Biopesticidal composition

Abstract

The present invention relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur and at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives. The invention particularly relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. The composition has particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. The present invention also relates to a method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases by treatment of plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or the surrounding soil with a biopesticidal composition comprising of an effective amount of elemental sulphur; an effective amount of at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient.

Description

[0001]BIOPESTICIDAL COMPOSITION FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur and at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives. The invention particularly relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. The composition has particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. The present invention also relates to a method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases by treatment of plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or the surrounding soil with a biopesticidal composition comprising of an effective amount of elemental sulphur; an effective amount of at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION An increasing global food demand poses huge challenges for the sustainability of food production systems. To satisfy the growing demand, the only feasible solution is to increase productivity on existing agricultural land. Insect pests are major problem in agriculture, as they contribute to crop destruction and damage to food products. Additionally they damage and weaken quality of food crops and act as vectors spreading plant diseases. Sucking pests are the major pests of agricultural products owing to their voracious feeding habits. They are also well known for their role in spreading plant viruses, making their control a crucial aspect of achieving optimal yields. Their small size, ability to develop quick resistance and biotypes make them very difficult to manage. Traditionally, farmers have made use of synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides for crop protection and production increase, but overuse of these products pose serious risk on the ecosystem, living animals and human health. In addition, the emergence of resistance phenomena, after prolonged application of chemical pesticides and withdrawal and restrictions on the use of such pesticides on a worldwide scale, are encouraging a reduction in chemical pesticide usage and the need for alternative control methods and integrated pest management (IPM) systems which not only obviate the negative effect of synthetic chemicals in agriculture, but also provide broad spectra of activity against various pests. By combining active compounds and / or biochemical pesticides having different mechanisms of action, it is possible to ensure successful control over a relatively long period of time. Another typical problem arising in the field of pest control lies in the need to reduce the dosage rates of the active ingredient in order to reduce or avoid unfavorable environmental or toxicological effects whilst still allowing effective pest control. The application of elemental sulphur as a fertilizer is an economical alternative for sulphur replenishment in agricultural soils. The elemental sulphur also provides several additional benefits in agriculture, including being a fungicide for certain microorganisms, being an insecticide for certain soils and plant pests, helping to break down plant residues and improve the utilization of phosphorus and nitrogen nutrients, and lowering the pH of alkaline and calcareous soils. Elemental sulphur (S0) is internationally certified for use in the production of organic crops as an insecticide, for plant disease control, and for use in plant or soil amendment. Biochemical pesticides are naturally occurring substances or structurally-similar and functionally identical to a naturally-occurring substance and extracts from biological sources that control pests or provide other crop protection uses, but have non-toxic mode of actions (such as growth or developmental regulation, attractants, repellents or defence activators e.g. induced resistance) and are relatively non-toxic to mammals. Secondary metabolites obtained from different parts of plants in the form of extracts or essential oils are also known to possess insecticidal, fungicidal and bactericidal properties and has no known harmful effects to living organisms or the environment and hence considered to be an effective biochemical pesticides. However, natural or biologically derived pesticides under certain conditions can also have disadvantages such as high specificity, which may require an exact identification of the pest / pathogen and also necessitates the use of multiple products to control various pests. Additionally, their slower action may render them ineffective in situations where a rapid pest outbreak poses an immediate risk to crops. Consequently, biopesticides have demonstrated lower efficacy and consistency compared to traditional chemical pesticides, which has hindered their widespread acceptance in the pesticide market. Thymol and eugenol are reported to have various pesticidal activities against fungi, nematodes, and / or insects. Thymol (2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol, IPMP) is a constituent of thyme oil, a naturally occurring mixture of compounds in the plant Thymus vulgaris L., or thyme. Thymol is reported as an active ingredient in pesticide products registered for use as animal repellents, fungicides / fungistats, medical disinfectants, tuberculocides and virucides. Eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol), is a major component of clove oil. Eugenol has been reported to control not only insects like ants but also mites, ticks and spiders. Despite of known activities, thyme oil and clove oil or their constituents have not been widely developed for use as an agricultural products due to some major intrinsic barriers such as lower water solubility, bioavailability and stability. These inherent characteristics makes them very difficult to formulate and present the challenges to formulator in formulating these compounds in stable formulations that can be easily stored for a long time and which still have a high stability and effective activity until end use. Additional difficulties are encountered while formulating their combinations with other actives due to incompatibility and instability in combination. One of the major challenges encountered in the development of biopesticides using these molecules is their short persistence (volatility, degradation, etc.) in comparison to synthetic pesticides, which affects the efficacy of these actives when applied in the field. The volatility of these compounds can be positive in terms of environmental impacts and in terms of food residues, but the release kinetic of the compounds and their molecular dynamics have to be known and controlled to ensure the product’s efficacy. In addition, due to volatization, they may not provide desired efficacy when applied at lower dosages and when applied at higher dosages, the organic compounds display phytotoxicity on untargeted crops and also render them uneconomical. Few prior arts disclose use of biochemical pesticides such as essential oils with other pesticides in tank mix forms. However, tank mixes are delivered with several difficulties and drawbacks. For instance, creating a tank mixture is tedious and less convenient, potentially hazardous to people who are not trained to properly mix products. In addition, the combination may not be stable on mixing, tend to be mixed at the highest labelled rates and product ratio cannot be maintained uniformly, thus hampering the desired efficacy. Furthermore, when essential oils are combined with other pesticides in a tank mixture, these oils being highly volatile, they are required to be used at a higher dosage and with multiple applications. Thus, there exists a need to develop a stable composition of biochemical pesticides that would overcome aforementioned drawbacks of conventional formulations and provide synergistic effect. There is also a need to improve the field application in order to provide an economical result and also reduce the burden on the environment. The inventors have developed a biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient present in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition and found that it exhibits superior physical characteristics such as suspensibility, dispersibility, wettability, flowability and also demonstrated superior performance under accelerated storage conditions. The inventors of the present application were successful in formulating a stable composition comprising combination of sulphur and one or more of thymol, eugenol in a suitable delivery form. In addition, the inventors surprisingly determined that these compositions comprising combination of elemental sulphur and one or more of thymol, eugenol are not only highly stable but also effective until end use and results in synergistic control over a wide variety of pests including sucking pests such as thrips, aphids, jassids and whitefly as well as diseases and pathogens at reduced dosage. The composition of the present invention not only exhibit a synergistic pesticidal effect but is also effective at a lower dosage, enhances the spectrum of activity, reduces application of chemical crop protection agents or its resistance and assists in management of residue of synthetic crop protection agents on fruits, vegetables and other crops. The invention also results in an advantageous behavior while formulating, for example during grinding, sieving, emulsifying, dissolving or dispensing; or during use, exhibits improved storage stability and light stability, improved toxicological or ecotoxicological behaviour, improved properties of the plant, for example better growth, increased harvest yields, a better developed root system, a larger leaf area, greener leaves, lower phytotoxicity and good compatibility with plants. Thus, the composition of the present invention not only exhibits a surprisingly higher field efficacy providing better crop protection over a broad spectrum of pests and improved yield at reduced dosages of application of the composition as compared to that provided by the stand alone actives but also environmentally friendly, economical and cost effective due to its superior stability, ease of handling and application in the field. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION: The invention relates to a biopesticidal combination comprising of elemental sulphur and at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives. The invention particularly relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. The invention also relates to a process of preparing a biopesticidal composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. The invention furthermore relates to a method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases, the method comprising treatment of at least one of plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or the surrounding soil with the effective amount of biopesticidal composition comprising of an effective amount of elemental sulphur; an effective amount of at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION: In describing the embodiment of the invention, specific terminology is chosen for the sake of clarity. However, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific terms so selected and it is to be understood that such specific terms include all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. It is understood that any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all subranges subsumed. Also, unless denoted otherwise percentage of components in a composition are presented as weight percent. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member can be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. One or more members of a group can be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and / or patentability. As used herein, the terms “comprising” “including,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. The terms “preferred” and “preferably” refer to embodiments of the invention that may afford certain benefits, under certain circumstances. In any aspect or embodiment described herein below, the phrase comprising may be replaced by the phrases “consisting of” or “consisting essentially of” or “consisting substantially of”. In these aspects or embodiment, the composition described includes or comprises or consists of or consists essentially of or consists substantially of the specific components recited therein, to the exclusion of other ingredients or excipients not specifically recited therein. Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In some embodiments, the numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as concentration, and so forth, used to describe and claim certain embodiments of the invention are to be understood as being modified in some instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters set forth in the written description are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by a particular embodiment. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should be construed considering the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of some embodiments of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as practicable. The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided with respect to certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention. As described herein, “WG” or “WDG” refer to water dispersible granules and are defined as a formulation which disperses rapidly when added to water to give a fine particle suspension. Water-dispersible granules are formulated as small, easily measured granules by blending and agglomerating ground active ingredients together with surfactants and other formulation excipients and are obtained by spray drying or by extrusion process. This granules instantaneously disperse into finer / primary particles upon addition to water. A water disintegrable granule or “GR” or “DG” refers to “water disintegrable granules” comprising agglomerated granules or particles which are generally hard and possess resistance not to easily break or crumble. These granules upon contact with sufficient water or soil moisture disintegrate or break into individual particles releasing the actives over a prolonged period of time. “Quick release” or “instant release” or “instantaneous dispersion” can be used interchangeably and is applicable to granules which rapidly disperse to release the actives. A ‘liquid suspension’ encompasses, “aqueous suspension” or aqueous dispersion” or “suspension concentrate (SC)” composition. The suspension is defined as composition wherein solid particles are dispersed or suspended in a liquid. The liquid as a vehicle can be water and / or a water miscible solvent. The water miscible solvent used herein is environmentally safe. As defined herein, suspoemulsion (SE) is a combination of an emulsifiable concentrate (EC) of one component and a suspension concentrate (SC) of another component. An EC phase is one in which the active ingredient is dissolved in oil or a solvent. A SC is a suspension of an active ingredient in water. When the two are mixed, water used as the continuous phase in the emulsion, carrying oil droplets used as the dispersed phase containing one active ingredient, is intermingled with suspended particles of another active ingredient. The term ‘Elemental Sulphur’ used in the composition refers to elemental sulphur (S°). The term includes allotropes of elemental sulfur such as plastic (amorphous) sulfur, monoclinic sulfur, rhombic sulfur composed of S8 molecules, and other ring molecules such as S7 and S12. The term also comprises sulphur produced through processing and refining of petrochemicals. The term also comprises ‘biosulfur’. The term also comprises elemental Sulphur produced through microbial processes. The term ‘derivatives’ used in this application shall encompass compounds that have been derived from said biochemical pesticides and have the similar activity. The term derivatives shall also encompass materials from which thymol or eugenol can be obtained. The term ‘plant’ refers to all physical parts of a plant, including seeds, seedlings, saplings, roots, tubers, stems, stalks, foliage, and fruits. The term plant includes transgenic and non-transgenic plants. The term “locus” of a plant as used herein is intended to embrace the place on which the plants are growing, where the plant propagation materials of the plants are sown or where the plant propagation materials of the plants will be placed into the soil. The term “plant propagation material” is understood to denote generative parts of a plant, such as seeds, vegetative material such as cuttings or tubers, roots, fruits, tubers, bulbs, rhizomes and parts of plants, germinated plants and young plants which are to be transplanted after germination or after emergence from the soil. These young plants may be protected before transplantation by a total or partial treatment by immersion. The term "broad spectrum," as used herein denotes that the composition possesses activity against wide range of pests including multiple species of insects, diseases and arachnids. The particle size of the composition is defined as the size of particles of the composition in the form of water dispersible granules (WG) or liquid suspension (SC) or water disintegrable granules (GR or DG) or suspoemulsion as a whole. D10 is the corresponding particle size when the cumulative percentage reaches 10% and represent 10% of the total particles to be smaller than the determined size. D50 is the corresponding particle size when the cumulative percentage reaches 50%. D50 is also called the median particle diameter or median particle size or average particle size and represent an average 50% of the total particles to be smaller than the determined size. D90 is used to indicate particle size distribution and represent 90% of the total particles to be smaller than the determined size. The term "synergistic effect" is understood to refer in particular to that defined by Colby's formula (Colby, S. R., "Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations", Weeds, 15, pp.20-22, 1967). As used herein, the term "pesticidally effective amount" or "an effective amount" generally means the amount of the inventive mixtures or of compositions comprising the mixtures needed to achieve an observable effect on growth, including the effects of necrosis, death, retardation, prevention, and removal, destruction, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of the target pest organism. The pesticidally effective amount can vary for the various mixtures / compositions used in the invention. A pesticidally effective amount of the mixtures / compositions will also vary according to the prevailing conditions such as desired pesticidal effect and duration, weather, target species, locus, mode of application, and the like. A mixture is defined as a combination of two or more substances that are not chemically united to each other. A homogeneous mixture is defined as one whose composition is uniform throughout the mixture. It is the type of mixture where the composition is constant throughout or the components that make up the mixture are distributed uniformly. The present invention relates to a biopesticidal combination comprising of an effective amount of elemental sulphur; an effective amount of at least one biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives. The present invention relates to a stable biopesticidal composition comprising of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. The composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. The present invention relates to a stable biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 to 50 microns. