Model Eye

The use of a reference device with a pattern-based eye model enhances the evaluation of ophthalmic scanning devices, addressing the limitations of existing methods by improving the accuracy of scan condition assessment and device performance evaluation.

JP7795016B2Active Publication Date: 2026-01-06TOPCON CORPORATION
View PDF 6 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2025008233
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Patents
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-01-21
Publication Date
2026-01-06
Estimated Expiration
2041-02-05

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing methods for evaluating ophthalmic scanning devices lack effectiveness in accurately assessing their performance and data collection capabilities, particularly when scanning living eyes.

Method used

A reference device, or eye model, is designed with a pattern based on preset scanning conditions to evaluate ophthalmic scanning devices, incorporating optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus camera systems, allowing for improved evaluation of scan conditions and device performance.

Benefits of technology

Enhances the evaluation of ophthalmic scanning devices by providing accurate assessment of scan parameters and device functionality, improving the quality of data collection and analysis.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 0007795016000001
    Figure 0007795016000001
  • Figure 0007795016000002
    Figure 0007795016000002
  • Figure 0007795016000003
    Figure 0007795016000003
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To improve the evaluation of an ophthalmologic scanning device using a model eye.SOLUTION: A model eye is used to acquire evaluation information on an ophthalmologic scanning device. The ophthalmologic scanning device executes alignment for a living eye using a cornea reflection image or an optical lever, and scans the living eye to collect data. The model eye includes a cornea part and an eyeground part. The cornea part is equivalent to the cornea of a human eye. In the eyeground part, a reference device having periodic patterns formed therein is provided as a simulated eyeground. The curvature radius of the cornea part is set to be about 7.7 mm.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 5
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to an eye model. [Background technology]

[0002] In the medical field, various devices are used, including inspection equipment, measurement equipment, and imaging equipment. Medical devices are precision instruments, and to ensure their full performance, they require adjustment and calibration based on rigorous evaluation. There are various methods for evaluating medical devices, but the most widely used method is the use of reference devices. Reference devices are also called standards (standards, etalons, etc.).

[0003] Standards used in evaluating medical devices are typically models (simulators) of biological tissues or organs, and are used as phantoms for evaluating radiological diagnostic equipment, model eyes for evaluating ophthalmic equipment, etc. Standards are designed according to the type, standards, specifications, performance, evaluation items, etc. of the medical device being evaluated. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0004] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-357868 [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2013-188314 [Patent Document 3] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-053462 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide a new technique for evaluating ophthalmic scanning devices that scan living eyes and collect data. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] A reference device according to an exemplary embodiment is used to obtain evaluation information for a medical scanning device that scans a living body and collects data based on preset scanning conditions, and the reference device has a pattern formed thereon that is designed based on at least one scanning condition. [Effects of the Invention]

[0007] According to some exemplary aspects, evaluation of an ophthalmic scanning device using an eye model can be improved. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0008] [Figure 1] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 2] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 3A] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 3B] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 4A] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 4B] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 4C] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 4D] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 4E] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 5] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a model eye for evaluating an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 6A] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a reference device for evaluating an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 6B] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a reference device for evaluating an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 7A] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scanning a fiducial for evaluating an ophthalmic device according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 7B] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scanning a fiducial for evaluating an ophthalmic device according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 8] 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a luminance profile obtained in a scan of a reference instrument for evaluating an ophthalmic device according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 9] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of an operation that can be performed by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 10] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of an operation that can be performed by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 11] 3 illustrates some examples of data generated by an ophthalmic device according to an exemplary aspect of the embodiment. [Figure 12] 1 illustrates an example of visualized information generated by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 13] 1 illustrates an example of visualized information generated by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 14] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of an operation that can be performed by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 15] 10A to 10C are diagrams for explaining an example of an operation that can be performed by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. [Figure 16] 1 illustrates an example of visualized information generated by an ophthalmologic apparatus according to an exemplary aspect of an embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0009] Some exemplary aspects of the embodiment will be described below. In the exemplary aspects detailed below, evaluation of an ophthalmic device that combines an optical coherence tomography (OCT) device and a fundus camera is handled, but the device (or system) to which the evaluation according to the embodiment can be applied is not limited thereto.

[0010] Some embodiments may evaluate ophthalmic scanning devices that scan living eyes to collect data. Examples of ophthalmic scanning devices include OCT devices and ophthalmic examination devices (e.g., ophthalmic imaging devices, ophthalmic measurement devices) such as scanning laser ophthalmoscopes (SLO). Some embodiments may also evaluate devices for biometric authentication (e.g., retinal scanners).

[0011] Additionally, some embodiments may evaluate devices in medical specialties other than ophthalmology. For example, some embodiments may evaluate devices used in radiology, dermatology, or dentistry. Specific types of devices include X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners, ultrasound scanners, OCT scanners, laser scanners, etc.

[0012] In this way, the evaluation according to the embodiment may be applied to any medical scanning device. Generally, a medical scanning device is an examination device (such as an imaging device or a measurement device) that sequentially acquires data (information) from multiple positions on a living body, and is typically configured to scan the living body and collect data based on preset scanning conditions.

[0013] The scan condition may be any condition (parameter, option, etc.) related to the scan, examples of which include a scan pattern (scan trajectory shape), a scan area shape, scan dimensions (length, area, volume, depth, diameter, perimeter), a scan spatial interval (scan spatial density), a scan time interval, a scan pattern repetition time interval, etc. Note that the scan condition is not limited to these.

[0014] The evaluation parameter according to the embodiment may be an evaluation parameter corresponding to any of the scan conditions, or may be any evaluation parameter related to any of the scan conditions. The parameter related to a scan condition may be, for example, any evaluation parameter that affects the scan condition.

[0015] At least a portion of the functionality of the elements disclosed herein is implemented using circuitry or processing circuitry, such as a general-purpose processor, a special-purpose processor, an integrated circuit, a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device (e.g., a simple programmable logic device (SPLD), a complex programmable logic device (CPLD), a field programmable gate array (FPGA)), or a combination of these devices configured and / or programmed to perform at least a portion of the disclosed functionality. The term "circuitry," "unit," "means," or the like refers to hardware that performs at least a portion of the disclosed functions or that is programmed to perform at least a portion of the disclosed functions. The hardware may be the hardware disclosed herein or may be known hardware that is programmed and / or configured to perform at least a portion of the described functions. In the case of a processor, where the hardware can be considered a type of circuitry, the term "circuitry," "unit," "means," or the like refers to a combination of hardware and software, where the software is used to configure the hardware and / or the processor.

[0016] An exemplary embodiment of an ophthalmic apparatus is shown in FIG. 1. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 in this example is a combination device of an OCT apparatus and a fundus camera. The OCT apparatus uses spectral-domain OCT, but it may also use swept-source OCT. Spectral-domain OCT is a technique in which light from a low-coherence light source is split into measurement light and reference light, and return light from the test object is superimposed on the reference light to generate interference light. The spectral distribution of this interference light is detected using a spectroscope, and the detected spectral distribution is subjected to Fourier transform or the like to form an image. On the other hand, swept-source OCT is a technique in which light from a tunable light source is split into measurement light and reference light, and return light from the test object is superimposed on the reference light to generate interference light. The interference light is detected using a photodetector such as a balanced photodiode, and the detection data collected in response to wavelength sweeping and scanning of the measurement light is subjected to Fourier transform or the like to form an image. In this way, spectral domain OCT is an OCT method that acquires the spectral distribution in a spatially divided manner, while swept-source OCT is an OCT method that acquires the spectral distribution in a time-divided manner.

[0017] In this embodiment, unless otherwise specified, no distinction is made between "image data" and "images," which are visualization information generated based on the image data. Furthermore, unless otherwise specified, no distinction is made between a region of the subject's eye (organ, tissue, etc.) and a corresponding portion of a phantom (reference device, eye model, etc.). Furthermore, unless otherwise specified, no distinction is made between a region of the subject's eye and its corresponding data (image, etc.), and no distinction is made between a portion of a phantom (reference device, eye model, etc.) and its corresponding data (image, etc.). The same applies when scanning a region other than the eye (organ, tissue, etc.).

[0018] The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes a fundus camera unit 2, an OCT unit 100, and an arithmetic and control unit 200. The fundus camera unit 2 is provided with an optical system and a mechanism for acquiring a front image of the subject's eye E, and an optical system and a mechanism for applying an OCT scan to the subject's eye E. The OCT unit 100 is provided with an optical system and a mechanism for performing an OCT scan. The arithmetic and control unit 200 includes one or more processors configured to perform various processes (arithmetic, control, etc.).

[0019] The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes a lens unit 400 for switching the region to which the OCT scan is applied. The lens unit 400 can be placed between the objective lens 22 and the subject's eye E. By inserting the lens unit 400 into the optical path, the region to which the OCT scan is applied is switched from the fundus Ef to the anterior segment.

[0020] The fundus camera unit 2 is provided with an optical system for photographing the subject's eye E (fundus oculi Ef and anterior segment). The acquired digital images are front images such as observed images and photographed images. Typically, observed images are acquired by video photography using continuous light in the near-infrared region, and photographed images are acquired as still images using flash light in the near-infrared region or visible region.

[0021] The fundus camera unit 2 includes an illumination optical system 10 and an imaging optical system 30. The illumination optical system 10 projects illumination light onto the subject's eye E. The imaging optical system 30 detects return light of the illumination light projected onto the subject's eye E. Measurement light from the OCT unit 100 is guided to the subject's eye E through an optical path within the fundus camera unit 2. Return light of the measurement light projected onto the subject's eye E is guided to the OCT unit 100 through the same optical path within the fundus camera unit 2.

[0022] Light (observation illumination light) output from an observation light source 11 of an illumination optical system 10 is reflected by a concave mirror 12, passes through a condenser lens 13, and is transmitted through a visible light cut filter 14 to become near-infrared light. The observation illumination light is then focused near a photographing light source 15, reflected by a mirror 16, and directed to a perforated mirror 21 via a relay lens system 17, a relay lens 18, an aperture 19, and a relay lens system 20. The observation illumination light is then reflected from the peripheral portion of the perforated mirror 21 (the area surrounding the hole), passes through a dichroic mirror 46, and is refracted by an objective lens 22 to illuminate the subject's eye E. Return light of the observation illumination light from the subject's eye E is refracted by the objective lens 22, passes through the dichroic mirror 46, passes through a hole formed in the central area of ​​the perforated mirror 21, passes through a dichroic mirror 55, passes through a photographing focusing lens 31, and is reflected by a mirror 32. Furthermore, this returned light passes through the half mirror 33A, is reflected by the dichroic mirror 33, and is imaged by the imaging lens 34 on the light receiving surface of the image sensor 35. The image sensor 35 detects the returned light at a predetermined frame rate. The focus of the photographing optical system 30 can be adjusted to match the fundus Ef or its vicinity, and can also be adjusted to match the anterior segment or its vicinity.

[0023] Light (photography illumination light) output from the photography light source 15 travels the same path as the observation illumination light and is projected onto the fundus oculi Ef. Return light of the photography illumination light from the subject's eye E travels the same path as the return light of the observation illumination light and is guided to the dichroic mirror 33, passes through the dichroic mirror 33, is reflected by a mirror 36, and is imaged by an imaging lens 37 on the light-receiving surface of an image sensor 38.

[0024] The liquid crystal display (LCD) 39 displays a fixation target (fixation target image). A portion of the visible light beam output from the LCD 39 is reflected by the half mirror 33A, reflected by the mirror 32, passes through the focusing lens 31 and the dichroic mirror 55, passes through the hole in the aperture mirror 21, passes through the dichroic mirror 46, is refracted by the objective lens 22, and is projected onto the fundus Ef. The fixation target is typically used to guide and fixate the gaze. The direction to which the gaze of the subject's eye E is guided (and fixed), i.e., the direction in which the subject's eye E is encouraged to fixate, is called the fixation position. The fixation position can be changed by changing the display position of the fixation target image on the screen of the LCD 39. The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 may be capable of providing a graphical user interface (GUI) for changing the fixation position.

