Water-in-oil cosmetic composition with improved performance of transfer-resistant and excellent glossiness
By combining ester-based oils and film-forming agents, the cosmetic composition addresses the issues of makeup transfer and gloss, resulting in enhanced adhesion and gloss retention.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- KR · KR
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- COSMECCA KOREA CO LTD
- Filing Date
- 2023-11-29
- Publication Date
- 2026-07-15
AI Technical Summary
Existing water-in-oil and water-in-oil cosmetic compositions struggle with makeup transfer and lack of gloss due to volatile oils, leading to a dry cosmetic effect.
Incorporating ester-based oils with a refractive index of 1.46 or higher and film-forming agents such as silicate, silsesquioxane, and acrylate silicone polymers to create a persistent film on the skin, enhancing adhesion and gloss.
The composition provides excellent gloss while suppressing makeup transfer, achieving improved adhesion and maintaining glossiness.
Smart Images

Figure 112023133767130-PAT00001_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technology Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a water-in-oil cosmetic composition that has improved makeup transfer resistance and excellent gloss. Background Technology
[0002] General emulsion cosmetic products are evaluated for quality based on factors such as spreadability, color payoff, gloss, longevity, stability over time, and skin safety. Therefore, a superior product applies smoothly and lightly to the skin, offers excellent color payoff, and lasts for a long time. Additionally, it must not be washed off by external factors such as sebum, sweat, or water, and must remain safe when applied to the skin without significant changes in physical properties during long-term storage or use. However, due to the nature of their formulations, emulsion cosmetic products have the disadvantage of easily smudging or transferring even during low-intensity daily activities, which leads to a reduction in the effectiveness of the makeup.
[0003] Until now, most water-in-oil and water-in-oil cosmetic compositions with excellent longevity have contained a large amount of volatile oil in the continuous phase, which causes the oil to evaporate and form a film or leave only the coloring agent. Consequently, they have the disadvantage of leaving a cosmetic effect that is dry and lacks gloss when applied to the skin.
[0004] In other words, existing technology had limitations in providing a makeup effect with excellent gloss while suppressing makeup transfer, and there is a need for the development of products that improve upon these limitations.
[0005] Against this background, the inventors confirmed that by simultaneously containing an ester-based oil and a film-forming agent, it is possible to produce a cosmetic composition that suppresses makeup transfer while providing excellent gloss, and thus completed the present invention. The problem to be solved
[0006] The objective of the present invention is to provide a water-in-oil cosmetic composition that improves makeup transfer and provides excellent gloss. Specifically, the invention provides a water-in-oil cosmetic composition comprising oil and a film-forming agent. means of solving the problem
[0007] To solve the above problem, the present invention provides a water-in-oil cosmetic composition comprising an oil and a film-forming agent, wherein the oil is an ester-based oil and the film-forming agent is one or more selected from the group consisting of silicate polymers, silsesquioxane polymers, and acrylate silicone polymers.
[0008] In the present invention, the ester-based oil is Tridecyl Trimellitate, Diisostearyl Malate, Methyl Hydrogenated Rosinate, Isopropyl Palmitate, Octyldodecyl Myristate, Isopropyl Myristate, Butyloctyl Salicylate, Coco-Caprylate / Caprate, Hexyl Laurate, Dicaprylyl Carbonate, Butylene Glycol Dicaprylate / Dicaprate, Decyl Cocoate, Dicaprylyl Carbonate It may be one or more selected from the group consisting of carbonate, cetyl ethylhexanoate, triethylhexanoin, dicetearyl dimer dilinoleate, caprylic / capric triglyceride, polyglyceryl-2 triisostearate, propylene glycol dibenzoate, and pentaerythrityl tetraisostearate, but is not limited thereto. Preferably, the ester oil may be tridecyl trimellitate, diisostearyl maleate, or methylhydrogenated rosinate, but is not limited thereto.
[0009] In the present invention, the ester-based oil may have a refractive index of 1.46 or higher. The "refractive index" refers to a value indicating the degree of speed reduction relative to vacuum when light passes through the oil phase of the composition. If the refractive index of the ester-based oil is less than 1.46, the gloss enhancement ability decreases, and there may be a problem with the excellent gloss quality characteristic.
