Immunological assay methods
Anti-C3 antibodies address the issue of non-specific reactions in immunological assays by suppressing interference, ensuring precise measurement results.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- JP · JP
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- SEKISUI MEDICAL CO LTD
- Filing Date
- 2022-01-25
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-15
AI Technical Summary
Existing immunological measurement methods suffer from non-specific reactions caused by substances like heterophilic antibodies and rheumatoid factor, which cannot be adequately suppressed by current inhibitors, leading to measurement errors.
Performing immune reactions in the presence of anti-C3 antibodies, specifically anti-C3b, anti-C3dg, or anti-C3d antibodies, to suppress non-specific reactions in both homogeneous and heterogeneous immunological measurement methods.
The use of anti-C3 antibodies effectively reduces non-specific reactions, enabling accurate immunological measurements by minimizing interference from sample contaminants.
Smart Images

Figure 0007859622000006 
Figure 0007859622000007 
Figure 0007859622000008
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to an immunological measurement method. In particular, it relates to an immunological measurement method for performing an immune reaction in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody.
Background Art
[0002] As a measurement method in the field of diagnostic agents, there is an immunological measurement method for measuring a substance to be measured present in a biological sample by using an immune reaction. Since the immunological measurement method utilizes an antigen-antibody reaction, it is a measurement method with very high specificity. Various substances are present in biological samples, and often contain substances that cause non-specific reactions, so-called non-specific factors. A non-specific reaction is a phenomenon in which a binding not based on a specific reaction is promoted or a specific immune reaction is hindered, and it causes a measurement error. As non-specific factors, the presence of heterophilic antibodies and rheumatoid factor (RF) has been clarified. Heterophilic antibodies are a general term for human antibodies that show reactivity against animal-derived antibodies, which are the main components of immunological measurement methods, and HAMA (human anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody) is known as a typical one. Rheumatoid factor appears in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and is common with HAMA in that it shows reactivity against animal-derived antibodies, and it is known that their entities are all human immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M (Non-Patent Document 1).
[0003] For example, Patent Document 1 is known as a technique for suppressing non-specific reactions in immunological measurement methods. Patent Document 1 discloses a method for suppressing non-specific reactions caused by RF by pretreating a sample in advance with a sufficient amount of an animal-derived antibody having a binding ability to the reaction site of human rheumatoid factor (RF). Examples of the animal-derived antibody include anti-human IgG antibody, anti-human IgA antibody, and / or anti-human IgM antibody.
Prior Art Documents
Patent Documents
[0004] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 07-012818 [Non-patent literature]
[0005] [Non-Patent Document 1] Clinical Chemistry; Vol. 23, Supplement 175a-1~175a-10 (1994) [Overview of the project] [Problems that the invention aims to solve]
[0006] Patent Document 1 describes a method for suppressing nonspecific reactions caused by innate antibodies and RF using anti-human IgM antibodies, anti-human IgG antibodies, and anti-human IgA antibodies. Although this method is currently in practical use with various reagents, the inventors' tests have revealed that there are still nonspecific reactions that cannot be suppressed even with these antibodies. The present invention aims to suppress nonspecific reactions in immunological measurement methods. [Means for solving the problem]
[0007] In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the inventors of the present invention investigated the non-specific reaction suppression effects of various substances and found that non-specific reactions can be suppressed by performing an immune reaction in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody, thus completing the present invention. In other words, the present invention has the following configuration. While anti-C3 antibodies are known to be used in immunological assays to detect target substances, their effect in suppressing non-specific reactions in immune responses is completely unknown. <1> An immunological method for measuring a target substance in a sample, characterized by performing an immune reaction in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody. <2> The immunological measurement method is based on either a homogeneous or heterogeneous method. <1> The immunological measurement method described in [reference]. <3> The method based on homogeneity is a latex immunoaggregation assay method. <1> or <2> The immunological measurement method described in [reference]. <4> A step of bringing the substance to be measured in the sample into contact with an anti-C3 antibody in a solution, The steps include adding latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured to the aforementioned solution, A process for optically detecting the degree of aggregation of latex particles in a solution, including, <3> The immunological measurement method described in [reference]. <5> The anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody. <1> ~ <4> An immunoassay method described in any of the following. <6> A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions in an immunological method for measuring a target substance in a sample, characterized in that the immune reaction is performed in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody. <7> The immunological measurement method is based on either a homogeneous or heterogeneous method. <6> A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions as described above. <8> The method based on the homogeneous method is latex immunoaggregation assay. <6> or <7> A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions as described above. <9> A step of bringing the substance to be measured in the sample into contact with an anti-C3 antibody in a solution, The steps include adding latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured to the aforementioned solution, A process for optically detecting the degree of aggregation of latex particles in a solution, including, <8> A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions as described above. <10> The anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody. <6> ~ <9> An immunoassay method described in any of the following. <11> Immunological reagents containing anti-C3 antibody. <12> An immunological measurement reagent as described in <11>, wherein the immunological measurement method is a method based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method. <13> An immunological measurement reagent as described in <12>, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is the latex immunoprecipitation method. <14> An immunological measurement reagent as described in any one of <11> to <13>, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is any one or more selected from the group consisting of an anti-iC3b antibody, an anti-C3dg antibody, an anti-C3d antibody, and an anti-C3b antibody. <15> An immunological measurement reagent kit containing an anti-C3 antibody. <16> An immunological measurement reagent kit as described in <14>, wherein the immunological measurement method is a method based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method. <17> An immunological measurement reagent kit as described in <16>, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is the latex immunoprecipitation method and includes the following. (1) A first reagent containing an anti-C3 antibody (2) A second reagent containing latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured <18> An immunological measurement reagent as described in any one of <15> to <17>, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is any one or more selected from the group consisting of an anti-iC3b antibody, an anti-C3dg antibody, an anti-C3d antibody, and an anti-C3b antibody. <19> A non-specific reaction inhibitor in an immunological measurement method, containing an anti-C3 antibody as an active ingredient. <20> A non-specific reaction inhibitor in an immunological measurement method as described in <19>, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is any one or more selected from the group consisting of an anti-iC3b antibody, an anti-C3dg antibody, an anti-C3d antibody, and an anti-C3b antibody.
Advantages of the Invention
[0008] According to the present invention, in an immunological measurement method, by performing an immune reaction in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody, a non-specific reaction caused by non-specific factors contained in a sample can be suppressed, and accurate measurement can be performed. In particular, the significance that the present invention can suppress a non-specific reaction that could not be suppressed even by a commercially available non-specific reaction inhibitor is great.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0009] [Figure 1] It is the correlation of the measured values of Comparative Example 2 (LTIA method without addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor) with respect to the measured values of Comparative Example 1 (CLEIA method). [Figure 2] It is the correlation of the measured values of Comparative Example 3 (LTIA method with addition of HBR-1 as a non-specific reaction inhibitor) with respect to the measured values of Comparative Example 1 (CLEIA method). [Figure 3] It is the correlation of the measured values of Example 1 (LTIA method with addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention as a non-specific reaction inhibitor) with respect to the measured values of Comparative Example 1 (CLEIA method). [Figure 4] It is a schematic diagram showing the structure, activation, and degradation of complement protein C3 (quoted from Figure 10 on page 27 of Introduction to Complementology: From Basics to Clinical and Measurement Methods, Hajime Kitamura, Interdisciplinary Planning (November 2010)).
Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
[0010] (Immunological Measurement Method) The immunological measurement method of the present invention is a method for immunologically measuring a substance to be measured in a sample, characterized in that an immune reaction is performed in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody. In other words, it is a method for immunologically measuring a substance to be measured in a sample using a specific binding partner other than the anti-C3 antibody in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody as a non-specific inhibitor. Immunological measurement methods are further broadly classified into homogeneous methods and heterogeneous methods. The homogeneous method is a measurement method that specifically detects the reaction proceeding by the target substance in a mixed solution (reaction solution) of the sample and reagent without performing B / F (bound / unbound) separation. The heterogeneous method is a measurement method in which excess components that did not participate in the binding reaction are washed and removed by a B / F separation operation, and then the main reaction is allowed to proceed and detected. The heterogeneous method has the drawback of being time-consuming due to the washing step, but it has the advantage of being relatively less susceptible to the influence of non-specific reactants. In contrast, the homogeneous method does not involve a washing step, and therefore is susceptible to the influence of non-specific reactions, but it is simpler, has fewer steps, and requires less time for measurement, making it a widely sought-after method in the field of clinical diagnosis. Homogeneous methods include immunoaggregation (TIA) and immunochromatography (lateral flow and flow-through). TIA is a method for qualitatively or quantitatively detecting analytes (target substances) in a sample based on the degree of aggregation of immune complexes formed by the crosslinking action of analytes by specific binding partners such as antibodies. Among these, latex immunoaggregation (LTIA), which uses latex particles as an insoluble carrier to amplify the agglutination signal, is suitable for optical detection and is easy to automate, making it a highly versatile measurement method applied to various test items. Examples of heterogeneous methods include ELISA using well plates and chemiluminescence methods. While the present invention can utilize any of the above immunological measurement methods, the homogeneous method, which is relatively susceptible to the influence of nonspecific reactions, is preferred because it is expected to yield better results.
[0011] (anti-C3 antibody) In this invention, the anti-C3 antibody used to suppress nonspecific reactions is an antibody against C3, and any antibody that recognizes the portion of C3 corresponding to C3d is acceptable. C3 is one of the complement proteins in the classical pathway and is also called complement component 3 or β1C globulin due to its electrical mobility. C3 is a protein with a molecular weight of 180 kDa and has a structure in which an α chain with a molecular weight of 110 kDa and a β chain with a molecular weight of 70 kDa are cross-linked by -ss- bonds, and is the central protein of the complement system. As shown in Figure 4, C3 is degraded via C3b, iC3b, C3dg, and further to C3d. The anti-C3 antibody used in the present invention can be any antibody that recognizes the portion of C3 that is produced when C3 is degraded, and in that sense, any of the anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, or anti-C3d antibody can be used. Among these, the anti-C3d antibody is particularly preferred. The anti-C3 antibody used in the present invention may be either a polyclonal antibody or a monoclonal antibody. More preferably, it is a monoclonal antibody. Furthermore, in addition to the entire antibody molecule, functional fragments of antibodies having antigen-antibody reaction activity can also be used as the anti-C3 antibody in the present invention. The anti-C3 antibodies used in the present invention may be obtained through an immunization process on common animals (such as mice, goats, and sheep), or they may be antibodies (chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, or fully humanized antibodies, etc.) in which the amino acid sequence of the immunogen (substance to be measured) has been altered to that of an animal species different from the animal immunized by genetic engineering technology. Examples of functional antibody fragments include F(ab')2, Fab', single-chain antibodies (scFv), VHH (variable domain of heavy chain of heavy chain antibody) antibodies, and IgNAR (new antigen receptor) antibodies, which are fragments having antigen-antibody reaction activity. These functional antibody fragments can be produced by treating the antibodies obtained as described above with proteolytic enzymes (for example, pepsin or papain). In the present invention, the functional fragment of the anti-C3 antibody may be any fragment that includes a portion corresponding to C3d as described above. In the present invention, unless otherwise specified, the anti-C3 antibody includes functional fragments. The antibody against C3 used in the present invention may be any one of the group consisting of anti-C3b antibody, anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, and anti-C3d antibody, or any two or more selected from these may be used in combination.
[0012] In this specification, the terms "reacting" with an antigen and "recognizing" an antigen are used synonymously, but are not limited to these examples and should be interpreted in the broadest sense. Whether or not an antibody "reacts" with an antigen (compound) can be confirmed by antigen-immobilized ELISA, competitive ELISA, sandwich ELISA, etc., as well as by methods utilizing the principle of surface plasmon resonance (SPR method). The SPR method can be performed using equipment, sensors, and reagents commercially available under the name Biacore®.
[0013] The antibody against C3 used in the present invention can be produced by dissolving commercially available human-derived C3, such as C3d protein, as an antigen (immunogen) in a solvent such as phosphate-buffered saline, and administering this solution to animals for immunization. If necessary, an appropriate adjuvant may be added to the solution, and immunization may be performed using an emulsion. As an adjuvant, commonly used adjuvants such as water-in-oil emulsions, water-in-oil-in-water emulsions, oil-in-water emulsions, liposomes, and aluminum hydroxide gel may be used, as well as proteins or peptide substances derived from biological components. For example, Freund's incomplete adjuvant or Freund's complete adjuvant can be suitably used. The route of administration, dosage, and timing of administration of the adjuvant are not particularly limited, but it is desirable to select them appropriately so as to enhance the desired immune response in the animals immunized with the antigen.
[0014] The type of animal used for immunization is not particularly limited, but mammals are preferred, such as mice, rats, cattle, rabbits, goats, sheep, and alpacas, and mice or rats are more preferably used. Immunization of animals can be carried out according to general methods, for example, by injecting a solution of the antigen, preferably a mixture with an adjuvant, subcutaneously, intradermally, or intraperitoneally into the animal. Since the immune response generally differs depending on the type and strain of the animal being immunized, it is desirable to set the immunization schedule appropriately according to the animal being used. Antigen administration is preferably repeated several times after the initial immunization.
[0015] To obtain monoclonal antibodies, the following operations are carried out, but are not limited to them. Since methods for producing monoclonal antibodies themselves are well known and widely used in the art, those skilled in the art can easily produce antibodies used in the immunological analytical methods of the present invention by using the aforementioned antigens (see, for example, Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, (1988), Chapter 6, etc.).
[0016] After final immunization, spleen cells or lymph node cells, which are antibody-producing cells, can be extracted from the immunized animals and fused with myeloma-derived cell lines that have high proliferative capacity to produce hybridomas. It is preferable to use cells with high antibody-producing capacity (quality and quantity) for cell fusion, and it is also preferable that the myeloma-derived cell line is compatible with the animal from which the antibody-producing cells to be fused originate. Cell fusion can be performed according to methods known in this field, such as the polyethylene glycol method, the Sendai virus method, or the electric current method. The resulting hybridomas can be grown according to conditions commonly used in this industry, and the desired hybridomas can be selected while confirming the properties of the antibodies produced. Hybridoma cloning can be performed by well-known methods such as the limiting dilution method or the soft agar method.
[0017] Hybridoma selection can be performed efficiently at the selection stage, taking into account the conditions under which the produced antibodies will be used in actual measurements. For example, by reacting antibodies obtained by immunizing animals with C3 immobilized on a solid phase in the presence of a compound whose cross-reactivity is to be confirmed, and comparing the reactivity in the absence of the compound, hybridomas that produce the desired antibody can be selected more efficiently. Alternatively, by reacting antibodies obtained by immunizing animals with C3 immobilized on a solid phase in the presence of a component derived from a biological sample, and comparing the reactivity in the absence of the biological sample component, hybridomas that produce the desired antibody can be selected more efficiently.
[0018] After the cloning process, the binding ability of the produced antibody to C3 can be assayed using methods such as ELISA, RIA, or immunofluorescence assay to confirm whether the selected hybridoma produces a monoclonal antibody with the desired properties. By mass-culturing the hybridomas selected as described above, monoclonal antibodies with desired properties can be produced. The method of mass cultivation is not particularly limited, but examples include culturing hybridomas in a suitable medium to produce monoclonal antibodies in the medium, or injecting hybridomas into the peritoneal cavity of mammals to proliferate and produce antibodies in the ascites fluid. The monoclonal antibodies can be purified by appropriately combining the antibody purification methods from antiserum described above, such as DEAE anion exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, ammonium sulfate fractionation, PEG fractionation, and ethanol fractionation.