[0025] The alignment optical system 50 generates an alignment index used to align the optical system with the subject's eye E. Alignment light output from a light-emitting diode (LED) 51 passes through an aperture 52, an aperture 53, and a relay lens 54, is reflected by a dichroic mirror 55, passes through the hole in the aperture mirror 21, transmits through the dichroic mirror 46, and is projected onto the subject's eye E via the objective lens 22. The return light of the alignment light from the subject's eye E is guided to the image sensor 35 via the same path as the return light of the observation illumination light. Manual alignment or automatic alignment can be performed based on the received light image (alignment index image).

[0026] Alignment methods applicable to the embodiments are not limited to those using such alignment indicators, and may be, for example, a method using a stereo camera, a method using Purkinje images, a method using an optical lever, or any combination thereof.

[0027] The focusing optical system 60 generates a split index used for focus adjustment of the subject's eye E. The focusing optical system 60 moves along the optical path (illumination optical path) of the illumination optical system 10 in conjunction with movement of the photographing focusing lens 31 along the optical path (photographing optical path) of the photographing optical system 30. The reflecting rod 67 is inserted into and removed from the illumination optical path. When performing focus adjustment, the reflecting surface of the reflecting rod 67 is tilted and positioned in the illumination optical path. Focusing light output from the LED 61 passes through the relay lens 62, is split into two beams by the split index plate 63, passes through the two-hole diaphragm 64, is reflected by the mirror 65, and is first imaged and reflected on the reflecting surface of the reflecting rod 67 by the condenser lens 66. The focusing light then passes through the relay lens 20, is reflected by the aperture mirror 21, passes through the dichroic mirror 46, and is projected onto the subject's eye E via the objective lens 22. The return light of the focusing light from the subject's eye E passes through the same path as the return light of the alignment light and is guided to the image sensor 35. Based on the received light image (split target image), manual focusing or autofocusing can be performed.

[0028] Diopter correction lenses 70 and 71 can be selectively inserted into the photographing optical path between the aperture mirror 21 and the dichroic mirror 55. The diopter correction lens 70 is a plus lens (convex lens) for correcting severe hyperopia. The diopter correction lens 71 is a minus lens (concave lens) for correcting severe myopia.

[0029] The dichroic mirror 46 combines the optical path for the fundus camera and the optical path for OCT scanning (measurement arm). The dichroic mirror 46 reflects light in the wavelength band used for OCT scanning and transmits light in the wavelength band used for the fundus camera. The measurement arm is provided with, in order from the OCT unit 100 side, a collimator lens unit 40, a retroreflector 41, a dispersion compensation member 42, an OCT focusing lens 43, an optical scanner 44, and a relay lens 45.

[0030] The retroreflector 41 is movable along the optical path of the measurement light LS incident thereon, thereby changing the length of the measurement arm, which is used for, for example, correcting the optical path length according to the axial length of the eye, adjusting the interference state, and so on.

[0031] The dispersion compensation member 42, together with a dispersion compensation member 113 (described later) disposed in the reference arm, acts to match the dispersion characteristics of the measurement light LS with the dispersion characteristics of the reference light LR.

[0032] The OCT focusing lens 43 is moved along the measurement arm to adjust the focus of the measurement arm. The movement of the imaging focusing lens 31, the movement of the focus optical system 60, and the movement of the OCT focusing lens 43 can be controlled in a coordinated manner.

[0033] The optical scanner 44 is disposed substantially at a position optically conjugate with the pupil of the subject's eye E. The optical scanner 44 deflects the measurement light LS guided by the measurement arm. The optical scanner 44 is, for example, a galvanometer scanner capable of two-dimensional scanning. Typically, the optical scanner 44 includes a one-dimensional scanner (x-scanner) for deflecting the measurement light in ±x directions and a one-dimensional scanner (y-scanner) for deflecting the measurement light in ±y directions. In this case, one of the one-dimensional scanners is disposed at a position optically conjugate with the pupil, or a position optically conjugate with the pupil is disposed between the two one-dimensional scanners.

[0034] The exemplary OCT unit 100 shown in FIG. 2 is provided with an optical system for spectral-domain OCT. This optical system includes an interference optical system. This interference optical system splits light from a low-coherence light source (broadband light source) into measurement light and reference light, and generates interference light by superimposing the return light of the measurement light projected onto the subject's eye E on the reference light that has passed through a reference arm. The spectral distribution of the interference light generated by the interference optical system is detected by a spectrometer. The output (detection signal) from the spectrometer is sent to the arithmetic and control unit 200.

[0035] The light source unit 101 outputs broadband low-coherence light L0. The low-coherence light L0 includes, for example, a wavelength band in the near-infrared region (approximately 800 nm to 900 nm) and has a temporal coherence length of approximately several tens of micrometers. Note that the low-coherence light L0 may be near-infrared light having a center wavelength of approximately 1040 to 1060 nm, for example, a wavelength band that is not visible to the human eye. The light source unit 101 includes a light output device such as a superluminescent diode (SLD), an LED, or a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA).

[0036] In an embodiment in which swept-source OCT is employed, the light source unit includes, for example, a near-infrared wavelength-tunable laser that changes the wavelength of emitted light at high speed.

[0037] Low-coherence light L0 output from light source unit 101 is guided by optical fiber 102 to polarization controller 103, where its polarization state is adjusted. The light L0 whose polarization state has been adjusted is guided by optical fiber 104 to fiber coupler 105, where it is split into measurement light LS and reference light LR.

[0038] The reference light LR generated by the fiber coupler 105 is guided by an optical fiber 110 to a collimator 111, where it is converted into a parallel beam, and then guided to a retroreflector 114 via an optical path length correction element 112 and a dispersion compensation element 113. The optical path length correction element 112 acts to match the optical path length of the reference light LR with that of the measurement light LS. The dispersion compensation element 113, together with a dispersion compensation element 42 arranged in the measurement arm, acts to match the dispersion characteristics between the reference light LR and the measurement light LS. The retroreflector 114 is movable along the optical path of the reference light LR incident thereon, thereby changing the length of the reference arm. Changing the reference arm length is used, for example, to correct the optical path length according to the axial length or to adjust the interference state.

[0039] The reference light LR that has passed through the retroreflector 114 passes through the dispersion compensation member 113 and the optical path length correction member 112, is converted from a parallel beam into a convergent beam by the collimator 116, and enters an optical fiber 117. The reference light LR that has entered the optical fiber 117 is guided to a polarization controller 118 where its polarization state is adjusted, is guided through an optical fiber 119 to an attenuator 120 where its light amount is adjusted, and is guided through an optical fiber 121 to a fiber coupler 122.

[0040] On the other hand, the measurement light LS generated by the fiber coupler 105 is guided through the optical fiber 127 to the collimator lens unit 40, where it is converted into a parallel beam, passes through the retroreflector 41, the dispersion compensation member 42, the OCT focusing lens 43, the optical scanner 44, and the relay lens 45, is reflected by the dichroic mirror 46, is refracted by the objective lens 22, and is projected onto the subject's eye E. The measurement light LS is scattered and reflected at various depth positions in the subject's eye E. Return light of the measurement light LS from the subject's eye E travels in the opposite direction through the measurement arm, is guided to the fiber coupler 105, and reaches the fiber coupler 122 via the optical fiber 128.

[0041] The fiber coupler 122 superimposes the measurement light LS incident via the optical fiber 128 and the reference light LR incident via the optical fiber 121 to generate interference light LC.

[0042] The interference light LC generated by the fiber coupler 122 is guided to the spectrometer 130 through the optical fiber 123. The spectrometer 130 includes, for example, a collimator lens that converts the incident interference light LC into a parallel beam, a diffraction grating that resolves the parallel beam of interference light LC into spectral components, and an image sensor that detects the resolved spectral components. This image sensor is, for example, a line sensor that detects multiple spectral components of the interference light LC and generates an electrical signal (detection signal). The generated detection signal is sent to the arithmetic and control unit 200.

[0043] In an embodiment employing swept-source OCT, interference light generated by superimposing measurement light and reference light is split at a predetermined split ratio (e.g., 1:1) to generate a pair of interference light beams, which are then guided to a photodetector. The photodetector may include, for example, a balanced photodiode. The balanced photodiode includes a pair of photodetectors that respectively detect the pair of interference light beams and output the difference between the pair of detection signals obtained by these. The photodetector sends this output (detection signal such as a differential signal) to a data acquisition system (DAQ). A clock is supplied to the data acquisition system from a light source unit. The clock is generated in the light source unit in synchronization with the output timing of each wavelength swept within a predetermined wavelength range by a wavelength-tunable light source. For example, the light source unit splits light of each output wavelength to generate two split light beams, optically delays one of the split light beams, combines the split light beams, detects the resulting combined light, and generates a clock based on the detection signal. The data acquisition system samples the detection signal (differential signal) input from the photodetector based on the clock. The data obtained by this sampling is used for processing such as image construction.

[0044] The ophthalmic apparatus 1 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 is provided with both an element for changing the measurement arm length (e.g., retroreflector 41) and an element for changing the reference arm length (e.g., retroreflector 114 or reference mirror), but in some exemplary embodiments, only one of these elements is provided. The coherence gate position is changed by changing the measurement arm length and the reference arm length relatively (i.e., by changing the optical path length difference between the measurement arm and the reference arm). The element for changing the optical path length difference is not limited to the elements disclosed in this embodiment and may be any element (optical member, mechanism, etc.).

[0045] The arithmetic and control unit 200 controls each part of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The arithmetic and control unit 200 also performs various calculations. For example, the arithmetic and control unit 200 forms a reflection intensity profile for each A-line by performing signal processing such as Fourier transform on the spectral distribution acquired by the spectroscope 130. Furthermore, the arithmetic and control unit 200 forms image data by imaging the reflection intensity profile for each A-line. The calculation processing for this is similar to that of conventional spectral domain OCT.

[0046] The arithmetic control unit 200 includes, for example, a processor, a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a hard disk drive, a communication interface, etc. Various computer programs are stored in the storage device such as the hard disk drive. The arithmetic control unit 200 may also include an operation device, an input device, a display device, etc.

[0047] Examples of the configuration of the processing system of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 are shown in Figures 3A to 4E. Figure 3A shows an example of the configuration of the entire processing system. The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 in Figure 3A includes a control unit 210, an image forming unit 220, and a data processing unit 230. The control unit 210, the image forming unit 220, and the data processing unit 230 are provided in, for example, the arithmetic control unit 200. Figure 3B shows an example of the configuration of the data processing unit 230. The data processing unit 230A in Figure 3B includes an evaluation unit 250 and a visualization information generation unit 270. Figures 4A to 4E show several examples of the configuration of the evaluation unit 250.

[0048] In this embodiment, the evaluation unit 250 and the visualization information generation unit 270 are provided in the ophthalmic apparatus 1 to be evaluated. Meanwhile, in some embodiments, an element corresponding to at least a part of the evaluation unit 250 and / or an element corresponding to at least a part of the visualization information generation unit 270 may be provided external to the apparatus to be evaluated (medical scanning apparatus, ophthalmic scanning apparatus). For example, an element corresponding to at least a part of the evaluation unit 250 and / or an element corresponding to at least a part of the visualization information generation unit 270 may be provided in an information processing device (computer) connected to the apparatus to be evaluated via a wired or wireless connection. Alternatively, an element corresponding to at least a part of the evaluation unit 250 may be provided in a first information processing device connected to the apparatus to be evaluated via a wired or wireless connection, and an element corresponding to at least a part of the visualization information generation unit 270 may be provided in a second information processing device connected to the first information processing device via a wired or wireless connection. Here, each of the information processing device, the first information processing device, and the second information processing device may be a single computer or two or more computers.

[0049] At least two of the configuration examples shown in FIGS. 3A to 4E can be combined. Any known technology and / or equivalent technology can be combined with any one or a combination of two or more of these configuration examples. Any one or a combination of two or more of these configuration examples can be combined with equivalent technology to any of the configuration examples. This "combination" may be any modification such as addition, substitution, or omission. The same applies to components other than the processing system (any matter in this disclosure).

