant and a polymer with a molecular weight of 8,000 to 10,000,000, and an overcoat layer 13 that protects the flame-retardant layer 12. Basically, the flame-retardant layer 12 is on the surface side in contact with the paper layer 11, and the overcoat layer 13 is on the surface side in contact with the flame-retardant layer 12. The present invention can be realized even if there are layers other than these between the layers, but it is preferable that there are no other layers between the flame-retardant layer 12 and the overcoat layer 13 because the flame-retardant layer 12 is more likely to exhibit flame retardant performance if it is closer to the flame or heat source from the surface side.
[0020] A general liner paperboard can be used for the paper layer 11. A liner paperboard having an inorganic layer on its surface can also be used, but in the present invention, the structure of the flame retardant layer 12 can suppress penetration into the paper layer 11, so that a general liner paperboard that has not been subjected to surface treatment such as providing an inorganic layer can be suitably used, which is desirable in terms of ease of acquisition and cost.
[0021] The flame-retardant layer 12 contains the flame-retardant agent and the polymer, and uniformly covers the entire surface of one of the paper layers 11 to provide flame-retardant properties. Examples of the flame-retardant agent contained in the flame-retardant layer 12 include phosphorus-based compounds, halogen-based compounds, and metal hydroxides. Among these, water-soluble salts are preferred because they facilitate mixing with the water-soluble polymer (described below) to form an aqueous solution of the flame-retardant agent when preparing a coating solution. Examples of water-soluble salt flame-retardants include phosphorus-nitrogen-based compounds such as ammonium polyphosphate and polyphosphate amide, guanidine salts such as guanidine sulfamate and guanidine phosphate, halogen-based compounds such as ammonium bromide and ammonium chloride, boric acid compounds such as borax and sodium borate, and inorganic salts such as ammonium sulfate. The flame-retardant being water-soluble means that its solubility is 1 g or more in 100 g of water, preferably 10 g or more.
[0022] The polymer contained in the flame-retardant layer 12 can be a polymer that can be dispersed or dissolved in water and dried to form a film on the surface of the paper layer 11. Among these, water-soluble polymers that can be dissolved in water are particularly preferred because they can be mixed with the flame-retardant and applied uniformly without agglomeration due to the flame-retardant, facilitating the formation of a highly uniform flame-retardant layer 12. Here, the term "water-soluble" refers to a solubility of 0.2 g or more in 100 g of water, preferably 6 g or more. The water-soluble polymer preferably has a relatively high oxygen index (OI) of 20 or more. Examples of suitable water-soluble polymers include homopolymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (OI = approximately 22), polyacrylamide (OI = approximately 27), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (OI = 21), as well as copolymers containing the monomers that make up these homopolymers.
[0023] The molecular weight of the polymer is preferably 8,000 or more, more preferably 30,000 or more, in terms of weight average molecular weight. With a polymer with a molecular weight of less than 8,000, it becomes difficult to achieve an appropriate viscosity at a concentration that is easy to coat, and penetration into the paper layer 11 becomes significant, making it difficult to form the flame-retardant layer 12. On the other hand, the weight-average molecular weight of the polymer is preferably 10 million or less, more preferably 8 million or less. If it exceeds 10 million, its solubility in water decreases significantly, making it impossible to increase the polymer concentration in the coating solution. As a result, it becomes difficult to prevent penetration into the paper layer 11, resulting in reduced flame-retardant performance. Since the number-average molecular weight generally exhibits a value equal to or less than the weight-average molecular weight, a number-average molecular weight of 8,000 or more satisfies the lower limit. Meanwhile, although depending on the molecular weight distribution of the polymer, the viscosity-average molecular weight takes a value intermediate between the number-average molecular weight and the weight-average molecular weight, so a number-average molecular weight or viscosity-average molecular weight of 10 million or less generally satisfies the upper limit.
[0024] The mixing ratio of the flame retardant to the polymer contained in the flame retardant layer 12 is preferably 0.5 to 10 times the flame retardant to the polymer. If the mixing ratio is less than 0.5, it becomes difficult to achieve flame retardant performance. On the other hand, if the mixing ratio exceeds 10, the strength of the coating film decreases, which may cause the flame retardant to fall off.