[0010] In one embodiment of the present invention, the ester-based oil may be included in an amount of 3 to 15 weight%, for example, 3 to 12 weight%, 3 to 10 weight%, 3 to 8 weight%, or 3 to 6 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition. If the content of the ester-based oil is less than 3 weight%, the glossiness enhancing power decreases, which may cause problems with the excellent glossiness characteristic, and if it exceeds 15 weight%, the emulsification stability of the cosmetic composition may decrease.
[0011] In the present invention, the "film-forming agent" is a component that forms a film on the surface of the skin and can be used interchangeably with the "film-forming agent." The film-forming agent may be added for the purpose of forming a thin film on the skin to prevent makeup from being easily removed and to provide a soft and smooth feel.
[0012] In the present invention, the film-forming agent may be one or more selected from the group consisting of silicate polymers, silsesquioxane polymers, and acrylate silicone polymers. For example, the silicate polymer may be trimethylsiloxysilicate, phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate, trimethylsiloxysilicate / dimethicone crosspolymer, dimethicone / vinyltrimethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer, or trimethylsiloxysilicate / dimethiconol crosspolymer, but is not limited thereto. In addition, the silsesquioxane polymer may be polypropylsilsesquioxane, polymethylsilsesquioxane, polyphenylsilsesquioxane, or dimethicone / silsesquioxane copolymer, but is not limited thereto. The acrylate silicone polymer may be an acrylate / dimethicone copolymer, an acrylate / ethylhexyl acrylate / dimethicone methacrylate copolymer, or an acrylate / polytrimethylsiloxymethacrylate copolymer, but is not limited thereto.In addition, they can have different physical properties depending on the degree of bonding.
[0013] In one embodiment of the present invention, the film-forming agent may be included in an amount of 1 to 10 weight%, for example, 1 to 8 weight%, 2 to 8 weight%, or 3 to 7 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition. If the content of the film-forming agent is less than 1 weight%, there may be a problem where the film formation is insufficient and the characteristic of improving transferability disappears, and if it exceeds 10 weight%, there may be a problem in terms of usability, such as a foreign body sensation, due to excessive film formation.
[0014] The oil-in-water cosmetic composition according to the present invention may include one or more film-forming agents selected from the group consisting of ester-based oils, silicate polymers, silsesquioxane polymers, and acrylate silicone polymers in the oil phase. In this case, after the volatile components evaporate, the ester-based oil may impart a glossy appearance, and one or more film-forming agents selected from the group consisting of silicate polymers, silsesquioxane polymers, and acrylate silicone polymers may form a persistent film on the skin to suppress makeup transfer.
[0015] The present invention can provide a cosmetic composition with excellent adhesion and gloss by including the oil and film-forming agent in an appropriate ratio. In one embodiment of the present invention, the weight ratio of the oil and film-forming agent may be 15:1 to 1:13, 14:1 to 1:12, 13:1 to 1:11, 12:1 to 1:10, 11:1 to 1:9, 10:1 to 1:8, 9:1 to 1:7, 8:1 to 1:6, 7:1 to 1:5, 6:1 to 1:4, 5:1 to 1:3, 4:1 to 1:2, 3:1 to 1:2, or 2:1 to 1:1, but is not limited thereto.
[0016] Meanwhile, the water-in-oil cosmetic composition of the present invention may further include additives commonly used in the field, such as preservatives, stabilizers, surfactants, thickeners, solvents, moisturizers, emollients, UV absorbers, preservatives, disinfectants, emulsifiers, antioxidants, pH adjusters, organic and inorganic pigments, fragrances, cooling agents, or limiting agents.
[0017] In one embodiment of the present invention, the cosmetic composition may further include a thickening agent. Preferably, the thickening agent may be a wax-based thickening agent, and the wax-based thickening agent may be glyceryl behenate / eicosadioate, tribehenin, poly C10-30 alkyl acrylate, etc., but is not limited thereto.
[0018] In one embodiment of the present invention, the thickener may be included in an amount of 0.5 to 5 weight%, for example, 0.5 to 4 weight%, 0.5 to 3 weight%, or 0.5 to 2 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition. If the content of the thickener is less than 0.5 weight%, transfer may not be improved and a gloss-maintaining effect may not be achieved. If the content of the thickener exceeds 5 weight%, the emulsification stability of the cosmetic composition may decrease, and problems regarding usability may occur, such as the product hardening on the skin and causing a foreign body sensation.
[0019] The water-in-oil cosmetic composition according to the present invention may further include a wax-based thickening agent in the oil phase, in which case gloss is maintained and transfer resistance can be improved.