[0050] The control unit 210 includes a processor and controls each unit of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The control unit 210 includes a main control unit 211 and a storage unit 212.

[0051] The main control unit 211 includes a processor and controls each element (including the elements shown in FIGS. 1 to 4E) of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The main control unit 211 is realized, for example, by cooperation between hardware including circuits and control software.

[0052] The imaging focusing lens 31 disposed in the imaging optical path and the focus optical system 60 disposed in the illumination optical path are moved integrally or in coordination with each other by an imaging focusing driver (not shown) under the control of the main controller 211. The retroreflector 41 disposed in the measurement arm is moved by a retroreflector (RR) driver 41A under the control of the main controller 211. The OCT focusing lens 43 disposed in the measurement arm is moved by an OCT focusing driver 43A under the control of the main controller 211. The movement of the OCT focusing lens 43 can be coordinated with the movement of the imaging focusing lens 31 and the focus optical system 60. The retroreflector 114 disposed in the reference arm is moved by a retroreflector (RR) driver 114A under the control of the main controller 211. Each of the mechanisms illustrated here typically includes an actuator such as a pulse motor operated under the control of the main controller 211. The optical scanner 44 disposed in the measurement arm is operated under the control of the main controller 211. Furthermore, the main control unit 211 can control any element included in the ophthalmic apparatus 1, such as the polarization controller 103, the polarization controller 118, the attenuator 120, various light sources, various optical elements, various devices, and various mechanisms. The main control unit 211 may also be capable of controlling any peripheral equipment (apparatus, equipment, device, etc.) connected to the ophthalmic apparatus 1, and any equipment, equipment, device, etc. accessible by the ophthalmic apparatus 1.

[0053] The movement mechanism 150, for example, moves at least the fundus camera unit 2 three-dimensionally. In a typical example, the movement mechanism 150 includes an x-stage movable in ±x directions (left and right directions), an x-movement mechanism for moving the x-stage, a y-stage movable in ±y directions (up and down directions), a y-movement mechanism for moving the y-stage, a z-stage movable in ±z directions (depth direction), and a z-movement mechanism for moving the z-stage. Each of these movement mechanisms includes an actuator such as a pulse motor that operates under the control of the main controller 211.

[0054] The storage unit 212 stores various types of data. Examples of data stored in the storage unit 212 include image data of OCT images, image data of fundus images, and information about the subject's eye. The information about the subject's eye includes subject information such as a patient ID and name, identification information for the left eye / right eye, and electronic medical record information.

[0055] Furthermore, the storage unit 212 can store data generated by the data processing unit 230. For example, evaluation information and / or visualization information, which will be described later, is stored in the storage unit 212. The storage unit 212 can also store information related to a reference device (eye model), which will be described later. For example, standard information, which will be described later, is stored in the storage unit 212.

[0056] The user interface 240 includes a display unit 241 and an operation unit 242. The display unit 241 displays information under the operation of the main control unit 211 and includes, for example, the display device 3. The operation unit 242 includes various operation devices and input devices, generates signals corresponding to operations and inputs, and sends them to the main control unit 211. The user interface 240 may include a device that combines a display function and an operation function, such as a touch panel. Ophthalmic apparatuses according to some exemplary embodiments may not include at least a part of the user interface. For example, the display device and / or the operation device may be peripheral devices of the ophthalmic apparatus.

[0057] The image forming unit 220 forms OCT image data based on the data acquired by the spectrometer 130. The image forming unit 220 includes a processor. The image forming unit 220 is realized, for example, by cooperation between hardware including a circuit and image forming software.

[0058] The image forming unit 220 forms cross-sectional image data based on the data acquired by the spectroscope 130. This image forming process includes signal processing such as sampling (A / D conversion), noise removal (noise reduction), filtering, and fast Fourier transform (FFT), similar to conventional spectral domain OCT.

[0059] The image data formed by the image forming unit 220 is a data set including a group of image data (a group of A-scan image data) formed by imaging the reflection intensity profile of multiple A-lines (scan lines along the z-direction) arranged in the area where the OCT scan was applied.

[0060] The image data formed by the image forming unit 220 is, for example, one or more B-scan image data sets, or stack data formed by embedding multiple B-scan image data sets in a single three-dimensional coordinate system. The image forming unit 220 can also construct volume data (voxel data) by performing voxelization processing on the stack data. Stack data and volume data are typical examples of three-dimensional image data expressed in a three-dimensional coordinate system.

[0061] The data processing unit 230 performs various types of data processing. For example, the data processing unit 230 can apply image processing and analysis processing to OCT image data, and can apply image processing and analysis processing to observed image data or captured image data. The data processing unit 230 includes a processor. The data processing unit 230 is realized, for example, by cooperation between hardware including circuits and data processing software.

[0062] The data processing unit 230 can process the 3D image data constructed by the image forming unit 220. For example, the data processing unit 230 can construct new image data by applying rendering to the 3D image data. Rendering techniques include volume rendering, maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection (MIP), surface rendering, and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR). The data processing unit 230 can also construct projection data by projecting the 3D image data in the z direction (A-line direction, depth direction). Similarly, the data processing unit 230 can construct a shadowgram by projecting a portion of the 3D image data (3D partial image data) in the z direction. Here, the 3D partial image data is set, for example, by applying segmentation to the 3D image data. This segmentation may include image analysis (image processing) such as thresholding and edge detection, or may include semantic segmentation using machine learning.

[0063] 3B is an example of the data processing unit 230. The data processing unit 230A includes an evaluation unit 250 and a visualization information generation unit 270. Note that the data processing unit 230 in some embodiments may include only the evaluation unit 250.

[0064] The evaluation unit 250 is configured to generate evaluation information of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The evaluation unit 250 generates the evaluation information based on data collected by scanning a reference device (eye model) described below. More generally, in some embodiments, the evaluation unit 250 is configured to generate evaluation information of an apparatus (medical scanning apparatus, ophthalmologic scanning apparatus) that scans a living body and collects data based on preset scanning conditions, based on data collected by scanning a reference device with the apparatus. The evaluation information is information that represents a predetermined quality of the target apparatus, such as the quality of operation, the quality of function, the quality of control, the quality of obtained data, or the quality of data processing.

[0065] 4A to 4E show several examples of the evaluation unit 250. As described above, the evaluation unit 250 may be a combination of two or more of the exemplary evaluation units 250A to 250E. Below, we will first provide an overview of the evaluation units 250A to 250E, which are several examples of the evaluation unit 250, and then describe specific aspects of evaluation of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 that can be performed using the evaluation unit 250.

[0066] 4A is configured to generate evaluation information based on projection data of the three-dimensional image data constructed by the image forming unit 220. The evaluation unit 250A includes a projection processing unit 251 and an evaluation information generation unit 252.

[0067] The projection processing unit 251 is configured to construct projection data (two-dimensional image data) from three-dimensional image data collected by scanning a three-dimensional region of the fiducial with the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The process of constructing projection data from three-dimensional image data (projection) includes, for example, an operation of adding together, in the z direction, the values ​​of multiple pixels included in each A-scan image data constituting the three-dimensional image data. The projection data of three-dimensional image data expressed in an xyz coordinate system is two-dimensional image data expressed in an xy coordinate system.

[0068] The evaluation information generating unit 252 is configured to generate evaluation information based on the projection data constructed by the projection processing unit 251 .

[0069] The evaluation unit 250 (for example, the evaluation unit 250A) may be configured to generate evaluation information based on data collected by scanning the reference device with the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 and standard information of the pattern.

[0070] A predetermined pattern is formed on the reference device. The standard information of the pattern referenced by the evaluation unit 250 represents the aspect of the pattern formed on the reference device. The aspect of the pattern represented by this standard information may be any parameter related to the pattern, such as shape, dimensions, distribution, number, spacing, etc. The shape of the pattern may be a three-dimensional shape, a two-dimensional shape, a cross-sectional shape, etc. When a pattern consists of multiple subpatterns (basic patterns or a combination thereof), the shape of the pattern represented by the standard information may be the shape of a subpattern or the shape of the entire pattern. The dimensions of the pattern may be length, width, depth, diameter, area, volume, etc. When a pattern consists of multiple subpatterns, the dimensions of the pattern represented by the standard information may be the dimensions of a subpattern or the dimensions of the entire pattern. The distribution of the pattern may be the distribution of the multiple subpatterns that make up the pattern. The distribution may be, for example, density, the ratio of the dimensions of the pattern portion to the dimensions of the non-pattern portion, or the ratio of the dimensions of the reference device to the pattern portion. The number of patterns may be the number of subpatterns that make up the pattern. The pattern interval may be the distance between two adjacent sub-patterns among the multiple sub-patterns that make up the pattern. When a pattern is made up of multiple sub-patterns, the standard information of the pattern may include statistics calculated based on at least some of the multiple sub-patterns, or may be values ​​for each individual sub-pattern.

[0071] The standard information of the pattern is created in advance, for example, based on the design information and / or measurement data of the reference device. The design information of the reference device is information referenced to form a pattern on the reference device. The design information is created based on at least one scan condition for OCT scans that the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can perform. In other words, a reference device on which a pattern designed based on at least one scan condition is formed is used for evaluation in this embodiment. On the other hand, the measurement data of the reference device is data obtained by actually measuring the reference device and includes information about the pattern formed on the reference device. The standard information created in this manner is stored, for example, in the memory unit 212 and / or in a storage device or recording medium accessible by the ophthalmic apparatus 1.

[0072] In the evaluation of the ophthalmic device 1, the ophthalmic device 1 can apply a predetermined pattern of scans to the reference device. This scan pattern includes a line scan, for example, a raster scan. A raster scan is made up of multiple line scans that are parallel to each other.

[0073] Furthermore, the evaluation unit 250 may be configured to determine the straightness (linearity, degree of linearity) of the line scan as evaluation information based on data collected by the scan applied to the reference device. The trajectory of the line scan is ideally a straight line, but the trajectory of the line scan may deviate from a straight line due to errors in the configuration and control of the ophthalmic apparatus 1. The evaluation unit 250 in this example can evaluate whether the trajectory of the line scan of the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can be considered a straight line, and can also evaluate the degree of deviation from a straight line.

[0074] A linear pattern is formed on the reference device used to evaluate the straightness of the line scan. This linear pattern may be, for example, linearly formed recesses (grooves, valleys) and / or protrusions. The dimensions of the groove may be designed based on the scanning conditions of the line scan. For example, the length of the groove may be designed based on the length of the line scan, etc. The depth of the groove may be designed based on the length of the A-scan (imaging range in the depth direction, imaging range in the axial direction), etc. The width of the groove may be designed based on the beam diameter of the measurement light, the line scan interval in the raster scan, etc. Protrusions can also be designed in the same manner.

[0075] The ophthalmic apparatus 1 applies a scan to the reference device on which such a linear pattern is formed. This scan may be at least one line scan set parallel to the linear pattern, and may typically be a raster scan. For example, the application position of the scan is set so that at least a portion of one or more line scans coincides with at least a portion of the linear pattern. The evaluation unit 250 can determine the straightness of the line scan of the ophthalmic apparatus 1 based on the data collected by this scan and the standard information of the linear pattern. Here, the standard information of the linear pattern is included in the standard information of the pattern described above.

[0076] An example configuration of the evaluation unit 250 for evaluating the straightness of a line scan is shown in FIG. 4B. The evaluation unit 250B in this example includes a projection processing unit 253, a position data generation unit 254, and a straightness calculation unit 255. In this example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 applies a scan to a three-dimensional area (including at least a part of the linear pattern) of the reference device on which the linear pattern is formed. This scan is, for example, a raster scan.

[0077] The projection processing unit 253 is configured to construct projection data from data (three-dimensional data) collected by scanning the three-dimensional area of ​​the reference device. The projection processing unit 253 constructs projection data from the three-dimensional image data collected by scanning the three-dimensional area of ​​the reference device by performing the same processing as the projection processing unit 251 described above. This projection data is, for example, two-dimensional image data expressed in an xy coordinate system.