[0025] The flame-retardant layer 12 is formed by applying the coating liquid containing the flame retardant and the polymer to one surface of the paper layer 11. The viscosity of the coating liquid is adjusted by adjusting the concentration of the polymer in the coating liquid depending on the molecular weight of the polymer used. As measured at 20°C using a Toki Sangyo Co., Ltd. B-type viscometer, the viscosity is preferably 20 mPa·s or higher, and more preferably 30 mPa·s or higher. If the viscosity is less than 20 mPa·s, the coating liquid will penetrate too much into the paper layer 11 during coating, resulting in an excessive amount of coating liquid being required to retain a sufficient amount of the flame retardant on the surface. On the other hand, the viscosity of the coating liquid is preferably 1900 mPa·s or lower, and more preferably 1800 mPa·s or lower. If the viscosity exceeds 1900 mPa·s, the viscosity will be too high, making it difficult to form a uniformly coated layer.
[0026] Examples of methods for applying the coating liquid to the surface of the paper layer 11 to form the flame-retardant layer 12 include gravure coaters, roll coaters, bar coaters, and die coaters, with direct gravure coaters and reverse gravure coaters being preferred. Even when applying directly to the paper layer 11, adjusting the molecular weight of the polymer and the viscosity of the coating liquid to fall within the above ranges makes it easier to form a layer of the flame-retardant on the surface of the paper layer 11 while suppressing penetration into the paper layer 11, thereby enabling sufficient flame-retardant performance to be achieved. In particular, coating with a gravure coater can flexibly accommodate small-lot production using a gravure printing machine.
[0027] By forming this flame-retardant layer 12 as a film containing the above-mentioned polymer, not only can peeling during coating be suppressed, but by further providing an overcoat layer 13 on the flame-retardant layer 12, peeling of the above-mentioned flame-retardant from the surface can be suppressed when used as a liner and processed into cardboard, thereby improving heat resistance and abrasion resistance.
[0028] The amount of the flame retardant contained in the flame retardant layer 12 is 0.2 g / m2 in terms of solid content. 2 It is preferable that the content is 0.7 g / m or more. 2 More preferably, it is 0.2 g / m or more. 2 If the amount of the flame retardant is less than 20.0 g / m, the amount of the flame retardant is too small, and the flame retardant layer 12 may not be able to fully exhibit its flame retardant performance. 2 It is preferable that the content is 5.0 g / m or less. 2 It is more preferable that the density is 20.0 g / m or less. 2 Even if the amount exceeds this, the improvement in flame retardancy cannot be expected to be commensurate with the amount added, and a lot of waste will result.
[0029] The liner 15 constituting the flame-retardant corrugated board 21 of the present invention has an overcoat layer 13 on the surface (upper side in FIG. 1 ) of the flame-retardant layer 12, opposite the paper layer 11. The overcoat layer 13 prevents the flame-retardant layer 12 from peeling or wearing away, protecting it so that the flame-retardant layer 12 continues to exert its flame-retardant properties even after being heated during processing into corrugated board. The overcoat layer 13 must uniformly cover the entire flame-retardant layer 12 to protect it. The overcoat layer 13 is formed by applying an overcoat agent over the flame-retardant layer 12 after its formation. This overcoat agent can be varnish or a varnish and additives. Examples of varnishes include nitrocellulose and acrylic varnishes. However, the type of varnish is not particularly limited, as long as the paper layer 11 is provided with a flame-retardant layer 12 with excellent flame retardancy, and the flame-retardant properties are not affected. Any varnish that exhibits sufficient abrasion resistance to prevent peeling during typical corrugated board manufacturing and use processes will suffice.
[0030] The amount of the overcoat agent applied was 0.4 g / m2 in solid content. 2 More than 18.0g / m 2 It is preferable that the density is 0.4 g / m or less. 2 If the thickness is less than 18.0 g / m, it becomes difficult to sufficiently protect the flame retardant layer 12. 2 If the temperature is more than this, the flame retardant performance may be reduced, coating becomes difficult, and there is also a problem in terms of cost.
[0031] The overcoat layer 13 may contain an inorganic substance as an additive in addition to the varnish. Compared to an overcoat layer 13 formed only with the varnish, an overcoat layer 13 containing the inorganic substance exhibits even higher flame retardancy. Examples of the inorganic substance to be contained include oxides such as calcium carbonate, kaolin, silicon dioxide, and titanium dioxide, as well as metal compounds.
[0032] The content of the inorganic substance in the overcoat layer 13 is preferably 3% by mass or more. If the content is less than 3% by mass, the effect of improving flame retardancy is small, and adding the inorganic substance does not improve flame retardancy. On the other hand, the content of the inorganic substance is preferably 35% by mass or less. If the content exceeds 35% by mass, the inorganic substance tends to settle in the coating liquid, which may prevent the formation of a uniform overcoat layer or cause the inorganic substance to fall off from the overcoat layer.