[0020] The cosmetic composition according to the present invention can be prepared in any formulation conventionally manufactured in the art. For example, the water-in-oil cosmetic composition can be formulated in the form of basic cosmetics such as skin toner, lotion, essence, cream, sun lotion, sun cream, etc., and makeup cosmetics such as lipstick, lip gloss, lip tint, primer, foundation, base, etc., but is not limited thereto.
[0022] In addition, the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing the aforementioned cosmetic composition.
[0023] The cosmetic composition according to the present invention can be prepared by the step of preparing a mixture of oil and a film-forming agent, and then mixing other ingredients used in general cosmetic compositions, or by the step of mixing the oil, the film-forming agent, and other ingredients together.
[0024] In one embodiment of the present invention, a thickening agent may be additionally used to prepare a mixture of oil and film-forming agent.
[0026] The advantages and features of the present invention and the methods for achieving them will become clear by referring to the embodiments described in detail below. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below but may be implemented in various different forms. These embodiments are provided merely to ensure that the disclosure of the present invention is complete and to fully inform those skilled in the art of the scope of the invention, and the present invention is defined only by the scope of the claims. Effects of the invention
[0027] The water-in-oil cosmetic composition according to the present invention can provide excellent gloss while suppressing makeup transfer compared to conventional cosmetics by increasing adhesion. Accordingly, it is possible to provide a cosmetic composition in which transfer and gloss, which are opposing properties, are simultaneously improved. Brief explanation of the drawing
[0028] Figure 1 is a graph comparing the area of the mask after 4 hours, with the composition according to the present invention applied to the skin and the mask attached. Figure 2 is an image showing the extent of the composition according to the present invention applied to the skin and the mask attached 4 hours later. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the degree of improvement in glossiness before and immediately after application of the composition according to the present invention on the skin. Specific details for implementing the invention
[0029] The present invention will be explained in detail below through examples. The following examples are merely illustrative of the present invention and do not limit the scope of the present invention to the following examples.
[0031] [Example]
[0032] Preparation Example 1: Preparation of cosmetic composition according to the type of oil
[0033] In order to evaluate the degree of glossiness of the cosmetic composition according to the present invention, water-in-oil cosmetic compositions of Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Example 1 were prepared according to the compositions listed in [Table 1] below (Unit: weight%). Specifically, different types of oil were included in the oil phase (A) of each of Examples 1 to 4, and in Comparative Example 1, cyclopentasiloxane was used as a comparison group, which acts as a bulking agent that does not affect glossiness or adhesion, as it is an oil-like substance or a raw material that is entirely volatile.
[0034] ingredient Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Comparative Example 1 Yoo Sang-bu (A) 1 PEG-10 Dimethicone 3 3 3 3 3 2 Cetyl PEG / PPG-10 / 1 Dimethicone 1 1 1 1 1 3 Sorbitan sesquioleate 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 Cyclopentasiloxane (66.0%), cyclohexasiloxane (34.0%) 10 10 10 10 10 5 diisostearyl malate 5 6 Tridecyl Trimellitate 5 7 Methylhydrogenated rosinate 5 8 Hydrogenated polyisobutene 5 9 Cyclopentasiloxane (comparison group) 5 Pigment (B) 10 titanium dioxide 5 5 5 5 5 11 Yellow, red, and black iron oxide 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Award Division (C) 12 purified water Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount 13 Sodium chloride 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 14 Disodium EDTA 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 15 antiseptic Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount
[0035] First, the pigment phase (B) of components 10 to 11 of [Table 1] above was placed in a mixer and ground and mixed at room temperature at 800 rpm to 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a mixture. The obtained mixture and the oil phase (A) of components 1 to 9 of [Table 1] above were introduced into an emulsification tank capable of stirring, heated to 70°C to 80°C, and stirred with a homomixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 2,500 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes to be uniformly mixed. At this time, the powder was sufficiently stirred using a disperser before being incorporated into the emulsification tank. The aqueous phase (C) of components 12 to 15 was introduced into an aqueous dissolution tank capable of temperature control and stirring, and while maintaining the temperature at 60°C to 70°C, it was stirred to be uniformly dissolved and mixed. Then, the aqueous phase of the prepared aqueous dissolution tank was introduced into the oil phase of a vacuum emulsification tank and mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes, and then cooled to 30°C to 35°C. Afterward, the mixture was mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 2 to 3 minutes in the vacuum emulsification tank. After stirring, the foundation was finally manufactured through cooling to 30°C and degassing.