[0078] The position data generation unit 254 is configured to obtain position data of the linear pattern based on the projection data constructed by the projection processing unit 253. This position data includes position information of the image of the linear pattern rendered in the projection data (two-dimensional image data). The position data generation unit 254 analyzes the projection data to detect the image of the linear pattern. This image detection may include segmentation. This segmentation may include, for example, image analysis (image processing) such as threshold processing and edge detection, or may include semantic segmentation using machine learning.

[0079] The straightness calculation unit 255 is configured to calculate the straightness of the line scan of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 based on the position data generated by the position data generation unit 254 and the standard information of the linear pattern. This straightness indicates the error of the line scan (its trajectory) relative to a geometric straight line.

[0080] Another example of evaluation according to this embodiment will be described. The evaluation unit 250 may be configured to generate, as evaluation information, position evaluation information related to the position of a scan applied to a reference device. The position of the scan evaluated in this example may be the application position of the scan relative to the reference device. If the scan whose position is to be evaluated is made up of multiple subscans, i.e., if the scan pattern is made up of multiple subpatterns, the position of the scan evaluated in this example may be the relative positions of two or more subpatterns applied to the reference device, or may be the application position of the subscan relative to the reference device.

[0081] In this example, the pattern formed on the fiducial may include a linear pattern group. The linear pattern group includes two or more linear patterns. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 collects data by applying multiple line scans to the fiducial. The multiple line scans may be, for example, raster scans. The evaluation unit 250 can generate evaluation information regarding the positional relationship of the multiple line scans as position evaluation information based on the data collected by the multiple line scans and pre-created standard information for the linear pattern group. The generated position evaluation information is referred to as positional relationship evaluation information. The evaluation unit 250 may be configured to perform, for example, a process of constructing projection data from data (3D image data) collected from the fiducial by raster scanning, a process of analyzing the projection data to detect images of each linear pattern, and a process of generating positional relationship evaluation information based on the detected images of the linear pattern group and the standard information for the linear pattern group. Here, the process of detecting the images of the linear pattern group may include any segmentation.

[0082] The linear pattern group formed on the reference device may include two (or more) parallel linear patterns. In this case, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can evaluate the scan interval. That is, the distance between these two line scans can be evaluated.

[0083] An example configuration of the evaluation unit 250 for evaluating the scan interval is shown in FIG. 4C. The evaluation unit 250C in this example includes a distance data generation unit 256 and a distance evaluation information generation unit 257. The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 collects data by applying multiple line scans to a reference device on which two (or more) parallel linear patterns are formed. The multiple line scans may be, for example, raster scans.

[0084] The spacing data generation unit 256 is configured to generate data indicating the spacing between the two linear patterns (i.e., the distance between the two linear patterns) based on the data collected by the multiple line scans. The data generated by the spacing data generation unit 256 is called spacing data. For example, the spacing data generation unit 256 may be configured to execute the following processes: constructing projection data from data (3D image data) collected from a reference device by raster scanning; analyzing the projection data to detect an image of each linear pattern; and calculating the distance (spacing data) between the detected images of the two linear pattern groups. Here, the process of detecting the images of the linear pattern groups may include any segmentation.

[0085] The distance evaluation information generating unit 257 is configured to generate distance evaluation information regarding the distance between the two line scans corresponding to the two linear patterns, based on the distance data generated by the distance data generating unit 256 and standard information of the two linear patterns created in advance. The generated distance evaluation information is an example of positional relationship evaluation information.

[0086] The linear pattern group formed on the reference device may include multiple linear patterns parallel to each other. In this case, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can evaluate overscan. Overscan is a technique for constructing an image by excluding data from the periphery of the scanned area. When scanning is performed using an optical scanner 44 that reciprocates, such as a galvanometer scanner, the scanner's motion becomes unstable in the sections before and after switching the direction of motion. For example, a sudden change in the scanner's motion speed (sudden deceleration and sudden acceleration) occurs in this section. As a result, artifacts such as image distortion occur. Overscan is a technique for constructing an image by excluding such artifact-causing areas. In this embodiment, for example, the artifact occurrence area can be determined from the performance and specifications of the optical scanner 44 to create standard information. The overscan evaluation in this example can provide a method for providing information on whether the artifact occurrence area is appropriately set, for example. Furthermore, the overscan evaluation in this example may be capable of providing information on the presence, degree, amount, and acceptability of overscan-related artifacts.

[0087] An example configuration of the evaluation unit 250 for evaluating overscan is shown in FIG. 4D. The evaluation unit 250D in this example includes a distance data generation unit 258, a distance evaluation information generation unit 259, a distribution generation unit 260, and an overscan evaluation information generation unit 261. The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 collects data by applying multiple line scans to a reference device on which multiple linear patterns parallel to each other are formed. The multiple line scans may be, for example, raster scans.

[0088] Distance data generation unit 258 and distance evaluation information generation unit 259 have the same configurations as distance data generation unit 256 and distance evaluation information generation unit 257 in Fig. 4C, respectively, and execute the same processes. A plurality of linear patterns parallel to one another are referred to as first to Nth linear patterns in the order in which they are arranged (N is an integer of 2 or more).

[0089] The distance data generating unit 258 obtains distance data between the nth linear pattern and the (n+1)th linear pattern (n=1, 2, . . . , N-1). That is, the distance data generating unit 258 calculates the distance between any two linear patterns that are adjacent to each other.

[0090] Furthermore, the interval evaluation information generating unit 259 generates interval evaluation information for the nth linear pattern and the n+1th linear pattern based on the interval data obtained for the nth linear pattern and the n+1th linear pattern and the standard information created in advance for the nth linear pattern and the n+1th linear pattern, thereby obtaining N-1 pieces of interval evaluation information corresponding to the N-1 pairs obtained from the N linear patterns.

[0091] The distribution generation unit 260 is configured to generate information representing the distribution of the N-1 pieces of interval evaluation information thus obtained. The generated information is called the interval evaluation information distribution. For example, the distribution generation unit 260 can generate the interval evaluation information distribution by determining the position of each of the N-1 pieces of interval evaluation information according to the arrangement of the N linear patterns (e.g., relative arrangement or arrangement on a reference device).

[0092] The overscan evaluation information generator 261 is configured to generate evaluation information regarding overscan (overscan evaluation information) based on the interval evaluation information distribution generated by the distribution generator 260 and standard overscan information created in advance. The generated overscan evaluation information is an example of positional relationship evaluation information.

[0093] Another example of evaluation according to this embodiment will be described. This example can be used to evaluate a measurement method that applies multiple scans to the same region of an object (i.e., evaluate the reproducibility of scans). Examples of such measurement methods in the field of ophthalmology include OCT angiography (OCT angiography), which emphasizes blood vessels by subtracting multiple images of the subject's eye, image averaging, which averages multiple images of the subject's eye to remove random noise, and methods for generating time-series data from multiple images of the subject's eye (e.g., OCT blood flow measurement, motion measurement, etc.). These measurement methods require repeatedly scanning the same region of the object (the subject's eye) with high precision. This example evaluates whether the positional reproducibility of such repeated scans is sufficient.

[0094] In this example, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 applies repeated scans to the reference device. That is, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 performs multiple scans of the same pattern targeting the same region of the reference device. This results in multiple data collected from the reference device by scanning the same pattern.

[0095] Although these multiple data sets are collected by multiple scans targeting the same region, they are not necessarily collected from the same region. If the position repeatability of the scans is low, the multiple data sets will be collected from substantially different regions. Here, the criterion (threshold) for determining whether the position repeatability is sufficient may be set according to the type of measurement method.

[0096] An example configuration of an evaluation unit 250 for evaluating the position repeatability of a repetitive scan is shown in FIG. 4E. The evaluation unit 250E in this example includes a repeatability evaluation information generation unit 262. The repeatability evaluation information generation unit 262 generates evaluation information (repeatability evaluation information) of the position repeatability of the repetitive scan based on multiple pieces of data collected by the repetitive scan. The generated repeatability evaluation information is an example of position evaluation information.

[0097] Next, we will explain the visualization information generation unit 270. The visualization information generation unit 270 generates visualization information from the evaluation information generated by the evaluation unit 250. The visualization information is information that visually represents at least a part of the evaluation information or information obtained therefrom.

[0098] The evaluation information input to the visualization information generation unit 270 may be any type of evaluation information collected by scanning a reference device, and may be, for example, any of the following exemplary evaluation information: evaluation information based on projection data; evaluation information based on standard information of a pattern formed on a reference device; evaluation information of the linearity (straightness) of a line scan; evaluation information of the scan position (position evaluation information); evaluation information of the positional relationship between multiple line scans (positional relationship evaluation information); evaluation information of the spacing between line scans (spacing evaluation information); evaluation information of overscan (overscan evaluation information); evaluation information of the positional repeatability of repetitive scans (reproducibility evaluation information); evaluation information that is a combination of two or more of the above examples; evaluation information similar to any of the above examples; evaluation information based on any of the above examples. Specific examples of visualization information will be described later.

[0099] The above has described an overview of the evaluation units 250A to 250E, which are examples of the evaluation unit 250. Several specific aspects of evaluation of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 that can be performed using such an evaluation unit 250 will be described below.

[0100] In some specific embodiments, for example, a model eye is used to evaluate the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. The model eye is provided with a reference device. As described above, a pattern designed based on one or more scanning conditions of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 is formed on the reference device. The reference device is used, for example, as a part of the model eye corresponding to the fundus (imitation fundus). The reference device is not limited to a simulation fundus, and may be a part of the model eye corresponding to any part of the eye. The reference device does not need to be part of the model eye, and may be, for example, a reference device alone, or may be provided as part of the simulation fundus.

[0101] An example of a model eye is shown in FIG. 5. In this example, the model eye 500 is placed in front of the objective lens 22 to evaluate the performance of the ophthalmic apparatus 1. For example, the model eye 500 is attached to a face holder (such as a chin rest or forehead rest) via a dedicated attachment. This places the model eye 500 in a position similar to that of the subject's eye E. The alignment function of the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can be used to align the ophthalmic apparatus 1 with the model eye 500. This facilitates the task of evaluating the ophthalmic apparatus 1 and also makes it possible to evaluate the ophthalmic apparatus 1 while taking into account an evaluation of the quality of the alignment.

[0102] The model eye 500 includes a cornea portion 510 (cornea-equivalent lens) corresponding to the cornea, an iris portion 520 corresponding to the iris, a lens portion 550 (lens-equivalent lens) corresponding to the crystalline lens, a vitreous body portion 560 corresponding to the vitreous body, and a fundus portion 570 corresponding to the fundus. The number of elements included in the model eye 500 (for example, the number of lenses) is arbitrary.

[0103] The iris portion 520 forms an opening 540 corresponding to the pupil. The iris portion 520 may be provided with a variable portion 530 for changing the size (opening diameter) of the opening 540. The variable portion 530 may be, for example, detachable from the iris portion 520, and multiple members corresponding to different opening diameters may be selectively applied. Alternatively, the variable portion 530 may be configured to be movable relative to the iris portion 520. The size of the opening 540 may be fixed. The vitreous portion 560 is filled with a liquid such as oil. The substance filled in the vitreous portion 560 is arbitrary and may be, for example, any gas, any liquid, or any solid. A gas (air) typically exists in the space between the cornea portion 510 and the lens portion 550. The substance provided in the space between the cornea portion 510 and the lens portion 550 is arbitrary and may be, for example, any gas, any liquid, or any solid.

[0104] The fundus section 570 is a simulated fundus and includes a fiducial. Details and specific examples of the fiducial will be described later.

[0105] The fundus portion 570 may have a layered structure corresponding to the fundus of a human eye. For example, the fundus portion 570 may have one or more layers corresponding to any tissue of the fundus of a human eye. Examples of fundus tissue include the inner limiting membrane, nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, inner plexiform layer, inner nuclear layer, outer plexiform layer, outer nuclear layer, external limiting membrane, photoreceptor layer, retinal pigment epithelium layer, Bruch's membrane, choroid, and sclera. The thickness and refractive index of each layer formed in the fundus portion 570 may be equivalent to the thickness and refractive index of one or more corresponding tissues.