[0033] The liner 15, which has the flame-retardant layer 12 and overcoat layer 13 in this order on the paper layer 11, is a flame-retardant liner that exhibits sufficient flame retardancy against flames or heat sources from the overcoat layer 13 side. By using this liner 15 as at least one of the front and back liners, it exhibits flame retardancy against flames or heat sources from the direction of use. In particular, when corrugated board is manufactured using this liner 15 as both the front and back liners, it becomes a flame-retardant corrugated board that exhibits flame retardancy equivalent to passing the flame retardancy standards set by the Japan Fire Retardant Association (disaster partitions, etc., 45° Meckel burner method).
[0034] Furthermore, the flame-retardant corrugated board 21, which has the above-mentioned liner 15 on both the front and back liners, exhibits sufficient flame retardancy without the need for special flame retardant treatment on the core 17. Furthermore, the presence of the overcoat layer 13 protects the flame-retardant layer 12 from stresses such as heat and friction applied during the normal corrugated board manufacturing process, allowing the board to continue to exhibit flame retardancy. Therefore, the flame-retardant corrugated board of this invention can exhibit sufficient flame retardancy, even though it can be manufactured in the same way as ordinary corrugated board.
[0035] The flame-retardant corrugated board of this invention can be used for applications such as building panels, exhibition panels, and room partitions, taking advantage of its sufficient flame-retardant properties, as well as for transport boxes and storage boxes for specific items that require flame resistance. [Example]
[0036] Next, the flame-retardant corrugated board according to the present invention will be described in more detail by way of examples in which the present invention was actually implemented. First, the chemicals used will be listed. <Flame retardant> Phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant: Nonnen R061-3 (aqueous solution: active ingredient = 40%) manufactured by Marubishi Yuka Kogyo Co., Ltd. Guanidine-based flame retardant: Manac Corporation: Prasafety SC-1000 (solid: guanidine sulfamate content ≥ 90%) Halogen-based flame retardant. Ammonium bromide (special grade reagent) manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. <Water-soluble polymer> Polyacrylamide 1: Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.: Product code 555-77731, viscosity average molecular weight 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 Polyacrylamide 2: Sigma-Aldrich Japan, LLC: Product code 738743, number average molecular weight 40,000 Polyacrylamide 3: Helios Corporation: HA-825, viscosity average molecular weight 11 million Polyvinyl alcohol 1: JF-02 manufactured by Nippon Vinyl Acetate & Poval Co., Ltd., average degree of polymerization 200 (viscosity average molecular weight 9,000) Polyvinyl alcohol 2: Nippon Vinyl Acetate & Poval Co., Ltd.: JF-10, average polymerization degree 1000 (viscosity average molecular weight 44,000) <Overcoat agent> Varnish 1: Sakata Inx Corporation: Gratone PCN (nitrocellulose type) Varnish 2: Sakata Inx Corporation: New FK MR OP Varnish N-2000 (acrylic) <Inorganic substances for overcoating agents> Silicon dioxide: Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (special grade reagent) Calcium carbonate: Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (special grade reagent) Titanium dioxide: Manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.: Titanium dioxide (for manufacturing purposes only) <Liner> General liner: Rengo Co., Ltd.: RKA170 Inorganic layer-containing liner: Rengo Co., Ltd.: CRC230
[0037] <Verification of coating properties based on viscosity> Example 1 A coating solution was prepared by mixing 28% by mass of a phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant, 6% by mass of polyacrylamide 1, and 66% by mass of water. The viscosity of this coating solution was 30 mPa·s. This coating solution was applied to the surface of a standard liner on a piece of corrugated cardboard at a deposition rate of 3.4 g / m 2 A flame-retardant layer was formed by coating with a bar coater (Select-Roller manufactured by OSG System Products Co., Ltd.) so that the flame-retardant layer was as follows. After this flame-retardant layer was dried, Varnish 1 was applied as an overcoat agent on top of the flame-retardant layer in an amount of 2.0 g / m 2 The flame-retardant liner was manufactured by applying the above-mentioned bar coater to form an overcoat layer. The overcoat layer formed was uniform in appearance with no unevenness. This flame-retardant liner was used as the front and back liners, and a general-purpose medium (S120 manufactured by Rengo Co., Ltd.) formed into a corrugated shape using a test flute (manufactured by Nippon TMC Co., Ltd.) was bonded with a starch adhesive to form an A-flute corrugated board, and the flame-retardant performance was evaluated. The flame-retardant performance test was conducted in accordance with the 45° Meckel burner method of the Japan Fire Retardant Association, and the evaluation was based on the following criteria. 〇: Afterflame time (10 seconds or less) and afterglow time (30 seconds or less) passed; △: Either afterflame time or afterglow time passed; ×: Both afterflame time and afterglow time failed. According to this criterion, this example was judged to pass. A photograph of the surface after the flame retardancy test in which the flame retardancy performance was measured is shown in Figure 3(a).