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 70% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 30% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 40% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 50% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 30% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 40% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 70% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 70% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 30% w / w to 70% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 40% w / w to 70% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 25% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 15% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 1% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 5% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 5% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 5% w / w to 15% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, at least one biochemical pesticide is present in the range of 5% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. Biochemical pesticides used in the present invention are procured through commercial sources manufactured and available for sale by various companies. According to an embodiment, derivatives of thymol comprises of thymohydroquinin, 4-Hydroxythymol dimethyl ether and derivatives of eugenol comprises of methyl eugenol. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition is in the form of a solid or a liquid or a gel. According to an embodiment, the solid biopesticidal composition is in the form of water dispersible granules, broadcast granules, extruded granules, wettable powders or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, the solid biopesticidal composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, the liquid biopesticidal composition is in the form of liquid suspension (SC) or suspo-emulsion (SE). According to an embodiment, the liquid biopesticidal composition is preferably in the form of a liquid suspension (SC). According to an embodiment, the water dispersible granules is in the form of broadcast granules, extruded granules or spheronised granules. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition is preferably in the form of extruded granules. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 6 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 5 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 4 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 3 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 2 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.05 mm to 1 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1 mm to 6 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1 mm to 5 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1 mm to 4 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1 mm to 3 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1mm to 2 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises granules in the size range of 0.1 mm to 1.5 mm. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 40 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 30 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 25 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 20 microns. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 10 microns. It has been observed that the biopesticidal composition comprising of particles in the size range of 0.1 to 50 microns has desirable dispersibility and suspensibility which minimizes caking of the sample and consequently improves ease of application to the crops and stability of the composition on long term storage resulting in enhanced efficacy of the composition. Furthermore, the composition owing to its particle size results in improved suspensibility of the composition and when applied as foliar spray, provides better leaf coverage which in turn increases the availability of actives on the leaf surface and enhances protection of the plants from pest attack. The present invention relates to an insecticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns. According to an embodiment the invention relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules, water disintegrable granules, liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment the invention relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; eugenol or their derivatives in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules, water disintegrable granules, liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment the invention relates to a biopesticidal composition comprising of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol or their derivatives in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules, water disintegrable granules, liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 85% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 10% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 85% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 20% w / w to 80% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 1% w / w to 60% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of liquid suspension (SC) or suspoemulsion (SE). According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 1% w / w to 55% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 60% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 55% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment, elemental sulphur is present in the range of 5% w / w to 50% w / w of the total composition when the composition is in the form of liquid suspension or suspoemulsion. According to an embodiment a biopesticidal composition comprising of an elemental sulphur in the range of 20% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules or water disintegrable granules. According to an embodiment a biopesticidal composition comprising of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 65% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and the composition is in the form of liquid suspension (SC) or suspoemulsion (SE). According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 25% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; eugenol in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; eugenol in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; eugenol in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of elemental sulphur in the range of 1%w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol and eugenol in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises agriculturally acceptable excipient. According to an embodiment, the agriculturally acceptable excipient is present in the range of 5% to 98.9% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the agriculturally acceptable excipient is present in the range of 5% to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the agriculturally acceptable excipient is present in the range of 5% to 95% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the agriculturally acceptable excipient is present in the range of 5% to 90% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the composition comprises one or more of agriculturally acceptable excipient selected from one or more of surfactants, disintegrating agents, fillers or carriers or diluents, spreading agents, colorants, anticaking agents, binders, buffers or pH adjusters or neutralizing agents, pigments, stabilizers, antifoaming agents or defoamers, penetrants, structuring agents, humectants, sticking agents, anti-freezing agent or freeze point depressants, chelating or complexing or sequestering agents preservatives. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize additional agriculturally acceptable excipients without departing from the scope of the present invention. The agriculturally acceptable excipients are commercially manufactured and available through various companies. According to an embodiment, the surfactants that are used in the composition of the present invention include one or more of emulsifiers, wetting agents, and dispersing agents. According to an embodiment, the surfactants that are used in the composition include one or more of anionic, non-ionic and polymeric surfactants. The anionic surfactants include one or more of, but not limited to a salt of Fatty Acid, a Polycarboxylate, Alkyl Ether Sulfates, an Alkyl Sulfate, an Alkylarylsulfate, , an Alkylaryl Sulfonate, an Aryl Sulfonate, a Lignin Sulfonate, an Alkyl Diphenyl Ether Disulfonate, a Polystyrene Sulfonate, a Salt of Alkylphosphoric Acid Ester, an Alkylaryl Phosphate, a Styrylaryl Phosphate, a Salt Of Polyoxyethylene Alkyl Ether Sulfuric Acid Ester, Alpha Olefin Sulfonate Sodium Salt, Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate or Its Salts, Sodium Lauroylsarcosinate, Sulfosuccinates, Polyacrylates, Alkyl Ether Phosphate, a Salt of Polyoxyethylenealkylaryl Phosphoric Acid Ester, Sulfosuccinates -Mono and other Diesters, Phosphate Esters, Alkyl Naphthalene Sulfonate-Isopropyl and Butyl Derivatives; Alkyl Aryl Ether Phosphates, a salt of Polyoxyethylene Aryl Ether Phosphoric Acid Ester, Mono-Alkyl Sulphosuccinates, Aromatic Hydrocarbon Sulphonates, Ammonium Laurylsulphate, Soap, Soap Substitute, Sodium Alkyl Sulfate, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate, Sodium Laurate, Sodium Laurethsulfate, Sodium Nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate, Alkyl Carboxylates, Sodium Stearate, Alpha Olefin Sulphonates, Naphthalene Sulfonate Salts, Alkyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Fatty Acid salts, Naphthalene Sulfonate Condensates–Sodium salt, Fatty Alcohol Sulphates, Alkyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Condensates–Sodium Salt, A Naphthalene Sulfonic Acid Condensed with Formaldehyde or a Salt of Alkylnaphthalene Sulfonic Acid condensed with Formaldehyde or salts or derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different anionic surfactants without departing from the scope of the present invention. The non-ionic surfactants or polymeric surfactants include one or more of but not limited to Polyol Esters, Polyol Fatty Acid Esters, Ethoxylated and Propoxylated Fatty Alcohols, EO and PO Block Copolymers, Di, Tri-Block Copolymers;, Polysorbates, Alkyl Polysaccharides, Polyoxyethylene Glycol, Sorbitan Derivatives, Fatty Acid Esters of Sorbitan (Spans) and Their Ethoxylated Derivatives (Tweens), copolymers, TERSPERSE 2700 (Huntsman International LLC), polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, Cocamide Monoethanolamine (MEA), Decyl, Narrow-Range Ethoxylate, Oleyl Alcohol, PEG-10, Polysorbate, Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 80, Sorbitan, Sorbitanmonolaurate, Sorbitanmonostearate, Sorbitantristearate, Stearyl Alcohol, Castor Oil Ethoxylate, Polyglycol Ethers, Polyadducts of Ethylene Oxide and Propylene Oxide, Polyoxy Ethylene Sorbitan, Fatty Acid Polyglyceride, Polyoxyethylene Alkyl Ether, Polyoxyethylenealkylaryl Ether, a Polyoxyethylenestyrylaryl Ether, a Polyoxyethylene Glycol Alkyl Ether, Alcohol Ethoxylates- C6 to C16 / 18 Alcohols, Linear and Branched, Alcohol Alkoxylates- Various Hydrophobes and EO / PO Contents and Ratios, a Polyoxyethylene Hydrogenated Castor Oil, salts or derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different non-ionic surfactants or polymeric surfactants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the surfactant is present in an amount of 0.1% to 40% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the surfactant is present in an amount of 0.1% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the surfactant is present in an amount of 0.1% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the dispersing agents which are used in the composition include, but not limited to non-ionic dispersants selected from one or more of polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether, ethoxylated fatty acids, aliphatic alcohol ethoxylates; alkyl ethoxylates; EO-PO block and graft copolymers; However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different non-ionic dispersants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the dispersing agents which are used in the composition include, but not limited to anionic dispersants selected from one or, tristyrylphenolethoxylate phosphate esters; lignin sulphonates, phenyl naphthalene sulphonates, alkali metal, alkylarylsulfonates, alkylsulfonates, mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid and salt of phenol sulphonic acid, mixture of sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid urea formaldehyde condensate and sodium salt of phenol sulphonic formaldehyde condensate, polycarboxylates, sodium alkyl benzene sulfonates, sodium salts of sulfonated naphthalene, sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensates, condensation products of aryl sulphonic acids and formaldehyde, polyaromatic sulfonates, sodium alkyl aryl sulfonates and kraft lignin . However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different anionic dispersants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the dispersing agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 40% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the dispersing agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the dispersing agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment the wetting agents used in the composition include, but are not limited to one or more of phenol naphthalene sulphonates, alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, naphthalene sulphonate sodium salt, dibutylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, alkylarylsulfonates, dioctyl sulfosuccinate, polyoxyethoxylated fatty alcohols, alkane sulfonates, alkylbenzene sulfonates, alkyl ether phosphates, alkyl ether sulphates and alkyl sulfosuccinic monoesters, salts, derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different wetting agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the wetting agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the wetting agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the wetting agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 10% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the carriers that are used in the composition of the present invention include, but are not limited to one or more of solid carriers or fillers or diluents. According to another embodiment, the carriers include mineral carriers, plant carriers, synthetic carriers, water-soluble carriers. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different carriers without departing from the scope of the present invention. The solid carriers include natural minerals like clay such as china clay, acid clay, kaolin such as kaolinite, dickite, nacrite, and synthetic and diatomaceous silicas, micas, such as pyrophyllite, talc, silicas such as cristobalite and quartz, such as attapulgite and sepiolite, vermiculite, laponite, pumice, bauxite, hydrated aluminas, perlite, sodium bicarbonate, limestone, natural and synthetic silicates, silicas, surface-modified silicas, zeolite, diatomaceous earth, loess, mirabilite, white carbon, slaked lime, synthetic silicic acid, starch, modified starch, cellulose, plant carriers such as cellulose, chaff, wheat flour, wood flour, starch, rice bran, wheat bran, and soybean flour, casein sodium, sucrose, salt cake, potassium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate or derivatives or mixtures thereof. Commercially available Silicates are Aerosil brands, Sipernat brands as Sipernat ® 22S and CALFLO E, and kaolin 1777. According to an embodiment, the carrier is present in an amount of 0.1% to 95% by weight of the composition. According to a further embodiment, the carrier is present in an amount of 0.1% to 80% by weight of the composition. According to a further embodiment, the carrier is present in an amount of 0.1% to 70% by weight of the composition. According to a further embodiment, the carrier is present in an amount of 0.1% to 50% by weight of the composition. According to an embodiment, the antifoaming agents or defoamers which are used in the composition of the present invention include but are not limited to one or more of silica, siloxane, silicone dioxide, polydimethyl siloxane, alkyl polyacrylates, ethylene oxide / propylene oxide copolymers, silicone oils and magnesium stearate or derivatives thereof. Preferred antifoaming agents include silicone emulsions (such as, e.g., Silikon® SRE, Wacker or Rhodorsil® from Rhodia), long-chain alcohols, fatty acids, fluoro-organic compounds. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different antifoaming agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the anti-foaming agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the anti-foaming agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 10% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the pH-adjusters or buffers or neutralizing agents that are used in the composition include both acids and bases of the organic or inorganic type and mixtures thereof. According to a further embodiment, pH-adjusters or buffers or neutralizing agents include, but are not limited to one or more of organic acids, inorganic acids, and alkali metal compounds or salts, derivatives thereof. According to an embodiment, the organic acids include, but not limited to one or more of citric, malic, adipic, fumaric, maleic, succinic, and tartaric acids, or salts, derivatives thereof, and the mono-, di-, or tribasic salts of these acids or derivatives thereof. According to an embodiment, the salts of inorganic acids include, but not limited to one or more of alkali metal salts such as, sodium chloride, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, sodium monohydrogen phosphate, potassium monohydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate and the like. Mixtures can also be used to create a pH-adjusters or buffers or neutralizing agents. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different pH adjusters without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the pH adjusters or buffers are present in an amount of 0.01% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the anticaking agents which are used in the composition include, but are not limited to one or more of polysaccharides, fumed and precipitated silica (white carbon), a petroleum resin, Foammaster® Soap L sodium stearate, Brij® 700 polyoxyethylene (100) stearylether, sodium acetate, sodium metasilicate, sodium alkylsulfosuccinates, or derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different anticaking agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the anticaking agent is present in an amount of 0.1% to 20% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the spreading agents which are used in the composition include but are not limited to one or more of copolymer of maleic acid with a styrene compound, a (meth)acrylic acid copolymer, aliphatic alcohols, vegetable oils such as cottonseed or inorganic oils, petroleum distillates, trisiloxanes and modified trisiloxanes, or derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different spreading agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the spreading agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the sticking agents which are used in the composition include, but not limited to one or more of paraffin, a polyamide resin, polyacrylate, polyoxyethylene, wax, latex, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, gums such as xanthan gum, vegetable oils such as cottonseed, or inorganic oils, petroleum distillates, modified trisiloxanes, polyglycol, a synthetic resin emulsion or salts or derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different sticking agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the sticking agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the structuring agents that are used in the composition include, but are not limited to one or more of thickeners, viscosity modifiers, tackifiers, suspension aids, rheological modifiers or anti-settling agents. A structuring agent prevents sedimentation of the active ingredient particles after prolonged storage. According to an embodiment, the structuring agents which are used in the composition include, but not limited to one or more of polyacrylics, polysaccharides, cellulose derivatives, co-polymers of cellulose derivatives, polyvinyl alcohol and derivatives; clays such as kaolin, smectite, attapulgites and gums such as guar gum, xanthan gum, gelatin, dextrin, fumed silica, mixture of fumed silica and fumed aluminium oxide, swellable polymers, poly(ethylene glycol), stachyose, celluloses such as hemicellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, hydroxy-methyl ethyl cellulose, hydroxyl ethyl propyl cellulose, methylhydroxyethylcellulose, methylcellulose; plant starches such as corn starch and potato starch. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different structuring agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. Preferred structuring agents include one or more of xanthan gum, aluminum silicate, Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, polysaccharide, alkaline earth metal silicate, clays, gelatin, and polyvinyl alcohol. According to an embodiment, the structuring agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 20% by weight of the composition. According to an embodiment, the structuring agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 10% by weight of the composition. According to an embodiment, the structuring agent is present in 0.01% to 5% by weight of the composition. According to an embodiment, the anti-freezing agents or freezing point depressants used in the composition include, but are not limited to one or more of polyhydric alcohols such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, monohydric or polyhydric alcohols, glycol ethers, glycerol, However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different anti-freezing agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the anti-freezing agents or freezing point depressants is present in an amount of 0.01% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the chelating or complexing or sequestering agents which are used in the composition include, but not limited to one or more of polycarboxylic acids such as polyacrylic acid and the various hydrolyzed poly(methyl vinyl ether / maleic anhydride); N-hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), N,N,N',N'-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, N- hydroxyethyl-N, N',N'-ethylenediaminetriacetic acid and N,N,N',N",N"- diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; α-hydroxy acids, such as citric acid, tartaric acid and gluconic acid; orthophosphates, disodium phosphate, monosodium phosphate; condensed phosphates, such as sodium tripolyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate and sodium tetrapolyphosphate; , ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), N-hydroxyethyl-ethylenediamine-triacetic acid (HEDTA), ethylene diaminediacetate (EDDA), ethylenediaminedi(o-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (EDDHA), cyclohexane diamine tetraacetic acid (CDTA), fulvic acid, ulmic acid, nucleic acids, cyclodextrin, humic acid, pyrophosphate. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different chelating agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the chelating agents are present in an amount of 0.01% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the penetrants which are used in the composition include, but not limited to one or more of alcohol, glycol, glycol ether, ester, amine, alkanolamine, amine oxide, quaternary ammonium compound, triglyceride, fatty acid ester, fatty acid ether, N-methyl pyrrolidone, dimethyl formamide, dimethyl acetamide, or dimethyl sulfoxide, polyoxyethylenetrimethylolpropanemonooleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate polyoxyethylenetrimethylolpropanedioleate, polyoxyethylene trimethylol propane trioleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different penetrants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the penetrant is present in an amount of 0.01% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the humectant is selected from, but not limited to one or more of polyoxyethylene / polyoxypropylene copolymers, particularly block copolymers. Other humectants are propylene glycol, monoethylene glycol, hexylene glycol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, poly (ethylene glycol), poly (propylene glycol), glycerol and the like; polyhydric alcohol compounds such as propylene glycol ether, derivatives thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize different humectants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the humectant is present in the range of 0.1% to 40% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the stabilizers which are used in the agricultural composition include, but not limited to one or more of peroxide compounds such as hydrogen peroxide and organic peroxides, zeolite, antioxidants such as phenol compounds, phosphoric acid compounds, EDTA, sodium sulphites, citric acid, citrates and the like. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other conventionally known stabilizers without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the stabilizer is present in the range of 1% to 30% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, preservative is selected from one or more of formic acid, and derivatives of 2H isothiazol-3-one (so-called isothiazolone derivatives) such as alkylisothiazolones (for example 2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one, MIT; chloro-2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one, CIT), benzoisothiazolones (for example 1,2- benzoisothiazol-3(2H)-one, BIT, commercially available as Proxel® types from Arch Biocides Ltd.) or 2-methyl-4,5-trimethylene-2H-isothiazol-3-one (MTIT), Proxel® from Arch Biocides Ltd. or Acticide® RS from Thor Chemie and Kathon® MK from Lanxess, , Sodium Propinoate, Sodium Benzoate, Propyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben Sodium, Potassium Sorbate, Potassium Benzoate, Phenyl Mercuric Nitrate, Phenyl Ethyl Alcohol, Sodium, Ethylparaben, Methylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzyl Alcohol, Benzothonium Chloride, Cetylpyridinium Chloride, Antioxidants includes but not limited to one or more of imidazole and imidazole derivatives (e.g. urocanic acid), 4,4′-thiobis-6-t-butyl-3-methylphenol, 2,6-di-t-butyl-p-cresol (BHT), penta erythrityl tetrakis[3-(3,5,-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)] propionate; amine antioxidants. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other conventionally known preservatives without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the preservative is present in the range of 0.01% to 2% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the pigments and colorants are selected from but not limited to synthetic chemicals obtained from various manufacturers. The pigments and colorants can be water soluble or water insoluble, in the form of lakes. Dyes can be solvent dyes, acid dyes or basic dyes. Examples of such products include, but not limited, Unisperse Red 3855, Pigmosol Agro Red 3785, pigment 15. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other conventionally known pigments and colorants without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the pigments and colorants are present in the range of 0.01% to 5% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the disintegrating agents which are used in the agricultural composition include, but not limited to one or more of inorganic water soluble salts e.g. sodium chloride; water soluble organic compounds such as agar, hydroxypropyl starch, carboxymethyl starch ether, tragacanth, cross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, metal stearates, a cellulose powder, dextrin, methacrylate copolymer, Polyplasdone® XL-10 (crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinylpyrrolidone). However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other conventionally known disintegrating agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the disintegrating agent is present in the range of 0.5% to 15% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the binding agents or binders that are used in the agricultural composition include, but not limited to one or more of maltodextrin, carbohydrates such as monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, complex organic substance, synthetic organic polymers or derivatives and combinations thereof. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other conventionally known binding agents without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the binder is present in the range of 0.1% to 10% by weight of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition optionally further comprises active ingredients selected from one or more of pesticidal active ingredients or fertilizers or nutrients or biostimulants. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other active ingredient without departing from the scope of the present invention. According to an embodiment, the further active ingredient can be present in the range of 0.001% w / w to 75% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the further active ingredient can be present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 50% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the further active ingredient can be present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the further active ingredient can be present in the range of 0.1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition comprises water soluble or insoluble selenium salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture thereof. According to a further embodiment, the water-insoluble selenium salts include but are not limited to selenium, selenium carbonates, vanadium selenide, magnesium selenide, manganese selenide, selenium sulphide, copper selenide, iron selenide, molybdenum selenide, cobalt selenide, bismuth selenide, zinc selenide, copper selenite, calcium selenite, magnesium selenite, manganese selenite, or cobalt selenite. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other selenium water-insoluble salts without departing from the scope of the invention. According to a further embodiment, the water soluble selenium salts include but are not limited to selenium dioxide, selenourea, sodium selenide, potassium selenide, copper selenide, ammonium selenide, sodium selenite, potassium selenite, ammonium selenite, iron selenite, zinc selenite, sodium selenate, magnesium selenate, potassium selenate, calcium selenate, copper selenate, ammonium selenate, iron selenate, cobalt selenate or zinc selenate. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other selenium water-soluble salts without departing from the scope of the invention. According to a further embodiment, selenium derivatives include but are not limited to potassium selenate, selenium sulfide, selenious acid, selenium yeast, downeyite etc. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible to utilize other selenium derivatives without departing from the scope of the invention. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention comprises water insoluble selenium salts, derivatives or mixture thereof. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises at least one enzyme in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises at least one enzyme in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises at least one enzyme in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition further comprises at least one enzyme in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises at least one enzyme selected from chitinase, beta-glucanase or bromelain. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 10% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition; at least one enzyme selected from chitinase, beta-glucanase or bromelain in the range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition; at least one enzyme selected from chitinase, beta-glucanase or bromelain in the range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition; choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, a biopesticidal composition comprises of an elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol in the range of 1% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition; selenium or its salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition; at least one enzyme selected from chitinase, beta-glucanase or bromelain in the range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition; choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. It has been surprisingly found that the biopesticidal composition of the present invention has enhanced and improved physical properties of dispersibility, suspensibility, wettability, flowability, provides ease of handling and also reduces the loss of material while handling the product at the time of packaging as well as during field application. The composition of the present invention is stable on accelerated storage. Suspensibility is defined as the amount of active ingredient suspended after a given time in a column of liquid of stated height, expressed as a percentage of the amount of active ingredient in the original suspension. The test for suspensibility is done as per the CIPAC Handbook, "MT 184 Test for Suspensibility”. According to an embodiment, the suspensibility of biopesticidal composition is at least 30%. According to an embodiment, the suspensibility of biopesticidal composition is at least 40%. According to an embodiment, the suspensibility of biopesticidal composition is at least 50%. According to an embodiment, the suspensibility of biopesticidal composition is at least 60%. According to an embodiment, the suspensibility of biopesticidal composition is at least 70%. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition can have a suspensibility of at least 80%. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition can have a suspensibility of at least 90%. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition can have a suspensibility of at least 95%. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates superior stability in terms of suspensibility under accelerated storage condition (ATS). According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates suspensibility of more than 50% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates suspensibility of more than 60% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates suspensibility of more than 70% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates suspensibility of more than 80% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates suspensibility of more than 90% under ATS. Dispersibility of the water dispersible granular composition of the present invention is determined as per the standard CIPAC test, MT 174. According to an embodiment, the water dispersible granular composition has a dispersibility of at least 30%. According to an embodiment, the water dispersible granular composition has can dispersibility of at least 50%. According to an embodiment, the water dispersible granular composition has a dispersibility of at least 70%. According to an embodiment, the water dispersible granular composition has a dispersibility of at least 90%. According to an embodiment, the dispersibility of the composition is at least 95%. The composition of the present invention disperses uniformly into finer particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns when comes in contact with water. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules exhibit almost instantaneous dispersion thus making the actives readily available to the crops. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 90% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 80% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 70% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 60% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 40% under ATS. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition demonstrates a dispersibility of at least 30% under ATS. Wettability is the condition or the state of being wettable and can be defined as the degree to which a solid is wetted by a liquid, measured by the force of adhesion between the solid and liquid phases. The wettability of the granular composition is measured using the Standard CIPAC Test MT-53 which describes a procedure for the determination of the time of complete wetting of wettable formulations. A weighed amount of the granular composition is dropped on water in a beaker from a specified height and the time for complete wetting was determined. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention has a wettability of less than 2 minutes. According to an embodiment, the composition has a wettability of less than 1 minute. According to another embodiment, the composition has a wettability of less than 30 seconds. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention in the form of water dispersible granules or aqueous suspension passes the wet sieve retention test. The test is used to determine the amount of non-dispersible material in formulations that are applied as dispersions in water. The wet sieve retention value of the composition in the form of liquid suspension and granules is measured by using the Standard CIPAC Test MT-185 which describes a procedure for measuring the amount of material retained on the sieve. A sample of the formulation is dispersed in water and the suspension formed is transferred to a sieve and washed. The amount of the material retained on the sieve is determined by drying and weighing. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention in the form of water dispersible granule or aqueous suspension has a wet sieve retention value on a 75-micron sieve of less than 2%. According to an embodiment, the composition has a wet sieve retention value on a 75-micron sieve of less than 0.2%. The wet sieve retention value of less than 2% indicates that the composition helps in the easy invention of the formulation preventing clogging of the nozzles or filter equipment. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of suspomulsion is not highly concentrated and is easily pourable. The viscosity of a fluid is a measure of its resistance to gradual deformation by shear stress or tensile stress. According to an embodiment, viscosity of the suspoemulsion is determined as per CIPAC MT-192. A sample is transferred to a standard measuring system. The measurement is carried out under different shear conditions and the apparent viscosities are determined. During the test, the temperature of the liquid is kept constant. According to an embodiment, the suspoemulsion composition has a viscosity at 25° C. of 200 cps to 2000 cps which makes it pourable. According to an embodiment, the liquid suspension composition has a viscosity at 25° C. of 200 cps to 1000 cps. According to an embodiment, the suspoemulsion composition has a viscosity at 25° C. of less than 2000 cps. According to an embodiment, the suspoemulsion composition has a viscosity at 25° C. of less than 1000 cps. Too viscous and highly concentrated composition tends to form a cake making it unpourable and thus is undesirable. According to an embodiment, the suspoemulsion composition of the invention is easily pourable. The pourability is the measure of the percent of residue. According to an embodiment, the pourability of the composition is determined as per CIPAC MT-148.1 by allowing the composition to stand for 24 hours and the amount remaining in the container after a standardized pouring procedure is determined. The container is rinsed and the amount remaining is determined and the maximum rinsed residue in percent is calculated. According to a further embodiment, the pourability of composition is less than 5% rinsed residue. According to a further embodiment, the pourability of the composition is preferably less than 2.5% rinsed residue. According to an embodiment, the spontaneity of dispersion is measured as per CIPAC MT 160. It involves preparing 250 ml of a mixture of formulation and water, mixed with only one inversion of the measuring cylinder. After standing under defined conditions the top nine-tenths is removed, and the remaining tenth assayed chemically, gravimetrically or by solvent extraction. The spontaneity of dispersion is readily calculated. According to an embodiment, the composition has a spontaneity of dispersion of 30%. According to an embodiment, the composition has a spontaneity of dispersion of 60%. According to an embodiment, the composition has a spontaneity of dispersion of 80%. According to an embodiment, the composition has a spontaneity of dispersion of 95%. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water disintegrable granules have hardness of at least 1 Newtons. According to further embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water disintegrable granules have hardness of at least 5 Newtons. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water disintegrable granules have hardness of at least 10 Newtons. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water disintegrable granules have hardness of atleast 20 Newtons. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules has hardness of less than 4 Newtons. According to further embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules hardness of less than 3 Newtons. According to further embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules has hardness of less than 2 Newtons. According to further embodiment, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules preferably has hardness of less than 1 Newtons. More preferably, the biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules has a nil hardness. The reference to nil hardness is indicative of the fact that the hardness of the granules cannot be measured by the hardness measuring apparatus. The hardness exhibited by the granules can be estimated by hardness testers such as the ones provided by Vinsyst Portable Table Hardness Tester VTHT series. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention demonstrates superior stability towards heat, light, temperature and caking. According to an embodiment, the stability exhibited by the composition is at least 3 years. According to a further embodiment, the stability exhibited by the composition is at least 2 years. According to a further embodiment, the stability exhibited by the composition is at least 1 year. According to a further embodiment, the stability exhibited by the composition is at least 6 months. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention on accelerated storage have active content of not less than 50% relative to active content available at room temperature. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention on accelerated storage have active content of not less than 75% relative to active content available at room temperature. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention on accelerated storage has an active content of not less than 85% relative to the active content at room temperature. According to an embodiment, the biopesticidal composition of the present invention on accelerated storage has an active content of not less than 95% relative to the active content at room temperature. According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for preparing the biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for preparing the biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition in extruded granular form, the process comprising of: i. Mixing one or more of biochemical pesticide with excipients. ii. Absorbing the mixture of step (i) in filler. iii. Preparing the mixture of elemental sulphur and various excipients. iv. Jet milling the mixture of step (iii) to obtain the desired particle size. v. Blending the mixture obtained in Step (ii) and step (iv). vi. Extruding the blend obtained in step (v) to get the granules with desired size. vii. drying the granules using fluid bed dryer. According to an embodiment, the drying is carried out in temperature range of 40 to 50 degree. According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for preparing the biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition in liquid suspension form, the process comprising of: i. Homogenizing a mixture of elemental sulphur, at least one biochemical pesticide described herein, one or more of excipient / s and water into a vessel provided with stirring facilities; ii. Milling the mixture to obtain the desired particle size. iii. Further adding preservative, thickener etc., as required to obtain product of desired composition According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for preparing the biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition in suspoemulsion form, the process comprising of: i. Mixing at least one biochemical pesticide described herein in one or more of oil or solvent. ii. Preparing aqueous phase by mixing elemental sulphur, other excipients and water and milling the mixture to obtain the desired particle size. iii. Blending the mixture obtained in step (i) and step (ii) under high shear. iv. Further adding preservative, rheology modifier etc., as required to get the desired product According to an embodiment, the invention further relates to the use of the biocidal composition as plant protection and a yield enhancer composition. According to an embodiment, the invention relates to a method of application of an effective amount of the biopesticidal composition, wherein the composition is applied to the seeds, seedling, crops, a plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or to the surrounding soil. The user applies the composition according to the invention usually from a predosage device, a knapsack sprayer, a spray tank, a spray plane, or an irrigation system. Usually, the biopesticidal composition is suitably diluted with water to the desired application concentration before application. The amount of water used will depend upon the particular mode of administration of the formulation and where it is being applied. The composition is suitable for use on most crops including monocotyledonous and dicotylendonous crops, but in particular can be used for the treatment of greenhouse crops, vegetables and fruit crops. The composition has no or very low phytotoxicity at the effective concentrations. According to an embodiment, the invention further relates to a method for protecting the plants against pests or diseases; the method comprising treating at least one of seeds, seedling, a plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or to the surrounding soil with effective amount of the biopesticidal composition comprising elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% w / w to 98% w / w of the total composition. According to an embodiment, the invention also relates to method for protecting the plants against pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 40 kg / ha to a plant or parts thereof or soil. According to an embodiment, the invention also relates to method for protecting the plants against pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 30 kg / ha to a plant or parts thereof or soil. According to an embodiment, the invention also relates to method for protecting the plants against pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 20 kg / ha to a plant or parts thereof or soil. According to an embodiment, the invention also relates to method for protecting the plants against pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 10 kg / ha to a plant or parts thereof or soil. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for protecting the plants against pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 30 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 25 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 20 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 15 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 10 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 5 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the invention also relates to method for controlling pests and diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition by foliar means at a dosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 2.5 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof. According to further embodiment, the method for protecting the plants against pests or diseases by applying a biopesticidal composition of the present invention provides protection to plants against broad spectrum of pests including multiple species of insects belonging to the order of Hemiptera, Lepidoptera and Thysanoptera; various diseases caused by pathogen belonging to genus Ascomycete, Colletotrichum, Septoria and Fusarium; and Acariformes such as mites. The pests controlled by the biopesticidal composition of the present invention include but not limited to chewing or sucking pests such as Thrips, Aphids, Jassids, Whiteflies, Helicoverpa armigera etc. The disease controlled by the biopesticidal composition of the present invention include but not limited to anthracnose, septoria, blast, fusarium, powdery mildew etc. The acariformes (mites) controlled by the biopesticidal composition of the present invention include but not limited to red spider mites, two spotted spider mites, yellow mites, scarlet mites, pink mites, purple mites etc. According to further embodiment, the method for controlling pests and diseases wherein the composition is effective against sucking pests at a dosage of 0.5kg / ha to 30kg / ha. According to further embodiment, the method for controlling pests and diseases wherein the composition is effective against sucking pests at a dosage of 0.5kg / ha to 20kg / ha. According to further embodiment, the method for controlling pests and diseases wherein the composition is effective against mites at a dosage of 0.5kg / ha to 10kg / ha. The rates of application or the dosage of the composition depends on the type of use, the target pests or diseases, the degree of disease and pest infestation, the type of crops and also on the specific active ingredients in the composition and the amounts in which they are used, such that the pesticidal active ingredient, is in an effective amount to provide the desired action (such as crop protection, crop yield). According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention can be applied as single dose or in multiple doses. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention may be applied repeatedly for predetermined number of times at regular intervals of a predetermined number of days. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied from 1 time up to 15 times, depending on conditions and disease pressure. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied from 1 time up to 12 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied from 1 time up to 10 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 8 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 7 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 6 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 5 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 4 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 3 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 2 times. According to an embodiment the composition can be applied up to 1 time. According to an embodiment the compositions described herein exhibit prolonged residual pesticidal activity, enabling a period of time to pass between re-treatment of target surfaces. A period of time greater than about a week, e.g.7 days, 8 days, 9 days, 10 days, 11 days, 12 days, 13 days, 14 days, 15 days, 16 days, 17 days, 18 days, 19 days, 20 days, or 21 days or longer is allowed to pass. Then any of the compositions described herein are re-applied to the pests or to surfaces where the pests or their eggs may contact or otherwise be exposed to the composition. According to an embodiment, the composition of the present invention is highly stable, synergistic in nature and is suitable for integrated pest management. It was found that the compositions of the present invention is non phytotoxic, has good control on wide variety of plant pathogens such as fungal, bacterial pathogens as well as insects as compared to application of individual actives, assists in managing pesticidal resistance or reducing pesticidal residue. Further, such composition also helps in improving the crop yield, crop characteristics etc. Thus, it has been observed that the composition of the present invention, demonstrate enhanced, efficacious and superior behaviour in the fields at reduced dosage along with ease of application making it economically beneficial and environment friendly. A. PREPARATION EXAMPLES: The following examples illustrate the basic methodology and versatility of the composition of the invention. It should be noted that this invention is not limited to these exemplifications. The form of the composition, excipients and the concentrations of actives and excipients can be replaced by any other forms, excipients and concentrations as covered in the present invention. The term ATS used means after storage at accelerated conditions i.e. storage at 54 degree centigrade for 14 days. EXAMPLE NO 1: Sulphur 90% + Eugenol 0.1% WG 91 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 2.4 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 2 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 15 microns. 0.12 Parts of Eugenol was blended with 2 parts of silica, 1 part of clay and 1.48 parts of sodium lauryl sulphate. This powder was mixed with the above milled material to obtain homogeneous powder. 10 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.5 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 60%, dispersibility of 64%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.25% and after ATS a suspensibility was 58%, dispersibility was 61% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.28%. EXAMPLE NO 2: Sulphur 45% + Eugenol 13% WG 46 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 11 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 7 parts of mixture of salt of naphthalenesulphonic acid and phenol sulphonic acid condensation product in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 5 microns. Further, 15.4 parts of Eugenol was blended with 5.6 parts of silica, 6 part of Perlite and 9 parts of anionic surfactant blend [3 parts of Morwet EFW (sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend) blended with 6 parts sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate condensate]. This powder was mixed with the above milled material to obtain homogeneous powder. 13 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.25 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 72%, dispersibility of 75%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.15 % and after ATS a suspensibility was 68%, dispersibility was 70% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.17%. EXAMPLE NO 3: Sulphur 75% + Eugenol 5% WG 75 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 7 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 3 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 20 microns. Further, 6 parts of Eugenol was blended with 2 parts of silica, 3 part of Perlite and 2 parts of Polymeric surfactant (TERSPERSE 2700) and 2 parts of tristyrylphenol phosphate. This powder was mixed with the above milled material to obtain a homogeneous powder. 13 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.5 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 57%, dispersibility of 60%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.10 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 55%, dispersibility of 57% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.11%. EXAMPLE NO 4: Sulphur 90% + Thymol 0.1% WG 91 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 3.5 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 1 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. Further, 0.11 parts of Thymol was blended with 1 parts of silica, 2 parts of perlite and 1.39 parts of sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 10 microns. 12 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.2 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 64%, dispersibility of 68%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.12 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 62%, dispersibility of 65% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.13% EXAMPLE NO 5: Sulphur 50% + Thymol 10% + Selenium dioxide 1% WG 51 Parts of elemental Sulphur and 1.2 parts of Selenium dioxide was blended with 15.05 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 7 parts of mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonicacid and phenol sulphonic acid condensation product, in ribbon blender to obtain homogeneous powder. Further 10.75 parts of Thymol was blended with 1 part of silica, 6 part of perlite and 3 parts of modified polyacrylate and 5 parts of clay to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain powder having particle size below 10 microns. 9 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.2 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 64%, dispersibility of 69%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.08 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 60.4%, dispersibility of 67% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.09%. EXAMPLE NO 6: Sulphur 70% + Thymol 3% + Selenium dioxide 3% + Chitinase 3% + Bromelain 3% WG 71 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 3.5 parts of Thymol, 3.3 parts of Selenium dioxide, 3.2 parts of Chitinase, 3.2 parts Bromelain, 8.8 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 3 parts of mixture of salt of naphthalenesulphonic acid and phenolsulphonic acid condensation, 1 part of silica, 2 parts of sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate and 1 part of modified polyacrylate in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 25 microns. 12 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.5 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 57%, dispersibility of 60%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.12 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 55%, dispersibility of 58% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.13%. EXAMPLE NO 7: Sulphur 90% + Thymol 1 % WG 91 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 1.1 parts of Thymol, 5.9 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 1 part of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 1 part of sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 10 microns. 14 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 73%, dispersibility of 75%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.08 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 71%, dispersibility of 72% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.09%. EXAMPLE NO 8: Sulphur 10% + Thymol 30 % WG 10.2 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 32.5 parts of Thymol, 15 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 10 parts of mannitol, 3 parts of sodium lauryl sulphate, 6 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 23.3 parts of clay in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 5 microns. 14 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.3 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 63%, dispersibility of 67%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.05 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 60%, dispersibility of 65% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.07%. EXAMPLE NO 9: Sulphur 70% + Thymol 9 % WG 71.5 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 10.3 parts of Thymol, 9.7 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 3 parts of kraft lignin, 0.5 parts of polycarboxylate, 3 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 2 parts of sodium lauryl sulphate in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 15 microns. 