[0037] Experimental Example 1: Comparison of Glossiness of Cosmetic Compositions According to Oil Type
[0038] A sensory evaluation regarding glossiness was conducted by applying the comparative example and example of [Table 1] to the cosmetic composition with excellent glossiness prepared as in Manufacturing Example 1 above to five people. The evaluation was conducted by setting the glossiness as higher as the score.
[0039] As a result, as shown in [Table 2], it was confirmed that the scores of Examples 1 to 4 were higher than those of Comparative Example 1, and in particular, the score of Example 1 containing diisostearyl maleate was the highest.
[0040] Gloss Sensual Test <5 out of 5> Subject Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Comparative Example 1 1 4.3 3.7 4 3.8 3.4 2 4.2 3.6 4.1 3.9 3.3 3 4.2 3.5 4.1 3.8 3.5 4 4.3 3.5 4.1 3.7 3.6 5 4.4 3.8 4 3.8 3.5 average 4.28 3.62 4.06 3.8 3.46
[0041] Preparation Example 2: Preparation of a cosmetic composition according to the type of film-forming agent
[0042] Among the compositions containing an ester-based oil with a refractive index of 1.46 or higher according to Preparation Example 1 above, a water-in-oil cosmetic composition with excellent gloss was selected through a sensory test, and Examples 5 to 9 and Comparative Example 2 were prepared as shown in [Table 3] below.
[0043] Specifically, among Examples 1-4 of [Table 1], two types of diisostearyl maleate and methylhydrogenated rosinate, which had the best gloss compared to Comparative Example 1, were selected and fixed (fixed at 3.0% diisostearyl maleate and 1% methylhydrogenated rosinate), and a comparative test was conducted on a composition containing a silicate polymer, a silsesquioxane polymer, and an acrylate silicone polymer.
[0044] In Examples 5 to 9, different types of film-forming agents were included in the oil phase (A) of each example, and in Comparative Example 2, cyclopentasiloxane was used as a comparison group, which acts as a bulking agent that does not affect gloss or adhesion, as it is an oil-like material that is entirely volatile. The compositions of each example and comparative example are shown in [Table 3] below.
[0045] ingredient Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Comparative Example 2 Yoo Sang-bu (A) 1 PEG-10 Dimethicone 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Cetyl PEG / PPG-10 / 1 Dimethicone 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 Sorbitan sesquioleate 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 Cyclopentasiloxane (66.0%), cyclohexasiloxane (34.0%) 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 diisostearyl malate 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 Methylhydrogenated rosinate 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate 3 8 trimethylsiloxysilicate 3 9 Acrylate / Dimethicone Copolymer 3 10 Polypropylsilsesquioxane 3 11 Polymethylsilsesquioxane 3 12 Cyclopentasiloxane (comparison group) 7 7 7 7 7 10 Pigment (B) 13 titanium dioxide 5 5 5 5 5 5 14 Yellow, red, and black iron oxide 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Award Division (C) 15 purified water Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount 16 Sodium chloride 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 17 Disodium EDTA 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 18 antiseptic Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount
[0047] First, the pigment phase (B) of components 13 to 14 of [Table 3] above was placed in a mixer and ground and mixed at room temperature at 800 rpm to 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a mixture. The obtained mixture and the oil phase (A) of components 1 to 12 of [Table 3] above were introduced into an emulsification tank capable of stirring, heated to 70°C to 80°C, and stirred with a homomixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 2,500 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes to be uniformly mixed. At this time, the powder was sufficiently stirred using a disperser before being incorporated into the emulsification tank. The aqueous phase (C) of components 15 to 18 was introduced into an aqueous dissolution tank capable of temperature control and stirring, and while maintaining the temperature at 60°C to 70°C, it was stirred to be uniformly dissolved and mixed. Then, the aqueous phase of the prepared aqueous dissolution tank was introduced into the oil phase of a vacuum emulsification tank and mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes, and then cooled to 30°C to 35°C. Afterward, the mixture was mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 2 to 3 minutes in the vacuum emulsification tank. After stirring, the foundation was finally manufactured through cooling to 30°C and degassing.
[0049] Experimental Example 2: Comparison of Adhesion and Gloss of Cosmetic Compositions According to the Type of Film-forming Agent
[0050] A cosmetic composition with excellent adhesion and gloss prepared according to Manufacturing Example 2 above (Comparative Example and Example in [Table 3]) was applied to five people, and a sensory evaluation regarding adhesion and gloss was conducted. The evaluation was conducted by setting the higher the score as the adhesion and gloss were higher.