[0038] [Table 1]
[0039] <Verification of the molecular weight of water-soluble polymers> Example 2 In Example 1, the water-soluble polymer was changed to polyacrylamide 2, which has a different molecular weight, so that the viscosity of the coating liquid was 25 mPa·s. The flame-retardant corrugated board was produced using the same procedure, and was rated as good. Figure 3(b) shows a photograph of the surface after the flame-retardant test, which measured the flame-retardant performance.
[0040] (Comparative Example 1) In Example 1, when the water-soluble polymer used was changed to polyacrylamide 3 with a different molecular weight, its solubility in water was significantly lower. When flame-retardant cardboard was produced using the same procedure except that the concentration of the water-soluble polymer in the flame retardant aqueous solution was 0.2 mass%, the polymer penetrated into the paper layer, and a sufficient flame-retardant layer could not be obtained.
[0041] (Comparative Example 2) In Example 1, flame-retardant cardboard was produced using the same procedure, except that polyacrylamide was omitted from the flame-retardant aqueous solution, resulting in a viscosity of 7 mPa·s. The flame-retardant performance was evaluated as "poor," and most of the cardboard burned. A photograph of the surface is shown in Figure 3(c). This is thought to be because the viscosity was reduced due to the absence of a water-soluble polymer in the flame-retardant aqueous solution, and most of the flame-retardant was absorbed by the liner, preventing the formation of a flame-retardant layer on the surface.
[0042] <Verification of the type of flame retardant> (Examples 3 and 4) In Example 1, the flame retardant was changed to a guanidine-based flame retardant (Example 3) and a halogen-based flame retardant (Example 4), respectively. Because these were provided as solids or powders, water was added to dissolve them so that the concentrations in the aqueous flame retardant solutions were the same, and the viscosity of the coating solution became 30 mPa s in both cases. Flame retardant cardboard was produced using the same procedure. In both cases, the flame retardancy was evaluated as good.
[0043] <Adjusting the amount of clothing> (Examples 5 to 7) In Example 1, the amount of flame retardant applied was 0.28 g / m 2 (Example 5), 0.7 g / m 2 (Example 6), 19.8 g / m 2Flame-retardant cardboard was produced in the same manner except for the modification to Example 7. When the flame retardancy of each cardboard was evaluated, Example 5, which had a small amount of flame retardant applied, was rated △, while Examples 6 and 7 were rated ○, indicating that the flame retardancy improved as the amount of flame retardant applied increased.
[0044] <Types of water-soluble polymers> (Examples 8 and 9) Flame-retardant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the polymer used was changed from polyacrylamide 1 to polyvinyl alcohol 1 (Example 8) or polyvinyl alcohol 2 (Example 9), resulting in coating solution viscosities of 30 mPa s and 80 mPa s, respectively. The flame retardancy was evaluated as good, confirming that the flame-retardant cardboard of this invention can be produced even if the type of water-soluble polymer is changed.
[0045] [Table 2]
[0046] <Adjusting the mixing ratio of flame retardant and water-soluble polymer> Example 10 In Example 1, when the mixing ratio of polyacrylamide 1 was changed to 15% by mass, the viscosity of the flame retardant aqueous solution became 1800 mPa·s, but a uniform flame retardant layer was obtained by coating at a coating speed of 80 m / min using a gravure printing machine. When flame retardant cardboard was produced from this liner, the flame retardancy was rated as good.
[0047] (Comparative Example 3) In Example 10, when the mixing ratio of polyacrylamide 1 was changed to 17 mass%, the viscosity of the flame retardant aqueous solution became 2000 mPa·s, and a uniform flame retardant layer could not be obtained, so it was not possible to produce flame retardant cardboard and evaluate the flame retardant performance.
[0048] <Type of varnish for overcoat layer> Example 11 Flame-resistant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the varnish 1 (nitrocellulose-based) used in the overcoat layer was changed to varnish 2 (acrylic-based). The flame-resistant performance was judged to be good, confirming that the flame-resistant cardboard of this invention can be produced even when the type of varnish in the overcoat layer is changed.