12 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.65 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 58%, dispersibility of 63%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.09 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 57%, dispersibility of 60% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.12%. EXAMPLE NO 10: Sulphur 60% + Selenium dioxide 3% + Thymol 3 % WG + chitinase 3% + 3% Bromelain + Choline pelargonate 2% WG 61 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 3.3 parts of Selenium dioxide, 3.5 parts of Thymol, 3.2 parts of Chitinase and 3.2 parts of Bromelain, 2.5 parts of choline pelargonate, 15.3 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 4 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, 2 parts of sodium lauryl sulfate and 2 parts of silica in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 10 microns. 14 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.7 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 55%, dispersibility of 69% wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.11% and after ATS a suspensibility of 50%, dispersibility of 66% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.18%. EXAMPLE NO 11: Sulphur 65% + Thymol 3% + Beta-glucanase 1% WG 66 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended 3.5 parts of Thymol, 1.3 parts of Beta- glucanase, 13.2 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 5 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, 6 parts of silica and 5 parts of lactose in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous mixture. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 10 microns. 12 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.2 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 78%, dispersibility of 80%, wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.08 % and after ATS a suspensibility of 74%, dispersibility of 75% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.1%. Example 12: Sulphur 5%+ Thymol 30% SC 12.5 Parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and 100 parts of propylene glycol were added to 350 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities. 52 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion, 20 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, 320 parts of Thymol, 15 parts of tristyrylphenol phosphate were added under continuous homogenization to obtain liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size.1.1 parts of xanthan gum, 1 parts of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion and balance water was added to this suspension under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension concentrate. The composition had a particle size D90 of 10 microns, suspensibility of 72%, after ATS a suspensibility of 71%, viscosity of 510cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.22% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.35. Example 13: Sulphur 50% + Thymol 1% SC 7.5 Parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and 50 parts of ethylene glycol were added to 250 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.510 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion, 17.5 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonae condensate, 120 parts of Thymol, were added under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size. 3.5 parts of xanthan gum, 1 parts of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion and balance water were added to this suspension under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension concentrate. The composition had a particle size of D904 micron, suspensibility of 92%, after ATS a suspensibility of 89%, viscosity of 810cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns of 0.10% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.55. EXAMPLE NO 14: Sulphur 15% + Eugenol 30% SE 20 Parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 50 parts of propylene glycol were added to 290 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.155 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion was added under continuous homogenization to obtain liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size. Then, 1.2 parts of xanthan gum, 1 parts of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3- one, balance water and 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion were added under continuous homogenization to obtain the water phase. The oil phase was prepared by blending 50 parts of ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate, 15 parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and 354 parts of Eugenol. The oil phase was mixed with the water phase at high shear to obtain the suspoemulsion composition. The composition had a particle size D50 of 3.2 micron and D90 of 6.2 micron, viscosity of 600cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.02% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.82%. EXAMPLE NO 15: Sulphur 45% + Eugenol 5% SE 25 Parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 60 parts of ethylene glycol were added to 290 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.460 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion was added under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size. 2.3 Parts of xanthan gum, 1 parts of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, balance water, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion and 0.5 parts of bentonite were then added under continuous homogenization to obtain the water phase. The oil phase was prepared by blending 10 parts of polymeric surfactant (TERSPERSE 2700), 7.5 parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and 60 parts of Eugenol. The oil phase was mixed with the water phase at high shear to obtain the suspoemulsion composition. The composition had a particle size D50 of 4.8 microns and D90 of 9.4 microns, viscosity of 812cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.04% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.45%. EXAMPLE NO 16: Sulphur 5% + Thymol 5% SE 10 Parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 40 parts of glycerin were added to 175 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.55 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion was added under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size. 1.3 Parts of xanthan gum, 1 part of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, balance water and 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion were then added under continuous homogenization to obtain the water phase. The oil phase was prepared by blending 25 parts of polysorbate, 20 parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, 50 parts of isostearic acid surfactant and 62.5 parts of Thymol. The oil phase was mixed with the water phase at high shear to obtain the suspoemulsion composition. The composition had a particle size of D50 2.1 micron and D90 3.2 micron, viscosity of 450cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve 0.04% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.25%. EXAMPLE NO 17: Sulphur 40% + Thymol 2% SE 25 Parts of Sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate and 100 parts of ethylene glycol were added to 300 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.410 parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion was added under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size. 2 Parts of xanthan gum, 1 part of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, balance water and 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion were then added under continuous homogenization to obtain the water phase. The oil phase was prepared by blending 20 parts of polymeric surfactant (TERSPERSE 2700) with 7.5 parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, 25 parts of Thymol and 20 parts of ethylene glycol. The oil phase was mixed with the water phase at high shear to obtain the suspoemulsion composition. The composition had a particle size of D50 2.4 micron and D90 3.5 micron, viscosity of 860cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.08% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.45%. EXAMPLE NO 18: Sulphur 30% + Thymol 4% SC 7.5 Parts of polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane and 70 parts of propylene glycol were added to 300 parts of water and homogenized by feeding them into a vessel provided with stirring facilities.310 Parts of elemental Sulphur powder was blended continuously for approximately 20 minutes until the total mixture was homogeneous. To the above mixture, 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion, 20 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonae condensate and 43 parts of thymol was added under continuous homogenization to obtain liquid suspension. Subsequently, the suspension obtained was passed through the wet mill to reduce the particle size.1.1 Parts of xanthan gum, 1 parts of 1, 2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 5 parts of polymeric surfactant (TERSPERSE 2700), 0.5 parts of polydimethylsiloxane emulsion and balance water were then added under continuous homogenization to obtain the liquid suspension concentrate. The composition had a particle size D90 of 4 microns, suspensibility of 85%, after ATS a suspensibility of 83%, viscosity of 610cps, wet sieve retention on 75 microns of 0.10% and pourability rinsed residue was found to be 0.75%. EXAMPLE NO 19: Sulphur 50% + Eugenol 2.5% + Thymol 2.5% WG 51 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 12.6 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 2.65 parts of Thymol, 5 parts of sodium naphthalene sulphonate condensate, 7 parts of mixture of salt of naphthalenesulphonic acid and phenolsulphonic acid condensation product in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 10 microns. 2.95 Parts of Eugenol was blended with 8.8 parts of silica, 8 part of perlite and 2 parts of tristyrylphenol phosphate. This powder was mixed with the above milled material to obtain a homogeneous powder. 12 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then granulated and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 1.5 mm. The composition had a suspensibility of 65%, dispersibility of 71%, wet sieve retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.30% and after ATS a suspensibility of 62%, dispersibility of 65% and wet sieve test retention on 75 microns sieve of 0.35%. EXAMPLE NO 20: Sulphur 90% + Eugenol 0.1% DG (Water disintegrable granules) 91 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 1 parts of sodium ligno sulphonate, 1.48 parts of sodium lauryl sulphate, in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 50 microns. 0.12 Parts of Eugenol was blended with 1 part of silica, 1 part of clay and 4.4 parts of Bentonite. This blend was mixed with the above milled material to obtain homogeneous powder. 8 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then passed through suitable equipment and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 4 mm. The composition exhibited an attrition resistance of 99.7%, disintegration of 78% and a hardness of 23 N. EXAMPLE NO 21: Sulphur 85% + Thymol 1.3% DG (Water disintegrable granules) 85.9 Parts of elemental Sulphur was blended with 2 parts of sodium naphthalene sulfonate condensate, 2 parts of sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate in a ribbon blender to obtain a homogeneous powder. The mixture was then jet milled to obtain a powder having particle size below 25 microns. 1.38 Parts of Thymol was blended with 1 part of silica, 3 parts of perlite and 4.72 parts of bentonite. This blend was mixed with the above milled material to obtain homogeneous powder. 8 Parts of water was added to the above mixture to prepare a dough and the material was then passed through suitable equipment and dried to obtain granules having mesh size below 5 mm The composition exhibited an attrition resistance of 98%, disintegration of 80% and a hardness of 21 N. B. Stability Study Stability study of composition comprising of elemental sulphur and biochemical pesticide viz. thymol in various formulations of the present invention viz. water dispersible granular (WG), liquid suspension (SC), suspoemulsion (SE) form on accelerated storage. The initial active content of the composition and that after accelerated storage (i.e storage at 54 degree Celsius after 14 days) were tested and reported in table 1 below. Table 1: Sr. Details of the Initial active content Active content on No. compositions (%) accelerated storage (%) Sulphur Thymol Sulphur Thymol 1. 45% elemental Sulphur + 10% Thymol WG as per 45.28 10.0 44.80 9.5 the embodiment of the present invention 2. 45% elemental Sulphur + 10% Thymol SE as per the 45.11 10.2 44.75 9.8 embodiment of the present invention 3. 45% elemental Sulphur + 10% Thymol liquid Suspension (SC) as per the 45.18 10.1 44.91 9.3 embodiment of the present invention From the data presented in Table 1, it was observed that the composition of elemental sulphur and thymol in the form of WG, SC and SE form as per embodiment of the present invention showed almost same content of actives before and after accelerated storage. Thus, the composition of the present invention in the form of WG, SC and SE are found to be highly stable even after long term storage which in turn results in superior efficacy when applied to crop. C. FIELD STUDY: The following are some abbreviations that have been used in this specification. ^ WG: Water dispersible granule ^ GR: Water disintegrable Granules ^ SE: Suspoemulsion ^ SC: Aqueous suspension concentrate ^ *: Expected effect calculated by Colby’s method ^ UTC: untreated control ^ DAA: Days after application ^ 1SP: 1st spray application, ^ 2SP: 2nd spray application ^ PDI: Percent Disease Index ^ g.a.h.: gram active ingredient per hectare ^ Qtl / ha: Quintal per hectare ^ T / ha: Tons per hectare The percentage reduction of insect pests over untreated control (UTC) was calculated using the following formula: % Reduction = [(Average No. of pest count in control plot – Average No. of pest count in treated plot) / Average No. of pest count in control plot] X 100 The percentage reduction of disease incidence against UTC was calculated using the following formula: % Reduction = [(PDI in control plot – PDI in treated plot) / PDI in control plot] X 100 Further, the percentage increase in yield over UTC was calculated using the following formula: Increase (%) = [(Crop yield in treated plot – Crop yield in control plot) / Crop yield in control plot] X 100 Synergy evaluation using Colby's formula: “Synergy” is as defined by Colby S. R. in an article entitled “Calculation of the synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations” published in Weeds, 1967, 15, p. 20-22. The action expected for a given combination of two active components can be calculated as follows: E = X + Y - (XY / 100) The action expected for a given combination of three active components can be calculated as follows: E = X + Y + Z – (XY+YZ + XZ) / 100+ (XYZ / 10000) Where, E= Expected % effect by mixture of actives A, B and C in a defined dose. X= Observed % effect by product A Y= Observed % effect by product B Z= Observed % effect by product C The synergy factor (SF) is calculated by Abbott’s formula Eq.(2) (Abbott, 1925). SF= Observed effect / Expected effect Where, SF >1 for Synergistic reaction; SF<1 for antagonistic reaction; SF=1 for additive reaction. When the percentage of effect (pest / disease reduction or yield increase) observed for the combination is greater than the expected percentage effect (E) i.e. SF >1, the synergistic effect of the combination is inferred. When the percentage of effect (pest / disease reduction or yield increase) observed for the combination is equal to the expected percentage effect (E) i.e. SF=1, merely an additive effect may be inferred, and wherein the percentage of effect (pest / disease reduction or yield increase) observed for the combination is lower than the expected percentage effect (E) i.e. SF<1, an antagonistic effect of the combinations is inferred. Field trial 1: To study the synergistic effect of WG, DG and SE composition comprising elemental sulphur and thymol in controlling pests in Brinjal. The field trials were carried out to study the effect of combination of elemental sulphur and thymol in water dispersible granular, water disintegrable granular and suspoemulsion form on Brinjal pests and yield. The trial was laid out during kharif season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with six treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The Brinjal crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. The experimental details are as mentioned below: Details of experiment Trial location Nasik (MH) Crop: Brinjal, (Variety Pusa purple long) Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Type of application Foliar Spray Water volume used: 500 L / ha Date of application 20.07.2023 and 30.07.2023 Assessment Insect Pests: Jassid and Thrips; Mites; and Yield The observations on number of insect pests (jassid and thrips) were recorded at 7thday after first spray application (7DAA1SP) and 7thday after the second spray application (7DAA2SP) and mean value of number of pests observed on 3 leaves from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded and % Reduction of insect pests over UTC was calculated and presented in Table 2A. Table 2A: Active % Reduction of % Reduction of Treatment Details dosage (g / ha) Jassid over UTC Thrips over UTC Sulp Thym 7DAA1 7DAA2 7DAA1 7DAA2 hur ol SP SP SP SP T1: Elemental Sulphur 80%+Thymol 90.83 89.32 84.71 88.57 3%WG as per the 960 36 (*63.61 (*59.54 (*57.72 (*59.77 embodiment of the ) ) ) ) present invention @1200 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 75%+Thymol 2.8% 87.16 85.92 87.06 89.71 DG as per the 960 36 (*63.61 (*59.54 (*57.72 (*59.77 embodiment of the ) ) ) ) present invention @1280 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 40%+Thymol 1.5% 83.49 82.52 87.06 90.86 SE as per the 960 36 (*63.61 (*59.54 (*57.72 (*59.77 embodiment of the ) ) ) ) present invention @2400 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 80% WG 960 0 15.60 17.48 23.53 30.29 @1200 g / ha T5: Thymol 3% 0 36 56.88 50.97 44.71 42.29 WG @1200 g / ha T6:Untreated - - 0 0 0 0 control (UTC) *Expected reduction of pests calculated using Colby’s formula The observations on number of Mites was recorded at 7thday after the second spray application (7DAA2SP) and mean value of number of mites observed on 3 leaves from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded. The percentage reduction of pests over untreated control (UTC) was calculated based on the mean values and presented in Table 2B. The observations on yield parameter were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data for yield is presented in Table 2B. Table 2B: Avg. Mites Yield count / Leaf % % Yield (T / ha) (Total 5 leaf Reduction increase Treatment Details Total of from 3 plants of Mites over 3 per treatment over UTC UTC pickings at 7AA2SP) T1: Elemental Sulphur 80%+Thymol 3%WG as per 92.92 53.33 2.75 9.2 the embodiment of the present (*81.45) (*33.42) invention @1200 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 75%+Thymol 2.8% DG as per 88.75 61.67 4.37 9.7 the embodiment of the present (*81.45) (*33.42) invention @1280 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 40%+Thymol 1.5% SE as per 91.35 50.00 3.36 9 the embodiment of the present (*81.45) (*33.42) invention @2400 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 80% 14.79 61.91 6.9 15.00 WG @1200 g / ha T5: Thymol 3% WG @1200 18.91 51.30 7.3 21.67 g / ha T6:Untreated control (UTC) 38.83 0 6 0 *Expected reduction of mites / increase in yield calculated using Colby’s formula It was observed from the results presented in Tables 2A and 2B that the treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the composition comprising of