[0051] As shown in [Table 4], the results of the adhesion test confirmed that the scores of Examples 5 to 9 were all higher than those of Comparative Example 2, and in particular, the score of Example 7, which used an acrylate / dimethicone copolymer, was the highest.
[0052] Adhesion Sensory Test <5 out of 5> Subject Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Comparative Example 2 1 3.7 3.5 4.5 3.6 4.2 3.2 2 3.7 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.5 3 3 3.8 3.4 4.3 3.7 4.3 3.1 4 3.7 3.5 4.3 3.8 4.2 3.1 5 3.9 3.4 4.4 3.8 4.2 3.2 average 3.76 3.48 4.38 3.7 4.28 3.12
[0053] In addition, as shown in [Table 5], the gloss test results confirmed that Example 5, which used phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate, had the highest score, confirming that both gloss and adhesion were excellent. Furthermore, in the case of Examples 6 to 9, as shown in [Table 4], it was confirmed that although the adhesion was very superior compared to Comparative Example 2, they exhibited a gloss similar to that of Comparative Example 2.
[0054] Gloss Sensual Test <5 out of 5> Subject Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Comparative Example 2 1 4.4 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.9 2 4.5 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.8 4.0 3 4.3 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.7 4.0 4 4.3 3.7 4.0 3.6 3.7 4.2 5 4.2 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.6 4.1 average 4.34 3.64 3.88 3.56 3.74 4.04
[0056] Preparation Example 3: Preparation of a cosmetic composition according to the type of wax-based thickener
[0057] Among the compositions containing an ester-based oil with a refractive index of 1.46 or higher according to Preparation Example 1 above, a water-in-oil cosmetic composition with excellent gloss was selected through a sensory test, and Examples 10 to 12 and Comparative Example 3 were prepared as shown in [Table 6] below.
[0058] Specifically, among Examples 1-4 of [Table 1], two types of diisostearyl malate and methylhydrogenated rosinate, which have the best gloss compared to Comparative Example 1, were selected and fixed (fixed at 3.0% diisostearyl malate and 1.0% methylhydrogenated rosinate), and a comparative test of a composition containing a wax-based thickener was conducted.
[0059] In Examples 10 to 12, different types of wax-based thickeners were included in the oil phase (A) of each example, and in Comparative Example 3, cyclopentasiloxane was used as a comparative group, which acts as a bulking agent that does not affect gloss or adhesion, as it is a raw material that is entirely volatile and has an oily nature. The compositions of each example and comparative example are shown in [Table 6] below.
[0060] ingredient Example 10 Example 11 Example 12 Comparative Example 3 Yoo Sang-bu (A) 1 PEG-10 Dimethicone 3 3 3 3 2 Cetyl PEG / PPG-10 / 1 Dimethicone 1 1 1 1 3 Sorbitan sesquioleate 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 Cyclopentasiloxane (66.0%), cyclohexasiloxane (34.0%) 10 10 10 10 5 diisostearyl malate 3 3 3 3 6 Methylhydrogenated rosinate 1 1 1 1 7 Glyceryl behenate / Eicosadioate 1 8 Tribehenin 1 9 Poly C10-30 alkyl acrylate 1 10 Cyclopentasiloxane (comparison group) 9 9 9 10 Pigment (B) 11 titanium dioxide 5 5 5 5 12 Yellow, red, and black iron oxide 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Award Division (C) 13 purified water Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount Remaining amount 14 Sodium chloride 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 15 Disodium EDTA 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 16 antiseptic Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount Appropriate amount
[0062] First, the pigment phase (B) of components 11 to 12 of [Table 6] above was placed in a mixer and ground and mixed at room temperature at 800 rpm to 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a mixture. The obtained mixture and the oil phase (A) of components 1 to 10 of [Table 6] above were introduced into an emulsification tank capable of stirring, heated to 70°C to 80°C, and stirred with a homomixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 2,500 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes to be uniformly mixed. At this time, the powder was sufficiently stirred using a disperser before being incorporated into the emulsification tank. The aqueous phase (C) of components 13 to 16 was introduced into an aqueous dissolution tank capable of temperature control and stirring, and while maintaining the temperature at 60°C to 70°C, it was stirred to be uniformly dissolved and mixed. Then, the aqueous phase of the prepared aqueous dissolution tank was introduced into the oil phase of a vacuum emulsification tank and mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes, and then cooled to 30°C to 35°C. Afterward, the mixture was mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 2 to 3 minutes in the vacuum emulsification tank. After stirring, the foundation was finally manufactured through cooling to 30°C and degassing.