[0049] <Adjusting the amount of overcoat layer applied> (Examples 12 and 13) In Example 1, the amount of varnish 1 applied to the overcoat layer was 0.5 g / m 2 (Example 12), 15.0 g / m 2 Flame-resistant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 13, except that the flame-resistant properties were rated as "good" in all cases, and the flame-resistant properties were not impaired during the manufacturing process of the cardboard.
[0050] Comparative Example 4 A flame-retardant liner was prepared using the same procedure as in Example 1, except that an overcoat layer was not provided. This liner was placed in a heated Gakushin-type abrasion tester (AB-301, manufactured by Tester Sangyo Co., Ltd.) and subjected to friction for 30 minutes under conditions of a heating plate temperature of 180°C, a load of 500 gf, and a reciprocating speed of 30 cpm. A-flute corrugated cardboard was then similarly prepared and its flame-retardant performance was evaluated. As a result, the flame-retardant performance of the non-friction area was evaluated as ○, but the flame-retardant performance of the friction area was evaluated as △.
[0051] (Comparative Example 5) In Example 1, the amount of varnish 1 applied to the overcoat layer was 20.0 g / m 2 A flame-retardant liner was produced using the same procedure, except that the friction coefficient was changed to 1 / 2. As in Comparative Example 4, an abrasion test was conducted on this liner, and then a flame-retardant cardboard was produced and evaluated for flame retardancy. As a result, the flame retardancy of both the non-friction and friction-exposed areas was evaluated as fair.
[0052] <Adjusting the Amount of Inorganic Substance in the Overcoat Layer> (Examples 14 and 15, Comparative Example 6) Flame-resistant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the overcoating agent contained 5% by mass (Example 14), 25% by mass (Example 15), and 30% by mass (Comparative Example 6). In Examples 14 and 15, although both were rated as "good" according to the evaluation criteria, both the afterflame time and afterglow time were shortened, demonstrating higher flame-resistant performance than in Example 1. However, when the overcoating agent containing the inorganic substance was left at room temperature for one day to check its dispersion stability, no particular change was observed in Examples 14 and 15, while most of the inorganic substance settled in Comparative Example 6. A photograph of the surface of Example 14 after the flame-resistant test is shown in Figure 3(d).
[0053] [Table 3]
[0054] <Adjusting the type of inorganic material in the overcoat layer> (Examples 16 and 17) Flame-resistant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 14, except that the type of inorganic substance used was changed from silicon dioxide to calcium carbonate (Example 16) and titanium dioxide (Example 17). In both cases, there was no problem with the dispersion stability of the inorganic substance, and the results of the flame-resistant test were also good, demonstrating good flame-resistant performance.
[0055] <Change of liner> Example 18 Flame-resistant cardboard was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the liner was changed from a general liner to a liner containing an inorganic layer. Even when the liner was changed, the result of the flame-resistant test was good, and good flame-resistant performance was demonstrated. [Explanation of symbols]
[0056] 11 paper layer 12 Fire-retardant layer 13 Overcoat layer 15 Liner 17 Core 21. Fire-retardant cardboard
Claims
1. This flame-retardant corrugated board has a paper layer, a flame-retardant layer containing a flame retardant and polyacrylamide or polyvinyl alcohol having a viscosity average molecular weight of 8,000 to 10,000,000, and an overcoat layer protecting the flame-retardant layer, with the overcoat layer being disposed on the surface side of the flame-retardant layer, and uses flame-retardant paper as a liner.
2. 2. The flame retardant corrugated board of claim 1, wherein the flame retardant is a water-soluble salt.
3. A method for manufacturing a flame-retardant liner, comprising: applying a coating liquid containing a flame retardant and polyacrylamide or polyvinyl alcohol having a viscosity average molecular weight of 8,000 to 10,000,000 to one surface of a paper layer to form a flame-retardant layer; and applying an overcoat agent to the surface of the flame-retardant layer opposite the paper layer to form an overcoat layer.
4. 4. The coating liquid according to claim 3, wherein the viscosity of the coating liquid is 20 mPa·s or more and 1900 mPa·s or less. A method for manufacturing a flame retardant liner.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Flame-resistant corrugated seal -
JP1985175628U
Paperboard
JP1996133269A
Anti-slip resin coated sheet and packaging box
JP2003034004A
Flame retarding corrugated cardboard
JP2013091210A
Flameproof corrugated cardboard and manufacturing method thereof
JP2015171816A