[0019] Methods for incorporating anti-C3 antibodies into the immunoassay system include using them as one of the reagent components in an immunoassay reagent, or adding them to the sample diluent or pretreatment solution. The term "immunological reaction system" refers to the liquid phase in which the sample and the liquid immunoassay reagent are mixed and the immunoassay reaction takes place, for example, when the immunoassay reagent is a liquid reagent. For example, in the case of the LTIA method, the sample may be mixed with an LTIA assay reagent containing anti-C3 antibody, or the sample may be pre-mixed with a pretreatment solution containing anti-C3 antibody before being mixed with the immunoassay reagent. In the case of the ELISA method, the sample may be pre-mixed with a pretreatment solution containing anti-C3 antibody before being dropped onto the microplate, or the sample may be mixed with a solution containing anti-C3 antibody and detection antibody before being dropped onto the microplate. In addition, in the case of chemiluminescence reagents, the sample may be mixed with a pretreatment solution containing anti-C3 antibody beforehand and then mixed with the immunoassay reagent, or the immunoassay reagent (for example, a solution containing detection antibody or antigen and magnetic particles) may contain anti-C3 antibody. Furthermore, when an immunoassay is performed on a solid phase, such as by immunochromatography, the term "immunoassay system" refers to the solid phase in which the immunoassay between the liquid sample and its binding partner takes place. In this case, the sample may be pre-mixed with a pretreatment solution containing anti-C3 antibody before being dropped onto the immunochromatographic test piece, or the anti-C3 antibody may be kept dry on a sample pad and then dissolved when the sample is dropped, developing the solid phase and becoming present in the reaction system.
[0020] In the present invention, the concentration of the anti-C3 antibody is sufficient to exert the desired non-specific reaction suppression effect without strongly influencing the immune reaction between the target substance and its specific binding partner, and can be appropriately set by those skilled in the art depending on the type of target substance and sample. The concentration of the anti-C3 antibody in the immune reaction system varies depending on the reagent composition of the immune reaction system, but is not limited to the following concentrations: 0.1 to 1000 μg, preferably 1.0 to 750 μg, more preferably 2.0 to 500 μg, even more preferably 3.0 to 250 μg, and most preferably 5.0 to 150 μg per 10 μL of sample. For example, 5.0 to 120 μg, 5.0 to 110 μg, 5.0 to 100 μg, 5.0 to 80 μg, 5.0 to 60 μg, and 5.0 to 50 μg may also be preferred. Furthermore, the lower limits of the above range may preferably be 10.0 μg or more, 15.0 μg or more, or 20.0 μg or more. Anti-C3 antibodies may be used alone, as a mixture of multiple anti-C3 antibodies, in combination with monoclonal antibodies, or as anti-C3 antibodies conjugated to an insoluble carrier. Furthermore, when using multiple types of anti-C3 antibodies in combination, the combined concentration of both antibodies must be within the specified concentration range. If the measurement reagent of the present invention is to contain anti-C3 antibody beforehand, it should be added to the measurement reagent beforehand so that the concentration is within the reaction system described above.
[0021] (Latex immunoaggregation (LTIA)) This section describes the LTIA method, one of the immunological measurement methods of the present invention. Methods for measuring target substances using the LTIA method can be broadly classified into two categories. The first method involves reacting latex particles immobilized with a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured with the substance to be measured to form a sandwich-type immune complex, and measuring the substance to be measured based on the degree of aggregation of the latex particles accompanying the formation of the immune complex. The second method involves adding proteins or the like immobilized with multiple target substances or their analogues (including fragments thereof) to a reagent, and allowing these to compete with the target substances in the sample. This inhibits the formation of an immune complex between the target substances in the reagent and latex particles immobilized with specific binding partners for the target substances, and the target substance (antigen) is measured from the degree of inhibition of aggregation of the latex particles due to the inhibition of immune complex formation. The substance to be measured and its specific binding partner can be selected from any substance depending on the purpose. For example, if the substance to be measured is an antigen, an antibody such as a polyclonal antibody or monoclonal antibody (including recombinant antibodies and functional fragments of each antibody) can be selected as the specific binding partner for the substance to be measured. If the substance to be measured is an antibody, an antigen such as a natural type or recombinant antigen can be selected as the specific binding partner for the substance to be measured. The present invention can be used in any of the above methods, and specifically, the following steps are exemplified. (1) A step of bringing the substance to be measured in the sample into contact with the anti-C3 antibody in a solution. (2) After step (1), a step of adding latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured to the solution. (3) A step after step (2) in which the degree of aggregation of latex particles in the solution is optically detected. Here, step (3) means "a step in which the aggregation reaction between the substance to be measured and the latex particles is measured during or after step (2), without going through a washing and separation step."
[0022] In the LTIA method, the substance to be measured can be determined by optically or electrochemically observing the degree of aggregation that occurs. Optical observation methods include measuring scattered light intensity, absorbance, or transmitted light intensity with optical instruments (endpoint method, rate method, etc.). The absorbance and other measurement values obtained from measuring the sample are compared with the absorbance and other measurement values obtained from measuring a standard substance (a sample in which the concentration of the substance to be measured is known) to calculate the concentration (quantitative value) of the substance to be measured contained in the sample. Note that the measurement of absorbance and other measurements of transmitted or scattered light may be performed using one wavelength or two wavelengths (difference or ratio between two wavelengths). The measurement wavelength is generally selected from 500 nm to 900 nm.
[0023] The measurement of the target substance in the sample of the present invention may be performed manually or using a measuring device. The measuring device may be a general-purpose automated analyzer or a dedicated measuring device (dedicated machine). Furthermore, it is preferable to carry out this measurement by a method consisting of multiple operating steps, such as a two-step method (two-reagent method).
[0024] (Latex particles carrying specific binding partners) The specific binding partner for the substance to be measured can be immobilized and supported on latex particles by known methods such as physical adsorption, chemical bonding, or a combination thereof. In the case of the physical adsorption method, the measurement can be carried out by mixing a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured with latex particles in a solution such as a buffer and bringing them into contact, or by bringing a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured, dissolved in a buffer, into contact with a carrier, according to known methods. Furthermore, when performing the test using a chemical binding method, it can be carried out by following known methods described in publications such as "Special Issue No. 53 of Clinical Pathology: Immunoassays for Clinical Tests - Techniques and Applications," edited by the Japanese Society of Clinical Pathology, published by the Clinical Pathology Publication Association in 1983; and "New Biochemistry Experiment Course 1: Protein IV," edited by the Japanese Biochemical Society, published by Tokyo Kagaku Dojin in 1991. This involves mixing and contacting a specific binding partner for the target substance and a carrier with a divalent crosslinking reagent such as glutaraldehyde, carbodiimide, imide ester, or maleimide, and then reacting the amino group, carboxyl group, thiol group, aldehyde group, or hydroxyl group of the specific binding partner for the target substance and the carrier with the aforementioned divalent crosslinking reagent.
[0025] The synthetic polymer constituting the latex particles of the present invention is not particularly limited, but examples include polystyrene, styrene-styrene sulfonate copolymer, methacrylic acid polymer, acrylic acid polymer, itaconic acid polymer, and styrene-hydrophilic carboxymonomer copolymer: for example, styrene-methacrylic acid copolymer, styrene-acrylic acid copolymer, and styrene-itaconic acid copolymer. Among these, styrene-methacrylic acid copolymer, styrene-itaconic acid copolymer, and styrene and styrene-styrene sulfonate copolymer are preferred. Particularly preferred are styrene and styrene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymer.
[0026] The specific binding partners for the particular substance supported by the latex particles are preferably of multiple types in order to form a sandwich. If the particular substance has multiple antibody recognition sites, one type of specific binding partner is sufficient. For example, if the specific binding partner is a monoclonal antibody, multiple monoclonal antibodies with different recognition sites are used. Also, for example, if the specific binding partner is a polyclonal antibody, it may be a polyclonal antibody derived from one type of antiserum, or from multiple types of antiserum. Furthermore, a combination of monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibodies may be used.
[0027] Furthermore, if it is necessary to perform treatment to suppress spontaneous aggregation of latex particles or nonspecific reactions, the latex particles may be treated by known methods, such as contacting and coating the surface with bovine serum albumin (BSA), casein, gelatin, ovalbumin or its salts, a surfactant, or skim milk powder, to perform a blocking treatment (masking treatment) of the carrier.
