Mineral-containing water composition

Abstract

To provide safe, tasty drinking water that is beneficial to human health. The present invention provides a mineral-containing water composition for oral ingestion, characterized in that the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition is 20 ppm or more.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a mineral-containing water composition that has significant buffering capacity in the pH range from weakly alkaline to weakly acidic, and that is mellow and has little unpleasant taste. [Background technology]

[0002] In recent years, against the backdrop of a growing trend toward health and delicious food, there has been growing social interest in safe and delicious water, with increased consumption of mineral water and the widespread use of home water purifiers.

[0003] Furthermore, drinking water has been developed in which high concentrations of minerals have been added to purified water, etc., with the aim of replenishing mineral components, which are trace elements necessary for the physiological functions of living organisms. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses the production of drinking water containing a high concentration of magnesium by mixing a concentrated solution with purified water containing a high amount of magnesium. Patent Document 2 discloses the production of a beverage by adding mineral components consisting of magnesium and calcium to water derived from deep ocean water. However, divalent metal ions are known to cause unpleasant flavors such as bitterness and astringency, and drinking water containing high concentrations of these minerals has the disadvantage of being difficult to ingest.

[0004] Furthermore, Patent Document 3 discloses a method for producing mineral water, characterized by immersing natural minerals such as Maifan stone, Tenju stone, and tourmaline in water to elute mineral components, but this method has drawbacks such as the inclusion of undesirable components such as vanadium, which is considered harmful if ingested in excess, in the obtained mineral water, and low mineral extraction efficiency. Furthermore, Patent Document 4 discloses a method for producing mineral water by heating and extracting chicken manure charcoal with water, but chicken manure charcoal is not suitable as a raw material for food use. Patent Document 5 discloses a method for producing mineral water by boiling and extracting bamboo charcoal, and Patent Document 6 discloses a method for producing alkaline water by boiling and extracting charcoal. However, the methods disclosed in these prior art documents were unable to efficiently extract mineral components and obtain mineral water containing only the desired mineral components. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2018-102137 [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-48742 [Patent Document 3] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2009-72723 [Patent Document 4] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 6-31284 [Patent Document 5] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2005-334862 [Patent Document 6] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-259659 [Non-patent literature]

[0006] [Non-Patent Document 1] Ikuo Abe, Manufacturing Method of Activated Carbon, Carbon Lecture Series, 2006, No. 225, 373-381 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0007] The object of the present invention is to provide drinking water that is safe, tasty, and beneficial to human health. [Means for solving the problem]

[0008] The present inventors have now discovered coconut shell activated carbon as a natural material from which minerals can be eluted using pure water. After extensive research into the mineral components of water compositions containing the mineral concentrate obtained using this material, they have made the surprising discovery that water compositions containing a specific concentration of potassium ions have significant buffering capacity in the pH range from weakly alkaline to weakly acidic, and are also mellow and have little unpleasant flavor.

[0009] That is, the gist of the present invention is as follows. [1] A mineral-containing water composition for oral ingestion, characterized in that the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition is 20 ppm or more. [2] The mineral-containing water composition according to 1, characterized in that the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition is 600 ppm or less. [3] The mineral-containing water composition according to 1 or 2, wherein the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition is 50 ppm to 200 ppm. [4] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 3, wherein the chloride ion content in the mineral-containing water composition is 50% or less of the potassium ion concentration. [5] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 4, wherein the calcium ion content in the mineral-containing water composition is 30% or less of the potassium ion concentration. [6] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 5, wherein the magnesium ion content in the mineral-containing water composition is 15% or less of the potassium ion concentration. [7] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 6, wherein the content of sodium ions in the mineral-containing water composition is 10 to 50% of the concentration of potassium ions. [8] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 7, characterized in that the pH of the mineral-containing water composition is 7.5 to 10.5. [9] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 8, characterized in that the mineral-containing water composition has a buffering capacity.

[10] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 9, characterized in that the buffer capacity of the mineral-containing water composition is 1.5 or more when 100 g of sodium hydroxide solution adjusted to pH 9.2 is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (A) mL, and the mineral-containing water composition is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (B) mL.

[11] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 10, wherein the mineral-containing water composition has a total organic carbon (TOC) of 3.0 mg / l or less.

[12] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 11, which contains an extract of activated carbon made from plant-derived materials or a concentrate thereof.

[13] The mineral-containing water composition according to 12, wherein the plant-derived raw material is selected from the group consisting of coconut, palm, almond, walnut, and plum shells; wood selected from sawdust, charcoal, resin, and lignin; nest ash; bamboo; food waste selected from bagasse, rice husks, coffee beans, and blackstrap molasses; or a combination thereof.

[14] The mineral-containing water composition according to any one of 1 to 13, which is used to prevent or improve acidification in a living body. [Effects of the Invention]

[0010] The present invention makes it possible to provide drinking water that is safe, tasty, and beneficial to human health. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0011] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows the buffer capacity of water compositions containing various concentrations of concentrated mineral extracts from coconut shell activated carbon, as well as controls (KOH and commercially available alkaline ionized water). [Figure 2]FIG. 2 shows the buffer capacity of water compositions containing a concentrated mineral extract derived from coconut shell activated carbon, adjusted to a final potassium concentration of 100 ppm, and controls (purified water and commercially available alkaline ionized water). [Figure 3] FIG. 3 shows the sensory evaluation of the mellowness of water compositions containing various concentrations of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon and the control (K2CO3). [Figure 4] FIG. 4 shows the sensory evaluation of the impurities of water compositions containing various concentrations of concentrated mineral extracts from coconut shell activated carbon and the control (K2CO3). DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0012] The present invention relates to a mineral-containing water composition, characterized in that the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition is about 20 ppm or more, in which case the lower limit of the potassium ion concentration may be 25 ppm or more, 30 ppm or more, 35 ppm or more, 45 ppm or more, or 50 ppm or more.

[0013] Potassium is one of the minerals necessary for living organisms. Most of it is present intracellularly, interacting with sodium, which is abundant in extracellular fluid, to play an important role in maintaining cellular osmotic pressure and retaining intracellular water. In addition to maintaining cellular osmotic pressure together with sodium, potassium also plays a role in maintaining acid-base balance, transmitting nerve impulses, regulating cardiac and muscular function, and regulating intracellular enzyme reactions. Potassium also inhibits reabsorption of sodium in the kidney and promotes its excretion in urine, thereby lowering blood pressure. While potassium is thus an extremely important mineral component for humans, excessive potassium ions can cause unpleasant flavors such as bitterness and astringency. Therefore, the potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is preferably 600 ppm or less.In this case, the upper limit of the potassium ion concentration is 595 ppm or less, 590 ppm or less, 585 ppm or less, 580 ppm or less, 575 ppm or less, 570 ppm or less, 565 ppm or less, 560 ppm or less, 555 ppm or less, 550 ppm or less, 545 ppm or less, 540 ppm or less, 535 ppm or less, 530 ppm or less, 525 ppm or less, 520 ppm or less, 515 ppm or less, 510 ppm or less, 505 ppm or less, 500ppm or less, 495ppm or less, 490ppm or less, 485ppm or less, 480ppm or less, 475ppm or less, 470ppm or less, 465ppm or less, 460ppm or less, 455ppm or less 40 0ppm or less, 395ppm or less, 390ppm or less, 385ppm or less, 380ppm or less, 375ppm or less, 370ppm or less, 365ppm or less, 360ppm or less, 355ppm or less, 350pp m or less, 345ppm or less, 340ppm or less, 335ppm or less, 330ppm or less, 325ppm or less, 320ppm or less, 315ppm or less, 310ppm or less, 305ppm or less, 300ppm or less, It may be 295 ppm or less, 290 ppm or less, 285 ppm or less, 280 ppm or less, 275 ppm or less, 270 ppm or less, 265 ppm or less, 260 ppm or less, 255 ppm or less, 250 ppm or less, 245 ppm or less, 240 ppm or less, 235 ppm or less, 230 ppm or less, 225 ppm or less, 220 ppm or less, 215 ppm or less, 210 ppm or less, 205 ppm or less, or 200 ppm or less.