elemental Sulphur and thymol as per embodiment of the present invention at different concentrations demonstrates a synergistic control over Jassids, Thrips and mites in Brinjal crop as compared to individual applications of the said actives. For instance, it can be seen from Table 2A that treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the compositions of the present invention demonstrated about 89.32%, 85.92%, and 82.52% reduction of jassids over untreated control respectively on 7thday after second spray. Whereas stand alone treatments T4 and T5 demonstrated jassid reduction of only 17.48% and 50.97% respectively. It can also be seen that the observed effect is higher for all the treatments T1 to T3 than the expected reduction calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e. 59.54%. The synergy factor for treatments T1, T2 and T3 is 1.5, 1.44 and 1.39 respectively, which depicts that the composition of elemental Sulphur and Thymol in WG, DG and SE form is synergistic in nature. This synergistic behaviour of elemental Sulphur and Thymol in different forms as per embodiment of the present invention was also observed from the percent reduction in thrips on brinjal crop. Further, it can be observed from Table 2B that treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the compositions comprising sulphur and thymol in WG, DG and SE form respectively as per the embodiment of the present invention demonstrated improved mite control in Brinjal as compared to the individual treatments with sulphur (T4) and thymol (T5). It can be seen that the expected percentage reduction of mites calculated using Colby’s formula is 81.45% whereas the observed percentage reduction of mites for treatments T1, T2 and T3 is 92.92%, 88.75% and 91.35% respectively. Thus, the synergy factor for treatment T1, T2 and T3 is 1.14, 1.09 and 1.12 respectively indicating synergistic effect. The treatments T1-T3 as per the embodiments of the present invention also illustrate the substantial increase in yield over the individual applications of the actives i.e. T4-T5 and over untreated control. Thus, the combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol in various formulation types prepared as per embodiment of the present invention is synergistic and provides superior crop protection over wide range of pests as well as higher yield as compared to individual application of elemental Sulphur and Thymol. The synergistic effect of the composition of the present invention was observed over the entire claimed concentration range of the actives and over the various formulation types as claimed in the present invention. Field trial 2: To study the synergistic effect of WG and SC composition comprising elemental sulphur and thymol in controlling pests in Chilli. The field trials were carried out to study the effect of combination of elemental sulphur and thymol in different form on chilli pests and yield. The trial was laid out during kharif season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with six treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The chilli crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. The experimental details are as mentioned below. Details of experiment Trial location Rajkot , Gujarat Crop: Chilli Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Type of application Foliar Spray Water volume used: 500 L / ha Date of application 21.08.2024 and 05.09.2024 Assessment Mites, Thrips, Anthracnose and Yield The observations on number of Mites and thrips were recorded at 7thday after first spray application (7DAA1SP) and 7thday after the second spray application (7DAA2SP) and mean value of number of mites and thrips observed on 3 leaves from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded. The percentage reduction of pests over untreated control (UTC) was calculated based on the mean values and presented in Table 3A. % Reduction of % Reduction of Active dosage Mites over Thrips over Treatment Details (g / ha) UTC UTC Sulp Thymo 7DAA 7DAA 7DAA 7DAA hur l 1SP 2SP 1SP 2SP T1: Elemental Sulphur 64% + Thymol 4% WG as 92.40 88.14 74.55 84.54 per the embodiment of the 768 48 (*85.2 (*75.2 (*57.4 (*50.8 present invention @1200 9) 3) 6) 5) g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 75% + Thymol 4.7% WG 96.80 90.00 80.00 89.86 as per the embodiment of 960 60 (*85.2 (*75.2 (*57.4 (*50.8 the present invention 9) 3) 6) 5) @1280 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 32% + Thymol 2% SC as 96.00 89.66 80.91 87.44 per the embodiment of the 960 60 (*85.2 (*75.2 (*57.4 (*50.8 present invention @3000 9) 3) 6) 5) g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 960 0 69.60 57.63 29.09 24.64 32% SC @3000 g / ha T5: Thymol 2% SC 0 60 51.60 41.53 40.00 34.78 @3000 g / ha T6: Untreated control - - 0 0 0 0 *Expected reduction of pests calculated using Colby’s formula The observations on disease (anthracnose) incidence were recorded at 10 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was presented in Table 3B to see the impact of the composition of the present invention on disease control (Anthracnose) in Chilli. The observations on yield parameter were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 3B. Table 3B: Anthracnose % Mean % % yield Disease Reduction Yield increase Treatment Details Index (PDI) of disease (Kg / ha) over (Observed at over UTC UTC 10DAA2SP) T1: Elemental Sulphur 64% + Thymol 4% WG as 81.74 40.92 per the embodiment of the 2.1 9625 (*52.52) (*24.84) present invention @1200 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 75% + Thymol 4.7% WG 86.96 44.22 as per the embodiment of 1.5 9850 (*52.52) (*24.84) the present invention @1280 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 32% + Thymol 2% SC as 84.35 43.22 per the embodiment of the 1.8 9782 (*52.52) (*24.84) present invention @3000 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 9.1 20.87 7520 10.10 32% SC @3000 g / ha T5: Thymol 2% SC 6.9 40.00 7950 16.40 @3000 g / ha T6: Untreated control 11.5 0 6830 0 *Expected reduction of disease / increase in yield calculated using Colby’s formula It was observed from the results presented in Tables 3A and 3B that the treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the composition comprising of elemental Sulphur and thymol in WG and SC form as per embodiment of the present invention at different concentrations demonstrates a synergistic control over Mites, Thrips and Anthracnose in Chilli crop as compared to individual applications of the said actives. For instance, it can be seen from Table 3A that treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the compositions of the present invention demonstrated about 88.14%, 90.00%, and 89.66% control over mites respectively on 7thday after second spray which is higher than the expected control calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e.75.23%. In addition, it can be observed that treatments T1, T2 and T3 exhibited 84.54%, 89.86% and 87.44% control respectively over thrips on 7thday after second spray which is higher than the expected control calculated as per Colby’s formula 50.85%. Similar synergistic behaviour of elemental sulphur and thymol in the form of WG and SC form as per embodiment of the present invention was also observed in controlling anthracnose disease in chilli crop as presented in Table 3B and such a superior control over various pests in turn resulted in enhanced yield. Thus, it can be observed from Tables 3A and 3B that the combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol in various formulation types prepared as per embodiment of the present invention is synergistic and provides superior crop protection over wide range of pests including insects, mites and diseases which in turn results in superior yield as compared to individual application of elemental sulphur and thymol. The synergistic effect of the composition of the present invention was observed over the entire claimed concentration range of the actives and over the various formulation types as claimed in the present invention. Field trial 3: To study the synergistic effect of WG, DG and SE composition comprising elemental sulphur and eugenol in controlling pests in Tomato. The trial was laid out during Rabi season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with six treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. For each treatment, plot size of 60 sq.m (20m x 3m) was maintained. The tomato crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. Details of experiment Trial location Nasik (MH) Crop: Tomato Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Type of application Foliar Spray Water volume used 500 L / ha Date of transplanting 10.11.2023 Date of application 30.12.2023 and 05.01.2024 Assessment Helicoverpa armigera (Fruit borer), whitefly and Yield The observations on number of Helicoverpa armigera count / plant were recorded at 10thday after first spray application and 10thday after the second spray application and mean data on number of Helicoverpa armigera count / plant from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded and is presented in Table 4A. Table 4A: Helicoverpa armigera Active count / plant (Mean % Reduction of dosage value from 3 H.armigera over Treatment Details (g / ha) plants per UTC treatment / replicati on) Sulp Eug 10DAA 10DAA 10DA 10DA hur enol 1SP 2SP A1SP A2SP T1: Elemental Sulphur 55% + Eugenol 10% 80.41 83.55 WDG as per the 440 80 1.9 2.5 (*51.54 (*53.1 embodiment of the ) 0) present invention @800 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 67% + Eugenol 12.2% 84.54 86.84 DG as per the 440 80 1.5 2 (*51.54 (*53.1 embodiment of the ) 0) present invention @656 g.ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 79.38 82.24 25% + Eugenol 4.55% 440 80 2 2.7 (*51.54 (*53.1 SE as per the ) 0) embodiment of the present invention @1760 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 440 0 8 12.9 17.53 15.13 55%WDG @800 g / ha T5: Eugenol 10%WDG 0 80 5.7 8.4 41.24 44.74 @800 g / ha T6: Untreated control - - 9.7 15.2 0 0 *Expected reduction of pests calculated using Colby’s formula The observations on number of whitefly were recorded at 7thday after first spray application (7DAA1SP) and 7th day after the second spray application (7DAA2SP) and mean value of number of pests observed on 3 leaves from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded to enumerate the impact of the composition of the present invention on control of whitefly. The percentage reduction of whitefly over untreated control (UTC) was calculated and presented in Table 4B. The observations on yield parameter were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data on yield is presented in Table 4B. Table 4B: % Reduction of Whitefly Yield % yield over UTC (T / ha) increase Treatment Details Total of over 3 7DAA1SP 7DAA2SP UTC pickings T1: Elemental Sulphur 55% + Eugenol 10% WDG as per the 80.56 81.62 45.59 9.9 embodiment of the present (*50.62) (*56.35) (*26.25) invention @800 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 67% + 77.78 80.15 47.06 10 Eugenol 12.2% DG as per the (*50.62) (*56.35) (*26.25) embodiment of the present invention @656 g.ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 25% + Eugenol 4.55% SE as per the 73.61 77.94 42.65 9.7 embodiment of the present (*50.62) (*56.35) (*26.25) invention @1760 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 11.11 13.97 7.4 8.82 55%WDG @800 g / ha T5: Eugenol 10%WDG @800 44.44 49.26 8.1 19.12 g / ha T6: Untreated control 0 0 6.80 0 *Expected reduction of whitefly / increase in yield calculated using Colby’s formula It was observed from the results presented in Tables 4A and 4B that the treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the composition comprising of elemental sulphur and eugenol as per embodiment of the present invention at different concentrations was highly effective in controlling the lepidopteran pest “Helicoverpa armigera” and whitefly in tomato as compared to individual applications of the said actives. For instance, it can be observed from Table 4A that treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the compositions of the present invention demonstrated about 83.55%, 86.84%, 82.24% reduction in Helicoverpa armigera infestation as compared to the expected control calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e.53.10% at 10 Days after application of second spray, indicating synergistic effect. In addition, it can be observed from Table 4B that treatments T1, T2 and T3 with the composition of the present invention exhibited 81.62%, 80.15% and 77.94% reduction of whitefly over untreated control on 7thday after second application which is higher than the expected reduction calculated as per Colby’s formula, 56.35%. Such a superior control over various pests in turn resulted in enhanced yield. Thus, it can be observed from Tables 4A and 4B that the combination of elemental Sulphur and Eugenol in various formulation types prepared as per embodiment of the present invention is synergistic and provides superior crop protection over wide range of pests which in turn results in superior yield as compared to individual application of elemental Sulphur and Eugenol. The synergistic effect of the composition of the present invention was observed over the entire claimed concentration range of the actives and over the various formulation types as claimed in the present invention. Field trial 4: To study the synergistic effect of WG, DG and SC composition of the present invention comprising elemental Sulphur, Thymol and Selenium on control of Powdery mildew and Jassid in Okra The trials were laid out during Kharif season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with seven treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The test product sample with the prescribed dose were applied as a foliar application at ETL. The Okra crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practices. Details of experiment Trial location Gandhinagar, Gujarat Crop: Okra Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Date of sowing 14.07.2023 Type of application Foliar Spray Water volume used: 500 L / ha Date of application 20.9.2023 and 30.9.2023 Time of application 8:00am Assessment Powdery mildew, Jassids and Yield The observations on the powdery mildew incidence were recorded at 7 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was presented in Table 5A. The observations on number of Jassids from 3 leaves of 3 plants per treatment were recorded at 7thday after the first spray application and 7thday after the second spray application and the mean data on number of Jassids is presented in Table 5B. The observations on yield parameter was also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 5B. Table 5A: Active dosage (g / ha) Powdery % Beta- mildew Reducti Sele gluca % Mean on of Treatment Details niu nase / Thy Disease disease S m Chitin mol Index (PDI) over diox ase + (observed at UTC ide Brom 7DAA2SP) elain T1: Elemental Sulphur 50% + Thymol 5% + Selenium dioxide 2% 89.32 WDG as per the 700 70 28 0 2.5 (*55.55 embodiment of the ) present invention @1400g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 70% + Thymol 7% + Selenium dioxide 700 70 28 40 1.1 95.30 2.8% + Beta- glucanase 4% DG as per the embodiment of the present invention @1000g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 30%+ Thymol 3% + Selenium dioxide 36 1.2% + Chitinase 1% 540 54 22 (18+1 0.7 97.01 + Bromelain 1% SC 8) as per the embodiment of the present invention @1800 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 50% WDG 700 0 0 0 16.5 29.49 @1400g / ha T5:Thymol 5% WDG 0 70 0 0 17.7 24.36 @1400g / ha T6: Selenium dioxide 0 0 28 0 19.5 16.67 2% WDG @1400g / ha T7:Untreated control 0 0 0 0 23.4 0 Table 5B: No. of Jassid Yiel (Mean of Jassid d % adult count from % Reduction (T / h yield 3 leaf from 3 of Jassid over a) increa Treatment Details plants per UTC Tota se treatment / replicati l of over on) 5 UTC picki 7DAA1 7DAA2 7DA 7DA ngs SP SP A1SP A2SP T1: Elemental Sulphur 50% + Thymol 5% + Selenium dioxide 2% 77.32 81.55 52.73 WDG as per the 2.2 3.1 (*47.1 (*58.1 8.4 (*35.4 embodiment of the 0) 0) 1) present invention @1400g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 70% + Thymol 7% + Selenium dioxide 2.8% + Beta- 1.3 2.4 86.60 85.71 8.7 58.18 glucanase 4% DG as per the embodiment of the present invention @1000g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 30%+ Thymol 3% + Selenium dioxide 1.2% + Chitinase 1% 1 2.1 89.69 87.50 8.8 60.00 + Bromelain 1% SC as per the embodiment of the present invention @1800 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 50% WDG 8.5 14.6 12.37 13.10 6.1 10.91 @1400g / ha T5:Thymol 5% WDG 7.1 10.8 26.80 35.71 6.7 21.82 @1400g / ha T6: Selenium dioxide 8 12.6 17.53 25.00 5.9 7.27 2% WDG @1400g / ha T7:Untreated control 9.7 16.8 0 0 5.5 0 It was observed from the results presented in Tables 5A and 5B that the treatment T1 with the composition comprising of elemental sulphur, thymol and selenium as per embodiment of the present invention at different concentrations was highly effective in controlling various pests (jassid) and diseases (powdery mildew) in okra crop as compared to individual applications of the said actives. It can be observed from Table 5A that treatment T1 with the compositions of the present invention demonstrated about 89.32% reduction over powdery mildew disease which is higher than the expected reduction calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e.55.55% at 7thDays after application of second spray, indicating synergistic effect. Similarly, it can be observed that treatment T1 with the composition of the present invention exhibited 81.55% reduction over Jassid population at 7thdays after application of second spray which is higher than the expected reduction calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e.58.10%. Such a superior control over various pests in turn resulted in enhanced yield. Further, it can be observed from Tables 5A and 5B that treatments T2 and T3 with the composition of the present invention comprising beta-glucanse or chitinase + bromelain in addition to elemental sulphur, thymol and selenium exhibited further enhancement of the efficacy in terms of control over powdery mildew and jassids as well as yield increase. It can be observed that treatment T3 with the composition comprising elemental sulphur, thymol, selenium, chitinase and bromelain exhibited superior efficacy even though it has been applied at reduced dosage of actives as compared to other treatments. Thus, it can be observed from tables 5A and 5B that the composition comprising of elemental sulphur, thymol and selenium or elemental sulphur, thymol, selenium and beta-glucanase or elemental sulphur, thymol, selenium, chitinase and bromelain in various formulation types prepared as per embodiment of the present invention provides superior crop protection over wide range of pests as well as higher yield as compared to individual application of these components. The synergistic effect of the composition of the present invention was observed over the entire claimed concentration range of the actives and over the various formulation types as claimed in the present invention. Field trial 5: To study the efficacy of composition comprising elemental Sulphur, Thymol and Choline pelargonate in controlling Anthracnose and powdery mildew in Chilli. Field trials were conducted to evaluate the composition of the present invention on Chilli Crop. The trials were laid down in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. For each treatment, a plot size of 35sq.m (7m x 5m) was maintained. The product samples at prescribed doses were applied as a foliar spray 50-70 days after transplanting of Chili. The Chilli crop in the trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. Details of experiment: Trial location Guntur, Andhra Pradesh Crop: Chili (Teja variety) Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Type of application Foliar application Date of application 1.10.2024 & 20.10.2024 Time of application 8:00am