[0028] (Reagents for immunoassay) The immunoassay method of the present invention is characterized by performing the immunoassay using an immunoassay reagent, which contains the aforementioned anti-C3 antibody in addition to the main reaction component. The main reaction component includes a binding partner (other than the anti-C3 antibody) specific to the substance to be measured, and other examples include insoluble carriers such as immunoassay particles, immunochromatographic test pieces, and microplates. The immunoassay reagent of the present invention may contain buffers, proteins, peptides, amino acids, nucleic acids, lipids, phospholipids, sugars, inorganic salts, polymer compounds, surfactants, other nonspecific reaction inhibitors, preservatives, etc., to the extent that they do not interfere with the nonspecific reaction inhibitory effect. Components for buffering and adjusting the pH, ionic strength, osmotic pressure, etc., of the sample may include, for example, buffers such as acetic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, Tris, glycine, boric acid, carbonic acid, phthalic acid, succinic acid, maleic acid, and imidazole, as well as Good's buffer and their sodium, potassium, and calcium salts. Furthermore, polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone and phospholipid polymers may be included as components to enhance aggregation formation. The concentration of anti-C3 antibody in each component reagent should be such that it can be adjusted to the concentration within the immunoassay system in the mixed state of the reagent and sample at the time of measurement, and this concentration will vary depending on the reagent type.
[0029] (Reagent Kit) The reagent kit of the present invention is characterized by containing at least an anti-C3 antibody in its kit composition. The kit composition includes reagents related to immunoassay, as well as a sample diluent, a sample extract, etc., but in the present invention, the anti-C3 antibody can be added to any one or two or more of these. In addition to the above, the kit composition may include an instruction manual and sample collection tools (collection pipette, syringe, cotton swab, filter, etc.). The reagent configurations used for each immunoassay method are described below.
[0030] <Latex immunoaggregation assay> Examples of reagents (LTIA reagents) used when the immunoassay method is latex immunoaggregation assay are given below. (1) First reagent containing anti-C3 antibody (2) Second reagent containing latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured. The first reagent typically contains a buffer, and the concentration of the anti-C3 antibody in the buffer only needs to be included in a form that can be adjusted to the preferred anti-C3 antibody concentration in the mixed state of the reagent and the sample at the time of measurement, and this varies depending on each reagent type. The anti-C3 antibody may be included in the second reagent in addition to the first reagent.
[0031] In the LTIA reagent, the concentration of the anti-C3 antibody generally contained in the first reagent is 1 to 2000 μg / mL, preferably 5 to 1500 μg / mL, more preferably 10 to 1000 μg / mL, still more preferably 15 to 500 μg / mL, and most preferably 25 to 500 μg / mL, but it is not limited to this concentration. Also, when adding a specimen diluent, a pretreatment solution, etc. to the specimen before subjecting it to the LTIA method, the anti-C3 antibody may be contained in the pretreatment solution, and the concentration of the anti-C3 antibody in the pretreatment solution is 1 to 2000 μg / mL, preferably 5 to 1500 μg / mL, more preferably 10 to 1000 μg / mL, still more preferably 15 to 500 μg / mL, and most preferably 25 to 500 μg / mL, but it is not limited to this concentration. The anti-C3b antibody, anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, and anti-C3d antibody can also be used in the same concentration range as the above anti-C3 antibody.
[0032] The immunometric particles used in the present invention can use known particles as long as they can carry a specific binding partner for the measurement target substance in addition to the above latex particles. For example, inorganic particles such as metal colloids, silica, and carbon can also be used as the immunometric particles of the present invention. The size of the immunometric particles can be appropriately selected from the range of 0.05 to 1 μm in consideration of the optical measurement method used (for example, nephelometry for measuring transmitted light, turbidimetry for measuring scattered light, etc.) so as to obtain the desired measurement sensitivity, measurement range, etc. In the optical measurement in an automatic analyzer, an average particle diameter of 0.1 to 0.4 μm is generally used, but it is not limited to this.
[0033] <ELISA method> ELISA is a method that utilizes various combinations of antigen-antibody reactions, ultimately incorporating enzyme-labeled antigens or antibodies into the reaction system to detect enzyme activity. For enzyme activity detection, substrates whose absorption spectra change during the reaction are used, and various methods such as direct, indirect, sandwich, and competitive methods are employed depending on the combination of antigen-antibody reactions. Examples of reagents used when the immunoassay method of the present invention is the sandwich ELISA method are given below. (a) Insoluble carrier on which an antibody that reacts with the substance to be measured is immobilized. (b) An antibody labeled with a labeling substance that reacts with the substance to be measured. (a) A plate is preferred as the insoluble carrier, and the labeling substance can be selected and used as appropriate. The antibody immobilized on the insoluble carrier captures the target substance in the solution containing the sample and forms a complex on the insoluble carrier. The antibody labeled with the labeling substance binds to the captured target substance and forms a sandwich with the aforementioned complex. The target substance in the sample can be measured by measuring the amount of the labeling substance using a method appropriate to the labeling substance. Specific methods such as the method for immobilizing the antibody on the insoluble carrier and the method for binding the antibody to the labeling substance can be any method well known to those skilled in the art without particular limitation. In this ELISA method, the anti-C3 antibody used in the present invention can be made present in the immunoassay system by, for example, adding it to a sample diluent or pretreatment solution, or by adding it to the solution in which the antigen-antibody reaction is carried out.
[0034] <Immunochromatography Method> The reagent configuration (test piece configuration) when the immunoassay method of the present invention is an immunochromatography method will be described below. Immunochromatographic specimen; When an antibody is used as the specific binding partner, the test piece is a sheet-like insoluble carrier such as a porous membrane, and in the direction of the spread of the solution containing the sample, it has the following components in order: 1. a sample supply area, 2. a site for holding the labeled antibody (labeled antibody holding area), and 3. a site for immobilizing an antibody to capture the complex formed by the labeled antibody and the antibody against the substance to be measured (capture antibody area). In immunochromatography, when a predetermined amount of a sample containing at least the above-described test piece and the substance to be measured is added to the sample supply site, the sample enters the label retention site by capillary action, and the substance to be measured and the labeled antibody bind to form a complex. When this complex expands the membrane and enters the capture antibody site, it is captured by the antibody immobilized on the membrane (capture antibody), forming a complex of capture antibody-substance to be measured-labeled antibody. The substance to be measured can then be detected by detecting the label using any method (for example, the agglutination image in the case of a visible label such as gold colloid, or a color reaction by adding a substrate in the case of an enzyme). In this immunochromatography method, the anti-C3 antibody used in the present invention can be present in the reaction system, for example, by adding it to a sample diluent or pretreatment solution, or by incorporating it into the sample supply site or label retention site and keeping it dry.
[0035] <Chemiluminescence> This method involves reacting magnetic particles bound to an antigen or antibody with the substance to be measured to form a complex, then removing unreacted substances by magnetism. Further, a reagent containing a labeled antibody is added, unreacted substances are removed by magnetism, and finally, a luminescent reagent is added to measure the amount of luminescence. When an enzyme is used for labeling, it is called chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). When a metal complex such as a ruthenium pyridine complex is used for labeling and the luminescence intensity is measured by an electrochemical reaction, it is called electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Furthermore, when a chemiluminescent substance is used for labeling, it is called chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Examples of reagents used when the immunoassay method of the present invention is the CLEIA method are given below. (a) Magnetic particles immobilized with antibodies (or antigens) that react with the substance to be measured. (b) An enzyme-labeled antibody (or antigen) that reacts with the substance to be measured. (c) Luminescent reagent Antibodies immobilized on magnetic particles capture the target substance in the solution containing the sample and form a complex. Antibodies labeled with an enzyme-labeled substance bind to the captured target substance and form a sandwich with the aforementioned complex. By reacting the enzyme-labeled substance with a luminescent reagent and measuring the amount of light emitted, the target substance in the sample can be measured. In the CLEIA method, the anti-C3 antibody used in this invention can be made present in the immunoassay system by, for example, adding it to a sample diluent or pretreatment solution, or by adding it to a solution in which an antigen-antibody reaction is performed.