[0014] The potassium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is, for example, 50 to 200 ppm, 50 to 190 ppm, 50 to 180 ppm, 50 to 170 ppm, 50 to 160 ppm, 50 to 150 ppm, 50 to 140 ppm, 50 to 130 ppm, 50 to 120 ppm, 50 to 110 ppm, 50 to 100 ppm, 50 to 90 ppm, 50 to 80 ppm, 50 to 70 ppm, 50 to 60 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 190 ppm, 60 to 180 ppm, 60 to 170 ppm, 60 to 160 ppm, 60 to 150 ppm, 60 to 14 ...200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 200 ppm, 60 to 130ppm, 60~120ppm, 60~110ppm, 60~100ppm, 60~90ppm, 60~80ppm, 60~70ppm, 70~200ppm, 70~190ppm, 70~180ppm, 70~170ppm, 70~160ppm, 70~150ppm, 7 0~140ppm, 70~130ppm, 70~120ppm, 70~110ppm, 70~100ppm, 70~90ppm, 70~80ppm, 80~200ppm, 80~190ppm, 80~180ppm, 80~170ppm, 80~160ppm, 80~150ppm m, 80~140ppm, 80~130ppm, 80~120ppm, 80~110ppm, 80~100ppm, 80~90ppm, 90~200ppm, 90~190ppm, 90~180ppm, 90~170ppm, 90~160ppm, 90~150ppm, 90~1 40ppm, 90~130ppm, 90~120ppm, 90~110ppm, 90~100ppm, 100~200ppm, 100~190ppm, 100~180ppm, 100~170ppm, 100~160ppm, 100~150ppm, 100~140ppm, 10 0~130ppm, 100~120ppm, 100~110ppm, 110~200ppm, 110~190ppm, 110~180ppm, 110~170ppm, 110~160ppm, 110~150ppm, 110~140ppm, 110~130ppm, 110~12 0ppm, 120~200ppm, 120~190ppm, 120~180ppm, 120~170ppm, 120~160ppm, 120~150ppm, 120~140ppm, 120~130ppm, 130~200ppm, 130~190ppm, 130~180ppm,130~170ppm, 130~160ppm, 130~150ppm, 130~140ppm, 140~200ppm, 140~190ppm, 140~ 180ppm, 140~170ppm, 140~160ppm, 140~150ppm, 150~200ppm, 150~190ppm, 150~180ppm m, 150 to 170 ppm, 150 to 160 ppm, 160 to 200 ppm, 160 to 190 ppm, 160 to 180 ppm, 160 to 170 ppm, 170 to 200 ppm, 170 to 190 ppm, 170 to 180 ppm, 180 to 200 ppm, 180 to 190 ppm, or 190 to 200 ppm.

[0015] Naturally occurring water contains a certain amount of chloride ions, most of which are derived from geology or seawater. Chloride ions present at 250 to 400 mg / L or more may impart a salty taste to sensitive taste-sensors and impair the taste. Therefore, the chloride ion content in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is preferably as low as possible. The chloride ion content in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, 50% or less, 49% or less, 48% or less, 47% or less, 46% or less, 45% or less, 44% or less, 43% or less, 42% or less, 41% or less, 40% or less, 39% or less, 38% or less, 37% or less, 36% or less, 35% or less, 34% or less, 33% or less, 32% or less, 31% or less, 30% or less, 2% or less, or 3% or less of the potassium ion concentration. It may be 9% or less, 28% or less, 27% or less, 26% or less, 25% or less, 24% or less, 23% or less, 22% or less, 21% or less, 20% or less, 19% or less, 18% or less, 17% or less, 16% or less, 15% or less, 14% or less, 13% or less, 12% or less, 11% or less, 10% or less, 9% or less, 8% or less, 7% or less, 6% or less, 5% or less, 4% or less, 3% or less, 2% or less, or 1% or less.

[0016] Calcium, together with phosphorus, is known to form the skeleton as hydroxyapatite and to be involved in muscle contraction. Magnesium is known to be involved in bone and tooth formation, as well as in many enzymatic reactions and energy production. The content of calcium and magnesium ions in water is known to affect its taste. Water with a hardness index (a measure of the total calcium and magnesium content of minerals) below a certain level is considered soft, while water with a high hardness is considered hard. Generally, mineral water produced in Japan is soft, while water produced in Europe is generally hard. According to WHO standards, water with a hardness index (mg / L), calculated as the amount of these salts converted to calcium carbonate, is considered soft with a hardness of 0-60, hard with a hardness of 120-180, and very hard with a hardness of 180 or above. Generally, water with a moderate hardness (10-100 mg / L) is considered palatable; water with a high magnesium content, in particular, tastes bitter and difficult to drink. Furthermore, excessively high hardness is undesirable because it not only affects the taste of the water but also irritates the stomach and intestines, causing diarrhea, etc. The calcium ion content in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, 30% or less, 29% or less, 28% or less, 27% or less, 26% or less, 25% or less, 24% or less, 23% or less, 22% or less, 21% or less, 20% or less, 19% or less, 18% or less, 17% or less, 16% or less, 15% or less, 14% or less, 13% or less, 12% or less, 11% or less, 10% or less, 9% or less, 8% or less, 7% or less, 6% or less, 5% or less, 4% or less, 3% or less, 2% or less, or 1% or less of the potassium ion concentration. Furthermore, the magnesium ion content in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, 15% or less, 14% or less, 13% or less, 12% or less, 11% or less, 10% or less, 9% or less, 8% or less, 7% or less, 6% or less, 5% or less, 4% or less, 3% or less, 2% or less, or 1% or less of the potassium ion concentration.

[0017] Sodium maintains extracellular fluid volume and circulating blood volume in the body while retaining water, thereby regulating blood pressure. It is known that ingesting a certain amount of sodium ions is effective for hydrating the body, and is particularly effective in preventing heatstroke. However, excessive sodium intake increases the amount of fluid, which can lead to elevated blood pressure and swelling. Furthermore, as the sodium ion content increases, a salty taste and slimy sensation may develop, potentially impairing the refreshing feeling of the beverage. The sodium ion concentration in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, 10 to 50%, 10 to 45%, 10 to 40%, 10 to 35%, 10 to 30%, 10 to 25%, 10 to 20%, 10 to 15%, 15 to 50%, 15 to 45%, 15 to 40%, 15 to 35%, 15 to 30%, 15 to 25%, 15 to 20%, 20 to 30%, 30 to 40%, 30 to 5 ... It may be 50%, 20-45%, 20-40%, 20-35%, 20-30%, 20-25%, 25-50%, 25-45%, 25-40%, 25-35%, 25-30%, 30-50%, 30-45%, 30-40%, 30-35%, 35-50%, 35-45%, 35-40%, 40-50%, 40-45%, or 45-50%.

[0018] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention preferably has a weakly alkaline pH, for example, 7.5 to 10.5, 7.5 to 10.0, 7.5 to 9.5, 7.5 to 9.0, 7.5 to 8.5, 7.5 to 8.0, 8.0 to 10.5, 8.0 to 10.0, 8.0 to 9.5, 8.0 to 9.0, 8.0 to 8.5, 8.5 to 10.5, 8.5 to 10.0, 8.5 to 9.5, 8.5 to 9.0, 9.0 to 10.5, 9.0 to 10.0, 9.0 to 9.5, 9.5 to 10.5, 9.5 to 10.0, or 10.0 to 10.5. The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention also has buffering capacity, preferably significant buffering capacity in the weakly alkaline to weakly acidic pH range. For example, when 100 g of sodium hydroxide solution adjusted to pH 9.2 is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (A) mL, and when the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (B) mL. In this case, the ratio (B) / (A) is used as the buffer capacity. The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention has a buffer capacity of, for example, 1.5 or more, 1.6 or more, 1.7 or more, 1.8 or more. The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may have a buffering capacity of 1.9 or more, 2.0 or more, 2.1 or more, 2.2 or more, 2.3 or more, 2.4 or more, 2.5 or more, 2.6 or more, 2.7 or more, 2.8 or more, 2.9 or more, 3.0 or more, 3.5 or more, 4.0 or more, 4.5 or more, 5.0 or more, 5.5 or more, 6.0 or more, 6.5 or more, 7.0 or more, 7.5 or more, 8.0 or more, 8.5 or more, 9.0 or more, 9.5 or more, 10.0 or more, 10.5 or more, 11.0 or more, or 11.5 or more. Such pH characteristics are useful for preventing or ameliorating acidification in vivo. Therefore, oral ingestion of the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention can prevent, for example, tooth erosion caused by postprandial acidification in the oral cavity and ameliorate gastrointestinal symptoms such as hyperacidity and abnormal intestinal fermentation caused by gastrointestinal acidification.

[0019] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is substantially free of organic matter. A typical indicator of the amount of organic matter contained in water is total organic carbon (TOC). TOC can be determined by oxidizing organic carbon contained in a water sample to carbon dioxide and measuring the amount of carbon dioxide. The TOC of the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, 3.0 mg / L or less, 2.9 mg / L or less, 2.8 mg / L or less, 2.7 mg / L or less, 2.6 mg / L or less, 2.5 mg / L or less, 2.4 mg / L or less, 2.3 mg / L or less, 2.2 mg / L or less, 2.1 mg / L or less, 2.0 mg / L or less, 1.9 mg / L or less, 1.8 mg / L or less, 1.7 mg / L or less, 1.6 mg / L or less, or 1.5 mg / L or less.