[0064] Experimental Example 3: Comparison of Adhesion and Gloss of Cosmetic Compositions According to the Type of Wax-Based Thickener
[0065] A cosmetic composition with excellent adhesion and gloss prepared according to Manufacturing Example 3 (Comparative Example and Example in [Table 6]) was applied to five people, and a sensory evaluation regarding adhesion and gloss was conducted. The evaluation was performed by setting the higher the score as the higher the adhesion and gloss.
[0066] As shown in [Table 7], the results of the adhesion test confirmed that the scores of Examples 10 to 12 were all higher than those of Comparative Example 3, and in particular, the score of Example 11, in which Tribehenin was used, was the highest.
[0067] Adhesion Sensory Test <5 out of 5> Subject Example 10 Example 11 Example 12 Comparative Example 3 1 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.0 2 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.2 4 4.3 4.5 4.1 4.1 5 4.2 4.4 4.2 4.0 average 4.2 4.42 4.22 4.1
[0069] In addition, as shown in [Table 8], the gloss test results confirmed that Example 11, in which Tribehenin was used, had the highest score, confirming that both gloss and adhesion were excellent. Furthermore, as shown in [Table 7], in the case of Examples 10 and 12, it was confirmed that although the adhesion was very superior compared to Comparative Example 3, they exhibited a gloss similar to that of Comparative Example 3.
[0070] Gloss Sensual Test <5 out of 5> Subject Example 10 Example 11 Example 12 Comparative Example 3 1 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.0 2 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.2 3 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 4 4.1 4.2 4.0 4.3 5 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.1 average 4.06 4.28 4.10 4.16
[0072] Preparation Example 4: Preparation of a water-in-oil cosmetic composition with excellent gloss and adhesion
[0073] Through comparative tests of the compositions shown in [Table 1], [Table 3], and [Table 6] above, a water-in-oil cosmetic composition with the best gloss and adhesion was selected.
[0074] Specifically, (a) one ester-based oil with a refractive index of 1.46 or higher [diisostearyl malate], (b) two film-forming agents [phenylpropyl dimethylsiloxysilicate, acrylate / dimethicone copolymer], and (c) one wax-based thickening agent [tribehenin] were selected, and as a comparison group, a final cosmetic composition was prepared using cyclopentasiloxane, which acts as a bulking agent that does not affect gloss or adhesion as a raw material that is oil-like or completely volatile, as shown in [Table 9] below.
[0076] ingredient Example 13 Comparative Example 4 Yoo Sang-bu (A) 1 PEG-10 Dimethicone 3 3 2 Cetyl PEG / PPG-10 / 1 Dimethicone 1 1 3 Sorbitan sesquioleate 0.5 0.5 4 Cyclopentasiloxane (66.0%), cyclohexasiloxane (34.0%) 10 10 5 diisostearyl malate 1 6 Phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate 3 7 Acrylate / Dimethicone Copolymer 3.5 8 Tribehenin 0.5 9 Cyclopentasiloxane (comparison group) 6.5 10 Pigment (B) 10 titanium dioxide 5 5 11 Yellow, red, and black iron oxide 0.52 0.52 Award Division (C) 12 purified water Remaining amount Remaining amount 13 Sodium chloride 1.5 1.5 14 Disodium EDTA 0.05 0.05 15 antiseptic Appropriate amount Appropriate amount
[0077] First, the pigment phase (B) of components 10 to 11 of [Table 9] above was placed in a mixer and ground and mixed at room temperature at 800 rpm to 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain a mixture. The obtained mixture and the oil phase (A) of components 1 to 9 of [Table 9] above were introduced into an emulsification tank capable of stirring, heated to 70°C to 80°C, and stirred with a homomixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 2,500 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes to be uniformly mixed. At this time, the powder was sufficiently stirred using a disperser before being incorporated into the emulsification tank. The aqueous phase (C) of components 12 to 15 was introduced into an aqueous dissolution tank capable of temperature control and stirring, and while maintaining the temperature at 60°C to 70°C, it was stirred to be uniformly dissolved and mixed. Then, the aqueous phase of the prepared aqueous dissolution tank was introduced into the oil phase of a vacuum emulsification tank and mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 5 to 10 minutes, and then cooled to 30°C to 35°C. Afterward, the mixture was mixed by stirring with a homo mixer at a speed of 1,500 rpm to 3,600 rpm for 2 to 3 minutes in the vacuum emulsification tank. After stirring, the foundation was finally manufactured through cooling to 30°C and degassing.