[0036] (Specific binding partner) In the present invention, specific binding partners for the substance to be measured include proteins other than anti-C3 antibodies, peptides, amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, haptens, etc., and there are no particular restrictions on molecular weight or origin (natural or synthetic), but examples include antibodies or antigens that can be used in immunoassays utilizing immune reactions. The antibody may be a polyclonal antibody or a monoclonal antibody. More preferably, it is a monoclonal antibody. In this invention, in addition to the entire antibody molecule, functional fragments of antibodies having antigen-antibody reaction activity can also be used as antibodies. These may be antibodies obtained through an immunization process on common animals (mice, goats, sheep, etc.), or antibodies (chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, or fully humanized antibodies, etc.) in which the amino acid sequence of the immunogen (substance to be measured) has been altered to that of an animal species different from the animal immunized by genetic engineering technology. Examples of functional antibody fragments include fragments having antigen-antibody reaction activity such as F(ab')2, Fab', single-chain antibodies (scFv), VHH (variable domain of heavy chain of heavy chain antibody) antibodies, and IgNAR (new antigen receptor) antibodies. These functional antibody fragments can be produced by treating the antibodies obtained as described above with proteolytic enzymes (e.g., pepsin or papain).
[0037] (sample) Examples of samples containing the substance to be measured in this invention include human or animal blood, serum, plasma, culture supernatant, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, sweat, ascites, or cell or tissue extracts. Furthermore, the samples in this invention include not only the samples obtained from living organisms themselves, but also samples that have undergone pretreatment such as dilution and purification.
[0038] (Substances to be measured) The immunoassay reagent of the present invention can measure various substances contained in the sample. The target substance can be any substance that does not react with the anti-C3 antibody used for non-specific suppression, such as proteins, peptides, amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, and haptens, but there are no particular limitations as long as it is theoretically measurable. Examples include CRP (C-reactive protein), Lp(a), MMP3 (matrix metalloproteinase 3), antiphospholipid antibodies, type IV collagen, PSA, BNP (brain natriuretic peptide), insulin, albumin, cystatin C, RF (rheumatoid factor), KL-6, procalcitonin, FDP, D-dimer, SF (soluble fibrin), TAT (thrombin-antithrombin III complex), PAI-1, as well as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, valproic acid, theophylline, TARC (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine), and sIL-2R (soluble interleukin-2 receptor).
[0039] (Methods for suppressing nonspecific reactions) Certain components in biological samples can often cause aggregation of immunoassay particles immobilized with specific binding partners for the target substance that should not occur (positive measurement error), or cause aggregation that should occur to fail (negative measurement error). These are called nonspecific reactions and are known to cause various measurement errors. In this invention, suppressing nonspecific reactions means acting on factors (nonspecific factors) in a biological sample that cause the above-mentioned nonspecific reactions, thereby suppressing the influence of reactions other than immune responses on the measurement. This invention can suppress nonspecific reactions by performing an immune response in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody.
[0040] (Non-specific reaction inhibitor) The nonspecific reaction inhibitor of the present invention only needs to contain a substance capable of suppressing nonspecific reactions originating from a sample in an immunological assay, and contains at least an anti-C3 antibody as an active ingredient. The nonspecific reaction inhibitor of the present invention can use the same reagent configuration containing the anti-C3 antibody as described above. The nonspecific reaction inhibitor of the present invention may contain buffers, proteins, peptides, amino acids, nucleic acids, lipids, phospholipids, sugars, inorganic salts, polymer compounds, surfactants, other nonspecific reaction inhibitors, preservatives, etc., to the extent that they do not interfere with its nonspecific reaction inhibitory effect.
[0041] The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to the following examples. [Examples]
[0042] [Example I: Suppression of nonspecific reactions in the LTIA method: Measurement of TARC] The following describes a test in which the TARC concentration in a sample was measured using a reagent prepared by the LTIA method with the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention and other nonspecific reaction inhibitors added. The samples used were those that showed values close to those measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA method) (Comparative Example 1) (control samples: samples 1-3) and those that exhibited nonspecific reactions and deviated significantly from the values of Comparative Example 1 (deviation samples: samples 4-10).
[0043] [Comparative Example 1] (Measurement by CLEIA method) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents HISCL (registered trademark) TARC (Sysmex Corporation) 1-2. Sample Physiological saline solution (Otsuka Saline Solution), specimen (serum) 1-10 1-3. Measurement Procedure Measurements were performed using HISCL(registered trademark) -5000 (Sysmex Corporation) in accordance with the instructions provided for the reagent.
[0044] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 1. The CLEIA method shown in Comparative Example 1 involves a B / F separation operation and a washing step. Therefore, it is a measurement method less susceptible to the influence of non-specific reactions originating from the sample, and was used as a comparative example.
[0045] [Comparative Example 2] (Measurement by LTIA method: No addition of nonspecific reaction inhibitor) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents An LTIA measurement reagent consisting of the first reagent and the second reagent shown below was prepared. (1) Reagent 1 100 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.5) 500mM NaCl 0.5% BSA (2) Second reagent Anti-human TARC monoclonal antibody-sensitized latex (2 types) 5 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.0) The anti-human TARC monoclonal antibodies were obtained using commercially available TARC antigens by methods well known to those skilled in the art. Examples of commercially available TARC antigens include CCL17, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (Shenandoah Biotechnology, Inc.), CCL17 / TARC, Human (LifeSpan Biosscience, Inc.), and Human TARC (CCL17) (Abeomics, Inc.). Furthermore, combinations of monoclonal antibodies suitable for sandwich assays against the TARC antigens were selected by methods well known to those skilled in the art. The latex sensitized with anti-human TARC monoclonal antibodies was prepared based on the method described in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2017-181377. 1-2. Sample The same sample as in Comparative Example 1 1-3. Measurement Procedure The TARC concentration in the sample was measured using a Hitachi 3500 automated analyzer by combining the first and second reagents. Specifically, 120 μL of the first reagent was added to 2.4 μL of the sample and incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes, then 40 μL of the second reagent was added and stirred. The change in absorbance due to aggregation formation was then measured over a 5-minute period at a primary wavelength of 570 nm and a secondary wavelength of 800 nm. The measured value was calculated by applying the amount of absorbance change to a calibration curve obtained by measuring standard substances of known concentration.
[0046] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 1. Furthermore, Figure 1 shows the correlation between the measured values of Comparative Example 2 and those of Comparative Example 1.
[0047] [Comparative Example 3] (Measurement by LTIA method: HBR-1 added) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 2, except that 100 μg / mL of HBR-1 (SCANTIBODIES LABORATORY, INC.), a commercially available non-specific inhibitor, was added to the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 2. The measurement results are shown in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the correlation between the measured values of Comparative Example 1 and the measured values of Comparative Example 3.
[0048] [Example 1] (Measurement by LTIA method: Addition of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 2, except that 100 μg / mL of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad) was added to the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 2. The measurement results are shown in Table 1. Figure 3 shows the correlation between the measurement values of this Example 1 and those of Comparative Example 1.
[0049] [Table 1]
[0050] (Results and Discussion) The effects of the present invention were considered based on the results of Comparative Examples 1-3, Example 1, and Reference Example 1. (1) The measurement results of the control samples (sample numbers 1-3) were verified. In the control sample, the measured values using the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 1) and the measured values using the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 2) were generally equivalent. Furthermore, the measured values using the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Example 1) were also generally equivalent to those of Comparative Examples 1 and 2. Therefore, it was found that the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody does not affect the measured values of samples that do not exhibit non-specific reactions. However, in Comparative Example 3, the measured values for sample 3 deviated from those of Comparative Example 1. It was considered that the addition of HBR-1 caused an undesirable reaction. (2) The measurement results of the discrepant samples (sample numbers 4-10) were verified. For sample number 4, the measurement value obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 1) was 205 pg / mL, while the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 2) was 669 pg / mL, showing a significant discrepancy in the measured values. Furthermore, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of HBR-1 (Comparative Example 3) was 634 pg / mL, which was a significant discrepancy from Comparative Example 1. On the other hand, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Example 1) was 271 pg / mL, showing a tendency to approach that of Comparative Example 1. Similar results were obtained for samples 5 to 10. Based on the above, in the immunoassay method, the presence of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention within the immune reaction system was able to suppress nonspecific reactions originating from the sample. The unexpected result was that the present invention was able to suppress nonspecific reactions that could not be suppressed even by commercially available nonspecific reaction inhibitors such as HBR-1. Furthermore, although the divergence samples used in this study contained RF at a wide range of concentrations, no correlation was found between the amount of RF and the degree of divergence in the measured values (data not shown). Therefore, it was suggested that the non-specific inhibitory effect of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention may not be affected by the amount of RF.