[0020] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may contain an extract or concentrate of activated carbon made from plant-derived materials. Activated carbon is a porous material composed mostly of carbon, as well as oxygen, hydrogen, calcium, and other elements. Its large surface area per volume allows it to adsorb many substances, and it has been widely produced industrially since the early 20th century. Activated carbon is generally produced by generating nanometer-order micropores (activation) within the raw carbon material. Activated carbon production methods can be broadly divided into gas activation, in which the raw material is carbonized and then activated at high temperatures using an activation gas such as steam or carbon dioxide, and chemical activation, in which a chemical such as zinc chloride or phosphoric acid is added to the raw material and then heated in an inert gas atmosphere to simultaneously carbonize and activate it (Non-Patent Document 1). The activated carbon used in the present invention can be produced by either the gas activation method or the chemical activation method using a plant-derived carbon material as the carbon material.

[0021] The raw material for the activated carbon used in the present invention is not particularly limited as long as it is a plant-derived raw material, and examples thereof include fruit shells (coconut, palm, almond, walnut, plum), wood (sawdust, charcoal, resin, lignin), nest ash (carbonized sawdust), bamboo, food residues (bagasse, rice husks, coffee beans, blackstrap molasses), waste (pulp mill effluent, construction waste), etc. Typically, it is selected from coconut shell, sawdust, bamboo, or a combination thereof, and preferably coconut shell. Coconut shell refers to the shell found inside the fruit of a coconut or palm.

[0022] The shape of the activated carbon used in the present invention is not particularly limited, but examples include powdered activated carbon, granular activated carbon (crushed carbon, granular carbon, molded carbon), fibrous activated carbon, and special molded activated carbon.

[0023] The step of extracting minerals from plant-derived activated carbon using an aqueous solvent is achieved by contacting the plant-derived activated carbon with an aqueous solvent to elute the minerals present in the plant-derived activated carbon. Such a step is not particularly limited as long as it can elute the minerals present in the plant-derived activated carbon. For example, it can be performed by immersing the plant-derived activated carbon in an aqueous solvent or by passing the aqueous solvent through a column packed with the plant-derived activated carbon. When immersing the plant-derived activated carbon in an aqueous solvent, the aqueous solvent may be stirred to increase the extraction efficiency. Furthermore, the method for producing a mineral extract may further include a step of centrifuging and / or filtering the resulting extract to remove impurities after extracting minerals from the plant-derived activated carbon using an aqueous solvent.

[0024] The aqueous solvent used in the process of extracting minerals from plant-derived activated carbon using an aqueous solvent basically refers to anything other than an HCl solution. A typical solvent is an aqueous solvent, and pure water is particularly preferred. Pure water refers to highly pure water that contains little or no impurities such as salts, residual chlorine, insoluble particles, organic matter, and non-electrolytic gases. Depending on the method used to remove impurities, pure water includes RO water (water passed through a reverse osmosis membrane), deionized water (water from which ions have been removed using ion exchange resins, etc.), and distilled water (water distilled in a distiller). Because pure water does not contain mineral components, it does not have the effect of replenishing minerals.

[0025] The extraction temperature is not particularly limited as long as minerals can be extracted from activated carbon made from plant-derived raw materials using an aqueous solvent. The step of extracting minerals from activated carbon made from plant-derived raw materials using an aqueous solvent can be carried out at a temperature of 5°C or higher, 10°C or higher, 15°C or higher, 20°C or higher, 25°C or higher, 30°C or higher, 35°C or higher, 40°C or higher, 45°C or higher, 50°C or higher, 55°C or higher, 60°C or higher, 65°C or higher, 70°C or higher, 75°C or higher, 80°C or higher, 85°C or higher, 90°C or higher, or 95°C or higher, for example, 5 to 95°C, 5 to 90°C, 5 to 85°C, 5 to 80°C, 5 to 75°C, 5 to 70°C, 5 to 6 5℃, 5-60℃, 5-55℃, 5-50℃, 5-45℃, 5-40℃, 5-35℃, 5-30℃, 5-25℃, 5-20℃, 5-15℃, 5-10℃, 10-95℃, 10-90℃, 10-85℃, 10-80℃, 10-75℃, 10-70℃, 10-65℃, 10-60℃ , 10~55℃, 10~50℃, 10~45℃, 10~40℃, 10~35℃, 10~30℃, 10~25℃, 10~20℃, 10~15℃, 15~95℃, 15~90℃, 15~85℃, 15~80℃, 15~75℃, 15~70℃, 15~65℃, 15~60℃, 15~55 °C, 15-50°C, 15-45°C, 15-40°C, 15-35°C, 15-30°C, 15-25°C, 15-20°C, 20-95°C, 20-90°C, 20-85°C, 20-80°C, 20-75°C, 20-70°C, 20-65°C, 20-60°C, 20-55°C, 20-50°C, 20- 45℃, 20-40℃, 20-35℃, 20-30℃, 20-25℃, 25-95℃, 25-90℃, 25-85℃, 25-80℃, 25-75℃, 25-70℃, 25-65℃, 25-60℃, 25-55℃, 25-50℃, 25-45℃, 25-40℃, 25-35℃, 25 ~30℃, 30~95℃, 30~90℃, 30~85℃, 30~80℃, 30~75℃, 30~70℃, 30~65℃, 30~60℃, 30~55℃, 30~50℃, 30~45℃, 30~40℃, 30~35℃, 35~95℃, 35~90℃, 35~85℃, 35~80℃, 3 5~75℃, 35~70℃, 35~65℃, 35~60℃, 35~55℃, 35~50℃, 35~45℃, 35~40℃, 40~95℃, 40~90℃, 40~85℃, 40~80℃, 40~75℃, 40~70℃, 40~65℃, 40~60℃, 40~55℃, 40~50℃,40-45℃, 45-95℃, 45-90℃, 45-85℃, 45-80℃, 45-75℃, 45-70℃, 45-65℃, 45-60℃, 45-55℃, 45-50℃, 50-95℃, 50-90℃, 50-85℃, 50-80℃, 50-75℃, 50-70℃, 50-65℃, 50-60℃, 50-55℃, 55-95℃, 55-90℃, 55-85℃, 55-80℃, 55-75℃, 55-70℃, 55-65℃, 55-60℃, 60-95 °C, 60 to 90°C, 60 to 85°C, 60 to 80°C, 60 to 75°C, 60 to 70°C, 60 to 65°C, 65 to 95°C, 65 to 90°C, 65 to 85°C, 65 to 80°C, 65 to 75°C, 65 to 70°C, 70 to 95°C, 70 to 90°C, 70 to 85°C, 70 to 80°C, 70 to 75°C, 75 to 95°C, 75 to 90°C, 75 to 85°C, 75 to 80°C, 80 to 95°C, 80 to 90°C, 80 to 85°C, 85 to 95°C, 85 to 90°C, or 90 to 95°C.

[0026] The extraction time is not particularly limited as long as minerals can be extracted from activated carbon made from plant-derived raw materials using an aqueous solvent. The step of extracting minerals from activated carbon made from plant-derived raw materials using an aqueous solvent can be carried out for 5 minutes or more, 10 minutes or more, 15 minutes or more, 20 minutes or more, 25 minutes or more, 30 minutes or more, 35 minutes or more, 40 minutes or more, 45 minutes or more, 50 minutes or more, 55 minutes or more, 60 minutes or more, 65 minutes or more, 70 minutes or more, 75 minutes or more, or 80 minutes or more, and can be, for example, 5 to 80 minutes, 5 to 75 minutes, 5 to 70 minutes, 5 to 65 minutes, 5 to 60 minutes, 5 to 55 minutes, 5 to 50 minutes, 5 to 45 minutes, 5 to 40 minutes, 5 to 30 minutes, or 5 to 60 minutes. 5 minutes, 5-30 minutes, 5-25 minutes, 5-20 minutes, 5-15 minutes, 5-10 minutes, 10-80 minutes, 10-75 minutes, 10-70 minutes, 10-65 minutes, 10-60 minutes, 10-55 minutes, 10-50 minutes, 10-45 minutes, 10-40 minutes, 10-35 minutes, 10-30 minutes, 10-25 minutes, 10-20 minutes, 10-15 minutes, 15-80 minutes, 15-75 minutes, 15-70 minutes, 15-65 minutes, 15-60 minutes, 15-55 minutes, 15-50 minutes, 15-45 minutes, 15-40 minutes, 15-35 minutes, 15-30 minutes, 15-25 minutes, 15-20 minutes, 20-80 minutes, 20-75 minutes, 20-70 minutes, 20-65 minutes , 20~60 minutes, 20~55 minutes, 20~50 minutes, 20~45 minutes, 20~40 minutes, 20~35 minutes, 20~30 minutes, 20~25 minutes, 25~80 minutes, 25~75 minutes, 25~70 minutes, 25~65 minutes, 25~60 minutes, 25~55 minutes, 25~50 minutes, 25~45 minutes, 25~40 minutes, 25~3 5 minutes, 25-30 minutes, 30-80 minutes, 30-75 minutes, 30-70 minutes, 30-65 minutes, 30-60 minutes, 30-55 minutes, 30-50 minutes, 30-45 minutes, 30-40 minutes, 30-35 minutes, 35-80 minutes, 35-75 minutes, 35-70 minutes, 35-65 minutes, 35-60 minutes, 35-55 minutes, 35- 50 minutes, 35-45 minutes, 35-40 minutes, 40-80 minutes, 40-75 minutes, 40-70 minutes, 40-65 minutes, 40-60 minutes, 40-55 minutes, 40-50 minutes, 40-45 minutes, 45-80 minutes, 45-75 minutes, 45-70 minutes, 45-65 minutes, 45-60 minutes, 45-55 minutes, 45-50 minutes, 5 0-80 minutes, 50-75 minutes, 50-70 minutes, 50-65 minutes, 50-60 minutes, 50-55 minutes, 55-80 minutes, 55-75 minutes, 55-70 minutes, 55-65 minutes, 55-60 minutes, 60-80 minutes, 60-75 minutes, 60-70 minutes, 60-65 minutes, 65-80 minutes, 65-75 minutes, 65-70 minutes,It lasts for 70-80 minutes, 70-75 minutes, or 75-80 minutes.