[0079] Experimental Example 4: Comparison of Smearing of Water-in-Oil Cosmetic Compositions
[0080] An internal clinical test was conducted to compare the transfer of Example 13 and Comparative Example 4 in [Table 9]. Three subjects were tested, and a certain amount of the product was applied to the forearm, a mask was attached, and the mask was photographed after 4 hours. The captured images were analyzed using the Image-Pro V.10 program.
[0081] As a result of comparing the adhesion area of Comparative Example 4 and Example 13, it was confirmed that the adhesion area of the composition according to Example 13 was reduced by approximately 72% compared to Comparative Example 4 (see FIG. 1 and 2).
[0083] Experimental Example 5: Comparison of Glossiness of Water-in-Oil Cosmetic Compositions
[0084] To compare the glossiness of Example 13 and Comparative Example 4 in [Table 9], a certain amount of the water-in-oil cosmetic composition was applied to the face, and an evaluation of glossiness improvement was conducted before and immediately after application. There were three subjects, and glossiness was measured using a 'Glossymeter GL-200', which is a device for measuring the glossiness of the skin surface. The amount of white light reflected from the skin at an angle of incidence of 60 degrees was measured, and the measurement was conducted using a specific formula to minimize the influence of skin color, and the results were compared and presented.
[0085] As a result of comparing the improvement in glossiness between Comparative Example 4 and Example 13, it was confirmed that the glossiness of the composition according to Example 13 increased by approximately 63.6% compared to Comparative Example 4 (see Fig. 3).
Claims
Claim 1 A water-in-oil cosmetic composition comprising an oil and a film-forming agent, wherein the oil is an ester-based oil included in an amount of 3 to 6 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition, and the film-forming agent is one or more selected from the group consisting of silicate polymers, silsesquioxane polymers, and acrylate silicone polymers, included in an amount of 1 to 10 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition. Claim 2 In claim 1, the ester-based oil is tridecyl trimellitate, diisostearyl malate, methyl hydrogenated rosinate, isopropyl palmitate, octyldodecyl myristate, isopropyl myristate, butyl octyl salicylate, coco-caprylate / caprate, hexyl laurate, dicaprylyl carbonate, butylene glycol dicaprylate / dicaprate, decyl cocoate, dicaprylyl carbonate, cetyl ethylhexanoate, triethylhexanoin, dicetearyl dimer dilinoleate, caprylic / capric triglyceride, A water-in-oil cosmetic composition comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of polyglyceryl-2 triisostearate, propylene glycol dibenzoate, and pentaerythrityl tetraisostearate. Claim 3 A water-in-oil cosmetic composition according to claim 1, wherein the ester-based oil has a refractive index of 1.46 or higher. Claim 4 delete Claim 5 In claim 1, the film-forming agent is trimethylsiloxysilicate, phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate, trimethylsiloxysilicate / dimethicone crosspolymer, dimethicone / vinyltrimethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer, trimethylsiloxysilicate / dimethiconol crosspolymer, polypropylsilsesquioxane, polymethylsilsesquioxane, polyphenylsilsesquioxane, dimethicone / silsesquioxane copolymer, A water-in-oil cosmetic composition comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of acrylates / dimethicone copolymer, acrylates / ethylhexyl acrylate / dimethicone methacrylate copolymer, and acrylate / polytrimethylsiloxymethacrylate copolymer. Claim 6 delete Claim 7 In claim 1, the cosmetic composition further comprises a thickening agent, a water-in-oil type cosmetic composition. Claim 8 In claim 7, the above-mentioned thickener is a wax-based thickener, a water-in-oil type cosmetic composition. Claim 9 A water-in-oil cosmetic composition according to claim 7, wherein the thickening agent is included in an amount of 0.5 to 5 weight% based on the total weight of the cosmetic composition. Claim 10 A water-in-oil cosmetic composition according to claim 1, wherein the cosmetic composition is formulated as a skin toner, lotion, essence, cream, sun lotion, sun cream, lipstick, lip gloss, lip tint, primer, foundation, or base.