[0051] [Example II: Suppression of nonspecific reactions in LTIA method: Measurement of sIL-2R] The following describes a test in which the sIL-2R concentration in a sample was measured using a reagent prepared by the LTIA method with the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention and other nonspecific reaction inhibitors added. The samples used were those that showed values close to those measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA method) (Comparative Example 4) (control samples: samples 11-15) and those that exhibited nonspecific reactions and deviated significantly from the measurements of Comparative Example 4 (deviant samples: samples 16, 17).
[0052] [Comparative Example 4] (Measurement by CLEIA method) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents Lumipulse Presto (registered trademark) IL-2R (Fujirebio Inc.) 1-2. Sample Specimens (serum) 11-17 1-3. Measurement Procedure Measurements were performed using Lumipulse (registered trademark) - L2400 (Fujirebio Inc.) in accordance with the instructions provided for the reagent.
[0053] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 2. The CLEIA method shown in Comparative Example 4 involves a B / F separation operation and a washing step. Therefore, it is a measurement method less susceptible to the influence of non-specific reactions originating from the sample, and was used as a comparative example.
[0054] [Comparative Example 5] (Measurement by LTIA method: No addition of nonspecific reaction inhibitor) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents The first reagent and the second reagent were prepared according to the method described in Japanese Patent Publication No. 2017-181377. 1-2. Sample The same sample as in Comparative Example 4 1-3. Measurement Procedure The sIL-2R concentration in the sample was measured using a Hitachi 7180 automated analyzer by combining the first and second reagents. Specifically, 120 μL of the first reagent was added to 5.6 μL of the sample and incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes, then 40 μL of the second reagent was added and stirred. The change in absorbance associated with aggregation formation was then measured over a 5-minute period at a primary wavelength of 570 nm and a secondary wavelength of 800 nm. The measured value was calculated by applying the amount of absorbance change to a calibration curve obtained by measuring standard substances of known concentration.
[0055] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 2.
[0056] [Comparative Example 6] (Measurement by LTIA method: HBR-1 added) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 5, except that HBR-1 (SCANTIBODIES LABORATORY, INC.) was added to the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 5 to a concentration of 100 μg / mL. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.
[0057] [Example 2] (Measurement by LTIA method: Addition of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 5, except that 100 μg / mL of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad) was added to the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 5. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.
[0058] [Table 2]
[0059] (Results and Discussion) The effects of the present invention were considered based on the results of Comparative Examples 4-6 and Example 2. (1) The measurement results of the control samples (sample numbers 11-15) were verified. In the control sample, the measurement values obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 4) and the measurement values obtained by the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 5) were generally equivalent. Furthermore, the measurement values obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Example 2) were also generally equivalent to those of Comparative Examples 4 and 5. Therefore, it was found that the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody does not affect the measurement values of samples that do not exhibit non-specific reactions. (2) The measurement results of the discrepant samples (sample numbers 16 and 17) were verified. For sample number 16, the measurement value obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 4) was 346 U / mL, while the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 5) was 1401 U / mL, showing a significant discrepancy in the measured values. Furthermore, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with HBR-1 added (Comparative Example 5) was 1216 U / mL, which was a significant discrepancy compared to Comparative Example 4. On the other hand, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention added (Example 2) was 409 U / mL, showing a tendency to approach that of Comparative Example 4. Similar results were obtained for sample 17. Based on the above, in the immunoassay method, the presence of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention in the immune reaction system was able to suppress nonspecific reactions originating from the sample. Since the present invention was able to suppress nonspecific reactions that could not be suppressed even by the commercially available nonspecific reaction inhibitor HBR-1, the nonspecific suppressive effect of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention was an unexpected result.
[0060] [Example III: Suppression of nonspecific reactions in ELISA: Measurement of sIL-2R] The following describes a test in which the sIL-2R concentration in a sample was measured using an ELISA reagent to which the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention and other nonspecific reaction inhibitors were added. The samples used were those that showed values close to those measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA method) (Comparative Example 7) (control samples: samples 18-22) and those that showed a nonspecific reaction and deviated significantly from the measurement value of Comparative Example 7 (deviation sample: sample 23).
[0061] [Comparative Example 7] (Measured by CLEIA method) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents Lumipulse Presto (registered trademark) IL-2R (Fujirebio Inc.) 1-2. Sample Serum samples 18-23 1-3. Measurement Procedure Measurements were performed using Lumipulse® L2400 (Fujirebio Inc.) in accordance with the instructions provided for the aforementioned measurement reagent.
[0062] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 3.
[0063] [Comparative Example 8] (Measurement by ELISA: No addition of non-specific reaction inhibitor) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Sample The same sample as in Comparative Example 7 1-2. Measurement Procedure The same antibody used in Comparative Example 5 was used. Anti-sIL-2R monoclonal antibody was dissolved in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2; hereafter referred to as PBS) containing 150 mM sodium chloride to a concentration of 10 μg / mL. 100 μL of this solution was dispensed into each well of a 96-well microplate and left to stand overnight at 4°C. Each of the aforementioned wells was washed three times with 400 μL of PBS containing 0.05% Tween® 20 (hereinafter referred to as PBST), then 200 μL of PBST containing 1% bovine serum albumin (hereinafter referred to as BSA-PBST) was added, and the mixture was blocked at room temperature for 1 hour. This was then used as an ELISA plate. After washing each well of the ELISA plate three times with 400 μL of PBST, 100 μL of the sample, diluted 40-fold with sample diluent (BSA-PBST), was added to each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 100 μL of biotin-labeled anti-sIL-2R monoclonal antibody, diluted to 0.50 μg / mL with BSA-PBST, was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 100 μL of HRP-labeled streptavidin (ThermoFishier Scientific), diluted to 0.20 μg / mL with BSA-PBST, was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.2% orthophenylenediamine and 0.02% hydrogen peroxide was added, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 10 minutes. Then, 50 μL of 4.5N sulfuric acid was added to stop the enzymatic reaction, and the absorbance at a wavelength of 492 nm was measured. The sIL-2R value in the test sample was calculated using a standard substance of known concentration as a calibrator. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.
[0064] [Comparative Example 9] (Measurement by ELISA: HBR-1 added) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 8, except that HBR-1 (SCANTIBODIES LABORATORY, INC.) was added to the sample diluent (BSA-PBST) shown in Comparative Example 8 to a concentration of 100 μg / mL. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.
[0065] [Example 3] (Measurement by ELISA: Addition of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody) The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 8, except that 100 μg / mL of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad) was added to the sample diluent (BSA-PBST) shown in Comparative Example 8. The measurement results are shown in Table 3.