[0027] The mineral extract thus obtained can be concentrated to obtain a mineral concentrate composition.

[0028] The step of concentrating the mineral extract can be carried out by methods well known in the art, such as boiling concentration, vacuum concentration, freeze concentration, membrane concentration, ultrasonic atomization separation, etc. By concentrating the mineral extract, a mineral concentrate composition containing a high concentration of desired minerals, such as potassium, can be obtained without significantly changing the composition of the mineral extract.

[0029] After the step of concentrating the mineral extract, the obtained mineral concentrate liquid composition is preferably stored in a refrigerator and filtered while cold. The cooling temperature is typically adjusted to 0 to 15° C., preferably 3 to 10° C., 3 to 9° C., 3 to 8° C., 3 to 7° C., or 3 to 6° C. Furthermore, it is preferable to adjust the pH of the mineral concentrate liquid composition before such refrigerated storage and cold filtration. The mineral concentrate liquid composition is adjusted to have a pH of, for example, 7.5 to 10.5, 7.5 to 10.0, 7.5 to 9.5, 7.5 to 9.0, 7.5 to 8.5, 7.5 to 8.0, 8.0 to 10.5, 8.0 to 10.0, 8.0 to 9.5, 8.0 to 9.0, 8.0 to 8.5, 8.5 to 10.5, 8.5 to 10.0, 8.5 to 9.5, 8.5 to 9.0, 9.0 to 10.5, 9.0 to 10.0, 9.0 to 9.5, 9.5 to 10.5, 9.5 to 10.0, or 10.0 to 10.5. By carrying out such treatment, a mineral concentrate liquid composition with high transparency and significantly reduced suspended matter and sediment can be obtained.

[0030] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention can be produced by adding the mineral extract or mineral concentrate composition thus obtained to purified water.

[0031] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention can also be prepared by adding an alkaline potassium salt to an aqueous solvent, preferably pure water. Examples of alkaline potassium salts include potassium carbonate, potassium bicarbonate, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, or a combination thereof. The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may also further contain an alkaline sodium salt or an alkaline calcium salt. Examples of alkaline sodium salts include sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, disodium hydrogen phosphate, trisodium phosphate, or a combination thereof. Examples of alkaline calcium salts include calcium hydroxide.

[0032] In addition, the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may further contain at least one component selected from cyclodextrin, finely ground activated carbon, sodium L-ascorbate, and sodium erythorbate to further enhance the effect of reducing chlorine odor.

[0033] The cyclodextrin can be selected from α-cyclodextrin, β-cyclodextrin, γ-cyclodextrin, or a combination thereof, but is preferably β-cyclodextrin. The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention has a cyclodextrin concentration of, for example, 0.25 to 1.00 g / L, 0.25 to 0.95 g / L, 0.25 to 0.90 g / L, 0.25 to 0.85 g / L, 0.25 to 0.80 g / L, 0.25 to 0.75 g / L, 0.25 to 0.70 g / L, 0.25 to 0.65 g / L, 0.25 to 0.60 g / L, 0.25 to 0.55 g / L, 0.25 to 0.50 g / L, 0.25 to 0.45 g / L, 0.25 to 0.40 g / L, 0.25 to 0.35 g / L, L, 0.25~0.30g / L, 0.30~1.00g / L, 0.30~0.95g / L, 0.30~0.90g / L, 0.30~0.85g / L, 0.30~0.80g / L, 0.30~0.75g / L, 0.30~0.70g / L, 0.30~0. 65g / L, 0.30~0.60g / L, 0.30~0.55g / L, 0.30~0.50g / L, 0.30~0.45g / L, 0.30~0.40g / L, 0.30~0.35g / L, 0.35~1.00g / L, 0.35~0.95g / L, 0.35 ~0.90g / L, 0.35~0.85g / L, 0.35~0.80g / L, 0.35~0.75g / L, 0.35~0.70g / L, 0.35~0.65g / L, 0.35~0.60g / L, 0.35~0.55g / L, 0.35~0.50g / L, 0.35~0.45g / L, 0.35~0.40g / L, 0.40~1.00g / L, 0.40~0.95g / L, 0.40~0.90g / L, 0.40~0.85g / L, 0.40~0.80g / L, 0.40~0.75g / L, 0.40~0.70 g / L, 0.40~0.65g / L, 0.40~0.60g / L, 0.40~0.55g / L, 0.40~0.50g / L, 0.40~0.45g / L, 0.45~1.00g / L, 0.45~0.95g / L, 0.45~0.90g / L, 0.45~ 0.85g / L, 0.45~0.80g / L, 0.45~0.75g / L, 0.45~0.70g / L, 0.45~0.65g / L, 0.45~0.60g / L, 0.45~0.55g / L, 0.45~0.50g / L, 0.50~1.00g / L, 0.It can be prepared to be 50 - 0.95 g / L, 0.50 - 0.90 g / L, 0.50 - 0.85 g / L, 0.50 - 0.80 g / L, 0.50 - 0.75 g / L, 0.50 - 0.70 g / L, 0.50 - 0.65 g / L, 0.50 - 0.60 g / L, 0.50 - 0.55 g / L, 0.55 - 1.00 g / L, 0.55 - 0.95 g / L, 0.55 - 0.90 g / L, 0.55 - 0.85 g / L, 0.55 - 0.80 g / L, 0.55 - 0.75 g / L, 0.55 - 0.70 g / L, 0.55 - 0.65 g / L, 0.55 - 0.60 g / L, 0.60 - 1.00 g / L, 0.60 - 0.95 g / L, 0.60 - 0.90 g / L, 0.60 - 0.85 g / L, 0.60 - 0.80 g / L, 0.60 - 0.75 g / L, 0.60 - 0.70 g / L, 0.60 - 0.65 g / L, 0.65 - 1.00 g / L, 0.65 - 0.95 g / L, 0.65 - 0.90 g / L, 0.65 - 0.85 g / L, 0.65 - 0.80 g / L, 0.65 - 0.75 g / L, 0.65 - 0.70 g / L, 0.70 - 1.00 g / L, 0.70 - 0.95 g / L, 0.70 - 0.90 g / L, 0.70 - 0.85 g / L, 0.70 - 0.80 g / L, 0.70 - 0.75 g / L, 0.75 - 1.00 g / L, 0.75 - 0.95 g / L, 0.75 - 0.90 g / L, 0.75 - 0.85 g / L, 0.75 - 0.80 g / L, 0.80 - 1.00 g / L, 0.80 - 0.95 g / L, 0.80 - 0.90 g / L, 0.80 - 0.85 g / L, 0.85 - 1.00 g / L, 0.85 - 0.95 g / L, 0.85 - 0.90 g / L, 0.90 - 1.00 g / L, 0.90 - 0.95 g / L, or 0.95 - 1.00 g / L.