[0106] The shape of the fundus 570 is not limited to the flat shape shown in Fig. 5, and may be a curved shape. For example, the shape of the fundus 570 may be a shape of a part of a sphere or a part of an ellipsoid, which imitates the shape of the fundus of the human eye.

[0107] The fundus 570 may have a structure corresponding to any part or tissue of the human eye. For example, the fundus 570 may have a structure corresponding to the macula, an optic disc, a blood vessel, or the like. The fundus 570 may also have a structure corresponding to any disease, pathological condition, or lesion. For example, the fundus 570 may have a structure corresponding to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (drusen, etc.), a retinal detachment, a hemorrhage, a tumor, or atrophy.

[0108] The parameter values ​​of the eye model 500 may be designed to be equivalent to or similar to those of a human eye. The parameter values ​​of the eye model 500 may be obtained, for example, from a standard eye model or clinical data. Standard eye models include the Gullstrand eye model, the Navarro eye model, the Liou-Brennan eye model, the Badal eye model, the Arizona eye model, the Indiana eye model, any normalized eye model, and eye models equivalent to any of these. The eye model 500 may also be designed based on an eye with a disease such as high myopia. For example, the curvature of the fundus (reference device) of an eye model corresponding to high myopia is designed to be larger than the curvature of the fundus (reference device) of another eye model (e.g., an eye model corresponding to a normal eye). The eye model 500 may also have a structure corresponding to any disease, pathology, or lesion. For example, the eye model 500 may have a structure corresponding to any corneal disease, any lens disease, or the like. The eye model 500 may also have a structure corresponding to an artificial object. For example, the eye model 500 may include an intraocular lens (IOL) or an equivalent structure.

[0109] The distance between the center position of the anterior surface of the cornea portion 510 (the position corresponding to the corneal apex) and the anterior surface of the fundus portion 570 may be designed based on the axial length of the human eye. Furthermore, the overall focal length of the cornea portion 510, the lens portion 550, and the vitreous portion 560 may be designed to be equal to the focal length of the human eye. For example, the model eye 500 may have a means (e.g., a spacer) for changing the optical distance between the lens portion 550 and the fundus portion 570. This makes it possible to change the refractive power of the model eye 500, which makes it possible, for example, to perform imaging and measurement evaluations on eyes with long axial lengths.

[0110] The reflectance of the front surface (surface facing the cornea 510) of the iris portion 520 (variable portion 530) may be designed to be equivalent to that of the human eye. This reflectance may be, for example, the reflectance of infrared wavelengths. Similarly, the front surface of the cornea portion 510 can also be designed to be equivalent to that of the human eye. Furthermore, the model eye 500 may be designed so that the entrance pupil of the iris portion 520 (variable portion 530, opening 540) is positioned at the same position as the entrance pupil of the iris of the human eye.

[0111] In order to prevent the light used to scan the model eye 500 (in this embodiment, the measurement light LS) and the light used for alignment (in this embodiment, the alignment light output from the LED 51) from being multiple-reflected within the model eye 500, it is possible to provide an anti-reflective coating on the lenses, etc., or to apply anti-reflective paint to the internal components.

[0112] When performing alignment based on the pupil, such as alignment using a stereo camera, the following parameter values ​​can be set, for example. First, the entrance pupil of the aperture 540 may be positioned approximately 3.06 millimeters away from the cornea portion 510. Furthermore, the diameter of the aperture 540 may be set to a value within a range of 2 to 10 millimeters. In addition, the infrared light reflectance of the iris portion 520 (variable portion 530) may be set to a value within a range of 2.0 to 2.5 percent. With this design, it becomes possible to perform alignment with the model eye 500 based on the aperture 540, similar to when performing alignment based on the pupil of a human eye.

[0113] Even when another alignment method is used, the parameter values ​​of the model eye 500 are set according to the method. For example, when alignment is performed using a corneal reflection image (Purkinje image), the radius of curvature of the cornea portion 510 (the radius of curvature of the anterior surface of the cornea-equivalent lens) may be set to approximately 7.7 millimeters. Similarly, when alignment is performed using an optical lever, the radius of curvature of the cornea portion 510 (the radius of curvature of the anterior surface of the cornea-equivalent lens) can be set to approximately 7.7 millimeters.

[0114] Next, the reference device will be described. In this embodiment, the reference device is a part (fundus 570) of the eye model 500, but the embodiment is not limited to this. For example, the reference device in some embodiments may be used alone for evaluation, or may be built into the ophthalmologic device.

[0115] An example of the fiducial of this embodiment is shown in Figures 6A and 6B. Figure 6A is a front view (top view) of fiducial 600 of this example, and Figure 6B is a cross-sectional view showing the AA cross section (xy cross section) of Figure 6A.

[0116] The reference device 600 has a plurality of linear patterns formed vertically and horizontally. In other words, a checkerboard (lattice or grid) pattern is formed on the reference device 600.

[0117] As shown in FIG. 6B, the pattern in this example is formed by recesses (grooves), but some patterns may be formed by protrusions. Furthermore, some patterns may be formed by two or more materials with different optical properties. For example, a base (substrate, board, etc.) can be made of a first material having a first scattering property, and a pattern portion can be formed of a second material having a second scattering property different from the first scattering property. Alternatively, a reference device with a groove formed therein can be made of a first material, and a second material can be placed in the groove (e.g., the second material can be filled in the groove). The optical property is not limited to scattering property, and may be any optical property such as absorption property, reflection property, transmission property, or polarization property.

[0118] As described above, a grid pattern is formed on the reference device 600. This grid pattern includes a plurality of linear patterns 601 aligned along a first direction and a plurality of linear patterns 602 aligned along a second direction different from the first direction. In this example, the first direction and the second direction are orthogonal to each other, but the embodiment is not limited thereto. For example, in some aspects, the first direction and the second direction may be oblique to each other.

[0119] When performing an operation with the ophthalmologic apparatus 1, the reference device 600 (eye model 500) is placed relative to the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 so that the first direction substantially coincides with the y direction and the second direction substantially coincides with the x direction. Such a configuration and placement corresponds to, for example, line scanning in the x direction, line scanning in the y direction, cross scanning, multi-cross scanning, and raster scanning.

[0120] The plurality of linear patterns 601 extending along the first direction are arranged substantially parallel to one another and at substantially equal intervals I. In other words, the plurality of linear patterns 601 extending along the first direction are periodically formed in the arrangement direction (second direction). The dimensions of the plurality of linear patterns 601 are substantially equal. As shown in FIG. 6B , the widths W and depths D of the plurality of linear patterns 601 are substantially equal.

[0121] Similarly, the plurality of linear patterns 602 extending along the second direction are arranged substantially parallel to one another and at substantially equal intervals. That is, the plurality of linear patterns 602 extending along the second direction are periodically formed in the arrangement direction (first direction). Here, the interval between the plurality of linear patterns 602 may be equal to or different from the interval I between the plurality of linear patterns 601. Furthermore, the dimensions of the plurality of linear patterns 602 are substantially equal. Here, the dimensions (width, depth, etc.) of the linear patterns 602 may be equal to or different from the dimensions (width W, depth D, etc.) of the linear patterns 601.

[0122] The relationship between the parameters (dimensions, intervals, etc.) of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the corresponding parameters of the plurality of linear patterns 602 may be designed based on the scanning conditions used in the evaluation of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. For example, if the intervals in the x direction and the y direction of the plurality of scan points (plurality of lattice points) in the raster scan used in the evaluation are equal, the interval I of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the interval (I) of the plurality of linear patterns 602 can be made equal to each other. Furthermore, if the intervals in the x direction and the y direction of the plurality of scan points (plurality of lattice points) in the raster scan used in the evaluation are different from each other, the interval I of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the interval I of the plurality of linear patterns 602 can be made different from each other.

[0123] Although the fiducial 600 shown in Figures 6A and 6B has a pattern formed on its surface, embodiments are not limited thereto, and for example, in some aspects, a fiducial can be provided that has a pattern formed therein.

[0124] In this example, the fiducial 600 is a flat plate-like member, but the embodiment is not limited to this, and may be, for example, a member having a curved surface or a curved plate-like member. Such a curved shape imitates the shape of the fundus of the human eye.

[0125] The material of the reference device 600 may be any material, for example, porous glass. More generally, the material of the reference device 600 may be any material that has scattering properties in the wavelength band of the measurement light LS (near-infrared light), for example, porous silica glass.

[0126] 6B indicates the central axis (center position) of the linear pattern 601. In this embodiment, the shape (width W) of the linear pattern 601 is created under the condition that the degree of symmetry is 1% or less when a plane that passes through the central axis 601a and extends in the z direction is used as a symmetry plane (datum plane), for example.

[0127] Examples of scans applied to the reference 600 for evaluation of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 are shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B. Reference numeral 700 in FIG. 7A indicates the application area (outer edge, outline) of the scan in this example on the reference 600. The scan in this example is a three-dimensional scan applied to a three-dimensional region of the reference 600 whose range in the x and y directions is defined by the scan area 700. An example of this three-dimensional scan is shown in FIG. 7B. The three-dimensional scan in this example is a raster scan consisting of multiple line scans 700-k (k=1, 2, . . . , K: K is a positive integer) along the x direction. The K line scans 700-1 to 700-K are parallel to each other. In some embodiments, a raster scan consisting of multiple line scans along the y direction can be applied to the reference 600. Note that the scan modes (raster scan mode, three-dimensional scan mode, etc.) are not limited to these.

[0128] An example of an intensity profile obtained using such a scan is shown in Figure 8. The intensity profile in this example is generated by constructing three-dimensional image data from data collected from a three-dimensional area of ​​the reference device 600 by raster scanning, projecting this three-dimensional image data in the z direction to construct projection data, and determining the intensity distribution on a line of this projection data along the x direction.

[0129] The horizontal and vertical axes of the luminance profile in FIG. 8 represent the x coordinate (position in the x direction) and luminance value, respectively. Each plotted point represents the luminance value at the corresponding x coordinate. The graph is obtained by interpolating the plotted points using a spline curve. Each dashed line parallel to the vertical axis represents the estimated position of the center of gravity (groove center of gravity) of the grooves (recesses, linear patterns 601) of the reference device 600. The distance between two adjacent groove centers of gravity is an estimated value of the spacing between the corresponding two linear patterns 601.

[0130] Several specific examples of evaluation of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 using such a reference device 600 and raster scans 700-1 to 700-K will be described below.

[0131] A first specific example of evaluation will be described with reference to Fig. 9. In this example, evaluation of the straightness of line scans of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 is performed. First, the model eye 500 (reference device 600) is placed (S1). For example, the model eye 500 is attached to a chin rest via a dedicated attachment. The manner in which the model eye 500 is attached is not limited to this.

[0132] After the eye model 500 is attached, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 starts alignment with the eye model 500 (S2). The alignment may be performed by any of the exemplary methods described above.

[0133] Once the alignment is complete, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 applies an OCT scan to the fiducial 600 of the eye model 500 (S3). The OCT scan in this example is a raster scan shown in Figures 7A and 7B.

[0134] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 constructs three-dimensional image data from the data collected by the raster scan in step S3 (S4), and constructs projection data from this three-dimensional image data (S5).

[0135] Furthermore, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates an intensity profile similar to that shown in FIG. 8 from this projection data (S6). The intensity profile is created for at least one line. The at least one line for which the intensity profile is created may include at least one of a line along the x direction, a line along the y direction, and a line along another direction. Typically, an intensity profile can be created for a line parallel to the line scan 700-k shown in FIG. 7B (in this example, a line along the x direction). This allows the straightness of the line scan 700-k to be evaluated. When determining the straightness of a line along a direction different from the x direction, the arrangement state of two or more line scans 700-k (such as their arrangement state in the y direction) can be evaluated.