Water Volume 500L / ha Target Pathogen Anthracnose Plot size 7 m x 5 m = 35 sqm Assessment % Disease Severity observation at 10 days after 2ndapplication Harvest Date 10.1.2025 The observations on disease (anthracnose and powdery mildew) incidence were recorded at 10 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was presented in Tables 6A and 6B to enumerate the impact of the composition of the present invention on disease control of Chilli when applied at reduced dosage as compared to standalone actives. The observations on yield were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 6B. Table 6A: Anthracnos % Active dosage (g / ha) e Disease % Mean (Anthrac Treatment Details Choli Disease nose) ne Sulp Thy Index (PDI) incidenc pelarg hur mol 10DAA2SP e over onate ) UTC T1: Elemental Sulphur 60%+Thymol 7.5%+ Choline 87.18 pelargonate 10% WDG as per 900 113 150 2 (*55.93) the embodiment of the present invention @1500 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 50%+Thymol 10%+ Choline pelargonate 7.5% WDG as 550 110 83 2.5 83.97 per the embodiment of the present invention @1100 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 15%+ Thymol 2.5%+ Choline pelargonate 2% SC as per the 600 100 80 2.4 84.62 embodiment of the present invention @4000 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 60% + Choline pelargonate 10% 900 0 150 10.3 33.97 WDG @1500 g / ha T5: Elemental Sulphur 60% 900 - 0 13.8 11.54 WDG @1500 g / ha T6: Thymol 7.5% WDG - 113 0 9.7 37.82 @1500 g / ha T7: Choline pelargonate 10% - - 150 12.5 19.87 WDG @1500 g / ha T8: Untreated control - - - 15.6 0 Table 6B: Powdery % mildew % yield Reduction Yield % Mean increase Treatment Details of disease (Kg / h Disease Index over (PM) over a) (PDI) UTC UTC ( 10DAA2SP) T1: Elemental Sulphur 60%+Thymol 7.5%+ Choline pelargonate 10% 95.73 42.74 1 9992 WDG as per the (*77.92) (*34.13) embodiment of the present invention @1500 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 50%+Thymol 10%+ 1.5 93.59 9780 39.71 Choline pelargonate 7.5% WDG as per the embodiment of the present invention @1100 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 15%+ Thymol 2.5%+ Choline pelargonate 2% SC 1.2 94.87 9879 41.13 as per the embodiment of the present invention @4000 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 60% + Choline pelargonate 10% 7 70.09 8654 23.63 WDG @1500 g / ha T5: Elemental Sulphur 60% 9.9 57.69 7929 13.27 WDG @1500 g / ha T6: Thymol 7.5% WDG 15.7 32.91 8151 16.44 @1500 g / ha T7: Choline pelargonate 18.2 22.22 7637 9.10 10% WDG @1500 g / ha T8: Untreated control 23.4 0 7000 0 *Expected reduction of disease / increase in yield calculated using Colby’s formula It is observed from Tables 6A and 6B, that treatment T1 with the composition of the present invention comprising Elemental Sulphur 60%+Thymol 7.5%+ Choline pelargonate 10% WDG as per the embodiment of the present invention exhibited synergistic control against Anthracnose and Powdery mildew disease in Chili when compared with standalone treatments T5 with 60% elemental Sulphur WDG, T6 with 7.5% Thymol WDG and T7 with 10% Choline pelargonate WDG wherein same dosage of actives i.e.900 g / ha of Sulphur, 113 g / ha of Thymol and 150 g / ha of Choline pelargonate were applied. Treatment T1 also exhibited superior control over Anthracnose and Powdery mildew as compared to treatment T4 with the composition comprising combination of 60% elemental sulphur and 10% choline pelargonate WDG. In addition, it can be observed that treatment T2 with Elemental Sulphur 50%+ Thymol 10%+ Choline pelargonate 7.5% WG and treatment T3 with Elemental Sulphur 15%+ Thymol 2.5%+ Choline pelargonate 2% SC prepared as per the embodiment of the invention demonstrated better control over Anthracnose and Powdery mildew disease as compared to stand alone treatments T5, T6, T7 as well as T4 with the combination of elemental sulphur and choline pelargonate, even when applied at reduced active dosage. Similar superior results are also observed with respect to the yield of chilli. For instance, it can be seen that treatment T1 with the composition of the present invention showed 42.74 % increase in yield over untreated plot which is higher than the expected yield increase calculated as per Colby’s formula i.e.34.13%. Similar effect is also observed for treatments T2 and T3 even when applied at reduced active dosage as compared to standalone treatments. From the aforementioned data, it can be concluded that the composition comprising elemental sulphur, thymol and choline pelargonate in WG and SC formulation as per the embodiment of the present invention with the particles in the size range of 0.1 to 50 microns provides surprisingly higher field efficacy at reduced dosages of application of the composition making it commercially economical and environment friendly. Field trial 6: To assess the efficacy of composition of the present invention in comparison to prior known or commercially used chemical products in Tomato crops. The field trials were carried out to evaluate the effect of composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur and thymol as per the embodiment of the present invention in comparison to prior known composition or commercially used chemical products on pest control in Tomato crops. The trial was laid out during kharif season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The Tomato crop in the trial field was raised following good agricultural practices. The details of the experiment are as follows: Details of experiment Trial location Balgana, Bhatar, Bardhaman, West Bengal Crop: Tomato (Abhilash) Trial Design Randomized Block Design Replications Four Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Date of sowing 10.08.2024 (Nursery) Type of application Foliar Water Volume 500 L / ha Date of transplanting 12.09.2024 Date of application 12.10.2024 and 25.10.2024 Assessment Insect Pests: Whitefly; Disease: Septoria and Yield The observations on number of whitefly were recorded at 7thday after first spray application (7DAA1SP) and 7th day after the second spray application (7DAA2SP) and mean value of number of pests observed on 3 leaves from 3 plants per treatment / replication was recorded to enumerate the impact of the composition of the present invention on control of whitefly as compared to market standard Clothianidin 50 % WG. The percentage reduction of whitefly over untreated control (UTC) was calculated and presented in Table 7. The observations on control over septoria infestation were recorded at 10 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was presented in Table 7 to enumerate the impact of the composition of the present invention on control of Septoria disease in Tomato as compared to market standard, Fluxapyroxad 25% + Pyraclostrobin 25% SC. The percentage reduction of disease incidence against UTC was calculated and presented in table 7. The observations on yield were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 7. Table 7: Active Septoria % Reduction % dosage % Mean of Whitefly Redu Yield % (g / ha) Disease over UTC ction (T / ha) yield Treatment Index of Total incre Details (PDI) disea of 3 ase Sul Th 7DA (Observ 7DA se pickin over ph ym A1S ed at A2SP over gs UTC ur ol P 10DAA UTC 2SP) T1: Elemental Sulphur 85% + Thymol 5% WG as per the 68 84.3 40 88.29 84.67 3.5 92.74 9.4 embodiment of 0 1 the present invention @800 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 60% +Thymol 4.5% WG as per the 48 70.5 36 80.18 78.83 5.8 87.97 8.7 embodiment of 0 9 the present invention @800 g / ha T3: Elemental 45 76.4 Sulphur 53 84.68 83.21 3.2 93.36 9 0 7 30%+Thymol 3.5% SC as per the embodiment of the present invention @1500 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 65%+Thymol 18.5% DG as 32 74.5 per the 93 82.88 81.75 4.2 91.29 8.9 5 1 embodiment of the present invention @500 g / ha T5: Clothianidin 50 % WG @ 33.3 50g / ha 25 88.29 83.94 45 6.64 6.8 3 (Market standard) T6: Fluxapyroxad 25% + Pyraclostrobin 62.5+ 27.4 6.31 13.87 3.1 93.57 6.5 25% SC @250 62.5 5 g / ha (Market Standard) T7: Tank mix of 68 45.1 elemental 40 59.46 53.28 7.9 83.61 7.4 0 0 Sulphur 85% WG @800 g / ha and Thyme oil @40g / ha T8: Untreated - - 0 0 48.2 0 5.1 0 control Herein the inventor has tested composition comprising combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol as per the embodiment of the present invention as compared to commercially used chemical products and elemental Sulphur and Thyme oil in tank mix form to illustrate the impact of combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol formulated as per the present invention for pest control in Tomato. It can be seen from the data presented in Table 7 that treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 with the composition of the present invention comprising combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol in the form of WG, SC and DG illustrated significant control over whitefly and septoria in tomato crop as compared to other treatments i.e. T5- T7. For instance, it can be observed that treatment T1 with Elemental Sulphur 85% +Thymol 5% WG prepared as per the embodiment of the invention demonstrated 84.67% control over whitefly at 7thday after 2ndapplication which is at par with the control achieved with commercially used chemical products i.e. Clothianidin 50% WG. Similarly, treatment T1 demonstrated 92.74% control over septoria which is at par with the control achieved with commercially used chemical pesticidal product Fluxapyroxad 25% + Pyraclostrobin 25% SC. Furthermore, it is evident that treatment T1 with the composition comprising of 85% Elemental Sulphur and 5% Thymol in a WG form as per present invention, exhibited significantly enhanced control over whitefly and septoria compared to treatment T7 with a tank mixture of elemental sulphur and thyme oil applied at the same active ingredient dosage. This indicates that thymol, a component of thyme oil, provides greater effectiveness when combined with elemental sulphur and formulated as described in this invention, rather than when thyme oil and elemental sulphur are used in a tank mixture form. In addition, it can be observed that treatment T2 with the composition comprising : Elemental Sulphur 60% +Thymol 4.5% WG as per the embodiment of the present invention, exhibited superior control over whitefly and septoria even though applied at reduced dosage of actives as compared to treatment T7. Thus, the combination of elemental sulphur and thymol in a single formulation, as outlined in this invention, yields superior results compared to the use of tank mixture of thyme oil with sulphur. The data presented indicates that the composition comprising elemental sulphur and thymol in WG, SE and DG formulation as per the embodiment of the present invention with the particles in the size range of 0.1 to 50 microns demonstrates remarkably enhanced effectiveness against broad spectrum of pests as compared to prior known or commercially used products. Field trial 7: To assess the impact of particle size of the composition comprising elemental sulphur and thymol on control of Leaf Blast (Pyricularia orizae) and yield of Paddy crop. The trials were laid out during kharif season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with five treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The test product samples with prescribed dose were applied as foliar application at 30 days after transplanting of Paddy seedlings in trial plot. The paddy crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. Details of experiment: Trial location Kaithal, Haryana Crop: Paddy (var. Pusa1121) Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Date of 25.06.2023 transplanting Type of application Foliar application Date of application 25.07.2023 Time of application 8:00am Water Volume 500L / ha Target Pathogen Leaf blast Plot size 7 m x 5 m = 35 sqm Assessment % Disease Severity observation at 15 days after 2ndapplication Harvest Date 30.09.2023 The observations on disease incidence were recorded at 15 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was presented in Table 8 to see the impact of particle size of the composition on percentage of leaf damaged by P. orizae. The percentage reduction of disease incidence against UTC was calculated and presented in Table 8. The observations on yield parameter were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 8. Table 8: Active Leaf % dosage Blast Grain % yield Disease (g / ha) Disease Yield increase Treatment Details Reducti Severity (Qtl / h over on over Sulp Thy (%) (15 a) UTC UTC hur mol DAA2S) T1: Elemental Sulphur 80%+Thymol 3%WDG with p.s. in the range of 800 30 2.8 92.53 26.3 69.68 0.1 to 30 microns as per the embodiment of the present invention @1000 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 80%+Thymol 3% DG with p.s. in the range of 0.1 to 50 microns as per 800 30 5.2 86.13 25.6 65.16 the embodiment of the present invention @1000 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 80% +Thymol 3%WDG with p.s. in 800 30 15.1 59.73 20.5 32.26 the range of 51 to 100 microns @1000 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 80% +Thymol 3% DG with p.s. in the range of 800 30 26 30.67 17.4 12.26 101 to 300 microns @1000 g / ha T5: Untreated control 800 30 37.5 0 15.5 0 It was observed from Table 8, that treatments T1 and T2 with WDG and DG composition respectively comprising elemental Sulphur and Thymol and having particle size distribution in the range of 0.1 to 50 microns as per the present invention showed superior yield and reduction in disease over untreated control in Paddy as compared to treatment T3 with same WDG composition having a particle size range of 51 to 100 microns, and treatment T4 with same DG composition having particle size distribution in the range of 101 to 300 microns and untreated control. The percentage reduction of disease observed for T1 and T2 were 92.53% and 86.13% respectively while the same for the treatments T3 and T4 was found to be only 59.73% and 30.67% respectively. Similar superior result were also observed for the yield in Paddy crop. It can be observed from Table 8, that treatments T1 and T2 with the composition of the present invention with the particle size distribution of 0.1 to 50 microns, demonstrated yield increase over UTC of around 69.68% and 65.16% respectively whereas treatments with the composition comprising higher particle size distribution demonstrated yield increase over UTC of only 32.26% and 12.26%. Thus, it was surprisingly noted that even amongst the WDG or DG formulations, superior efficacy was observed with WDG or DG formulation having a specific particle size distribution of 0.1 to 50 microns in comparison to WDG and DG formulations having different particle sizes in varied ranges. Field trial 8: To study the effect of different types of compositions comprising combination of elemental Sulphur and Thymol / Eugenol in controlling Fusarium wilt in Tomato. The field trials were carried out to study the effect of combination of elemental sulphur and thymol / eugenol on Fusarium wilt in Tomato. The trial was laid out during Rabi season in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with five treatments including untreated control, replicated four times. The Tomato crop in trial field was raised following good agricultural practice. The experimental details are as mentioned below: Details of experiment Trial location Nashik Crop: Tomato Trial Design RBD, 04 replications Plot size 20 m x 3 m (60 Sq.m) Type of application Soil Drenching Water volume used: 1000 L / ha Date of transplanting 01.11.2024 Date of application 07.11.2024 and 27.11.2024 Assessment Fusarium wilt and Yield The observations on disease (Fusarium Wilt) incidence were recorded at 10 Days after second spray and Percent Disease Index (PDI) was calculated and presented in Table 9 to see the impact of the composition of the present invention on disease control of Brinjal. The observations on yield parameter were also recorded at the harvesting time and mean data were presented in Table 9. Table 9: Fusarium Active dosage Wilt (g / ha) (Fusarium oxysporum) % Yield % Yield Treatment % Mean Reduction (T / ha) increase Details Disease of disease Total of 3 over SulphuThymol / Incidence over UTC pickingsUTCr Eugenol (Observed at 10DAA2SP) T1: Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Thymol 5% WG as per the 1170 90 6.01 85.07 8.4 55.56 embodiment of the present invention @1800 g / ha T2: Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Eugenol 7.5%WG as per 1170 135 6.97 82.68 8.1 50.00 the embodiment of the present invention @1800 g / ha T3: Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Thymol 5% 1170 90 13.75 65.84 7.3 35.19 Wettable powder (WP) @1800 g / ha T4: Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Eugenol 7.5% 1170 135 18.29 54.56 6.9 27.78 Pastilles (PS) @1800 g / ha T5:Untreated - - 40.25 0 5.4 0 control (UTC) It was observed from the results presented in Table 9 that the treatment T1 with the composition comprising Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Thymol 5% WG as per embodiment of the present invention demonstrated 85.07% reduction over fusarium wilt which is higher than that for treatment T3 with the composition comprising Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Thymol 5% in WP form. Similarly, treatment T2 with the composition comprising Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Eugenol 7.5% WG as per embodiment of the present invention demonstrated 82.68% reduction over fusarium wilt which is higher than that for treatment T4 with the composition comprising Elemental Sulphur 65%+ Eugenol 7.5% in PS form. The treatments T1 and T2 as per the embodiments of the present invention also illustrated substantial increase in yield over treatments T3 and T4. This shows that the composition of the present invention in WG form provides a significantly higher control over Fusarium wilt and superior yield in tomato crop as compared to same compositions in WP and PS form. It was observed that the composition comprising combination of elemental sulphur and biochemical pesticide viz. thymol or eugenol, in various formulation types prepared as per embodiment of the present invention is synergistic and provides superior crop protection over wide range of pests including insect pests along with higher yield as compared to stand alone actives, commercially used chemical products or prior art compositions. The composition of the present invention was therefore found to be highly efficacious. It was observed that the superior field efficacy demonstrated by the composition of the present invention is on account of combination of elements being the mixture of elemental Sulphur and biochemical pesticide viz. thymol, or eugenol in specific concentration in the form of water dispersible granules, water disintegrable granules, liquid suspension or suspoemulsion and in specific particle size of 0.1 to 50 microns and the same effect was not observed when there is a change in any of these elements. It has been observed that the combination of elemental sulphur and one or more of thymol, eugenol or their derivatives demonstrated synergistic and superior effect in WG, DG, SC and SE form wherein particles of the composition are in the size range of 0.1 to 50 microns. In addition the composition of the present invention demonstrates enhanced, efficacious and superior behaviour in the fields. In fact, various advantageous properties associated with the compositions according to the invention, include but are not limited to an advantageous behavior while formulating and / or upon application, improved stability, improved toxicological and / or ecotoxicological behaviour, improved crop protection and crop yield and other advantages familiar to a person skilled in the art. Through the composition of the present invention, the number of applications or the amount of fertilizers or pesticides are minimized. The composition is highly safe to the user and to the environment. From the foregoing it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred.