[0034] The pulverized activated carbon in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be, for example, activated carbon made from the above-mentioned plant-derived raw materials. The concentration of the pulverized activated carbon in the mineral-containing water composition of the present invention is typically 0.1 to 15.0 mg / L, preferably 1.0 to 15.0 mg / L, for example, 1.0 to 14.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 13.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 12.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 11.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 10.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 9.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 8.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 7.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 6.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 5.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 4.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 3.0 mg / L, 1.0 to 2.0 mg / L, g / L, 2.0~15.0mg / L, 2.0~14.0mg / L, 2.0~13.0mg / L, 2.0~12.0mg / L, 2.0~11.0mg / L, 2.0~10.0mg / L, 2.0~9.0mg / L, 2.0~8.0mg / L, 2.0~7.0mg / L, 2 .0~6.0mg / L, 2.0~5.0mg / L, 2.0~4.0mg / L, 2.0~3.0mg / L, 3.0~15.0mg / L, 3.0~14.0mg / L, 3.0~13.0mg / L, 3.0~12.0mg / L, 3.0~11.0mg / L, 3.0~10. 0mg / L, 3.0~9.0mg / L, 3.0~8.0mg / L, 3.0~7.0mg / L, 3.0~6.0mg / L, 3.0~5.0mg / L, 3.0~4.0mg / L, 4.0~15.0mg / L, 4.0~14.0mg / L, 4.0~13.0mg / L, 4. 0~12.0mg / L, 4.0~11.0mg / L, 4.0~10.0mg / L, 4.0~9.0mg / L, 4.0~8.0mg / L, 4.0~7.0mg / L, 4.0~6.0mg / L, 4.0~5.0mg / L, 5.0~15.0mg / L, 5.0~14.0m g / L, 5.0~13.0mg / L, 5.0~12.0mg / L, 5.0~11.0mg / L, 5.0~10.0mg / L, 5.0~9.0mg / L, 5.0~8.0mg / L, 5.0~7.0mg / L, 5.0~6.0mg / L, 6.0~15.0mg / L, 6. 0~14.0mg / L, 6.0~13.0mg / L, 6.0~12.0mg / L, 6.0~11.0mg / L, 6.0~10.0mg / L, 6.0~9.0mg / L, 6.0~8.0mg / L, 6.0~7.0mg / L, 7.0~15.0mg / L, 7.0~14.0mg / L, 7.0~13.0mg / L, 7.0~12.0mg / L, 7.0~11.0mg / L, 7.0~10.0mg / L, 7.0~9.0mg / L, 7.0~8.0mg / L, 8.0~15.0mg / L, 8.0~14.0mg / L, 8.0~13.0mg / L L, 8.0~12.0mg / L, 8.0~11.0mg / L, 8.0~10.0mg / L, 8.0~9.0mg / L, 9.0~15.0mg / L, 9.0~14.0mg / L, 9.0~13.0mg / L, 9.0~12.0mg / L, 9.0~11.0mg / L, 9. It can be prepared to have a concentration of 0 to 10.0 mg / L, 10.0 to 15.0 mg / L, 10.0 to 14.0 mg / L, 10.0 to 13.0 mg / L, 10.0 to 12.0 mg / L, 10.0 to 11.0 mg / L, 11.0 to 15.0 mg / L, 11.0 to 14.0 mg / L, 11.0 to 13.0 mg / L, 11.0 to 12.0 mg / L, 12.0 to 15.0 mg / L, 12.0 to 14.0 mg / L, 12.0 to 13.0 mg / L, 13.0 to 15.0 mg / L, 13.0 to 14.0 mg / L, or 14.0 to 15.0 mg / L.

[0035] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention has a sodium L-ascorbate concentration of, for example, 10 to 50 mg / L, 10 to 45 mg / L, 10 to 40 mg / L, 10 to 30 mg / L, 10 to 35 mg / L, 10 to 30 mg / L, 10 to 25 mg / L, 10 to 20 mg / L, 10 to 15 mg / L, 15 to 50 mg / L, 15 to 45 mg / L, 15 to 40 mg / L, 15 to 30 mg / L, 15 to 35 mg / L, 15 to 30 mg / L, 15 to 25 mg / L, 15 to 20 mg / L, 20 to 50 mg / L, 20 to 45 mg / L, L, 20~40mg / L, 20~30mg / L, 20~35mg / L, 20~30mg / L, 20~25mg / L, 25~50mg / L, 25~45mg / L, 25~40mg / L, 25~30mg / L, 25~35mg / L, 25~30mg / L, 30~50mg / L, 30-45 mg / L, 30-40 mg / L, 30-30 mg / L, 30-35 mg / L, 35-50 mg / L, 35-45 mg / L, 35-40 mg / L, 40-50 mg / L, 40-45 mg / L, or 45-50 mg / L.

[0036] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention has a sodium erythorbate concentration of, for example, 10 to 50 mg / L, 10 to 45 mg / L, 10 to 40 mg / L, 10 to 30 mg / L, 10 to 35 mg / L, 10 to 30 mg / L, 10 to 25 mg / L, 10 to 20 mg / L, 10 to 15 mg / L, 15 to 50 mg / L, 15 to 45 mg / L, 15 to 40 mg / L, 15 to 30 mg / L, 15 to 35 mg / L, 15 to 30 mg / L, 15 to 25 mg / L, 15 to 20 mg / L, 20 to 50 mg / L, 20 to 45 mg / L, , 20-40mg / L, 20-30mg / L, 20-35mg / L, 20-30mg / L, 20-25mg / L, 25-50mg / L, 25-45mg / L, 25-40mg / L, 25-30mg / L, 25-35mg / L, 25-30mg / L, 30-50mg / L, 30-45mg / L, 30-40mg / L, 30-30mg / L, 30-35mg / L, 35-50mg / L, 35-45mg / L, 35-40mg / L, 40-50mg / L, 40-45mg / L, or 45-50mg / L.

[0037] The mineral-containing water composition of the present invention may be drunk as is, or may be used as cooking water for cooking rice, etc., as water for infusing or extracting tea leaves, barley tea, coffee beans, etc., as water for diluting extracts or powders of tea, coffee, fruit, etc., or as water for beverages such as whiskey.

[0038] The present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to examples. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples and can be practiced with appropriate modifications. [Example]

[0039] <Example 1: Preparation of mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon> A 1-L Erlenmeyer flask was charged with 30 g of coconut shell activated carbon ("Taiko CW Type," unwashed, manufactured by Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd.) and 400 g of distilled water heated to 90°C. The mixture was stirred with a stirrer at 100 rpm for 15 minutes while heating at 90°C. The resulting suspension was filtered under suction through a polyester 500 mesh (25 μm), and the resulting filtrate was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant after centrifugation was filtered under suction through filter paper to obtain a mineral extract.

[0040] Example 2: Comparison of activated carbons A mineral extract was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the coconut shell activated carbon was changed to Kuraray Coal (registered trademark) GG (unwashed product, manufactured by Kuraray Co., Ltd.).

[0041] <Example 3-6: Comparison of extraction times> Mineral extracts were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the extraction time was changed to 10, 20, 40, and 80 minutes.

[0042] <Examples 7-9: Comparison of distilled water volume and extraction time> Mineral extracts were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the distilled water was changed to 130, 200, and 400 g and the extraction time was changed to 5 minutes.

[0043] <Examples 10-12: Comparison of extraction temperature and extraction time> A mineral extract was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the extraction temperature was changed to 30, 60, or 90°C and the extraction time was changed to 5 minutes.

[0044] The mineral extracts prepared in Examples 1-12 were analyzed according to the following methods. <ICP analysis of metals> An ICP optical emission spectrometer, iCAP6500Duo (manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific), was used. A four-point calibration curve of 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg / L was prepared by diluting the ICP general-purpose mixture XSTC-622B. The sample was diluted with dilute nitric acid so that it fell within the calibration curve range, and then ICP measurement was performed.

[0045] <Cl- ,SO4 2- IC analysis of The ion chromatography system used was ICS-5000K (manufactured by Nippon Dionex Co., Ltd.). The columns used were Dionex Ion Pac AG20 and Dionex Ion Pac AS20. The eluent was a 5 mmol / L potassium hydroxide solution from 0 to 11 minutes, 13 mmol / L from 13 to 18 minutes, and 45 mmol / L from 20 to 30 minutes, with a flow rate of 0.25 mL / min. Anion mixed standard solution 1 (Cl - 20 mg / L, SO4 2- Dilute 100mg / L of 7 ion species (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) and - Five calibration curves of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 1.0 mg / L were used for SO4 2- A five-point calibration curve was created at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mg / L. The sample was diluted to fall within the calibration curve range, and 25 μL was injected to measure the IC.

[0046] The results are shown in the table below. [Table 1]

[0047] The significant high potassium concentration remained unchanged even when the activated carbon, extraction time, volume of extraction liquid relative to activated carbon, and extraction temperature were changed. Furthermore, while a significant amount of chloride ions was extracted when HCl was used (data not shown), the chloride ion concentration was low in all examples. Furthermore, heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, etc.) were not detected in any of the above examples (data not shown).