[0136] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 detects the sulcus centroid from the luminance profile created in step S6 (S7). Any method may be used to detect (estimate) the sulcus centroid. For example, the luminance profile in FIG. 8 may be analyzed to identify the local lowest end position, and the local highest end positions in the vicinity (on both sides) of the identified local lowest end position may be identified, and the estimated position of the sulcus centroid may be obtained from these identified positions.

[0137] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 identifies the coordinates of each groove centroid identified in step S7 (S8). Here, at least the x coordinate of the groove centroid is identified. This allows the coordinates (at least the x coordinate) of each linear pattern 601 that intersects with the line for which the luminance profile has been created to be obtained. In other words, the distribution of the centroid positions of the multiple linear patterns 601 on that line is obtained.

[0138] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 calculates the interval between the groove centroids from the coordinates of the multiple groove centroids identified in step S8 (S9). The calculation of the groove centroid interval may be performed for each pair of adjacent groove centroids, or may be performed for a pair selected from these pairs. Furthermore, when the groove centroid intervals are calculated for two or more pairs, statistics (e.g., mean, mode, median, variance, standard deviation, etc.) of the two or more obtained groove centroid intervals may be calculated. Alternatively, the groove centroid interval may be estimated by calculating the distance between two non-adjacent groove centroids and dividing the calculated distance by a value obtained by adding 1 to the number of other groove centroids existing between the two groove centroids.

[0139] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 generates evaluation information based on at least one of the groove centroid coordinates identified in step S8, the groove centroid interval calculated in step S9, and information obtained from at least one of these (S10).

[0140] In this example, the standard information of the reference device 600 is stored in the storage unit 212. The standard information in this example includes standard information on the groove centroid position (groove centroid coordinate), standard information on the groove centroid interval, and standard information on parameters obtained from the groove centroid position and / or the groove centroid interval. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 can generate evaluation information on the linearity of the scan by comparing the groove centroid coordinate identified in step S8, the groove centroid interval calculated in step S9, and information obtained from at least one of them with such standard information. For example, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can calculate the difference between the groove centroid coordinate identified in step S8 and the groove centroid position (coordinate) included in the standard information, and can obtain linearity evaluation information (straightness) of the line scan 700-k based on the calculated difference (i.e., the deviation of the actually measured groove centroid coordinate from the standard groove centroid position). In addition, the ophthalmic device 1 calculates the difference between the groove centroid spacing calculated in step S9 and the groove centroid spacing included in the standard information, and can obtain linearity evaluation information (straightness) of the line scan 700-k based on the calculated difference (i.e., the error between the actually measured groove centroid spacing and the standard groove centroid spacing).

[0141] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 generates visualization information from the evaluation information generated in step S10 (S11). The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can display the generated visualization information on the display unit 241. The visualization information may be, for example, a map (such as a heat map) showing the distribution of the evaluation information, a brightness profile (such as a graph or plot), or the like. Specific examples of the visualization information will be described later.

[0142] The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can transmit the evaluation information and visualization information to an external device and can also record them on a recording medium. This concludes the explanation of the first specific example of evaluation (END).

[0143] A second specific example of the evaluation will be described with reference to Fig. 10. This example is for evaluating the straightness of the line scan of the ophthalmologic apparatus 1. Steps S21 to S25 may be performed in the same manner as steps S1 to S5 of the first specific example, respectively.

[0144] Furthermore, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates a luminance profile similar to that shown in Fig. 8 from the projection data constructed in step S25. In this example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates at least one luminance profile along the x direction and at least one luminance profile along the y direction (S26).

[0145] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 detects the groove centroids from each luminance profile created in step S26 (S27). This process may be performed in the same manner as step S7 of the first specific example. Furthermore, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 identifies the coordinates of each groove centroid identified in step S27 (S28). Here, the x-coordinate and y-coordinate of the groove centroid (i.e., coordinates in the xy coordinate system) are identified.

[0146] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates a scatter diagram by plotting the positions of the groove centroids in a predetermined two-dimensional coordinate system based on the x- and y-coordinates of the groove centroids identified in step S28 (S29). For example, the horizontal and vertical axes of this two-dimensional coordinate system represent the distance in the x- and y-directions, respectively. The unit of distance is, for example, micrometers.

[0147] Some examples of data generated in step S29 are shown in Figure 11. Reference numeral 800 denotes a portion of the reference device (scan application area) corresponding to the scan area 700 in Figure 7A. Reference numeral 801 denotes one line along the x direction in the scan application area 800, and reference numerals 802 and 803 denote two lines along the y direction. Reference numeral 811 denotes a scatter diagram created by plotting the positions of multiple groove centroids on line 801. Similarly, reference numeral 812 denotes a scatter diagram created by plotting the positions of multiple groove centroids on line 802, and reference numeral 813 denotes a scatter diagram created by plotting the positions of multiple groove centroids on line 803.

[0148] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 applies polynomial fitting to each scatter diagram created in step S29 (S30). The polynomial used in this polynomial fitting may be, for example, at least one of a quadratic polynomial, a cubic polynomial, and a quartic polynomial. Note that any curve fitting may be performed instead of or in addition to the polynomial fitting.

[0149] Next, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 generates linearity evaluation information (straightness) based on the coefficients of the polynomial obtained by the polynomial fitting performed in step S30 (S31). More specifically, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can generate the linearity evaluation information based on the magnitude of the coefficients of the polynomial. For example, by utilizing the property that the coefficient becomes zero when the deviation of the groove center of gravity is small and close to a straight line, the value of the coefficient can be converted into a straightness value according to a conversion formula generated in advance. Alternatively, by utilizing the same property, the quality of the linearity can be determined from the value of the coefficient based on a threshold value generated in advance.

[0150] Furthermore, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can generate visualization information from the evaluation information generated in step S31. In addition, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can display the generated visualization information on the display unit 241. Furthermore, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can transmit the evaluation information and the visualization information to an external device or record them on a recording medium. This concludes the explanation of the second specific example of evaluation (END).

[0151] A third specific example of evaluation will be described with reference to FIG. 12. This example provides an example of visualized information that visually represents evaluation information. The visualized information in this example represents the distribution of groove centroid intervals in a scan application area 800 similar to that in FIG. 11.

[0152] Reference numeral 821 denotes a groove spacing map that two-dimensionally maps groove spacing in the x direction at multiple positions in the scan application area 800. For example, a groove spacing 805 in the x direction at a certain position is expressed at a corresponding position (position indicated by an arrow) in the groove spacing map 821.

[0153] Similarly, reference numeral 822 denotes a groove spacing map that two-dimensionally maps groove spacing in the y direction at multiple positions in the scan application area 800. For example, groove spacing 804 in the y direction at a certain position is represented at a corresponding position (position indicated by an arrow) in the groove spacing map 822.

[0154] The groove spacing maps 821 and 822 may be color maps that express the magnitude of the groove spacing value with different colors. A color code indicating the correspondence between the groove spacing value and the color is arranged on the right side of the groove spacing map 821 as a color map. Similarly, a color code indicating the correspondence between the groove spacing value and the color is arranged on the right side of the groove spacing map 822 as a color map. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 assigns a corresponding color in the color code to the groove spacing value at each position.

[0155] In some embodiments, the color code is set such that larger groove spacing values ​​are closer to yellow and smaller groove spacing values ​​are closer to blue.

[0156] At least one of the groove spacing maps 821 and 822 may be visualized information in a form different from a color map. For example, a map that expresses the groove spacing value using contrast or a pattern may be used. Alternatively, the groove spacing may be expressed numerically.

[0157] In this example, the groove spacing is defined as the distance between two adjacent groove centers of gravity, but the embodiment is not limited to this. For example, in some aspects, the groove spacing may be defined as the amount of deviation (distance value, variance value, standard deviation value, etc.) of each groove spacing from a representative value (average value, mode value, median value, etc.) of multiple groove spacings.

[0158] Furthermore, by setting a threshold value for the groove spacing in advance and comparing the groove spacing value at each position with the threshold value, it is possible to determine whether the groove spacing at each position is good or bad. Furthermore, it is possible to provide visualized information showing the results of this pass / fail determination. For example, it is possible to provide a map showing the distribution of pass / fail determination results.

[0159] A fourth specific example of evaluation will be described with reference to Fig. 13. This example provides an example of visualized information that visually represents evaluation information. The visualized information in this example visually represents overscan evaluation information for the scan application area 800 similar to that in Fig. 11.

[0160] As described above, the overscan evaluation may provide, for example, whether the artifact occurrence area is appropriately set, and whether or not there are any artifacts related to the overscan, their degree, amount, and acceptability.

[0161] In this example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can evaluate the image condition in the x-direction edge region of the scan application area 800 in the manner described above, where the x-direction is the direction along each line scan 700-k.

[0162] The ophthalmic apparatus 1 can determine the relative positions of two images corresponding to a pair of adjacent line scans 700-k and 700-(k+1) in the x-direction edge region of the scan application area (800). For example, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can determine at least one of the distance (spacing) in the y-direction and the deviation in the x-direction between these two images. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 can also determine the uniformity (uniformity) of the spacing in the x-direction of multiple A-scan image data included in the image (B-scan image data) corresponding to the line scan 700-k.

[0163] The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can generate visualized information that visually represents the overscan evaluation information based on such information about the overscan evaluation parameters. Visualized information (overscan evaluation map) 823 related to overscan shown in Fig. 13 represents the distribution of information about the overscan evaluation parameters in a scan application area 800 similar to that shown in Fig. 11 (particularly, edge regions 824 and 825 in the x direction).

[0164] The overscan evaluation map 823 may be a color map that represents the magnitude of the value of the overscan evaluation parameter with different colors. A color code indicating the correspondence between the value of the overscan evaluation parameter and the color is arranged on the right side of the overscan evaluation map 823 as a color map. The ophthalmic apparatus 1 assigns a color in the color code to the value of the overscan evaluation parameter at each position. As in the third specific example, the overscan evaluation map 823 may be visualized information in a form different from a color map.

[0165] Furthermore, by setting a threshold value for the overscan evaluation parameter in advance and comparing the value of the overscan evaluation parameter at each position with the threshold value, it is possible to determine whether the overscan evaluation parameter at each position is good or bad. Furthermore, it is possible to provide visualized information showing the results of this pass / fail determination. For example, it is possible to provide a map showing the distribution of pass / fail determination results.

[0166] A fifth specific example of evaluation will now be described. This example provides evaluation information and visualization information regarding the position repeatability of repeated scans performed in OCT angiography, image averaging, OCT blood flow measurement, motion measurement, etc. An example of processing for generating repeatability evaluation information and its visualization information is shown in FIG. 14. Steps S41 and S42 may be performed in the same manner as steps S1 and S2 of the first specific example, respectively.

[0167] After the alignment in step S42 is completed, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 applies a repetitive scan to the eye model 500 (S43). That is, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 performs multiple scans targeting the same location on the fiducial 600. The repetitive scans in this example are multiple raster scans.

[0168] The number of scan repetitions in the repeated scan may be any number of times equal to or greater than two. The number of repetitions may be determined, for example, depending on the type of measurement method to be evaluated. In some embodiments, when the measurement method to be evaluated is OCT angiography, the number of repetitions of the repeated scan may be four, which is the same as the number of scans performed targeting the same location in OCT angiography. The number of repetitions when other measurement methods are to be evaluated may be determined in the same manner. In this example, four raster scans are performed targeting the same location (scan application area 800) of the reference device 600.

[0169] The ophthalmic apparatus 1 constructs three-dimensional image data from each of the four collected data sets obtained by the repeated scans in step S43. This results in four pieces of three-dimensional image data corresponding to the four raster scans (S44). Furthermore, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 constructs projection data from each piece of three-dimensional image data constructed in step S44. This results in four pieces of projection data corresponding to the four raster scans (S45).

[0170] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates a luminance profile similar to that shown in Fig. 8 from each projection data obtained in step S45 (S46). In this example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 creates, for example, one or both of a plurality of luminance profiles along the x direction and a plurality of luminance profiles along the y direction. This results in four luminance profile groups corresponding respectively to the four raster scans.