[0066] [Table 3]
[0067] (Results and Discussion) The effects of the present invention were considered based on the results of Comparative Examples 7-9 and Example 3. (1) The measurement results of the control samples (sample numbers 18-22) were verified. In the control sample, the measurement values obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 7) and the measurement values obtained by the ELISA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 8) were generally equivalent. Furthermore, the measurement values obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Example 3) were also generally equivalent to those of Comparative Examples 7 and 8. Therefore, it was found that the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody does not affect the measurement values of samples that do not exhibit non-specific reactions. (2) The measurement results of the discrepancy sample (sample number 23) were verified. For sample number 23, the measurement value obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 7) was 1534 U / mL, while the measurement value obtained by the ELISA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 8) was 2132 U / mL, showing a significant discrepancy in the measured values. Furthermore, the measurement value obtained by the ELISA method with the addition of HBR-1 (Comparative Example 9) was 2155 U / mL, which was a significant discrepancy from Comparative Example 7. In contrast, the measured value of the ELISA method with the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention added (Example 3) was 1338 U / mL, showing a tendency to approach that of Comparative Example 4. From this, it was found that some nonspecific reaction that occurred in Comparative Examples 8 and 9 can be suppressed by adding the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody. Based on the above, it was possible to suppress nonspecific reactions in the immunoassay method by introducing the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention into the immune reaction system. Since the present invention was able to suppress nonspecific reactions that could not be suppressed by commercially available nonspecific reaction inhibitors such as HBR-1, the nonspecific suppressive effect of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention was an unexpected result. Furthermore, it was found that this nonspecific suppressive effect was not limited to the homogeneous measurement systems of Examples I and II, but also demonstrated in the heterogeneous measurement system of Example III.
[0068] [Example IV: Suppression of nonspecific reactions in LTIA method: Measurement of sIL-2R] The following describes a test in which the sIL-2R concentration in a sample was measured using a reagent prepared by the LTIA method with the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention and other nonspecific reaction inhibitors added. The samples used were those that showed values close to those measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA method) (Comparative Example 10) (control samples: samples 12, 24, 25) and those that exhibited nonspecific reactions and deviated significantly from the measurements of Comparative Example 10 (deviation samples: samples 16, 17).
[0069] [Comparative Example 10] (Measurement by CLEIA method) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents Lumipulse Presto (registered trademark) IL-2R (Fujirebio Inc.) 1-2. Sample Samples (serum) 12, 16, 17, 24, 25 1-3. Measurement Procedure Measurements were performed using Lumipulse (registered trademark) - L2400 (Fujirebio Inc.) in accordance with the instructions provided for the reagent.
[0070] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 4.
[0071] [Comparative Example 11] (Measurement by LTIA method: No addition of nonspecific reaction inhibitor) 1.Measurement method 1-1. Measurement Reagents The first and second reagents prepared in Comparative Example 5 were used. 1-2. Sample The same sample as in Comparative Example 10 1-3. Measurement Procedure The measurement was performed using the same method as in Comparative Example 5.
[0072] 2.Measurement results The measurement results are shown in Table 4.
[0073] [Comparative Example 12] (Measurement by LTIA method: HBR-1 added) The same reagents as in Comparative Example 6 were used. The measurement results are shown in Table 4.
[0074] [Example 4] (Measurement by LTIA method: Addition of anti-C3d polyclonal antibody) The measurement was performed in the same manner as in Comparative Example 5, except that anti-C3d polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad) was added to the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 5 at concentrations of 25 μg / mL (Example 4-1), 50 μg / mL (Example 4-2), 100 μg / mL (Example 4-3), 200 μg / mL (Example 4-4), and 500 μg / mL (Example 4-5). The measurement results are shown in Table 4.
[0075] [Table 4]
[0076] (Results and Discussion) The effects of the present invention were discussed based on the results of Comparative Examples 10-12 and Examples 4-1-4-5. (1) The measurement results of the control samples (sample numbers 12, 24, and 25) were verified. In the control sample, the measured values using the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 10) and the measured values using the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 11) were generally equivalent. Furthermore, the measured values using the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Examples 4-1 to 4-5) were also generally equivalent to those of Comparative Examples 10 and 11. Therefore, it was found that the addition of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody does not affect the measured values of samples that do not exhibit non-specific reactions. (2) The measurement results of the discrepant samples (sample numbers 16 and 17) were verified. In sample number 16, the measurement value obtained by the CLEIA method (Comparative Example 10) was 346 U / mL, while the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method without the addition of a non-specific reaction inhibitor (Comparative Example 11) was 1419 U / mL, showing a significant discrepancy in the measured values. Furthermore, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of HBR-1 (Comparative Example 12) was 1216 U / mL, which was a significant discrepancy from Comparative Example 10. On the other hand, the measurement value obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of 25 μg / mL of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Example 4-1) was 352 U / mL, showing a tendency to approach Comparative Example 10. Similarly, the measurement values obtained by the LTIA method with the addition of 50 and 500 μg / mL of the anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention (Examples 4-2 and 4-5) were 395 and 374 U / mL, respectively, showing a tendency to approach Comparative Example 10. Furthermore, similar results were obtained in sample 17. The anti-C3d polyclonal antibody of the present invention showed an effect of suppressing nonspecific reactions in a range of at least 25 to 500 μg / mL.
[0077] [Reference Example 1] (Production of Complement C3d-specific monoclonal antibodies) 1.Material (1) Freund's complete adjuvant: Manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, 014-09541 (2) Freund's incomplete adjuvant: Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, 011-09551 (3) Myeloma cells (SP2 / O) (4) RPMI1640, GlutaMAX: GIBCO, 61870-036 (5) Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS): Manufactured by Biological Industries, 04-001-1A (6) HAT culture medium: Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd., 16213004 (7) 96-hole plate: NUNC, 167008 (8) HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H & L): Southern Biotech, 1031-05 (9) Complement C3d, human: Sigma-Aldrich, 204870 (10)Complement C3d Goat anti-Human Polyclonal Antibody: Manufactured by LifeSpan BioSciences, LS―C147220 (11) Biotin Labeling Kit - NH2: Manufactured by Dojindo Molecular Technologies, LK03 (12) C3d, Human, clone 3: Hycult Biotech, HM2198
[0078] 2. Creation of monoclonal antibody-producing hybridomas against human-derived Complement C3d. (2-1) Immunity to animals Commercially available human-derived Complement C3d (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the immunogen. An emulsion prepared by mixing equal parts of the immunogen diluted in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2; hereafter referred to as PBS) containing 150 mM sodium chloride and Freund's complete adjuvant was used, and 20 μg was injected into each Balb / cAJcl mouse. Furthermore, from the second dose onward, Freund's incomplete adjuvant was used, and 10 μg was injected into each mouse four times at two-week intervals (a total of five doses including the initial immunization). Antibody titers in antiserum obtained by collecting blood from the tail vein were measured using the antigen-immobilized ELISA method described later.
[0079] (2-2) Evaluation of antibody titers in immunized animal serum (antigen-immobilized ELISA method) The presence of antibodies against Complement C3d in the serum of the aforementioned immunized animals was confirmed by ELISA with an immunogen immobilized on the phase (antigen-immobilized ELISA). Details of the antigen-immobilized ELISA are as follows. (2-2-1) Preparation of antigen-immobilized ELISA plates The immunogen, Complement C3d, was dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 0.5 μg / mL. 50 μL of this solution was dispensed into each well of a 96-well microplate and allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 hours. Each of the aforementioned wells was washed three times with 400 μL of PBS containing 0.05% Tween® 20 (hereinafter referred to as PBST), then 100 μL of PBST containing 1% bovine serum albumin (hereinafter referred to as BSA-PBST) was added, and the mixture was blocked at room temperature for 1 hour. This was then used as an ELISA plate. (2-2-2) Antigen-immobilized ELISA method After removing BSA-PBST from each well of the ELISA plate, 50 μL each of immunized animal antiserum and non-immunized animal serum, serially diluted with BSA-PBST, were added to each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of HRP-labeled anti-mouse IgG (H&L), diluted 9500-fold with BSA-PBST, was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.2% orthophenylenediamine and 0.02% hydrogen peroxide was added, and after standing at room temperature for 10 minutes, 50 μL of 1.5N sulfuric acid was added to stop the enzymatic reaction, and the absorbance at a wavelength of 492 nm was measured. From mice in which an increase in antibody titer was confirmed as a result of the measurement, the spleen and lymph nodes were excised, and spleen and lymph node-derived cells were prepared and used for cell fusion.
[0080] (2-3) Cell fusion Either spleen-derived cells or lymph node-derived cells were mixed with myeloma cells in a 1:1 ratio, and cell fusion was performed using an electrical pulse method. The fused cells were suspended in HAT medium and cultured in a CO2 incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 8 days to obtain fused cells (hybridomas).