[0048] Example 13: Preparation of concentrated solution A 1-L Erlenmeyer flask was charged with 174 g of coconut shell activated carbon ("Taiko CW Type," unwashed, manufactured by Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd.) and 753 g of distilled water heated to 30°C. The mixture was stirred with a stirrer at 100 rpm for 5 minutes while heating at 30°C. The resulting suspension was filtered with a polyester 500 mesh (25 μm) filter, and the resulting filtrate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant after centrifugation was filtered with filter paper under suction to obtain a mineral extract. This procedure was repeated two more times. The three mineral extracts obtained were mixed and concentrated 62-fold using an evaporator to obtain the concentrated mineral extract shown below.

[0049] The mineral extract and concentrated mineral extract prepared in Example 13 were diluted 62 times and analyzed according to the above method. The results are shown in the table below.

[0050] [Table 2]

[0051] Even after undergoing the enrichment conditions, the characteristics of high potassium concentration and low concentrations of sodium and chloride ions remained unchanged.

[0052] Example 14: Preparation of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon A 1-L Erlenmeyer flask was charged with 200 g of coconut shell activated carbon ("Taiko CW Type," unwashed, manufactured by Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd.) and 1,500 g of distilled water heated to 90°C. The mixture was stirred with a stirrer at 100 rpm for 15 minutes while heating at 90°C. The resulting suspension was filtered with a polyester 500 mesh (25 μm) suction filter, and the resulting filtrate was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant after centrifugation was filtered with filter paper under suction to obtain a mineral extract. The resulting mineral extract was concentrated 14-fold using an evaporator to obtain the concentrated mineral extract shown below. [Table 3]

[0053] <Example 15: Buffer capacity evaluation-I> (1) Creating an evaluation sample The concentrated mineral extract obtained above was added to ultrapure water (MilliQ water) so that the potassium concentrations were as shown below to prepare evaluation samples. [Table 4]

[0054] (2) pH measurement In addition to the extracts obtained above, the following samples were prepared as comparative examples. 1 ml of 0.1 N HCl was added to 100 ml of each sample while stirring with a stirrer, and the pH was measured. KOH Commercially available alkaline ionized water (Na: 8.0 mg / l, K: 1.6 mg / l, Ca: 13 mg / l, Mg: 6.4 mg / l, pH: 8.8-9.4) 100 g of sodium hydroxide solution adjusted to pH 9.2 was titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, and the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 was (A) mL. The mineral-containing water composition was also titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, and the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 was (B) mL. The ratio (B) / (A) was defined as the buffer capacity. As shown in Figure 1, it was found that water to which a concentrated mineral extract derived from coconut shell activated carbon was added had excellent buffering capacity.

[0055] <Example 16: Buffer capacity evaluation-II> (1) Preparation of comparative examples and evaluation samples As comparative examples, purified water (tap water treated with a water purifier manufactured by Water Stand) and the same commercially available alkaline ionized water as in Example 1 were prepared. In addition, the concentrated mineral extract obtained in Example 1 was added to the purified water (same as above) so that the potassium concentration was 100 ppm, to prepare an evaluation sample. (2) pH measurement The buffer capacity of the samples obtained above was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 2. That is, 1 ml of 0.1 N HCl was added to 100 ml of each sample while stirring with a stirrer, and the pH was measured. As shown in Figure 2, it was found that purified tap water to which concentrated mineral extract derived from coconut shell activated carbon was added had superior buffering capacity compared to purified water and alkaline ionized water.

[0056] Example 17: Preparation of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon =Pilot Scale= 180 L of pure water was passed through 40 kg of coconut shell activated carbon ("Taiko", unwashed with hydrochloric acid, manufactured by Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd.), and the resulting suspension was clarified by sieving and centrifuging to obtain a mineral extract. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure 92 times using a centrifugal thin-film vacuum evaporator, and the resulting concentrate was clarified by centrifugation and filter paper. Each of these was filled into 1 L vinyl pouches and heat-treated at 85°C for 30 minutes to obtain a mineral-enriched extract. The potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium ion concentrations of the resulting mineral-enriched extract were analyzed using ICP atomic emission spectroscopy, chloride ion concentration using ion chromatography, and TOC using a total organic carbon meter. In addition, the obtained mineral-concentrated extract was stored in a refrigerator for two weeks, and then the degree of turbidity was visually evaluated on a five-point scale: "-" (high transparency, no floating matter or sediment), "+" (slight floating matter or sediment), "++" (large amount of floating matter and aggregates), "+++" (even more floating matter and aggregates, loss of transparency), and "++++" (large amount of floating matter and aggregates, low transparency).

[0057] Example 18: Preparation of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon =Lab Small Scale= 200 g of coconut shell activated carbon (Granular Shirasagi, unwashed with hydrochloric acid, manufactured by Osaka Gas Chemicals Co., Ltd.) and 910 g of distilled water were mixed and stirred at 100 rpm for 20 minutes with a stirrer while heating at 30°C. The resulting suspension was suction-filtered through a filter (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd., ADVANTEC quantitative filter paper No. 5C, φ55 mm). The resulting filtrate was further suction-filtered through a filter (MERCKOmnipore PTFE Membrane, 5.0 μm, φ47 mm) to obtain a mineral extract. This process was repeated several times until a sufficient amount of mineral extract was obtained. After mixing the entire mineral extract, it was concentrated 50 times under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator. The resulting concentrate was then filtered through a filter (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd., ADVANTEC 25ASO20AN, 0.2 μm) to obtain a concentrated mineral extract. Hydrochloric acid was added to this mineral concentrate to adjust the pH to approximately 9.5, and the solution was divided into 10 mL aliquots and filled into vials. The solution was then refrigerated for two days. It was then cold-filtered through a filter paper (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd., ADVANTEC 25ASO20AN 0.2 μm) and heat-treated at 80°C for 30 minutes to obtain a mineral-enriched extract. The potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium ion concentrations of the resulting mineral-enriched extract were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), and the chloride and sulfate ion concentrations were analyzed by ion chromatography (IC). In addition, the obtained mineral-concentrated extract was stored in a refrigerator for two weeks, and then the degree of turbidity was visually evaluated on a five-point scale: "-" (high transparency, no floating matter or sediment), "+" (slight floating matter or sediment), "++" (large amount of floating matter and aggregates), "+++" (even more floating matter and aggregates, loss of transparency), and "++++" (large amount of floating matter and aggregates, low transparency).

[0058] Example 19: Preparation of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon =Lab Large Scale= 800 g of coconut shell activated carbon (Granular Shirasagi, unwashed with hydrochloric acid, manufactured by Osaka Gas Chemicals Co., Ltd.) and 3660 g of distilled water were added and stirred for 15 minutes while heating at 30°C. The resulting suspension was suction-filtered through filter paper (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd. ADVANTEC A080A090C) to obtain a mineral extract. This process was repeated multiple times until a sufficient amount of mineral extract was obtained. After mixing the entire mineral extract, it was concentrated under reduced pressure 60 times using a rotary evaporator. The resulting concentrate was filtered through filter paper (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd. ADVANTEC A080A090C) to obtain a concentrated mineral extract. This was then dispensed into 10 mL aliquots in vials and stored refrigerated for 2 days. It was then cold-filtered through filter paper (Toyo Roshi Co., Ltd. ADVANTEC A080A090C). Hydrochloric acid was added to the extract to adjust the pH to approximately 9.5, and the extract was further diluted with purified water to adjust the potassium ion concentration to approximately 100,000 ppm. This extract was then heat-treated at 80°C for 30 minutes to obtain a mineral-enriched extract. The potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and sulfate ion concentrations of the resulting mineral-enriched extract were analyzed by ion chromatography (IC), chloride ion concentration by ion chromatography, and TOC by total organic carbon (TOC) analysis. The mineral-enriched extract was then stored in a refrigerator for two weeks and visually evaluated for turbidity using a five-point scale: "-" (high transparency, no floating matter or sediment), "+" (slight floating matter or sediment), "++" (large amounts of floating matter or aggregates), "+++" (larger amounts of floating matter and aggregates, loss of transparency), and "++++" (large amounts of floating matter and aggregates, poor transparency).