[0171] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 detects sulcus centroids from each luminance profile created in step S46 (S47). This process may be performed in the same manner as step S7 in the first specific example. As a result, four sulcus centroid groups corresponding to the four raster scans are obtained.

[0172] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 identifies the coordinates of each sulcus centroid identified in step S47 (S48). In this example, the x-coordinate and y-coordinate of the sulcus centroid (i.e., coordinates in the xy coordinate system) are identified. This results in four sulcus centroid coordinate groups corresponding to the four raster scans, respectively.

[0173] Next, for each point on the reference device 600 (each point within the range where the repeated scans have been applied; the same applies hereinafter in this example), the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 selects one groove centroid coordinate corresponding to that point from the group of four groove centroid coordinates identified in step S48. As a result, four groove centroid coordinates are assigned to each point on the reference device 600. In other words, four groove centroids are associated with each point on the reference device 600. Furthermore, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 calculates, for each point on the reference device 600, the position error between the four groove centroids associated with that point (S49).

[0174] The error calculated in step S49 represents the amount of deviation (deviation, variation) of the scan position (scan range) between four raster scans that are performed sequentially targeting the same region of the reference device 600. This provides a distribution of the amount of deviation of the scan position in the reference device 600 (the range to which the repeated scans are applied). The value calculated in step S49 may be, for example, any amount calculated from the four groove center positions (coordinates), such as the standard deviation, maximum error, or average error.

[0175] Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 generates repeatability evaluation information based on the error distribution of the groove centroid positions obtained in step S49 (S50). This process may include, for example, a process of comparing at least a portion of the errors obtained in step S49 or a value obtained based thereon with a predetermined threshold (threshold process).

[0176] Furthermore, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 generates visualization information (reproducibility visualization information) from the reproducibility evaluation information generated in step S50 (S51). Examples of the form of the reproducibility visualization information will be described later. In addition, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can display the generated reproducibility visualization information on the display unit 241. Furthermore, the ophthalmic apparatus 1 can transmit the reproducibility evaluation information and the reproducibility visualization information to an external device or record them on a recording medium. This concludes the description of the series of processes shown in FIG. 14 (END).

[0177] A specific example of the series of processes shown in Fig. 14 will be described with further reference to Fig. 15 and Fig. 16. In this example, as shown in Fig. 15, four pieces of projection data 831 to 834 corresponding to four raster scans are obtained.

[0178] First, for an arbitrary position (first position) 831a of the first projection data 831, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 determines a position (second position) 832a of the second projection data 832 corresponding to this first position 831a.

[0179] For example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 can identify the x and y coordinates (first x and y coordinates) of a first position in the x and y coordinate system (first x and y coordinate system) in which the first projection data 831 is defined, identify a position having the same x and y coordinates as the first x and y coordinates in the x and y coordinate system (second x and y coordinate system) in which the second projection data 832 is defined, and set this identified position as the second position 832a. The position (third position) 833a of the third projection data 833 corresponding to the first position 831a and the position (fourth position) 834a of the fourth projection data 834 corresponding to the first position 831a can also be determined in the same manner. Note that the method of determining four corresponding positions in the four projection data 831 to 834 is not limited to this.

[0180] Next, as shown in FIG. 16, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 generates information at a position (defined position) defined by these positions 831a to 834a based on data P(1) of the first projection data 831 at the first position 831a (and its vicinity), data P(2) of the second projection data 833 at the second position 832a (and its vicinity), data P(3) of the third projection data 833 at the third position 833a (and its vicinity), and data P(4) of the fourth projection data 834 at the fourth position 834a (and its vicinity).

[0181] For example, the data P(1) to P(4) may be pixel information at the corresponding first to fourth positions 831a to 834a, respectively, or may be data generated from the pixel information. Furthermore, the data P(1) to P(4) may include pixel information at positions near the corresponding first to fourth positions 831a to 834a, respectively, or may include data generated from pixel information at the nearby positions. Furthermore, the defined position may be any one of the first to fourth positions 831a to 834a (e.g., the first position 831a), or may be a position determined from at least two of the first to fourth positions 831a to 834a (e.g., an average position).

[0182] The information obtained in this manner is assigned to the defined positions, thereby obtaining reproducibility visualization information 841 shown in FIG. 16. The reproducibility visualization information 841 is a color map that represents the distribution of the displacement amount of the groove centroid in the x direction. Colors corresponding to information (values) generated from the four data P(1) to P(4) that correspond to the first to fourth positions 831a to 834a, respectively, are assigned to the positions of the reproducibility visualization information 841 (the defined positions described above). By performing this process for each point of the first projection data 831, reproducibility visualization information 841 is generated, which is a map that represents the distribution as reproducibility evaluation information. Reproducibility visualization information 843, which is a color map that represents the displacement amount of the groove centroid in the y direction, is generated in the same manner.

[0183] Another example for generating reproducibility evaluation information will be described. This example utilizes registration of projection data (or three-dimensional image data). The ophthalmologic apparatus 1 provides registration for the first to fourth projection data 831 to 834. This registration may be global registration or local registration.

[0184] Global registration is image processing aimed at aligning the overall positions of the first to fourth projection data 831 to 834. For example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 uses the first projection data as reference data and registers each of the second to fourth projection data 832 to 834 with this reference data. Any registration method may be used, and may include, for example, a process of detecting feature points of each projection data 831 to 834 and a process of calculating the deviation of each of the second to fourth projection data 832 to 834 from the first projection data 831 based on the positional errors of the detected feature points. This deviation is used as the amount of positional deviation between the projection data.

[0185] Local registration is image processing aimed at aligning partial regions (local regions) of the projection data 831 to 834. For example, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 first uses the first projection data as reference data and sets one local region (reference local region) of the first projection data 831. The reference local region may have any size and shape. For example, an arbitrary point of the first projection data 831 may be designated, and a region in the vicinity of this designated point may be set as the reference local region. Next, the ophthalmologic apparatus 1 analyzes each of the second to fourth projection data 832 to 834 to identify a partial region corresponding to the reference local region. This makes it possible to calculate the amount of local positional misalignment between the first projection data 831 and each of the second to fourth projection data 832 to 834. For example, it is possible to find the amount of positional misalignment between an arbitrary point (the above-mentioned specified point) of the first projection data 831 and each corresponding point of the second to fourth projection data 832 to 834. By performing such processing for a plurality of points of the projection data 831, it is possible to obtain the distribution of the amount of positional misalignment between the first to fourth projection data 831 to 834.

[0186] Some features, actions, and effects of this embodiment will be described. Each of the features described below can be a feature of this embodiment individually, and any combination of two or more of them can also be a feature of this embodiment. Note that the features provided by this disclosure are not limited to those described above.

[0187] This embodiment provides a reference device for evaluating a scan-type medical device, the reference device having a pattern formed thereon according to the scanning conditions of the medical device. More specifically, the reference device 600 of this embodiment is a reference device for acquiring evaluation information of a medical scanning device (ophthalmic device 1) that scans a living body based on preset scanning conditions to collect data, and the reference device has a pattern formed thereon that is designed based on at least one scanning condition of the ophthalmic device 1. This type of reference device having a pattern formed thereon according to the scanning conditions of a medical scanning device is novel, and use of this reference device enables new evaluation methods for medical scanning devices, such as evaluation of scan linearity, evaluation of scan position repeatability, and evaluation of motion contrast imaging (such as OCT angiography).

[0188] The pattern formed on the fiducial 600 is designed based on, for example, any scanning conditions for the OCT scan performed by the ophthalmic apparatus 1. The scanning conditions referred to in designing the pattern may include, for example, at least one of the scan pattern, scan dimensions (length, area, volume, diameter, etc.), scan interval, scan density, and number of scan repetitions, and may also include at least one of the other scanning conditions exemplified in this embodiment.

[0189] The pattern formed on the fiducial 600 of this embodiment may include at least a first periodic pattern along a first direction. The plurality of linear patterns 601 and the plurality of linear patterns 602 in this embodiment each provide an example of such a first periodic pattern. According to this embodiment, for example, evaluation can be performed for one or more scans along the first direction.

[0190] The pattern formed on the reference device 600 of this embodiment may further include a second periodic pattern along a second direction different from the first direction. In this embodiment, both the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the plurality of linear patterns 602 are formed on the reference device 600, and the combination of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the plurality of linear patterns 602 provides an example of a combination of a first periodic pattern and a second periodic pattern. In other words, one of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the plurality of linear patterns 602 provides an example of a first periodic pattern, and the other provides an example of a second periodic pattern. Furthermore, the combination of the plurality of linear patterns 601 and the plurality of linear patterns 602 provides an example of a grid pattern. According to this embodiment, for example, evaluation can be performed for one or more scans along the first direction, and evaluation can also be performed for one or more scans along the second direction. In this embodiment, evaluation can be performed for a raster scan, for one line scan constituting a raster scan, for two or more line scans constituting a raster scan, or for multiple raster scans. Conventionally, evaluation of scan length etc. has been performed using a reference device with a cross pattern formed on it, but because the evaluation could only be performed on the cross pattern, it was not possible to evaluate, for example, diagonal scans, or scan distortion. Such inconveniences are resolved by the present embodiment.

[0191] At least a part of the pattern formed on the fiducial 600 of this embodiment may be recesses (grooves, valleys) and / or protrusions (mountains) formed on the surface or inside. In the example shown in FIG. 6B, recesses formed on the surface of the fiducial 600 constitute the pattern. Although not shown, the pattern may be formed by forming protrusions on the surface of the fiducial, or by forming recesses and / or protrusions inside the fiducial. According to this embodiment, a specific configuration is provided for including information about the pattern in data collected by scanning.

[0192] At least a portion of the pattern formed on the fiducial 600 of this embodiment may be formed from two or more materials with different optical properties. For example, although not shown, for a specific optical property, a base (substrate, board, etc.) can be made from a first material having a first characteristic amount, and a pattern portion can be formed from a second material having a second characteristic amount different from the first characteristic amount. This embodiment provides a specific configuration for including information about the pattern in data collected by optical scanning.

[0193] At least a part of the pattern formed on the fiducial 600 of this embodiment may be formed from two or more materials with different light scattering properties. According to this embodiment, a specific configuration is provided for including information about the pattern in data collected by optical scanning using a measurement method that utilizes differences in light scattering properties between tissues, such as OCT.

[0194] This embodiment provides a reference device for evaluating a scanning-type ophthalmic device, the reference device having a periodic pattern formed thereon. More specifically, the reference device 600 of this embodiment has a spatially periodically arranged pattern, such as a plurality of linear patterns 601 or a plurality of linear patterns 602. The periodic pattern may include a pattern periodically arranged in one direction, or may include a pattern periodically arranged in two or more directions. Such a reference device for evaluating an ophthalmic device having a periodic pattern formed thereon is novel, and use of this reference device enables new evaluation methods for ophthalmic devices, such as evaluation of the linearity of the scan of the ophthalmic device, evaluation of the positional repeatability of the scan of the ophthalmic device, and evaluation of motion contrast imaging (such as OCT angiography) of the ophthalmic device.

[0195] This aspect provides an eye model in which a reference device having at least one of the above-described features is used as a simulated fundus. More generally, this aspect provides an eye model in which a reference device having at least one of the various configurations described in this disclosure is used as a simulated fundus. Note that the eye model provided by this aspect is not limited to this, and for example, the tissue simulated by the reference device may be any tissue of the eye, such as the cornea, lens, iris, or vitreous body.

[0196] In the eye model provided by this aspect, at least a portion of the surface of the reference device may be formed as a curved surface. Furthermore, a pattern may be formed on or within the curved surface. According to this aspect, it is possible to evaluate an ophthalmologic device using an eye model including a reference device having a curved surface that mimics the shape of the fundus. This makes it possible to more accurately reproduce the scanning conditions actually applied to a living eye and perform the evaluation, thereby improving the quality of the evaluation.