Claims

Claims: We claim, 1. A biopesticidal composition comprising : elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; at least one biochemical pesticide in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition wherein the biochemical pesticide is selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient in the range of 5% to 98% by weight of the total composition, wherein the composition comprises particles in the size range of 0.1 micron to 50 microns and wherein the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules (WG), water disintegrable granules (DG), liquid suspension (SC) or suspoemulsion (SE).

2. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1; wherein the agriculturally acceptable excipient is selected from one or more of surfactants, emulsifiers, wetting agents, dispersing agents, fillers, carriers, diluents, spreading agents, colorants, anticaking agents, binders, buffers, pH adjusters, neutralizing agents, pigments, stabilizers, antifoaming agents, defoamers, penetrants, structuring agents, humectants, sticking agents, anti-freezing agent, freeze point depressants, chelating, complexing or sequestering agents, preservatives or bactericides, anti-fungal agents or biocides, anti-microbial agents and antioxidants.

3. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the agriculturally acceptable excipient comprises one or more of anionic or non-ionic surfactant.

4. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the surfactant comprises one or more of emulsifiers, wetting agents and dispersing agents and is present in the range of 0.1% to 40% by weight of the total composition.

5. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the dispersing agent is non-ionic dispersant which is selected from one or more of polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether, ethoxylated fatty acids, aliphatic alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl ethoxylates, EO-PO block copolymers, graft copolymers, addition products of ethylene oxide and fatty acid esters, Kraft lignin polymer, polyoxyethylene alkyl esters, polyoxyethylenesorbitan alkyl esters, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and polyoxyethylenestyryl phenyl ether.

6. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the dispersing agent is anionic dispersant which is selected from one or more of sulfated fatty alcohol glycol ethers, tristyrylphenolethoxylate phosphate esters; lignin sulphonates, phenyl naphthalene sulphonates, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal and ammonium salts of lignosulfonic acid, lignin derivatives, alkylarylsulfonates, alkylsulfonates, mixture of sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid urea formaldehyde condensate and sodium salt of phenol sulphonic formaldehyde condensate, polycarboxylates, sodium alkyl benzene sulfonates, sodium salts of sulfonated naphthalene, sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensates, condensation products of aryl sulphonic acids and formaldehyde, polyaromatic sulfonates, sodium alkyl aryl sulfonates.

7. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the granules are in a size range of from 0.05 mm to 6 mm.

8. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the granular composition comprises a D50 particle size of less than 10 microns.

9. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the granular composition comprises a D90 particle size of less than 20 microns.

10. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition is in the form of water dispersible granules.

11. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the biochemical pesticide is in the range of 1% w / w to 25% w / w of the total composition.

12. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the elemental sulphur is in the range of 20% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition.

13. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition comprises elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol or derivatives thereof in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient.

14. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition comprises elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; eugenol or derivatives thereof in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient.

15. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition comprises elemental sulphur in the range of 1% w / w to 90% w / w of the total composition; thymol or derivatives thereof in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition; eugenol or derivatives thereof in the range of 0.1% w / w to 30% w / w of the total composition and at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient.

16. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition optionally further comprises active ingredient selected from one or more of micronutrients; biostimulants and pesticidal active ingredients or mixturesthereof, wherein the further active ingredient is present in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 50% w / w of the total composition.

17. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises selenium salts, complexes, derivatives or mixture thereof in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 20% w / w of the total composition.

18. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises at least one enzyme in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition.

19. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 18, wherein enzyme comprises chitinase, beta-glucanase, bromelain or mixture thereof.

20. The biopesticidal composition as claimed in claim 16, wherein the composition further comprises choline pelargonate in a concentration range of 0.001% w / w to 40% w / w of the total composition.

21. A process of preparation of biopesticidal composition in the form of water dispersible granules as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process comprises: i. mixing one or more of biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives with at least one agriculturally acceptable excipient. ii. absorbing the mixture of step (i) in filler. iii. preparing the mixture of elemental sulphur having one or more excipients. iv. jet milling the mixture of step (iii) to obtain the desired particle size. v. blending the mixture obtained in Step (ii) and step (iv). vi. extruding the blend obtained in step (v) to get the granules with desired size. vii. drying the granules using fluid bed dryer.

22. A process of preparation of biopesticidal composition in the form of liquid suspension as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process comprises: i. homogenising the blend of water, elemental sulphur, one or more of biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol or their derivatives with one or more agriculturally acceptable excipient in a vessel provided with stirring facilities to obtain a liquid suspension. ii. passing the liquid suspension obtain in step (i) through the wet mill to obtain the composition comprises of particles in the size range of 0.1-30 microns. iii. adding further excipients as required and balance water to obtain the liquid suspension concentrate.

23. A process for preparation of biopesticidal composition in the form of suspoemulsion as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process comprises: i. mixing one or more of biochemical pesticide selected from thymol and eugenol, or their derivatives in one or more of oil or solvent to prepare the oil phase . ii. preparing aqueous phase by mixing of elemental sulphur and one or more of excipients in water and milling the mixture to obtain the desired particle size. iii. mixing the oil phase and aqueous phase at high shear to obtain the suspoemulsion composition.

24. A method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases, the method comprising treatment of plant, plant propagation material, locus, parts thereof or the surrounding soil with a biopesticidal composition as claimed in claims 1 to 20.

25. The method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases as claimed in claim 24, wherein the method comprises applying a biopesticidal composition at adosage of 0.5 kg / ha to 40 kg / ha to a plant or a crop or parts thereof or the soil per application.

26. The method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases as claimed in claim 24, wherein the method comprises applying a biopesticidal composition from 1 time up to 10 times.

27. The method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases as claimed in claim 24, wherein the said pests being selected from Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Thysanoptera and Acariformes.

28. The method for protecting the plant against pests or diseases as claimed in claim 24, wherein the said disease are being caused by the pathogen belonging to genus of Ascomycete, Colletotrichum, Septoria and Fusarium.