[0059] Example 20: Preparation of concentrated mineral extract from coconut shell activated carbon =Pilot Scale= A 2500L conical tank was charged with 360 kg of coconut shell activated carbon (Granular Shirasagi, unwashed, manufactured by Osaka Gas Chemicals Co., Ltd.) and 1620 kg of 35°C pure water, and the mixture was stirred for 15 minutes. The resulting suspension was clarified using a vibrating sieve, centrifuged, and filtered through a filter paper to obtain a mineral extract. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure by 60 times using a centrifugal thin-film vacuum evaporator, and the resulting concentrate was filtered through a filter paper to obtain a concentrated mineral extract. The mixture was filled into a drum and stored in a refrigerator for two days, after which it was cold filtered through a filter paper. Hydrochloric acid was added to this to adjust the pH to around 9.5, and the mixture was further diluted with pure water to adjust the potassium ion concentration to around 100,000 ppm. This was then heat-treated at 130°C for 30 seconds to obtain a concentrated mineral extract. The potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and sulfate ion concentrations were analyzed by ion chromatography (IC), chloride ion concentration by ion chromatography, and TOC by combustion oxidation-infrared TOC analysis. The resulting mineral-enriched extracts were refrigerated for two weeks and then visually evaluated for turbidity using a five-point scale: "-" (high transparency, no floating matter or sediment), "+" (slight floating matter or sediment), "++" (large amounts of floating matter and aggregates), "+++" (even larger amounts of floating matter and aggregates, loss of transparency), and "++++" (large amounts of floating matter and aggregates, low transparency). The NTU turbidity was also measured using a HACH 2100AN Turbisimeter.

[0060] The results of Examples 17-20 are shown in Table 5. In terms of the components of the mineral extract, Example 17 yielded a mineral extract with a potassium concentration of 60,994 ppm, a chloride ion concentration of 3,030 ppm, and a pH of 11.1; Example 18 yielded a mineral extract with a potassium concentration of 87,500 ppm, a chloride ion concentration of 32,890 ppm, and a pH of 9.50; Example 19 yielded a mineral extract with a potassium concentration of 100,000 ppm, a chloride ion concentration of 13,132 ppm, and a pH of 9.51; and Example 20 yielded a mineral extract with a potassium concentration of 111,747 ppm, a chloride ion concentration of 8,545 ppm, and a pH of 9.48. Furthermore, in terms of turbidity, Example 17 was rated "++++" (a lot of suspended matter, aggregates accumulated, and transparency was low), while Examples 18, 19, and 20, which were subjected to refrigerated storage and cold filtration, were all rated "++" (a lot of suspended matter and aggregates were observed). In particular, Example 18, in which pH adjustment was performed before refrigerated storage and cold filtration, was rated "-" (high transparency, no suspended matter or precipitate was observed). From this, it was found that refrigerated storage and cold filtration are desirable to obtain a highly transparent mineral extract, and that if pH adjustment is performed, it is desirable to perform it before refrigerated storage and cold filtration. [Table 5]

[0061] Example 21: Sensory evaluation The concentrated mineral extract prepared in Example 1 or potassium carbonate was added to purified water so that the final potassium concentration was 50 to 300 ppm, and mineral drinking water samples were obtained as shown in the table below. Purified water was also prepared as a control. The purified water used was tap water treated with a commercially available general-purpose water purifier (with activated carbon to remove chlorine odor, etc.). [Table 6] The samples obtained above were subjected to a sensory evaluation by four trained panelists. In the sensory evaluation, the panelists first agreed on the evaluation criteria, then evaluated the water's "mellowness" and "off-flavor" in comparison with the control, and the scores of each panelist were averaged. "Smoothness" was defined as a smooth, non-irritating, and rounded flavor, and was scored on a four-point scale (0 = same as control, 1 = slightly mellow, 2 = mellow, 3 = very mellow). The higher the positive number, the stronger the mellowness. "Off-flavor" was defined as unpleasant flavors such as bitterness or astringency, and was scored on a four-point scale (0 = same as control, -1 = slightly off-flavored, -2 = off-flavored, -3 = very off-flavored). The more negative the number, the stronger the off-flavor.

[0062] As can be seen from the sensory evaluation of "mellowness" (Figure 3), adding concentrated mineral extract derived from coconut shell activated carbon results in a smoother taste than purified water. Furthermore, when comparing Sample C and Sample G in the table above, all of the evaluators responded that the water with concentrated mineral extract added was smoother than the potassium carbonate aqueous solution, and when comparing Sample D and Sample H in the table above, more than half of the evaluators responded that the water with concentrated mineral extract added was smoother than the potassium carbonate aqueous solution. As can be seen from the sensory evaluation of "off-flavor" (Figure 4), when the potassium concentration is the same, the addition of concentrated mineral extract derived from coconut shell activated carbon results in less off-flavor than the potassium carbonate solution. Furthermore, when comparing Sample C and Sample G in the table above, more than half of the evaluators answered that the water with added concentrated mineral extract had less off-flavor than the potassium carbonate solution, and when comparing Sample D and Sample H in the table above, all of the evaluators answered that the water with added concentrated mineral extract had less off-flavor than the potassium carbonate solution.

[0063] Example 22: Sensory evaluation in water - pH effect Purified water (tap water treated with a water purifier) ​​and tap water were prepared, and a mineral concentrated extract (potassium concentration: 53,375 ppm) obtained in the same manner as in Example 17 was adjusted to each pH (pH 11.2, 10.2, 9.2, and 8.1) with hydrochloric acid. Potassium was then added to the water so that the concentrations shown below were achieved, and the water was subjected to a sensory evaluation. The sensory evaluation was carried out by five trained panelists who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria. Using a control without the mineral-enriched extract, each panelist scored the samples on a four-point scale (0 points = changes but very poor flavor; 1 point = changes but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = changes and good flavor; 4 points = changes and very good flavor) and calculated the average. A score of 1 or less was marked with an "x," 1.1 to 2 or less with a "△," 2.1 to 3 or less with a "〇," and 3.1 or more with a "◎." [Table 7] In alkaline water with added concentrated mineral extract adjusted to a pH of 8.1-11.2, especially pH 8.1-10.2, the flavor was significantly improved over a wide range of potassium concentrations. Furthermore, in tap water with potassium concentrations of 50 ppm or higher, a significant reduction in chlorine odor was confirmed at all pH levels compared to before the addition of concentrated mineral extract. Each pH and potassium concentration yielded a pH-potassium concentration range with favorable flavor. In purified water, each pH and potassium concentration yielded a pH-potassium concentration range with favorable flavor.

[0064] <Example 23: Preparation of pseudo-extract and sensory evaluation> To simulate the mineral-concentrated extract, we mixed potassium salts. Specifically, we mixed 40.9 mg / L of potassium carbonate (K2CO3) in purified water with 196.8 mg / L of potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) to obtain pseudo-extract 1, a solution with a potassium concentration of 100,000 ppm and a pH of 9.41. Furthermore, we added 1.265 mg / L of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in purified water to obtain pseudo-extract 2, a solution with a pH of 9.45. Sensory evaluation was carried out on each extract immediately after preparation, and as a storage test, each extract was stored at 5°C for one month and at 45°C for one month, and then sensory evaluation was carried out on the extract. The water used was purified water (tap water treated with a water purifier) ​​and tap water, to which the mineral concentrated extract (potassium concentration: 88,000 ppm) obtained in the same manner as in Example 20 was added so that the potassium concentration in the water was 100 ppm, and a sensory evaluation of the water was carried out. Pseudo extract 1 was also diluted 1,000 times so that the potassium concentration was 100 ppm, and pseudo extract 2 was also diluted 1,000 times in the same manner as pseudo extract 1 to prepare the respective sensory samples. The sensory evaluation was carried out by four trained evaluation panelists, who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria. For the evaluation, samples without the addition of each extract were used as controls, and the evaluation scores given by each panelist on the following four-point scale (0 points = changes but very poor flavor; 1 point = changes but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = changes and good flavor; 4 points = changes and very good flavor) were added up, and the average value was calculated. An average value of 1 or less was marked x, 1.1 to 2 or less was marked △, 2.1 to 3 or less was marked 〇, and 3.1 or more was marked ◎. For the reduction of the chlorine odor of tap water, the reduction rate of the chlorine odor that wafts into the nose when drinking control tap water was set to 0%, and the reduction rate was calculated by comparing the control to the chlorine odor reduction rate. If you feel that the chlorine smell has not been reduced at all: (remains at 0%) If you feel that the chlorine smell has decreased slightly: 1% to 25% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been reduced to some extent: 26% to 50% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 51-75% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 76-99% If you feel that the chlorine smell has completely disappeared: 100% It was evaluated as follows. [Table 8] The purified water and tap water to which the concentrated mineral extract was added were given a mellow taste and had a significantly improved flavor. In particular, the chlorine odor of tap water was significantly reduced. Furthermore, although not as effective as the concentrated mineral extract, the pseudo-extract containing potassium ions was also confirmed to have the effect of improving flavor and reducing the chlorine odor. These results were also confirmed after storage for one month at 5°C and 45°C.