[0197] This aspect provides a novel medical evaluation device for acquiring evaluation information of a medical scanning device that scans a living body and collects data. The medical scanning device includes a reference device and an evaluation unit. A pattern designed based on at least one scanning condition of the medical scanning device is formed on the reference device. The evaluation unit generates evaluation information based on data collected by scanning the reference device. For example, the above-mentioned ophthalmologic device 1 collects data by applying an OCT scan to the subject's eye E, and includes a reference device 600 on which a pattern designed based on at least one scanning condition of the ophthalmologic device 1 is formed, and an evaluation unit 250 (e.g., at least one of evaluation units 250A to 250E).

[0198] In some embodiments, the medical evaluation device may be integrated with the medical scanning device. For example, in some embodiments, the medical evaluation device is incorporated into the medical scanning device, i.e., the medical scanning device has the configuration and function for evaluating itself. In contrast, in some embodiments, the medical evaluation device may be separate from the medical scanning device. For example, in some embodiments, the medical evaluation device may be a combination of an information processing device (computer) including an evaluation unit and a reference device. In this way, the implementation form of the medical evaluation device may be arbitrary.

[0199] In some embodiments, the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device can include at least a first periodic pattern along a first direction and can further include a second periodic pattern along a second direction different from the first direction. For example, the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device can be a grid pattern.

[0200] In some embodiments, at least a portion of the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device may be recessed and / or protruded on or within the fiducial, and in some embodiments, at least a portion of the pattern on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device may be formed from two or more materials with different optical properties, which may include scattering properties.

[0201] This aspect also provides a novel medical evaluation device for acquiring evaluation information of a medical scanning device that scans a living body to collect data. This medical scanning device includes a reference device and an evaluation unit. A periodic pattern is formed on this reference device. The evaluation unit generates evaluation information based on data collected by scanning this reference device. For example, the above-mentioned ophthalmic apparatus 1 applies OCT scanning to the subject's eye E to collect data, and includes a reference device 600 on which a periodic pattern corresponding to a raster scan or the like that can be performed by the ophthalmic apparatus 1 is formed, and an evaluation unit 250 (for example, at least one of the evaluation units 250A to 250E). The medical evaluation device may be implemented in any manner.

[0202] In some embodiments, the reference of the medical scanning device may be a simulated fundus of an eye model. In the simulated fundus reference, at least a portion of the surface of the reference may be formed as a curved surface, and the pattern formed on the reference may be formed on or within the curved surface.

[0203] In some embodiments, the medical scanning device may be configured to perform evaluation based on projection data. Such a medical scanning device collects three-dimensional data by applying a scan to a three-dimensional region of a reference device. The evaluation unit includes a projection processing unit and an evaluation information generation unit. The projection processing unit is configured to construct projection data (two-dimensional data) from the collected three-dimensional data. The evaluation information generation unit is configured to generate evaluation information based on the constructed projection data. It is clear to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 has such a configuration. According to such an embodiment, evaluation can be performed using two-dimensional information represented by the projection data, which has the advantage of requiring fewer processing resources and processing time than using collected three-dimensional information. For example, in various evaluations performed by the above-described ophthalmic device 1, z-coordinate information is not required, and it can be said that there is no particular problem even if the dimension is reduced to projection data defined in an x-y coordinate system.

[0204] In some embodiments, the evaluation unit of the medical scanning device may be configured to generate evaluation information based on data collected by scanning the reference device and standard information about the pattern formed on the reference device. As described above, the standard information about the pattern can be created in advance based on, for example, design information about the reference device and / or measurement data about the reference device. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. This embodiment enables more accurate comparison between the actual pattern formed on the reference device and the data collected by scanning the reference device, thereby improving the quality of the evaluation information.

[0205] In some embodiments, the evaluation unit of the medical scanning device may be configured to determine the straightness of the line scan applied to the reference device. Straightness (linearity, degree of linearity) is an example of evaluation information. It will be clear to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. This embodiment makes it possible to evaluate whether the trajectory of the line scan performed by the medical scanning device can be considered a straight line, and also to evaluate the degree of deviation of the line scan trajectory from a straight line.

[0206] In some embodiments, the pattern of the fiducial of the medical scanning device may include a linear pattern. Furthermore, the evaluation unit may be configured to determine the straightness of the line scan based on data collected by scanning the fiducial and standard information of the linear pattern. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. According to such an embodiment, a specific configuration for evaluating the straightness of the line scan is provided.

[0207] In some embodiments, the evaluation unit of the medical scanning device may include a projection processing unit, a position data generation unit, and a straightness calculation unit. The projection processing unit is configured to construct projection data from three-dimensional data collected by scanning a three-dimensional area of ​​the reference device. The position data generation unit is configured to determine position data of a linear pattern formed on the reference device based on the generated projection data. The straightness calculation unit is configured to calculate the straightness of the line scan based on the determined position data and standard information of the linear pattern. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. According to this embodiment, a more specific configuration for evaluating the straightness of the line scan is provided.

[0208] In some embodiments, the medical scanning device may further include a visualization information generating unit that generates visualization information from the evaluation information generated by the evaluation unit. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes such a configuration. According to such an embodiment, it is possible to provide a user with visualization information that visually represents the evaluation information of the medical scanning device.

[0209] This aspect provides a novel medical evaluation device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of a scan of a medical scanning device that scans a living body and collects data. The medical scanning device includes a reference device and an evaluation unit. The reference device has a pattern formed thereon that is designed based on at least one scanning condition of the medical scanning device. The evaluation unit is configured to generate position evaluation information regarding the position of a scan applied to the reference device based on data collected by scanning the reference device. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-mentioned ophthalmologic device 1 includes such a configuration. The medical evaluation device may be implemented in any manner.

[0210] In some embodiments, the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device for obtaining evaluation information related to the position of the scan can include at least a first periodic pattern along a first direction and can further include a second periodic pattern along a second direction different from the first direction. For example, the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device can be a grid pattern.

[0211] In some embodiments, at least a portion of the pattern formed on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan may be recessed and / or protruding portions formed on the surface or inside. Also, in some embodiments, at least a portion of the pattern on the fiducial of the medical evaluation device may be formed from two or more materials with different optical properties, which may include scattering properties.

[0212] This aspect provides a novel medical evaluation device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of a scan of a medical scanning device that scans a living body and collects data. The medical scanning device includes a reference device and an evaluation unit. A periodic pattern is formed on the reference device. The evaluation unit is configured to generate position evaluation information regarding the position of a scan applied to the reference device based on data collected by scanning the reference device. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-mentioned ophthalmologic device 1 includes such a configuration. The medical evaluation device may be implemented in any manner.

[0213] In some embodiments, the reference of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan may be a simulated fundus of an eye model. In the simulated fundus reference, at least a portion of the surface of the reference may be formed as a curved surface, and further, the pattern formed on the reference may be formed on or within the curved surface.

[0214] In some embodiments, a medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of a scan may be configured to perform the evaluation based on projection data. Such a medical scanning device collects three-dimensional data by applying a scan to a three-dimensional region of a reference device. The evaluation unit includes a projection processing unit and an evaluation information generating unit. The projection processing unit is configured to construct projection data (two-dimensional data) from the collected three-dimensional data. The evaluation information generating unit is configured to generate evaluation information based on the constructed projection data. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes such a configuration. According to such an embodiment, evaluation regarding the position of a scan can be performed using two-dimensional information represented by the projection data, which has the advantage of requiring fewer processing resources and processing time than using collected three-dimensional information.

[0215] In some embodiments, the evaluation unit of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan may be configured to generate the evaluation information based on data collected by scanning the reference device and standard information about the pattern formed on the reference device. As described above, the standard information about the pattern may be created in advance based on, for example, design information about the reference device and / or measurement data about the reference device. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. This embodiment enables more accurate comparison between the actual pattern formed on the reference device and the data collected by scanning the reference device, thereby improving the quality of the evaluation information regarding the position of the scan.

[0216] In some aspects, the pattern formed on the reference of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan may include a group of linear patterns. Further, the evaluation unit may be configured to generate positional relationship evaluation information regarding the positional relationship of the multiple line scans as position evaluation information based on data collected by applying multiple line scans to the reference and standard information of the group of linear patterns. The positional relationship of the multiple line scans may be, for example, the spacing between the line scans (e.g., the spacing between raster scans, the angular spacing between radial scans, etc.).

[0217] In some embodiments, the linear pattern group formed on the reference device of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan may include two linear patterns parallel to each other. Furthermore, the evaluation unit may include a distance data generation unit and a distance evaluation information generation unit. The distance data generation unit is configured to determine distance data between the two linear patterns based on data collected from the reference device. The distance evaluation information generation unit is configured to generate distance evaluation information regarding the distance between two line scans corresponding to the two linear patterns based on the determined distance data and standard information for the two linear patterns. The distance evaluation information is an example of positional relationship evaluation information. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes such a configuration. According to this embodiment, it is possible to evaluate the distance between line scans performed by the medical scanning device in reference to the standard information.

[0218] In some embodiments, the linear patterns formed on the reference device of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the scan position may include multiple linear patterns parallel to each other. Furthermore, the evaluation unit may include a spacing data generator, a spacing evaluation information generator, a distribution generator, and an overscan evaluation information generator. The spacing data generator is configured to determine spacing data for the multiple linear patterns based on data collected from the reference device. The spacing evaluation information generator is configured to generate spacing evaluation information regarding the spacing between multiple line scans corresponding to the multiple linear patterns based on the determined spacing data and standard information for the multiple linear patterns. The distribution generator generates a spacing evaluation information distribution representing the distribution of the generated spacing evaluation information from the generated spacing evaluation information. The overscan evaluation information generator is configured to generate overscan evaluation information based on the generated spacing evaluation information distribution and the standard information for overscan. The overscan evaluation information is an example of positional relationship evaluation information. It is clear to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. According to this embodiment, it is possible to evaluate the state of overscan performed by the medical scanning device in light of the standard information.

[0219] In some embodiments, the evaluation unit of the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the position of the scan is configured to generate repeatability evaluation information regarding the position repeatability of the repeated scan based on multiple data collected by applying repeated scans to the reference device. The repeatability evaluation information is an example of position evaluation information. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmic device 1 includes such a configuration. Such an embodiment makes it possible to evaluate the position repeatability of the repeated scans performed by the medical scanning device. For example, such an embodiment makes it possible to perform quality evaluation of modalities that use repeated scans, such as OCT angiography, image averaging, blood flow measurement, and motion measurement.

[0220] In some embodiments, the medical scanning device for obtaining evaluation information regarding the scan position may further include a visualization information generating unit that generates visualization information from the evaluation information generated by the evaluation unit. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above-described ophthalmologic apparatus 1 includes such a configuration. According to such an embodiment, it is possible to provide a user with visualization information that visually represents the evaluation information of the medical scanning device.

[0221] The above-described embodiments are merely examples of the implementation of the present invention. Anyone who intends to implement the present invention may make any modifications (omissions, substitutions, additions, etc.) within the scope of the gist of the present invention. [Explanation of symbols]

[0222] 1 Ophthalmology equipment 500 model eyes 600 standard

Claims

1. An eye model for acquiring evaluation information of an ophthalmologic scanning device that performs alignment using a corneal reflection image or an optical lever on a living eye and scans the living eye to collect data, a cornea portion corresponding to the cornea of ​​the human eye; a fundus portion having a fiducial on which a periodic pattern is formed as a pseudo-fundus; an iris portion corresponding to the iris; a lens portion corresponding to the crystalline lens; The vitreous part corresponds to the vitreous body. Including, the iris portion, the lens portion, and the vitreous portion are disposed between the cornea portion and the fundus portion in this order from the cornea portion side, The radius of curvature of the cornea is set to approximately 7.7 mm, The iris portion forms an opening corresponding to the pupil. Model eyes.

2. Further comprising a variable portion for changing the size of the opening. The eye model of claim 1.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • eye model

    JP1991006660U

  • QC phantom

    JP2004357868A

  • Simulated fundus

    JP2011053462A

  • Measuring instrument for evaluating capacity of radiation image diagnosing equipment

    JP2013188314A

  • Simulated eye, simulated eye device and method for manufacturing simulated eye

    JP2019068930A