[0081] (2-4) Selection of hybridomas (sandwich ELISA method) Hybridomas were selected using a sandwich ELISA with an anti-Complement C3d polyclonal antibody. Details of the sandwich ELISA method are as follows. (2-4-1) Preparation of plates for sandwich ELISA Anti-mouse IgG antibody was dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 5 μg / mL, and 50 μL of this solution was dispensed into each well of a 96-well microplate and allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 hours. Each of the aforementioned wells was washed three times with 400 μL of PBS containing 0.05% Tween® 20 (hereinafter referred to as PBST), then 100 μL of PBST containing 1% bovine serum albumin (hereinafter referred to as BSA-PBST) was added, and the mixture was blocked at room temperature for 1 hour. This was then used as an ELISA plate. (2-4-2) Sandwich ELISA method After removing BSA-PBST from each well of the ELISA plate, hybridoma culture supernatant was added to each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of Complement C3d diluted to 50 ng / mL with BSA-PBST was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of anti-Complement C3d polyclonal antibody (LifeSpan BioSciences), which had been biotin-labeled using a biotin-labeling kit (Dojindo Molecular Technologies) and diluted to 0.8 μg / mL with BSA-PBST, was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of HRP-labeled streptavidin diluted to 0.2 μg / mL with BSA-PBST was dispensed into each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes. After washing each well three times with 400 μL of PBST, 50 μL of citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.2% orthophenylenediamine and 0.02% hydrogen peroxide was added and left at room temperature for 10 minutes. Then, 50 μL of 1.5N sulfuric acid was added to stop the enzymatic reaction, and the absorbance at a wavelength of 492 nm was measured. Based on the measurement results, wells with high absorbance were selected as wells containing anti-Complement C3d antibody-producing hybridomas (positive wells). As a positive control, commercially available mouse-derived anti-C3d monoclonal antibody (Hycult Biotech) at a concentration of 1 μg / mL was used instead of hybridoma culture supernatant.
[0082] (2-5) Cloning Using the anti-Complement C3d antibody-producing hybridomas selected in (2-4), monoclonalization of the hybridomas and purification of monoclonal antibodies were performed. Cloning was carried out using a standard method (limiting dilution method), and positive wells were selected in the same manner as the sandwich ELISA method described above, ultimately yielding five types of monoclonal antibody-producing hybridomas. The monoclonal antibodies produced by these hybridomas S3520X (X=1~5) were each referred to as S3520X antibodies.
[0083] [Example V: Suppression of nonspecific reactions in LTIA method: Measurement of sIL-2R] The following describes a test in which the sIL-2R concentration in a sample was measured using a reagent prepared in Reference Example 1 by the LTIA method, to which the anti-C3d monoclonal antibody of the present invention was added. The same sample as in Example IV was used.
[0084] [Example 5] (Measurement by LTIA method: Addition of anti-C3d monoclonal antibody) The measurement was performed in the same manner as in Comparative Example 5, except that the first reagent shown in Comparative Example 5 was modified by adding five types of anti-C3d monoclonal antibodies prepared in Reference Example 1 to each antibody at a concentration of 100 μg / mL. The clone numbers added were as follows: Example 5-1: Clone No. S35201, Example 5-2: Clone No. S35202, Example 5-3: Clone No. S35203, Example 5-4: Clone No. S35204, Example 5-5: Clone No. S35205. The measurement results are shown in Table 5.
[0085] [Table 5]
[0086] (Results and Discussion) The effects of the present invention were discussed based on the results of Comparative Examples 10-12 and Examples 5-1-5-5. (1) The measurement results of the control samples (sample numbers 12, 24, and 25) were verified. The measurement results for Comparative Examples 10 and 11 are as described in the discussion of Example IV. Furthermore, the measurement values of the LTIA method with the addition of the anti-C3d monoclonal antibody of the present invention (Examples 5-1 to 5-5) were generally equivalent to those of Comparative Examples 10 and 11. Therefore, it was found that the addition of the anti-C3d monoclonal antibody does not affect the measurement values of samples that do not exhibit a nonspecific reaction. (2) The measurement results of the discrepant samples (sample numbers 16 and 17) were verified. The measurement results for Comparative Examples 10, 11, and 12 are as described in the discussion of Example IV. On the other hand, the measurement value of the LTIA method with 100 μg / mL of the anti-C3d monoclonal antibody clone No. S35201 of the present invention added (Example 5-1) was 377 U / mL, showing a tendency to approach that of Comparative Example 10. Similarly, the measurement values of the LTIA method with 100 μg / mL of the anti-C3d monoclonal antibody clones No. S35202 to S35205 of the present invention added (Examples 5-2 to 5-5) were 339 to 368 U / mL, showing a tendency to approach that of Comparative Example 10. Furthermore, similar results were obtained for sample 17. The anti-C3d monoclonal antibody of the present invention showed an effect of suppressing non-specific reactions. Based on the above, the effect of the anti-C3d antibody of the present invention in suppressing nonspecific reactions originating from the sample could be obtained with either a polyclonal antibody or a monoclonal antibody. Accurate measurement is extremely important in immunological assay methods, and the fact that the present invention can suppress nonspecific reactions that could not be suppressed even with commercially available nonspecific reaction inhibitors is of great significance. [Industrial applicability]
[0087] This invention makes it possible to perform an accurate immunoassay even when a sample contains nonspecific factors by performing an immunoassay in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody.
Claims
1. In a method for immunologically measuring a target substance in a sample, the immune reaction is performed in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody as a non-specific reaction inhibitor. The anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody. An immunoassay method characterized by measuring the target substance in the sample using a specific binding partner other than an anti-C3 antibody.
2. The immunological measurement method according to claim 1, wherein the immunological measurement method is based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method.
3. The immunoassay method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is a latex immunoaggregation assay method.
4. A step of bringing the substance to be measured in the sample into contact with the anti-C3 antibody in a solution, The steps include adding latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured to the aforementioned solution, A process for optically detecting the degree of aggregation of latex particles in a solution, The immunological measurement method according to claim 3, including the following:
5. A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions in a method for immunologically measuring a target substance in a sample, An immune response is performed in the presence of an anti-C3 antibody as a non-specific reaction inhibitor. The anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody. A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions, characterized by measuring the target substance in the sample using a specific binding partner other than an anti-C3 antibody.
6. The method for suppressing a nonspecific reaction according to claim 5, wherein the immunological measurement method is based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method.
7. A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is a latex immunoaggregation assay.
8. A step of bringing the substance to be measured in the sample into contact with the anti-C3 antibody in a solution, The steps include adding latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured to the aforementioned solution, A process for optically detecting the degree of aggregation of latex particles in a solution, A method for suppressing nonspecific reactions according to claim 7, including the method described in claim 7.
9. An immunoassay reagent comprising an anti-C3 antibody as a non-specific reaction inhibitor, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody, and comprises a specific binding partner for a target substance other than the anti-C3 antibody.
10. The immunoassay reagent according to claim 9, wherein the immunoassay method is based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method.
11. The immunoassay reagent according to claim 10, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is the latex immunoaggregation method.
12. An immunoassay reagent kit comprising an anti-C3 antibody as a non-specific reaction inhibitor, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody, and the immunoassay reagent kit comprises a specific binding partner for a target substance other than the anti-C3 antibody.
13. The immunoassay reagent kit according to claim 12, wherein the immunoassay method is based on a homogeneous method or a heterogeneous method.
14. The immunological assay reagent kit according to claim 13, wherein the method based on the homogeneous method is a latex immunoaggregation method, and further comprises the following: (1) First reagent containing anti-C3 antibody (2) Second reagent containing latex particles carrying a specific binding partner for the substance to be measured.
15. A nonspecific reaction inhibitor for an immunological assay method, comprising an anti-C3 antibody as an active ingredient, wherein the anti-C3 antibody is one or more selected from the group consisting of anti-iC3b antibody, anti-C3dg antibody, anti-C3d antibody, and anti-C3b antibody, and the immunological assay method is a method performed using a specific binding partner for a target substance other than the anti-C3 antibody.