[0065] Example 24: Effect of cyclodextrin on reducing the chlorine odor of tap water Tap water was prepared and the concentrations of α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrin in the water were adjusted to 0.25 g / L, 0.5 g / L, 0.75 g / L, and 1 g / L, respectively. Furthermore, water to which a mineral-enriched extract (potassium concentration: 88,000 ppm) obtained in the same manner as in Example 20 had been added so that the potassium concentration was 80 ppm, and water to which β-cyclodextrin had been further added at the above concentration were subjected to sensory evaluation. The sensory evaluation was carried out by 6-7 trained evaluation panelists, who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria. For the evaluation, a control was used with no cyclodextrin or extract added, and the evaluation scores given by each panelist were summed up on the following four-point scale (0 points = change but very poor flavor; 1 point = change but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = change and good flavor; 4 points = change and very good flavor), and the average value was calculated. An average value of 1 or less was marked x, 1.1 to 2 or less was marked △, 2.1 to 3 or less was marked 〇, and 3.1 or more was marked ◎. For the reduction of chlorine odor, the reduction rate of the chlorine odor that wafts into the nose when drinking control tap water was set to 0%, and the reduction rate was calculated by comparing the results with the control. If you feel that the chlorine smell has not been reduced at all: (remains at 0%) If you feel that the chlorine smell has decreased slightly: 1% to 25% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been reduced to some extent: 26% to 50% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 51-75% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 76-99% If you feel that the chlorine smell has completely disappeared: 100% It was evaluated as follows. [Table 9] It was confirmed that the chlorine odor was significantly reduced by adding cyclodextrin together with the concentrated mineral extract.

[0066] Example 25: Effect of activated carbon on reducing the chlorine odor of tap water Tap water was prepared and the concentration of finely pulverized activated carbon in the water was adjusted to 0.14 mg / L, 1.4 mg / L, 14 mg / L, or 140 mg / L. The finely pulverized activated carbon was prepared by pulverizing coconut shell activated carbon (Granular Shirasagi, manufactured by Osaka Gas Chemicals Co., Ltd.) in a grinder and then passing through a 500-mesh sieve. Sensory evaluations were conducted on water containing a concentrated mineral extract (potassium concentration: 88,000 ppm) prepared in the same manner as in Example 20 to achieve a potassium concentration of 80 ppm, water containing finely pulverized activated carbon at the same concentration, and water containing finely pulverized activated carbon and concentrated mineral extract at the same concentrations. The sensory evaluation was carried out by four trained evaluation panelists, who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria. For the evaluation, a control was used with no activated carbon or extract added, and the evaluation scores given by each panelist on the following four-point scale (0 points = changes but very poor flavor; 1 point = changes but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = changes and good flavor; 4 points = changes and very good flavor) were added up and the average value was calculated, with an average value of 1 or less being marked x, 1.1 to 2 or less being marked △, 2.1 to 3 or less being marked 〇, and 3.1 or more being marked ◎. For the reduction of chlorine odor, the reduction rate of the chlorine odor that wafts into the nose when drinking control tap water was set to 0%, and the reduction rate was calculated by comparing the results with the control. If you feel that the chlorine smell has not been reduced at all: (remains at 0%) If you feel that the chlorine smell has decreased slightly: 1% to 25% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been reduced to some extent: 26% to 50% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 51-75% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 76-99% If you feel that the chlorine smell has completely disappeared: 100% It was evaluated as follows. [Table 10] It was confirmed that the chlorine odor was significantly reduced by adding finely ground activated carbon together with the concentrated mineral extract.

[0067] Example 26: Effect of sodium L-ascorbate on reducing the chlorine odor of tap water Tap water was prepared, and a mineral concentrate extract (potassium concentration: 88,000 ppm) obtained in the same manner as in Example 20 was added so that the potassium concentration in the water was 80 ppm. Sensory evaluations were also conducted on the same water, and on water adjusted to 10 mg / L, 15 mg / L, 20 mg / L, 25 mg / L, 30 mg / L, and 50 mg / L of sodium L-ascorbate. The sensory evaluation was carried out by five trained evaluation panelists, who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria among themselves. For the evaluation, a sample with no added extract was used as a control, and the following four-point evaluation scores (0 points = changes but very poor flavor; 1 point = changes but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = changes and good flavor; 4 points = changes and very good flavor) given by each panelist were summed up and the average value calculated, with an average value of 1 or less being marked x, 1.1 to 2 or less being marked △, 2.1 to 3 or less being marked 〇, and 3.1 or more being marked ◎. For the reduction of chlorine odor, the reduction rate of the chlorine odor that wafts into the nose when drinking control tap water was set to 0%, and the reduction rate was calculated by comparing the results with the control. If you feel that the chlorine smell has not been reduced at all: (remains at 0%) If you feel that the chlorine smell has decreased slightly: 1% to 25% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been reduced to some extent: 26% to 50% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 51-75% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 76-99% If you feel that the chlorine smell has completely disappeared: 100% It was evaluated as follows. [Table 11] It was confirmed that the chlorine odor was significantly reduced by adding sodium L-ascorbate together with the concentrated mineral extract.

[0068] Example 27: Effect of mixing sodium L-ascorbate and sodium erythorbate on reducing the chlorine odor of tap water Sensory evaluations were carried out on tap water to which a mineral concentrate extract (potassium concentration: 88,000 ppm) obtained in the same manner as in Example 20 was added so that the potassium concentration in the water was 80 ppm, as well as water to which sodium L-ascorbate was adjusted to 25 mg / L, water to which sodium erythorbate was adjusted to 25 mg / L, and water to which 12.5 mg / L of sodium L-ascorbate and 12.5 mg / L of sodium erythorbate were mixed. The sensory evaluation was carried out by four trained evaluation panelists, who had previously agreed on the evaluation criteria. For the evaluation, a sample with no added extract was used as a control, and the following four-point evaluation scores (0 points = changes but very poor flavor; 1 point = changes but poor flavor; 2 points = no change; 3 points = changes and good flavor; 4 points = changes and very good flavor) given by each panelist were added up and the average value was calculated, with an average value of 1 or less being marked x, 1.1 to 2 or less being marked △, 2.1 to 3 or less being marked 〇, and 3.1 or more being marked ◎. For the reduction of chlorine odor, the reduction rate of the chlorine odor that wafts into the nose when drinking control tap water was set to 0%, and the reduction rate was calculated by comparing the results with the control. If you feel that the chlorine smell has not been reduced at all: (remains at 0%) If you feel that the chlorine smell has decreased slightly: 1% to 25% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been reduced to some extent: 26% to 50% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 51-75% If you feel that the chlorine smell has been significantly reduced: 76-99% If you feel that the chlorine smell has completely disappeared: 100% It was evaluated as follows. [Table 12] It was confirmed that the chlorine odor was significantly reduced by adding sodium erythorbate together with the mineral concentrate extract, and that the odor was further reduced by combining sodium L-ascorbate and sodium erythorbate.

Claims

1. A mineral water for oral intake, characterized in that the mineral water contains an extract or a concentrate of activated carbon made from plant-derived materials containing potassium ions, chloride ions, calcium ions, magnesium ions, sodium ions and sulfate ions, the potassium ion concentration in the mineral water is 10 ppm or more, and the chloride ion content in the mineral water is 50% or less of the potassium ion concentration.

2. 2. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the potassium ion concentration in the mineral water is 600 ppm or less.

3. 3. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the potassium ion concentration in the mineral water is 20 ppm to 200 ppm.

4. 4. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the calcium ion content in the mineral water is 30% or less of the potassium ion concentration.

5. 5. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the magnesium ion content in the mineral water is 15% or less of the potassium ion concentration.

6. 6. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the content of sodium ions in the mineral water is 10 to 50% of the concentration of potassium ions.

7. The mineral water according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the pH of the mineral water is 7.5 to 10.

5.

8. The mineral water according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the mineral water has a buffer capacity, characterized in that when 100 g of sodium hydroxide solution adjusted to pH 9.2 is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (A) mL, and when the mineral water is titrated with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the amount of liquid required to change the pH from 9.2 to 3.0 is (B) mL, the ratio (B) / (A) is defined as the buffer capacity.

9. 9. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the mineral water has a total organic carbon (TOC) of 3.0 mg / l or less.

10. 2. The mineral water according to claim 1, wherein the plant-derived raw material is selected from the group consisting of coconut, palm, almond, walnut, and plum shells; wood selected from sawdust, charcoal, resin, and lignin; bee ash; bamboo; food waste selected from bagasse, rice husks, coffee beans, and blackstrap molasses; or combinations thereof.

11. The mineral water according to any one of claims 1 to 10, comprising potassium carbonate, potassium bicarbonate, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, disodium hydrogen phosphate, trisodium phosphate, and / or calcium hydroxide.

12. The mineral water according to any one of claims 1 to 11, which is used to prevent or improve acidification in a living body.

Images